The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1249 Vancouver Avenue - Staff Report_ � - :� ,_ _ - , � PUBLIC HEARING - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1304 -_"'.,EASING DOG LICENSE FEES City Attorney reviewed his memo of April 25 in whic'::e r=commended Council adopt Ordinance 1369. Mayor Pagliaro opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Mangini moved to adopt Ordinance 1364. Seconded by Coun- cilman Lembi, the motion carried 5-0 by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 47-88 ORDERING DESTRUCTION OF WEEDS AND RUBBISH - PROJECT 8803 Public works Director reviewed his memo of May 10 in which he recom- mended Council hold a public hearing and adopt resolution. Mayor Pagliaro opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Lembi moved to adopt Resolution 47-88. Seconded by Coun- cilman Mangini, the motion carried 5-0 by voice vote. LETTEA-Fi2dPi �IiA1oISER�E�CO TIN�P:PPROVAtb�EVENTs — — There being no comments, Council unanimously approved the request as conditioned by voice vote. PROPOSED 1988-89 BUDGET & CAPZTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Item will be considered at the June 8 study session. Mayor Pagliaro asked that a proclamation be prepared designated the week of May 15-21, 1988, as Human Services Recognition week. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION 48-88 - AMENDING CONTRACT WITH MWM ARCHITECTS FOR PARKING STRUCTURE ON LOT A City Manager's memo of May 9 recommended Council approve a new contract with MWM Architects to complete construction documents and construction phase services at a cost of $53,500, less credits paid for previous work. - b. 2 RESOLUTIONS 49-88 AND 50-88 - BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES City Treasurer's memo of May 16 recommended Council approve ` resolutions authorizing agreement with Bank of America and � authorizing signature authority as indicated. C PARCEL MAP FOR 1249 VANCOWER City Council P1inutes - Ma�=� 16; �9g8'- � LL- ---� City Engineer's memo of May 10 recommended Council concur with _ the Planning Commission and approve parcel map as both tentative (Consent Calendar approved) and final. d. SPECIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR FENCE AT 1035 MORRELL City Engineer's memo of May 11 recommended Council approve the special encroachment permit request for 4' high picket fence subject to standard conditions of removal and located as shown in the sketch. e. WARRANTS AND PAYROLL Finance Director recommended approval of �darrants 39523 - 39949 duly audited, in the amount of 5807,453.75, and Payroll Checks 83191 - 83877 for the month of April, 1988, in the umount of 5699,016.49. N s�mething else, but was willing to i,P_Bp the same assignment. Other co��ncil members cancurred. CANCELLATION QF DECEMF�F_R 1�19B� MEETINI3 Mayer Am>tr�ip cc.ancel�d the Der_�mber 19 meeti.ng due to the holidays. CONSEfJT �ALENDAF: � � � �. _��.�.:w:�r.'��:u:.�.�_.........: r.a City Council Minutes - December 5, 1988 (Consent Calendar- .. appr;obed);; rT b. c d. B f. 9- I� RESULUT I ON 1 l 1�-88 - SETT I N6 F'UPL I C HEAR I IVG F Ok r;h1ENDI NG bOUND- ARY OF UNDERGROUND DISTFICT [3 - CALIFOfiPJIA DRIVE F'ublic Works' memo of November '�� recommended council schedule a public hearing January 4, 1989 for amendinq the California Drive Underground District 8 by e>:tendinq the boundary to incl�ide the area from the intersection of Proadway and Carolan te F'ollins Foad. The city's share of the costs is estimated to be �o�.UUO, in addition the city would install street lights at a cost of t81 , C�i�U. RESOLUTION 111-88 - EXTENDING AGF,EEMENTS WITH HIGH SCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTFCICTS FOR COLLECTION OF SCHOOL FEES City Manager's memo of November �� recommended council approve this resolution extending separate agreements with each of eur school districts for collection of the School Facilities Fees. These fees are collected as part of the building fees. There have been nv major administrative problems in collecting the fees for the schools and this saves developers the time and effort of ma�:ing separate payments to the schools. The �agreements are subjer_t to a�O day termination clause. (1) RESOLUTIQN iii-�B - DESTFUCTION OF TREASUREF: RECL�RDS (L> �iESULUTION li�--8�3 - DCSTRUCTIOIV OF ENGINEEF:ING FELORDS (1) Fin�nce Director's memo of November 2� recommended council approve destruction of certain records over two years old. (�) F'ublic WorF;s" memo of November �= recommended destruction ot obsolete records over two years old. RESOLUTION 114-c�8 - AUTHORIZING AF'F'LICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR RESURFACING TENNIS AND L�ASf::ETPALL COUFTS Fark Director's memo o+ November �� recommended council adopt a resolution approviny application tor grant funds under the Park L'and Rond Act of 19E38. Rurlingame has received an allocation of �82,��i�0, these funds c�nnot be applied to e:;isting pro�ects or used for maintenance or ❑per�tion. Staff proposes to use funds for resurfacing several courts. TEN7ATIVE AND FINpL F�AF.CEL IHAP FDR 1�49 VANCOUVER AVENLiE F'ublic Worl;s' memo of November �O recommended council concur with the Planning Commission and approve the map as both a tentative and final parcel map subject to conditions. DENIAL �F CLAIMS: (1) JERF;V F'ELUFFO; (2> SHAN LAM k;AN, CHI F:WONG f:AN, AND CHI kEUNG k'AhJ City Attorney recommended dt.nial of these claims for (1) car damaqe from a storm drain qrate: and i�) injuries from a car cr�+st-� cau=,ed by ; stol en car bei nq chased by Pii l l �r �e pol i �e. FNCf_uHLHhlEfd7 f='F�;1�1I-f 1-0F FEh1GE= ��T t48�.1 HIGHWr;Y ROAD F'LILiLAC LJar�::s rnemo of IJovtmh�r �1 recommended counr_il qrrant this permit �or a four fout wrr_��ic�ht iron fence alanq the back: 04 the sidew�l{:. l Fi'J-I AT i','F r'dVD F I IJHL I�IAF' FI IR l: 0�,' i;ND 1_':'1 Hi.itJNk11 HVEIVUE f>��bl ic l�J�..�rl �, mema n� I:lovr-;�mher :'9 rc:commi-:nded counci l rr_,nr_ur wiPf� 'r'l.:�rir�iri�.� Ci,a�ioi�.:si�',n „rid ;�ppri,.,Fr int�, in�.�, rnr .� tur. ccrn[� t n..� l. i i,n _ � y `, GTY �C,A O'e' BURLINGAME �..,:� �• STAFF REPORI`�' To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUN .TT, suE BY �aTE: NOVEMBER 30, 1988 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS - EN TNF.F.RTN(� AP - 6Y � AGENDA 7 E ITEM n MTG. 12�5�8$ DATE sue,ecT: TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS - DEEDED LANDS OF COLOMBO (VOL. 5706, PAGE 698) 1249 VANCOWER AVENUE (APN 027-340-010) - P. M. 88-14 Recommendation: It is recommended that Council concur with tha Planning Commission and approve the attached map as both Attentive and Final Parcel Map, sub- ject to the foliowing conditions as amended at the Planning Commission meeting: 1. The driveway access to Armsby shall be limited to a 15' maximum width driveway located at least 10' towards Jackling from the center of the proposed lot or for Parcel G. Design to meet both Hillsborough's and Burlingame's City Engineer requirements. 2. u An advisory 20 m.p.h speed limit sign is to be posted by de- veloper on northbound Armsby Drive. 3. Driveway exiting to Armsby shall have a grade not steeper than 5$ for at least eight feet (8') behind the curb line. Retaining walls and grading need to be designed to keep sight distances for exiting vehicle as large as possible. 4. All trees on Armsby and in Hillsborough property (Lot A) shall be trimmed by owners regularly under Hillsborough guidance to provide clear sight distances from the ground to six feet (6') clear. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Two lamps shall be installed at the driveway entrance to provide adequate lighting. Subdivider to install a 5' wide asphalt concrete walk area ad- � acent to Armsby Drive improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Hillsborough. All sewer, water, storm drainage and cable T.V. access shall go to or be off Vancouver Avenue. The existing sewer lateral to 1249 Vancouver shall be tested and repaired or replaced in accordance with City Ordinance No. 1329. All curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting Vancouver Avenue shall be replaced as required by the Public Works Department. . � .., 10. All utility services to the two par.r,els shall be installed underground without any additional pole sets. 11. All improvement plans to be prepared by the applicant's engineer and to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Any new house on Parcel G to be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Standard and by noncombustible roofing. 13. All required construction as conditioned above or shown as required drainage or utilities to each parcel shall be completed prior to the filing of the final map or the subdivider shall submit a complete engineer's estimate of the cost and enter into an agreement with the City of Burlingame to install all such improvements within one (1) year of map filing or prior to issuance of a Building Permit on any created parcel. 14. This map to be considered as both the Tentative and Final Parcel Map, and staff will see that the proper Final Map is recorded. Hackground. Council may recall approving another division on this property. In May 1988, Council approved a land division creating three lots out of this one lot. The Town of Hillsborough would grant access onto Armsby for only one (1) lot. As a result, the applicant has had the attached map prepared for approval creating one lot, Parcel F(7,986 s.f. area), facing Vancouver with the same frontage as existing (65') and a second lot, Parcel G, with an area of 19,602 s. f. and a frontage of 125'. The developmental conditions attached include the same as the three lot split with others added as appropriate. Staff pointed out to the Commission that Hillsborough has other conditions of approval which the applicant will be required to adhere to. Hillsborough staff has agreed to conditions of approval as they affect access onto Armsby Drive and related improvements. Exhibits• Map, Planning Comm. Report as amended at meeting and attachments � j �. ` Frank C. Erbacher mg cc: John & Theresa Colombo, Owner 1249 Vancouver Av., Burlingame Chas. L. Kavanagh, Engr. 708 Carolan Av., Burlingame Leonard Smith, Town of Hillsborough City Clerk/City Atty, � P.C. 11/28/88 Iiem #7 As Amended at a.:,. Meeting MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING CONIl�IISSION DEPARTMENT OF PUHLIC WORKS - CITY ENGINEER TWO PARCELS -DEEDED LANDS OF CC�LOMBO (VOL. 5706, PAGE 698) -1249 VANCOWER AVLNUE (APN 027-340-010) -P.M. 88-14 -TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO This parcel map application is to divide an existing lot into two lots, Parcels F(7,986 S.F.) and G(19,602 S.F.). Parcel F will continue to front on Vancouver while Parcel G will front on Armsby Drive, Town of Hillsborough. This is a second subdivision application of 1249 Vancouver Avenue. The previous application was to divide existing lots into three lots and was approved at City Council's May 16, 1988 meeting; however, the Town of Hillsborough allowed access onto Armsby for only one lot. Staff Review This proposed land division is in the R-1 zone, with a required minimum lot size of 7,000 S.F. These two proposed parcels meet Burlingame's 7,000 S.F. minimum required lot area. Parcel G, however, does not meet Hillsborough's minimum 21,780 S.F. lot size. In the block containing this proposed land division, all lots have access and frontages on Vancouver Avenue. One lot, 1215 Vancouver, has access on both Vancouver and Armsby. All lots in this block are in Burlingame. Parcel F street frontage of 65' (55' average lot width) and Parcel G street frontage of 125' (135' average lot width) meet Zoning Ordi- nance requirements of a 55' (60' for Parcel G) minimum street frontage and an average width of 5C'. Parcel G faces on Armsby Drive and will require access through Town of Hillsborough-owned property. In Parcel F, the existing structures are to remain. The house front setback remains at about 40' with a side setback of 5' minimum and rear setback of 65'+. The garage structure is next to the side property line and is in the rear third of the proposed parcel. Parcel G has proposed 25' minimum front setback conforming to Hillsborough's 25' minimum. There is only one other "frontage" on the Burlingame side, 1215 Vancouver, which is about 10' from the Armsby property line. The side and rear setbacks on Parcel G are proposed to conform to City of Burlingame requirements based on the latest zoning code amendments, not Hillsborough requirements. � Page 2 � The Planning Department has reviewed this map and commented that new construction will have to meet the Declining Height Ordinance requirement. The Fire Marshal has no objection provided that the house be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Stan- dard, and non-combustible roofing will be installed on the house. The Town of Hillsborough, at their July 11, 1988 City Council meeting, approved a 15' wide access off of Armsby Drive with the following conditions: 1. The easement will access one lot with a lot frontage of 125' and approximately 0.450 acres. No further subdivision will be allowed in the future. 2. Access will be located at the most southwesterly corner of the lot. 3. Construct a 5' Asphalt Concrete parking strip across the frontage of the lot behind the curb and gutter on Armsby Drive. 4. The strip of Hillsborough property between the parking strip and the right-of-way shall be maintained and properly land- scaped by the owners of the lot fronting this property. 5. The proposed dwelling shall be reviewed by the Architecture Design and Review Board of the Town of Hillsborough. Hillsborough's Engineering Department has approved a change in the driveway's location to 10' northerly of the middle of Parcel G to provide more sight distance on Armsby. The Subdivision Code, Section 26.24.050 provides four (4) review criteria that need to be addressed in the Commission's review of the proposed map. It states: "The commission shall make its decision upon such considera- tion as, but not limited to, the following: (a) Recommendations of the city engineer; (b) Compatibility of proposed lots to pattern of existing lots in the neighborhood; reverse corner lots or key lots shall not be introduced into a neighborhood where such lots do not now exist; (c) Accessibility to safety services. The commission may consider grade of access roads or easements and require that such grade is not excessive or beyond the capacity to traverse by safety equipment; Page 3 (d) Proposed grading and contours of the finished sites. The commission may require as a condition that the finished contour of the building site or sites reasonably conform with the neighborhood pattern where such �attern exists." From the standpoint of Items (�), (c) and (d) which includes site development, accessibility to safety services, easements, grading and contour of the sites conforming to the neighborhood, the City Engineer can recommend the Commission's approval of this land division based on a field review; review of pr.