The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1516 Vancouver Avenue - Staff Report: � �""� ��";;`T��+�' *.. �`� �, � ��e ,r.: { \�C � i.•i` ^��t�i�y' _ � � ,�,�- . :. , K � � �,. � 1 r�, � � � � • � � . �� .�. . a �' �r, r ,+�-,'✓ � " �� /.� ' ►.,. � y .. i � J � �.. Y/, �..�� .• "^'��:'."� „gy . _�--�+ , '� {+ ..t �.'�'�« �. , '.�,." �� w .,t �•S: "� " .i� i`___�`� y... ..'' ,%M�� J �. . e'�� I t �� f r..�'�,�,�..�:�� 1`:�I �I'�Ff/ � . ' ` �� , �; } ..,��.,.�1. � �� j��'7 � � 't:�� :•� x � `p r ^r''�&. f'� r. k rr�. � l r�. � �. �� 1 :r� r��.a, �.p�• ..��'::� � _ ,� . y.. ,-Y�._ ..��;; •''% R,,l � . * : �.: c �"t. #� �� rr � � ny ; 4 r," �.,: � �„ r :'Cvj *,$��. " �' �' 4!, *_�: �r:;. Y'�� . �� ,;,� * � � Y I � I �y 1 �� ' �� 1Y � � ..w:�;,�. i �. � 2! J � =x .�;'�.r � �� , i F� � M • L � .:�q J :�� '� . r' r ,� ;;��l:;. :�k .,�s.:,��+iF eti ., -'�+w,,.,,f.1n _� �'�^-Z` tq�� C� �zL... ::i•l/W`� 9�'1�'_. M..� � R.` . City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permit Address: 1516 Vancouver Avenue Item No. Consent Calendar Meeting Date: August 23, 2010 Request: Design Review and Special Permit for building height, for a new, two-story single-family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Bart Gaul Designer: Jack McCarthy General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-034-170 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house with a detached garage to build a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,354 SF (0.56 FAR) where 3,356 SF (0.56 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 2 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). A Special Permit is required for overall building height (33'-2" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed). The portion of the roof which extends above the 30'-0" height limit is the peak of the roof along the middle of the house. The project includes a detached garage (336 SF) which provides one code-compliant covered parking space for the proposed four-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010); and ■ Special Permit for building height (33'-2" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060). 1516 Vancouver Avenue Lot Area: Ei,UUU Sr Nlans date stam ect: Au ust 5, 1U1 U � PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS � : : ............................................................................. .. .. .. .... Front (1st f/r): � 19'-0" � 18'-6" (block average) (2nd flr): � 33'-8" 20'-0" (block average) . �.. �� .._ . ..... ........... _ Side (left): � 4-2 i 4'-0" � ; (righf): ; 11'-2" 4'-0" _........_ ...................._.. _..........._._.........................;.........._......._............_............_...._............ . . _.. ..........................................................................................................�..........�� ....................................._...................................................... Rear (1 sf flr): ; 35'-8" (to bay) 15 -0 (2nd f/r): I 35'-0" (to bay) � 20'-0" . ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. , Lot Coverage: ( 2,241 SF j 2,400 SF � 37% � 40% : ............................................................................................................................................................................................:........ _............._............................... FAR: ; 3,354 SF ' 3,356 SF 0.56 FAR j 0.56 FAR' _ .......................... .................................................................................,.................................................................................... _.....4........................._..._.__._._.....---....._......_........_......,---._..._....._......_.....__._._._...._..............._.............._............................._...._...._...__._..._._.......----.........._._.._._...._._..._....... # of bedrooms: : � --- Design Review and Special Permit 1516 Vancouver Avenue PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED Parking: � 1 covered � 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ; ..................................................................................................................................................................................................'........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Height: � 33'-2" 2 � 30'-0" ..............................:......................................... ..... ........................................................................................... ..... :. DH Enve/ope: � complies � CS 25.28.075 ' (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF + 336 SF = 3,356 SF (0.56 FAR) 2 Special Permit for building height (33'-2" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 26, 2010, the Commission made comments and suggestions regarding the overall building height, the addition of small windows at the rear elevation and in the master bedroom and the extension of the front porch towards the dining room and voted to place the item on the Consent Calendar at the next available Planning Commission meeting when the plans had been revised as directed (July 26, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes). The designer submitted revised plans and a response letter on August 5, 2010, to address the Commission's concerns. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for Design Review: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their July 26, 2010 Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed house is appropriate for the neighborhood, and that the architectural style, mass and bulk of the house will be consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit for building height, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation forthe removal that is proposed is -2- Design Review and Specia/ Permit appropriate. 1516 VancouverAvenue Special Permit Findings for Building Height: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's July 26, 2010, Design Review Study meeting, that the portion of the roof which extends above the 30'-0" height limit is the center portion of the roof along the middle of the house, that from average top of curb level (74.65') the lot slopes upward approximately 2.29' to the front of the house and that the finished floor (elevation 79') is 4.35' above average top of curb level, the Planning Commission is supportive of the Special Permit request and the project is found to be compatible with the special permit criteria listed above. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 5, 2010, sheets 1 through 6, L1.0 and Boundary and Topography Map; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 14, 2010 and May 26, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's June 9, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 26, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's July 14, 2010 and May 26, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 25, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes ordumpsters forthe construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm �c� Design Review and Special Permit 1516 Vancouver Avenue Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Bart Gaul, 232 Dwight Road, Burlingame, CA, 94010, applicant and property owner. Attachments:' Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, date stamped August 5, 2010 Minutes from the July 26, 2010, Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application, date stamped July 12, 2010 Photographs of streetscape, date stamped July 15, 2010 Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 13, 2010 Aerial Photo -4- .1:�cic ��1c1::��•tl�� Ilc�i��ic�•, I��c. PMB 311, 5339 Prospect Road, San Jose, California 95129 Phone/Fax (408) 973-0162 August 4, 2010 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: 1516 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame We have revised the plans per the comments made at the July 26, 2010 meeting of the Planning Commission. Our response to each item is as follows: 4. 5. The average top of curb elevations is 74.65' and the lowest natural grade adjacent to the proposed structure is 76.94'. Therefore the natural grade rise from the curb to the face of the residence is 2.29'. The top of the roof is at elevation 107.8' which means that the high point on the roof is 30'-10" above adjacent natural grade. We have revised the left side elevation to show accent sash on both sides of the fireplace in the family room. They will stack with added accent sash in the master suite. This can be seen on page 4. We have added a French door from the dining room. The door will center with the arch opening in the entry porch. The revision can be seen on page 2 and on the front elevation on page 4. We have added sash to the master bath on page 3 and on the left and rear elevations shown on pages 4 and 5. We revised the sash over the tub from a single large unit to two smaller units. Also we added a sash between the two sinks on the vanity. Now all of the sash in the bath will be the same width and the same height making their appearance on the elevations much more pleasing. In our opening remarks I said that we would revise the following items on the plans. This has been completed and can be seen on page 4 at the front and rear elevations. The items were: a. The direct vent shall vent out of the top of the living room false chase. b. We added the word `wood' to the half timber call out. c. We added the word `metal' as the cladding for the sash. d. We added the phrase 'simulated travertine stone finish' to the sill cali out. If there are any questions we will be happy to discuss them at the public hearing. Regards, Jack McCarthy au� o � zo�o CITY OF BURLINUAME PLANNING DEPT. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes July 26, 2010 11. 1516 VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (BART GAUL, APPLICANTAND PROPERTY OWNER; AND JACK MCCARTHY, DESIGNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated July 26, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Terrones opened the public comment period. Jack McCarthy, 5339 Prospect Road, San Jose; represented the applicant. Clarified finishing materials. Noted that there are a number of houses that have similar roof pitches. Commission comments: ■ What is the average top of curb elevation? What is the actual height of the structure above grade? (McCarthy — 74.65 feet. Would still be a foot over the maximum height if ineasured from the grade at the proposed building location.) ■ Consider small windows adjacent to the rear fireplace. (McCarthy — could place windows at the family room level.) ■ Also add some small windows at the master bedroom, below the eave. ■ Likes the side porch entry. ■ Why couldn't the porch be extended to have a door opening from the dining room onto the porch area? (McCarthy — this is acceptable without a roof covering.) ■ On the right side elevation on second floor at the master bathroom; consider flipping the bathroom and closet with the bedroom area, and use the bay as a sitting area, place the bathroom where the wall is and include windows all around. Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the ifem on the Consent Calendar when complete. This mofion was seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Terrones called for a vote on the motion fo place fhis ifem on fhe Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as direcfed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2-1 (Commissioners Cauchi and Vistica absenf, Commissioner Gaul recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded af 19:28 p.m. Commissioner Gaul returned to the dais. 7 �,�....� �*'� � t Ur�i ir�cnmF ��. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Ty e of application: Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Parcel #: � �� V ��l''r � I �/ ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ` 5�� va-h CO�J ��✓ ' N e- � Please indicate tt�e contad person for this project APPLICANT project contact person� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents'�' OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: �i��/1/ �"'/ �/ � Name: ��,� U�"�U� Address: �J� �G�i�'hf ��c' Address: �� City/State/Zip: /.��/��1�'� � City/State/Zip: ��'/'�`'7��''� � . � Phone: �S� 7 7 3 ��S� Phone: ��- O�S � Fax: `-��/ "� G-� 7� Fax: Y� ��'� 7� / � � r--� � E-mail: �CJ-/�i'`��' � �'%Gi/r. �i� E-mail: �G�,��L/'.LCG�G/n-�'/��'rl ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ect contact Person f�' OK to send electronic copies of documents� Name: �..l,bv1L �`'%�Gi4 Pi)N/ :.�!�S��a !��'� �/-i�--- Address: '� � S �� 7 U i i"�, .�. j,-� ?-�y: 1 � � ��Z � City/State/Zip: � " � '. �� '� , -.. � t Phone: c.:� �' � , %': ' U) !,� Z Fax: � f;�i = a 7� �J 1� 2 E-mail: ..-/`� - , � _, �t Burlingame Business License #: ��C��I V �� MAY 2 � 2010 � BURLINGAPAF PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Ih=� %;�' i� 1 � T;��- '� l' ��'�.�-,'D<, r � • • . � :' . - � - '. ,. ' �,. . ; . AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. � Applicant's signature: � � Date:�/-' '�`' '' 1t I am aware of the proposed applicaticm and hereby authoriz the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. i � � � Property owner's signature: Date: �'l/ �' � Date submitted: -' � '' � ,t Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�HalloourslPcnpplication zoo8.hondour.doc ��i��1�ur� -�� S, �^ � 1 e -Fr, ,r , I � � �.S i r � , we�l�`^� K v� P t..� --��,�� C,� �c�-�l �-�� c �i ��lC��;� I �L `S -�-c� � �n� � �< � .l:�cl� �11c1::��•tl�� Ilcsi��c�•, I��c. PMB 311, 5339 Prospect Road, San Jose, California 95129 Phone/Fax (408) 973-0162 July 6, 2010 City of Burlingame Special Permit Application. Structure height of 33-2" RE: B& S Vancouver, LLC, 1516 Vancouver project, Burlingame 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood? We are requesting the planning commission to allow the maximum roof elevation to be increased from 30' as stated in the City Ordinance to 33'-2". The style of this structure requires a steep pitched roof and we are proposing a 10 in 12 pitch slope. To comply with the 30' roof limit our roof slope would need to be reduced to 7 in 12. The existing structures on this street comprise an interesting blend of both low and step pitched roofs. There are also many varying styles. Our proposal will blend in both style and pitch of roof to many of the existing residences. Reduction of the slope to a much lower pitch will damage both the character of this structure and the blend of structures in the community. 