The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About136 Costa Rica Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8c Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 136 Costa Rica Avenue City of Burlingame Negative Declaration and Design Review Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue Item No. 8c Regular Action Item Meeting Date: January 9, 2017 Request: Application for Negative Declaration and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Chu Design Associates Property Owners: Frank and Maureen Cafferkey General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-293-260 Lot Area: 7,179 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmenta� Review: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was ondicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any ,�roperty located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 9, 2015. The results of the evaluation concluded that 136 Costa Rica Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis by Page and Turnbull, it was determined that there would be no adverse environmental impacts, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared (see attached ND-596-P). The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the initial study, facts in the Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing one-story single family dwelling and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,796 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,798 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 2 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within less than 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. A total of three off-street parking spaces are required for the proposed five-bedroom house, two of which must be covered. The new detached garage will provide two code-compliant covered parking spaces; one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. The proposed project complies with declining height envelope requirements using the window enclosure exemption along the left side of the house. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Environmental Review for Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)). Negative l7eclaration and Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avenue Lot Area: 7,179 SF Plans date PROPOSED SETBACKS Front (1st flr): (2nd flr): Side (left): (right): Rear (9st flr): (2nd flr): Lot Coverage: FAR: _ _ # of bedrooms: Off-Street Parking: 2Q1'O1�2n 0 20'-8'/2" __ _ 5'-0" 10'-6'/z" 54'-6'/z" 64'-0'h" 2368 SF 33% 3796 SF 0.53 FAR _ _ _ 5 136 Costa Rica Avenue d: October 13, 2016 and January 4, 2017 ALLOWED/REQUIRED _ , _ 20'-6" (block average) 20'-6" (block average) _ _ _ _ 5'-0" 5'-0„ _ __ _ __ _ _ . __ _ :_ 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 15'-0" 20'-0" 2872 SF 40% _ _ 3798 SF' 0.53 FAR (9' x 20') __ __ __ __ _. Building Height: 29'-8" DH Envelope: complies using window enclosure , exemption along left side of house ' (0.32 x 7,179 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,798 SF (0.53 FAR) 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 30'-0" CS 25.26.075 Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire, and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on November 14, 2016, the Commission had several comments concerning the proposed project (see attached November 14, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission's concerns focused primarily on the synthetic lawn �roposed at the front of the house, the front of the house looking similar to the adjacent house to the left, and the species chosen for the street tree. Please refer to the attached applicant's response letter dated January 3, 2017 and revised plans date stamped January 4, 2017 for detailed responses to the Commission's comments. Negative Declaration: Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on November 14, 2016. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Division staff. It has been determined that the proposed project can be covered by a Negative �eclaration since the Initial Study did not identify any adverse impacts from the proposed construction of the new single fam'ily dwelling and detached garage (please refer to the attached Negative Declaration No. 596-P). The GJegative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review on December 15, 2016. The 20-day review period ended on January 4, 2017 and no comments were submitted on the Negative Declaration. 