Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1761 Adrian Road - Staff Reportf r � r MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A PUBLIC STORAGE WAREHOUSE AT 1761 ADRIAN ROAD P.C. 5/28/80 Item No. 2 The attached Project Assessment describes the proposal by Dan Brown of Public Storage Properties VI, Ltd. to develop 917 self-storage lockers on the property at 1761 Adrian Road. Additional project details are provided in his April 15, 1980 letter and plans date stamped May 6 and May 21, 1980. A recent traffic count taken at the Public Storage facility in Castro Valley is also attached, as confirmation of the typical weekday/weekend traffic pattern that can be expected to develop on Adrian Road. Copies of this application were circulated to the Public Works Department and Fire Department. The May 9 memo from the Chief Fire Inspector advises that he has no objection to its approval, provided that an automatic sprinkler system is installed, together with a fire hydrant at the rear of the property. The May 8 memo from the Chief Building Inspector recommends five conditions of approval. The May 20 memo from the Director of Public Works states that "the Engineering and Traffic Departments have no requirements for the project. We anticipate no traffic problems from this use ..." After reviewing the above comments, together with the application details, it appears that the proposed public storage project will both provide a service to homeowners and businesses in the Burlingame area and reduce the number of employees, peak hour vehicle trips and demand for utility services that a typical light industrial business would generate on this property. The 65 on-site parking spaces should be adequate for both employees and customers*. Self storage lockers are available at two other Burlingame locations**; no problems have been observed with this type of business. For the above reasons, staff recorr�nends that this special permit be approved. Recommended conditions for Commission review at the public hearing are: 1. that the permit be approved to Public Storage Properties VI, Ltd. and be nontransferable; 2. that all construction be consistent with the drawings filed with this application; 3. that the conditions recorrrnended by the Chief Fire Inspector and Chief Building Inspector be observed; and 4. that a landscape and irrigation plan be approved by the Park Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. J�,�. �-- JRY/s JOHN R. YO 5/23/80 CITY PLAN R cc: Mr. Dan Brown *17 spaces should be reserved for the tenant in the 5,000 SF office suite in the front portion of the building, and 2 spaces should be reserved for the resident manager. The 46 remaining spaces will provide a standard of 1 space/20 lockers. 1 space/50 lockers has been found to be generally satisfactory at Burlingame's other self storage facilities. **There are 495 lockers at U-Store-It, 1855 Rollins Road, and an additional 184 lockers at Star Self Storage, 1241 Whitethorn Way. _� � PROJECT APPLICATI0�1 1" (1 n n � r�r+ � Ir �1 T �� Cll HJVCuS�ILl� 1 Application received ( 4/ 16/80 ) Staff review/acceptance ( 5/6/80 )• fE, f:ITy �r"? �°" 1761 ADRIA�J ROAD ��_���?�!�� project address '� PUBLIC STORAGE MINI WAREHOUSE ��� �. _ �*�y'.e���, project name - if any 1. APPLICANT_ Public Storage Properties, VI, Ltd. 828-4805 name telephone no. 11828 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, CA. 94566 applicant s address: street, city, zip code - Dan L. Brown, Construction Superintendent 828-4805 contact person, if different telephone no. 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Special Perr�it (X ) Variance* ( X) Condomi�i�m Permit () Other *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SPECIAL PERMIT to convert the existing Bay Cities 4lholesale Hardware warehouse at 1761 Adrian Road into a"self-storage" facility with 820 lockers in 96,500 SF of warehouse area; a 900 SF house and office for the Public Storage Properties staff will occupy the remainder of the existing building, together with a 5,000 SF general office area to be subleased. The present parking area at the side and back of the building will also be develoaed with four s�ecial nurpose storage buildings, and an additional 97 lockers with an averaqe size of 200 SF each. Lot coverage will be 57%, with 10% landscaping. A VARIANCE is requested to allow two of the new storage buildings to be constructed on the (attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) east side property, < rather than observe the Ref. code section(s): ( 25.42.030 )(25.42.055c ) 10' sideyard required by Code Sec.25.42.055(c). 4. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION portion of 11 ( 025-169-200 )( 9, 10 &� ( 6 )( Millsdale Industrial Park Unit 3) APN lot no. block no. subdivision name ( M-1 ) i 131,000 SF ) zoning district land area, square feet Bay Cities Nlholesale Hardware Company 1761 Adrian Road land owner's name address Burlingame, CA. 94010 Required Date received city zip code #���) (n0} ( - ) Proof of o�anershio (yes) ��ts� ( 5/6/ 80 ) Owner's consent to application 5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Older office/warehouse approx. 160' x 320' on a 131,000 SF site. Required (yes ) (� (VARIANCE) (yes) (� Date received ( 4/30/80 ) ( 4/30/80 ) (yes) {� � 4/16/80 � �:s� (no) (other) ( 4/16/80 ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewalks and curbs; all str�ctur�s and improvements; paved on-site parkino; landscaping. Floor plans of a11 buildings showing: gross floor area by type of us�`on each floor plan. Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). Site cross section(s) (if relevant). Letter of explanation. *Land use classifications are: residential (show � dwelling units); office use; retail ' sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; a�arehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL Proposed construction, Belovr grade ( Q Srj Second rioor ( 51,[UU ��i gross floor area First floor ( 23,600 SF) Third floor ( 0 Sf) Frpnt sPtha�k Side setback Side yard Rear yard Project Code Proposal Requirement 30' , 15' � 0' 10' 4'-45' 0' Lot coveraae Building height Landscaped area On-site pkg.spaces Project Code Proposal Requirement 57% over 60q 65 I n.a. u � 0 Full time employees on site Part time employees on site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trip ends to/from site'` Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) EXISTING after 8-�J � Yi�i �0 ��' ��I �� �0 � 11 � �� �� IPI 2 YEARS after 0-5 5 PM 21 1 1 1 80-90 20-25 50-60 20-25 2 2 200-22 40-50 20-22 5± 20± 4± iN � YEARS after 8-5 5 Fi�i 21 1 1 1 110-120 25-30 70-80 25-30 2 2 250-270 50-60 20-22 7± 25± 6± *Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAP�D USES A new office/warehouse is built immediately adjacent to the southeast side _�roperty line. There is a large older warehouse to the northwest. A railroad spur track crosses the back of the property. Bayshore Freeway Required Date received parallels Adrian Road to the northeast. (yes) �r��k ( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties. ���) (no) ( - ) Other tenants/fi rms on property i n futUre : An air photo is attached to the staff report for agenda item #3. 5,000 SF of office no. firris ( 1 ) no. employees (15-20 ) floor area occupied ( 5,000 SF office space) space wi ll be sub- ( _ SF other) ledsed in future. no. emnloyee vehicles regularly on site (- ) no. company vehicles at this location (- ) 8. FEES Special Permit> all districts $100 (X ) Other application type, fee 5 () Variance/R-1,R-Z districts $ 40 O Project Assessment � 25 (X ) � Variance/other districts $ 75 (X ) Negative Declaration $ 25 (X ) Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ (). TOTAL FEES 5 150.00 RECEIPT N0. 3959 Received by H.Towber . 