Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2843 Adeline Drive - Approval LetterCITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINGf�N1E City Hall — 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010-3997 March 25, 2015 Alex Mortizavi 2843 Adeline Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 2843 Adeline Drive Dear Mr. Mortizavi, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division PH: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the December 10, 2012, Planning Commission approval of your application for Amendment to Design Review became effective December 20, 2012. This application was for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3 '/2 story, single-family dwelling and attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1. The December 10, 2012, minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al through Al and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubject to Planning Division or Plannirii j Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; �� Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org March 25, 2015 2843 Adeline Drive Page 2 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; C: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org :C March 25, 2015 2843 Adeline Drive Page 3 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. An extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely, William Meeker Community Development Director C. Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (PARCEL B PM VOL 76/78-79; APN: 027-093-310) File :: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org .. Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments June 30, 2014 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 June 30, 2014 (IV -On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California ,.-wilding Codes. -Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. Indicate on the plans that the standing seam metal roof will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 Residential and Non -Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ /'Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) (5POn the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on -site parking. 8) Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a legend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 9) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 10 Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. .1)1 dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 12)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 13)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC §1009. 14)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 11 must be re -submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commi action. Reviewed by: � ate: 6-30-2014 17 Project Comments Date: June 30, 2014 To: X Engineering Division 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 0 Building Division 0 Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 0 Parks Division 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 Staff Review: June 30, 2014 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. Reviewed by: V V Date: 7/18/2014 Project Comments Date: June 30, 2014 To: U Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 U Building Division (650) 558-7260 U Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff OFire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 U City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 Staff Review: June 30, 2014 No comments at this time. Reviewed by: �% �_/��� Date: 1 Project Comments Date: June 30, 2014 To: U Engineering Division U Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 U Building Division U Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 Parks Division U City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 Staff Review: June 30, 2014 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. No further comments Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 711114 Project Comments Date: November 5, 2014 To: 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 U Building Division (650) 558-7260 U Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff U Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 U City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 Staff Review: 1. Project is not subject to C.3.i. 2. All other comments shall be addressed during building permit issuance. Reviewed bv: EJ Date: 11/7/2014 Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments June 30, 2014 U Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 U Building Division (650) 558-7260 U Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff U Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 U City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a new detached patio shelter at 2838 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-091-080 June 30, 2014 01 Please provide the square footage of the amount of impervious surface that is created and/or replaced. Please label all pervious and impervious surfaces as such. Please provide installations specifications, as appropriate (i.e. pervious pavers, etc.). 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http:/Iflowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPP[anJun2Ol 2. pdf 5) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs .pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD 5� Date: 718114 .