2 Negative Declaration and Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avenue Required Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Suggested Findings for a Negative Declaration: A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 9, 2015. While the subject property was constructed in 1921, the results of the evaluation concluded that it is not eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. Those four criteria include Events, Persons, Architecture and Information Potential. On the basis of the Initial Study, the Historic Resource Evaluation, and comments received and addressed by this Commission there were no project-specific significant effects particular to the project or its site identified. Therefore, the project as proposed would not have significant adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the structure, featuring wood shingle siding on the main body of the house and stone veneer at the base of the house, articulated first and second floorwalls, proportional plate heights, aluminum clad wood windows, wood trim, composition shingle roofing, and sloping roofs with gable ends is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed landscape plan incorporates plants, hedges and trees at locations so that they help to provide privacy and compatible with the existing neighborhood, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report and within the Negative Declaration. Affirmative action on the following items should be taken separately by resolution including conditions from the staff report and/or that the commissioners may add. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. 1. Negative Declaration. 2. Design Review. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 13, 2016, sheets A.1, A.3 through A.6, and L2.1 and date stamped January 4, 2017, sheets A.2 and L1.1; 3 Negative Declaration and Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avenue 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's August 10, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's October 21, 2016 and August 15, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's October 14, 2016 and August 12, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's August 11, 2016 memo, and the Stormwater Division's August 10, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 4 Negative Declaration and Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avenue 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff wilG inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer Frank and Maureen Cafferkey, property owners Attachments: Response Letter Submitted by the Applicant, dated January 3, 2017 November 14, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed December 29, 2016 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: Negative Declaration and Initial Study (ND-596-P), dated December 15, 2016 Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 9, 2015 5 ry �' i� 1� : � ` �' / Chu I3esign Assaciates , "'�USiom � - ,ian�iary 3, 2017 City of Burlingame Plannin� Commission 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 136 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame. CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioner: ��.v.�� JAN - 4 2017 CITY OF BURL!'NGAME �CD-PLARlf�!':NG DIV. Per your design review comments, we have made the following changes/clarifications to the new proposed two story residence at 136 Costa Rica Ave., Burlingame. 2 3 4 � On landscape plan, we have replaced the synthetic turf to re;ular natural (awn at front and rear yard. The existina lawn, which is shown on the survey will be removed/replaced per new proposed landscape plan. The eYisting fence, on the right side of the garage has been retained per our adjacent neighbor's request. The street tcee has been replaced with 24 inch box, Raywood Ash fast growing type. Tlle windo�vs on the left side, 2°d floor were mostly for bathroom, walk in closet, laundry room, and for staiccase. There's only 1- 2 feet square window in bedroom# 3 is looking toward the front yard of adjacent. We have revisited the neighborhood and took another look at our left adjacent neighbor's house. We feel our design didn't look similar, except the roof form (gable). The applicant has provided a color rendering which shows the comparison. Thank you for your time in reviewing the revised plan. Sincerely, � James Chu Chu Desi��n 55 West 43rd Avenue San Mateo, CA 94a03 Phone: (650�345-9286 Fax: �650�345-9287 �� City of Burlingame BURLINGAMECITYHALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, November 14, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers d. 