The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About100 Costa Rica Avenue - Staff Reportr � Item No. 8a Regular Action Item '" �� .`-a�',,, .. - 4 � �: -- , - y+ - . ,�.+x ?. � . - _ � � ��<. �� > s� .,Y f � �; . � ,�.: �! _ *�::�= _ ... �- ��-_ _ _ �R: - -- ..:f�• ' r . � `. - - ---...: � � .� ,� .. _ �� ' � � � .. �t^,�_'�= � �. � - �'�'`.,�#'�'� t ��'�"�� r_ m a-`, rY =r �� „'� - = �'.� - - - � . �.s w°� ��. �i: ... ','�. � . �+ �� 'a i�. , . . .,} R� -_. _:�..r. _ ; -, ' � � � � . � � �' - _ PROJECT LOCATION 100 Costa Rica Avenue City of Burlingame Item No. 8a Design Review and Conditional Use Permits Regular Action Item Address: 100 Costa Rica Avenue Meeting Date: September 28, 2020 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and Conditional Use Permits for a new detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Gleason & Gleason Design Partners Property Owner: Kristine Furrer General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-293-190 Lot Area: 7,045 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 26, 2019. The results of the evaluation concluded that 100 Costa Rica Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Project Description: The subject property is a corner lot and contains an existing split level house with an attached garage. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing attached garage into living area and a first floor addition at the front of the house. A second floor addition at the rear of the house is also proposed. The existing accessory structure will be replaced with a new 455 SF detached garage in the same location on the lot. The proposed house and detached garage will total 2,882 SF (0.41 FAR) where 3,504 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed. With this application, the number of bedrooms will be increasing from three to four. Two off-street parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The detached garage provides one covered parking space (10 -0" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) and an uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway leading to the garage. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010(a)(2)); ■ Conditional Use Permit for a half bath in a detached accessory structure (C.S. 25.06.010Q)); and ■ Conditional Use Permit for enclosing pool equipment within the detached accessory structure located within 10 feet of property line (C.S.25.60.010 (k)). Design Review and Conditional Use Pe�mits 100 Costa Rica Avenue Lot Area: 7,045 SF SETBACKS __ _ _ Front (1st flr): (2nd flr): _ _ __ _ Side (interior): (exterior): Rear (1st flr): (2nd flr): Lot Coverage: fy ►:7 # of bedrooms _ Off-Street Parking _ __ Building Height: DH Envelope: EXISTING 33'-6" 66'-6" 2'-11 " 4'-10" 54'-0" 54'-8" _ . 2,156 SF 30.6% _ __. _. 2,625 SF 0.37 FAR _ _ 3 1 covered (17'-6" x 18'-6" clear interior) + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') __ _ __ 18'-7" not applicable Plans date PROPOSED 100 Costa Rica Avenue �ed: September 21, 2020 ALLOWED/REQUIRED , _ __ 25'-3" ' 22'-7° (block average) no change ' 22'-7" (block average) _ . _._ 11'-0" (to addition) 23'-2" (to addition) 53'-4° ' no change ' 2,481 SF 35.2% 2,882 SF 0.41 FAR 4 4'-0" 7'-6" 15'-0" 20'-0" __ .. 2,818 SF 40% 3,504 SF' 0.50 FAR . _ 1 covered ', (10' x 20' clear interior) +'' 1 covered (10' x 20') + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ _ _ 28'-6" 30'-0" _ _. _ _. _ complies CS 25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 7,045 SF) + 900 SF + 350 SF = 3,504 SF (0.50 FAR) Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows and doors: Double-pane aluminum sash (anodized bronze). • Siding: Stucco, 10" cedar shiplap. • Roof: Concrete tile. • Other. 6" T&G gable ends; metal ridge chimney cap. Staff Comments: The revised changes on the plans date stamped September 21, 2020 do not impact the building footprint, setbacks, or building envelope; the changes made were only to architectural details. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 13, 2020, the Commission provided recommendations for the project and referred the application to a design review consultant (see attached July 13, 2020 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below is a summary of the Commission's main concerns: • Fix inconsistencies in drawings; • Drawings are hard to read; and • Ensure that there is proper ciearance between the driveway and the utility pole at the corner of the property. � Design Review and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans, date stamped September 21, 2020, to address the Commission's concerns. Please refer to the applicant's response letter (attached) for a full response to the Planning Commission's suggestions. Analysis and Recommendation by Design Reviewer: The design review consultant met with the project designer/applicant to address the Planning Commission's main concerns. Please refer to the attached design reviewer's analysis for a detailed review of the project and recommendation. The design reviewer notes thatthe "proposed style of the residence will blend in well with the existing neighborhood". Based on the design review analysis of the project, the design reviewer supports approval of the project as proposed. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural sryle with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the proposed project (featuring hip and gable roofs, proportional plate heights, wood and stucco siding) is compatible with the variety of styles that define the character of the neighborhood, and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties. Therefore, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020, a-c): (a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) The planning commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity Suggested Conditional Use Permit Findings: The proposed accessory structure will accommodate a single covered parking space and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the viciniry as it will not contain accessory living space for the main residence. The accessory structure will be finished with materials to match the existing house. The proposed half bath (a sink and a toilet) will not have a window within 10 feet of any property line and will not be visible from the exterior of the structure. That enclosure of the pool equipment will minimize noise to surrounding neighbors. For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's Conditional Use Permit criteria. 