The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1812 Davis Drive -Staff ReportItem No. 7b Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 1812 Davis Drive � ,.._ . ,... . - � :�� :-- - � . r,.�• . - .� .._ .� � _ .-�_ - _. . � �.-�:��. _. _.�--", . City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1812 Davis Drive Request: Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: JoAnn Gann APN: 025-201-030 Property Owner: Candace Nagare Lot Area: 5,250 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot, with the lands of Peninsula Hospital immediately behind. The existing house is single story and features a u-shaped plan with a courtyard in the center. An attached garage is connected to the left, front corner of the house by a breezeway. The applicant proposes a first story addition behind the existing garage to accommodate stairs leading to a second floor addition over the garage. The total proposed floor area is 2,270 SF (0.43 FAR), where 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemptions). The existing house has two bedrooms, and with the second story addition the number of bedrooms on site will be increased to three. There is one covered parking space (10' x 20') in the garage and an additional covered parking space in the driveway leading to the garage. The stair addition at the rear of the garage will maintain one covered parking space (10' x 20' with a minimum of 7'-6" vertical clearance) and the two existing parking spaces meet the code requirement for a 3-bedroom house. No work is proposed to the existing first floor living area. The applicant proposes two 24-inch box trees Crepe Myrtle trees in the rear yard to meet the on-site landscaping requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: Item No. 7b Consent Calendar Meeting Date: May 11, 2015 ■ Design Review for a second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 1812 Davis Drive Lot Area: 5,250 SF Plans date SETBACKS _ ......... ;_ _. Front (1st flr): ; (2nd flr): i EXISTING _ _ , 16'-6" _..... . ..... _ 2'-8" , 5'-0" _ :........... 17'-6" _ __ 1,931 SF 37% d: April 30, 2015 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Side (left): , (right): ; _ __ _ Rear (1st flr): ' (2nd flr): ; Lot Coverage: ' No change 20'-8„ 4'-0" (to addition) No change 15'-0" 20'-0" _ _ 4'-0" 4'-0" No change 63'-3" 2,020 SF 38% 15'-0" 20'-0" 2,100SF _ _ .............. 40% Design Review EXISTING FAR: ; 1,821 SF 0.35 FAR , 2 3 PROPOSED 2,270 SF 0 43 FAR __.... _... ,... __ # of bedrooms: 2 ' 3 _ __ __ __ _ __ Parking: ; 1 covered (10' x 20') No change 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ __ .. _ _ _ ... _ ....... _.._.... Height: ' 12'-3" 21'-3" _ _..._.... ;........ _ _ DH Envelope: ; --- complies 1812 Davis Drive ALLOWED/REQ'D 2,780 SF 2 0.53 FAR __. __ _ _ . __ 1 covered (10' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ _ _ ..... ............. 30'-0" _.. . _ CS 25.26.075,b,2 applies 3 Existing, non-conforming left side setback. (0.32 x 5,250 SF) + 1100 SF = 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR) Window enclosure exception was applied to the left side of the second floor (CS 2526.075,b,2). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on April 27, 2015, the Commission had a concern regarding the symmetrical design of the addition over the garage and voted to place this item on the consent calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached April 27, 2015, Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans date stamped April 30, 2015, to address the Planning Commission's comments. The bay and window over the gable of the garage have been revised to address the Commission's concerns. Suggested Findings for Design Review: At the April 27, 2015, Design Review Study meeting the Planning Commission noted that the massing of the proposed addition is consistent with similar two-story homes in the neighborhood. The Commission found that the proposed project preserved the integrity of the original courtyard- central design of the house. For these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning -2- Design Review 1812 Davis Drive Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 30, 2015, sheets 1 through 6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Engineering Divisions February 23, 2015 memo, the Building Division's February 26 and April 14, 2015 memos, the Parks Division's March 2 and April 22, 2015 memos, the Fire Division's February 23, 2015 memo, and the Stormwater Division's February 25, 2015 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; -3- Design Review 1812 Davis Drive 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. JoAnn Gann, applicant Attachments: Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, date stamped April 30, 2015 Minutes from Design Review Study Meeting for the April 27, 2015, Planning Commission meeting Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Photographs of Neighborhood Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 1, 2015 Aerial Photo -4- JMG Design � Consultant � Planner JoAnn Madeira Gann 244 Fulton Street Redwood City, Ca. 94062 Phone # (650) 464-9182 Email: jmadeiral8@aol.com April 29, 2015 City of Burlingame Design Review RE: 1812 Davis Drive The front elevation has been revised to eliminate the symmetrical look over the garage. After revisiting it I think the new design does not accent the garage doors now. The other right angles I feel look good and the corners lineup with the lower floor corners and by keeping the second floor back helps not to over power the entry gate. Sincerely, Jo Ann Gann R�� V �� APR 3 (� �:; _. CITY OF B�RLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DI�% � c�rr '`� : �i 1 . !