The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1611 Adrian Road - Staff Report (2)MID PAUFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Statement of Qualifications Butte Creek Bridge, Butte County The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Redding Field Office is replacing the single lane Butte Creek Bridge with a new bridge funded by BLM's deferred maintenance program. The existing Butte Creek Bridge was constructed in the t935 by the U.S. Forest Service (and Civilian Conservation Corps — CCC's) and is a steel truss bridge with a concrete deck which crosses Butte Creek on Ponderosa Way. Over the years, the Bu#te Creek Bridge has become structurally deficiemt and ir� need of replacement. The proposed project involves construction of a new concrete, one-lane h±-idge over Butte Creek at the same site of the current bridge and the remaval of t'�he current bridge structure. Mid Pacific Engineering, Inc. is providi�g a f�all scope of construction materials testing and special inspections required for the project's reconstruction. Item # Action Item City of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Recreation Use and Parking Variances r_�r:rr��:��_�r�n:z.fr:� Meeting Date: 6/11/07 Request: Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances for a commercial recreation use (indoor badminton facility). Applicant and Designer: Property Owners: General Plan: North Burl./Rollins Road Specific Plan: Adjacent Development: CEQA Status: Jeff Lea, DaRosa and Associates Joey Lo and Frances Huang Industrial & Office Use Industrial & Associated Office Use — Auto Row Overlay District Caltrans parking lot and Hyatt Hotel. Refer to attached Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND-545P. APN: 026-141-020 Lot Area: 115,850 SF Zoning: RR Existing Use: Office/warehouse — packaged food warehousing Proposed Use: Indoor badminton facility (commercial recreation use) and office/warehouse Allowable Use: Air courier service, light industrial or manufacturing use, labs, office uses in conjunction with a permitted use, warehouses; indoor badminton facility (commercial recreation use) allowed with a conditional use permit Application Summary: The applicant is proposing to operate an indoor badminton facility (commercial recreation use), Bay Badminton Center, Inc., at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned RR. The applicant is requesting the following: • Conditional Use Permit for commercial recreation use (indoor badminton facility) (CS 25.44.030, h); • Parking Variance for 118 parking spaces (107 parking spaces proposed where 225 are required based on commercial recreation and office/warehouse/storage parking ratios) (CS 25.70.040); and • Parking Variance for substandard parking space dimensions (8'-6" x 18"unistall'spaces proposed where 9' x 20' is the minimum required) (CS 25.70.020, a). Environmental Review: A parking variance for 118 spaces is required for this application because the Zoning Code establishes on-site parking requirements for commercial recreation uses (1 space for 200 SF) as well as for an office/warehouse use based on the uses inside the building. Based on the square footage of uses proposed in the entire existing building the on-site parking requirement is 225 spaces (34 parking spaces forthe office/warehouse tenant + 191 parking spaces for the badminton facility). Because of the large Parking Variance requested (118 space parking variance), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared (Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 545P attached for reference). The Planning Commission held a study session for this project on April 9, 2007 (April 9, 2007, P.C. Minutes). An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Department. Based on the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for review by the Planning Commission. As presented, the Mitigated Negative Declaration identified potential impacts in the areas of traffic/transportation. However, based upon the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the proposed project can be addressed by a Mitigated Negative Declaration since the Initial Study did not identify any adverse impacts which could not be reduced to acceptable levels by mitigation (please refer to the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 545P). The mitigation measures in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval (in italics). Since there were no State agencies involved in review, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review on May 23, 2007. The 20-day review periods ends on June 11, 2007. No comments were received as of the date of printing of the staff report (June 6, 2007). Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road Project Description: Currently, the 64,094 SF office/warehouse building is occupied by a packaged food warehousing business, QFCO, Inc. (QFCO). The owners of QFCO are also the property owners. The existing building contains two floors of office space at the front of the building (10,613 SF) and a single-storywarehouse space with a high ceiling in the remainder of the building (53,481 SF). The applicant is proposing to divide the building into two tenant spaces, one to be occupied by QFCO, Inc. and the other space to be occupied by the proposed indoor badminton facility. QFCO would reduce their space to 23,675 SF (19,435 SF of warehouse and 4,240 SF of office). QFCO would remain in the second floor office space with theirwarehouse space on the ground floor. Access to the second floor office space is provided by an existing central lobby and stairway. The office space for QFCO makes up 17.9% of the total space where 25% is the maximum allowed. Thirty-four (34) parking spaces are required by code to support this use. The proposed indoor badminton facility would be 40,419 SF in area and would contain 2,085 SF of office, 493 SF of retail, 1,765 of storage and 36,076 SF for the indoor badminton courts and associated activities including a lounge, children's play zone, stretching zone and restrooms. Sixteen (16) courts are proposed forthe badminton facility. The office space for the badminton facility would be on the ground floor. The badminton facility would also use several storage rooms on the second floor (1,232 SF) for storage. The office space for the indoor badminton facility makes up 5.1 % of the total space where 25% is allowed. One hundred ninety-one (191) parking spaces are required by code to support this activity. The applicant notes that the badminton facilitywill offer membership court play-time, professional coaching for all levels, walk-in court play-time and special programs for school age children, retirees and young adults. In addition to the typical weekday/weekend activities, there would be two tournaments each year, one in the spring and another in the fall, both of which would occur on a weekend (Saturday and Sunday). On these two weekends, the facility would be closed for other users. Tournaments would include no more than 60 individuals per tournament, of which 40 players would play singles on the first day and 60 players would play doubles on the second day. Some of the players would participate in both singles and doubles matches. Spectators are anticipated at the tournaments, but they would mostly be friends and family members arriving with the tournament players in the same vehicle. There are no changes proposed to the exterior of the building with the exception of adding new disabled- accessible ramps at the front and rear of the building. Interior remodeling includes demolishing existing walls on the ground floor not needed for the proposed badminton facility. A new full height, one-hour fire rated wall is proposed in the existing warehouse to separate the proposed badminton facility and QFCO, inc. warehouse use. The proposed badminton facility would be open seven days a week from 9:30 a.m. to 11 p.m. The applicant notes that the badminton facility will be most active from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. on weekdays and from 10 a.m. to 11 p.m. on weekends. At opening, the badminton facility would have three full-time employees before 5 p.m. and two full-time employees after 5 p.m. on weekdays, with no part-time employees. On weekends, there would be four full-time employees before 5 p.m. and three full-time employees after 5 p.m., with no part-time employees. The number of employees is anticipated to change to, at maximum, four-full time employees before 5 p.m. and three full-time employees after 5 p.m. on weekdays, with no part-time employees. On weekends, the numberof employees is anticipated to increase to five full-time employees before 5 p.m. and four full-time employees after 5 p.m., with no part-time employees. On weekdays, 40 customers are expected before 5 p.m. and 48 customers after 5 p.m. On weekends, 58 customers are expected before and after 5 p.m. In five years, 50 customers are expected before 5 p.m. and 58 customers are expected after 5 p.m. on weekdays. On weekends, 68 customers are expected before and after 5 p.m. It is expected that there would be a total of 62 customers and employees on site at any one time. QFCO, the existing office/warehouse business, would be open Monday through Fridayfrom 8:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. QFCO has seven full-time employees and no part-time employees. The numberof employees is not expected to change in the future. The applicant indicates that no customers come to the site for this business and therefore there would be a maximum of seven persons on site at any one time associated with this business. 2 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road Landscaping: When the use in a building is intensified, in this case from office/warehouse to commercial recreation, on-site landscaping must be provided to current code standards. The RR zoning district regulations require that a minimum of 10% of the total area of the property be landscaped and that a minimum of 60% of the front setback be landscaped. The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan encourages landscaping in the front setback and 10% total site landscaping. A majority of the existing buildings in this area were built before the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan was approved and this landscaping was required by code. However, this site will comply with the minimum required on-site landscaping: 10.7% (12,452 SF) total on-site landscaping proposed where 10% (11,585 SF) is the minimum required; 80.8% front setback landscaping proposed where 60°/o (5,045 SF) is the minimum required. Eight existing Chinese Elm trees, located at the front of the lot, will remain. Proposed landscaping enhancements include sun tolerant ornamental shrubs and flowering perennials. Parking: Because the proposed badminton facility creates an intensification of use on this site, there is an increase in the number of parking spaces required. The existing 64,094 SF office/warehouse building is served by 63 on-site parking spaces. The site with the existing office/warehouse use is non-conforming in parking (63 parking spaces provided where 85 are required). With this application, the on-site parking supply will be increased from 63 to 107 parking spaces (100 unistall spaces (8'-6" x 18') + 7 disabled-accessible spaces). However, based on parking ratios established in the Zoning Code for commercial recreation, office, warehouse, and storage uses as proposed, a tota� of 225 parking spaces are required for the proposed badminton facility and office/warehouse tenant (34 parking spaces forthe office/warehouse tenant + 191 parking spaces for the badminton facility). Therefore, a Parking Variance is required for 118 spaces (107 on-site parking spaces provided where 225 parking spaces are required based on commercial recreation and office/warehouse/storage parking ratios). A Parking Variance is also required for substandard parking space dimensions (8'-6" x 18' 'unistall' spaces proposed where 9' x 20' is the minimum required). 1611 Adrian Road Lot Area: 115.850 SF Use: Existing office/warehouse (64,094 SF) Plans date stamped: April 23, 2007 Proposed Allowed/Required indoor badminton facility' (commercial recreation) (40,419 SF) + conditional use permit required for commercial recreation use office/warehouse _. _ (23,675 SF) Hours: office/warehouse: ' badminton facility: Monday through Friday ', 7 days a week 8amto6pm ; 9:30am-11pm no requirements office/warehouse: Monday through Friday 8amto6pm ' Conditional Use Permit required for commercial recreation use (indoor badminton facility). i Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road 1611 Adrian Road Lot Area: 115,850 SF Plans date stam ed: A ril 23, 2007 Existing Proposed Allowed/Required Parking: 63 spaces 107 spaces 2 191 spaces (badminton facility) (61 standard spaces) + (2 disabled-accessible) 34 spaces (office/warehouse) 225 spaces for entire building __ _ _ _ __ __. Parking Space 9' x 18' 8'-6" x 18' 3 9' x 20' Dimensions: _ _ __ _ __ __ _. _ _ Setback (Left): 10'-0" 10'-0" to disabled- 10'-0" accessible ramp : _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ Landscaping 12.4% of site 10.7°/o of site 10% of site Total Site: (14,412 SF) (12,452 SF) : (11,585 SF) Front Setback: $0.8% of front setback 80.8% of front setback 60% of front setback (6,795 SF) (6,795 SF) i (5,045 SF) ` Parking Variance for 118 parking spaces (107 proposed where 225 are required based on commercial recreation and office/warehouse/storage parking ratios) (CS 25.70.040). 3 Parking Variance for substandard parking space dimensions (8'-6" x 18' uninstall spaces proposed where 9' x 20' is the minimum required) (CS 25.70.020, a). Transportation/Circulation Summary: Adrian Road parallels U.S. Highway 101 and is located on the west of U.S. 101. The project site can be accessed from Millbrae Avenue and Broadway using Rollins Road. Adrian Road is a two-lane street with primarily industrial uses. It begins at Rollins Road in Millbrae in the north, and dead-ends south of David Road in Burlingame in the south. Rollins Road connects to Millbrae Avenue at the north end and to Broadway at the south end. Both Millbrae Avenue and Broadway provide access to U.S. 101. The average daily traffic volume along Rollins Road is approximately 14,000 to 15,000 vehicles. Because the proposed badminton facility creates an intensification of use on this site, there is an increase in the number of parking spaces required. The existing 64,094 SF office/warehouse building is served by 63 on-site parking spaces. The site with the existing office/warehouse use is non-conforming in parking (63 parking spaces provided where 85 are required). With this application, the on-site parking supply will be increased from 63 to 107 parking spaces (100 unistall spaces (8'-6" x 18') + 7 disabled-accessible spaces). However, based on parking ratios established in the zoning code for commercial recreation, office, warehouse, and storage uses as proposed, a total of 225 parking spaces are required for the proposed badminton facility and office/warehouse tenant (34 parking spaces forthe office/warehouse tenant + 191 parking spaces for the badminton facility). Therefore, a parking variance is required for 118 spaces (107 on-site parking spaces provided where 225 parking spaces are required based on commercial recreation and office/warehouse/storage parking ratios) and for parking space dimension (8'-6" x 18' unistall parking space dimension proposed where 9' x 20' standard parking space dimensions are required). CHS Consulting Group prepared a traffic and parking study for the proposed indoor badminton facility, dated April 18, 2007. The purpose of the study was to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts from the proposed badminton facility at this site. Because the badminton courts occupy a large area for a limited number � Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road of players, the parking requirement of one space for each 200 SF of floor area established for commercial recreation uses may not be appropriate. The parking study is provided to examine the actual parking demand for similar facilities in the area. Trip Generation — Existing Use: The study notes that the existing office/warehouse business is a wholesale operation and has seven employees. It is not open to the public. On a typical weekday, there is a demand for nine parking spaces (seven spaces for employees and two spaces for delivery trucks). Planning staff would note that the existing office/warehouse business could eventually be replaced with a use which requires the 34 parking spaces required by the Zoning Code. The parking analysis assumes the warehouse space will use the required 34 spaces. Trip Generation— Proposed Uses: The study provides estimated number of employees and players bytime of day for weekdays and weekends, including both the existing office/warehouse use and the proposed badminton facility. The study notes that the average stay for a badminton player is one hour or less, but that the study is based on one and a half hours to accommodate parking turnover time for players. In addition to the typical weekday/weekend activities, two tournaments are expected to occur each year, generally on weekends. Spectators are expected to attend the tournaments, but not during typical activities. Since the badminton facility would not open until 9:30 a.m., the proposed project would not cause any increase in the AM peak hour traffic volumes (typically 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.). The Traffic Analyzer, prepared forthe North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, identifies the AM peak period as 7:00 a.m. to 9 a.m. and the PM peak period as 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The traffic study indicates that the AM peak hour within that period is 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and the PM peak hour is 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. All trips during the AM peak hour would be generated by seven office/warehouse employees (existing) and two badminton employees. During the weekday morning period from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m., the badminton facilitywould generate a maximum of 40 vehicle trips, 20 inbound and 20 outbound, assuming the worst-case condition (all badminton players drive alone, none take public transit or carpool and all players stay for one hour only). An additional three trips would occurjust before 9 a.m., when two badminton employees and one coach would arrive. During the weekday afternoon period from 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., there would be a maximum of 60 vehicle trips, 30 inbound and 30 outbound, assuming the worst-case condition. During the PM peak hour there would be 34 vehicle trips, 16 inbound and 18 outbound (10 adult players, one coach and seven office/warehouse employees). The highest number of vehicle trips during the weekday would occur during the evening period from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. It should be noted that the current office/warehouse business would not be open after 6 p.m. During the 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. period there would be a maximum of 96 vehicle trips, 48 inbound and 48 outbound, assuming the worst-case condition. The heaviest period would be from 7:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. when 22 players would be present. The study notes that weekend activity would be higher than that of a typical weekday. On Saturdays and Sundays, there will be a total of 144 players using the facility each day compared to 98 players on a typical weekday. During the 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m., 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. periods, there would be 59, 74 and 57 players using the facility, respectively. It should be noted that the current office/warehouse business is not open on weekends. In addition to the typical weekday/weekend activities, there would be two tournaments each year, one in the spring and another in the fall, both of which would occur on a weekend (Saturday and Sunday). On these two weekends, the facilitywould be closed for other users. Tournaments would include no more than 60 individuals per tournament, of which 40 players would play singles on the first day and 60 players would play doubles on the second day. Some of the players would participate in both singles and doubles matches. Spectators are anticipated at the tournaments, but they would mostly be friends and family members arriving with the tournament players in the same vehicle. The demand during a tournamentweekend would not be higherthan a typical weekend demand. Therefore, there would be no significant impact during the tournament weekends. 