� Construction Best Management Practices J Mph SAN MATED COUNTYWIDE Water Pollution Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, Prevention Program as they apply to your project, all year long. Clean Water. Healthy Community. Materials & waste Management Non-llivurdow Materhds ❑ Dew and cure sloekpides or sand. dirt or cill,er construction mnicrial with lnrys when ruin is forecast or Want nctirely being owd within 14 days. ❑ Use (bra don't overuse) reelaintad scaler for dust conwl, Hazardous Materials ❑ Label all hmanlnns materials and hazardous w'osics (such as Pesticides. paints. t,ina— solvent, feel. oil. and omit eze) in accordance with city, eounn, stale and fderol regulations. ❑ Store l,azanlous mnieriuls and wastes in water tight containers. stale in appropriate secondary conlninmart. and cover then, al the end of every work day or during wet n•wtler or when min is forecast. ❑ Follow mmndacturcr's application inslmelions for Imunlcnns maeralx end be earefnl --I to use ramal titan ne«swan•. Do no a poly chemicals outdoors w�hcn rain is forecast . i hu PP. t v n , 14 hmtn. ❑ Arrange for appropriate disposal of all harnrdous wastes. Waste Ma—g—'rill ❑ Cover wasne disposal containers scei mly ,with larps al the end of every .work day and during suet ww,hcr, ❑ Check waste disposal eonlniners frcqucnlly for leaks and to oaks sue t,cy are not overfilled. Never hose down is dnurpstcr on .hc eo„nT.Gtlo„ site. ❑ Clam or replace portable toilets. and inspect Then, frequently for leaks and spills. ❑ Dispose oral) wastes amt debris properly. Recycle materials slid w'nsics Thal call be recycled (such as asplmll. eonctcle, aggregae base materials. wood. gyp board, pipe, ate.) ❑ Dispose of liquid residuc. from points. dtirn L sal -eels. glues. and cleaning fluids as hazardous .vase. C-0—t]on Enlrnnces and Perimelcr Cl Esmblish and mninutin eff clive Perimeter controls slid stabilize all eanstw.: col entr.twcs and esils to surrciently cannot erosion and sedimcnt discharges front site and tracking air site. ❑ Swccp or vacuum any street.racking immcdiatcly and secure mlimcnl source to prevmn f,.hcr ir.cking. Ncvcr how ,k,vn sued. e c1c.. up.ncking. Equipment Management & Spili Control r i'�' 3 Maintenance unit Parking ❑ Dcsign.te so, area, fined will, appropriate Mips, for vehicle and equipment parking and storage. ❑ Perforin m jot ainemnce, mpairJobs, and vehicle endequipnow washingoRsile. ❑ If ref.fingarvd,iclemaintenancemusibcdmm ..site. work in a banned area away from so rl drains and over a drip pan big enough to collect fluids. Recycle or dispose of fluids as hazardous hyena. Cl Ir-hicle or eq,dpment cleaning nmst be done assi.e, ale 1 1 with water only in a berried area dint will non allow- rinse water to ram into guticn, sucels,'tom, or " drains, dace waters. ❑ Do not clean vehicle or equipment onsite using soaps, wlvanls. degn rn—. steam cleaning equilanenL etc. Spill Prevention unit Control V o ❑ Keep spill cleanup malerials (logs. absorbents, eic.) "-liable at the construction site at all tbnes. Cl Inspect vehicles oil(] equipment fregnendy for and repair leaks promptly. Usc drip pans,, catch leaks until repair. . made. Cl Clean up spills or leaks i.mcdialely and dispose or cleanup oralcriols properly. ❑ Do not hose down s rr cos where fluids have spilled. Use dry elcvmp nmlhads (absorbent malerials, cat litter, and/., tags). ❑ S,vicep up'pill,d dry ionicrials immediarely. Do act try..'ash teem auav with water, or bury deco. ❑ Clean up spills on din arcs by digging up and prolerly disposing of ennla.inated soil. ❑ Report significonl spills im.cdiinely.You one required by law to report all significant act..., Innhazardous materials, including oil. To report a spill: 1) to, 911 or ve our local crrgency response another. 2) Call the Governor's Oruce or Emergency Services Warning Center, ry, ran) 552-75511 (14 hours). Earthwork & Paving/Asphalt Work Contaminated Soils a~� Erosion Control ❑ Schedule grading and eseayati.n work for dry .cattle, only. ❑ Stabilize all denuded areas, install ad maintain lanporan• erosion c,mtrods (wdI as erosion eonlrol fabric or bonded fiber .,at") I fit vegeation is established. ❑ Secd or plant vegetation for erosion, control an slopes or, here construction is not innncdimly plmutcd. Sediment Control ❑ Protect slow, drain inlets, gullets, ditches, and drainage co, uses with aPp.Pd.Ic BM Po, well as gravel bogs, fiber rolls. bcws cic. ❑ Prevent sedimcnt fore migrating orrsire by installing and mnintolning san,ncrt eonlrol., such as fiber rolls. silt fences• or sedimcnt basins. ❑ Keep exc., led coil on the site where it will not collect into the street. ❑ Transfer eseavnted mnerinls to dump trucks on Lite site, not in the nrGeL ❑ C-trunina.ed Soils ❑ trany or the fnli—ing conditions are obsened, test for con.minatian and contact the Region.[ 11'ater Quality Control Board; ■ Unusual soil conditions, discoloration, or odor. Is Abandoned underground outs. as Abandoned wells IN Buried barrels, debris. or trash. Cl Avoid paving and seal tooting in wel weathe, or,,he. rain is r east before fresh pavement will have tin. an wrc. ❑ Cover slow drain inicts and mauholcs when applying seal coal. rock coat, slurry seal. fog scat, etc. ❑ Collect and recycle or appropriately dispute orescess abrasive gravel or sand, Do NOT sv ecp or wash it into guncrs. ❑ Do non use wa(t, to wall, down fresh asphalt concrete paraucnl. Sartcutting IT, AsphallIConcrcle Rnoovnl ❑ Complecly corer or barricade sionn drain inlets when sn•eunin6, Use filter fabric eaten, basin ' sat udcl fibers, or gravel begs to keep slurqant of the noon drain s-alcn,. ❑ Shover, abowrb, or vacuum cow<u, slurry and dispose of all wane m soon as you are finished in one location or at die end of each work, do)- (whichever is soanerl). ❑ Ir sawcul slum colcrs a catch basin, cicarl it up immediately, Concrete, Grout & \lortar Application ❑ Siam concrete. grout and manor undcr cover. on pallets and assay font dnivage areas. These materials must never reach a storm drain. ❑ tvnsh out concrete equipmao/.rncks online or in is contained area. so them is no discharge into the under])'ing wit or onto surrounding areas. Let concrete harden and dispose of as garbage. ❑ Collect file wash nmer fen, washing cspuscd nggregae e.rxme.,,it ren,ove it for appropriatc disposal olrsi,e. Dcwatcring �flLv ch ( j v v� n � tar ❑ Elpectiseh manage all moron, all rononwil,in the sic, and all runon'ftla, discharges font the site. Divert run-on .ca,cr from onsite away from all disturbed areas or otherwise ensure conhplin ee. ❑ Nq,a, dc.