The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1808 Davis Drive - Staff Report_ � t�� ,,., fe� 4">a�, ��"��,r� . ti�'F' ' ��• r �+,3, M , ' , . � : � . : �� . . '• f � '�. . a'� � ' ;w � '�,�� ,.�� MS � �� Y �� r� �. . =.� �. ` � � t�y; ,� �'i►,� p� t ��^�� '° ,�� ,4�, +h � ��,�'�� . + . a 1 irs�� I$i � sat S:.e�p.•- .� � , � ��a � `�! ��,.' `MI\, , r. ,,, y� .{I' "� - . '7" '� .^ .�' Re\� ,'•� • (f� � * 1 � rf',�� 4�. r' �: M'�`, ,�` . .6: „� '��, z ' •'' ••' f* � •',�'•' e . �� ._4'.. ' ;�► �� . • �. . `'�'�% �> �'�. � .� � .: ' M -�d R �.' �'+�.7J'�"'j• ' 4. � � � � , ?,�, �� r. �f , , _,�„ �.� • . ',rs • ,��. � _ • \ �� .� "" ...�'��'�{ j� �o�'�/....�,.- ; � � i �� .. . �rt.�i� �„ ��.�� . _ �,..�:. , , ��., � . . . . . .'�+�yeaweC.,f�;. .�0� � , .. ' .-r . -� ! —- � �`'. _— .�.--=.. _ . � ___�� . '� ` � '.� ` Y �� T{�F•.:l�'w � - v;,�. �k w , r. �� i„. r E~ '. = $ ; ~ � �r; �' r. , .. . _ !;. •" ':' k ` zs,� � ` ,..,:_., ��:� ,_ �' � rr�.,+a ,. �--o �s��i. }�I� � �I, v y. p � ^� � �}". ,1�"'��« ,��t N" �Ip �I i ` Y�N.•. �" ' �! � •—•. . !� .�. :� . . . �M\4 ��,y p '.� ,� , - ' �I ^$a`M\w,r 't�l'ci�� •y � M � ' � �' . . . " .. y . � . .. fler -' ��. �la.. 4R� .�. r� .i • . ; ��A. � . .. � _�.' ♦ � " _.... .. ' ��. . -.. � . y . .. r�, .Y : ��;. . y �`,� � t+�0. �� ' .. �Z,��,.{.� ` �1Y�''�' ' �� -.. City of Burlingame Design Review for a First and Second Story Addition Item # b Consent Calendar Address: 1808 Davis Drive Meeting Date: 6/13/OS Request: Design review for a first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.040) Applicant/Architect: TRG Architects, Poko Klein Property Owner: Ken and Carolyn Way APN: 025-201-040 General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Lot Area: 5,250 SF Date Submitted: April 15, 2005 Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Summary: The applicant is requesting design review for a first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1. The existing house is one story with an attached garage. The existing floor area is 1,750 SF (0.33 FAR). The first floor addition is approximately 189 SF and includes expanding the master bedroom at the rear, extending the kitchen on the right side, and expanding the front entrance. The new second floor will be 795 SF and will include adding two bedrooms, a full bathroom, a laundry room and play area at the top of the stairs. The first and second floor addition will increase the total floor area of the remodeled house to 2,734 SF (0.52 FAR), where 2,780 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposal is 46 SF under the maximum floor area allowed on this parcel. The existing attached garage is 17'6" wide by 20'2" deep and is considered to be a one car garage (10' x 20'), and meets the parking requirement for this four-bedroom house. The den on the first floor is considered a bedroom in terms of parking calculations and the playroom on the second floor at the top of the stairs is not counted as a bedroom because it is open to the floor below. Lot Area: 5,250 SF Existing Proposed Allowed/Required SETBACKS i � _ _ _ ____ _....... _.........._. Front (1 st flr): 15' 6" No change ; 15' (2nd flr): N/A 32� 20' _ _ _ __ Side (left): 4' 7' new portion 4' (rigl:t): 4' , 17' new portion 4' Rear (Ist flr): 3T6" ' 34' 15' (2nd flr): N/A ' 32'6" 20' _ _........ . ; .. Lot Coverage: 1,826 SF 1,992 SF 2,100 SF 34.7% ; 37.9% � 40% FAR: 1,750 SF j 2,734 SF ' 2,780 SF 0.33 FAR 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR Design Rei�iew 1808 Davis Drii�e Existing Proposed Allowed/Required # of bedrooms: 2 4 ------- _ _ _ __ _ _ ......... _ _..... _ _..__ ___. Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (17' 6" x 20' 2") No change (10' x 20') 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _. __. ._... _ _ ... __... _. _ _ _..._.. _ _ . _.._.. Height: 16' 6" 25' 30' DH Eiivelope: N/A Meets Requirement See code This project meets all code requirements. Staff Comments: See attached. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on May 23, 2005, the Commission requested that the floor plans be revised to show the columns supporting the porch roof and suggested that the owners have a safety gate built at the top of the stairs for small children. The Planning Commission voted to place the proj ect on the consent calendar. The applicant submitted a revised first floor plan, sheet A-2, date stamped May 27, 2005, that includes the columns for the porch. In addition the plans include a revised right side elevation, sheet A-4, with the middle window (kitchen) moved 18" toward the rear of the house to better accommodate the kitchen layout. