The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1251 Broadway - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Item # 10 Anzend�nent to Cotiditional Use Permit and Take-occt Permit Address: 1251 Broadway Meeting Date: 11/9/98 Request: Amendment to conditional use permit and take-out permit to change the hours of operation of a food establishment at 1251 Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area. Applicant: Alene Brisbane APN: 026-193-300 Property Owner: Kwok Leung & Chui Fong Wong Lot Area: 8826 SF Zoning: C-1, Broadway Commercial Area General Plan: Shopping & Service Commercial Adjacent Development: Retail/Service Commercial CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1, operation of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing. Previous Use: Restaurant - The Coffee Stop Proposed Use: Restaurant - mexican grill (change in hours) Allowable Use: restaurant - amendme�lt to conditional use permit and take-out permit required Sununary: The applicant, Alene Brisbane, is requesting a conditional use permit and take-out permit amendment to allow a change in hours of operation and take-out service for a mexican grill to replace The Coffee Stop at 1251 Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area. In April, 1992 the City Council approved a conditional use permit and parking variance for a food establishment at this location (April 6, 1992 C.C. Minutes). This approval included a take-out permit (July 27, 1992 P.C. minutes). Condition #3 of the April 6, 1992 conditional use permit and variance approval limits the hours of operation to Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (see attaclled action letter dated April 7, 1992). The applicant is proposing to amend the hours of operation to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. seven days a week. The proposed mexican grill restaurant would occupy the 1724 SF space now occupied by The Coffee Stop. The zoning code limits the number of food establishments in the Broadway Commercial Area to those existing in 1985 or those which have a use permit for food establishment use. This location is an existing food establish►nent wl�ich may be replaced by another food establishment. The business will be open Monday through Sunday from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. They will have 5 full-time employees before 5:00 p.m. and 3 full-time and 2 part-time employees after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. On weekends, there will be S fiill-time and 1 part-time employees before 5:00 p.m. and 3 full-time and 2 part-time employees after 5:00 p.m. The number of employees is expected to remain the same in five years. Cvnditional Use Pern:it and Take-out Perrnit Ainendinent 1251 Broadway A maximum of 150 customers per day are expected before 5:00 p.m. on weekdays and on weekends. After 5:00 p.m. between 50-100 customers per day are expected. In five years, these numbers are expected to stay the same. The maximum number of customers and employees on site at any one time is expected to be 35 people. Public parking is available in Lot P(26 metered stalls), Lot Q(24 metered stalls), and Lot R(34 metered stalls) and in 1-hour metered stalls along Broadway. Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd Use: *restaurant w/take-out restaurant w/take-out restaurant w/take-out service and change to requires conditional use hours of operation permit Restaurant Area: no change 530 SF seating area N/A (1724 SF total area) Parking: no change None 3 space parking variance granted in 1992 for change in use from retail and o�ce to eating establishment * Conditional use and take-out permit amendment for change to hours of operation. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The Fire Marshal notes (October 13, 1998 memo) that the kitchen is to be protected by an automatic �re extinguishing system. The Chief Building Official and City Engineer had no comment on this project. Planning staff would note that the "pizza prep table" listed on the floor plan is a generic term and the table will be used for preparation of tacos and other mexican food. The applicant currently operates the Taqueria Zapata at 1850 Collingwood (near Castro Street) in San Francisco. Required Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must fnd that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. 