HomeMy WebLinkAbout1811 Adrian Road - Staff Report (2)City of Burlingame
Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits and Parking Variance
Address: 1811 Adrian Road
Item No. �a
Environmental Scoping
Meeting Date: February 9, 2015
Request: Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits for use, floor area ratio and building height and
Parking Variance for an addition to an existing commercial building for a self-service storage use.
Applicant:
Designer/Engineer:
Property Owner:
Zoning:
General Plan:
Jim Fitzpatrick, Public Storage, Inc. APN: 025-169-050
Lars Andersen & Associates, Inc. Lot Area: 5.82 acres
Public Storage, Inc.
RR, Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area
Industrial and Office Use
North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan — Adrian Road Auto Row District
Environmental Review: Environmental review is required because the proposed project includes adding more
than 10,000 SF to an existing commercial building (61,945 SF addition proposed, mostly within a new second
floor within the existing building), and therefore does not qualify for an exemption from CEQA (California
Environmental Quality Act). As a part of preparing the Initial Study for the environmental document for this
project, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission comment on any potential environmental effects which
you feel should be investigated. Potential environmental effects identified by staff include on-site
parking/circulation and site access/safety issues.
The issues identified by the Commission will be incorporated into the Initial Study for the project. The standard
list of items investigated in an Initial Study is attached for reference. At this time, staff notes that based on
preliminary analysis, it appears that the type of CEQA document required will be a Negative Declaration.
However, the type of CEQA document will be finalized during the environmental review process. During
preliminary review Planning staff identified the following applications required for this project:
■ Conditional Use Permit required for a self-service storage use located within the Automobile Sales and
Service Overlay Area (Code Section 25.44.050 (b) (2));
• Conditional Use Permit to exceed 0.50 FAR for an industrial use (0.85 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is
the maximum allowed) (Code Section 25.44.030 (a));
■ Conditional Use Permit for building height (37'-0" proposed where 35'-0" is the maximum allowed) (Code
Sections 25.44.080 and 25.44.030 (s)); and
■ Parking Variance for number on-site parking spaces (167 on-site parking spaces provided where 218
parking spaces are required for the intensification of use; 51 space deficiency) (Code Section 25.70.010
ib))�
Project Description: The subject property contains two commercial buildings; a vacant 80,377 SF
office/warehouse building at the front of the site (1811 Adrian Road) and a 74,675 SF warehouse building at the
rear of the site (1801 Adrian Road), which is currently occupied by Goodwill (donation center). The most recent
use at 1811 Adrian Road was a warehouse supplying products for virtual sales. There are no changes proposed
to the building at the rear of the site (1801 Adrian Road).
Public Storage, Inc., a self-storage facility, is currently located on the adjacent property at 1761 Adrian Road.
With this application, the applicant is proposing to add a second floor within the existing commercial building
located at 1811 Adrian Road (subject building is located at the front of the site), as well as some minor additions
on the ground floor. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested for the proposed self-storage use because the
site is located within the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area in the RR Zoning District (Code Section
25.44.050 (b) (2)).
Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permifs and Parking Variance 1811 Adrian Road
The proposal includes alterations to the existing building and adding a new 61,495 second floor within the
existing building. The applicant notes that the proposed renovations would accommodate 436 storage units on
the first floor and 692 storage units on the new second floor, for a total of 1,128 storage units within the self-
storage facility. The proposed floor area on the site (including both buildings at 1801 and 1811 Adrian Road)
would increase from 0.61 FAR (155,052 SF) to 0.85 FAR (216,157 SF) where 1.0 FAR (253,519 SF) is the
maximum allowed . A Conditional Use Permit is being requested because with the proposed project the FAR on
the site will exceed 0.50 FAR.
A new front office and merchandise area for the self-storage facility is located at the front, left corner of the
building. This new entry is identified by a tower element with an aluminum storefront system, clear glazing and a
metal canopy. The overall height to the top of the tower element is 37'-0" above average top of curb (the existing
building measures 28'-8" above average top of curb). The project also includes adding a new loading area near
the front, right corner of the building and would contain four loading spaces and five parking stalls. Access to
this loading area would be through new vehicular entry off Adrian Road. The existing loading dock at the rear of
the building will be eliminated and replaced with additional parking stalls. The existing loading dock along the
left side of the building will be upgraded to include a covered loading area leading to a secured lobby with an
elevator. The applicant has been working with the various City divisions to ensure that the proposed project will
comply with all exiting and disabled-accessible requirements.
As shown on the proposed building elevations, there are fa�ade changes primarily along the front and left sides
of the building. However, Commercial Design Review is not required for the proposed project since the exterior
alterations do not exceed 50% of the building fa�ade (changes to more than 50% of the fa�ade would require
Commercial Design Review). Therefore the Planning Commission's review is limited to the Conditional Use
Permit and Variance requests.
Off-Street Parking: The existing parking demand for the storage and office/warehouse uses within both
buildings at 1801 and 1811 Adrian Road is 196 parking spaces. Since there are currently 135 parking spaces
provided on-site, the existing site is nonconforming in parking. With the proposed modifications to 1811 Adrian
Road, the proposed parking demand (including both buildings at 1801 and 1811 Adrian Road) is 218 parking
spaces, which includes 139,329 SF of self-storage on the first and second floors (1:1000 SF parking ratio) and
1,655 SF of lobby/retail space (1:400SF parking ratio) at 1811 Adrian Road and 74,656 SF of existing storage
space at 1801 Adrian Road. With this application, the applicant is proposing site improvements which will
increase the number of parking spaces on-site from 135 to 167 spaces where 218 spaces are required.
Therefore, a Parking Variance is being requested for the difference of 51 parking spaces.
The applicant prepared a Parking and Trip Generation Analysis for the proposed project, dated August 19, 2014
(see attached). The City's Engineering Program Manager reviewed the analysis and notes in his memorandum
dated November 18, 2014, that "the Pubiic Works - Engineering Department is in concurrence with the
conclusions and justifications as presented in the analysis" and had no further comments. This information will
be provided to the environmental consultant for preparation of the on-site parking and circulation analysis in the
environmental document.
Landscaping: When the use in a building is intensified, in this case by adding a second floor within an existing
building, on-site landscaping must be provided to current code standards. The RR zoning district regulations
require that a minirnum of 10% of the total area of the property be landscaped and that a minimum of 60% of the
front setback be landscaped. However Planning staff would note that since the setback requirements of the RR
zoning district require buildings along Adrian Road to have a zero front setback, the front setback landscaping
requirement is not applicable.
The existing landscaping, consisting of trees, shrubs and turF complies with the minimum required on-site
landscaping and amounts to 11.8% of the site (29,923 SF). Some existing landscaping will be removed to
accommodate walkways at the front, left corner of the building as well as the new loading area at the front of the
building. However, new landscaping is proposed along the left side property line and at the rear of the building.
With the proposed modifications, the site will be in compliance by providing 10.7% (27,191 SF) of total on-site
landscaping proposed where 10% (25,352 SF) is the minimum required.
2
Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits and Parking Variance 1811 Adrian Road
Planning staff would note that although the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Area Plan recommends
planting Eucalyptus ficifolia (Red Flowering Gum) along Adrian Road, the Parks Supervisor recommends
planting Acer rubrum (Red Maple) trees instead, noting that it is a better species for this location and that the
Parks Division has had good success in planting them along Rollins Road. The applicant is proposing to install
five, 24-inch box Red Maple trees are recommended by the Parks Supervisor. Planning staffwould note that the
Community Development Department and Parks Division will be reviewing the recommendations in the Specific
Area Plan in the near future and will process a request to make amendments as necessary.
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions.
1811 Adrian Road
�oi Hrea: 5.u� acres Plans date stamped: Janua 13, 2015
EXISTING : PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED
Use: warehouse no change : self-storage use
(1801 Adrian Road) (1801 Adrian Road) I requires a Conditional
Use Permit
office/warehouse - , self-story facility'
vacant ; (1811 Adrian Road)
(1811 Adrian Road)
__ _ _ .._ _ -.._ _. _ __ __...
F/oorArea Ratio: 80,377 SF (1811 Adrian) ; 141,482 SF (1811 Adrian) 126 760 SF
74,675 SF (1801 Adrian) i 74,675 SF (1801 Adrian) ' 0.50 FAR
155,052 SF 216,157 SF 253,519 SF
0.61 FAR '„ 0.85 FAR 2 ; 1.0 FAR max. w/CUP
--- -..._ _ _ _... __ __ _.. __ _ _.....__..
Lot Coverage: 149,284 SF 149,166 SF 152,111 SF
58.8% 58.8% 60%
___....__ _..... _ _......_
_.. __ _...._.
Building Height: 28'-8" 37'-0" 35'-0„
_.... _ ..---..._ 0 __ _.. _ -
Front Setback: 35'-5° 101'-8" to addition at at least 20 /o of the
ground floor j building to have a zero
setback — not applicabie
since addition at front is
----_ ...._.--- ....______ ._ minor
— --- - ----- — _ _
__....__ .—.._ _..__-
Side Sefback (leff): 89'-8" i 100'-6" 10'-0"
(right): 20'-3° no change 10'-0"
' Conditional Use Permit requested for an addition to an existing commercial building for a self-service storage
use within the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area.
2 Conditional Use Permit to exceed 0.50 FAR for an industrial use (0.85 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is the
maximum allowed).
Table continued on next page.
3
Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits and Parking Variance
9811 Adrian Road
Lot Area: 5.82 acres
Off-Street Parking:
Tota/ On-Site
Landscaping:
EXISTING
135 spaces
11.8%
29,923 SF
1811 Adrian Road
Plans date stamped: Janua 13 2015
PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED
167 parking spaces 3
(65 standard)
(12 truck loading)
4 disabled-accesible)
10.7%
27,191 SF
218 parking spaces
10%
25,352 SF
3 Parking Variance requested for number on-site parking spaces (167 on-site parking spaces provided where
218 parking spaces are required for the intensification of use).
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should reviewthe proposed project and the areas of
potential significant environmental effects suggested by staff. The Commission should add any additional
effects of the project that it anticipates might be potentially significant. The areas of investigation for
environmental evaluation as defined by CEQA are listed on the attached sheet for your reference.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Jim Fitzpatrick, Public Storage, Inc., applicant
Scott Mommer and Art Lucas, Lars Andersen & Associates, Inc., design professional
Attachments:
Environmental Checklist — CEQA Guidelines
Application to the Planning Commission
Project Description submitted by the applicant, date stamped November 12, 2014
Conditional Use Permit Applications
Variance Application
Commercial Application
Staff Comments
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed January 31, 2015
Aerial Photo
C!
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FROM APPENDIX G OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
AESTHETICS. Would the project:
o Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
❑ Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
❑ Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
❑ Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely afFect day or nighttime views in the
area?
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
❑ Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
❑ Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
❑ Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make tne following determinations. Would the project:
❑ Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
❑ Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation?
� Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
� Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
❑ Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
❑ Have a substantial adverse efFect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
o Have a substantial or adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified
in local or regional pians, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish
and Wildlife Service?
❑ Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
❑ Interfere substantially with the movement of any native or resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native �?sident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
❑ Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
❑ Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation pian?
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
❑ Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined in '15064.5?
� Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
' 15064.5?
❑ Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature?
❑ Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines
GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
❑ Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
b) Strong seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Landslides?
❑ Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil?
❑ Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstabie, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
❑ Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2001), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
❑ Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
❑ Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
❑ Conflict with an applicabie plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
❑ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposall
of hazardous materials?
❑ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
❑ Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
❑ Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
❑ For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
❑ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
❑ Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
❑ Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
❑ Violate any water qualiry standards or waste discharge requirements?