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer; Frank and Maureen Cafferkey, property owners) (55 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Commissioner Gaul was recused from this item as the applicant is a family member. All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Gum spoke to the neighbor at 132 Costa Rica Avenue. Senror Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. James Chu, Chu Design Associates, represented the applicant. Commission comments/questions: > What type of fence will be on the right side? (Chu: Wood fence.) > Any concerns that the front of the house looks very similar to the adjacent house to the left at 140 Costa Rica? (Chu: Had not noticed.) > Were any other landscape treatments considered other than synthetic lawn in the front of the house? (Chu: Does not know. Bruce Chen is the landscape architect.) > On Sheet A.4 there are sections through the bedrooms. Is there a purpose for showing those7 (Chu: Response to comments from Planning staff.) The sections are useful for showing the benefit of being able to have taller cei/ings with a pitched roof even when the plate height is 8 or 9 feet. > �l/ the street tree be replaced? It /ooks like it was just planted. (Chu: Not sure, does not show on the site plan.) Given the tree appears to have just been planted, perhaps it could be re/ocated. Public comments: None. Chair Loftis closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: > Handsome design, fits into the neighborhood, and is compatible with the neighborhood design guidelines. > IYs a nice design, but it looks very similar to the house next door. Questions whether it is the best design to put two houses next door that are so similar. > Concerns with neighbors windows looking into windows. Would be helpful to locate the outlines of neighbors' windows particu/arly on the left side. > Synthetic tuif in the front yard is not desirable. Less objectionable in the back yard. It is such a smal! piece, the amount of water saved would be minimal and there are other options for drought-tolerant landscaping. While there are some good authentic-looking turfs available, they are expensive; less City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 1/3/2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 14, 2016 expensive turf may not wear well and could look bad. > 15-gallon maiden tree for the street tree will be inadequate. Very s/ow growing. > The house is well crafted and the massing is nice. If the house is too similar to the neighboring house the designer should revisit and ensure the house is what the applicant intends. > Concern that the house designs are looking very similar over time -"cookie-cutter" quality. Here a small house is being replaced with a big house that looks like lots of other new houses. > If changes are made to the /andscape plan and synthetic lawn is replaced, it would be helpful to show on the plan what is existing and what is new. Chair Loftis made a motion, seconded by Commissioner DeMartini, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4- DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, and Terrones Absent: 2- Bandrapalli, and Sargent Recused: 1 - Gaul Ciry a/ Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1/3/2017 i `��M,.. COMMUNITY DEVEGOPMENT OEPARTMEN7 • 501 PrtinnRose Roi.0 • BURLINGAAtE, CA 9d010 p: 650.559.7260 • f: 860.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNiNG COMMISSIC?N Type of application. 17� Desi�n Rcview ❑ Variance �.l Canditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permii PROJECI' ADDRESS: 136 COSTA RICA AVE. APPLICANT Name �HU DESIGN ASSOCIATES Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. CitylState/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phonc�: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: )ames�a chudesign.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: JAMES CHU Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. CitylStatelZip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-maie James�chudesign.com Bu�lingame Business License #: 22684 ❑ Parcel #: az8-293-260 ❑ Zoning / Other. PROPERTY aWNER Name: FRANK & MAUREEN CAFFERKEY Address: � 36 COSTA RICA AVE. City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA Phone: � � 4� 5�1�— ��-�� E-maiL t�l/1�! h�f-�' � Y�`KL�. C��1il �� CT 1 3 20i6 CITY OF SURLINGAME CD�-��.�i�!t�!�t�du D11i. Authorizatton to Reproduce Proiect Plans: l hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to raproduce upon requesE and/or post pla�s submitted with thls application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any ctaims against lhe City arlsing out oi or related to such action. x (Inftlals of ArchitecUDes(gner) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW TWO-STORY RESIDENCE W/ DETACHED GARAGE AFFIDAViTISIGNATURE: I hereby �ify under p�nalty of perjury that the infwmat�on given hare+n is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ' O f� I t� Appl(cant's s(gnature: � � Date: � � � I am aware o( the proposed Iica n nd her uthoriz applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commiss�on L` Property owner's signature:- - �"��— �� Date: �� ' � � ' �-'� ` � . / Oate subm3tted: � � � 3 � I �O__ s•�xA1.Dcx1751+'C+�Pp/xor+on. dor � CITV O �� ' � , �`;� � �.