2 Conditional Use Permit and Take-out Per�nit An:endment 1251 Broadway Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the restaurant shall be remodeled as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 8, 1998, with 530 SF of seating area; 2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's October 13, 1998 memo shall be met; 3. that the business may not be open for business except during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p. m. daily; 4. that there shall be a maximum of seven employees, including the owner, on site at any one time; 5. that the project shall provide adequate filtering and venting to avoid dissemination of odors on neighboring properties; 6. that an enclosed and ventilated garbage storage area shall be maintained at the rear of the site and that garbage cans shall be kept in the storage area until such time garbage is picked up and upon pick-up cans shall immediately be returned to the storage area; 7. that no banner signs shall be used per Title 22 Sign Code Section 22.48.080 and the applicant shall obtain planning and building permits for all signage; 8. that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 9. that the project shall be reviewed for compliance with these conditions in six months (May, 1999) or upon complaint. Maureen Brooks Planner c: Alene Brisbane, applicant 3 �r� c�r� BURIJNQAMi� CITY OF BUItLINGAME �� j APPLICATION TU TI� PLA�NNIlVG COMIVIISSION Type of Application: Special Permit Variance � Other�( �,(� � ((� (`�.{�(�-,�-� �}� Project Address: � Assessor's Parcel Number(s):_ 0�(�� QG �— t t.� � APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: t-t ��-i� � ��1 `��C�GC�NI e� Name: Q� �'� 1� C��1 � 1� Address: l` io ��LIC<,v� 4„'�— Address: G� J�r `�� lzz.z �,�-I�C,�,�, � s� • s-t� City/State/Zip: ��l L �� r� �� l�City/State/Zir: Gt,l'�Gi, � ��-� Gj�l� Phone (w):_ � 5�'� 3�� (� k 3c Phone (w): �l � 1�� I�J (h):� S� � � � ��3� �n�: fax: �'� l S � �c5 �.o � " Z.Z`-J � fax:_ Li1, � � � � � � � � ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: � � � � Address: �` �I Sv �, � � � City/State/Zip: �-� l ��1 �C�J�.�� 1.� Phone (w): �� C� � 2 �'1��bC� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. (h): fa.x: �� b 5��(, J o � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �� Y`(�(X 1�'_.1 C�� (��ir�� ,-i c� �,�-�,`h—� AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATLTRE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. __`_G Applicant's Date I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Filed: Fee: Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: City of Burlingame Special Permit Applications 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. Tliis facility will operate under tlze current use as to which it is permitted and defined by t/te City of Burlingame (restaurant). In addition, it will be compatib/e to otl:er uses in the vicinity while offering additional food choices to slioppers, customers, and surrounding residents. It is witlz absolute intention t/zat this enterprise will be a neig/iborhood/ community venture tltat wil! respect t/�e surrounding non-competing businesses witlz integrity w{tile improving and keeping a first-class appearance due t/:is Bur/ingame locale. 2. Discuss how the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed use is in compliance wit/z t/:e General Plan for sales and food service uses on Broadway and is Zoned accordingly. Discuss how the proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing neighborhood and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. T{te proposed project will be that of a tenant improvement in an existing buildir�g. Our goal is to establish a first-class neighborhood facility that will cater to tliose retail s/:oppers and surrounding residents looking for a ltiglz-value, authentic Mexican mea[. COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM 1. Proposed use of site: Mexican-Style Grill serving autl:entic Mexican food and related items. 2. Days/hours of operation: M- F: 7:OOam -10:00pm, Sat/Sun: 7:OOam - IO:OOpm 3. Number of trucks/service vehicles: 0 4. Current and Projected maximwn number of employees at this location: Existin� 7am-Spm After Snm In 2 Years 7am-Spm After In 5 vears 7am-Spm After Weekdays Full-time 5 3 5 3 5 3 Part-time 0 2 0 2 0 2 Weekends Full-time 5 3 5 3 5 3 Part-time 1 2 1 2 5. Current and Projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: Existin� In 2 Years In 5 vears 7am-Spm After 7am-Spm After 7am-Spm After Spm Spm Spm Weekdays 100-150 50-100 100-150 50-100 100-150 50-100 Weekends 150 50-100 150 50-100 150 50-100 6. Maximum nu►nber of employees and visitors/customers which can be expected to be on property at any one time: 35 7. Where do/will the employees park? Side streets and/or Public Transportation 8. Where do/will customers/visitors park? Due to the nature of this neighborhood establisl:ment, many customers will be surrounding residents, commuters going to and from t/ie train stution, retail slrop employees, - all ot/:ers will be either retail shoppers or destination customers (minimal) who wil[ park along Broadway and street parking spaces on side streets. 