The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About821 Cowan Road - Staff Report (3)e STAFF REPORT Agenda Item # 9d Meeting Date: Auqust 21, 2006 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: DATE: FROM HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 7, 2006 PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A 5-UNIT COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM AT 821 COWAN ROAD, PARCEL B-93, BLOCK 2, MAP OF EAST MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT N0.1 SUBDIVISION, PM 05-03 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve this map subject to the following: � 1. All sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter shall be replaced as new. 2. All conditions attached to the condominium permit shall be met. O 3. The conditions, covenants and restrictions for this map must be approved by the City Attorney and conform to all approval conditions and City codes. BACKGROUND: The condominium map was approved by Planning Commission on April 24, 2006. Staff has reviewed the finat condominium map and recommends approval subject to the above conditions. EXHIBITS: Final Condominium Map, Condominium Permit Conditions Victo 00 Ass' tant En ineer c: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk � S:W Public Worlcs Directory\Staff Reports105-03Condo.doc OWNER'S STATEMENT I, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE OWNER OF OR HAVE SOME RIGHT, TtTLE OR INTEREST IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THIS MAP, AND i AM THE ONLY PERSON WHOSE CONSENT tS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID REAL PROPERTY, AND I HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDING OF THtS PARCEL MAP. KONSTANTINOS DOKOS, OWNER OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ON 2006 BEFORE ME, ,A NOTARY fN ANb FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS AUTHORIZED CAPACITY, AND THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTE�, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND NOTARY'S SIGNATURE NOTARY'S NAME PRINTED NOTARY'S PRINCIPLE PLACE OF BUSINESS COMMISSION NO. EXPIRATION OF NOTARY'S COMMISSION TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT NORTH AMERfCAN TITLE COMPANY, TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2003298204 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY. ENCt1MBERlNG THE LAND HEREIN SHOWN, HEREBY CONSENTS ON BEHALF OF TNE BENEFICIARY TO THE MAKlNG AND FILING OF THIS MAP. BY: PRINTED NAME: TITLE: _ TRUSTEE'S ACKIVOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ON , 2006 SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND {S BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF KONSTANTINOS DOKOS ON MAY 25, 2006. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDtTiONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. DATE: RAYMOND B. THINGGAARD, PLS 3820 LICENSE EXPIRES: 06/30/08 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN HEREON IS SLTBSTANTIALLY TI-TE SAI� AS APPEARED ON TFIE TENTATIVE MAP, IF REQUIRED, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS 7T�REOF; THAT ALI, PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND OF TIiE SAN MATEO CQUNTY ORDINANCE APPLICABLE AT THE TIlv1E OF APPROVAL OF TFiE TENTATIVE MAP, IF REQUIRED, HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISIFTED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. i�1vM� RCE NO. LICENSE EXPTRES TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2005 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2005221077 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY. ENCUMBERIPIG THE LAND HEREIN SHOWN, HEREBY CONSENTS ON BEHALF OF THE BENEFICIARY TO THE MAKING AND FILING OF THIS MAP. BY: PRINTED NAME: TITLE: TRUSTEE`S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO BEFORE ME, , A NOTARY !N AND ON 2006 BEFORE ME, , A NOTARY IN AND CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT I DORIS J. MORTENSEN, CLEK OF THE CtTY OF BURLtNGAME, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY STATE THAT TkiE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY APPROVED THE WITHIN THE MAP ON DATE � DORIS J. MORTENSEN CITY CLERK CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THIS AT DAY OF M. IN BOOK 2006 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE AT THE R_F,QUEST OF RAYMOND B. THINGGAARD FILE No. FEE WARREN SLOCUM, COUNTY RECORDER BY: Deputy FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED � PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE} TO BE THE PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SAT{SFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT �RSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS AUTHORIZED CAPACITY, AND THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THE INSTRUMENT ME EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS AUTHORIZED CAPACITY, AND THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMEWT. WITNESS MY HAND NOTARY'S SIGNATURE NOTARY"S NAME PRINTED NOTARY'S PRINCIPLE PLACE OF BUSINESS COMMISSION NO. EXPtRATION OF NOTARY'S COWPMIS510N WITNESS MY HAND NOTARY'S SIGNATURE NOTARY'S NAME PRINTED NOTARY'S PRINCIPLE PLACE OF BUSINESS COMMISSfON NQ. EXPIRATION OF NOTARY'S COMMISStON JULY 2006 Thinggaard Land Consulting 3524 Breakwater Ave, Suite B Hayward, California 94545 (510)732-6608 SHEET 1 OF 2 Job No. N-17TM TRACT MAP A 5 UNfT COMMERCIAL �ONDOMINIUM CONVERSION of Parcel B-93 shown on Parcel Map 93-10, filed March 16, 1994, in Book 50 pgs. 24&25 San Mateo County Records. CITY OF BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA $AYS�OgE . I�IG� AY � � 1�31 Par era I..P. � L.orraine �'Iary �rnaudo � �� o�.I�To.2�032�l2115 �p�'� �°�' I)o�.1�Io.9�00904 � lo ,� � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - �� -�- — — H � � � W 0 � �t � .� � � � O U � � Q O � 0 � a Z a � a L a� � 0 LL � �� o� �� I I � , � 27.0' S 50°41'25"E 23 �0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMEN 24.0' �1 ._..�..�.b�_.._.. 3�sQ�.._.._..�..�..�.. ..�.._..�.._.._.._.._..�.._••�-•�• — — —��•_••_..�..�.. . 0� . 5' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTT_.ry ��• •. 60.�0'_ __ _� FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE 3.0'; ANCHOR EASEMENT� — — — — — -E��}�%��K & TAG � I � WIRE CLEARANCE EASEMENTI I I� I _______ ISTRAIGHTENED & RESET H t- � � II�II � � � lol !ol�l i i j �� a� j I � I a� I a � a I Q� ( �t� I j �ZlFj��W� - j �' � I �N��iW�¢� 1 0�1, j ��j��W� j ' � • t° >- v • Mazon Precieion � � ��z� �----- Z' z � aq - Mofore Inc. a� � �� D�. I�To. �9082520 �!W �� I �I �!� I "I � vd'ilm I� ��a�a I�� o�'�) �� !N LOT 1 �� I � I � �" I "I �I °�00 �°' Area = 42,300 Sq. Ft .+/- �� (� � � ol �,� �°� I I � I I �� m, ,�, M � �I j IIIII �I i i �' Il�fi �! !� � I I� I I M! �� I I �I I �r----- � � II�II � ! � Ilill � � � � II�II � �� I ��I(� 1 i � � ( � � � � �- `� I � � I( � I ��p� � �------- ------------------1-1! I I � I • 12" PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS DRAINAGE O�. I FOUND 3!4' IRON PIPE � D UTILITIES PER SERIES tp4047801 I I ! � I (S 50"42'25"E 60.0 -A ! � � .. W/ PLUG - RCE 20858 ..—.._.._..—..^.. �..—.._..—..—..—..—. —.._..—..—.. �, FOUND 3/4' IRON PIPE so.o' �� S 50"41'25"E 60.00' �pQ/ptUG - RCE 2085s I S �46'35"E —•$30°�'25"E 175.00' - —.._.. , ----- 12" PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS DIt41NAGE ' � AND t1TILITIES PER SERIES #94047800 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � I �F-�N�G4RCE 208I58 �'� � II II � � �'o�°� I I I I �cliard �.1udi Ruggeri tlsia Pg�fi� Celifornig Ino. � I ( I I�o�.10Io. 9�213203 � �G Do�. I�to. 9410�128 j� 4 �� - II II � II {I LEGEND � O = found standarct city monument I I � I • = found survey monument as noted + = set cross w/ tack & tag � = set mag nail — - — - - = cenferline —••—••- = distinctive exferior boundary — — - = easement line Thinggaard Land Consulting 3524 Breakwater Ave, Suite B Hayward, California 94545 (510)732-6608 REFERENCES -A = Record per "EAST HILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK" -� filed 1/23/59, Bk 50, Pgs 24-25 -B = Record per Parcel Map 93-10 filed 3/16/94, Bk 67, Pg 40 BASIS OF BEARlNGS The monument line on Cowan Road, between the monument at Bayshore Highway and the monument 545.96' SW ly was taken as N 39°18'35"E as shown on Parcel Map 93-10, filed March 161994 in Book 67 of Maps, page 40 TRACT MAP A 5 UNIT COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION of Parcel B-93 shown on Parcel Map 93-10, filed March 16, 1994, in Book 50 pgs. 24&25 San Mateo County Records. , CITY OF BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFOR�IIA 5CALE: 1" = 20' JiJLY, 2006 2OF2 Job No. N-17TM � , , ;,;. : City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Comment on the tion: have Acti hair Bro gg called sultant. T motion pass�e' were adv� d. This item�6nclu to the �en good direc ' on this chan r oice vote o e m ion to a 5-0-1-1 ir Aur recuse �t 9: p.m. � nd took ove c air. Apri124, 2006 design review is the way to go. a procedures 10. 821 COWAN ROAD, ZONED IB — APPLICATION FOR CONDOMIlVIUM CONVERSION PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUII.,DING (ONE STOP DESIGN, INC., APPLICANT; KONSTANTINOS DOKOS, PROPERTY OWNER; DOMINGUEZ ASSOCIATES, ENGINEER) (14 NOTICED) PRO7ECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIlV A. B. APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PERMIT FOR AN EXISTIlVG FNE- iJNIT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUII,DING; AND APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE CONDOMINNM MAP Reference staffreport Apri124, 2006 with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifly-five conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked what the actual address is because the site signage says 819 and the staff report says 821. Staff noted that they will verify the address with the Public Works Department. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Greg Ward, One Stop Design, project applicant was present to answer questions. He noted that they negotiated with the City to have a 7 foot sidewalk. They are trying to save the Sycamore tree in the front, and will try to move it. If it can't be saved then they will be adding two, new 24 inch box Sycamore trees. Commission asked if the Sycamore tree can be moved easily? Commissioner Osterling clarified that it can be relocated easily. But it might be better to have two new 36 inch box trees. Having two on each side will establish symmetry. Commission asked if it might be better to have 48 inch box size trees. Commissioner Osterling responded that the largest tree that he would recommend would be 36 inch box because it will catch up in size faster and become better established over time. Would like to add a condition that the existing Sycamore tree be relocated and a new 36 inch box Sycamore tree be added. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Vistica moved to approve the application for the condominium conversion and amendment to the conditional use permit for floor area by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent date stamped March 6, 2006, sheets L.2, A.3, A.3A, A.4 through A.7, D.1, E.1, E.2, C.l, AS.1 through AS.3, C-1 through C-5, Lighting Details (8%2" x I 1" sheet) and date stamped April 13, 2006, sheets T.1 and L.1, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and the Physical Elements Report, Physical Standards Report and Acoustical Assemblies Report date stamped December 27, 2005; 2) that the reports required by this code, in a form approved by the city, shall be provided to each person executing anypurchase, rental or other agreement to purchase or occupy a unit in the project. Copies of the full reports shall be made available at all times at'the sales office and shall be posted at various locations, as may be required by the city, at the project site; 3) that a new 7'-0" wide sidewalk shall be installed along the front of this property as shown on the plans date stamped April 13, 2006, sheets T.1 and L.1; the new 7'-0" wide sidewalk, curb and gutter and driveway apron shall comply with the Public Works' construction standards and shall be installed prior to the final inspection; the applicant shall obtain the necessary special encroachment permit to install the curb, gutter and sidewalk and 12 .� �s • City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Apri124, 2006 driveway apron; 4) that the applicant shall attempt to relocate the existing 12" Sycamore tree that will be within the new 7' sidewalk; and if that is not possible then it shall be replaced with a new 36-inch box Sycamore tree; and the applicant shall plant one new 36-inch box Sycamore tree adjacent to the relocated or replacement Sycamore, for a total of 4 Sycamore trees (two on each side of the main walk way) at the front of the property; 5) that the conditions of the City Attorney's February 3, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's January 30, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's January 4, 2006 memo, the Chief Building Official's January 3, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's January 4, 2006, memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's January 6, 2006 memo shall be met; 6) that the final inspection shall be completed and acertificate ofoccupancyissued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 7) that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an ownerpurchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 8) that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future, the gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; the security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each unit which allows occupants to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 9) that demolition for removal of the existing structures or walls within the condominium units and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration proj ects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 4, 2005, sheets T.1, L.1, T.2, A.1 through A.7 and Plat of Survey; 12) that a seating area, to b� architectural compatible with the building, shall be designed at the front entrance to the building;l3) that vines, to grow along the front wall of the building, shall be planted and maintained by the property owner; 14) that the windows and window trim shall be installed as shown on the detail, date stamped February 4, 2005;15) that the pazking variance shall only apply to this building and shall become void if the building is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster or for intentional replacement; 16) that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Fire