75.00 �— . prague I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and corr .t to the best of my knowledge and belief. • 1 Signature �� Date 4/15/80 , plicant STAFF USE OPlLY NEGATIVE DECLARATlON ` F�le No. ND-243P The City of Burlingame by John R. YOst on Mdy 5 , 19 80, completed a revie�v of the proposed project and determined that: ( X) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environrriental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a Conclusion: The majority of the proposed self-storage lockers will be located within the existing warehouse at 1761 Adrian Road. The four additional storage buildings to be constructed at the back of the site will not exceed the 60% maximum site coverage allowed by code. The average number of vehicle trips per 1,000 SF of storage lockers is only 20% - 50% typical light industrial development. No prob ems ave en o serve wi wo o er se -s orage pro�ec s in e- is ric �J ➢ �• �! . CITY PLANNER May 5, 1980 Signature of Proc ssing Official Title Date Signed Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date pos d, the deterr�ination shall be final. DECLARATION OF POSTIfdG Date Posted:�%�� �/',Q Q i deciare under penalty of perjury tnai i ar, Ciiy �ierK or' tne �ity of ouriinya���e ar�d t`at I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers. � Executed at Burl i ngame, Cal i forni a on � 1,, �,� /,j /�/,�Q , 19 Appealed: ( )Yes ( No r �. \ STAFF REUIEW 1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATIOfd Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by: City Engineer Building Inspector Fire Inspector Park Department City Attorney date circulated ( 5/5/80 ) ( 5/5/80 ) ( 5/5/80 ) � - ) i - ) reply received �Yes) _�_ �.Yes ) =i�= (.yeS� �_ (yes) (no) (yes) (no) memo attached (ye5) _(�_ (YeS) __(�_ (Yes) __(�_ (yes) (no) (yes) (no) 2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES Concerns Mitigation Measures Are the site plan design standards Review plan and proposed standards; adequate? approve or require amendment. -Aisle widths between buildings. -Location and number of customer parking spaces. -Employee parking areas. -Front setback landscaping. Will the conversion of the existing Request comments from the Chief warehouse to self-storage units meet Building Inspector and Chief Fire Bldg. Code & Fire Dept.requirements? Inspector. Will the number and frequency of Request comments from the Traffic customer trips to and from the Engineer. storage lockers be more or less of a traffic impact on Adrian Road than the present light industrial use? Is the proposed land use appropriate Consider adjacent uses, and access to at this location? this area from Bayshore Freeway and nearby residential areas. Who will be this facilit 's customers? 3. CEQA REQUIREMEPITS (see Negative Declaration ND-243P) If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project: Is the project subject to CEQA review? IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED: Initial Study completed Decision to prepare EIR Notices of preparation mailed RfP to consultants Contract awarded Admin. draft EIR received Draft EIR acce�ted by staff Circulation to other agencies Study by P.C. Review period ends Public hearing by P.C. Final EIR received by P.C. Certification by Council Decision on project Notice of Determination � � � � i i � 4. APPLICATION STATUS telephone Date first received ( 4/16/80 ) Accepted as complete: no(X )�call to aoplicant advising info. required ( 5/5/80 ) Yes( X) date 5/6/80 P.C. study ( 5/12/.80 ) Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) �=rt3� Recommended'date ( 5/28/80 ) Date staff report mailed �to aoplicant ( 5/23/80 ) Date Commission hearing ( 5/28/80 ) Application approved (✓) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no) Date Council hearing ( ) Application approved ( ) Denied ( ) �Jc�,, �, ��� , 5/22/80 si ned date �.._.�_ 0 . PUBIIC STORAGE Inc. Aprit 15, 1980 � ��!'��,;�� �p���S 11828 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, California 94566 (415) 828-4805 REC�CVED Mr. John vost APR 16 1980 Planning Department Ci ty of Burl i ngame ��y pF BURLINGAME 501 P r i m ro s e Roa d PU►NNINO DEPT. Burlingame, Ca. 94010 Re: Variance and Use Permit Public Storage Miniwarehouse Project 1761 Adrian Rd., Burlingame Dear Mr. Yost: Enclosed is the information you require to issue a side yard variance and a use permit for a miniwarehouse project in a warehousing area: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Variance application. Use Permit Application. Six (6) copies of