�,posed easements, grading and access; and subject to the normal developmental condi- tions recommended below. Item (b), compatibilitv of the ro osed lots to patterns of existing lots in the neighborhood, is the only issue which the Commission may wish to consider in some detail since the definition of both neigh- borhood and compatibility to the pattern of existing lots is not defined. In the block bounded by Vancouver Avenue, Jackling Drive, Armsby Drive and Broadway, there is a variety of lot sizes and frontages and patterns. Lot sizes range from 24,960 S.F. down to 6,050 S.F. Excluding 1249 Vancouver, there are 15 lots. Of these, six (6) lots, or 40%, have larger areas than the proposed Parcel F(7,990 S.F.). The frontage for Parcel F remains the same as it is now (65'). Across Vancouver, all street frontages are 50'; and lot areas are 6,000 S.F., except at Easton and Vancouver (13,000 S.F.). Parcel G fronts on Armsby Drive with a proposed area of 19,602 S.F. Only one lot, 1215 Vancouver, is larger in this block. On the Burlingame side of Armsby Avenue, only this proposed lot with a frontage of 125' and possibly the lot at 1215 Vancouver (frontage of 150') can be considered as fronting on Armsby Drive. On the Hills- borough side of Armsby Drive, facing this block, there is only one very long estate lot having an area of 5+ acres and a frontage of 550'+. Commission Questions At their October 24, 1988 study session, the Commission asked the following questions: 1. Number of driveways. Only one (1) driveway out of Parcel G is proposed. 2. The alternate upper driveway - is it an option? The Town of Hillsborough originally approved an upper driveway next to 1215 Vancouver. Sight distance is poor at this location (175' southbound and 90' northbound) and the appli- cant wishes to move the driveway to the center of Parcel G. Page 4 3. The center driveway location gives a good compromise (140' southbound and 125' northbound for sight distance). The desired minimum stopping sight distance is 150 feet at 25 m.p.h. per Caltrans standards. Since there is a somewhat steep grade, 9$ to 14%, in the braking area, the uphill traffic can stop faster than those going downhill. Staff recommends that this driveway be lowered down the hill at least ten feet (10') further than the center of Parcel G. This will provide all cases with a 20 to 25 mph stopping sight distance to an object in the road. Has Hillsborough reviewed the Map? The Town of Hillsborough has reviewed the Map and the proposed driveway location. Their staff has agreed to relocate the driveway from the southeasterly corner to 10' northerly from the center of Parcel G because of stopping sight distance concerns. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a Public Hearing. Upon comple- tion of the hearing, the Commission must make a recommendation to Council indicating any reasons for the approval or denial recommenda- tion. Reasons should be tied directly to the Subdivision Ordinance Section 25.24.050 criteria. Staff also recommends the following conditions of approval of the division: l. The driveway access to Armsby shall be limited to a 15' maximum width driveway located at least 10' towards Jackling from the center of the proposed lot or for Parcel G. Design to meet both Hillsborough's and Burlingame's City Engineer requirements. 2. -An advisory 20 m.p.h. speed limit sign is to be posted by developer northbound Armsby Drive to meet sight distance standard. 3. Driveway exiting to Armsby shall have a grade not steeper than 5� for at least eight feet (8') behind the curb line. Retain- ing walls and grading need to be designed to keep sight distances for exiting vehicle as large as possible. 4. Al1 trees on Armsby and in Hillsborough property (Lot A) shall be trimmed by owners regularly under Hillsborough guidance to provide clear sight distances from the ground to six feet (6') clear. Page 5 5. Two lamps shall be installed at the driveway entrance to provide adequate lighting. 6. Subdivider to install��a 5' wide Asphalt Concrete walk area adjacent to Armsby Drivg improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Hillsborough. 7. All sewer, water, storm drainage and cable T.V. access shall go to or be off Vancouver Avenue. , 8. The existing sewer lateral to 1249 Vancouver shall be tested and repaired or replaced in accordance with City Ordinance No. 1329. 9. All curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting Vancouver Avenue shall be replaced as required by the Public Works Department. 10. All utility services to the two parcels shall be installed underground without any additional pole sets. 11. All improvement plans to be prepared by the applicant's engineer and to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Any new house on Parcel G to be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Standard and by non-combustible roofing. 13. All required construction as conditioned above or shown as required drainage or utilities to each parcel shall be completed prior to the filing of the final map or the sub- divider shall submit a complete engineer's estimate of the cost and enter into an agreement with the City of Burlingame to install all such improvements within one (1) year of map filing or prior to issuance of a Building Permit on any created parcel. 14. This map to be considered as both the Tentative and Final Parcel Map, and staff will see that the proper Final Map is recorded. Hillsborough has indicated additional conditions in their approval of the access onto Armsby. djm ' � , // ,/� , lt� � `f-,� rank C. Erbacher Attachments: Map; Assessment; Aerial; Assessor's Map; Commission Minutes; July 18, 1988 Hillsborough Letter; Fire Marshal's Memo; Planning Departments' Memo; Burlingame Municipal Code Section 26.24.050 cc: Owner; Applicant; Leonard A. Smith, Town of Hillsborough Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 November 28, 1988 �o a Commissioner question, CP explained CBI�s and FM's,,�emos were nb� included in the conditions of approval because th�L��'r fire wall requirements will have to be met at the building pe�r�ni�t stage. r Chm. Ja�obs opened the public hearing. Lorett�^'`inenta, applicant, was present. She noted it is extremely inc�P'venient to park a car in the garage and that is why they ar�r'}�asking for 3� more in length; applica t asked about the CE�s �equirement for a property line survey sin� they are only ask,'�g to lengthen the garage at this time, the exis''�'ng walls wil]��iot be widened. In discussion CE stated with extensi of the �isting wall he would not require a property line survey. The��^�`'were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed.�� C. S.Graham found there ere ex�g tional circumstances in that the garage is now too sm 1 to park� car, the property is not as valuable without us e covered park' and applicant�s property rights will be dam� ed if the varianc�e�i�s,.,,�not granted since others have adequate pa ing, the variance will no'�.,affect the zoning nor be injurious t the neighbors since there wi`�,.]. be no addition to the dwelling �its. C. S.Graham moved for appro'��nl of the variance and for ado�tion of Commission Resolution Approvii� Variance with the follo�ng conditions: (1) that conditions #2 and"` 3 of the City Engineer�s memo of November 14, 1988 shall be met; and ) that the garage,�.�•shall be expanded by 3' as shown on the plans su itted to the P;3anning Department and date stamped November 15, 1988 a that the additional lot coverage shall not exceed 61 SF. Motion,,was s onded by C. H.Graham and approved on a 7-0 roll call vote. ppeal procedures were advised. �7. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP 'I'0 DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS AT 1249 VANCOWER AVENUE Reference staff report, 11/28/88, with attachments. CE Erbacher reviewed details of the request; Engineering, Planning and Fire Department staff review; review and action by the Town of Hillsborough; subdivision code criteria, study meeting questions. Fourteen conditions of approval were recommended. Commission/staff discussed Fire Department requirement for an interior sprinkler system and noncombustible roof; relocated driveway location; a change to Condition #2 to read "20 m.p.h. advisory speed limit sign to be posted ...��, this was agreeable to Hillsborough; 8' wall inside property line of adjacent property; Hillsborough will take care of their condition #2 regarding access. