The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1501 Cortez Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 1501 Cortez Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1501 Cortez Avenue Item No. Regular Action Meeting Date: October 12, 2010 Request: Design Review for a new, two-story single-family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant, Architect and Property Owner: Andrea Van Voorhis APN: 026-031-030 General Plan: Low Density Residential Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, ora second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,155.5 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,158 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 2.5 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). The project includes a detached garage (350 SF) which provides one code-compliant covered parking space for the proposed four-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). 1501 Cortez Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 29, 2010 ' ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED 07/06/10 09/29/10 SETBACKS '' _.. _ _ _... _ _ .. _ _ _ .. _ - -- Front (1st flr): ''; 20'-0" 17'-9" (to bay) 16'-7" (block average) (2nd flr): '; 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" ___ _.... _....... __ _ Side (left 15`): ' 9'-2° ' 9'-3" 7'-6„ (left 2"d): 12'-0" 12'-0° 12'-0" (average) (right)� ; 7'-6" 4,_9,. 4'-0„ _.. .._ _.__ . _ .. _....... . _ _ _ - _. Rear (1st flr): : 47'-1 " 45'-7" 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; 45'-7" (to bay) 45'-7" 20'-0" _.. _ .. ___._ . _ __ _... _ .. ___ _.. _ _....... Lof Coverage: : 1,891 SF 1,917.95 SF 2,400 SF 32% 32% 40% _....... _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _........ FAR: ' 3,142 SF ' 3,155.5 SF 3,158 SF 0.52 FAR ' 0.53 FAR 0.53 FAR' . _. ___ _._ # of bedrooms: '; 4 no change --- _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ _. _ . __...._ _........ Parking: ! 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') no change 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Design Review 1501 Cortez Avenue ! ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL ALLOWED/REQUIRED 07/06/10 09/29/10 Height: ! 2g�-11" no change 30'-0" __ _ __._. __ _ DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.28A75 ' (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + g00 SF + 338 SF = 3,158 SF (0.53 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 26, 2010, the Commission expressed concern with the massing and the lack of dimension on the structure and had some questions concerning proposed materials (July 26, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission voted to refer the project to a design review consultant with direction. The applicant submitted revised plans to the Planning Division on September 29, 2010, after meeting with the design review consultant, to address the Commissions concerns. Please refer to the copy of the July 26, 2010, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission concerns. Analysis and Recommendation by Design Reviewer (dated September 13, 2010): The design reviewer met one time with the applicant and staff at City Hall to discuss the Planning Commission's concerns with the project and he also reviewed two sets of revised plans over e-mail. In a letter dated September 13, 2010, the reviewer notes that the traditional shingle style proposed for the structure will fit well with the surrounding structures and feeling of the neighborhood, which has many older, established charming homes of various styles. He also notes that the this is a well located building with an entry porch that faces two ways, that respects the setbacks, has ample vegetation and creates a positive relationship to the streets and the neighborhood. The reviewer comments that the prominent pattern for on-site parking is detached garages in the rear of the lot, many single car, which is whaYs proposed and is therefore consistent with the neighborhood pattern. The design of the new garage, he notes, is the same style as the house and is the perfect complement to the overall composition. He also notes that the massing of the house is interesting and the second floor roof lines are brought down to the first floor level to reduce the bulk. The design reviewer comments that due to a concern from the next door neighbor at 1505 Cortez Avenue, the applicant has made windows smaller, placed windows higher and has frosted some of the proposed windows, which helps the elevations of the design while also compromising with the neighbor's demands for privacy. He thinks the final balance is appropriate and meets the intention of the design guidelines. In summary, the design reviewer states that the applicant has responded positively with major changes and more detail to alleviate the concerns of the Planning Commission, the initial concerns of the design reviewer and to be sensitive to the privacy concerns of the neighbor at 1505 Cortez Avenue. Lastly, he states that the design has an overall high-quality feeling with details that are nicely presented and that he recommends approval of the design as shown. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. -2- Design Review 1501 Cortez Avenue Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 29, 2010, sheets 0 through 7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 23, 2010, July 7, 2010 and May 17, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's June 2, 1020 memo, the Parks Supervisor's July 13, 2010 and May 21, 2010 memos, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 19, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: -3- Design Review 1501 Cortez Avenue 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staffwill inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Andrea Van Voorhis, 1501 Cortez Avenue, Burlingame, CA, 94010, applicant, architect and property owner. Attach ments:' ApplicanYs Response to Commission's comments, date stamped September 29, 2010 Jerry Winges, Design Reviewer, Letter of Recommendation, dated September 13, 2010 Minutes from the July 26, 2010, Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting Letter and plans from applicant discussing changes to project proposal, date stamped July 26, 2010 E-mail from neighbor at 1718 Adeline Drive, dated July 26, 2010 Letter and plans from applicant discussing changes to project proposal, date stamped July 23, 2010 Application to the Planning Commission Arborist Reports, date stamped July 6, 2010 Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 1, 2010 Aerial Photo �! Andrea Van Voorhis Sparks Architecture 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 September 29, 2010 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Response to Commission Comments in July 26th, 2010 Hearing Response to Commission comments: Concerned about the applicanYs proposal to remove seven windows on the elevation facing the neighbor, at the request of the neighbor: this change will make that wall appear more massive and more blank. We met with the Burlingame appointed design consultant to review our proposal for adding interest to the fagade while making every effort to maintain the neighbor's privacy. We undulated the fa�ade, brought the plate height of the roof down to 3 different, lower heights to create depth and added trellises. Of the 91 square feet of glazing in 7 windows that the neighbor at 1505 requested we remove, we removed three windows entirely and reduced the size of the others such that 63 feet of glazing has been removed. The remaining glazing will be privacy glass. Additionally, we change the roof structure from web joists to rafters alfowing 2 of these window srll heights to be 7'-2" above finish floor, effecfively making them skylights. There needs to be some effort made to bring down the massing of the structure: it appears boxy. The massing has been radically revised (and actual volume of the building reduced). Instead of one major roof plate height for the structure there are now 3, the 3 facades have been revised to give them more depth, frellises have been added. The north elevation looks very flat. Instead of being one plane it is now three and has additional detail, material, and compositional elements. The first floor windows could be expanded in size. These header heighfs on these windows are 8'-6": they are quite large. Making them bigger wiN increase structural costs significantly and will not allow for reasonably sca/ed crown molding on the interior. Provide some undulation to make the side elevation more exciting. The facades have been significantly altered: undulafed, the roof plate heights varied, the structure changed and trellises added to create more interestrng compositions. If a high efficiency furnace is provided, the flu could be reduced in height. Flue has been reduced in height. Clarify the material to be used on the front stairs. Stone over concrete. s�i e-� ��lyi�� Consider stepping the second floor back to add dimension. % t P 2� 2010 =,ITY OF EURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. City of Burlingame Planning Commission September 29, 2010 Page 2 Roof plate heights have been manipulated: Long sweeping roof lines and dormers to add dimension. What is above the back door: can the door be centered? Back door has been center. What is the material to be used for the attic vents? In the hearing July 26`h, we said the vents were wood. However we are changing to painted metal so we can make smaller louvers so they won't compete with the new detai! in front of the vents. What is the material below the windows on the second floor? Question no longer applicable as fa�ade has change and the material in quesfion no longer exists. Noted that there are no railings on the stairs. No railing is required as they are a series of 2 stairs separated by landings. Public comments: Chris (Kristine) Donnellan, 1505 Cortez Avenue; Pat Giorni 1445 balboa Avenue; spoke The windows will only be seen from their property; the windows impact their privacy. This home will affect them more than any other construction in the area (Terrones- there may be other design solutions besides windows that will improve the design.) Per design comment number one, significant efforts have been made to create an architectural interesting fagade with very little fenestration on that fa�ade. We are still willing to remove all of the window requested by the neighbor at 1505 Cortez per notes 14 and 15 on page six of the drawing set. At present they are included because the Burlingame design consultant would not support the design without them. We leave this to discretion of the commission. Encourage the architect to listen to the Commission's suggestions regarding the design review process. Understood. Sincerely, ��-- ,' �� Andrea Van Voorhis ��G.� r ^�� d....� sEP 2 s �au� �m oF aun�.�.�:�^,.� �� • . _ vv�� ARCHITECTS MEMO: Date: 9-13-2010 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 1501 Cortez — Design Review I have visited the site, the street and have reviewed the initial plans. I have had one meeting with the architect/applicant at City Hall and another on site to review the Planning Commission comments. I have reviewed emailed files of the proposed changes to the design and made additional suggestions. I have the following comments on the final revised design plans dated Sept. 9, 2010 per the Design Review Format: 1. Compatibility of the architectural stvle with that of the existinq neiqhborhood: • This older established neighborhood is one of charming homes, of many various styles. • Many homes have steep pitched roofs and traditional features. • Lush vegetation, many trees and planted parking strips between curb and sidewalk with street trees provide greenery and shade. • The traditional shingle style proposed for this structure will fit well with the surrounding structures and feeling of the neighborhood. 2. Respect the Parkinq and Garage Patterns in the Neighborhood: • The predominant pattern for on-site parking is detached garages in the rear of the lot or an attached garage to the side. Many garages are single car. There are a few newer homes with double garages. • The existing home on this lot has a detached garage facing Adeline Drive. This garage takes up valuable yard space and is prominent on the street. • The new proposal for a smaller single car garage against the rear property line is consistent with the neighborhood pattern, and improves the use of the site for outdoor living area. The proposed setback from Adeline and the fencing and sliding gate will help make the garage less prominent. • The new design of the garage structure is the same style as the new house and is a perfect complement to the overall composition, providing privacy and a backdrop for the rear yard outdoor use. 3. Architectural Stvle, Mass and Bulk of the Structure, and Internal Consistencv of the Desiqn. • This is a well located building with entry porch facing two ways toward the street corner, respecting the setbacks, vegetation, and creating a positive relationship to the streets and neighborhood. • The plan and arrangement of rooms and circulation make sense for the corner lot. This allows the family room to face and open up to the yard, with more formal areas toward the street corner and linked to the entry foyer. • The location of stairway minimizes circulation and provides for a small central hallway on the second level while maximizing the size of the rooms. • The arched entry is a wondertul counterpart to the rest of the design and is harmonious with the overall shingle style. • The massing is interesting and the second floor roof lines that are brought down to the first floor level reduce the bulk. The varied plate lines and large dormers, and the recessed dormer windows create a neat composition. WINGES ARCHITECTS. INC. 729G HOWARD AVE SUITE 371. BURLWGAME. CA 94070 / FAX: (650) 343-1297 / iNo@wingesaia.com / TEL: (650) 343-7701 ARCHITECTURE / MASTER PLANNMG / INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE / SPACE PLANNING / OESIGN COUNSELING vv1��s � ARCHITECTS • The detail at the gable vent with arched trim and louver is repeated on the garage and on each side. This repeating element helps unify the design. • The windows and window style are consistent with design guidelines and the use of divided lites is consistent with the style. • Windows previously removed due to neighbor concerns have been reintroduced but made smaller, placed higher and/or frosted. This has helped the elevations while compromising with the neighbor demands. • The applicant has responded very positively to suggestions on reducing the massing by offsetting wall elements, adding dormer features, adding trellis window shades, planter boxes, and reducing the prior boxy appearance. All elevations have been broken up with these which reduce the scale in a positive interesting way. • The use of stone, shingles and wood trim gives a richness of surface to the house. 