Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1337 Vancouver Avenue - Approval Letter�� ��b, CITY O� 4� �"' � BURLINOAME MN os y'Or., g CITY OF BURLINGAME Planning Department Ciry Hall - 501 Primrose Road Budingame, Caiifornia 94010-3997 Tel. (650) 696-7200 August 17, 1999 Todd Arris and Allyson Willoughby 1337 Vancouver Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Willoughby and Mr. Arris: Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the August 9, 1999 Planning Commission approval of your design review, front setback variance and special permit for height became effective August 16, 1999. This application was to allow a first and second story addition and remodel to your home at 1337 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1. The August 9, 1999 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 20, 1999, Sheets P-1 through P-6, except that all the windows on the second floor shall be replaced to match the new windows on the approved plans, the windows existing on the first floor may be retained as shown on the approved plans; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the second floor, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's June 24, 1999, memo shall be met; and 4. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. August 17, 1999 1337 Vancouver Avenue page -2- Reimbursement of the unspent portion of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to you under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, ��I��'e�'(��rl�.- Margaret Monroe City Planner jg/smg 1337vanc..cca c: Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (Lot 17, Block 58, Easton Addition No 7, RSM 8/28; APN: 027-151-130) * , . ROUTING FORM DATE: 7une 23, 1999 TO: �CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BIJILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at 1337 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-151-130. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, 7une 28, 1999 THANKS, Maureen/7anice/Ruben 6 Z`� Q`� Date of Comments �4 ' C/Vl�c-'[/r, .Pi cii� L(Ci lTJ � i'f�'» ri ar7 Ir`�.d � 7 ' � � � . City of Burlingame Pla�ining Commisslo�: Mi�tutes August 9, 1999 A�'PLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 1374 DE SOTO AVENUE, ZONED R^l. (LUIS A. RO,�LES, APPLICANT AND CYNTHIA AND MICHAEL LAZZARETTI, REQUEST FO�ONE-YEAR EXTENSION ADDITION AT 4 OCCIDENTAL AVEN and A DESIGN REVIEW AP ICATION FOR A SEC D STORY �ZONED R-1. (TRICIA IN HAGEY, APPLI NT AND APPLI TION FOR A LAND APING VARIANCE, CO ITIONAL USE PERMITS O VARY FROM THE LANDS E DESIGN GUIDELI FOR BAYFRONT DEV OPMENT AND CONDIT NAL USE PERMIT AMENDM T TO EXPAND O ICE FACILITIES AT �N EXISTING OFFICE,�'" STORAGE AND MAINTENAN FACILITY FOR A C RENTAL BUSINESS AT 1650 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY, ZONED C-4. C. Vistica moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. It was noted for the record that condition No. 1 of Item No. 6; 1337 Vancouver Avenue should read; " that all the windows on the second floor shall be replaced to match the new windows on the approved plans, the windows existing on the first floor may be retained as shown on the approved plans ". The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Acting-Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and Item 5, 2804 Easton Drive passed 4-0-1-2 (C. Deal Abstaining and Cmsrs. Bojues and Coffey absent); Items No. 6, 1337 Vancouver Avenue; 7, 1374 DeSoto Avenue; 8, 344 Occidental Avenue and 9, 1650 Bayshore Highway, were approved on a 5-0-2 (C. Bojues and Coffey absent). Appeal procedures were advised. REGULAR CALENDAR APPLICA ON FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 401 BLOOMFIELD ROAD, ZONED R- (MICHAEL AND ROBIN FMANN, APPLICANTS AND OPERTY OWNERS) - RESUBMITT OFA PROJECT WHICH WAS D IED WITHOUT PREJUDICE - C TINUED FROM JULY Reference staff repor 8.09.99, with attachments. City anner and Commission discussed th report, reviewed criteria and Planning partment comments. Three con itions were suggested for consider 'on. Planning Commission had no questio s of the staff report. �� � Acting-C ' Luzuriaga opened t public hearing. The project applican`�, Michael Liffrnann, 401 Bloomfield ad, was in attendanc he noted that he