5 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road Traffic Impact Analysis: The study notes that because the facility opens at 9:30 a.m., the proposed project would not generate any traffic impacts during the AM peak hour because there would be few additional trips generated during the AM peak hour (7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.). Therefore, the study focused on potential impacts during the PM peak hour. The study found that traffic generally flows well along Adrian Road and Rollins Road. The badminton facility would add approximately 34 vehicle trips to Rollins Road during the PM peak hour (16 inbound and 18 outbound). This would represent a 1.1 to 1.5 percent increase over the current volume along Rollins Road. Therefore, the study concludes that no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. The study also analyzed intersection level of service (LOS) at the intersections of Rollins Road/Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road/Broadway for both Existing and Existing plus Project conditions during the PM peak hour. Existing PM peak hour turning movement counts were taken on March 1, 2007 at these two intersections. The Millbrae/Rollins intersection currently operates at LOS C and the Broadway/Rollins intersection currently operates at LOS D during the peak hour. The study also points out that two approaches currently operate at LOS E: the northbound left turn from Rollins Road to Millbrae Avenue at the Millbrae/Rollins intersection; and the eastbound left turn from Broadway eastbound to Rollins Road and southbound through at the Broadway/Rollins intersection. The study found that the proposed project trips would not change the current LOS and would have minimum change to delays at these two intersection and the existing LOS E approaches. Therefore, the study concludes that the proposed project would not have significant traffic impacts at these two intersections. Parking Impacf Analysis: Because the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Parking Generation Manual contains no land use category of "Badminton Club", "Commercial Recreation", nor "Gym", the parking demand analysis was estimated based on comparable uses in the Bay Area. A parking survey was conducted at four known active badminton clubs in the BayArea, including clubs in Sunnyvale, Fremont, Milpitas and Menlo Park. Based on these facilities, the average midday parking demand during a typical weekday is approximately 1.4 spaces per badminton court. During a typical weekday evening the average parking demand is 4.3 spaces per court. Based on these ratios, the estimated demand for this site is 59 spaces during weekday midday and 107 spaces during weekday evening and weekend. This includes the parking ratios established in the zoning code for the existing office/warehouse business to remain on the site and for the office, warehouse, and storage uses for the badminton facility; the demand for 22 spaces forthe badminton courts (1.4 spaces per court x 16 courts) during weekday midday and 69 spaces (4.3 spaces per court x 16 courts) during weekday evening and weekends; and the demand for 3 to 4 spaces for the badminton facility offices. Please see Table 1 below for a breakdown of parking demand. Office/Warehouse Badminton Badminton Office Total Weekday midday: 34 22 ' 3 59 Weekday evening 34 69 2 4 107 and weekend: ' 16 courts x 1.4 spaces per court during weekday midday = 22 spaces 2 16 courts x 4.3 spaces per court during weekday evening and weekends = 69 spaces The study concludes that the proposed 107 parking spaces provided on-site should be sufficient to meet the project parking demand. Planning staff would note that based on the traffic and parking study, the 107 parking spaces provided on-site will be sufficientforthe proposed badminton facility. However, the office/warehouse business is onlyopen from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and closed on weekends, which adequately offsets the peak operating days and hours of the badminton facility. The property owners have agreed to limit the days and hours of operation of the current and future office/warehouse business to morning until 6 p.m. on weekdays and no operation on weekends. Therefore, with mitigations the impacts on transportation/circulation are considered less than significant. 3 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road April 9, 2007 Study Meeting: At the April 9, 2007 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commission asked several questions about the proposed indoor badminton facility (April 9, 2007 PC Minutes). The applicant submitted revised plans along with a letter, dated April 23, 2007, in response to the Commission's comments and questions. The responses to the Commission's comments are summarized below. In addition, the Commission asked how the applicant plans to regulate, if at all, future warehouse/industrial activity in the adjacent tenant space. It was noted that while wholesale importing of foods is benign, should there be a concern about a future activity that might have noxious fumes in the adjacent warehouse space? How do we address a future, more noxious industrial use and its compatibility with an athletic facility? In a letter dated June 6, 2007, the applicant notes that as the owners of the building, QFCO, Inc. will only engage in freight and warehousing distribution. There will be no manufacturing, reprocessing or repackaging conducted in the adjacent tenant space. There will be no noxious fumes or other industrial uses which would pose harm to the badminton use. Parkinq: 9. Prepare addifional parking layouts one using code allowed compact parking spaces and one using unistall parking dimensions, how would that affect the amount of parking on-site. The applicant considered several parking layout alternatives. After reviewing the different layouts, the applicant is proposing unistall parking spaces for all on-site parking spaces, with the exception of the disabled-accessible spaces (8'-6" x 18' unistall space) (see revised Site Plan, sheet A1.2). By using unistall parking spaces, the number of on-site parking spaces increased by 6 spaces, from 101 to 107. As noted in the staff report, a Parking Variance for substandard parking space dimensions is required (8'-6" x 18' unistall spaces proposed where 9' x 20' is the minimum required). 2. There is an inconsistency between fhe business plan included in the staff report and the staffing chart provided for the traffic study and planning review, particularly number of emp/oyees/statf/coaches on site during different fimes of day; these are nof included in the parking demand study or the trip generation sfudy, all these people should be included as sfaff in these ana/yses. • In a letter dated April 16, 2007, the applicant notes that 14 employees, as stated in the business plan, will be full-time and part-time employees to cover seven working days consisting of two shift schedules. The applicant notes that on weekdays from 9:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., there will be two employees and one coach; after 6 p.m., there will be two employees with no coaching. On weekends from 9:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., there will be three employees and one coach; after 6 p.m. there will be three employees and no coaching. 3. Ufilify pole in the new parking area is not shown on the plans, and will affect parking layout. • The revised Site Plan has been corrected to show the existing PG&E utility box and pole at the rear of the site (see Site Plan, sheet A1.2). 4. Clarify how the loading dock will6e used, diagram how the trucks would enter, exit and maneuver on fhe site, remove any parking areas which will conflict with !he truck access and loading dock access on site. • The revised Site Plan shows the truck turning radius and maneuvering on-site (see Site Plan, Sheet A1.2). In a letter dated April 16, 2007, QFCO, Inc., notes that trucks will enter and proceed to the rear of the lot. Once the truck is in the truck turning radius, the truck will continue towards the south and the back into the loading dock area. 7 Condifional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road 5. Parking spaces are located in front of fhe building utility box for the site, is this allowed. • The applicant notes that parking is not allowed in front of the existing utility box adjacent to the loading dock at the rear of the building. The utility box is protected by several existing bollards (see Site Plan, sheet A1.2). 6. Can additional parking be /ocated in the PUE, as the neighbor appears to do? • The applicant notes that locating additional parking in the PUE would decrease the amount of on-site landscaping below the minimum 10% required (10.7% total on-site landscaping proposed where 10% is the minimum required). 7. Because of the impact on the AM peak hour in the area, fhe badminfon use should not begin unfil 9:30 a.m. • The applicant has agreed to open at 9:30 a.m. The conditions of approval reflect the revised opening time. S. The deficiencies in the parking and traffic study identified by staff should 6e addressed by the applicant's parking/traffic consultant, city sfandards should be used including parking sfandards and a.m. and p.m. peak hours as identified in the Norfh Burlingame/Rollins Road and Bayfronf Specific Plans which affect the Broadway/Rollins Road intersection; the fraffic study should a/so address the parking and traffic impacfs of badminton tournamenfs on the site. • These issues have been resolved in the revised Traffic and Parking Study, dated April 18, 2007. Please refer to the revised Traffic and Parking Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND-545P. 9. ADA accessible parking should be distributed on both sides of the building, particularly c/ose to the ADA ramp. • The applicant notes that the new disabled-accessible ramp at the rear of the building is for exiting only. The disabled-accessible parking spaces are proposed at the front of the site closest to the building entrance. The Chief Building Official reviewed these p�ans and did not have specific comments related to the proposed disabled-accessible parking. Compliancewith ADAwill be reviewed in detail when plans are submitted for a building permit. Court Use: 10. What is the maximum number ofpeop/e who can use a badminton court at one time, and what is the turn over of courts (fime between uses). • The applicant notes that the badminton courts will be designated as eight single courts (two players per court) and eight double courts (four players per court). Badminton matches generally last 20 minutes or less in a 21-point format. Most players will play two matches each time they visit the facility. The applicant notes that an electronic queuing system will allow players to be queued and directed to appropriate court play. 11. Tournaments should be limited to week-ends and holidays. • The applicant has agreed to limit tournaments to weekends and holidays. A condition of approval has been added. : Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road 12. Will there be bleachers or designated viewing areas inside for people to wafch, will fhese be present all the fime or only for tournaments. • There will be benches and chairs throughout the badminton court area for players to relax and for other players and spectators to watch matches (see revised Warehouse Floor Plan, sheet A1.3). 13. How frequently will tournaments be scheduled at this site each year, what fime of year, how many players will participate at each fournament, how many spectators will attend each tournament from how far away will the players come (local, regional, state, international). Please refer to two attached letters, dated April 23, 2007 and May 18, 2007, submitted by Ben Lee and Harry Tan, respectively, discussing tournament play. In addition to the typical weekday/weekend activities, there would be two local tournaments each year, one in the spring and another in the fall, both of which would occur on a weekend (Saturday and Sunday). On these two weekends, the facility wouid be closed for other users. Tournaments would include no more than 60 individuals per tournament, of which 40 players would play singles on the first day and 60 players would play doubles on the second day. Some of the players would participate in both singles and doubles matches. Spectators are anticipated at the tournaments, but they would mostly be friends and family members arriving with the tournament players in the same vehicle. Mr. Lee notes thatthe International Badminton Federation (IBF) requires a minimum ceiling heightof 32 feet for international play, while the proposed facility has a ceiling height of 26 feet. Therefore, the proposed facility is not capable of hosting international tournaments, only local tournaments. Site Development: 14. The s/ope on the ADA ramp should be reduced to 1:15 or 1:20, fo provide more useable access. • The slope of the ADA ramp at the front of the building has been reduced to 1:15 (see revised Site Plan, sheet A1.2). 15. Provide a f/oor plan which includes the entire first floor of the building, identify where the wall dividing fhe office/warehouse use from the badminton use will be locafed. • The Warehouse Floor Plan has been revised to include the entire first floor of the building and identifies the location of the wall dividing the office/warehouse use from the badminton use (see revised Warehouse Floor Plan, sheet A1.3). 16. Description includes a gymnasium, does this mean that there will be training equipment such as u�veights etc. on fhis premise, if so how much and where will it be located? • There will be no training equipment in the proposed badminton facility. The applicant notes thatthe term 'gymnasium' was used to describe a sporting institution as a place for physical exercise. 17. �-low will fhe 2,000 SF of office space be used, by whom and during what hours. • The applicant notes that the office space for the badminton facility will be used for new membership and renewal membership enrollment, accounting/administration, coaching/staff and management. 18. c4ow will the fufure use of the office/warehouse use remaining on the sife be limited to insure compafibility with the badminton use? �� The applicant notes that in a letter submitted by QFCO, Inc., dated March 29, 2007, the property owners have agreed to limit the days and hours of operation of the current and future office/warehouse business � Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road to morning until 6 p.m. on weekdays and no operation on weekends. A condition of approval has been added. 19. Should provide a planting plan, irrigation system af the front looks good, but the plant maferial has died out. • The revised Site Plan show more detail with respect to the on-site landscaping. Eight existing Chinese Elm trees, located at the front of the lot, will remain. Proposed landscaping enhancements include sun tolerant ornamental shrubs and flowering perennials (see Site Plan, sheet A1.2). The applicant notes that dead plant material will be replaced with new shrubs, bushes and flowers. 20. Use should be limited to badminton only, no other commercial recreation use should be allowed because the parking demands and impacts are different. • If approved, this Conditional Use Permit would apply only to an indoor badminton facility. If a different type of commercial recreation facility is proposed in the future, a new application for a Conditional Use Permit would be required at that time. 21. Staff should provide the applicant with a copy of the proposed Sign Code regulations. The applicant has been provided with a copy of the recently adopted Sign Code regulations. Noticinq: 22. Notice for this Conditional Use Permit should include all property owners on Adrian Road and Adrian Court, as well as all property owners within 300 feef as required 6y law. • In addition to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, all property owners on Adrian Road and Adrian Court were sent notices for this public hearing. Staff Comments: See attached comments from the Chief Building Officia�, Ciry Engineer, CityTraffic Engineer, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Two letters of concern, dated December 14 and December 20, 2006, were submitted by an anonymous person. In addition, emails of concern were submitted by Peter Weiss, dated April 9, 2007. Several letters in support of the project were submitted by the following: Ben Lee (dated January 23, 2007); Patrick Cheng, owner, AJAX Technology International, Inc, 1576 Rollins Road, Burlingame (dated February 15, 2007); Hong Tan and Joo Tan, owners, Broadway Prime, 1316 Broadway, Burlingame (dated February 15, 2007); Rev. and Dr. Cyrus O.K. Lam, General Director, Gospel Operation International (dated January 31, 2007); and Senator Leland Y. Yee, Ph.D. (dated February 2, 2007). Ben Lee also submitted a letter date stamped March 22, 2007, addressing traffic flow and parking for the proposed facility. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Recreation Use (indoor badminton facility) the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; 10 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Required Findings for a Variance: In order to grant a parking variance for number of parking spaces and parking space dimensions, the Planning Commission mustfind that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings for accepting the environmental document (mitigated negative declaration), conditional use permit and parking variances. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. Please note that the conditions below include mitigation measures taken from the mitigated negative declaration (shown in italics). If the Commission determines that these conditioris do not adequately address any potential significant impacts on the environment, then an Environmental Impact Reportwould need to be prepared forthis project. The mitigations will be placed on the building permit as well as recorded with the property and constitute the mitigation monitoring plan for this project. At the public hearing the following mitigation measures and conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 23, 2007, sheets A1.1 through A1.9; 2. that demolition or removal of any existing walls and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 3. that the existing and proposed landscaping shall be installed and maintained as shown on the Site Plan, date stamped April 23, 2007, and that all areas of landscaping shall be irrigated by an automatic sprinkler system on a timer and shall be maintained by the property owner in good operating condition at all times; 4. that the indoor badminton facility shall only be open seven days a week from 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., with a maximum of five full-time employees and a maximum of 62 people on-site at any one time, including the owner, employees and customers; that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees or people on-site which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 5. that there shall be no gambling or wagering on this business premise and no alcoholic beverages shall be served, stored in lockers or private use, or sold on the site; 11 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Variances 1611 Adrian Road 6. that the indoor badminton facility shall be limited to 40,419 SF in area with 2,085 SF of office, 493 SF of retail, 1,765 of storage and 36,076 SF for the 16 indoor badminton courts and associated activities including a lounge, children's play zone, stretching zone and restrooms; that outdoor areas shall not be used for any activities associated with the badminton facility; 7. that this Conditional Use Permit shall only apply only to an indoor badminton facility; that if a different type of commercial recreation facility is proposed at this site in the future, a new application for a Conditional Use Permit shall be required; 8. that the parking variances for on-site parking spaces and parking space dimension shall expire with the termination of the conditional use permit for the indoor badminton facility; shall be reviewed with any amendment to the Conditional Use Permit granted to the indoor badminton facility; and shall expire should the building on the site be deliberately demolished or destroyed by a natural catastrophe or disaster or should a major remodel of the building be proposed; 9. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 15, 2006, memo, the City Engineer's December 15, 2006, memo, the City Traffic Engineer's January 25, 2007, memo, the Fire Marshal's December 18, 2006, memo, and the Recycling Specialist's November 28, 2005 memo shall be met; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 11. that while the badminton facility operates in this building, the current and future office/warehouse businesses in this building shall only be open forbusiness from morning until 6 p.m. on weekdays and shall not be open on weekends; any changes to hours for the office/warehouse use shall require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit; 12. that there shall be a maximum of two tournaments per year at this facility; the tournaments shall only be held on weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and holidays and shall be limited to a maximum of 60 players; and 13. that spectators who wish to attend the tournaments shall be encouraged to arrive in the same vehicle as the tournament player, shall arrive by carpooling or taking public transportation and walking to the facility. Ruben Hurin Planner c. Jeff Lea, applicant and designer 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA April 9, 2007 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL Chair Brownrigg called the April 9, 2007, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners iran, Brownngg, Deal, Terrones ai Vistica; C. Osterling arrived at 7: p.m.; C. Gauchi arrived at 7:12 p. ., Absent Staff Broo ioners: none �Cnt: City Planner, Margaret Mo e; Senior Planner, Maureen City Attoiney, Larry Anderson. IIL MINUTES e minutes of the March 26, 07 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were amended pa , para� aph 2, "Chair Brownrigg noted that the house plans appea�- to resolved Ee�}�lete� ,... Commissio ers also noted that page 3, para aph 5 should be amended, line 5, t ead: "�ke IV. APPROVAL OF A V. FROM THE �'L STUDY ITEMS he applicant subnzittecl u singl copy of a r•educed sheet of r�ew propo d r�evisioris at the public l�earin .' The minutes for the March 26 007 ineeting were approved amended. The mutes for the Joint City CounciUPl � g Commission meeting, March �, 2007, were approved as mailed. � A There were no changes to the R Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa discourage future use lowered more; on St be an asset to the ' v. A 1ue, noted concern about b� second units, chimney at 15 Item on Adrian Road, feels b� !fits and ways to alboa could be n facilitywould l. 1611 ADRIAN ROAD, ZONED RR — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE (INDOOR BADMINTON FACILITY) (JEFF LEA, DAROSA & ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT & DESIGNER; AND JOEY LO AND FRANCES HUANG, PROPERTY O`VNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Cauchi arrived at 7:12 p.m. CP Monroe presented a sumtnary of the staff report. Commissioners asked that the following items be addressed before this item returns: City of Burlingame Planning Commissio�i Aliiicetes Apri19, 2007 Parking • Prepare additional parking layouts one using code allowed compact parking spaces and one using unistall parking dimensions, how would that affect the ainount of parkin� on-site; • There is an inconsistency between the business plan included in the staff report and the staffing chart provided for the traffic study and planning review, particularly number of employees/staff/coaches on site during different times of day; these are not iucluded in the parking demand study or the trip generation study, all these people should be included as staff in these analyses; • Utility pole in the new parking area is not shown on the plans, and will affect parking layout; • Clarify how the loading dock will be used, diagram how the trucks would enter, exit and maneuver on the site, remove any parking areas which will conflict with the truck access and loading dock access on site; • Parking spaces are ]ocated in front of the building utility box for the site, is this allowed; • Can additional parking be located in the PUE, as the neighbor appears to do? • Because of the impact on the AM peak hour in the area, the badminton use should not begin unti19:30 a.m.; • The deficiencies in the parking and traffic study identified by staff should be addressed by the applicant's parking/traffic consultant, city standards should be used including parking standards and a.m. and p.m. peak hours as identified in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road and Bayfront Specific Plans which affect the Broadway/Rollins Road intersection; the traffic study should also address the parking and traffic impacts of badminton tournaments on the site; • ADA accessible parking should be distributed on both sides of the building, particularly close to the ADA ramp; Court Use • What is the maximum number of people who can use a badminton court at one time, and what is the turn over of courts (time beh�een uses); • Tournaments should be liinited to week-ends and holidays; • Will there be bleachers or designated viewing areas inside for people to watch, will these be present all the time or only for tournaments; • How frequently will tournaments be scheduled at this site each year, what time of year, ho�v many players will participate at each tournament, how many spectators will attend each tournanlent from how far away will the players come (local, regional, state, international); Site Development • The slope on the ADA ramp should be reduced to 1:15 or 1:20, to provide more useable access; • Provide a floor plan which iucludes the entire first floar of the building, identify where the wall dividing the office/warehouse use from the badininton use will be located; • Description includes a gynu�asium, does this n�ean that there will be training equipment such as weights etc. on this preinise, if so how much and where will it be located? • How ��ill the 2,000 SF of office space be used, by whom and during what hours; • Ho�v will the future use of the office/warehouse use remaining on the site be linuted to insure compatibility with the badminton use? • Should provide a planting plan, irrigatioiz systen7 at the front looks good, but the plant �naierial has died out; • Use should be limited to badminton only, no other commercial recreation use should be allowed because the parking demands and impacts are different; • Staff should provide the applicant with a copy of the proposed sign code regulations. 2 City of Bza�lirigairie Planning Comrnissiort Mincrtes Apral 9, 2007 Noticing • Notice for this conditional use permit should include all property owners on Adrian Road and Adrian Court, as well as all property owners within 300 feet as required by law. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department and the appropriate enviromnental document has been prepared. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS ConSent Calen r- Itents o�� tlte conse�2t calendar m�e corrsidered �o be r-oi�tine. Tliey m�e acted on sinu�/taneously unless sepm•ate discus � ri mid/or action is rec/uesterl by the applicant, a r�iember of I{ie public or a comrnissioner prior to the ti� �� t17e commission es on tl�e motion to adopt. Chair rownrigg asked if anyone in the ience or on the Commission wished to call an tein off the co ent calendar. There were no requ s. 2a. 1456 DRAKE AVENUE, ZO R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REV W AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING IGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SEC STORY ADDITION (CHIWA HL1NG, APPLI T AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD & ASS IATES, DESIGNER) (67 2b. 1473 CORTEZ A NUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR D IGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SING AMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED G GE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICAN AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DE GN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (63 C. D�l noted that he had a business relationship wit he applicant at 1456 Drake and would re e himself frgtl voting on that item. C. Osterling moved approval of the oi� the facts in the staff reports, c recommended conditions in each ; Cauchi. Chair Brownrigg called passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abs in: vote. Appeal procedures we advi VIII. REGULAR ACTIOl�VITEM onse calendar, 1456 Drake Avenue and 1473 C ez Avenue, based m ssioners' comments and the findings i e staff reports with report and each by resolution. The m on was seconded by C. a voice vote on the motion to approve. m 2a, 1456 Drake Avenue, g) voice vote. Item 2b, 1473 Cortez venue, passed on a 7-0 voice �d. This item concluded at 7:38 p. 3. 1605 QUESAD WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATI FOR DESIGN REVIEW SETBACK V NCE FOR A FIRST AND SECO STORY ADDITION TO A SI� DWELLIN (CHARLES AND LARA CAMMARA , APPLICANT AND PROPERTY� SUZA DEHNE. DESIGNERI (57 NOTICE ROJECT PLANNER: LISA WF-TYf1 R�rence staff report 4/09/07, with attachmP.�ytEs. SP Brooks presented the comments. Thirteen conditions were sugsl��ted for consideration. FAMILY ER: AND criteria and staif 3 Responses to Planning Commission Comments/Questions From April 9, 2007 Study Meeting darosa & associates April 23, 2007 City Of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 .,�� `s se� � � 2 3 2007 RE: Comments in Response to Study Session Minutes on April 9, 2007 for Bay Badminton Center, 1611 Adrian Road, Burlingame CA Dear Sir or Madam, The responses to the Planning Commissioners' comments on April 9, 2007 are listed below. Parking 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 The parking layout has been revised to provide 100% unistall 8-1/2' x 18' parking spaces; 100 unistall and 7 handicap for a total of 107 parking spaces. Please see attached plan, sheet A1.2. Please see attached letter provided by Bay Badminton Center, Inc. (Exhibit 1). Utility pole and PG&E utility box are shown on revised plan. Please see attached plan, sheet A1.2. The truck turning radius is show on attached revised sheet A1.2. Also, please see attached letter submitted by QFCO, Inc. (Exhibit 2). Parking is not allowed in front of the existing utility box adjacent to the rear loading dock. Existing protective bollards are also installed in front of the utility box. Please see the attached sheet A1.2. Locating additional parking spaces in the PUE would decrease the total percentage of onsite landscaping below the 10% minimum. Please see exhibit 1. Please see attached revised Traffic Study Report prepared by CHS consulting group (Exhibit 3). The new rear handicap ramp is for exiting only. Handicap parking spaces are located at the front, closest to the entrance. Court Use 1. Please see exhibit 1. 2. Please see exhibit 1. 3. Please see attached plan sheet A1.3 and exhibit 1. 4. Please see attached letter from Ben Lee (Exhibit 4). 475 el camino real, #308 millbrae, ca. 94030 tel: 650-692-4072 fax: 650-692-4073 darosa & associates Site Development 1. The slope of the front ADA ramp has been reduced to 1:15. Please see attached plan sheet A1.2 and A1.6. 2. The first floor office plan is included in the revised warehouse floor plan. Please see attached plan, sheet A1.3. 3. Please see exhibit 1. 4. The first floor and second floor storage will be used by Bay Badminton Center. The remaining second floor spaces will be used by QFCO, Inc. Please see attached plan, sheet A1.6 and A1.7. 5. Please see exhibit 2. 6. A planting plan is shown on revised sheet A1.2. In addition to removing dead plant material, new shrubs, bushes and flowers will be planted. 7. Please see exhibit 1. 8. A copy of the proposed sign regulations has been provided to the applicant. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank yo�. B gards, �_, Lea Darosa a Associates 475 EI Camino Real, #308 Millbrae, CA 94030 Phone: (650) 692-4072 Fax: (650) 692-4073 475 el camino real, #308 tel: 650-692-4072 millbrae, ca. 94030 fax: 650-692-4073 w ^� Exhibit 1 � g�4- Y g�4-.�/�l�NTON G�NT��, �NC. TEL: (650) `sD3-3s�� i611.4DT21�{N P�OAA ��x: �� 9T-�� g�TZLI NGi�F��IE, C�F 9�f DID April 16, 2007 City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 �-MAIL: `; � `l.r i`o d �v` e� f� � - �� 3 2007 �, � . _ .. . ; , _ i,: �- ,iv,.� ,=�-��:��: ��,�� -, RE: Comments in Response to Study Session minutes on April 9, 2007 for Indoor Badminton Facility located at 1611 Adrian Road Dear Burlingame Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff: Please find our response to the comments addressed at the April 9, 2007 study session. Parking #2: The business plan states a total of 14 total employees, some of which are full time and some of which are part time. These 14 employees will be circulated to cover 7 working days of two shift schedules. During weekday operation from 9:30am to 6pm, there will be 2 employees and 1 coach. During weekday operation after 6pm, there will be 2 employees and no coaching. During weekend operation from 9:30am to 6pm, there will be 3 employees and 1 coach. During weekend operation after 6pm, there will be 3 employees and no coaching. Parking #7: The badminton facility will not open until 9:30 a.m. Court Use #1: Badminton courts will be designated as 8 singles courts and 8 doubles courts. Badminton matches normally last approximately 20 minutes or less in a 21-point format. Most players will play 2 matches each time they visit the facility. An electronic automated queuing system will allow players to be queued up and directed to appropriate court play. Court Use #2: Tournaments will be limited to weekends and holidays. � `! �ourt Use #3: There will be benches and chairs throughout the gym for members to relax and for other members and spectators to watch other badminton players. �ourt Use #4: Please see attached letter from Ben Lee regarding tournament play. Site Development #3: There will be no training equipment in the gymnasium. The term gymnasium is used to describe a sporting institution as a place for physical exercise. Site Development #7: The facility will be limited to only badminton play. If there are any further questions please feel free to give me a call. Thank you very much Sincerely, Harry Tan, resid nt � ' Exhibit 2 : ��;� �' �, �� FCO� INC. clba Q UEENS WA Y FOODS � TEL: (650) 697-2233 1611 ADRIAN ROAll FA�: (650) 697-9966 TEL: (888) 737-FOOD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 E-MAIL: info(uqfco.com Apri1 16, 2007 City of Burlin�ame 501 Primrose Road Burlinjame, CA )4010 €'µa � _, .