HomeMy WebLinkAbout833 Alpine Avenue - Staff ReportD�' � ,,,�-��„-
I�M # 7
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT AND VA�RIANCE
Special Permit for Size and Rear Setback Variance
Address: 833 Alpine Avenue Meetinq Date: 8/8/94
Request: Special Permit for size and rear setback variance for a new
garage at 833 Alpine Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.073 2d, and 25.60.010
b) .
Applicant: Dave Howell, Peninsula Drafting APN: 029-025-030
Property Owner: Donald Cory
Lot Dimensions and Area: recently combined lots 7& 8= 6,641 SF
General Plan: Low Density, Single Family Residential Zoninq: R-1
Adjacent Development: City playground and single family residences
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Class 3(e), Accessory
(appurtenant) structures including garages.
Summary: The applicant and property owner are applying for a rear setback
variance and special permit for a new 661 SF garage. The proposed three
car garage will replace an existing one car garage (216 SF). The lot has
two street frontages, on Carolan and Alpine Avenues. The front of the lot
is on Alpine Avenue and the rear of the lot is along Carolan Avenue.
Access to the garage will be from Alpine Avenue.
The existing and proposed garage are located outside the rear 30� of the
length of the lot line therefore this garage must then meet rear and side
setback requirements. The proposed rear setback is 5'-0" where the code
requires 15'-0", so a rear setback variance is required.
The existing house has one bedroom and a den and requires one covered and
one uncovered parking space. The proposed garage is 661 SF and provides
parking for three covered parking spaces. The driveway from Alpine Avenue,
in front of the garage, provides parking for one uncovered parking space.
At 661 SF the new garage is 161 SF more than the 500 SF allowed for an
accessory structure. The new construction requires a special permit for
size.
History: Recently the Planning Commission reviewed a Tentative and Final
parcel map to combine two lots at 833 Alpine Avenue. The Planning
Commission and City Council approved the parcel map to combine Lots 7 and
8. This lot combination allows the property owner to build his garage
without having to cross a property line.
PROPOSED
Front Stbk:
Location:
33'-0"
outside rear 30�
of lot length
Side Stbk (L): 13'-0"
ERISTING
41'-0"
outside rear
30� of lot
39'-0"
ALLOWE,REO' D
15'-0"
meet side & rear
setback req.
7'-0"
0
SPECIAL PSRXIT
�
(continued) PROPOSED
Side Stbk (R): 11'-6"
(between qaraqe and house)
Rear Stbk: * 5'-0"
ERISTING
. �
3'-6"
833 AZpine Avenue
ALLOWED/REO'D
4'-0"
15'-0"
Lot Coveraqe: 33� 26.5� 40�
Size: * 661 SF 216 SF 500 SF
FAR: Not applicable, since not considered new construction
DHE: Not applicable, since not two story construction
Parkinq: 3 covered 1 covered 1 covered
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
Height: 14'-0"
±12'-0"
14'-0"
Meets all other zoninq code requirements.
* Special permit for size and variance to rear setback for size for an
accessory structure.
Staff Comments: City staff reviewed the application. The Chief Building
Inspector, Fire Marshal, and City Engineer had no comments (July 18, 1994
memos) .
Findinqs for a variance:
In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the
following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to
property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to
prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or
convenience;
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics,
mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties
in the general vicinity.
Required Findings for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that
the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-
c) .
�
SPECIAL PERXIT
833 AZpine Avenue
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or
convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accor.d
with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or
restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this
title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with
the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential
uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. �
Planninq Commission Action: The Planning Commission should
hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution.
for any action should be clearly stated. At the public
following conditions should be considered:
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
hold a public
The reasons
hearing the
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Department and date stamped July 14, 1994 Sheet 1, Existing
Floor Plan and Site Plan, and Sheet 2, Garage Elevations and Plans;
that no portion of the garage shall be used as a living area or
converted into a living area at any later date;
that there shall be no encroachment of any structures, equipment, or
appliances into the l0' X 20' required vehicle parking area; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Jane Gomery
Planner
c: Donald Cory, property owner
Dave Howell, applicant
3
CITY OF �U�LINGAME
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TY,�e of Anelication: �Special Permit �Variance Other
Project Address���� ���,liC/� �G�'�� .s
Assessor's Parcei Number(s)
APPL/CANT
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: � � � � � Name: d��- C'
Address: �3-3 -�-tG.�i�� ���� Address:
City/StateRip: ���1��r�� � �'�? City/State2ip: ����
Telephone:(work) ��''-�%�3� �i��=��elephone:(work)
(home) -��%-�l�/�
ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER
Name: �p���t��CIL�L�i. ��Ll�� iUL�4
Address: -���c/ �/,/, -��-A � �1��
City/State2ip: U = ��;��'��0
Telephone (daytimei: '� `�7 , (o _5 (Q %
(home)
�kA�l71U�
Please indicate with an asterisk l•1 who the contact nerson
is for th/s n�o/ect.
