Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1464 Vancouver Avenue - Resolution2004-256051 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMF.NT C17'Y OF BURLINGAME3 501 PRIMROSE BURLINGAME, CA 94010 09:10am 12(31/04 Fi1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 12 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder i II�III! � 1� I� RI ■��I �I I �I I I II � I�,�: IIII IIIII����I IIIIII I Illi *��� 0 � 0 2� 6 0� � A R* Resolution No. 103-2004 1464 VANCOLJVER AVENUE; APN: 026-044-190 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. t �� Date: 12/29/2 Ma garet onroe, Ci Planner RESOLUTION 103-2004 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review for a new, two-story sin�le family dwelling and detached ��e at 1464 Vancouver Avenue, zoried R-1, Michael Gong and Am�property owners, APN: 026-044- 190; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on December 13, 2004, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exe�i�ption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3— (a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. �� � e � Chairman I, /,UtG(�//�r,'L ��W �/l ��i , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13t" day of December, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Keele, Keighran, Osterling NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Bojues, Brownrigg, Vistica / n / �. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 1464 Vancouver Avenue Effective December 27, 2004 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped December 2, 2004, sheets A1 through A6 and L1.0; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3. that the property owner shall apply for a tree removal permit with the Parks Department prior to removal of the existing 18-inch diameter pine tree along the right side property line; 4. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 5. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 8. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's, and Recycling Specialist's September 13, 2004, memos, and the Chief Building Official's September 10, 2004, memo shall be met; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption arid design review. 1464 Vancouver Avenue Effective December 27, 2004 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of pern�it application; 13. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 14. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storni Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff. .�R:. .�.4... Project Comments Date: 09/09/2004 To: � City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1464 Vancouver Ave, zoned R-1, APN:026-044-190 09/13/2004 � 5� �� � - � : �(L.la:. _ . . , �' � � yf:s� ���. .����_, _ ---' - - ' - - - = '" �..•_- _- - ��� i.! �►.; ..�,�. _ � :� i ..c .. �� i: :.c:��- � J� cow�l. + ' � � � lu..i..�i ?a.:1 > e! ' ��, " / ► .... . r , . �[�L�.m' .,i.L_..., r�f:� 1; - � � - ,� . (J i ��,• � � • Reviewed by: .�J_ ���, Date: al �13�' f' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS � '� �r�"( Project Names �,r.,..�►�c�l�f , ��� - Project Address: V��✓�� The following requirements apply to the project 1 _�� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land . surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property comers, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) �,�wMn�'Y t'� �tu��,,,�, ���t,+�/ �ow.�-'►� s��' � �� t� � �-ca.� � N,A►-�fi�+�[� ��6.cF'u+it' 'T�r� �f� 2 '� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building pernut. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral Ir! is required for the project in accordance with the City's standazds. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. 'The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a tr�c impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. `The parcel map shall show a11 existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. '� A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. �,,, ,q,.ry� ����-1,� � �� � t�-�,� 1,r" ACv(�,,a,s3. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculafions shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 �_ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage sh�eetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, pazking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehiculaz traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Departrnent of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 _,,L The project shall comply with the City's NPDES pernut requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 `The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMIvvIENTS.doc , . . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a gazbage receptacle shall be placed in &ont. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the gazbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: 09/09/2004 To: ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official � Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Subject: Planning Staff Request for design review for a new finro-story single family dwelling at 1464 Vancouver Ave, zoned R-1, APN:026-044-190 Staff Review: 09/13/2004 n c----. � �..� � c�\�.6 a-- �'S ���� �� ��6��� �-��..�s��• Reviewed by: � Date: ` � a� �'� 3 � < _� . � Project Comments Date: 09/09/2004 To: ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal �Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1464 Vancouver Ave, zoned R-1, APN:026-044-190 Staff Review: 09/13/2004 °1/1310 Project Comments Date: 09/09/2004 To: ❑ City Engineer � Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attomey From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1464 Vancouver Ave, zoned R-1, APN:026-044-190 Staff Review: 09/13/2004 1464 Vancouver - Proiect Comments 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the properly line. 3) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the properly line. 4) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of one-hour fire-rated construction. 5) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 6) Provide guardrails at all landings. 7) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than two risers. 8) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.