The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2900 Adeline Drive - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit to Attach a Detached Garage Address: 2900 Adeline Drive Iem#� Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 8/28/00 Request: Hillside Area Construction Permit and special permit to attach a detached garage for a first floor addition at 2900 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1. (25.28.035 (1)) Applicant: R.C. Smith Property Owner: 7im & Mary Tomlinson Designer: JD & Associates Lot Area: 57,532 SF APN: 027-111-020 General Plan: Low density residential Zoning: R-1 Adjacent Development: Single family residential CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers bf new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. Summary: The applicant, R.C. Smith, is requesting a special pernut to construct an addition to a single-story residence which will attach the e�cisting detached garage to the house at 2900 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1. The following applications are required: Hillside Area Construction Permit for review of the project's impact on distant views; and 2. A special permit is required to attach a garage to an e�sting single family residence. The existing one-story house and detached garage now contain 3,717 SF of floor area (0.06 FAR), and includes 3 bedrooms. The 183 SF first floor addition will add a bathroom and closet to an existing master bedroom and will attach the house to the existing 586 SF 2-car garage. There will be no access between the house and the garage. The addition will increase the floor area of the structure by 183 SF, for a total floor area of 3,897 SF (0.07 FAR) where 8,454 SF (0.15 FAR) is the maximum floor area ratio allowed, including the existing 454 SF accessory structure (CS 25.28.070 provides that the maximum single family house size shall be 8000 SF, exclusive of accessory structures, regardless of lot size). PROPOSED SETBACKS Front: Ist flr Side (left): Side (right): Rear: 1 st f Ir LOT COVERAGE: no change no change 51'-0" no change 6.8% (3897 SF) EXISTING 36'-0" 18'-0" 41'-0" 253'-0" 6.5% (3714 SF) ALLOWED/REQ'D 15' or block average 7'-0" 7'-0" 15'-0" 40% (23,012 SF) Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit FAR: PROPOSED 3897 SF/ 0.07 FAR EXISTING 3714 SF/ 0.07 FAR 18000 SF ina�cimum house size + 454 SF accessory structure = 8454 SF. PARKING: no change 2 covered in garage (23'-2" x 23'-3 ") + 1 unc. in driveway HEIGHT.• DH ENVELOPE: 12'-6" N/A 16'-0" N/A Special permit required for attaching a detached garage to a single family residence. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. 2900 Adeline Drive ALLOWED/REQ'D 8454 SF/ 0.15 FARI 1 covered in garage (10'-0" x 20'-0") + 1 unc. in driveway 30'/2'/z stories see code Stafi Comments: The Chief Building Official, the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer had no comments on the project. Planning staffwould note that the new ordinance for single story design review requires that a project is subject to design review if 1) it is substantial construction of or to a single family dwelling, the addition will have a plate height greater than 9' above finished floor; the addition will result in the increase to the plate height; or construction of a garage attached to a single family dwelling. This project is not subject to design review because the garage is already existing; the addition will add floor area to the house which will attach to the existing garage; the plate height of the addition will be 8'-4" above the finished floor. Study Meeting: At the August 28, 2000 Planning Commission study meeting, there were no questions from the commission and the item was placed on the consent calendar for the September 11, 2000, meeting. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a hillside area construction permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Hillside Area Construction Permit Findings: Based on the fact that the lot slopes down from the street, that the proposed 183 SF addition is single story, and that is between two existing single story structures, the project is found to have no substantial impact on views from adjacent properties. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit to attach a detached garage the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions e�st on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) (b) (c) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the e�sting structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and 7 Hillside Area Construcdon Permit and Special Permii 2900 Adeline Drive (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Special Permit Findings: Based on the fact that the garage will not be relocated and is not visible from the street, and that the proposed addition is also not visible from the street, the single story addition is consistent with the style ofthe e�sting house, and that there are no trees being removed for this proposal, the project is found to be compatible with the special permit criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 10, 2000, Sheets 1 through 5, Site Plan, Floor Plan and Elevations; and 2. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Maureen Brooks Senior Planner c: R.C. Smith, applicant 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes August 28, 2000 2900 ADELINE DRNE - ZONED R-1- APPLICATION FOR A HII,LSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ATTACH AN EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO TI� MAIN DWELLING (R.C. SMITH, APPLICANT; J.D. & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER; JAMES E. AND MARY TOMLINSON, PROPERTY D�TRR Cl CP MonrQe presented the staffreport. C. Dea1 noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant so he would abstain from discussion on this item and would step down during action. There were no questions from the commission and the item was placed on the consent calendar for the September 11, 2000, meeting. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m. PERMI SF ORA��WEDETACHED,�ARAGE (ALEX FANDCO ORIA HIDCHENKOR��PPLIACANTS CAND CP Monr presented the staffregdrt. C. Dreiling noted tha e lived within 300 feet of e proposed project so wou abstai rom discussion tonig t�and step down for the a ion. C. Deal noted that had a business relationship ith � the pplicant and he woul bstain from discussion this item and step down r action. Commissioners ed: if ant these requests for e garage could a condit' n be added requiring the arage to be converted from orage to parking if two cover parking spaces were re ired in the future; staff n ed that parking in a tandem nfiguration requires a conditio use permit but that requ' ment could be worked in a condition for this project; as a mitigation for the large pin to be removed been inclu d in the project proposal; oes the 1'/2" line for the sin refer to the waste line, if so sh d it be limited to a 2 in maximum; would prefer �e entire structure to be pus d back 2 feet further on the si to increase the distanc etween it and the existi �tructure. There were no er comments from the co ' ioners. Chairman Luzur} ga set the item for the co sent calendar for the Septe er 11, 2000, meeting if t rea sted information is sub�ted to the Planning Dep ment in time This item co�t luded at 7•25 p m 931 CAPUCHINO COVERED PARKII� STORY ADDITIf� A�ENUE - ZONED J SPACE AND FOR P. (THOMAS MCCAR� = APPLICATION