PROJECT DESCR/PT/ON: �'ii1'ii�`i,F�,��G�'/G� �.� %i�i �=-� �� �%�'�'6�'
��,��'��?T / � �?�i� �""/� �r,r-E� .�'�=%:��Gifl"� �'��.5 ��i��..
�iY� C� �i�'.�'fr'�' �-P/G T �.c`��.�-i=,� (i ��r�i.�� �/..���'_�L-
AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE:
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
� �/...�
Applicant's Signature Date
I know about the proposed application, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application.
�
,� �-_ �� l �
Property Owner's Sign re Date
--------------------------------------------------0 F FI C E U S E O N LY --•--------------------------------------------------
Date Filed: Fee
Receipt #
Letter(s) to applicant advising application incomplete:
Date application accepted as complete: '
P.C. study meeting (date) P.C. public hearing (date)
P.C. Action
,sias Appeal to Council? Yes No �
r���.fn„ Council meeting date Council Action
�r� ciTr a� ,
B4JRLINCrAME'. �10� U 11 �U ��U UL��UlJ�1�l�IICYU LS I._; � i _''
. �_ - ���o��c�� ���u���o���
��... .�9. � . i:;'{
The Planning Commission is requlred by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the followin � � � � ' '''r � " �`'
g questions will assist�_the _Planning-=
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your r'equest: `
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your
property which do not app/y to other properties in this area. r�i`s �`s ��in�czpi�r/
�D� c��Z7� .r�� fi�G� �j4`r�/Js.�r! �sUio��rli'� �f�.-�o/ i! �1v�-i�✓ �r� ��r/
6' � ' , � G /54�7 ��i-�'J ���� a7��/��S �//.%� � • .
h��f�s" %il' l � � l� /�. ��1' e �Sis�'J %`t�
�so�/y f�v f'��`�'iv� ����rp�, /i�a�. i�i� u�i��.ai�. �,�l��-v�� �'v� �
�'�'j��rt�� ��is�,v��O�i� i��l�s 6-r��7�his sr�l.����.. 1 ����Y�
,fJ�zi�o� � �c�e'ry-� _i'��.r.�� ��7��i//���i.� �'�.r`s%���a.�� �
S�i/%� �r����,�/�� .�v� s���� ����,dvr-.��.
b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantia/ property right �nd what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship
might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication. �3.� /�/�ai�c <�s �/�.�e �� 3.f�--r�
�� i�� ,�i%i%r �o����i,���.--Qj�' ��i�� ���. ��i,,� ��
�' .C�ei/�/%x�--s- `���- �i� 1r� .���•�c�w�����i
��'e/ $� � / ` � r�«G�Gl4���i��'.�av-f��,'���o�t� ��a��� �
� .� r'7� , /�/%�ir.�s orr �f�s- .bl�' �� �f��c� .b/c� h2��
y�i ip /� y 2
�',�'���s�y���-�o�%�/ ��S��G��.�i��i��:-►.��1� ���r�
�� ��ys! '� �c�,6�2c,E-'� ,�l1y ,�C��l'�-�i�%�.�,��r-�
c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or Injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic health, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience. ,������ ��' y�� ; c�i��i�s�/� `` ���o`r �f ��r /o�
,6���i�o.�/ .� ���.�s� �s�-� ��, �f ��� ��,-i'�'�
afj'G�ir'' ��'i4`v� ��''� �`✓�� �s 5� /'�"�'-�Js�S cP� ���eA�
�,��<-�'� f j�%s �'s a�rr �sc�'�Jro �io�,�/Go�i�"�a, oi,�el.�.��c�._r
�x.3� �sy/i;�, y ����� Y� ,�'�s��! /�i�'s�i//�i��� �ir,�-, �i�
�Q��^.s ���i �Z�.�v�G 4�«t��5« s��rf -��-I�xc�% sr�o��,L.�e s��1 �
d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character
of the exfsting and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicfnityT
%��,o�-o�o�---c� o%-�H ,d/��s ��� ��/�, s�� ��.�%�
��c,����c��i��. 1���.��s�s�.��c�'.�s�e s�r,-� �zs y��
� f �� �e��lG� d���� ,L%c�. ����s�� � � f Q. 9�r� �
!�(i//��///!1//�-� ��� s��- `��m� � �.=2i�s�i� SG��,��2�
�i���/`c ��-rv�i.� �i� osa ��y�r` ���l.s �w � ��r
,6v�1���'a �
,a.�ss ��.t►n,
a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your
property whlch do not app/y to other properties In this area.