4. Interface of the Proposed Structure with the Adlacent Structures to Each Side: • The adjoining house on the West side, 1505 Cortez appears to be a split level design with the attached garage and the side of the family room facing the proposed house. Above the garage are 2 bedrooms and a bath with 3 small windows facing this property. • The massing of the new house has been changed and reduced in height. The Master closet has been located on that side to help with privacy. • Windows have been reduced in size and minimized for privacy. The Owner has tried to balance the need to avoid a blank wall with no windows as required by the guidelines, with the privacy concerns of the neighbor. The neighbor apparently has no issue with the lower level plan, and is concerned about windows near the rear of the west wall facing their rear bedroom. Those windows have been made smaller. I think this final balance is appropriate and a successful compromise and meets the intentions of the design guidelines. • The mud room and stair have also been placed to minimize need for view windows on the neighbor side, and the smail windows on the landing are for the purpose of allowing natural light in at the stair and enhancing the elevation. This is not an occupied room and will have minimal impact on any privacy issue. • This new 2 story house has been located far from the south property line. The location of the garage up against the 10' wide alley is appropriate and has minimal impact on the neighboring house to the south on Adeline. This will provide a 1 story high separation from the yard area to the alley and this neighboring house. 5. Landscapinq and Its Proportion to the Mass and Bulk of Structural Components� • The landscape development shown maintains the greenery and trees at the corner. • The fenced rear yard makes sense and leaves the attractive house elevation visible from the street. • The location of walks and entry steps are straightforward and logical, and the rich stone materials for planti�g beds and the walk surface will harmonize with the overall design. Summarv: 1. This design has an overall high-quality feeling and details are nicely presented. 2. The applicant has responded positively with major changes and more detail to alleviate the concerns of the Planning Commission and the initial concerns of the design reviewer. 3. I recommend approval of the design shown. Jerry L. Winges, AIA, Principal Ll6VGE5 ARCHITECTS. WC. 1290 HOWARD AVE. SUITE 371, BURLINGAME. CA 94010 / FAX: (650� 3a34297 / info@wingesaiacom / TEL: (650) 343-U07 ARCHITECTURE / MASTER PLANNING / INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE / SPACEPLANNING / DESIGNCOUNSELING CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes July 26, 2010 1�. 1501 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (ANDREA VAN VOORHIS, APPLICANT, ARCHITECT AND PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated July 26, 2010, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Terrones opened the public comment period. Andrea Van Voorhis, 1501 Cortez Drive; represented the appiicant. Commission comments: ■ Concerned about the applicant's proposal to remove seven windows on the elevation facing the neighbor, at the request of the neighbor; this change will make that wall appear more massive and blank. ■ There needs to be some effort made to bring down the massing of the structure; it appears boxy. ■ The north elevation looks very flat. ■ The first floor windows could be expanded in size. ■ Provide some undulation to make the side elevation more exciting. ■ If a high-efficiency furnace is provided, the flu could be reduced in height. ■ Clarify the material to be used on the front stairs. ■ Consider stepping the second floor back a bit to add dimension. ■ What is above the back door; can the door be centered? (Van Voorhis — a shed roof is provided. The placement of the door made more sense prior to removal of the windows.) ■ Referral to a design review consultant would be helpful. ■ What material is used for the attic vents? (Van Voorhis — wood.) ■ What is the material below the windows on the second floor? (Van Voorhis — wood siding) ■ Noted that there are no railings on the stairs. Public comments: Chris Donnellan, 1505 Cortez Avenue; and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke: ■ The windows will only be seen from their property; the windows impact their privacy. ■ This home will affect them more than any other construction in the area. (Terrones — there may be other design solutions besides windows that will improve the design.) ■ Encouraged the architect to listen to the Commission's suggestions regarding the design review process. Additional applicant comments: Will make the desired revisions and resubmit. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Lindstrom made a motion to refer the project fo a design review consultant. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. 5 CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minutes July 26, 2010 Discussion of motion: None. Chair Terrones called for a vote on the motion to refer the project to a design review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners Cauchi and Visfica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 11:13 p.m. Commissioner Gaul noted that he would recuse himself from participating in the discussion ofAgenda Item 11 (1516 Vancouver Avenue), since the applicant is his brother. He left the Council Chambers. 6 f . 6� . 2b• ld �C. ��^"� q-��sl.A S',� � �a Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 July 26, 2010 Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner Community Development Department - Planning Division City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Strohmeier: CO.l1.11 U�'7C.4 TION RECEII'ED AF'TER PREPARATIOiV OF STAFF REPORT In our letter of July 23, 2010 we said that our neighbor at 1505 Cortez Avenue requested we remove 7 windows, and that we were willing to remove 6. This was not satisfactory to our neighbor, so we are deleting all 7 windows. To address the lost IighUcirculation we are adding a skylight. Thank you for forwarding this to the planning commission for their consideration. Sincerely, Andrea Van Voorhis Cc: Kristine Donnellan �ECEIV�� JUL 2 6 201Q CITi OF BURLINGAME PLANM�IG �Ppr .. ... 1501 CORTEZ AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA V�� OJ 1 Y D �L V' �d 9 6 .�9� �1 'i' /�.��f.�t1 i`� ��,�� ,�: 07.2t�.lo PG �ee}�nq ��d�. �-}�� 1 and� �Ic7 CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben From: Malik, Suzanne A. (SAM33) [sam33@tmw.com] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:48 AM To: CD/PLG-Brooks, Maureen Cc: CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben; CD/PLG-Strohmeier, Erica Subject: Planning Meeting 7-26-2010 Importance: High Maureen Brooks- Page 1 of 1 COMIt�fURTICAT101�' RECEIV�D AFTER PRI:P�4�lTION - - OF STAFF REPDRT On Friday, July 16th, we received two notices that the homes on either side of us were going to be reviewed. Unfortunately we left for vacation on July 18th and therefore have not been able to view the plans at the Planning Office. We will still be away for the meeting on July 26th. For this reason, my husband and I would like to file this e-mail for the record that we may have objections to the homes being built on either of our home. We had an opportunity to view plans about a month ago for our neighbor at the corner of Cortez and Adeline and did not have any objections to their plans, but we are unsure if they have changed since we saw them. We were oniy able to view the elevation posted in front of the house at the corner of Cabrillo and Adeline. We would like to raise the following concerns and possible objections for this home (again we have not had the opportunity to review the plans): . The existing patio structure CMU wall at the rear of the property is currently encroaching on our property and we would like to request that it be removed without damaging our newly built garage (this may already be contemplated). . That any power lines or sewer lines not run under or over our property (there is no recorded easement to allow this). • It is our understanding, based on our survey that the current fence separating our properties is on our property. If the new owners wish to build a new fence on the property line, we would request to be consulted so that we can determine how our current fence will be impacted. If they build it entirely on their property, then we of course have no say or issue as long as it complies with Burlingame standards. . It appeared from the posted elevation that the house would no longer have an Adeline Drive front door — unsure how the rear and side elevations will be viewed from the street and from our property. We assume that there are no variances as stated on the notice. We would want to ensure that the design of the home was in character of the neighborhood (possibly maintain the existing Tudor character) and not simply a stucco box. Are the setbacks side and rear also changing with the change in orientation of the property? If so, does the new home encroach more or less toward our property line? Obviously, we have a concern if it would encroach closer that the current home. We would assume that if the front of the home is on Cabrillo, that the back would be facing our shared property line so there should be a minimum 15' rear setback, right? Or would it still be maintained as a side setback at 7' minimum (57" wide lot) with a declining height requirement? Please advise. . Landscaping??? We respectfully submit the above to maintain our rights both now and in the future. As previously stated, without having the opportunity to review plans, we may or may not have had all the above concerns/objections. Please confirm receipt and next steps if any for us to be able to follow-up upon our return. Best Regards- Suzanne A. Malik and John M. Schmid 1718 Adeline Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 b,'� Piease consider the environment before printing this e-mail �r2�izo i o �� 0�• 26 • � 0 1 C�Mee� �� lD Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 July 23, 2010 Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner Community Development Department - Planning Division City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Strohmeier: COAI �iL';�-1C.ATION RECEI VED 14FTFR PREPARATION �� r, c 7�: � r. �: n T' n,7 �. ?' Our next door neighbor at 1505 Cortez Avenue, Kristine Donnellan, was concerned about the impact our project might have on the privacy of her home. To that end we sat down July 22 to discuss the project, specifically, the right side of the property which is adjacent to her property. She requested that we delete 7 windows from that side of the house. We discussed using privacy glass, landscape screening, and making the windows smalier; but she did not feel these would be effective. As a gesture of good will, we are willing to delete 6 windows on that side of the house per the (per attached elevation). To make up for the loss of light, we are requesting 3 additional skylights. There is one window we are unwilling to delete because its loss will make our child's bedroom feel depressing. Because it is well offset from her windows (per attached plan), we feel it still allows her home a reasonable degree of privacy. Thank you for forwarding this to the planning commission for their consideration. Sincerely, �i Andrea Van Voorhis Cc: Kristine Donnellan ��i: �NV�� JUL 2 � 2010 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. _ � . __ _ 1501 CORTEZ AVENUEa B�JF�LI�VGAME, CA 1 �J�� URLINGAME Ff�� ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ( �,, l� Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: �/�—� l J V�`' ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ' 7 L I ��T�L QU�� 0 � Piease indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person F� OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ �l.. Ri__� +._ r Address: j��,� XkV�1i�. City/State/Zip: �1�il�UUlJCArMr,. CA ��l(� Phone: ( �-lb� 31C� - � O� Fax E-mail: v'1��,',j3Q��-it�� I�P�kL �1� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documenfs ❑ Name: � Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: ,�-, Name: ��f{�_ Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: * Burlingame Business License #: � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �EY�-�;�'�I�i,-I A`�� %W L� S' ✓►=�{ �Y.IST'� 1Jlo ��. �ur� C�;�ti.t,L� i��'� (�Uil.-C> A ►��;N Tw�� `� �f i�.r.�� A1J0 C��. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I he�eY�y certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie#. �prl:c:nYs sign�ture: ��` 1�• C��±e: _�. 17. l� I am aware of the proposed applic2tion and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � �� Property owner's signature: �, _ Date: �� Date submitted: ,t Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�Halloours�Pcappiicarion zoos.hondour.doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only Project Description: l� P� I; c a�'o� -�,� �es� � r� IZa� �� w -t�✓ c� n.¢,w� �o � S� S i•• �y �..0 -� v,-, ;� y c� w e� I�� r y a^ c1 o�,e.-f -a ��.a� d � cc.�r� Key: Abbreviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelope DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New SFD Sinale Famiiv uwellina SP Special Permit Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors � �� .� �">>:. -.