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Charles Kavanagh, Civil Engineer, was present and advised he has looked at the conditions and expected no problem in meeting all of them; the driveway will be located well beyond the brick wall along Armsby. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page � November 28, 88 K Musso, 227 La Prenda, Millbrae, was present repre,, �enting the pr erty owners, John and Theresa Colombo. There wer,� no audience co ents and the public hearing was closed. ,} Commi sioner comment: this lot is too small for ��illsborough and quite large for the neighborhood, have no r�bjection to the proposa . Staff advised any new construction � Parcel G would be regulate by the new Declining Height��y�Envelope ordinance automatica,�ly. � ��. C. Giomi �und this proposal is com tible with surrounding Burlingame si�tes, a lot of effort has en expended by Burlingame and Hillsboroi:�gh in addressing the r uirements and concerns of both cities. C�,. Giomi moved to reco end this tentative and final parcel map to �`.�City Council for ,srapproval with the following conditions: `. �" 1. The driveway�:,access to 1�r�msby shall be limited to a 15� maximum width '�driveway ],(icated at least 10 � toward Jackling from the center,of the "roposed lot or for Parcel G. Design to meet both Hi�lsbor�ugh�s and Burlingame�s City Engineer requirements. \ � 2. 20 m.p.h. adviso speed limit sign to be posted at northbound of Ar�y rive to meet sight distance standard. 3. Driveway exiti�"g to A sby shall have a grade not steeper than 5� for least ei ht feet (8') behind the curb line. Retaining w ls and gra ing need to be designed to keep sight dista ces for exitin vehicle as large as possible. 4. All tree on Armsby and in Hillsborough property (Lot A) shall b trimmed by owners regularly under Hillsborough guidanc to provide clear sight distances from the ground to six fe t (6') clear. 5. Two flamps shall be installed at �t,,he driveway entrance to pro�Gide adequate lighting. ,\ 6. �(zbdivider to install a 5' wide aspha t concrete walk area Fadjacent to Armsby Drive improvements to the satisfaction of j°the Town of Hillsborough; 7. / Al1 sewer, water, storm drainage and cable �V. access shall l go to or be off Vancouver Avenue. 8. The existing sewer lateral to 1249 Vancouver sli�ll be tested and repaired or replaced in accordance with City Ordinance No. 1329. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 November ��, 1988 Ken Musso, 227 La Prenda, Millbrae, was present representing the property owners, John and Theresa Colombo. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. _. Commissioner comment: this lot is too small for Hilisborough and quite large for the neighborhood, have no objection to the proposal. 5taff advised any new construction on Parcel G would be regulated by the new Declining Height Envelope ordinance automatically. C. Giomi found this proposal is compatible with surrounding Burlingame sites, a lot of effort has been expended by Burlingame and Hillsborough in addressing the requirements and concerns of both cities. C. Giomi moved to recommend this tentative and final parcel map to City Council for approval with the following conditions: 1. The driveway access to Armsby shall be limited to a 15' maximum width driveway located at least 10� toward Jackling from the center of the proposed lot or for Parcel G. Design to meet both Hillsborough�s and Burlingame�s City Engineer requirements. 2. 20 m.p.h. advisory speed limit sign to be posted at northbound of Armsby Drive to meet sight distance standard. 3. Driveway exiting to Armsby shall have a grade not steeper than 5� for at least eight feet (8') behind the curb line. Retaining walls and grading need to be designed to keep sight distances for exiting vehicle as large as possible. 4. Al1 trees on Armsby and in Hillsborough property (Lot A) shall be trimmed by owners regularly under Hillsborough guidance to provide clear sight distances from the ground to six feet (6�) clear. 5. Two lamps shall be installed at the driveway entrance to provide adequate lighting. 6. Subdivider adjacent to the Town of 7. : to install a 5' wide asphalt concrete walk area Armsby Drive improvements to the satisfaction of Hillsborough; Al1 sewer, water, storm drainage and cable T.V. access shall go to or be off Vancouver Avenue. The existing sewer lateral to 1249 Vancouver shall be tested and repaired or replaced in accordance with City Ordinance No. 1329. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 November 28, l9gg to a Commissioner question, CP explained CBI's and FM's memos were not included in the conditions of approval because their fire wall requirements will have to be met at the building permit stage. C. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Loretta Armenta, applicant, wa� present. She noted it is extremely inconv�riient to park a car in ��he garage and that is why they are as�'ing for 3� more in lengt�; applicant asked about the CE�s requ�rement for a property line survey since they are only asking to•%'lengthen the garage at this ti�e, the existing walls will not bedwidened. In discussion CE stated, with extension of the existing,�'"wall he would not require a propert� line survey. There were no�'"audience comments and the public hea��ing was closed. C. S.Graham ��ound there were except��onal circumstances in that the garage is no� too small to park;�a car, the property is not as valuable withd,ut usable covered parking and applicant�s property rights will be��amaged if the variance is not granted since others have adequate pa�king, the variance will not affect the zoning nor be injurious to '�he neighbor��"since there will be no addition to the dwelling units;ti C. S.Gra�am moved for approval of the variance and for adoption o� Commisg�on Resolution Approving Variance with the following condit'ons: ,(*�) that conditions #2 and #3 of the City Engineer�s memo of N�tiemb�'r 14, 1988 shall be met; and 2 that the garage shall be expand�d�` by 3� as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department,'��,nd date stamped November 15, 1988 and that the additional lot cover"�e shall not exceed 61 SF. Motion was seconded by C. H.Gr�ham d approved on a 7-0 roll call vote. Appeal procedures wefe advi�. �°'�,. 7• TENTATIVE 1�ND FINAL PARCE3� MAP TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCF_.T,S A�rz`' i �e o �TTTT/�l�TTcfnn ,,.�,�._.._ Reference staf,f` report, 11/28/88, wi h attachments. CE Erbacher reviewed det�ils of the request; En� De artment 9 eering, Planning and Fire P ��taff review• review and �,action by the Town of Hillsboroug��; subdivision�code criteria,�°' tud meetin Fourteen cAqnditions of approval were recomm�id d, g questions. � a Commissio�/staff discussed Fire Department �requirement for an interio�% sprinkler system and noncombustib'� roof; relocated drivewa�y location; a change to Condition #2�� t read "20 m.p.h. adviso�fy speed limit sign to be posted . . , th's was agreeable to Hi,�lsborough; 8� wall inside property line of adj ent property; Hill�borough will take care of their condition #2 rega ding access. � , Ch�{. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Charles Kavanha''�g�h, Civil En�gineer, was present and advised he has looked at the coi��itions and expected no problem in meeting all of them; the driveway-,will be located well beyond the brick wall along Armsby. . Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 November 28, 1988 9. All curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting Vancouver Avenue shall be replaced as required by the Public Works Department. 10. All utility services to the two parcels shall be installed underground without any additional pole sets. 11. Al1 improvement plans to be prepared by the applicant�s engineer and to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Any new house on Parcel G to be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Standard and by noncombustible roofing. 