�,.�:.,. .ho�._90 Rnowwr Project Comments - Planning Application ' Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1) Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory 1�Ieasur�es ��ith the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 2) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of OccLlpancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Buildin� Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 3) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 4) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 5) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88) 6) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 7) Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive consh-uction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire- resistance-rated construction per 2013 CBC §705.2. 8) Indicate on the floor plans that exterior bearing walls less than tive feet from the property line will be built of one-hour tire-rated construction. (20U CBC, Table 602) 9) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2013 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specities 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 10) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawin�s specify the location and tlre rret clear opening Ireigl�t and widtli of al! required egress ►vindows. 20l 3 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. 11) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 12)18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended—Exit terminals of inechanical draft and direct-vent venting systems. Tlie Figure in Appendix C of the 2013 California Residential Code is amended by adding the follow�ing note: Note: Vdhere the property line is less than ten (10) feet fi-om the exit terminal of any ne�vly installed or replacement hiQh efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3") or, as an alternative, manufacturer-approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 � 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: August 10, 2016 650 558-7270 auR� � I']..... ..a /'�.. ...�.i.. Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No further comments The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Reviewed By: BD Date: 10/21/16 650.558.7333 � ,a�R��AME I � Project Comments - Planning Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Landscape plan is required to meet the new 'Water Conservation in Landscape Regu!ations" (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final. 2. Landscape plan shall include 1 new street tree in City ROW. Tree must be chosen from attached list and be a 15 gallon or 24" box landscape tree. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 3. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558- 7330) Reviewed By: BD Date: 8/15/16 650.558.7333 � CITY O ^� � jl � _�`�` ,� � �� OFFICAL STREE TREE LIST - CITY UF BURUNGAME - PARKS DIVISION 850 Burlir►game Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 phone:(650)558-7330 • fax:(650)696-7216 gborba @burlingame.o rg Click on the link below to view a sample of the tree. TREES TO BE PlANTED IN AREAS UNDER 4' a1.1.."�'' �r' � ;,.� ��_.`; �� Height at Botanical Name Common Name Maturity Description Acer Trident Maule 20'-25' DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; roundish crown; buergeranum glossy, three lobed leaves; fall color. Acesculus carnea Red Horsechestnut 40' DECIDUOUS: Fast early growth; round headed; dark green leaves; plumes of crimson flowers in spring. Celtis australis Euroaean Hackberry 40'-SO' OECIDUOUS: Fast growth; gray-green,elm-like leaves; upright, round headed form. Subject to availability. Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 30'�0' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth, glossy, dark green, elm-like leaves upright round form. Craetagus Washinston Thom 20'-25' DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; graceful open limb phaenopyrum structure; glossy leaves; foliage tums fall colors. Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 25'-30' EVERGREEN: Moderate growth; graceful branches; fine textured leaves. Gingko biloba Maidenhair tree 30'-50' DECIDUOUS: Slow growth; fan shaped leaves turn yellow in fall; spreading, almost umbrella form. Koelreuteria Chinese Flame Tree 20'-35' DECIDUOUS: Slow to moderate growth; clusters of bipinata yellow flowers; leaves yellow in fall, drop late. Keolreuteria Golden Rain Tree 20'-35' DECIDUOUS: Slow to moderate growth; yetlow paniculata flowers; leaves red in spring, light-green in summer. Lagerstroemia Crepe Mvrtle 20'-30' DEUDUOUS: Moderate growth; spring foliage light Indica "Tuscarora" green and bronze, fall yellow; dark pinkflowers. Magnolia Samuel Sommers 30' EVERGREEN: Fast grovuth; upright branches; dark grandiflora geen foliage with rusty bronze coloring on leaf underside. White flowers in early spring and again in late summer. Maytenus boaria Mavten Tree 20'-40' EVERGREEN: Slow to moderate growth; pendulous graceful branches. Pistachia Chinese Pistache 30'-40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; darlc gree� leaves, chinensis brilliant fall color. Pittosporum Victorian Box 30'-40' EVER6REEtV: Moderate growth; fragrant white unduVatum flowers; glossy leave; round headed. Prunus cerisafera Purple Leaf Plum 20' DEGDUOUS: Moderate growth; coppery leaves; light pink flowers in spring. Pyrus calleryana F{owerins Pear 25'-35' DEC(DUOUS: Fast growth; upright form; masses of "Red Spire" white flowers in spring, red leaves in fall. Robinia ambigua Idaho Locust 30'�0' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; magenta flowers in the spring; long leaves divided into ovals. Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow 35' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; dense, round crown; outstanding fall color. Subject to availability. �� CITY O� , '`� ; d � �l _ � �`e� �,;_�.� �c'� � y �"�roranr Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: ..a � ,.�„ „t� , , , , 4. No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Based on the scope of work, this is a"Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 2. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire line protection are to be installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be installed by builder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval. 3. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 4. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. S. A survey by a licensed surveyor or engineer is required. The survey shall show how the property lines were determined and that the property corners were set with surveyors license numbers on durable monuments. This survey shall be attached to the construction plans. All corners need to be maintained or reinstalled before the building final. All property corners shall be maintained during construction or reestablished at the end of the project. Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 10/14/16 650-558-7245 �� CiTY O, �� t � I , �t0� �;�;-� ,� o'� _ 9 »POA.. Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: i. On the proposed plan, please show the location of all proposed locations for utilities (PG&E, water, sewer, and sewer cleanout). z. Please show how the post-construction will address the additional stormoff due to the new residence. Please be aware that no additional storm runoff is allowed from post-construction project site. 3. Please show the removal and replacement of all sidewalk and driveway approach. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. eased on the scope of work, this is a"Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a euilding Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 2. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire �ine protection are to be installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be installed by ba�ilder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval. 3. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 4. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. 5. A survey by a licensed surveyor or engineer is required. The survey shall show how the property lines were determined and that the property corners were set with surveyors license numbers on durable monuments. This survey shall be attached to the construction plans. All corners need to be maintained or reinstalled before the building final. All property corners shall be maintained during construction or reestablished at the end of the project. Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 8/12/16 650-558-7245 �� C 1 TY �� ID' � � �� `��. -.- , i;l:; 6.i �p� � n Project Address Description: From Project Comments - Planning Application � 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Provide a residential fire sprinkler system throughout the residence: 1. Provide a minimum 1-inch water meter. 