3 Des%gn Review and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider pubiic testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the follcwing conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 21, 2020, sheets A1.0 through A.5.1 and L1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters forthe construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removai of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Counci� on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flies shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, 4 Design Review and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architecturai certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been build according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Arnelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Gleason & Gieason Design Partners, applicant and designer Kristine Furrer, property owner At4achments: Ju!y 13, 2020 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant Response letter, dated September 9, 2020 Design Review Analysis, dated September 21, 2020 Application to the Planning Commission Canditional Use Permit Applications Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Nctice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 18, 2020 Area Map Separate Attachments: �listorical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 26, 2019 5 � CITY �� ; � � � � ��—N City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, July 13, 2020 7:00 PM Online b. 100 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure. (Gleason & Gleason Design Partners, applicant and designer; Kristine Furrer, property owner) (114 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi attacnments: 100 Costa Rica Ave - Staff Report 100 Costa Rica Ave - Attachments 100 Costa Rica Ave - Historic Resource Evaluation 100 Costa Rica Ave - Plans Commissioner Comaroto was recused because she lives within 500 feet from the property. All Commissioners have visited the project site. Commissioner Terrones while visiting the site was visited by nerghbors asking questions about what was being requested, and did not get addresses for those neighbors. Commissioner Schmid had a brief visit with the neighbor across the street on Costa Rica during the site visit, but did not ta/k about anything substantial. Community Development Director Gardiner provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff > Need to receive the plans as half size sets so they can be measured - not l 1"x 17". > Where the new proposed d�iveway is being slid to the back of the property, there's an existing utility po/e with a tension support which extends about 8 feet from the pole which would obstruct the garage approach. Don't know how that will be addressed as an issue of constructability. (Gardiner: We could ask the applicant that when we get to fhe questions for the applicant.) Chair Tse opened the public hearing. Don and Rela Gleason, represented the applicant with the property owner Kristine Furrer Crouch. Commrssion Questions/Comments: > (G/eason: We have /ooked at the e/ectrica/ pole that you spoke of; and there is a way to maneuver the driveway so it doesn't have to impede on the pole. That has to do with the /andscape design and how the driveway is going to bend in fo reach the garage.) > This can be a handsome design and nice project, but noi sure because of some clarifications we need in ihe drawings. In looking at the west e/evation, the items that are shown next to the windows, are those shutters of some sort? They're not called out on the drawing, so if we could get that noted. (G/eason: Yes they are shutters.) > On the same e/evation towards the rear of the house, we're seeing what /ooks to be a dormer with your keynote number 7- doub/e pane aluminum sash window. That dormer doesn't show up on the roof City of Burlingame page 1 Prinfed on 9/24/2020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 13, 2020 p/an like the other dormers. Not sure how that dormer aligns with the window thaYs in the master suite. but the window looks like its shown wall-to-wall on that exterior. IYs not drawn like that on the other dormers. A/so, what is the scale of that dormer7 (Gleason: Correct. It will look exactly like the others. Thank you for calling that out.) > On the south elevation, you're showing what looks to be a large acorn-shaped light fixture next to the larger doors and french doors, is it real/y intended to be that size? It /ooks like it would be fhree or four feet tall. (G/eason: It's not three or four feet tall. It's about 28 inches tall. IYs is supposed to be a gas lantern.) > If you're not familiar a/ready, there's a requirement for the exterior light fixtures that they have to be downcast and they don't shine at the other properties and maximum wattage, etcetera. (G/eason: There's no neighbor on that side. A/so we can drop the height of that fixture because iYs on a hook, and we can make it any height we want. lYs shielded to the other neighbor by the roof of the new entry and there is very mature /andscaping there, so it wou/d not be visib/e from the street.) > On the north e/evation facing the backyard, the dormer on the front of the house is not shown. (Gleason: Correct.) On the east e/evation where dormers are shown, they don't appear to align with where the windows are occurring on the p/an. So if you could check that, you have one on the window into the master bath and one in the master bedroom area. These dormers don't seem to a/ign. The dormer on the lefr is going to benefit by being further into the roof area if the plan is correct with where you want that window into the master bedroom. (G/eason: Yes.) > You said that the mature trees are going to remain. It seems like there's a/ot of hedge going on the sidewalk along Barroilhet Avenue and Costa Rica Avenue. IYs out quite a ways. Is there a plan to trim them7 (G/eason: Yes, we're going to be cleaning them