The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1480 Vancouver Avenue - Staff Report (2)Item # 8 Design Review Study City of Burlingame Coizditio�zal Use Permit for Re-einergence of Two Parcels Previously Merged by a Siizgle Faniily Dwelling; Design Review for Two New, Two-Story Single Family Dwellings With Detacl:ed Garages, ai:d a Special Permit for Decli�zing Heiglzt Envelope at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lot 39 Address: 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40 Meeting Date: 06/13/OS Request: Conditional use permit for the re-emergence of two parcels previously merged by a use, design review for two new, two-story dwellings with detached garages and a special permit for declining height envelope at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lot 39. Applicant and Designer: James Chu, Chu Design & Engr., lnc. APN: 026-044-210 Property Owners: Robert and Cynthia Gilson Lot Area: 5994 SF, Lots 39 and 40 General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Summary: The site is located at the southeast corner of Vancouver Avenue and Adeline Drive and is a single parcel with a submerged lot line. Lot 39 is on the right side and Lot 40 is on the left side (corner lot). There is an existing two-story, single-family dwelling built across Lots 39 and 40 and a detached garage on Lot 40 that provides covered parking for the dwelling. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to demolish the existing dwelling and detached garage on the site, causing the two existing standard lots to re-emerge. Each lot measures 5,994 SF where the minimum lot sizc for thc arca is 5000 SF. Each lot has 50' of street frontage. 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 39 The floor area for the new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage proposed at 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 39 will be 3,417 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,418 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes exemptions for covered porch and chimneys). Three parking spaces, two covered (20' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for this five-bedroom house. The proposed detached two-car garage (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) meets the on-site parking requirement. One uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 40 The floor area for the new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage proposed at 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 40 will be 3,162 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,168 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes exemptions for covered porch and chimneys). Two parking spaces, one covered (10' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20'), are required for this four-bedroom house (den qualifies as a bedroom). The proposed detached one-car garage (15' x 20' clear interior dimensions) meets the on- site parking requirement. One uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The following applications are required: • Conditional use permit for two (2) re-emerging standard lots (C.S. 25.28.030,5); • Design review for two new, two-story single family dwellings at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40 (C.S. 25.57); and • Special permit for declining height envelope at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lot 39 (left side encroaches by 145 SF, 5' x 29') (C.S. 25.28.035,c). CUP for• re-emerging lots, Design Review foi- Two, New Two-story Dwellings 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40 and Special Per•mit for DHE Trees An arborist report was prepared by Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc., dated April 11, 2005, which provides information for all existing trees on Lots 39 and 40, as well as trees located in the City's public right-of-way. Lot 39 - There are a total of 12 trees on Lot 39 (ranging in