13. All required construction as conditioned above or shown as required drainage or utilities to each parcel shall be completed prior to the filing of the final map or the subdivider shall submit a complete engineer�s estimate of the cost and enter into an agreement with the City of Burlingame to install al such improvements within one (1) year of map filing or prior to issuance of a Building Permit on any created parcel. 14. This map to be considered as both the Tentative and Final Parcel Map, and staff will see that the proper Final Map is recorded. Motion was seconded by C. H.Graham and approved on a 7-0 roll call vote. Staff will forward to City Council. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO MERGE TWO ADJO��NG PARCELS INTO ONE PARCEL AT 1209/ 1221 HOWARD AVENUE -'" Refer ce City Engineer�s staff report dated November 16, 1988 with attachme ts. CE Erbacher reviewed detai�.s`"'�of the request, a simple me ing of two parcels required`�'��by the conditions of Planning Co ission and City Counc,j�°``"when approving a parking variance in ��87; any develo�ri't must follow normal zoning requirements and'°�;rocessing p�,.v�edures. Chm. Jacobs opened t�-public hearing. D.R. Patel, India Club, Inc., applicant, was��5re�^s�t�. There were no audience comments and the public hearin�:�s�vas clos :.,� _ ,, hr C. Garcia m�v"ed to recommend this t tative and final parcel map to City Cou�,�il for approval. Motion was econded by C. S.Graham and approv,„�9" on a 6-1 roll call vote, C. Jac `bs�dissenting (since she did riot vote for the original application). `�aff will forward to City Council. kry,,. y*��'� i r Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 November 28, 1988 � �� '� r! 9. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR EXPANSION OF AN ,�'EXISTING ORIENTAL RUG AND ANTIQUE SHOP AT 1199 BROADWAY, �ONED C-1, L]D(�TT1T.iTV nllewwwrir��r�r �.�...� „ Referen e staff report, 11/28/88, with attachments�''� CP Monroe reviewe details of the request, staff review, fin� ings necessary to grant special permit, study meeting questions,a'signage on this building d master signage program granted in �une, 1988. Five conditions ere suggested for consideration at t�e public hearing. Commission/st ff discussion: what can be done�to get property owner or his agent o conform to the master signac� program, not contact with the prope ty owner but with the subl ssee of this building, the alternative is legal action; enforc ent problems with this building, all te ants have put up signs without a sign permit or building permit, m ster signage program� as never been implemented, should have been by end of July;�rj� existing signage is the responsibility of t business tenan;i; the master signage program is the responsibili of the prc�erty owner and his agents. Applicant is alread� using Suit,� 5 on the basis of prior Commission approval, co cern about��causing applicant major problems in using Suite 5 beca e of ;�he sign problem for the entire building. ,, Chm. Jacobs opened the publi.'hearing. Iraj Shayesteh of Galleria De Farsh (applicant) was�� esent. Responding to Commission questions, Mr. Shayesteh s,�ate they have been using Suite 5 since 1987, they got a use perm�t last year (staff advised the permit for use of Suite 5 required,�emoval the wall between the two suites which was not done); th�y do not e large signs permanently, only temporary signs for sales, for the st two months they have had no signs at all. CP cliscussed code efinition and regulation of temporary signs. ' Applicant and Com�ssion reviewed his use�of Suite 5 and number of employees, he use�s as many as three tempor ry employees for a sale or on weekends. A Commissioner noted whe she visited the site they were usin� both suites and had a minim of five employees. It was determi.�5ed the original use permit was a proved for only two employees incd"�uding the business owner. Commissi"ener comment: have a problem w th limiting number of employees of ``� business, many things can happen with inadequate help; regardi��g advertising signs, hav a problem going after one merchant when�,,,there are so many oth stores in the city in violation of the code:, This k�"iilding was allowed with a parking variance and \there has been latant abuse of the sign code; this was a new building, a s ial permit was required for each tenant so the city could regulate operations at this key corner, a tenant can always ask for � ��.. .__ P.C. 11/28/88 Item # 7 MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - CITY ENGINEER TWO PARCELS -DEEDED LANDS OF COLOMBO (VOL. 5706, PAGE 698) -1249 VANCOUVER AVENUE (APN 027-340-010) -P.M. 88-14 -TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO DIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO This parcel map application is to divide an existing lot into two lots, Parcels F(7,986 S.F.) and G(19,602 S.F.). Parcel F will continue to front on Vancouver while Parcel G will front on Armsby Drive, Town of Hillsborough. This is a second subdivision application of 1249 Vancouver Avenue. The previous application was to divide existing lots into three lots and was approved at City Council's May 16, 1988 meeting; however, the Town of Hillsborough allowed access onto Armsby for only one lot. Staff Review This proposed land division is in the R-1 zone, with a required minimum lot size of 7,000 S.F. These two proposed parcels meet Burlingame's 7,000 S.F. minimum required lot area. Parcel G, however, does not meet Hillsborough's minimum 21,780 S.F. lot size. In the block containing this proposed land division, all lots have access and frontages on Vancouver Avenue. One lot, 1215 Vancouver, has access on both Vancouver and Armsby. All lots in this block are in Burlingame. Parcel F street frontage of 65' (55' average lot width) and Parcel G street frontage of 125' (135' average lot width) meet zoning Ordi- nance requirements of a 55' (60' for Parcel G) minimum street frontage and an average width of 50'. Parcel G faces on Armsby Drive and will require access through Town of Hillsborough-owned property. Parcel F, with existing structures, is proposed to remain. The house front setback remains at about 40' with a side setback of 5' minimum and rear setback of 65'+, The garage structure is next to the side property line and is in the rear third of the proposed parcel. Parcel G has proposed 25' minimum front setback conforming to Hillsborough's 25' minimum. There is only one other "frontage" on the Burlingame side, 1215 Vancouver, which is about 10' from the Armsby property line. The side and rear setbacks on Parcel G are proposed to conform to City of Burlingame requirements based on the latest zoning code amendments, not Hillsborough requirements. Page 2 The Planning Department has reviewed this map and commented that new construction will have to meet the Declining Height Ordinance requirement. The Fire Marshal has no objection provided that the house be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Stan- dard, and non-combustible roofing will be installed on the house. The Town of Hillsborough, at their July 11, 1988 City Council meeting, approved a 15' wide access off of Armsby Drive with the following conditions: 1. The easement will access one lot with a lot frontage of 125' and approximately 0.450 acres. No further subdivision will be allowed in the future. 2. Access will be located at the most southwesterly corner of the lot. 3. Construct a 5' Asphalt Concrete parking strip across the frontage of the lot behind the curb and gutter on Armsby Drive. 4. The strip of Hillsborough property between the parking strip and the right-of-way shall be maintained and properly land- scaped by the owners of the lot fronting this property. 