up, pruning them, and trimming them down because there's a lot of ivy thaYs grown into them and we need them to get sunlight and fill out. We plan on doing that early in construction so they have time to fill out again and look good.) (Crouch: 1 cou/d cut those back as well. I cut those back last month because it was hard to wa/k on the sidewalk, so they're trimmed back from two weeks ago.) > What is the height of the building? (Gleason: The top of the ridge from the finished floor is 25'-3". The top of the ridge to the average top of curb is 28'-6". The /ot s/opes slight/y from south to north and also from east to west.) There we�e no public comments. Chair Tse closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > This has the potential for being a well-crafted design. Some of the inconsistencies in the drawings makes it difficu/t. Like the direction this is going. > Have the concerns with the uti/ity po/e and the guy wire. The comment was made by the design team that the driveway in the landscaping can are curved around it, 6ut thaYs not shown on the /andscape p/an . WhaYs shown on the landscape p/an is a straight shot driveway that comes in right at the corner of the property. So as the driveway is going to come around off the existing curb-cut, then those rarsed planters have to get revised. The hedge infill will have to get revised and some of the drawing issues with the inconsistency with the floor plan needs to get updated. Would benefit from design review consulting. > Can make the findings /n terms of the application for design review and conditional use permit for the bathroom, the new detached garage and the poo/ equipment in the accessory structure. They're re/atively straight fonvard and we've approved similar requests in the past. > Has the potential to be a good project. It was just hard to read from the drawings. Also wou/d agree with the design review consultant, it would just streamline the application process here for the applicant and it would get us to approval of drawings more quick/y. > The roof p/an was very confusing and can't make sense of it. IYs a very odd design. It might be nice, but it sort of looks like it wants to have a f/at roof. /t's so unusual, it looks like an Irish thatched-root cottage. Not sure that it fits into the neighborhood. Don't want to get into making decisions about the sty/e, there's so much about the project that just doesn't make sense. The drawings have to be much CityofBurlingame page 2 Printed on 9/24/2020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 13, 2020 more refined to be approved. > The elevations and the design a�e handsome. It has ihe possibility of going a real/y nice direction. The split leve/s are fun, it creates an exciting dynamic to a project but it's different. The design consu/tant could he/p with the format of this presentation so the drawings work well and they're a bit more consistent with the way we see other kinds of projects come through. It wou/d make it a/ot easier for us to make it approvable because then the informatron that we're looking for and expecting wou/d be there. > There's some very interesting design e/ements to this home and it has some great potential. Had a hard time reading the drawings, and want to suggest that in the next go around that there will be better utilization of the white space on the sheet, maybe an en/arged p/an and maximize the drawing on each sheet. Also maybe better differentiate some of the /ine weights on each of the drawings, that wou/d help us to understand and read the context of the plans and drawings better. (G/eason: Is it possible to make one c/arification, comment7) Chair Tse opened the pub/ic hearing. (G/eason: I'm not sure from the comments that this was clear. It is an existing split leve/ house. The second floor additior, thaYs referenced is only the size of the boxed out window. IYs about 12 square feet.) (Crouch: It is only one room. 1 current/y have an upstairs bedroom and bath.) (G/eason: The staff report suggested to me when 1 read it that the second story addition was a major deal. IYs not. The plate height has been raised to allow us to expand the living space. So anyway. I just wanted to make sure that was c/ear.) Chair Tse closed the public hearing. > It seems like al! commissione�s are in agreement that some more attention to the drafting of the set of drawings can he/p us understand your proposed plans better, and so we hope that you can take that opportunity to do that rn this next go around. > Do want to follow up on the comment made by the app/icant that the second story doesn't amount to much. There's something odd about the building and iYs c/aiming a/ot of vertical space for not having much going on upstairs. If the second floor is not that important, this building is saying something comp/ete/y different. It's saying the second floor of fhis bui/ding and everything up high is real/y important because you've got this 11-1/2:12 roof. There's a/ot of space being c/aimed for a building. Don't care whether you use the space or not, but iYs making a statement thaYs not in agreement with what we just heard about this building. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Loftis, to refer the application to a design review consultant. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Sargent, Terrones, Tse, Loftis, and Schmid Absent: 1 - Gaul Recused: 1 - Comaroto Cify of8urlingame Page 3 Printed on 9/24/2020 GLI?��O\s(;Lt?