—ring. nmiry and obtain approval from to local I n r icipadily before discharging sva.cr Ia a .nect Suite, or storm drain. Filvalion or diversion through a basin, land, or sci iusaw trap may be required, ❑ In a.m orkuon•n canamivation, cling is required prior to reuse or discharge or groundwater. Cnnsuli with de Engineer to determine ..lather csting is required and Imw to interpret results. Concminacd groundwater nust be trcaed or hauled oQ sire ror proper disposal. Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Painting & Paint Removal Painting c]conu� ❑ Never clean brushes ar rinse paint containers intn a street. Fuller. storm dram. or surface wnici s. ❑ For natn-baud paints. paint out brushes to ,he —cal P..ibic. Ponsc to the sa.lilan• uueroee you have gained pcmnasian fron, the Neal wnscunwr trealnllcol aml,nrin'. Never pour paint doo n a drain. ❑ For oil -bawd paims, pain, our bosh., to the extent possible and clean with IN cr or solvent in a proper container. Filter and reuse thinners and solvents. Dispose of rcsiduc and unusable lhinncrlsalvems as he—mi.., n. ,.. . Polar —n-1 ❑ Chanical paint stripping residue and chips at Id dust fr n mrina palm' or P.-Ins, containing ]cad .r Iribuly kin must be disposed oras homrdo is waste. ❑ Paint clips and dust fron, non-hazardoua dry s.riin•, an d hit so lid blaming n m nv ,. he 6 ,u save p p tarcMlc sled in plastic imp cleans and dislx sed oral Irnsh. Landscape Materials Ctr`• •A• n J ❑ Contain nockpikil landscaping malerals by storing than undcr corps when they arc non actively beitig used. ❑ Stark crodible 1-duope nmtcrinl on pallets. Cover or store these maleralx when thew am not actively being used or .pplicd. ❑ Discaninnc application crony erodible landscape mnlcrinl ,within 2 days before s ron-I rein even; w during n'ci .weather. SAH NATEO COUNTYWIDE Water Pollution Prevention Program Requirements for Architectural Copper Clean VAm. Heafthq [a+nmaniy. Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Building with copper flashing, gutter and drainpipe. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited discharges to storm drains. During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on -site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off -site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re -application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off -site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing �n:�, copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal ���Y ` stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. Photo credit: Don Edwards National Wildlife Sanctuary Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobaV.org (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 TO: DATE: FROM: STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL December 27, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO: MEETING DATE: SUBMITTED B APPROVED B1 William Meeker, Community Development Director — (650) January 7. 2013 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO A PRIOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AS -BUILT CHANGES TO A NEW, 3 % STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE AT 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should conduct a public hearing to consider the analysis contained within the staff report and public testimony relative to the applicant's (Alex Mortazavi's) request for amendments to the prior design review approval for as -built changes to a new, 3 Y story single-family dwelling with an attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive. Following conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council should articulate findings in support of its position and affirm its action by resolution. The Council may consider the following alternatives: approve the request for a Design Review Amendment, subject to conditions; or 2. deny the request for Design Review Amendment. BACKGROUND Reason for City Council Consideration: This item appears before the City Council not as an appeal, but because the prior action by the City Council (on appeal) included a condition of approval that was specifically imposed by the City Council that was not a consideration in the Planning Commission's prior action. For this reason, the City Attorney determined that though the Planning Commission could act upon the majority of the project changes, the City Council must weigh-in on the modification to the deck adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 of the project, as the design of this deck was specifically restricted by the City Council's action (on appeal) of April 20, 2009. Overview of Project: The applicant previously received approval to build a new, 3 Y2 story single family dwelling with an attached two -car garage on what was previously a vacant, half acre parcel at 2843 Adeline Drive. The proposed house with attached garage has a total floor area of 6,087 SF (0.28 FAR) where 8,000 SF (0.37 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 1,913 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). Because the lot slopes upward more than 25%, the Planning Division measured the overall height of the building from 15 feet behind the front property line of the lot at the intersection of the front and side setback lines at each side of the lot (C.S. 25.28.060 c). A Variance from the building height limit was CITY COUNCIL MEETING —January 7, 2013 Public Hearing — 2843 Adeline Drive approved as part of this project as the proposed height (3 Y2 stories, 63'-5") exceeds the maximum allowed (2'/ stories, 30') by the City's zoning ordinance. The attached two -car garage (20' x 20', clear interior measurements) provides two covered parking spaces for the proposed five -bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. The