5. The proposed dwelling shall be reviewed by the Architecture Design and Review Board of the Town of Hillsborough. Hillsborough's Engineering Department has approved a change in the driveway's location to the middle of Parcel G to provide more sight distance on Armsby. The Subdivision Code, Section 26.24.050 provides four (4) review criteria that need to be addressed in the Commission's review of the proposed map. It states: "The commission shall make its decision upon such considera- tion as, but not limited to, the following: (a) Recommendations of the city engineer; (b) Compatibility of proposed lots to pattern of existing lots in the neighborhood; reverse corner lots or key lots shall not be introduced into a neighborhood where such lots do not now exist; (c) Accessibility to safety services. The commission may consider grade of access roads or easements and require that such grade is not excessive or beyond the capacity to traverse by safety equipment; Page 3 (d) Proposed grading and contours of the finished sites. The commission may require as a condition that the finished contour of the building site or sites reasonably conform with the neighborhood pattern where such pattern exists." From the standpoint of Items (a), (c) and (d) which includes site development, accessibility to safety services, easements, grading and contour of the sites conforming to the neighborhood, the City Engineer can recommend the Commission's approval of this land division based on a field review; review of proposed easements, grading and access; and subject to the normal developmental condi- tions recommended below. Item (b), compatibility of the proposed lots to patterns of existing lots in the neighborhood, is the only issue which the Commission may wish to consider in some detail since the definition of both neigh- borhood and compatibility to the pattern of existing lots is not defined. In the block bounded by Vancouver Avenue, Jackling Drive, Armsby Drive and Broadway, there is a variety of lot sizes and frontages and patterns. Lot sizes range from 24,960 S.F. down to 6,050 S.F. Excluding 1249 Vancouver, there are 15 lots. Of these, six (6) lots, or 40$, have larger areas than the proposed Parcel F(7,990 S.F.). The frontage for Parcel F remains the same as it is now (65'). Across Vancouver, all street frontages are 50'; and lot areas are 6,000 S.F., except at Easton and Vancouver (13,000 S.F.). Parcel G fronts on Armsby Drive with a proposed area of 19,602 S.F. Only one lot, 1215 Vancouver, is larger in this block. On the Burlingame side of Armsby Avenue, only this proposed lot with a frontage of 125' and possibly the lot at 1215 Vancouver (frontage of 150') can be considered as fronting on Armsby Drive. On the Hills- borough side of Armsby Drive, facing this block, there is only one very long estate lot having an area of 5+ acres and a frontage of 550'+. Commission Questions At their October 24, 1988 study session, the Commission asked the following questions: l. Number of driveways. Only one (1) driveway out of Parcel G is proposed. 2. The alternate upper driveway - is it an option? The Town of Hillsborough originally approved an upper driveway next to 1215 Vancouver. Sight distance is poor at this location (175' southbound and 90' northbound) and the appli- cant wishes to move the driveway to the center of Parcel G. � Page 4 The center driveway location gives a good compromise (140' southbound and 125' northbound for sight distance). The desired minimum stopping sight distance is 150 feet at 25 m.p.h. per Caltrans standards. Since there is a somewhat steep grade, 9% to 14%, in the braking area, the uphill traffic can stop faster than those going downhill. Staff recommends that this driveway be lowered down the hill at least ten feet (10') further than the center of Parcel G. This will provide all cases with a 20 to 25 mph stopping sight distance to an object in the road. 3. Has Hillsborough reviewed the Map? The Town of Hillsborough has reviewed the Map and the proposed driveway location. Their staff has agreed to relocate the driveway from the southeasterly corner to 10' northerly from the center of Parcel G because of stopping sight distance concerns. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a Public Hearing. Upon comple- tion of the hearing, the Commission must make a recommendation to Council indicating any reasons for the approval or denial recommenda- tion. Reasons should be tied directly to the Subdivision Ordinance Section 25.24.050 criteria. Staff also recommends the following conditions of approval of the division: l. The driveway access to Armsby shall be limited to a 15' maximum width driveway located at least 10' towards Jackling from the center of the proposed lot or for Parcel G. Design to meet both Hillsborough's and Burlingame's City Engineer requirements. 2. 20 m.p.h. speed limit is advised to be posted at northbound of Armsby Drive to meet sight distance standard. 3. Driveway exiting to Armsby shall have a grade not steeper than 5$ for at least eight feet (8') behind the curb line. Retain- ing walls and grading need to be designed to keep sight distances for exiting vehicle as large as possible. 4. All trees on Armsby and in Hillsborough property (Lot A) shall be trimmed by owners regularly under Hillsborough guidance to provide clear sight distances from the ground to six feet (6') clear. Page 5 5. Two lamps shall be installed at the driveway entrance to provide adequate lighting. 6. Subdivider to install a 5' wide Asphalt Concrete walk area adjacent to Armsby Drive improvements to the satisfaction of the Town of Hillsborough. 7. Al1 sewer, water, storm drainage and cable T.V. access shall go to or be off Vancouver Avenue. 8. The existing sewer lateral to 1249 Vancouver shall be tested and repaired or replaced in accordance with City Ordinance No. 1329. 9. All curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting Vancouver Avenue shall be replaced as required by the Public Works Department. 10. All utility services to the two parcels shall be installed underground without any additional pole sets. 11. Al1 improvement plans to be prepared by the applicant's engineer and to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Any new house on Parcel G to be protected by a sprinkler system that meets NFC 13-D Standard and by non-combustible roofing. 13. All required construction as conditioned above or shown as required drainage or utilities to each parcel shall be completed prior to the filing of the final map or the sub- divider shall submit a complete engineer's estimate of the cost and enter into an agreement with the City of Burlingame to install all such improvements within one (1) year of map filing or prior to issuance of a Building Permit on any created parcel. 14. This map to be considered as both the Tentative and Final Parcel Map, and staff will see that the proper Final Map is recorded. �� for Frank C. Erbacher djm Attachments: Map; Assessment; Aerial; Assessor's Map; Commission Minutes; July 18, 1988 Hillsborough Letter; Fire Marshal's Memo; Planning Departments' Memo; Burlingame Municipal Code Section 26.24.050 cc: Owner; Applicant Leonard A. Smith, Town of Hillsborough �. � � � � PROJECT APPLICATION �� "T" °� 1249 Vancouver Avenue �t CEQA ASSESSMENT �RUN�E project d�� _�� ; , �,��t�� project nare - if any Application received ( ) Staff review/acceptance ( ) i. APPLICANT Charl es Kavanagh, Ci vi 1 En r. 415-579-1944 name telephone no. ZQ8 Carolan Avenue, Burlingame CA 94010 appl�cant s address: street, city, zip code contact person, if different telephone no. 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Specia.l Perr.iit () Variance* () Condominium Permit () Other Pa rc el M *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 5.