The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About776 Walnut Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8b Regular Action Items �r�.,:�`�`�fi�' _� i�'�� 'w. N. ' . , �` � � ,1� < • f - �- �, �-� � �"*.� ` � . : ' ' ,� R � �Yt�' r' < . , �,,,�� , � � . <� � �1� t MD�� ;%'� i . � n �N i• � . - ' . . ' �.� j �� i . �� M �E .. - ��. f ¢, � �.. :�� ' 'y, � f�'�. Z.��d y: � u� ,�'"�t ,�" `�E' ° E r;�: t �, ,. i�f'� � �� - -. �� ' , ` �� ..�f _ . �R 3 ' �� :x � . ��Y li .—ad7Lr, `-�:�i — - � � . -.e&��' � ,� � � ' }+�i-. - —. — - �� , � �� , �' .�-,�:� -�- �-' �-y � _ x��---�_ � �� ; .� - - .��,r� ' - � j��-� - � _ . �� °. ¢ - �_ -_:� .. I': � .l . . f�� I,,; . . ' 4I . � . i�j�±l � U ��{f�il .��i� !ttPaS��i MIMti 11i.tiM 3� . �� _ �� ""�� .i#� �x..�ec�.� �,�. ,_ �a.. _ - _ s ��Fj.:��n ..: ��"�' _. . � ,._� . . �� — . . �..sx.�s'�:�'�'qli�rl+�,a.�.=..�c�� a�' - -- . - " � i�--� - . � �3v' `"-!�T'.. � ��+� . � . _ _. r,.y*.' • - .,.��.... . .. � ' - -_i.-r_. _ - . ._ __ . . . _. .-. ___. ... �-.__-.�._��1Li1C� .. PROJECT LOCATION 776 Walnut Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 776 Walnut Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Items Meeting Date: February 13, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Chris Day, Day by Day Designs Property Owner: Jerry Ceglia General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-141-220 Lot Area: 5,250 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California �nvironmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. !?roject Description: The subject property is a corner lot that has frontages on both Walnut and Willow �,venues. For corner lots, the code defines the front for the property as the side with the shortest linear frontage. For this property, the code defines the front of the lot as Willow Avenue even though the street address is on Walnut Avenue. The existing one-story house with an attached garage contains 1,606 SF (0.31 FAR) of floor area and has one bedroom. The applicant is proposing to extend the depth of the existing garage by 3'-9" and add a new second story. With the proposed project, the floor area will increase to 2,448 SF (0.47 FAR) where 2,580 SF (0.49 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 132 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. 1EVith this project, the number of potential bedrooms is increasing from one to three. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage provides one covered parking space (15'-5" wide x 19'-7'/2" clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010 (a) (2)). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review 776 Walnut Avenue Lot Size: 5,250 SF SETBACKS __ Front (15t flr): �2nd flI'): Side (interior): (exterior): Rear (15} flr): �2nd fl�): _ Lot Coverage: _. FAR: _. # of bedrooms: Off-Street Parking: Height: _ _ DH Envelope: 776 Walnut Avenue Plans date stam ed: Februa 3, 2017 and December 30, 2016 ORIGINAL ' REVISED EXISTING PROPOSAL ' PROPOSAL ALLOWED/REQ'D (12.30.16 plans) ' (02.03.17 plans) ; 14'-0" n/a 5'-4" 14'-0" 17'-0" n/a _ _ 1715 SF 32.6% __ _. 1606 SF 0.31 FAR 1 1 covered (15'-5" x 19'-7") 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 13'-9" not applicable _; _ . no change 20'-1 " no change no change ; no change 37'-3" 1789 SF 34.1 % 2448 S F 0.47 FAR 3 1 covered (15'-5" x 23'-2") 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 24'-8'/° complies '(0.32 x 5250 SF) + 900 SF = 2580 SF (0.49 FAR) no change 20'-1 " no change no change no change 37'-3" _ 1789 SF 34.1 % __ 2448 S F 0.47 FAR 3 1 covered (15'-5° x 23'-2°) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 24'-8'/4" complies 15'-0" 20'-0" 4'-0" 7'-6" 15'-0" 20'-0" . 2100 SF 40% 2580 SF' 0.49 FAR 1 covered (10' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') __ _ 30'-0" _.. CS 25.26.075 Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Engineering, Building, Fire, Parks, and Stormwater Divisions. The subject property currently has an active building permit that was issued on July 1, 2016 and has not yet been finaled. The scope of work of the building permit includes a kitchen remodel, alteration of the existing first floor plan (two bedrooms and two baths) to accommodate a new master suite (master bedroom, ensuite bathroom, master closet), guest bathroom, and new family room. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on January 9, 2017, the Commission had suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached January 9, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below is a summary of the Commission's comments from the January 9, 2017 Design Review Study meeting: • Break up the blank wall on the Proposed North Elevation with windows; • If replacing existing windows, consider another material for proposed windows; 2 Design Review 776 Walnut Avenue • Extending eaves would add architectural interest to the house; • If using Hardie siding, provide an address where it is being used; • Things seem off-center, make relationship between first and second floor compatible; • Revisit the combination and variety of different materials being used. The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans date stamped February 3, 2017. The revised plans include the following changes: • Windows have been added to the Proposed North Elevation; • Only two existing windows will be replaced with two wood French doors, the proposed windows material will match the existing windows material; • Eaves at gable ends have been extended to match the eaves at shed ends; • Pine wood lap siding is proposed; Please refer to the applicanYs response letter (attached) for a response to each of the Commission's concern. If an item was not addressed with a revision to the plans, the applicant has provided a detailed response as to why a change was not made. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring gable and hip roofs, composition shingle roofing, proportional plate heights, pine wood lap siding, and wood trim) is compatible with the existing house and character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 3, 2017, sheets A0.0 through A4.2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; � ' Design Review 776 Walnut Avenue 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's September 8, 2016 and November 29, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's September 13, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's September 12, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's September 15, 2016 and December 1, 2016 memos, and the Stormwater Division's September 12, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO TFRE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. n Design Review `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Assistant Planner c. Chris Day, Day by Day Designs, applicant and designer Jerry Ceglia, property owner Attachments: January 9, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes ApplicanYs Response Letter, dated January 26, 2017 Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 3, 2017 Aerial Photo 776 Walnut Avenue � �� City of Burlingame gURLINGAMECITYHALL � 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURL!NGAMF BURLINGAME, CA 94010 -+.. �_ �,;� Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, January 9, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers a. 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (Chris Day, applicant and designer; Jerry Ceglia, property owner) (99 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi A/l Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Gum met with applicant. Pla�ning Manager Gardiner provided an overview of the staK report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Chris Day, Day by Day Designs, represented the applicant with property owner Jerry Ceglia. Commission Comments/Questions: > Have the p/ans been shared with the neighbors? (Ceglia: Yes.) > Consider windows on the back? (Day: Faces the neighboring house. Concerned about windows looking into neighbor's home.) > Significant portion of back of the house still visible to the street. > What type of windows are proposed7 (Day: Milgard Montecito vinyl. Originals were Andersen renewab/es, but will be replaced.) Shou/d provide more detail - vinyl windows are not typically approved by the Planning Commission. > Why no overhang of the eaves on the gables? (Day: Mimic the existing design. Not touching much of the first floor.) > Extending the eaves wou/d add architectural interest to the house. > Why the Hardie siding? Wou/dn't the corners all need caps? Should show that on the elevations. > Thought of using regular wood siding7 Or if using Hardie siding provide an address where iYs being used. (Day: Not opposed to