size from 2 to 46 inches in diameter). The applicant is proposing to remove one, protected size 46-inch Deodar cedar tree and nine, unprotected size trees (2 to 8 inches in diameter). The east side of the 46-inch Deodar cedar tree has been cut for line clearance and the limbs are heavy and brittle. The arborist report notes that safety of the tree has been compromised, the tree is mature and will start to fail. The City Arborist reviewed the arborist report and the proposed landscape plan. In his memo dated May 18, 2005, he notes that a tree removal permit will be required for removal of the existing 46-inch protected size Deodar cedar tree. The applicant is proposing to plant five, 24-inch box size trees throughout the site. Lot 40 - There are a total of eight trees on Lot 40 (ranging in size from 2.9 to 14 inches in diameter). The applicant is proposing to remove three, unprotected size trees (3.9 to 14 inches in diameter). The City Arborist reviewed the arborist report and the proposed landscape plan and had no comment. The applicant is proposing to install six, 24-inch box size trees throughout the site. The arborist report notes that protective fencing shall be installed around the existing trees to remain and that fencing shall be removed without authorization from the project arborist and City's arborist. Utility trenching shall not be done within fenced areas without approval of the projects' arborist. Street Trees - There are a total of eight street trees in the City's right-of-way along Vancouver Avenue and Adeline Drive. Along Vancouver Avenue, there are four Sycamore trees (14.1 to 22.0 inches in diameter). Along Adeline Drive, there are two Sycamare trees (15.8 and 16.3 inches in diameter), one Stone pine tree (31.2 inches in diameter) and one Pear tree (11.7 inches in diameter). All of the existing street trees will remain. To protect the street trees during construction, the arborist report requires fencing along the project side of the sidewalk and that the protective fencing shall not be moved without authorization from the project arborist and City's arborist. Utility trenching shall not be done within fenced areas without approval of the projects' arborist. The development data tables for each proposed dwelling and detached garage at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40, follow. Information was provided for the existing house to use as a comparison. Because the existing house and detached garage are located on a double lot and each of the proposed houses would be located on a single standard lot, the FAR and lot coverage for the existing house is based on the total area of the two lots combined (11,988 SF). 2 CUP for re-emerging lots, Design Review for Two, Netiv Two-story Dwellings 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40 and Special Permit for DHE 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 39 Lot Area: 5,994 SF Existing Proposed Allowed/Required SETBACKS _ . _ _ _ _ ... _ _._ . . _; _ _ Front (Ist flr): 40'-0" 20'-2" ' 20'-2" average of block (2nd flr): 40'-0" 25'-2" 20'-2" _.._.... :............. _.. ......... _........ Side (left): n/a 4'-0" 4'-0" (right): n/a 10'-0" 4'-0" _. ._ _ _ :. _ __ Rear (Ist flr): n/a 44'-4" 15'-0" (2nd flr): n/a 48'-4" 20'-0" __ __ ___ _ _ _ _. _.. : Lot Coverage: 1879 SF' 2079 SF 2398 SF 15.7% 34.6% 40% FAR: 2940 SF' 3417 SF 3418 SF2 0.25 FAR 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR _. _... . _. _ _. ..._ i _. __....... i. __...... # of bedroo»:s: n/a 5 --- Parki�ig: 2 covered 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') HeigJit: two stories 29'-9" 30'-0" DHE�zvelope: n/a ; special permit required3 ; see code encroa.ches 145 SF along left side ' lntormation obtained from the San Mateo County Assessor's Office Appraisal Report and Metroscan; percentage based on area of the combined lots (11,988 SF) 2 (0.32 x 5994 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3418 SF (0.57 FAR) 3 Special permit for declining height envelope at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, Lot 39 (left side encroaches by 145 SF, 5' x 29') � CUP for re-emerging lots, Design Review for Two, New Two-story Dwellings 1480 vancouver Avenue, Lots 39 and 40 and Special Permit fo�� DHE 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 40 Lot Area: 5,994 SF Existing Proposed Allowed/Required SETBACKS __.... _ _ ....... _ _ _....... _;... _....... Froizt (lst flr): 40'-0" 20'-2" '��! 