HomeMy WebLinkAbout1800 Davis Drive - Staff ReportItem #
Consent Calendar
�
' .� ,,.
�'
�S
�: �
;� { :�
r��. i ':
ai `� .:
,
'' ��;
1��:
s
���,�;
. �.,. , , . : . . .
� .
�_,,,�, . � � ......, ' ' �:,A � . .. m.. ,a.. . • _
...... _ _ . . .
� , � -, % ;, �. � .. .,.,.. ... . � .��,,,�, _
S :�$��.2��„� w-.''ftS��` .'�i- - ; �° . . ' � - �'� 'n ^�x 'Sea,,:• 4
i �r '+ �x�! + +- - .
. . . � . . . .r' k'
, .._, , . . .._ i
. , . , '. '-, � .
}K'y^,4�s' 9w„ � y . : . . ., . . , . _... �... , � .: _ _�.. . ; ..,. , . . ...�.: ... . . . - � . . . � ' . .. .. .
.. '� � �,.. .,S � . , � � . . - . . . . . _ . . , . . ' .
PROJECT LOCATION
1800 Davis Drive
City of Burlingame
Design Review
Address: 1800 Davis Drive
Request: Design Review for a first and second story addition.
Item #
Consent Calendar
Meeting Date: 11/26/07
Applicant/Architect: Randy Grange, TRG Architects APN: 025-201-060
Property Owner: Derex Louie Lot Area: 5,250 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing
structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than fifty percent of the floor area
of the structures before the addition, or 2500 square feet, whichever is less.
Summary: The proposed project is located where Lassen Way intersects with Davis Drive. The
existing single story house with an attached garage (16'-4" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions), contains
2,058 SF (0.39 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to demolish
approximately 90 SF of the existing living room (along with a 110 SF accessory structure in the rear
yard), add approximately 225 SF at the front left corner of the existing first floor, and to build a new
780 SF second story. With the proposed first and second story addition, the floor area will increase
from 2,058 SF (0.39 FAR) to 2,775 SF (0.53 FAR) where 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum
allowed.
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from two to four. Two parking
spaces, one covered (10' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for the proposed four
bedroom house and are provided in the existing garage and driveway. All Zoning Code requirements
have been met. The following application is required:
• Design review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 5).
Table 1— 1800 Davis Drive
Lot Area: 5,250 SF Plans Date Stam ed: November 14, 2007
EXISTING ' TO PROPOSED ADDITION ; ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS
_
. ; ....
_ � �� _...
Front (15` f/r): 14'-11"' (to garage) (no change) 15 -0 (block average)
(2"d flr,�: n/a 35'-7' (to BR2) 20'-0"
_... .. _ _
Side (left, 1S` f/r): 4'-1" (to BR2) 4'-1" (to LR) 4'-0"
(left, 2"d flr): n/a 12'-6" (to office) 4'-0"
(right, 1St flr): 3'-0"' (no change) 4'-0"
(right, 2"d flr): n/a 12'-0" 4'-0"
..... . :. ... . .. ........ . .. _ _ __.... _.. _ _.._ . _
Rear(1St flr): 17'-9" (to BR2) (no change) 15'-0"
�y�d f�r�, n/a ; 35'-5" (to BR3) 20'-0"
_ _. .
Lot Coverage: 2,133 SF' 2,075 SF 2 2,100 SF
40.6% 39.5°/a 40%
_._. ,. 3...._. .. . . .....
FAR: 2,058 SF 2,775 SF 3,780 SF
0.39 FAR 0.53 FAR 0.53 FAR
_ . __ _. __.... .... _....
# of bedrooms: 2 4 ---
Design Review 1800 Davis Drine
Staff Comments: See attached.
Design Review Study Meeting (October 22, 2007): At the Planning Commission's design review
study meeting on October 22, 2007, the Commission commented on the side-yard fence, the roof
pitch, the landscaping, the window pattern on the garage, and the stone veneer at the front of the
structure (October 22, 2007 Planning Commission minutes). The following is a summary of the
Commission's direction and responses by the applicant. The applicant submitted revised plans
addressing the Commission's concerns, date stamped November 14, 2007, and a response letter date
stamped November 20, 2007.
The side-yard fence should be pulled forward to the new line on the chimney.
The architect moved the side yard fence forward to the new area of the chimney (revised site
plan, Sheet A1.1, date stamped November 14, 2007, and response letter from the architect
date stamped November 20, 2007).
2. Consider the possibility of a steeper roof pitch to unify roof design and make it look /ess than a
mass added to a one-story house; propose a window paftern on the garage that is consistenf
with the window pattern on the house.
