The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1808 Davis Drive - Staff ReportMEMO DATE: TO: FROM: November 2, 2005 Planning Commission City Planner Planner's Report Meeting Date: 11/14/OS RE: FYI —1808 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 Summary: On June 13, 2005, the Planning Commission approved, by resolution, an application for design review for a second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1 (June 13, 2005, Planning Commission action minutes and May 23, 2005, design review study minutes attached). A building permit was issued for the project on August 18, 2005. Requested change: The following changes are proposed to the approved plans (refer to Revised elevations date stamped October 21, 2005): Right sidc Elevation: o Window added on second floor at stairwell; o First floor window in master bedroom removed; and o Skylights added above kitchen. • Front Elevation: o New Gable Vent proposed (to be centered under roof eave). • Rear Elevation: o Larger window proposed in master bedroom (6' x 6'-6" to 9' x 6'-6") The design of the house remains the same. Planning staff would note that because of the type of revisions, it was determined that this change could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item should be placed on an action calendar for a review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Maureen Brooks Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: May 23, 2005 Design Review Study Minutes June 13, 2005 Planning Commission Action Minutes Comparison of Approved and Proposed Floor Plans and Elevations Cidy qf Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 13, 2005 1B. 1808 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (POKO KLEIN, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CAROLYN AND KEY WAY, PROPERTY OWNERS) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER 1C. " 1800 RAY DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING � VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS RUFFAT, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; DAVID AND HOLLY PARRY, PROPERTY OWNERS) (64 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HUIZIN Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests from the public. However a Commissioner had some comments on item 1D. 1312 Vancouver Avenue and asked that this item be moved to the regular action calendar. C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar items lA. 800 Burlingame Avenue, 1B. 1800 Davis Drive, and 1 C. 1800 Ray Drive based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and each by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m. 1 D. 1312 VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITI ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JOHN SHANLEY PROPERTY 8 NOTICED PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Chair Aur ed himself because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property, C. D al recused hi cause he has a business relationship with the property owner, the y Council mbers. Reference staff report June 13, 2005, with attachment arber presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were su or consideration. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Brownrigg opened ic hearing. John Shanley, property owner, was present to answer questions. Commission c d with how close the garage is to neighbor, has the property owner tried to contact the neighb e the last meeting. Mr. Shanley noted that he left messages for the neighbor including hi e number and email address but has had no response from the neighbor. Commission noted e plans have been revised so that there is 2 feet between the detached garage and the property line at the rear and at the side property line, this is better than the 1 foot originally pr oot is pretty tight to get in to maintain the structure, but with the new site plan prov' ppears to be 4 feet to the adjacent garage, so if the owner wants to have only 1 foot betw rage and the property lines it is o.k.. There were no further comments and the public heari c osed. C. Keighran moved to approve the application itted with the garage 2 feet from the side and rear property lines, by resolution, with the fol conditions: 1) that the proj ect shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning D ent date stamped April 18, 2005, sheets 2 through 7, and - r plan, building elevations a age plan, and sheet 1, date stamped June 1, 2005, si c uding