The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1212 Vancouver Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8b Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 1212 Vancouver Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Item Meeting Date: June 12, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling and construction a new detached garage and carport. Applicant and Designer: Insite Design, Audrey Tse Property Owner: Greg and Roseate Wagner General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-173-150 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 Class 1, (e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than: (1) 50 percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less; or (2) 10,000 square feet if: (A) The project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and (B) The area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The subject property slopes from front to rear with an approximately 4 foot difference in elevation; at street level the house appears as a single story home and at the rear there is lower level living space. There is an existing single story detached garage located along the right side, located approximately 15 feet off of the rear property line. The applicant is proposing expand the kitchen 3'-6" at the rear of the first floor along with a 1,015 SF second story addition. As part of the project, the existing detached garage will be demolished and a new detached single car garage with a carport will be constructed along the rear property line, in the right corner. The first and second story addition and new detached garage and carport will increase the floor area to 3,401 SF (0.56 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.56 FAR) is the maximum allowed. Given the slope of the lot, there will be 94 SF of the accessible crawispace that exceeds 6 feet in height. The Zoning Code states that accessible space between the surface of the ground and the bottom of the first floor joists that measures six feet or more in height shall be counted toward the total floor area. However, the code allows for up to a 100 SF deduction from floor area for lower floors and therefore this space will not counted toward the total floor area. The proposed second story addition will encroach into the declining height envelope along the left side; however this portion meets the allowable encroachment for a dormer exemption. With the addition, the number of bedrooms will be increasing from four to five. Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. The new detached one -car garage (10' x 20' clear interior dimensions) and carport (10' x 20') will provide two covered parking spaces. One uncovered parking space is provided in the driveway (9' x 20'). All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010). This space left blank intentionally Design Review 1212 Vancouver Drive 1212 Vancouver Drive Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stamped: June 2, 2017 ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/ EXISTING PROPOSAL PROPOSAL REQUIRED 4/25/17 plans i 6/2/17 plans SETBACKS [ A.. I ............ ...................... .............................. Front (1st fir): ............................................................................................................................................................... 16'-9" No change ... ...... .............. ......................... ............................................ ....................... No change .............................. 15'-0" or block (2nd fir): No change I 30'-3" average 20'-0" or block e average ._......... _.................. _... _._.................-...g......_...... -__-....._........... ..................................................................................................................._._................._........................................................._.............._.................................................................................................................................................................................................__ Side (left): 6'4" 6'4" No change 4'-0" (right): _.... N/A ..... .... _._................ _........................................... _................. 11'-0" ._........................ ................................. ....................................................... .................................................................. ......................... _... .L 4'-011 .............. _... .................. ........................ .......... ...... __........ __................ .. Rear (1st fir): 351-9" 47'-0" to addition No change ! 15'4" (2nd fir): N/A 50'-8" _.._.._.................. ............. _................ _.................. ........... .... _..................... _....... _...... _...._......._...............:..........._.._..___ 1 20'-0" ... ---....... ._._... _........... __.._..... _............................ ............ ....._...__..._............. _............................. ....................... _.._.... Lot Coverage: ................ _....___................................................................... ......... 2,016 SF ........................... i 2,239 SF i No change I 2,400 SF 33.5% � 37.3% 40% FAR: 2,172 SF 3,401 SF ...... ........... ............................................ No change ..... _..... _........................ .....................................__......................... i 3,420 SF 0.36 FAR ' 0.56 FAR _................. _............... _....... _... ............... _.. __...................................... __.................. ......_.............. _...... i 0.57 FAR ........................................................................................ _._...................... ........ _.._.._..... _............ _....... _..... _._........ .......... _........ _................. _...... .............. # of bedrooms: _.................... _............................ _....................... _.... 4 ...................................... 5 No change --- ........................................................................... ....................................... ........................... Off -Street Parking: ....................................................................... 1 covered ..................... ................................................................................................._._..._............................................................. 2 covered I ......... _.......... No change ___............................................ _............................................................... 2 covered (12 x 19'6") (10 x 20' each) (10' x 20') + 1 uncovered + 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') .......... .............................................................................._..................-.. Height: ..................... ... _........ ......................................_........ 1611" 27'-5" 26-10" ........ _. 30'-0" _............................ _...... _.......... _.._.... _..... _.... _..... DH Envelope: ............ Complies :....... .......... __.......... _............................... __............. _....... .................... _.. Complies ..................................................................................... No change CS 25.28.075(b)(2) (Dormer exemption applied) Existing non -conforming (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire, and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting, May 22, 2017: The Planning Commission reviewed this project as a Study item at their May 22, 2017 meeting. The Planning Commission had the following comments and concerns and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when revised plans are submitted and reviewed by staff: • Feels like it was designed from the inside out; • Exterior elevations feel disorganized; • Revisit window placement, doesn't seem to be a pattern; • Pull the design together so that the elevations relate, looking for a bit more cohesiveness between the first and second floors; • Roof pitch needs work, concerned about the parapets; • Try to match roof pattern on the first floor; • Revisit the stairway window; perhaps consider four smaller window units together; 2 Design Review 1212 Vancouver Drive • Encourage the preparation of perspectives from the left and right. The applicant submitted a response letter and revised elevations date stamped June 2, 2017. A summary of the revisions is provided below: • Changed second floor roofline to coordinate elements of the main floor; • Second floor windows on the front elevation have been reduced in width; • Overall building height reduced; • Rendering of the proposed project has been provided; • Window added along right side elevations, toward the front; and • Window at the stairway along the left side elevation has been revised. Please refer to the applicant's June 2, 2017 letter of explanation for a detailed explanation of the changes made to the plans since the study meeting. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed addition respect the interface with the main floor below. The materials and finishes of the proposed addition are consistent with the existing structure. All elevations are well articulated and help to break up the massing of the structure, which increases in height towards the rear due to the slope of the lot; for these reasons the project, may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 2, 2017, sheets A1.0 through A4.3; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff),- 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's May 8, 2017 and March 3, 2017 memos, the Parks Division's May 11, 2017 and March 22, 2017 memos, the Engineering Division's May 5, 2017 and March 7, 2017 memos, the Fire Division's May 2, 2017 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 4, 2017 memo shall be met; 3 Design Review 1212 Vancouver Drive 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 4 Design Review 1212 Vancouver Drive Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Insite Design, Audrey Tse, applicant and designer Attachments: ■ Design Review Study Meeting Minutes, May 22, 2017 ■ Applicant's Response letter, date stamped June 2, 2017 ■ Application to the Planning Commission ■ Staff Comments ■ Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) ■ Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 2, 2017 ■ Aerial Photo 5 DRAFT CITY • City of Burlingame 6501LINGAME PRIMROSE ROADLL BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, May 22, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers C. 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and demolition of an existing detached garage and construction of a new detached one car garage and carport (InSite Design - Audrey Tse, applicant and project architect; Greg and Roseate Wagner, property owners) (51 noticed) Staff Contract: Catherine Keylon Commissioner Comaroto returned to the dais. All Commissioners had visited the property. Chair Gum met with the neighbor at 1216 Vancouver Avenue. Community Development Director Meeker provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Gum opened the public hearing. Audrey Tse and Greg and Roseate Wagner represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Building feels like it was designed from the inside out; feels like the exterior is a bit disorganized . Doesn't seem to be a rhyme or reason to the window placement. Looking for something that pulls the design together. > Feels the same as the other Commissioners. Not certain that the roof pitch works; was looking for something more like a pattern that is present on the first floor. Also concerned about the parapets. Encouraged the preparation of perspectives from the left and right. (Tse: felt that having a second story with the same roofline as the first floor made it look more like a civic building; were trying to fit it in with the neighborhood.) Is an eclectic neighborhood. Looking for a bit more cohesiveness between the first and second floors. > Provide examples of a couple of homes that have the "western -style" parapet. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gum closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Doesn't have a programmatic issue > Applicant could revisit the stairway window; perhaps consider four smaller window units together that could still qualify for the declining height exception. Regular action City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 61712017 [ inSite ] archilcclury • de'i'n • fi•n� ,6ni June 2, 2017 Attn: Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 Regarding: First and Second Story Addition @ 1212 Vancouver Avenue — Project Comments from the Planning Commission Dear Ms. Keylon, Please find attached revised plans addressing the comments/suggestions that came from the Planning Commission at the May 22❑d, 2017 meeting. We took the suggested design ideas for addressing the second floor roofline into consideration. Though we studied an asymmetrical approach to the upper floor our client would like as much as possible to maintain some symmetry on the upper floor. That was one of the reasons they liked the originally proposed elevation so much. The newly proposed front elevation has an upper floor roofline that coordinates with elements found on the main floor. The window sizes have been reduced in width so they feel better in proportion to the lower floor but we have maintained the arched windows for added architectural character, another element that our client liked a lot from the original design. The newly proposed front elevation reduces the overall height of the structure by nearly 1.5 feet. 2. A rendering of the proposed elevations is attached for your reference as requested. The side elevations have been addressed with respect to roofline and window sizes, profile and alignment. On the left side elevation we improved the shape and detailing of the large window over the stairwell. As well, with the reduction in size of the windows in the upper front bedrooms, we added a second window to each of the bedrooms and aligned them with those in the floor below. The roofline over the stairwell carries over the design aesthetics and architectural elements from the front elevation. Sincerely, oti'll— Audrey Tse Principal, Architect 1534 Plaza Lane, #318 « Burlingame, CA 94010 . [t] 650.697.1318 « [f] 650.697.0338 + www.insite2design.com City of Burlingame Building and Planning Departments 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Date: February 28, 2017 To Whom It May Concern: V MAR - 3 ?017 CITY OF DU-9UNGAME (-;F)D-€ LA.NN!NG DIV We, Greg and Roseate Wagner of 1212 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame, California, do hereby grant authorization for our agent, Audrey Tse or Lauren Lee, of inSite Design to submit drawings and required materials on our behalf as related to our residential remodeling project. Additionally, inSite Design is authorized to apply for any necessary building permits and represents our best interest in any communications related as such. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 917-544-1476. Sincerely, Greg and Roseate Wagner Owners, 1212 Vancouver Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: 'd Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: D '2-(f — 115 —ISO ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 212- V1 fjr-01Av�P A; "A3 APPLICANT Name: /�yz," T" r Address: 1 �iy" 'f LAB 4- l—t~l City/State/Zip: Phone: k�o-4110-0-1 15 E-mail: AAAWR `l 6-LI PLSI11,2 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: `� Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: E-mail: Burlingame Business License #: PROPERTY OWNER Name:�— Address: City/State/Zip:% wit Far' Phone- �) � Le E-mail: 124 c, C-,QACc,- �=,_t1)k1 L- . CV-"-1 R E F � MA,Z CITY OF BURLINGAME CUD -PLANTING DIV. Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /�pYJIT1,0D r-I e-43)4�yz_ RW AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby rtify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. / Applicant's signature: TDate: '/ ' A I am aware of the proposed applica 1 n and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. _p Property owner's signature: h 22 a ,t(:►J ()WrW-PS L¢t-r Date: Date submitted: S: �HANDOUTS�PC Application. doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only Project Description: .Sec&,J D '-------FD. aul s Mc"L-J DSR deposit/handling fee paid by: Pik C Key: Abbreviation' " Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declining Height Envelope DSR Design Review E Existing N New SFD Single Family Dwelling SP Special Permit CITYY Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: May 8, 2017 650 558-7270 CITY O ?ror+nt Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non -compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water -conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1,1994. Details can be found at http•Ilwww.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09- 10/bill/sen/sb 0401-0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 2) Provide two completed copies of the Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 3) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No Work Allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 4) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 5) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2016 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 6) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 7) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 8) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line 2016 CRC § Table R302.1(1) or 2016 CBC Table 705.2 9) Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire -resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one -hour fire - resistance -rated construction per 2016 CRC § R302.1(1) or 2016 CBC §705.2. 10) Indicate on the floor plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. 2016 CRC Table R302.1(1) § or 2016 CBC, Table 602) 11) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2016 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 12) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 13) Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood -burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood -burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood -burning device. 14) If the fireplace is a solid wood -burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2016 CRC § 1003.9 or 2016 CBC 2113.9 18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended —Exit terminals of mechanical draft and direct -vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2016 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the property line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed or replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3 ") or, as an alternative, manufacturer -approved baffles must be installed. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: March 3, 2017 650 558-7270 CITY O Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 2. No further comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 3. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 4. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 5. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. 6. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at htto://www.flowstobay.orR/sites/default/files/Countvwide%20Program%20BMP%20PIan%20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 5/5/17 650-558-7245 CITfYaq O Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: i. On the proposed plan, please show the location of all proposed locations for utilities (PG&E, water, sewer, and sewer cleanout). The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 3. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 4. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. 5. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www flowstobay org/sites/default/files/Countywide%20Program%20BMP%20PIan%20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 3/7/17 650-558-7245 CITY O FI Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal: Provide a residential fire sprinkler system throughout the residence: Provide a minimum 1-inch water meter, dependent on sprinkler system flow demand. 2. Provide a backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — A schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building permit plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate fire sprinklers shall be installed under a separate deferred fire permit, approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 5-2-17 650-558-7617 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Existing tree in backyard is protected size and requires a Private Protected Tree Removal Permit for removal. Contact Parks Division for permit or download from website. Tree will need to be replace with one 24" landscape tree. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Landscape to remain the same Reviewed By: BD Date: 5.11.17 650.558.7333 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1212 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-173-150 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling with new detached garage. From: Bob Disco Parks Divison Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Please indicate on plans if landscape will remain or be rehabilitated. 2. Include city street tree on plans. 3. Include tree protection plan for City Street tree 4. 3 existing or new landscape tree required for final. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558- 7330) 2. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) Reviewed By: BD Date: 3.22.17 650.558.7333 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and construction of a new detached _garage and carport at 1212 Vancouver Avenue Zoned R-1 Roseate and Gregory T. Wagner, property owners, APN: 026-173-150; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 12, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 Class 1, (e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than: (1) 50 percent of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less; or (2) 10,000 square feet if: (A) The project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and (B) The area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A' attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. I, , Secretary o hereby certify that the foregoing resolution Planning Commission held on the Chairman f the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the 12th day of June, 2017, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1212 Vancouver Avenue Effective June 22, 2017 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 2, 2017, sheets A1.0 through A4.3; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's May 8, 2017 and March 3, 2017 memos, the Parks Division's May 11, 2017 and March 22, 2017 memos, the Engineering Division's May 5, 2017 and March 7, 2017 memos, the Fire Division's May 2, 2017 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 4, 2017 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1212 Vancouver Avenue Effective June 22, 2017 Page 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURUNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 0 FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1212 VANCOUVER AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and demolition of an existing detached garage and construction of a new detached one car garage and carport at 1212 VANCOUVER AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 026-173-150 Mailed: June 2, 2017 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IDI.— —f— fn nfh—oirl.l ? e �d 1218 'I *a- .. ..:.. w t V t_ / • p4bw r^ Ir . , .�,• Q'%�, a► uM sap 1' e 4 /• law • o f p