2. Explain how the variety of roofline, fa�ade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood? As I stated above there is an interesting blend of many styles on this portion of Vancouver. Our proposal will blend nicely with its neighbors. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C. S. 25. 5 7) ? The style of the structure is along the traditional European lines and a steep pitch on the roof is in keeping with the style. There are many structures with similar styles and roof slopes along the street and this structure will be in keeping with the neighborhood feel. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any tree? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. We are proposing the removal of one camphor tree on the site as it conflicts with the footprint of the structure and the city arborist has requested that we replace the street tree. Our proposal includes the planting of 6 new trees. Two of those trees will be 24" box trees. ��'V �.L.f JUL 1 2 2010 CITY OF BURLINGAME ol_ANNING DEPT ,v . ., , ; _,o .. , . . . ,. . . , , ..-. � � . ,.w . . :. . - . F . . . `� :; � � � ; � .� �., �'a � -,.� � � � � p �,� . . � � , � �� '�A . �- ^�...��.. yr�' .. � * . .. �� e ,"�^�-^'� ' � °L_$ ga�'� . � . • _ , e .,r.: . � s....ti..� _ . .. . .�.,.....». ^ '.. .k ,s1rt'�+��' �.: � :: _ r , ^..�.. ".t. ` �. x 1 �� " �'' 3l �$ � � :� � � ,� ;'" � - � , � ' .r",�-��,.�,.�an ' �.."�� _... �� :3r_s. '�1 � +. �t �q�, .•�:�� . ,a� ��i#.y; ,,,�5'w .',�. � , e '+� k � .. N � �,' �,� u'�� t r „ �. �r . �� . _. .� � > y� �,�.;:� �+ f d ' .«. �, ��.: � _ �. . � .. 1�/2 r �� ___.._ �� _ '�, � �.� _. � � � � � �. ,, . s q � �,��- � �.�,� �t � s. a� �.x ' ._ .. : � t" ;��: _.. �"��'�� . - � �. 2y • �-z . :F. � x'�,� F"... g� •,t.. � . � �'Sa '� • < � -'`- `� � '�',�y , .y ..-�`�i �.. .. / � r✓ i� �" >�- ��„�,� � , �--. *" � � � �, � ;� � �'•_ � ._� ;�� +`ri�� _ �". ��; � � � �# � �.� �� r � �° ��r}w� �� f �f � '��,. � A�r � °� � -� �. . '�`� ° �.'....�C- ; ,�,� ,. /5�-� � �� . ... � � � �/p �..�G�v �/r �- �� s� U �,�N��. �ur�1✓U •��i � . �� ,Y � � [i.,it�, ."�r (.'1C `>3i �ii� ��i�.. .�P:. t �ffi�' �i Y(��( t ��11�`��r., * �� °� ��_ �� _ _ � �m �`�:� �"�� r, � � t,. : � � �f . �'�, � ��, � � �� '� ° �� ` � � ;;� �� . �,' �� .��a,�. .. �`�� . . . �� '�� , " .^�• m'.'� . »cc�`w, tnr o - � e. , a,s. x,.�•��_ _. � � ,�� ; � ��.� - � � � �� W � �� f < t, ,� -� `�.� , �� .. ;�'� � �' '�" � ` �. � a .� � �� '��_� �, � � �� .�.. � � .. ��, s� . �, � �� y � � � �., � � �� ; m y � �. s�� ° v�a, ,< f . `%�� . �� ' �i �.. � � � kW?�..�� " �. �,: „ ;:<.�:u x�. '� � �,'� � 2.t � tt � � �a' �F �" � �. .' ` °� � �y#� �� .,,, � �i- i ■ i ' � �' .. , � � r a� �` Il ■.��li �.� ��.p '� K1� �� x'� i!■ ! $��. � � ��.. � , �� A1 �-s 6 3i� ,�_ . �- g� � : ¢ . t � -��s �p ` «, 4 .�-{� #d � � K � --°...--g `� e .� .•��,�� ` `�, �� aE� q _`. ...._. � _ _ �� .�<. � g�"` . , a�,° � �q.. , � ., 4 . . .. .. a: .. .�.; �M� �^" �t'.�i.� � �:. , � $ 6 i�� 3 ay°"E.�`ae� �.� � � � �A� ��1'"� �/ �i � L�✓� l �a� lv ��4�-' �'��:� t��1�� . ,�, �'i�� f�y t�S l U�.J �� . r Project Comments Date May 24, 2010 To: d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: June 1, 2010 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/09/2010 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS �� "tw'�'s�'i Project Name:�� i�u�y Project Address: �'6 ��w"^��-k� The following requirements apply to the project 1 _�_ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) �'�{,1,�►:j�� ,�s��4 2 �_ The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. �Fj`� "l�� "�{ 5 _�� anitary sewer lateral �t is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ( ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the proj ect to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMIVIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project sha11 submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers t ermits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc �, .., ,,�._ , , � , ..� ,. .. . . ., � ;.,, rw... , , , ,... . � Pro ect Comments Date: To: From: Revised Plans Submitted July 12, 2010 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as noted on the review dated 5/26/2010 apply to this project. Reviewe�lc _by:_ _ ------ ��- C_ / , � � �� Date: � f�/��- p/o � Project Comments Date: To: From May 24, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 XChief Building Official (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: June 1, 2010 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after January 1, 2009 must complete a"GreenPoint Rated ChecklisY'. The GreenPoint Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL: http://www.burlinqame.org/Index.aspx?page=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at 650-558-7273. 