Do any conditions exist bn the site which make other the alternatives to the variance impracticable or
impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area7 For example, is the�e a c�eek cuttinp
throuph the p�operty, an exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of
existin� structures7 How is this property different from others in the neighborhood7
b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enfoyment of a
substantia/ property right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship
might resu/t from the denia/ of the application.
Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception7
(i.e., havinp as much on-site parkinp or bed�oomsl) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses
allowed without the exception7 Do the �equirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship
on the development of the property?
c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or fnjurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ welfare, or
convenlence.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structu�e affect neighboring properties or structures on those
propertiesl If neiphboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about Vaffic, noise, liphting,
pavinq, IandscapinD sunlipht/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the
structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or peneral welfare?
Public health includes such thinps as sanitation (garbage), ai� quality, discharpes into sewer and stormwater
systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underpround
storage tanks, stora�e of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or
communicable tliseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fi�e protection7 Will alarm
systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need
for police services (i.e., noise, unruly patherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use
flammable or haza�dous materials, o� potentially danperous activities like welding, woodwork, enpine removal).
reneral welfare is a catch-all ph�ase meaninp community flood. Is the proposal consistent with tfie city's
policy and goals fo� conservatio� and developmentT Is there a social benefit7
�onvenience. How would the proposed st�ucture or use affect public convenience (such as access to or
parkin� for this site or adjacent sites)1 Is the proposal accessible to particular sepments of the public such as
the elderly or handicapped?
d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass,�bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not
affect aesthetics, state why. If chan�es to the structure are proposed, was the addition desipned to match
existinp architecture o� pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighbofiood7 If use will affect
the way a neighborhood/area looks, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to neighborinp structures in terms of mass or bulkT If there is no
chanDe to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with
other structures in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structu�e or use within the structure chanfle the character of the neighbo�hoodl Think of
character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and qeneral pattern of land use.
Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this usel If you don't feel the character of
the neiflhborhood will chanpe, state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the peneral vicinity7 Compare
your project with existinp uses. State why you ieel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity,
and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. �zas,,..,f,,,,
� �� � �^ �-� ��--�
���, cnr o+ , �. �c �:'. ' ___., .; ,, . ,
�,�4�� i ' �U1�1( �� ����0(I���U�[�
�� _�; - S���U�9. �(�Q�OiIUD�' /�9�.8�A�'B�WS� . � ,#�.;�. 1 :� ie:�P
,.__ �'
kt•"F�±�,��;�:( rry�*...; .
The Plannlnp.Commiss(on is required by law to make findfngs as deffned by the Ci�'s.�ordina�c�"`
(Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the foliowing questions will assi�t the Planning
Commission (n` makina the decisior� es to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type� or write .neatiy ,in ,lnk. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
question�.
1. Exp/a!n why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or. InJurfous-
�:to property or Improvements !n the vlclnity or to pub/ic health, safety, genera/ we/fare, or ��
convenlence. ,���r�5� �-t�� p��-�f'o�t.� t-���nl` �,v,�1'cT;�a�1'�'-,�- .
�'� %1��' ��l��� �'�i,LI,J��.`-,� � G��.-,�T"�5 !�lo ,� 1��� .�/h'Bl! l7'� .
� ,
7"l��nl � :�4 �� s���t�'�� G�oU�� ������ A-pP�`7-�0��-�-
� ���1��N�U,�/�y�-�t�.f' ���/,�+.l� �n��.,p -�`-z- ]'/! 'L ,��— ��,y�'r 1���
/�1 �'�� v�l�� � y��.��r/��' � .�� ��: �.���- .