plot plan and space layout. Six (6) copies of front building elevation. Two (2) copies of traffic count for Redwood Storage. One (1) set of five other PSI renderings. One (1) set of color samples. Public Storage proposes to construct a building on the south property line. This building will back directly to the neighbor's building that is already on the prop- erty line. This layout effectively uses the land and does not create a dark dead spot between buildings. I have set back this building 130 feet from the sidewalk and added extra landscaping and parking to maintain the feeling of open space that now exists. The Burlingame area has been surveyed by Public Storage and it shows a shortage of small private storage. Based on this survey and the location, we have agreed to purchase this site. We feel this type of project falls in line with the basic planning program of the city. This planned development would construct public storage rental spaces in individual units on an average of 100 square feet per unit. The total site occupies approxi- mately 130,000 square feet of land area and the proposal calls for constructing approxi- mately 850 feef in a total net building area of approximately 95,000 square feet, figuring 25,000 square feet of haliways. _ t -. �_.<.. Los Angeles • San Francisco • Miami • Atlanta • Toronto • Seattle � - 2 - We have reviewed the traffic volume data for a similar development in Castrp Valley, California (Redwood Private Storage), as counted and reported by the California De- partment of Transportation in early 1977. The Castro Valley site had 213 rental units and occupied approximately 22,000 square feet of floor space. The facility was lo- cated on a site of approximately 40,000 square feet of land area. This week-long study indicates that traffic generation/attraction is generally greatest on weekdays and that the average weekday trip qeneration/attraction was 56 trips per day (a trip is defined here as a one-way automotive movement with either its origin or destination on the site). Using this average of 56 trips per day to and from a 22,000 square foot facility equates to approximately 2.5 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of building area. This trip generation/attraction rate is substantially below general averaqe rates for industrial-manufacturing facilities which averages are between 4.5 and 12.2 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of building area. (As reported in the lOth Pro- gress Report on Trip Ends Generation Research Counts-California Department of Trans- portation.) The proposed project contains 4 times the number of spaces that Redwood Private Storage has; therefore, we project four times the number of trips per day. Public Sitorage miniwarehouse project in Burlingame should have 112 (224 trips) visitors on week- days and 77 (154 trips) visitors on weekends. And additional trips would be generated by the small office area during weekdays. The earlier Transportation Department report also indicated the average weekday peak hour occurred between 2:00 and 3:00 p.m. and accounted for approximately 16% of all daily traffic for the facility. The report also indicates facility-oriented traffic during the normal P.P1. commute peak hour (5:00-6:00 PM) accounted for approxi- mately 9� of the total average weekday traffic for the facility. I have enclosed four pictures of renderings of existing projects for qeneral information. Each of these successful projects are designed around 25 ft. wide driveways. This size has proven to offer ample room for unloading cars and trucks and the low volu�ne of traffic moving around the site. The number of vehicles on site at one time will average less than three, figuring ten minutes per trip. Public Storo�e uses steel reinforced concrete corner columns, thus eliminating bumper posts that reduce clear travel at corners. Enclosed, but not requested, is a set of standard Public Storage colors. The existing building has been recently painted the almond shell color. tde planto keep the existing color. Any trim repainted will be oxford brown and the preifnished roll-up doors are pumpkin orange. Public Storage will be happy to furnish any additional information as required. Sincere`nly, Y �-"-" ?