Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1504 Alturas Lot 1-:ti;y:..�.. . r .' ' '` .1, � � - 1 i .' v �i, iz. f �Y�v� 3` �4 e - ��E �. Y� 1 s. S� - ..,Fy; .�* 4, -.�.�" ' S T 3 . �; �i .�. _ _ f = _ _ .' w c�r ��r � �i � , �� ; ',,�.� �iF'4E�r, �4 0�,� �, t9 � ��Orw The City of Burlingame PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 28, 2006 George Sun Sun Architecture 6014`�' Street #202 San Francisco, CA 94107 Dear Mr. Sun, CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 TEL: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 At the September 25, 2006 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed your request for a minor revision to an approved design review project at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1. The minor revision included changing the roofing material from composition shingle roofing to Class A wood shingles, as shown on the revised plans date stamped September 12, 2006. The Planning Commission acknowledged receiving the request and noted that the revision was consistent with the design previously approved. The approved revisions shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Sincerely yours, � � "" �' Ruben Hurin Planner c. Derek and Amy Chung, property owners 140 Laurel Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030 . �� CITY p � � BURLJNGAME %%�a A 900 �HATED JYNE b- MEMO DATE: September 18, 2006 TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Planner RE: FYI —1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 Planner's Report Meeting Date: 9/25/06 Summary: On May 10, 2004, the Planning Commission approved an application for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling and attached garage at 1504 Alturas Avenue, zoned R-1(May 10, 2004 P.C. Minutes). A building permit was issued for the project on September 8, 2004, and construction is underway. On March 13, 2006, the Planning Commission approved an application for an amendment to the originally approved project (March 13, 2006 P.C. Minutes). The changes included converting crawl space to floor area and changes to the roof configuration and exterior elevations. Requested change: Originally, the house was approved with composition shingle roofing. The applicant is now requesting approval of Class A wood shingles for the roofing material. In a letter date September 11, 2006, the architect notes that he feels that wood shingle roofing will enhance the original design of the house. The overall design of the house remains the same. Planning staff would note that because of the type of revisions, it was determined that the change to roofing material, from composition shingle to wood shingle, could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item should be placed on an action calendar for a review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Ruben Hurin Planner ATTACHMENTS: September 11, 20061etter from architect May 10, 2004 and March 13, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes Proposed Building Elevations (Sheets A3.0 and A4.0, date stamped September 12, 2006) Photograph of Proposed C1ass A Wood Shingles City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2006 C. Osterling noted th there are several options to protect these tress, In this case have an opportunity to be creative, see the s tions and detail, the City Arborist can review, so moved to recommend the parcel map to the City Coun ' for action. The motion was�econded by C. Terrones. , Comme on the motion: limited ac 'on if the lot split is already approve , how then require access to acco odate new site? CA sug t that Commission could approve th ot line adjustment but hold off on rec ding the action until the anning Commission has reviewed e arborist's report to be sure that a d veway can be installed w� out damaging the Oak trees. The ker and second of the motion agreed to amend the motion with e provision that the Commission r ommend to Council action on the lot line adjustment but that th ap shall not be recorded until the anning Commission has reviewed a approved a more detailed arb 'st report which defines how the d' eway can be installed without da ing the roots of the large Oak ees in the vicinity of the propose new driveway on the larger lot. Chair Aur called for a voice vote on the ion to recommend the lot line ustment map to the City Council r approval with the condition tha he map shall not be recorded un ' the applicant has prepare detail arborist's report addressing the 'nstallation of the driveway in t vicinity of the large O trees pro ding for the long term protectio of these trees, and the report ha een reviewed by the Cit Arborist a dreviewed by the Planning Co ission. The motion passed on 6-0-1 (C. Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This ' em concluded at 8:35 p.m. 6. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, ZONED R 1— APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (DEREK & AMY CHUNG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND GEORGE SUN, SUN ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT) (54 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report March 13, 2006, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twenty five conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. George Sun, architect, represented the project and was available to answer questions. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Deal stated that he had no objections to the changes proposed and moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 13, 2006, sheets A2.0, A2.1, A3.0 and A4.0 and date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0, A1.1, A5.0, topographic map, C-2 and L1.0; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 17, 2006, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 21, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, the Recycling SpecialisYs February 22, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met; 4) that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5) that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2006 until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit,shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6) that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7) that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8) that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9) that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10) that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11) that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12) Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the proj ect and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 �Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13) that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15) that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been E City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes 7. March 13, 2006 built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24) that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25) that all windows shall be true divided light windows. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:40 p.m. 1255 BERN AVENUE, ZONED R-1— QUEST FOR DETERM ATION IF A RESUBMITTAL OF A PRO CT WHICH WAS DE WITHOUT PREJUDIC PRESENTS A SUBSTANTIAL CHAN FROM THE PROJECT ENIED FOR A NEW GLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH DET CHED GARAGE (C OPHER & A1�iITA KE ON, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY O RS; AND JAMES C , CHU DESIGN AND EN ERING, INC., DESIGNER) (53 NOTICED) ROJECT PLANNER: EN HURIN Chair Auran noted project. He pas � chambers. �fat he would recuse hims from this item because he lives within 500 feet of the the gavel to Vice Cha Brownrigg and stepped down from the dias a�eft the Referenc staff report March 13, 20 , with attachments. CP Monroe presented the ort, reviewed criteria and st f comments. She note hat the action requested is a determination ' the resubmitted project rep sents a"substantial chan " from the project denied without prejudice; � it does represent a substantial ange then the item shou be set for action at another meeting. If t� esubmittal does not represent a substantial change, the a licant should be directed regarding the cha es required. Commission asked the CA for clarification o his request. CA noted that this request wa nusual in the sense that the denial was without prejudice, ere the more common determination acti follows a denial; but the issue is the same, this project as r ubmitted did not comply with the direc 'ons given by the Planning Commission e changes did n represent a'significant change'. Vice Cha' Brownrigg opened the public hearing. mes Chu, 39 West 43rd Avenue, San ateo, designer and Ch' s Kennon, applicant and property owne , represented the proj ect. Noted the thi s they had done to resp d to the Commission comments, redu d the plate height at the front from 8' to 6', redesigned the ro so that it looks better than before, add arch elements and two new trees at t front and 5 street trees; noted that the neighbors support these c nges even though they did not come t'ght. Commissioner as applicant to respond to the itemized ff comments on page 4, added vari ion at the rear, pushed o the master bath tub and added a gable, anged the trellis to a patio and reduc d the mass by added roo lement which affected the side as well• ade no change to the footprint, d' not understand the de al without prejudice to mean a complete design of the house; FAR is still un r the maximum, the in ease proposed in the revision is minor, s re footage not the issue, it is mass nd bulk; disagree tha ' is good to put a design feature out towar e front of the lot, if the majority of the commission had directed the redesign of 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 Department staff wi 'nspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify th he project has been bui ccording to the approve lanning and Building plans; 6) that all air duct plumbing vents, and fl shall be combined, w e possible, to a single termination and installe on the portions of the r f not visible from the eet; and that these venting deta' shall be incl ed and approved in th construction plans befo a Building permit is issued; that prior to eduling the roof deck i pection, a licensed surve r shall shoot the height of the ro ridge and provide certification of that he' t to the Building Dep ent; 8) that the conditions of t ity Arborist's January 29, 2004 memo, a the City Engineer's, Fi Marshal's, and Recycling Spe ' lisYs December 22, 2003, memos shall b et; 9) that the project s complywith the Constructio d Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance ich requires affected d olition, new construction and teration projects to submit a Waste Reducti Plan and meet recycli requirements; any partial or 1 demolition of a structure, inte 'or or exte ' r, shall require a demo ' ion permit; 10) that the appl' nt shall comply with Ordinanc 503, the C' of Burlingame Storm ater Management and Disch e Control Ordinance; and 11 at the project s all meet all the requi ents of the California Buildi Code and California Fire C e, 2001 edition, as amended by the Cit of Burlingame. The motion s seconded by C. Bojues . Chair Osterl' g called for a voice vote on Keighran stained and C. Keele absent� p.m. . eighran returned to the dias. motion to approve. The eal procedures were adv�f ion passed on a -1-1 (C. This item concluded at 7:55 5. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1 AND LOT 2 ZONED R-1- (DEREK CHUNG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MICHAEL JiJNG, ABR ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT) (56 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER � a. APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGING LOTS b. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1- application for design review, hillside area construction permit, and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-story single family dwelling c. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 2- application for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-story single family dwelling Reference staff report May 10, 2004, with attachments. Plr. Barber presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twenty-three conditions were suggested for consideration for lot 1 and twenty-six conditions were suggested for consideration for lot 2. Noted that conditions of approval for both lots refer to April 14, 2004, plans but should read Apri128, 2004, plans. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Derek Chung, property owner, 1504 Alturas Drive and Michael Jung, architect, 4075 Papazuan Way, Fremont, were available to answer questions. Mr. Chung noted that he tried to address the Planning Commission's concerns, which were mostly on lot #2 regarding the 15% driveway verses the 12% driveway. They decided to keep the 12% driveway. With the original plans they had a 15% driveway proposed , then during the design review process with Jerry Winges he suggested reducing the slope and thought it would be a better solution. Provided a cross section in the revised plans that shows both a 12% and 15% to show the difference between the two. Decided that the 12% slope was a better alternative for the following reasons: 1) safety for a better approach; 2) appears cleaner from the street without a big drop down; 3) practicality, don't want cars to scrape when entering and exiting the driveway. Lot #2 has three retaining walls, the north wall steps down, is a terraced wall, 3'6" at the lowest point and 10' at the highest point. Planning on planting vine plants to cover the wall, blue star creeper and rosemary, he submitted a picture. The wall will also have a stone veneer to soften the appearance. The neighbors at 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 1500 Alturas originally had a concerns with the ash trees proposed, however have changed the ash to flowering cherry and now the neighbor is happy. Commission stated they would like to see all the windows be true divided light windows. Stated that do not like shutters that don't fit the size and shape of the window they are hung next to, would like to this as a condition of approval. Commission noted that due to the driveway slope on lot #2 there are places where the retaining wall will be 12' tall, can anything be done to reduce the height of the walls. Owner shouldn't expect a flat driveway on a hillside property. Retaining wall on north side is a problem, need to reduce height and appearance. Will be better and safer construction and will reduce difficulty with drainage problems if you bring driveway lower. Don't build a 12' retaining wall if you don't have to. Mr. Jung responded that after final construction when the footing is burred and the site is graded it won't appear to be 12 feet, the terrace was created to reduce the vertical appearance of the retaining walls. The 15% slope for a driveway run that is this short makes for an uncomfortable transition to a flat garage slab. Commission noted that up to a 20% driveway slope is allowed with a conditional use permit. The driveway has a 35' length, should sink house down like the house on either side, reduce plate heights to 9 feet and increase driveway slope. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: would like to see condition added that requires handing digging for base and arborist supervision during the construction of the concrete walkway near the Redwood tree, and that this walkway should be changed to pavers; big improvement on this project with design review, visual impact has been addressed, would like to add a condition that true divided light windows be installed, overall support project. C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions as amended during Commission discussion. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Osterling called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve the conditional use permit for re- emerging lots, and the design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for attached garage for both lots 1 and 2. The motion failed on a 2-4-1 (Cmrs. Bojues, Brownrigg, Osterling and Vistica dissenting and C. Keele absent) roll call vote. Discussion on the motion: can not support the proj ect, it is fundamentally flawed; o.k. with the house on the right, but there are a lot of unresolved issues with the house on the left, are going to need to push it back. Commission consulted with CA Anderson and asked if the project can be divided, can Commission just vote to approve lot 1 and continued lot 2. CA Anderson stated that yes the project can be divided, but in order to approved lot 1 Commission must also take action to approve conditional use permit for approval of the re- emerging lots. Commission gave the following direction to the applicant for lot 2: • Need to lower driveway by increasing the slope to 15% and reduce the plates on the first and second floors to 9 feet; and May need to push the house back, that might cause trouble with the two protected trees on the lot, but this is a large house and applicant may be forced to reduce to the size of the house to address this issue. C. Vistica made a motion to continue the action on lot 2 until the applicant has revised the plans and moved to approve the application for the conditional use permit for re-emerging lots and approve the application for lot #1 only for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for a an attached 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 garage byresolution, with the following conditions as amended during Commission discussion: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0 through A5.0, topo, C-2 and L1.0, site plan, floor plans, roof plan, building elevations, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plan; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's, Fire Marshal's, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met and the City Arborist's December 11, 2003 memo shall be met along with the approved arborist's report date stamped January 6, 2004; 4) that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5) that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6) that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7) that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adj acent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8) that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9) that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk;l0) that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11) that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12) Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13) that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14) that the project shall comply with the Construction and 7 City ojBurlingame Planning Commission Minutes 6. Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15) that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the proj ect, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23) that the proj ect shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24) that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25) that all windows shall be true divided light windows. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. May 10, 2004 Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to continue action on lot 2 pending plan revisions and approve the conditional use permit for re-emerging lots and the design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for attached garage for lot 1. The motion passed on a 6-0-1(C. Keele absent) vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. 2725 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS F� HEIGHT AND FOR AN�TACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW, OI�-STORY SINGLE FAMIL�WELLING (DEr]ISE CHU HLJ DESIGN & ENGR., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER) (42 NOTICED) � OWNER; JAMES PLANNER: RUBEN Reference staff report y 10, 2004, with attachments. Plr Bar r presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. ourteen conditions were suggested for nsideration. Commissioner asked if the st poles as installed ad been surveyed. Staff noted yes. The ommissioners all noted that they had a site visit. There w re no other questions of staff. Chair O erling opened the public hearing. Ja s Chu, designer; Denise Balestri ', property owner and Sony on, property owner; Aneglo Arsell 731 Summet; Greg Kosko, 6' view Court; spoke. The applicant noted that two of the three chi ys were removed because they w e not needed change type and the third, wood burning with spark arre or in the family room is only 2 fe taller than the lower ridge of the . R IT URE `; To: Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 From: George Sun Job Name: Chung Job Number: 0507 Date: 9-11-06 Re: 1504 Alturas Material Enclosed: 10 Sets of Proposed Revision DESCRIPTION / REMARKS: We are requesting a roof material change from composition shingles to a Class A wood shingles, as indicated on exterior elevation drawings clouded #4. In our opinion this change will enhance the original design. We are seeking your approval on this change. Thank you. Sincerely, George Sun, Architect For Your: Review/Info Via: Personal Delivery Copies To: Derek, and File If you do not receive all of the pages or they are illegible, please contact this office as soon as possible. , 601 4TH STREET, #102 SAN FRANCIS(0, CA 94101 TEL 41S 546-5652 FAX 415 546-5657 �;...,�..�_ � ,�-,,,�::<:�. � RGV�� V �� SEP 1 2 2006 CITY OF BUn�ItdGAME PLANNING DEPT. n �0 Z � zW zc � :n � re �, Cn m -D � � � � a GS) � � n � � �Y � � . ' �.�.. � �r = J-,r - -.] �..� ro►���•yir� j`% r " � '..�;; � �, ��� �--�. �/ :- � � , -�.,�,� ..� .� �, `,�"'. . ,, � ��+ R'4 y w ._ --• >� . -----. ��, -�- ��< � �,�"r. ;,{:±�..;;;.:"'.--- �.. _ y ' �.. ,e�', �+ "'--"�— .�•- _ �, �• s' ��'� f � - _ _ � • -_-r..,. � a � �.�.: �--�... � r * r 1���,�•� . �-.nwr+�a� r� �/' � } ��.r: � �w • � y-s�� i ic.�i. � � s',� _ .. � �. � I�". `t� � ` 4t� � ..� ./, �- - _i �. 1, - ' _. � �+� l�-s' � : x� � ,,,,� --• - w .. _.�z�:.-;�c- -- =�'--,�.� .-. r * � ' ,,, < � --w _ � �rs'� r...�.�r-.+ - - _ .� �+s J � .�+ ,� . ; -w,.+..-- - - � ,�,..t� .� ' �+��','` •� , �'� �� M+, "s- . �^�(� � ��� � � � . & - � �' , a � � "+ �+' r-w/ 1 • � p� Ma w� ` � �rlr „� . . y I �! � N� �,_ � _„� �.....,. � �..„y �. • �rr --, .�� ` �'°��„' 0 s..� _ � .n'g:y. �-r .-� - _ �� i `i f � s� - �: � :�j4. � � �- � ,�,. ::, � � - _ � S�. .i! .rt'.- _ -�_4 .� _ *����� - j_ _ _ �: ; r �s . t: -�1. _ =,> . F ; s �, `` �-�: ., ` — _ { , ��� CITY O� BURLINGAME a �O�A 90 �NATm JVNE 6• The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790 March 24, 2006 George Sun Sun Architecture 101 Townsend Street #201 San Francisco, CA 94107 Dear Mr. Sun, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the March 13, 2006, Planning Commission approval of your applications for amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage became effective March 23, 2006. This application was to allow modifications to a new two-story single family dwelling on 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1. The March 13, 2006, minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 13, 2006, sheets A2.0, A2.1, A3.0 and A4.0 and date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0, A1.1, A5.0, topographic map, C-2 and L1.0; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 17, 2006, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 21, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, the Recycling Specialist's February 22, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met; 4. that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5. that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the � March 24, 2006 1504 Alturas Drive Page 2 trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the properly owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an azborist selected by the City; 6. that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7. that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8. that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9. that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the.43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10. that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11. that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made ofpig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12. Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International � Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; March 24, 2006 1504 Alturas Drive Page 3 14. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new conshuction and alteration proj ects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17. that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project azchitect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Dischazge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24. that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25. that all windows shall be true divided light windows. March 24, 2006 1504 Alturas Drive Page 4 All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, �� M aret Monroe City Planner c. Derek and Amy Chung, properly owners 140 Laurel Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOT 5 BLOCK 5 BURLINGAME MANOR MAP NO 1 RSM 26/15 16 CITY OF BURLINGAME; APN: 027-061-060) Project Commenfs Date: � From: 02/16/2006 ❑ City Engineer X Chief Building Offiaal d Recycling Specialist a Fire Marshal ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attomey Planning Staff ❑ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review amendment for a new, two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-061- 060 Staff Review: 02/21/2006 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 Califomia Building Codes (CBC), the Bu�lingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. , 3) Comply with the new, 2005 Califomia Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential buildings. Go to http:l/www.enerqy.ca.qovltitle24 for publications and details. 4) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 5) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 6) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than four risers. 7) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. - 8) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof.surface within ten feet. � Reviewed Date: �1� �`� � 0 Project Comments Date: 02/16/2006 To: O City Engineer � Recycling Specialist ❑ Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal O City Arborist ❑ NPDES Coordinator O City Attomey From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review amendment for a new, fwo-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-061- 060 Staff Review: 02/21/2006 � Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide double backflow prevention. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: :%%G �'� Date: �-- - a-1 - csb � Date:. � � To: - � Fmm: � . �Subject: . Staff Review: � � P�ojec# Comments ' C_ 11/1�/03 � E';i ��i O City Engineer. O Chief Bu+�ding Official � 4i Fire Marshal ` 0 Recyding Specialist � � City Arborist� . . . O Gity Atfomey Planning Staff - Request for condifional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area canstruetion peRnit.ar�d side setback variance for a new two-story�. singte �family dwelG�g at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:02T-061-050 11/17/03 � � - '� __, �e _ � 1 _ _ � - - _ - ., _! ... , .� � . � � �. � _ s� ` I Reviewed by: . . Date: � � �ry��_� � � t `�" Date: Project Comments 02/21 /2006 To: ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist O City Attorney From: Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review and special permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition at 1625 Lassen Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-202-100 Staff Review: 02/21/2006 ', Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction P/an for i approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects �, prior fo construcfion or permitting. Reviewed by: ,- Date: a :�.Z,/� � � . � � . � � Project Comments � . � � � � � Date: 11113/03. - � � To: . � �Cify Engineer � � � - � - O Chief Buil�ng �ff'icial . � . . � � � � Fire Marshal � � . �Recyding Speaalist . � . - � - � C] City Arborist - - � . . � t] Cify Attomey � � . � � � From: Plahning Staff � . - Subject: . Request for conditional .use permit for re-emerging lots, � design : review, hiliside area construcfion permit and side setbadc variance . for a new two-story single family� dweiling at 1504� Alturas Drive- � .. � LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 _ � Staff Review: 11/17/03 - - . . � licant shall submit a V1/aste Reduction Plan and Rec ciin �P Y 9 Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects � - prior to any demoli6on, consfruction-or permitting. . , - - �� � - .� I bafe• To: � � - Project. Comments � � � � 11/13103 � . �City Engineer � Ehief Buifding.Official O F'u�e Marshai � O Recyding Special'�st � 0 City Arboris� - . - � City Attomey . ' � Planning Staff . � Request for conditionai use . permit for re-emerging lots, design relriew, hr�lside area oonstruction permit and side .setback variance for a nevir -two-story singfe family dwelling at �1504 Alturas C�r�ve- � LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 11/17/03� - From: Subject: � Staff�Review: . �� . - � �. � - - d - r� : (�� �a �rr�.c�o, - Reviewed�b�: v, _ V . Date: ll�17`�ns �, . . ,-•-• . , .. i � PUBI,IC �WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERIfitG DIVIS�ON � . �. �. �. : - r�nvc R�w�co�nv�rrrs � -i�-�,�Y. . � _ . � ' . � Project Name:.�..�r� �y. .�T�"�. . � . ' � - Project Address:_ �S� �-�.�,tsr� . _ . . - _. �T .l .._ ... The following requirements apply to the project 1� ''� A. PI'oPeriY. bounda� stirvey shall be prefc�rmed by a licensed land . � surveyor. The survey . shall show all prop�cty lines, ProPeriY comers, '�' r�ents,. topog�raphical features .and utilities. (Require+d prior to the .: � buiic�ng permrt issuance ) c�c�.wi4' sa:.a''''�i t�s �wrs.�•�ct�o cs �.'.�C' A�`��. . 2 ��The site and roof dra.in,age shall.be shoyyn on plans and should be made to drain tovvards the Frontage Sh� (R+oquit�ed prior to the building permit � � - � . issu�wce.) or � yt,�.K�,�.. �� �,(,�,<,�r,, � , : � 3. _� � T6e applicant shal} submit project grading and drainage plans for . approval .prior to the issuance of a Buitding pem2i� . � 4 � The project site is in a flood zone, the pmject shall�comply with the City's . - _ " flood zone requirements. Y A sanitary sewer lateral �et is requireci for the pmject in accordance with t}ie City's standards:. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) . The project plans shall show the required $ay&ont BikelPedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. . $ 6: -' 7. •_ �.Sani� sewer- analysis is required for the projec� The sewer analysis � :shall identify the proiect's impact to the City's sewer system and any :. �. - sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. -. �8 �. - .�obmit� traffic trip generation a�alysis for the pmject. �.� 9. �- - Submit� a traffic impact. stud�r for the projec� The h�a�c study should � � . identify the project . generated impads and recommend �mitigation �. measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City � . � �• - . - .�� 14:� ," ...: ..The pioject sball file a parcel map with tbe Public Works Faxgineering. � .- Division The parcei map shall show all existing propett;t�lines, easements, - . � monuments, and new.proPedY and lot lines proposed by the map.. �. - . . � �" � =� � � Page i of3 _ : i�:�p�ivate developmeatlPL�4NNI1�iG REVIEW CO�1TS.doc f .J ,. ' . ._ • ,. ' . - _ , `., ; - � . . . '� �: PIJBI:IC WO�tKS DEPARTMENT ENGII�EERING DIVISI41� � � 11. : . . _- �12 . .� � 13 A� lafest preliminary title .report of t�e subject parcel of, land sh�il be submittsd to�the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. . � � � Map closiuel.lot closure . calculations shall� be submitted with the � parcel map. � � ' . T6e projed shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordanc� with the requirements of th� Subdivision Map Ae� - 14 -� The. pro�ect shall, at its own cost, desiga _and const�uct frontage public . improvements including curb, gidtei, sidewalk and other nec�ssary . ; appurtenant work. _ _ . 