FOR P G VARIANCES F R ONE 1G IN THE FRONT SE ACK FOR A FIRST SECOND APPLICANT AND D SIGNER; MATTHEW CYNTHIA D. CP Monr e presented the staff rep . Commissioners asked: th' is the only house on th�l'ock without a garage, if we gr ted this variance for cove d parking would we be settin precedent; would staff i ntify other similar proje s w'ch have been approved i the past; a condition shoul e added that if this hou is ever demolished or an e�ensive remodel the vari ce for covered parking should xpire, and it should be re� 'red that covered parkin o code be provided; when wa e portion of the house tha�t oks as if it was placed i ihe driveway built, was i riginal or an addition; concern about the precedent being e i a blished in a case like thi here substantial const tion is being done on the hous , applicant should address that ' sue in making findings f a variance; is it possible all to get a car between the h se and the property line on e side where the structu appears to be built in w t would have been the drivewa , feel it is imperative to provid some covered parking o ite, given the problems i the area with parking on the st et; doing a lot, asking for a v�ance for covered parkin s a huge request, would e applicant address w y they ose not to provide covered �king on site; they are do ling the size of the hous , why not remove the rch a provide covered parking. ere were no further ques 'ons and the item was set or action at the Septe er 11, 000, meeting providing all th information is submitted the Planning Departme in time and there is ce on that agenda. This item was c luded at 7:32 p.m. Unapproved Minutes -2- r` CIT � /BURIJNQM/G CITY OF BURLINGAME ��;� APPLICATION TO T�� PLANNING CONIlVIISSION Type of Application: �Special Permit Variance Other Project Address:��%l� �lj,b/1�'f //�/� .�f Assessor's Parcel Number(s): d L 7—//r -- O Z d APPLIC Name: Address: � .� City/State/zip: i U 3 Phone (w): �"� �' �'��' I c��: � f�: 3 � � = �oC � ARC�IITECT/DESIGNER Name• Address: � �� City/State/Zip: ,�rl,� ii�i��r Phone (w): � � � - �o/ �l PROPERTY OWNER Name:_��tvl -�- l��i�� OI�'(�-//J.��IV Address:_ Z�� D ��=�t-1 �✓� ��11�� City/State/zip: b(/I �� 1��"� y� ��i � t/� / U Phone (w): ��1 2�11 �f-6 �.�SJ ��r�-�� SZ�i-/��"'y= m�: �L��-qga i 3�Iy-9Ltry fax: Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. (h): f�• 3 75 = �'��r� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �/.4ST/L2 �9�ff � �1,�s�t ; - i��Q,�-��-✓ . „ „ _ _� . . . _ AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and conect bes f my knowledge and belief. � � •6 Applicant's Signature Date I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. �. 1,� �y � 6 .�� e o Property Owner's Signature Date ----------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------------------------------- Date Filed: F�: R E C E I V E D Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: JUL 1 0 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. �r�, ciTr os. BURLINGAME ��...e � The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why tlae blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consiste�tt ivith the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neiglZborizood. . I �� t ��. u�-�-G�_ �.�o� G�. a��e� �iC�.u�.�c,��^�-e�.- ✓� � ��" GLU�G�.( ,c,cr� l�-' I�l�tl� � -c.�-�. r1;�1 �-�c �.ti,�-��-� � ��/ , _ ,�� '�`� � !��-<.�. . :��-� �,/�-� �-�� '�`� 1�v� r�, � aJ,�� . � - � �-�-�z-- J''� � �'-u��-c� �c��;� �z-�� j ,�.-��- c�.�- ,(�;.�. U��-c��. Gn..e�u�- u��: .� � �►O,�,t.v�-�, �,r,.} cz.c . � 2. Explcu- 'n ho►v tlze va�ie o roo line�, acade ext,erior nish materials and elevations o the ro osed h' .f .% ,F , .f .% P P ne�v structure or addition are co�tsiste�at ivith the existing structure, street and neighborlaood. ��-c�n t�-�--�.