. � � _
�
z.
3•
0
�
How wl// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted fn accordance witfi the Bur/ingame
G�nera/ P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT
� %r�' �a�s i���� T' �f�!��fT ��.�% ��-,���� ��J'�.�s �
,
�j- , �%�.--�'��.� f4� 7-� � �-�r� �-�� ��
��� � GJ/L � �-L,�/N'�� � �xc�s�V� ��V/S/f3L� `� �',�f � �
Ql.. St�; f � ' ''`�1 �
7%i�/�?.�G� �"�� r�?.�itl �v 1���/i�l '� � /o� c3
��� ����'� ��,'�.,� To .,� _ �i � ���7 ���s �
%n1��,�s�' �, ��% P�-� -�'-� �1.��cN ,���?' .
� r � =� f � �1 � � , �=. T
T�-.: �7." � �.�: ,� �e �� �,�1v�-y 7-�,�. . :
G{�1L1� �"�' �`�
��rTt� ' 7'�� �L.�����,�o � v�.��v�� T� 7'�f l5 �17�
How w!// e proposed proJect e compatib/e with the aesthetfcs, mass, bu�and character
of the exlstlns and potentla/ uses on adjolning propertfes in tha genera/ vlclnity?
���r�y ��, /�/ T'��= ��}- ;-� � 9.�.�� ���L7- 7-z�
7"1�� �'-�'�Fx�Mv� �--,�'�f�«l�7- �/.�/,%� �"f% .�f��=T�ati� �, f-
��� `�.�T� ;7-� ���r� ����T�s �-'���� �.���,�,4.� ����
T
�'�!�� �n1 .��. �r�,, �v rr�.�t T�� N�r ��
� � �i/ ,e ��� /-��rT}"-�'u�
� C'���PGy�nI� �/�;�f �{� ,���x���v� ��z� ,4L.lc�l�1� !3y' cdf�� �- �. _5
` � %�
�-10�� �� �} �r/.�>cy s�,qf�f'r.�'�tilc� � , /�r-� �l���S
�'%Sr��= lJ�! L � r= ' ��- ,�ti1;.�
. r �r�� .-��s� �� �, T�s ,��,������
�
,
DATE:
• TO:
. FROM :
SUBJECT:
� ROUTIlVG FORM
CITY ENGINEER
? CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARRS DIRECTOR •
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLAIdNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
.
REQIIEBT FOR _ � ���L( � � �
�
AT __ C) �3 t"( 1 Arl l��
�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION P�DIaMEETING: C7
�
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY:
THANKS, .
Jane/Sheri/Leah
N �
N�
S A` Date of Comments
C�-� rzG•-c.TS •-'
�
�..,,.,,,,,z,� ��I ���5�
-�.
�� Co►�c� F,.�
---'_
-,,
,� � ���
.�; Q
� � . �
` ✓� .i
�
0
�
______._ _ __ _._ _ -= - � � C
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: CITY ENGINEER
- CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
✓ FIRE MAItSHAL
PARRS DIRECTOR •
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AT �
' — Date of Comments
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION 1��8DInMEETING: C�
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �
THANKS, .
Jane/Sheri/Leah
` � - �vN�N
G
�� �� ��-- ��s�
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
. /
REQIIEBT FOR _ � ��� (,( /1 �
d��c�l�,�T
;
��'
G�
m
� ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: �� CITY ENGINEER
� CHIEF BIIII,DING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL .
PARRS DIRECTOR •
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN .
SUBJECT: REQIIEBT FOR � ` .Q�i%� (—
_\ . � / � / A A _.
AT
� . I .I�
��
1
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION nMEETING: �.( r%'�
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY:
THANKS, •
Jane/Sheri/Leah � � � � Date of Comments
� �
,U _ � ���� l . /
h,
� � �
�i�1 � .
. � � �
. , /� j -
C�
0
0
CITY OF BIIRLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BIIRLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BIIRLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1994, at
7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans
may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
833 ALPINE AVENOE
APN: 029-025-030
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY STRIICTIIRE
SIZE AND REAR SETBACR VARIANCE TO BIIILD A NEW DETACHED
GARAGE AT 833 ALPINE AVENUE, ZONED R-1.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
Please note, when possible, and when multiple family or commercial
development is involved, this notice shall be posted in a public
place on the project site and on neiqhborinq buildinqs with
tenants.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
JULY 29, 1994
�� {�µ i��..�' �.. u � 'p;4 M � ��. . _, .