❑ Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such #hat
there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
❑ Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
-2-
Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines
❑ Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
o Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
❑ Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
❑ Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
❑ Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
❑ Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding
as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
❑ Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
❑ Physically divide an established community?
❑ Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
❑ Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
❑ Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
❑ 2b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a
local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
NOISE. Would the project result in:
❑ Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
� Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
� A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise leveis in the project vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
❑ A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
❑ For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
❑ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the prn,�ct:
❑ Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
❑ Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
❑ Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
-3-
Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
❑ Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
RECREATION.
❑ Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
❑ Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
❑ Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
❑ Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
❑ Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in substantial safety risks?
❑ Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
❑ Result in inadequate emergency access?
❑ Result in inadequate parking capacity?
❑ Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
❑ Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
❑ Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
❑ Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
❑ Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
❑ Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
❑ Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
❑ Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
❑ Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
�
Environmental Checklist from Appendix G of fhe CEQA Guidelines
❑ Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
❑ Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
-5-
• STi � �..
�f:'
� l �'�� �
COMMUN(TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 50'I PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
❑ Design Review � Variance ❑ Parcel #: flz5 `� l��- ��
� Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other:
-• -��- : �• .� :..• : �..u- .
APPLICANT project contact person ❑ PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: Jim Fitzpatrick Sr. VP. Entitlements, Real Estate Group Name: Public Storaqe clo Jim Fitzpatrick, Sr. VP. Entitlements,
Real Estate Group
Address: 701 Western Ave
CitylS±ate(Zip: G!endale. CA 91201
Phone: (818) 244-8080 E�. 1476
Fax: (818) 543-7341
E-mail: jfitzpatrick@publicstorage.com
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person �l
OK to send electronic copies of documents f&
Address: 701 Western Ave
Gi!;i!State!Zip: Glendale; CA 91201
Phone: (818) 244-8080 Ext. 1476
Fax: (8181543-7341
E-mail: jfitzpatrick@publicstorage.com
Name: Lars Andersen & Associates Inc. c/o Scott A. Mommer, PE
Address: 4694 W. Jacquelyn Ave
City/State/Zip: Fresno, CA 93722 � � � � ��� �
Phone: (559) 978-1000
Fax: (559) 276-0850 �=� `�� �� � � `�'�'�
E-mail: smommer .larsandersen.com :='' � Y OF BUR�INGa,tJE
_;C�n_-�L�'�..:_t��dir,:G DI\r
* Burlingame Business License #: 2����
PROJEC'T DESCRIPTION: See attached.
AFFADAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief. i �
��,� s�2�f � �-
ApplicanYs signature: /T Date:
I am aware of the proposed applic�tion and,hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission. ) �. - �1�
Property owner's signature: Date: S'Z� I�`T�
Date submitted: ���2 ��� �
ic Verification that the project architecUdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
5: �HANDOUTS�PC Application. doc
Public Storage BURLINGAME, CA
1811 Adrian Road
�. _. �y�����.
- -�. R�
' ';l�G
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes the renovation of an existing warehouse with a two level office space along Adrian
Road. The building will become a two-story self-storage facility with a maximum height of approximately 42' 8"
feet at the top of the new tower(in which a CUP in being requested as part of this application) and a gross floor
area of 141,482 square feet and a building footprint of 74,535 square feet. This development will be located in
Burlingame, California on Adrian Road just south of Freeway 101.
The subject property includes two lease areas and addresses with an APN number 025-169-050. The existing
building at the rear of the parcel with address 1801 Adrian Road is an existing Goodwill Outlet Store and Donation
Center and is not a part of this development. A remodel and site improvements will involve the property at 1811
Adrian which is located at the front or north end of the Parcel. The existing building has most recently been the
home of a WILCO warehouse supplying products for virtual sales. The building included a large +/-62,735 square
foot single story warehouse with a loading dock at the rear building wall and roll-up doors for loading on the east
wall. The west was used in years past for railroad off-loading with the existing remnants of a spur line still in the
ground. The northern portion of the building facing the street has two levels of office space with store-front
windows and an entrance overlooking Adrian Road. The building is setback from the street right-of-way
approximately 34' with established landscaping and sidewalks. A single shared entrance providing access to both
addresses is located to the east of the 1811 Adrian Road building. Parking stalls for this building are located along
this access road leading to the rear property where an existing chain link access gate is located and will remain.
The proposed improvements will include the construction of a second story within the main warehouse area to
provide additional self-storage spaces. To comply with current codes a new stairwell will be constructed at the
southeastern end of the building and a proposed accessible route will begin at the stairwell exit door and head
west along the southern wall and rap around the eastern wall where a new compliant sidewalk will be constructed
that will extend to the sidewalk on Adrian Road. The existing loading dock will be removed and parking stalls will
be painted along this south wall. The existing loading docks on the east wall will be upgraded to include a covered
loading area leading to a secured lobby with an elevator. At the northwest corner of the building a new parking lot
and loading docks will be constructed. Access from Adrian Road will be provided via a new concrete drive
approach. 4 loading stalls will be provided at this location. A new office and merchandise area for the self-storage
facility will be constructed at the north east corner of the building. This building will be upgrade at this location
with a tower structure and new display windows. The parking stalls along the western side of the access drive to
the property will be shifted closer to the building to allow a 50' wide turn around space for trucks visiting this
facility. In addition the accessible parking stalls will be moved and two additional stalls will be added to meet code
requirements. New accessible pedestrian ramps will be constructed to provide an accessible route of travel to the
new lobby area and the accessible loading docks on the eastern wall. The existing gross b::'.'�ing area is 80,377sf
with a FAR of 0.61. The proposed renovations will increase the gross building area to 141,482sf with a FAR of 0.85
(1.00 is the max) and a total of 167 parking stalls provided (in which a CUP is being requested as part of this
application). The proposed required parking is 217 stalls therefore a parking variance will must be approved and
being requested as part of this application.
The existing landscaping will remain along the street frontage except for the areas that will be disturbed or where
sidewalk will be removed. Shrubs, trees, ground cover, and turf will be installed in these areas.
The building facelift design will be a modern/contemporary design and have display windows on the northeast
corner of the building near the existing site entrance. The building fa�ade will consist of silver and orange metal
Public Storage BURLINGAME, CA
1811 Adrian Road
panels, aluminum frames, and bright silver or weathered zinc colored split face masonry blocks. In addition the
existing wall surfaces will be painted to match the new color palette.
City of Burlingame Plarming Department �O1 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(6�0) 696-3790 wwtiv.burlineame.or�
r`, ciTr o -z �;..1 �� w�a � 4'
BURLINGAME CIT`Y OF BURLINGA.ME
� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION '' � [ � ��+
�o
_'_•Ui�LIf�GAA�E
� � _� _:'-J�NfFJ�,"'. Djy
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code
Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in
making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly
in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in t/ze vicinity or to public health, safery, general welfare or
convenience.
This project proposes to renovate an existing warehouse building into a self-storage facility with
upgrades to the facade and tenant improvements to the interior. Existing building height and building
footprint will remain. The infrastructure will continue to be used to serve the property, therefore the
impact to public health will not be impacted. The facility currently has a fire sprinkler system which will
be upgraded as necessary to meet current codes. No activities (potentially dangerous) other than
personal storage will be allowed on the premises. In addition space will be provided at the rear of the
building for a fire truck turn around and the facility will have adequate security controls to restrict
access to only patrons that lease storage spaces. The project will implement necessary improvements
to provide access for persons with disabilities and the elderly, including parking, ramps, and elevators.
We believe that this project will benefit the public and is consistent with the city's goals for conservation
and development.
2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance?
The existing zoning is Rollins Road (RR) zone district, within the Automobile Sales and Service
Overlay district, and lies within the general plan area for Industrial and Office Use. The adjacent
property to the east is an existing Public Storage facility with the same zoning and general plan
designations. We believe that this justifies that a similar facility will meet the cities general plan and
zoning statutes on a neighboring parcel.
3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, »:ass, bulk and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinit��?
The proposed development will be upgrading the existing facade similar to the Public Storage facility to the
east. Boxed columns with a cement plaster finish will be added to the new office and building entrance near
the southeast corner of the building. Existing metal panels and building walis will be painted and will match
the aesthetic appearance of the neighboring Public Storage Facility to the East. The size of the exterior shell
will remain relatively the same size which is comparative to neighboring properties in the immediate area. The
existing buildings in the area have a simple modern 1960's style and the proposed design is post modern,
with office and big box look with new building articulation to comply with the design guidelines for this area.
This will provide a more natural look to the area.
CliP.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin am�e.or�
��`, CITT 0� � � � � V � �
BURLJNGAME CITY OF BURLINGAME
� CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT APPLICATION ;,�� r�� x�?�;�,
"i�b^.
CUP for FAR "� � '�� URLINGkViE
CDD-P NNING Dki/.
CUP for Height limitation (Code section 25.44.080 and 25.44.030(s))
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code
Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Conunission in
making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly
in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safery, general welfare or
convenience.
This project proposes to renovate an existing warehouse building into a seif-storage facility with upgrades to the
facade and tenant improvements to the interior. The majority of the existing building height and building footprint will
remain. As can be seen on the architectural elevations on the south and east elevations tower elements have been
added to enhance the building its maximum height is 42'8" above adjacent grade. The infrastructure will continue to
be used to serve the property, therefore the impact to public health will not be impacted. The facility currently has a
fire sprinkler system which will be upgraded as necessary to meet current codes. No activities (potentially
dangerous) other than personal storage will be allowed on the premises. In addition space will be provided at the
rear of the building for a fire truck turn around and the facility will have adequate security controls to restrict access
to only patrons that lease storage spaces. The project wiil implement necessary improvements to provide access for
persons with disabilities and the elderly, including parking, ramps, and elevators. We believe that this project will
benefit the public and is consistent with the city's goals for conservation and development.
2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance?
The existing zoning is Rollins Road (RR) zone district, within the Automobile Sales and Service
Overiay district, and lies within the general plan area for Industrial and Office Use. The adjacent
property to the east is an existing Public Storage facility with the same zoning and general plan
designations. We believe that this justifies that a similar facility will meet the cities general plan and
zoning statutes on a neighboring parcel.
3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining propeKies in the general vicinity?
The proposed development will be upgrading the existing facade similar to the Public Storage facility to the
east. Boxed columns with a cement plaster finish will be added to the new office and building entrance near
the southeast corner of the building. Existing metal panels and building walis will be painted and will match
the aesthetic appearance of the neighboring Public Storage Facility to the East. The size of the exterior shell
will remain relatively the same size which is comparative to neighboring properties in the immediate area The
existing buildings in the area have a simple modern 1960's style and the proposed design is post modern,
with o�ce and big box look with new building articulation to comply with the design guidelines for this area.
This wili provide a more natural look to the area.
CUP.FRM
CITY
r :1� i
_�.
—. .;�,. J
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT •$O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
...,.-,...^�G.���.
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
The existing building interior will be renovated with minor improvements to the exterior facilities. The subject
property also serves another estabiished tenant in the rear (not a part of this development) with the only access
through the drive aisle (and parking lot) east of the subject building. In addition based on research done on other
similar but established Public Storage Facilities the number of visitors is far less than what is required to fill the
city parking requirements. This information can be found in the parking study prepared by Lars Andersen &
Associates dated 8-19-14. We believe that the above stated conditions create a unique circumstance compared
to a typical new development in this area.
b. Explain why the variance requesf is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from fhe denial of the application.
