The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1318 Broadway - Approval Letter�JYb� �Il1C� �� PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 21, 2000 Mazilyn Olcese Et Al 1696 Edgeworth Avenue Daly City, CA 94015 Dear Ms. Olcese, CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 JLD�IC°llll]CIL��.]CC�11c� TEL: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the March 13, 2000 Planning Commission approval of your conditional use permit application became effective March 20, 2000. This application was for an existing food establishment classified as a Full Service Food Establishment in the Broadway commercial area at 1318 Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area. The March 13, 2000 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that this business location presently occupied by a full service food establishment, with 700 SF of on-site seating may change its food establishment classification only to a lunited food service or bar upon approval of a conditional use permit for the establishment change; the criteria for the new classification shall be met in order for a change to be approved; 2. that the 700 SF area of on-site seating of the full service food establishment may be enlarged or extended to any other areas within the tenant space only by an amendment to this conditional use permit; 3. that this food establishment shall provide trash receptacles as approved by the ciry consistent with the streetscape improvements and maintain all trash receptacles at the entrances to the building and at any additional locations approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department; March 21, 2000 1318 Broadway page -2- 4. that the applicant shall provide daily litter control along all frontages of the business and within �fty (50) feet of all frontages of the business; 5. that an amendment to this conditional use pernut shall be required for delivery of prepared food from this premise; � 6. that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any opening within 10' of the property line; 7. that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use, a food establishment shall not be replaced on this'site and this conditional use permit shall become void; 8. that�this full service food establishment may be open fram 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven days a week, with a maximum of six employees on site at any one time; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements in effect at the time of the California Building and Fire Codes, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. � The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. in ely yours, gazet nr rty Planner . RH\s c. Cafe Figaro, applicant 1318 Broadway Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (WLY 50 FT OF LOT 32 BLOCK 16 BURLINGAME GROVE RSM B/30; APN: 026-095-150) � City of Bur/ingame Planning Commission Minutes March 13, Z000 1200 BROADWAY, ZONED G1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD �PABL�ISNHMAEMEDNT�IC DUCOS-�S TR, PROPERTY OWNER ) (GRACE GARDEN RESTAURAN , 1230 BROADWAY, ZONED G1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISHIvIENT IN THE BROADWAY COMNIERCIAI- AREA (GOLDEN CHINA RESTAURANT, APPLICANT AND THEODORE KOROS, PROPERTY OWNER) 1232 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLIS�IMEI�1T IN THE BROADWAY COIvIMERCIAL AREA (PIZZA ETC., APPLICANT AND THEODORE KOROS, PROPERTY OWNER) 1318 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLIS�IMENT 1N THE BROADWAY COMNIERCIAL AREA (CAFE FIGARO, APPLICANT AND MARILYN OLCESE ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) 1320 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISHIVIENT IN THE BROADWAY COMNIERCIAL AREA (BUA THONG KITCHEN, APPLICANT AND ERNEST A. SCHEPPLER TR, PROPERTY OWNER) 1355 BROADWAY, ZONED G1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLIS��VVIENT IN THE BROADWAY COMI��RCIAL AREA (7UN RESTAURANT AND SUSHI BAR, APPLICANT AND MARIO AND HELGA N. CROCCO TRS, PROPERTY OWNERS) 1150 PALOMA AVENUE, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISF�VIENT IN THE BROADWAY CONIlV�RCIAL AREA (MATSUSANO APPLICANT AND KOWK L WONG PROPERTY OWNERI C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar, with the project at 2004 Davis Drive removed, based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Luzuriaga called for a voice vote on the motion to approve and it passed 5-0-2 (Cers. Bojues, Deal absent). Appeal procedures were advised_ Consent item concluded at 7:50 p.m. REGULAR CALENDAR 2004 DAVIS DRIVE, ONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN R� T RY ADDI I N LL WNER• 1N LN L APPL� Re ence staff report, 3.13. , with attachments. Ci Planner discussed tl T�Pna ment comments. Three onditions were suggest d for consideration. VIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND reviewed crit a and Planning ion had no aue 'ons of staff. Chairman uzuriaga opened the pu �c hearing. Lincoln Lue,' chitect, 1567-33rd A` nue, represented the project with Stella Hun the property owner. He oted that the house is p\ sently very small, 2 be rooms and one bath for a family ' h three c ren, other houses in th rea are much larger; t�.e owner likes this desi ' n arrived at through the design revi w process. Commissioner asked, be re the city esiablished sign review we saw a� t of examples of houses built 'mum f the zonin limits with o er bearing design, this ouse has some of thes qualities e.g. a front facade to the axi S with a 1 of items hich come toward the s eet such as three row of bay windows, did y u consider softening those features t lend be er with the neighborho ; architect noted did t want to look like at was there which is old fashioned, p�n, want design to be more eleg t, do not feel that this , a"monster" it meets�our code requirements, city standards o not all monster houses, used larger scale (1/8") in the drawings to show detail, perhaps this makes the house look ore impo ' g than the typical smaller scaled drawings; commissioner's noted that there are ways in the -4-