9. Present or most recent use of site: Cof.fee Sliop/Sandwicl: Eatery (The Coffee Stop). ] 0. List of other tenants/finns on the property: C/:ic Hair Salon and a Chinese Restaurant. City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 September 24, 1998 Dear Members of the Commission: Please accept this additional letter-of-explanation in order to give further information as to the proposed nature and use of the facility at 1251 Broadway. In summary, we are intending to run a first-rate, high-value, neighborhood Mexican Grill that will serve authentic Mexican Food and related items. Due to the nature of the proposed establishment, please allow us to explain the need to change the hours of business and the impact of parking. Hours of Operation: As the property is currently zoned as (and intended to be) a restaurant, the purpose of tl�is Special Permit Application is to change the hours of business from it's current definition (Monday through Friday 6:30am to 7:OOpm and Saturday and Sunday 7:OOam to S:OOpm) to hours more appropriate for a Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner establishment as are the surrounding restaurants. Our proposed hours are Monday through Sunday, 7:OOam to 10:00pm. Parkin�: The impact of parking needed to cater to customers/visitors will be minimal. Our goal is to be a high value neighborhood business which relies upon repeat customers from the area. We do not expect to be a destination type restaurant. Rather, this will be the type of facility that surrounding residents will walk to; retail shoppers will stop by during their shopping day; and commuters walking to and fro►n the train station will visit to get a quick bite to cat. Retail shop employees will also have another choice for their daily lunches. Therefore, it is expected that the impact of additional parking will be minimal to none. As the partners are native residents of the Peninsula, we are very familiar and excited with the prospect of having a business in the City of Burlingame that will cater to the Burlingame consumer as well as add an additional cuisine to the Cosmopolitan nature so identified with the San Francisco Bay Area. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact myself or my partners. Sincerely, �� P�� Phil Piserchio (1-650-737-9748) Robert and Alene Brisbane (1-650-355-6839) ROUTING FORM DATE: October 8, 1998 TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL �FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUB.TECT: Request for ainendinent to conditional use pennit to extend hours of operation for a food establislunent at 1251 Broadway, zoned C-1, APN: 026-095-140. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: November 23, 1998 STAFF REVIEW B1� M�ETING ON: Tuesd�y, October 13, 1998 THANKS, Maureen/Janice/Ruben I � �.J Date of Cominents I . ��c�n� � � o �C�-�.� � �.r�,. e.`�,-t�v� v�s�,i ' (. � C�. o W�� t�c. . �. ,. BQRLINGAME, CALIFORNIA Apt].1 6� 1992 CLOSED SESSION A closed session regarding property acquisition and litigation was called to order at 7:0o p.m. in Conference Room A at City Hall. All council members were present. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meetinq was called to order at 7:38 p.m. by Mayor Frank Paqliaro. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Pledge was led by Sandy Burnett, San Mateo Times reporter. ROLL CALL COUNCIL PRESENT: COUNCIL ABSENT: MINUTES HARRISON, KNIGHT, LEMBI, O'MAHONY, PAGLZARO NONE The minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 16, 1992 and the S dy Meeting of March 18, 1992 were unanimously approved on mot'on of Councilwoman O'Mahony, second by Councilman Harrison. Mayor Pagli�o announced council had reached a decision after several closed`sessions and a study session regarding parking on Broadway and th urchase of property for a parking,.lot. Coun- cilman Harrison no d there was mone in the Y pa�rjc�ng fund for purchase of this pro rty; he moved the city archase 1133 Chula Vista for the price of 630,000, that ther e no der�olition until the city sells the arking lot on inette, and effective July 1, 1992 the parking f d be abol' ed and henceforth parking funds go into the general fu T motion was seconded by Councilwoman O Mahony. Councilwoman Knight said she�uld ote against this proposal; she agreed that any money s,pent on pa king should be in the Broadway area, but with a� the other m'or capital projects before the city she did�iot feel the cit hould spend the money on this parking lot.,,/ Councilman Lembi aid the city is coming out o he recession, and sales tax ' come is up; this purchase will be positive addition to oadway and assist the merchants and re 'dents. Mayor Pagl' ro commented council had pledged to help t mer- chants o Broadway. Councilwoman O'Mahony was pleased to.,,support this m ion, Broadway has been waiting too long for a parking lot, is purchase will have 48 