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Uivide existing 27,588 S.F. lot into two parcels. One parcel �7 986 S.F.) will have access from Vancouver Avenue. The remain- in parcel (19,602 S.F.) Will have access from Armsb Drive, Hillsborough. Minimum street frontages: Vancouver - 65' S0' avg. width); Armsby - 125' (attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) Ref. code section(s): ( ) ( ) 4. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION . ( 027-340-010 ) ( - ) ( - ) (Deed 1l01. 5706, Pg. 698 APN lot no. block no. subdivision name ( R-1 7 000 S. F�. ( �77 588 > zoning dis�rict lan a'rea, square feet �nhn �nd ThPres� Cnlnmhn ],�4� VanCollVer 9VPn��P land own?r's name addre s Bur�ingame; CA 94010 Reouired Date received city zip code (yes) (�) ( g/30/$$ ) Proof of ownershi� (yes) E�el ( g� 3 p� gg ) Owner's consent to a�plication 5. EXISTIPJG SITE CONDITIONS ' Existing single-family dwellinq with access on Vancouver Avenue Reo,ui red (yes ) (�� (,y�) (no) (ges) {no) (,�;s) (no) (other) Date received ( 9/ 3 0/ 88) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall;s and curbs; all str�ctures and improvements; paved on-site parking; landscaping. ( ) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area by tyae of usc�`on each floor plan. ( ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). ( ) Site cross section(s) (if retevant). '`Land use classifications are: residential (sho�� # dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT P(?npr�SAL N. A. Proposed c�nsiruction, �ross floor area 3elow orade ( S�) Second floor ( SF) First floor ( SF) Third floor ( �F) Pro.ject Coc�� Pr000sal Requirem-�n� Front setback Side setback Side y�rd ��ar yarcl � �I �roject Code Proposal Requirement Lot cover�,•e fluilrtiri� hei�ht Lardsc�oed area n^ �? tr� nkc�.sn,��e�' j i L� N J 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) Full tine emoloyees on site Part time employees on site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trip ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles "Show calculations on reverse side or attach senarate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES Sinqle-family dwellinqs on all sid �and a rost street frontaac�es Required Date received iYeS) {�) � 1��1%/8� (yes) (no) ( N.A. ) Location plan of adjacent properties. Other tenants/firms on property: no. firms ( ) - no. employees ( ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany vehicles at this location ( ) 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $ () Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 ( j Variance/other districts $ 75 () veoative Declaration $ 25 Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ () TOTAL FEES $ 56. �� RECEIPT N0. Received by F. �. Erbacher I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature See Map Appl ication Date Applicant STAFF USE ONLY NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. N.A. . me c;ty of Burlingame by F.C. Erbacher o►, October 18. , 1988, completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a cor,�i�s;or,: Categorically exem�t; CE A Chapter 3 Guidelines for Tmplementation of CE(�A, Article 19, Section 15315, "Minor Land Divisions." � �. ��-� w-�--- � *� �� i� �� gnature of Processing Official Title aie Signed� Unless anpealed within 10 days hereof the c�ate oosted, the deternination shall be final. DECLARATIOv OF POSTI!`IG Dai;e Posted: I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of 6urlingame and that I �osted a true copy of the above Ne�ati��e Declar�tion ai, the City Hall of said City near the doors to ilia Council Char�ibers. -xecuted at 3urlingame, California on Ap�ealecl: ( )Yes ( )f!o 19 ;LDITI' ; ""�LF�1TT[, CITY CLERK, CIT`, �`' ;,I;�LI'JGr.':E EXISTIN6 IPI 2 YE^RS IN 5 YEARS after � �?ter after 8-5 5 PM 8-5 :��M 8-5 5 PM - �_, � ,��. " ' ' EASTON - 0 ORNE e- r• .,.. � � �� o F \' ��. -� J.n•. j j 0 ✓AC/YL/NG OR. DR FA�AN . ,� pF'."'� a��1?� /, / / ��/lG��'o�/GH 7- O 341 w r ,, J \ �� l :I� ,��o�. � � c4o 1^ '9 W ��G?8 T �o. w: a4 0� W —-- r�� , �� .pC ' �' 8�' . � ;!= 6 � � :. , � •�' / I f • O � '. , — �-1ti/- . 1 �� r.�v�� cs - = �: - Ro �= �t � :� 3 � � _ � p 6. �. ,(. J - =>- , _� loo ' � � _— - F ;v1� " ;r - �, � � ia �' � � ` n, c s 7 5 � � O uc n � � p� �'� e � a-f, o h h` .I � . � y N ' , � , v � 'O i v /P �j 70q�SF l� �` 9 1 ��1 :,y - y_ �.i,- ` s � �35 �� %� s, , � — � � m�'� � _! _ , ay � _, � � �: .� ` O � 9 a �o _ 1 �j v�� w LJ J �� r c� . �-, �� ., ud 'rr V O _ i � "'. - r., ',v� $ � i.::. E�� L`, • � m � ' -- `" � �5. y�a� ,� �, . hO �. � � _ -- � � � � It9d' i` `/�/ � � . J � `�; � � �, v r- �. � � " ; 0 G��l �� • _ . m , _» �--. - ,i= ti �� .�+�,�, �P�, *��3 , oo r c`�j�`�;v� o�, �., �, � ,c�, , / � � `_ � - =h¢_, J _� co I i' i "2,�' �� ti � � 3c.ca .. i� � 1� D� yZ �. ,�'C'�C�y16 OD � � , / � � h� � � o N �-- ^aS' ��l/�' O N J ,�6�� ' � • --- -- ti � �o , a, � � ; o � __ y 332 ►,e� -` G F �i `�` _ — — w — _ ;� P�, sF'� 2� � � O � o = - , ,� a _ o �z m ,� �i �i > % _ . .� � �,Z�oh�,:s � `Z '^� " -'A _ � " � m 6' �,(� -- - _ '. � � h � ``, � � . N .n ` _ PA ,"ti `•?, �,1��0h� �' � � � � � _— O Q. �9,b0a SF `� `^ - - = � � � � � __ — -�••' �'S h F � r� '1"J' K ��"l�� r n'L. � ,�O B25 �AS� � ` __ . -- - � �� i6 � -. , . � � ` ry .� ` � �'.; � � N �' � � N .� � 34 0 '�---� � � m "__ o � Zao.a� ,00 w pO 3 �lP= s� - -� -��D�� ' l� - _ a .. c.oJ i - � � .- - �� o� � ��,lp o O� � o - , �, �; :,�� _ 6t, ,1� h,� r �- � � , 1 �nJ �G �� g\� '�, h,F , � �ioo y � '� O _ - ` �,w ' O „ ,,,� 7� p0 _— -�"p00 �i -, o �, ,�, O � `a m 1 /0 I" � v', B � � �t"'� , , 0 � � 0?.��° 5 J�1�f� �� 1�K� ^� � ' �/2 y08 �°¢ �,1 ,,° � '�'��lIG 1, ; _ -� 1 1 1 -- �l �f � •r �' �� D `' �::" •; ,�. - B��A pWAY �LUT � ' . � -r� , � "�� ` � � 7� sF 1 .� SCNOOL DIST ( BURLlh'GAME °„ % � 'I . _� / ` . / `v. . (.,tl`'( � '1 ' ` l .� � ' . - ' � C � . . � J ' . ' ��' ' • ., . . `4� aa�..� .�s �' '�� ` .�.'�w �•'3 i", � . ' '�'� s� }•_, � i i , �� •�� 1}S � i.. . Y ,-�l ' -�r ' '� ' • �/ • :�,. � � . Y,. ''t` ^ � �./ l.l.• / � ;- � x',. � �f ,c � , , ` " �� G ..� ~ 'ti , y� � �` ��`�� .�� ' `�. �.; . �.r � �,` ` �.�� . +r r • •"� + . .., �:�'-. �`" � � ' ,•4 �a1 � li � d ••��,�,y `� f , � + /.. ,.� . . � � t � ��i�� C��! �� 0. J , y)' .. �'6 I � � � ♦ � , �a• • y E ,� '•, -� . � '�� ,'� y',R. s�" �, • �. � `�jie �,� . .. �,c; � �. � v:.r '� � � � � `� 7e, � .s. t. ��1- � ��ti � � � t . r w �, � �' � j � „" s i.> � i,r3�� _, � ,�� i -ty . .,�= :� • ' . �• � r .. .. • . ',+�`�': . � ��y� -,4 . '�,,. �.� �� ',, t P';� ^p '� �r , µ y ' � i K� � t . ✓ �� TY"= /s � . r v y..'• �, � ` _ ' � ��-: .�. �. f._,� • . � � �'�t �'4� � 1� ' �• R.� , � .i-�,`$ ;j j _ i" . . . ' . i, . "�y . . .`l J , . �s .. . � s7 ". t t � ' � Y �R �y.�L'43^ ' *...,.,�c- ';'�s _ - "� �t° 4,,' '� _,�-' � '� _ :'%� , �� ,�'; 1 � . ^; � . � :'t-• • � � , ~ ' ="� �_ ` � � '-,•� s'` ,.�� ^`'a�� 1'� f `. � +t � � ' . , ��+; �� ,~� �� w "� . �•"a � �.� �;�.5 4 ,. J . ' -_. '_. �' - " � �•'� Yt� . . .«i � ` � � •�� ` �. _ �; .L. �" � 4 , . - �„ : ; x; . : + J� -�..� � � � � � �c � � � r � . :s, '+ :�. • MM ' � ��1+F �'� � � �. r. �� / � '� .. � � �� L. . �ri � � � ��'�.� .i� n �� li .Vi• • ,l . • - :i� . . �-t � e t ,. _ .rJ � • 4 ...Nf'K .r. R+t'�� • � . � r�� . i �. � ry I - . _ .' '. , � ♦ � ��_ ,'y."�+ � ,�y _� M� }_�.. . e ��'� _ i _ ( , ,.. `� '� �y y �,.. 't) � r ' / - / � ' �,� ,♦ ' �f`r'; � i � '�' , x .. � r, , '1'� ;*,� � ♦ . � � • � I , � S .` ' :. � I y4 , , t + •r` �.,,�,r-� v �, � :.,..+�'' # �4`t:�'r� �� A . � .`�� . �/+;�' �,�: � . �- � �� :•�,� , c °� , � � . � � � ° �„ ,� . r. '�` 4 ' � - � � `� �°.' `T _ ' 'r� • � � � r�. ... ., !! �: .. �. ir� �a ' �+'� ? � _i � i _ �,,. ' ,rt,�„� r, .,� � ., ..� , r-w�r��l . a , `• o� .� �� e � � . .. � .�, � ., � � � �;�, � ,, -., ; ;�:., . m �r..�� , • ��A.. ,��,i�.' . 1 � �' � 1'� 7xr � �— � ,,�y . . , : �, �� ' l /�. ��y,.$• - ♦ � � t . �� +:: �` C '� ty,/21 � ` ��. � . f��.�i�•�I��a• .