HomeMy WebLinkAbout1219 Vancouver Avenue - Approval Letter�� CITY p
� �
BURIJNGAME
e
°�, ,,o
�.O�T[o wiucd•
The City of Burlingame
CITY HAI,L 501 PRIIviROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010.3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790
March 29, 2002
Gary Diebel
Diebel and Company
P.O. Box 1044
Burlingame, CA 94011-1044
Dear Mr. Diebel,
At the March 25, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed your request for minor changes
to an approved design review project at 1219 Vancouver Avenue. The minor changes included opening up the
space adjacent to the interior balcony and revisions to the roof configuration on the east and south elevations, as
shown on the attached approved plans date stamped March 8, 2002.
The Planning Commission acknowledged receiving the request and noted that the changes were minimal and
consistent with the design previously approved.
The approved revisions shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Sincerely yours,
��� ' lJ�--
Margar�;t Monroe
City Planner
RH�s
1219vanc.let
c. Chief Building Inspector
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
• Landscape plan, with attention to the entry gate, should be included in submittal.
March 25, 2002
• Provide a written response on your thinking about how you arrived at the best solution regarding the single
story vs. the two story structure, can base on the conceptual studies previously done.
• Will traffic back up on Park Road before and after school when children are being delivered/picked up?
• Does parking study need to be updated, observation is not confirmed by numbers shown in report; may be
parking at 7:30 a.m. but not at 9:00 a.m.
• Will mullions in the windows match those in the existing buildings? Plans should show window pattern.
• How did the city obtain the church land now used for public parking?
• Need verification of some information concerning parking, week-end use of parish hall and weddings.
� Design reviewer should look to see if there is a way to alleviate difficult parking.
• Design of church should consider community interest, based on the impact of the project on parking.
Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design reviewer. The motion passed
on a roll call vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item
concluded at 10:05 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of March 18, 2002.
CP Monroe reviewed briefly the planning related items from the March 18, 2002, City Council
meeting. C. Auran noted that a building permit had been issued at 1109 Bernal for an interior
remodel and window replacement. Because none of the requirements for design review were
triggered this applicant is not required to have consistent windows through out the building. The
replaced windows in this case are vinyl without stucco m�ld while the first floor windows, not being
replaced are true divided lights with stucco mold. The resulting house will not be consistent with the
neighborhood, in fact will detract from it. Should there be design review of window replacements?
Chairman Vistica noted that this item should be placed on the agenda at the next Design Review
Subcommittee meeting. C. Osterling asked if there was a way to discuss street tree replacement with
the City Arborist, and perhaps limit choice of tree where there was a significant pattern or scale
established by existing trees. CP noted that she would pass this concern on to the city arborist.
FYI — Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1219 Vancouver Avenue
Commissioners acknowledged receiving this item and felt that the changes were minimal and
consistent with the design previously approved.
FYI — Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1322 Carlos Avenue
Commissioners acknowledged receiving this request and noted that the changes proposed were
minor and consistent with the design previously approved.
