HomeMy WebLinkAbout1230 Broadway - Staff Report (2)Item # $
Action Calendar
City of Burlingame
Conditional Use Permit for Food Establishment
Address: 1230 Broadway Meeting Date: 7/14/03
Request: Conditional use permit for a food establishment reclassification from a full service restaurant to a limited
food service with indoor seating exceeding 250 SF (C.S. 25.08.264-4; C.S. 25.36.042(e)(1);).
Property Owner: TSTN Partnership APN: 026-094-160
Architect: Vitae Architecture Lot Area: 13,772 SF
Applicants: Vitae Architecture/Zeden Jones, Starbucks Coffee
Zoning: C-1, Broadway Commercial Area
General Plan: Commercial, Shopping and Service
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exemptper Section: 15301- Existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or
exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
Adjacent Development: RetaiUService/Sales
Previous Use: Golden China — Full Service Food Establishment
Proposed Use: Starbucks Coffee — Limited Food Service
Allowable Use: RetaiUService- Food Establishments Require Conditional Use Permit
Ordinance: In October 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1619 which made all food establishments in the
Broadway Commercial Area and Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area, Subarea A, conditional uses. The City
Council also adopted Resolution 111-1999, a Food Establishment Table that established the location, type and seating
area for each food establishment in each corrimercial area. The ordinance required that these establishments included
in the resolution obtain conditional use permits to reflect the requirements of the new ordinance. All the food
establishments existing on the list in October 1999 now have conditional use permits.
History of Restaurant Use at This Site: A conditional use permit was granted by the Planning Commission in March
2000, for a full service restaurant with 990 SF of on-site seating at 1230 Broadway (March 13, 2000 P.C. Minutes).
This was the Golden China Chinese Restaurant. The Golden China conditions of approval dated March 21, 2000 are
also attached for reference. '
Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to change the food establishment classification from a
full service restaurant to a limited food service at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1 in the Broadway Commercial Area. The
property is approximately 100 feet wide by 140 feet c�eep, located at the northwest corner of Paloma Avenue and
Broadway. There are three separate tenant spaces on the site, 1230 is the last tenant space, farthest from the corner.
The storefront for 1230 Broadway is 18'-2" wide. Code Section 25.57.015 states that any fa�ade that has 25 feet or
less of frontage along a public street is exempt from commercial design review, therefore this project is not subject to
commercial design review. ,
The site was previously occupied by Golden China Chinese Restaurant which was classified as a full service
restaurant. The Code defines a full service restaurant as: "a food establishment which sells food prepared indoors on
the premise with a full menu and provides an indoor seating area of at least two hundred and fifty (250) square feet.
The operating criteria which defines a full service food establishment include some or all of the following: served by
waiters to seated customers and where payment is made at the end of the meal; presence of a full commercial kitchen
and commercial dishwasher; and food is served on ceramic plates with metal flatware and cloth napkins." The
proposal is to change to a limited food service business. The tenant will be Starbucks Coffee, whose operation
classifies as a limited food service. The Code defines a limited food service as follows: "a business which sells food
which is ready to eat such as sandwiches, frozen deserts or beverages served in edible, plastic or disposable containers.
1
Conditional Use Perinit 12�0 Broadway
Operating criteria to define a limited food serve include some or all of the following: no commercial kitchen; no
commercial dish washer; take out food service only; and an indoor seating area of less than two hundred-fifty (250)
square feet." Code Section 25.36.042(e)(1) allows, in the Broadway area, a full service restaurant to change food
establishment classification only to a limited food service or a bar upon approval of a conditional use permit.
The Starbucks proposal includes a classification change from a full service restaurant to a limited food service. As
proposed the business complies with the requirements of selling food in disposable containers. The business will not
have commercial kitchen, commercial dishwasher and it will provide take out food service only, e.g. pick up food at a
counter, pay and eat on-site or take away. However, the proposal does not conform to the seating requirement for
limited food service. The proposed use at the site will have 341 SF of indoor seating and 175 SF of outdoor seating,
for a total of 516 SF of seating on-site. A limited food service is defined as having less than 250 SF of indoor seating
area. Therefore, a second conditional use permit is required for variation from the limited food establishment seating
operating criteria.
The hours of operation for Starbuck's will be Monday thru Thursday from 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 .p.m., Friday from 5:30
a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.. There would be
3-5 deliveries per week. During the week and on the weekend there will be three (3) to four (4) employees on site. It
is anticipated that in two (2) years the number of employees would grow to five (5) employees and in five (5) years the
number of employees would grow to six (6). The operator anticipates that there will be approximately 300 customers
visiting the site per day during the week, and 275 people visiting the site per day on the weekend. The maximum
number of people expected on site at one time is twenty (20).
The parking requirement for a food establishment is one space per 200 SF of gross floor area, (C.S. 25.70.040). The
site is non-conforming with five (5) parking spac�s on site located at the rear of the building. Two (2) of the five (5)
spaces at the rear have been limited by the property owner to half-hour parking, to accommodate high turn over
demand. Since the tenant space will still be used as a food establishment, no additional parking is required.
The applicant is seeking the following:
• Conditional use permit for changing food establishment classification from a full service restaurant to a limited
food service; and
• Conditional use permit for variation from the limited food service operating criteria (250 SF of on-site seating
allowed, where 516 SF (341 SF indoors and 175 SF outdoors on-site) of on-site seating is proposed.
Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd.
Use: Limited Food Servicel Full Service Restaurant Conditional Use
Required for change in Food
Establishment Classification
Area: 341 SF indoor seating2 990 SF of indoor seating Limited Food Service
175 SF outdoor seating
(Tota1516 SF) _, Less than 250 SF
Parking: No change 5 spaces* 11 spaces (1230 Broadway only)
, -1 space for each 200 SF
food establishment
'� �xisttng [Von-(,"onjorming .
1 Conditional use permit required for change in food establishment classification from full service restaurant to a
limited food service.
�
Conditional Use Permit
1230 Broadway
2 Conditional use permit for variation from operating criteria for a limited food service, 250 SF of indoor seating
allowed where 341 SF of indoor seating proposed, total on-site seating 516 SF.
Staff Comments: See attached. It should be noted that while the applicant is proposed to move the front of this store
out 3.5' to property line by installing a 30 inch high decorative railing to separate the enclosed porch seating area from
the sidewalk, they are not proposing to place any tables of chairs in the public right-of-way.
June 9, 2003 Study Meeting: At the June 9, 2003 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commission had the
following concerns with the project. The applicant has submitted a written response date stamped June 11, 2003,
to address the Planning Commission's June 9, 2003, comments. Planning Staff as well as the applicant has
addressed the last item regarding other similarbusiness with outdoor seating and problems that other jurisdictions
may have encountered with this use. Staff's summary can be found in table form attached at the end of this staff
report. Each concern expressed by the Commission is listed below with the applicant's response summarized and
found under each item in italics. Please refer to the applicant response letter dated June 11, 2003 for more detail.
• How much seating is available at the Burlingame Avenue Starbuck's site, indoor and outdoor;
The Burlingame Avenue store is approximately 1,800 SF with 325 SF of dining area. In addition to this
space there are S exterior patio tables with two chairs a piece.
• Have seen a security officer at the Starbuck's on Burlingame, describe the program;
Due to several problems with loitering and resulting altercations the City Planner and Police Chief inet
with Starbucks management on several occasions to work out an action plan to remedy these situations.
The proposed action program went before the City Council in October 1997. Part of that action program
included Starbucks hiring a security guard for evening hours, especially during the summer months.
There was also an "officer friendly"program instituted as part of this action program. This included
having a uniformed police officer sit with patrons randomly and have coffee on the site during evening
hours. After problems subsided on 'the site, the security guard was eliminated, as well as the officer
friendly program. �
There have been no reports to the Planning Department about problems with Starbucks patrons for
several years. Don Shepley of the Burlingame Police Department has put together a memo for staff
chronicling the calls that they have received at Starbucks on the Burlingame Avenue from May 2002 to
May 2003. Please find this memo attached with the staff comments. They have had Sl calls over thepast
year, 38 calls of interest. Four of the calls resulted in arrests, 3 due to warrants and one for assault.
Most other incidents occur in the late afternoon to late night hours. The Police Department notes that
often times when large numbers people.gather at one location problems occur. They suggest that if the
Broadway Starbucks is approved and encounters similar problems of those at the Burlingame Avenue
store, that the Police Department would ask that Starbucks hire a security officer to assist in alleviating
these problems.
• When are the peak sales hours, how do they correspond to available parking on Broadway;
The peakparking demand for Starbucks is in the early morningfrom 6: 00 a.m. to 9: 00 a.m.. During this
time the majority of the other business on Broadway will be closed. The applicant has noted that 65% of
their business is done between the hours of 6: 00 a.m. to 9: 00 p.m.; 10% of their business is done from
3
Conditional Use Permit
1230 Broadway
9: 00 p.m. to 1: 00 p.m.; 20% of their business is done from 1: 00 p. m. to 4: 00 p. m. and the last S% of their
business is done from 4: 00 p.m. to 10: 00 p.m.. Staff would note that from observation the most street
parking is available on Broadway before 9: 00 a.m.. The applicant did not submit parking availability
information. ,
Will deliveries be made at the front•or from the rear;
Deliveries will be made from the rear.
• What standards does the city usually require of limited food services regarding trash, clean up and
sidewalk cleaning; •
Planning approval for food establishments generally have a conditions of approval that require the
applicant to remove, once a day or more frequently, if necessary all take out debris on the sidewalk and
on sidewalk tables, in the gutter and in parking lot in front of the store and within SO' of thepremises of
the store, as well as maintain a clean andsanitary sidewalk area in front of the store. The applicant has
stated they will have trash receptacles in the enclosed patio area and within the store. They also plan on
having a janitorial contract for a monthly power washing of the sidewalk area in front of the store. The
conditions will require the applicant provide, install and maintain daily trash cans on the street in front
of the store and at a location determined by the City.
The City power washes the sidewalk along both Broadway and Burlingame Avenue five times per year. If
more frequently washing is required.the applicant will be notified and required to do so. The garage
can liners are also replaced once a inonth by the City.
• How can the business encourage customer use of the public parking nearby, can an access into the store
from the rear be created;
The applicant has stated that due to the limited width of the tenant space at 18.5' and the fact that the
rear access door will be used for deliveries and is not ADA accessible that having a rear access door for
customers is not feasible. They have suggested posting a sign at the front of the store to notify customer
about the availability of parking in the rear of the building or in the public parking lot on Paloma.
• How will the "outdoor" seating area be secured at night or when the business is closed;
The patio furniture to be used is light-weight and movable, and will be taken inside of the store at the
close of business each night. There will also be fully interactive security system with live videos and
audio monitoring of the store 24 hours a day.
• How many similar businesses have outdoor seating in the Peninsula, what sort of problems have arisen
from such seating; have there been problems created inside the store from outdoor seating; in this
evaluation should consider at least one site within a block of a high school.
Applicant's response: �
4` Avenue Starbucks. San Mateo
The applicant has stated that their 4`h Avenue store has outdoorpatio seating and has experienced some
of the same problems as the Burlingame Avenue store, such as loitering during the evenings. They also
had problems with robbers entering the site from the rear alley. They hired a security guard to assist
4
q
Conditional Use Permit
1230 Broadway
with both of these issues. In addition to the security guard, staff began enforcing seating limits for non-
customers and began mitigating some of the problems. These mitigations remedied the problems at the
site and the security guard is no longer needed at his site.
Sequoia Station Starbucks, Redwood Citv ofBurlingame
The Sequoia Station Starbucks is similar to the Burlingame Avenue store due to its proximity to both a
high school and a train station. This store has also had problems with loitering and has found that
removing the outdoorfurniture eliminated manyproblems. Restroom access is also restricted, customers
must obtain a key from staff for access to the restrooms.