-� �� w� `} �¢�M '' k � � � . � -� �,�k��jjj�r• r, f, �" . •, �, . _ 6 �� Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 October. :' 4 , 1988 SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE A MEETING ROOM AT THE IBIS CL AIRPORT BOULEVARD ZON ` Requests: can t ermit be limited; ve classes been is site. Item set for public hearing November , , 4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR RESUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT INTO TWO LOTS - 1249 VANCOWER AVENUE Requests: explain alternate upper driveway, is this an option; has Hillsborough been made aware of this application; number of driveways. Item set for public hearing November 14, 1988. FOR ACTION 5. VARIANCE TO REAR SETBACK FOR A DECK TO BE CANTILEVERED OV R CREEK EXTENDING TO WITHIN 5' OF PROPERTY LINE AT 433 O IDENTAI� AVFNTIF. _ 7.(1NFn u_1 Reference st f report, 10/24/88, with attachments. CP oted the neighbor to t e rear has requested a continuance of his item; neighbor was pre ent and withdrew his request. CP Monroe reviewed tails of the application, the revious request and city action, Co ission/Council requests d guidelines for review when the previo application was deni without prejudice, staff review of the curr t proposal, Plann' g Department comment, Council's recent adoption an interim ur ncy ordinance regarding development on lots with a rtion of cr ek on them (processing of this application is not affe ed by is ordinance), applicants� letter, comment from the neigh r to the rear, findings necessary for variance approval. Three nditions were suggested for consideration at the public hear' If the first floor deck is denied and Commission wished to cons. er the existing second floor deck, one condition was sugges ed. CA commented that in view f Council�s ac 'on adopting the urgency ordinance Commission co d use Council�s olicy stated in this ordinance as one ju ification for denia if they felt it appropriate. Chm. Jacobs open the public hearing. Donald and amela Asplund, applicants, we present. Mr. Asplund�s comment : they have attempted to meet the concerns expressed about th 'r previous application the 176 SF portion of deck built on footin has been eliminate , the larger first floor deck and the smaller xisting second oor deck have been retained, the proposed deck 'll-be cantil ered from the house by steel beams, a long narrow eck woul be too expensive because of the cost of supports, the curr nt pl s have been drawn by a civil engineer supported by a soi gineer, from the rear this deck will appear as a shelf. � t . � .'. � '�� , J \.�'. . -..i � '� v � LESS THAN F'IVE LpTS 26.�.050' case, the city shall be made an owne� of the easemen �: .,:.. , :_ � The map shall show the following: :. � - . ..; .. ,.i ,y.,; (a) Loca.tion and size �of water a.nd sewer mains; ;,.(b) Width and location of any existing easements; _ . , :.,(c) Location and di.mension�of streets; .; ,.(d) Loca,tion of any`proposed street widening or extension if.required; ,, (e) ..Building setba.ck lines, , . _ . ' . f ,. (f) Location of any �proposed public utilities and any �easements neces- sary for such utilities • ' , : ..,.,�.;.,, �.,, ;..� ��(g) Dimensioned showing of any exi.sting structures and notations re- garding removal or remodeling,of:sa,me; �; (h) Existing and proposed contours of land and proposed elevation at lot.'corners. :- The city en� neer shall: examine the map and submit it to the planning commission together with his recommendations. (Oz•d. 895 � 1; Februa.ry 17, 1969: Ord. 859 § 1(part) ; December 5, 1966) . 26.2�.050 Action of planning commission and council on tenta,tive ma,p. At its next regular meeting following the submission of the map and the recommendations of the city engineer, the planning commission shall consi- der the map. The commission shall make its decision upon such considera.- tion as, but not limited to, the following: (a) Recommendations of the city engineer; , (b) Compatibility of proposed lots to pattern of existing lots in the neighborhood; reverse corner lots or key lots sha11 not 1�e introduced into a � neighborhood where such lots do not now exist; � (c) Accessibility to safety services. The commi.ssion maS consider gra.de of access roads or easements and require that such gra,de is not eg- cessive or beyond the capacity to traverse by safety equipment; (d) Proposed brading and contours of the fuushed sites. The commis-. siom m�,y requirr� ;in ,�. condition thr�t the finiahed contour of the building site or sites re�s��i�ab]y conform with thc neighborhood pattcrn where such pattern exists. If the map meets all the requirements of the code and does not require the dedication of easements or the construction o,f any public work, a final map may be prepared without reference to the city council. Notification of the hearing shali be mailed to the person filing the map and to all owners of contiguous progerty. If the map requires the dedication of ea,sements or the construction of a.ny public work, the tenta.tive map shall be filed ��ith the city clerk, to- gether with the recommendations of the planning commission, for the con- siderai:ion of the city council at its next regular meeting following the ac- tion of the commission. The counciI may accept or disapprove the action of the commission, but no substantive chan�es shall be made on the map w-ith- out reference io the corrunission for its recommendation. (Ord. 895 § 2; February 17, 1969: Ord. 859 § 1(part) ; December 5, 1966) . ,. -, _ ' �.,,�, ��... ,� .. . , � � � CITY OF BURLINGAME MEMORAtJDUP•1 To : � O � '' ,c�` F, �'t� � � � �� From:� ��ti Re: � � a � �,y�yu �x 9 � Phone (415) 342-8931 Da te CS�-e� 3 , � ��.� . � /�: �G� �r� • �, � �r (i.\h:�� : / ,� G � !! .� L ( ,- � ► bN-� : CITY OF BURLINGAME MEMORANDUP•1 l ` -e�,� To: ' ` � '�� /v ` ' � From: �►�, Re: Phone (415) 3c2-8931 � . �� ; � � C- G��'ti-�' l - -- � �r - - � �� G�'�� -��`' �� fR'- i�- �� TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH SAN MATEO COUNTY ��0� NILLSBp� L O Pg 1 i � # O _ �g 4 'q AO�%'BD GA�y� July 18, 1988 Frank C. Erbacker City Engineer Town of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, Ca. 94010 Dear Frank: 1600 FLORI[3UNDA AVE. HII,LS[30ROUGH, CAI.IFORNIA 94010 �4J �"� E`' �I f p� I� �� .._ .�w�,, �. 2 1 �_�� -w._� � _ .- ___ � �,�,�� The City Council at their July llth, 1988 hearing approved a 15' wide access easement across Town property. This easement will give ingress and egress easements to a property which is currently a one lot parcel located at 1249 Vancouver Avenue. The conditions for granting these access easements are as follows: 1. The easement will access one lot (parcel G and H as shown on the proposed tentative map combined) with a lot frontage of 125' and approximately 0.450 acres. No further subdivision will be allowed in the future. 2. Access will be located at the most south westerly corner of the lot. 3. Construct a 5' Asphalt Concrete parking strip across the frontage of the lot behind the curb and gutter on Armsby Drive. 4. The strip of Hillsborough property between the parking strip and the right-of-way shall be maintained and properly landscaped by the owners of the lot fronting this property. 5. The proposed dwelling shall be reviewed by the Architecture Design and Review Board of the Town of Hillsborough. The owners of 1215 Vancouver Avenue, Mr. & Mrs. Colombo have agreed to these conditions. If I can be of any assistance in this matter please do not hesitate to con ct me. V truly yo r eonard A Smith Assistant City Engineer CC: CityManager & File LAS/lp CITY OF BURLINGAME MEMORANDUP•1 To : l ` � ,�� ., � . � From: �►�, ` Re: Phone (415) 342-8931 Da te c_x.-e�l,, 3 , � � � � ��C� � , ��i� . � � �� ='-- // - �� / ��E'C�i��U' ��Cf ��C'//E� � p✓i'/Jn2C'� �cv�l�i`/'P/7Z�� GU/ �/ � �� '�� 0 _7a .hiov�. a � �d� � ' ��i �L� ��''o S,�_ �� .��- ��