HomeMy WebLinkAbout1504 Cortez Avenue - ApplicationPROJECT APPLICATION
�r CEQA ASSESSMENT
Application received ( 7/24/87 )
Staff review/acceptance ( )
�r�, ciry O.e
1504 CORTEZ AVENUE
BURLINGAME project address
�b,�'W�,'� pro�ect name - if any
1. APPLICANT Greg & Nancy Sterl i ng 579-1859
name telephone no.
1504 Cortez Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Same
contact person, if different telephone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Mi nor
Special Perr:it ( ) Variance' ( ) Ccndor^inium Pernit ( ) Other Modification
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findir.gs required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MINOR MODIFICATION for the addition of two bedrooms bringing the
total number of bedrooms on this propert to 4, without providing
a second code standard parkinq space on site. The existing
ara e measures 13'-3" x 44'-3" whereas the minimum dimensions
for an existing garage are 18' x 20'. The project meets a ot er
code requirements for setbacks, lot coverage and height.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref, code section(s): ( 25.70.030 )� ( )
4. PROPERTY IDEFaTIFICATION
( 026-012-080 ) ( 8 ) ( 52 � � Easton Addition �
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
( R-1 ) ( 6,000 )
zoning district land area, square feet
Gregory & Nancy Sterling 1504 Cortez Avenue •
land owner's name a dre s,
�ur�ingame, CA 94010
Reauired Date received city zip code
(y€4� (no) ( - ) Proof of ownershio
(3�es� (no1 ( _ ) Owner's consent to application
5. EXISTIPJG SITE CONDITIONS
2 bedroom/1 bath house with 1 car garage (13'-3" x 44'-3")
Required Date received
(yes) (rco� ( 7/24/87 )
�Yes) �� � ��
�Yes) i� � ��
(�o her)(n�) ( ��
Site plan showino: property lines; public sidewall:s and
curbs; all structur�s and improvements;
paved on-site oarking; landscaping.
Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of us�`on each floor plan.
Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
Site cross section(s (if relevant).
letter of exp�anation
�
�
''Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; ivarehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PP,np�SAL NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY
Proposed consiruction, 3eloo-r orade ( - SF) Second floor ( 5 6 3 SF)
gross floor area First floor ( 40 5 SF) Third floor ( - SF)
Project Cod� Project Code
Pr000sal Requirem�nt Proposal Requirement
Front setback 25'-6�� 15' min Lot coveraae 33% 40% max.
Side setback Ruilr;in� hei9ht 24' 30' max.
Side yard 5'�11' 5' Landscaoed area - -
°ear yard 22 � j5' min �n site gk�.space�� 1 2
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
EXISTING IP! 2 YEARS
after after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
full tine emoloyees on site
Part time emoloyees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trin ends to/from site'
Peak hour trip ends"
Trucks/service vehicles
,j
i,
one ; mily
!
�
IN 5 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
one mil
/
/.
Date received
( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties.
( - ) Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comoany vehicles at this location ( )
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach se�arate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Residential uses on all ad,iacent lots; this use conforms to
the General Plan.
Required
(3+e�j (no)
(yes� (no)
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $ 2 5.(X )
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 ()
Variance/other districts $ 75 ( ) ^legative Declaration $ 25 ( )
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees 5 ()
TOTAL FEES $ 25 . �� RECEIPT N0. 2OJ16 Recei ved by L. Gan�Tc oT�i
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and cDrrJ ct to the be�t of my knowledge and belief.
Signa u e���fC�d✓iLtif/!`!�i Date �' �GI' a�
Categorically exempt - Reference
Code Section 15301, Existinq Facilities
19
�( a��C9'Z v�/a � r�Pi'� %' c' % 4�'
re of Processin, Official Title Daie Signed
STAFF USE ONLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION file No.
The City of Burlingame by on
completed a revie��� of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
Unless aopealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the deternination shall be final.
DECLAP,ATIO^� OF POSTIPlG Das;e Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I posted a true copy of the above Neoati��e Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to th� Council Chambers.
�xecuted at 6urlingame, California on
Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P;o
19
JUD TH A. M�FATTI, CITY CLERK, CITY f!� oURLINGAM1tE
e
STAFF REVIEW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply received
City Engineer ( 7/27/87 ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( �� ) (yes) (no)
Fire Marshal ( " ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( — ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no)
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASUP.ES
Concerns Mitigation Measures
Does the project meet Fire
and Building Code requirements?
Does the project meet the
four legal findings required
to grant a variance?
Request comments from the Fire
PAarshal and Chief Building
Inspector.
Review applicant's letter
and plans.
3. CEQA REQUIREP1EMTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
is the project subject to CEQA review? No - categorically exempt.
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study comoleted
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
2FP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR accepted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
Study by P.C.
Review oeriod ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
4. APPLICATIO�J STATUS Date first received ( ��24�8�)
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study ( )
Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( )
Date staff report mailed to aoplicant ( ) Date Comnission hearing ( )
Application approved ( ) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( ) Apolication aporove ( ) Oenied ( )
, � �,Z � z��
signed date