- �G tjl.v' "v V Dan L. Brown DLB/rce Encl. r---== -�-1�� SL�-.1.�, �i�E �' 33 � � 7R.IP GE.NE.R4TI0N_STUOY TRqFFi_C COUNT ! REDW000 STOF2AGE QUTOMnTIC COUNT R�C�IVED � .� _... .._ .__ _�.._.APRLB 1.qR.O STUDY 005 CIT1f QF. BURUNC�AME LOC4TION _ CASTRO VALL�.Y_+_.�Q.LIFQ_RHSA _ _ �___ __ _ �N��D�. pIRECTION BOTN _�_.MOND{�Y T.UESn.�i,L' WEDNES�AY_��_THURSDAY ___FRIDAY._..___.__ AVERAGE"�___., SATUR�AY__._. .SUNDAY__ _. AVERAfi�� � 02-24-77 OZ-25-77 WEEKDAY 02-26-77 02�27-77 �AY OF'�`� 02-28-77 03-01-77 03-OZ-77 H 0 U R.. .__.. C 0 U N 7.�._.�.�.-C 0 U'J.T � C 0 U N T_ _%_ C 0 U N.�._9S_.- C 0 U N.L__-�____C 0 U N 7_ .-__ `� _- 0- 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 • 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.� • 1- 2__ __0 �0._0 0._0 � 0 __0... _.0.._0 0_0._0 0___0 . 0 0._.___0 • �_ 2- 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3- 4 0 0.0 • 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4- S 0 O..Q 0 0•0 0 0•0. 0 0..0 0____ 0.0 _ 0 0.0 S- 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 `0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0� 0�0.0 6- 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 11.5 0 0.0 1 1.9 �" •8. Z--2'� S -T•�- 3 �5.9 0_0.0 2 3.�+-------2 3.b_� g- 9 3 4. 1 2 2. 8 0� 0. 0 � ?. 7. 7 -. 0� 0. 0 1---� 1.8 9-10 4 5.5 6 8.5 1 2.0 0 0.0 2 3.4 J 5.4 10-11 ' 9___.12�3 7__9�9 :i „5.9 2 7�7 4_ 6�9_,__�. 5_ A.9_ 11-12 --T-�3 4.1 2 2.8 2 3.9 2 7.7 2 3.4 -2- -3.6 12-13 � 5 6.A 11 15.5 6 11.8 5 19.2 8 13.R 7 12.5 13-14 ._.�_.._ .3__..4. 1 6-.._8.5 .`_.4:.-----�..8.. 3.�1 l.r 5 .--- 4----h'�9 �_ 4__ 7. 1_.� 14-15 15 20.5 13 18.3 2 3.9 1 3.8 � 13 22.4 9 lh.l 15-16 2 2.7 3 4.Z 6 11.8 3 11.5 1 1.7 3 5.4 1�-17 _ 10.F13�_7 1n_1.4�.1_ _.A__15..7 3_11..•.5 3 5.2 � 12.5_ 17-18 ^ 10 13.7 4 5.6 2 3.9 0 0.0 7 12.1 5 R.9 19-19 1 1.4 0 0.0 6 11.A 1 3.R 8 13.8 3 5.4 1 9•20._- ---. 1__._1 .4 0��..� _h..�l l � A �-_� � � 2----3 • 4 ._. 2. __ 3.6__._, 20-21 5 6.8 2 2.B ? 3.9 0 0.0 2 3.4 2 3.6 21-2Z 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 3.A 0 0.0 0 0.0 22^23. _, � 0,__. 0•,0 0 0..0 0' 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0_ �. 4 _ 73-24 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0� 0. 0 0 0_�.�____ p-_ .O �.�--------.� •. -•0. 0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- - -- T07AL .___._ 73,_.100.0 71__100.0._____51. 100.0__.____26 10(1.0 ______SA 100.0 56 10�.� � . -------._. _.. ..._..- _CO.UNT_._�_`� �..CO�INJ %__�.OUNI__` 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.� -- ... 0 � _ 4 . 0 __�-.0 ._0 4 0 . � 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.r 0�, 0.0 • 0 0.0 0 O.r � ��� � ��� 1 2�� 1 2.9 0" 0.0 ' ?. 3.� '..._0- - 0.0 0---0•0 1 2.�' 6 17.1 3 7.7 3 5.� --�- z• --- � ' �� - 3 _ 7 . 7 4 _7 � F 0 0.0 1 2.6 2 3 8. 6 1 1 2 8. 2 7 ,�': ' 2 5.7 3 7.7 4 7.= -��-2 �- 5. 7 4�--10 . 3 7 13 .' 2 5.7 7 17.9 3 S.G 1 2.9 2 5.1 5 9.F .__-6 .....� 7 . 1�-- --2. _ -5 . 1 5 9 � F S 14.3 0 0.0 3 5.� 1____2.9_ z 5._1 _� __3.� ' 2 , 5.7 1 2.6 ? 3.� 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.r .?__ S.7 0 0.0 0 0�. � 0. 0• �---0---0. 0-----� --� � C ^_ 3 5_ 1 0 0. 0_____3 9 1 0 0. 0 ____ 51 _ 1 0 0." DETAIL PERCENTAGES MAY vOT ADD TO TOTAL. PECAUSE OF ROUNDTNG. MEMO To: Planning Department May 20, 1980 Re: Public Storage Mini Warehouse 1761 Adrian Road A review of the subject project indicates that the Engineering and Traffic Departments have no requirements for the project. We anticipate no traffic problems from this use, the site over any other permitted use. Excess vehicle capacity is available on Adrian Road and there are no other Public Works problems different from other permitted uses. �G' Ralp E. Kirkup Director of Public Works REK:mg REG�iVED M RY 1 3 1980 MEMORANDUM May 9, 1980 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. T0: John Yost, City Planner FROM: Larry vewell, Chief Fire Inspector SUBJECT: Public Storage Mini Warehouse, 1761 Adrian Road We have reviewed this proposal and have no