Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda FS - PC - 2005.04.11AGENDA CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA Monday, April 11, 2005 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. MINUTES March 28, 2005 Regular Planning Commission Meeting I►��\7771]��IlT.rlf�1\I1.1 V. FROM THE FLOOR VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 934 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-2 — application for side and rear setback variances and special permit for direct exit from a basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling (John Matthews Architects, applicant and architect; Aline Bier, property owner) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin 2. 2750 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1 — application for conditional use permit and hillside area construction permit for a remodel and addition to an existing school gym (Laura Held, Principal, Mercy High School, applicant; DES Architects and Engineers, architect; Mercy High School, property owner) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin VIL ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. 3a. 1408 Columbus Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for floor area ratio variance for a first floor remodel and addition at the rear of the house (Sheila Young, applicant and property owner; James Chu, Chu Design & Engr., Inc., designer) (63 noticed) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin 3b. 1440 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for declining height envelope for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Edith and Tony Leung, applicants and property owners; James Chu, Chu Design & Engr., Inc., designer) (69 noticed) Project Planner: Catherine Barber 3c. 1530 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review for a second story addition (Martin and Theresa Dillon, applicants and property owners; JD & Associates, designer) (49 noticed) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS —There are no regular action items for review. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Agenda April 11, 2005 IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY 4. 1329 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permits for height and declining height envelope for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Con Brosnan, applicant and property owner; Mark Robertson, designer) (64 noticed) Project Planner: Erica Strohmeier 5. 1109 Balboa Avenue, zoned R-1 - application for design review and side setback variance for a first and second story addition (Irene and Frankie Gonzalez, applicants and property owners; JD & Associates, designer) ( 72 noticed) Project Planner: Catherine Barber 6. 2509 Hillside Drive, zoned R-1 - application for design review for a second story addition (Daniel Biermann, applicant and designer; Joshua and Kimberly Gratch, property owners) (60 noticed) Project Planner: Catherine Barber 7. 1524 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for declining height envelope for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Gary Partee, applicant and property owner; Chu Design & Engr., Inc., designer) (66 noticed) Project Planner: Erica Strohmeier 8. 1021 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1 — application for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Farshid Samsami, applicant; Samuel Kwong, architect; Kwang Pak, property owner) (46 noticed) Project Planner: Ruben Hurin X. PLANNER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of April 4, 2005. FYI: Revisions to an approved design review project at 1341 Laguna Avenue, zoned R-1. XI. ADJOURNMENT Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on April 11, 2005. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2005 the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $250, which includes noticing costs. AGENDA0411/posted04/06/05