2. Provide a backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — A schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Buildinq permit plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate fire sprinklers shall be installed under a separate deferred fire permit, approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 8-11-16 650-558-7617 � CITV O �� ; � � � , �� `}� „� � ,� a o� � q Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 136 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-260 Description: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a new detached garage. From Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. (None, include BMP sheet in full-size drawing sets) For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolvn.critz[@veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Cretz Date: August 10, 2016 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE LOCATED AT 136 COSTA RICA AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as fol lows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, per Negative Declaration ND-596-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, _ Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9�h dav of January, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE AT 136 COSTA RICA AVENUE, ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE R-1 ZONE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, an application has been made for Desiqn Review for a new two-story sinqle family dwellinq and detached garaqe at 136 Costa Rica Avenue Zoned R-1 Frank and Maureen Cafferkev, 136 Costa Rica Avenue. Burlinqame, Ca 94010 propertv owners APN: 028-293-260; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on January 9, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dav of January, 2017, by the following vote: Secretary i��:u:3��_� Conditions of Approval for Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avneue Effective January 19, 2017 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 13, 2016, sheets A.1, A.3 through A.6, and L2.1 and date stamped January 4, 2017, sheets A.2 and L1.1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's August 10, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's October 21, 2016 and August 15, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's October 14, 2016 and August 12, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's August 11, 2016 memo, and the Stormwater Division's August 10, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that a�l air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Bui�ding permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review 136 Costa Rica Avneue Effective January 19, 2017 Page 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. � ��'�:j� CITY OF BURLINGAME ��'� °� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 136 COSTA RICA AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 2017 at 7:00 P.M, in the City Hall Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose Rnad, Burlingame, (A: Appiication for Negative Declarntian and Design Review for a new, two-stary single family dwelling and detached garage at 136 COSTA RICA AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-293-2b0 Mailed: December 29, 2016 (Please refer fo other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE HAMILTON JOSEPH F TR 263 CRESCENT AVE BURLINGAME, CA 94Q10 Cifv of Burlingame A copy of the application and ptans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650} 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (P/ease re%r to other side) �s--��—�.�a��"� -�"•' � r�y �,�-r+c .1 a�� ;��, j _. - $� � 4P `.' .ak�" ��'Y'�-y.�"i"�r' � � � F F � `�y�� 4 '' �, '��"'w,� �; �p� ; ' fi ,�" "' r . .�� ,� r' ,,� ' ;+��`°� ` • : ,�' �aa � } �.��,� �� .� ��r�;x �„ '' ,p 'r�p' f 4 .! r ";a� / . �, r t', dt ti '. ��'"I��T�� .I k a � °` .1 �� ,��.�g�.�. ' . � � .1� . „Vy R �4y'�� ^ �!$,�.:$+�� k�,p�,,�14,�.' # �� -',�,. {,..� � ��.. .' ��;'�=6tl£W ,7,} ffi� ai,dl I � Y °��'� l ' "'{' /°� fn� �' �� r V, �IS� Y�' �WI � �` �IN'^MT�w _ � h A . S '�d ��`r�� . i�� ' � . r�il µ� �� I� "'1� � ��' �� w�� ' �^✓ 1 �d �w��,m»r ,f,�' �,�p � p��G ra_'�l�Ii'AJ'p`)m'j y'��i r�l��y�a f1"} �` . �Ny ,. � 51. F ' � � ��. J, ��1;� � �� ,x ti ,.. � 4 � ,� ��dhi,,�f � ��'t.w r � �.� � �, � a � ,.� . �a � ,:^� , �� y";� �'�t 1 �v ta a �� , "ti"'r � '�"�� 9 y � r � N y�� ' .�� i� �a u. � � � /�.e�- r �,rywi:{ � f �. ,�� G�"`� �" f � �,� � �4�'�Aii��tl�� &�. �r , I,�ryi, ,� ,�'� [��. h W .i r,t AI � fl: .�� i `�'r'�� Ty 4 i� ..�'P �� p� ` j y �� ,�9tll;n, •.� ' ,y�' � � . �I � ,a � �r.,.d� � t�W..