Based on the City Zoning Code Section 25.70.040 the required parking for a warehouse/self-storage facility
is 1 stall per 1000sf of warehouse space. The proposed project including the additional building on the
parcel which is not a part of this renovation (or lease) has a total area of 216,157 square feet which would
require 217 stalls. Based on a parking study by Lars Andersen & Associates dated 8-19-14 the total
number of parking stalls that will be used by Pubiic Storage customers would be 14. The proposed stall
count is 167 stalls with 81 stalls serving the Pubtic Storage which will be far more than what is necessary.
We believe that the zoning code parking requirement would over park the site and request this variance. If
this variance is not granted the project will not be able to move forward.
c. Explain why fhe proposed use at the proposed /ocation will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
This project proposes to renovate an existing warehouse building into a self-storage facility with upgrades to
the facade and tenant improvements to the interior. The infrastructure will continue to be used to serve the
property, therefore the impact to public health will not be impacted. The facility currently has a fire sprinkler
system which will be upgraded as necessary to meet current codes. No activities (potentially dangerous)
other than personal storage will be allowed on the premises. In addition space will be provided at the rear of
the building for a fire truck turn around and the facility will have adequate security controls to restrict access to
only patrons that lease storage spaces. The project will implement necessary improvements to provide
access for persons with disabilities and the elderly, including parking, ramps, and elevators.
d. How wil/ the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed development will be upgrading the existing facade similar to the Public Storage facility to the
east. Boxed columns with a cement plaster finish will be added to the new office and building entrance near
the southeast comer of the building. Existing concrete tilt-up panels and building walls will be painted and will
match the aesthetic appearance of the neighboring Public Storage Facility to the East. The size of the exterior
shell will remain relatively the same size which is comparative to neighboring properties in the immediate
area.
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
City of Burlingame Planning Deparhnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin¢ame.ore
,�r� ��T• �t COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS �� � '` ��-�- �
BURLINGAME PLANNING COMNIISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEM.ENTAL FORM
' _ ; Li ,I4�
�o
�:;�_
1. Proposed use of the site Self-Storage
Access 6am to 9pm daily ; Office hours M-F 9:30am to 6pm; SaUSun 9:30am to 5pm
2. Days and hours of operation
3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type) 4 moving vans/trucks
4. Current and ro'ected maacimum number of em lo ees (includin owner at this location:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of AM to After 5:00 AM to After 5:00 AM to After 5:00
Operation PM PM PM PM PM PM
Weekdays Zp 5 2 2 2 2
Full-time
Part-time
Weekends p 2 0
Full-time 5 � 2
Part time
5. Current and ro'ected maximum number of visitors/customers who ma come to the site:
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of AM to
Operation PM
Weekdays 26
Weekends �0
After 5:00 AM to
PM PM
0 20
0 37
After 5:00 AM to
PM PM
37 20
� 37
After 5:00
PM
37
�
6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner,
employees and visitors/customers): 37
7. Where do/will the owner and employees park? Along the east property line
8. Where do/will the customers/visitors park? In any stall in the east, north, or south parking lots
9. Present or most recent use of site Wilco warehouse (virtual sales)
10. List of other tenants on properly, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach list if
necessary) Goodwill outlet store / Donation Center, hours of operation are M-Sat 9am-8pm and Sun 10am-6pm:
25 to 30 employees coNrntExc:AL.Ft�t
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO: Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner
FROM: Augustine Chou, Engineering Program Manager
DATE: November 18, 2014
SUBJECT: 1811 Adrian Road — Proposed Self-Storage Facility
I have reviewed the Parking and Traffic Analysis prepared by Lars Andersen &
Associates, for the proposed self-storage facility at 1811 Adrian Road.
After review, the Public Works — Engineering Department is in concurrence with the
conclusions and justifications as presented in the analysis. The department has no
additional comments.
August 19, 2014
LARS ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. SCOTT A. MOMMER, P.E.
PRESI�ENT
CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS DAN[EL J. ZOLDAK, P.E.
CASP • LEED ACCREDITED • QSP/QSD l9CE PRESI�EFT
4694 W JACQUELYN AVENUE aEY BALL�NCER, P.L.s.
FRESNO, CA 93722 SAMUEL L. BEEGHLY, P.E.
PH (559) 276-2790 FX (559) 276-0850
� t����� Y ��
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA
94010-3997
Subject: Public Storage - 1811 Adrian Road, CA
CUP and Parking Variance
Re: Parking Analysis
Background:
��J., �1 � 2��Ij
�ir�� c= aus� ir.c�.n�E
cc�-F1,�r:iNG �iv.
This study is in support of the conditional use permit and parking variance with respect
to the above referenced project. The City Zoning Code section 25.70.040 requires one
(1) parking space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area for
warehouse and storage uses. The proposed project includes the renovation of an
existing 80,377 square feet warehouse building that also shares the parcel and has a
separate lease area and existing 74,675 square feet warehouse at the rear of the
property. This other building is not a part of the renovation. The proposed renovation
will increase the gross floor area to 141,482 square feet. After construction has been
completed, there will be a total of 216,157 square feet of building on the site.
Therefore, the required parking spaces in accordance with the Zoning Code is 217
spaces in total. The existing facility currently has 117 parking stalls with 42 stalls of
those stalis on the proposed Public Storage lease area.
Public Storage proposes to provide 65 surFace parking spaces (including 4 additional
disabled spaces) and 4 new truck loading spaces and 8 existing truck loading spaces
to meet the parking demand. However, based on the operational experience of Public
Storage regarding actual parking demand at their store locations supported by actual
parking studies conducted at several locations and attached hereto, the institute of
transportation parking generation manual standards for self-storage parking, the
proposed parking should sufficiently serve the proposed site development.
Institute of Transportation Parking Generation Manual Discussion:
The Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Parking Generation, 3�d Edition ("ITE Manual")
provides a separate and specific category for self-storage facilities under "Mini-
Warehouse" and is defined as, "buildings in which a number of storage units or vaults.
CASp — LEED AP-QSP/QSD
They are typically referred to as `self-storage facilities.' Each unit is physically separated
from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other
common access point." The ITE Manual provides a peak parking demand ratio of 0.06
vehicles per 1,000 square feet or 0.77 vehicles per 100 storage units. The calculation
based upon square footage for the proposed facility is 141,482 / 1,000 x 0.06 = 9 parking
spaces. The calculation under the unit analysis is 927 / 100 x 0.77 = 7 parking spaces.
Public Storage Similar Store Case Studies:
Public Storage operates over 2,000 stores nationwide and has not documented any
incidences of parking shortage using their criteria for parking. The objective when
developing or redeveloping any site for self-storage facilities is to provide adequate
parking spaces for the customers but not over park the facility hence wasting valuable
real estate. To accomplish this objective, Public Storage conducted parking studies on
similar representative projects.
Public Storage has recently conducted parking counts at three (3) similar facilities.
Public Storage's study used one summer month and one winter month and studied 360,
one (1) hour periods at two of its properties and 450, one (1) hour periods at an
additional property, representing each facility's hours of operation. Each Public Storage
customer has an individual security code that deactivates the alarm to their space and is
recorded when they enter the facility. This study counts the number of customers
entering the facility in each one-hour period. The number of units, not building area, is
used as the denominator because each unit represents a customer. The results of the
attached studies are as follows:
# of units Peak hour visits Peak hour units/visit
i
Attachment 1 781 13 0.017
I
Attachment 2 1,050 14 0.013
Attachment3 1,558 26 0.017
The calculation based upon the observed conditions at these Public Storage facilities is
927* 0.017 * 0.5 = 7.88 (8) spaces plus the six (6) office spaces during peak hours of
operation, totaling (14) spaces.
Conclusion:
The proposed 81 spaces (including 4 disable spaces) and two (12) truck loading
spaces will satisfy the parking requirements of the proposed site. The proposed
parking is well in excess of both observed parking requirements at other Public
Storage sites and the ITE Manual.
Sincerely,
Les Beeghly, PE, QSD
LARS ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
CASP • LEED ACCREDITED • QSP�QSD
4694 W J.4CQUELYN AVENUE
FRESNO,CA 93722
PH (559) 276-2790 FX (559) 276-0850
SCOTT A. MOMMER, P.E.
PRESIDENT
DANIEL J. ZOLDAK, P.E.
\'ICE PRESIDEh'T
I(,EY BALLINGER, P.L.S.
SAMUEL L. BEEGHLY, P.E.
August 19, 2014
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA
94010-3997
k4����i `J ��
°� �_J G�� 5 2 0 i�
crrr o� auFune�.r��=
CCD-FL�,PdNiNG DIV.
Subject: Public Storage - 1811 Adrian Road, CA
CUP and Parking Variance
Re: Traffic Analysis
Background:
This study is in support of the conditional use permit and parking variance with respect
to the above referenced project. This analysis is for the review of traffic generation from the
proposed Public Storage facility located at 1811 Adrian Road Burlingame, CA.
Institute of Transportation Traffic Generation Manual Discussion:
The Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Parking Generation, 3�d Edition ("ITE Manual")
provides a separate and specific category for self-storage facilities under "Mini-
Warehouse" and is defined as, "buildings in which a number of storage units or vaults.
They are typically referred to as `self-storage facilities.' Each unit is physically separated
from other units, and access is usually provided through an overhead door or other
common access point." The ITE Manual provides a daily trip requirement of 2.5 trips per
1,000 SF of gross floor area and an AM peak hour of 0.14 trips per 1,000 SF of gross
floor area and a PM peak hour of 0.26 trips per 1,000 SF of gross floor area. The
following Tables A and B repre�?nts the trip generation for the proposed project:
CASp - LEED AP-QSP/QSD
Table A. Trip Generation Rates
I Dail Am Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Bldg. Area (sf) Land Use Trips/ % % Trips/ % % Trips/K % °/a
KGFA Enter Exit KGFA Enter Exit GFA Enter Exit
PS � 141,482 Mini-Warehouse � 2.5 50% 50% 0.14 55% � 45% 0.26 � 50% 50%
Table B. Trip Generation Study
� Daily Am Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Bld . Area (sf) Land Use Trips Enter Exit Trips � Enter Exit Trips Enter Exit
PS 141,482 Mini-Warehouse 354 177 177 20 11 9 37 I 19 � 19
Total Trips Generated 354 � 177 177 20 11 9 37 19 19
Conclusion:
Based on The Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Parking Generation, 3�d Edition ("ITE
Manual") the traffic analysis for PM peak trips is 37 trips, which is less than 100 new
peak hour trips generated and therefore will not require a Transportation Impact
Analysis per the Transporfation Impact Analysis Guidelines 2009 and is considered a
less then significant impact.
Sincea�elv.
Les Beeghly, PE, QSD
Proj ect Manager
� Project Comments
Date
To:
From
December 23, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permit and
Parking Variance for a self-storage use in an existing commercial
building at 1811 Adrian Road, zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of this project will apply to
this project.
--.. �
_ _<
Reviewed by: ; �.�'� Date: 12-23-2014
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
November 13, 2014
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permit and
Parking Variance for a self-storage use in an existing commercial
building at 1811 Adrian Road, zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review:
Second Comments:
� On your pians provide a table that includes the following:
a. Occupancy group for each area of the building
b. Type of construction
c. Allowable area
d. Proposed area
e. Allowable height
f. Proposed height
g. Proposed fire separation distances
h. Exterior wall and opening protection
i. Allowable
ii. Proposed
i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered
The building's Type of Construction is shown as Type VB; fhis is incorrect. The
informafiora on fhe Allowable Area and Fire Separation Distances was nof found
on the plans. Provide fhe requested informafion. In addition, based on the
information that you provide, show that the building will not exceed the maximum
allowab/e f�oor area per the 2013 CBC.
' 22. Specify the accessible path of travel from the public right of way, through the main
ir
entrance, to the area of alteration.