15 ' T6e project shall, at�its own cost, design and conshuct�fmntage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights id accord�wce with streetscape maste= plan. 1� By the preluninazy re'view of plans, it appears that tlie project may cause � adverse impacts .during conshuction to vehi�ulaz traffic, _pedestrian� tra�c _ and pub�ic on strcet parlcing. The project shalt identify tliese impacts and .. provide mitigation m�as�ue acceptable to the City. . � 17 � The pmject shall submit hyclmlogic calculations from a registereci civil engineer �for the. pmposed creek � enclosure. The hydraulic calcuiations � mUst shaw that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to lioth upstream and downstream properties. � The hydrologic . � calculations sball accompany a site map showing. the area of the I00 year � flood and existing�impmvements with proposed improvements. � 18 -'� Any work within the drainage area; creel� or.creek banks requires a Sta% ,� ; Department of� Fish� and Game Permit �nd Atmy Corps of E�gineers _ Permits. . - � . � � ::i9 . . 20 m � No construction debris shall be allow� into the creek. - -� The project shall comply with the�City's NPDFS pernvt requirement to prevenf storm water poUution - 21� �� The groject dcjes not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- ' submit plans wi� .drivearay,�dimensions. Also clarify if the project is � :.�� proposing to widea the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is sabject . �to City Engineer's appmval: . ..�� : � � , . ,-�e-submit. plans " .. � showing the.ckive�ray profile with eIevations . � �- - - . . . . � . ' .' Page3�of3 . U:lprivafe.developmeat\PLANNINCs BEVIEW COi��.doc -�-' ' ' � � �- �-- - ' _ , t' _ - y � - _ , . • - � , ' ' . • ' . � �. ' � - .PUBLIC WORI�S DLPARTlV�1�1T�ENGINEEItING DIVISIUN � � . . . . ._ . . ... � 23 � The back of the dri ' Isidewalfc � shatl .�ie at l+�.St� 12" above - - v�Y - �1PPI'�� . � the #low line of the Erontage ca�rb in the. street to prevent overflow� of storm � � � � � - watei� from the street into �private properly. . -. .� 24. For the takeaut service, a garbage reeeptacte� shall be placed �in: fron� The � : ' sidevvalk fronting the store shall .be kept cleaa 20' from each side of the . - :: � . Pt'o�Y• - . � , - ��... . 25. : For commercial pm�eds a desigttated garbage bin spa�oe and cleaning area . �.� . shall be located� inside the building. A drain c;onriecting the garbage area to. �. � ..� the Sanitary Sewer Sysfem is require�. - ' • � ' • � - • - � . - ' -r � - . { ' . . . . . . - - • � � ' � ' � � Page3 of3 � - _ . - . - U:�ii+ate.dcv�lopmeritlPLANNQiG REYIE'W CONIIi�IJTS.doc - � _ City of Burlingame Item # Amendment to Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit Action Calendar for an Attached Garage for a new Two-Story Single Family Dwelling Address: 1504 Alturas Drive Meeting Date: 3/13/06 Request: Amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for modifications to a new two-story single family dwelling. Applicants and Property Owners: Derek and Amy Chung APN: 027-061-050 Architect: George Sun, Sun Architecture Lot Area: 8,922 SF General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. History: On May 10, 2004, the Planning Commission approved an application for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1 (formerly known as 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1) (May 24, 2004 P.C. Minutes). A building permit was issued for the project on September 8, 2004. The project is currently under construction. Revisions Requested: The applicant is now requesting an amendment to the previously approved design review application for a new two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage. The applicant submitted a letter and revised plans, dated February 13, 2006, explaining the changes to the project. A set of the originally approved and proposed plans has been included for comparison. The applicant notes that during construction it was discovered that a portion of the lower level crawl space has a higher ceiling than originally planned. In addition, several changes are proposed to the exterior elevations and roof configuration. The following is a summary of revisions proposed: Convert crawl space to floor area in lower level: Crawl space adjacent to the office in the lower floor with a ceiling height originally proposed at 5'-10" would be converted to a library and bathroom with a ceiling height of 7'-6". The total area converted from crawl space to living area is 309 SF. A new window would be added to this room (see Lower Level Floor Plan and Rear Elevation). Increase in Iloor area: With this application, the applicant is proposing to reduce portions of the interior volumes in the living room and loft area to be less than 12'-0" in height (see building sections, sheet A4.0). As a result, the net increase in floor area on this lot would be 32 SF. This amendment application would increase the total floor area on the site from 3,842 SF (0.43 FAR) to 3,874 SF (0.43) where 3,955 SF (0.44 FAR) is the maximum allowed (81 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). The proposed increase in floor area is not visible since it is within the approved lower level which is partially below grade and is located at the center of the house. Front Elevation: Roof pitch above entry porch and dining room increased from 9:12 to 12:12 (see revised Front Elevation, sheet A3.0). This revision does not change the overall building height. Rear Elevation: There is a discrepancy in the originally approved plans. The architect notes in his letter, dated February 13, 2006, that the originally approved Rear Elevation shows the roof above the kitchen intersecting with the large main roof. If the project is built with the approved 10'-0" plate height at this location, it will not intersect with the main roof causing the main roof to abruptly cut short and hang above the kitchen roof. As a solution, the architect is proposing to increase the plate height in the kitchen by 2'-6" (from 10'-0" to 12'-6") so that the kitchen roof will intersect with the main roof as originally intended. Amendment to Design Review, Hillsi�le Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for Attached Garage 1504 Alturas Drive Left Elevation: The originally approved Left Elevation shows a continuous roof plan from the master bedroom down to the toilet room in the master bathroom, making the plate height at this location less than 6'-6". The architect is proposing to introduce another roof above the toilet room to provide a 9'-0" plate height to match the plate height in the master bedroom. Revised Project Summary: The applicant is requesting an amendment to an approved design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1. With this application, the proposed floor area would be 3,874 SF (0.43 FAR) where 3,955 SF (0.44 FAR) is the maximum allowed (81 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). The subject property slopes from the front to the rear, so street level is nearly even with the second floor elevation. On-site parking required for this five-bedroom house (2 covered and 1 uncovered parking spaces) will be met in the attached two-car garage, which requires a special permit. 1504 Alturas Drive Lot Area: 8922 SF Plans date stam ed Februa 13, 2006 Original Proposed Allowed/Required Approval 2/13/06 plans SETBACKS Front (IS`flr): 23'-0" no change 15'-0" �2nd�Ir�: n/a no change 20'-0" Garage: 20'-0" & 27'-1" no change 20'-0" & 25'-0" Side (left): 7'-0" no change 7'-0" (rigl:t): 7'-0" no change 7'-0" Rear (ls`flr): 84'-7" no change 15'-0" �2nd JIY�: 84'-7" no change 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2564 SF no change 3569 SF 28.7% 40% FAR: 3842 SF 3874 SF 3955 SF 0.43 FAR 0.43 FAR 0.44 FAR Parking: 2 covered no change 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 5 no change --- Heigl:t: 18'-1" no change 30'-0" (32'-0" from adj grade) DHEnvelope: complies no change CS 25.28.075 -2- Amendment to Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for Attached Garage 1 SO4 Alturas Drive Staff Comments: See attached. Planning staff would note that since this request is an amendment to a previously approved project and the increase in floor area is within the footprint of the house, the amendment request was taken directly to the consent calendar. If the Commission requires any additional information before action, this item can be continued or discussed as a regular action item. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a hillside area construction permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a special permit for an attached garage the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings for amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for attached garage. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered, including those from the original approval (revised conditions in italics): 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the PlanningDepartment date stamped February 13, 2006, sheets A2.0, A2.1, A3.0 and A4. 0 and date stamped Apri114, 2004, sheets A1.0, A1.1, AS.O, topographic map, C-2 and L1.0; -3- Amendment to Design Review, Hillside Area Constrcrction Permit and Special Permit for Attacheci Garage 1 SO4 Alturas Drive 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 17, 2006, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 21, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, the Recycling Specialist's February 22, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met; 4. that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5. that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6. that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7. that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8. that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9. that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10. that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; -4- Amendment to Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for Attached Garage 1504 Alturas Drive 11. that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12. Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17. that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; -5- Amendment to Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for Attached Garage 1504 Alturas Drive 23. that the proj ect shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24. that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25. that all windows shall be true divided light windows. Ruben Hurin Planner c. George Sun, architect � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 Departmen aff will inspect and not ompliance of the archit ctural details (trim mate ' als, window type, etc.) to v' fy that the proj ect has en built according to th pproved Planning and ilding plans; 6) that all ai ducts, plumbing vents d flues shall be com ' ed, where possible, to single termination and in alled on the portions the roof not visible fr the street; and that t e venting details sha be 'ncluded and approve in the construction pla before a Building pe t is issued; 7) that or to scheduling the roof ck inspection, a license surveyor shall shoot the ight of the roof ridge provide certification of t t height to the Building epartment; 8) that the co itions of the City Arbo 'st's January 29, 2004 me o, and the City Enginee s, Fire Marshal's, and Re cling Specialist's Dec ber 22, 2003, memos sh be met; 9) that the pro' ct shall comply with the C struction and Demolitio Debris Recycling Ordina e which requires affec d demolition, new const ion and alteration proj s to submit a Waste Red ction Plan and meet re cling requirements; any p ial or full demolition a structure, interior or e erior, shall require a olition permit; 10) that e applicant shall compl with Ordinance 1503, t City of Burlingame St Water Management an ischarge Control Ordi nce; and 11) that the p � ect shall meet all the r uirements of the Californi uilding Code and Cali rnia Fire Code, 2001 e' ion, as amended by the ity of Burlingame. The m ion was seconded by C ojues . Chair Os ling called for a voice vo Kei abstained and C. Keele ab p.m . Keighran returned to the as. the motion to appr e. The motion passe on a 5-0-1-1 (C. Appeal procedur were advised. This ite concluded at 7:55 5. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1 AND LOT 2 ZONED R-1- (DEREK CHUNG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MICHAEL JUNG, ABR ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT) (56 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER a. APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGING LOTS b. 1504 ALTURAS DRNE, LOT 1- application for design review, hillside area construction permit, and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-story single family dwelling c. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 2- application for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-story single family dwelling Reference staff report May 10, 2004, with attachments. Plr. Barber presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twenty-three conditions were suggested for consideration for lot 1 and twenty-six conditions were suggested for consideration for lot 2. Noted that conditions of approval for both lots refer to April 14, 2004, plans but should read Apri128, 2004, plans. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Derek Chung, property owner, 1504 Alturas Drive and Michael Jung, architect, 4075 Papazuan Way, Fremont, were available to answer questions. Mr. Chung noted that he tried to address the Planning Commission's concerns, which were mostly on lot #2 regarding the 15% driveway verses the 12% driveway. They decided to keep the 12% driveway. With the original plans they had a 15% driveway proposed , then during the design review process with Jerry Winges he suggested reducing the slope and thought it would be a better solution. Provided a cross section in the revised plans that shows both a 12% and 15% to show the difference between the two. Decided that the 12% slope was a better alternative for the following reasons: 1) safety for a better approach; 2) appears cleaner from the street without a big drop down; 3) practicality, don't want cars to scrape when entering and exiting the driveway. Lot #2 has three retaining walls, the north wall steps down, is a terraced wall, 3'6" at the lowest point and 10' at the highest point. Planning on planting vine plants to cover the wall, blue star creeper and rosemary, he submitted a picture. The wall will also have a stone veneer to soften the appearance. The neighbors at 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 1500 Alturas originally had a concerns with the ash trees proposed, however have changed the ash to flowering cherry and now the neighbor is happy. Commission stated they would like to see all the windows be true divided light windows. Stated that do not like shutters that don't fit the size and shape of the window they are hung next to, would like to this as a condition of approval. Commission noted that due to the driveway slope on lot #2 there are places where the retaining wall will be 12' tall, can anything be done to reduce the height of the walls. Owner shouldn't expect a flat driveway on a hillside property. Retaining wall on north side is a problem, need to reduce height and appearance. Will be better and safer construction and will reduce difficulty with drainage problems if you bring driveway lower. Don't build a 12' retaining wall if you don't have to. Mr. Jung responded that after final construction when the footing is burred and the site is graded it won't appear to be 12 feet, the terrace was created to reduce the vertical appearance of the retaining walls. The 15% slope for a driveway run that is this short makes for an uncomfortable transition to a flat garage slab. Commission noted that up to a 20% driveway slope is allowed with a conditional use permit. The driveway has a 35' length, should sink house down like the house on either side, reduce plate heights to 9 feet and increase driveway slope. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: would like to see condition added that requires handing digging for base and arborist supervision during the construction of the concrete walkway near the Redwood tree, and that this walkway should be changed to pavers; big improvement on this project with design review, visual impact has been addressed, would like to add a condition that true divided light windows be installed, overall support project. C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions as amended during Commission discussion. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Osterling called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve the conditional use permit for re- emerging lots, and the design review, hillside area conshuction permit and special permit for attached garage for both lots 1 and 2. The motion failed on a 2-4-1 (Cmrs. Bojues, Brownrigg, Osterling and Vistica dissenting and C. Keele absent) roll call vote. Discussion on the motion: can not support the project, it is fundamentally flawed; o.k. with the house on the right, but there are a lot of unresolved issues with the house on the left, are going to need to push it back. Commission consulted with CA Anderson and asked if the project can be divided, can Commission just vote to approve lot 1 and continued lot 2. CA Anderson stated that yes the project can be divided, but in order to approved lot 1 Commission must also take action to approve conditional use permit for approval of the re- emerging lots. Commission gave the following direction to the applicant for lot 2: • Need to lower driveway by increasing the slope to 15% and reduce the plates on the first and second floors to 9 feet; and May need to push the house back, that might cause trouble with the two protected trees on the lot, but this is a large house and applicant may be forced to reduce to the size of the house to address this issue. C. Vistica made a motion to continue the action on lot 2 until the applicant has revised the plans and moved to approve the application for the conditional use permit for re-emerging lots and approve the application for lot #1 only for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for a an attached � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 garage by resolution, with the following conditions as amended during Commission discussion: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0 through A5.0, topo, C-2 and L1.0, site plan, floor plans, roof plan, building elevations, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plan; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subj ect to design review; 3) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's, Fire Marshal's, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met and the City Arborist's December 11, 2003 memo shall be met along with the approved arborist's report date stamped January 6, 2004; 4) that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5) that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adj acent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6) that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7) that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8) that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adj acent to Lot # 1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9) that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk;l0) that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the conshuction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11) that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12) Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the proj ect and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13) that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14) that the project shall comply with the Construction and 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2004 Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; anypartial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15) that demolition of the existing stnzctures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24) that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25) that all windows shall be true divided light windows. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to continue action on lot 2 pending plan revisions and approve the conditional use permit for re-emerging lots and the design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for attached garage for lot 1. The motion passed on a 6-0-1(C. Keele absent) vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. 6. 2725 SUM DRIVE, ZO ED R-1 — APPLICATIO OR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMI OR HEIGHT FOR AN ATTACHED GE FOR A NEW, ONE- ORY SINGLE F Y DWELLIN ElVISE BALESTRIERI, PLICANT AND PROPERT OWNER; JAMES C , CHU DESI & ENGR., INC., DESIG R) (42 NOTICED) PROJE PLANNER: RUBEN Referenc staff report May 10, 2004 and s f comments. Fourteen con� �s as installed had been �th attachments. Plr Barber p sented the report, reviewed c'teria ions were suggested for consi ration. Commissioner asked ' e story Staff noted yes. The co ssioners all noted that they made a site �6'isit. There were no other estions of staff. Chair Osterling ope d the public hearing. James C, designer; Denise Balest � ri, property owner Sonya Son, prop y owner; Aneglo Arsella, 27 Summet; Greg Kosko, 6' lview Court; spok . The applicant note at two of the three chimneys ere removed because they re not needed chan type and the third, wood burning with spark arrestor i the family room is only 2 f t taller than the lowe ridge of the E:3 !� Se �' 1 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org `; CITT p 4 " ��E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION '�+,�._..� . Type of apptication: Design Review !/ Conditional Use Permit Variance 1� Special Permit Other Parcel Number: t/ Project address: f`J�B � �/ Z`��Qs �r.. �T � i APPLICANT Name: ,Der�k CGr,r.�n 4 Address: �� o � a.�.� ���. City/State/Zip:�'J/,��=a T c� 9�n3 b Phone (w): � 3— l o a (�)= .� -s- - q 3 cfl: (�.�� �`a �- �3 �� � ARCffiTECT/DESIGNER PROPERTY OWNER Name: I�Pre�C � A-r►� � �N� �'L Address:�� O L auy� f�v�e , City/State/Zip: /_�i 11Jh6t �-- _ j � Gl �.3 a Phone (w): C�o.sa) 773 - ��00 �n�: G s�� � s-� ' �'39 7 � cfl: C6sa) �sa - �.�q � Name: �i� �a�c�� ���Tu�e�- ( Mi�e �ia,�/ .% �� Address: �07.$ f`'�a z%a� way . Su�O z��C City/State/Zip: ��20��, �� ��� Please indicate with an asterisk * Phone (w): ��io� 6(/ �- `J qd l the contact person for this project. c��: cfl: ��D� ���— ��a � RECEIVED NOV 12 2003 CITY OF BURLINGAME � PLANNIN6 DEPT. PROJECT � .� 0 3, o od -S'. �. S'� 0 AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct st of my knowledge and belief. L Applicant's signature: Date: � � � �3 I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Co Properiy owner's signature: �--- � Date: t� � L �' ,���L f�� Date submitted: . PCAPP.FRM R T� To: Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 From: George Sun Job Name: Chung Job Number: 0507 Date: 2-10-06 Re: 1504 Alturas Material Enclosed: 10 Sets of Original Approved and Proposed Revisions REVISION STATEMENT We have discovered that part of the lower level crawl space has a higher ceiling than ariginally envisioned, thus providing additional living spaces. In addition, we have discovered that there are discrepancies with the exterior elevations and the roof plan: in particular, the roof over the kitchen area at the rear elevation, and the roof over the master toilet bathroom area at the ]eft elevation. We are requesting for additional living spaces on the lower level for a library, and a bathroom. We are reducing the interior volume in the living room and loft area on the main leveL The net square footage increase from the currently approved design is 32 square feet, and this does not increase the footprint of the approved design. The approved rear elevation design shows that the roof over the kitchen area intersects with the large main roo£ If we maintain the current plate height at 10', the large main roof will not intersect with the kitchen roof, and the main roof will abruptly cut short and hang in mid air above the kitchen roof. We feel this is not an acceptable design. We are proposing to increase the kitchen plate height by 2'-6" so that the kitchen roof will intersect with the main roof, and this will maintain the currently approved rear elevation design. On the left side elevation, it shows that the roof is a continuous plane from the master bedroom down to the master toilet bathroom; this will make the plate height less than 6'-6". We are proposing to introduce another roof over the master toilet bathroom, and it is not on the same plane as the roof over the master bedroom; this will make the plate height same as the master bathroom and bedroom at 9'-0". All proposed revisions are clouded on the plans. Please call me ifyou have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, George Sun, tect For Your: Review/Info Via: Personal Delivery Copies To: Derek, and File RECEIVED FEB 1 3 2006 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNiNG DEPT. If you do not receive all of the pages or they are illegible, please contact this office as soon as possible. 101 TOWNSEND STREET, #201 SAN fRANCISCO, CA 94107 TEL 415 546-5652 FAX 415 546-5657 Project Comments Date: � From: 02/16/2006 ❑ City Engineer X Chief Building OfFicial ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney d Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review amendment for a new, two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-061- 060 Staff Review: 02/21/2006 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) Camply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential buildings. Go to http://v�Nvw.energ�ca.c�av/title24 for publications and details. 4) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 5) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 6} Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than four risers. 7) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 8) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof surface within ten feet. Reviewed by,_...----��__.___� ;.___�� � ` Date: ��l ��� � ��--- r�_.. '�, / Project Comments Date: To: From: 02/16/2006 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist �Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for design review amendment for a new, finro-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-061- 060 Staff Review: 02121 /2006 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide double backflow prevention. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: - � ���� Date: �.- - �--t - csb i :,' Date: Project Comments �.. 11/13/03 To: O Ciiy Engineer. � Chief Buiiding Offic'ral �Fire Marshal � 0 Recyding Specialist �- O City Arborist � � City Attomey From: Subject: Staff Review: planning Staff � � Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction peRnit and side setback variance for a new finro-story. single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 11/17I03 � �s ,� �� _ � � _ . �' . , _ -- , - •� -� .� s .� � � � � �.. .� _„s' - ` � Reviewed by: . Date: � � �ry�-�--o � �-(��- Date: � From: Project Comments 02/21 /2006 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for design review and special permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition at 1625 Lassen Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-202-100 Staff Review: 02/21/2006 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: � �� Date: � .�..2,/G (� Date: To:� � From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments . 11 /9 3/03 � City Engineer � Chief Building Official ❑ Fi�e Marshal �Recycling Speaalist [7 City Arborist - � � City Attomey Planning Staff Request for conditionai use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction permit and side setback variance for a�new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 11 /17/03 � � _ � Applicant shall submit a VVaste Reduction Plan and Recycling Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects prior to any demolition, construction. or permitting. ; . . Date: To: � From: Project Comments 11/13/03 �City Engineer ❑ Chief Building.Officiai � Fire Marshal O Recyding Specialist � City Arborist O City Attomey Planni�g Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design reYiew, hillside area construction permit and side .setback variance for a new twastory single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 cn � (,� , � ► .,...:� �.� � � : _i �_, ,.�� s Reviewed by: . . Date: vV. 1���7�� , . 4 � � . . . . �. PU�LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION � - ._ : rLArnv�avc x�v�w co�nv�rrrs �,r -�,.;�-;'�. . . Project Name:-� �� . . ,�,�`'"�'.'�`"q " . ' � - Project Address:__� �-�ac,��wc� . _r�q-•t ....... The following requirements agply to the project � 1�' � � A property. boundary seirvey shall be preformed by a licensed land . - surveyor. The survey . shall show all prope,rty liaes, property corners, �, � � easements, topograp}iical feahues and utilities. (Required prior to the . building pemut issuance.) �,�,��- � s,,�,�rP �cs �.�t�o �s ►.�.� A`���. 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to . drain towards the Frontage Sh�eet� (Required prior to the building permit . . issu�wce.) or `� v�a.�ovf" ,e�.,� a�-� �- , 3. _- � The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for . approvai .prior to the issuance of a Building permit � 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall�comply with the City's . - � flood zone requirements. 5 Y A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with ttie City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6: . The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. � -� 7. � � Sanitar� sewer analysis is required for the projec� The sewer analysis � � �.shall iden6fy the projecYs impact to the City's sewer system and any . . sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 4- . . � � . 8. �� � Submit �ffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. -� Submit a traffic impact. study for the projec� The traffic study should � identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer• . �. 14. � The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering . Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, � ' monuments, and new properly and lot lines proposed bq the map._ � � � . Page 1 of 3 U:lprivate developmcnt\PLANNING REVIEW COb�IEI1'TS,doc ,. - . � � - . •� �_. PUBLIC WO�ZKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISIUN � 11. A latest preliminary tide report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering _Division with the parcel map for reviews. �12, Map closure/lot closure . calculations shall be submitted with the parcel , . map. . 13 � The pmject shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Ac� 14 � 'I'he. project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary ; appurtenant work. . � 15 ' The pmject shall, at its own cost, design and construcY frontage sh�eetscape . improvements incIuding sidewalk, curb, gutters, pazking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with sheetscape master plan. 1!6 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse unpacts .during construction to vehiculaz traffic, pedestrian traffic . and public on street parking. The project shall identify fliese impacts and .. provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. . 17 � The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek � enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse imgact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year � flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. � 18 � Any work within the drainage azea; creek, or creek banks requires a State ., Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers . Permits. � I9 � No consh�uction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 -� The project shall comply with the City's .NPDES permit requirement to - � . . prevenf storm vv�ater pollution. � 21 � The groject does not show the dimensions of� existing driveways, re- � submit plans with .driveway �dimensions. Also clarify if the project is �- � proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's appmval: � � 22 - � , {`�e-submit plans - . showing the.driveway profile with elevations � : . ' Page 2�of 3 U:lprivate developmentlPLANNING ItEVIEW CONA�IENTs.doc _;.= •. � '• .�. ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 � The back of the drivewa /sidewallc a roach shall be teast 12" � . Y PP at above � the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent ovecflow o€ storm water from the sh�eet into private property. � 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacte� shall be placed in. front The �. ' sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the . ProPe�Y• - . . �. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area . . shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage azea to. . � .. the Sanitary Sewer System is required. � - � _ Page3 of3 - U:lgrivate development�PLANNING REYIEW COMr+tEN'I'S.doc THE GREEN .1EANNIE - Jam�azq 5, 2004 .Derdc chung 1504 Altmvs Drive Buriingame, CA 94010 Re: impact of proposed constnection to site Vees RECEIVED JAN -� 6 2004 CITY OF BURLIN6AME PLANNING DEPt. R�1ie.StOd t0 inSj�Ct SitC 1t+CFs by inai� "IYee CarC foi IICw COns6[1ttXiori plOp05dL OII S[tC al+e 2 Catifornia Native Heritage T�es in q�tion to new oon�on pc+nposa� and 1 sigufic�nt tree. Culifornia Native Heritage T�+ees #1 #2. 43" Native Califotnia Coastal Live Oak (Quercu.s agrifolia), 28'driPline, strong vigor, �ood st�uctare, good health with signs of oak moth There is minimal decline to the tree. Reoommead insecticide treatm�M in the Spting to in�ubit aak math fiuther. Southwesterly U+ee fringe is three feet m�er g�osting noof line. ] recommend prior to oonstruction a few two inch brand�s cart at existing gutter iine a�d only raise fiinge six fcet over exisbing roof line. Plaoement of 6" mulc� i0' acnund tree ttunk but not against tnmk of tree will in�ubit oompaction from mectianical oqnipmeut, �d placement of temporary barrier fencing for the protection and safety of the tree at 8' southwest side of mmk 28' northeast side of tnmk during demolition af exisbing dedc s�trucxime. Immediately after deck demoli6on bairier fencing to be plaoad as close to dripline of 28' as poss�'ble and reuraain in place during constrnction. Pmposed wnstruction shall not adversely affect this tree. 47" Native Coastal Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens),17' dripline, stmng vigor, excelleni . structure, excellent health, 3' from water line, 8' from exis6ng shucture and 7' from Proposed construction I recommend a few three inch limbs growing southeriy three feet m�er existing roof line be pruned to existing gutter line so tLat tree limbs growing over roof clear six feet over raof prior to constructioq cutting of ivy away from tree tnmlc, and plaoememC of temporary barcier fencing for the protection and safety of the tree ai 5' saath side of tiunk and 15' east and west side of tnmk during oonstrucrion. Tha�e is a north side neighboring baandary fence in place. When trenching in dripline of tc�ae, the wo�ic shatl be performed by hwd Iabor. When 4" diameter roots or larger are enoowrtered from hand diggimg under dripline, the oonsulting Afiorist m�st be called to the site bei'ore work can resume under trae dripline. Proposed oonstrnction shaIl riot adversely affe�t this tc+ee. S�gnificant Tree - #3 24" Weeping Willow (Salix babylonica aurea), 24' cirip 1inc� modetate vigor, fair . stiucture, poor health: aphid damage, boarer bcetle present, uutrient dfficient Proposed c;onstruction impacts this tree. This is a declining low value tree with invasive roots. I recommend remaval of this tree regardless vf proposed constrndion. Fencing Detail The fencing shaild not mtesf'ec�e with acd�al oonstruction, but is urtended to radirect �neo�.sary traffic, and to protect limbs and roots. No stocage of maierials, u�ac�' �g. �ding or comipaction shall be allowed wiWin fencing. The fenoe shaWd be a minimum of four �feet Irigh; � ma� of pig wire, snow fence, ar cyclone fence, with st,eel stakes or pipes as posts. All oontractots, subconttactors, and other peisoffiet shall be watnad that encroach� within the feaced area is forbidden without the oonsent of the certified arborist on the job. Tbis includes, but 137 CAs7iLulW WAY • SAN MATEO. CA 94401 • 650fi838717 • THEGREEN.IEANNtE'@YAHOo.COM THE C�sREE1�I..IEANNIE ���a to, Sw�e ��� � ffic�, a�a�f-�, �an�, o� or� noxious matecials, P�d �s, �ng eq�pment, a�d other heavY eqaiP� '� �p�Y fenoe shall be naai�tained wrtil tl� landscape comracxor enters the job and oom� Iand�pe oonstcuction � Sammary. The C�lifomia Native Heritage Trees ou site will �not be adveisely impacted from PmPosed oonst�uc�ion. Minimal pnming a�tr�oes shaild be iione ptior to Spring. After remaval of the willow, the sdvmp shaWd be groa�d to pceveM azry sucket gtovvth. Plaoeme� of tempotaty barrier �encing shouldremain u� oonstcnc�ion is compl�sd. Treat oak moth in the Spring thmugi� t�+ee inject�ion or topical sptay. When oompletiag the dedc demolition, the oan�ing Arborist must be qlled W inspxt p�aoeme� of tem�porary_ barrier f�ncing, When tcee mMs fa�r ind�es in dameter ot' 1a�'ger � during h�d digging �mder tree driplin�, the consWting arborist will be called and remain on sife wheu wurk is performed under tree driplin� These trces a�e lovely assets t+� ihe property and provide great beauty and landsr.ape valtte. . Thank you fot the opporhmity to touch those hees! RespedfullY submiue� with tl�e best of my aiboricult�aal knowledge � J die RayeSchmuck wcz2ss T37'��nruwatS:Vft'a�r'p��li�t'�erEt�,�(•3�'1'+�6?�69d8�'�'1'.'��rft��►�tta��attats Gti�fi , . ,.. .,`. :�� -.;: � ,, , .�',, y �� � 3�... . . ' � �' 11 � � �,� � �` . 5.� i'�"`' % s:'� � -'�`�.Y.;, �' �,. ' . �-� $ e� ` a ` y r . �� �,��� . �� �� �' '�. • �'' � "' f. . - ��� .� . . � ,. � L -�' h {�'` . : ,4 A " , ' � ? � S ' • ��� � 'n . F S ..� � � i� -'r �;y .� �, � 3C� �' .:. • .. �h `�y'e �� �. . � �� ' � .. h"�. ;e '�5ti � .� ..1'�-� ���� � . !F4 S :3=4-►'�. . _. "d l� . . � F._ 'v, :c;%'. � , :.., ,r .. :�: ,,`'� ..- ie ' _ 'rrs r � -� '.r.� � .: r , � � ,, ��s; . r: � - �K �.� +� ��:�� �� � : ,� a 4 � '�� � : 41g 6 4 4 �ae+ � • �� y� . -, i � �.� ���� IM1 ._ _._ .. .. . ���y CITY o� C�Jy OF BURLINGAME -. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �ar � • ti � 'F � TEL: (650) 558J250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 � �"=`' ����4325 �+..m....•��� www.burfingame.org ti � ���J.24o - Site:1504 ALTURAS DRIVE � L ; = � - x ;�: s:ti�;t; - -; �,,, 94U1D Application for an amendment to an a U� ^��.x��AG� design review application and hiilside area construction permit for a new, two-story single PUB��� ���RI�lG family dwelling at:1504 ALTURAS DRIVE nj�''�'��� zoned R-1. (APN: 027-061-050). � - -_ _- _ ,--� The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing � on Monday; March 13, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. �., ,. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Californ7a. _ �� Mailed: March 3, 2006 � ;' � : ����iu�n����nin����n���i�i���i�n����n�����n���nn���� - - ; � .�'`�: ._'.._�"__.._. ....__ __. _.'_.___-..f . (Please refer to other side) �. CITY OF B URLINGAME �i�,,-. =�- ` .. �:� u�: �� �lication and plans for `this project` nay be reviewed prior �t,t� he �lanntng ;Dep�rtment, at�5'D�1-�Primrose Road, fortxia .�� � �>,_.a���; -' -� .•�- � ���' "'�-� - ' A copy of the aF � to the meeting ; Burlingame, Cal a �� ;a` If you challen�e � raising only fh�ii? described in �he � at or prior toathe i � . ' `:'�-t;a � ; Property owner; itheir tenants��ab� ; (650) 558-72��0. � , � be limited to �.blic hearing, �d to the city �qC� r� Y� .. _ � %� a � informing please call Margaret Monr�e �'� '��� City Planner `�'� ��� PUB ��L (Please refer to other side) � : � ��p°'� �.� ���� �� ,� �. �,� � �,�:�' 0�'ICE RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached arg�a e for modifications to a new, two-story sin�le family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive, zoned R-1, Derek and Amy Chun�, 140 Laurel Avenue, Millbrae, CA, 94030 property owners, APN: 027-061-060; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 13, 2006, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March, 2006 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage. 1504 Alturas Drive Effective March 23, 2006 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 13, 2006, sheets A2.0, A2.1, A3.0 and A4.0 and date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0, A1.1, A5.0, topographic map, C-2 and L1.0; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 17, 2006, memo, the Fire Marshal's February 21, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, the Recycling Specialist's February 22, 2006 and November 17, 2004, memos, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos .shall be met; 4. that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arbarist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5. that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6. that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage. 1504 Alturas Drive Effective March 23, 2006 Page 2 7. that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8. that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9. that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10. that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot # 1 and Lot #2; 11. that the protective bamer fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessaxy trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12. Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, amendment to design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage. 1504 Alturas Drive Effective March 23, 2006 Page 3 16. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17. that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24. that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25. that all windows shall be true divided light windows. ! . . ��� CITY O� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 • yc� •, f . ti � TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 6963790 -,�., ^ o ` ,,,,Ee 9� www.burlingame.org e i d - � Site: 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE = `_�����' - �� � �.,� �A •° �` � � �� � o Application for an amendment to an a �� design review application and hillside ar `r� ..,��, .�.r' � / �.,,.. . ; F� ,� i.�� _ ea construction permit for a new, two-story single PUBLIC �i�;;��'�` ;��G family dwelling at: 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE zoned R-1. (APN: 027-061-050). N����l�' The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed: March 3, 2006 ��i��ii�n���inin�����iu�i�i�i�nn���iu���i��i�i�iun��� (Please refer to other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed �r��,:r to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Rouu, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the."subject application(s) in eourt, you may' be limitecl `� raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public h�:�� �:; described in the notice or in written corresporidence delivered to �h�� �, at ar prior to�the p'ulilic hearing. �" ' .,.. . � Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for ii� �+? �-1 � �;�; their tenants �about this notice. For addrtional information, pleas� .,; �; (650) 558 72�0. Thank yo�i � �: : P� �,F' � _� fi �- : � � � T�., �', ,' � f �� ';�'. 6 Margaret Moni��e �"��. �` � � " _���' ��`" '�.�2 Y� � :'3 City Planner `�;,.�. °�:� ��� . �.._._�:.' � ,� t . ��. PU�B�:�I��:�EA�IN� .NpTI�CE `� (Please refer to other side) � . -� , , � � � Y� �. . �... `1� ,, '. . . . . OS[ - . . ' s,�o ~7��'Q� �,' / �� . % _ � � °g` � ' ��b�l! � ' � '� ' ' � � s b ,6 � �, � `� , ' �, � � .c� _ � `� 6,� , � � , � ` ,• , � , , . . �� : � , � . . ._.. zs� � / . ��� . . � � � ��� ��� � � �� ��� ��� , � . Q � � � ,Q �� � �' , , � , �� � �' eo, �� ��� `� ," ��' � � � y� ,� ,. � -� � � «< ,� �<G ,� , � ,- -: -� . 3 - ` �� �, � �„ �P�- `, � � � ��`'�� � ��jb . � . , . ,�. , � , ,, ��; . � �� � � �z� ��' .: ,� ��. � � � �. � __. , . , � �/ �` ,�,Q' � ��` ,- o � .- � 90� �, ` `` , o« , ' `., ;� ,,� � >« �� ` `, `...-' ^ �� � ,' � ` �� � � �� �� . . -- � _, � � . ,�� , � � � , g � , , / � , , , ,-... , . ,- � � , � . . , � . v �, . � � ` �� � � , , , �, � , , . � � . ; . . _ . �. +,� . ,, ryp ., , ; � . � � . .' ' "� � � � � �"� � /� � ��, � � , 1 .. \ . � . . . � �15 � / � � .' � .' ;' ,...._...��' r� , . . 10g �,� . �.. �� ,6 . � _ Bfp • � f . __ ,' . . . �� . � � ♦ _A � � ,, ., ,� . . L�f 116 �. . ,, � �, . , . . . , ._..... . . ` � Ci{ ��� . . . � . :`t . " '. '�. � . . � ... _. \ � . ` . . .-. � . .. � 1� ,� 1 �' � �. ♦ y�v $ .� . .; ."� . �- . {l . , _. . � . . '. . _. .� '. : , � . , p. �. '��-. g � , , , _ � � � , ,� �, ,._, - . . , . �� �� , � , ,a� . 1� : � �a � � �� �� � � � \� h, � ' , � . � �� � �' , � ', � � . '-.. � � o � � . , ,ry ;�O . e . � 1`'� . . _4 ,� S� . ,� . '�Oti . . �. ��..�,�� � N 2� � � � . � ���. . . y° S � . % ^�-`„"„�..,.., � � '�, � , > � ..� . .� � ,� � °� �,.. •. .<'"l � .'� .....�_... � -, � 1°e � � � . . 1�p £o�� `. <.''",�' '�. . � � . . ._.� , . 0 . / ,� '� • . . � e - � ,^3 ..... ;. __ -; .. , . - ', ^� �. vi � , _ „�. '�, . � �S �� � � 5 � � .. �� . � . ��� � �a5 �-� �� ' \ � ��� Q— y�y ,� � .. . � R�ie , \ �, , � _....,a � � . :. � . .. � t ��. . - � .. , �, �H�'' ,� �OQJ . � � M . �'' �.; � ,'`. �' �. . . ; , z �. .. . ... ,� ��r�P �, , ti ,e , ,� Z ,�J �� � �� ��: y,° `o�e � � Q�' � , ``� b ' ' Q' � � � (� �'.. ,'p 6 . . �' . / ``Ci 6 � � � ^ � . . � `�`�'� j -�� %� ,, '� Q,�P -� �� �q aM� �°° .� �_, ; �� � � � ; � , 1. h �y` P i j � / � �,h� � , � �Ot .' v/l � , i . ... . . ,�� / \ / : y� .�, � b b � . . / . ^�, . � _ � � OZ � �.. y,� . " . `r . ^' so�F ' m _ �. , / �� �_ / � `. �,�� �O ,� . e �,Vb' � / . --- � -_. \ .. . ; . . . � � : . � . �' � � 8 ., �� � ,� y,,� �� �� , �� � , > o � , s . . . ��� � � . � � � , A _ . ...... � ` /. � , � Z Q . �a}'� � P . . r�6�6 h f _ � i ,g i^ `- j / ' \ � y �. � � � . . / � - � � . � . " 9 �. . � � O .. � � � �_ �.5� ', _-' � . � � � g . y � ^`P � \ ,� . �s'�° �5%, � . . 0 'e ,' �p°' . � / + i"' n . �.�' � g . . � . ' , ^�, �. , � '. � �A � / . ,�rya .��� ..�',�,� , r . � _ . � . � � ;,. � � n F . . % � i � �Stis �`'ti� � � J - . : � > � � yyti��. � � ,�op^ �v' � ����. � .�������_ � �Scfl � , '8 e ��`` r� . ,� �9 . . ,�� .��GO� `�, ,ory. ' _ � .,,.* � J �(� �f \y ^� �/ .� 1� �O \ ,�` '. ,S� e . •/V \ reg, �� seg, . / � 1� .. `�e, �OS -� ,�5 . 5�0 � . � . 8 . `o� �.. . e$ . . ' . � . . ,c�A'1 . 16,A . ,Oµ . �n . . 1pA .. 5ph . � . . f ' . .. n . . . S� .. . . � . a . . . . . . . � . � .�t`9 ��a�b .., � O� 15�4 Alturas Drive " Planning Commission Notices Parcel Owner 027 015 120 Stieren Lynette M, + 027 021 100 Ericsson John E, Karin G Trs 027 021 110 Durazzo-caseye Trust 027 021 120 Dugoni William E Tr 027 021 130 Marquis Donald A, Anita E Trs 027 021 140 Gross Howard, B 1999 Trust 027 021 150 Sarkar Rajabrata, Minakshi 027 021 160 Stallings Michael F, Joni L 027 021 170 Saraceno John A, Irma M Trs 027 021 180 Cornejo William Richard 027 021 190 Caviglia Norina M Tr 027 022 130 Magner Diane M Tr 027 022 140 Chowaiki Samir 027 022 150 Wong Stephen H M, Melinda A 027 022 160 Mcnamara Shawn 027 022 330 Vielbaum Walter H, N E Trs 027 022 340 Lappos Charalambos, E Trs 027 022 350 Eifler Horst Tr 027 022 510 Samsami Farshid Trust 027 046 010 Estassi Roger J, Maria Trs 027 046 020 Perotti John A Jr 027 046 030 Ostertag Willy Tr 027 046 040 Pappas Anthony G Tr 027 046 050 Latorre Thomas, C Trust 027 047 010 Wereda Walter G 027 047 020 Grantham Paul V 027 047 030 Corazzini James G 027 047 040 Platt Frederick O, E A Trs 027 047 050 Wong William, Helen 027 047 060 Reynolds Ann F 027 047 070 Cheung Alice Nga Yee 027 047 080 Pollack Jonathan R, Anna S 027 047 090 Wan Alain K K, + 027 047 120 Dacanay Conrad, Alma 027 047 130 Gee Clinton, Judith 027 056 010 Reedy Steven A Tr 027 061 010 Wilson Kenneth F, C L Trs 027 061 020 Koontz Michael J 027 061 030 Legos Gerald A, Leanne 027 061 040 Hagenah John W, Mildred J 027 062 010 Zhang Jian-wei 027 062 020 Hsia Jeou Dao, Diane 027 062 030 Dulman Mikhail, Marina 027 062 040 Neger Robert E, L H Trs 027 062 200 Lycett Trust 027 062 210 Law David, Tsui Betty 027 063 050 Smith Of Aaker Trust 027 063 060 Schmelzer Charles H 027 063 180 Sale Dwight B, Laura M Trs 027 063 190 Pollard Gene A, Janice D Trs 027 063 200 Gumas John, Janice Trust 027 063 210 Froehlich Ralph, Monika 027 063 220 Nix Jeffrey A, Kathryn K 027 063 230 Lee Thomas F, Elizabeth M Address 1523 Alturas Dr 1517 La Mesa Dr 1515 La Mesa Dr 1511 La Mesa Dr 15 0'1 t-�, rn�s�. 1503 La Mesa Dr 1508 Alturas Dr �512 (�I�oUJ 1514 Alturas Dr 1516 Alturas Dr 1520 Alturas Dr 3044 Hillside Dr 3048 Hillside Dr 3052 Hillside Dr 1504 La Mesa Dr 1516 La Mesa Dr 1518 La Mesa Dr 1506 La Mesa Dr 1508 La Mesa Ln 1519 Alturas Dr 560 Acacia Ave 3104 Cananea Ave 3108 Cananea Ave 3112 Cananea Ave 3 Cananea PI 1 Cananea PI 3101 Cananea Ave 1505 Alturas Dr 1503 Alturas Dr 1501 Alturas Dr 3104 Hillside Dr 3108 Hillside Dr 3112 Hillside Dr 4 Cananea PI 3109 Cananea Ave 3103 Hillside Dr 42 Estates Ct 3066 Hillside Dr 3C�o �+-l�'115�� 1500 Alturas Dr 100 La Mesa Dr 108 La Mesa Dr 116 La Mesa Dr 120 La Mesa Dr 105 Alturas Dr 3075 Hillside Dr Iz z vw��.