�. :J , .�s�'� � APR 2 3 2007 crrr or- Bu��_��vG^.�,�E RE: Comments iu Response to Study Session minutes on april 9, 2007 f'or Indoor Badminton Facility loc�ted at 1611 ?�driln Road Dear B�u-lingame Planning Commissioners and Plaiuling,Staff: Please find our response to the comments addressed at the April 9, 2007 study session. Parking #4: Attached please find a diagram of how trlicics would enter and inanuetrver on site. Trucics will enter and proceed westbound to the fire trucl: turninQ radius (the "radius"). Once at the radius the truck will proceed south botiild and from there it can then bacl: into the loading docic area. Site Developmeut #5: Attached please find a lett�r dated March 29, 2007. This letter affirms that use of the officel��arehouse space will only operate fronl morning tintil 6:00 pm on weel<days and will not operate on the weekends. If there �re any furtller q�iestions please feel free to give us a call. Tl�anlc you for your consideration. Sincerely, -� �'„�`-� �/�'�.. �- Frances Hu�ng, President / /� _ Y� � Joey Lo, Vice-President , , `� ''�\ f,��_�� QFCO� INC. clbcc QUEENSWAYFC�ODS TEI_: (650) 697-2233 1611 ADRIAN ROAD FAX: (650) 697-996G TEL: (888) 737-FOOD BURLINGAI�'ll�, CA 94010 E-1�7A11.: intb(ic��f'co.com March ?9, 20U? City of Burlin�anie 501 Primose Ro1d B��rlingame, CA 94U10 '1'o Whom IL I��lav Concern: On b�half of my company as office'warehouse tei�ant and ow�ner at the above address, we would like to tillli"Ill IIl<lI OUt" US� an�1 fiiture tenant use of the oCtice/�varehouse space �� ill only operate from moi»in� until (i:00 p.m. on �L�ecl:days and will not operate on the weekends. Please f�eel fr�e to ;ive us a call at the abo�•c numbers if therc are 1ny qucstions or concerns. Thanl:s. Sincerely, �'wr C `.�z �`"-�� l � Frances Huang, President � Joey Lo, Vice-Preside�lt Exhibit 3 BAY BADMINTON CENTER TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY Prepared for: City of Burlingame Prepared by.� CHS Consulting Grortp 130 Sutter Street, Suite 468 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 392-9688 April 18, 2007 ., , :. .,::...,,,, ��C?G�.�) ,' � �;j: i�/�� y1 . . •"�Q, _ ' �;il(\' J� � y.. ; � ,Z`� T� G% � :�s,�U O-ryn' � � ; i�o TF �15U o r ; = �� 3� 2�-�S� : : il' ;ExP• .: *, : '�cf'J'• �AFr�G'��P�,.. ��''�� 7F�CA��`'��, �-� : -. _ _ -'�-� _-� . �_,� � ��.PR 2 3 2007 CITY OF BURLIrJur„�;E PLANNiNG UEP'f. � � � Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study The purpose of this study is to examine the potential traftic and parking impacts that would be generated by the proposed Bay Badminton Center in Burlingame (Proposed Project). Project Description The Proposed Project would be located at 1611 Adrian Road in Burlingame. The site currently contains a warehouse building of approximately 59,429 gross square feet (gs� with 63 parking spaces. A portion of the building would be converted to a 16-court Badminton Center; the remaining space would continue to be used as a warehouse. There would be an increase of 44 parking spaces (from 63 to ]07 spaces). Of the total ]07 spaces, 7 would be disabled accessible spaces and 100 would be regular spaces. Table 1 compares the existing and proposed uses at the project site. Figure 1 presents the proposed project floor plan. Table 1— Project Warehouse for QFC Badminton Club Court (16 courts) Office Retail (pro shop) Total Buifding Area Parkin� Soaces ng Uses 47,672 1 1.757 59,429 63 �ed Uses 19.339 31.955 7,606 529 59,429 107' ' The Proposed Prc�jeet would include 107 parking spaces. 7 of �vhieh ��ould be disabled spaees. Gros� syuare feet ofeach use ineludes fair share of aceessoq� uses. such as stair�v�c. janitorial room. rest rooms, and utilit}� room. Project Setting Adrian Road parallels US 101, and is located on the immediate west side of US 101. The project site can be accessed from Millbrae Avenue and Broadway via Rollins Road. Adrian Road is a two-lane street with mostly industrial uses. lt begins at Rollins Road in Millbrae in the north, and dead-ends just south of David Road in Burlingame in the south. Rollins Road connects Millbrae Avenue at the north end and Broadway at the south end. The average daily traffic volume along Rollins Road is approximately 14,000 to 15,000 vehicles. Project Trip Generation Existing Uses The existing warehouse has seven employees and a typical weekday demand for seven parking spaces. The existing warehouse operation is "wholesale" - i.e., not open to the public, nor can the general public rent the warehouse units in wholesale. This use generates a demand for approximately two trucks per day. ��hich deliver goods to warehouse customers. Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 � e zro�•�r e see �� —. —�!. �. ,.-�:-eoc—� Ba�� Badminton Center Tratlic and Parking Study r CHS Consultrng �w � Group Figure 1 Project Site Plan Proposed Uses Since there is no '`Badminton Court", "Commercial Recreation", nor "Gym" land use in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual, project trip generatio�� is determined by the estimated levels of activities at the project site, provided by the project sponsor. Tables 2 and 3 present the estimated activities of the Proposed Project during a typical weekday and weekend, respectively. It should be noted that average stay by the players is typically one hour or less. The estimated number of players presented in Tables 2 and 3 are for one and half hours to allo�v for changing time for players. Table 2— Estimated Number of Em lo ers and Pla ers b Time of the Da Weekda Adult Children Badminton Warehouse Pla�-ers Players Coaches Parents Club Employees Total Em lo ees AM 7:30 - 9:00 0 0 0 0 ? 7 9 AM 9:00 — 10:30 10 1 2 7 20 AM 10:30 - 12:00 10 1 2 7 20 PM 12:00 - 1:30 10 1 2 7 20 PM 1:30 - 3:00 0 1 2 7 10 PM 3:00 - 4:30 0 10 1 10 2 7 30 PM 4:30 - 6:00 10 1 2 7 20 Evenin 6:00 - 7:30 16 2 18 Evenin 7:30 - 9:00 22 2 24 Evenin 9:00 - 1 1:00 10 ? 12 �ource: tsav esaannnton �znrer. inc. Note: The coach �could be the same person sta} ing for the entire duration �nd emplo��ees ��ould be in two shiCts with 2 employees per shitt and the shift chanee ��ould occur at 3:00 p.m. Table 3— Estimated Number of Em lo ers and Plavers b Time of the Da (Weekend) Adult Children Badminton �,arehouse Players Pla,yers Coaches Parents Club Employees Total Em lo �ees AM (7:30 - 9:00) 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 AM (9:00 —10:30 18 5 1 0 3 0 37 AM 10:30 - 12:00 ?0 5 1 0 3 0 29 PM 12:00 - 1:30 6 0 1 0 3 0 10 PM 1:30 - 3:00 8 5 1 � 3 0 22 PM 3:00 - 4:30 1 Z 5 1 5 ; 0 26 PM 4:30 - 6:00 12 0 1 0 3 0 16 Evenin 6:00 - 7:30 14 0 0 0 3 0 17 Evenin 7:30 - 9:00 24 0 0 0 3 0 27 Evenin 9:00 - I 1:00 10 0 0 0 3 0 13 Source: Bav Badminton Center. Inc. Note: The coach ��ould be the same person staying for the entire duration and employees would be in rivo shifts with 2 employees per shift and the shift change would oceur at 3:00 p.m. In addition to the typical weekday/weekend activities, there would be two tournaments each year, one in the spring and another one in the fall, and both of which would occur on a weekend (Saturday and Sunday). On these two weekends, the Club would be closed for other users. Tournament participants would be no more than 60 individuals each time, of which 40 participants would play singles on the first day and 60 participants would play doubles on the Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 3 second day. Some of these players would participate in both singles and doubles matches. Spectators are anticipated during the tournament. However, it is anticipated that they would mostly be friends and family members arriving with the players in the same vehicle. Since the Badminton Court would not o�en until 9:00 a.m., the Proposed Project would not cause any increase in AM peak hour traffic volumes. All trips generated during the AM peak hour (typically 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.) would be existing warehouse employees. During the weekday morning period from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon, the Proposed Badminton Project would generate a maximum of 40 vehicles, 20 inbound and 20 outbound, assuming the worst-case condition (all badminton players drive alone, none take transit or carpool, and all players stay for 1 hour only), with the exception of the period just before 9:00 a.m. wllen a coach and two badminton employee would arrive. During the weekday afternoon period from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m., the Proposed Project would generate a maximum of 60 vehicles, 30 inbound and 30 outbound (20 adult players and 10 children players), assuming the worst-case condition (all badminton players drive alone, none take transit or carpool, and all players stay for 1 hour only), with the exception of the PM peak hour (usually bet��een 4:30-5:30 p.m.) during �vhich the warehouse employees would leave. Durin� the PMpeak hour, the number of outbound vehicle trips would be 18 (10 adult plavers, one coach, and seven warehouse emplovees), an increase of 11 vehicles. The munber of inbound vehicle trips would be 16. The Proposed Project is anticipated to generate a maximum of 96 vehicle trips during the evening period from 6:00 p.m. to 1 1:00 p.m., 48 inbound and 48 outbound, assuming tlle worst- case scenario (all players drive alone, none take transit or carpool, and all players stay for I hour only). The period with heaviest usage in the evening would be beriveen 7:30 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. when 22 adult players would be present. Total weekend activity would be higher than that of a typical weekday (total 144 players on a weekend day as compared to 98 players during a rypical weekday). However, on any given hour, the largest increase would be between 10:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon when an additional 15 players (instead of 10 players) would use the facility. Difference in activities at other hours would be smaller. Traffic Impact Analysis Because the facilitv opens at 9:00 a.m., the Proposed Project would not �enerate anv traffic impacts durin� the AM peak hour because there would be no additional trips �enerated during the AM peak hour. The only potential impact analyzed in this report is during the PM peak hour. Based on the data presented above, the Proposed Project would not cause any significant traftic impacts on the surrounding streets. A field observation shows that traffic generally flows well along Adrian Road and Rollins Road. The amount of vehicles the Proposed Project would add to Rollins Road during the PM peak hour (under worst-case conditions) would be approximately 34 (16 inbowld vehicles bv plavers coming in for the 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. slot and 18 outbound vehicles b��lavers leavinn for the 4:30 to 6:00 p.m. slot). This would represent an Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 4 approximately 1.1-1.5 percent increase over the current volume alon� Rollins Road. Therefore, no significant traffic impacts are antici�ated. In addition to assessing traffic volumes along Rollins Road, PM Peak hour intersection level of service (LOS) at the intersections of Rollins Road and Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road and Broadway was analyzed for the Existing and Existing plus Project conditions. The existing PM peak period traffic turning movement volumes were counted between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on March 1, 2007 at these two intersections and the PM peak hour was determined to be from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. for the intersection of Rollins Road and Millbrae Avenue and from 4:15 p.m. to 5:15 for the intersection of Rollins Road and Broadway. Appendix B presents the field data collection for each intersection. Table 4 presents the LOS and delay calculation for the PM peak hour. Figure 2 presents the traffic volumes at these two intersections. Appendix A presents LOS calculations. Table 4 shows that the existing LOS at these two intersections is C for Millbrae and Rollins and D for Broadway and Rollins. It should be noted that while both intersections currently operate at acceptable conditions, there are approaches that currently operate at LOS E condition. These approaches include: • Millbrae and Rollins — Northbound westbound) • Broadway and Rollins — Eastbound Road) and southbound through left turn (from Rollins Road to Millbrae Avenue left turn (from Burlingame eastbound to Rollin The Proposed Project would not change LOS and would have minimum change in delays at these two intersections and the existing LOS E approaches. Thus, the Proposed Project would not have significant traffic impacts at these two intersections. Table 4— PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Anal �sis Existin� Millbrae Ave/Rollins Rd Broadwav/Rollins Rd LOS � Delay (sec C 33.9 D 36.1 Parking Impact Analysis Existin Plus Pr LOS De C D ect � 34.1 36.8 Because the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Pu��king Generation Manual contains no land use category of "Badminton Club", "Commercial Recreation", nor "Gym", parking demand analysis is estimated based on comparable uses in the Bay Area. Table 5 presents survey data of parking demand at four known active badminton clubs in the Bay Area. The average midday parking demand during a typical weekday is approximately 1.4 spaces per court; during a typical weekday evening, average parking demand is 4.3 spaces per court. Based on these ratios, Table 6 presents the estimated demand for the Proposed Project to be 59 spaces during weekday midday and 107 spaces during weekday evening and weekend. This includes the Planning Code requirements for the �varehouse use (not observed existing occupancy of seven vehicles for the warehouse use and two for the delivery trucks); the demand for 22 spaces for the badminton court (1.4 spaces per court x 16 courts) during weekday midday and 69 spaces (4.3 spaces per Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 5 court x 16 courts) during �veekday evening and weekend; and the demand for 3 to 4 spaces for office use (2 to 3 for Badminton Court employees and 1 for the coach). This analysis further assumed that the 34 spaces required for the warehouse use would not be available for other uses during weekends. The Proposed Project would provide 107 total parking spaces. This supply should be sufficient to meet the project parking demand, including potential overflows because the warehouse portion of the project would not open on weekends. Table 5— Parking Survey of Known Parking Facilities in the Badminton Club Number of Parking Courts Supply Bin Tan Club (Sunn vale) 1 1 40 Boscell Road Club (Fremont) 9 83 24,000 sf C�lub Mil itas) 12 60 190 Constitution Drive C�lub (Menlo Park) Source: CHS Consulting Group y Area Parki Weekday 30 8 10 8 I 23 I 7 Table 6- Estimated Parkin� Demand for the Badminton Club I Warehouse Weekday Midda� � 34 Weekdav Evenine/Weekend 34 Badminton 22 69 Pro.ject Badminton Office 3 4 Demand Week r 45 28 50 47 Total 59 107 Table 7 presents the parking requirements imposed on the four other badminton courts by tlle city in which they are located. There is no consistency in parking requirements among these four cities. For example, the City of Menlo Park would consider the club an industrial use because it is located in a M-2 zone, while the other three cities have established requirements for a badminton club, either per court or per square feet of the court. The Milpitas requirement appears to be most comparable. The City of Milpitas requires the badminton court within its city to provide one space per 500 gsf of court area (similar to the requirement for a tennis court) and one space per 200 gsf of retail/lounge area. Table 7— Parkin Re uirements for the Known Parkin Facilities in the Ba Area Project Number of parking Requirements Parking Size s Courts Su 1 Bin Tang Club (Sunnwale)� ��•��0 1 1 1 space per 400 gsf of court 38 Boscell Road Club �,�.�� g 2 spaces per court 23 (Fremont)' 1 s ace er 200 sf retail 24,000 gsf Club 24,000 12 � space per �00 gsf of court 56 (Mil itas)' 1 s ace er 200 �sf of retail/lounae 190 Constitution Drive Club (Menlo Park � �6,389 8 1 space per 1,000 gsf (M-2 zoning) 22 Sources: 1 Cih Planning Commission Staff Report, September l3, 2004 2 Cit} of Fremont letter dated No�ember 4, 2004 regarding Zoning Administrator Pennit for a Badminton Club at 4�901 Boscell Road � Approved Special Conditions. Milpitas Planning Commission Appro��al. February 9, Z005. Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 6 Additional research on parking requirements for a comparable use was also conducted for reference purposes. This includes parking requirements for "Tennis Court"' in the Cities of San Jose, San Mateo, Campbell, and Monterey. Parking requirements for a tennis court in these four cities are the same — two spaces per court. Tennis court has similar characteristics to a badminton court since both sports usually have four persons per court and badminton court is slightly smaller than a tennis court (36 feet by 78 feet vs. 20 feet by 44 feet). Based on the demand analysis, this requirement would meet the average demand on a typical weekday conditions. Thus, parking requirements for a tennis court is recommended as a comparable for badminton court. Based on the estimated tournament participants during the tournament weekend, its demand would not be higher than a typical weekend condition. Thus, there would not be parking impacts during the tournament weekend. Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study April 18, 2007 � Summary The proposed Burlingame Badminton Club would not generate any traffic impacts because the project area roadways operate in a reasonably free-flow condition and the amount of traftic that would be generated by the Proposed Project would add only approximately 1.1-I.5 percent of the existing traffic volumes. PM peak hour LOS at two major intersections in the vicinity of the Proposed Project (Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road in Millbrae and Broadway and Rollins in Burlingame) was analyzed and found that the Proposed Project would not cause significant traffic impacts at these two intersections as well. The proposed Burlingame Badminton Club would have sufficient parking spaces to meet its demand durin�� a typical weekday midday and evening, a weekend, and tournament period. The Proposed Project �vould provide a total 107 parking spaces; total estimated weekday midday demand would be 59 spaces, and weekday evening and weekend demand would be 107 spaces, assuming the 34 spaces required for the warehouse use would not be available for other users during weekends and �aeekday nights. With respect to the parking requirement, it appears that two spaces per court is a reasonable requirement. No local jurisdictions in the Bay Area have "Badminton Court" as a land use in its Zoning Code. The requirements imposed by the four cities that have approved badminton courts vary substantially, from one space per 1,000 square feet to one space per 400 square feet. On the other hand, several cities have '`Tennis Court" in its Zoning Code and the requirement is consistent — 2 spaces per court. Badminton court has many similar characteristics as a tennis court and badmii�ton court is somewhat smaller in size than a tennis court. Bay Badminton Center Traffic and Parking Study .April 18, 2007 g �m �iliiiri �� ,: � � a t�s �; �o� � iP i � � � `J � � � � �rw..w ? i;'� PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN � � =- BADI"IINTON OFFICES "a "-° `'/ 1J ��i L� �o) �" 1 � ��i �� m � � � U Z O � - � Q m : F � K � Z � Q W � �a O� a p �O a� cNeo A 1.6 ; �� — - Z � � �_.. �D� �mo ;oo jcm �(t� O m N o- ;Om T, n ��o z Sm� ; � � O � O � � r D z - � � 4 I i � r�� o� _ .� ,_ �� .� _ � — � PROPOSED SECOND D '' FLOOR PLAN V i� I BADMINTON CLUB � d � a � � I � � ^ �en wr+�H a,Ao. eua� r�ceMt. i,n da osa a associates I , ..... ._ . I i —�--- -_ �_ 3� �� I� _' �u f� _ III _ — _ . . _ �� _I� � ��_ . ,. — — v Existing PM Peak Hour 3: Millbrae AVE. & Rollins RD. 3�2��200� � -i � � � t � t r� �* 1 � Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j �,�„� �r ►jt� �,�„� �r r�►j ,� �r v�r� � �r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 74 1122 178 393 1503 87 341 32 289 200 61 174 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 1320 209 418 1599 93 411 39 348 238 73 207 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 122 0 0 45 0 0 249 0 0 132 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 1320 87 418 1599 48 411 39 99 238 73 75 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 7 Actuated Green, G(s) 11.4 48.0 48.0 19.8 56.4 56.4 16.8 16.8 16.8 13.4 13.4 13.4 Effective Green, g(s) 11.9 48.5 48.5 20.3 56.9 56.9 17.3 17.3 17.3 13.9 13.9 13.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.42 0.42 0.18 0.49 0.49 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 2126 662 601 2494 776 512 278 236 411 223 190 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.26 c0.12 c0.31 c0.12 0.02 c0.07 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.62 0.13 0.70 0.64 0.06 0.80 0.14 0.42 0.58 0.33 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 49.1 26.5 20.8 44.9 22.0 15.5 47.7 42.9 44.8 48.3 46.8 47.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 1.4 0.4 3.5 1.3 0.2 8.8 0.2 1.2 2.0 0.9 1.4 Delay (s) 51.1 27.9 21.2 48.4 23.2 15.7 56.5 43.1 46.0 50.3 47.6 48.5 Level of Service D C C D C B E D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 28.3 27.9 51.3 49.2 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 116.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 1 Existing PM Peak Hour 6: Broadway & US 101 SB offramp 3/21/2007 -� � �i '- '� `� T �' �► � d •� Movement EBL2 EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR2 SBL SBT SBR SWR Lane Configurations �j►j �'� � �� c� � .�� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3329 1441 3441 1842 1583 3515 1583 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3329 1441 3441 966 1583 2938 1583 2787 Volume (vph) 112 648 406 498 113 26 92 247 88 548 177 327 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 123 712 446 566 128 31 108 291 107 668 216 367 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 801 332 694 0 0 139 291 0 775 59 428 Turn Type Prot custom Perm Free Perm Permcustom Protected Phases 3 2 2 5 4 4 6 Permitted Phases 3 3 4 Free 4 4 Actuated Green, G(s) 9.0 77.0 77.0 28.3 32.0 120.0 32.0 32.0 36.2 Effective Green, g(s) 8.0 75.0 75.0 27.8 33.0 120.0 33.0 33.0 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.28 1.00 0.28 0.28 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 229 2192 949 c0.04 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.54 0.37 0.35 54.2 10.9 10.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.8 0.5 1.0 63.0 11.4 11.8 E B B 16.5 B 797 c0.20 0.87 44.4 1.00 10.2 54.6 D 54.6 D 266 1583 0.14 0.52 36.8 1.00 1.9 38.7 D 12.7 B 0.18 0.18 0.0 1.00 0.3 0.3 A 808 435 818 c0.15 c0.26 0.04 0.96 0.14 0.52 42.8 32.8 35.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 21.9 0.1 2.4 64.8 32.9 37.8 E C D 57.8 E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 36.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 2 Existing PM Peak Hour 6: Broadway & US 101 SB offramp 3/21/2007 t/ Movement SWR2 La��,Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) 65 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 73 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio _ ._ _ ... _ _ _ - - - _. Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio - Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) — - — - - _ �—_— --- - Approach LOS Intersection Summary Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 3 Existing Plus PM Peak Hour 3: Millbrae AVE. & Rollins RD. 3i2�i2oo� -� --� � 1� � � �1 I �' �►' � � Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j �,�„� �r ►j� ��. �r �t� � � 1�� . � Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 74 1122 182 397 1503 87 345 32 294 200 61 174 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 1320 214 422 1599 93 416 39 354 238 73 207 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 125 0 0 45 0 0 249 0 0 131 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 1320 89 422 1599 48 416 39 105 238 73 76 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 7 Actuated Green, G(s) 11.4 47.6 47.6 20.0 56.2 56.2 16.9 16.9 16.9 13.5 13.5 13.5 Effective Green, g(s) 11.9 48.1 48.1 20.5 56.7 56.7 17.4 17.4 17.4 14.0 14.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.41 0.41 0.18 0.49 0.49 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 182 2109 656 607 2486 774 515 279 237 414 225 191 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.26 c0.12 c0.31 c0.12 0.02 c0.07 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.63 0.14 0.70 0.64 0.06 0.81 0.14 0.44 0.57 0.32 0.40 Uniform Delay, d1 49.1 26.8 21.1 44.8 22.1 15.6 47.7 42.8 44.9 48.2 46.7 47.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 1.4 0.4 3.5 1.3 0.2 9.0 0.2 1.3 1.9 0.8 1.4 Delay (s) 51.1 28.3 21.5 48.3 23.4 15.8 56.7 43.0 46.2 50.1 47.5 48.5 Level of Service D C C D C B E D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 28.6 28.0 51.5 49.1 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 34.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 116.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 1 Existing Plus PM Peak Hour 6: Broadway & US 101 SB offramp 3/21/2007 -� � �► � �- '� 1 r' \► l .1 ./ Movement EBL2 EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR2 SBL SBT SBR SWR Lane Configurations ►�� :, � T'� � � �''� � �� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3329 1441 3438 1842 1583 3514 1583 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3329 1441 3438 954 1583 2928 1583 2787 Volume (vph) 116 648 406 498 117 26 92 247 93 548 181 327 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 127 712 446 566 133 31 108 291 113 668 221 367 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 801 332 699 0 0 139 291 0 781 61 428 Turn Type Prot custom Perm Free Perm Permcustom Protected Phases 3 2 2 5 4 4 6 Permitted Phases 3 3 4 Free 4 4 Actuated Green, G(s) 9.0 77.0 77.0 28.4 32.0 120.0 32.0 32.0 36.1 Effective G�een, g(s) 8.0 75.0 75.0 27.9 33.0 120.0 33.0 33.0 35.1 Actuated g!C Ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.28 1.00 0.28 0.28 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 229 2192 949 799 262 1583 805 435 815 v!s Ratio Prot c0.04 020 0.20 c0.20 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.18 c0.27 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.37 0.35 0.87 0.53 0.18 0.97 0.14 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 10.9 10.8 44.4 36.9 0.0 43.0 32.8 35.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.4 0.5 1.0 10.5 2.1 0.3 24.5 0.1 2.4 Delay (s) 63.6 11.4 11.8 54.9 39.0 0.3 67.5 32.9 37.9 Level of Service E B B D D A E C D Approach Delay (s) 16.7 54.9 12.8 59.9 Approach LOS B D B E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 36.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 2 Existing Plus PM Peak Hour 6: Broadway & US 101 SB offramp 3/21/2007 t/ Movement SWR2 La�I�Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Vo�ume (vph) 65 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 73 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time(s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio � Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary Burlingame Badminton Project Synchro 6 Report CHS Consulting Group Page 3 Exhibit 4 'I'o: City of I3urlingame >O1 Primmse Road Burlingame, CA 94010 From: f3cn Lec 33048 Lake Michigan Street Premont, Ca 94555 y __ _v :� =-'� 2 3 2007 _ ,�u:^._ vc ,,,�� "t'o Whom It May Concern: Vly name is Ben Lec and I am writing to you in regards to the proposed Bay I3adminton Center in Burlingame, Ga. First, I would like to add just a short background on my involvement in playing badminton in the I3ay Area. I have played Bay Area badminton for 31 years and have been involved in the sport at many dif�ferent levcls. I have becn competing at the Olympic level, I have coached all levels of players and I have been on the board of directors for USA Badminton. I would like to specifically address the tournament situation that the city council memhers were conccrned about. I have played more than 500 local tournaments throughout my career and feel that I have a fairly good grasp on the tournament formatting. The proposed Bay Badminton Center will host two local tournaments a year. I)ue to thc cciting height requirement for international level play, I3ay Badminton Center does not mcct fBF (Internationa! Badminton Federation) height requirements to host a sanctioned IBP tournament. The height requirement for intcrnational badminton is 32 feet minimum. Bay Badminton Center has 26 feet clearance. Our ceiling clearance is more than adequate for local tournament play. "I'ypically, a local tournament will draw about 60 participants. "I'he tournament competitors will consist of 40 the first day of competition (Saturday) for singles and 60 the following day (Sunday) for dot►bles play. There will be an overlap of the same playcrs who also play singles and doubies. "Che club will be closed to the general m�mbership and solely dedicated for tournament play. 'I'his will allow the toumament to be complete within a reasonable time frame. 1�here shouid be absolutely no impact on traffic issues because the tournament participants will just replace (and in most cases be Icss) the general membership. Also. thc match play in tournaments are scheduled at various times throughout the day so that playcrs will be arriving and leaving at various times. Fveryone will not arrive and Ieave at the same time. 1 hope that information that I have provided will shed some light on the concern fi�r tournament play. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 408-422-2379 or 510-754-4492. Thank you for your attention. ,� __= �'�t ��c �tn i.�� _ = g�4- � g�-�/�1 /NT-ON G �N7��, �NC. TEL: (E .50) . --.- I�YIi�D,2l.4h•1 �OfFD �AX. (�Si�� c �-_�c.;,,r, �. � ; E',L4�LING�.%�ME, C<i ��!Oi0 E-h�,AIL: May 18, 2007 City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: Additional Information Regarding Spectator for Normal and Tournament Play Dear Burlingame Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff: _- This letter is to provide additional information regarding spectator attendance for normal business `' hours and tournament play. Bay Badminton Center during normal business hours will operate similar to any gym or gymnasium (ie. 24 Hour Fitness, Gold's Gym) where entrance will be through membership only or through a one-time fee. In this manner there will be no spectators during - normal business hour. During the two tournaments throughout the year we anticipate approximately 60 participants for each tournament. These participants will normally come by themselves or with their family members in one car. These will be the only spectators for the tournaments. If there are any further questions please feel free to give me a call. Thank you very much. � Sincerely, �� Harry Tan, Presid _ �: � ~ �Fl., �, INC. dba QUEENSWAYFOODS TEL: (650) 697-2233 1611 ADRIAN ROAD FAX: (650) 697-9966 TEL: (888) 737-FOOD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 E-MAIL: info(a�,qfco.com June 6, 2007 City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 1`►e 'l.rt��L� !UN - 6 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLr1NNING DEPT RE: Comments in Response to Future Warehouse/Industrial Activity for Indoor Badminton Facility located at 1611 Adrian Road Dear Burlingame Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff: This letter is in response to the concern of future warehouse/industrial activity in the space occupied by our company that may affect the Badmtinon facility in the adjacent warehouse. As o«-ner usage of the the space �ve will only engage in freight and warehouse distribution. We will not engage in any manufacturing, re-processing or repackaging, We will not in any way harm the badminton usage with noxious fumes or other industrial uses. Our concern for the badminton facility and all future usage of warehouse space will be used on]y for freight and distribution and in all ways to be environmentally friendly. [f there are any further questions please feel free to give us a call. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -N�--� 1-�-�-� o Frances Huang, President �Y � � 7oey Lo, Vice-President R Project Comments Date: To: From: December 15, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (badminton facility). at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-262-340 Staff Review: December 18, 2006 1) Ali construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 4) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise non -residential buildings. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24 for publications and details. 5) Provide a second means of egress from the basement area. 6) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 7) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 8) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 9) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction c. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Allowable area increases taken h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered 10) Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 11) Specify the total number of parking spaces on site 12) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2001 CBC, Chapter 11, for existing buildings including: a. Accessible paths of travel b. Accessible countertops c. Accessible bathrooms d. Accessible parking 13) Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2001 CBC Appendix Chapter 29, Table A-29-A. 14) All NEW non-residential buildings must comply with the requirements of AB-2176 Sec. 42911 (c) as follows: a. Space for recycling must be a part of the project design in new buildings. b. A building permit will not be issued unless details are shown on the project plans incorporating adequate storage for collecting and loading recycled materials. �� l ��s'/o(� Project Comments Date: To: December 15, 2006 [� City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (badminton facility) at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-262-340 Staff Review: December 18, 2006 1. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 2. The sanitary sewer lateral shall be tested in accordance with City's standards. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V -�� ' Date: 12/15/2006 Project Comments Date December 15, 2006 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From Subject: Staff Review: ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff � � �r�� E�� lx� i� Request for application for conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (badminton facility). at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-262-340 December 18, 2006 ��_��-Ul�s.s1_��`je�f`�,� v'l��Lce�� arkivL _�-u� y �r � d' ✓ he��3. l�l��s-�,�o�'l._--� a�rs Cc _��-_ / � Reviewed by: _ � ��; , Date: l �-�� 7 Project Comments Date: To: From: December 15, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (badminton facility). at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-262-340 Staff Review: December 18, 2006 No comments at this time. Reviewed by: �� L%�k� Date: ��r�-„�a � '.� Project Comments Date December 15. 2006 To: � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 Q NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Subject: Request for application for conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (badminton facility). at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-262-340 Staff Review: December 18, 2006 No comment. Reviewed by: .�� Date: 12/18/06 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org �a� ciT. o,. BURLlNGAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �� Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit�_ Variance� Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Proj ect address: � L, i I �crG= � �+� �� , f� � �il�.c-�1 � , <-A APPLICANT Name: ) Grr` 1,�= A � Address:_�}"1E� r—t� GAn�1 <<� D 2�R ��- �� , City/State/Zip: � � i,��pa= ,�k �3�=>� Phone (w): �i„2��1 z -4��1 Z (n�: ��sl 5-��- z��-c- (tl� `-� �`{L " ��7T- ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �0.,�--�,�_�,nU .�t i c:� Address: �i-�7�� t, c�hM t �I o R-��<<$�� City/State/Zip: M�u ��z�{ G� �l�.(0-=;�1 Phone(w):_(��;� t��i�2-�fc7Z PROPERTY OWNER Name: �r,� �; �J ,,:� Address: 1 � � ! ?�� Q_�,�,�� ;,-^ . City/State/Zip: �Jy��.�,rl� � UA y�(�l p Phone (w):I`�� "v'1 i � -� � - (h): l•J• 4.i.��'/C � E.'