�_-
23. S'pecify an accessible path of travel from all required exits to the public right of way.
1
24.%Specify the path of travel from on-site parking, through the main entrance, to the
, �a of alteration.
When an accessible path of travel exceeds 200 feet, a passing space with a widfh
of at least 60" must be provided. Revise the plans to show compliance with this
Code section (2013 CBC 118-403.5.3) for items 22, 23, and 24, above.
i
�r'25� 5pecify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all
�equired entrances and exits.
All of the requested information was not found on the plans.
>' j
��2 . Provide complete dimensioned details for accessible bathrooms.
There are two types of bathrooms. A complete dimensioned floor plan was sho�wn
for only one of the bathroom fypes. P/ease provide fhe f/oor plan for the other
bathroom type.
--.
f/ 32.,�Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel
L�
Follow-up comment: The distance from the center of the second floor to the nev►r
stairway a t the back of the building and from the center of the second f/oor fo t�e
existing stairway at ihe front of the building exceeds the maximum alloweable
travel distance of 400 feet. Revise the plans to show Code compliance.
�-� -�
� 33. EW COMMENT:
Remove a/1 references to "Handicap'; "Handicapped'; or "HC" and replace wifh
the terms "Accessible'; "ACC; or "D.A."
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 32, and 33 must be re-submitted before this
project can move forward for Plannin Commission action.
Reviewed by: �- �- Date: 11-17-2014
Joe Cyr�C.� (6"5 - 8-7270)
`
_
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 28, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
i� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit & Parking Variance for a self-
storage use in an existing commercial building at 1811 Adrian Road,
zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review: September 2, 2014
1�) lans submitted for any commercial project must be designed, wet-stamped, and
signed by a licensed architect. 1997 Uniform Administrative Code §302.2 and
§302.3.
� On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building
Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California
Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing
Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the
Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California
Building Codes.
,�' As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures
to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is
undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and
commerci�l property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at
htt��://�v�vw.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb 0401-
0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show
.,�campliance ��ith this requirement.
�Specify on the pians that this project will corr�ply with the 2013 California Energy
Efficiency Standards.
Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and
details.
5) Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the
submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition,
replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must
provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure
can befound.
� Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
ee City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
7) n the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that
require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for
these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning
Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must
submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
8) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
9) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries,
the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
10)Provide existing and proposed elevations.
11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of
Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate
of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No
occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy
has been issued.
12)Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a legend and indicates existing
walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and
new walls and features.
NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will
not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a�
building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the
project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is
authorized or performed.
13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
14)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
/�ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
L�Department of Public Works.
16)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
17)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC
§1009.
18)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
19)� n your plans provide a table that includes the following:
a. Occupancy group for each area of the building
b. Type of construction
c. Allowable area
d. Proposed area
e. Allowable height
f. Proposed height
g. Proposed fire separation distances
h. Exterior wall and opening protection
i. Allowable
ii. Proposed
i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered
20 Ilustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described
in the 2013 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 422.1 Minimum
Plumbing Facilities and Table A- Occupant Load Factor.
�On Sheet 2 the scale of the drawing makes it impossible to determine if the site
accessibility from on-site parking and from the public right of way is Code
�compliant. Provide drawings that are scaled at no less than 1/8" = 1 foot.
��pecify the accessible path of travel from the public right of way, through the
main entrance, to the area of alteration.
�"5pecify an accessible path of travel from all required exits to the public right of
way.
24 Specify the path of travel from on-site parking, through the main entrance, to the
� area of alteration
(25�Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all
,-Cequired entrances and exits.
C2,6�'Specify accessible countertops where service counters are provided
�Provide complete dimensioned details for accessible bathrooms
���Provide complete, dimensioned details for accessible parking
�pecify a minimum 48" wide walkway with a 6" x 6" concrete curb (or 42" high
guardrail) where the walkway is adjacent to the drive aisle
�)Provide details on the plans which show that the building elevator complies with
all accessible standards. 2013 CBC §11 B-407.
-�'The second exit appears to terminate at the rear of the property. Provide an exit
plan which shows accessible path of travel from the exit to the public right of way
per 2013 CBC 1007.2.
�rovide an exit plan showing the paths of travel
33)Please Note: Architects are advised to specify construction dimensions for
accessible features that are below the maximum and above the minimum
dimension required as construction tolerances generally do not apply to
accessible features. See the California Access Compliance Manual -
Interpretive Regulation 11 B-8.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 15, 19, Z0, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
and 32 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for
Planning Commission action. %� ,� _
Reviewed by: �-��" �� � �' —� ,�` � / Date: 9-8-014
Project Comments
Date:
��
From:
August 28, 2014
� Engineering Division
ic�iii ��s3 -T��'S�
�:...::� - ..:.r. �....
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
/ �l:Jl%I :):NY%.l.V�i
0 Fire Division
ic�ni ��� °SG/5h
�L�.J� �.c...-. ......
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
IFI:)I%/ ��)C]-%%IIKii
t_ _�.
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit & Parking Variance for a selfi-
a....,.,.,. .. :.. .-... .: a:.... • t �. ,:l,�:.,,. + � on� w.a..:.... o_ _,..�
:Jt\lI�YJ�.. li.�G 111 a11 GAI.Sl�11V lW1I111111�i11.i1Ci1 1.%UIIVIIIY Cit IVVV A{.���Q1� �VQY:
zoned RR, APN: Q25-'169-050
Staff Review: September 2, 2014
1. Existing landscape to remain as noted on plans.
2. 5 new 24Abox Acer rubrum ok as specified on Landscape Plan.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 9/4/14
� � � Project Comments�
Date:
To:
From
August 28, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
X Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit & Parking Variance for a self-
storage use in an existing commercial building at 1800 Adrian Road,
zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review: September 2, 2014
1. Building's existing fire sprinkler system requires current 5-year certification
inspection. Provide proof of inspection prior to final field inspection.
Reviewed by
�
C. Reed �� � �
Date: 9/4/14
Project Comments
Date: August 28, 2014
To: X Engineering Division � Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600
� Building Division � Stormwater Division
(650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727
0 Parks Division � City Attorney
(650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit & Parking Variance for a self-
storage use in an existing commercial building at 1811 Adrian Road,
zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review: September 2, 2014
1. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter.
2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 9/10/2014
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
November 13, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558- 7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permit and
Parking Variance for a self-storage use in an existing commercial
building at 1811 Adrian Road, zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review:
1. Project proponent submitted a signed and completed C.3 Regulated Project
Checklist verifying applicability and proposals to meet C.3 requirements.
2. Post-construction Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of proposed stormwater
treatment measures follow the property owner unless a designated entity has
been identified by the property owner. An 0&M agreement/plan specifying the
party responsible for ownership, inspection and maintenance of the
stormwater treatment measures will be addressed during the building permit
issuance.
3. Comments or information not required or addressed at this stage will be
addressed during the building permit issuance.
Reviewed by: EJ/KK
��
Date: 11 /21 /2014
�
.-�..
SkN'MATEO COUN'ft'4i'IDE
p��rn�p���m `��(� ��CITY OF BURLINGAME - OFFICE OF
- - 4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
C.3 Regulated Projects Checklist 1103 AIRPORT BLVD
Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) , ) Q.
Stormwater Controls for Development Projects °� �� 650-342-3727
FAX 650-342-3712
� ����',`,F
�,�I_I�a�.:
� ���i�'t �
1. Applicability of C.3 and C.6 Stormwater Requirements
I.A. Enter Project Data (For "C.3 Regu/ated Projects,"data will be reported in the municipality's stormwaterAnnua/ Report.)
I.A.1 Project Name:
I.A.2 Project Address (inciude
cross street):
I.A.3 Project APN:
I.A.5 Applicant Name:
I.A.6 Applicant Address:
Public Storage - Burlingame
1811 Adrian Road
025-169-050
Public Storaqe
I.A.4 Project Watershed:
701 Western Avenue; Glendale, CA 91201
I.A.7 Applicant Phone: (g18) 224-8080x1476 Applicant Email Address: jfitzpatrick@publicstorage.com
I.A.8 Development type: ` Residential�C3ommercial 0 I dustrial ❑ Mixed-Use ❑ StreeURoad ❑ Other, specify:
(check all that apply) ��RedevelopmenY as defined b RP: creating, adding and/or replacing
xterior existing impervious surface on a site where past development has occurred�
❑'Special land use categories' as defined by MRP: (1) auto service facilitiesz, (2) retail gasofne
outlets, (3) restaurants2, (4) uncovered parking area (stand-alone or part of a larger project)
I.A.9 Project Description3:
(Also note and past
or future phases of the
project.)
Existing warehouse to be converted into 2-story self-storage facility with minor renova?ions
to the parking lot.
I.A.10 Total Area of Site: 3.197 (lease area) acres
Total Area of land disturbed during construction (include clearing, grading, excavating and stockpile area: � 8�2 acres.
I.B. Is the project a"C.3 Regulated ProjecY' per MRP Provision C.3.b?
I.B.1 Enter the amount of impervious surface' created and/or replaced by the project (if the total amount is 5,000 sq.ft. or more):
Tab/e of Im ervious and Pervious Surfaces
a b c ci
Existing Post-project
Pre-Project impervious New Impervious landscaping
Impervious Surface to be Surface to be (sc�.ff.), if
Type of Impervious Surface Surface (sq.ft.) Re laced6 s.ft. Createds s.ft. a ticable
Roof area(s) - excluding any portion of the roof that is 74,535 0
ve etated " reen rooP' 506
Impervious4 sidewalks, patios, paths, driveways 31,628 1 5,838
Impervious" uncovered parkings 10,738 � 3,973 3,768 NFA
Streets (public) N/A "� NlXC �
Streets (private) N/A N/A N/A
Totals: 116,901 5,817 � 10,112 �g,p2g
Area of Existing Impervious Surface NOT replaced 104,303 N/A
Total New Impervious Surface (sum oftotals forcolumns b and c): 15,929 ./
' Roadway projects that replace existing impervious surface are subject to C.3 requirements only if one or more lanes of travel are added.
Z See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here
4 Project description examples: 5-story offce building, industrial warehouse, residential with fve 4-story buildings for 200 condominiums, etc.
Per the MRP, pavement that meets the following defnition of pervious pavement is NOT an impervious surtace. Pervious pavement is defined
as pavement that stores and infiltrates rainfall at a rate equal to immediately surrounding unpaved, landscaped areas, or that stores and
infiltrates the rainfall runoff volume described in Provision C.3.d.
5 Uncovered parking includes top level of a parking structure.
6"Replace" means to install new impervious surtace where existing impervious surface is removed. "Construcf' means to install new impervious
surface where there is currently no impervious surface.
a�� 3�
Update approved December 4, 2012
I.B. Is the project a"C.3 Regulated ProjecY' per MRP Provision C.3.b? (continued)
C.3 Regulated Project Checklist
Yes No
1.6.2 In Item I.B.1, does the Total New Impervious Surface equal 10,000 sq.ft. or more? If YES, skip to
Ifem I.8.5 and check "Yes." If NO, continue to Item I.B.3.
1.6.3 Does the Item 1.B.1 Total New Impervious Surface equal 5,000 sq.ft. or more, but less than 10,000
sq.ft? If YES, continue to Item 1.8.4. If NO, skip to Item 1.B.5 and check "No."
I.B.4 Is the project a"Special Land Use Category° per Item I.A.8? For uncovered parking, check YES
only if there is 5,000 sq.ft or more uncovered parking. If NO, go to /tem 1.8.5 and check `No." If
YES, go to Item I.B.S and check "Yes.'