wood. Thought there is a way to join the corners on the Hardie siding.) > There is not a strong re/ationship to the windows on the second floor to the first floor. Why don't the gables on the south elevation line up? (Day: Yes, because of the setback requirements.) > Give some thought to tying together by relating upper floor e/ements to lower floor elements rather than just happening wherever they fall. > �ndows on covered deck have odd /ineup. (Day: Windows on the deck could be centered. Tried ha�d to line up proposed windows with existing windows, difficu/t to do so.) > If windows are already replaced could reframe and move to a more optimal location. Public Comments: There were no comments from the public. Chair Loftis closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Take opportunities to tidy things up. There are nice things going on, but others look accidental. Just a shift he�e, shift there to line things up upstairs and downstairs. City of BuAingame Page 1 Printed on 7l9/2017 Plannirt�g Commission Meeting Minutes January 9, 2017 > Not a fan of the big blank wall. However it is close to the building on the back. > Look at the north e/evation and the 61ank wa/ls. �l/ be viewable from the street. Look at design guidelines page 39 layer effect. Would prefer windows and landscape screening rather than a blank wall. > Master Bedroom on the ground floor add a window facing the street. > Everything seems off center including the garage. > Combination of Hardie plank, vinyl windows, and meta/ garage doors - shou/d look at all three items. > Will there be some type of patio on the street side with the french doors7 Tie in yard with exit area. Chair Loftis re-opened the public hearing. > (Ceglia: There is not much yard space. It was an attempt to make a garden type area.) Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli, to approve Discussion Item . The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, Bandrapalli, Sargent, and Gaul Absent: 1 - Terrones City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 2/9/2017 D A Y 120 Montalvo B Y D A Y D E S[ G N S wood City, California 94062 •(650) 283-7840 26 Jan 2017 776 Walnut Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Permit Number: B16-0206 PLANNING COMMISSIOI`I STUDY RESPONSE PLANNING Windows at back: We have added windows to the back wall to break it up. We had explored various different window arrangements. Type of windows proposed: The existing windows on the first floor are all Anderson 100 Series vinyl windows. During the first study I misrepresented that a number of the first floor windows will be replaced. Two windows on the first floor are being replaced with wood French doors. All other windows are existing. No overhang of eaves on gable ends: The recommendation of having an eave on the gable ends was proposed and we have studied the impact and like the design. Eaves at the gable ends to extend similar distance as the eaves at shed ends are being proposed. Hardie Siding: We have changed the siding to wood lap siding. Relationship to windows and gables from 15S to 2"d floor: During the initial design phase we had studied many different roof configurations and window placements. We have created a short back wall that enables the 2"d floor gable to align with the 15t floor gable. This short wall also helps minimize the appearance of a"big blank wall". The windows have been a battle from the beginning. We have tried to align as many of the windows as possible. Many of the existing 15S floor windows are flanked with structural elements that limit the ability to move them with ease. The second floor windows have been placed (if not able to be aligned with 15t floor windows) with respect to exterior and interior elements. Layer cake effect windows and landscaping: We looked at page 39 and the design guidelines. We have tried to design as well we can to them. We have discussed this project with the planning and building department on various occasions. They have informed us that getting a variance is not recommended or given easily. With the changes made to the design it breaks up the back wall. Windows at master bedroom facing street: We tried a few designs but found with the French doors windows would not be very tight. Also with trying to align the 151 and 2"d floor elements adding one or two windows to the master bedroom at facing the