Citv resnonse:
PlanningDepartment staff contacted several Planning Departments and in some cases were referred to
Police Departments, throughout the county to ask them if they had problems with outdoor seating at
Starbucks in their ciry or with other sirriilar business with outdoor seating, and how they have remedied
these problems. Nine other jurisdictions in the county were contacted and three had problems with the
Starbucks in their jurisdiction. These cities were Millbrae, Pacifica and Redwood City. They had
problems with loitering and altercations that result from groups of people hanging around and having
verbal exchanges, and at times physical interactions. Added police presence and/or security guards
along with more management involvement and supervision helped alleviate these problems. Trash was
also a problem that several of the Cities stated. None of the cities stated that they currently have
problems with Starbucks. Please find a summary of the responses for each City attached.
Criteria for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission
must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and wil� not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or
convemence;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan
and the purposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to
secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the
aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action
should be taken by resolution and should include findings for the conditional use permit. At the public hearing
the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date
stamped May 12, 2003 site plan, floor plan and building elevations; with a total tenant space of 2,147 SF;
�
Conditional Use Permit . 1230 Broadway
2. that this business shall be occupied by a limited food service with a total of 516 SF of on-site seating, 341
SF of indoor seating and 175 SF of outdoor patio seating, and seating and tenant space area may by
enlarged only by an amendment to this conditional use permit;
3. that this limited food service may change its food establishment classification only to a full service
restaurant or bar with approval of a conditional use permit amendment;
4. that the business may be open Monday through Thursday from 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday from 5:30
a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with a
maximum of five employees, including the manager, on-site at any one time;
5. that this business shall be responsible for immediately cleaning any coffee or other beverages spills that
result on the public right-of-way in front of this location; and that if a cleanliness problem arises the
operator shall steam clean the public sidewalk on a schedule approved by the City;
6. that all deliveries to the site shall be from the rear of the store, shall not result in double parking along
Broadway and shall not exceed 5 deliveries per week;
7. that should security become a problem or the use become a public nuisance the operator shall provide on-
site security during the hours of bperation and shall work with the City to develop the most effective
solution to the problem and the applicant shall provide 24 hours a day, a surveillance camera with video
and make this information available to the City for law and code enforcement;
8. that an amendment to this conditional use permit shall be required for sale of food prepared on this
premise;
9. that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any opening within 10' of
the property line; . '
10. that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any other retail use, a food establishment
shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void;
11. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain at least daily, more often if necessary, a trash receptacle
inside the door to the store and on the sidewalk along Broadway at a location approved by the City
Engineer and Fire Department, and the trash receptacle on the sidewalk shall be of the design approved
for the streetscape improvements and installed as required by the City;
12. that the applicant shall remove once a day or more frequently, if determined to be necessary by the City,
all take-out debris on the sidewalk, in the gutter, and within 50' of the store in each direction; and
�
Conditional Use Permit
1230 Broadway
13. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 2001
Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Catherine Barber
Planner
c: Vitae Architecture, applicant and architect
TSTN Partnership, property owner
Zeden Jones, Starbucks Coffee, tenant
7
Evaluation of Starbucks in San Mateo County
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
Belmont 1071 Alameda de las Pulgas Outdoor seating in shopping
center
Planning Departrnent had no record of complaints
Police Department had occasional problems with teen loitering, usually taken care of by
sho in center security. No serious roblems.
CITY
Millbrae
ADDRESS
513 Broadway
TYPE OF SEATING
Outdoor seating on private
property in shopping center
Although this site appears to have outdoor setting within the public right-of-way it is actually
private property. Have had serious problems with loitering and litter resulting in a meeting
between Starbucks, the property owner, the Police Department, the Code Enforcement officer
and City Council members. Conditions were imposed through the properly manager that
required spot cleaning of the sidewalk, and police officer presence from 3pm to 7pm several
nights per week. These conditions along with added cooperation by store management have
remedied much of the nuisance. The Police Department no longer has officer presence and
there are currentiv no on
CITY
Pacifica
blems at this store.
ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
1227 Linda Mar Center Outdoor seating in
shonnine center
Planning Department and Code Enforcement did not know of any complaints. Police
Department said they have had occasional problems with loitering by homeless and teens, but
not unique to the Starbucks, more of a shopping center issue. Don Shepley of the Burlingame
Police Department notes in May 27, 2003 memo (attached) that Pacifica Police Department had
contacted him regarding problem that they were experiencing at the Linda Mar Starbucks
similar to the nroblems Burlin�ame has experience at the Burlin�ame Avenue site.
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
San Mateo 54 E. 4` Avenue Recessed outdoor seatin
San Mateo 2294 Brid e oint P Recessed outdoor seatin
San Mateo 842 No. Delaware St. Outdoor seatin
San Mateo 1701 El Camino Real Outdoor seatin
San Mateo 145 Hillsdale Mall Outdoor seatin
San Mateo 111 DeAnza Blvd. Recessed outdoor seatin
Planning Departrnent stated that there were problems with trash when the downtown (4`
Avenue) store first opened. But they were not aware of any current problems. The Police
Department stated that they required an encroachment permit for seating on the public right-of-
way. They have not had any serious problems with loiterng. They might keep an eye out every
now and then for kids loiterin , but has not resulted in roblems.
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
San Carlos 1187 San Carlos Avenue Limited outdoor seating, no
atio furniture
Planning Department stated that they have problems with the garage overflowing and with the
trash enclosure. The have had no roblems with loiterin .
Evaluation of Starbucks in San Mateo Countv
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
San Bruno 851 Cherry Avenue #39 Outdoor seating in shopping
center
No roblems re orted
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
Foster Ci 1000 Metro Center Blvd. #E Outdoor seatin
Foster Ci 1066 Foster Ci Blvd. Outdoor seatin
Planning Department stated that they have had problems with trash overflow, no other problems
re orted.
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
Redwood City 1045 El Camino Real Outdoor seating removed -
none
Redwood City 264 Redwood Shores Pkwy. Outdoor seating in shopping
center
Redwood Ci 820 Woodside Road Outdoor seatin
Redwood Ci 400 Walnut Road Outdoor seatin
Redwood Ci 995 Marsh Road Outdoor seatin
The Planning Department noted that the only problems they were aware of was with the
Sequoia Station Starbucks at 1045 El Camino Real with loitering. The patio furniture has been
removed to address the problems that had occurred at this site due to loitering. The two
businesses adjacent to Starbucks however still have outdoor seating. Starbucks has also limited
the restroom access at this store, so customers must re uest a ke from staffto use the restroom.
CITY ADDRESS TYPE OF SEATING
Menlo Park 643-693 Santa Cruz Avenue Recessed outdoor seatin
Menlo Park 699 Hamilton Avenue Outdoor seatin
Menlo Park 3590 Alameda de las Pul as Outdoor seatin
Planning Department had no complaints. The Police Department has had a variety of call, but
nothin s ecific to the use, mostl transients han in out.
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 12, 2003
TO: _City Engineer
Chief Building Official
✓Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review and conditional use permit for a food estblishment
change at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1, APN: 026-094-160.
STAFF REVIEW: Mondav, Mav 12, 2003
-�-��- �.,�:.�..$.. 'b�,���.,�� s��,�, ��- ��,.�e�� � �
=�'.. S � �,(� �-.�.��„�..'r— �5'}�s�QJ�^'�-. .L:. .s�\.+�`� �' � l��--..../�
� �¢ �..ti_
5 �c�� 5��,`, �rz- -St� s.��,�,e-a-�-c� �,JJ��.�,�. S
y�
�� e�-�.� ��-� ��-� ���-�. -�.� � �
-�����,..�.� �.� Q�- s— ���.s �� �
y �
��� ��� ������ ���
-S � t+--���..� C��� ,� � ��� �-� ����
�
Reviewed By: Date of Comments:
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 12, 2003
TO: _City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
�Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review and conditional use permit for a food estblishment
change at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1, APN: 026-094-160.
STAFF REVIEW: Mondav, Mav 12, 2003
�� l(�C%�t�- �'��� �u%��1�-�-� lir I/�� Or'L J������'
II��% ` -
1 �� c�-c� �� J�'� � f�� �� ��
� ��� 5 `'�-�
�',� c�v��� � -��� G��c�' ��e'Y�— °�
�� !
�-�v� c� r�Y- �f-D � ��l'�o l � � �
� � � . _
��. s � � �����
��
Reviewed By: �/r�t�V//V l��'v� Date of Comments: �
ROUTIl�TG FORM
DATE: May 12, 2003
TO: �City Engineer
_Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review and conditional use permit for a food estblishment
change at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1, APN: 026-094-160.
interoffice
M E M O R A N D U M _
�E ., �� � ���a� �.� ..
to: City Attorne /Planning Department
from: D. Sheple ��, y 7
subject: Stazbucks - 1230 Broadway
date: May 23, 2003
f,,�Y 2 7 2003
CITY OF BURLI�.�F�����-
PLANNING Ci"t PT
The purpose of this memo is to provide the Police Department's input on the opening of
Starbucks at 1230 Broadway. An examination of the call history at the Burlingame Av. Starbucks
was performed. This examination was performed as this is the same business going into a similar
downtown area. Burlingame Av. does have more nightlife and is closer to the Burlingame HS.
However, Broadway has restaurants and bars which are open in the evenings into the early
morning hours. Juveniles also frequent the Broadway area. Thus, there is potential for the same
problems at the Broadway location that has occuned on Burlingame Av.
From 5/1/2002 through 5/20/2003, there were 51 calls at Starbucks. 38 of these calls are of
interest. Of these 3 8 ca11s, 16 occurred after 6pm. Of these 16 calls, 13 were disturbances, and 4
were arrests. It should be noted of the 4 arrests at this location three were for warrants and one
was for an assault with a deadly weapon. The victim was struck in the head with a chair. A
description of these calls follows:
436769 Solicitor asking for money while purchasing coffee.
439671 Transient locked in the bathroom.
442289 Employees reported to be throwing cigarette butts in the gutter.
443870 Transient in the doorway (0410 hrs).
444750 Juveniles with attitude blocking (Starbucks employee was RP).
Call/Report # Description
423116 Lost/Stolen property.
424034 Verbal argument - Possibly friends who were joking. Gone on arrival.
426098 Parking probem.
434472 Lost/Stolen property.
434887 Parking problem.
436211 10 juveniles fighting. Employee said it was not physical. Gone on arrival.
200203807 Warrant arrest.
445990 Transient yelling at passers-by.
446326 Ma1e and female arguing.
447511 Subjects screaming.
200203982 Warrant arrest.
200204021 Lost/Stolen property.
Lost Verbal Physical Parking M'isc Ca11
City Attorney/Planning Department
Page 2
May 27, 2003
200204096 Assault with a deadly weapon. Suspect hit victim in head with a chair.
451794 Employee reports a person was a victim of a battery in front of the store.
453334 Argument at a table.
453985 Verbal disturbance. One party hitting the other party's vehicle with hands.
455111 Parking problem in the loading zone.
455878 Verbal argument.
200300142 Lost/stolen cell phone.
200300303 Warrant arrest.
461951 Citizen complaint of patron throwing cigarette butts in the gutter.
200300797 Dog tied to meter outside of Starbucks bites passer-by.
466277 Juveniles causing a disturbance by playing music from a boom box.
470611 Subject being harassed by phone. Suspect outside of Starbucks.
470633 Physical fight. No other details (0016 hrs).
200301297 Theft from employee. Property taken from back room.
472309 Boyfriend and girlfriend arguing with each other.
474514 Subject illegally parked in loading lone threatened Parking Enforcement
Officer.
475006 Transient bothering customers. Transient was advised of trespass laws.
200301588 Ex-boyfriend harassing employee.
475956 Reckless driving in front of Starbucks.
476558 Report of a physical fight in front of Starbucks. Officers were unable to
locate.