1.6.5 Is the project a C.3 Regulated Project? If YES, skip to Item 1.8.6; if NO, continue to /fem I.C.
� ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
/:1
■
1:/
I.B.6 Does the total amount of Replaced impervious surface equal 50 percent or more of the Pre-Project �
Impervious Surface? If YES, site desrgn, source control and treatment requirements app/y to the
whole site; if NO, these requirements app/y only to the impervious surface created and/or replaced.
I.C. Projects that are NOT C.3 Regulated Projects
NA
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
If you answered NO to Item I.B.5, or the project creates/replaces less than 5,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface, then the project is
NOT a C.3 Regulated Project, and stormwater treatrnent is not required, BUT the municipality may determine that source
controls �nd site design measures are required. Skip to Section II.
I.D. Projects that ARE C.3 Regulated Projects
If you answered YES to Item I.B.5, then the project is a C.3 Regulated Project. The project must include appropriate site design
measures and source controls AND hydraulically-sized stormwater treatment measures. Hydromodification management may
aiso be required; refer to Section II to make this determination. If final discretionary approval was granted on or after
DECEMBER 1, 2011, Low Impact Development (LID) requirements apply, except for `Special Projects." See Section II.
I.E. Identify C.6 Construction-Phase Stormwater Requirements
I.E.1 Does the project disturb 1.0 acre (43,560 sq.ft.) or more of land? (See Item
I.A.10). If Yes, obtain coverage under the state's Construction Genera/ Permit at
https.//smarts. waterboards ca oov/smarts/faces/SwSmartsLoqin isp. Submit to
the municipalrty a copy of your Notice of Intent and Storm Water Pollufion
Prevention P/an (SWPPP) before a grading or building permit is issued.
I.E.2 Is the site as a"High Priority Site" that disturbs less than 1.0 acre (43,560
sq.ft.) of land? (Municipal staff will make this determination.)
•"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to
a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during
construction (see MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2))
Yes No
❑ �
❑ ❑
NOTE TO APPLICANT: All projects require appropriate stormwater best management practices (BMPs) during construction. Refer to
the Section II to identify appropriate construction BMPs.
NOTE TO MUNICIPAL STAFF: If the answer is "Yes" to either question in Section E, refer this project to construction site inspection
staff to be added to their list of projects that require stormwater inspections at least monthiy during the wet season (Octobes 1 through
April 30}.
2 Update approved December 4, 2012
C.3 Regu/ated Project Checklist
11. Implementation of Stormwater Requirements
II.A. Complete the appropriate sections for the project. For non-C.3 Regulated Projects, Sections II.B, II.C, and II.D apply. For
C.3 Regulated Projects, all sections of Section II apply.
II.B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures (Required for C.3 Regulated Projects; all other projects are encouraged to
imp/ement site design measures, which may be required at municipality discretion. Starting December 1, 2012, projecfs that
create and/or replace 2,500 — 10,000 sq.ft. of impervious surface, and stand-a/one single famil� homes that create/rep/ace
2, 500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface, must include one of Site Design Measures a through f. Consult with municipa/ staff
about requirements for your project.)
II.B.1 Is the site design measure included in the project plans?
Plan
Yes No Sheet No.
a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation
or other non-potable use.
b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas.
❑ X❑
❑ 0
� ❑
X❑ ❑
❑ �
❑ X❑
❑ 0
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
� ❑
� ❑
� ❑
c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas.
d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated
areas.
e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces.
f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with
permeable surfaces.
g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots).
h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open
space.
i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention.
j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize
changes to the natural topography.
k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance)
� See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(6) for non-C.3 Regulated Projects, C.3.c.i(2)(a) for Regulated Projects, C.3.i for projects that create/replace 2,500
to 10,000 sq.ft. of impervious surtace and stand-alone single family homes that create/replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface.
3 Update app�oved December 4, 2U12
C.3 Regulated Projecf Checklist
II.C. Select appropriate source controls (Applies to C.3 Regulated Projects; encouraged for other projects. Consult municipal staff e)
Are these Features that
features in require source
project? control
measures
Yes No
❑ � Storm Drain
� ❑ Floor Drains
❑ � Parking garage
� ❑ Landscaping
� � Pool/Spa/Fountaii
❑ x❑ Food Service
Equipment
(non-
residential)
❑ X❑ Refuse Areas
❑ � Outdoor Proce
Activities 10
❑ X❑ Outdoor
Equipment/
Materials
Stora e
❑ � Vehicle/
Equipment
Cleanin
❑ ❑X Vehicle/
Equipment
Repair and
Maintenance
❑ � Fuel
Dispensing
Areas
X❑ ❑ Loading Docks
X❑ ❑ Fire Sprinklers
� ❑ Miscellaneous
Drain or Wash
Water
❑ 0 Architectural
Copper
Source control measures
(Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements)
Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumpingl Flows to Bay" or equivalent.
Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer9 [or prohibit].
Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.3
• Retain existing vegetation as practicable.
• Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest-
and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects.
• Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers.
• Use efficient irrigation system design to minimize runoff.
Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.3
Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is:
• Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge. 3
• Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned.
• Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on
and run-off, and siqned to require equipment washinq in this area
• Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc.,
designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff.
• Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors, and tallow bin
areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.3
Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to
prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and to drain to the sanitary sewer 3
• Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff.
• Locate area only on paved and contained areas.
• Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary
sewere, and contain by berms or similar.
• Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff,
plumb to the sanitary sewer3, and sign as a designated wash area.
• Commercial car wash facilities shall dischar e to the sanitary sewer 3
• Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to
prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment.
Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas.
• No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. 3
� Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 3
• Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to
prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break.
• Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain
away from fuelinq area.
• Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area.
• Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area.
• Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.3
• Install door skirts between the trailers and the buildinq
Design for discharge of f re sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewer.3
• Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air
conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.3
• Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable.
• Drain boiler drain lines; roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewer3.
• Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewer 3, or collect and
dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper."
Is source control
measure included
in project plans?
Plan
Yes No Sheet No.
❑ ❑
❑ � tbd
❑ ❑
� ❑ 6
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
� ❑ 2
❑ ❑ tbd
❑ 0
❑ ❑
$ See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7) for non-C.3 Regulated Projects and Provision C.3.c.i(1) for C.3 Regulated Projects.
9 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval.
�0 Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment inciude machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities.
4 Update approved December 4, 2012
C.3 Regulated Project Checklist
II.D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Applies to all projects).
Yes No Best Management Practice
� ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to ;� ��.
project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. c? <<- :r'�3 hi�.
� ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established.
� ❑ Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, I
trees, and draina4e courses.
� ❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following:
• Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency;
• Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of
excavated or cleared material;
• Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization;
• Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation.
❑ � Perform clearing and earth moving activities only durinq dry weather.
W ■
0 ■
0 ■
Use sediment controls or fltration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits.
Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fber rolls, or flters.
Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences,
check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc.
❑ � DiveR on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes).
� ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips,
sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching or other measures as appropriate.
0 ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points.
� ❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is
contained and treated.
� ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater.
X❑ ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs.
� � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints,
concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and
non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses.
PROJECTS THAT ARE NOT C.3 REGULATED PROJECTS STOP HERE!
II.E. Feasibility/Infeasibility of Infiltration and Rainwater Harvesting/Use (Applies to C.3 Regulated Projects ONLY)
Except for some Special Projects, C.3 Regulated Projects must include low impact deve/opment (LID) treafinent measures. LID
treatment measures are rainwater harvesting, infiltration, evapotranspiration, and biotreatmeni (i.e., landscape-based treatment with
special soi/s). Biotreatment rs allowed ONLY if it is infeasib/e to treat the amount of runoff specified in Provision C.3. d with rainwater
harvesting, infiltration, and evapotranspiration.
Yes No N!A
II.E.1 Is this project a"Special ProjecY'? (See Appendix J of the C.3 Technical Guidance for
criteria.)
➢ If No, continue to Item II.E.2. ❑ 0 ❑
➢ If Yes, or if there is potentia/ that the project MAY be a Special Project, complete the
Special Projects Worksheet.
II.E.2 Infiltration Potential. Based on site-specifc soil report", do site soils either:
a. Have a saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) less than 1.6 inches/hour), or, if the
Ksat rate is not available,
b. Consist of Type C or D soils?
➢ /f Yes, continue to II.E.3.
➢ lf No: comp/ete the /nfiltration Feasibility Worksheet. If infiltration of the C.3.d
amount of runoff is found to be feasi6le, skip to II.E.B; rf infiltration is found to be
infeasib/e, continue to II.E.3.
X❑ ❑ ❑
" If no site-specifc soil report is available, refer to soil hydraulic conductivity maps in C.3 Technical Guidance Appendix I.
5 Updaie approved December 4, 2012
C.3 Regu/ated Project Checklist
II.E.3 Recycled Water. Check the box if the project is installing and using a recycled water plumbing system for non-potable
water use.
❑ The project is installing a recycled water plumbing system, and the installation of a second non-potable water
system for harvested rainwater is impractical, and considered infeasible due to cost considerations.
9 /f you checked this box, there is no need for further eva/uation of rainwater harvesting. Skip to Il.E.9.
II.E.4 Potential Rainwater Capture Area
a. Refer to the Table of Impervious and Pervious Surfaces in the C.3 and C.6 Data
Collection Form, and enter the total square footage of impervious surface that will be
replaced and/or created by the project. 15,929
b. If 1.6.6 indicates that 50% or more of the existing impervious surface will be replaced
with new impervious surface, then add any existing impervious surface that will remain
in place to the amount in II.E.4.a.
c. Convert the amount in Item II.E.4.b from square feet to acres (divide by 43,560). If
II.E.4.b is not applicable, convert the amount in II.E.4.a from square feet to acres. This
is the projecYs Potential Rainwater Capture Area, in acres.
II.E.5 Landscape Irrigation: Feasibility of Rainwater Harvesting and Use
a. Enter area of onsite landscaping.
b. Multiply the Potential Rainwater Capture Area (the amount in II.E.4.c) times 3.2
c. Is the amount in II.E.5.a (onsite landscaping) LESS than the amount in II.E.S.b (the
product of 3.2 times the size of the Potential Rainwater Capture Area)'Z?
➢ lf Yes, continue.
➢ lf No, it may be possible to meet the treatmeni requirements by directing runoff
from impervious areas to self-retaining areas (see Section 4.3 of the C.3
Technical Guidance). If not: refer to Tab/e 11 and the curves in Appendix F of
the LID Feasibility Report to evaluate feasibilrty of harvesting and using the C.3.d
amount of runoff for irrigation. Skip to II.E.7.
N(A
0.366
0.426
1.17
Sq. ft.
Sq. ft.
--Acres
Acres ��4�
'� Acres
❑X Yes ❑ No
✓
�i �4 L I, i i�
II.E.6 Indoor Non-Potable Uses: Feasibility of Rainwater Harvesting and Use (check the box for the applicab/e project
type, then fiU in the requested informatron and answer the question):"
❑ a. Residentiai Project
i. Number of dwelling units (total post-project):
ii. Divide the amount in (i) by Potential Rainwater Capture Area (II.E.4.c):
iii. Is the amount in (ii) LESS than 1247
� b. Commercial Project
i. Floor area (total interior post-project square footage):
ii. Divide the amount in (i) by Potential Rainwater Capture Area (II.E.4.c)
iii. Is the amount in (ii) LESS than 84,000?
❑ c. School Project
i. Floor area (total interior post-project square footage):
ii. Divide the amount in (i) by Potential Rainwater Capture Area (II.E.4.c):
iii. Is the amount in (ii) LESS than 27,000?