= � " `7 �i iei�- Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. (h): (fl� C�S�� z-�i� R�CEIVED DEC 1 2 2006 CiTY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. PROJECTDE5CRIPTION: ��Pi�Fa7 t3aDMi�( lv��I G[,�l (�=.Yz i�� rX�S � � � L ;,�; la �-crt-nz�sc AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct� the best of my knowledge and belief. � Applicant's signature: `,i�- -`� Date: / L�i 2-�p� I know about the proposed application ancl hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature:/ / � ;`� � Date: � �-� / �-� � �.:• , t--�—� —�— Date submitted: l L�/ Z� 0 t� Ti PCAPP.FRM aP�,l� ca�;o� -�,r UGir�a�1CC tDr Ge. co.,d �=�;a �q ( Co r�n�nuc � a � d�c �Oe�r,�� YrC rta� v� Pa�k'� u �.e, C i7Ac�r��n-�jn �vtc� ��-�y/>. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7?50 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.or� �j� CITY �� 4 BURLNGAME o'' �,': CITY OF BURLINGAME CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the Ciry's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or ��rite neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1 2. 3. Explain whv the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious fo propertv or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The proposed badminton center in the existing warehouse space will minimally impact the neighborhood. The proposed use will be within the existing building which will contain any noise. Also, food will not be served. The badminton courts will mainly be used for practice and casual play; tournaments and spectator events will not held. Changes to the exterior of the building are limited to improving handicap accessibility and adding more on-site parking spaces. Since parking will be on-site, any inconvenience to the surrounding neighborhood will be negligible (see attached traffic and parking study). The existing fire sprinkler and fre alarm system will remain to ensure public safety. Overall, the addition of the interior badminton courts will provide a recreational facility to the neighborhood which promotes exercise and group activities. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General P/an and Zoning Ordinance? Currently the area is zoned for warehouse, distribution, manufacturing and automobile sales and service. Our proposed use of the site will provide a recreational facility for the neighborhood and employees in the area. How wi/1 the proposed project be compatib/e with 1he aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the e_risting and potential uses on adjoining properties in the genera! vicinit��? The proposed use of the building will take place inside the existing building. Changes to the exterior are limited to improving handicap accessibility and providing more on-site parking spaces. CUP.PRM City of Burlingame Planning Department �Ol Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin a�g a� ciTr"o � � BURLINGAME °�,. How wi/1 t/�e proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and characler of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in t/ze general vicinity? Since the proposed use wili take place inside the existing building, it will not change lhe appearance of the building and remain compatible with its surrounding neighborhood. Exterior changes will be limited to improving handicap accessibilily and providing more on-site parking. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icable to your propertv wlaich do not apply to other properties in this area. We are required to provide a minimum of 206 parking spaces. However, due to the limited size of the property we will only able to provide 101 parking spaces. b. Explain whv the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia! property right and what unreasonable propern� loss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. The requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation on the development of the site. The number or parking spaces required is based on a model of a recreational facility where a large number of spectators will be present to view a sporting event. This requirement was chosen since there was none that fit our proposed use. The badminton center will be used for training and casual play. No tournaments or spectator events will take place. c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed location wil! not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic health, safety, genera/ welfare or convenienee. The badminton courts and all activities will be on the inside of the existing building. Parking will be provided on-site with minimal impact to traffic and parking to the surrounding neighborhood (see attached traffic and parking study). d. a. CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION Within 500 feet of the site there is another recreational facility. We feel that our badminton center is staying within the character of the neighborhood by providing a recreational facility in a large warehouse setting. Describe the exceptionnl or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property VAR.FRM FROM :QFCO, INC. FRX N0. :6596979966 Dec. 11 2006 12:44PM P12 Ci1y o3'Buriing:imc Plnnning Dapnrunent SO1 Prinirose Rnact P(C50) SSR-7250 f(65U) 696-3710 �[linga{�ie.nrg COMM�RCIAL APPI.ICATIONS lURLI OAME PLANNING CUMMISSIUN APYLiCAT10N SUPPLEMENTAL FURM �. ,t 1. Proposcd t�se of the site Badminton Faei 1 i tv __. 2. Days ancl l�ours of operation Mnn—San 9am— l 1pm 3. Nuct�ber uf trueks/service vehicles to be parkecl at site (by type) N/A 4. Cw•rent nnd ro'ec:l�l maximuni iiumber of em lo ees includin�; owner al this Iocarion: Exiyting In Z Ycars In 5 Ye:tts --- .......... ._-- -- ..--- Hrn�rs of g AM to After 5:00 9 AM tu After S:UQ 9 AM to AEl.er 5:00 Qperution 5 PM PM 5 PM PM 5 1'M PM --..__. — — --. _.. . _ . Weekdays I�ull-time 3 2 4 3 4 3 _..__. , --- Part-kimc 0 0 0 0 0 a - -----_...----_ .. ....._ _ _. ___ _._ Wcckcilds P'ull-timc 4 3 5 4 5 4 Pare tiin� ---_ _ _ _ __._ _ .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 5, C'u�xent a�d . ro'ecte �xisting Hours of g AM tu Operatiun g PM Weekday� 40 58 imwn number of visitorslcustumers who ma cotne to thc site: In 2 Years In 5 Years After 5:00 g AM co Aitcr S:OU 9 AM to After S:UO PM 5 PM PM 5 PM PM 48 45 53 50 58 58 � 63 � 63 I 6A � 68 G. What i� �he maximum number of pe<�ple expected un 5ite at any oue time (include owner, employees and visitorsfctutomers): fi 2 ?, Where do/will the owner and emPloyeec park?� Park i nq Lot 8. Where do/will the cuswiners/visitors parlc7__�.^_Parking Lot 9. Present ur most recent use of site Wn rAFinq �„Q 10. LisC of other tenants on property, their number pf empl�yees, hours of operntion (nttach list if ncccssary) T�� CUMML•KCIAL.PkM FROM :QFCO, INC. FAX ND. :6596979966 Dec. li 2006 12:45PM P2i2 Ciry of IIurlingnmt Plntroing ikrartment 501 Piimru�: Roed P(65U) SSA-'1250 F(b50) 696-379U www.but'f jj,�� i �e�ore �� COMMERCIAL APPLICATtONS e YI:,ANNTNG COMMI5510N APPLICA'('iON SjJPPLEMENTAL POItM '�:. 'r 1. Proposcd use of the site Warehouse-Present Use 2. Days and hours of opersition Mon-Fr i 8am-5pm 3. Numbc;r of trucks/setvice vchicles to be parked at' sitc (by type) One Truc� 4. Currcnt and ro'ccted mnximum numher of em lo ecs includtn owner) at this tocation: Existing in 2 Yc:u•s In 5 Years I Io�irs of g AIvI to At}er S:OO e AM tu AAcr 5:00 8 AM to After 5;00 Uperatian 5 PM PM 5 PM PM 5 PM PM W eckciays --_ _.._ .....- Full-time � 0 7 0 7 0 _ .. . _ -- Pa.rt-timc 0 0 0 0 0 0 � . . ._ ..__- Wcckends Pull-tinic 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ _.._._ ._.__.. _ ------ - _ . _..__....--- Part timc 0 0 0 0 0 0 $. CUttL'nt 1t1C{ fo�CCtCo mAx Existing ilours of AM to Operntion PM Wcckdays 0 Wczkends ❑� imum numher of visitors/cusWmers who tna come to the site: in 2 Ye�erti In 5 Ycars After S:UU A.M to After S:QO AM to Afler 5:00 PM PM I'M PM PM — -- - _ __. _ _._ ...... 0 0 0 0 l_ a 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 G What is the maxinium nun�t�;r of people expc:el�;d on sice at. any one cime (include owner, enipl�yees and visitoTs/Cuslon�Crs): 7 7. Wt�erz ili�/will thc ocvTie,• �tnd en�ployees pa.rk'? Parkina Lot K. Where do/will thc customers/visitors park7 Parxing Lot 9, Pres�;nl or rnu5t recent utic uf tiite warehouse 1l). List of other tenants on Property, their iiwnber of empinyees, houn of operxiion (attxcl� li9l if nece�;saiy) ---- WMMGRCIAL.I'ILM ^ �, ��'� QFCO, INC. d b a Q UEENS WA Y FOODS TEL: (650) 697-2233 1611 ADRIAN ROAD FAX: (650) 697-9966 TEL: (888) 737-FOOD BURI,INGAME, CA 94010 E-MAIL: info ccqfco.com e d March 29, 2007 City of Burlinganle 501 Pnmose Road Bur1i11game, CA 94010 To �Vho�n It I�1ay Concern: ��CEiVED MAR 3 0 2007 �� ry pF BURLINGAPAE pi�,NNING DEPT. On behalf of m}� company as office.%��arel�ouse tenant and owner at the above addi-ess, we would lil<e to affin�� that otir use and future tenant use of tlle office/warehouse space will only operate from moining unti] 6:00 p.m. 0�1 «�eekdays and ��ill not operate on the �veekends. Please feel free to gi��e us a call at the abo��e numbers if there are any questions or concerns. Thanks. Sincerely, � C•� � Fra�lces Huang, President � Joey Lo, Vicc-President Bay Badminton Center, Inc. (2006) founded by Mr. Ronald Fong Mr. Victor Lo Mr. Harry Tan Mission Statement: To construct a gymnasium that would meet the standards of professional badminton players — to be enjoyed by all who takes an interest in the sport of badminton — from diehard badminton players to avid beginners. To give this gymnasium a family onented, social friendly environment that will encourage young adults and families with children explore the sport of badminton To create a safe, ideal and healthy environment in which youngsters and adults can hangout and enj oy. The Gymnasium Itself: Bay Badminton will have professional Robbins flooring, 16 well-spaced courts, locker rooms, bleachers, common area, children's playroom, sufficient parking area, pro-shop & refreshment area. Bay Badminton will offer meinbership court play-time; professional coaching for all levels; walk-in court play-time; and special programs for school age children, retirees and young adults. Bay Badminton will also be in a position to hold and run tournaments once or twice a year, offering sufficient parking, good bleacher seats and viewing areas and superb refreshments. The majority of Bay Badminton's business will be conducted between the hours of S:OOP-11:OOP M-F and 10:00A-11:OOP Sat-Sun. Bay Badminton will join the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce and intends to become a pillar in the community by providing emplo}nnent as the gym grows and by offering after-school and summer programs to youths. To Fill a Need: Badminton, a widely beloved sport in Asia, is becoming more and more popular here in the USA and there is a very real need for a gyinriasium of this stature. Badminton is a fast, precise and beautiful sport that requires discipline, agility and skill. It attracts and holds fast the attention of inen and women of all ages. Originally, it was considered a young person's sport but today, men and women of all ages continue to compete well into their 50's and 60's. It is also a sport that encourages friendships and social rapport. It is not surprising for someone to walk into a badminton gymnasium and immediately gets invited to play a friendly game. It has also come to our attention that young people today does not get enough exercise to keep in shape and exhaust their tremendous supply of energy. Badminton is an inexpensive way to keep our youths out of the streets while impressing upon them rules, discipline, skill, physical exercise and camaraderie. Unfortunately, badminton is a sport that is hard on the joints and the wrong flooring can cause severe injuries. It is also a sport that is hard on the eyes and unsuitable lighting will cause fatigue and strain. Currently there are simply not enough places/gyms in which to play the sport of badminton. A gymnasium with superb flooring and adequate amenities is a very real need. To the City of Burlingame: Bay Badminton Center would like to serve the City of Burlingame by providing a state-of-the-art Badminton Center that would be open to people of all ages and backgrounds and physical abilities. We will dra�v badminton lovers from surrounding Cities and they will stay to shop and dine (on the weekends) in the lovely City of Burlingame. Bay Badminton will be here to facilitate a caring and connected community. Ideally, Bay Badminton will employ 14 employees: 1 fiill-time manager/accounting; 3 part-time coaches; 3 full-time front desk sales (1 shift); 3 part-time front desk sales (1 shift); various part- time assistants during peak hours (approximately 4). Bay Badminton approximates $300,000 in payroll after the first year. Bay Badminton has found a location that would fit it's needs at 1611 Adrian Road, Burlingame, CA, 94010, a 33,000 square feet stand alone warehouse including 5,070sf of office space. The leased space comes with 102 parking spaces. This space is ideal for our purposes. We understand that sufficient parking is of great concern to the City of Burlingame. Please be advised that most of Bay Badminton's business takes place after normal business hours (S:OOP- 11:OOP M-F; and 11:OOA-11:OOP Sat & Sun). Sixteen badminton courts will hold a maximum of 56 players at any one time (four singles courts and twelve doubles courts). Although we will have 102 parking spaces that surrounds the warehouse... there are plenty of street parking as well. We do not anticipate more than 80 people in the gymnasium at any one time. We also do not anticipate that every person will drive their own vehicle to the gym. The warehouse space at 1611 Adrian Road, Burlingame fits Bay Badminton's criteria for well- spaced badminton courts. Bay Badminton will need to put in Robins grade flooring for the sixteen courts. Existing lighting is good but insufficient and more lighting will need to be added. Add a fresh coat of paint and the courts are ready to go! The office space already comes with bathrooms, reception area and several well-spaced and well-placed rooms. All that needs to be added is a men and women's locker rooms. This location is ideal in that it requires the least amount of tenant improvement work. Bay Badminton Team: There are a total of three partners in this endeavor. Mr. Ronald Fong, Mr. Victor Lo and Mr. Harry Tan, all of whom have been playing professional badminton for 20 or more years. Each partner brings with him an area of expertise. Mr. Ronald Fong: Mr. Fong is currently employed as a Quality and Reliability Engineer for AJAX Technology Intemational, Inc. in Burlingame, CA. He will bring to the team dynamic and creative problem solving and analytical skills as well as cutting edge technology. Mr. Fong's strengths lies in his soothing team player approach and his wide network of connections. Mr. Fong discovered badminton while in college at UC Davis, CA and has never looked back. He has been playing for 12 years now and still competes in Northern California tournaments. Mr. Fong also coaches badminton in his spare time. Today, he is eager to create an ideal badminton environment for all to enjoy, and at the same time, fulfill a lifelong dream. Mr. Victor Lo: Mr. Lo currently divides his time running his own international trading business and managing Joey Lo Investment, LLC by overseeing the design team in the development of real estate properties. Mr. Lo will bring to the team valuable insights and alert the team of impending issues and marketplace changes. He will guide the team in the all important marketing of Bay Badminton's programs and benefits. Mr. Lo is a young man with fantastic energies and a lover of all sports. Although not as advanced a player as his other partners, he none-the-less devotes himself to the sport. Today, he is eager to create an ideal badminton environment for all to enjoy, and at the same time, fulfill a lifelon� dream. Mr. Harry Tan: Mr. Tan is currently running his own insurance agency. He will bring to the team his business acumen, management and organization skills. Mr. Tan's strengths lies in his easy rapport with people and his ability to get the job done. His management style is one of fairness and "good for all involved". Mr. Tan has been playing badminton since he was ten years of age. He followed his passion to win honors for Foon Yew High School, the City of Johar and the Johar State of Malaysia in his teenage years. He then moved to Taiwan to shidy politics for one year and was deeply immersed in the Badminton Association of Linko University. Since coming to the United States in 1987, Mr. Tan continued to play and compete in the World of Badminton. Today, he is eager to create an ideal badminton environment for all to enjoy, and at the same time, fulfill a lifelong dream. Mr. Harry Tan 1153 Rickover Lane, Foster City, CA 94404 (650)303-3385; FAX (650)345-1688 1997-Present TAN's Farmer's Insurance A�ency, Owner Managing and Operating TAN's Farmer's Insurance Agency Selling both personal lines and commercial lines insurance products Servicing both personal lines and commercial lines clients Working closely with Farmer's Management Team to keep abreast of new products and/or changes in the company Maintains an office and one employee 1987-1997 Stephen Ng Gas Stations, Manager Managed six (6) gas stations around Bay Area for Mr. Stephen Ng Job duties included but is not limited to occassional cashiering; inventory replenishment; gas replenishment; gas pricing; solved problems related to equipment failure, robberies, employee disgruntlement, etc.; collected, balanced & deposited cash payments Badminton Hon 1984 15t Place, Men's Doubles Championship, Johor State of Malaysia 1985 15` Place, Foon Yew High School Championship, City of Johor Baru 2"d Place, Foon Yew High School Championship, Johor State of Malaysia 1s1 Place, Men's Doubles Chainpionship, Johor State of Malaysia 1986 2°d Place, Men's Singles, PJCC Open, Malaysia lst Place, Men's Doubles, PJCC Open, Malaysia Chairman of Badminton Association, Taiwan Linko University 1987-2000 Won Various Badminton Tournaments throughout California for Men's Singles and Men's Doubles 2000-2006 Continue to pursue the sport of Badminton vigorously but did not compete in tournaments as rigorously Education 1991 Bachelor of Sciences Degree, Lincoln University, Business Accounting Mr. Victor Lo 250 King Street, #902, San Francisco,CA 94107 (415)297-0709 2003-Present QFCO, Inc., dba Queensway Foods Co., O�vner Company is primarily engaged in the worldwide scourcing, transportation and marketing of packaged foods and leather furniture. QFCO's packaged foods group is classified into two segments, packaged foods and food ingredients. The packaged foods segment includes shelf-stable consumer products, which are processed and packaged for sales to retail, deli and foodservice customers. The food in�-edients include specialty ingredients, milled ingredients and basic ingredients far foodservice customers. QFCO's leather furniture group operates as a residential furniture manufacturer and import distributor in the United States. The Company sources its products primarily from China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan and Thailand. 