Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1261 Vancouver Avenue - Resolutionr RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE CA 94010 2003-278068 11:06am 09/26/03 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages '!4 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Siocum Assessor-County Clerk-Recorderl I �ii ��i � iii ii�ii ii�ii ��ili iii�i i��iii iii{� �ii�i iiiii i��si ii�►iii iiiiii �I liii p q 3 q 2 7 8 0 6 8 A R* * Z Resolution No. 072-2003 1261 Vancouver Ave.; APN: 027-332-020 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. i� Date: 9/8/03 arga et Monroe,�City Planner RESOLUTION 072-2003 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a desi�,n review for a new, two-story dwelling with detached garage at 1261 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, Crai� Suhl, propertv owner, APN: 027-332-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Au�ust 25, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. C AN TIM AURAN I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August, 2003 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS Auran; Bojues; Brownrigg; Kerighran; Vistica; Keele NONE Osterling NONE SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review 1261 Vancouver Avenue effective September 4, 2003 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 30, sheets A.1 through A.3 and C-1 and date stamped August 5, 2003, sheets A.4 through A.6 and L.1, with a new 4-foot high fence atop a 2-foot curb running the length of the of the upper retaining wall along the left side of the property (approximately 86-feet starting at the back, left property corner); and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 4. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 5. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 7. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the conditions of the City Engineer's May 22, 2002 and July 21, 2003 memos, the Chief Building Inspector's and the Recycling Specialist's May 20, 2003 memos, and the City Arborist's June 4, 2002 and May 14, 2003 memos shall be met; 10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; page-2 ' Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review 1261 Vancouver Avenue effective September 3, 2003 11. that the construction for the new residence, including retaining walls and detached garage, shall take place entirely on the subject property and that at no time shall construction materials or activities extend onto neighboring properties; and that prior to a Building permit being issued, the applicant shall submit for the approval of the Public Works Department a construction plan to show how the property will be developed within these guideline; 12. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 14. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 15. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. ROU'TIl�1G FORM DATE: June 30, 2003 TO: X City Engineer Chief Building Offiicial Fire Marshal Recycling Special'rst _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for new single-family dwelling with detached garage at 1261 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-332-020 . STAFF REVIEW: second comments routing � �-�.. � � ,��.�.�.,� �,�,.� � � � � ✓� t�"�� CL`,-uC (3 "I.u'"'• eX''W[ "`" • `�f'�,� �'tT^-- �"`"`� _ , . 1 -�' � �V � �'Ge'„ a� l2 � ''Q°'�-�- ' � �� ' � � �.� c� 4�,(.I�,� a��- -d'�-e �y�t�.. ti�%i���"`; j w�c.� �� u � 1/ _ V � ��� " � _ Q� a� - VQ _w�I ��,� p �p1�rl- 0�-�.�/�`- �iTS'S�°"., 0�,ti91N'`'"" � ! /-""`'', ^C�'l�C t � �yr� v"Tv C"""� � �� ti � � ^ �W`�`�' �OkM'k-v� Gkl� � ��. �"�7 .L� 11 G `� . ` ` -. � �• R�� V � �� �- 0�.; ' � � �� � Reviewed By: V`� Date of Comments: %/'�G� II ROUTIl�TG FORM DA'TE: May 20, 2002 ` TO: �City Engineer Cluef Building Offiicial � Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _City Arborist City Attorney FROM: � Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review and special peccnit for height for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1261 Vancouver Ave.,-zoned R-1, APN: 027-332-020. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, May 20, 2002 �J " � l�� � � �� � ��� �" �"� `�`- �� � � � � ��� �,� ,�--���.�- ��� ��� � � � � �� _� _� � �, �� � � °�` c _ _ � � _ " . � �� � � � g�'� .� � �` _ v�. Revtewed Ey: V a � h i� � _ ,�';c�o� ��g��. Date of Comm�nts: S v� �� � � PUBLIC �V'VORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS The following requirements apply to the project Project Name: ��1,1 �i�7�y�� S� �''i'M'`,�^( au►t�`'`,�Ft � Project Address:_ 12(o j,,� � 1 �_ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land sutveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 2 _� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building perm.it issuance.) 