Units
Du/ac
❑ Yes ❑ No
/
506 Sq.ft.
1,3$3 �� Sq.ft./ac
� Yes ❑ No �
Sq.ft.
Sq.ft./ac .
❑ Yes ❑ No
�3 Landscape areas must be contiguous and within lhe same Drainage Management Area to irrigate with harvested rainwater via gravity flow.
Rainwater harvested for indoor use is typically used for toileVurinal flushing, industrial processes, or other non-potable uses.
6 Update approved December 4, 2012
C.3 Regu/ated Project Checklist
II.E.6 Indoor Non-Potable Uses: Feasibility of Rainwater Harvesting and Use (continued)
❑ d. Industrial Project
i. Estimated demand for non-potable water (gallonslday):
ii. Is the amount in (i) LESS than 2,900?
❑ e. Mixed-Use Residential/Commercial Project14
i. Number of residential dwelling units and commercial floor
area:
ii. Percentage of total interior post-project floor area serving
each activity:
iii. Prorated Potential Rainwater Capture Area per activity
(multiply amount in II.E.4.c by the percentages in [ii]):
iv. Prorated project demand per impervious area (divide the
amounts in [i] by the amounts in [iii]):
Gal.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Residentia/ Commercial
Units
o�a
Acres
Du/ac
Sq.ft.
%
Acres
Sq.ft/ac
❑ Yes ❑ No
v. Is the amount in (iv) in the residential column less than 124, AND is the amount
in the commercial column less than 84,000?
� If you checked "Yes" for the above question for the applicab/e project type, rainwater harvesting for indoor use is
considered infeasib/e un/ess the project inc/udes one ormore buildings that each have an individual roof area of
10,000 sq. ft. or more, in which case further ana/ysis is needed. Comp/ete Sections /I.E.S and /I.E.6 of this form for
each such building, then continue to II.E.7.
➢ If you checked "No" for the question applicable fo the type of project, rainwater harvesting for indoor use may be
feasible. Complete the Rainwater Harvesfing Feasibility Worksheet, and then continue to II.E.7.
II.E.7 Identify and Attach Additional Feasibility Analyses
If further analysis is conducted based on results in II.E.1, II.E.2, II.E.5, or II.E.6, indicate the analysis that is
conducted and attach the applicable form or other documentation (check all that apply):
❑ Special Projects Worksheet (if required in II.E.1)
❑ Infltration Feasibility Worksheet (if required in II.E.2)
❑ Rainwater Harvesting and Use Feasibility Worksheet (if required in II.E.5 or II.E.6), completed for:
❑ The entire project
❑ Individual building(s), if applicable, describe:
❑ Evaluation of the feasibility of harvesting and using the C.3.d amount of runoff for irrigation, based on
Table 11 and the curves in Appendix F of the LID Feasibility RepoR (if required in II.E.5).
❑ Evaluation of the feasibility of harvesting and using the C.3.d amount of runoff for non-potable
industrial use, based on the curves in Appendix F of the LID Feasibility Report (if required in II.E.6.d).
II.E.8 Finding of Infiltration Feasibility/Infeasibility
Infiltration of the C.3.d amount of runoff is infeasible if any of the following conditions apply (check all that apply):
� The "Yes" box was checked for Item II.E2.
❑ Cornpletion of the Infiltration Feasibility Worksheet resulted in a finding that infiltration of the C.3.d amount of
runoff is infeasible.
➢ Based on the above eva/uation, infiltration of the C.3.d amount of runoff is (check one):
� Infeasible ❑ Feasible
14 For a mixed-use project involving activities other than residential and commercial activities, follow the steps for residential/commercial
mixed-use projects. Prorate the Potential Rainwater Capture Area for each activity based on the percentage of the project serving each
activity.
7 Update approved December 4, 2012
II.E.9 Finding of Rainwater Harvesting and Use Feasibility/Infeasibility
x❑ Infeasible ❑ Feasibie
Harvesting and use of the C.3.d amount of runoff is infeasible if any of the following apply (check all that apply):
❑ The project will have a recycled water system for non-potable use (II. E.3).
� Only the "Yes" boxes were checked for Items II.E.5 and II.E.6.
❑ Compietion of the Rainwater Harvesting and Use Feasibility Worksheet resulted in a finding that harvesting and
use of the C.3.d amount of runoff is infeasible.
❑ Evaluation of the feasibility of harvesting and using the C.3.d amount of runoff for irrigation, based on Table 11
and the curves in Appendix F of the LID Feasibility RepoR, resulted in a finding of infeasibility.
❑ Evaluation of the feasibility of harvesting and using the C.3.d amount of runoff for non-potable industrial use,
based on the curves in Appendix F of the LID Feasibility Report, resulted in a finding of infeasibility.
� Based on the a6ove evaluation, harvesting and using the C.3.d amount of runoff is (check one):
II.E.10. Use of Biotreatment
If findings of infeasibilitv are made in both II.E.8 (Infiltration) and II.E.9 (Rainwater Harvesting and Use), then the
applicant may use appropriately designed bioretention facilities for compiiance with C.3 treatment requirements.
� Applicants using biotreatment are encouraged to maximize infiltration of stormwater rf site condrtions allow.
II.F. Stormwater Treatment Measures (Applies to C.3 Regulated Projects)
II.F.1 Check the applicable box and indicate the treatment measures to be included in the project.
Yes
❑
�
L■
No
x❑
❑■
0
Is the project a Special Project7 If yes, consult with municipal staff about the need to prepare a discussion
of the feasibility and infeasibility of 100% LID treatment. Indicate the type of non-LID treatment to be used,
the hydraulic sizing methodi5, and percentage of the amount of runoff specified in Provision C.3.d that is
treated:
Non-LID Treatment
❑ Media filter
❑ Tree well filter
Hydraulic sizina method'S % of C.3.d amount of runoff treated
Is it infeasible to treat the C.3.d amount of runoff using either infiitration or rainwater harvesting/use (see
II.E.8 and II.E.9)? If yes, indicate the biotreatment measures to be used, and the hydraulic sizing method:
Biotreatment Measures
0 Bioretention area
❑ Flow-through planter
C.3 Regu/ated Project Checklist
Hydraulic sizinq methodt5
Simplified Method - 4% Rule
Is it feasible to treat the C.3.d amount of runoff using either infiltration or rainwater harvesting/use (see II.E.8
and II.E.9)? If yes: indicate the non-biotreatment LID measures to be used: and hydraulic sizing method:
LID Treatment Measure (non-biotreatmentl
❑ Rainwater harvesting and use
❑ Bioinfiltrationt6
❑ Infiltration trench
❑ Other (specify):
Hydraulic sizinq method15
II.F.2 Alternative Certification (to be completed by municipal staffl: Was the treatment system sizing and design
reviewed by a qualified third-party professional that is not a member of the project team or agency staff7
❑ Yes ❑ No Name of Revi
15 Indicate which of the following Provision C.3.d.i hydraulic sizing methods were used. Volume based aooroaches: 1(a) Urban Runoff Quality
Management approach, or 1(b) SO% capture approach (recommended volume-based approach). Flow-based aooroaches: 2(a) 10 % of 50-year
peak flow approach, 2(b) Percentile rainfall intensity approach, or 2(c) 02-Inch-per-hour intensity approach (recommended flow-based approach).
If a combination flow and volume design basis was used, indicate which flow-based and volume-based criteria were used.
16 See Section 6.1 of the C.3 Technical Guidance for conditions in which bioretention areas provide bioinfiltration.
8 UpdaYe approved December 4, 2012
C.3 Regulated Project Check;ist
II.G. Is the project a Hydromodification Management" (HM) ProjectT (Complete this section for C.3 Regulated Projects)
II.G.1 Does the project create and/or replace 1 acre (43,560 sq. ft.) or more of impervious surface? (Refer to Item 1.6.1.)
❑ Yes. Continue to Item Il.G.2.
� No. Skip fo Item li.G.5 and check "No."
II.G.2 Is the total impervious area increased over the pre-project condition? (Refer to Item 1.6.1.)
0 Yes. Continue to Item ll. G.3.
❑ No. The project is NOT required to incorporate HM measures. Skip to ltem II.G.5 and check "No."
II.G.3 Is the site located in an HM Control Area per the HM Control Areas map (Appendix H of the C.3 Technical Guidamce)?
❑ Yes. Skip to Item G.5 and check "Yes."
x0 No. Attach map, indicating project location. Skip to Ifem G.5 and check "No."
❑ Further analysis required. Confinue to Item G.4.
II.G.4 Has an engineer or qualified environmental professional determined that runoff from the project Flows only through a
hardened channel or enclosed pipe along its entire length before emptying into a waterway in the exempt area?
❑ Yes. Attach signed statement by qual�ed professionaL Go to Item G.5 and check "No."
❑ No. Go fo Item G.5 and check "Yes."
II.G.5 Is the project a Hydromodification Management Project?
❑ Yes. The project is subject fo HM requirements in Provision C.3.g of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Pemtit.
� No. The project is EXEMPT from HM requirements.
➢ If the project is subject to the HM requirements, incorporate in the projecf flow duration sformwater control measures
designed such that post-project sformwater discharge rates and durations match pre-project discharge rates and
durations. The Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM) has been developed to size flow duration controls. See
www.bavareahvdroloavmodel.ora. Guidance is provided in Chapter7 of the C.3 Technical Guidance.
Name of appiicant completing the form: .lim Fitzpatrick
Signature: patp: �8' tb• ��
II.H.Confirm Operations and Maintenance (08M) Submittals (for municipal staff use only):
II.H.1 Stormwater Treatment Measure and/HM Control Owner or Operator's Information:
Address:
Phone: Email:
➢ Applicant must call for inspection and receive inspection within 45 days of installation of treatment measures arad/or
hydromodification management controls.
The tollowing questions apply to C.3 Regulated Projects and Hydromodificatron Management Projects.
Yes No N/A
II.H.1 Was maintenance plan submitted? ❑ ❑ �
II.H.2 Was maintenance pfan approved? ❑ ❑ �
II.H.3 Was maintenance agreement submitted? (Date executed: ) ❑ ❑ ❑
➢ Atfach the executed maintenance agreement as an appendix to thrs checklist.
" Hydromodification is the modification of a stream's hydrograph, caused in general by increases in flows and durations that result when land
is developed (made more impervious). The effects of hydromodification include, but are not limited to, increased bed and bank erosion, loss of
habitat, increased sediment transport and deposition, and increased flooding. Hydromodification management control measures are desianed
to reduce these effects.
9 Update approved December4, 2012
C.3 Regulated Project Checklist
III. Incorporate HM Controls (if required)
Are the applicable items in Plans?
Yes No NA
�I �
___ �.-_._ ".._.. �._ _.._ �__. �...,,�.......����...�.........,v��u.... ui�.�.�, �uiia�.c i�VVV UIICI.IIVIIJ VI
entire site, locations of flow duration controls and site design measures per HM site
design requirement
� � � Soils report or other site-specific document showing soil types at all paRs of site
U U � I If project uses the Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM), a list of model inputs.
❑ ❑ ❑ If project uses custom modeling, a summary of the modeling caiculations with
corresponding graph showing curve matching (existing, post-project, and post-project
with HM controls curves), goodness of ft, and (allowable) low fiow rate.
Ll ❑ ❑ If project uses the Impracticability Provision, a listing of all applicable costs and a brief
description of the alternative HM project (name, location, date of start up, entity
responsible for maintenance).