parking spaces, the Rhinette lot onl has 26 and is not used; the parking fund has the money for � s purchase. The motion carried 4-i on roll call vote, Coun- ilwoman Knight voting no. CONTINUED APPEAL FOR A SPECIAL PEZMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A RESTACIRANT AT 1249A QROAD�4AY - RF.SOI.UTION 26-92 APPROVING S,aME City Planner's memo of March 23 recommended council take action; the public hearing was held on March 16 and council continued action to tonight's meeting. The applicant, Steve I,ebb, and the property owner, htiaok Leung and Chui Fonq Wong, are requesting a special permit for an eating establishment and a three space parking variance. The Planning Commission voted 3-3 for denial r •� . � of the request; under rules of the commission a tie votc is a denial of a request. ' Councilwoman o�Mahony said she thought long and hard about this project and decided it was a good project for Broadway. She moved to grant the special permit and variance with conditions in staff report. Councilman Harrison seconded the motion and com- mented we would never solve the traffic circulation problems on Broadway because of the location of the freeway access; this project will enhance Broadway and would not be detrimental or injurious; council has given other businesses larger parking variances. Councilwoman Knight, at the last meeting, had moved to deny this request because the project would create more traffic and parking problems; she thought it would be detrimental to the area and could find no extraordinary circumstances to grant a variance. Councilman Lembi said there was nothing that would alleviate the traffic flow problems since Broadway was the access to freeway; and if people can't park they will not stop. The motion carried 4-1 on roll call vote, Councilwoman Knight voting no. May Pagliaro announced that council would hear protests abo� the Ds but because this is a new proposal, council would 1' ten to con erns and allow time to think about the proposal, co cil would nqt take action until the meeting of April 20. He ted council i`¢ neutral in this matter, this is a proposal fr m the merchants'`associations. � The City Attorney reviewed his memo of March 19 whicK recommended council hold t,�wo separate public hearings on forma��on of the districts. Bus,�ness improvement districts are fo� ed under • Street and High�Says Code Section 36500 et seq. fiouncil can determine to forill��both districts, or one, or ne�'ither; it can revise the assessments, zones and purposes anc� can reduce the area of the propose�"d districts. The only li�iit on action is that a district cannot be`'c�formed if council rece,� ves written protests from a majority of the� value of the assess�iients. He announced that any more written rotests must be r�eived at the beginning of the hearing; written withdrawals of rotests must be received by the end of the hearin ,. /� Councilman Harrison told tk`t audienc,�'�that another reason council is not makinq a decision to 'ght islthat written protests handed in toniqht will have to be co ntec�to determine if there is a majority protest. Mayor Pagl'a.d had some questions on the wording of the ordinances; won ed if the district would have to get approval from council befo it could increase assessments; asked about fines for unpaid � se �sments; City Attorney and Finance Director reviewed ho�i busi ss license fines are collect- ed; the city will incur exp�nses in ollecting these assessments, would the city be repaid; �lection o the Board of these dis- tricts; can the BID be el�minated by vote of council. Council- man Lembi wondered who�ars appeals f�assessments, city council or the Board o the district. DISTRICTI David Hinckle, 161+� Sanchez and owner of Earth eam Foods on Broadway, reporte� the idea of a BID was presen d to the Broad- way Merchants �sociation over a year ago, they cided to adopt the proposal a requested help from the city in 'ring a consul- tant; the mer ants held open meetings on this; see s the best possible t�et od to effect real lasting change, make ong term improvement , provide liaison with city and provide a nited approach t improving Broadway; they propose to clean dewalks, advertise�'and promote the area, provide for commercial cruit- ment and ,retention of business and improve parking enforc ent. � Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 July 27, 1992 Commission discussion: there appears to be three choices: no improvements beyond maintenance without removing one unit; allow expansion of floor area and footprint increase to the primary but not the second unit; allow floor area and/or footprint to both units. A key aspect of this is that some of these units are so advanced in age that they need major rehabilitation which exceeds the narrow interpretation of the code; there