�.. cell/voicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 email RCL3�i-mindsnrina com Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Date: 7/7/10 ARBORIST REPORT Tre� Protectian Plan Assignment • Provide document review of proposed construction • Determine impacts that could adversely affect one cedar tree • Develop tree protection strategies to preserve the cedar tree during construction • Provide a Tree Protection Plan report for inclusion in Pianning documents Background The tree subject to protection by way of this report is an incense cedar (Ca/ocedrus decurrens) with a 48-inch diameter equivalent. The tree is located near the corner of the lot at 1501 Cortez Avenue in Burlingame, California. The plan set produced by Sparks Architecture was evaluated. These plans show the existing building footprint with the tree location and what is planned as new construction. The tree protection plan drawing on page 4 is based on these plans with additions by Tree Management Experts. A separate Arborist Report dated 7!6/10 was provided to evaluate tree health and structure. Based on that assessment, this tree is recommended for removal. Without going through the tree removal process, this tree protection plan is required for Planning Department approval. Purpose and Procedures A tree protection plan is required by the Planning Department where an existing tree is on or near a property that is proposed for development. This plan is to identify what the tree needs, and insure that those needs are accommodated through design and construction procedures. For effective tree protection, soil associated with roots must be preserved. This area is designated as the Tree Protection Zone, or TPZ. Within the TPZ, activities must not cut roots through excavation or compact soil so as to make it non-horticultural. Where areas can be fenced off, mulch and irrigation are to be provided. For areas outside the fencing such as between the fence and the new building envelope, a plywood root buffer must be laid over the mulched soil. Contractor'sLicense#885953 www.treemanaaernen<exper's-bioaspctr:om Page 1 of6 c�Tv oF e:.i�i_�Ncnn�� , �A�r��i�;�> �-,-r-T. Tree Management Experts Consulting Arbarists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �+ 4�-�- f�� cell/voicemai1415.606.3610 office415.921.3610 fax 415.921.771� email RCL3�o^.mirds��rir.a ccm The project must have a designated Project Arborist who is part of the design/build team. This Arborist will be the authority on tree requirements should questions arise, and must be called in during the installation of tree protection features and when any excavation activity is occurring within the TPZ. To insure that trees and building procedures are continuing to be compatible, the Project Arborist must make monthly inspections and file brief memorandum reports. All tree protection measures outlined in this report are to be installed prior to demolition, except the mulch and plywood root buffers that are to be installed immediately after demolition and before foundation excavation begins. Fencing is to be continuous 6-foot high chain link securely attached to iron posts driven into native soil. All fencing ends shall be overlapped and securely attached to each other to prevent entry into protected areas. Mulch and irrigation must be installed within the tree protective fencing. Irrigation may be as simple as a soaker hose that is looped around the fence perimeter. Mulch is to be comprised of wood chips of 4 inches depth and absent from within 12 inches of the base of the tree. Plywood root buffers are to be comprised of 3/4-inch plywood laid over 4 inches of mulch. Impacts and Mitigation Impact: Demolition All demolition in areas of the TPZ must be completed from within the building footprint. Patio concrete and footings may be broken and removed with heavy equipment, but that equipment must not enter protected areas at any time. Mitiqation: Should demolition equipment enter the protected areas of the TPZ at any time, the Project Arborist must evaluate soil impacts and may require soil decompaction. Impact: Excavation Tailings, Demolition Debris and Materials Staging All transitory materials from excavation or due to construction must remain outside TPZ areas at all times. Mitiqation: Should materials be placed within a TPZ, the Project Arborist must evaluate soil impacts and may require soil decompaction. Contractor's License #885953 v✓v✓4%_trees�ana4er*�entexperts.bloqspoccom Page 2 of 6 ary o� � ��RLINGAM7E °�AP:N�NC i.E?i. Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulti�g Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ��:��. �;. cell/voicemail415.606.3610 office415.921.3610 fax415.921.7711 emailRCL3,iim!ndsarinq.com Impact: Foundation Excavation The existing concrete porch wiil be removed and the new retaining wall and porch will be set back on both sides of the comer, by approximately 6 feet further from the tree to the east and about 4 feet further to the south. This will substantially increase space for the tree and essentially eliminate impacts from the foundation line of the new building footprint. Mitiqation: Standard foundation design is acceptable. Any roots encountered must be cleanly cut at the edge of the excavation trench. Impact: Existing Underground Utilities Any existing underground utilities within the TPZ must either continue to be utilized without upgrade or be abandoned. Miticlation: No trenching shail be done to expose existing utilities. Impact: New Underground Utilities New underground utilities shall run in trenches outside the TPZ areas. Mitiqation: Any new utilities that must run through the TPZ must be installed with directional boring. Impact: Final Grading Final grading shall not modify the soil levels within the TPZ, except to accommodate necessary surface water drainage patterns. Cuts and fills shall not exceed 4 inches and shall not extend further than 4 feet from the new building envelope without consultation with the Project Arborist. Miticlation: Any significant soil cuts may impact roots that are critical to tree stability and tree removal may be necessary. Any significant soil fill will harm tree health and must be removed or the tree may be lost. Tree Care Requirements The tree has been recently pruned and cabied, and no further work is required. Contractor's License #885953 �� :�:.�.tr� �� ;eoiex,�� : hr , occ�trr Page 3 of 6 _. � i� ��i l�i C� � _..L�: � _,qn{iE °LA^:NitiC,� C�PT. Tree Management Experts Consuiting Arborists ±�� 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ' celllvoicemail 415 606 3610 office 415.921 3610 fax 415.921 77'11 email RCL3Co�minCsprina.com Tree Protection Plan Drawing — _ ' I I I I 4 f;,i�� --.'�'�r� --- � � ��'.�<<-'�r`� � � � ��' � ', �,J�t=t i -+; r,'=;: Ni:r;tci:��`�:?ti��r"t�:�: ; � I , - -,.- . , . � I � � � � � � "'...._. ___ _".___"_._ __ _.'_ �.'_ ��' ..' � ,:.::: " _ •: ,�'' � � nni�� .;�;��;��,<<; _ - � � Roo� : :, .. . . . `� . r r ,; t_; ;, . --------- ----,--,-- . - --- -f'�------ � r<< J � ( I `�. .i �� I 'NS L YW_li:�[� �',�_!(f — �— - —. ■ � � MULC � IRRI�,AT `r �� — �— — - TREE P OTEC i ItIN ZONE i TPZ MULCH IR RIGAT!( ; ,� - `r� —`-� � I I 1i5r �:c s�rbA� K ��, �a ��K I � � � ; G � � ITRE� PR�TE IVE I FEN�IN I I 1 �r�� w �.�K � �5T SETBACK� � � F--_ � -- -� � �� . f Piacement of al! tree protection features is to be determined in the field by the Project Arborist. Contractor's License #885953 www.tre�n�anacemantexperts binqspot.com Page 4 of 6 C1TY Q� BURUNGANiE c*i i.rt�:itiv ��?T Tree Management Experts Consuiting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �+ . '� {;_ cell/voicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 email RCL3uvminds ;nn -com Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Title and ownership of all property considered are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other govemmental regulafions. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible. The consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. Various diagrams, sketches and photographs in this report are intended as visual aids and are not to scale, unless specificaily stated as such on the drawing. These communication tools in no way substitute for nor should be construed as surveys, architectural or engineering drawings. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. 7. This report is confidential and to be distributed only to the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any or all of the contents of this report may be conveyed to another party only with the express prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. Such limitations apply to the original report, a copy, facsimile, scanned image or digital version thereof. 8. This report represents the opinion of the consultant. In no way is the consultanYs fee contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule, an agreement or a contract. 10. information contained in this report reflects observations made only to those items described and only reflects the condition of those items at the time of the site visit. Furthermore, the inspection is limited to visual examination of items and elements at the site, unless expressly stated otherwise. There is no expressed or implied warranty or guarantee that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property inspected may not arise in the future. Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Contractor's License #885953 ^, r�e.�m�;n.,�7ernentexperts.bloqspot.com Page 5 of6 2��0 �:��r! OF G.J^� i�!GF.��E Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors cell/voicemail 415 606 3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415 921 7711 email � C'_;(:f;n,�ndsc,rinq com Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborisYs services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. An arborist cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification of Performance I, Roy C. Leggitt, III, Certify: • That we have inspected the trees and/or property evaluated in this report. We have stated findings accurately, insofar as the limitations of the Assignment and within the extent and context identified by this report; • That we have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or any real estate that is the subject of this report, and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are original and are based on current scientific procedures and facts and according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That no significant professional assistance was provided, except as indicated by the inclusion of another professional report within this report; • That compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party. I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and a member and Certified Arborist with the International Society of Arboriculture. i have attained professional training in all areas of knowledge asserted through this report by completion of a Bachelor of Science degree in Plant Science, by routineiy attending pertinent professional conferences and by reading current research from professional journals, books and other media. I have rendered professional services in a full time capacity in the field of horticulture and arboriculture for more than 20 years. "' C L `� ,—� ;,�"1 Siqned: � 1 Date: 7/7/10 Contractor's License #885953 ��r�a4 ��-��te <r �s-bloqspot.com Page 6 of 6 CITY OF BURLINGAME P,J�NNitvG GL-� T. Tree lVlanagement Expe�� Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors :f- celUvoicemail 415 606 3610 o�ce 415 921 3610 fax 415.921 7711 email R�'_�r�,mindsorina com Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Date: 7/6/10 �1RBORlSi RERORT Tree Health and Structure Assignment • Provide a site inspection to evaluate one cedar tree • Evaluate tree health and hazard potential • Provide an Arborist Report of findings and to make recommendations Observations and Discussion I provided a site inspection of the Van Voorhis property located at 1501 Cortez Avenue. This is a corner lot, and a mature incense cedar tree (Calocedrus decurrens) is located between the house and the intersection. Please refer to Photograph 1. This tree is comprised of three trunks that join a short single trunk. For trees of this configuration each trunk is measured and an equivalent single trunk diameter is calculated. The equivalent diameter is 48 inches. Tree health is fair, with foliage of proper size, shape and color, but of low density. This may be from over-pruning, but shoot extension did not appear to be particularly strong and is instead most likely an indication of decline. Two large girdling roots were found, each directly impacting a large buttress root. The tops of each trunk have been removed, each at a different level. It is possible that the topping was improper pruning, but it is more likely that the topping occurred due to dieback caused by the girdling roots and was proper pruning. The junctures between each of the trunks is very weak. There are large amounts of bark trapped between the trunks, and large ribs that have formed below these junctures indicate internal cracks. Between the three trunks, above their juncture, is a mass of roots that have grown up into the cracks. Please refer to Photograph 2. A cabling system has been installed in a ring system using extra high strength cable and "J" lags at 2/3rds the height of the tree. All cables are taut. Conclusions and Recommendations This tree has low to moderate vitality and is in gradual decline. Contractor's License #885953 ��:�-�•a.trF�r��a;��_ne.r�entexperts.bloqspot.c�r,� Page 1 ofi6 CITY O� Q`--"R! IP�CA!�AE �I1�.h.NiN': u'�T�T. Tre� Mar�agement Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors � ..+ '�. ' i*� a, celVvoicemail 415 606 3610 office 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email RCL3�mindsprinq com Tree structure is in poor condition with three trunks and very weak and failed attachments. The structural problems have been partially mitigated through the installation of a properiy installed cabling system. Cabiing systems are intended to prevent failures, not to support failed trees, and this tree has experienced failures where cracks have developed in the short lower trunk. Tree hazard potential for this tree is moderate to high. Retaining this tree will require that the property owner accept risks that are above average. I recommend that this tree be removed. Contractor's License #885953 ��, i� �°, !�e�_ n�,�nayementexperts.bloqspot.com, Page 2 of 6 CITY OF BURLINC�AME GLANNit�G DEPT. Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ��,,, �'�•�-. 1i cell/voicemail 415 606 3610 office 415.921 3610 fax 415.921.7711 email RCL3Ca�mindsorinQ.com Supporting Information Contractor's License #885953 Photograph 1 ��✓ww.treemanaqementexperfs.bloqspot.com Page 3 of 6 6 2010 CITY O� F3URLINGAME pLANNINC CEPT. Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 .,, .� .�;,,.. W{ember, American Society of Consutting Arborists '" Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �� celUvoicemail 415 606 3610 office 4�5 921 3610 fax 415.921.77� 1 email RCL3 ar�mindsorina.com � -�' �� 1 � � �' - , � ' � '1 i Yj', �; � � �il � �� ' ` ��. , ' �+ ' r � + i � �• �� , t� , , ,��:� . , � � � M, ,; � + . ��, , � , ; � �_ � +�,� 1 .t .' 1 r - � . . � � ! �ye,�.: � , �� " � � ' 1 � I _ ' ��i 4 + � r "' : V� I � � � 7�� 1 '� � . � � � 1 . � . - 9� � �� I ` � � ' t � � `� ��f�` � • � � � l�� I � �; � -1hl t � � � �� /' ; � � � ' �1 J 1 �. • �C x � ��Y .S� � - ...� ' � ' ' . _ . _[ � f+6. . , � r � � N �✓ W'� _ - p' .j � ` fl��f �i , � � i l�Y � �C� C�� ' �,_ .. ��1, _ r�o- ' ' i ; , '�+� � ' , , .) 