street seemed to through off what we had accomplished. Combination of hardie, vinyl, and metal: We have replaced the hardie with wood and replaced the metal garage doors with wood to tie the materials together. View from bedroom window to neighboring deck: We have shifted the bedroom window over to help with view. Also windows at bedroom are place symmetrically off the gable roof. Will there be some type of patio on street side with French doors: Yes we have added a wood patio to be one step off the ground and extend from roughly chimney to back wail and out to the fence. This area will be surrounded by a 5' solid fence (match existing solid fence) for privacy. The fence starts more than 15' from property corner. Chris Day Day By Day Designs Page 1 iti?c:+ka�rj,.� rrr�'� �' eur�uNcnrne: \� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: • �Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: � L� '�`��' �Z2� Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: �� G l,Jal h ��' �!e vt ✓� APPLICANT � Name: C�� Address: 12.c� I"(p�1�g��o ��, City/State;Zip: �� C+� ��QC�Z Phone: ( 6 �o� 283 78 �(o , � E-mail: /��,.c�vrSo�a.v� �,wn�.1�,Gc�_ ARCHITECT/DESIGNER PROPERTY OWNER �- , Name: + Address: '77� �%a(u[� � City/State/Zip: `�^��i��Cci,�. C�- ��i01 O Phone: E-mail: Name: ��wti�. � s;,b o�re. Address: _ City/State/Zip: Phone: E-mail: Burlingame Business License #: � � 3�� V�� V �i� SEP -"r lGio i�!TY OF BURLINGAti�iE CD�-P!A�!!vING [?IV. Authorization to Reproduce Prolect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. �(Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ApplicanYs signature: Date:_ �I I'rL.O«o I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: �j/ZS�I� o� Date submitted: � � �� 5: �NANDOUTS�PCApplication.doc D A Y B Y D A Y D E S 1 G N S 120 Montalvo Road • Palomar Park, California 94062 •(650) 283-7840 1 August 2016 Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 LETTER OF EXPLANATION Dear Planning Commission On behalf of Jerry Ceglia (Owner) we are submitting plans to add a second story over an existing one story house. Our intent is to create a layout that provides the owner with adequate space for his needs. In adding extra SqFt we want to keep as much of the original house as possible, instead of tearing down and rebuilding. The addition is to be in sync with the existing house design. The owner plans on staying at this location (as his primary residence) for a long period of time. The intent of the layout is to have a first floor master suite for the owner and provide additional quarters for his family on the second floor when they visit. Thank You; CYW l/a' �G{� Owner Day By Day Designs F�ECEl��+ SEP - 7 �� CITY OF BURLIi�1GAME CDD-PLANNtNG DIV. Page 1 � CITV O �� l �1 �� ,� Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed and or acknowledged at the time of building permit submittal. 1) Note: As of October 19, 2016 an ordinance was passed with the following changes to the construction hours. "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No work allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in tlie City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-Ci�ty Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: November 29, 2016 650 558-7270 � �� ;.�(. �� = Project Comments - P/anning Application Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 2) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifrcally shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 3) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 4) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 5) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 6) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 7) Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood-burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood-burning device. 8) lf the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC �1003.9. 9) 18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended—Exit terminals of inechanical draft and direct-vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2013 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the property line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed or replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3 ") or, as an alternative, manufacturer-approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 § 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) Tt�e following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 10) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: September 8, 2016 650 558-7270 �„ c�Tv �� ,�� ;:�;� Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Based on the scope of work, this is a"Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of- way). z. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to starting work. s. Replace damaged and displaced curb, gutter and/or sidewalk fronting site. a. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire line protection are to be installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be installed by builder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval. s. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 6. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. ?. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowstobay. orq/sites/default/files/Cou ntvwide%20Proqram%20BM P%20PIan°/o20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlav-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.orq/brochures then click "construction bmq plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 9/13/16 650-558-7245 �� CITY O �� ; 9 � � "� � f� ; .�� ;��-��., ryc � q Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existir�g single family dwelling. From: Rocque J. Yballa Central County Fire Department Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: None at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 2. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed By: Rocque J. Yballa Date: 12 Sep 2016 (650) 558-7618 BURLINGAME �r�vwiwwi i+w..,.r,,.wwiw Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No further comments The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Reviewed By: BD Date: 12.1.16 650.558.7334 leuAur nrnE Project Comments Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single familyr dwelling. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the foll�wing comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Please note on plans if landscape will be rehabilitated or remain the same. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need tm be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2. Two ma�le trees and 1 birch tree exist on property and meet tree requirements Reviewed By: BD Date: 9/15/16 650.558.'7333 C7TY �� i ��:�� Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 776 Walnut Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-141-220 Description: Request for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. From: Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay. orq/Construction For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolvn.critz(c�veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: September 12, 2016 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existina sinqle familv dwellinq at 776 Walnut Avenue. Zoned R-1, Jerry Ceqlia, propertv owner, APN: 028-141-220; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 13, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13�h dav of Februarv, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 776 Walnut Avenue Effective February 23, 2017 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 3, 2017, sheets A0.0 through A4.2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf fl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's September 8, 2016 and November 29, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's September 13, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's September 12, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's September 15, 2016 and December 1, 2016 memos, and the Stormwater Division's September 12, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 776 Walnut Avenue Effective February 23, 2017 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ��`'�: CITY OF BURLINGAME �i' ''� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 776 WALNUT AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, fEBRUARY 13, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application far Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 776 WAINUT AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-141-220 Mailed: Pebruary 3, 2017 (Please refer to other side) Citv of Burlinaame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) c .