Marshal's June 1, 2004, memos, the Chief Building Official's February 9, 2005, and June 4, 2004, memos, the Recycling Specialist's June 2, 2004, memo and the NPDES Coordinator's January 31, 2005, memo shall be met; 17) that payment of a Bay&ont Development fee to the City of Burlingame for traffic impacts in the Inner Bayshore and Shoreline areas sHa11 be required to mitigate cumulative impacts of this and other projects on area circulation, one-half of the fee is due at the time of planning application and one-half due before the final framing inspection; 18) that one-way directional signage shall be installed and painted throughout the pazking azea to clearly define the vehicular direction for employees and visitors to the site; prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant/property owner shall work with the City's traffic engineer to determine the required signage and markings on th� pavement to clearIy identify the on-site vehicular direction;l9) that the driveway aisles in front ofthe roll-up doors at the rear of the building and in the parking area shall be maintained clear and trucks shall not be stored or parked in the driveway aisles; 20) that the paved area adjacent to parking space #15 shall be painted "No Parking" to provide a clear, unobstructed back-up area for the disabled-accessible parking spaces; 21) that the 53 on-site parking spaces shall be used only for the customers and employees of the businesses at this site and shall not be leased or rented for storage of automobiles either by businesses on this site or by other businesses for off- site parking; 22) that the landscaping noted on sheet L.l shall be installed according to plan and shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system; landscaping that does not survive on the site shall be immediately replaced with an equivalent species; 23) that the property owner shall provide a complete 13 � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Apri124, 2006 Irrigation Water Management Conservation Plan together with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 24) that the office/warehouse building shall be built so that the interior noise level in all areas used as office does not exceed 45 dBA; 25) that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and shall occur only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays; 26) that on-site illumination shall be shielded and directed only on to the site in compliance with the City's exterior illumination ordinance; 27) that all parking areas should be lit for safety at night, such lighting should comply with the requirements of the City's exterior illumination ordinance; 28) that the remodeUaddition shall not be built with a reflective exterior finish; 29) that theproject shall obtain necessary permits to meet the standards of the required permitting agencies including: Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 30) that the project design shall conform to all seismic related requirements of the latest edition of the California Building Code as amended by the City of Burlingame in effect at the time a building permit is issued and any additional seismic requirements established bythe State Architect's office; 31) that all construction shall be required to be done in accordance with the California Building Code requirements, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame, and in addition to the limitations of hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code (CS 18.08.035); 32) that all new utility connections to serve the site arid which are affected by the development shall be installed to meet current code standards and diameter; existing sewer laterals shall be checked and replaced ifnecessary; 33) that water and sewer lines shall be constructed from flexible material with flexible connections with the degree of flexibility established by the City Engineer and with his approval and inspection; 34) that in the event that there is subsidence as the result of an earthquake, the site shall be repaired as approved by the City Engineer; 35) that all site and roof drainage shall be directed to the street frontage; 36) that low flow plumbing fixtures shall be installed and City water conservation requirements shall be met at all times, including special additional emergency requirements; 37) that the grading plan shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All applicable requirements of the NPDES permit for the site shall be adhered to in the design and during construction; 38) that if construction is done during the wet season (October 15 through Apri115), that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoffby inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately aRer each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 39) that all applicable San Mateo County Storm water Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices shall be adhered �to in the design and during construction, including stabilizing areas denuded due to construction prior to the wet season; erosion shall be controlled during and after construction to protect San Francisco Bay waters; 40) that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cuUfill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 41) that the erosion and sedimentation control plans should include notes, specifications, and/or attachments describing the construction operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measu'res, including inspection frequency; methods aiid schedule for grading, excavation, filling clearing of vegetative cover and mulch, including methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; and provisions for temporary and permanent irrigation; 42) that all runoff created dwing construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet the applicable San Mateo County Storm water Pollution Prevention Program Best Management Practices for surface water runoff and Storm Drain maintenance; 43) that all runoff in the parking lot, 14 T� City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Apri124, 2006 including runofffrom the landscaped areas, shall be filtered to remove oil and grease prior to discharge by a method approved by the City Engineer and such facilities shall be installed and maintained by the property owner, failure to maintain such filters and facilities in working conditions shall cause this conditional use permit to be called up for review, all costs for the annual or more frequent inspection and enforcement of this condition shall be paid for by this project's property owner; 44) that the phrase "No Dumping-Drains To Bay" shall be labeled on new storm drain inlets by stenciling, branding, plaguing or casting; 45) that grading shall be done so that impacts from erosion and runoff into the storm drain will be minimal; 46) that each storm water inlet on the site shall be equipped with a sandloil separator; all sand/oil separators shall be inspected and serviced on a regulaz basis, and immediately following periods of heavy rainfall, to ascertain the conditions of the chambers; maintenance records shall be kept on-site and maintenance shall be as directed by the City; 47) that drainage from paved surfaces, including parking lots, driveways and roofs shall be routed to storm water inlets equipped with sand/oil-separators and/or fossil filters, then the water shall be discharged into the storm drain system; the property owners shall be responsible for inspecting and cleaning (vacuuming out) sand/oil separators and changing fossil filters on a regular basis as well as immediately prior to, and once during, the rainy season (October 15 — April 1) and as directed by the City; 48) that off-site runoff shall be diverted around the construction site and all on-site runoff sliall be diverted around exposed construction areas; 49) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that ifwater cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained draznage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 50) that no vehicles or equipment shall be washed, cleaned, fueled or maintained on-site; 51) that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, straw bale dikes, check dams storm drain inlet protection soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed during construction to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established; 52) that the site shall be sprayed with water to cantrol dust during grading and construction. Construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with the standards of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 53) that a construction fence, including a impermeable fabric/material, shall be required around the site during construction to keep all construction debris on site; 54) that if any trenching is proposed on the site, the applicant shall contact the San Mateo. County Health Deparkment; if any contaminated soil is encountered, the applicant shall follow County protocol for its disposal; and 55) that if any prehistoric or historic archeological relics aze discovered during grading and construction, all work shall be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the condominium permit and amendment to the conditional use pernut for floor area. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Cauchi absent). C. Vistica moved to recommended approval of the Tentative Condominium Map to the City Council. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. C. Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the Tentative Condominium Map to the City Council for actions, including the conditions of approval. The motion passed in a 6-0-Y (C. Cauchi absent) vaice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:35 p.m. 15