4 ,� , �'� M4�az � I"' � L ,y', �+ r � •'+� , i�+ r' ;w - � • j 4 �;` - ' � . �q . � � �i ' � � � � � � . \ 7�� .i �:i �i ( • . �, � � . • ;� � � � � � � � I . � .- . ` ., t _ � � � ' � i ', � . , � fC.;% . � � � �-d,:� . . �U t ' �i ; � � l .+ '. � � � � ' _ r�� ,_ �r� �( � � �s:_� �:� �, , _ �_ _. . - , �-�{ � P � � , � � " ; , � ! ,� ,'+' t ; � �� 3 �,� .:' i ' �: + ' `�: "' � �• . �_ -. ��'�eY.,�l t � iJfr . -� T ; } � . �tys_' � �},� .Y' ' � _ � �.i�: �.:r-,,•�E'E�ti. ♦.�! � i . � r �� I • . �� 4 �}r .e y � , � � . . � : , � . . .'C - .y+,i _ l� � . e� . , , �:ta ��i�� ft �R{ ' 3 �' � � �-�,' .-�;'�• � "T,7C"'� '�-iI�l..J . . �i�.` � I `. � �� = �� _ . ` r s � . Y . • �� .� � � � V � �. r _. � �� . , j -, : , �.�; .; , k , �1, . ; •�';, �`_ � . r � =1 •-- �r �� %� � ,� �' � ' , ,, .L �. ., . .�.� _ '� },a, - f, � . � ► , , � :�; — . , � .�,;. �� c� , i +�, � � � , ��. _� ' " � ,�` ',.r4: ,, ' �� ';, �+i . ' '�t.; :.✓ . _. i �t �O � r 1!" Y>, �t � �� _ a� v, . � l: . ` - . � y � _� (�' �J, r�y�� ,�� _ . �, _ � �q . � ,�� .� . , �;� � '� >.;„'r•�s�, � � - _ - _ _ -,� . _ x — ��:�� Photograph 2 ;�. .-,�.: - ,r - ��•``��_. . �u `.r'.�. ": ?'� � Contracfor's License #885953 wwi�i.treamanaqementexperts.bloqspot.com Page 4 of 6 CITY OF 2URL:i;,�;;�vi_ P�?^J`�.'ittiG GErT. Tree Management Experts Consufting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors � �, � i celllvoicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.92t7711 email RC'�3;i.-min �sorinq com Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Title and ownership of aIl property considered are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible. The consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. Various diagrams, sketches and photographs in this report are intended as visuai aids and are not to scale, unless specifically stated as such on the drawing. These communication tools in no way substitute for nor should be construed as surveys, architectural or engineering drawings. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. 7. This report is confidential and to be distributed only to the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any or all of the contents of this report may be conveyed to another party only with the express prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. Such limitations apply to the original report, a copy, facsimile, scanned image or digital version thereof. 3. This report represents the opinion of the consultant. In no way is the consultanYs fee contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. �. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule, an agreement or a contract. 10. Information contained in this report reflects observations made only to those items described and oniy reflects the condition of those items at the time of the site visit. Furthermore, the inspection is limited to visual examination of items and elements at the site, unless expressly stated otherwise. There is no expressed or implied warranty or guarantee that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property inspected may not arise in the future. Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine t�rees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and heaith of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of Idving near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. �rborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidde� within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Contractor's License #885953 ��_v1��,��-1r.�=er��araremen'exper!s.ologspotcom Page 5 of 6 OITY O� F. _ �, , Tree Management Experts Consulting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consuiting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors � .�- :�,, � j;. cell/voicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 email RC�3;a�m�ro�orina com Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborisYs services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. An arborist cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonabiy rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification of Performance I, Roy C. Leggitt, III, Certify: • That we have inspected the trees and/or property evaluated in this report. We have stated findings accurately, insofar as the limitations of the Assignment and within the extent and context identified by this report; • That we have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or any real estate that is the subject of this report, and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties invoived; • That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are original and are based on current scientific procedures and facts and according to commonly accepted arboricuitural practices; • That no significant professional assistance was provided, except as indicated by the inclusion of another professional report within this report; • That compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party. I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and a member and Certified Arborist with the International Society of Arboriculture. I have attained professional training in all areas of knowledge asserted through this report by completion of a Bachelor of Science degree in Plant Science, by routinely attending pertinent professional conferences and by reading current research from professional journals, books and other media. I have rendered professional services in a full time capacity in the field of horticulture and arboriculture for more than 20 years. � �� L ` 1'�— `:.i Siqned: � � 1 Date: 7/6/10 Contractors License #885953 ��v.tr�e.manaqemenfexperts.i��oas„oi-�r_m Page 6 of 6 J t�. �.,� _� Z�� '=�TY OF Si:RLIfdGAWiE �`.,<n,;��_ r,t�r OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST � � � ' • • ' ' R • � • • .. '. � I certify that the subject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. T� ,�� Signature Date Single Family L] Multi-Family ❑ Commercial U Institutional ❑ irrigation only ❑ Industrial ❑ Other: Applicant Name (print): ��b v ��5 Contact Phone #: � �S� 3�_�OB I Project 5ite ,4ddress: I S O � �I2�-Z /�V�. NU� Agency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): G Q�� # of Units: # of Meters: (Pass) (Fail) Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.): ❑ 2 S48 �+ 3l5 u ctry c QE� x Turf Irrigated Area isq.it.j: Q ,fd� [3 Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): �� -� 3 S G G 121f.f-� � ❑ Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.j: � ❑ � \N2ter Feature Surface /�rea (sq.ft.): Q .............. ..............._.. ._ ................ Turf Less thzn 25% ef the Izndscape arez is Yes .❑ �� ❑ Nc, See \Nater Budget All turf areas are >& ieet v;ide ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ All turf is pianted on slopes < 25% ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Non-Turf At least 80% of non-turf area is native �Yes [] or low wat2r use plants ❑ No, See Water Budget � Hydrozones Plants are grouped 'oy Hydrozones 2� Yes p At least 2-inches cf mulch on exposed 1'es ja' ❑ � Muich soil surfaces � Irrigation System Efficiency 70% ETo (100% ETo for SfAs) ',✓e; �� ❑ No overspray or runoff �J Yes 0� C.1 irrigation System Design System efficiency > 70% � Yes ❑ Automatic, self-adjus�_ing irrigatior� ❑ Nc, noc required for Ticr 7 I� ❑ controllers � Yes fv1oisture �enso ;'rair� sensor srutofrs ❑ Yes � i� No sprayheads in < 8-ft wide arez �' Yes 1�' I] Irrigation Time System onl}� operates betv✓Aer. 8 PM � Yes i! and 10 AM Meter�ng Scparate irrigation mete� � No, net required because < S,QQO s F* !� �, - Q Yes Swimming Paols / Spas N�, Cover highly recorr��nended ❑ YEs d" ❑ � � � No, no[ required � Water features ►�� Recirculating ❑ Yes p Less than 10% of landsrpe area ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ Documentation Checkiist Yes � ❑ Landscape ard Irrigatior, Design Flan ❑ Prepared by applicant {� � � Prepar�d by prafessional Vdater 6udget (optior.a j ❑ Prepzred by applicznt l,a" ❑ '� Prepared by professional Audit Post-installaticn audit completed ❑ Cemple±ed by zpplicant Q/ ❑ � CompleTed by professional �.��.�� . ,_ _ . ,_, _ ;_ ,�-'-,. _ OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST Auditor: Materials Received and Reviewed: 1a Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist i 0 W ter Budget I Landscape Plan ❑ Post-Instaliation Audit Dat eviewed: Follow up required (explainj: �/� /U(� ��(FJc(% !/� f�l y�U/IfC�I/ U Date Resubmitted: Date Approved: Dedicated Prr�gation Meter Require�+: � Meter sizing: ! Comments: Selected Defini�ions: T1e, i Tier � ETo SLA Professicnzl f � Water Feature l3 Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance Ca Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist �Nater Budget Calculation Worksheets ❑ Plant List �Other: ryv� � U Drip irrigation ❑ Self-2djusting Irrigation Cantroller U Plant pGlate ❑ Three (3) inches of mulch C! coil amendment (e.g., compost) ❑ Grading ❑ Poo! and/or spa cover ❑ Dedicated irrigation meter ❑ Other: NeGvi censtruc� ier and rehabilitated landscapes �,��ith �rrigated landscape areas beri:�een 1;d"u0 znd 2,500 square feet requirir,g a building or Izndscape permit, pla!? checl: or design review, or neve or expznded water service. New construction �r,d rehabilitated landscope= U✓ith irrigated !andscap2 0� eas greate� than 2,500 sGuare feet recuiring a huilding or landscape permit, plan c!�ec!: cr design � euievd. Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large fi21d of four- tc seven-inch tall, cool-season gras< that is we!I wztered. Referenre evarotransniration is used as t!�� basis of estimating wat<r budgets sa t,h.at r2gional differerces in climzte car be aacmmodated. Special Landscaped Area. includes edibie plants, Greas irrigated witl-� recYcled ��ater, surface water ieatures using recycfed water and areas dedicated to active plzy such as �iarks, sports fields; golf courses; and where �urf provides a p!aying surface. Frofessional is a"certified prefessioi�ai" or "authorized professional" that is a certifiea irri�ation designer, a certified IGndscape irrigatier auditor, a!icensed landscape archit�ct, a!icensed landscape centractor, a licensed professional ei�gineer, or any other person aUthO"IZECi �V CIIC =t2te to de�ign a!andscape, an irrigation sys+:em, cr zuthorized to com�lete a water hudget; irrigation <urvey or irrigation audit. A design element wnere oper: water performs an aesthetic or rea�earional functien. VVater feacures include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artiiiciai streams, spas, and swimming poeis (where �vater is arificially supplied}. Project Comments Date: To: May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/02/2010 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS 1�� i'"l' " 5�'"`'� Project Name: C,ti„l�1,� �•�1 Ow�Gi,i� Project Address: �� Grr�Z 1� The following requirements apply to the project 1 _� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) ��u�dl� 15 ��F'�� 2 '� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � �s,� -�,a -�- ►-�n( A�anrtary sewer laterallOt is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 CJ:\private development�PLANNING REVEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 13 14 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accardance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 1> The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers rermits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subj ect to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMIvIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Date Revised Plans Submitted September 20, 2010 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 5-17-2010 shall apply to this project. Reviewed by: - - � �,'( = Date: 9-23-2010 -�'� d� �=� C Project Comments Date: 1 �•ii From Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated on the review dated May 17, 2010 apply to this project. Reviewed by; % ��` �- �� - �% �- Date: �/�/ ��-� 0 Project Comments Date To: From May 17, 2010 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after January 1, 2009 must complete a"GreenPoint Rated ChecklisY'. The GreenPoint Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL: http://www.burlinqame.orq/Index.aspx?paqe=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at 650-558-7273. 3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 4) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 5) Indicate on the plans that all work shall be conducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See Citv of Burlingame Ordinance Municiqal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. 6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 9) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 10)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 11)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. Note: The areas labeled "Media" and "Study" are rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 12)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 13)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 14)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. , Reviewed by: ` Date: � ��` �r.�. / Project Comments Date: Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010 �o: 0 City Engineer � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7271 � Chief Building Official � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7260 (650) 558-7600 X Parks Supervisor � NPDES Coordinator (650) 558-7254 (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: N/A 1. Landscape and irrigation plan is sufficient and meets requirements. 2. Tree Managemenf Experts report on the health of Cedar in front yard indicates tree is in gradual decline. This tree is on private property and it will be up to applicant if tree will be removed now or at a later date. If tree is to remain during construction, the attached tree protection plan by Tree Management Experts will need to be followed. 3. If Cedar is to be removed before construction, applicant must apply for a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 7/13/10 Project Comments Date To: From: May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1. If Cedar tree is to remain, provide (1) arborist report on health, structure and (2) tree protection plan during construction. 2. Tree list only list 1 appropriate landscape tree. Plans need to show at least 2 landscape trees. 3. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width of Planter Strip needs to be implemented. 4. Trees that are to remain need to be identified and noted on Landscape plan. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 5/21 /10 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 � Recyciing Specialist (650) 558-7271 X Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for dwelling and detached garage at APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 a new, two-story single family 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. ��- Project Comments Date: To: From May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for dwelling and detached garage at APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 i� NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney a new, two-story single family 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as appropriate) for readability. For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. Reviewed by: � �,-��/� � �� \ Date: '� i ( 1 � / I � °��,, -;;�„ s,.,.w...�u � i rom�ao� ra.�e�r,o„ r,o�.o .n�r rM,oar � �r..: � � -€� �a ' �7� �� l , �� . General '"4'` COIISCPI1Ct107A 3c Site Siipervis;ian ea�� „�, m� !pe yewe welea plae�ly mnulnN vec for au� n,��... i r .w u.eLw e».n �v�wtl �� u��se . oo�ue..o > e.�d ��em nwo�.�„`�u m �orevM.� Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! Ruuut7fi'om streets aud oWer paved azeas is a major sowce oCpollution itl local cieeks, San Fraucisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Collstruction nctivities cnn direclly affect the healdi of our w¢ters uoless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away frmn srorm drains and creeks. Following tliese guidelines wiil ensure your compliance with local s�oroiwaler ordivauce requirements. Remembet, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of iusWlled conh�ols is crucial to proper implemen�ation. Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwozk & Paving F resh Concrete Painting & Applicarion Landscaping, Equipment Acfivi �e� & Mortaz Apglication of Salvents & Adhesives Gazdening, Operation , �:� and Pool Maintenance , i �'�� x� � Ill 111 „�"` N � �� , � - .�o �� _, � em r �:.�R�p°�:� �e � ��Wa �.�d ,� n� � �„ . ae.��,.�e� . w� �4WP ��:� �.�� ;� �W�Ae �� ,e,., a��.��,m.s, o,��, ` '�brc+n��.m....�o�m�moeuoo�Lw.Wi.yv�roM v.xw.dx. y •••wu.ed�¢pA�:yh�m.m..�bm.wa oom y(.Sro �r. u.-.ina..e..�o . s cwim.i�m Na�la��blupoieuetwn✓1 m ia. Jta n Pvewultt �va�xem 1.mn mk.uL�m�.-+4exbunw rtG.lev ryp�o.mwuiev�e. luee.,�nuer��.�mm..o�.x�5um. y��•"� aoqe� e�..uien�e.b�o rx.�.a . nulluerunon. Y W.�imn unngel on�ivn� JS�L.a a.W�FUI��.a '°�In I��on�.�nJ.ehkl..m �m••• naeAv.v. mL.�n�wolluwWe�e��v. Tra 0. m tuw�lu� y ryv�e.. e..un..u.4.uu. nm�i�ei��e..inJnen�ort a� �um�er. s uc Qyr,i� neanr�ul��Yvrthueurcdwp�a m�Nmano� u� o-i irn i„� �'n..e.�mi.��nonn. e.l..w.L�nw�r x�oy...0 o��me o1in 'i��a mbinwM1m w.ne ua�rc�0.nwmN.mitl�uW.ea�khn.w�mw�. � w J� i�Jevv. aoY�uwn��.n.u�uuuwr.u. a woluuW�a.mnitlmuv rev�n�e.m mowi.. wu�lle�wmaal�adiueoi •.ai�w..o�l�m..w.u.er��.n.uwn u.l. ar. "hunwuo.uor�nxui uvww0 W�'Ue�o' w e m.lm�lw.al.renm�wwlme IK' v�e aktlunal�med� M��.mrvW.rcvwv�m.u..�ne i..W'.w. o.,ro. �,..i„��aw�.e�.,,,�. , �, ,a ,.�n.w��,A�m�.,.,�� r �� ,e,w..o,� ,..�o�.. .�<.,.n��,�..,. �.mn ,oi..�. ,�m�. o.a,,..a .,.,.,��...�.�4.�..,. P�w...U.�.o..e�� / m ��.n.a�l.wn.�.. J�..rt.�.i.�......�m.�v�nw.vf d.d... Jl�w .I��.a M..vu��..m��.e nn.a w m.dou�evd i�. �v�. �u•no�. �wa.eo u.�.�.w..ik.oero. *m��m'�r k„ .'.,ey.o a�c v.ud�r.m�cov�uw. nn.,.u.,M .m+�Nnt,uh�we.vr.a��e�. orm �YI �n.n nV P nnu.y'.0 rv�� p.�im.,� v.n�,ay., ,�.vaw+�ewm�oe,� i" ee e. ..n�anm „ �"':h.., �am.w.,.y�.,.. . w..ar..�. . wutiu., mmww� �r+�+;n m. �„� a,�... .. ��m W� ��, o.. k. �o-�em,.�ni...��iei,.au,��,.i w�v�^ v. n.�wo. cvu i�q,.i..mK��m�n�ono�. a ��.mammii,.tm�n��ir. e�fimo.m ��.i.owum� r» � d...i.. �� w •�rwoo�,saa„�,�°•e.�w.�am�n.y my� ."`��m��no va"�" �A�.,.�ew�a,�,s:�n,�.� m�.,;\'�oe wr�i�. .,drv�A�a..u. m.rx�a �aw�.. w�.�m� .,MSew�a..�. ..,,;� �ue�se.a,..trie�..:.,.�o�m..Q�. �e �.cw��yce�n�a. "°<<..�,e.n,.m �e�w.,�W l°mm.o«�o.qwir.�.n..� � v� r � .� � � m.te. da.. uta.. wsf -� -,. �.,,,.m„a m....,x., .m..m��.��. �nma.�m.e�wa�e.�t��...�,n,aw. iw�, au . wo-.... ... M9�u.o J+r..w.. ur.�..mm1'mrcr .1 t . �b,.ac�.�.a.e,.d�,.� �,..�.�n�„a.��,w«m..�mm, me�,,,�m.�.m �..�...� h��,�.��. rr��o�.aerva., �,�.e.o,ay�m.�w�.e,��e.��e,.� �a��,.� p tra�,,.u.,,� �r....w„W�,�.,e.,.,�_,,....�.�.,�. ,�noaw,m. m��<r�,.��wa i.�n�ew�ow� Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per da,y! .R.i� e x.ne....�e.u,ea�..�n. .�O.Ae�u.ry �r�ww< mr• a�,�„�� me��mbm ui.amw.l a C rycl�•y aV". e•.Cw ,��,a� „��,��..�km,.�,m,.,.,� �;��°�;��m;°�e�fi ;°�;��: ,�+�ry�` .,,s, ,�a��,o a�,- , , �a. > u ,. � ,��, o�.�, RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a new, two-story sinqle familv dwelling and detached qaracLe at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Andrea Van Voorhis, property owner. APN: 026-031-030; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 12. 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12`h dav of October, 2010 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1501 Cortez Avenue Effective October 22, 2010 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 29, 2010, sheets 0 through 7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 23, 2010, July 7, 2010 and May 17, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's June 2, 1020 memo, the Parks Supervisor's July 13, 2010 and May 21, 2010 memos, the Fire Marshal's May 20, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 19, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1501 Cortez Avenue Effective October 22, 2010 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. �CITY OF BUP,LINGAME � CGMMUNI I Y DEVELOPMENT DE suRLING�NtE 501 PRIfv1ROSE ROF�D p�yL �I BUP.LINGAME, CA 94010 r-- . PH: (E5G) 558-7250 a FAX: (650) E www.burlingame.org Sit�: 1501 �ORTEZ AliENUE The Ci9y of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2010 �t 7:09 P.M. in the Ci9y Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application far Design Raview for a rew, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 CORTEZ AVEMUE zoned R-1. APN 026-A31-030 ►Yiaile�: �ctober i, 2�� (Please refer to other side) � _ f � A=' � - ' ,:�:.r_ .-,-�,, .,—.. .., _" _ '�;�-_ �� - ' - _. y �. Cit� of �urli�a�arr►e A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. IT you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone eise raised at the pubiic hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Propery owners who receive this notice are responsible for i�forming their tenants aboui this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development D;rector �� R�� N�`�1C� (Please refer to other siaeJ . , -R- . r > . 4 �, - � �z � _ • �� {- �� , - t � � �* � , � � �e ::� , ��; �� ` _�,� "`�.�� r :4; �. �� ` � �� `�' - x . : , . �-.� :' ,. �% ��, �� > , : '°� ' � � ��,. 2� t :�:� � � .. . . . - 1 , �� ; , , . . .. � � ��.�� F <.� t t� , f � �� . .. � >�� . a - .� � . �:��.{t.^��' � _ �, ��"a,�� ''n'�:., . ,� :�< '�� .a�, � . i \ > , . � ,� �� .'�� ¢a.� _ d„- '� . . 'I. '" 1i,,,� ( �. , . � Y..� � � Y a ' �� ':i - �\ • �'�'(� `'� . - �� #`t � �'��° �' i ` i. � �.� °+�C �t� "� R ; �: � � 6�s. ��'� .,f' . � .3�. , � _ � t �l'r�g , ,}. �; ^ t k y� � "�. � ,� t � A. r �-1 r� �+�` � ' } ` , r _ ,.. � � • �, " {� � �:si.••"t� :J ¢ " � ��`��, '�� . _ 1 � _ ; �F.y � , f � � t�� /��i ��'. � - r�� . . •� 3A' � _ �' . $ � � F` ` �. � . Y ?'. �- .* � � . � y � }+ a �. / �� } � '=" tr� 4 nj * +.�a.� E:. � � r � T , / - - �. ' S.� - . � ,�s, � - } � n '�, �' . ' -'r. - r .�` t C.� � F l �'�`�. . �( f �, la .:�, . � � �� - j"�i� - �: r�C�T� ��'., ` -:'_, .r - t. n\.: }�� r �„ . \ +`iii � q .� 1_ : - � `�d� 1^�.� � F�.. .. ', . ~ �`�'� �Y' � I t � � \, � � ,4 �. �� ,a _ y . � � . A .�� r f �.-�� ^ �� (�i„ �' � � - . „� i � �§ / �F' 1' � t}�}- e ;�a�� • �t. ,� . . , �, . . - � '� �a�� : � -� .� '#°�`"�".y� �� . �� _ k = � � - a ,,� � Y' A � F � ' . , � , . , ' 45 � c' � * �s_. � . _ # . � . � � �, . <�� i `~ ��-z . .`�` X� y�� A� � r ��.�?. a;, .+ � '_y � . � � . `i 4 � 0..1, �(� � - s ; . �� ,�� ( '.,� � � ' �� ''� i�.., . ��,. ,. , , . ��,�`�'�` � � /, � � w . :'s" - ,�vz�;.s , J/ , �� ' �� y � / ' � r � t�, I � a`T� . �.-` ' . j � i. � `' �.. . '�}'`� f �- - �. � j•i � �. �� ✓� 1� ��' � "�"e �_ r�.'� '!� . �� _ � c Y � h '��..� _ .�'�` �� ' � : i , � . ;_�" � r y . �, .i � J. � . se `. y _,��"��., : �� ` �.�� l . ^ �f � � � . �� y ., . �. y ,_ '' '� '' j,•;�� #=� �T,��y �. ,� -� ',. ,�. ;l �� •� `� _,��• '� � �±� :��' S; � ,�.-� �` `�I , 1 `� �� -. ; ` �' '�+ r � � "; �:. ��. � . .,,� _,•, " ' ' • ' , � � , `-"l i �� V 't r � .v.' � - '� :r. � r '�. � - � ��. �h. }� � f',.� : ` ` Y -- - x, ; �.:. .. .� ; y _ � ,.� � `�.� `-: ' o` 6 �- t' - �!6 � �':� . ��a.. '. dai A,s"'' a� i�� 1 � - d;� a_ �{'Y� `0y � � „� Y. •-�!' ��.� "it r,r p .. '�XV�j , ��F�� t �-. s..a` ^' - l�,ti i � - �� j� �fM . �. j _ �� } f: � ,! � .r � �. �:� e , � a � � 6 � �� e c ` � � ��, �' i �� =�i' _ � .! �'•� . � o � � �. ��' + A _ .�� Y � � � . , i' F � � • •� • • � �!/; } � � '�� #�... ..r"+�`•. • �{•� r. � 1t ••�. i� � �� r �y :: , .:y� ,.�-k- , � �"� �t"y � � :�� ,•,E �; "j � _ ' $ ' ,s�ri � -�. �� a � �� - E , ` �� ` .. �Y . -� - `'��' .. . 4 � � , r�:�-� 1501 Cortez Avenue �A , � f . ,� � '.'r"�� . _ '� � . � _ _ .:• -�. �. Item No. Design Review Study PROJECT LOCQTION 1501 Cortez Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1501 Cortez Avenue Item No. Design Review St�dy Meeting Date: July 26, 2010 Request: Design Review for a new, two-story single-family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant, Architect and Property Owner: Andrea Van Voorhis General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 APN: 026-031-030 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,142 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,158 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 16 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). The project includes a detached garage (338 SF) which provides one code-compliant covered parking space for the proposed four-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). 9509 Cortez Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Jul 6, 2010 PROPOSED ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ! ' --._.. -------- __._.. ----------- --. _........ __ _ _ --- --- _ Front (1sf flr). ; 20 -0" , 16'-7" (block average) (2nd flr): ; 20'-0" 20'-0„ __...._.. --- _ ____._.... __._ _ ___ ------ __ _- __._.._ ____ ___— ------ ------�_ __ Side (/eft 15f): 9 -2° 7'-6" (left 2"d): j 12'-0" 12'-0" (average) (righf): ; 7'-6° 4'-0�� _—.._._ --_ _---.- _... _......._ ._ ____ _._..-- - - ___- _ _.._.... __ _ __..__ __.._ ----- Rear (1sf flr). ; 47 -1 " ' 15'-0" (2nd flr): ' 45'-7" (to bay) , 20'-0" __—_ _ ____...----- --- _ ___-- - ----- _ _._..... Lot Coverage: 1,891 SF 2,400 SF 32% ' 40% _.... __ . ___ _-- -- --- ----- -- _.. --- -- .._.. .. _..- - - -- --- ----- FAR: 3,142 SF , 3,158 SF 0.52 FAR ' 0.53 FAR ' _...... _.._._ . ___---- - — _ _ . _ _ .._..._ ____._ _ .. __.. _.. ._ _ ___ _ _ _._ _. _ --- --_ ------. # of bedrooms: ' 4 --- __.__.. __ -_ - ---- � - .. - - - -- - .---.. __ -- .__ _.. -- - ___--- _ ___ _-- _-- _ ___... _ _ -----__.._ Parking ; 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') ' (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered io� ., �n�� r4� V �n�� i � �� _..... _.._ . ----- _...._ __.......... . ___ __ _.... _.. -- ---..._.� - --- -- ----r'�ri,�C ;i. ' 2° -11 " 30`-C�„ __..... __ ._----- -------_.._.. --- -... _ _._.... _ _ __ _ _ ---- __... . DH Envelope• complies CS 25.28.075 ' (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + g00 SF + 338 SF = 3,158 SF (0.53 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner 15C1 Cortez Avenue c. Andrea Van Voorhis, 1501 Cortez Avenue, Burlingame, CA, 94010, applicant, architect and property owner. Attachments:' Application to the Planning Commission Arborist Reports, date stamped July 6, 2010 Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 16, 2010 Aerial Photo 6ea �� eIIRLit�G�'FME �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRirrRosE Roao • BURLlNGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.695.3790 • www.burlingame.org �r��'Cf��oltl �� l�lltllV�ltl� is�iV1��7��IV Type of applicaiion: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Parcel #: ii n�� ! d �� a ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ' 7 U I ��--I �L �1i��b� O Piease indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person F3' OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: %1��i"'r�r �J�-i.� �1?'JE�Ni�� Address: i 5';i :_=vc� ,'�- 7.� Cti�f ��L`� City/State,�Zip: 'c�;'t?..��5��-i`1�,; �: `��-�F�:: Phone: i �-15� ' Sf U � `=t� ��' � Fax: E-mail: �� 1Y��`��C>��ii�� 1 t�P�.� • N�? �:RCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��.M � Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: 7,'r1`�� Address: _ City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: � Burlingame Business License �#: �;. � ��( 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: `� %� icitrl��-i l`z ��%�-.L� '��i � X4'�i i I�'„_ :':x �`� 1t1�:¢i C:b�t"�L�� i+'-�i� (;iiil.-t^ /� ?.:F t�.: �„ii� �t C��''f is=v�� J.ii? .��t'`��y AF�RDAVIT{SIGNATURE: I herehy cer;ify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is frue and correct to the hect nf mv knnwlarina anri heliP_:f. /�_� 1 --. _. ..., ....-�--�- — - - _, / \ i r A....1: � e. �.�r / �✓' I i�i�,a__ R�.F.. ~ !:'l ��:�::....�^.t: ��'i�i'....ic— _"_ I !_ .. . � �_. . � �' �i. . __ , i . . i F I am �vvare ef the prerosed app!ica±ier, and here�'y 2U!flOnze the above applican± te s�:bmi? i�is app!ica?ion io the FlBrtr?i�g Commission. � �� s�,� � �roperty owner's signaiure: i I �� k�:�,V = Date: �� Date submitted: � Werification that the project architectldesigner has a valid Burlingame business iicense will be required by the Finance Department at the time applicatian fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. 5:'i,v�N�ouis�Pcappiicarron zm&.nonoout.aoc `�� €��€�€��€�� cn�ur�:r�r �=.r� :ris�� 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ��: ��:�-�. -� =�= � _:�Y ,x;, ceil/voicemail 415 606 3610 office 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email RCL3 �mindsnrino.com Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Date: 7/7/10 ��` r�:��`t 's'�� . . .`��.