2003-Present Grace Realtv Investment, Inc., Broker Associate Examine and evahiate prospective commercial and residential properties Responsibilities including making offers and closing deals Initiate resale activity — set fair pricing expectations Negotiate final sales price with buyers 2003-Present Joev Lo Investments, LLC Oversee design team in the development of real estate properties Work with City Planner, Architect, Engineer, Surveyors & Marketing Team Education 1999 Bachelar of Science Degree, University of California, Berkeley Business Economics Mr. Ronald Fon� 16815 Selby Drive, San Leandro, C 94578 (510)909-8939 2006-Present AJAX Technoloav International Inc., Burlin�ame, CA Quality and Reliability Engineer 2003-2005 Peppermint Grill, Berkelv, CA, Owner Managed a team of four (4) employees Job duties included but is not limited to acquiring fresh produce and meat for daily operations, bookkeeping, servin�, attending to customer needs, etc. 2001-2003 LIGHTech Fiberoptics Inc., San Leandro, CA, Senior Process Engineer/Assistant Production Manager 1999-2000 LIGHTech Fiberoptics Inc., San Leandro, CA, Mechanical Engineer — Research & Development Badminton Honors 2001 Runner Up, A Men's Doubles, UC Davis Open Runner Up, A Mix Doubles, UC Davis Open 2002 Winner, A Mix Doubles, UC Davis Open Runner Up, A Men's Doubles, UC Davis Open 2004 Runner Up, A Men's Singles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open Winner, B Men's Singles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open Winner, B Men's Doubles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open 2005 Winner, A Men's Singles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open Winner, A Men's Doubles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open 2006 Runner Up, A Men's Singles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open Runner Up, A Men's Doubles, UC Berkeley, Golden Bear Open Winner, A Men's Doubles, UC Berkeley, Smashapalooza Education 1999 Bachelor of Sciences Degree, UC California Davis, Mechanical Engineering Market Research: To date, badminton is a sport that draws people of all nationalities and ages ... As such, our market research shows the deinographics surrounding our target location to reveal the following: Total Population Median Family Income City of Burlingame 27,380 591,309 City of San Mateo 92,482 $76,223 Town of Hillsborough 10,615 $200,000+ City of Foster City 34,000 $95,000 City of Belmont 24,522 $95,722 City of Millbrae 20,342 S82,061 City of San Carlos 26,821 $103,971 City of Atherton 7,177 �200,000+ City of Redwood City 73,114 $67,243 City of South San Francisco 60,735 S66,�98 City of San Francisco 776,000 $55,221 The above mentioned Cities are within a 15 mile radius of our target location. The population within these cities and the median family income assures our target market has the people and the means to make Bay Badminton Center a reality. Marketing Strategies: It is Bay Badminton's intention to start marketing as soon as the site is approved. To start, Bay Badminton �vill use flyers and place ads in several newspapers to reach our initial set of inembers. While the gym is undergoing tenant improvements, the owners will go out in teams of 2 to visit various schools and community centers to build up recognition and to share programs and build partnerships. Bay Badminton is also looking into several radio spots for a period of three months to gain exposure. Bay Badminton Center will have a user-friendly website as well. The �vebsite will include a menu of all our programs and events as well as valuable links for the Badminton fans. Eventually, word of mouth will be our strongest marketing tool. We believe that nothing will convince people more than high praise from existing members. Bay Badminton's first priority is to create a wholesome environment catered to the badminton player. Growth and Expansion Plans: The three owners of Bay Badminton plans to meet once a month to access the progress of the gym's programs, to solve any existing problems/concerns and to continually come up with innovative ideas to manage the gym and grow revenues. The three partners will take a completely hands on approach to assure the success of Bay Badminton. Target Clientele: At present, Bay Badminton has four (4) target clienteles. 1) Diehard Badminton Players 2) The Occasional Badminton Player 3) Children ages 5-18 4) The Afternoon Crowd For the Diehard Badminton Players: Bay Badminton will offer membership at $50/mo. along with membership privileges. These players know and respect the game of badminton and will need little or no guidance in the game. Bay Badminton targets 500 Diehard Badminton Players. They will pay their monthly dues, come in, freely use the gyms facilities and play their game. We will offer to string rackets for these people at $15 per racket as well as offer a pro shop that will cater to their needs. Bay Badminton will also hold tournaments for these people to play in. For the Occasional Badminton Players: These are people who are not sure that they want to commit to the monthly dues as they may not plan to play regularly. Bay Badminton will charge the Occasional Badminton Player a$8/walk-in fee. Bay Badminton targets 50 walk-in players per evening. Our coaches will also offer to play games with them should they be a player short. Bay Badminton will offer to these players professional coaching lessons if they desire at $30/hour. They have free access/use of Bay Badminton's facilities once they enter the gym. Bay Badminton is also offering to these Occasional Players a�25/mo. membership that will allow them to play up to 4 times a month. This way, they too, will enjoy membership privileges. For Children ages 5-18: Bay Badminton Coaching School will offer classes to children of all ages and all levels. There will be an array of after school programs that will teach children discipline, sportsmanship, and above all, badminton. After all, healthy minds and healthy bodies are equally desirable. Bay Badminton will work with local schools and youth centers to attract students. Children will be coached and afterwards, have supervised play time. Bay Badminton intends to start with five (5) classes of different levels, each meeting once a week with two hours total play time, at between $80.00/mo to $160.00/mo. Bay Badminton targets 70 students the first year, eventually working up to 150 students a year. Bay Badminton is also planning summer programs for extensive badminton training. For the Afternoon Crowd: Bay Badminton will open the gymnasium for those who wants to use the gym from 10:00A-2:OOP for a quick warkout. These clients will consists of homemakers, workers, members and seniors in and around the area. Bay Badminton will charge a very reasonable S3hvalk-in fee. They have free access/use of Bay Badminton's facilities once they enter the gym. The Competition: There are currently four and only four other badminton gymnasiums in Northern California today that we consider our competition. Each one of these badminton gymnasiums are located at least 20 minutes from our target location. We've put together a list of what we see as their strengths and weaknesses. While each one of these gyms are currently thriving, we believe that the badminton market is still not saturated and needs yet more space for people to play. Smash City, 1191 Monta�ue Expressway, Milpitas, CA 95035 12 badminton courts, reception area, pro-shop, restrooms Pros: Good flooring, best lighting, friendly environment Cons: Mediocre management, no programs, no shower, no playroom for young children Bintan� Badminton AcadmenV, 1375 Geneva Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 11 badminton courts, reception area, restrooms w/ shower Pros: Good coaching program for beginners, good management, charges lowest fees Cons: Mediocre lighting and flooring, mediocre shower/bathrooms, no viewing area, no playroom for young children United Badminton Club, 43901 Boscell Road, Fremont, CA 94536 9 badminton courts, reception area, restrooms Pros: Good coaching program, good flooring Cons: Mediocre management, no locker rooms, no showers, not children friendly Golden Gate Badminton Club, 190 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025 8 badminton courts, pro shop, locker rooms/restrooms, kids room, work-out rooms, offices, reception area, refreshment area Pros: Best flooring, good lighting, well designed locker rooms, kids room, good marketing Cons: Mediocre coaching program, inadequate viewing area, insufficient parking, charges highest fees December 14, 2006 Ms. Terry Nagel Mayor Mr. James Nantell City Manager Ms. Margaret Monroe City Planner Mr. Tim Auran Chairman Planning Commission CiTY v^F BVRLIiVG�iviE 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Honorable Members of the City of Burlingame: ��c�� :�' DEC 1 8 2006 Gll� �NNING DE�f�i^ As a concerned citizen, it has been brought to my attention that an application for a sports facility to be located in a commercial/industrial/manufacturing building on Adrian Road, has been submitted to the city for consideration. I want to caution the city on reviewing this application because I believe it is in direct conflict with current zoning and usage in the Adrian Road area, and that it could pose a real danger and safety hazard to members of the community traveling through this area and using the facility for the following reasons: a. Badminton is a social, family activity, and many people will be traveling through an industrial area trafficked with large tractor trailers and big rigs coming and going to make deliveries. It would be horrible if something terrible were to happen to school age children trying to participate in sports traveling on bikes to the facility or walking in the parking areas and coming face to face with a large delivery truck. How will traffic be handled with the large rigs and the smaller cars? Will there be a traffic study? b. Another issue is the exhaust discharge into a building with an athletic facility during deliveries. I am not sure an environmental study would be sufficient to determine the risk to people's long term health. How will you determine if this usage is environmentally safe? c. Seems odd to me to place a recreation facility in the same building housing industrial/commercial and light manufacturing. How do you determine if the proper use? d. With the large scale of the project you could easily have in excess of 100 people in the facility in the evening. This is a major traffic problem. In addition, what are the city's requirements for a large public gathering place for parking? Is it safe for the public to use the street parking at night? Is there enough lighting to assure clear visibility to the public as they return to their cars at night? e. Will the combination of a sports facility and an industrial use create a dangerous mix in the event of fire? How will fire safety concerns be addressed? In closing, who would be responsible if someone had an accident with a delivery truck or for health hazards created by having industrial manufacturing in the same property? Again, I provide this as a concerned citizen because this does not appear to make any sense to me. I wish to remain anonymous to avoid any problems. Thank you for your time and thoughtFulness for this letter. ��i/ED oEc 1 8 2oos C�T1' OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. December 20, 2006 Mr. Joe Cyr Building Department CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. Cyr: RECEIVED JAN - 2 2007 C�TY OF BURLINGAME pLANNING DEPT. AN � u 2007 ji ��';11L� �.=r �. -� i , .� ., ., � �, . .i.' ,M�� As a concerned citizen, it has been brought to my attention that an application for a sports facility to be located in a commercial/industrial/manufacturing building on Adrian Road, has been submitted to the city for consideration. I want to caution the city on reviewing this application because I believe it is in direct conflict with current zoning and usage in the Adrian Road area, and that it could pose a real danger and safety hazard to members of the community traveling through this area and using the facility for the following reasons: a . c. Cl e Badminton is a social, family activity, and many people will be traveling through an industrial area trafficked with large tractor trailers and big rigs coming and going to make deliveries. It would be horrible if something terrible were to happen to school age children trying to participate in sports traveling on bikes to the facility or walking in the parking areas and coming face to face with a large delivery truck. How will traffic be handled with the large rigs and the smaller cars? Will there be a traffic study? Another issue is the exhaust discharge into a building with an athletic facility during deliveries. I am not sure an environmental study would be sufficient to determine the risk to people's long term health. How will you determine if this usage is environmentally safe? Seems odd to me to place a recreation facility in the same building housing industrial/commercial and light manufacturing. How do you determine if the proper use? With the large scale of the project you could easily have in excess of 100 people in the facility in the evening. This is a major traffic problem. In addition, what are the city's requirements for a large public gathering place for parking? Is it safe for the public to use the street parking at night? Is there enough lighting to assure clear visibility to the public as they return to their cars at night? Will the combination of a sports facility and an industrial use create a dangerous mix in the event of fire? How will fire safety concerns be add ressed? In closing, who would be responsible if someone had an accident with a delivery truck or for health hazards created by having industrial manufacturing in the same property? Again, I provide this as a concerned citizen because this does not appear to make any sense to me. I wish to remain anonymous to avoid any problems. Thank you for your time and thoughtfulness for this letter. Ben Lee 761 Mabury Rd. Suite 105 San Jose, Ca 95133 408-422-2379 To Whom It May Concern: Jan. 23, 2007 My name is Ben Lee and I am writing to you on behalf of the proposed Bay Badminton Center located in Burlingaine, California. First, let me give a short suminary of who I am. I am a Bay Area native and currently live in the San Jose area. I gre�v up playing many different sports �vith an emphasis on the sport of badminton. Once I started to compete in tournaments for badminton, it became mv primary snort. I represented the United States in many different intenlational competitions far badminton including the 1992 Olympic Games in Barcelona, Spain. Some other competitions include the Pan American Games, World Championships and Thomas Cup Team competitions. Through the years as an athlete, it has been a stru�gle to find suitable facilities to train and practice. I was forced to share gymnasium space with other sports and in many cases, was forced to sacrifice my �ym time to accommodate other sports. Through my own determination, I never lost focus on my Olympic dream and pressed on. I constantly drove all over the Bay Area to different facilities to get in my practice time. Finally, when I reached Olympic caliber level, I was forced to live overseas in Europe in order to find adequate training facilities. It was a huge sacrifice I decided to make in order to pursue my dreams and goals. I am in full support of the proposed Bay Badminton Center. This new facility will not only benefit the community of Burlingame, but will give our young athletes the opportunity to achieve their goals and dreams. I have already offered my services as an advisor, coach and consultant to the partners of the proposed Bay Badminton Center at no charge. There are currently tour other badminton facilities in the Bay Area and each of them are succeeding very well. Each of them benefits the community by offering community programs that can be affiliated with the City's Parks and Recreation department. Badminton pro� ams can be offered to participants of all ages. This can also include senior programs. The opportunities with a project like a badminton facility are endless. Ideas can be shared with the director of Parks and Recreation as well as community leaders. Finally, the opporttuiity the proposed badminton facility will bring to our young athletes will be priceless. Training sessions with qualified coaches, reserved court time, video recorded training sessions and review, physical training with court specific training are just some of the thin�s the proposed facility can offer to our young athletes. These are R�CEIVED MAR tl 2 2007 CITY OF 6URLIiVGtiME PLANNING DEPT. things that I never had the opportunity to have. With some of these things, we hope to produce world champion athletes and help our young athletes of today and tomorrow. Thank you for your time and consideration. If there are any questions that I can answer for you, please do not hesitate to call me at the above telephone number. Ben Lee RECEIVED MAR 0 2 2001 CITY OF BURL:i';,;hlv�E PLANNING DEPT. al � �, �~'i' �� GOSPEL OPERATION I NTERNATIONAL / �%�a�{��' City of Burlingame 501 Priinose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: Proposed Bay Badminton Center, Burlingame At 1611 Adrain Road. Burlingame, CA 94010 Ii�tcrnitiQ��i��1HQ OR?T.`-�aG 411 Airport I�Ivd. Burlingame, CA 9401QU.S.A Mailing: P.O- Box )9. San Brunq C.A 940GG, U.S.A. TEL: G�0-344-2299 FAX: G50-344-9922 www.goi n tl. nrg January 31, 2007 I am writing on behalf of Gospel Operation International, headquartered in Burlingame. We are a non-profit organization that sends workers to 15 countries to serve projects in building healthy coulmunity and starts churches. We are in full support of the proposed Bay Badminton Center. This new facility will not only benefit the community of Burlingame, but will give our community a place to enjoy the sport of Badminton and will be a place that creates a safe and healthy community for both young and old. At the same time, the Badminton facility can also help in promoting team building. Discipline and focus. We hope that you will take the time to consider Bay Badminton Center as a benefit to the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. If there are any questions that I can answer for you, please do not hesitate to call me at the above telephone number. Your Sincerely C" U �"� � rt� Cyrus O.K. Lam (Rev. Dr.) General Director RECEIVED FEB 0 5 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. ST4l E �;APITOL _.