The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1609 Albemarle Way - Staff ReportItem # Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 1609 Albemarle Way City of Burlingame Design Review, Side Sefback Variance, and Parking Variance Address: 1609 Albemarle Way Item No. Design Review Study Meeting Date: January 12, 2009 Request: Design Review, Side Setback Variance, and Parking Variance for a first floor remodel and second story addition to a single-family dwelling. Applicant and Property Owner: Guohui Chen Designer: Michael Tsao General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 025-205-150 Lot Area: 5,500 SF Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single-story house with attached garage contains 2,029 SF of floor area and has finro bedrooms. There is also a 292 SF second unit onsite that was legalized through the second unit amnesty program in 2001. No changes are proposed to the second unit. The existing nonconforming lot coverage is 2,331 SF where 2,200 SF is the maximum allowed. The applicant is proposing to decrease the width of the playroom by 2'-1" and remove a chimney structure at the rear, reducing the lot coverage from 2,331 SF (42.4%) to 2,255 SF (41 %). The applicant is also proposing to add a 367 SF second story. With the proposed changes to the building footprint and the addition of the second story, the floor area onsite will increase from 2,228 SF (0.41 FAR) to 2,527 SF (0.46 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR). The project is 333 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With the addition, the number of existing bedrooms in the main structure will increase from three (3) to four (4) (the playroom is considered a bedroom). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for the main structure. One uncovered parking space is required for the second dwelling unit. The existing attached garage (9'-1 ° x 20'-3" clear interior dimensions) is non-conforming in width and the applicant has submitted an application for a Parking Variance. Two uncovered spaces (9' x 20' each) are provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design Review for a second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5); ■ Variance for covered parking space width (9'-1" existing and proposed, where 10' is the minimum required) (CS 25.70.030); and ■ Variance for a left side setback to the first story (5'-1" proposed where 6'-0" is required) (CS 25.28.072c). Lot Area: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: November 20 and December 19, 2008 EXISTING PROPOSED TO ADDN , ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (15� flr): 16'-6" (no change) 15'-0" 2"d flr : n/a 35'-0" (to new bath) 20'-0" Side (left, 15t flr): 3'-0" * 5'-1" 6'-0" (left, 2"d flr): n/a 6'-0" 6'-0" (right, 15t flr): 6'-0" (no change) 6'-0" ri ht, 2"d flr : n/a 31'-6" 6'-0" Rear (1st flr): 36'-6" (no change) 15'-0" 2nd flr : n/a 39'-0" 20'-0" Loi Covera e: 2,331 SF * 2,255 SF � 2,200 SF Desi n Review, Side Setback Variance, and Parkin Variance 1609 Albemarle Wa EXISTING PROPOSED TO ADDN I ALLOWED/REQUIRED I 42.4% 41 % 40% FAR: 2,228 SF 2,527 SF 2,860 SF 0.41 FAR 0.46 FAR 0.52 FAR' # of bedrooms: 3 4 -- Parking: � 1 covered I' , a 1 covered ! ; � (9'-1" x 20'-3") 2 ; , 2 ; (9'-1" x 20'-3") ( no change 3 2 uncovered E t uncovered � 9'x20',9'x20' � � 9'x20' 9'x20' ..— _�:��._: _ _��.__�_..: .__�... ��_...._�.��._._._._._�._____... _._..��_.—:�.....�__.___�_� ___�—�_....:_. Hei ht: 20'-11" 24'-10" 30'-0" DH Envelo e: complies complies CS 25.28.075 " Exisfing nonconforming ' (0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) Z Variance for covered parking space dimensions (9'-1" x 20'-3° existing and proposed, where 10' x 20' is the minimum requirement) (CS 25.70.030). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on December 8, 2008, the Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding this project (December 8, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission voted to continue the item with direction to have the project designer present when the item is rescheduled as a Design Review Study item. The property owner submitted a response letterand revised plans (Sheets A-1, A-2, and A-5), date stamped December 19, 2008. Please referto the copy of the December 8, 2008, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission concems. One issue raised by the Planning Commission at the December 8th hearing was whether a Variance is required for lot coverage. When a project is not adding additional lot coverage where it does not currently exist and is decreasing lot coverage overall, it is considered an existing nonconforming condition, and staff does not require the applicant to seek a Variance. Lisa Whitman Associate Planner c. Guohui Chen 1609 Albemarle Way Burlingame, CA 94010 Attachments: Response letter from applicant, date-stamped December 19, 2008 Minutes from December 8, 2008 Design Review Study hearing Application to the Planning Commission Variance Application Forms Applicant's Letter of Explanation Photos of Adjacent Properties Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed December 30, 2008 Aerial Photo -2- Guohui Chen 1609 Albemarle Way Burlingame, CA 94010 December 19, 2008 City of Burlingame Planning Commission _,��4 u' �, �EC 1 9 2008 1` OF BI�RLINGAME ,.,��,�,,, . _ -�'T Dear Commissioners: Thank you for you time to review my project. I read the minutes and listened meeting recordings. Based on your comments, I made these changes to my project: 1. Replace the exisring concrete pario in my backyard with pavers to increase pervious area. 2. New windows will be metal or vinyl cladding wood frame. 3. The proposed second floor will have 6 feet side setback. 