3 4 The applicaat shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval .prior to the issuance of a Building pernut. The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral �is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6. T'he project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and I�evelopment Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the projec� The sewer analysis shall identify the project's unpact to the Gity's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traff c impact study for the project. The traffic study should , identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering - Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 II:�private development�PLAM�iING REVIEW CONII�IENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land sha11 be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12, Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. � 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act 14 The project sha11, at its own cost, design and construet frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary � appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan, 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may ca.use adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traf�ic and public on slreet pazking. The project shall identify ttiese impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 �_ No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 _�� The project shall comply with the City's NPDES pernut requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 T The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is � proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANMNG REVIEW COM1vv�ENTS.doc ' PUBLIC V�ORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The b�ck of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overIIow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage reeeptacle shall be placed in fronk The sidewalk fronting the store shail be kept clean 20' from each side of the proPert3'• 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage azea to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:lprivate development�FLANN[NG REVIEW CObII�IENTS.doc ROUTIl�TG FORM DATE: May 20, 2002 TO: dy Engineer Chief Building Offiicial Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planni�g Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1261 Vancouver Ave., �zoned R-1, APN: 027-332-020. 0 ROUTIl�IG FORM DATE: May 20, 2002 TO: _City Engineer _Cluef Building Offiicial Fire Marshal � ecycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff : SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height Eor a new two-story single family dwelling at 1261 Vancouver Ave.,�wned R-1, APN: 027-332-020. STAFF 1tEVIEW: Mondav, Mav 20, 2002 �J�%t:GU�I�-T- tx� i L� 'Y�-Q-c.� 'To d�c� �j- ��Z�vo wcs�_ � Y ^ (��- �w ��� � � � �-� -�- ��,►��=-� � �- �� �K� � �-h,�-t-.�,�.�.� , �,,,�-d�- �-� �- �- � � � �� �Fo� � w� �( b�- ` �.pw� �-F-�- �� � _ ` �, �, �.� �,- P ,� � � ��e U� � � � L� �� - �t,,`� � . Reviewed By: ! �� Date of Comments: �� �n �_ ROUTING FORM DATE: May 15, 2Q03 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Offiiciai Fire Marshal ��Re ling Specialist Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling with detached gazage at 1261 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:027-332-020. STAFF REVIEW: Thursday, May 15, 2003 � L�,6�vE' i2�A� 7�� Su4M dY`�`6� ,�lLF3ca,�sc1-- 2E�o�-�-- F'2a�'�t /''!�lJ�/��E �.� Gc► .�4�� S�/Y� 3 ws,�:cy fL� c oy,r �c �u� S�.we � � � �,r ,B ��� � E �ia-k �`n.E�E �1-vz- 7'k� s G�GjcP�� . � �70 ,� G/�.EE ' Gus` i1�/ TX� S lL�6 ca�, �,�,cc �� Y�a�-, �.�(.d�ko-�i G��� ��o P�-21�,� mu� K'� /`?u TP" m�3y`� � M � l�20'Y"� c.� � ���� %Z�i�o v/1 C f �/2.�s`c `I . Reviewed B : � . Y Date of Comments. s�Y a � � ' I�lllayne Tree Expert Company , ESTABl1SHED 1931 � 535 BRAGATO ROAD, SUITE A SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 � TEL: (650) 593-4400 FAX: (650� 593-4443 MEldBER NATIONAL �� � � E-MAIL: info�maynetree.com ARBORIST ASSOCIATION COMPLETE TREE CARE: Pruning Pest Controi Cabling Consultations RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON STATE LICENSED: � KEVIN R. KEILTY PRESIDENT Contracto�'s License #276793 �ed Arborist WC 0476 cert�rad n�no� wc o� �s Pes� C�tr°� Adv�s°� #06894 KENNETH D. MEYER Pest Contrd Bus. Lic. #01061-00000 CerGfied Arborist WC 0162 CLIENT �+ TEL JOB SITE CON7ACT PROJECT TEL BILLING ADDRESS f CITY ZIP DATE �` 1.�.[j 3 CONS LTANT: R H, K K, K M Consultation Fee $ HOURS AMOUNT . � ' �k c � U -Q u/G� �1 �.ci, � _ � 1 ` ,� ( � �L , 0� !Y' ! � � � / _ �. S�'N-�p'�_ ( � r / � � `1 � 1 S �/ ., � �^ r I S �'l.� � � � �- / �l, � � S� �r � r .� ; ;�i� � � / vl,� ��L �1/�l � f , ' :1 r� f / �, . r� / o-.� ac !` �v1 r�V icah��4 , N �cNv��ta YLL�� - r � � G i l � Y►-� `vt � �Y, o�.t � a V S K S` - My changes or a�tio to the above o�ic may change the cost of the estimate. ft is the responsibility of the properly owner to clearty maiic all underground utilities including irrigation systems, and to advise the Mayne Tree Expert Company of such locations. The Mayne Tree Expert Company will not be responsible for damage to utilfties unless the above conditions have been sa6sfied. TERMS: Payable in full n receip ' voice. S rge of - % per mo th on all a ounts over 30 days. Minimum monthly service charge $2.00. �_ � % s�! 7i �0 �% DATE � .�>>..v... +� • . ROUTIlVG FORM DATE: May 20, 2002 TO: City Engineer Chief Building Offiicial � . Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist � ✓City Arborist City Attorney FROM: Planr ���� ; Staff s SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permlt for`;height for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1261 Vancouver Ave.,�zoned R-1, APN: 027-332-020.