LJ ❑ ❑ If the project uses alternatives to the defauit BAHM approach or settings, a written
description and rationale.
IV. Annual Operetions and Maintenance (08�M) Submittals (for municipal staff use only): � �ti` �'��"-�-w- �
�� �� c� r� SJ��n-�-
For C.3 Regu/ated Projects and Hydromodification Management Projects, indicate the dates on hich the Applicant submifted
annual reports for project O&M:
V. Comments (for municipal staff use only):
Zj�} ''I o F�n, l�. G�-b'�,_._. ` F- �9 �
C£� t�1 �'Vl�,'�C� �[ (/S i�t S� c�
� `fn-z: CO c1� �'Y�P-;'� z ��,
VI. NOTES (for municipal staff use only):
Section I Notes:
Section II Notes:
Section III Notes:
Section IV Notes:
Section V Notes:
VII. Project Close-Out (for municipal staff use only):
VII.1 Were final Conditions of Approval met?
VI1.2 Was initial inspection of the completed treatmenUHM measure(s) conducted?
(Date of inspection: )
VI1.3 W�s maintenance plan submitted?
(Date executed: )
VI1.4 Was project information provided to staff responsible for O&M verifcation inspections?
(Date provided to inspection staff: �
Yes No NA
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
�� Update approved December4, 2012
C.3 Regulated Project Checklist
VII. Project Close-Out (Continued -- for municipal staff use only):
Name of staff confirming project is closed o
Date:
Name of 0&M staff receiving
Date:
Appendices
Appendix A: O&M Agreement
Appendix B: O&M Annual RepoR Form
11 Update approved December 4, 2012
Page FI-3
I
' Project Comments
�
Date: August 28, 2014
To:
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
d Fire Division
(650) 558- 7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit & Parking Variance for a self-
storage use in an existing commercial building at 1800 Adrian Road,
zoned RR, APN: 025-169-050
Staff Review: September 2, 2014
1) Determine if proposed construction is subject to additional stormwater requirements
under the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). A project may be subject to additional
requirements under the MRP if:
❑ 2,500 sq. ft. but less than 10,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface is created or
repiaced OR
❑ 10,000 sq. ft or more of impervious surface is created or replace, OR
❑ 5,000 sq. ft. or more impervious surface is created or replace at stand-alone
parking.
Complete, sign and return the appropriate checklist based on the triggered threshoid.
Forms, checklist, flyers and factsheets and additional resources are available for
download at http:(Iwww.flawstobay.org/newdeveiopment .
2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities.
Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best
Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, inclu�';ng demolition.
When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as
project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Electronic
file of a BMP Plan Sheet is available for download at http://flawstobay.orq/construction .
3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at
http:liflowstabay.orqlnewdeve�opment .
Page 1 of 2
4) II surfaces must be labeled as to whether it is pervious or impervious. Details must
e provided for impervious surfaces such as driveways, patios; sidewalks. etc.
For assistance please contact Eva J. at 650-342-3727.
Reviewed by: EJ �'(�
"�
Date: 9/4/2014
Page 2 of 2
;,
�.� �_�_ s:�,
_ : „ . ,: . � �: � � �..., %., ' ' .'. . . . . _��'ri;'.�.��c�� ai�. r �..�t:.�.. _.^Y��:• n' . �i
i _ ' ... � ,�;�3.�:a..�._.. ....,._ �._��x�?M'�.. . .��_�,.. t� a:�t �. �_W+; .. ..m.__ � ... . . .
Stormwater Controls
Stormwater runoff from urbanized areas is a major source ofi pollution to local creeks and San Francisco Bay. To
comply with the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP), fssued by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board in 20�9, local agencies in San Mateo County require development projects to incorporate appropriate
stormwater controls. These may include the following:
1. Site Desi�n Measures are permanentfeatures that reduce water
quality impacts by:
• Reducing impervious surfaces
• Directing runofF from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas
2. Source Controls prevent potential pollutant sources from contacting
rainfall and stormwater, Examples incfude:
.
Roofed trash enclosures
Pest-resistant landscaping
• Sanitary sewer drains for vehicle wash areas
3. Stormwater Treatment Measures are engineered systems
that remove pollutants from stormwater before it reaches a
storm drain, creek, or the Bay. The treatment measures
selected must be Low Jmpact Development (LID) te�hniques
{see box at right} except for certain types of projects.
4. Hydromodification Mana�ement (HM) reduces erosive
flows in creeks that can occur when amounts of impervious
surface on a project siie are increased.
5. Gonstruction Site Controls required during the construction
phase of project include:
Low Impact Development {LID) techniques
reduce stormwater runoff and mimic a
site's predevelopment hydrology. LI❑
treatment options include infiltration,
evapotranspiration, and rainwater
harvesting and use, and where these are
infeasible, 6iotreatment may be used.
• Control of erosion on slopes and/or areas of exposed soiL
• Keeping sediment on site using perimeter 6arriers and storm drain inlet protection.
• Proper management of construction materials, chemicals, and wastes on site.
Projects disturbing one acre or more must comply with the State Constructlon General Permit For more information on
the Construction General Permit, visit wwwsnrrcb.ca.gov/water issues/pr��rams/stormwater/constructior shtml
Determining Project Requirements
To determine if Stormwater Control Requirements apply to your project and identify appropriate controls,
municipality staff will ask you to fill out either.
• The 5tormwater Checklist for Small Projects for single family homes, projects that create and/or
New replace between 2,500 and l0,OD0 sq. ft. of impervious surface, and "special land use projects" (see
page 2) that create and/or replace between 2,500 and 5,D00 sq. ft. of impervious surface.
• The C.3 Regulated Projects Checklist for projects that create and/or replace 10,000 sq. ft. or more of
impervious surface, and "special land use projects" tsee page 2) that create and/or replace 5,000 sq.
or more of impervious surface.
ft:
Current Stormwater Quality Control Requirements
• LID Requirements/Stormwater Treatment Measures apply to:
• Projects that create and/or replace 10,000 square feet or
more of impervious surface, and
•"Special Land Use Category" projects that create and/or
replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface.
If the stormwater treatment requirements apply, you will need to fill out the
feasibility screening portion of the C.3 Regulated Projects Checklist to
determine whether it is feasible to treat the water quality volume of runoff
with infiltration, evapotranspiration, or rainwater harvesting and use.
SpecialLand Use Categories are
• Uncovered parking areas (stan
alone or part of another use)
• Restaurants
Auto service facilitiesl
Retail gasoline outlets
Where infiltration, evapotranspiration, and rainwater harvesting and use are
infeasible, stormwater may be directed to an on-site biotreatment system, such
as a bioretention area or flow-through planter. Biotreatment systems contain a
specified biotreatment soil and have a surFace area that is approximately 4% of
the contributing impervious area. Biotreatment systems should be designed to
maximize infiltration into native soil wherever possible. Vault-based treatment
systems may not be used as stand-alone treatment, except for limited use of
media filters in certain high density and transit-oriented projects.
• Hydromodification Management (HM) requirements zpply if a project creates and/or replaces 1 acre or
more of impervious surface, increases impervious surface over pre-project conditions AND is located in a
susceptible area.
New Requirements for Small and Single Family Home Projects (Effective December 1, 2012) app�y to:
■ Projects that create and/or replace at Ieast 2,500 square feet, but less than 1D,000 square feet, of
impervious surface
■ Stand-alone single family home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of
impervious surface
These projects must inmrporate one of the following site design measures:
1. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels.
2. Direct roaf runoff into vegetated areas.
3. Direct runoff from (sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onta vegetated areas.
4. Dirett sunoff from driveways/uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas.
5. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces.
6. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces
No treatment measures are required for these projects.
For More lnformation:
• Contact the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program at
www.flowstobay.org (For the New Development webpage, dick on
"Businesses", then "New Development". For a list of local contacts for new
development, click "local permitting agency".)
• The Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects, the C.3 Checklist for Regulated
Projects, the C.3 Technical Guidance Manual, and other guidance
documents are provided on the New Development webpage.
, � y j �+�� „ �``,
_ �� � . �,A�
���
r'�
� i � �
s::
�"``'-'��- � •_ `__. r`.. _ �.��''�
Bioreferstian s��sJem in Burlingmee
'Auto service facilities indude those described bythe following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes:
5013, 50=4, 5541, 753?, 7533, 7534,7530, 7537, 7538, 7539.
�� - - - - - - -
� "
:
� `
� , � ��
4— - - -- — - _ -_ . "
, t=��_�-�.�#'
� t�� �c �u;sr,�;�
�Ar��.e:� _.. ... � r ru�� �r;�
Requirements for Architectural Copper
Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing!
Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life
Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes
into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to
remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants
Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the
installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper.
��?-
tm >��
-� �,� y� ",
M-"`
�, w � 1 ���n-�«�
� � �
.�-
, � ��
� �- � ,._ �. .
Building i�✓ith copper flashing,
gutterand drainpipe.
Use Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited
discharges to storm drains.
During lnstallation
• If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain.
Block off storm drain inlet if needed.
o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary
sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for
proper disposal.
• Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious
coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will
also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance.
During Maintenance
Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination or re-application of impervious coating:
• Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains.
• Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local
sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal.
Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself!
If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non r� "' `' `_
stormwater generated by installing, deaning, treating or washing _ - -
copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal `-�`� �
stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine.
Pno�o : �cdit Don �Etlwards Nafional �Idlrle Sanctuary
Contact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at
��rtJww.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New DevelopmenY', then "local permitting agency").
FINAL February 29, 20�2
Storm drain inlet is blocked to pre�ienf
prohibited discharge. The water must be
pumped and disposed of properly.
0
Water Poilutian
Preventi�n Program
acanwater.'� �. ..
�'ons�;ruct:ion �est l�lf�n�g�r�e�l� �'� a�tices (�11�IPs)
Con:;t.i�uction pro.jcc�s are rcc�uircd lo implcmcni thc sCormwalcr bcsl m�in�igcmcnt precticc�s (f3MY) oi� tltis pagc, �is
t1iey appLy to you� project, �ll year long.
M��terials & V�1'xste MauagemeN
nm�-un�n�rn,��m �tni�•�;nt,
IJU I .I�l I l l I �t'I
v I I� whuii u Iiviv.l�.r'lua ,u.i il) ��i� e�.W �iWii
I-0tlqx
❑ lf. (I � Aui'I n� tr �tiul ' Jo niJ rvn cr R� di uuY �vol.
Ilxe �1 . �1 1 I I,
❑(.�I I II1� A '1 - I Ila.qrin�twnslc*(auch.�+
,�� � i. , i i� i� � �,��i ��i A,na �.>:i ,
. .�Inai�iilic' . eml,anrlGd�inlrcFilaire.
❑ SI i'r i Ini. 'nIs ni ��� ., u' li�,ht rnn�mn �'�.;f ni
� ii F-' n� a�„ , �„a��� �..m��,�� u„���d��i
.�>w��,d�v�ra , ��.�nu����i�,�����, �rta,�,�.
❑I�Il�wmmul��iru'nx�pli�au�ii� u �.ti rlu�e�idn.
n-r'�I.-nuALn i(ui J �.Uauol
a� � ly ��.brnmak � i J .. 1•n iai �. 1 n.cu�l �vll n 24 hrvrs.
L7A�� ,cl'<'n���ro�.-��������i,nli'ulllin�,.ar�lo�v�vnxlcn.
1Vx.�'t nl �, il
UC . �.nd'.�ic�l . �-elyw�hw��w7ltlarud�d
��ywm4Ja�aWd n a�hei.