20'-2" average of block (2nd flr): 40'-0" 25'-8" 20'-2" _ _ _ __ _:. ___ __ : _ _ Side (exterior-1 S' flr): n/a 8'-0" 7'-6" (exterior — 2"d flr): n/a 13'-6" 12'-0" average (riglzt): n/a 4'-6" 4'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ : ; .. __ _ _ Rear (lst flr): n/a 43'-10" 15'-0" (2izd flr): n/a 43'-10" 20'-0" _ _ _. _..... _...... .. _.... .... . Lot Coverage: 1879 SF' 2026 SF 2398 SF 15.7% 33.8% 40% _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. FAR: 2940 SF' 3162 SF 3168 SFZ 0.25 FAR 0.53 FAR 0.53 FAR __ _ . ___ _ ; _ _ __. # of bedrooms: n/a 4 --- _._.. _ __. _... :...... _. _.... ;.. __..._.. _..._.. Parki�:g: 2 covered 1 covered 1 covered (15' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ___ _ _ _ _..._ : .. _ . ;_ _ _ _ _ Heiglzt: two stories 27'-2" 30'-0" DHE�:velope: n/a complies see code ' lntormation obtained from the San Mateo County Assessor's Office Appraisal Report and Metroscan; percentage based on area of the combined lots (11,988 SF) z (0.32 x 5994 SF) + 900 SF + 350 SF = 3168 SF (0.53 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached. Ruben Hurin Planner c. James Chu, Chu Design & Engr., Inc., applicant and designer � �a� CITY o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLJNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 `''b,,,,m,,,,,,�.''�' www.burlingame.org Site: 1480 VANCOUVER AVE, LOT 39 & 40 Application for conditional use permit for re- emerging lot line, design review, and one special permit for declining height envelope for two (2) new, two-story single-family dwellings w/ detached garages at: 1480 VANCOUVER AVE, LOT 39 & 40, zoned R-1. (APN: 026-044210). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, June 13, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed: June 3, 2005 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ' �a�`:: I I - �, : . . <� • x •`� CY _ � . _. li� ;�, ; � CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application and ��lans for this�project��i�►ay be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at' 5hl Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the �subject��pplication(s) in court, you may�� be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice'o",r in writte� �ot�respori�lence delivered to the city at or rior to,,the ublic ,earin T. ��`�: ` P P h � �� . �=<. �.$. _ - . ;�� _. _ Property ow �rs who receive this riotice aretresponsible for informing their tenants��bout this notice. Eor additic�nal information, please call (650) 558-7�50 : Thank you. ;; � . _ -�k `'r .�3 i�"; � �,. � � � �:_. �. ; r �� h Margaret Monr�� `�` �, _ ,� � �Ci City Planner R r* �`'� �,.:�� r.�,: ��,j`( '� >>�,¢. � �:: . ` .I�4 l � �.. T A � •4^y="' PUBLIC `HEA�1�+_G��TICE (Please refer to other side) CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEL. (650) 558-7250 FAX. (650) 696-3790 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: James Chu Ruben Hurin, Planner Bob & Cynthia Gilson COMPANY: Chu Design & Engr., Inc. FAX NUMBER: (650) 345-9287 (650) 401-7979 RE: 1480 Vancouver — Lot 39 DATE: May 19, 2005 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES: 13, including the cover sheet ❑ URGENT Q FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE James, Attached please find my plan check comments for the project at 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 39. Because additional information and clarification is required, this