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's May 23, 2005, design review study meeting the architect has done a nice job on this addition; proposal is simple, elegant design that blends in quite well with the existing house, and for these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 2 Design Review 1808 Dnvis Drive that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 15, 2005, sheets A-1, A-3, A-5 and A-6 site plan (including landscape plan), roof plan, building elevations, and sheet A-2 and A-4, date stamped May 27, 2005, floor plans and right side elevation and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment; 2. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subj ect to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist, Fire Marshal, Chief Building Official, NPDES Coordinator and City Engineer's memos dated April 15, 2005 shall be met; 4. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty ofperjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 5. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 8. that during construction the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Catherine Barber Planner TRG Architects, Poko Klein, applicant/architect 3 Project Comments Date: 04/15/2005 To: � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney From: Subject: Staff Review Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal � NPDES Coordinator Request for design review for first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-204-040 04/18/2005 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: � ��".��-� '� �_ Date: � �-Z_��/Z% � � P■ r {, II � � ' e �r . � ,�.^ :.., • ��i � 'r'�. 1 �w�smi'�'.._.....�. ___.T_.__'...�._..____... _.._.... . ____.... .. ._. _. ... I�;.ifl": �-� �, . � � �., ��a�� ; �a��4 ��if ��oe�: 04/15/2005 � City E�gineer � Chief Building OfFicial � City Arborist � City Attorney � Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal � fVPDES Coor�ina�o� Plannang Staff Reques4 for design review for first and second story addition a4 �� e�� ae��9 ��e�3 f�� 9 ��'�1: ��5-�� /� �/�0�5 1) All construction must corr�ply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Niunicipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and FederaE requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies uvit� the egress requirements. R�ote: The den musi have a code-compliant egress �rindow and smoke detector. 4) Provide guardrails at all landings. 5) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than fvvo risers. 6) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. _ _ __. __ � ' �c�e�u��c��l �: --..._ , � C"�__� �, �� ; ( ''�/ J-� Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: 04/15/2005 � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney � Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal ✓ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Request for design review for first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-204-040 04/18/2005 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Ensure that sufficient amount of erosion and sediment control measures are available on site at all times. The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging and/or storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: � � Date: 04/18/05 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: 04/15/2005 d City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Request for design review for first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-204-040 Staff Review: 04/18/2005 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 4. Plans indicate a 5 feet public utility easement along the left side of the property. No construction work including the foundation work shall occur within this easement area. Reviewed by: V V Date: 4/18/2005 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: 04/15/2005 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff ❑ NPDES Coordinator Request for design review for first and second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-204-040 Staff Review: 04/18/2005 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide double backflow prevention. Reviewed by: �� / �� ` Date: , c _ . . — �.; Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes May 23, 2005 11. 