�� I�
h '^
., J 1 �' � � u '�J .
* r � rivi �'� ^ � a ' �t P� .
,
i.
�
8 - . ' .
' .,,��: �-��r.
, �
p � ... � � � .. _� :,I
. t "" ' ."',' iw.�w� � � �.� F I �u' .
uh � .�.� � � '� �. ni � i
i i ;
� '�4 �
rx,
i ��m�,���,�� i.�� �. ,JI�N y � r� �
� N i� � �
� ' �f"
" T'd ' p Y�" , .,� u '� i '° � � �� ° � I ' , .
� .� � � � °��
. m
r, ., ^ ui v i ` tl� ,� ^'
� . . wy� ,� � ii � v � �Y 1
I ^ �w
r ^�w
1 �� Y
,
� ,�iiiuNWWI �,� `� I .i - � . � � � �� I
I
. O�i��;� I �L I ' .YM ,I�m
1 " � "�
�'i � �� u � .: 6 ;. ..
, ri
V �' ; ,� wuy q � �
� , �, �� � �� � �I � � � � _W �
� � � �R� �,
�� ] � � , n�' � � �
„ �� ��� ii �� ii"dii � oi�, r �u �( ������' � i 1 ��� � �
i ��¢o �-1 � ° I � q �
� �� q � �,�� � ,r �,�;, �� � — �i; uui�
� ' ���. �wwm��..�
� i�� .
,�y m 4� S .�' a. i� �� ��
,� � irz � _w. � • V
'� d h
� � ���
� ��� � A
.
*,� ' y �� � � L . �envG
�
t
t,, �:
�� . �' . m � . � � ��� ��" �,,
�
� � � ��'�i�' � ,� � `
�
,�.
e � � � ��y �. r :�
.
. , ,
.
���� �, ' ' dii �� h i �
�, , � �I � m � �i. d ��,�� � � �„� �
f i r " ��
m•
V+n.� � � � , � rypi ,, i � � � MM�iN � � `. � �Y r r r, �� ..: .. �� .. , . tl i LWi �u �
i
�.�"�" . � J'i� u I . . . � . . � .
� �y � �
��'vJ I�� � ��iIN i il�� M'R . { � ,.
� � 'mW".:, 71 -�i �� ���u �'� r . ,� �.,,� .. � �. � i p � ,� �..
� ' , ��� �::� . i , -
� �� �
� . ��.�' ;,i � Im:, ' k � �
�1 i� ^I�� i� u I
+� '„� �� �� � r i . I � ��no� �� � , �K � :�.��
,u� i iiR��. . ,����, . , �u�� 1 , � �� . . . ., !, .V III. y^r .
u ,i� � � � � = i � n�
� „a''"" � � .,_��, " .. MI;�..�� _ � ir�; � fi. r�' ,�y�. o.„ I ..:G,�� �i d ` f ' '� i l „ �.� ....
� !9 �w r �, ��;� � ,ir � 4N
� � �.� ���I'�i� „ �� q i ��.. fli ilNlll,u�Rdhil� �i?, �7iV � IV�iY��"� �r,��.;�i��� � .. .iu ��e,� �,°p6��.� ��� � im' ��iW� �� r
�.„uu. � ,. ���i �Wli'.�P gW "� ��`_''r�irw_ ., ' 4—illr� ' ��p $�r � u � I �I'
� �,������N i�i � �'' � \r �� �a i��.UP' , 4� ' �� .� �I�YI� Iliiir,� i Af,
���r����. � � �� ��� ; �� ,.� ; �i�ritlN.r,w� I,. ���a�� ' � �.�, :m�h i m �I�i�l� ��" y��� � I�...i�
� 1A
� � �.�'��� �.,., � � , � , e ''� �� . d �
,. � '� p2 '� 832 �2��` � 2fv ��
M 4 ':.' tl luii �.' . ,�O p°�.i���rc TJJ�O � u �I,' .���YVi „�� V'.