• No response.
3. Consider an alternate species for the 24" box size Photinia; landscape along the side of the
residence; take into account the landscaping along the rear of the property and note that the
adjacent hospital site will be landscaped along the rear property line; and select a non-
deciduous tree to shield the power pole at the rear of the property.
The architect replaced the 24" box size Photinia with 15-gallon bay laurels and shifted the
landscaping from the rear property line to the right side property line is proposing two additional
bay laurels in the rear left corner of the yard where the existing mayten tree will be removed
(revised landscape plan, Sheet L1.0, date stamped November 14, 2007, and response letter
from the architect date stamped November 20, 2007). Staff notes that with the changes to the
landscape plan, the project still complies with the landscaping requirement.
4. Stone veneer should be wrapped around the front of the house.
• The architect extended the stone veneer to the front of the property to complement the overall
design (revised front elevation, Sheet A3.1, both date stamped November 14, 2007 and
response letter from the architect date stamped November 20, 2007).
2
' Existing nonconforming condition
2 Lot coverage is decreasing overall (and bringing the lot coverage on the property into compliance)
because a 110 SF accessory structure in the rear yard will be demolished.
3 (0.32 x 5,250 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR)
Design Review
1800 Davis Drive
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591
adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2.
3.
4.
5.
Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their
October 22, 2007 design review study meeting, that the first and second floor addition is well-
designed, that with the changes proposed at the October 22, 2007 meeting the architectural style is
consistent throughout the house, and that the project is consistent with the mass and bulk in the
neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design
review guidelines.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be by resolution and include findings made for Design Review. The reasons for any
action should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be
considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 14, 2007 (Sheets A0.1, A1.0 through A1.2, A2.1, and A3.1 through A3.4),
and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the
building shall require an amendment to this permit;
E
3
that the conditions of the Fire Marshall's, the Chief Building Official's, the City Engineer's, and
the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memos shall be met;
that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required
to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
4. that any changes to 1
which would include
architectural features
Commission review;
ie size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
l�esign Revietiv 1800 Davis Drive
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the Ciry of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
8. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,
such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural
certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the
Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
9. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and
10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
Lisa Whitman
Zoning Technician
Cc: Randy Grange, TRG Architects
0
City of eurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
October 22, 2007
11) to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note com I' e-vf"fie
architectura �tails_ trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that ct has been built
according to the approve���la�.ing and Building pla�_
The motion was seconded by C�ncx�iss"rtsn`er Visfica. __
�___ - ---_
Vic - au h alled for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion pass -1 Chair Deal
absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:47 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
6. 1800 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, AND DEREK LOUIE, PROPERTY OWNER) (48 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Senior Planner Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Deal opened the public comment period.
Randy Grange, 205 Park Road, Burlingame; represented the applicant:
■ Existing style of house is difficult to add to.
■ Owner wanted to center the entry door on the house.
■ The owner wanted to open up the floor plan.
■ Main living space exits to side-yard which terraces down to back yard.
■ This plan makes the back yard space more usable.
Commission comments:
• The side-yard fence should be pulled forward to new line on chimney.
■ Consider the possibility for a steeper roof pitch to unify roof design and make it look less than a
mass added to a one-story house; less like a layer cake.
■ Consider an alternate species for the 24" Photinia; 15-gallon specimens of another species would
be acceptable.
• Suggested adding landscaping along the side of the residence.
■ Complimented the design.
■ Take into account landscaping along rear of the property; the adjacent to hospital site will be
landscaped along the rear property line of the subject site.
- Stone veneer should be wrapped around front of house.
■ Window pattern on the house is somewhat different from garage windows; make the pattern
consistent.
• Choose a non-deciduous tree to shield power pole at the rear of the property.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the item on the regular Consent Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Brownrigg.
Vice-Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (Chair Deal absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appea/able. This item concluded at 9:02 p.m.
10
- ArcGitcctr �'
November 13, 2007
Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 1800 Davis Drive
Dear Commissioner,
The home at 1800 Davis Drive was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission on
October 22, 2007 and received a few design recommendations before approval. We have
addressed the suggestions in the plans provided.
The side yard fence is pull forward to the new area of the chimney.
15 gallon Bay Laurels are noted in place of the 24" Photinias on the right side of the
property. In addition, we have included two (2) additional 15 gallon Bay Laurels to
shield views of the power pole at the rear of the property.
The stone veneer at the rear and sides of the house has been extended to the front
property to complement the overall design.
We hope that you will find the proposed revisions acceptable.
Sincerely,
Randy Grange
�u ���:a 2!_'� Z OD 7
c�n �_ . _ . .;t
PL'�.,lFL :_ .-,: -��.