-,1,0�� 126 Valdeflores Dr 109 La Mesa Dr 105 La Mesa Dr 103 La Mesa Dr 3051 Hillside Dr 30�� �(� �(s��-- 3041 Hillside Dr Mailed: March 3, 2006 54 Notices City Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame ST Zip CA 94010-5966 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Bruno Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Rafael Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5910 CA 94010-5910 CA 94010-5910 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5973 CA 94010-5966 CA 94066-4222 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5937 CA 94010-5935 CA 94010-5935 CA 94010-5935 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5965 CA 94010-5911 CA 94901-3617 CA 94010-5953 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5904 CA 94010-5954 CA 94010-5933 CA 94010-5919 CA 94010-5919 CA 94010-5919 CA 94010-5955 CA 94010-5955 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIF'ORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Kristina Krow , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 3rd day of MARCH 2O06, deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE 54 NOTICES ..n�,g:y.- 'y .,...�� t i i � x - ; - :i�5 f _ r 4 ✓ � . i 1i` r .K: _ .F„ , � b _ ::Jc t� ..iZA�'• �.� t-:i �� '_ '}..... .'. s.. 3; c:: " ' �, _ - . r� ��� CITY O� BURLJNGAME m �,� �o �AAlID JVNE 6• PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 21, 2004 Derek Chung 140 Laurel Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030 Dear Mr. Chung, The City of Burlingame `CIT'Y HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 TEL: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the May 10, 2004 Planning Commission approval of your applications for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage became effective May 20, 2004. This application was to allow the construction of a new two-story single family dwelling on 1504 Alturas Drive on lot 1(5), zoned R-1. The application for lot 2(6) was not approved at this hearing and was continued. The May 10, 2004 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application for lot 1(5) was approved with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0 through A5.0, topo, C-2 and L1.0, site plan, floor plans, roof plan, building elevations, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plan; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) 4) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's, Fire Marshal's, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met and the City Arborist's December 11, 2003 memo shall be met along with the approved arborist's report date stamped January 6, 2004; that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c);. 5) that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the .t May 21, 2004 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1 Page 2 trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6) that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Deparhnent that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; 7) that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8) that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9) that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10) that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective bamer fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11) that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12) Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13) that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan �{ May 21, 2004 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1 Page 3 and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15) that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 16) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24) that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25) that all windows shall be true divided light windows. Reimbursement of the remainder of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to you under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one � • May 21, 2004 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1 Page 4 year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, 1�— M garet Monroe City Planner c. ABR Architecture, Michael Jung 4075 Papazian Way Fremont, CA 94538 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOTS 5& 6 BLOCK 5 BURLINGAME MANOR MAP NO 1 RSM 26/15 16 CITY OF BURLINGAME; APN# 027-061-050) Date: � To: � From: Project Comments 11/13/03 O City Engineer O Chief Building Official O Fire Marshal �Recycling Specialist O City Arborist O City Attomey Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction peRnit and side setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 I Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and Recycling Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects prior to any demolition, construction. or permitting. F:,' Date: Project Comments <- 11/13/03 To: O City Engineer. O Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist � � O City Arborist O City Attomey From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff F � Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review. hillside area construction permit and side setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 11/17/03 � � .� �� - � . , -•— — � _ - � •� �� r .. � ► � � �. .� _,�s' - , Reviewed by: . Date: �� i�r-o � � Date: To: Project Comments 91/13/03 � �City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal � Recyding Specialist ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attomey From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditionat use permit for re-emerging lots, design reyiew, hillside area construction permit and side .setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 -�► � -(;�' . T, , � ;....: _ .� • � : s ■; ..�� Reviewed by: . Date: vv. 1�11?�� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION � . : rr.arnvuvG xEv�w co�rrrs � -�-;'n�f. Project Name:-� S�a�c� . . � '"'�`.�-,��"R . � - Project Address:__lS� A�-�Ym� � _- r,�tr-- • � The following requirements apply to the project � 1� � A property. boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land , � surveyor. The survey shall show all prop�rty lines, property corners, �, � easements, topograptiical features and utilities. (Required prior to the . building permit issuance.) Gu.a��- �� l}s z,,�,s��o �s � A�g�Pt'kBr�. 2 � The site and roof drainage shall_be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Streetf (Required prior to the building permit � issuance.) cyr � v��av�' �o.�.� o��:�., ,A.�o�-,- . . 3. � The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for . approval prior to the issuance of a Building pernut. � 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's � flood zone requirements. 5 Y A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with tlie City's standazds. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6: The project plans sha11 show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. - Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis _shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any . sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 4� . 8. � Submit traf�ic trip generation analysis for the project. . 9. �� Submit a traffic impact. study for the projec� The traf�c siudy should � identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation � measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City � . Engineer. . = 10. The project shall file a pazcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all e�cisting properiy lines, easements, � monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. - Page 1 of 3 U:lprivate developmentlPLANNING REVIEW COh�IEI1TS.doc �� :.. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary tide report of the subject pazcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12, Map closure/lot closure . calculations sha11 be submitted with the parcel map. � � 13 � The project shall submit a condomi.nium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � T'he. project sha11, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary � appurtenant work. � 15 � The project sha11, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, pazking meters and poles, trees, and streedights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 1!6 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehiculaz traffc, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify t�iese impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. . 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil . engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that ihe proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse imgact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year � flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. � 18 � Any work within the drainage azea; creek, or creek banks requires a State _, Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 � No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 -� The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to . prevenf storm water pollution. � 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with .driveway� �dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's appmval. 22 � � , �e-submit plans showing the.driveway profile with elevations : � � Page 2 of 3 U:lprivate development�ELANNING ItEVIEW COI�IlvtENTS.doc �; . - • � '• .�. ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 � The back of the drivewa /sidewalk a roach shall tie at least 12" above Y PP � the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm � watei from the street into private property. � 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacic shall be placed in. fron� The � sidewalk &onting the store shall be kept cIean 20' from each side of the . ProPertY• �. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area . shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the gazbage area to . . the Sanitary Sewer System is required. � � Page 3 of 3 . U:�private development�FI.ANNING REVIEW COb�vIEI�Ti'S.doc ,' THE C,�REEN .)�ANN[E Jam�arq 5, 2004 RECE11lED ne� c�� 1504 Altucus Drive JAN = 6 2004 Burlingame,CA94010 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEP7. R,e: im�pact of pmposed constnuKion to site trces Requested to inspect site trecs by Peninsula Tiee Care for new construction proposal. On site are 2 California Native Heritage Trees in qu�stion to new oonstivction proposaj and 1 significant tree. California Native Herita�ge 1�ees #1 43" Native California Coastal Live Oak (Quercus agrifolfa), 28'dripline, strong vigor, good shuctare, good health with signs of oak moth There is minim�al decline to the tree. Recomme�l insecticide treatme� in the Spring to inhi'bit oak moth further. S��uthwesteriy tree fringe is thres fcet over existing roof line. I recommend prior to oonstruction a few two inch branches cat at eausting gutter line a�d only raise fringe six feet over existing roof line. Placement of 6" mulch 10' around trec tivnk but not against tnmk of tree will inhibit compaction from mechanical �me�t, and placement of temporary barrier fencing for the �otection and safety of the tree at 8' southwest side af trtmk 28' northrast side of tnmk during demolifion of existing deck stiuchu�e. Immediatety after deck demolifion bazrier fencing to be placed as ciose to dripline of 28' as possi'ble and remain in place during constnx,�tion, praposed oonstruction sball not adversely affect this trce. #2. 47" Native Coastal Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 17' dripline, strong vigor, excellent structure, excellent health, 3' from water line, 8' from existing stiucture and 7' from proposed construction I recommend a few three inch limbs growing southerly three feet over existing roof line be pruned to existing gutter line so that tree limbs growing over roof clear six feet over roof prior to constructioq cutdng of ivq away from tree tnmk, and placememt of temporary barrier fencing for the protection and safety of the tree at 5' sonth side of tivnlc and 15' east and west side of tivnk during oonstmction. There is a north side neighboring boundary fence in place. When trenching in dripline of tree, the work sbaU be performed by hand labor. When 4" diameter roots or larger are encounterecl from hand digging under driplin� the oonsulting Afiorist must be called to the site hefore work can resume nnder tree dripline. Proposed consh�uction shall not adverselq affect this tc+ee. Signif'�cant Tree #3 24" Weeping Willow (Salix babylonica aurea), 24' drip lia�, moderate vigor, fair stiucture, poor health: aplud damage, boarer beetle preseirt, nutrient deficient Proposed conshvction impacts this tree. This is a declining low value tree with invasive roots. I reoommend remaval of this tc+ee regardle� of proposed constn�ction Fencing Detail The fencing should not interfere with actual oonswction, but is intended to redirect umnecessary traff c, and to protect limbs and roots. No storage of mateiials, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction strall be allowed within fencing. The fence shauld be a minimum of four feet high; made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts. All contiactors, subcontractors, and other persoffiel shall be wamed Wat encroacbment witl�in the fenced area is forbidden without the oonsent of the certified arborist on the job. This includes, but 137 CAST7l.LIAN WAY � SAN MATEO, CA 94401 � 6�83$717 � THEGREENJEANNIE@l'AHOO.COM THE C.�sREEl1[ .1EANNIE is not limitsd to, storage of lumher and other materials, disposed-of�ai�s, solyents, or other noxious materials, P�� �, �g e�MPment, and other heavy eqoiPment. The temporary fence shall be mai�rtainecl uirtil the landscape contractar enters the job and commences Iandscape constcuction Sammary The California Native Heritage Trees on site will not be adversely impacted from pnappsad construction M'mim�dl pnming of trees should be done prior to Spring. Atter remavai of the willow, the stump shonId be �d to p�eve� any sucker growth. Plaoeme� of temparary barrier fencing st�uldremain u� �on is completed. Treat oak math in the Spring through tree injaction or tapical spiay. When oompleting the deck demolition, the oansntting Arbori� gnust be called to inspoct placement of temporaip barrier fencing. When tree t+oo�s faut inches in diameter or larger enoountered cturing hand digging undcr tree dripline, the consutting arborist will be called and �+emain on site whea work is performed under troe driplin� These trees are lavely assets to the pmperty and provide gceat beauty and landscape value. Thank you for the oppordimty to touch tliese treesl RespedfiillY submitted with the best of my afioricultucal knowledge J eue Ray�eSchmuck wc22sg r�zr..��r►�u�.v�r����.�,a� ��c.�����as�'r����u<,��,��r;�axs�: , . � ,.. , .�". - - .: � ¢ �,+ ' : ., � �� �' � 4' � �k� 4 J � . ,� � ' - �. .. , � i�fi.�� X��[ ���• �1��&�g�, �j. S " y wi�. '` � . !"" P +'� ^.:! ��` s .�'.� . �.�'i'a ,''' � p. . ..- ' . .f'�'-r� � . . . � t ,. t. �. z-. �'� ; � �:. �:�.��;,: � � .� �� " -�`. �i� 4 �- . i'. �: ti -.a r1 �' .�r . .. �us`� � `. ��� . .K� k • F-; � YTt y • ._ g �'s, �_� � . .�.'� ;� � . �_ j -.r.ti � � # � T,�,: .a � "�c �IR . y ar"L�.�r:t'*_�• .�...��. _ ; ;Fr f,- .,'�� • • �• .. � .� � • ,.7 " ::�' A �. ���� ;��� `, � i � ��i .. '��t : .e. < �, � � � � �, ,� a .; _,; � � � �: , .� ��= V r �,. : � _ �. � ^�1'� � , ` __ �• �.. �� _,_ F ' . M; r� . , Vr�, � � VICINfTY All�P r� , �� � 'r, •..+ „�! �'. • ••�i' f ;.� s ( ' . � J�.�,'k � : �d �� � �".h\\ i `. , L.,; •�'L�ti,��� ���; I �,, h ��Y ,,,u�� ,r�:�"„ ;r, ,i �; '��: �, ;. . p. ;};�,<, , " .�r4 P r!': •+. ti �� �dY. �., ���Q�'��• i.. ;(�;' :�� �'� . �V i�•, � �'!i'.:: Il, �? � ,r f�,ns.� ;i �,,,:,;� • , ��I�:�III� �. .fJ� ` �w`r�,��;�`y�..�I� , . \ ' `� `��.i;lt?r•tin �l �. �r3.�ll.'.�.�i,. a��w � �yp��1� ti� 11r Yr1 �r� �� � ,, \ �,, �� i!(j '�� ��1i ''- �f,,;�ta„_ ._ � . . . ` ,� :• . : � ,. �� ., , -- �.. � �.. : r:, n •.� � � ••��;, ....,i.•� . _� � �...w t � `�.g�"�� •.� ' ��''�� —�- -•;"lL�t'.._ • �`� Q ..:y'� ' qG � •�: ...a- ___ _+_ -�. .....�= .:.r.�'''.r _ •��_ �•/r .r ._�-. _ . •- ��.�.nr.��-.+ . " �'��}..1'..... ,. . _ . - � . _ - .."'• • "'.'."" � .�.. -' • �.M-*--- .--�'-._..�--� ; -� �,�— - — - — , , �,wM. oi.R ►� ��♦ OEMOIdT10N aRE PUW �u �... �. M`�nno�r� 4 ' • .- � .� -. . ''�. �1; i�: � :: �::. ...._ r� �� ��i �c� !i�� i� 1�� i��. � ``�� ��� �� �� �1�� �^• ���y������• ��; ������ ��: �� ��� ��` .�����.� ��: �i �� ��� • �� � ��� ��� i��� �. ��.