3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 4) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 5) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 6) Indicate on the plans that all work shall be conducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See Citv of Burlingame Ordinance Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. 7) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2007 California Building Code for new structures. 8) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 9) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. �J Ml�Y � �i �. ;�, Clr�r o� ��Fc� � PI �' RJ�i � I 11) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 12) Indicate on the plans that the roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2008 California Energy Code. 2008 CEC §151 (f) 12. The 2008 Residential and Non-Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ 13) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 15) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 16) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88) 17) The plans show that the structure is three feet from the property line. To comply with the opening protection required in Table 704.8 the building face must be more than three feet from the property line or the gable end venting must be eliminated and attic ventilation must be achieved through other means. 18) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 19) Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance- rated construction per CBC 704.2. 20) Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (Table 602) 21) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with Table 704.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 22) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. Note: The area labeled " " is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 1541.1. 23) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 24) Provide one emergency escape and egress from each sleepinq room in the basement area. Sec. 1026.1. On the plans provide details for the window well as required by Sec. 1026.5 and for the required ladder access from this area as described in Sec. 1026.5.2. Provide complete details for a guardrail around this opening at grade level. 25) Water heaters and furnaces located in closets adjoining rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must comply with the provisions of CPC Section 505 and CMC Section 904. In addition to other requirements each appliance must be located in a closet that is for the exclusive use of that appliance. Provide plans which show compliance with these code requirements or re-locate these appliances in an area of the building where code compliance can be achieved. 26) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 27) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 28) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 29) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 11, 20 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: Brooks MacNeil Date: 5/26/10 Project Comments Date: Revised Plans Submitted July 12, 2010 To: 0 City Engineer (650) 558- 7230 � Chief Building OfFicial (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff � Recycting Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558- 7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: N/A ,� Gt� (�� 'e�- d��C. GJ� � �t �� e� �/ ��-�� a P.�.�. � ��, � �. � � � Reviewed by: �� Date: 7/ j� /td / ( Project Comments Date: To: From: May 24, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558- 7254 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: June 1, 2010 1. No tree over 48" in circumference may be removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7334) 2. City street tree is in decline and will require a 15 gal size or larger replacement is same general area. Choose tree from attached list. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 5/26/10 �� BURLIfVGAME l - -�: 1 - �\� '.x. _'w . CITY OF BURLINGAME - PARKS DIVISIO�i, 558-7330 850 BURLINGAME AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-2858 OFFICIAL STREET TREE LIST - MAY 2010 TREES TO BE USED UNDER PRIMARY UTILITY LINES r�cinr usA Site Height at Min Botanical Name Common Name Locations Maturitv S acin Description Acer buergeranum Trident M�ple W�shington Park Rose Garden 20-25 25' DI:CIDUOUS: Moderate growth; rotmdish crown; glossy, tltree- lobed leaves.lall color. * Acer rubrum Red Maple Id�O Capuchino 40-;p' 3;' DF:CIllUOiJS: Fast gro�mth: lobc;d, shin�� green leaves; shorn• flowers; bnlliant lall color Geijera pan�itlora Australiau Willorr Wells Far�o Bank (Broad��a� j, 2�-30' 30' EVF?R(TRF;EN: Moderate growth; gracetiil branches; fine