objection to its approval. We will require all construction to meet Fire Zone II requirements, complete automatic and supervised sprinkler protection throughout and a fire hydrant at the rear of the property. L. J. N. + � ' ► INTER-OFFICE MEMO To; John Yost, City Planner From: Pete Kriner, Chief Building Inspector MAY 8, 1980, Subject: Public Storage Mini Warehouse - 1761 Adrian Road. Should the application be approved by the planning commission, the building department requests the approval be done with the following conditions: 1, Exits in existing building to meet U.B.C, section 3302(c), (Arrangements of Exits), If only two exits are required they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one- half of the length of the maximum over all diagonal dimension of the building or area to be served measuring in a straight line between exits. 2, B-2 occupancy in Fire Zone II, Exterior walls to be 1-hour construction, openings not permitted less than 5 feet, protected less than 20 feet. 3. Roofs to be fire retardant, 4. All roof water drainage to be collected and distributed to the street or storm drain in an approved manner. 5. Approved back flow protection required on fire and lawn sprinkler systems. Pete Kriner Chief Building Inspector PK/ln it�i::�.:r�1�1/�1.� MAY o - 198�� %1TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT, � P.C. 5/28/80 Item No. 3 MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: VARIANCE FROM 10' SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT AT 1761 ADRIAN ROAD On January 22, 1979 the Planning Commission approved a parcel map which subdivided the Bay Cities Wholesale Hardware Company property at 1761 Adrian Road into two parts: a 139,800 SF lot with the existing 51,200 SF building, and an unimproved 52,600 SF lot. The smaller lot has a 100` frontage on Adrian Road, and a 526' average depth. Shortly after the City's approval of the parcel map, a building permit application was filed for a 24,000 SF warehouse on the smaller lot, consisting of 23 individual units which average 20' x 52' (a xerox reduction of the site plan is attached for information; the building location is also shown on the air photo). Because of the unusual width of the lot, and the absence of a sideyard requirement for the M-1 District in the zoning ordinance, the new warehouse was constructed immediately adjacent to the new property line which subdivided the original parcel at 1761 Adrian Road. In January this year the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1164, which establishes a 10' sideyard requirement for new construction in the industrial area. At about this time Public Storage Properties VI, Ltd. arranged to purchase 1761 Adrian Road, with the intention of remodeling the older warehouse building into a system of small self storage lockers and constructing 4-5 new storage buildings with larger lockers and roll-up doors. The proportions of the Bay Cities Wholesale Hardware Company site will allow two of the storage buildings to be constructed along the back wall of the new warehouse on the adjacent lot (see Sheet 1, drawing no. BE-619, date stamped May 6, 1980 and circulated to the Corrnnission with the materials for the May 12 meeting). The recent ordinance amendment which establishes a 10' sideyard requirement (Code Sec. 25.42. 055c) prohibits this location, however. The present application is to allow Building B (a 30' x 160' structure with 16 lockers) and Building C(a 30' x 170' structure with 17 lockers) to be constructed to the side property line. Mr. Dan Brown's May 21, 1980 letter describes his company's reasons for this application, and argues that the legal requirements specified by Code Sec. 25.54.020 are met by the proposed project. After reviewing the plans, staff believes that the proposed location of Buildings B and C is reasonable, given the new warehouse on the adjacent lot. A 10' sideyard down the 460' length of the neighbor's building would have little benefit to either property or to the general public. Given the above background and project details, staff recommends that this application be approved, if