�SO\ DESIGu CARTrvEG$ T0: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION FR: RELA GLEASON DATE: 9/20/20 RE: 100 COSTA RICA AVE PROPOSED PLAN REVISIONS DATED 8/31/20 VVe have submitted revisions dated 8/31/20 to the proposed plans for the 100 Costa Rica project which are responsive to the Planning Commission's comments from the July 13, 2020 meeting, and to input from Catherine Nilmeyer, the Design Review Consultant assigned following that meeting. The purpose of this memo is to summarize these revisions. P�RAWING SIZE AND READABILITY: The 8/31/20 drawing set are all reproduced at 12" x 18". Small font sizes have been increased for readability. New walls are poche'd for clarity (A2). COORDINATION: Elevations, plan view, and roof plan are coordinated so components Eparticularly dormers) align and are shown consistently. CAPTIONS AND LABELLING: Certain captions which were noted as missing have been added or corrected (Shutters at A4.1, A4.2, A4.3, A4.4; 6" T&G siding at second floor boxed window at A4.1 and A4.4). CODE COMPLIANCE: Windows required for emergency egress at BR1, BR2, and Master are shown as operable casements on elevations (A4.1, A4.3, A4.4). Windows at east garage wall too close to property line have been eliminated. Large "acorn" light fixtures at south and north elevations have been eliminated. Toilet at powder room has been rotated 90 degrees for �dequate clearance. DIRIVEWAY: Driveway has been rerouted to avoid utility pole guy wire eight feet from pole lotated at rear property line. New alignment uses existing curb cut. Driveway shown on L1. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION 9/20/20 PAG E 2 TREE ON NORTH PROPERTY LINE: In connection with a their own separate Planning Application, neighbor at 112 Costa Rica intends to remove 22" diameter tree which straddles applicant's rear property line. Applicant has agreed to this plan. Planned removai of tree is noted on A1.1 and L1. Design Review Comments City of Burlingame Property Owner: Applicant Name: Designer: Project Address, P(anner: Date of Review: Kristine Furrer Gleason & Gleason Design Partners Gleason & Gleason Design Partners 100 Costa Rica Avenue `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi 21 September 2020 Design Guidelines: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood. The proposed style of the residence will blend in well with the existing neighborhood. Many of the homes in the area were built in a similar era and, even though several have been remodeled, many have retained the style of architecture on the block. 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood. The homes in the area have both attached and detached garages. This existing residence currently has the garage attached at the rear of the house. In the proposed remodeling, the garage will become detached at the rear of the praperty; following suit with the preferred method in Burlingame Design Review. 3. Architectural style and consistency of mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures. The existing exterior stucco finish is to be utilized, while adding horizontal wood siding to break up the elevations and add interest. Although the proposed fioor plans are not dissimilar to the existing spaces, the roof height has been raised over these spaces adding a more dramatic visual elevation. The proposed garage will reflect the characteristics of the proposed residence. 4. Interface of the proposed str'uCture with the structures on adjacent properties. The home to the North, 112 Costa Rica is to be remodeled. 100 Costa Rica will have only a single story garage adjacent to the driveway at 112 CR with no impact. 1620 Barriolhet, the neighbor to the East is distanced by a driveway and a fence with vines. This residence has iwo large bedroom windows facing the 100 Costa Rica property. The placement of the 100 Costa Rica's proposed second story windows are not aligned and are much smaller windows, with no impact to its neighbor. 5, Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of the structural components. Currently there is much overgrown landscape protecting privacy between properties. Much of this will be pruned, but stilf allow privacy to adjacent properties. 6. In the case of an addition, compatibi(ity with the architectural style and character of the existing structure as remodeled. Although the style of the proposed structure is much taller, due to the steeper roof slope, the designer has incorporated similar materials from the existing residence, such as stucco exterior and many similar window placements. Comments: The designers has listened to comments presented by the Planning Commissioners. They have worked on drawings which make them easier to read and resolved inconsistencies between Floor Plans and Elevations. I made some suggestions on code issues so as to avoid having to return to Planning if revisions were to be made by Building Department. I believe this design proposed wil! be a beautiful addition to the neighborhood, while providing the homeowner with her requests and requirements. • Catherin J.M. I eyer � =-k- "e� �g�` PLANNING APPLICATION �. �� euRu�cr,ME Lp�,��UNITY DEVELOPMENT CEPARTN1�Ni—pLA�NIl�G DIViSIOt�d `, �r ' S01 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANN�NGDEPT(a�BURIINGAME.ORG z 0 � a � � O � Z H U w � O � a. z O � Q � � O � z r- Z Q U J d � Q a x � � w z � O � O r- > ¢ 0 � � a 100 COSTA RIGA AVE 028-293-190 R-1 PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL #(APN) ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remodel of existing 3BR 28A residence to include: Reconfigure kitchen, bathrooms, and other liang spaces; addition of front entry (166 sqft); conversion ot existing attached garage to living space; demoli6on of one accessory structure (-283 sqft); construction of new detached garage at rear of , � . iar of garden wall at front of house; new swimming poo�. Project has undergone Planning Oepartment Pre-Review. Drawings submitted include corrections responsive to Pr�Review comments - _ _ _ . __ Kristine Furrer PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT7 415-652-3579 PHONE Gleason & Gleason Design Partners ARCHITECTIDESIGNER APPLICANT7 650-201-7967/415-317-6001 PHONE 950213 BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # 100 Costa Rica Avenue, Burlingame ADDRESS kfu rrer@woodruiisavryer.com E•MAIL 77 Huntleigh Rd, Piedmont, CA 94611 ADDRESS don.gleason777@gmaii.com keri@ggdesig npartners.can E-MAIL 'FOR PROJECT REFUNDS' - Please provide an address to which to all refund checks will be mailed to: K. Furrer 100 Costa Rica Avenue, Budingame, CA 94010 NAME ADDRESS _ I HEREBY CE TIFY U R PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANHBLRIEF. � I AM 05/14/20 DATE OF E PR OS PLICATION AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE SION. � �� N 'S SIGNATURE DATE I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME HE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST ANDIOR POST PIANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEB5ITE , P OF HE �k.4NNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTtON �(INITIALS OF ARCHITECTIDESIGNERI i � } APPLICATION TYPE Z❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) W� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) ❑ WIREIESS ? ' `� DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION �❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ OTHER: Q � ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) �� n C !UN - I 2020 0 z DATERECENED: `�''�' CF B�RLINGAME i -�G _ pL�-PLANNtN� DIV. ` 5/15/20 City of Burlingame Planning Department .