4. Create 1 ft step-up on the side wall and 1 ft bump-out on the back wall, adding complexity to the addition. I fully understand your comments about that the addirion is not well integrated. I have consulted many designers including 3 AIA members, such as the local architect Jerry Winges. None of them could produce a well integrated sketch without tearing down the whole roof, if not the whole house. My house is located in a modest area, and the addition is hidden in my backyard with many tall trees. It does not have the same visual impact as a corner house on the hill. On the other hand, we are new to Burlingame and bought our house at the very top of the market trying to accommodate growing family. A complete retrofit is far beyond overstretching. I hope you can be flexible on this issue. Sincerely, Guohui Chen CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minutes December 8, 2008 nai Commission comments: ■ larified location of neighbor's fence. ■ C sider changing the shingle style on the house (Robertson — the owner likes th ingle style; will ensu that the design is quite different from adjacent houses). ■ Asked a ut species of the street trees; a bit concerned that the only real ndscaping buffer is the proposed anese Maple; will there be enough mass in the landsc ing; review before the item returns. Requ t staff to verify species of existing street tree(s •' not large scale trees, then an addition large sc tree should be planted in the front yard. ■ Can the Commissi comment on the solar panels ( eker — precluded by State law from regulating the solar pa Is). ■ Make the stone veneer a' more prevalent on the ont faCade. Additional public comments: ■ Elaine ?, 1516 Howard Avenue: Expr sed concern about air and noise pollution impacts during construction. Minimize the time of nst ction and address dust control. There were no other comments fro e floor and the ublic hearing was closed. Commissioner Cauchi made otion to place the item on Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was Discussion of by Commissioner Lindstrom. iai auchi called for a vote on fhe mofion to p/ace this item on the RegularAction ( e been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:01 p.m. when plans �ion's action 7. 1609 ALBEMARLE WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (GUGHUZ CHEN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND JOE HALL, DESIGNER) STAFF CONTACT: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated December 8, 2008, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Cauchi opened the public comment period. Michael Tsao, 2463 Montry Court; represented the applicant. Commission comments: Clarified that there will be a Variance required for lot coverage; the project will still exceed the maximum lot coverage following project construction. Asked forclarification of hardship forthe setback Variance; affects the playroom and the bedroom; these areas could be adjusted to eliminate the Variance. 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes December 8, 2008 ■ The second floor addition looks like it is not integrated with the lower floor; looks tacked on and boxy; would like to have a conversation with the designer. ■ Instead of concrete surfaces, provide pavers that will allow water absorption in the driveway and patio areas. ■ Strongly encourage wood windows. ■ Questioned the appropriateness of continuing the discussion absent the applicant or designer (Meeker — suggested continuing the item until such time that the applicant and/or designer are present to represent the application). Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Cauchi made a mofion continue fhe item with direcfion to have the project designer present when the item is rescheduled as a Design Review Study item. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Brownrigg. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the motion to continue. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:17 p.m. 8. 2104 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL RMIT FO HEIGHT FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GAR (RINALDI WIBO , APPLICANT; RINALDI WIBOWO AND YVONNE LIAO, PROPE OWNERS AND DESIGN 1 STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff re� rt dated December 8, 2008, with attachments. nior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project descriptio There were no questions of staff. Chair Cauchi opened the p ic comment period. Rinaldi Wibowo and Yvonne Liao, 4 Hil ' e Drive; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Are steps into the nt of the house and ou rear of house needed (Liao — provides for a crawl space under t irst floor). ■ Questione e 2" x 12" wood beams on the second �r along the left elevation (Liao — proposed wood ms are under second floor cantilever). ■ Re rding the front balcony; feels like it needs some glazing oor or window). ■ I of the bedrooms are small. ■ Could take the style a bit further; referenced 2312 Hillside Drive; coul vide twisted columns; the house looks really heavy; open the railing a bit more or eliminate railing a t porch. 11 / ��r�v. ;ti•� lI �eu�+urrcnn�� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review �ance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: �,6� 1 �� rn 0 Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents i� Name: G'(�D �-1 c�t 1- L�� Address: �6 `'� F1 j b�x (s� �� City/State/Zip: ��`►"�"�+ �- �� °�a Phone: 6s� ' S Z� � ��i Fax: E-mail: lrz��^ar� Q a7ncu�� ❑ Parcel #: C> � S� ZO S` �Sd ❑ Other: �� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��O llc� 1 C'�l��A� �,'�Z�.�C�f/ Gr �a-� Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents O Name: � �'r= ! l��`l Address: � � 3 � S t- City/State/Zip: I�[� v, S, L/�-� �s � l� Phone: �l l��' G l� 3 c� 3 � Fax: E-mail �k Burlingame Business License #: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /I�� '� � � r �.�r� � �'. J :+ i'l� i ' L%✓h-Ct) Ci� C' � ��' � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ApplicanYs signature: �- �� Date:�/3 ��8 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: q�3� �'O 8 � Date submitted: * Verification that the project architecUdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by ttie Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:\Handouts\PC Application 20o8-B.handout � tia}r i i 'r'a' � �BURLINGAME � :,;�`�; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION ( 5� D� 5�8h�-Ki The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. The existing left side setback is only 3 feet. Current planning code requires 6 feet. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denial of the application. The proposed design will increase left side setback from 3' to 5'-1". It is only 11 inches short from code requirement but is a substantial improvement over the existing condition. It also meets Declining Height Envelope and fire separation requirement. On the other hand, the existing area which is used as a play room is 18'-2" wide. Losing 3 feet in width will be a huge blow to the function of the room. If I keep the existing lst story wall with 3' setback and build 2nd story wall with 6' setback, it will be a serious structural problem to support the 2nd story wall. c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to properfy or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The addition will reduce lot coverage and increase the side setback from 3' to 5'-1" which is also good for fire separation. The existing shrub and trees in the backyard are about 20 feet tall, blocking the view to neighbor. No trees will be removed and no new pavement in the backyard. d. How will fhe proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general viciniiy? The addition actually reduces lot coverage and increases the side setback. It is located at the rear of the house and only adds four feet to the total height, so it's hardly noticeable from the street. HandoutslVariance Application.2008 ti�� 1 ;BURLINGAME I � � �- �r �`�� ._...- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION c��2C� Pi't��'^� sP�t� �t�D��f The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your properfy which do not apply to ofher properties in this area. The net width of the garage is 9 feet 1 inch. The parking regulation requires 10 feet. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. There are only two bedrooms in the house. To add another bedroom, a covered parking space must be provided. There is no alternative to increase the net width to 10 feet except relocate the foundation wall between house and garage and reconstruct a substantial part of the main house to meet the current code. c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimenfal or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. �� The addition will reduce lot coverage and increase the side setback from 3' to 5'-1" which is also good for fire separation. The existing shrub and trees in the backyard are about 20 feet tall, blocking the view to neighbor. No trees will be removed and no new pavement in the backyard. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properfies in the general vicinity? The addition actually reduces lot coverage and increases the side setback. It is located at the rear of the house and only adds four feet to the total height, so it's hardly noticeable from the street. _ _ ��.zoos Guohui Chen 1609 Albemarle Way Burlingame, CA 94010 December 1, 2008 City of Burlingame Planning Cominission Dear Commissioners: Thank you for you time to review my project. Here is some background. i'�.�v�Ii%�Y� t G � 1 2008 `: C�F BURUNGAME �,,^ii��. �,��T My house is located in a modest area of Burlingame, one block from the El Camino Real. The other side of Albemarle way is occupied by semi detached houses, mostly two-story. On my side of the street, the 2 neighbors next door also have two-story houses. Actually the proposed addirion will be hardly noticeable from the street, because it is behind the garage and adds less than 4 feet to the total height. In my back yard, there are trees along the fence as tall as 50 feet, so there is no new concern of view blockage or shading. When I spoke with my neighbors and show them project drawings, their feedbacks were supportive. My house only has 2 bedrooms. My parents, both in their 70s, have not visited me since I moved to USA simply because I cannot accommodate them. So I need the third bedroom, and I hope I can build it as soon as possible. On the other hand, my child really enjoys the 18x22 feet playroom which I try to preserve. The project will increase the side setback from 3' to 5'-1 ". It is only 11" short of the code requirement but it will sarisfy the fire separarion requirement, greatly simplify structural design and provide mnumum width for the second floor en-suite and the first floor playroom. As far as the window selection, I choose the vinyl windows with longer warranty, better energy performance (see attachment) and almost the same look as vinyl clad wood window. Equipped with wood moldings and interior screens, there is little visible difference between these two types of windows. My project has a limited scope and budget. It cannot be compared to multi-million dollar mansions in other parts of town. But I hope I could have the equal opportunity to enjoy the life in our beautiful Burlingame. Sincerely, Guohui Chen 1 of ��'j, ; 9i��.%�� a�-�. '.. — � 2��8 Windows comparison - P�_��=.� ��.��;:�.�� Milgard Vinyl Window Marvin Wood Clad Window Casemaster Montecito Casement Insulating Low E II glass Low E no Argon Warranty Full lifetime warranty to the 10 years limited warranty original owner (10 years transferrable) Coverage Labor and material for repair Only material cost for replacement AND replacement Exclusions Excludes Finish failures or corrosion of aluminum cladding or other components due to environmental conditions such as air pollutants, acid rain or other corrosive substances U value 0.31 0.34 SHGC 0.26 0.32 2 of x'� ' J ' ,4,_ +�'t _„i; � �V.?.. . '3 2 :. � . . l `y ' � �` f � L�''j' ~ii _ ��`�, . �.',�.-� �,�� _ § � �, � � �,� � , t:� F,, `y� . .._ v g :.^�"'�', . �`�,��,' y . -� ; �,>�.±s+-�"�.� � �„„ :�� 't' � '- � ' ,. +s '4 � � � �� a� �,,..- �_ � . �.� <I� �_ _.:a „°i' .. . �~ i 4_. t�,d' S` � k��, i�i � 1 y,'r' t% c, M�-� � ��'. f a�,.� - Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject Staff Review September 8, 2008 d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 September 8, 2008 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V �� Date: 9/08/2008 � Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: September 8, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Rsquest for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 September 8, 2008 �'�On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 5) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 6) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non-residential buildings. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. �he plans show that the structure is three feet from the property line. To comply with the opening protection required in Table 704.8 the building face must be more than three feet from the property line. On the plans show that these walls ��e more than three feet from the property line or remove all openings. n the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the roperty line. ��'" . rovide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per CBC 704.2. ��icate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (Table 602) � ,, ��ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. ��entify the use of the room that is labeled "area of work." If this room is to be the new living room then identify the area that is now labeled "living." ��e garage cannot have any openings into a room used for sleeping purposes. The area labeled "area of work" will be considered a room that can be used for sleeping purposes. Please amend the drawings to show code compliance by either removing the door from the garage that leads directly into this room or by showing the construction of a room, with minimum code dimensions, that is placed between the garage and this room. 14)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in heiyht at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Departrnent for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 15)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 16)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. � 17)NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed b • � ate: � � Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: September 8, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7279 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 September 8, 2008 Items 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 have been addressed. 13) The garage cannot have any openings into a room used for sleeping purposes. The area labeled "area of work" [and now labeled Play Area] will be considered a room that can be used for sleeping purposes. Please amend the drawings to show code compliance by either removing the door from the garage that leads directly into this room or by showing the construction of a room, with minimum code dimensions, that is placed between the garage and this room. NOTE: A written response to the item noted here and plans that specifically address this item must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: Date: Project Comments Date: September 8, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 �ief Building Official � ��650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 September 8, 2008 �/_� .: � �i� Li �i Revi ate: �� Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject Staff Review: September 8, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 O City Arborist (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 December 1, 2008 While the project appears to not require sprinklers based upon proposed addition and remodel, the project is close. Be advised where more than one (1) addition and/or alteration for which building permits are required are made within a two (2) year period and said alterations are made to the premises of the same occupant. In such circumstances, the sum of these additions and/or alterations construction costs during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for the purpose of calculating the replacement cost value formula. Final determination will be made and the plan review phase of the project. It is very important that you understand the threshold indicated by BMC § 17.04.030. Designer, contractor, and owner should communicate specifically the extent of demolition and remodel. Keeping in mind any change orders and addendums which increase the total amount of square footage added or remodeled after plan review would be applied to the sprinkler ordinance. Reviewed by: �—� `��l� Date: i�'�� Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: September 8, 2008 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 City Attorney Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition at 1609 Albemarle Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-205-150 September 8, 2008 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Include a list of BMPs and erosion and sediment control measure plan as project notes when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. Reviewed by: EJ Date: Da�1D�2� a ClTY OF BURLINGAME ` `��_i _;, � ^ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLWGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �4; �" "_�'� ��`� . .. „ �'�, a:.� ,� � �..�`• � I y BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ,��°� _,. � � \ � �"�; . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) � . - � = aa . 3 � sl www.burlingame.org �j��i�,�.:��.= �; ��..:�;�� e :� $��; �� -. � �. � �.=3�: = -� �� .; , �. �'�ti i �� _ �"'-" -- � ,.S �3"" Site: 1609 ALBEMARLE WAY The City of Burlingame Planning (ommission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first nnd second story addition to a single family dwelling at 1609 ALBEMARLE WAY zoned R-1. APN 025-205-150 Mniled: December 30, 2008 (Please refer to other side) �-;�.��s::,43?� � �� ,�� ;.:..,:_A i�tv,.. � =i-�� 3:! �� 1 �a�� PUBLIC HEARING NOiICE Citv of Burlin�iame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other sideJ