�j'." ` .. �9 � j �.. a•':�... a ��yyy�� . 4 � �a ° a "s � s' . � a'�- * � ' �'�� . .�� ? � i i `� �c� ..� � ! � .�j+ �.'ry. y; r f,p..-..� �� *'t �� ,,! �„ .g�yt � . . � �� i � „, g y �"�� ` � �, r ��' ` ry* t f � /"' +� \.%`°'� � , � \ c;�'�� .�r .'"� +w� d�,�`�, �y �'"d� F � �� ,�I "a '�i�'. y <c�� ''�, �• � �1` ��y"� �� _"'"- ��.• "� ''+e ," 1 �,, : � s � a+ � � � ��G�3�. . � ?.-ct . dt,�.-'`�'s� � � - ^ � 11� 3i� ""� ; . t \j� �;..,t'`i �� 4+r �-4 �:' '."�'„;� . A�,° h � � y�y wl�c* V�et� # 1 � �• u ]�'�,� '��';� '�j, ...An .. � .'} .� . .� � _ ' r�y�- � �..: Ys� t".^ d�''4/ a�i�� .'�`+,. t�i ��;��i�� L ,,�`M -i� ',A � �5�'p' '4.� $:� �� , � 3��,� �� 6j� � . ,p � .. 4 � � . 1 l, i (v��,,, :. �R. , � ' \ 3 /�.. .'�'... ' .�` 7 � .. y� N 4 �d" � , ��' j` � `a%'� Poy w � '�;�� 0. � ' ��`' ,'�1.� �i1'�I ��` +�w�,,, �, �y l !�� ! t� �v' 4 .,�� s ., F : /�`°,�"�� ,�' c ",� � . �' �t�ay,;,a'`�' � �d"`. � �id'% � �� , .� � � Gj � v �' ` ; �,,�, � �: r �,.g`�. � _ � ",�,. +,p� ~. � � , , �� .t r �, , . �, ,� , �, ,�' `� �, } _ ,J�i��S� `� b W ' � , F ' � �ir�':�. ,�;''�- °�r'Y'� `•:.a�'�j ' �.� n,. � ,�� r ,� 'c �:: ,��i''y�,;F"` ��' / %�� kr,,,,,,e 15,�' �'�'�`�€. � � �� Y�!`.�- `�t' - `"�� '� � �, � a .4'' 1109 � ' � ., Y�r�� f.�i � . `i. '� i d '. � .1r' ��' ... - a, ♦ �, Y � k � .�� ' �� 7r . � ��,,.� . , , ,/II�; ,�.� � ,�,,, �i, , , �t��t 't?►�'1 ��ir ,g �'" 4r�'�� '� � `� q•4'� �' � . ; I� ` � i Ir'�' j{�h'; � , \ r .rOI � � � � �'" w . �. 4 � �� `; � �^ � �,�, ; `� �� . � u ,,� � ."� i; .,`J' �,x. � 5� +$J � c{ "` 1 'k.1' � ,j- +, ^� P � s ! �. . 7, � A ',v�D, � ' % �,,� r,�atiy .. ��1, � ° ,� � �" �j �.�i_ � ' �( �".� .y � ; . . . � � �' �e .vi�( �°. c :� S�'f �. 'r `4t��.� e ,k,.�.t �, u�� µ c, •�,� 4 , `�,�j%/T"�"` a ��? �� .. , . � . . �,> ��.* M,,., ,� t ' a „ r n�L;ey r � _, . t � �. `,'� - ' d � s, � �", e - � ��'1..1 � � �.. �t: � , � r '"�"� t�/�i , {i� s � , r - ,�j w �� ±, 1� , el`,�a, 4� a e''" . � ,� ' `' � I� r ' J' � 4e. l.� `��A �,� . � =�e=l °� �1`" � . q '' x � � � h S � �°"'� � a �� r.�,� '4 ""�+ ��"� "� ' $�,� e�' .. � �' z� ��W* +��,"''' �G °�+ A? V �� .��. �� . . ,y, � �,j r x � � Y� � �d �� " �?y � l •� � �t'�r T�,� �' , ��+ " �� +� �ytx . �t� o �'r � "�4•,"�� d'°�, ,y 7xpf d ��z�� vx� � �.� fA t7.r � 'w."N° � � 4 �'f, y_ ` Vi ` `: �1� '.rv� ' ;,; w �+4'`�,�,'"�i � �^` ,'ek ^°a � .� � ,. >� Y: r< ,l `�v `�',..�f � r'':r��'y�:��`\ .+� :� "� n r-,�"� /, �i ,y,� ,\ �.. �a. �y`� � - �,`, k; a :*�� ^� / r° �,,a�; � �,� �, a� ��:;; � �� pre' r' �� r�.,� y � � "��,�°'1 A � �G S. F � � � �,� ?, �� i s yL�' �._ � .e � �,'� �� . �,d� � , ,�r,� w� � • ; � � , � �` �a � .�.�`� ,6*a� � �^ ��. � .�i " �^��t. � rl � t�r'nrs�j b - T� �\ , � � � �� '+.�'r� ..,�y i��. '� . \ � �y,t�_ * . .�' � � �'� �� . �� <<+ �� T;��, �p � � e,� • ,�.��.�i� :;, .,"�,`� �, ��/+��y'�", � �..`A� /� -^�.�- �� F ��ty� :�. ��. c�_�r` , � `� �"' 9 � ` :��.. �,�.,� � /r�� ` ,+�„ `r �� i. � . ,"'4, «��A�r�'''T��sc1.`W, -�f�'.�? !,y��,t� .�4�'''' .'@! t. � t`� f�'�..�!��"— y -. .�.��` .. . �� r{��'~ ti . � r 4..�. j�(" . r. )' . j�. � !n M.. �fr" /l y. ✓ . .':�.�' .�� .� } a, yj� / � �'�• 1 . 1 �('� �y�� -:.� .. � _':� �.- �� +'h. r •�� -.�� `iryri �M� � �,+K . 'wf 1.1 ^�. . " � '� �ibro ✓° pY .Y+ � � .� f. ;> ."oYl ,. 'c�j� � ` '�'�,tt� .;y �� ''0� �"'�I�"+�� # y;" '� sr� � •''��`�, r - � �S r.. . �� ' , �.� . "� 1 � �' f i .. ��.r � vy., � � � , .. ;, r'� � , I �� '� . � . �\� �� y� �� .t ��.( y '`iF q . . � ��i� "'� [;-� : S ��G��t� �_.M T . � i�. P, � �� ..�n Y � R � . ',4�`1�� r' ,1..�`" _♦ !k � �.o =.0 � ` , �,:� .: �,� �`► � y�? � � � �, �� P �r y��, q. „ ; '��.� �pe� a �, , 'x �,s�.�' � ,r'� I�a' •;'�!�'"' ��'�� E „� :�'�' • � r, - , �'{ �"�:�� '�'� 3;w�'f ��t.�a '�'�- - •f'�� '�'s -` - ��*�� x +� ' ;�+r .o. . �''^� �,. f� � a.';y� /' � .: �P' a. �„ � rt � i r;- � �.r� ,� '4. Sx �', _ 3, i ' �' '-�� r : v �I'� , f � � hr r+i � a � ->... � ;. ,.. , i � w � �f'� ; \;�'�, ,� .x ;, " / �, .: r= _�` i,� � �.` }, � �� - ti" > C � � '� �a. �.� � , ' � ' '` '�,'t� `"�" � `� " { � b ,,�� e� `� ;� x > ,'�y,/ ��' ;� . , �` '' �� s �'�r'�%'�4 �; # s. �.� �\ � �'�^'}.� + c � � r p-; ,��` � P�"q�u ati�',r, �. t n ,y/.'/ .,.' r .�,� f �' �. '� a ,i °7!, l � -� ;�" ,� ;� :�b' . • � , �<,: , � . , � . ,' ,.; .cr�4�r"..,..� . �.'d`4 �/�i � F �".f., ..,�.Y�.""4, � ;°_. .6 :. ..� d .y � ,�„.,�:�-.�-.ra^,�n,_; �t. �_. 776 Walnut Avenue, R-1