HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda FS - PC - 2006.02.27AGENDA
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2006
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER
IL ROLL CALL
III. MINUTES February 13, 2006 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. FROM THE FLOOR
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1124 Balboa Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for conditional use permits, special permit and
parking variance to convert an existing detached garage to accessory living quarters. (Steve
Mendenhall, applicant, and Candida-Rene Ordonez, property owner) Project Planner: Erika
Lewit
2. 1199 Broadway #1, zoned C-1, Broadway Commercial Area — application for conditional use
permit and parking variance for new food establishment. (Dana Kern, applicant; and Garbis
Bezdjian, property owner) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on
simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the
public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
There are no consent calendar items.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
3. 1416 Balboa Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permits for height
and declining height envelope for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage
(Catherine Anderson, applicant and designer; Clement & Eva Hung property owners) (67
noticed) Project Planner: Maureen Brooks
4. 1329 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review amendment to a previously
approved project for a new single family dwelling and detached garage (Con Brosnan, applicant
and property owner; and Mark Robertson, designer) (64 noticed) Project Planner: Erica
Strohmeier
5. 1830 Sequoia Avenue, zoned R-3 — application for front setback variance for a structural wall at
an existing apartment building. (Robert M. Blunk, AIA, BDA Architects, applicant and
architect; and George Williams III Trust, property owner) (64 noticed) Project Planner: Ruben
Hurin
6. Implementation of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan: Public Hearing on
Proposed New Zoning Regulations for the Rollins Road Industrial Area (newspaper notice
and 124 noticed) City Planner: Margaret Monroe
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Agenda
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY
February 27, 2006
7. 127 Loma Vista Drive, zoned R-1 — application for design review for a first and second story
addition to a single family dwelling. (Luis Robles, applicant and designer; and Jaime Gomez,
property owner) (35 noticed) Project Planner: Erica Strohmeier
8. 1824 Barriolhet Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review for a first and second story
addition (Paul Howie, applicant and property owners) (37 noticed) Project Planner: Erica
Strobmeier
9. 1456 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review for a new two-story single
family dwelling and detached garage. (Tony Leung, applicant and property owner; and James
Chu, designer) ( 66 noticed) Project Planner: Erica Strohmeier
10. 1450 Rollins Road/20 Edwards Court, zoned M-1 — Second Environmental Scoping for
Environmental Impact Report and Design Review Study for reconstruction of and addition to an
existing building for the Peninsula Humane Society and SPCA (Ken White, Peninsula Humane
Society & SPCA, applicant, George Miers & Associates, architect, Henry Horn & Sons, property
owner) (15 noticed) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin
X.PLANNER REPORTS
- Review of City Council regular meeting of February 22, 2006.
- Required Ethics Training; Re: AB 1234
- FYI — 1637 Coronado Way —review requested window changes to approved design review project
- FYI —Guidelines for Resolution of Bay View Disputes, Beautification Commission
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's
action on March 9, 2006. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council
by 5:00 p.m. on March 9, 2006 the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk
and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $250, which includes noticing costs.
AGENDA0227/posted02/22/06
-2-