1808 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (POKO KLEIN, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CAROLYN AND KEY WAY, PROPERTY OWNERS) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, architect, 205 Park Road Suite 203, Burlingame, Michael Shea, 1812 Davis Drive, spoke regarding this project; applicant was available to answer questions, noted that this was not an easy house to add on a second floor, tried to simplify what was existing on the house, removed one of three gables at the front of the house, now have a more balanced roof and centralized the second floor mass. Neighbor noted he was in favor of the project, will be visually appealing and an improvement on this street. Commission noted that the designer has done a nice job; this simple, elegant design blends in quite well with the existing house; appreciate seeing the existing and proposed building elevations side-by-side on the same page. Commissioners made the following comments: • Columns supporting the porch roof are not shown on the floor plans, please revise plans to show; and • If the owners have small children, suggest a safety gate be built at the top of the stairs. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. 14 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org ��`, CIT7 O� BURLINGAME ��.,m .... •��o' Type of application: APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Design Review� Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: -� -- Project address:� �+�� 1�� ; ; .`_� APPLICAN � Name: ��D� K j�� Address: . City/State/Zip: 9t C� Phone (w): �J�� ,�"-I� 2 (h): �� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER ;r � ' �� ' i✓�� . i 1/ L � City/State/Zip: Phone (w): (h): (fl�- PROJECT DESCIfIPTION: '� PROPERTY OWNER Name: ��T�'l� �iJ'I %Ct "/ Address: ,4(�YS �i • City/State/Zip: �(ff'%��'1-�, � /�� —�-� . -�� Phone (w): (�� .� �'723 (h): �� 2�%G. �fl� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this �r�,;��IVED � APR 1 5 2005 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. « »•,•, , � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: � ` Date: / d� r I know about the proposed plication and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Pro ert owner's si atur : �� P Y � ,2 �� Date: � � � Date submitted: � i D Pcnre.r►u� e ', .' • � - . • ��. . ._ i . • � . . � � , • ... . ' , • •� �, t. . - , � ' ,' "r, . � � ' • , , • ' . • ., . �, t',•�•.�•.�, c .. •� � ' •, • ' • ••r . �`'1`• ' • • •`' •,'`: � .. ,. ' ' • • . • . . .� • � '�., ,• ;. . • •� . �„•� �, . � .. . ' . '�:;�► ' ,� � � . . • . . ''� ` ' - ,• .• . ..� �• - �• : � • ' i.. �� i c�V.�--�t�t,• c� � , . . � :, .�`� �-��L' . S-i-a v L.l °`�L t,-�I'�-r1 , ' ' . • • , _ �• , . . �, . . . . , . . �.. _� �: .l, : , RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review for a second story addition at 1808 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, Kenneth L. and Carolyn F.H. Way, property owners, APN: 025-201-040; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 13, 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Section: 15303, Class 3— (a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June, 2005, by the following vote SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review 1808 Davis Drive Effective June 23, 2005 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 15, 2005, sheets A-1, A-3, A-5 and A-6 site plan (including landscape plan), roof plan, building elevations, and sheet A-2 and A-4, date stamped May 27, 2005, floor plans and right side elevation and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment; 2. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist, Fire Marshal, Chief Building Official, NPDES Coordinator and City Engineer's memos dated April 15, 2005 shall be met; 4. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 5. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 8. that during construction the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. �� CITY o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURIJNGAME 501 PRIMflOSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 � o� 9jt,,,,,m,,,�. www.burlingame.org Site: 1808 DAVIS DRIVE Application for design for a second story addition at: 1808 DAVIS DRIVE, zoned R-1. (APN: 025-201-040). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, June 13, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed: June 3, 2005 (Please refer to other side) , � � � - t:.� . r_iY � 1^:.H CITY OF B URLINGAME ��.. . .�.- - A copy of the applicatic�n and.plans for this project'may be reviewed prior to the meeting at''the Planning Departinent at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califortiia. y: If you challerige the �ubject application(s) in cow�t, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice q�r�in written correspondence delivered to the city at or priar to'the public I�earin�. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants��bout this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250.: Thank you. � - ' ` rr'- # . �.:, t � _ �i, � :. Y � ��..T , a,• Margaret Monroe ' ��;d'�� v , W ,/` ,�'�,�/'�� City Planner „ ; PUBLIC �HEARING �VOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer tn othc�r side)