hope ' the revised plans they had addresse all the issues raised by Commission s Deal and Dreiling. ere were no comme s from the audience and the public he 'ng was closed. Commission co nt: the most recent lans were well drawn; that this projec�,was an example of how the Planning Commission could n make a determinatio based on the plans submitted because t y were so incorrect could not tell what would be built, n all the plans agree nd the looks of the project are much im roved from the original. C. Deal moved, by resol 'on, to approve thi application with the following conditio : 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the pl ubmitted to the Pl ing Department date stamped August ,, 1999, sheets A-2, A-3, A-6 & A-7, date stamped June , 1999, sheet A-1, a date stamped May 25, 1999, sheets A-4 & A-5, and that an� 3 . ' City of Lurlingame Planning Commission Minutes APPLICATION� OR CONDITIONAL U RESTAURANT A`�' 1300 HOWARD AVE August 9, 1999 PERMIT FOR TAKE-OUT SERVICE FOR AN EXISTING ZONED C-1, SUBAREA B. (CONDON'S �STAURANT, CP Monroe briefly review the staff report and the cor�missioners asked: letter from the applicant needs arification, they are open for catering an have take-out now, what is` the current number of take-out transactions and h w do they expect them to increase; if th business is sold will the take� out food service permit go to the next operator; an a fast food business erate on this per it; clarify the number of customers to this site, if it is 200 people after 5 p.m. ow do they get that n ber on the site; i�approve for 200 commissio�n would need a more accurate count or justificat n for that number. The were no further questions from the commissioriers and the item was set>�for public hearing on A�gust 23, 1999. �:� � '�. ``�' APPLICATION FOR RKING VARIA�TCE FOR REAL ESTATE USE (TITLE COMPANY) AT 1129 HOWARD AVENUE, ZONED G SUBAREA B. 4�, (AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, APPLICAI�IT AND LAMANET FAMILY TRUST. PRO RTY OWNERI�'�.: '�w CP Monroe briefly reviewed tl�e staff report and the commissioners had no questions. The item `was set for action on the consent calendar at the �gust 23, 1999, meeting. ���0.. V ,. � APPLICATION FOR SIGN EXC�PTION FOR TWO NEW SECONDAR � FRONTAGE SIGNS��LOCATED ABOVE THE FOURTH FLOOR ANI��FOR A GROUND SIGN WITH NO OPEN� SPACE BETWEEN HE BASE LI OF THE SIGN AND THE GROiJ�D LEVEL (2' REQUIRED) AT 765 AIR�ORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4. (STEVE PETERSON, AD ART SIGN COMPANY, APPLICANT AND 7f5 AIRPORT BOUL � VARD TlAT7T TTC�TTTT TT/ITTTT�7 lltS7ATTT\ �� . t, �� @ CP Monroe�i�riefly reviewed the staff report and th.e commissioners asked: not requesting any:,signage on the facade, of the builduig viS�ble from Airport Blvd. southbound, th� only signage visible will be the monument'Sign, if want to address this now is the t'u�e; why does the code require a 2 foot, opening between the base and the grounc� on a monument sign; there were no furt� r questions from the commission and �t was suggested that this item be set for the consent calendar. The item was set fo�ction on the consent calendar at the August 23, 1999, meeting if all the inform�tion is available. �� � ACTION ITEMS '� �U�, .� :� `� Consent Calendar - Items on the cqnsent calendnr are considered to be routine. They are acted on�� multaneously unless separute discussion and/or action is requested by the app,�icant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the tim��the Commission votes on 'ti�e motion to adopt. ' ` � p��s C. Deal asked a change in condit would require a regular hearing. CA advised; no C. Deal then ask��i that a condition be ad to Item #6; 1337 ancouver to read: "that all the windows on the secon floor shall be replaeed, those existing win ws on the first flo r may be retained as shown on the��approved plans. �, � � �. AP ICATION FOR LLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND�EAR SETBACK��;YARIANCE FOR A FI `ST FLOOR AD TION AT 2804 EASTON DRIVE, ZONED R-1. (ROD AND TA�MI DOWIAT, � APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 1337 VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1. (TODD ARRIS AND ALLYSON WILLOUGHBY. APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS) �►a