Juvenile and adult customers have been known to block the sidewalk. This causes citizens to
have to walk in the street to continue onto other businesses. Acts of vandalism and violence have
occurred around the Burlingame Av. Starbucks. This occurs prepotently in the afternoon to late
night hours.
In the past, the Burlingame Av. Starbucks has hired a security guard to assist with the crowding
issues sunounding Starbucks. Currently, the Burlingame Av. Starbucks is not providing security.
In addition to this, the loading zone at the Burlingame Av. was designated a 24 hour loading zone
to assist in the above issues.
These problems are not unique to Burlingame. Approximately one year ago, Pacifica PD
contacted me. They advised they were experiencing similar problems at their Linda Mar
Shopping Center Starbucks.
Starbucks is a popular place for people to meet and gather. Often times when large numbers of
people gather at one location, problems occur. Should this project on Broadway move forward,
and should Broadway experience similar problems to those of Burlingame Av., the Police
Department would ask that Starbucks to be open to hiring a security of�icer to assist in alleviating
the problems their business draws.
cc: Chief Palmer, Commander Floyd
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
3. 704 BURLI , AME AVENUE,
SETBACK �ARIANCE FOR A
(RANDY�KiRANGE, TRG
June 9, 2003
NED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR LOT C�VERAGE AND SIDE
.ST FLOOR ADDITION AND A NE�DETACHED GARAGE
�
,ECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCI�ITECT; BRUCE KALDOR,
� ��,,�' ���r-•
Plrhiurin presented a�snfnmary of the staff report. C. Brownrigg arrived at 7:28 p.m.
�'y
� Commissioners ask d: �`� ,�
• Provide a better explanation of the hardships�"n the propertyto justifythe variance, for exariiple a second
story add tion would eliminate the lot cofierage exception, why not proposing; �-
• Concemed about expanding the foo�print of the existing house and some one�date adding a lazger
sec�d story; �'� ��x�`"p
• There is little back yard left�vith this proposal, need a stronger rational for fhe exceptions;
• Neighbor adj acent to arage should be contacted about the extension of t�e house and the new garage;
,
• Simple to reduce 's proj ect to comply with lot coverage, reduce the gazage some and the house some.
G�� �,.
Chair Bojues place this item on a future action calendar when ther� space after all the information has
been collected, addressed and reviewed by staff. This item con�uded at 7:30 p.m.
�
4. & 5.1230 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT (VITAE ARCHTTECTURE,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ZEDEN JONES, STARBUCKS COFFEE, APPLICANT; TSTN
PARTNERSHIP, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERIl�]E BARBER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project. Commission asked the following questions:
• How much seating is available at the Burlingame Avenue Starbuck's site, indoor and outdoor;
• Have seen a security officer at the Starbuck's on Burlingame, describe the program;
• When are the peak sales hours, how do they correspond to available parking on Broadway;
• Will deliveries be made at the front or from the rear;
• What standards does the city usually require of limited food services regarding trash, clean up and
sidewalk cleaning;
• How can the business encourage customer use of the public parking neazby, can an access into the store
from the rear be created;
• How will the "outdoor" seating area be secured at night or when the business is closed;
• How many similar businesses have outdoor seating in the Peninsula, what sort of problems have arisen
from such seating; have there been problems created inside the store from outdoor seating; in this
evaluation should consider at least one site within a block of a high school.
CA Anderson noted that this is an application for a limited food service which is a change in type of food
service on this site but a permitted option if the criteria are met, in this case the applicant is also asking for
an increase in the seating limitation for a limited food service business so that requires review as well.
The commission set this item for the consent calendar after the information has been submitted, when there
was space available on that calendar. This item concluded at 7:46 p.m.
RECEIVED
Jur�e l l, 2003
JUN 1 1 2003
Cathcrine Barber
Planniz�g Dcpartment
City of Burli�lgatxx�
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: Response to Study Session for Amended Conditional Use Permit Applicatio» fo;r
Starbucks Coffee Company at 1230 Brpadway, Burlingame
Dear Catherine:
We wanted to take th� opportunity to provide the Planning Commission with a Response Letter to
address the questions that arose on thc cvening of June 9, 2003 during the Stud� Sessioz� for thc
Starbucks Coffee store at 1230 I3roadway. We have solicited feedback fmm ou;r opetalional
parmers who reside and work on the Peninsnla.
Bur]inQame Avenue Storc: Our existing store loeated on �3ur�inganie Avenue (Starbucks Coffee
store #523) is a sli�tly larger space; it has a total of 1800 sc�uai�e feet with a dining area of
�pproximately 325 squaze feet along witlt 5 exterior patio tables arith a two chairs apiece_ The
services of a security company/guard havc bccn retained at this loeation in the past, but their
contract is not administeKed by Starbucks CofF�c Company.
The staff report noted that thcre have becn a number of calls to the police originatirtg fiom this
Ioeation in tlze past year. Some of these ealls have nothing to do with Starbucks' ope�alicros; our
store is simply a convenient rcference point for callers. We believe that some of the incidents
repdrted probably originated elsewherc_ Many of the cpnflicts arise from the nature of outdoor
seating on a erc�wded and busy corner in i}te downtown area. Our managers reetive training in
customer reIat�ions and we work hazd to mix�imize confliets that ean occur at a busy store.
A unique feature of the Broadway store will bc the recessed patio seating. C:u,Stomer seating will
not interferc with the public right of way, thereby minimizing confliets. Also, the enclosed patio
will keep tables and chairs in their intended location, further reducing the pocezitial for eonflicts
that may occur with sidewalk seating.
Pa. rkan�z: Our pcak bvsiness hours are in the early mprning (6 am unt�I 9 am), which is the time
�uvhen our parkin� demand is highest. During these hours, a majoriry of our neighbors are closed
Zd WdZb:ZZ �00Z tiZ 'un!' L�Z0Z960S9I :'ON �NOHd : W02��
for business. Heztcc, our peak parking houzs are complimentary to those of surrou,nding
businesses and wc feel that parizing vcrill not bc an issue. The typical distributzon uf our business
during star�datd business hours is as follows: bctwccn the hours of 6-9 arn, we evnduct GS% of
our busincss; from 9 Fun-1 pm, we eonduct 10% of our business; fzom 1-4 pm, about 20% of our
business; lastly 5% o� our sales are generated in the �vening shifts between 4-1 U pm.
Rcar Parlain� Lot: The Comzzuission asked if we cou�d have a customer entrancc �ix� the rear of the
store to 1i� to the publie parkzz�b lot. Because the Brc�adway store is only 1S.S feet wide, this
really isn't feasible. We will have a rear doc�r �'or dclivcries and access to otur irash receptacles,
but it will not be ADA compliant and w�ill not be appropriate for use by ou�r customers. A better
solution may be to post a sign at our storefront notifying patrons of the availability of parking in
the rear of the building.
Trash Recept�cles and Szdewalks: Starbueks will provide an exterior trash x�cccptacle within our
enclosed patio area in conjunetion w�ilh two trash receptaeles xnszdc our store for the diriu�g arca.
We routinely empty our trash containe.rs throughout the day as wcll as monitox the sidewalk
immediately in front of our storc for any rubbish. In addition,, we keep a janitorial contract for a
monthly power washing of the aidewalk area in front of the store. We will comply with the
City's requirements for trash pickup.
�'atio Seating_Area: '�'he design challcngc of this outdoor patio scativa� area was hovv to mxkc the
entrance to this store accessible to disabled patrons. By zcc;cssing the storefront, a properly
sloped path of travet allows �'or convenient access. The by-product is a uniquc c,�nvironment
whereby an exterior retrcat zs cre�►ted for our patrons, thereby rnalcing this location very speoial.
Whereas zu�ost Starbueks Caffcc locations have outdoor seating, very few stores havc a secluded
patio area as is being proposed at this location.
Coxr►parisan to Other Staxbucks Loeations: �very Starbucks store has a unique setting, featwes,
and eustornaer base, so it ean bc difficult to rnake dircct coinparisons. Tvvp nearby locations (4�'
Avenuc in San Mateo and Sequoia Station in �tedwood City) �ight be of interest to the Planning
Commission:
T'he 4�' Avenue swrc (Starbucks Coffee storc #6]3) has a similar patio scczaa�io and
like thc store on Burlingamc .A,venue has experienccd loitering issues during the
evenin�;s. Similaz to the Burlinsame store #523, a secuxity �;uazd was posted in the
past, but the security company was primarily retaineci bccause of robbers that were
entering from a rear alIey. As far as the patio area was concerned, our operat�ons
par�ers have learned thc cffectiveness of good management in mitigating most
issues. �y internal enforecnacint of seating time ]iznits for non-consumers, loitering
is no langcr a concern at this location and the serviees o;f a security eompany were
discontinued. The lessrnns in customer max�agement learned at this loeation will be
applied at the Broadway store.
�'kxe Scquoia Statian store (St�bucks Coffee store #555) is similar to the �urlin�ame
store #523 in t}aat its proximity is n;ea�r a local high school as well as a train station
dcpot. This store alsp contended with loiteri�g and found it beneficial to r�move its
patio furniture before dusk in order to mitigate any nuisamces.
�d WdLb:ZZ �00Z t� '�nf L�Z0Z960S9t : 'ON �N�Hd : W0�1�
please be advised that these circunnstanccs arc limitecI and isolated. k'urthcr, thcsc stores are older
locations. Today, our outdoor furc�ituxc is Iight-wcight, movable and has a clip for collapsing thc
tablctops in order to allow for its cransport inside our store pxior to t}ac close qf business each
nigh� This convenience eliminates any cancems of securins thc £uzxxiture outside of our premises
and enables oux operatio;nal cou�nterparts to employ strategies such as store #555 of remo�ving
patio furnityre as the need arises. Furthermore, a11 ncw stores arC built with a full� interactive
sccuzity systcnn with ]ive vidco sund audio monitqring of our stores 24 hours a day.
Xl yc�u have any more questions or eoncerns as we construct and opcn �� stores, please feel free
t4 contact me at the number listed below.
Sincerely,
(�f�Yt 4��n�0
eden Jones xZ293
Construction Manager
Starbucks Coffee Cornpany
���%��l/C� ���/
Marcelline Mahern x2271
Uevelopment Manager
a55 N�rth Point, San P'rancisco, CA 94133
(415) 241-025b fax (415) 2Z7-9911
bd WdBb:zti �00Z TI '�nf L�Z0Z960S9T :'ON �NOHd : W0�l�
�
.�.
n
��
ir---
� ,;'�,
9
��
; . ' tc� ct�,.' � ^," •ir
� Y,. �
�.r,�, ;.�:..:�?�.�"
�---...-- s �K�. , �r� _---
., `* _ � � — � _
4� 'i,�� �- � � � ��y 't :�� '
ti � l� 1 �
1� � i"'Y�. f. �}' ��...
�/ � • �, _ � 1 � f .� � � � f'� ( 1 ,��� 1' .
� �� � ..�' �rs-�;
� t•��. A� � �e.t..�`�\ 'i� —Cl�� .�1�
� . , o, . . o ; . . ,.
. . �° i,,�,, � �,�����
��? :�x �t.
-::�.-' , �
___l � ' K 1
. ' ` t' � 1
� . � � � Y ,
{ - . i � ,t•: -•!
�� � ':�� � � jC�. � f '
1 ' �`�" e
��. �, � �'�V/�� .P�a . ! ��'.
��::;,��.. �
0�1�, �ISIO� �FO1�,� 1�,0.,� 1��1�,.,��
RECEIVE�
JUN - 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
�
�.
�
��
�.�---
�
I
1
a ° �-a�:.�� �.�
0
, . . ,•
�
; �2���'���
;�
� , ____ . ;
.�..�,,,,�. _.�`- d...�' - _ -,,
_— � sS
_ :'-�ch'�: �-. 9 �.t �iiirz-
, `'�� . . .. .!