ZOS Purk Roud, tiuice ?0>, Hurlingumr, CA 9�1Q10
650.5'9.5'G3 Fax 650.5'`).Ol l5 �r�cw.rrgarch.com
�"��
BURIINGAME
�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
J�4. Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Other:
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Parcel Number: 02 5- 201 - C>�D
PROJECT ADDRESS: ���� /�AViS L�rz� ✓E
APPLICANT project contact persort �
OK to send electronic copies of documents i7
Name: �.4ncc�x ��Q�Gr�
Address: �� ,P�9,ek. �_� ��Z't ��
City/State/Zip: ���G �6.� ���
Phone (w): ��7�. 5 � g, � �,(0 2
(Home): `^
(Fax): !/J �D cr7 � �'. �l/J�
(E-mail): T�O, G rG�'1� %PG� � Q6` ' ��
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ect contact person�
OK to send electronic copies f documents�
Name: ! � i9�G�'i'/T�G1".S C���yJ
Address: � � l�,e� /e�. � �U� z�' 2�
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents 0
Name: 1�6�i� �!�
Address: _ �_��� �s� ✓tS L.��
City/State/Zip: �r21.,r�4Rln6t (_.f9 ���%�
Phone (w): �� � ` � c� � 5 �CE'�C�- �
(Home): �
(Fax): �
(E-mail): �/� �P_ „�A,� `�(>1 �G �`L 6l J�Ct� •
�:�jYyL�
City/state/zip: I��,,2r��G�A-m6 �, �� %�6`4
Phone (w): ,G�S�, � � �- � ��0 2
(Home): �
(Fax): 1i��0. 5 ��f, �//$
(E-mail): ,7�i^c�Qi^l�l�iA'�PGT�,S � Q�1S6 - C'(lYX�
�v
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , � "� cSY'67e.�/ DD�r'/O�f „ � "- �Z�_ 2�'ioD�L �U�UviT��
Td � xiS rl ��� ��cSt�7�e h' s.
Y ��
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowled e lief.
ApplicanYs signatur � Date: � 2 q �
I am aware of the proposed application nd h reb authorize the above applicant to submit this apptic tion to the Planning
Commission. _ .
Property owner's signature: Date: ��� �( J�
Please mark one box
with 0
to indicate
the contact person
for this project.
Date submitted:
S:\Handouts\PC Application 2D09.handout
,
� �C-+�.�'r�ja ���-�'1� . - �� �� �'� .
�v.
�� -�° ��� � •
`�S�.r � �<,� � .��,A
�-
5-� � �.��1►� :
�
u
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
September 24, 2007
� City Engineer
(650) 558- 7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558- 7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558- 7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1800 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-060
September 24, 2007
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 9/24/2007
Project Comments
Date:
To:
September 24, 2007
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1800 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-060
Staff Review: September 24, 2007
1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame
Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. NOTE: Projects for
which Building Permit applications are received on or after January 1, 2008 must comply
with the 2007 California Buildinq Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning
Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. Projects that have been approved by
the City of Burlingame Planning Commission on or before December 31, 2007 may use the 2001
California Codes.
2) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
3) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
4) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new
walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit
is issued for the project.
5) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame
Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed
fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined
by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the
requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2001 California
Building Code for new structures.
6) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will
be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued
after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
7) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential
buildings. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24 for publications and details.
8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that
complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress
windows on the elevation drawings.
9) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are
considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if
your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
10) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
11) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
12) If the fireplace is wood burning then the chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof
surface within ten feet.
,
� �
�_
����/� -�
�
Project Comments
Date:
��
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
September 24, 2007
O City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
O Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
fi�Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
Planning Staff
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1800 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-060
September 24, 2007
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: � ��-- � ����� Date: 2.,4� .�Q� `c� �
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
September 24, 2007
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
� Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
Q NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Planning Staff
Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1800 Davis Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-201-060
September 24, 2007
1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not
limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management
Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases
of the construction project (including demolition). Include appropriate stormwater
BMPs as Project Notes. These BMPs include but are not limited to the following:
• Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials and wastes properly
to prevent contact and contamination of stormwater;
• Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including
pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals,
wash water or sediments, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains
and watercourses;
• Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering
site and obtain all necessary permits;
• Avoid cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site except in a
designated area where wash water is contained and treated;
• Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction
impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes,
mulching, or other measures as appropriate;
• Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather;
• Limit and time application of pesticides and fertilizers to prevent polluted
runoff;
• Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points;
• Avoid tracking dirt or other materials off-site; clean off-site paved areas
and sidewalks using dry sweeping method;
• The Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees and
subcontractors regarding the construction BMPs.