�i'6t}ri �"'tkc�i'. Assignment • Provide document review of proposed construction • Determine impacts that could adversely affect one cedar tree • Develop tree protection strategies to preserve the cedar tree during construction • Provide a Tree Protection Plan report for inclusion in Planning documents Background The tree subject to protection by way of this report is an incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens) with a 48-inch diameter equivalent. The tree is located near the corner of the lot at 1501 Cortez Avenue in Burlingame, California. The plan set produced by Sparks Architecture was evaluated. These plans show the existing building footprint with the tree location and what is planned as new construction. The tree protection plan drawing on page 4 is based on these pians with additions by Tree Management Experts. A separate Arborist Report dated 7/6/10 was provided to evaluate tree health and structure. Based on that assessment, this tree is recommended for removal. Without going through the tree removal process, this tree protection plan is required for Planning Department approval. Purpose and Procedures A iree protection plan is reauired by the Planning Deoartment where an existing tree is on or near a proFerty thai is preposed for deveiopment. This plan is to identify what the tree needs, ard �nsuie that those needs are accommodated through design and construction procedures. For affective tree protection, soil associated with roots must be preserved. This area is designated as the Tree Protecti�n Zone, or TPZ. Within the TPZ, activities must not cut roots through excavation or compact soil so as to make it non-horticultural. Where areas Ca�i �^c �^cf�C�G� .^.�, fT'�:%�ch ar.d ir�jr�atinn are re �e nrovidea. ror areas auisici� i��e ienciny s,....... a+t.., vu'��7r,.. o olnno � r�iv�ninnri rnnt h� iffar mi �ct ha SUCI`t ciS DeiwCCi i ii ic ICI II.0 GI IU u�c � ic^V: �� y .,� �... ..r�� u ry � iaid over the rnulched scil. Contractor's ticense #885953 � - � �� - =��' � �"�; r� �. �'� —.. - ��:''� Page ? of 6 ,; t_ ��`�� f.E��,.��E�°"t�€'t� ��3?�� QC1sEPlfsi�.�".�e t�.i'�i.'e�€'fSiS 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �_..- `��`�.� , c. celllvoicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 email ��L: 3%r�.-.dsorinacom The project must have a designated Project Arborist who is part of the design/build team. This Arborist will be the authority on tree requirements should questions arise, and must be called in during the instailation of tree protection features and when any excavation activity is occurring within the TPZ. To insure that trees and building procedures are continuing to be compatible, the Project Arborist must make monthly inspections and file brief memorandum reports. All tree protection measures outiined in this report are to be instailed prior to demolition, except the mulch and plywood root buffers that are to be installed immediately after demolition and before foundation excavation begins. Fencing is to be continuous 6-foot high chain link securely attached to iron posts driven into native soil. All fencing ends shail be overlapped and securely attached to each other to prevent entry into protected areas. Mulch and irrigation must be instalied within the tree protective fencing. Irrigation may be as simple as a soaker hose that is looped around the fence perimeter. Mulch is to be comprised of wood chips of 4 inches depth and absent from within 12 inches of the base of the tree. Plywood root buffers are to be comprised of 3/4-inch plywood laid over 4 inches of mulch. Impacts and Mitigation lmpacf: Demolifion All c3emolition in areas of the TPZ must be completed from within the bui►ding footprint. Patio concrete and footings may be broken and removed with heavy equipment, but that equipment must not enter protected areas at any time. Mitiqation: Should demolition equipment enter the protected areas of the TPZ at any time, the Project Arborist musi evaluate soil impacts and may require soil decompaction. Impact: Excavation Tailings, Demolition Debris and Materials Staging All transitory materials from excavation or due to construction must remain outside TPZ areas at all times. Mitigation: Should materials be placed within a TPZ, the Project Arborist must evaluate soil impacts and may require soil decompaction. Contractor's License #885953 �n��uv treem=nao a; �� _- �- Page 2 of 6 ��`�� F€��"��E'� ��"'�� {�arF�u(�€�� -.;�uF��.E�, 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists CeRified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �� . �� :�� _~;��: �w _. � jv cell/voicemail 4'15 606 3610 office 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email P.CL3n�rdndspnno.com Impact: Foundation Excavation The existing concrete porch wiil be removed and the new retaining wall and porch will be set back on both sides of the corner, by approximately 6 feet further from the tree to the east and about 4 feet further to the south. This will substantially increase space for the tree and essentially eliminate impacts from the foundation line of the new building footprint. Mitiqation: Standard foundation design is acceptable. Any roots encountered must be cleanly cut at the edge of the excavation trench. Impact: Exisfing Underground Utilifies Any existing underground utilities within the TPZ must either continue to be utilized without upgrade or be abandoned. Mitiqation: No trenching shall be done to expose existing utilities. lmpact: New Underground Utilities New underground utilities shall run in trenches outside the TPZ areas. Mitiqation: Any new utilities that must run through the TPZ must be installed with directional boring. Impacf: Final Grading Fina! grading shall not modify the soil levefs within the TPZ, except to accommodate necessary surface water drainage patterns. Cuts and filis shall not exceed 4 inches and shall not extend further than 4 feet from the new building envelope without consultation with the Project Arborist. Mitiqation: Any significant soil cuts may impact roots that are critical to tree stability and tree removai may be necessary. Any significant soil fill will harm tree i�ealth and must be removed or the tree may be losi. Tree Care Requiremenis The tree has been recently pruned and cabled, and no further work is required. Contractor's License #885953 �� - � �a= :�> s...;�� s�� Page 3 of 6 �_ � �i�� :��E��:= ��.��?`�'� Y " -�,. _ 4o�vu�t;E�a .�rE�c� is�� - 3109 Sacramento Street �'�--�= San Francisco, CA 94115 ;.��. Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ^ell/voicemail4156063610 o�ce4159213610 fax41 5 921 7711 email,4CL,:�mindse�rin_.�om Tree Protection Plan Drawing ; I I 7 • -- ---- -T ° � ��; — - f � � ,t :� , �' r ..' � _r. L� _ �: � ' i . i 1' � l: i� IA �. � l. __� t i,� �� 4 - T " }� �rr� : � e i . � YL � � � i � �E i . } t� t; .:, t w��t� V� Fl�jf r->>>1, � i _ ---- - - --- -- +----� ' � -� � � - i .r >c ' i �:� � tri — � :" � � rrr . ��r��ra �: � ; � , - -----------------�--,-- � -----=-l-------- �-��' 'I. _`s� �; ' ; �: � i �� , , j 1= __, P�F_%ti' 1 f",�Ft—:'� 'j �� ' ._ r — —�� ,� — J � � � i .�.`rt (.;l1 ict�!`- -' - i' - � — Y:`et:ji i F{t� Ci�cC i !i_l Ld I�Y f TGJ �,;;; �, - H �FiRt'_ iz � i�. i, i i 1 i; r Ft; �T r � �1 i FL� -�Ti 6 � I � �� w � - � I � _ ;F-- I I �'4-_ I � � � . I I ��, TFE� �L ��1�'�Ef �1 ��fF I FE�c�r� ' ! � II i ,: � <��, -�r,�.::�: i � -�i ��r =Er�acr I � L� \ � � � ----;! �laeement of al,' tres prcfecticl7 f�2fG��@S is te be determi.ned in the field by the Project Arborist. Contractor's License #885953 � .� a .'�� _ - � =>: � � �.� �? �:- �. - = � Page 4 of 6 �� Gar��[iE�� ,=�r�c� "s�� 31G9 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ��:. ��fa_ �= `'��'��"Y~� -; cellNoicemail 415 606 3610 office 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email RC� 3-;� mind,�rrira.com Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Title and ownership of all property considered are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership a�d competent management. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible. The consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. Various diagrams, sketches and photographs in this report are intended as visual aids and are not to scale, unless specifically stated as such on the drawing. These communication tools in no way substitute for nor should be construed as surveys, architectural or engineering drawings. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. 7. This report is confidential and to be distributed only to the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any or all of the contents of this report may be conveyed to another party oniy with the express prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. Such limitations appiy to the original report, a copy, facsimile, scanned image or digital version thereof. 8. This report represents the opinion of the consultant. In no way is the consultanYs fee contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, inciuding payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule, an agreement or a contract. 10. Information contained in this report reflects observations made oniy to those items described and only reflects the condition of those items at the time of the site visit. Furthermore, the inspection is limited to visual examination of items and elements at the site, un�ess expressly stated otherwise. There is no expressed or implied warranfy or guarantee that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property inspected may not arise in the future. Disciosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and heaith of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Ciients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are fiving organisms that fail in ways we do not fuify �nderstand. Cenditions are often hidden within trees B�S� ,~,�;pb✓ ^yf'3::nd- Arberis+� ran�nt �ii�r2niBg Th2t 8 if@B WIfI DB fl2�i`t�IV Of s8ie uiiu8i 8ii I.IIl.l111StGl��c�� .,_ c...- ,. .. ....{Ff..fl r� �infl n{ #imo I ilro�micP �P�.,P��ai traatmants. like anv medicine. cannot be guaranteed. �� , a �p��„�� re,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, �..._..._ , _...__._. _.__-__ _ � - - Contractor's License #885953 � -�� : �`��re�s.;�� ' �': co�;; Page 5 oi 6 1: eu_ K 4 f,e. . �1 . � �" F. �^ � �.._' ��' `��;ac��.��tc- �e� � �i'_ .�i�.�- �E1E'sS`l�4[fiCs r�if.,'�•!i�ic 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors =� �� a:`:,;;,,. c II/voicemail 415 6D6 3610 o�ce 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email � Ci- � mindsorinq.cor*m Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborisYs services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. An arborist cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate a!I risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification of Performance I, Roy C. Leggitt, III, Certify: • That we have inspected the trees and/or properry evatuated in this report. We have stated findings accurately, insofar as the limitations of the Assignment and within the extent and context identified by this report; • That we have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or any real estate that is the subject of this report, and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are original and are based on current scientific procedures and facts and according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That no significant professional assistance was provided, except as indicated by the inclusion of another professional report within this report; • That compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the ciient or any other party. I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and a member and Certified Arborist with the International Society of Arboriculture. I have attained professionai training in all areas of knowledge asserted through this report by completion of a Bachelor of Science degree in Plant Science, by routinely attending pertinent professional conferences and by reading current research from professional journals, books and other media. I have rendered professional services in a full time capacity in the field of horticulture and arboriculture for more than 20 years. � �� Sianed� 1 1� Date: 7/7/10 Contractor'sLicense#885953 iar�%��,n�.ireern�r-�aa�rr,en;ax��r.'s.bloaspotca�i� Page6of6 � � , , � � , .� F., � i i � .� � __Y. .t�-i Ec�m,.[eS ��R„ai..�fs....�<a� v.'�.€.`✓' �-C}€l5€S�i[its..5 ,�._• r.,:: : i� 4.a 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certifed Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors 4F�� 'S`,4`�` _T, cell/voicemail 415.606.3610 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 email RC'_3�^':mindserinq com Andrea Van Voorhis 1501 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Date: 7/6/10 ��,�� " ��i��; �� . _ E `�:�€�.1 , �;c° �Y ;c�:.!c•., Assignment • Provide a site inspection to evaluate one cedar tree • Evaluate tree health and hazard potential • Provide an Arborist Report of findings and to make recommendations Observations and Discussion I provided a site inspection of the Van Voorhis property located at 1501 Cortez Avenue. This is a corner lot, and a mature incense cedar tree (Calocedrus decurrens) is located between the house and the intersection. Please refer to Photograph 1. This tree is comprised of three trunks that join a short single trunk. For trees of this configuration each trunk is measured and an equivalent single trunk diameter is calculated. The equivalent diameter is 48 inches. Tree health is fair, with foliage of proper size, shape and color, but of low density. This may be from over-pruning, but shoot extension did not appear to be particularly strong and is instead most likely an indication of decline. Two large girdling roots were found, each directly impacting a large buttress root. The tops of each trunK have been removed, each at a different level. It is possible that the tepping was improper pruring, but it is more likely that the topping occurred due to dieback caused by tne girdling roots and was proper pruning. The junctures between each of the trunks is very weak. There are large amounts of bark trapped �etween the trunks, and large ribs that have formed below these junctures indicate interna! cracks. Between the three trunks, above their juncture, is a mass of roots that have grown up into the cracks. Please refer to Photograph 2. A cabling system has been installed in a ring system using extra high strength cable and "J" lags at 2/3rds the height of the tree. All cables are taut. LOf1C1il5i6ii� c?P6fi r�BCGiii�ii^ci�fi?iiCR:� This tree nas low to r�7ode�ate v�tality ard is in gr�dual dec!ine. Contractor's License #885353 *ra, ,, _, �o =; � ,'s_hl� r `.c� r.? Page ? of 6 ��`�� [��1::�`�.�g``��?�€i� ��i�� e��s�Elt�ng �rf��-ists 3109 Sacramen'to Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �- ��.�- - �;'�,-�-� -_�� _ ...� .,�,t» � ..