� �� <�,c_�t., G��. �5'-u.,� �L., �-cU C.�-c�c.c,0.,�--��'�''�"--- � � �p, _ � �� -� ��'-�.c G�'t-�- ID-t�%u�.c.�-�� Gv�u� ;��-c'r' vv'✓� -�- �� .� �, U � ��1..� � �,�- � � � , ,,�� .u�-�. 1^��GL�.I�- 1�- t�- ��-�. ..�- �i �w✓f,c_ �3h.-e� , �,,-Q-�`/�l'`,`''.G� - - -��" � ,�-c� �(�. �1,t, c� o�- �� 1�-d,c,�'�-.�� '�vt._ � /d- (�.� �it,c-c., o�� -�:'�� -. ��i,G, ��L(��'�L' Z-' ( � � 3. Hoiv will tlze proposed project be consiste�zt with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C. S. 25. 57) ? _ �'�,c.� Cu,�.�c.c��2:,c�� ,��e-, c.�-= Ca-,��Z�,c.� �� , �.�.�.c;G�� l�.e— ��.��.�� ' `�-- �-�'.,�'�� , �� 1� � �.�,�{,�� ,b r��t;c. �` /� ,��c-e., i �-�?.e � � .�.- �� t�t�.�.�, �,��; �� ,�►��..�� , �',Gt,e, �x° ,d.� �.� �. � �.�� 3 ; p � •�`�" . �-�. � .�� r��. , s; �a �� ,� �. ��-. Q. Explain hoiv the removal of arey trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary aiad is consistent with the city's reforesialion requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain ivhy this mitigation is appropriate. �/i.�' ��..Qlz-�L, LU�-(.�, � � RECEIVED JUL 1 0 Sp'��11/98 2�0� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. 1. Explain why ihe blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent witla the existing struciure's design and wiila the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring p�operties or structures on those propertiesl If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neigboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finzslZ materials and elevations � of tlae proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, , street and neighborizood. � How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhoodl ' If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal "fits" in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of "character" as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the reside�ztial desig�z guidelines adopted by tlze city? . Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelinesl 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees loca�ed within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain wlay ihis mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposall If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are "protected" under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. sp.frm/11/98 �� o c� � . .� � 4 (�.�G ��n�.,� � � � a ,�,� �� — 7-1_"�-il ��'�-- A "`� Q .� �I.tti� -�..C� � �'�il .�,�/ ,`,, ��u-�-1�G (� �,�,,� ,� ' , : � r ,�;, -� ii�,'�, � ��, : ' � , � € �,' �� i l Q.G�,Qe�L��-C�"-� �� i . � , c,£.L�r�GE �,�; '- � ,- ��9� � �; � c � a 7�� t� �.- � �� i��-�{'�"��-- �� ,�� - . _ :�— � — RECEIVED J U L 1 0 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. --- - -- - - � �� -�.. �� . � �' �°�� . � r .��t�; � � �-� ; T-�,.y, � .� __ ��' U , `" � �� .,�[/1� �'° _ `` �,i ' s�. � `; � . � ✓,��—y�� , r, � � ,' � . ;�- - i'T _ � ; ' s �sf /' '� - �'l�' ` � �'q �'q�, 9 '�.� Mr�-L/�%G�'<. �C.OI-.�4?^_tVi� [ �� :� � 7� lit� j- .�_' .. i , t C � ( _ •j � � ` , . . �� , �� "•]l� _ --'�P' . . � . 5 r � �f ��4 �t�. !� :� `� f +��.5 �� : � � ff �T.. z . ir ' ��,,,� _ :� a � , • : � � _ ,. �, ,u.=,- f.;r � . - i-� �, - �'" a �i. _ •� �� .. �'T � � � � ` S y �°F�� r � . . ` b. . � .?` '�� ;. ' ,t � LE . ^ P� ►'Y` .�'e t'.. % J: r ��. . � � _ � . � � fP — � : �;�_ . j ..ar � �r �. ` �, `, .r '. ^ l�� a� ; � � g/'~�'"r: �1:: _ � '. 1'';j �'.♦' �� ,�� ,\ �""�_.�. � .`". �' �� ` � t A� r. - ' � "'^ .'`.l } i 3:F .� . �✓ ,Srri�� :`, :,-'�^- ;�� ,:'�. +��T .► :�i ,-� ��%—� •� �:. _ . �!i -- �- �• �, .:.r . • -�" � ' .• 'a ,,, ar .. �•, E � ' : ,� \, i r• +�::� �� .� i� " . e,� , :,� F�. �. t `f`�'i � ' t- �- �;� � � .