landscaping); and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes r floor area of the building shall require an amendment; 2) that the property owner the existing hedge along the driveway as often as necessary to provide adequate vehicul ess to enter and exit the new detached 2 City of Burlingarne Planraing Comrnissiorz Minutes May 23, 2005 C. Cauchi made �motion to place this item n'the consent calendar at a ti e when the suggested revision have been de and plan checked. Th' otion was seconded by C. istica. C�h �ifAuran called for a vote o e motion to place this item the consent calendar when p s had been fevised as directed. The m on passed on a voice vote 7- . The Planning Commission's a ion is advisory and not appealable. T�i item concluded at 9:35 p.m. 11. 1808 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (POKO KLEIN, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CAROLYN AND KEY WAY, PROPERTY OWNERS�(43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, architect, 205 Park Road Suite 203, Burlingame, Michael Shea, 1812 Davis Drive, spoke regarding this project; applicant was available to answer questions, noted that this was not an easy house to add on a second floor, tried to simplify what was existing on the house, removed one of three gables at the front of the house, now have a more balanced roof and centralized the second floor mass. Neighbor noted he was in favor of the project, will be visually appealing and an improvement on this street. Commission noted that the designer has done a nice job; this simple, elegant design blends in quite well with the existing house; appreciate seeing the existing and proposed building elevations side-by-side on the same page. Commissioners made the following comments: � Columns supporting the porch roof are not shown on the floor plans, please revise plans to show; and � If the owners have small children, suggest a safety gate be built at the top of the stairs. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. 12. 1800 RAY �IVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW A�VD PARKING VAR E FOR A FIRST AND S CDND STORY ADDITION (( AS CIATES, APPLICANT A DESIGNER; DAVID AND HO ERS 64 NOTICED OJECT PLANNER: RUBEN H �UFFAT, STEWART PARRY,PROPERTY Plr Hurin briefly pres ted the project description. There re no questions of staff. Chair Auran o�d the public comment. John Ste �rt, Stewart Associates, architect, 1351 aurel Street, San Carlo�and David Parry, property owncr, w c availablc to answcr qucstions, notc at thc property owner s no problems with replacing the e�'sting solid stucco wall with a redwoo ence. Commission hat this is a difficult house to wo�ith, the design did a good job, what stepping back of the mass. C�missioners made the following comm� this project work well 13 :. • .r . ; , _ � �`�� '' �w r_ , _ � �'� �; � ` T'Y �+ � J� ,4 P i �� f, ' . �� L� � � ��:. � � � .� � i. � � . � � , JY. ` e `%- y, ` � �n �j' �. . ll! N� � �. : •� rl� :y� ...� 1R9� � .{p+J . r �j � �� r , � r :`:. �,�� r:",' � y , � • • I �� .7' '� .�t .•c �4t�' . ��. w',..r ,� _ � � � P�� 11� . �, � �� . � ,� , z� � �� n,�',�� it� , �� A , �., ��+� �i � �' 7 �� ; � � . �. � � . . �., f �i� " i � ,r�,, � r : ✓� � ,� � � ` �� k �� 1 � �� ' 1t`,/+ I��, ` � � � . . �,� �,�� _ . � � �, � "'7 i � , • •-> .r � �' �y� ` �_ �� ♦ . ^�'�� % � � -t '�q; � 7� r��`�, t �?� t�� • '� r► � ;�� 1 � � : y' � �' , � j, 'i , � � ♦ � j.r _ � . �,� �,.� f t � � � • ��r} `1� �� , � , 4+'" �< , � � Iu ' .� - l' _.. eti7 ^ J.�a- y .,, � ,- � i : � a�-' . r, _ � �I �' �+ �," . y � . � . ;�� ;� � . . ' � � , �. w • �.' � � ` � � 'v". �k`, . . t.. � .�.1, h.. �� % .•`.� � � �F. 'j.,. ' �„�, „" � . �: . -- ��` � . � � . r, '. �r' I ��E, •� � �j ,. � , �..} �� . - .. ;; � � �� i � Y�. ;� - �, R ��' +�, l. % � � f��. . � � y �,� �/�' � _ � - r �4 �.; �! � `.�� ,ti • ,y • � ,�,�w . ;. : .� •*.. , . ' Jp f , . . • L.K • , �p, . I � , ` °i . y - . �. . , :�.. . • ' _Gw, ., y `�, �'" � ' 7 , � �`, �. '�� r � � ,rf�' ~�: `' x - , ` //. r`� `�� ` � ,y`,f / . 7��,y � ' �, �,, ...r ..:�, �' � /F: ..\ �,Y. I. A � � � ' ��Ii�� j "%. ' . � �J i + •w`�� , ,� � �� ,k•- 1 i� •• J �,.:iia! >+. � ` 1�� y'1�,+ '.;�,'I,� ; es'.+^ 'w �� ' � �' �;.� / •r �, i {� i' .� . � .L � �� , "1 ♦ � � `, � •�,A� f �, �' ` ° r ,,,�'y �r^_,'' � �� '.1 ' � ''�K � � � . / f � Y' � � ` � � � ! �1� �;.t. �r,� ;,� / ^` 't,i r�i. � . ,� � ,.a.. � ' : ;:. � � � '� 'L r f `. . ek+ . ► .yti . • ._ _ . . �i�'"�` '� � . .. .,_. ��. � f•' � /� � .� � i a � A �%.�:' ,; 1