1 of 2
Project Comments — Con't- 1800 Davis Dr., 1St and 2"d story addition.
2) The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging
and/or storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times.
3) Implement Erosion and Sedimentation Controls:
a. Install and maintain all temporary erosion and sediment controls
continuously until permanent erosion control have been established;
b. Address method(s) for diverting on-site runoff around exposed areas and
diverting off-site runoff arount the site;
c. Address methods for preventing erosion and trapping sediment on-site.
4) Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following:
a. Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control
measures, including inspection frequency;
b. Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of
vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material.
Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for
your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project
proponents.
For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727.
Reviewed by: � Date: 09/24/07
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
design review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwellinq at 1800
Davis Drive, zoned R-1, Derex Louie, propertv owner, APN: 025-201-060;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
November 26, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 Class
1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an
increase of more than fifty percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition,
or 2500 square feet, whichever is less.
2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of November. 2007 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review.
1800 Davis Drive
Effective December 7, 2007
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped November 14, 2007 (Sheets A0.1, A1.0 through A1.2, A2.1, and A3.1
through A3.4), and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor
area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshall's, the Chief Building Official's, the City Engineer's,
and the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memos shall be met;
3. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
8. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer,
or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved
plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design
shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled;
9. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height
of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and
10. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
-2-
. CITY OF BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLIN,GAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � �- - s
� ' << ' BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ���_ �� '
``�"�' �,' _ I.• PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650 � ��:;� : y
www.burlingame.org ' - ;,
��a i���"�� 2
��j,,,g `�^� " E.r
'4"a�`�'a 3� a
Site: 1800 DA1/IS DRIVE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2007
at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review for a first and second story
addition to a single family dwelling at 1800 DAVIS DRIVE
zoned R-l. APN 025-201-060
Mailed: NoveFnber 16, 2007
(Please refe� to other srde)
016H1650432�
�t�� _a�
mailed From 94� G�i7
ilS POSTAGE
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
City of BurlinC►ame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues ycu or someone elsE raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
"�' ,7 �cl� �: -n - :;., ^� yJ� �� -:�s�"-s� �:,ae �
� ,s ��" T �,� �, ' �` �i' � j� � 1' f
� q �`�i'� ,� � ' ��: � r � � n ,y�� ' ��,"`�'r 9 y �.,� :'� rr,.
. .
r ��`��fp. ``�'• � �-n �� �' ' . _' 3 ! -y :' "n r
q � � rn �. � ..� r� .: �
'. i �'�1 � ,` '�� .� , "�� �ai��' ,T�, "q �'� �`
. . �'"r w�k� T;`�"� ' �J'��' '� � �`� .r�a � > s� t: � �"
,S'�'4`� �`� �'� ... `,� i�,'� _n . µ A���_ n�.:.
' �� �* � �j � � '�i 1 ti {�.
,� � -, � �,* `� �,�'� �,,�, .+� , � r� '�' . �
� � � , � '� �� � ;�
- -%- '� r �'' � "'"�,�,," �' `� � ' '9 'yr� k �':
'` ,'�\�� . ./` ��� '���� ��'SI .��^ ��'�A ��� ��� � �.f .
� � i� �e; 1�f`��► � � < � � � , � _
�Y" - = i " f s : ,,,
� 7 .�" - ,`'.',' � .� .� ��..� P r1 e �� ���i�'f s� 7N � ^. �
� ! �, ` ''. `'� ��\ � �, �s �+.� =� �,y�^, 3; �. '� ' � �
%� i �CM, � •��. � � '�i +z, �..e �s , ti, ,+` �i �t . � . A
.�
1 ,,
.
%.f t�' � *� '• ` .c� 3 �r 1 /
! � �! � � . � �+�f k \ `�� ` � � � T;�� --'�i �, .. � ..?, r1
F � �T1 � ,'
�� `` + ' � ��. e r '� � "� �T � + � � I
41 i �!\ �� �`: � � �'.•� � k � • �,'�4, ,� '�i
"#"�' `• � ��� � r " i� �, � a s v j.
X• � i,�:i• . . � � �� . �'\ � �T! iS i�.i . .
� �,.: �►,� �� � `' �,��p �r� P **i ,q t�. " 1' .
� '\. � � ` �';- � � .��► . �'�► ,.