� •� ����i �� �i� ��. �i��ay�i�ii�i��G _ � -'IIII., Y�f f ��i ����i ��i ��� ���� ��1111 ��1 �� 4� � • ` �i�o� Ji� �� ��� � . '•••.;;.•;.:•.;.. �••��: ;::; :;. �. . ��v�"'��: �: �: �:: ;j�•.; •:;.:;.;.. �`,;•".;: ;:;:�;. . �:. •.: •. ••. '�� ��`�.:�;:?;` : � � �•. : � 1"�• � �:� ' � � •�. : - . . - �� . . i � �. `� . �� . � � �• � �, " � a � .>+��.,>. � ��'���� ♦����.w� ���!���� .�.. �,�, � I �`� � �'\ �� ��� , . . !' �� � . �� � '�-cn� �� �r.��� c�,n,��'r�-�'o� a,� ��o�u -E-�'a� RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2004-11 �329 12:16pm 05!27/04 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 15 Recorcled in Officiat Records County af San Mateo Warren Slocum A�sessor-Cc�snty Gierk-Recorder �� � � I� I� � � �� � �� � l�'�� '�I .'�I�� �I��!'�, lil!�I �� �II'� . � ? 9 A R * Resolution No. 044-2004 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1; APN: 027-061-050 TITLE OF DOCUMENT 1, (� RECEIVEQ JUN 1 7 2004 CITY �F BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. I hereby certify this to be a full, true and conect copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: OS/21/2004 �-- M rga t Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION 044-2004 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGENCE OF TWO PARCELS, DESIGN REVIEW, HIILSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for conditional use permit for re-emergence of two parcels, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit for an attached garage for a new two-stor ���le familv dwellin� at 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1(5), zoned R-1, Derek and Amv Chun , pro e�rty owners, APN: 027-061-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on May 10, 2004, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15304 Class 4-(c) filing of earth into previously excavated land with material compatible with the natural features of the site; and Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single- family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said conditional use permit, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for conditional use permit, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be r� ded in the official xecords of the County of San Mateo. � ,� � � x � i" ,� � L. � ,,�,_ ,,�a � � �� Ch rman I, ��^�n�Z, 3'ZowN��,�, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting the Planning Commission held on the lOth day of Mav, 2004, by the following vote AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Bojues, Brownrigg, Keighran, Osterling, Vistica NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - Keele ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE , � � � , ,� � Sec tary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, conditional use permit, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit. 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1(5) Effective May 20, 2004 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 14, 2004, sheets A1.0 through A5.0, topo, C-2 and L1.0, site plan, floor plans, roof plan, building elevations, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plan; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's, Fire Marshal's, and the City Engineer's November 17, 2004 memos shall be met and the City Arborist's December 11, 2003 memo shall be met along with the approved arborist's report date stamped January 6, 2004; 4) that the 24" Weeping Willow tree located in the front of Lot #1 is approved for removal by the City Arborist as per Code Section 11.06.060(c); 5) that the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall not be removed and the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures , prior to any grading or demolition on the site. The tree protection measures, as defined in the applicant's arborist report by the Green Jeannie (date stamped January 6, 2004) which has been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist, shall be maintained on site until after the final inspection and the City Arborist authorizes their removal; the contractor shall call for the City Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a grading permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified arborist's report; failure to continually provide the tree protection and implementation of any of those requirements in the arborist's report shall result in the property owner paying for an independent inspection of the site by an arborist selected by the City; 6) that a certified arborist shall be on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take place within the designated tree protection zones, and that a certified arborist shall inspect the construction site once a week and certify in writing to the City Arborist and Planning Department that all tree protection measures are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; inappropriately stockpiled or stored material and equipment shall be moved immediately; and that a certified arborist shall be given written authority by the developer and be obligated to stop all work on the site should any activity violate any and all conditions of approval relating to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site, and the City Arborist may also stop work for any violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of trees on the site; EXHIBIT "A"- Page 2 Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, conditional use permit, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit. 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1(5) Effective May 20, 2004 7) that prior to demolition or construction the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, shall be trimmed, raising the fringe only six feet over the existing roof line, this shall be done under the direct supervision of a certified arborist at a time during the project determined by the City Arborist; 8) that prior to demolition or construction 6" of mulch shall be placed 10' around the trunk of the 43" Coastal Live Oak located on the right side of Lot #2, immediately adjacent to Lot #1, but shall not be placed directly against the trunk; 9) that prior to demolition of the rear deck temporary barrier fencing shall be placed at 8' on the southwest side of the 43" Coastal Live Oak, and 28'on the northeast side of the trunk; 10) that after the demolition of the rear deck, but prior to the construction of the new homes, protective barrier fencing shall be placed as close to the drip line of the 43" Coast Live Oak as possible and shall remain in place throughout the construction of both houses on Lot #1 and Lot #2; 11) that the protective barrier fencing shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, and shall be made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts; there shall be no storage of materials or equipment, unnecessary trenching, grading or compaction within the protective barrier fencing; encroachment into these areas is forbidden; 12) Tree Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for maintenance during demolition and construction work on the project and for a 5-year maintenance program for the 43" Coastal Live Oak, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of the January 6, 2004 Green Jeannie report as well as such additional recommendations as the developer shall receive from a certified arborist; 13) that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; 14) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15) that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; � , EXHIBIT "A"- Page 3 - Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, conditional use permit, design review, hillside area construction permit and special permit. 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1(5) Effective May 20, 2004 16) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 17) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 18) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 19) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 20) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 21) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 22) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 23) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24) that the shutters shall be consistent with the size and shape of the windows; and 25) that all windows shall be true divided light windows. Project Comments � Date: To: From: 11/13/03 � City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal �Recycling Specialist O City Arborist O City Attomey Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction permit and side setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 i i � i � I � Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and Recycling Deposit for this and all covered projects and sections of projects prior to any demolition, construction or permitting. 1: Project Comments �. Date: 11 /13/03 To: O City Engineer � Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal ❑ Recycling Specialist � O City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff t Subject: Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area constn.�ction permit and side setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 � � �,� _ � � _,_ . _ Y - - � - - •� —� ,� J \ � � ' � :r. .a ��i' ` Reviewed by: . Date: �� i��--� � :�� . � . _ .>t�..�__... _ , . . Project Comments 11 /13/03 Date: �City Engineer a Chief Building Official O Fire Marshal O Recycling Specialist ❑ City Arborist O City Attomey To: Planning Staff From: Subject: Request for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots, design review, hillside area construction permit and side setback variance for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1504 Alturas Drive- LOT 1, zoned R-1, APN:027-061-050 Staff Review: 11/17/03 b�i� ��� � . %a �- - - - • ► �..... _. ' � = s �, _..�• Reviewed by: �v. Date: l�l17�� . s � , � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW CONIlVIENTS �,it� � —rt� , Project Name: �� Ss� ,� �� The following requirements apply to the project - Project Address:_ ISN� �-�c�-��n� ��- �l 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land . surveyor. The survey sha11 show all property lines, property comers, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the . building permit issuance.) �,r,�,,�- � � �,,,,�,��o is ,,.,,,.� �p��, 2 ?S The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Streety (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) cx� `l� t�e�„�a�,f- ,a-�'--o.,,,,� �*%�.�:r.. �e.�. , � 3. � 4 The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. The project site is in a flood zone, the project sha11 comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 '`� A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. (Required prior to the building pernut issuance.) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. -. 8 Submit trai�ic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. -� Submit a traf�ic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a pazcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, � monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:�private davelopment�PLANNING REVIEW CONIIviENTS,doc ��� • � � . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the pazcel map for reviews. 12, Map closure/lot closure . calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. � 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary ; appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights iri accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during conshuction to vehicular traf�ic, pedestrian traffic ancl public on street parking. The project shall identify ttiese impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year � flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 � Any work within the drainage area; creek, or creek banks requires a State -. Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 � No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 �� The project sha11 comply with the City's NPDES pemut requirement to prevenf storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 � , �e-submit plans showing the.driveway profiie with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW CONIIvIENTS.doc .� ` �: , � . .' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 � The back of the drivewa /sidewalk a roach shall be at least 12" above Y PP the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the properiy. 25. For commerciai projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the gazbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. . Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�FLANNING REVIEW CONIIviENTS.doc THE GR�EN ,1EANN[E 7anuary 5, 2004 .ncrek chimg 1504 Altwvs Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: impact of pmposed conshvction to site trees RECEIIfED JAN =� 6 2004 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. Requesced to inspect site trees by Peninsula Tree Care for new constcuction proposal, pn site are 2 California Native Herihage Trces in quesrion to new constcuction proposal and 1 sigmfipirt tree. California Native Heritag�e 1Yces #1 #2. 43" Nativ�e California Coastal Live Oak (Quercus agrijo[la), 28'dr�pline, strong vigor, good s�tructwe, good health with signs of oak moth There is minimal decline to the tree. Recommeid insecticide �ent in the Spring to inlubit oak moth further. Southwesteriy tree fringe is three feet over existing roof line. ] reoommend prior to oonst�uction a few two inch branches cat at existing gutter line a�d only raise fringe six feet over existing roof line. Placement of 6" mulch 10' around tree ttunk but not against tnmk of tree will intnbit oompaction from mechanical equipment, and placemenl of temporary barrier fencing for the protection and safety of the tree at 8' southwest side of mmk 28' northeast side of tnmk during demolition of existing deck stiucdue. Immediately after deck demolition barrier fencing to be placed as close to dripline of 28' as possble and r�emain in place during construcrion Proposed oonstiuction shall not adversely affect this tree. 47" Native Coastal Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 17' dripline, strong vigor, excellent stcucture, excellent health, 3' from water line, 8' from existing shucture and 7' from proposed oonstruction I recommend a few three inch limbs growing southerly three feet over existing roof line be pruned to existing g�rttcr line so that tree limbs growing aver roof clear six feet over roof prior to constructioq cutting of ivq away from trce trunk, and placeme� of temporacy barrier fencing for the protection and safety of the trce at 5' south side of tiunk and 15' east and west side of tiunk during oonstruc�ion There is a north side neighboring bonndary fence in place. When trenching in dripline of trce, the work shall be performed by hand labor. When 4" diameter roots or larger are encountered from hand digging under dripline, We consulting Afiorist m�st be called to the site before work can resume under tr�ee dripline. Proposed conshuction shall not adversety aff'ect this tre�. Significant Tree #3 24" Weeping Willow (Salix babylorrica aurea), 24' drip line, moderate vigor, fair structure, poor health: aplud damage, boarer beetle present, nutrient deficient Proposed conshuction impacts this trce. This is a declining low value trbe with invasive roots. I recommend remaval of this tree regardless of proposed constmction. Fencing Detail The fencing should not interfere with actual construction, but is intended to radirec:t unnecessary traffic, and to protect limbs and roots. No storage of materiais, unnecessary treaching, grading or compaction shall be allowed within fencing, The fence should be a minimum of four feet high, made of pig wire, snow fence, or cyclone fence, with steel stakes or pipes as posts. All contiactors, subcontractors, and other personnel shall be wamed tt�at encroachme� within the fenced area is forbidden without the consent of the certified arborist on the job. This includes, but 137 CASTILLIAN WAY � SAN MAl"EO, CA 94401 � 650-48�-87 i 7� THEGREENJEANNIE�S'AHOO.COM THE C.