,� „ aiwtlr.�„'i,.
i u " I � �� �� . � M� , ir- �� ��„""� � � �� � �� � ,�� � � ��� n ve. �u�. � � ,,'. i'' � �
� �� d
�p .�iu��o��� 4i � .��, . �.� p{:i�i � � � i id u� p 'u
� e �Wi ��
�,� :� �'/ � j� la ro u a�
i�e � �
i„ � � , �N�a'��� � � ,
�� , k r, 17� n �i i ir
J ! � � r
� � u � � � �� �' ,' ��� � � ���Vi�, .. i � � ,i�r � � �
'��' e � i d
u
' � .
ii �.� ,. ,,,y u� im' r� r. m I�u�, I i
� qt r ,�� � � � t +�t� �
� � ��
F , ������ .� , , i m
�° � .�.� ,��5 �,��� - a��^,� � ,�� � �� �
w l� , � ' r I. ���
��� ���, � �����, ��` ' ,, ` �,, r�L ���� �. �H=� ��-
� ,
I'� �^ I � I,ii, .9�.1 .. � R��N
� i � �'� ,: * �� .. � 4N �IM � Ihld'. � , ,.
+ R
f�N� � w q` ^ V . r.-. �. 4 d ��I
,:i CV— � '�„� ,
'.,l � � � �� �f, � i i I aii ,y ��"� � � '^i �"� �i ,�. u
� � t tlm
44 -'W�.� ��u �I �.
�' ,y�, �
� .. � �}q"�:Y"!i"� . � .pu . _ , i ���
..''� � ..: in ��:�iiT: - -.r �. ul � . ` _�r." .... . �� .. '. lir� i: . ...�� � I '
e ��... . i..�. .: .. � ,. _ . .
� , , . . .,i.. .. ' ... . . -
� . . � . . . .3 I ::�,
��'I i,.;,i.� �, Y. R ��• �, .
t
nY f�Y
_,����� _
_,, � .
�
��
I
F .,,ipYYMu^�.,, ,.n
, JG � k �
��� � � �m ' � ,� � �' �:
�
� � __
r _.� ...
��`���'„ r u � ` � ��. � � �. ;,��� � . �,." '� � , � � � � ^ ��wArruu
� �.
' �"`� � t � u� �
� � � +.,��w� . � �s � ,� � � roi
. �'� �� , ,� ��°� � �� �" ,. ��.�or �' � � � � ^ , .
��R �
� � ���
�° �
,
� �.,
, ._ , ,.
, _
� . ,,,F �
,� � ,
,,,� � �� �
W� .. , � ��� � r
� � ��ww w, �.._ �
�„ r �
�,. � ,� .��
°� � � �
y �� ������ti� °�
. ' ;;,
� � Au� n . �.,, m � � ,,, '�I µ1'W�fi�l I%i.
. _.i .. - . � � ' �� Ipl 1 "'
, m n. a � � � I� �
� . �
I�I �
� r � W
�' �I� ��III 3
T"�� �IT ,.I �..
A � �� I ' �
� ,i�. �� " .,.�� � .��� � � �� � I� I� �I� ^ .. µ .. I :: } � r '
i Mi u �
�, �� � 4 ,�1 �.���� � .
i Y� � �4�M �,1 �_ �. � � •. '1�!"^a]fy' , „��atlP'�1 I'��.
,�yq. m 7: il-�-tr
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application
has been made for a special permit and variance for size and rear setback
variance at 833 Alpine Avenue; APN: 029-025-030; property owner: Donald
Cory, 833 Alpine Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the
City of Burlingame on August 8. 1994 , at which time it reviewed and
considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony
presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning
Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted
and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it
is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project
set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and
categorical exemption Section: 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of
Small Structures Class 3(e), Accessory (appurtenant) structures
including garages is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit and variance are approved subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such
variance and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording
of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certif ied copy of this resolution
be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Mike Ellis , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 8th day of August , 1994 , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption, special permit and variance
833 ALPINE AVENIIE
effective AIIGIIST 15, 1994 ,
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department and date stamped July 14, 1994 Sheet 1,
Existing Floor Plan and Site Plan, and Sheet 2, Garage Elevations
and Plans;
2. that no portion of the garage shall be used as a living area or
converted into a living area at any later date;
3. that there shall be no encroachment of any structures, equipment, or
appliances into the l0� X 20' required vehicle parking area; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of
Burlingame. �