�� CITT 0.. 4 � BURLINGAME �o �.� CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin.a�me_org 100 Costa Rica Avenue Proposed half-bathroom at new detached garage The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. i.� Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, genera! welfare or convenience. Proposed detached garage is located in rear 30% of property as permitted by zoning ordinance. Proposed half-bathroom is located inside garage structure, and will therefore not be visible; will be constructed in accordance with all applicable building codes and will not alter the use of the property; and therefore will not adversely affect the public health, safety, general welfare, convenience, or aesthetics of the neighborhood. How will the proposed use be [oeated and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? Proposed detached garage housing half-bathroom is located in rear 30% of the lot as permitted by code section 25.26.073(b4) 3. How will the proposed projeet be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Half-bath will be located inside permissible Accessory Structure, and will not be visible from outside. Therefar neighborhood aesthetics are not affected. ��A�F�� JUN —1 2020 CITY OF BURLINGAME CUP.FRM CDD-PI_,qNNING DIV. 5/ 15/20 City of Burlingame Planning Department ��, ciTr o ,� * BURIJNGAME � �- �<,.� CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.orQ 100 COSTA RICA AVENUE: PROPOSED POOL EQUIPMENT WITHIN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain whV the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or con venience. Applicant proposes to locate pool equipment (pumps, filter, heater) within new Accessory Structure (detached garage). Design will provide sound insulation as determined by Building Official so as noot to affect aesthetics of neighborhood. 2. How will the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? Proposed detached garage housing equipment is located in rear 30% of the lot as permitted by code section 2526.073(b4) 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existrng and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Equipment will be located inside permissible Accessory Structure, and will not be visible from outside. Suitable sound insulation will be provided. Therefore neighborhood aesthetics are not affected. R�V�I i/ �� ,i�N - � 2C!'�0 CUP.FRM C�TY OF BURLENC--,Ai�,�E CDD-PLANNING D1V. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL PERMITS, RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WFVEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Re�+iew for a first and second story addition and Conditional Use Permits for a new detached qaraqe at 100 Costa Rica Avenue Zoned R-1 Kristine Furrer, property owner APN: 028-293-190; WFNEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 28, 2020, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written ma�erials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Conditional Use Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Conditional Use Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meetir�g of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of September, 2020 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue Effective October 8, 2020 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 21, 2020, sheets A1.0 through A.5.1 and L1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flies shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visibie from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design EXHIBIT "A" Cond�tions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue Effective October 8, 2020 professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; � 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been build according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ,o,_��xi� CITY OF BURLINGAME ��. : � COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT I ��R! !NGabsc 501 PRIMROSE ROAD '� ' BURLINGAME, CA 9G010 �-.ti.� \�� PH: (650) SSSJ250 www.burlingame.org Project Site: 100 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1 The City of Burlingame Planning Commissinn announces the following virtual public hearing via Zoom on Monday, September 28, 2020 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting online at www,zo�oi� o� by phone at (669) 900- 6833: Meeting ID: &91 8594 9112 Passcode: 466732 Description: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing singie family dwelling and Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure. Mem6ers of the public may provide written comments by email to: publicrommPntQ7�6urlingame oro. Mailed: Septem6er 18, 2010 (Plecse �efer to other srdeJ PUBLIC HEARlNG NOTICE Cit o Burlinppme _ publrc Hearina Nefi�p If you have any questions about this a appointment to view a hard co PPlication or would like to schedule an lanninedentic�burl;�a� pY °f the application and plans, please send an email to �, or call (b50) 558-725p. Individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disahility and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet ar other writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at lannin de t burlin ame.or or (650j 558-725p by 10 am on the day of the meeting, If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. Kevin Gardiner, qiCp Community Development Director (P/ease refer to other sideJ �1.- 100 Costa Rica Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 028.293.190 ra ;:� p, `(� (a `v - �i - v ti�v �7 � � 4q 'a� �aQ ��fl Q��O �F3� � 43 v �� c �� G� �� 7 F� 51c�4 �� c� Way ^�9 flQ.. ��3; � ` d�� `� 4j« - e,> Q� Q� `�� oo� �� n�� '� o Q�� 4�� '�p�.