-� �O � yo m .-�Q9nnw•.vo � City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, April 27, 2015 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single family dwelling (JoAnn Gann, applicant and designer; Candace Nagare, property owner) (43 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit Anachmenrs: 1812 Davis Dr staff report 1812 Davis Dr - attachments All Commissioners had visited the project site. Commissioners Sargent met wifh the homeowner but did not have a subsfantive discussion about the project. Commissioner Bandrapalli a/so met the applicant. Questions of staff.� > Is there a minimum unobstructed depth for the garage? (Hurin: 18 feet for an existing garage, but if the garage is being altered a minimum depth of 20 feet is required. Existing covered space measures 10' x 20' and no changes are proposed.) Chair DeMartini opened the public hearing. JoAnn Gann represented the applicant. > Would there be cooking facilities so that it could be used as a second dwelling unit? (Gann: No.) > Have plans been shared with neighbors? (Gann: They did the neighborhood notification.) Public comments: Cathy Smith, 1811 Davis Drive, spoke on this item: > Lives directly across the street. > Likes the design and supports the construction of a second story. Commission discussion: > Not many comments — can be put on consent calendar. > Massing from front of house is OK. It is a bit awkward from rear and sides, but it is a challenge to add a second f/oor to u-shaped courtyard houses. > Good that the courryard is not being filled in. > Second story matches houses on either side — both have second story additions. Lack of depth would not be noticed from the street. > Addition has some hard corners going from front to the back, but courtyard is a constraint. > Bay above garage is so symmetrical, it accentuates the garage. "Church-like" element. > Doesn't like the stepping back — creates a busy roofline. > �th mass at the front avoids issues of views into back yards. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to place the item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 5/8/2015 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 27, 2015 Aye: 6- Loftis, Gum, Sargent, Terrones, Gaul, and Bandrapalli Nay: 1 - DeMartini City of Burlinqame Page 2 Printed on 5/8/2015 euWunGnmc p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: � C/ I� V�LL`� ��`i� APPLICANT project contact person �( PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents l� OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: � i.l, �-�,1,1, Name: �—+�-*Ct�'(7�i t� /�L��c'1��, Address: Z�' ��;1.,�0� �� City/State/Zip: ��ll.� a� C� C�1,-C .�C- Phone: �� i"lo � Q ( �`Z �� Fax: Address: � �� %-�-�c�l� 172-��1�, City/State/Zip: ��t1J- � /�-V-tF , � , Phone: ��gC( � ��4' Fax: E-mail: -��WL�-� � 1 Y� �- �--< ) C°� /�C7Zl � [ �'�, E-mail: ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro]ect contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents ji( Name: c ��.t ��N1-4 Address: ___�,'�-��-("t1�G ��`� City/State/zip: ��i1�:1,67',� L.l-C�(,� G�. ��4-b�, �. Phone: (� �7V ` � �'� � i g`� Fax: E-maiL �l iMC��.�c'_ �G`. `� � �'- �l� , L.U-7-- � * Burlingame Business License #: � � ��' �, - _ _, � �d ��--� � � .. F "1t t,�.,_, rJ `'F BURLIP�iuAMF �,��•1PvING �1\' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �1�S�.I� ��L-O(� t� �"-i�(Z, `�L�(Q �C� � �-( ��.- C��C�- �7(��C i (�� K �� b � �. �c�,-�l_. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: 1 c:�------� Date: ��(,U �(,� I am aware of the proposed �ppli ation and hereby a th rize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: ( , _/�c��.;%li � c�-�-�— Date: � • � � � � �!7 Date submitted: * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the FinanrP nPnartmPnt at thP timP annliratinn fPPc arP naic�. ��_,,�� re��c� _�� ; _� � � � ��' � �� -�,� �� 5� ��`��`- �� ``� � y �� `' �., � `�-�.-�1 � �� S� � � �. � G �1s2-,C=, �`__ �..� A �-, ►-,. C � � C� c�� --e�� -'�r � �-- �� s� Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2015 0 Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 � Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650J 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: February 23, 2015 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay. org/Construction Please contact Kiley Kinnon, NPDES Stormwater Coordinator, for assistance at (650) 342-3727. Reviewed by: KJK Date: 02/25/15 Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2015 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558- 7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: February 23, 2015 No comments at this time. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 2/23/15 Project Comments Date: 1� From: February 23, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 �Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: February 23, 2015 No comment at this time. Reviewed by: ��-� Date: � 1 a�.�'l� Project Comments Date: To: From: April 14, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: Revised Plans dated April 7, 2015 No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 2-26-2015 will apply to this project. Reviewed by: Date: 4-14-2015 Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2015 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: February 23, 2015 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built pi•ior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at htt�//www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09- 10/bill/sen�sb 0401-0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 6) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a leqend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 11) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 12� Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. ��3�' oms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin s. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. 14) e garage cannot have any direct openings into a room used for sleeping purposes. Please amend the drawings to show code compliance. 2013 CBC §406.3.4 15) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 16) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC §1009. 18) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 13 and 14 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written response must include clear direction re ardin where the re uested information can be found on the lans. Reviewed by: � � � Date: 2-26-2015 Joe , BO 6 -558-7270 l� Project Comments Date: To: From: April 14, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (s5o) ss8-�2so X Parks Division (65U) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: Revised Plans dated April 7, 2015 1. Landscape to remain the same. 2. Two new 24"box size Crape Myrtles added to existing landscape to fulfill requirement. 3. No further comments. Reviewed by: BD Date: 4/22/15 Project Comments Date: To: From: February 23, 2015 � Engineering Division (65U) 55�7230 � Building Division (sso) sss-72so X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-030 Staff Review: February 23, 2015 1. Please indicate on plans if landscape will remain or be rehabilitated. 2. Completed landscape must include 3 landscape trees (non-ftuit bearing) for final inspection. 3. Identify species of e�asting trees on property. Reviewed by: BD Date: 3/2/15 °� '-'. 4 "•s �. ,,}� i wt _ �R � � � � ��► � �� A� � � i1. - s , '.. � _ , 1900 �ww�F+. '� � < *, �� ; . � .. _ i� �� 1816 ,�;`,� - �,' 3' ,_ m� m� mi ` � � � 1812 •� ' � � —��___—_ � _... � �i � - I � �+; - I .�. � 1 � / / � �. � . - — r - � 1901 1811 1801 1711 ,�1 T - .3 ;' '�.. . �. .. , . :'�g� x� '� w � , • ' � .,k , • .� . ___,._- '' �! �¢ - � [ �1� I . - ~ �' ,_' T - ��. . 1707 :C�r/�� Project : 1812 DAVIS DRIVE, BURLINGAME �b��.. • * ,' . � �� *�'. � r + - �n� �i.� .... .i:+ ' �.� �\ • • .�. > .�_y � , ��.�.._ . - � , y. 17��; _ , ; ,' OF BURLIIVGAME' CDD-PLANNING DIV RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for first and second story additions at 1812 Davis Drive, Zoned R-1, Candace Naqare, property owner, APN: 025-201-030; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on May 11, 2015, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th dav of Mav, 2015, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1812 Davis Drive Effective May 21, 2015 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 30, 2015, sheets 1 through 6; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Engineering Divisions February 23, 2015 memo, the Building Division's February 26 and April 14, 2015 memos, the Parks Division's March 2 and April 22, 2015 memos, the Fire Division's February 23, 2015 memo, and the Stormwater Division's February 25, 2015 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1812 Davis Drive Effective May 21, 2015 Page 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `�.��'� CITY OF BURLINGAME � ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ;g _ BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � __ . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1812 DAVIS DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning (ommission announces the PUBLIC HEARING following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, MAY 11, 2015 at NOTICE 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for first and se�ontl story additions to an existing single family dwelling at 1812 DAVIS DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 025-201-030 Mailed: May 1, 2015 (Please refer to other side) Citv of Burlinaame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the noticP or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)