�sREEI�I ..IEANNIE � is not limited to, storage of lumber amd other materials, disposed-of-paints, solvents, or other noxious materials, Parked c�, S�ing ec�uiPment, and other hr�'Y eqaiPmeni. The temporaiy fence shall be mai�ained uMil the landscape contrador enters the job and oommences landscape oonstiuction Sammary 'Ihe California Native Fieritage Trers on site will not be adversety impacted from pcnposed oonshuction. Minimal pnming of trces should be done prior to Spring. After nemoval of the willow, the stump shoaId be gmund to prevent any sucker gcnwth. PlacemeIIt of temporary barrier fencing shouldremain u� oonstruction is oompleted. Treat oak moth in the Spring thmi►gh tree injection or topical spray. When oompletiag the deck demolition, the consulting Afiori� must be called to inspect pl�ement of temporary barrier fencing. When tree roots faur ind�es in diameter or larger enco�mtered during hand digging under tree dripline, the consniting arborist will be called and rem�n on site when work is performed under trae dripline. These Urees are lovely assets to the property and pmvide great beauty and landscape value. Thank you for the opporh�mty to touch these trEes! Respedfully submitted with the best of my arboricultucal knowledge J ette RayeSchmuck WC2258 r37r esricu�iv�ras���,=Mat�'o:,G'K.�4f,T't`�6�t548�8�`r;'�'.��►E����a�ui�t�rAi�b� c�r �, ,.. ; .,� - , �; _ .. ' .,� -� i.3� � `. %f � +��{„A��li � ..� ���;" �' , 's" +. `� � • -•'�.;� �" , ^� +A r `' � #' µ� v�,. . t �` �`�� F�.' .�i �'' � p` � . .. ' �� . �-� � � .. �� .' �'� �`.��..1� s. v � Y .s .. t ,� �." `+J,� � � � .. : � ' . 4q��<��� � �� F� �ri ,�� > :.x . • , �'� r .�, ;�f .+„ ' �'�:� �.� �.9 ��� � .so�'Y:i 9 , � y� ��� A. . . � �.j' s'� . �.�@' 3^�3�"�� :n �' ..y� �a�Y13, ��� ' . ... ;�� �'�'i "�4-� � �: N � ' ti '-. �� �ir ,..,y " . ��-� .-t ..,. . _...� ..�...:...,. _ . " `- _ 7Pe'.'. . } - . r.., yr r �a �, ' - . # ... --.---� :�,; � � �a1Za' - 3.'. , r �� �� g��- . -.� � � . .� �; r `i?� : � �it. �� ` - .Nf a `',+ � . �, Y - '� `- .,� �= , � �-4��� � - � •y �: ��, �1` u. ..r- . �a : _ w • x�`. _ �� :4� - c i� : ,r�• � ��' M � �� . � +�`�� � . i jt'd� � . �� �� .r � �! ; �.s �/ .,—_. -. �+ �; : .. �..,. — �... �.. � ."' ,/i `� �� � .� ��.� .� �7ltr�t�l,:•n„'•. � � � �rl� � •� '��� �` �'�ir,}<,t:f(�'! .��.���� .�. s � \ ` ♦ �� J�.. � .' � \ . : , .7�r;�e�, �n ��, .. �.;y%:-a,x �,� ':�� i" . "� ..� _1- .-��.t►__ . -�� ,�;. ;� � ,"-.�'_ =--_ - ;:��'� _'—_--�.�'�- ��--� . � . ���___ �;� ; �� � ---- � �--- ���� --�_ _\ �. �bM1�� �'���V�.1�—�amor� artE a,ui -• � ... .- � .� -. . ir�: M1: ,.,:: :; :::. ..•..•. ...... .:..:.:.o, �.::.:.::.: :�;:��:�: �:��.. -..•..•.•.. .,,; ,;,;;; ;:: ;: ;;,,, .....,.. ;... ;.. .. .. . .... .,,;�:�: ��:::::.'e.:.' ,,;�`� :::..::::::.. � ���i/i..- `�'••= •-- •:••: •- ..-- �►'�....•••. � � `•'• • •''• ••� . '•� : � ,�r�: •:: �••����� �'''. ���!•��;: �:: ..: .. • � .o �` i� �� ��� i� �� �• r •��•. �•••' •' ••'••', . � •,1•• •' ••• ••• . r�� •,••'•'•••• � '+• ••'• •'i I /""� �� •b r � ••' ���� : • ' � � _ ' ►. , �. ,� ••' • � ,c � !� ' :. � _ � �. �� �,. ,. � .•' •� q � "'� i�a.,: • � � �,,�:°: �i�'l � �U �'l� c�rlvt� c.�s v�`�'�r�-'�'t�0'�C� o.v�.c� �,e-�'�o��i '�-�'a �n .S.a'.. :t� ��4baiS� . �`'�f4 t �: f ?�� 3Ge��:. q: :.iF.f f .. �. �. � � t ,. '� F�� Y' -� _�' �j�. .t'` ;� ::1� - ♦ _ �. ,F . .= � .i �_ � �' �} X� ' Z — .I � � S �i' �.-4'� f*. } . i . `J, �5.: r'� <';t.�?'� fs:-- .-a� .. �' . . t%� } ''�. � t -„I _ "=r., . . f�:`: P,,,Er'-.�. � �, c�rr ,�� °s CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLJNCrAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �.,,� �,,,.'' � TEL: (650) 558-7250 Site: 1504 A,I,TURAS DRIVE, I,OT 1& 2 Application for conditional use permit for re-emerging lots; application for design review, hillside area construction permit, side setback variance and special permit for attached garage for two (2) new, two-story single family dwellings at: 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1� 2, zoned R-1. (APN: 027-061-050). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, February 9, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia. Mailed: January 30, 2004 (Please refer to other side) ��� } �� If�you chal ge t�t �i�ii"ec� appl�c� �i (��n i��ur�, �_�� raising onl hos :�[ssues�011 QI';soii�eQne�l�e�x�i�sed a described i t � at or prior t ��i�li� .-ea���g���� �t'`���� g�. "ti�� C a c. �� o�!� t�s Property o ers W Q r � i e ��q t ��es�onsi�i � tenants ab t thi� no i,; ��r' d�����`informatio� 558-7250. ank ��.n�i � .� .� A copy of the a to the meeting Burlingame, Cal Margaret N1�3� o��� City Planner � i PU CITY OF BURLINGAME ,� � _�. � � � �_ _.�-i��E PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE be reviewed prior Primrose Road, na be limited to ie blic hearing, �►e d to the city � � >r i orming their ple e call (650) ��� � ��� . .�� � �� � ICE (Please refer to other side) �' . . � � ' . � . . ' . . . ! . . , _ �� � . . . . � . ^ �.� OSL�e . ' , ^ . _ \ \ � , _ " � �p,'L , p�` l/ _ �` � �.0� . .. , . .. 1��' .��JO` . .. ��� � � , ,�`�J� �o� ��0� ,�' �� , � `� ��� � � <<< � ,ti� � ��G ,� � �Q- i � � � ry� � «< �P�' � � � , ^ �i � , �Z� ,� �S ^� � � �� � � � ��/ � �_ � �� � . � $ O[� . � 1•�0 . � �,Ly . � � , \ . bl! � . . � . , ' ��p V ' . . � . ..... 12 \ � ' . � . �Zl . ZZl . � � . ,y^ �.. Y ., . � . 1'��' � � o � � ��� �p � � � . . '` � � ,1,9 . � 1�5 2 �p9 . �`,�p /� .. � '�,�y O� �•y0 �'o�, 6E0£ ' \\ ' . � � � . . . Ly0 �p5 � �� , 1ry'. . _A . , . L�E . �16 �� S •, . ��f � (�F ����.� '��� �OB � � \ . � P,� ` ' �' � seoe � �<-� � � � � � ,, .... oroe "�.. ->�a � � �� b ��� 1� �OE BbOE . = _ . ��`0 . ZSOE ._.""-,* �09 �ti � . . � � � e� � 5�� .. . �1ry . �.r� , y ���o � � � � o � � � � � . � � � '�"''"�':�",�r,. s��� . . �^oe . �� � ' Y,. . lgp� 9�E --:.,,,,� - . � . � � 06 Y."'�st,.. � �.`' 0�� .�A.,,, �'. . . � � � yo� eoLe ,'• , ,'', ` .. - - _ ^�e 1�0� ,Ty 3:` '� � �' �� ya1 � �a � ,,..'� � ,��3 ^6 � � � ,�h � . 15p1 . �s,., .. 1p9 � G� y1 . � .. �`'^ . 15�` o� � ��e ~ j"�. . ` ,�oy . w`� ` M��' � � Q ,`��� ,y°� �� � �`£ ��'� _ ��' ,� o S 1 . 15p`' . . 2`` a� . �O �y�y ��5 y^,� ^y,ti £ ,� � � �lJ� �P a Q�' ^ 1yti ^�,, �o�e � P y,�° � A � e N �0��� , ; � ��y � y�,6 �. � � ��� ; � � ���� � ^� �ti° � GP , � �5'� ,y� a ��e b � ti ^9 b� �� � , y,�� ^`' O �.`' eoi f ^ � � l! � � ^yti� , , A� ^ ,� �� f � ^yo � ^h�� � � C � . � 9 ' � . . � .. . . y�ry�. , �J yry� � . . � . . � ��F . . . � ^�� . . / ��� , '�� �. � ���� � , � � Z ^y'� ^y�^ �5� � � s 9 �' .. ^�pp . ^y,jy - . . . � , ^g� � . � � . OCi ' bh � � � . �5 1 .P y^��' . .. 15�'� . . 1y21 � . � � N � ed�£ � . � � '� o �� 5`� cA� aA�' � � � 16�'A � . 15� . . .. " . Q . . . � � 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1 and 2 Planning Commission Notices Parcel Owner 027 015 120 Lipinski Lester S Trustee 027 021 100 Ericsson John E,Karin G Trs 027 021 110 Durazzo-casey Trust 027 021 120 Dugoni William E Tr 027 021 130 Marquis Donald A,Anita E Trs 027 021 140 Gross Barbara L,H B Trs 027 021 150 Sarkar Rajabrata 027 021 160 Stallings Michael F,Joni L 027 021 170 Saraceno John A,Irma M Trs 027 021 180 Cornejo William Richard 027 021 190 Caviglia Norina M Tr 027 022 130 Magner Diane M Tr 027 022 140 Church Susan J 027 022 150 Wong Stephen H M,Melinda A 027 022 160 Gage Roland K,Anne V 027 022 330 Vielbaum Walter H,N E Trs 027 022 340 Lappos Charalambos,E Trs 027 022 350 Eifler Horst Tr 027 022 510 Strocher Jewel B 027 046 010 Estassi Roger J,Maria Trs 027 046 020 Perotti John A Jr 027 046 030 Ostertag Willy Tr 027 046 040 Pappas Anthony G Tr 027 046 050 Latorre Thomas,C Trust 027 047 010 Wereda Walter G 027 047 020 Grantham Paul V 027 047 030 Corazzini James G 027 047 040 Platt Frederick O,E A Trs 027 047 050 Wong William 027 047 060 Reynolds Ann F 027 047 070 Cheung Alice Nga Yee 027 047 080 Pollack Jonathan Robert 027 047 090 Wan Alain K K,+ 027 047 110 Navab Massoud 027 047 120 Lombardo Josephine P 027 047 130 Gee Clinton,Judith 027 056 010 Reedy Steven A Tr 027 061 010 Wilson Kenneth F,C L Trs 027 061 020 Koontz Roland F,Regina A Trs 027 061 030 Legos Gerald A 027 061 040 Hagenah John W,Mildred J 027 061 050 Martin Charles P 027 062 010 Bobrow Harold S,Linda R Trs 027 062 020 Hsia Jeou Dao,Diane 027 062 030 Dulman Mikhail,Marina 027 062 040 Neger Robert E,L H Trs 027 062 200 Lycett Trust 027 062 210 Law David,Tsui Betty 027 063 050 Smith Andrew B,+ 027 063 060 Schmelzer Charles H 027 063 180 Sale Dwight B,Laura M Trs Mailaddres 1523 Alturas Dr 1517 La Mesa Dr 1515 La Mesa Dr 1511 La Mesa Dr 1507 La Mesa Dr 1503 La Mesa Dr 1508 Alturas Dr 1512 Alturas Dr 1514 Alturas Dr 1516 Alturas Dr 1520 Alturas Dr 3044 Hillside Dr 1011 Capuchino Ave 3052 Hillside Dr 1504 La Mesa Dr 1516 La Mesa Dr 1518 La Mesa Dr 1506 La Mesa Dr 1508 La Mesa Dr 1519 Alturas Dr 560 Acacia Ave 3104 Cananea Ave 3108 Cananea Ave 3112 Cananea Ave 3 Cananea PI 1 Cananea PI 3101 Cananea Ave 1505 Alturas Dr 1503 Alturas Dr 1501 Alturas Dr 3104 Hillside Dr 3108 Hillside Dr 3112 Hillside Dr 6 Cananea PI 4 Cananea PI 3109 Cananea Ave 3103 Hillside Dr 42 Estates Ct 3066 Hillside Dr 3070 Hillside Dr 1500 Alturas Dr 9991 Roseclover Way 100 La Mesa Dr 108 La Mesa Dr 116 La Mesa Dr 120 La Mesa Dr 105 Alturas Dr 3075 Hillside Dr 122 Valdeflores Dr 126 Valdeflores Dr 109 La Mesa Dr January 30, 2004 56 Noticed Mailcity Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Bruno Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Rafael Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Galt Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame �ilst� Mzipandzip CA 94010-5966 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5921 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5936 CA 94010-5910 CA 94010-3649 CA 94010-5910 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5922 CA 94010-5966 CA 94066-4222 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5938 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5937 CA 94010-5935 CA 94010•5935 CA 94010-5935 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5912 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5939 CA 94010-5965 CA 94010-5911 CA 94901-3617 CA 94010-5953 CA 94010-5953 CA 94010-5936 CA 95632-8856 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5920 CA 94010-5904 CA 94010-5954 CA 94010-5933 CA 94010-5933 CA 94010-5919 , 1504 Alturas Drive, Lot 1 and 2 Planning Commission Notices 027 063 190 Pollard Gene A,Janice D Trs 027 063 200 Gumas John,Janice Trust 027 063 210 Gumas John,Janice Trust 027 063 220 Dowd Juliet R Tr 027 063 230 Lee Thomas F,Elizabeth M 105 La Mesa Dr 103 La Mesa Dr 3051 Hillside Dr 3047 Hillside Dr 3041 Hillside Dr January 30, 2004 56 Noticed Burlingame CA 94010-5919 Burlingame CA 94010-5919 Burlingame CA 94010-5955 Burlingame CA 94010-5955 Burlingame CA 94010-5955 CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Kristina Krow , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 30`h day of January 2004, deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said properly who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOT 1& 2 56 NOTICES � , . �r�, c rr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME e�reur�wME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �„v,,,,,�.''�� TEL• (650) 558-7250 Site: 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOTS 1& 2 Application for conditional use permit for re- emerging lots; application for design review, hillside area construction permit and special permits for attached garages for two (2) new, two-story single family dwellings at: : 1504 ALTURAS DRIVE, LOTS 1& 2, zoned R-1. (APN: 027-061-050). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, May 10, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at _ . 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. � Mailed: April 30, 2004 • (Please refer to other side) A copy of the appli to the meeting a Burlingame, Cal' � If you� chal ge t` raising onl os 1� described i t�Y��� at or prior t Property o ers tenants ab t thi 558-7250. ank :� i Margaret o��`� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF B URLINGAME° > an `i�EQ,�,r�i ay be reviewed prior �la�ung� D�p ent 1 Primrose Road, � � ��� �� $ �� �,. �� � � b��� t ���:�' :��'� -���c, , �.: �;� �� �� ���� t� �tjuir't, a, u ma be limited to ;������ ���� �+�u, �, e;���.=���ed a; he blic hearing, �,�,�� �p�p�rle��e d to the city C A L t F O R'd t A City Planner � �'b:� C�? , PU � (Please refer to other side) ';�� onsi �` or i orming their ' ,. ��informatio ple e call (650) t�- _ ,�: ;;;�� ,:. + . � �j � � �� A �.�. - � � � . �CE � � '' � �G v ° Q- �2A � 1504 Alturas Drive, Lots 1 and 2 Planning Commission Notices Parcel 027 063 050 027 062 010 027 021 190 027 047 070 027 022 140 027 061 050 027 047 030 027 021 180 027 047 120 027 021 120 027 062 030 027 021 110 027 022 350 027 021 100 027 046 010 027 063 210 027 022 160 027 047 130 027 047 020 027 021 140 027 063 200 027 061 040 027 062 020 027 061 020 027 022 340 027 046 050 027 062 210 027 063 230 027 061 030 027 015 120 027 062 200 027 022 130 027 021 130 027 047 110 027 062 040 027 063 220 027 046 030 027 046 040 027 046 020 027 047 040 027 047 080 027 063 190 027 056 010 027 047 060 027 063 180 027 021 170 027 021 150 027 063 060 027 021 160 027 022 510 027 022 330 Owner Aaker Trust Bobrow Harold S,Linda R Trs Caviglia Norina M Tr Cheung Alice Nga Yee Chowaiki Samir,Rhonda N Chung Derek,Amy Corazzini James G Cornejo William Richard Dacanay Conrad,Alma Dugoni William E Tr Dulman Mikhail,Marina Durazzo-casey Trust Eifler Horst Tr Ericsson John E,Karin G Trs Estassi Roger J,Maria Trs Froehlich Ralph,Monika Gage Trust Gee Clinton,Judith Grantham Paul V Gross Howard,B 1999 Trust Gumas John,Janice Trust Hagenah John W,Mildred J Hsia Jeou Dao,Diane Koontz Roland F,Regina A Trs Lappos Charalambos,E Trs Latorre Thomas,C Trust Law David,Tsui Betty Lee Thomas F,Elizabeth M Legos Gerald A,Leanne Lipinski Lester S Trustee Lycett Trust Magner Diane M Tr Marquis Donald A,Anita E Trs Navab Massoud,Refahi Maryam Neger Robert E,L H Trs Nix Jeffrey A,Kathryn K Ostertag W illy Tr Pappas Anthony G Tr Perotti John A Jr Platt Frederick O,E A Trs Pollack Jonathan R,Anna S Pollard Gene A,Janice D Trs Reedy Steven A Tr Reynolds Ann F Sale Dwight B,Laura M Trs Saraceno John A,Irma M Trs Sarkar Rajabrata,Minakshi Schmelzer Charles H Stallings Michael F,Joni L Strocher Jewel B Vielbaum Walter H,N E Trs Address 18 Eastwood Dr 100 La Mesa Dr 1520 Alturas Dr 3104 Hillside Dr 3048 Hillside Dr 140 Laurel Ave 3101 Cananea Ave 1516 Alturas Dr 4 Cananea PI 1511 La Mesa Dr 116 La Mesa Dr 1515 La Mesa Dr 1506 La Mesa Dr 1517 La Mesa Dr 1519 Alturas Dr 3051 Hillside Dr 1504 La Mesa Dr 3109 Cananea Ave 1 Cananea PI 1503 La Mesa Dr 103 La Mesa Dr 1500 Alturas Dr 108 La Mesa Dr 3066 Hillside Dr 1518 La Mesa Dr 3112 Cananea Ave 3075 Hillside Dr 3041 Hillside Dr �,G7v N� I.I��'�}."._� 1523 Alturas Dr 105 Alturas Dr 3044 Hillside Dr 1507 La Mesa Dr 6 Cananea PI 120 La Mesa Dr 3047 Hillside Dr 3104 Cananea Ave 3108 Cananea Ave 560 Acacia Ave 1505 Alturas Dr 3108 Hillside Dr 105 La Mesa Dr 3103 Hillside Dr 1501 Alturas Dr 109 La Mesa Dr 1514 Alturas Dr 1508 Alturas Dr 126 Valdeflores Dr � c; ��' i=' l�"�� �"� �_i 1508 La Mesa Dr 1516 La Mesa Dr City Orinda Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Millbrae Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Bruno Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame April 30, 2004 56 Notices ST CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA Zip 94563-4308 94010-5920 94010-5936 94010-5912 94010-5910 94030-2326 94010-5937 94010-5936 94010-5939 94010-5921 94010-5920 94010-5921 94010-5922 94010-5921 94010-5966 94010-5955 94010-5922 94010-5965 94010-5939 94010-5921 94010-5919 94010-5936 94010-5920 94010-5953 94010-5922 94010-5938 94010-5954 94010-5955 CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 94010-5966 94010-5904 94010-5910 94010-5921 94010-5939 94010-5920 94010-5955 94010-5938 94010-5938 94066-4222 94010-5935 94010-5912 94010-5919 94010-5911 94010-5935 94010-5919 94010-5936 94010-5936 94010-5933 Burlingame CA 94010-5922 Burlingame CA 94010-5922 ��1504 Alturas Drive, Lots 1 and 2 Planning Commission Notices 027 047 090 Wan Alain K K,+ 027 047 010 Wereda Walter G 027 061 010 Wilson Kenneth F,C L Trs 027 022 150 Wong Stephen H M,Melinda A 027 047 050 Wong William,Helen 3112 Hillside Dr 3 Cananea PI 42 Estates Ct 3052 Hillside Dr 1503 Alturas Dr Burlingame CA Burlingame CA San Rafael CA Burlingame CA Burlingame CA April 30, 2004 56 Notices 94010-5912 94010-5939 94901-3617 94010-5910 94010-5935 � CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) Kristina Krow , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 30��' day of A np �l 2004, deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. � � `f "(Itii��C�� 1504 ALTURAS DRNE, LOTS 1& 2 56 NOTICES