the Commission first determines that the four requirements for a variance are met. Recommended conditions for review at the public hearing are: 1. that all construction be consistent with the drawings filed with this application; and 2. that a landscape and irrigation plan be approved by the Park Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. JRY/s 5/23/80 cc: Mr. Dan Brown J�,�. � John R. Yo t City Pla er ��Cti V t,U PUBI.IC STORAGE Inc. �� ■ M��Y 2 i 198� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING OEPT. 11828 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, California 94566 (415) 828-4805 May 21, 1980 Mr. John Yost Planning Director City of Burlingame Burlingame, Californi'a Dear Mr. Yost: I would like to note for you tlie reasons that we feel a variance is required for our project. We are requesting a variance on the 10 ft, side yard set-back require- ment recently passed. About a year ago, Public Storage agreed to purchase property at 1761 Adrian Road for the purpose of converting it into a miniwarehouse, The decision to purchase this property was based on placing a 30 ft. building on the property line, backed up to the existing new building also on the property line. Reduction in the size of this building would significantly reduce this anticipated income, With our neighbors 6uild��lready on the property line, constructing a new build 10 ft. away from it would result in making that area unusable. The dark area would be una6le to 6ring any enjoyment to the owner. Eliminating the 10 ft. dead space 6etween 6uildings (none have windows) would improve security, building protection and surface maintenance. This area could possibly, in time, become overgrown, poorly drained an8 a health hazard. The intent of the 10 ft. set-tiack and landscape requirements in this area are to add open space and trees to an industrial area. We feel tF�at we have a special case and a variance will not effect the zoning of the area. We have added extra landscaping to the front and we have continued the 10 ft, iandsc,ape and set-back on the other side all the way to the 6ack of the lot. Tfiis side i's an open space area and it is greatly enhanced by more landscaping. Sincerely, �o�.� �3�� Dan L. Brown DLB/6jn Los Angeles • San Francisco � Washington, D.C. • Miami • Chicago �� �� �� r�', W �' ' �+ �.; �+ �k�' �1�'� .. �. �� .. i . w t�. .�������������������� � . ��������: � � . '�.-- � � _.. , • . � s � w,� �'�i . . � • r�,,,�, , • • :�' �:1.• S , ' � �Q � �, i' � � d f ;`�j' r � • o , � -� �., :`` • � a • � � J • � ' `� L -�� t�a`� � `; � � �h� � �` � � r�� ��,�'� ���.�° ; " . ;�� ;� ,��r,�.. . 4, s -v E�.`- �� ' s �. . • � � r' u� � ai � K N �' • �° � o` -� �_ � "i � � � .a� � , ' • "'"� ' ^'� ' ; i :,,'. V J ' ' --� �.�i j t.� ° .,� � 'i�� � rt.l.a � Iy r 6'� � • .L y �'�, a y, J i .l � � Y �'( � n � I .� . : _,�:r '�, w . • � � yt�� � �" - ,,, 1�• • � , ,u.. �. P�,. �r �,�r� � �, , • , -�J •���������������il.A����������� . �.�t �-� � 176I ApRIAN ��ir ��'_.� . �"`^". M `,. � ,u� -�_.....�,.r� _. , � - � � �1� �� ~ �' _r, � �. � ._► w � _� �.,. . � � ,�o „. � ,�.,� � - - ,,w w� W... .wa� �..m�w,�M ��„� �R1�",�,,,:, ������ �������� � 6AYSHOf�E. �REEWfi�,Y , . . � k, w_b _ � ,� � � . .. _ _ , , . V 9 A . i i� x 5 ���rr� .�_-x-a.,c ., -. � a�. _ t . � � : - ! � �_ � �� ��' J I � i� q ^ ���i�:;� � '( ' �52,60o Sq �!r� �. t � / ;j� � T ,.. � i I N � 1 �i s �� ��� , �; � � ' �, ; - �� � , y o �� j I S, c•� I i ''" ., � _ �;� , �> sro ' � „ a �.,,., >M i ./� ; i ,/'� ; :i I il��� �i i i ' � i'i�` `�� i � .: g"f� 5��v�n , m _� _� � �e..�.:. . ; �� I� i ���i , , �� 'i � ;+ � � ,)iI r II 3 � ' i I � ''�' - - — ' �5 ,�� '� ` -�--�. I� l I I O J 1 2 - _— . — _f . ._ r - . _ _' , : . . . __ ���_ Z_._ . ._ - - �--. � �/ • , � r acv "' /-\i>i? tr=� `,v �� _ d, .: ., �. , ° \ ` , � ; x�., ��. � ,.,��--,,. - � -- _ � — �._ _ : � �-- - r�^ 1 V k � - � �.c. .. � , , _ �,?.- . t;��.c _ _ - , �,, . _- _ c_ � , . F-- � aj 1 � � � -- -- �� � �, _, � - I . ` � - _ , � _� � .., �. f��MP Y � .�4.� �— I I �/I O f D I I I le v r ,� _ � _ c , 'I` � ( ; � �-i o I= � - l00 Q J�, �:s\ c�i . 