� � �; t ��� � � ���� �v � ��_ y�
` � � \ � ti}ti; , ., �� , .,. ., s ;.�.� s �
' � ��, �� �� � a� �+��� � +� � � .,� �,�� , �, � `�/'t ,
� „�� �\� -��y�I,* ya s��� .�+,�i,�� M � , ♦'�
.:y ? ,�� ��$ ��! �`� �+'� '�f''�l ,�' � � k� :i��
�,s
� ~ �.; ,' `y �� �T % ' �;,1' ',t �z R '�
,�����.� .� ���_ } �„� * .'>
-�'e i , ! � ° "'� `' �.� '* ,, �. ' " � , .
- � � �` �_ '
�y ;��,p�, �'''�`'� �1 1�� � `�` �'`✓, ` r .�,�"• `<<` � ,
� `l, } �� ,/ < f M� /
. . �..� � � s,.Y i � 1 ti. ,� �'�, I }
MX ; � � �'•� �:�� �`�(i� y � 1 . <� � � � r �..� � 2��^ Y �,f!�
1 � y+ti { ..�.. ...Nr :' r .1`� �.� f Sr' �' �r F � �� � �* ~� '�,
,C ry:, '�ry -. r , .
c "�� �` • �.r�. �, �t�v a''� 'S � r,, . ,
� �+'. R. � 4'�� �$ �jf �.� ��` � ��.• v. ;
. '` ti .,'4.�'` � �: � � ,�� G.� ,� t.:. . > `� t"� . �+
�. `�,� l;� ,:#q � T ,, �Y' .,,'��► . . �•� .;- � , �y y „� .��'� vt . w
Rµ t } � �p
§y 4 '. �1� ���f �+,y ' ��} � ..
� � t� �, . .,t �. . ry4 ... -w�` � ��^�'� "a6!
(
�' :: � .tf.' . �-i l� ?,,�iA � :_� x�� l..�L: �.: �.� � :.
A�j:� ' � � '� �� �l•��y "�'yy. �"�k�": ��.., -� r �
QaP .
'1 � .'?? ��7. � �{ r , ,/ '.
� . ,��„ �,, , i+. �,�., � f . � � °: ' ' �
. � � :�_ � � � .
_h. � � ' � � is � , ,1��' 4 ' `s..,
'� r � {� 1 ra�• , K.,
� ' ' ' , J 4F.,, , ;� ,,',• ?.. �.," . ' : .r.7E_ �c .i,
� r
' �� } - '1 f
� ' .��..1,� ;� � �f
� �.: � � �
N J �
�(� I ��'a� ;:;�.`. . '�..
��? �� � �� �-
� . y� , .'�.:
.�� � �
<� �� � .: � � `' ,�
� '�r � .�- � �' F f �: f
, � !�. � ,� _, t
'r% l � �M �. � � Zr�1 ,. �� Y , '
� � , �,'�jj�
�£
. � LY �t,{ ` ~ ' � � , \
°� `� , � f ,
�'�'... ,? �y `� ��
/
�0
� �^
r+�
.. .►�
\/Yx��\�
/ �;
.�',
',`
.`�"'
.r _ `
� •y ,.
�;: ;
�i '� �
i � � - �
�' � �� ��� • .
�i � � ��
^�t
i �.
`` x
� a% /y ��
, + � � � J:
� t•' ';
k�. C...
!� � . ��'� .
, ' '"y y "•�� �
�
�
City of Bur/ingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
November 26, 2007
This item was continued to the December 10, 2007 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant's
request.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon
simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the
public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Chair Deal asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. There were no requests.
2a. 345 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA B-1 —APPLICATION FOR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF
AN APPROVED APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR AN ADDITION TO THE FOURTH FLOOR
OF AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING (ANGELINE ASKHAM, WALKER WARNER ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; OUTFITTER PROPERTIES LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT
PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
2b. 1800 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANTAND ARCHITECT, AND DEREX LOUIE, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA
WHITMAN
2c. 1775 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (ROBERT MEDAN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; WADE AND ELIZABETH LAI,
PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Commissioner Osterling moved approval of the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports,
Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff
reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by CommissionerAuran. Chair Deal called for a voice
vote on the motion and itpassed 6-0-1 (CommissionerTerrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
3. 2538 HAYWARD DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY
ADDITION (AUDREY TSE, INSITE DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND STEVE AND SHANNON
CANNON, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Reference staff report dated November 26, 2007, with attachments. Planner Strohmeier presented the
report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven (11) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Deal opened the public hearing.
Steve Cannon and Shannon Casey-Cannon, 2538 Hayward Drive and AudreyTse,1534 Plaza Lane, Suite
318, Burlingame; represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
The plan is nicely done.
Vinyl windows are not acceptable, should be true divided light, or simulated true divided light
windows either of wood or vinyl-clad wood design; detachable mullions are not acceptable.