� fl°Q�� '°� 4�`� 4�� , t 443n .�4 �D� �IIC 0�`^ �•� �� 46� 4�t)� �� , q`�� 4 �q4i , � � 7JQ�� ,�''�•�� 6 �� q�� . 4�� wa� OC Q��' i•�'' + �,a �� 9� �,4 � pQ�'' qQ�' W'�`� .�`''� �� +e* �1 ��" . � ��a � ��7� �wf�,� �45� �q� p �'� � p ` ,•�♦�,! . ��,� 4,a ,� c=� � � ♦ 1 � �� 4`� 'J,�4! �c.,� •� c,� t7 •♦ �,'b ��' �p` q�� 4. q4� a� � W ,' �� i �� S�� Q�� 9 4.0 � �G � ,''j•�'�� a ,;f' ��m � � ` �' ♦ • o�� °4 � a � � � � .•''.'',' + +�+ '• 1 •� ''� _ , , �� u- ,,r�"�' �, �S _ * � ��4 `=�� j ,i�r A'%� s 9�� p o ��•1r �, �~ �� - . i b � 4 ,� Q�Q '��• s+ r� ��. , a� �' � 4� �� + � �`�a � q�a •'',��.�' + �'� • ..70� q�� !�� w , pJ C� �.� ~ � _ c� Q .�� '�� _ � � 4�6 , ,�'"''�� s ��' �s' t*�' g�� _', � �a �,� 4�or �,► �� ' _ _ �, . , � � , � j• � - t�'� ';� , .� � �' � ,,,,'+ � ��s � � �' �� , �e+� -, �, _ �� -' _ _ . » �r _ � , � �i• � �ss _ _ -II, 4 , - _ , '��',•' {' - �� - -�11T j �� - - �`� y!� - - '1 �_ _' � � �S� , --, -- �' - - pc noticing mtg date: 09.28.20 100 COSTA RICA AVENUE 114 noticed APN Resident Address City State Zip City of Burlingame Plannning Division/'AKolokihakaufisi 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010 32031280 Woolf Amy J Tr 407 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1041 32031010 Sheu Gary P 0 Box 428 San Mateo CA 94401 28316110 Macia Sara Tr 1632 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5250 28293080 Freethy Barbara 125 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5246 32011030 Villongco David L& Isabel T 825 Crescent Ave San Mateo CA 94401-3707 28293140 Waaland Joseph Robert Tr 7029 18th Ave Ne Seattle WA 98115 32031040 Lipson Kenneth E 733 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316140 Franzella Philip S Tr 1644 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5250 32011230 Wang Yuchang 742 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316200 Ward Joseph A Tr 120 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5268 28293110 Margulies Elliott H 113 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5246 Z8293170 Mason Robert W Tr 1616 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5227 28293250 Levine Edward S Tr 132 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5212 28316150 Clifford William John Tr 1648 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5250 32031260 Hall Daniel F Tr 415 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1041 28293060 133 Crescent Ave Llc 1332 Pebble Dr San Carlos CA 94070 28293120 Putnam Sara Romain Tr 105 Crescent Avenue Burlingame CA 94010-5246 28316090 Breazeale Gary 117 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293200 Oceanwide Global Llc 1325 Howard Ave #708 Burlingame CA 94010 28293260 Kennedy Patrick & Colleen 144 Costa Rica Burlingame CA 94010-5212 28316120 Doss Patsy M 1636 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5250 32031020 Schoenstein Erwin A Tr 526 Cornell Ave San Mateo CA 94402-0000 28316180 Duggan Daniel & Karen M 114 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5268 28316060 Pineda Lisa M 129 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5211 32011260 Watermulder Paul G Tr 325 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1001 28293090 Edison Linette J Tr 121 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5246 � 28293230 Bohnert Edward M Tr 124 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5212 28316130 Hirabaru Rie 1640 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031030 Wong Mary Ying 741 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1014 28316210 Bouquet Pierre F Tr 1241 Edinburgh St San Mateo CA 94402 32011240 Gulliksen Joanne L Tr 748 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1065 32031240 Pitlyk Nicole R Tr 451 Barroilhet Avenue San Mateo CA 94402 32011270 Putsis William P Jr 315 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1001 28316070 Mattick Bradley Thomas Tr 125 Costa Rica Avenue Burlingame CA 94010 32011010 Gehrke Michael Edward 829 Crescent Ave San Mateo CA 94401 28293180 Gorrie Thomas C Tr 1620 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5227 28293240 Kwoklundy Sonia Jeannette Tr 128 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5212 32031270 Johnson Beth 411 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1041 28316100 Calandra Jack P Tr 113 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5211 28293070 Holmes Irvin R Jr Tr 129 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5246 28293150 0'dell Duane R Tr 1608 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5227 28293210 Nichols Gary W Tr 116 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5212 32011220 Gonsalves Keith C Tr 738 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1065 28316190 Lane Jeffrey C Tr 118 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5268 pc noticing mtg date: 09.28.20 100 COSTA RICA AVENUE 114 noticed 32031220 Carboni Victor B Tr 756 Occidental Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1057 28316050 Statz Sing Tr 133 Costa Rica Avenue Burlingame CA 94010 28293160 Keefer Thomas D& B A Trs 1612 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5227 28293100 Zigal David Tr 225 Humboldt Rd Burlingame CA 94010 28293220 Hughes Sean S Tr 120 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5547 28316160 Pearcy Mark Darwin Tr 1650 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011250 Sarna Punit 754 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 32031250 Halmos Frank Tr 421 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402-1041 28316220 Walsh James P Tr 128 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5268 Z8293130 Lee Jeffrey M Tr 3145 Geary Blvd # 333 San Francisco CA 94118 28316080 WiderJune L Tr 121 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5211 28293190 Furrer Kristine Tr 100 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010-5212 32011020 Corrigan James Patrick 827 Crescent Ave San Mateo CA 94401-0000 32031280 Occupant 407 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 32031010 Occupant 755 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316110 Occupant 1632 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293080 Occupant 125 