��RP.� tEI�ITO_ CA 55814 �916�651-4008 C��1Y�ux�t�t �5��t�� e��t�e SENATOR LELAND Y. YEE, PH.D. EIGHTH SENATE DISTRICT srn�, ' ,�>i,,=:'3e �: �' � `�� .-:A�� ", , �t Fcbruary ?, 2007 Bw•lingame Plannin�! Commission Attn: Mar�aret Monroe. Citv Planner JU 1 i�l'lllll"OSf' KC�. f3urlingame. C�1 94010 Dear Planning Con�missioners, I am writing to express my support for the badminton facility that is proposed to be built at 1611 Adrian Road in Burlingame. I understand that this item is scheduled to be heard by �he Commission on Februaty 26. 2007. One of my priorities as a legislator is to promote health and wellness in all of our cities a��d thi-olighout olir state. This badminton facility ��ill be able to provide the opportunity fur ph��sical fitness to residrnts locallv and in the Bar Area, and ��ill also bring a revenue source and n��r� peoplc to this area of Burlin��ame. Victor Lo intends for the center to be family-focused ��ith a sociall�� friendly environment to encourage }�oun� adults and lamilies ��°ith children to discover the sport of badmintoil. The proposed center ��ill create a safe and healthy community center. I encourage }�ou to support t11is project. Please Ceel 1�ree to c�i�taet �ii� �r in�� stal�i member. I�irsten w'aal�rs[edt_ at (650) 3-�G-8840 sholild you ha�e any questions or requ�re any assistance. '��ncerely, %� , � . G� Lcland Y. Ye , Ph.11. �lssistant President Pro 'l��mpore California State Senate LYY:kw G�h �� FEB � S 2007 � CITY OF BURLiNGAME PLANNING DEPi. AJAX Technology International, Inc. 1576 Rollins Road Burlingame, CA 94010 February 15, 2007 Planning Department City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Subject: Bay Badminton Center Dear Sir/Madam, I am excited and pleased to hear of this new development of a badminton gymnasium located just around the corner. I want to let you know that this project has my company's full support. My employees are a hard-working group and they are looking forward to having a place to exercise in during lunch and after work. Simply put, our lovely City of Burlingame has all the right amenities; and a badminton gymnasium with professional courts would be a perfect fit. It would be a fine thing to see the youths of our City participating in such an enduring, character-building sport. I can see that such a project will only add to the City of Burlingame's presence and sense of community. Sincerely, �0��-�1. Pairick Ch ��g� Owner R�CEIVED MAR 0 2 2007 ��N OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. Broadway Prime 1316 Broadway Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 February 15, 2007 Planning Department City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Subject: Bay Badminton Center Dear Sir/Madam, It is wonderful news to us that Bay Badminton Center would like to settle in Burlingame. We want to let you know that this project has our full support. Our family, employees and their families are looking forward to having a place to exercise and play badminton. Most importantly of all, we are writing this letter to attest to the character of one of the owners, Mr. Harry Tan. We have known Mr. Tan for over eighteen years. Over the years, he has proven to be loyal, innovative and most of all, caring. Never one to turn his back on a friend, we have seen him go that extra mile, or two or ten when calied upon. Mr. Tan's humor and easy rapport with people is what drew us to him and his sense of fair play is what maintained our wonderful friendship these eighteen years. It is Mr. Tan's dream to build a community surrounding his beloved sport of badminton, of which he is an excellent player. To have him realize his dream here in Burlingame is a source of great joy for us. We are indeed proud to support Mr. Tan in his endeavors and would like to welcome him and his team whole-heartedly to the �ity of Buriingame. Sincerely, ��=/�/' ` Hong Tan & Joo Tan Owners RECEIVED MAR 0 2 Z007 G�� . ':. �JUi:LINGAME Pi1,ivNING DEPT. MAR, 22, 2��J] ',�9F'vl 3RENT'n�00G FINANCIA� To: The City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, Ca 94010 �rom: Ben Lee 761 Mabury Road Suite ]OS San Jose; Ca 95133 To Whom It May Concern: iu0, 9533 P, 2 RECEIVED MAR 2 2 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. My name is Ben Lee and 1 am wTiting to you in regards to the proposed 8adminton facility located at 1611 Adrian Road in Burlingarrae, I would like to address the traffic flou� and parking situation that has raised some questions within the planning department. Let me start by stating that I have personal experience with ihe traffic k7ow and parking pertaining to a badminton facility because I was the Co-founder of the Golden Gace Badminton Club located in Menlo Park. This is an identical type of business also located ia a very simila►• type of location setting as the pro}�osed site for Adrian Road (I have enclosed a map from vfapquest to show locations). The Burlingame Badminton Club currently has 16,389 sq ft and the proposed Bay Badminton Center has 36,600 sq ft. .As you can see, the square footage is a little more chan dauble but the available parking spaces for the proposed �ay Badminton Center is almost five times that of Golden Gate Badminton Club. The existing site in ;vlenlo Park is currently operating wich about half the square footage as the proposed site but with only� about 23°/a of the parking spaces, Up to date, there have been no complaints or issues pertainin� to both the traff`ic flow along the service road or the parking situation. Just to recap, the facility in Menlo Park is an eight court badminton f'acility and the pzoposed site is l6 couns. Menlo Park has only 2� pArking spaces (22 with 1 for handicap) and the proposed facility in Burlingame will have 101 parking spaees. From personal experience and having been involved in Bay Area badminton for more than 31 years, ihis is more than ampte parking spaces for such a proposed facility_ At the peak times of operation for the proposed facility�, which is approximately 7:30 PNl, we are anticipating only about 48 of the parking spaces being occupied. Again, chis is assuming that the facility will be operating at maximum couct capacity, 1 hope this will shed some light on what is needed as far as parking for the type of business that is proposed. If you have any further questians, please do n�t hesitate to cal� me at 408- 422-2379 and I will be more than happy to discuss the issue further. Thank y�u very much for vour attention. Sincerely, � 'C.� Ben Lee Page 1 of 3 PLG-Monroe, Meg v �� From: PETER WEISS [peter.weiss55@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 11:23 AM To: Michael Brownrigg Cc: PLG-Monroe, Meg; rhuren@burlingame.org 19FTER PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT � � 'N�`� • ��. �. � � Subject: Re: ALARMING CONCERNS for planning commission meeting on Monday, 04/09/07 Dear Mr. Brownrigg, I would like to give my appreciation for such a prompt and detailed reply. Yes, I did realise the email would reveal my name, but I would appreciate that my letter remain anonymous at your study tonight. Thank you most graciously. I am very happy with your attention to this issue which I find is vitally important to keeping our community safe and hazard free. Although I do condone good athletic facilities, I am very health conscious myself, I believe my concerns are not in vain nor unreasonable. It is a fact that all the other fitness facilities you mention above are for one primary purpose only, that of a purely fitness/recreational facility. In my observation, they have taken all necessary environmental and various research studies before being granted permission to conduct their business. My concern here is that this particular study item is proposed to be used as both Industrial and recreational intended far a large gathering of people as far as I know. I would hope you can agree with me to find this detail rather unusual, as well as against all common sense for safety, and worthy of all the thorough studies the other facilities were deemed mandatory at the time. I hope you won't mind that I have also cc'd Mr. Ruben Huren whom I found is the planner for this study item throltgh the online meeting agenda. Once again, Thank you for your reply to my concerns. Sincere Regards, PW On 4/9/07, Michael Brownrigg <mbrownrigg@china��est.com> wrote: Dear Mr Weiss: Your hardcopy letter, which was included in our packet, requested anonymity, but of course email does not afford that luxury al��ays. Please let the City Planner know whether you would still prefer that your letter be referred to anonymously at tonight's meeting. With regard to your specific concerns, this is a study item tonight and the Commission ��ill direct staff to review any and all issues we believe need to be understood before a decision can be rendered. I am quite sure many or all of your concerns will be among those studied by staff and the Commission. That said, in our review of the land uses for Rollins Road/North End two years ago, the Commission and the public specifically reviewed the merits of having more fitness facilities such as Prime Time, baseball, paintball and basketball, which draw the public, in the Rollins Road area that is also Burlingame's industrial center. The Conmlission and the public agreed that it «�as not ideal for several of the reasons that you mention, but that it was a trend that the people of Burlingame wanted to maintain, and therefore we did not exclude such uses in this area. 4/9/2007 Page 2 of 3 Very best, Michael Brownrigg 2006-7 Chairnian, Planning Comnussion -----Original Message----- From: PETER WEISS [ inailto:peter.weiss55 a�mail.com] Sent Mon 4/9/2007 12:33 AM To: Michael Brownrigg; roc r�ralphosterling.com ; rtCcssanf.com; mmonroer burlingame.org Subject: ALARMING CONCERNS for plannin� commission meeting on Monday, 04/09/07 Dear respected Commissioners and Planner: As a concerned citizen, it has been brought to my attention that an application for a sports facility to be located in a commercial / industrial / manufacturing building on Adrian Road, in Burlingame, has been submitted to the city for consideration. I want to caution the city on reviewing this application very cautiously because 1 believe it is in direct conflict with current zoning and usage in the Adrian Road area, and that it could pose a real danger and safety hazard to members of the community traveling through this area and using the facility for the following reasons: a. Badminton is a social, family activity, and many people will be traveling tl�rough an indusn-ial area trafficked with large tractor trailers and big rigs coming and going to make deliveries. It would be horrible if something terrible were to happen to school age children trying to participate in sports traveling on bikes to the facility or walking in the parking areas and coming face to face with a large delivery truck. Ho�v will traffic be handled with the large rigs and the smaller cars'? Will there be a tra�c study? b. Another issue is tlle exhaust discharge into a building with an athletic faciliry during deliveries. I am not sure an environmental study would be sufficient to detemiine the risk to people's long term health. How will you determine if this usage is environmentally safe? a Seems rather odd to me to actually place a recreation facility in the same building housing industriaUconunercial and light manufacturing. How do you determine what is the proper use? d. With the larae scale of the project you could easily have in excess of 125-1�0 people in the facility at the same time in the evening. This is a major traffic problein. In addirion, what are the ciry's requirements for a large public gathering place for parking? Is it safe for the public to use the street parking at night? Is there enough lighting to assure clear visibility to the public as they return to their cars at night'? e. Will the combination of a sports facility and an industrial use create a dangerous mix in the event of fire? How will fire safety concerns be addressed? In closing, who would be responsible if someone had an accident with a delivery truck or for health hazards created by having industrial manufacturing in the same property? Again, I provide this as a concerned citizen because this does not appear to make any sense to me. I wish to remain anonymous to avoid any problems. Thaiilc you for your time and thoughtfulness for this letter. 4/9/2007 Page 3 of 3 Sincere Regards, From a very concerned Citizen of Burlingame P.S. I have also sent a hard copy of this email to Mr. Tim Auran approximately one month ago. Hopefully he, along with the other Commissioners, as well as those not on this email list, will �ive serious consideration to the concerns I've listed above. 4/9/2007 RESOLUTION APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCES RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a mitigated negative declaration has been proposed and application has been made for conditional use permit for a commercial recreation use (indoor badminton facility) and parkinq variances for number of spaces and parkinq space dimensions at 1611 Adrian Road, zoned RR, Joey Lo and Francis Huanq, 3300 Ralston Avenue, Burlinqame, CA 94010, property owners, APN: 026-141-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 11, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and mitigated negative declaration, per Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND-545P, is hereby approved. 2. Said mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit and parking variances are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit and parking variances are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11'h day of June , 2007 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit and parking variances. 1611 Adrian Road Effective June 21, 2007 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 23, 2007, sheets A1.1 through A1.9; 2. that demolition or removal of any existing walls and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 3. that the existing and proposed landscaping shall be installed and maintained as shown on the Site Plan, date stamped April 23, 2007, and that all areas of landscaping shall be irrigated by an automatic sprinkler system on a timer and shall be maintained by the property owner in good operating condition at all times; 4. that the indoor badminton facility shall only be open seven days a week from 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., with a maximum of five fu�l-time employees and a maximum of 62 people on-site at any one time, including the owner, employees and customers; that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees or people on-site which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 5. that there shall be no gambling or wagering on this business premise and no alcoholic beverages shall be served, stored in lockers or private use, or sold on the site; 6. that the indoor badminton facility shall be limited to 40,419 SF in area with 2,085 SF of office, 493 SF of retail, 1,765 of storage and 36,076 SF for the 16 indoor badminton courts and associated activities including a lounge, children's play zone, stretching zone and restrooms; that outdoor areas shall not be used for any activities associated with the badminton facility; 7. that this Conditional Use Permit shall only apply only to an indoor badminton facility; that if a different type of commercial recreation facility is proposed at this site in the future, a new application for a Conditional Use Permit shall be required; 8. that the parking variances for on-site parking spaces and parking space dimension shall expire with the termination of the conditional use permit for the indoor badminton facility; shall be reviewed with any amendment to the Conditional Use Permit granted to the indoor badminton facility; and shall expire should the building on the site be deliberately demolished or destroyed by a natural catastrophe or disaster or should a major remodel of the building be proposed; 9. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 15, 2006, memo, the City Engineer's December 15, 2006, memo, the City Traffic Engineer's January 25, 2007, memo, the Fire Marshal's December 18, 2006, memo, and the Recycling SpecialisYs November 28, 2005 memo shall be met; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 2 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval variances. 1611 Adrian Road Effective June 21, 2007 for mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit and parking 11. that while the badminton facility operates in this building, the current and future office/warehouse businesses in this building shall only be open for business from morning until 6 p.m. on weekdays and shall not be open on weekends; any changes to hours for the office/warehouse use shall require an amendment to the Conditionai Use Permit; 12. that there shall be a maximum of two tournaments per year at this facility; the tournaments shall only be held on weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and holidays and shall be limited to a maximum of 60 players; and 13. that spectators who wish to attend the tournaments shall be encouraged to arrive in the same vehicle as the tournament player, shall arrive by carpooling or taking public transportation and walking to the facility. 3 � �CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1 bl l ADRIAN ROAD The fity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, June 11, 2007 at 7:00 P.M� in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit and parking variance for a commercial recreation use (indoor badminton fa�ility) at 1611 ADRIAN ROAD zoned R-l. APN 025-262-340 Mailed: June 1, 2007 (Please refer to other side) }�� ' fi � 3in, a L _�� .s � ��:= �-� i3 �,�p��- � � �� .�y,q g•, l�. .� i;� ' _ ' �s �,. Ji�H1��04325 � �� 19ailed Fren� 5=01U :�J Yv�'S:=,U�" PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Plannin� Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the cubject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Margaret Monroe City Planner PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to otlaer side)