9! v : ' O" t` �o.� �\ - e + i p y . � a ` 9 I � � u I O � �I � � � - , t� i j �/ i �� I 7 �O� �, , , ' s I � � � I i � `o � � �°/ � G �' '_.'....-^---� ' � � �: � r � � � � _',i, I o139,gop :q _t', O. � 1=� o I y �' � ,a I - I � �� I � Ip t:4 , � i ��` G � � � j i 0 i � � 1 � I � j , �. � � T :9 � 4 �u 3 I C�f� , �c _ � :_�Ii i _ �� �9 4' � � i ��.c �o � ia w� N n . i3 Ia i �� -,Y � I � � J J I i , i � � i �4 f i \ i �r I I %! ' � � ' � - �LL , i ' ���� ! ; � o�r�cE i � _' .. ; u . � �� asoo '�t �rE) � , �� r�. I � a i � G r I � I �_T_I� ! �-,. ; �, I U . � �i_� if 4.. . . ..- I: `rYT�� IL 1 � _ ' : � s� . s _•' � ��/ 3r�`a\ r'= ' -� - - --- 1 � c ' _i: _.__ � ^ _ i�-- � C - f -. �'- _ _ �'_'��-�..� _.� � � , � 5 l i � _' �- ---- � t , ._. Z � � . _` y � , � . — — ��__� , _ �-� . ----- _ � 3; ,10 c ' :.; �c :, •-a �� _'--- --- � j �, , , . , . �,l . ; ` _ �? � . . __ . � ,. �: . . ,_ . � .r , P : _ -7 I. � . _ �.I i . \S .,� _, ��'7�_.� :� '�~ : ° �'r N .' ''.\ b S '. , " N p I ` \ • � yYo � 2 „ i,�'. �, � 'i.r� ' ��-f L; _� ��-,,.7�-Y. •i . ` H ;. y . �'' t f ,. H, ' c v i �� '�- .y � :3 .� n Y � � � { ,�. �. '� \./ _ 1_ '.'� �� �.��t-.. � S` --- 1-5-' � `u - ,�.i:. ;'�. �y ��' ~i— J•�!,� �, 'l; . ♦ iJ ' \\ ( u ll.� 1 _ � � i 3 �;� . �, V�1 . . . . . .� �: !-. ' g. � ' I ;` [•r''_'�` : � J � '. �`--_ � i -� � �-,. , r. , � ,� �. .. � -s� - ' ��' - • � 'n�ii'-s_ ,� I � _ ;� .� ,, �s � --� } � ' ' i. Z . r, . s�. e ,,: �>.:�:- : _ ` _� i - � •J I 1 :- ' j • 3 .. i 'C� ' .� ' � \ I � � e I =i— -i "' ul �n � � • !a 5 \u i = � E _J I •e�_r � �� i . = r• I - I •I i '_� /���! � � J . ; . i .vF� Y--'' --f-i a . . � l i .i..a�:,�:li . ,. �i .' ' � � � i I '�+��i_.�.�--...��.:=:;:1 -:� � � . . ¢ . � � � . � v T , � � I�s"`�_'"� ; _ ' `- , d � d r , a �l „ • � I . , _ t; g ; j � - ,. � � rl I � . . f' i ,� ' i �'� _ i ' . . , .-�, ��'1 � _ ."�i ^ `S� � ,,f ; � v a � f m c� I ia �; - i I F- aci i I t. i �y ' i � — .> �a-�= '" , � s °, �-; t � c� � i y�..�—;-i 2_' r d V �� J � �� i iy.�`;�:.: _ r_. . �. Q _; � 'i�� �� s , . . i,; 3 - - �_� � � ��, , ; I � ; .� � � i �' y ;'��—�'L u. : I � i i-1 ��\`, i 6. � l�w�� �� � i r ; � " `;i -- ( :t � � i • "� : _ i Y •�� � .� _o v� �'.- � z o � - � - - „ .e;zs �t,:, i ;:� � .a N. � � . I � � - ��'' �: s 'c .i,c � � '�-r"_ � + �0 - � f 3� r �� � / : . - --,w , :ory -- 'a., �. H ,,-- �r� 'j�, . . . , Q C _'-!� � . . ' t m . , � � S N C � G � � i�---'� : ; � � h'^ , ' ', �I ' � � ! : - ,� i �.� .,? d - � � 1 � ' Y i .? ' ,}q � � - � "�' t s : Y, -. 7 O a s a _-� i � }4�i�s'.,.� L .�--- � w t � � ' _aoi -.� ' ,�� � , - � � ° . ,;�'• - � < � i �L��F•.� .. �C.. ,- "' -• � � J a � r �\ q. � � y� .- � �i d f 3 3 � p`. c � � �. i1 :I— 1� 5 F- � i) �� � �, • i�ty ; � • � . C 1�° u . » �h„ . w�• .� .'•- � f Y{�'...��: ... o.- . i o {� • - o '-' ' f } �� w _-� '-_ __ _�� . ~ -' _.a , ia� _ �m �� i�' � ' + � � --� -- - � � — : i� ii: ;�� �,�(� � ..� � J �r: � -• � � � � 0 11/2g/79 o��zr,�;JCE N0.1164 ORDI:�TA:`iCE ES lABLISHIhG SIDE YARDS IN CERTAIN t4-1 DISTRICT SUB�IVISIO�IS The CI�Y COUTICIL of tlie City of Burlingame does OF.DAIN as follows: Section L Section 25.42.055(c), establishir.g side yard setbacks in certain N,-1 District subdivisions, is hereby adopted, to read as follows: "(c) There shall be a mini^�u:� ten (10) foot side yard setback on all buildings and structures constructed on lots in the following 21-1 District subdivisions: :fillsdale Industrial Park No. l, ido. 3 and No. 5; Irgold Industrial Park; East :�:illsdale Industrial Park No. 1 and No. 2. Section 2 required by law. This ordinance shall be published as . or I, EVELYN H. HILL, City Clerk of the City of Burlinga*�e, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was intreduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17thday of December, 1979, and was adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council'held on the 7th day of January , 1980, by t�e following vote: AYES: COUti'CILCIEt�: Amstrup, Barton, Crosby, Mangini, Martin. :IOES: COUNCIL;tEV: hone ABSENT: COUNCIL^SEP7: None ;✓ !,� y, �� �!; j 1i O � --�=-<_� < i,� �,/ E�' Cit Clerk �