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011030 Occupant 825 CrescentAve San Mateo CA 94402 28293140 Occupant 1604 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031040 Occupant 733 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316140 Occupant 1644 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011230 Occupant 742 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316200 Occupant 120 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293110 Occupant 113 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293170 Occupant 1616 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293250 Occupant 132 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316150 Occupant 1648 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031260 Occupant 415 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28293060 Occupant 133 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293120 Occupant 105 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316090 Occupant 117 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293200 Occupant 112 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293260 Occupant 136 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316120 Occupant 1636 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031020 Occupant 747 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316180 Occupant 114 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316060 Occupant 129 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011260 Occupant 325 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28293090 Occupant 121 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293230 Occupant 124 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316130 Occupant 1640 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031030 Occupant 741 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316210 Occupant 124 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011240 Occupant 748 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 32031240 Occupant 451 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 32011270 Occupant 315 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316070 Occupant 125 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 pc noticing mtg date: 09.28.20 100 COSTA RICA AVENUE 114 noticed 32011010 Occupant 829 CrescentAve San Mateo CA 94402 28293180 Occupant 1620 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293240 Occupant 128 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031270 Occupant 411 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316100 Occupant 113 Costa Rica Ave Bur�ingame CA 94010 28293070 Occupant 129 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293150 Occupant 1608 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293210 Occupant 116 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 320112Z0 Occupant 738 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316190 Occupant 118 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32031220 Occupant 756 Occidental Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316050 Occupant 133 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293160 Occupant 1612 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293100 Occupant 117 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293220 Occupant 120 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316160 Occupant 1650 Barroilhet Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011250 Occupant 754 Costa Rica Ave San Mateo CA 94402 32031250 Occupant 421 Barroilhet Ave San Mateo CA 94402 28316220 Occupant 128 Occidental Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293130 Occupant 101 Crescent Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28316080 Occupant 121 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 28293190 Occupant 100 Costa Rica Ave Burlingame CA 94010 32011020 Occupant 827 CrescentAve San Mateo CA 94402 CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Abiqail Verqel de Dios , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18-years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 18th Dav of September 2020 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 100 Costa Rica Avenue 114 — 300' Notices Item No. 9b Design Review Study r] l f.. . � xj�' j, e. . .+(. `: � tn � ,..,� � i.; y . S .._�"��$�.!� �t-' ;,, i � ��' 'x _� := ?�' � t � � � '� ,�� "`� ,��:`��° +�� . � _ ^.� � =-- _ - - �- -` -- _'_ - - _ -- --�-�—��...��, � � - ,� � '�' �� ' � , � .r :�i:.- � a~ _- .P �._�-.� .. -.._y.- y ��:: , ,_..: -•�t� _ _ m 'k� ��:.' . .1 ,:��d:r. • �-. rs � i;.L 4 - i � �r — PROJECT LOCATION 100 Costa Rica Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and Conditional Use Permits Address: 100 Costa Rica Avenue Item No. 9b Design Review Study Meeting Date: July 13, 2020 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and Conditional Use Permits for a new detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Gleason & Gleason Design Partners Property Owner: Kristine Furrer General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-293-190 Lot Area: 7,045 SF Zoning: R-1 Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whetherthe existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 26, 2019. The results of the evaluation concluded that 100 Costa Rica Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Project Description: The subject property is a corner lot and contains an existing split level house with an attached garage. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing attached garage into living area and a first floor addition at the front of the house. A second floor bump out at the rear of the house is also proposed. The existing accessory structure will be replaced with a new 455 SF detached garage in the same location on the lot. The proposed house and detached garage will total 2,882 SF (0.41 FAR) where 3,504 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed. With this application, the number of bedrooms will be increasing from three to four. Two off-street parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The detached garage provides one covered parking space (10'-0" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) and an uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway leading to the garage. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010(a)(2)); • Conditional Use Permit for a half bath in a detached accessory structure (C.S. 25.06.010(j)); and ■ Conditional Use Permit for enclosing pool equipment within the detached accessory structure (C.S.25.60.010 (k)). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review and Conditional Use Permits 100 Costa Rica Avenue 100 Costa Rica Avenue �ot Area: i,U45 5r Plans date stam ed: June 30, 2020 EXISTING PROPOSED ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ' _ _ _ __ __ . _ _ _. Front (1st flr): 33'-6" 25'-3° 22'-7" (block average) (2nd flr): 66'-6" no change i 22'-7" (block average) _ __ _ _ __ ___ _ __ __ _ Side (interior): 2'-11° 11'-0" (to addition) 4'-0" (exterior): 4'-10° 23'-2° (to addition) 7'-6° __. _ _ __ __ Rear (1st flr): 54'-0" 53'-4" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 54'-8" ' no change 20'-0" _ _ _ _ . _ __ _ .. __ _ _. LotCoverage: 2,156 SF ', 2,481 SF ; 2,818 SF 30.6% ' 35.2% 40% _ _ _ _ , _ _ __ _ _ _ __ FAR: 2,625 SF 2,882 SF 3,504 SF' 0.37 FAR 0.41 FAR 0.50 FAR _ __ __ _. __ . _ _ _ _ # of bedrooms: 3 4 ___ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (1 T-6° x 18'-6" clear '(10' x 20' clear interior) +' 1 covered (10' x 20') + interior) + 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _. _ . __ __ Building Height: 18'-7" 28'-6" ' 30'-0" --- DH Envelope: not applicable complies CS 25.26.075 ' �0.32 x 7,045 SF) + 900 SF + 350 SF = 3,504 SF (0.50 FAR) Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows and doors: double-pane aluminum sash (anodized bronze) • Siding: stucco, 10" cedar shiplap • Roof: concrete tile • Other: 6" T&G gable ends; metal ridge chimney cap Staff Comments: None. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 2 Design Review and Conditional Use Permits 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Gleason & Gleason Design Partners, applicant and designer Kristine Furrer, property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Applications Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 2, 2020 Area Map Separate Attachments: 100 Costa Rica Avenue Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated November 26, 2019 3 CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURL,�E Planning Division City Hall — 501 Primrose Road � pH: (650) 558-7250 Burlingame, California 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mondav, Julv 13, 2020 at 7:00 P.M. Project Location: 100 Costa Rica Avenue, zoned R-1 (APN: 028-293-190) Description: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure. Pursuant to the CDC's social distancing guidelines which discourage large public gatherings, the Planning Commission meeting will be held via Zoom, a teleconference platform (see below for access details). The Council Chambers will not be open to the public for the July 13, 2020 Burlingame Planning Commission meeting. To access the meeting by computer: Go to www.zoom.us/ioin Meeting ID: 846 2316 9257 Password: 116435 To access the meeting by phone: Dial 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 846 2316 9257 Password: 116435 Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment cC�.burlinqame.orq. Comments submitted during the meeting will be read aloud by staff for the record. Questions/Comments If you have any questions about the proposed project or would like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please contact 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, staff planner for the project, at ameliak(a�burlinqame.orq or (650) 558-7216. Written comments on the project may also be emailed to the staff planner prior to the public hearing. We encourage you to review the proposed plans for this project online now at www.burlinqame.orq/planninqcommission/aqenda. Agenda and Staff Reports The City of Burlingame will publish the meeting agenda at 5 p.m. on Thursday, July 9, 2020. The agenda will be available online at www.burlinqame.orq/planninqcommission/aqenda and will contain the staff report, related documents, and proposed plans for this application. The agenda will also be posted at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. A hardcopy of the staff report and related documents may be obtained upon request to the staff planner (see contact information above). (please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Accessibility In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed at the meeting, should contact the Planning Division at planninqdept(c�burlinqame.orq or (650) 558-7250, by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, July 13, 2020. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting, the materials related to it, and your ability to comment. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about the notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director Mailed: Julv 2, 2020 100 Costa Rica Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 028.293.190 �� :v e� -t:� �ti , , � t;1� b� i � � Q4q � � , �G � ��1 � �. 4144 Qpi! � c�� Q� 4G�" ar�r`� �'.n, �� f�' n��f� ��- ._ O' 4�� 4�i r' �q R;.}`� ^`U�' �' 4�3 4Ll� '�� =.} c„Sti� r�: � �. ��p 4� q�' �y�C: �W�� ,�a� ��," �,,,�: ��,� t � q�E �9� ��y�� •,�`�`'` Qr�.y Q�� 4`�y� n4,,,�� r�r� ��' v � 1 d c� � q4�. n' } ` ' �, i', � � C� � <<, � �Q� `�iJ*� � �j � � t� � �� 9�� 9 � �=, `� q ,n ';� r,�� ,�' q�4 4, �� , ,�,� 4�� c•_� �: ♦ 49 �96 ,�,-� t2 �` •��•, 4 aJ� �, � _� '��,�.�' � `':a �,� � a 'v 4p{� 9t'6 ��' � o •�► 4��p r� O� I'��'' . a � �y q' �• `�a � 1 �'8 J a� � �.�'�� a� � � ��43 � ��e• �► ---..___1� p�� ,/.•�� _ 1�'� s . i�' S' '' 19 f�� qpOr ✓��.+' . i � � �� ffiy� n ♦�.►•j" �s� ' Y.� _, 4�� - s9 i T `'� � �.�• '', 1 ��• ._ _ �` ' 7!� , - y!1 -v -� 1u a�,�a Q�QQ a�� as��;� a�Q� �� Q� ��Q� �Q�� 7�� qfl�' 0 fl Dfl�, Qt7� q�QQ ',•'.�,♦ t�� a�,C� d '��•� 94� ��' �'� , ♦ ii 0�•`~' qU� f•�� s �+ �i1 .=� . i� . � � � .. `�� ► '� �'B . ' �.,� `,;- � �:. _� ,�• � * ! ::, i: . � `'s �� . �' �� i• i �� , s ''�,�• *O . q� �� '"' * + A 4� � e ��'P � �B� w�' � - � � � '� � �� . - 19�`3 �� - , '�4 �� 7� ,�� w , � 4 � t�� _ sg� I � � - _ 1 � _ ,,' � I �� _ ��' �- N I „ _- i J �, � a - � -- � , � { _ ' � fs� '� �