� : '.:1-.:v . �
... , _. 1 �
Ov1�, �ISIO� FO12,<31�,OA 1��i1�.,�. � �
RECEIVE[�
JUN — 2 ��(;3
CITY Of BURLIIVGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.org
�`, CITY 0
�
�.��E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
��'�: � .
Type of application: Design Revie� ..' Conditional Use Permit� Variance
Special Permi�_ -� Other Parcel Number: ��"L7�f �-�
Project address: `
APPLICANT
'• i'�.�tli.��.�
� � � . . .� ►L`�. J : ��
� �r1.�r'' : �iur
��� . �� .I
(h):
(fl� �����-�7Z���2
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
Name: V�
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone (w):
�h)�
�fl�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �
�
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: �� �n�'E}t �'
Address: 2�$ 'Jr �� p�•
City/State/Zip:� �:Irll�, ��i0`�
Phone (w): ��� �?$- �3
ih)�
� (fl: y��- �� �S--c�� �-
� �� �'
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVED
MAY 1 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGqME
PLANNING DEPT.
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and correct to th of knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signahue: Date:
I know about the proposed application and hereb authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's signature: Date: D
Date submitted:
PCAPP.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.ore
`; CIT7 p
t
�RLIJ�IC�AME
�.,..•�� .
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application: Design Review_ �_
Special Permit
Project address:
� APPLICANT
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: ��%N -�oN� ST,q�'dvG�S p��Name: %1� ��1205 , T.�7'n/ Pafiicrslti�
Address: � N0�27X1 PO/N7; 2� ,2 Address:
City/State/Zip: � �1ZA'NG%S�O C� 4]�I3�j
Phone (w):_ ��'l.i� 2���!'JL��O x27p3
(�): �l`�S� �rXo —4��c�
cfl: �4�.�� Zz�- ��9i
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
Name: �%NA'17-loN R4Nto5. C�T7,E�-- R�qN
Address:l�.�fi�% No.l►r1GLbWEGz $LVD. �P-Z
City/State/Zip:_ �El'A� Wivl �{- { � G%J. -t�
Phone (w): �_� 7D�,) 7�1- 32.sS �C /'%
(�): C?�7� 3 r�o - 4�-8s
(fl._ ���! �S�l - 32 / �
City/State/Zip:
Phone (w): �l�� 3�"� - 71( �
(h):
c�:
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVED
MAY 1 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �N✓�KS� OF �e) �,D �STAp l,�S,�fMEl�rT, �vu. ��.ulC,�
/NTa A� LI M �7�D �T� S�'2vl G� �,2 �a2�oN o� STf1Rt3uC.Y.S C'DFPE�
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: Date: 5-� � p3
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's signature: Date:
Date submitted:
Conditional Use Pe t Variance
Other Parcel ber:
PCAPP.FRM
lZ.3� T✓��� H/,�-tif
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin am .
��6; CITY o�
BURI.INCiAME
P�
�.�..•.
1. Proposed use of the site
COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS' E
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL F��I 1 2 2��3
C17Y OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT•
UUGtGS
Mo�Y— T�Iv25. 5:3oam ��Dp+� FRlDA�i 5: ��t•+� -fo l f p►+�
2. Days andhours ofoperation SA-Tu�z.pf} (o aw� -fc /lD�.,,, SUND�y 6�r•�►-� �v /OP�
3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type) DE L-1 �R IE� oNL'�
3- 5' D�U vE�eS t�'� w�K ��
4. Current and ro'ected maximum number of em lo ees (includin owner) at this location:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of lo AM to After 5:00 (o AM to After 5:00 6 AM to 'After 5:00
Operation /DPM PM !o ��:� � PM �o PM PM
Weekdays oN� ONE o�v� c7/� ?'wo oNC
Full-time
Part-time 7,K�� 7wa Fv� -y-wD
77�/o i�v�
Weekends ONE N��E oN� NraN� d/�E ON�
Full-time
Part time ��� �-H�,� �DU,� 7N1�� P! VE Fov�2,.
5. Current and ro'ected maximum number of visitors/customers who ma come to the site:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of 1p AM to After 5:00 �o AM to After 5:00 (v AM to After 5:00
Operation �p PM PM �� PM PM l v PM PM
Weekdays
2sD sn ��o too 3�0 �Z�
Weekends I�� I �� I 2.�0 I /�✓- � I 2�� I/�D
6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner,
employees and visitors/customers): TW��tI�
7. Where do/will the owner and employees park? V�16NAT�D SPkG�S BEffl�lD Svl LD/l�1(�
8. Where do/will the customers/visitors park? �T�E'�T �I�Ni � AT RF�t2 PuS�IC pA�eK/N� Lvj"
9. Present or most recent use of site CKINE� �STi}-U,�IV'j� �(�Ol.l7�'N Lf(1 N��
10. List of other tenants on property, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach list if
necessary) N�R
\
COMMERCIAL.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Department
���; ��T. o�
e�,��+E
'�'�+>,..e� '�
,y,.,.
EIVED
1 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code
Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in
making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly
in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or
convenience.
2.
TK� 72�� UR�I SKMEI�f OF T�-�i5 SUI �D/ntlo ! N CONJ�NLTivN (�v� 7'f-1 -T�N,q.r�—
t M���ov�M�►.rr5 � sT�r�v vcY�s GoFF� u�i u_ � fl- CoM�LI M�NT
�o N�1(�N�12rNCo p�����. f}5-� PUSUG /�-(�'f}LTN� w� ��eE A-
C L�!-�N � vP��,4-TtoN s� NG� TN�2� I5� No �o� �� o1z- Ga�l�1 �� •
A�S �'D SA�FETY, STftfz� uG(GS uT� U z�5 (.�A-D�NG ��H n�oL t� �i Es w 17�f
�4 ZA�- HDU�� Fv LL`� lNf��AG77v� �✓EL�1Z17� �-.�iST�M A-N jj W�' �(ND o�2
S7DR�s 7� � F�aZver�r�� o�i� P�Y l�oc�-� o�rc�s onr 1s�-a�, ,�
A5 � bE�� w��s�e��1sT�rr�r�vc�s �s x�owN �5� ��TN�R-J� PLt�G�
'�l� �Et7P(.'� 72� ME�T �FL.�t'1C �� SbC[si�L!?� ti�D (�� 1��L OV,e P.4�1'lv R'le�'�F
W! 1.� Gsi?Tu�� TN4T �NutT�N�'�7-. LRS�7t�f GD,Jtl1�W �N C� (.�// L L�E i4GEf! EV E� �3`�
TN� Gon�. �uC77o� o� � FvU.�I A�G�S�t�sl-� �rfi�NC.E AND ��T�a�Ms.
How will t�ie proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance?
? E! I S L DC�1T/on� Fo,�j��zL�J W� �4 N� ST�18 [.l.Sf-!� �D li5�,
A� A LI M 17�1� �t�p S�f2VlC,� � S�Tf}Tz gUG6CS fol= F�
1 S A- SV/Tf1-g(� �.��1�'C�/1'IE!`l� FOIe 7NE �12EVlOvS
�v L�c- S�IzV(G� F���7'�4U�.
3.
How wil[ the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity?
"rffE 8� 1 �D /n� C�'S 5H �l.L �l C-L � P��R.v�7 f}n!p F�E -�'�5f-��,
�3�f �EG�S�NG TH� STo�EFR�T r
1 nr v��-�N � �e��T �o� P�77zanrs,
�2�M TNE �xl `�TINC� TiY1t1���G-.
501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org
� w t L c, C�.�i4T�' A-�
0�2(NC� 5k�c�iz
cur.�
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ag me.org
1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious
` to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or
con.venience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring
properties will not be affected, state why. Think about tra�c, noise, lighting, paving, landscaping sunlighdshade, views from neighboring
properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare?
Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety,
and thing wluch have the potential to af%ct public health (i.e., underground storage tanlcs, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage
the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection? Will alarm systems or sprinklers be
installed? Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings,
loitering, tra�c) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding,
woodwork, engine removal). ' . ; �
Genera! wel are is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation
and development? Is there a social benefit? , �
Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent
sites)? Is the proposal accessible fo particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped? '
2: How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance ivith the Burlingame
. - General Plan �and Zoning Ordinanc�? .
Ask the Planning Department for the general plan designation and zoning districf for the proposed project site. �Also, ask for an explanation
of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated designated use and zoning, then explain why this
proposal would fit accordingly.
3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character
. of the existing and pote�ctial uses on adjoining prop�ties in the general vicinity?
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If
changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent
properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare
your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it fits.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so.
If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone
established by size, density of development and general pattem of land use. Will there be more traf�ic or less pazking available resulting
from this use7 If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity? Compare your project with existing
uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, andlor state why your project would be consistent with
potential uses in the vicinity. . . .
CUP.FRM
May 8, 2003
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
RE: Amended Conditional Use Permit Application for
Starbucks Coffee Company at 1230 Broadway, Burlingame
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to take the opportunity to address the Planning Department with a Letter of Explanation.
Starbucks Coffee Company is truly excited about this prime location at 1230 Broadway and we
feel that our use will be a fine addition to this neighborhood.
It has been very challenging to secure the right location since food establishments must replace
food establishments and there is very little turnover on this popular street. The Golden China
restaurant was a full service use with 990 square feet of dining space. Starbucks Coffee will be a
limited food service proposing a reduction of the dining space to approximately 310 square feet,
plus an outdoor patio area. The creation of the outdoor patio area is the implementation of how to
make the entrance to this store accessible to disabled patrons. By recessing the storefront, a
properly sloped path of travel allows for convenient access. The by-product is a unique
environment whereby an exterior retreat is created for our patrons, thereby making this location
very special. To further emphasize this open air environment, our building permit application
will include the installation of a significant skylight above our dining space within the existing
structure, which previously was concealed.
Furthermore, our use will not impact the existing congestion. Our peak business hours are in the
early morning (6 am until 9 am), which is the time when our parking demand is highest. During
these hours, a majority of our neighbors are closed for business. Hence, our off-setting day parts
are complimentary and we feel that parking will not be an issue.
If you have any questions or concerns as we construct and open our stores, please feel free to
contact me at the number listed below. n�� E�`, E D
rc v
Sincerely,
�y�4
Z en Jones
Construction Manager
Starbucks Coffee Company
455 North Point, San Francisco, CA 94133
MAY 1 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
(415) 241-0256 x.2293 (415) 227-9991 fax
Dear City Planning Commission,
We are in the process of establishing new occupants in our properties on
Broadway, specially: Magic Video store at 1400 Broadway; a new restaurant run
by the proprietors of La Scala restaurant at 1232 Broadway. Magic Video and La
Scala are both successful local businesses that will draw customers to the
troubled Broadway, which is presently faced with increasing vacancies and
decreasing foot traffic.
We are also in the process of bringing Starbucks to 1230 Broadway. There have
been few questions taken regarding the addition of Starbucks to Broadway,
specifically, that it may detract in some way from other coffee vendors on the
block. While we are sensitive to this position, it is proven Starbucks will
greatly increase foot traffic on Broadway and benefit all the Merchants,
including Merchants struggling to stay in business due to lack of foot
traffic and the independent coffeehouses. This is based on extensive
research as to the effects of Starbuck on independents. Wall Street Joumal,
September 24, 2002
For those of you who do not know our family, we have resided in Burlingame for
over 30 years, 25 years of which were spent running our family grocery store.
Our ties to the street and Burlingame community are long standing and heart felt
and our vision is simple to see the street revitalized in such a way as to bring in
new patrons while preserving the "heart" of Broadway. It is our position that
Magic Video, La Scala along with Starbucks will achieve this goal.
As we take step toward revitalization of Broadway, we hope the Burlingame City
Planning Commission will welcome Starbucks to Broadway.