tettnred 1] 7 Ba��s�� ater leaves: st frce. Gingko biloba Maidenliair tr�e =30�. �09 F31ock Ba��swater Ave. 30-50' 40' DECIDUOIJS: Slo��- gro��th; tan sha}�d leaves tuni y�ello�� in fall: 1240 Cabrillo s readin , almost umbrella lonn. Koelrauteria bipi�uiata Chinese Flame Tree 209 Victoria, 1 14J F3alboa 20-ti�' 35' I)I?CII)IJOiJS: Slo�� to moderate gro��th; clusters of ��ello�� flo�vers; leaves �ello�� in fall, dro � i�ite. Koelrcuteria paniculata Uolden Rain Tree 1�28 �Iow°ard 2U-�>' 35' DECII)UOiJS: SIo�� to moderate gro��th; ��eilow tlowers: le�ves readisli in s rin dull- rcen in siuivner. Lagerstrontia indica Crape M�rtle Pershin� Park, 1325 Ih�ake 20-�U' 2S DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; spring foliage li�ht green tin�;�d bronze red; red flo�tiers Jul��-September: �ello« fall color. Magnolia gra�idiflora Magnolia 'St Man�' 1700 Sherman 20-40' 25' EVERGRI?EN: Moderate to fast grow�th: ��hite flo�ti�ers: sunilar to Southern Magnolia, but smaller. (*Itequires 6' wide & over �lanter stri . Maytenus boaria Ma�ten Tree j]]5_ 1301, & 1462 Burlingame 20�{0' 2S E�RURL'EN: Slo�� to moaerate �ro��rth: pendulous graceY�ul Av�-' brancli�� Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 2�Qi liaston, 121 Costa Rica Av� 30-40' 4��' DFCII�UOUS: Moderate g��yth; large, dark greeu leaves, brilliant fall color. Pittosponim undulatum Victorian Bo� 1201 & 1230 Burlingame Ave 3p�p' 40' t;VERGREIiN: Moderate gio��th: fragrant ��hite flo��•ers oloss�� leaves; round headed. * Ylatanus acerifolia London Plane 603 Pl}niouth 40-60' -J�' DI:CIDUOUS: Fast grot�th; largc, lobed, maple like lea�es: sheds S�camore old bark: ne�� bark smooth creain colored. Pnmus cerasifera Pur��le I,eaf Plum 1320 I,incoln, Village Yark 20' 1 S DF.CIDUOUS: Moderate gro�vtlt: copper�� lea��es: light pink Eastmoor side 1320 Lincol�i Av�; tlo�vers ui s rin� Pvruscalleryana Flowering Pear 1(i17IIo�ard, 2112 Adelitte 25-35 2S DIiCIDUOUS: Fast gro�i7lt; upright forni; masses ��hite tlowers in `Aristocrat' s rin�, red leaves in fall. Sapium sebifenuu Chinese Tallo�� 2009 Deeerauy Drive 35' �10' DECIDI.JOUS: Moderate to Cast gro��th; dense, round cro��n; outstandin� lall color * Plantar �v�idth mt�st be at least 48" Project Comments Date: To: From: May 24, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 X Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: June 1, 2010 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: c� t� Date � � (� �� Project Comments Date: To: From: May 24, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558- 7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 X NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-170 Staff Review: June 1, 2010 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as appropriate) for readability. For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. Reviewed by: � U.�� = Date: �J ; 1�S I 1 D o� � M'4 i;�i%��:. S�wm.r.iv 2 Pollalioo Pmeeew pmgam � YT a� ��_� /i.= <. �-.. �_ � _ _ -- _ � `�� _ General '''��'. CoIISY[llCt10II & Site Supervision ��..e.�.'eo�...a ma�ee ,�.��ae r,, en �,-�� ; �,�.,�o�,.� . �.�.�..�.a� ,�„�a�..,.,��.K m��'.�m. ��a�do,r„� . �. ,�.�....�.,o,peaw�...,o...� ;..K�, �.:..ed,�,,.,_�.�mv.�. ��,�.�.�,�.aaK,.�.�,. �.oti �..��w � � m..��.�,a. �.m _ !T^: mYe.v�>rm+m we.<�e,m... at.t� ebs��sa�wlWoab�tara�ta9w awRe Mm+a�nrtpN�exwunrper�q�uplNtla � /�� obely m�W� ru fa mn V�W^4��RAeM �Aw"sL oJ rwme Wq�we� � ll�JaPmwlvea�4wtll�wYaw�Y 6en �m�an� v�>b�m Mi� vkb, mtl yeron� Jsre�y ' Wmywr�.Qu�a �IRp e��sriL� wi M i�e nN - prtrt�i rv�oQ .� �x .o.�. ca.R �.,.�m wa �� w o, .� a ��. w. «w n �., e..w<.. s> � wW� eQ eqeed wfi¢ P6n �nY m .um �w�a..�.r r.,.... �.. wart �1hY iw'snJ Mwd �w(w Jal �Y�in r LLrm hia aee4. m Wreb.IfP�.wm� 11u.M� e ateW. �.a ww+M w�r.w4.., W ..r...iw.. � w.. wu�� / �eu rr Iol�. �.q. �rl ahn FIW msedlazN w 1 Ju wl avnvuiWc W u O��•m'ra lo�� midK n wrod x`4ao. U1e M' ckax sNei .luem w�.bie. 1lrv� mm we ..w. u.e lm ��6b W wV J¢ Jux Jwi JCo.<� aN v�In�L G�mnn�n. C1rti 6m+�W 16 k.ka. Rxe Jev.Kr�.N.� rvaf� or m�nx rl�� urp� w v�a�:.r.w,y.�,..a..ada w..Nr+. orn. yeTsw. A WuM loa n �cwmmOeE M P��w wws. oriy.w. n..., am w�. aa.pm y ma� i� m.. m w. �uaae. �u. �wtr .w. w�e+ei. mn.o a. �.�.a m �ow �^h��6 erdv bY W Is�mt mmp.vy.M Mt wna kds.+o�*� afpmp�n�'. as[ `rilea 6<Zmy ror �u4/ �� UUL �r..�� .�..b.� - �;.imi3...� .r. Ya mlci min�W.Ordv adY Ibeuom�>�w s�d /U�e�.M'dil+kmio:.I.�Frn..eM�T.e Am. fw v�h-ro ef �.e.:YbM m�viW rvr1 n eoQ�e�e,R �+CW4+�*Tuevl. yM1e�ii �Frawi. c!e�M ve� daean o�p¢ ierk m! . W h m W u�:a m W� W W�� 1NI.s�(5eve,Wroiee.vdmv lD4pwc ot u wa.µ..y,� ��Qa. �y.y ��h, '+tir �oms��ia e+aWi W.ub cm Ee rcryckd .a�d�ell•a.�v...vn.F.w te'v�.. •'mrl. �uN, Notn ay��F al «an�u. �aW. atl ck.uN rt,�eo- a. M,.�,x..n e�e,�. �a,.,m,� x�.�Kke mv .. �vv�. e.aw o. e:a..e n.. Y.n�duu w.