}. cell/voicemafl 415.606_36'10 office 415.921.3610 fax 415.921.7711 emaii �C-�3n�;mfnds^rina.com Tree structure is in poor condition with three trunks and very weak and failed attachments. The structurai problems have been partially mitigated through the instaliation of a properly installed cabling system. Cabling systems are intended to prevent failures, not to support failed trees, and this tree has experienced failures where cracks have developed in the short lower trunk. Tree hazard potential for this tree is moderate to high. Retaining this tree will require that the property owner accept risks that are above average. I recommend that this tree be removed. Confractcr's Lrcense #885953 ��-�s-:-.rr��r!ara�ry�menf�x�a�s.blocs�c:.�_ � Page 2 of 6 �K _ _r �� - � �.� - � �� :� ��'�� ,�E ��€� �� cn�.�,t:�� ,:•�c•; i�f v 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �. :��-` ; ��,�� cell/voicemail 415 606 3610 office 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email :Ci � a�r-iindsprinc.com Supporting Information Contractor's License #885953 Phoiogr�pii i , i,�.+r ,_�r,�Q �-;,tev Frrs.bl os�oi.c�:�� Fage 3 of 6 Tre� �JEanagem��t Ex��rts Gc�r�su[ting Arborists 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, CeRified Tree Risk Assessors �. -�:�� ,!L cell/voicemail 415-606.36'10 o�ce 415.921.361D fax 415.92t7711 email RCL� ��r'�indrorinq.com � 1 F 4 � , ' j � � � � ,` �n'� ' � 5 `,k , , < < � � '� � �� i �� ` +' � �, 1�� ; f7 � tk � � j sa � ;. °� ' 1 Y�- I i' , i �,�' 7� � �`i'� 1 z�/ Y � r� �j, ��: i � `f '��+i �� t1 c s , � , 7-� r v- -� � � ' � _ � � �,� .�. _ � �' 3 C � F'; �' 1' � + � '�a � �� '`, S ' � �,�"�'1.� S � `� i: i i, 1� ' S�, ��-�`-' � � r'i, i�`�' � �;. g� � t � _'.�� ' :��p. (�1. t�_ . � �. . � °� - �; �r � �� 1 s� � ' - i j � 1 � �, �` �-• �` �t � { +' t ;�;i� { �' i ;(y �r� � �_ �� . �� " a � �: Y J . . J; 1 � Y*b !! t ii � fi� �� n � .� r , � I � 1� � �� ? _ s _ �� ' � � � ,, ti �. u� � � � � � � �' I' I; . �.s �, . �r . � , A4 + , � � ' ' � � ��` ��' i�#,� ! �,'='� � _ ;� � , i �� . r: ,�, � "�+ t ;;�� t � � � � . '� . . t ,� , 9 1l� � t-_ j I �� 3� f i � -� � j j ,1 '� i �" -� - � � � � f � � � i �' - (� . 1 j !" 4 . ' . r -.. - . �s;� � � ( �l "!9t l �j�- �t� .t r�_. s . �� ;�� , � , f *,� t, r '_ ' � � j , � E � � ; 3„yerh} �I1 .3 � 3�� ; �� j t�. .. ��f�� !'�.� . M1'`� ' p_: � f � � r � �+�„ � ,�� C L ,� � � � �� i ; Y � i _ � ,, a � ��E� - ��'; �I t�� f' � J � ��r � �(,�o _ � i�' . - +.�T � , :h I j _ ..1 1 � 3 � �, � �.._..�4� ' ♦ � � 7 �, � � �� . _; ..:�., .�.- ,.t.�_ �� ,�' _ I `- . j i � `1" � - j - ` � � j' y � J�. % }i . �: � �. : i, i, ° t ;; p _� 3' i . - �.� � , ' � � } i: 1 :� �;t - ; �� ?,�� - r� �'fi.. •�� ! � `, f x=� 2 � '.�-�. � �' �.. _ � .,4� _ 1 F � - � 7.e� Y'�:t � � , 1 -� � -t ; � �,� r .`� �+ � -� a� r4 _t ��; .�'.r � t 1 � ��k9-3 ��r� 1 �A � .,_ �: F : � `� f ' '� 1 3 � 3 ' ) yr : Pz .� t �} � � �, `�i� �:.. �E'{ .�.��. .� �%:� 1 � � � � i-� �� f � � � � /'SC,� � r �� fsf :. �` �'�� . . - - � i i �T��i� i- ' �. � � s - • + �� `�. _ y .4� ...� ��1�` �{ '� �s. } 'ta� i�_ -- i � �-i � ., ; i „�.-. _ ...� 1 . = a�_y .,_ � c .i- �`� . •�,' � _ , �.- > �� , ^ �_ �-i ��.. �.� _<e F�'^� .� i1 -. { :r.� ` \ _ ,-.. � .s� � � t ��i� �;i� � 4 { i��_.' _ �� - j� a� i� � 'I� � � 7 �� .- • � �t� �� r_ ~ u � - { ``�4 9_��f � ,uY _� _� � �� - _ - �, ' � 1 �.. Y _�� r " _ . - . . � 3 '(� �� -� j, g�� '- - - -� � - . ��' `;=� _ _ - ��,�"- �_ _ _ _ ,_ - _ _ �� :,'-: "_ _ - � - ,� _ .� �:r - �; . - __ .;4- � �� .. � - - - �-,�.� �r: - = `� �`` _ _ — -` - - - .- Phntn�r2�h� __.__ Contractor's License #885953 v��✓w.trPemanaaemantexperts.bloaspotcom Page 4 oi 6 e :'� � � e s s.-� �`° �'" � �`m.-- ��'a � . . � `�, � F� �� € �� ns€�4�i�:� ?,€ ��?ri�-;€: 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors ��- ��,;;�'�'�``- � -�._��. ;;� cell/voicemail 415 606 3610 o�ce 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7�11 email P.CL3��nlindsprinq.com Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Title and ownership of ail property considered are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible. The consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. Various diagrams, sketches and photographs in this report are intended as visual aids and are not to scale, unless specificaliy stated as such on the drawing. These communication tools in no way substitute for nor should be construed as surveys, architectural or engineering drawings. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. 7. This report is confidential and to be distributed only to the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any or all of the contents of this report may be conveyed to another party only with the express prior written or verbal consent of the consultant. Such limitations apply to the origi�al report, a copy, facsimile, scanned image or digital version thereof. 8. This report represents the opinion of the consultant. In no way is the consultanYs fee contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report uniess subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule, an agreement or a contract. 10. Information contained in this report reflects observations made only to those items described and oniy reflects the condition of those items at the time of the site visit. Furthermore, the inspection is limited to visual examination of items and elements at the site, unless expressly stated othenvise. There is no expressed or implied warranty or guarantee tha� probiems or deficiencies of the plants or property inspected may not arise in the future. Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are livino organisms that fail in ways we do not fufly understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborisis cannot guarantee ihat a tree vdiil be heathy or safe ;�nder a!! ciroums±ances, a:,.;..,. ,. .,�� roorl Of fnr a g�a�ifl2d �B�ICd Ot t1R1B. LIKBWIS2, �2fTl�Ciidi iFBBifi iei ii5, iin8 ai iy i i�2��u ��, �o� �� ., .. ^y..8� 3^........ Contractor's License #885953 � i cr �:�.� :e; -. �'!,- -'- `:�:r Page 5 of 6 ��`�� ;t��E�� "��'�� C�;��4s�•�:�:;� �.;�c,...;e 3109 Sacramento Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Certified Arborists, Certified Tree Risk Assessors �� _,�` � �- �'�,�._ f�- cell/voicemail 415 606 3610 o�ce 415 921 3610 fax 415 921 7711 email r�,C�_3;c�r;i:�dsprino.�om Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may invotve considerations beyond the scope of the arborisYs services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. An arborist cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification of Performance I, Roy C. Leggitt, I II, Certify: • That we have inspected the trees and/or property evaluated in this report. We have stated findings accurately, insofar as the limitations of the Assignment and within the extent and context identified by this report; • That we have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or any real estate that is the subject of this report, and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis: opinions and conclusions stated herein are original and are based on current scientific procedures and facts and according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That no significant professional assistance was provided, except as indicated by the inclusion of another professional report within this report; • That compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party. I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and a member and Certified Arborist with the International Society of Arboriculture. I have attained professional training in all areas of knowledge asserted through this report by completion of a Bachelor of Science degree in Plant Science, by routinely attending pertinent professional conferences and by reading current research from professional journals, books and other media. I have rendered professional services in a full tfine capacity in the field of horticulture and arboriculiure for more than 20 years. C � � J Siqned � � �� Dafe: 7/6/10 Contractor's Lrcense #885953 � -;;a� - _ Page 6 of 6 �t1i�C�� .�_�� 4 R��` �F°��KLlST �.� , ,. : : . ��.F� �. E, ; � ; ��, � „�,� � �¢ a a--o c kEo oi° : - s y a� ��!x� 3S i « v.,�:� � �• � .: - �yx� . ;� _. _. � �I certify that the sub�ect project meets the sp�u�ico reoui �i� :n. o` �F t� ��.e� C� nsr r��tio� in Landscaping Ordmanc_. � � � Signature Date ' Single Family D Multi-Family ❑ Commercial � Institutional ❑ Irrigation only ❑ fndustrial ❑ Other. Applicant fVame (print): �� 5 Contact Phone +":: �, �r�� '� Cj - G�OB f Project Site Address: � S � � � Uj2T�L-� �}�l� Nl,f � Rgency Review Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): � QQQ # of Units: # of Meters: (Pass) (�ail) � Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.): � � � 2 S48 �+ 3� 5 ch ctt�{ � t��a >c ��; Turf Irrigated Area (sq.�t.): Q -� � � a Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): �rf %� -p 3 S G G121�F-�{ '� ❑ �" � Special L�ndscape Hrea (SLA) (sq�ir j: � l� L1 � � �Nat2r fezture Suriace Area (sq it.): Q ; '� Turf ��_� Less than 25% of the landxape arez i� Yes '. �-•. .❑•: -� turf � f�c, 52e \/�ater Budget � � All t�arf areas are > 8*eet +a�ide C4 Ye<_ � � �: Ail turf is planted on siopes < 25% � Yes � D �_ 3RIon-Tu�f � At least 80% ofi non-turi area is nati��e �Yes �� ❑ or lov,r w2ier use plznts � I�lo, See `A�ater B�.�dget � Hydro�ones �y Plznts are group�d by Hydrozones � Yes � F� ��N�. ��t least �-:nches o` mulch cn e;:pesed Yes � � � , C��uEch � 501� Sl1!'i3C�5 � � Err€,stp�r� St�si_�nz Fi�fir.iertcy 7G% ETv {1 rC% E � c ior 5[�+,s? � � Yes � '� �_� f��o averspray or runofi � Yes ��V � � CI � irrs�ot€an Systein 1�esdgn��____ �� tem �f�iciency> %0% � Yes ..�.�4N� � � � � P.utematic, s21i ac�.as.i-�g irriseiion � I��, r�cc rc:;�.ir?d =�' Tier 1 '�' 1 k � cei �trollers � Yes � � _^ � �I�iOIS;u: c SBiIJv�; ; GiI I:^cI1�Ul' SI;ULJTiS � i'C-.� f � � � L� I�o sprayneads ir� <� ft vvide arez � Y�s �..� �. �� Erri�at.ian TPnieLL.....-...��. Sys�em only c�e�a�es hrr�,�ee� g Pf;� 1�. v�s ��'" � � � s � � � � cnc �� r-NI f�EeterPn� .�._,,_..m,___.._.F.__ �cr�i..r��;r;g=re.,�-��+��a_.�...w, ��f•�c,nc* c.,��w��___-� <`.pp0 ,=* c�' I,�� k � �1`cS � 4�: � �S�n�•imrnEr�� f��n!_,� �� s@�� Cove- h��ghl�v ��oi�;�r,erceu � ves �- ��.�,......_.a._.,.e.� �g L �', _ - ..�._. .._...w.____,_.. �' NC, n�r _�.. '=� .�.n_�.�� , �1l��tErFeatures ►�� Re��rc.ula�i^g �Yes ��---! —k � Less thar 10% cf lardscape 2' � Yes � � '� � �[inrFt�rtant�tlnll C�',e[E:�Si cc ��5 �I � � I��' �- . � �Lan�scape s �d r�'reti�•i Gesign Flan �� Pr2^ar�4 �v �rplican; f � f I � R f k . I �' �� PrEp3I"?c bv� p'��1 G.IC�na� � � � G — r` � \%t'c'ier 5.:��e` �OOLiO,=;j � �PRp�r_C t�� anpll � �; � �� ` J* �'� P _par<o h` p-o�e .,ral � � v.�..___.. _.�....._..�E� .�.Y..�__ .� �4t��ff � Gn�r i�� II � n� � ri d �[� C�r�� I �� li � � � �t � � _ __. . _. . �. ... _ _�_. � � .� _ � Cor�pl e� r^rc�e s��nzi R Project Comments Date: To: May 17, 2010 6( City Engineer (650J 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/02/2010 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �N(�IllTEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS ��^� �'"�'�' `�� `'`"�l Pro j ect Name: ��,nl��-��t�+��'�%t� Project Address: [�� C��-�2- r� The following requirements apply to the project 1 _�____ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) �'�t'�' iS �'��l''��'� � 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) ;. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. �1 � -� �-+;rx+�,.1' 5 � A anitary sewer laterallAt is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measares. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel rriap w�th the Public Works Engineering 7�._.....,.... T7..,, 1«...,.. ' 71 h..�,. �ii A i��ir�rT nrnr�artc� �ynP� aacPmPniC Ll V 1J1VL1. 1 llc �J0.i i.�it liln�l Siiaii Siiv vr u �.�i.� ila t-�+�y�+� �� - 5 . �� um�n�� n`� n�;" Yr�YPrt�, a,nr� lnt IinPc prppnePr� hv t1iP m�n, Page 1 of 3 U:\private deve]opment�PLANi�TING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PiTBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division ��ith the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, desib and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular tra�c, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Garne Permit and Army Corps of Engineers rermits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 `� The project shall comply with the Cit� �s I�rPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existinD driveways, :e- submit plans with drive��ay dimensions. Also clarify if the project is +„ �7 +t,e u�;< «.uJ, On� .z��.-�Pn�n� nftha r�riyPc��av ic ciil��t �Jiv�JvSiii� w �,'iit�i. �u�. a..,v, . 4r� i�t1'cl FY1T1lPPt'�C '71lYlT(1VA� w � :f i. - ...... ., ...r.t.�.. ...._. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plaris sho��inj the drivew�ay profile «�th elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private developmenf�,PL.ANNING REVIEW COMIvIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS D�PARTMENT ENGINEERIN� DIVI�I�JN 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storni water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLAI�'NING REViEW COM�ENTS.doc Project Comments Date Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dweiling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated on the review dated May 17, 2010 apply to this project. Reviewed bv: �� ; ,' � Date: / �/ .��"-'�"-' Project Comments Date: �� May 17, 2010 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for dwelling and detached garage at APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) �� a new, two-story single family 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after January 1, 2009 must complete a"GreenPoint Rated ChecklisY'. The GreenPo'int Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL: http'//www burlinqame.orq/index.aspx?paqe=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at 650-558-7273. Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Provide fully dimensioned plans. Indicate on the plans that all work shall �e canducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See Cit�� of Buriinqame Ordinance Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. When you submit yo�r plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. Specify on the plans that this project wi!! comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is x �__..__. , ��., � i., ...;+h +ti nnQ r i�f„r � CPGPIVeQ Of� Of dltef Jclf IUcif y I, GV � G' � i �U;� Cvi i i.rii y vviu i u i@ Zvv� v?e v� Il a r � r u: C` f" .-..,I .-..-.�1 �. f_'.-. t.-� G ICI Uy CI I II,ICI ll.Y �7�ai ivai u�. vv w http�i/www enerqv.ca Gov/title24;2008stardards/ for publications and details. Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 9) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 10)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 11)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. Note: The areas labeled "Media" and "Study" are rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 12)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 13)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 14)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: � � Date: �� ` ��=�� // i4u�a-��.� -- :��-��,.�.��:��,-_ _ �.��-._.�.a.- � � � _ y - • � --_ _ ._ _ ...-_ _ Date To: From: Revised Plans Submitted July 6, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-72�0 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 0 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 o City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: N/A 1. Landscape and irrigatian pian is sufficient and meets requirements. 2. Tree Management Experts report on the heaith of Cedar in front yard indica�es tree is in gradual decline. This tree is on private property and it wil! be up to applicant if tree will be removed naw or at a later date. li tree is to remain dur�ng construction, the attached tree protection plan ay ire� ,Management Experts wili nee� to be fo9lowed. 3. If Cedar is to be removed �efore construction, a�plicant must apply for a Proiecte�' Tree permit from the P�rks Division (558-7330). Re��evv�d by: B Disco Da�e: 7113/10 Project Comments May 17, 2010 Date To: 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 1. If Cedar tree is to remain, provide (1) arborist report on health, structure and (2) tree protection plan during construction. 2. Tree list only list 1 appropriate landscape tree. Pians need to show at least 2 landscape trees. 3. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Widih of Planter Strip needs to be implemented. 4. Trees that are to remain need to be identified and noted on Landscape plan. Reviewed by: B Disco � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Date: 5/21 /10 Project Commenis Date To: From: May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 i� Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 o NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for dwelling and detached garage at APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 a new, two-story single family 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop cirawings shall be appreved by the Fire Deparfinent prior to instal�ation. �-- _--�,-, ,.�-��, � . �.. _ ..� , �_..M�,�..r _ _�� .. _.�__,� Project Comments Date: To: From May 17, 2010 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design dwelling and detached APN: 026-031-030 Staff Review: May 24, 2010 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 X NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Review for a new, two-story single family garage at 1501 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Pract��es (RMPs) during construction. Please inc9ude a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from `�flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as appropr;ate) for readability. For addi�ional assistance, please cortact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. Reviewed by: � �,-�/� j;��, � , Date: �� l � � l � a�M� %/��//� s rou„r�� rR��no � r�� °��pT -on Yollutlon Yrevention — It's Part of the Plan �`=�� a�� It is your responsibility to do the job right! �,,'..'�� _._.�� RuvolFfi�oms[reetsaudotherpavedazeasisamajotsotuceoLpollu[iouu�localcreeks,SauFranciswBayandthePacificOcean. -�; :!��— - Construction activities can directly affec[ the liealtl� of our w¢ters unless co�tractors and crews plan ahead [o keep dirt, debris, and other '- co�structiun waste away from stomi clrau�s aud creeks. Following ti�ese guidelines will ensiue your compliance witl� local stormwater ('jEIl�Igl , orclinaucerequiremen[s l�emember mi d l,OIISfAllCt1017l 8c ;;ite Supervis;ioii moe. �,�., �..,.�.�� o.. � � ,.�n,..e,e.,.�,..rv..� . _,��.�.�i„� �n.'oe •.P�nedrJ.a.no i �.arc�d �neros. em.� �:� e��„��., o, o=,.. «.� „ e,,.,m b.a. St�orinwater Pollution Prevention Program - , gmng mo�ttocuig an ma�ntenance of mstalled controls is crucial to proper tmplementat�on. Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwork & Paving F resh Concrete Painting & Applicarion Landscaping, Equipment ,4,ctiviti�$ & Mortar Apglicatioa of Salvenis & Adhesives Gazdening, Operation r ��„ � � s„{ �� '�� and Pool Maintenanee '�-�" ,- � � � �f�� I1 �� . ,�`- "_,�`,_�r��. ��z ,�,k��w o ,e, � - ._., ` �i C00� p �te.iaa.ea.No-i..tU[mw m�.� illuvw P� [�aun.+ne.v�.�...�oam » .ww,x..�. iiv.oi.we�aa.i > ^. .�'r.u+.� � a v r �i'°°��'"� ....r,n.en. mo(��n n r� wFiam��.��m�v�s. o.�n �. �u.rA�.��i.�..e�we..�es eez �I�M ta.in�..ue ,��+cn .evr.��immi.novusoi��mulu.ryo�mo�l "�w'�•�ay•^w•e•,�^F• +y r ��l" r' .Altl�.oa�wW mmu.�a�v�e. ^avaim��ine a1e�s uA�eela�blulr��mi:wekanwyomm�e. vbmrvorn.amm r urb¢. wa�haor F�oL�n mLc.u�mi�a�miben.r �-m�vm vFlR. rme.ttr.a..ar��e�e.ee�nu�m. .u� e�3n.n«.a,<rt..b�o we,��ea �'°�'.nn4.ee�orf. .�.etnn<[.ie�nsw.ee•s..m en.ena JS.� 4..w..uni.Vrv.e! �uw.r. m�mme.�.. e 6�ir �••"e.eL.l..od na�cv.a�el�nYmnkewed�+m�ar �� i�Ju.� a �••nue.�..na.nnemr. nE.m�.5lrnwi� n'°"a F ue �neey nmo tl�Jut b'wee�pm�or �ee.m�. P w v ievo. ni owu we�Nui..uauwcuue. v�o�mamawwu.wnnlav�eJ�wmen� elmwFm �ylri�e u,p.W.. euua�.11n�fe.mer�rerioo�sevoll r Lm mevai�. u nu.o�bam.wJi..nnni�a.wna W'^ Y rtf.ax.eun�¢mene�u� Y w �.mrvW � ��'�'��ofe.�eir � ipeuvfuu��v��lan��lm��cv�e JVGmeel�mrtol� see wuAvamn�..a�e. Vvn. ••��•'r1..II�aWe..o�<.nel. a �,,,, i,� �eweu.-.mlem.�.�.rna..��i M1 ��o�nue��iLn �ruJ�N�.eoi w aw.. ns�m+llmnmmomnrh rv>I,ne o�Mw mm.Inm1..M�.m�1�. °�Pml.«uuncrai��.N i o,...,..�,�a.e,�,.,,.. �s.me�m......��w .. e �m,�.. a... ��e.��',r �rt.i� .�eP.�ma�.. ae„ °'°o�ww..�nd.�a.eo�„o-,�o. n.�,. P �� o,�oe�.,.rw, M,��.,.,e.�.�a„�,,.�.. �r�e, m.i m�m�. m�,,.,,vu,.,a<�w�,�� J�'° w-��u. �.,��,.,�,my.e�. Y o, e�ni �,. µ�mr o.. h. mrv�� ,.me�.. r��wrtt� �.., F�n.ram m,t�w �Am�wn �m..r,�re,e.�,.,��«. �•�m�.�m �wem�a nbm��. cq.e s v..roa.ao.ew o ee e.•..n�mwu� �•+�n'�t �Lo� vc .b..m�av� .�.a uuamn. �.v+Nn eam.w�vy��. wi..�l. wx+f..>.. M��`�` . bwlaixer. ni01uN� Ec�w+ med�ne...... �u�u.e.a.. I eewWw v ln�IJo. . �e.I.naWIJ� nui.. uV..�.o., te /e�ae��i�wioiinii�F�,�.r.i F vm mvm. �0 Pv i••�e.eyna�uwNN�dm�aon..l. m['mM � a mrmamrnib:lm�i��lra p�0uriryw'fiMouiJ.a mlmo rv� � - [�sr�dle. N mm�e..i..wemarl.ma MedvCeuv °•"^ly'v mE��. /Wm�tb....�.41e....x.eia�.oQi U�.u��m.e.i w ui.�ore��.�.eu.o� m. ! wenewa�nre.nn.oW�uv�d�ar�w. .eaeow. 'ne'.� �k4wa0 n��u ++n.wi.io..weeiai.Janrymm.kuelutl.n��on oeVFow �e/Sp. ...Ma� �a�v+ao� r •ee..eeue�m 0..¢��Wxs��eQwl�yCaowiPama. •��mrt�e••J� JR* n. � v . �.M.r�wee .. �..Y. ___ _. =r.. _i��iae�m., d..v R wa�m�ww�. me... e � JN��eabxPo emrnido.�no�mmeio�anunwiw ��'O�<<Euulefnntm�auaei..��iwEW, •eh^� .w..aa..<..e.e�,o,w� •'^y•^••.w*rea��,�.ed�.m..uoem. ,ma�mrnu�vw.m�� ofn.menmrc� �.a� .^L ,,,.Y.nfi^�r�•"'yMu.no�.aevxv �Muae+� , ry�m.�xaiw.a e.�e�a,. ��I� avmm�om. a�.,.i w��ee.�us.,h Jn...b.n,.n�u�.w..��.„.�...�..,.�ew. �.u.l .nM ., o`n"e.ut�c�W,�4 i<a .i q)es>>ssunsnP�.�. mi<nu�onc � m..�b..,ea...u�.. n6��• uM�`ustetwe mr+�.e�w�� - e.M1....xem.d� � i. '`� �` a�i. �e� I Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25 000 per day►. '°� � �.,,,,,.,,a �^•�, mM� �,,,�o. ,� � ��,m ,, � wR�� o �," ao� n°� _ CITY OF BURLINGANIE '� COMf�UNiTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGlaME 501 PP.IMROSE ROAD - _ -_ �d�� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 = PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650F6963790 _ _ www.burlingame.org — _ __ _ Site: 1501 CORiEZ �VENUE �` —� The City of Burlingame Plonning Commission annaunces the following pu6lic heoring on MO�DAY, JULY 26, 2010 �t 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose Road, Buriingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelli�g and detached garage at 1501 CQRTEZ A!/EPJUE zoned R-l. RP1d 02b-031-030 ►Nailed: July 16, 2Q10 (Please rafer io other side) i c� - ,.._..__.._-., �=_.� __ - _ ��..�;� ��;�� _ -_ ��.,_--� ( � � � i i� �6�'� �� '��a�� A copy of the application ana plans for this project may be revievved prio� to the meeiing at the Communiiy �evelopment Depaiment at 501 Primrose P.oad; Burlingame, Caliiornia. ff you challenqe ihe subleci applicaiior(s) in court, vou m�y be fimited te raising only �hose issues you or someone else raised �t the public hearinq, described in the no:ice or in writt�n correspondence delivered io ihe ciiy at o� prior io the public hearing. Property owncrs v��5o receive this notice �re responsi�le for iriorming their �enGnts about this notice. ��; ��u;�;�^�i �rinrm�t;�n fIIPaCP r:�� 65p1 558-725D. i h�nk you. _ , r.�v , , \/�lillja~i r�/I�gkar Community Devefopment Director � � @Y�� r ��— ��-�� - � ��, "_ (?�szs� reier te other sidaJ �..— � {��1�� '.�Y � �``'� �,� '� "„ ,. Lp ;� F T � � _ v+a t, s- ti a ,� '�+ ` ... . _ : r . � ' � t ._i . : - b { �4,,: ,. , f� � �� 't �" t _ ,� ' 'ii a � � , : � , , �a a i. ' I 's � � �y '' `i . Y .. ` .. ��T�� 3 � �� `�,� I �.5- �' :. ��}V� 'Y�.a' • t y3' ,y 7 . .t� � �`}��,. � '" i ; �"' . �fi � � . -` s� � _ >'�n --' �� . ,?E ' . . '� .. . � � y , � � c ' �r'r .�.,�-� .. � p 3 �< v 4� . l.r .. � � �� ., ; g� a, , � 7 ,��.� 4 Y � 4 �� i d C �� ' � / aY �. 3 .�` < '� . . . l � ��4 � �� -.� � �r ; /t ii_.� � � . „3 .. rv�� l�� .. �� '� .� , �.� � � ., . � {�, i. �3 � � t� .�� 1-. ._ ��`ri �' �R. y4 � +a � ,�'F , ��:.` . � ' i , t _ �y„ � �� .Y t �. � _ � y,r':,�,�Y �` �a... v . �` st'' .�; ✓ :'-y .�. ` F . . � F-r j� x �F � : �}' �� vE � `�k � �q }!. '� : ' � . �-": .r t - c�" c, . - � � � ' . � � �'. -1 � ' . y t' (� i 4 £ d�. ��a., �� k. .. .. � S" > J:} " 5 � Ytr. 1.�;. � �'"E� �'�''�"- � �.. �T `i�Q:�L J�< �.°G�`� ?��i . S .� ;�� ' �� t=�`�� ' � i "' `� � � � ';�� y� � c�R-�t "�`,3.`` Z3 +� f s :�,,�i' � � _ �'�,` , ir� � � z � � 't � ' � '`3 ��y : , � . y 9 .r � ? J � � �.s! -: y � � � 7'�' �, " d ! .. � �'Y'-.3 t � f , � e i �,, � ' F'�2 � r -e tzy -{y ;$� �� ., y �'t p' , �� i �i 3 ��_�.. -" W '�' 6' .. g � ,7 � �i... .. . �� .�� z'�� rfa a�1�� .�r��`�i� `i� 4 ��s� ! � ��,�.��y��x�i� �� ' � s .i .0 �,��- `"ni��T _,�.'a � ��~' +tf j�- 4 �`� .�:''i q'J 3� �` • 4,�o- '� � �4" � '4 ii+. , F _�: } . �, � s , �� + j :. ;.; �/ '• '�� '� �6 i �k�� "C13 _ �3 . � `�',��g�y�� .� z . ! ,� :� '"a_ � � , '_�. � � �' � }- �� r4 ��,e -t Y a �� '� �.��i ��*��}=rvr� � ! '�`.`a�% t � `'-+ . � � �� ,� - ��. �� Rf � .� t Y� s 7' '' - �� ` x .. € t ;A �t � > . _ � . �� .. � ��_ �:� .�, , �`� t� � � ��',� � �.:. � .,� � v `�` ^��,�, � �s tr k� _ �� _ 3 ` `� _- x : � �,�y , ;'Y '�.e��i"',^�rt `:, a � � � T ;� �- � �! . f2 s '� q - 4 r ' 4 - 1 � �'3 � �g,� � �� . � ��i�� . '� .,. z�y i s: �r T� � �'{— r �` - sm �'x`'� `p t . �, ° � q y� �: 1� �� ` F�,i� s t �. �„�a �,>,� h,�'�, k� � s '�'�' a,�q Ftt', �..��a 4g - :� ��W � __� ', ,�"�� a . .S ��. �. � `''� .� r �i =-a'" �„+4+,- .`''� � G° a ��is �� , z'�'. �`'��, ,*e' n. �� l c -n,v�m�� V�� F�:�- �, c '� :. ._ � �� .� [� . , y �, m i,F 4t $ -?�. �,� 'e�n � ..,i �g . � ., 4 ' sr� �� a s�, , '°y f/' _ � �sf� � � = x'r .,. _ § SS-=_ $ � h "'t � �y 9 . . f-f.ti-�'� ..r _ � . . -•/ � \ " / � '��:� zl � * S � � - #' � t "`' � s�;} l � '-` ' E i j y�� i,� �.� : .�� '�' ,C a �y �,�� y�� . '. : x � 'rt�� 5��7 t� � � �.~i - .` k - 'Y �. � , �',� . � o 7, ,� ; s� Z '�• j '3^" ` c { ✓ �_¢ :: ��;�� . . . $j'� �� ,r� � ��' . � w's�i, � �z""r"`� f 'i ti, . �i"i . �� Y a;! � a' � iy �'�2 �'`�'�,.,n�':..n � e � .x` � �*'. � �� - '�-" , ,: � 1� �� 'S�Mi - r,.�� `' � � � 1 'zg ��.P 5` 'f"2 �f �� ^��'�-0"� � Y :� �� - 4 �� t �T .it �� a� . �1` � , a&,�(�� '�..,�� :�` � 3ii� `X ,E+'�', � Y ��'...'._ �E� • �- . ��' �" ^ , a ' � i ' ';�i 'C,_ � � ` z"��.�3� �8�s .; ' * -�r`: � �� _ � � ' t �' c` 1�. , � ,s.,� {�, �r- -''.�'�, ,r?�' . s.l - .,y _ ' _Z � y�%. - �' Y� a J . '� �.'� � . x e"��,. � ' � ' ` e3'� l�. ' �'� � � �� 1. �.,.: � ' (.s� � _ t �-�s' - �� . e ��1{i -. r • s _ � � �,y4 `�' � �'�r r • /�'�, A, ,..{- s-T, , � . Vzt =s� p� �,.'. �. � �a- � 's "t� "p 4 �?'�'� �` i � �� e � ` `� . � �ic�*4`� � r g 6 ;�'��' �,�t �r g� 'i ,�� 3 ! � �=e� �� ^ , x' -`� f � . 1��i',e��.� � ��.-+��.� i � -�' � J' '* ' s � � ' - .F� s �r s'�`, �''',��,,r..�� fi`� `-� i L. � �„��; .�_` c .!.' � ': y p��A' ='I t � "� '� ' � ' f � q � 1�` fy .,� e�.� �'9 �' ' � ` � ��-��- �� '�}'�4" i�; � .s� ��`�� ,d�,.- �,+��.f �, , >I � -' ��,�.. l�;.: �:� f� .� '�� `�:,�ti �.,4*-�.` . � .. ,T� � ,�'` .-,3 . �� F�, r x � , r :' - �� '�''� s �; 1' +a�.� `� � � � �.+,. ..'�r^�S � , '"�e `} � � f � } : � �� i� �� / ��.�� .ti # ,� �� , � � `� �`E� -`^ar }`�,, .,.� , � .r��s ;' R� �' � '� L � },{ ' txy`4r .\ f��;- �i� '�� r� � `�;a, 'F�'ki�,. �� a.F : q_.. �s �+�- . �.3 r��,,`a +,.f � �i. .��+ ti � r - _ 4r - �� , Y ;L�y " -a�f� .. _ "� . I _��'� '.�r�` `'`�� '�, t 7 . �P �gL'�,';'� � s- '� ' � �. _ ��y-' . � �,, � �"' " . � � � .` _c g " t, ,�� «�� .� ��3 a '' �`�". � '-( � `..� � �� 6 r `�� -�.� � : f e.� �. � , 1 .��''�s �-� '' � z•; �y . . - �' .� _,'� E� V � � . ,�j� . . . z. c- �i �_ -'!.v�.� .;'�` � �l �� r �� $, � � .r �% ��`, � f . � �(' . �R°tr..T� �.� t� � 4" �' .;'-"�� r .J�r� �_�„ I ��.�` �r . . �...� -a �;� .- � .� � ��_vv. �. ,�v� . ��r { . ��'`5-� � �+ i � .r `.,. . � ?. .•�3"�" j .rr c ..r ` ,y "� *-^` 1 '°r � �w � � �^.� � "s'..`�a��i '�L-}�; } !�, ¢. � � ' .. � �� .,'�'ya� �,��, _� �' � .�,�� n w s`' � � a'%�'��c �"�"^.-`�'� �A3 g"�",. �f`�. �'r�` �. ^' .{ � � � .. "'� e,� r. � ^�' �. P' .1'&� ��' ��,�.� ,� �� - �. '_ _3� s a'A�_ `� '�. �r.�. �r` t"i�. {� §„y<,.. g $ � aW � "� •c,,, � '�t,�. �� ,`��r��R��'�'. } 't . � �� .,f \ _ • '�.��"t;ra, •--�``"' 6�'`� � . 3' '-�°� � k l°s� � . X � +� 3_'?�.��_,. �I� '''=S '¢� '��°Y � 'r`��'�� ' a�Y"�. `j- =� r� ' 1 � #4 �.� zG° : i .: � �,l _ ...,:s '.� '� � _ �.. .� �..�- �;. q � � � e viF �z � :.� � � S :. -/ ,. __-__ --.asa.� _ - a t r. i ` x �'S f ��F �- � � ' p � �s. ��,�-�� .�. �1 . � l�-�`.� ._ .. �,�r��. � � �'.�� R,�'' � �'� �. - �,.., ,��" _ ' �'�'. T�. . ,�� $�^�sr -�t ��-�"�..'3 :: -v. i�a � � �` , ,-a -� � . �' Ka : �'.� �. �'r � ,.�t°a'�`,�� z a -� � .�E� �oe:k� P��_ .:�,. �dX,y.,�%-- C ° �"�I . `� = � � l�� f �� F� ��'' - ` _; ,�" � �� -.� - �:kJ' d�'+� i. �a a �� / (d �� f �A� d kt_ .:'R,. - i� : i _ c'c'i'*�Bi�,.�� . � .�� +' �ca� `;� < is. �� ,�,'. 1� i;� � �. � ��•��,er' .. a��};� '�'- ��'�('� � ; . ,+ t i, �r_,, �€� �a s,�.- yy ` s � � ._ _ �:: � � � � �� f � _ � �.�f:' ��`� ^��° � '�'� �r'..� ±� �� . � t' ,�ea � �.'' - - *� �',� ��,�y K.. � i � _ � � � -� � Y '� t F �� i � � � __. . ��---" _ . �i "�."'i K_�� 4 � � . � ( �„��-r �. _� ..., �.._ _ y„' � �..� 4 F .. ° �. � '„u , . • � � . �� ' °i 50 � COI`tez e4veil u� � �. �' i �s.�., �t�` '� 3 � �' c � �- r' � ^ � � �� . ��,.'H?�� r .e�i.. _:�r ,� ._ � .� + � � ` :_+F._,�'�. � `: �r.r. +� �.