project is incomplete at this time. In the comments, you will find requests for additional information and clarification on the plans (asterisked items). Once these items have been addressed on the plans, please submit one set of plans for our review. This project requires a conditional use permit for demolition of a structure built over two subdivided lots and a special permit for declining height envelope. The filing fees were paid, but the forms were not completed. Forms can be found at www.burlinqame.orq. Please include these forms with your resubmittal. Also attached are preliminary comments from the City Arborist, City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, NPDES Coordinator and Recycling Specialist. If any of these comments require changes which will affect the design of the house, they need to be addressed now. Otherwise, their comments can be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Please call them directly if you have any questions regarding their comments. The City Arborist notes that a tree removal permit is required to remove the existing 48-inch diameter on Lot 39. The tree removal permit must be approved prior to Planning Commission review. Please call the Parks Department at (650) 558-7230 for more information regarding the application. If you should have any questions regarding the plan check comments, please feel free to call me at (650) 558-7256. Regards, Ruben Hurin, Planner 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME CA • 94010 Job Address: Date of Plans: Job Description: �o: �'.yE!1 City of Burlingame Planning Department (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 1480 Vancouver Avenue — Lot 39 April 29, 2005 (N) SFD � -. r� Page: � ��.-,� �, �z—� � �.v - , � — � � �'s� G� � .� �� "�,� �Frj :] �r�„-= �.- �n, - �O�_2�� -- �� ,��1 � �" -.� �_ "_Zh 2�->' �;� ';.� 4� !' � _ �' ,,.', n � (- . � - � ��' ✓ '+; � . . __ ` �' - �"' ' . � /' ' - � ,_. . �-,r,� �z�„, , i - l � !�'_(i' ✓i'' _ - - �' �, r, - � . /, :o �`�, 7" _. � ` � , � r . r� i ` _ �.- , � � � ,,�,� -- _� . � (o�_-�, Y g�l a, -� ; _ �_,�-.� � �-�- , � � V, _ ��r� � -�?��;�: � ; ., � , . '� .� _ � . , .. � r _ -- r ,�' -� ' . .. c cr _ _ ._ �4gv �anrAv��. Avc - (..o� 3� 1�� : ? _ _ 3. ��oo✓ �rFGi- �A�i�iD C�,32x 5`�'1�1�' )-�-1�00+ 4an= 3�i��' CO,S� FA t21 �►'D�� _ Z d��l'�' (lS-�- 1`Ir, c q�pra 1 �( � - _ -- - _ . i � _ -- --- _ in 44 (z�' � 3�� - --- _ zL2,s C1S� � 1-1'- (��1 � �iG3 � �Z�c� .i�oar> I _ _ - + �5;� ��Z��13'� 3s 42�' — -- - ---- - z 5 �� l�_,v� n e`��-- - ---- - ------- U� -- - --- I oo C��P.v� d �arc(,� �i,,,._��lvn> 3�i-►� o�� r��) - � . - -- ---- ' �� l � e S _ w.�-a'_1.�- F ft r2 , . . �- - �, B�; �d;�� +��_�+- -- -- --- -- -- � -�-o,p o -� w r � : C� I , � d � �' � � � �'`�_ � L Z- _ � I ,1-� � � -- - _ PropvS�d ' _g�'��I�-� Z�.1� _ �Iv� $� (Z�l'-`�") 1 (�1a A-I��w-c �I � �1, ►1' � �a' = ( ► I, 1�' �3a'i �=- -- -- - — -- ' �o � I � cs ,a � -� � � � ; l� i' � �P�1�_n_n ��'�' �nve�v�.e, ��'i�> i� ��,r-iS �� R� a r-Ivv� •, LQ-�'�' - C�'o. �'+ 11. q3`i�Z =�`�, 11 � �,9�.� - (�2 Z,��. �� r�yZ= �a.�� S � �',�_c �A� �Pv m� � �� ro��r� c) (S xL°l�� Q'S� n�o�� 1� +� ; � c� e e X-��5 �k'�o� � �� City of Bu�lingame Planning Department (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) � - -� Job Address: � `� r �� ;' , ,� � ; ,, . � , ; _ - Page: 3 / � / ,- �O� � lx Y .� �� — V�; P Q 4 . _ � . " � �� '.� . .. �� . .�. . - ' � �., �� . j - � ��j. � � . , . �, �, J L'.. / f e �J, �� - " � - � �, � . � � T � � '_ � �' � . , J� � . ' . - _ . . --� . - .,, - . ' � / - � . , _.y ." , ,� ., , . . .. ,.� .� _ . . . . .,�j � — . � ,� , . � � �• � � � ' ' � . . , . , . r.� � � � - . . ! � � i . .. _ . . , - � . . ,"� y (_ � .