�k N�us� bury �vk m�n"o4 w le��e 0am u Wa �Ycei or vw � ush a v�ca bed. Stormwater Pollution Prevention I'rogram Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! Runoff from streets and other pavzd azeas is a majot source o: pollutiou in local creeks, Sau Fraucisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Construction activities can duectly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensure your compliance wi[h local stormwater ordinance requiremcnts. Remember, ongoing morutoring and maintenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwork & Paving F resh Concrete Painting & Application Equipment Ac�vi�ias J�. Operation 0 Ie II+uYC ad Dr.+�e�. .eL'J. vy.�m.es �uu�p,�, �wqu�rymmi.ea ve or iec cm..w�- Me oM �dl �.n54en �v�w m�bv Mvu idrn fm a�uo aN yuqsml pvtivs, rclue 4�� mC �voom �el4Y a o! �u�pcs �menan. ! AWw.aN �<hicle atlYea..qui�oue Wpmfe- qumil�la ud rey�r IeCi. ��wn�..�.rv:�.,a,<ba..aa �ipmeY �uh�n{ aHYt �u �.Wa,�..e,�p�.�,b..a.w:ia..da nm. e, mc � e.y� pu, a mw wm� a �.a� dw m.ww rdidi.0 m�. me.. sa<o �etr+w avucm, m ��ryek �4a..vpa.rLe, x �*o� or eMm., m.ao.a .,.,� � ne,a� n. a�.K� a w��. a��.o:�a�a Wv. J AscKY utl.aM1id� patwa�, Cfm W TJL umdiuVl wie M bOP�u � xW.... co� mo. u„f w•.�. amv.�et �r; .w�nw�e..�wal,x��.�Ma.�mc`. .Lw.bo� mne:.yui tim, vWanp).6u�... wsmk. [r�w �n � �...w. ��a�.y, o t� J S��eW W �pilleEb�'miavL�ms�Eveh Nema4 ra�ueu 1�N �nan ��af v�M tay.� I�my rMx Vaa r FWe w�� u pmW� fwem aonn� ! CM y� � �4 m�4rt vmby di{�eKy� md p�eJ> 4+poa�o(mMomd+oiL JR.��m,:rn�f t.Tilhmu�erol��m��MLmw�� ' �ww.Nraou.��.dMm.e�qan +� ��Ea��Mm�a alb+rtlan w�ol�b. bc�qlq eJ.To iepan ��0�1 ne foliewi.t a�eaelc: 1)UJ 911xroo.lanl m�s.Y��n. ])Ca0 ds Gv�vo�'a Omce of Pmer�ac� $mta Wapip� �.. Poo) �sl.vesa a� mn.�. .,� . •s . . . . f �..�_�.�-� ,,�.,w�,a��.�,�,.��,�. «..�aa ! s.adwe e.....e�. w p.m.y.oh rnM•�.c �amo..c4m��nua,.w..sw.ewiwxhoew Jn.wWr.��mm.iea..am�.�.i..u�fwromw �y�. !� mm.ywem�m.�api�.advutiyKR��. y 6m J.auu�rcJw �iq. /Savo�MaV�4�•e•��e.r..av��awsae. Jwhmrcfu�lioa�r.sbcl./wwo�am+Wmrc.munbe �bma.�er.m.,mKrio.n.a�,,.ry�q. y +wa.o�,up.i..�e�p.xir�er.�e.�.F..,.,� 4midm traot vL aysb. JPnieam.wop�JrmF«v.a..euw...Ewa JlbvamxAisel��bM�trirmmelmW�a AaawidFaYWI¢�mppuY�+�[em'+k4Wt Pu: ��a�mawnasi+msN61a. �RaxLu�lo6.)uwk4mmsw.Foluui�l•c vYmnapoakk lU.e�6xkEww4tbnmtivmmsMfuwut�unr JT��Cbn��liArbrman�wwR..y��y �+d w�,�.,� O�vi� Cuan�um JC fwebPesuEunv�ufmdsi0iecuedtrp+a lA.vMprL6aE�elemriotwR.v�b.n.�M.i� ��^6 lCMvmlwl )hmmA'rticbinwhmroGyvC l/��'atalYmaeAaadm�ieWnafiamwadiadimm �d�OY•��I�+lfosuil.ec I lw•"�Cc+4 alw. o� em�v w iB.m �wrt �wq JhwM'�mbuolem�iwaeislima(matl� lf..u.vhe.weveri.l6mupeud-.pyeryecee- rou.�.ro�.�.e�ry .,..Q,�uu�w,oww�..w.,an�,�:..cd- Im u4 rtqck, v Eupo.� w din wa ! Ce.ciahyilv s eJv cm�wmm m�qi�y.ip GmeM Bsms txYe� V� �arP- Pw� Guw'viufuG aod N�.�e w.Q.i�l JJrM�vu.�ew.mlv+4uF•vhb.3Sw6a. �yYreo6aoL�Ic�6cmvWb.z�u. J CaML hip, fim onv.:rb 4y qu w ab[vpen smi�� JFofimmlaqipxarepainmwfbmed.FM1�ve Ida�hnyV..t711u0�iWa�ucGz.Laswuuw. J O�m W all N��1� mmF'M� mciEeNfryh �wea�tiotQ•ba�e�wwdom..a�m�v.�u •tidxv,,.w�wx,¢q.aaew..d�.,.o..�..t.d. hdw�w�ik.oh.Wo��vmpietlrh•medm�wry u�NvLL Gvm�wa �Ya'un J Cdka.�d �ec�le m qpopuwb dvpor dum. .t�:..s,..aa..me. �w.a�.u.mai�i,�e,;�n.w.�.�,,;p,...�ar,n. �nmamer.�qw�iwMmwcua�maw<mnd. �� ':�, �� -�'! ;l�y<<<.!� � r -�� . � �Y,- �� , � �/ �Z��.. Landscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance 111 lil e�e x+.uw n.� nea�m J riV aY WdE DWi POEecM1 aW �uwi a�p Oem Cae�Ievl�rAWr LL.NnRawM1UA.a�lnm.LW4resNue6wo JGaYxTe�atlYe�v�me�be�RYr�P�ae N�^p.Um.m.wl.�wa.O+.o4clam[fWMaus JP�w��unb��•..�l+wb`4xusoeoY�a..iM.d bdLdrraW.erwini��wEermm.Ra �fias EunAms.aiaWmwhN�omNof�i�Gw'Ew� �wbrNaw�hmuJe�bm�anxuedyWueaeyv, ni�[aYa.i�6Pwa�6.macLivm.roy w mo4cJi��(�rvuc�ymvtralf�nm.,ue JSawbwefamm[�flu P��ltt lYbrepvaJe.fwLan.aeubv.Ymi.abi�bwav ibcyveWn.HewuvYk T Ia��4Mww.Rcobinn �'vJ-lL�.naaeuro..daa.�H6mpeera.�m M1i�el�ekvq trw,nvl+4uGiwart. JNm�iel�vOmJmaw�qWe�Wwr�Yua JSdRAJe�ralY�aluuvxWeN�FafvJrY��.+Yw. J`F�Awwonnenivmoiyisdm�mN�Wm..m �trtKfuMa��a�tr�u.xaYe�s J Ur �m�pwary �Y�k 6� w diK�v M i�en ruellm� dlo'+N6wOwJeva�awNOovbermoloe+[ lYu�4rt.WdVW4➢�uawMubeae0�e�uvx G.uJuay�.im rv��'+w.an.lno.cn.e.nwwh�pa.�er.. om.bk�l4mcwnersver�ae.>we..«w � Wa�eM1M1ew�vw�itk.+sy�i....bwbww�°e fiemArcbavm.rw�au�b�ev. Jfmiec.er�ei.bi.kn.w��.16Dah�v�Naev� ExtWovl[anbuastl�amlfppuOl�+Wmllbm Vv wD>�l�i�pduw�Ja4. womuidtlmh�'timuc�ua 1�. �wt s!m @�6a dr�n�[v Gnba x�eew,. � r. ea� p.;,u, o....,. e.,,,c„ a u...,w � l Ilaqetiy� n u o<�IIM !a� of �rv�Im �weol br �°[C�muLo� .31eW.h..iviWJrmvvwlr.mW�p�q.riWaiw, u�iie JW'I1waT�artM1eFewae�eweaae�tWmttv�W F�bmEm�eOlmmuEet�MtDLpe�aNs`eaf w�e.G+Y. bPuO�se.eW�u�wNauxru. L�It�pu✓Ga�Me}4:.buaa ! Ur 4�id�. W fNb Lb.l i:acian. R:..s lS�Wavtl4a+k�mallni'amwmRVYnryqwc /�u��evonl um+.Wwe�ve.unvi��efnml trW �bi�. ! �alv� diry uN Ju�� 6an �n.