should be review of major remodels in this situation, but there appears to be a need to allow something beyond minor maintenance and repair; policy change should be reviewed by the City Council, if done by ordinance change they would have to act on it. Commission directed the City Attorney and City Planner to develop a change to the ordinance which would define the primary residential structure on such a lot, would establish criteria to be used in this determination, would require a special permit or commission review of expansion of such a unit and would limit improvements to those as defined in the UBC. Review of a Take-out t�ermit for a Coffee Shop at 1249 Broadway f zoned �-l. CP Monroe reviewed the July 27, 1992 memo which noted the need to � clarify that the action on this permit had included take out sales. �••�....� �,�cci au�ar�a A. CP Monroe reviewed the staff inemo, 7/27/92 with attachments, in which it noted that at study the commission�had requested that this applicant prepare a parking and traffic study to address the intensification of use and expansion of floor area proposed by this project in Subarea A of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area. The applicant submitted a letter stating that they wished to move to hearing before the co7nmission without preparing the study. The commissioners noted that this was a big variance request and the parking and traffic information would serve as another input in that determination. The City Attorney noted that in these proceedings the burden is on the applicant to present evidence. If the evidence is insufficient because of the absence of the traffic and parking study, it is not the City's responsibility. With that point clear, the commission determined that the application could be brought forward without the traffic and parking study. - CP Monroe reviewed the City Council actions at its July 20, 1992 regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 P.M. 0 r � �.�.E ln� .U'.� ��Z".�Y1'C.��1'1'C,e � CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 (4I5) 342-8625 April 7, 1992 Mr. Steven Webb 1633 Madison Avenue Redwood City, CA 94061 Dear Mr. Webb: At their meeting of March 16, 1992 the City Council held an appeal hearing on your application for a special permit and parking variance to allow a food establishment at 1249A Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area. Following the public hearing Council continued its decision to the meeting of April 6, 1992 and at that time approved your application with the following conditions: 1. that the proj ect shall be built as shown on the� plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 26, 1991 Floor Plan and Site Plan; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's December 27, 1991 memo (provide handicap restrooms) and the Fire Marshal's January 6, 1992 memo (if building renovations exceed $50,000 the building will require a sprinkler system) shall be met; 3. that this business shall operate Monday through Friday 6:30 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. and Saturday and Sunday 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. with a maximum of 10 employees, including the owner, on site at one time; 4. that the project shall provide adequate filtering and venting to avoid dissemination of odors on neighboring properties; 5: that an enclosed and ventilated garbage storage area shall be identified at the rear of the site and that garbage cans shall be kept in the storage area until such time garbage is picked up and upon pick-up cans shall immediately be returned to the storage area; 6. that no banner signs shall be used per Title 22 Sign Code Section 22.48.080 and the applicant shall obtain building permits for all signage; ❑ Mr. Steven Webb Page 2 April 7, 1992 7. that the project shall meet Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 8. that the project shall be reviewed for compliance with these conditions in six months (September, 1992)�cir upon complaint. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. Sincerely yours, 'l Marg et Monroe City Planner MM/s Att. cc: Kwok Leung & Chui Fong Wong (property owners) (w/att.) Richard L. Pierce, Esq. (w/att.) Frederick R. Strathdee, architect (w/att.) City Clerk (w/att.) Chief Building Inspector (w/att.) Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (0.20 Ac MOL Lot 25 and PTN of Lots 26 & 27, Block 3, Easton Addition; APN 026-193-300) � . ROUTING FORM DATE :. ' I � � � � TO: CITY ENGINEER ' � CHIEF BIIILDING OFFICIAL . FIRE MARSBAL ' pARRB DIRECTOR � CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY pLANNER/S�IIING TECHNICZAN SUBJ�;CT: REQIIEST FOR � �,�%.;�f _ .... ��_ ." . .- � AT G�-C/��t/V � SCHEDIILED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETINC� ON MONDAY: � v. THANKS, ` Jane S eri/Leah � . � Date of Comments . `�� ;��+'� � � � �/ f1'e�`� G� _ � � , .