❑ci���.,,�,«n�a�n,��i �i...,,.�i�rna�ro���.�H,,-,��h��,,i,�
a �cdr�anr�to�u�l�llul Nr�crLued,.anxdw��p>nvu �L�.
�.��.I'uilii.i vle.
❑f:li�ni�nrrrlicc�����ll .'l�ix,m�dliq�c tl�mfr+y�rilyfn�
Icnl�e i id vp'Ila.
Ulti,l .Ill 1� IJl`p-� IJ.It.yd 'I 1
.:I ' l. yJ 11 I th'I, nu.a ,u b�elx.r.
iViul.�.ilF.Ni�iI.h1ll ��I.�ii�i..�I��.)
ultinpo ofliquiJreaidur�.iinnrpn ..iliinrvav,.inh�rnu.Gl�n�a.nnd
d<n�,��� n,da, A, t���,a,�i,���., �,�a.������,�
(. nNt .t k' I an l l me1
U Ls-ll'_I I.� Il' � �prii rnlxni I I tlizeull
. ��a �•x . . rr - . n� �����«,i r�,�l„ , a
ualim11ru`1Aia9mrr; x fimu ,sile miJ trurkiup, nff.�im.
❑ S�recpni va�.u�i ai•vnucciire�sLiuiinwrdin�r,lY:��lncrme
ardiw ._ rulu�¢evrmfunL<nrvul�iuK.Neverho�eduo•n:,ucrr„
lu 1 i� b�rlci��p.
lsquipment Mxnakement &
�tipiLl Coulrnl
i ��
�--' � �•'f.
nr�d�m ���o � .��a rxd� ���, . .
u u,:.,p��x�� ���, d,���, r�n�d »�;d� �i,i,��.i,.�xie imar_., n��
i� le I I�I. ill`� I�. l; ' �c
L1 I vi I . �-r�il�,ai�l�el�rle
and�i��i - r� u.�..
U If lucll gnricl �.I � Ihcdnu
I I J �. f u L� i
x'i I�� `- J'1 1 ' I � I. 1. L'u � I � II
11 I..R YJ -J.�p.a�.ill�il:»�In�il .
u ir�i �i �} i�a,��„��„�s�t,�d� ���ti�
denn w� I w Ic' ml v��� u henn •J i rcn Il�m ry II iol
=1l��vr�� � I ' ' 'nlaFulltrfi.stic_.nii�iii�
d'�" „ ,, rtfet� �v e.
LI I)ninn[�I ��elulr�ri.� � x'Ir� ingFa'��=,
.eai�ci.:, 1 p-u.u..ir.l .I ,.� Fer��i�inri�.
S��III 1'rev�.nll�n atiil f'nnlrnl
U kupxpli I �-. I�1. I.ewbunnwd
nilinel �-In1l�aliL� i. � �i�iulli���ir.
U I'� i I�.I. � �'� !.� .Ilyl'r.n�l
'7 i'Ic l � � I�. ll�. I � �,�i�.viiinci lwl::
nlrcp�v.n nodi
LJ Cl�xu ul �I II� ,rl�nk��i �rJ a ely �i�l Jii.l����•���I
�i�,� ����, �.�rL i� ��,i � �i�-
U I�lo noi I oc� dnry 1 xi 'I �-lu't fl�.'lla hn��t' N�i'llcd.
I,I.r.tlr�� cici�n�i�+ni��IiuAn(ahniinc�i�i iiiaiciinlh,c:�i
Llt r. x V� y.l
LI (��r������ .� II.IJv na ' I.' I' .ly.11n�iii
�altl. n I � r�huptlun.
❑ [liiuufsl-II �nJi'a I.yJiuu�n.uPxnd
pr,�prd)' dupoainR nf um�owwm�rA nuil.
❑ Rrpnrleirnifcinilspill.�Imnn.di:uclp.Ynuure.rryuir�•d
hy �xw m wl��^'� ��II signiilenm relnues ol'hnniNann
, �nnit,����i�ur�i,�,��i.�w��q.�����si,acnn�aivii
ory���r IOCal cinirpCncy rcv��nn.0 nuinF,;r. Jl (;ali iI�C
:nu �ii.�,r. �s�,�m�aww����,r,
C: .ur�lh ,pN. -"1"+501241 �wxl
ISertk�mm�ing
� ` ._.. _ _. _.,_, , . _..
�(t Q � li�-i
_ �,4. � J„
�'' ;rq r __
U ti I J I � ding nJ �.cmn on w.�d�
� I I)�e 1
Uti-I'I' 111 I I � .i�lliil
� � y . I� I'I.ur.l
� IPh' �I. I�J(hri
'�I I F. . 1 1 h:hed
UR .,i �4'�-. dy��Lru
l�lll� e � d .1.-pen
J C -I �i I.pex
eul�i�ei� I � uniiini�cAixl�ly
plunne.d.
ui i�.r r, �l�i r r�..
x ai ,� i,�„i �.,.: u�.,'.
I' �I I I�' � t�- ��il ig
I m 1 . q I�lii��rt 14MF,. nurl
nsfLi itlln '�I � i ,.td' �nh�, n,.
},� rl'L�.�:.I� . ..
UhiiGi.x ��xl�d�u'Icn.�'r.in1.�"ii�li.�i�
�o Au p� i ��.6 . i e'It. a in Ihe u� r,1�.
(.- 1 nteJ . II
UI! y.11.fll . Ifin>a'c
.b�cn�d,l�.11 - mid
.nl,uihrltr�.iialNum�QUdity
(: rnl Bnurd:
. uu.vi�la.l � f. n,di.r�L �n u.
iil�r
Ah i A�mrd d. q md i nLn.
ALu d� ue I weil.
. liurii•d bnireLr, dc6ri,q nr vna6.
.,.I -, �
l �1
i.f 1 '� " a � •
LIn'I���� I I�. ,r�i
i�vail . � �vl i� i, ;. It �r[ .rl.l�i�
��,�„i ����v����i,. �i���� i��„• ���<<����•�i
fmnamm� � u�Mf
L] f. �n I��' I,I 1�noil�lr.
I. � �. Iv f.. . I r� � lidi cn�. � xinir�
If�,.l 1
LI t: fl J t I.� I'I�I' 111
J' I�.I ex I � .{. I -, J.
n rvc i i i � r. �� ,
❑ 1 . � I �. � Rcsh
n..�. inl! conc'uc �.ncun�m.
� l' y, tt�� I It f. i��le Remin'nl
ur. �� i�y i� ��i��i.�xi�.�
�'µ.1 fI.�IL' Ilini
' I Ifl . � IF �. . I<c.� 'litry,
i��li�llii.�r Ilm'ii.)�I�n.
U SI . I I,. I ,
inryinldil�.��fall�� .�.�.
.��fn I I' .I. a
II uW R. J �� �i Jvy (.JdJi u� is
1
❑ Ifenwµteli � uvn:al I haYn deai
�n i , �„n �„ir. �
C'nacrctc, (:ruut & Jtilnrtxr
Application
I
j i
�
JI' . iAr . J �vrnd�
i��n,�i., �„�d��� < <� r.��i<��� i����� a,���,
. .� �„�n��,�,n����n.
LJ \V���I n �i t. � q�n r� I�In�ekx
f('I 1 �, ��.I � I itl
�.�.i,rn�� ��nn�� ,,,
� � J' � � A 'v .r
1 II^ �� I I:.I' � II
i�� i i � �. „
f l�mrclt I a dc 1nd d"�.ua� ol us u
R+
❑ WI i nJwi! . � �.I bY.v_cate,
�� I n•n.vLi . i ' .nlerinl: � ��rm
d ins. iflnr.k an�� inlrn mW � nonnm
} . I . �,i51t�llt'cnlnQtnoi[�.5��-
I' � h �. 1 ctobcpim��cd
tAip��qsc�l nl�. o�i� i��.
�.Al!(�9l'ilE]III�
❑ I i. i t f� leJ Ixi hu I� ��s ���ntu'�J..
1' - J��J �' I i u �I��i» uiiJr
�xT���IIY� .u�i I.
CI W nok bnRP.cd m:eri inl nn p.vlle�e end
under uv �.
u u�.���,�i��� ��:�F��,r<:�d���� ��ra�,y ����,a�i,i�
lundxrepr u�xirriul mflhw Z Jnys b�i.nv a
f. . runiiFu�lnrd�n���.������.nllie.
�Sto` nii d�ain po111aters ix�a� �ie liab�� �'+d� fl��� `af up tt� $��,OOQ per da��.:
Pninliiig & Pai��l Remov;tl
,
il��
r��n������; ci,�����i„�a ii����,�.��i
o rv��<� d::�� b�t�,u�.� „�,;�,:.�, �,a�„i
��,�m���., ��,�o ,� >��a,:�, n,�uu, ,io�,�,
d�x �. .� ,�� . �,
❑��. ,��-i,,.�a�„n�,.�,������i,�,�e�•�
� II I� � ll. J� ��
d I .l. f 1 ��.
N � � �� i ��.
UI� 'll�.�d�-L�I' II ,1
li�x� pn illi � A�l�n ��iii lh'��
..:.hcnlii I'Pu�on uJ�ihu�id
� ��, w������,„ ����d,��i���,�.. u�..i,�„� „r
��s rquin� �.: iwzurd�u. ���:u«.
lJixi �.h��r.unlAuvll�,n ��I�.x�ilmn
Ji� nvlip i�' I I U.�1' uo� bn
iupi q� m r Il�r eJi Plxnt . iL ��
I.II I I'el J I' 1- I
U(.I �Ir�' �.�' ..'I - d I ��,s
J J. (� . � i �' i
I ' I d 1 -1.
I I. I� � i I f 1�. I. �.
f Ib .I�.i� i��alclurreaykia
e ti( w �ort"�u�t
llc�� atcri�ig
I y.
. .'�. . . . ..
1
�• �'w
o n �i,�,��. � i i, t a� ll�� � � p�����a
,�,n��o�d ���,nro�„��
bcprop�.il� u 4 �..nJ�liap,.n.ANhu�
puinihla srwl demnci ml: Jiyaleuve w
I i�.��lnr y ew -If
1'� I - �,I II �q .� riall>�.in
I I I ��I � 'I I�I'
U Iliv� I i � oli�cuwm�
u xll A�unrhn� x c v.
U N'lirii dewaicriny. nnl3ify niiJ nbiain
NpPrm-ulln�m ihnlncul nwidoipality
t,�.r��� a;.«i,:,������r. ,�,��,�. �,� n .t�����.��i ,���,�,�
,� a��d��. r�i�.�n�-,n ��� d���s,.d„„
ihrvul`h u I,osin. �nnL. n� ncJimem vap
i.���������o n
❑ Iu arcn> ��i�lamnm �,r..n.y�rc�eJ
.nrlainiim�in�t .nll yom- lornl neem:y e�
delrimin�•. �vheJua' i6e ;�inund nvter rtmn�
1., I.I i� Jf d �'r�ii��l
� ,� , � � � � � � ��,.
�„�„ o ��,,., ,,,,.. �
�CITY OF BURLINGAME
� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
6URLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 1811 AdRIAN ROAD
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9,
2015 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Cham6ers, 501
Primrose Road, Buriingame, CA:
Application for Environmentol Review, Conditional Use
Permits for use, flaor area ratio and huilding height and
Paricing Variance for o self-storage use within an existing
commercial huilding at 1811 ADRIAN ROAD zone�l RR.
APN 025-169-050
Mailed: Jnnuary 31, 2015
(Please refer to other side)
City of Burlinpame
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARINC PJ01'IC