Thank you,
The Koros Family
"... Starbucks increases the overall market, attracting new customers to the product who
then patronize the independent providers next door. "When a Starbucks opens, it educates
the market, expanding it for everyone,"
-Bruce Milletto, President of Bellissimo Inc.
Consulting company to independent coffeehouses
WALL STREET JOURNAL, September 24, 2002
"One of the things that all of the merchants wish to see is something that draws people to
the city. Starbucks is a proven draw. It's an excellent business stimulus."
-MAYOR MIKE COFFEY
May 2003, On Starbucks opening o��� V E D
J U N- 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
RECEIVED
JUN-22003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
� � _Y � �—..-1
� � � �
Counting Beans
Despite the Jitters, Most Coffeehouses Survive Starbucks
Old Couches and 'Joie de Vivre'
By Kevin Helliker and Shirley Leung
KANSAS CITY, Mo.—The news gave quite a jolt to the owners of a coffeehouse here called Broadway
Caf�: Starbucks Corp. was planning to open one of its outlets next-door.
Fearing that their caf� wouldn't survive a war with the coffee giant, the Broadway's customers and
owners collected a thousand signatures on a petition asking city leaders to thwart the plan. But
Starbucks won city approvat and pushed ahead.
That was four years ago. Today, the Broadway Caf� remains open. In fact, sales at the 10-year-old
coffeehouse have grown stronger since Starbucks arrived. With reluctance, Jon Cates, a co-owner of the
Broadway, concedes that that might not be a coincidence. "Starbucks helped our business, but 1 don't
want to give them any credit," he says.
Unexpected Boost
The battle between independent coffeehouses and Starbucks may be on of the most hostile-and most
misunderstood—rivalries in retailing. Starbucks is prospering, with earnings up 22.4% in the first nine
months of the year that ends Sept. 29, and a compound annual growth rate from fiscal 1997 to 2001 of
26.8%. Conventional wisdom, meanwhile, says Starbucks is clobbering the independent—invading its
turf, stealing its customers, bankrupting its owners.
In fact, most independent are doing fine-and not just in spite of Starbucks, but perhaps because of it.
Here in Kansas City, nearly all of the coffeehouses operating before Starbucks arrived in 1998 remain in
business. Since then, other independents have opened, pushing their numbers well beyond the 25 stores
Starbucks has on the market. Like Broadway Caf�, many of the independents operate with(n a store's
throw of a Starbuck's outlet.
Nationwide, fndependents accounted for more than half of the fndustry's growth between 1996 and
2001, when the number of U.S. coffeehouses doubled to 13,300, including Starbucks, according to
Mintel Customer Intelligence, a Chicago market-research firm. Moreover, the large majority of
independent coffeehouses started withfn the past decade have survived, industry experts say. By
comparison, close to half of the country's sit-down, slow-food restaurants are less than two years old,
according to D&B, another research-market firm.
Educating the Market
Many coffeehouses have found proximity to Starbucks to be a blessing. A small
Seattle chain called Tully's Coffee Corp. has even developed the strategy of
placing its stores near a Starbucks shop. Chicago entrepreneur poug Zell fn
1995 started his Intelligentsia Coffee Roasters within walking distance of two ,�,,.,.. A=
� . �. ..,..::Y L..'��:
http://www.espresso101.com/coffee_article wsj.html 5/16/2003
Coffee Books for the Coffee Business Page 1 of 3
Coffee Books for the Coffee Business
Starbucks outlets. "It's double-digit growth every year," Mr. Zell says.
Page 2 of 3
A third of Amer(cans who drink coffee away from home order gourmet coffee from a specialty shop,
according to Mintel. Many people believe that Starbucks increases the overall market, attracting new
customers to the product who then patronize the fndependent provider next door. "When a Starbucks
opens, it educates the market, expanding it for everyone," says Bruce Milletto, president of
Bellissimo Coffee InfoGroup Inc., a Eugene, Ore., company that provides consulting services
to independent coffeehouses.
The coffeehouses may be that rere thing in retailing—a concept that doesn't heavily favor chains. Never
mind that critics of Starbucks routinely compare it with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Starbucks s(mply doesn't
enjoy the advantages that have made Wal-Mart the bane of countless Main Street retailers-lower prices,
longer hours, wider selection. The Starbucks offerfng isn't less expensive or more extensive than the
independent's, and the chain's hours often are shorter.
This may be why, contrary to popular perception, independents still dominate the industry.
Independents and small chains boast a 61% share of the industry, says Mintel. In fast food, by contrast,
independents and small chains hold only a 27% share, according to Tachnomic Inc., a Chicago food-
consulting firm. Indeed, the coffeehouse industry boasts only one big cha(n-Starbucks, with 3,167
company stores in the U.S. Of the countless others that have tried mimicking it, not one has matched its
success. The nation's second-largest chain, Diedrich Coffee Inc., of Irvine, Calif., boasts only 237 U.S.
stores.
A big reason for the success of independents is that they're less like restaurants than like neighborhood
taverns-a concept no chain ever threatened. As at taverns, many customers come alone in search of
company. The ideal setting is comfortable, intimate and personal. It doesn't look like 3,000 other joints
with the same name. Often, the person behind the counter fs the owner.
"This is like'Cheers' without the alcohol," says Seine Riley, a morning regular at a Chicago coffeehouse
called Katerina's, referring to the television sit-com. On a recent day, the dozen customers there all
knew each other as well as owner Kater(na Carson. At night, Katerina's offer jazz performances, poetry
readings, and old-movie screenings. The place is well-appointed-upholstered chairs, antique tables, a
copper coffee bar-and (ntimate, like a living room.
Since Starbucks opened down the street two months ago, Katerina's sales haven't dipped. But Ms.
Carson is convinced that Starbucks would like to hurt her busfness. Never mind that at least 300
independents operate alongside more than 90 Starbucks locations in Chfcago, Ms. Carson once
patronized an independent coffeehouse that didn't survive the arrlval of Starbucks. "Starbucks is a
corporate monster," she says.
'The Old Wal-Mart Thing'
Occasionally, the opening of a Starbucks does precede, and perhaps instigate, the closing of a nearby
fndependent. When this happens, and contrary to what the numbers show, it's typlcally viewed as the
rule rather than the exception. Most independent coffeehouses in Indianapolis have survived the opening
of about two-dozen Starbucks. But when Caf� at the Point shut its doors early this year, the Indianapolis
Star devoted a column to it, quoting the caf� owner as say(ng, "A big company like Starbucks can come
fn and lose money for two years until they wipe everybody else out. It's the old Wal-Mart thing.°
The perception of the battle as pitting Goliath against pitiable Davids helps exptain why independents are
faring so well. For one thing, sheer terror goads many independent owners to improve their shops when
Starbucks enters the neighborhood. Kansas City's Broadway Caf� banned smokfng and began roasting
its own beans when Starbucks opened next door. Similarly, the arrivat of additional Starbucks in Long
Beach, Calif., prompted the five-store IYs a Grind chain to spend thousands on cosmetic improvements
as well as staff training, customer service and quality control. Sales have been rising by 8% to 15%
since Starbucks moved close to the It's a Grind stores in 2000.
The image of Starbucks as a decimator of independent shops can also turn customers into activists.
When the chain announced it would enter the Ocean Beach neighborhood of San D(ego last year,
protests arose. Twelve months later, Starbucks fs open and the protests continue-even though the area's
Independent coffeehouses are thriving. Since Starbucks opened nearby, two stores called Newbreak
Coffee have watched sales rise 15%. Co-owner Norma Slaman says: "Competition is good."
Like a tavern, the local coffeehouse can become a key component of an area's charecter. In reviewing
neighborhood coffeehouses for a Kansas City Star artfcle this June, writer Lauren Chapin recommended
23 of them—not one of them a Starbucks. "I chose to just do local coffeehouses because they simply
have better atmosphere, more local color, more jo(e de vivre," she says.
America's 'Third Place'
For its part, Starbucks agrees that atmosphere is important. Howard Schultz, Starbucks founder and
chairman, sald a coffeehouse must provide not only great products but also hang out appeal. His goai
http://www.espresso101.com/coffee article wsj.html 5/16/2003
.
Coffee Books for the Coffee Business
Page 3 of 3
was for Starbucks to become America's "third place" between home and work. In an interview,
Starbucks Chief Executive Orin Smith concedes that independents can provide a more-distinctive
atmosphere than Starbucks. But he says not everyone wants "old couches and chairs to lounge around
on."
Of course, most independents didn't exist before Starbucks demonstrated the tremendous potential of
the coffeehouse market. But that doesn't mean Starbucks believes (t should own the entire market. " We
have created the umbrella under which they are thrivfng," says Mr. Smith. "They can do well right next-
door to us." Mr. Smith says the U.S. coffeehouse market is five to 120 years from saturation.
Even when it sets up shop beside an independent store, Starbucks says it isn't applying a squeeze. And
Doug Weltner believes it. The landlord of Kansas City's Broadway Caf@, he was skeptical when Starbucks
approached him about leasing the space next-door. Why fill one slot if the effect would be to empty
another? "But Starbucks convinced me that it wouldn't hurt the Broadway Caf�, and it didn't," he says.
Starbucks, he says, told him that independent coffeehouses that didn't panic fared well.
Still, suspicion of Starbucks remains deep. When the Starbucks asked ]eff Schmidt whether he'd
consider selling LatteLand in Kansas City, he didn't even ask how much. "I don't think they really wanted
to buy it," he says. "They just wanted a peek Inside my business." Starbucks declined to comment on
the matter.
Before opening City Market Coffee Co. in Kansas City, Courtney Bates made certain Starbucks couldn't
open next door: She inststed on a clause preventing her landlord from renting to another coffeehouse.
IYs doubtful that many fndependents are as profitable as Starbucks shops. The size of it s orders means
that Starbucks receives purchasing discounts that fatten its profit margins. Even amid the current
economic weakness, its sales and earnings have been climbing steadily. In the quarter ended ]une 30,
Starbucks posted a 20% rise fn earnings from the year-earlier period, to $56.2 million, or 14 cents a
share, on a 29% rise in sales to $972 million.
But the profit margin on gourmet coffee drinks are so high that independent operators can thrive even
without volume purchasing discounts. ThaYs especially so for coffeehouses that roast their own coffee
beans because of the plunging prices of rew beans.
The three-store Kansas City coffeehouse chain of Diane and Oliver Burnette more than pays their bills,
including Catholic-school tuitfon for one-child and daycare expenses for another. "It's the American
dream-running your own business," says Mr. Burnette, whose stores, called Muddy's, are posting
double-digit growth within walking distance of Starbucks shops.
Starting a coffeehouse requires only a fraction-from $50,000 to $250,000—of the more than $500,000
needed to start a MCDonald's franchise. Along with dot-coms it's the business that has been most
alluring to the young entrepreneur, not least because the entry fee is relatively low. Ms. Bates, who was
21 when she founded City Market Coffee, six years later bought out her financial partner: her father. "I
just paid Dad off, and at 27, I own my own business and love it," she says.
Home � Coffee Videos � Coffee Business Consulting � Espresso and Coffee Books � Privacy Info
Coffee Links � Coffee ClipArt � Start-up Packs � Music/Interactive � Media Production � What's New
http://www.espresso101.com/coffee article wsj.html 5/16/2003
ev
�
1i �� �1J�� �JL � W.Y �1LJL1L����
ClTY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790
March 21, 2000
Theodore Koros
2225 Summit Drive
Hillsborough, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Koros,
5ince there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the March 13, 2000 Planning
Commission approval of your conditional use permit application became effective March 20,
2000. This application was for an existing food establishment classified as a Full Service Food
Establishment in the Broadway commercial area at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadway
Commercial Area. .