��n � �C - /�� a�� Cc'��%r�— C�llMUN �TIONREC �D AF'TER PREP.lR�l1'70N �"� "''�' �'�' REPORT MEMORANDUM � � � � � CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY ARBORIST � � (;,� � �/`� (� JUN 2 7 2005 DATE• 6/22/OS ��TY OF BURLINGAME � PLANNING DEPT. TO: Planning Dept. FROM: Steven Porter - ' RE: 1480 Vancouver Ave. With reference to the Arborist Report, (Mayne, 4/11/OS), Tree #15 Deodar Cedar, indicates the tree as having a 70% condition rating. Removal of the tree is not recommended, I agree. Permit Application to remove this protected Cedar Tree has been denied. This Tree will require an independent Arborist report outlining tree protection measures before, during and after construction. The report should also address, and approve, or not, the planned landscaping around and near the cedar tree. The concrete patio near the tree may not work as designed due to conflict with the trees root system. Some measures, including protective fencing, among other possible recommendations from the project arborist, will need to be in place prior to issuance of demolition permit. Go�Y ��'��'� �� CITY O� � OURLiNGAME ti ��' ,. �, ,� ��o.,r.o CITY OF BURLINGAME PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California 94010-2899 Telephone (650) 558-7300 • Parks / Trees (650) 558-7330 Fax (650) 696-7216 • E-mail: recreation@burlingame.org [� ' i� . .�'�,,,,�� June 15, 2005 Robert Gilson 30 Woodgate Ct. Hillsborough, CA 94010 RE: REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF ONE CEDAR TREE @ 1480 VANCOU[jER - BURLINGAME I reviewed your request for the removal of one Cedar tree in the backyard at the above address and have made the following determination: 1) The tree is a healthy, mature, structurally sound specimen. 2) Criteria used to grant removal has not been met. 3) Therefore, the application has been denied. For further consideration of this decision you may: 1) Submit an independent Arborist Report suppotting justifiable criteria for removal of this tree and, 2) Appeal this decision in writing to the Burlingame Beautification Commission. Any documentation must be received at our oi�ice by June 27, 2005. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (650) 558-7330. Sincerely, �� Steven Porter City Arborist - (ISA #WC-3073) SP/gb CC: Herbert Wei TR 1470 Vancouver Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dolores B. Burnett TR 1477 Bernal Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Thomas Eastham TR 1473 Bernal Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Vyi lY� VJ l�l 1Y. LJ �A.1 VJVJ�JYY4J :�H1.V� 1�� A��1�1J l.V Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. L•S.TA[iI.ISHFI) 1931 STATE CONTRACTOR� S LIC�.NSE NU. 276793 C;TiAn(fAi t FOR.ESTGR • c rr:r�r•�Lr� nRBU�tisi a - rr_ST Ci�h ritot. • nUViSpR$ qtiD OPGRqT01tS RIC'l IAI�i) I. HI INT�NGTQ;J rR�s�ocN � April 11, 2005 KFVIN R KIEITY UPI-tiKrlON� M�'�NAGER �4ttn: James Chu �;.hu Design and Engineering 39 West 43'� Avenue ��an Mateo, CA 94403 RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNWG DEPT. Re: Gilson Project, 1480 Vancouver, Burlingame, CA Dear Mr, Chu: �/J UUL 535 a►tP.C�nTO ROAu, �rE A s,w c:�R�.os, cn ��,o�o-6aza TC•LtPHUNE: (650} SUa-q400 FACSiM1LE (65U) 593•4443 LMAIL into(ulmaynctrcc.CmD ��n April 6, 2005, I inspected 28 trees on the above referenced site. The existing house is to be removed, the lot sub-divided and two new houses built. ��his report assigns a number to and identifies each tree. All trees were measured at 54 inches above grade. They were given a Condition rating which is a combination of ��eneral tree health and structure and (a perfect tree would be 100 percent). Life ��xpectancy is also addressed, where appropriate. fhe "Comments" section explains the condition rating, as well as general tree character- ��stics such as past care, recommended care, hazards, maturity, landscape funttions, etc. ��nly 6 trees have a 70 percent or greater conditfon rating. Tree with ratings below 70 p�ercent are candidates for removal, but this does not mean they may not remain. TREE SURVEY �ree No. Species DBH �ndition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 1 Sycamore 14.1 Z Sycamore 16.4 3 Sycamore 22.0 4 Sycamore 16.6 70 Street tree; has been topped fnr line clearance. 