� : ROU'I�G FORM DATE : ' I � � [/� � TO: CITY ENGINEER ' CHIEF BIIILDING OFFICIAL FIRE M�IRSHAI, PARRS DIRECTOR� ' ' CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN SIIBJECT: REQIIEST FOR - ��C'JV c�� ( �.eiVi� d-. �'�.ti�%c� � AT SCHEDIILED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY:. � Z THANKS, -, Jane S eri/Leah � � � 2 Date of Comments ".'` ' �"-tt-� N� N G � �ft • /'.lPl� ��1�F9"� % /'� �� D f� . .,�,n v �,1,c�,,s �-�- �' � � nc� �5o cx� o �- Qc�6 � S�i"Ku��- �� - . � ��jsi�� CITY OF BURLINGAME euzuhcnr.�e PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 r"'� TEL: (650) 696-7250 1��1 hKCJNI1Wf=aY HF'rJ:��b-1yJ—Ji�� :'i:: ; :i�j:�Y�'.�,2R`�ii:�„ } �.a .`&�f�°�r -�. Application for� an amendment to � PUBLIC HEARING conditional �_�se per,mit and a take-o�_�t permit NOTICE for-• a fc,nd est�biish¢�ent at 1�51 Pr�oadway, zoned C-1, Br,oadway Cammer�cia! Area. The City of P�_�r��lir�game F'lanning Commissian anno�_mces the following ��_�blic hear•ing on Monday, NoveHber 9, 1998 at 7:�� G. M. in the G"i �y �aT7��`�Coi_inci7�'��mber,s l oc�t Ed at 5� 1 F'r,imr,o�e Road, B�_�r,lir�game, Califor�nia. Mailed Dctober 30, 1998 (Plense refer to otlaer sicle) CITY OF B URLI1VGAME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written conespondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing: Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for inforining their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 696-7250. Thank you. � ; .� �<� � :..r �t � ; 4:.� �. � _ ' � Margaret Monroe � `� •. City Planner ��' �`` � €�� . � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE i I� L��'�'�+��.`t� A. , (Please refer to other side) � �•3 C-I � Y _�--�� I '_ � � ' � � i � � � - -� � i �� '� �_ K � �� 1 _��' �� 3 ' � �-. , I - �, " r . � � � �, �"` ,�-. �• _.� . r � . �.. L-AGut�q -� . - _... � � ��.Nv� �' -��. - � A �. � � � , , _� ■ � . -- � � � � �,�. �z,� ' � . - iz�S . ,�,�...,_ . .. i9 � r � �3 i .. � IZ3o �Z3; r 32 �S ; � . � 34 39 ;� � 1 , �� tt43 � ,i . ' ,. � ..J . � ,....- t� tL3 ' � '�� % �` G �r �-1 �iso ttAo u3to _ ,� � I L---� •• ' _ ^ PI►L pMA ' _ �, , A�r.rt��- � ir �� a8 Q �3oi �i4a ��4� �ia7 r-� �, � 3 �3�s � ►►�6 � . _ . �� +� , ,-�.--� A • 'r - ..• � ! 321 # �, � 0 23 3 _� _ — a 2� R� - d� � - - _,_.._.,. _ �--- _ ► �,-Z � � _ _ � � - �,� � 4 � y ` � � � '; � '� � a , � ' � . , i � i , • � ��, + '� � ' ..r {f � CAp��NiNO i �. � : A�E��E. � � -.,---� � ' ,, �.: i ,�. � �' �i E � �� ` i � � � �, 1 ` � � I RESOLUTION AFPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE AND TAK�OUT PERMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: ' ' '•• � • •-- � •�• -� � .�� -- .�- � !I! I1It I • �I� • S 4!! S.f •_ � !I • .�.�� - �• � �� I � �� t� l l!'1 i �.� • a •1'� i �.I �. �1111" 0 ►•�� 1' ! 1. •1• 1 �l' U�l !�ll' �� .� .) � G �' �' I �I"� � • 1" : �\ 1 • ' 11 WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on November 9� 1998 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, existing facilities, operation of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing, is hereby approved. 2. Said amendment to conditional use and take-out permits is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such amendment to conditional use and take-out permits are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Dave Luzuriaga , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2� day of November , 199g , by the following vote: AYFS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Conditional Use and Take-out Permits 1251 Broadway effective NOVEMBER 16, 1998 1, that the restaurant shall be remodeled as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 8, 1998, with 530 SF of seating area; 2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's October 13, 1998 memo shall be met; 3. that the business may not be open for business except during the hours of 7:00 a. m. to 10:00 p.m. daily; 4. that there shall be a maximum of seven employees, including the owner, on site at any one time; 5. that the project shall provide adequate filtering and venting to avoid dissemination of odors on neighboring properties; 6. that an enclosed and ventilated garbage storage area shall be maintained at the rear of the site and that garbage cans shall be kept in the storage area until such time garbage is picked up and upon pick-up cans shall immediately be returned to the storage area; 7. that no banner signs shall be used per Title 22 Sign Code Section 22.48.080 and the applicant shall obtain planning and building permits for all signage; 8. that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 9. that the project shall be reviewed for compliance with these conditions in six months (May, 1999) or upon complaint. 2