� f� �:, � �• �'� - -1 �� 's �' ., '� , � '� • i ��j`? • i F ,.e . �.,, �� ':.y � � � Y,. � tiI Y"l��R �� ,'`�K:�,►..'`'i�f`� �i ' � .t ��•� � } �ck �! •'i � �'�i��4� r, �� ?� �� . 3; �.i � � � 4 'd� �. � � : '8''��} ,,� — . d � � a.J � s . :. 'Fi ?�.` ' .... _ . ,� �YA ��.��+��" i � .. �. • f t, � , Y �� N hf. �� f �1 `y A�� ' +�,T,�� _ ' ' • f'tiF �rt'.a� .k' . _ .. } y��_� .'-"� - .1 r FM1— �+� �� '� �:v� �- � ' j� ' � = � �''`. x ;.°� �.;T _ a k �. � ' ��"`� � 4 ti'�- w ��-� �,� : V � ,� , . V� ,�1'�'r x -.g � � � 4,� - . � 'j "� - �F. ' ��F,�"�� .� � �,i: ,r � r�!R � 2S�z��'. - T _ . ., � � ' � � - - - .x. � ._ � `�' .� =..,.. ^ - • . - �- . . . �� . � �� y '� _- �� , �:, �. - " _ .�.' -'�"�.�`- .�_ : �' --` � ' -� ` ; . . 4 �--; •I . v a �n1 n1+C fi�' � � � d � ti ' �� . ,� �� }• �� .� �'i ,; ,� . �;r�;a w �' � � w,;, rr-. .: �! • , ,�'., .,�" � � .w_• , �+"i' -:, r� �-�,c wE" ,�' y�: /p Vi� t� '�. , �,` "� I ' .�; ,� r�`�S'�"� ,c_ ... � °�� ' .�,� - •, �..E t • : � ' �..� �. �.� � ��•Y � . . �, / � i• P � �'� ' •f'.X� � �^' -y� �' � `� �FC��' ;� r�d.��. �_/. .L . , ` ` � � . , t . M � �y'' �,�.�: . ` ,. "�,r .tei � �' . � , %�.�; � _ � . _ � .�. � ,,, .. . :� ', -'.�." `. � . � — 3�r--� '� � „' s — "� �� r : ;; � . ,� �,, �� , d ,,..,� . � �% � C� `�� /., ( �(iC�� - r ��,��.� �7 �'� �-� �i�-Q-(s` a� �-''�" � � �: _��:� � _, _ �� a � . . --- , , _� RECEIVE� JUL 1 0 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. :�� qo � ��'�� _ _ � �-, , �7 � C� ,�- � � �. ll�/�-� — �f�/� /�; � � �!a /� � � � �; � �,(,�,� �� ,, ,�� I,�.� �� ,�� a.C`"—v a� �� .�1�.(�`�� , � � ,� �-�- ,� � ` ��.� ��_ ��-- �� ,�-��.�- RECEIVED JUL 1 0 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT ' e " � q�,,��-�tSz �� ; � ��'�� ,��`,�(j G�—L��,� �jL,��—� �� ' '� � ; ��..�ti �Q��` � � �� . 4 �� ` � ~ T i �,% p� �;��• �l � lC� �,% , � � � t� �, �� ' �� _ ��: Y ��`.---�� •� � � �=� �� r: � �� ... �. ,_ "�---� - — � � i�4 J � .` __�.i:� : � �h`'�'.,�,r ."' . n.e. � .S`�_ �--- - — ��s . �;::,�. _ �- �� v� ��r��' �RECEIVED J U L 1 0 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. � �� ^. _ - �. - - 1�,�� .g,,, �_ __�-�� ` � �� i U �� .. _ .. n .0 ,� ! �� , 11 �%t � � ��, ��.��,_ CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-3997 (650) 558-7250 PUBLIC H�ARING NOTICE 2900 ADELINE DRIVE APN: 027-111-020 ACTION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ATTACH AN EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO THE MAIN DWELLING AT 2900 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1. The City of Burlingame Planning Conunission announces the following public hearing on Mond�y, September 11, 2000, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject appiicatioii(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public ilearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. � Margaret Monroe City Planner Mailed September 1, 2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a hillside area construction �ermit and s�ecial �ermit to attach a detached garage for a first floor addition at 2900 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1. Jim and Mary Tomlinson, propertv owners. APN: 027-111-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 11. 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a signiiicant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. 2. Said hillside area construction permit and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such hillside area construction permit and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Keighran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the l lth day of Se�tember , 2000 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval categorical exemption, hillside area construction permit and special permit 2900 Adeline Drive effective September 18, 2000 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 10, 2000, Sheets 1 through 5, Site Plan, Floor Plan and Elevations; and 2. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. 7 ��.:� � �-�`��?g .,��; � ��,` �. , y�.�'� -�� y ._. °�x�` '' -;�A�. �::# . � i,,. ` �_ �� •�� ' �r., f ' � ' x�,� ' � � �� ' t s � "�°� 4� � �,�"" �� r. �d �, w ` ' ..� "� ,�..� ;� �• ,, a��'�� `,�:. -'1r+� _,.+, ?4r � � , , � � � ��' < , s m� � � �^,�'� � * . �' � � � � , . _ � � ,� t � ` +�t '�;;. , ; '� � � �►.�� '}; ;;�►a: . • _ , , . �' , ,- ,�. , ,Y, � �. � � B,. � - - .� : ' a. ,.e : , , � � _. . 1� A� � ,k 1' h ` i, i' �� L� ��5 'cl � ��. � ��fi' � � �� ?"`� .. . °�� I //I��`� � � ,�- - � ,�; �� ,�;,� ✓ � Y " �"'� � �# �}y a :.:�.fy�� I � . 8 �` j� �J� �� ' �. _ ��' � " o�"w. � � i.�. ,i' . t -J .Y' � � . . . 0� � _.i .�... �I' • � � 7.��-�. � `. . '�'J4 S �.,�j'q. 3 '°°; � n}t. 1'�"n� q`.t". - � , r '7•. � t *� �-: � ��y �� ..� � � < . �; 9 � � , �! ' ^+� :� "�?;i� ,+ "''� g �, �; '' fi � ' ' - �a«�M . .. S *�K �� !� �,'..., �~?, �'y �$' �t�y�. q. . »� ^�. M�� :+n ;q� _ �. � ;� elk � . � � -' . , * t '�i'►.'�' '' �'► ' �` '��. � x = � . �, -.< � � -� �.��.i�. ` �''" - � q'' - - � "� },'� � `� � ��' '� �,, "� .a� � ,4 � '� � � 'i a � �''�. :�` : �`"� i� t-�; ��,a"� �:> � r�� ' �� w-s �.�: �� S �, , w � � � � �a �� y `� � � sT �� , � � '0� " �%„�' „�� s� � �� '�i,�, . , c�..!' . qti .� � � � "k7 �.� A' �f. �� +i.� _ ' i 3 �� r "s�� '-i n.�" �� ' j a, "� �, �, , . x '�� a �;,�� ; 4� , f 4 ,� . a�.t w t�"q�'� c '`}�" 1 ',� `� �fi� . . .�. �" �� *.- R = � -y �`�, � ...�� '�: ��- x x, )�:; „�yjj,� .+�� y$�� 7:. N. ,F +^ , �I..� '�,� 'ak � � � , ,y 'L .. ,�,•' � , , ,a'Y- �� . � . . . �� „ � �� - � �" � �m � � �� .. j. � ��?�, y. . .. ' ( ��'{' �9. ..� 7� �� tr�-� 'm _ p � . ' � _ i :�.a �: 1=' . �k'.�� . e ... N �� .. �a., �p,� � ��r. , � , ;, a, y �. .. ,� � � � '� : � , . ' ; a „ ,��*„�.� ' �' �..;�i # '�p..,i' ,y.,. � . > i� se ":'� A ' . ti" �, r .". ) ' 4r p: �� r ��" � Kr:c{- - �� . $' � ,a, . . t '�' �.' � .,y K a t,1 1 � � � .. �� "� y � .� �- .. ,� .... _ . � ''� y+,. � x;� . .. � ♦ . �� s*i . �'''�j- . . . � .� T � .. ' ., .. ?�� T �:•` . � .. � ; ,T.. .. , ��. '� i: � � �"�s �� +r- . �+a � st, � =,� y.•+y�i -. v : ,i'; �� '"t�!�Lt � °''!�� '� i; ��1_ � , .a�� •�.,c.��"1' k di f �A �'r:.. � �,`.�' , �. � �� ` � a, , � x A c, � � �'� � �- • �' � ��4 � �� » � �`"�` .� . � • , • x vt , d w a � ,:� ��,� � i... � > _ �E�: ��'�� ^� 4 �y 11(� V�, ��F� �� h s e �� .�-.�#_ ��'��.,'- � _ - -;.�ti qlq; � � w.��`M' ..�t." f f � �.. �,, � � ... �, s��1�� >� ��C. ,• � :� q �"� k . + '�� T�`° ' '�'i.. k'*= � Y,. _. �� /� ��„. , � .. ,�� d . _ a► '�'� '� "� _.. Y �� :�r,+,. � � � �? � ♦ ! �.,1 � ' ,i "�� 4�. ,.w. a�'�'_ tit e � a1 . � � .�. , ,.. � � �� .�x yr'"T�'4.,.2" ��.VO � � •� � _� �. :,, e' � � �a s,;,.� � � �a , a � �� : :� � � `� �3�1 . � ��" 3 .r . 'A",�.��,''� „- � �;ar ,>F �� g- s � � � . �p,, �i: .a�, I� �iYR . n �� f, 1'Y� ; � �t♦P�� r�� y �: �#Y - ' � �, � ^��N �� '� � A � ...d':.�� $��.,. .�� _ � � I �� .� �� y �i ��. . � �� :� a � y . ' . , . 4i. fi. br� � /�, �,.•a � t # � r� ��k M i/ + Q.. - ^}� � �'�� ... �� y��', � � ♦� �� . � � � � c �f � . �� _� f� � � �� - � r . 4 .�.,. ,',�:: �=:- �;� . . .r �, F• � ,�� .� � -� ;...�IV� M�;T�Q � . L,� i' , , � _ �- _.�� , � - �,,�, ,� �. ,� �� ` �'� � � ' .�r k�: � �. � w , ��a. — � � �� . ��. �� - ..� � � ,, �,� , ..... � . 2 , , �¢. T� � �j �� e�•n�« /�- �� ' v� � `.,��7 \ /��' .. . � Y ve . �a� � � � i�l I� yr i M, � .� �' y �`/�/./ � � C�... . . Ytl.� � �f0� �'�^'� '� � � '� w' a^� wEh f a + � , . . . � . .. � ,. - �au � 'J� "�4� '^� "�$� � . � .. _ — .. � 6�'. - . . . ....�°Sr