The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1525 Adrian Road - Approval LetterACI Concrete Field Testing Technician - Grade I RYAN M DEAN Certification ID #01400766 Expires on: 09/30/2022 �1 Verify at CheckACl.org dC� Certification �, ;,.: ,� .;: �as complicd wit�i tize rcquzremer�� ,�-1� ,S'tnr�cfnrrf{nr_�`�V.S Cert1'f��c�rtiorr of �VeCc�i�ng IjTspecto�rs 97041501 CERTIFICATE NUMBER April 01_ 2021 EXPIRATION DATE _ .;�� ,�� Tfi> Aw� i�iiH.sinrrv'r r ;. :'-;�_�� 1��iti (>1!nl,lf��l TION & Elt�l'll�l( -+.�I�1(�� f �O�11 �\111�T1'.1'. ('l l �� I It �;,,;.,, � � , F, ciry �� BURLJNGAME 'ro � � o' , + � ''s...o � �''� ��e f�tt� o� ��zrlirc�ttme CITV HALL - SOI PRIMROSE ROAD rE� (4i5) 696-7250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME. CAUFORNIA 940ip-3997 �nx f415) 342-8326 February 7, 1995 Larry Weinstein DESIGN - BUILD SOLUTIONS 200 Poinsettia Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Dear Mr. Weinstein, '� Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the February 13, 1995 Planning Commission approval of your Parking Variance amendment application became effective February 6, 1995. This application was to allow a variance amendment for the total number of stalls and compact number of stalls at 1525 Adrian Road, zoned M-1. The February 13, 1995 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 10, 1995 and November 21, 1994, Site Plan revised to show access to the roll up door and a tree to be saved at the southwest driveway entrance, for a total of 28 parking stalls (22 standard stalls, 4 compact stalls and 2 disabled accessible stalls); 2. that the conditions of the City Engineers' October 7, 1994 and January 12, 1995 memos, the Chie� Building Znspectors' October 17, 1994 memo, and the Parks Directors' ��tober 31, 1994 memo shall be met; 3. that the business shall be open 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday with a maximum of fifteen employees including the proprietor, on site, at any one time; and 4. that a planter area with proper irrigation shall be created to support the tree and should the tree die it shall be replaced with at least a 24" box tree; 5. that the use and any improvements to the building or site for the use shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. � �,^�.�� tJ � �'* February 7, 1995 1525 Adrian Road page -2- All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. Sincerely yours, �� Marg ret Monroe City Planner MM:smg 1525ADR2.cce c: Gary Airsch Anthony and Anne Tsou Chief Building Inspector Dir. of Parks Chief Deputy Valuation, (Lot 1 2& NWLY 40 Ft of APN: 025=-273-010) Assessor's Office Lot 3 Block 7 Less SWLY 20 Ft.; -''� Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes January 23, 1995 C. Deal noteti this project will not be detrimental to the neighborhood and is not obtrusive, the roof ridge of the stair well would closely match the new roof ridge. He then moved approval of the this application, by resolution, with the following conditions; 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 28, 1994, Sheets A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 and amended by Building Data Sheet and South/West Elevation dated January 17, 1995; 2) that the property owner shall receive an encroachment permit for the fencing on the public right-of-way; and 3) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the City. Motions was seconded by C. Kelly and approved on a 7-0 voice vote. Following the vote the commissioners noted that they hoped the applicant would consider the safety issues and modify the design accordingly. Appeal procedures were advised. 6. PARKING VARIANCE AMENDMENT AT 1525 ADRIAN ROAD, ZONED M-1 (GARY HIRSCH, PROPERTY OWNER AND LARRY WEINSTEIN DESIGN - BUILD SOLUTIONS APPLICANTI Reference staff report, Planning Department suggested. 1/23/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, comments, and study meeting questions. If approved four conditions were Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. Larry Weinstein, 200 Poinsettia, San Mateo expressed a preference that the tree remain, it is one of few on the street, it is a nice specimen in good health, they would develop the space that was to be a pazking space as a planter area with landscaping and water to support the tree. He agreed to a condition specifying the tree be replaced if it dies. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Jacobs noted this is a good project that will not be detrimental to the neighborhood, she then moved approval of the this application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions; 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 10, 1995 and November 21, 1994, Site Plan revised to show access to the roll up door and a tree to be saved at the southwest driveway entrance, for a totat of 28 parking stalls (22 standard stalls, 4 compact stalls and 2 disabled accessible stalls); 2) that the conditions of the City Engineers' October 7, 1994 and January 12, 1995 memos, the Chief Building Inspectors' October 17, 1994 memo, and the Parks Directors' October 31, 1994 memo shall be met; 3) that the business shall be open 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday with a maximum of fifteen employees including the proprietor, on site, at any one time; and 4) that a planter area with proper imgation shall be created to support the tree and should the tree die it shall be replaced with at least a 24" box tree; 5) that the use and any improvements to the building or site for the use shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motions was seconded by C. Ellis and approved on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. Page -3- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes January 23, 1995 7. PARKING VARIANCE FOR A NEW RESTAURANT AT 346 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED G2 SUB AREA B(DON SABATINI. PROPERTY OWNER AND ALI MOUSAIVI APPLICANT) Reference staff report, 1/23/95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study meeting questions. If approved four conditions were suggested. The City Planner asked several questions regarding how parldng requirements for various uses were determined, if a condition limiting the number of chairs was possible, if sidewalk seating counted in parking or as seating area as defined here. A letter from Edith E. May, owner of Geo. W. Bower Paint Company, objecting to the project because of pazking impact was read into the record. C. Kelly noted he has a business relationship with the applicant and therefore he will abstain from the discussion and vote. Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. Mr. Mousani, 809 Spruance Lane, Foster City, explained the seating arrangement noting that there was no space to add seating. Tfiey would increase the umber in 5 years by removing the storage closet and putting in a big table. The seating area is very narrow with tables for 2 on one side and tables for 4 on the other. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners discussed the project noting that noticing requirements included posting the site and giving notices to the businesses on either side; the parldng requirement for the prior use, a grocery store which had no seating, was three spaces, compazed to six for this use, this site is non conforming for retail use such as a dress store could go in without a parking variance; the issue is not the cunent parlflng availability but the availability when the other food establishments have finished their tenant improvements and open for business particulazly the brew pub and Il Fornaio, the area cannot accommodate another parking variance; feel that restaurant use much more than two times parldng of retail use, if continue small variances no one will have a place to work; as a successful restaurant there will be more than 37 customers a day, suspect tables will be filled more than once for lunch and dinner; too many food establishments in the block, limited number of food establishments in subarea A to maintain retail balance; need to keep the policy; need restaurants if have good retail, poor location for destination business; general plan does encourage retail support activities in subarea B. C. Jacobs noted there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to all property in the same district and this project would be a detriment to those attempting to park in this neighborhood, referring to the details stated and the facts in the staff report and commissioners comments, she then moved denial of this application. Motions was seconded by C. Ellis and the denial was approved on a 6-0-1 (C. Kelly abstaining) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. Page -4-