65 Street tree; has been severety topped far Iine clearance. 70 65 Street tree; topped for line clea�ance. Street tree; topped for line clearance. c V��1I�VJ l�l lY.LJ �A.1 �JVJtlJ444J Chu/Giison 4-11-05, Pg. 2 Tree No. S�ecies 5 6 7 8 China berry Plum Tritania Tritania 9 Tritania l0 Crabapple 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .�.�11.\� 1�� .��1� l,V TREE SURVEY (continued) DBH ondition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 9.0 45 5ignificant top diebaCk. Retommend removai. 6.3,6.3, 65 This is a mature tree. Recommend 4.9,4.0,4.8 removal. 4.4 60 Slight lean and is suppressed. Is in footprint of proposed driveway. 5.8 75 Good screen tree Proposed b.8 70 6.5 70 Privet 7.6 60 Privet 6.3,6.0,4.8 60 Plum 6.4,3.5,3.3, 50 3.1, 3.2, 2.0 Privet 4.8,4.4 55 Deodar cedar 45.9 70 Pittosporum Cotoneaster 4.1,4.1 60 3.8, 2.7, Z.6 3.9,3.1, 60 3.0,2.9 driveway may need to be moved in order to retain tree. Good screen tree. Proposed driveway may need to be moved in order to retain tree. Most growth on north side. In proposed driveway. Leans with all growth on west side. In proposed driveway. Tree has been topped and is in proposed driveway. Prune to fan shape if retained. Has included bark. Leans, with all growth on north side. Is in proposed footprint. East side has been cut for line clear- ance and limbs are heavy and brittle. Safety of the tree has been compromised; Tree is matu�e and will start to fail. Forks at base. Is a large shrub. ��/J V U J UY� 14% V� 1Rl 14: G� I'HA OJVJ21JH44J �t1Y,\L 11(CC G.�f Gl(1J l,V l�/f VU�i Gilson 4-11-05, Pg. 3 TREE SURVEY (Continued) Tr�e No• Saecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 18 Japanese maple 5.2, 4.8, 45 Has verticillium wilt disease. 5.0,3.7,5.3 Pruning out dieback would be beneficiai, if tree is retained. 19 Coast live oak 8.4 60 Leans, with all growth on south side. 20 �oast live oak 13.9 65 Forks � 8' with included bark. Has been pruned for line clearance. 21 Sycamore 15.8 60 There has been significant line clear- ance. Tree has potential to undermine utilities. 22 Stone pine 31.2 50 Topped for line clearance, has very large limbs on the south. Tree is breaking curb and uplifting sidewalk. There is high risk of south limbs failing. Removal recommended. 23 Sycamore 16.3 65 Outgrowing space, has been line cleared. 24 Black acacia 6.8 55 Volunteer, topped for line clearance. Removal recommended 25 Black acacia 14.0 55 Volunteer, topped for line clearance. Removal recommended. 26 Pear 11.7 60 Street tree, growing into wire, has basal deformity. 27 Bailey acatia 6.5,6.1,4.2 20 Tree leans and is dying. Removal is recommended. 28 Incense cedar 11.9 80 Hides the power pole, not encroaching into wires. 'There can be obstacles to protecting trees during construdion. An example would be ��roteding the street trees. Their roots are below the hardscape, so fencing at the �iripline will not work. Therefore, fence along the site side of the sidewalk. The retained trees, such as the live oaks, No_ 19 and No. 20, may be fenced at 10 feet away, or as tar from the trunks as needed to complete construction. The fencing shall not be moved �vithout authorization from the Arbo�ist and the City. The area within the protective fencing is not to be breached. Vl! lY� VJ ll�l� lY. LV l A�l VVVVOV'3Y9V !•1(ll�ll. li\L.L Lail LL�1J VV I VVV Gilson 4-11-05, Pg. 4 ihis means that these areas are off-limits to all construction activity and materials. Also, utility trenching should not be done within these areas without the ArborisYs approval . i think this report is accurate and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. �Please Cdll with any questions. Sincerely, , �� J r�� '�� .� � iRichard L. Huntington Certified Arborist WE #0119A S��ETY ��ertified Arborist #1925 a��'_� V NI IRLH:dcr � � s '� � Np. WF10110A �, . ��