The March 13, 2000 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved
with the following conditions:
1. that this business location presently occupied by a full service food establishment, with 990
SF of on-site seating may change its food establishment classification only to a limited
food service or bar upon approval of a conditional use permit for the establishment change;
the criteria for the new �classification shall be met in order for a change to be approved;
2. that the 990 SF area of on-site seating of the full service food establishment may be
enlarged or extended to any other areas within the tenant space only by an amendment to
this�conditional use pernut;
3. that this food establishment shall provide trash receptacles as approved by . the ciry
consistent with �the streetscape improvements and maintain all trash receptacles at the
entrances to the building and at any additional locations approved by the City Engineer and
Fire Department;
Mazch 21, 2000
1230 Broadway �
page -2-
4. that the applicant shall provide daily litter control along all frontages of the business and
within fifty (50) feet of all frontages of the business;
5. that an amendment to this conditional use pernut shall be required for delivery of prepared
food from this premise;
6. that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any
opening within 10' of. the property line; �
7. that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use, a
food establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall
become void;
8. that this full service food establishment may be open from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.,
seven days a week, with a ma3cimum of three employees on site at any one time; and
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements in effect at the time of the California
Building and Fire Codes, and as amended by the City of Burlingame.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you
miist do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant
to state or federal law. . �
Si ly yours
garet nr � �
ity Planner
RH\s
c. Golden China Restaurant, applicant
1230 Broadway �
� Burlingame, CA 94010
Chief Building Inspector �
Chief Depury Valuation, Assessor's Office �
(LOT 28 & 29 BLOCK 15 BURLINGAME GROVE RSM B/30; APN: 026-094-160)
�
�,
r-r
�
�
��'
�
;
1
i
�a,;;� -�
' � ° t�-�.�.;��s�
�
f :��,x� :.�:� �?�.�:_
�- �
,.r. . _
,
�
�, � �,, ��►
�
�
�, l����` t �
/�, ��Y "r !�-� �
,�-i�:'r"� '' rg' � �s-»'�, �
�' �. � : � _ ,�
�;;�: �. ;� _
1'"'�—�—�- o'
., o
�����un;
��
��u
r��
- � . .
..�.�;,,�;,� ti�,,
.� ��
_�,..,""�;D:i
�_ �
�. -
�T �
: ' •
; '������
�
ov� v�slo� �o�,��,oA��vA��
RECEIVED
JUN - 2 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
NUTS FOR CANDY
1241 Broadway Avenue, Burlingame, CA (650) 343-8758
June 9, 2003
.;�)r,rP�1Ur�Ic,ATIOtv RECE�v�r-
.µ;iER PR�PARAl10{��
G3�' �?��?F�= �?�P�_�
Dear City Planning Department:
I am the owner of Nuts for Candy on Broadway in Burlingame.
Our family has been on Broadway operating various businesses for many years. I
currently own Nuts for Candy. Over the past several years, I have been experiencing a
drastic slow down in my business. Through my observation, other than the current
economic condition, Broadway is not providing exposure and foot traffic for the
independent merchants.
I believe that Starbucks Coffee on Broadway would increase foot traffic on the street and
stimulate exposure for the independent merchants.
After previewing the proposed drawings of Starbucks, I feel that the look of Starbucks
will hannonize with the aesthetics of Broadway.
I have had the opportunity to discuss this issue with other merchants. There is an
overwhelming consensus of the need for Starbucks Coffee on the street.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Best regards,
i �. r
�
� cGG� g� ��!% ' .���'
�
John Kevr ian
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
��s�
June 8, 2003
��.���`�`��
J U N 0 9 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
:;OMi�1UNIt,ATiOfv RECE�vEC:
I��TEFt �'REPfaRA 110^�`
caF �?:aF� RF pn� ;
Dear City Planning Department of Burlingame,
Some of the Planning Commissioners were interested in the position of the Merchants on
Broadway in regards to the proposed Starbucks on Broadway. I was able to speak to 44
available Merchants associated with Broadway in Burlingame this past weekend. Out of
the 44 authorized Merchants that I contacted on Broadway, 43 supported and signed
documentation as to the arrival of Starbucks and only one Merchant did not sign. That
comes out to a 98% support of Starbucks of the available Broadway Merchants and I will
continue and hopefully speak to every Broadway Merchant.
Sincerely,
Nick Koros
Business Name
_ ���._.c�
� J �R'2.1.�1
���
�,
,r�:`���•
�
Merchants for Starbucks on Broadway
The following are merchants in favor of Starbucks on Broadway
Address Position S' ature
� � 2�� n►l.I�Z �-�
� �Q
/OC'
�
�
� a c1s
J
�
.
�f3Et•�A�.T ENGRA.l�N(r l�123 �R.i
Sa��-}�, �t/��tl��� ��S i�d�.�
�, . `� � / -
�+-�n'1 t0 ��✓l� � �i �l 1
t7— �
flW���
Ie����1!'
�
�
. �
�a
/�
��
—�
��
I �
u
�
� �
`J 1�.�`.� T��
��--�
j3�� ���
.---__
� •
�
�
�
Q C"J' `-�.Q'Y'
�
Merchants for Starbucks on Broadway
The following are merchants in favor of Starbucks on Broadway
Business Name Address Position Sign
/YjoU��' �!'l.¢�i � ��oo ��o�w�-y ���v c� �
�z�o
0
� �,. � �j1�0�. �.r
c� �— ��
�s,� �
�y, � .�
.
_aw�
��
�i ,�
u
�
� (.i�,u/�.LL
�1/��
�
�2 0
�C ��.0 C►ri hv� 0 0 �.JLcJL'�
�71�!_i
��
_--
SUPERCUTS �
1222 Broadway, Burlingame, CA 94010
June 5, 2003
The Supercuts team on Broadway in Burlingame supports a Starbucks on Broadway.
Our business has slowed lately and we feel that a Starbucks would increase foot traffic
and increase our exposure on Broadway. We also believe Starbucks would improve the
appearance of Broadway.
Sincerely,
Supercuts Team, Broadway, Burlingame
June 7, 2003
Grace Garden Restaurant
1200 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear City of Burlingame,
I am writing this letter to let you know the importance of bring Starbucks to Broadway,
Burlingame. Our business has slowed greatly over the past few years. The customers
walking on the street have gone down greatly. We aze in great need of more business or
we could lose everything. Please bring Starbucks it will bring in customers we need and
help the street look better. The over whelming majority of inerchants I have spoken to
support Starbucks on Broadway.
Thank you,
06/06/03
City of Burlingame,
My family owns the Burlingame Foods at 1236 Broadway in Burlingame.
We feel that Starbucks would be VERY GOOD for Broadway. Burlingame
business has slowed due to lack of foot travel on the sidewalks. Starbucks
would increase people to come to the street and shop at the other
independent businesses. This would be good for all the merchants on the
street.
Please allow Starbucks to come to Broadway,
Thank you,
�:�r-� p ��� �;�
Broadway Foods
1236 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
June 6, 2003
Gary Andreini
1449 Bernal Ave
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear City Planning Department,
I am the new tenant of Magic Video at 1400 Broadway in Burlingame and I am in
support of Starbucks coming to Broadway in Burlingame. I feel it will bring the
foot traffic needed on the Broadway to increase the business of the other
merchants. Further, after viewing the planned sketch I feel the appearance of
the new Starbucks will be very appealing for Broadway. We need to stimulate
Broadway and I think Starbucks is the perfect solution.
ank you,
Gary Andreini
Broadway Cleaners
1234 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Planning Department,
We are the owners of the Broadway Cleaners at 1234 Broadway in
Burlingame. We want Starbucks to come in next door to us, because we feel
it would bring us more business and make the street look much more
beautiful. We feel the street doesn't have enough people walking around for
business to do good and Starbucks would bring people.
Thank you,
,
n - , � v� �
1�
w��� �
Nirismet pet�itkol
12� Clxron�n
Burlim�utme, Ca 94010
Dear City Pleawit�g I3el�arnn�n�,
I sm tho o+�vner of th�e i.a Scala restaurar�t nn Busling�me 4veane in Burlin�te for ova
1 o yr�rs. M�ny of my ciienxle live ia � erosdway �ea of Burtingame. �nnd the drivi�c�g
and paz�cittg on Hettting�aue Ave. is difTcult anci u1coati�nt for tt�cm. 'it�cy hs� e�
as�cing for a lac�►tioA th�z is in wallcing distance u� Bropdw�y.
I pm ttnder C4�ttr�ct with ihe Koros family Lo open a iestsan'aat at 12�32 Btosdway,
Burliztgaune (Miv�u). 1 fcel thai 5tubucks will be a gre�t �dditioa ta Htaadway, h will
cm.�ate mare fooc �e�'ic on the �trat a�d incroase the indapea+dent bus3nesses on
B�way. One of the reaaons an co�n;ng arui opaain� a re�urwt aa �dwaY w�,s that
Starbuoks was ir.ta�sd ia t�e ne�door space.
Sn �ldition. t�RGr viewiug tkeo propos�d sicetch of thc Statbocks spaca, I feel the
sppearen�o of Broa�ctway will have mare charmin� aad bttractivc laok 13�st aIl of
Bramdway wili beaefit.
i loak %rward ia opeaing a r�es�tawant on 8roa.dway and I lvok forward w Staxbucks
being rn� business ueighbor.
Tlt�k yrou, . , , .,,, . ... _
Mcismet Demirko!
� ��
�;�1�� .��w-:
�_-�_�o�
Mario Crocco
2326 Ray Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
June 6, 2003
Dear City of Burlingame,
I am the property owner of 1365/1361/1359/1355 Broadway in Burlingame.
This letter is in support of Starbucks on 1230 Broadway, Burlingame. My
tenant's business has slowed and they feel the street needs more of a
stimulus to increase foot traffic. All my tenants and i feel that Starbucks
would increase the foot traffic to the street giving them increases business.
In addition, after seeing the sketching of the proposed Starbucks, we all
feel that the building would be much more appealing and attractive with the
Starbucks than how it looks today.
Sincerely,
��i,% i�l/ ��' i�(�L�
ario Crocco
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Star�nck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereTraffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Buriingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we'have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NtlIbrae �tarbucks�have encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. "
We wish the Citv of Bnrlingame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printedl Address Si�nature
�
�3
�(ines per page)
RECFl��ED
JUL - 1 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAP�1E
PLANNING DEPT.
�
�
�.�_����. �
-��
we �have several in place already.
� c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. I�lIbrae �tarbucks liave encountered loitering and complaints from residence �
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
azea Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
�, This petition states that we a�GA NS� vin�a Starbnck's Coffe��#acility on �,,� �,
Broadway, Burlingame for the o owing asons:
.� , a) Sever�'ra�c and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the -�(
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�inBuriingame AND a freeway entrance.
-r b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when -j�. "
We wish the
townsfolk.
�' ��'
���� \ �\�� �
�� ���.
_ �., � �,
�.:�
` .
� (� lines per page) -- � ._ _ ...
. ._ , � _ _ _ ^-t.