�,�� ii;l!,�rai;iilr �� S a � � ��"� � � ° �,�� {,,� ► "�� i � ' �" � ��i,��,�� °f�r � .� ` � � � �'� � ( �`:';, ��t» �y,,�":� �� „ i'i � s ,� s��"��u }� ��"'� � �i "'m�� . '�"�`��.'"� � + ;��y. � � i �.A?7'.�ir � ��.6� �e `� u�1 �� V��^�m i'y �'�y � ��,P�'I'I, � �, r� "� l�a��"'�.n�, 'Yr„ 4�. � .�" t�� . � �- �t T5� � } �� p�, � �L,� � �1�;, ��, .. ��.,'�d�� mP�! ` � f ' �� :`� �� , '�'4^ . i `�:�' "��^� ��i � '4�, � '.� �r��o �. .,,".� I�'y�.�,�1� Ci1� uJ� � t� �M.��'�'�'�'1 ��'�e,1+�"�� 7� �' ' � : ,y±��' >> . . �-�y,,,,, "�rye_ f � ��"� .,w ` + J:� � d V'�.✓'"- �"�� wi � � ��4�. �� ,,�,;��,""'�'»i1� �' `,h � am��' I'�� y�� "`�4��i ��n I n � � T)� �9� .. /�fl� �. ir � �I'"17i�� W! �` t V�.�� f '� �'<.ei i y '�� ay,u ��I�, �w�_ . �,y � �.,��r�i+ �r,�� if� r .y,,�� pd�� -'� �� ttY �w " �'' �, r � �.. �. � �t r � "%�r^'��""."�„��4q�y,.�r�. � �j� ;� �� ° an � ` � �' � '� �yy � �� "8 � � � � 'C �e� '� �'1�'� � �' Q - � � . � � 4 k�"1�^ � �,� h m' q '� ��' � � � Ju'�W rv�• . .�y � r •+�' d � ''�t�pi � 7' 7J- `'iV., i '.1 br t �l� � �'��ry .3 r,��yC� 1�P�p,�,l ��,�. � I ��' � .��!f�,��« ��}.s.� i � .�R! F��.� �1��"�Ij�� j" ��'"�,.,��`��1° � �.ti�. � ,.�. � .Y'f;�{'' i� ?^a _'•�t� i ^� wi- t '� �-.- V a,1 � �� ♦ , , � � .�"4N r� T n 1 tTM`'y � � � � p �o � . ��" II�°i'.. � f �,„� �� y� � �� if �i .." �,�t" + � o �� ,� '� '. �, �"�,p � ,;�' �� .:, r�i � i , � Fn �,� W,sr � .� v� c��q� s� � ��,�a �r^a. i �� , � a-;�� .,'��1) �._t �� ,�"��P,� � � ny�r�'�'�?�� ?�y\r �uti. � �`r'�`� ;�.4��c'�� t� �"(�`��'�� "..�a �. i;�� t ':�.. ��'` . ��„��-.�; �' � ° ry�, �b S�r � � W p��jy �r � � � � i '�. :,� �� ,c�v �. ar � a '��+, A��+ �t�Y�'; � �,��^�, lyo'��'�i4��' �Qwp,� e1�"� �I� �'W�.� �� `�,� t +� �r .� ` � � �a �z �"'� �` � , �` �k t . r �.�r � . M L.'� �i � 'M � t� �'! �.'� �''1.� za3 4m �'zs.`��;� ,. .tp' ��r�' �• �4 �k , w I ^ � r ~ "P kj � . �� ,� � p� � i k i�. k , � 1 m' q� . � y � �� } �� _' � u�$'� ,u • . �I i r � � ° �+ 4i o ��ih�, '� 1� � ..�' � ,%� � � 1 � � � t �u �:49�,�• rl �� . � �;� ��, � � � � � ��. � �° `� 9 � i4" �" �' � i� ,� � ._ . d � � � F 1� � � w � �` g� e '�� ' � � � � " \ i � �� "� 4 '�, �a� a41�" ` , � � p�:' � , �v � � � . � .�-� � . r" 6� M y � P V.,# �,�q� � T*�, i� � ,«✓'' 6 i �. �' r� �- f�.,� � ¢r ,'. �� Wy ,� � ,� a s � � ^' � f {� ry°�� I�i,}�4 �, T d ti a� _ -�� H �.. I t � � � '�Rr17� . W 9"< �,'Y!'��'P � �4 .. "'d �,. M�.: �P l � � ��'+: ' .� �•�'� Up ro'hM�� ,� � w � r, '1 1 � i" r � ; �� ' � 4^� „!_r! _ � E`�i', �Y '�y MI yJ ��,I+ry� •`'b ,�•�` � ; �} �l'� "' .,:� �,^iw tiryJ�l T. .i»��.w ��- '� � , f ��I IJ�P" ' I F�l�' ` �'�IG�� ;:'��u . ,� �e !�� . �;, �, '�_ 4�.�� 1 5 'p1 � �'y, . � + �.. � G�f��.r � � � '�y;'�" � '^i `'R y: � y r`'' Y�' �� .�i�" • M`S"��'��"•�iai+�°+A Ti N�:�,ri,Fy7��w ��f?� �� r�..."a'�y_ ��'�, I�'� �4'„� �� . �' y Ayyyjjj +'�; � q . �, MK� v .'�,w£�sr ( I �", .',� , i �'i'�g . � �', �.1� ; � � �!i��i�.:i�� ., . ; � 1 � �' tl h �i,... � C �„ � '�-�;� 1.'^ r' r� 'i��R � ., �,ip � ,,.a '� � � � "rl"F N�� ., r�` �" 1 p�ry ^ . ^ �. ' � r� �� ..��„ � i� �� r,II,, .� ,1' �I �' .�' r'�„ ttw' i �ill Y � 4 �py., m .«� "� �� '�"� �� , f ��' i.� �� ,� � k� '`� ,� � ".. �«� r,;y:e�. `,¶� tiY�n� ��'`s i��h 31.��d � a YJ6�� t .m"� n" �� , r � '"�C � ,, • ,, , �Woi �r M1 ��,.� t�., � �yy� 1 r.� r .dry . m.R�J� �[ � � vr' �F 1� �` � �P 9ro �' } ��.t�^'t�k'. " q��l, �•��.��i� � er,.,., � 'Ay� .e.+�� '�� { �'„A��11�iol4ii�h��lwl�, ��:/" �� inT'Cy4i' I�� r�{��'FL�`� �'4'��uy�M,. '� F yI �h' � v � � i '� , . '" „.AG� ��,�, +°� . � . Y� JM s ` �> � p, • wv \M �*� � �• � " ��Q� '� � .. '. ��,� ' � �;�,� r � � , �y� �„�?�� '�A� ;-; � � :. � ��I� i o � i�� ' �� '� Y � ro � .x;� � �dI mr. a �A�"'S`" 1 �I'�m�� I' ,tpa �.�+�,� �� 6 � �^ �� '� �� i m, � d ��,� r u+ ,w ,��E m' , y �. ,� �' • "� �+` rt :, ✓� �i .,*^4h i a � r S ,�.�q� , s � .�' � r , "'� � �I,p�'e ,�, M1 �r � �'� r u "� p� � � m �� ` � ` ` , +' i 3�"" �� i ( ^�� 'I „� iq�l � „�f, � � i��' �n 1�' 1V� �, i � ��idu �, e' y� � ��,.�" I� �e � ix� �<� �.;n �j� �� r �;� , w a,� � �` °�" ,��a A � Y , ,, , .��, i � � ' � ��5�, r ;�p�, '�. '°�� y" �r�� "�'� � k�a� i � ;s � � � �^'"�� J° �'�,'r,' �rg � � �,a.4.� i'�4 � �� w� ��fi� ' � � � a �` +i �� r . �' �`m . vF ' w � �,� � p" �, y� i �'' ��. ��,�:•-*' �� ta�n� � �� 0�� 15��'� �'� �� " ��"�'�I� � �'�'�,, �C�'`i �� .�+ � Ei-R �I ^' \ \ � 1' � �. f � � u� o� � ii �t' '� , r � u� � a�� In � i � i � � �I � �:, i� � � � � �� a . � ,� � Pl M� �.,� � ~„- �� 4r�'„'�°�f y , �� f�,�' ��:�I�� , , ; ' _ .a! � "` 'y: b..��. .��!i;�6:.�*.v,'e:.. w�""� �d .�,n ml1^;� t�'� �� ,u�m't�.��j�^ ��L�+� . ':,_�.,�1 .��'ad f �� _ "f� �w�x��w�� '� d , �,� , ;,: � ,� 136 Costa Rica Avenue, R-1