�mrbu trY �PDe[ rmul�minM. m�F. ud � W Wuce{ m�Y E� a.ap y v milc,sJ w VW�i J Wkv�lu�i�F W Jb bns+q' wwdn�W emMatioa bv➢ eYA� vE dfOaN Nu ea�L J U+p�s� A uwal VucMv a nuvJm wuk. � �Ml�etar4n�e�.wtEowWsbimry>'sb ✓e�u�aysiue�4.W. J Re.m� ap�eyK .vY 4n� da �erayip�o.o..vrriov �mn*�s.a. anw. tb..,i�.M..a �„aaM ud m�'vuo din. � n.a wr w.: ww.. �rmm cwo-w ao.o.wa w w+W��en�,y;.R�...v�,.eeexb�r e��k. Ns�bwdWP��x�dwaertl�emrhw. � �oN 0..mmJi.'a IfaY WumWi�wa. �a��evaOunwMnlmWi(+WEWmew. J0.knM1�skiK�DMruf_he�vaupi�k4��11Ue�i¢a udwesniFeR °�`�`{�esiWrcmtmw�tiea lMu4rrdqWN! �d^WKPM*h� RiaulNSeiP�d4Co0d9md: �p.ewetMv.miwneL . l�mdrallwrvfi J.WkewreWkmWnmaudoe�inmoel�mWnwYE �MJ'��m�6+ebMWakn�oevwa�aWOfill. • MnEovedmOa�J'umbnew.Kwb. v'sf+OawoQ ♦.�ae.N-ew�m� Irm.cinc�q.wme.bwwsWne....�uuq.seu.a �q'�'orma�.iwuiexu�vD1'wocrec[�wt . ovieeeu.n�t.e�.,a.ww nva�*r�mdm.o.<wmns admmvud.mA �tk.e�..m.owwm��.�y�.amawu..,y �n....wy.�w,.n...�a.....n.�.�:i. nxp meWNi Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! JC1miolT+iw.vipyoiroide..MrdIMwGJv lf.oB�.+swawFvd..ciMsc.v�ltwa�.edoa liam vviz pW a PtlW cm�apu� katl or Cipuryl ur��r�iqy lTp If �¢.m.Yy. vtl mmpn be d'ymd efv Moµy� �ruf. lNTui a�nim '�Uow�p4aY+rdwvanpnv�.laumuuw.irt �9pnllttckavnt4JW�L� wiWGt1 cwWtl�lava�kraT�[.Imc�ppmVuli�a5 w., .,�.,.em.k��..s.e..u;a.,4.�.e� ....rowwewmw�we.vw�i.o,.o,Ht. .�.wy.u.Ma.w.a.eKn.we.ioa..,m„�, e.w.wua�.my,,..�.a.w. wwrnmmU;ner.ea.arw wo��R •.cwoJ�uldi�YeNm:F+a�.rvdWa•bLL�omtuT lDo�et6M�rNeln.e.ve.inaW�Rt. er.�`ouVWR uf iEe..vuay 6e�rywdb ui4i �4 �ssu v.rmeia��6er"vym�qv,dcnia PoeUFuuoivSy�Main�mer� � N��e m.i;�:"��.. R.,i _ r...n.. a. �...� a. �uT��XAma�pW6�berer/io01e �wwwJr�. � KaYak Etpex ol euna v�la-Yesd Met �t � M�sebeNlvrrda+.�xk.W4��i..f.eA'y.o.u.e.p. JwMu'MmY�I*as.p.4�rAlvati..qnie[v5�n w�..w�r.2uw�.�r�ryr.mronw+w..� im�..rr,�.c��k..eMm�.:�.�.a.xr.e. �4np,uENWeqyOY�d+MiMafaW� �aPEm.eetrveWtlerlyeuyywucaaamm s�.m.a.x„r�,ann ,`.,. Ilteiwlafnretoll�EseGWb�UW�afatmlYpl4 JQIeeeNNvynm�f'leb�tl��L�WnWemiwy m�uwaaea.,�s.wa...�+,a ....,;v,uMaenym��,��-+ai�m�.�i,w�n)M rvn�'v� a Iue u�� atiry JY w ie� ryv �Imw j�w �S�PetlHam�w��Cw�bctRtn045�Mum tivu cA�r �ms� rwx� rvm,�, Ryw,K R�u.� wn...�a�...« awdn J Do en ur eappv-l.W �Pael� [wud Jtr' •im ��ro•wlou�fl.ium�vh..Aknt.mnm.lmme o4weanu..y4..,�mumppv.e...aYW�4ed- ynt radrc.0e<k�l ye�awbr CWD> Y\wfiY b W�ulie IIRe ud eevet N 'e..r•wo-.r. 'R"u�,�e�v,r mvvw.��.o...aya....c.em�v�� RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Design Review and Special Permit for heiqht for a new, two-story single familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1516 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, Bart Gaul, 232 Dwiqht Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, property owner, APN: 026-034-170; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Auqust 23, 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23�d dav of August, 2010 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit. 1516 Vancouver Avenue Effective September 2, 2010 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 5, 2010, sheets 1 through 6, L1.0 and Boundary and Topography Map; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 14, 2010 and May 26, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's June 9, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's May 26, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's July 14, 2010 and May 26, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 25, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit. 1516 VancouverAvenue Effective September 2, 2010 sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. o CITY OF BURLIi�IGAME ; ' COIViMUNI�' DE'dELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRINiROSE ROAD - - , �� BURLINGAPAE, CA 94010 :_ - "�' PH: (650) 558-7250 B FAX: (650} 69b 3790 - - wvvw.burlingame.org _ ;°; - Sit�: 1515 VANCOUi/ER AVENUE � � '� The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the foilowing puhlic hearing on MONDAY, AUGUST 23, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Applicatian for Design Review and Special Permit far height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1516 VANCOUVER AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-034-170 Mailed: Augusfi 13, 20i0 jPlease refer to other side) - -� �: _ _ . . - ,� - � �� -- �If1/ Of �d.91"Old�� A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. !f ��o� cha!!enge the sub;ect applicatior(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or sameone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for iniorming their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank yeu. William Mesker Comrriunity Developmer�t Director ��L�� + N�� (Please rzfer to other side)