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffex facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever�'raffic and Pazlcing hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we'have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IVT1Ibrae StarUucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
S
� �
We wish the Citv of Bnrlin�ame to address and re�tifv these renuests from its
townsfolk�
�,��-otE� 'Z.urno�l" i 44 S
��lines per page)
�.e�-'�evv� i�yc
�' �� o
� �Ya��
�ur� �l�.�Ci�� � �i�/b i O
Name (Printed) Address Simature
This petition states that we _are AGAINST baving a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in�Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several�in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NTilIbrae �tarbucks�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Ci of Burlin ame to address and recti t6ese re uests from i
townsfolk. L r,t/ �rr�.J�
CL �/ /`�O
���
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
-.•
i
,
Z 3 � lines per page)
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. 'They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several-in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NlilIbrae �tarbucks have encounterecl loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
�
S o, �f ,�G�Q-�-aY �t-�... r es �� rr�.-n'� � � '
�'� b �� c.c� C� (U2-� � � �
��4lines per page) . � c\ `
� � V\�
. �� � � � ������ `" ' �
`�L-�� �' '�
ATamP fPrintPcll Address Si�nature
This petition states that we _are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a} Sever Tra�c and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several�in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1�1Ibrae �tarbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wis6 t6e Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z� (2�" lines per page)
� f��,�j,�v�Z"G�co
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever�TrafFic and Parking hindrance. 'They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several-in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Nlillbrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish t6e Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
�k�Q, v\�Ai�. `1,3� C v�c�.��'� �J`G �u��, .
l.� �a�`��` « �. �� ��
� 0 �i� � '� s� Sr C� �i�tt�2
/�-I��„�.►� ���1-�< ��r��i l'a ( � ���l1ia 4�r (�v�1�noC'i
��i�'�7" ��
, _ �,,
�►�i �w I cR-�-
;2- �i c�u s�l,� C�`
�� � ��Lcv
; r-�- o N ��'►.�
��J����a,� al�
�U S��-s.� ��
� � � .. .
r( ,�
ar'
; ��v-
1 �-33 :,��z.
`') l l 1..���i'L
o`t l/ 1 C.,�GC�i IS
_� �
D (/�A(�t'lhP�tZ (� �
zl � �p ✓ �r� /
'7 3S P�e-A G � P�- �Y'
lli�
�u 3
►
0
�
� �' y �
i_ _�
i� o/��
�� ' , . _�'�'!�
��/'rl�
- '����
' . �c�,.���i
I.
�—
�'.� � i:�
r/�L. i � . i14 ' �
�. �. ' .�i��
'��'�l�i !��:
-- . �
�' ��t:I
,����A�'�
�li—�--
/� .
������_
r� �yG!
• � � �i�,��; _
�� v
�-
� �� �
o � �o�'�'
��olv
- ��I,�
�j� (�ines ger page)
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever TrafFic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we �have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. N11Ibrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see trafjic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z� ( mes per page)
This petition states that we are A�AINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Tra�c and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
wehave several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. Ivlillbrae �tarbucks�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z� �,�ines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traf£ic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several�in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. I�llbrae Starbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
azea. Note: Broac�way is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
�� �lines per page)
�-hdr�iP �f�w�G�h �70 y LQrME�il'Lt �}Ve �� `
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIREC"TLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we �have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1�'ilIbrae Starbucks l�ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
Z` j� lines per page)
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in BurIingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NrlIbrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
Z3 (2� lines per page)
We wis6 the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifiv these requests from its
townsfolk.
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1VIilIbrae �tarbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Buriin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
��
�� (�lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
This petition states that we .are AGAINST baving a Starbnck's Coffes facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereT'ra�c and Paricing hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laa �na blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we'have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1VI'lIbrae �tarbucksliave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its
townsfolk.
�� (�� lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address � Simature
Ti�is petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereTraffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1VIiIlbrae �tarbucics l�ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Bnrlingame to address and reMifv these reQuests from its
townsfolk.
.�
2� (?j4lines per page)
This petition states that we are AGAII�IST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IV�TIbrae Starbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
Z�
We wish the City of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
(� lines per page)
l
This petition states that we are AGAINST .having a Starbnck's Coffe� facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereTraffic and Pazicing hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we'have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NtlIbrae �tarbuckshave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra,�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
We wish the Citv of Bnrlin�ame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its
townsfolk.
i
U
.N �,h�� �C�C
,.
�.
�
� � (� ines per page)
This petition states that we are AGAINS'I' having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Nfillbrae �tarbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wis6 the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
��(2 lines per page)
�
This petition states that we .are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffe� facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereTra�c and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
wehave several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IvIiibrae 5tar'bucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. ��
We wish the Citv of Bnrlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
/� � ;(�#'tines per page)
N�me (Printedl Address Simature
Ti�is pedtion states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffex facility on
Broadway, Bnrlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevereTraffic and Paricing hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Buriingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IVI'Ilbrae Starbucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
� We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its �-�
� ta_� �� � ���
�\
�
�
2 (� lines per page)
�
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the foUowing reasons:
a) SevereT'ra�c and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NTillbrae 5tarbucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
;
�� � lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
This petition states that we are AGAINST baving a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. 'They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we �have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NlilIbrae �tarbucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printed) Address � Si�nature
J u� Ccl�. r�2s A� v� c� ��.���t ��
.. � .. , .,_. �. �.�A � , � , Aa�., �., � A,« � ���
e. �olf-�n i�f-�-.3 (:av�r,l�.�ti
. �� ��;U r ►{ ti3 � ,o u ��c
�
�� lines per page)
- -2�,�, �,� �-�l �.��. "
� �, � � �,,� ,� �,c.,ricA P t � u i �V�a,t� �,u � �.t,i.Q� �-� �
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever�Traffic and Parking hindrance. 'They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Buriingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NlilIbrae Starbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
�
23 (� lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
,
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Tra�c and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NfilIbrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv t6ese requests from its
townsfolk.
Z3 (,?� lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
This petition states that we are AGAINST' having a Starbuck's Cof%e facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Nfillbrae Starbucks �ave encountered ]oitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising ", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broaclway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
��;���
� ri��
Z3 (2�lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Millbrae Starbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wis6 the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
� T4--� 1-� rnw I�.�► 1� Z s I��• I o,�.,� l��e. 13 ��� I��,c�-^�. � b-� �)
s/t,�-
�o ,
� UN�ntrz �-
,c�1,N�-��{
�✓��K Dr�l��r�
V�
5� ��
iu�r
,� ve
�
_I v�
�
, �4�-= �1 �t-r��t:
� 3 I��57'� o a
� O �L
��(�% �-!�� �OLD '��
��o �z�-� �.n��.�,�
0
��
. � .,
1���.�
�IJG ( 7����us J��i�» ��>;�L
4l� Las 1�ob�es�jr. (��cL�
'�"�l � �, �f.Q-� V ` � �l�✓
�7 3 � C.Uv�M� J� �I/�
_. � ., d). , cl-�_,
_ C��� /�(� d�ae'Y� �-�
0./� Q- Cj �� Z�/ LJ'E' l/ �((V�
r� �'rsr�h'h�e� 1/��7 �G.dGr<ef,i/�n
s �,�„p �l2 i,� � l!� •
%�6�i?G/'�-�'h c. 13 3 � �t �G/11 � /
� /z� 5���% <'a �^rr/�a �P
��-� . �/l�� �'A����
„_ . .
�„/ � /'L G1
.
�1 7 � rzi�?s� S ��. � �
I 5� s >3,-��c,�,( �v��., �c,1 � ��
,
� +! r
.�.�.�,,.�.�._
�=�.4.�:
al1�/�
Z3 ��lines per page)
This pedtion states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
NlilIbrae Starbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traf,�ic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish t6e Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z� �� lines per page)
This petition states that we are AGAINST baving a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Tra�c and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several-in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Nfillbrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z3 (�4lines per page)
This peNtion states that we are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. 'They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several�in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IV!'ilIbrae 5tarbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbuckr are NOT.
We wis6 the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
ZJ7 (�'lines per page)
Name (Printed) Address Si�nature
�--Q-
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Buriingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several�in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1VI'ilIbrae �tarbucks�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wis6 the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
��
,,� �' I
���o�
��y�10
:o�� l��yr���
c�yydl0
Z�(� lines per page)
I
Name (Printedl Address Si�nature
This petition states that we are AGAII�IST .having a Starback's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever�'ra�c and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we�have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 11�Iillbrae �tarbucksl�ave encounteredloitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Z��'� lines per page)
Name (Printedl Address Si�nature
n on Li 1 N n n., i.a�
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
wehave several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NIilIbrae Star�ucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see trafj`'ic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
Z3 �� lines per page)
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
tncvnafnllt_
This petition states that we are AGAINST baving a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burliagame`for the following reasons:
a) SevercTraffic and Pazicing hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NrlIbrae �tarbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising ", see traffic issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish t6e Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name (Printed) Address � Si�nature
RN �
�� RDSS r ,�Os� �v. $u� r�
�
�
�
Z� (?�lines per page)
This petition states that we are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever�,Traffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IVIilIbrae �tarbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
Name Printed Address Si ature
( gs/o3v �
/ � / �c�CBR.� DF'�
Ot-i' Df� � � Z ��-t- rli4 �w��
� G� � �rn, Q t *�
c�,�. � �.
�. . ��—
�
- ��.,
� ��v� µ►N• �.rv.�-
�1 \ c �.� \ . 1�nc \ � \ 1 \ l, w-f"'�c'1�..7c�_ � �. �i ti_ 1 . \. e �✓'� ' /
�
�� ��f
� /3 6�
.�-- �� �
�
, 13��
7 . , •_ :�.�►Jl��
. "'�v"ill��':�'�
�
_ ►�
w t
a��. �. ., �
w�e - , _
��R�� �ck �5�a �I�Nef��z
��/ w �/TTG•� /��.� G''i9f��/� ,gv,E �`oZ
ky -�¢;��/
���
...
�-
� -
i ►� '<t c�jo
'�� R'�/DI Y��
"���� �'a 9s�'c�
. C�
, ^
I�'� a.,z� �er�.,� �� �8S � )I�'I�1 � �u��[��
� � � c
�3 (�'lines per page)
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbuck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons: -
a) SeverRT'raffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Builingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
Niillbrae Starbucks �ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see tra�c issue) within their
azea. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wisln the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk.
�� �� lines per page)
T�is petition states that we .are AGAIrIST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Sever Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IvIllbrae Starbucks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
�
�3 (� lines per page)
We wish the Citv of Burlingame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its
to_
This petition states that we .are AGAII�I'ST having a Starbnck's Coffee facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) Seve�Traffic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
aiso a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. NIilIbrae �tarbuc'ks have encountered loitering and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
azea Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these requests from its
townsfolk�
�3 (� lines per page)
/
This petition states that we.are AGAINST having a Starbnck's Coffes facility on
Broadway, Burlingame for the following reasons:
a) SevenaI'ra�ic and Pazking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery�in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when
we"have several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. IvIilIbrae Starbucks �have encountered loite�ring and complaints from residence
and business owners (along with "cruising", see traff'ic issue) within their
area Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT.
We wish the Citv of Burlin�ame to address and rectifv these reQuests from its
townsfolk.
Z� (�lines per page)
�.r,,,....e ��,.;r+oa� e.�ri,-P�� � �iQ-nati�re
� � .
` �
� �
�� P � / � �
This petition states that we.ar AGAINST ving a S_arbn�k'a �' es facility on
� Broadway, Bnriingame for the foUowing reasons:
a) SevereT'raffic and Parking hindrance. They will be DIRECTLY across the
street causing congestion between the Paloma/Laguna blocks. Broadway is
also a major artery in Burlingame AND a freeway entrance.
b) Removal of family friendly restaurant, to install another Coffee House, when "
wehave several in place already.
c) Extreme loitering and night time activity. Both the Burlingame Avenue &
. 1VIiIbrae Starbucks l�ave encountered loitering and complaints from residence
._ and business owners (along with "cruising", see traffic issue) within their
area. Note: Broadway is in the middle of a residential area, Burlingame
Avenue & Millbrae Starbucks are NOT. �
We wish the Citv of Buriin�ame to address and rectifv these re�uests from its
townsfolk.
" Name (Printed) Address � Si�nature
Z� �� lines per page)
� � . . . . � � .. . . . . . . . . . � . � � �
�,t.e' c�T" o,�, CITY OF BURLINGAME
euRUN n�E PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• � • ��• � • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
. $URUNGAME, CA 94010
� TEL: (650) 558-7250
b... .�....•'•o . . .. �. : . . . � - . . . . .
Site:1230 Broadway
Application for condifional use permit for a food _ ,
establishmenfat: 1230 Broadway: zoned C-1 PUBL�C HEAR�NG -
Broadway Commercial Area. (APN: 026-094-160 ).
d. _:�_ NOTICE.-._. _ _a..�-
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission '
announces the #oilowing public hearing on Monday
July 14, 2003 7:00 P.M. in the City HaII Council
Chambers tocated at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, `
Califomia. .
Mailed: July 3, 2003
�
�
,
�
`(Ptease refer to other side) ; �
CITY OF BURLINGAME y .
�
A copy ' of the applicafi�n a'��r"�ans-�ort�ns� `�'' � ay.be reviewed prior" Y
to the meeting at�l'I�e��lar�ing�;Llepar�ment � t� �l Primrose Road,
= Burlmgame, Cal��rrua �`"`"�` �' �� _ �„ �
�; � � , �
� ��~�y� :� � �
� srk� :�` 2'M.w' � ,
` If ou chall n e the,�F b ect; a licati (s� �n cou�i;'�Qu ma � be limited to
: Y g.� t� J PP {�P
� raising onl� hose;issues �t�u or saz�e�n� el�� ra.�sed atFihe��blic hearing,
.� �.� � ��.��:.� �
� described i:tI�e �nq�ic �r..�n wntten corr�sp rtde�nce�i�liuer�d to the city '
` at or prior t tt�,�-�u�li� ht�a�i�g a � �.v �.'. �, � � � ` � � �� � �
�:
� � �, �
' : , � .' �: 3 � �: "� `� 1"�
. � .a�uer:R.��� ,z�F'rFa, r �� _�„�•- � g . :cc. ?zF�a".� `
Property.o ,�iers �i4_reeeixe this ��ti�e a�'� ��sponsibl�,�or i orming� their ��
}� tenarits' abo. C thi� nofi e��F'or �iicltt c�na�:informatio �� ple se call (650)
� 558-7250. ank j�u. ����:��. � '� �' �`�� �` � ��. �' �
� ��f �Y _ �3�+���s' � � i��i "�� a � k� � '� �7t�=�
6� � � � !
�� � ' � a��'��' ���� � � S � ��5���' ��s� ���
� Margaret � ro� ��, " �� �;�, � �; " �, � '.:�"" � � ,�
City Planner � ��'>� � �' � ; �z '
, ���: y ����y�x � � � �. � "' �1P
M1
: PUBL1.����1R��.�;�IVOTICE
: � � — � � � ����� �,�v �...� ���� . � �� � ��
, : `
: . . . :
t (Please refer:to other side)
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
conditional use permit for a food establishment at 1230 Broadway, zoned C-1, Broadwav Commercial Area,
Theodore, Thomas and Nicola Koros, propertv owners, APN: 026-094-160;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Julv
14, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received
and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set
forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article
19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations
involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
2. Said conditional use permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit is set forth in the minutes and recording of said
meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of Julv, 2003 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use permit.
1230 Broadway effective July 24, 2003
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
and date stamped May 12, 2003 site plan, floor plan and building elevations; with a total
tenant space of 2,147 SF;
2. that this business shall be occupied by a limited food service with a total of 516 SF of on-site
seating, 341 SF of indoor seating and 175 SF of outdoor patio seating, and seating and tenant
space area may by enlarged only by an amendment to this conditional use permit;
3. that this limited food service may change its food establishment classification only to a full
service restaurant or bar with approval of a conditional use permit amendment;
4. that the business may be open Monday through Thursday from 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.,
Friday from 5:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday from 6:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with a maximum of five employees, including the manager, on-site at any
one time;
5. that this business shall be responsible for immediately cleaning any coffee or other beverages
spills that result on the public right-of-way in front of this location; and that if a cleanliness
problem arises the operator shall steam clean the public sidewalk on a schedule approved by
the City;
6. that all deliveries to the site shall be from the rear of the store, shall not result in double
parking along Broadway and shall not exceed 5 deliveries per week;
7. that should security become a problem or the use become a public nuisance the operator shall
provide on-site security during the hours of operation and shall work with the City to develop
the most effective solution to the problem and the applicant shall provide 24 hours a day, a
surveillance camera with video and make this information available to the City for law and
code enforcement;
that an amendment to this conditional use permit shall be required for sale of food prepared
on this premise;
9. that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any opening
within 10' of the property line;
10. that if this site is changed from any food establishment use to any other retail use, a food
establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become
void;
1230 Broadway
Exhibit A- Conditions of Approyal
Page 2
11. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain at least daily, more often if necessary, a trash
receptacle inside the door to the store and on the sidewalk along Broadway at a location
approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department, and the trash receptacle on the sidewalk
shall be of the design approved for the streetscape improvements and installed as required by
the City;
12. that the applicant shall remove once a day or more frequently, if determined to be necessary
by the City, all take-out debris on the sidewalk, in the gutter, and within 50' of the store in
each direction; and
13. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire
Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame.
�rE, c�Tr p� CITY OF BURLINGAME
BURLlNS:AME PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
.,,�' BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
Siie: 123� BiOa(li'vay
Appeal of Planning Commission approval of
conditional use permit fior a food establishment at:
1230 Broadway . zoned e i. (APN: 026-094-160 ).
The City of Burlingame City Council announces the
following public hearing on Monday August 4, 2003
7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at
501 Primrose Road, �urlingame, California.
RAailed: July 25, 2���
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINUAM�
A copy of the application and plans f�r this`pmject may be reviewed prior
to the meeting at ��"the Planning� Department at SQ1 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California. � � .
If you chall�'`nge tl�e.subject applicalion(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only�hose issues yon or some�>ne else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in writ�en c�ri•esp��ndence cielivered to the city
at or prior tq the public hearing. � � �
�
�
'ti.-�.<: �:.
Property ow�ers who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants abo�t this�:notice. For �dditional inforiiiation, ple�ise call (650)
558-7250 ��ank �ou. �,;:: ;
t�=.
� �Lf r.� ' ���. .;„ �:. � �- :� ;;
� ���� �a ' ���� ��
Margaret M�"��ro�
���,_ �
City Planner �g�, .�� _ ,,��
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
• �. �• �� T , � . �,� � ��j��t�/°'' ,�4! , ��: �
�T,t�, /� ���! �' \ � � ?. `�y1 . � �
r � � >� 7 � A�� r
'�: ;,� � :. � .,��� ?'�„ �`�.�f : )
�i �::� - �:' - � a, '� .� ' �,\ ,,,� �- �9�'9`9 .
�i� A ' L
�V�i � y ''% �' � ' �(t;� ',''' .k ' � �%� •'�� �7% :cJf % •I
t�� : �� s:s y , a.� T � �7 F
1 �. .H� 'i "� � w'� • / � % ,'' � �/ � � �l`�' ` ` . ' �l
at� � ,?�? � �� , � � \
� . t}� � ; • ri .�� � . \ ' ''\ n � ' ��
'� :�, > ,/j[' �
� � � , p t*� �I�� � , 1, �j�"• f ��
' +. ' /. '' ° � , � '+ A � ~ � ��i • .�i F, \ , \ , \�; � '�� ! � �
, � .�,,r `ti, i! • i► .: � � , `�
.t}� , �9�'�r . , � \ . �r Q, ` �!
ti � � '� � ai �,i�" � t� 'l T
-�� � � d � ;� o . �, � ,
.. . \ ��" rj ; I '�b' �' �
' ` ''1 ii: � '�: ,f ' � , . �:;
� , �j . � ,' �� d
.i _ qI ' � • / ' �i x�'��
I ! � � � • � <a .. ��. "'"` . +�i1 %�: �
1230 BROADWAY Y''� � ,' '�� ` . '+� '
,,'�; �, � � � � , ,'. �
; � - , �� �` ' .�
.,, , '� ` ��� ,//, �' 4 � �
� .'''► ' � ) , y
,M� �- — ��,�� � � ` i y• ' >
T` / � • �9
� i .
�,
�. 4� Rc � ,, � . , ��r
��. - �'< � ,' °- � �T:
� , '�; _ � . .�\�/�`�\ `� .�✓ .
4 ti � � ��
� t ,. : �'► � ;' °. `�'� '' � > ''
,�"'; �`. r: ` : � �• • � >' �� . 1 \'� �
. /' 1 . .s r ':`K,� ` ''�
%i �'s `�� � '` t�1 ` � '•'!� \��'. � �+�` '� :� �' � 1� �,� '
� ;:= . � \ � �
� � y ,''�'�'* � \ � �'.� ♦ y��� '\�l,.. !�' �; `�'
���` 4{ � � 1 • . `, / - �'7 J l , 7 , �( ` �'
��1�. .n � . + ,�/��' . � � ��� � 7�� �'�,
� � ,�,�, �. `�; � , :� , �. �-1+. �
a `•�`�. � �,'� �� � `` �r,l . ���••' �1 , F a ' \ .
� ' +f . J u � �^ � y � y`� !� . . . .
�. � �.. , � r ..� , � . s:
� .
.1` .,•:.a.l . .,, � �, -1
,., i' � ; � . ` " ��
, �i -
�i. 1 , ,�at ' \ ,: ,�',. � , .. . L
.` oP�k � y � i� ` +. �\ �' � . � , � •
: � i . � � ♦ �� ,��` � , � "� � • �� �=
�y � � . - <� ,
� �• � '� � a ."q� � � �
Ix �j� �� � .`��' 1 y'�IJ.-� `�7 �` � �.
r '.,' ' ` �; ..�t� T:� r 's�� � � •'.�: � . . I_�.
ti ; � . � ..v. .�� � '., , .
� r!" � ��' ,�.+! I "�•7,� �� . + ,'25�� y +► �. '�
� *,, � /�� � �y `. :• , •�P•�� �. ��`�
, � `'� \ \ �, � � , �� .'�'� ' f. ' �` ,
/ , ,� �� . �.D�' ` ', �V � �,
�� ti � , ' }�� � � .�.. �� �j ���'��,
,j� 4� , % y '" ' , . •1� �' � i�t�`'r. t � •'t
� .• � ''76:�.1 � .r ��` � �l' „�..>.
_�'� . y� � • . . ,.., �,t^ xS`' � �:�a� '
�n„� \' .�'' �' ��• � \ kC�' � ^.�. � . .
� � ,w �'4�:.s•, �'� !"�� � ,
'4� i ,.� / • � � .. / . r. .:,;�...:
� : . � �� � .� t, �
,
f,++ , i , : i., � +
� � � . 'M. � \> � � . � �� V . � �� �1
:s�1 � ♦ �.� ;s� ' / � .�'� ;5 L ? : , �Y P F
.�� • : � . � • � ` T .., �. �' ,' �.�
� \ � `. \ .������' ti�� � .�� •.
, ���� � � � , .� . � Ra ,y�,� � ML r _ . ,�-�.�
-'� t i,y Jf P � '1' ,'�.
t � � � ��'�br ` ��r..
��,7�. '�. '��,�, "�.�, fi+�. !� F. �
�'S� r) � �
"';_ 1 ; . ��� - , � .
`� �� � ' � � �'` � '� �:, �, �: ��;
.. �y `` , � >;` - '� � � �,�� •�� , ,+,�•` ,�
�►'' , �! "`� �. 1 �1 `� / a t*-, ^ 4> '� � , •+y. „y,
,,'' �c• . , � �� , . . • � � j��. �
,� , . . + -� �P'T
� 4'�`._ `, ` `�' �
� , .� � -.;�', M. ,/' { . i•
♦� \ �
� . � _,1 � �.
�!�' �• � �� .v , <, .. . � � ;yt ,;; ;,C�• � �..
. ,. �
� �`� r ., r`� 1. 1', �:
' �� � � �` 1; � ;��;n, � � '�' 1. , `�° � �,=� � �
��, � ��'� � � _ s• , � :�
� � ■ 1 . � �