following applications were approved by the City Council on April 20, 2009: ■ Design Review for a new two and a half story, single family dwelling with an attached garage (CS 25.57.010); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a new single family dwelling (C.S. 25.61.020). ■ Special Permit for an attached garage (CS 25.28.035 a); and ■ Variance for building height (63'-5" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060 c). (NOTE: The attached December 10, 2012 Planning Commission staff report regarding the current request provides a detailed analysis of the original project, as well as the amendments proposed with this application.) Prior Planning Commission and City Council Actions: On March 9, 2009 the Planning Commission approved the applicant's requests for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Variance for building height and a Special Permit for the new single-family dwelling at 2843 Adeline Drive. On March 18, 2009 the approval was appealed to the City Council by the owner of the neighboring property at 2839 Adeline Drive. On April 20, 2009 the City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the appeal. After considering all public testimony regarding the matter, the Council voted to deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the project with the added condition that the "deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans". This additional condition was imposed as a result of the neighboring property owner's concerns regarding potential impacts upon privacy at his property located at 2839 Adeline Drive. Shortly after the City Council's action, the applicant submitted construction plans for the project to the Building Division that were consistent with the Council's action. A building permit was issued for the project on January 20, 2010; the project is complete at this time. Changes to Project Made during Construction: On November 8, 2012, the Planning Division conducted a final inspection on the property and noted that several changes were made to the project during construction, including that the deck adjacent to bedroom #3 was not reduced by 50% in length and width as was conditioned by the City Council. On November 28, 2012, the applicant submitted an application for a Design Review Amendment for all of the as -built changes made to the project during construction (see attached December 10, 2012 Planning Commission staff report for a full description of all changes). 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING —January 7, 2013 Public Hearing — 2843 Adeline Drive Planning Commission Action regarding Proposed Amendments: On December 10, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider amendments to the original Design Review approval to permit the as -built changes observed by staff at the final inspection (see December 10, 2012 Planning Commission staff report). After considering staffs analysis as well as public testimony provided during the public hearing, the Commission formulated a recommendation to the City Council (on a vote of 6-0-0-1) to approve all as -built changes to the project. As stated previously, since the approval of the project by the City Council included an added condition requiring that the "deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans", the City Attorney determined that the City Council should specifically review the modification to the deck. Given that the deck modification is only a part of the package of amendments considered by the Planning Commission; action regarding the Design Review Amendment was in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. It is notable that the applicant has provided an executed agreement with the neighboring property owner at 2839 Adeline Drive that includes terms that effectively eliminate that property owner's objections to the proposed deck modification; the agreement has been attached to this report. The following conditions of approval, associated with the Design Review Amendment, have been recommended by the Planning Commission. 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, A10 through A16 and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — January 7, 2013 Public Hearing — 2843 Adeline Drive 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — January 7, 2013 Public Hearing — 2843 Adeline Drive 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; .architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single- family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Attachments: ■ Letter from Alex Mortazavi, property owner, date stamped December 21, 2012 ■ Copy of Settlement Agreement between Alex Mortazavi, property owner, and Art Labrie, neighbor, dated December 21, 2012 ■ December 10, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes ■ December 10, 2012 Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments ■ Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed December 28, 2012 ■ City Council Resolution (proposed) December 21, 2012 City of Burlingame City Council Re: 2843 Adeline Drive Dear Madame Mayor and Honorable City Council Members, During construction of the above project, we encountered a great concern about decks over living spaces. This presented a long term liability for potential leaks and repairs. I am sure that you have witnessed or know of this kind of leak which will require jack hammering the file and concrete bedding in order to do repair a leak with an unknown source of origin. In most cases, you have to rip off the entire deck to figure out where the leak is in order to repair. We conducted long hours of research to find the best solution to address this concern. We discovered a method of construction of prefabricated tiles which sits on an adjustable pedestal. This is a floating floor file system which allows the water to penetrate in between the tiles and drains to the waterproofing membrane which leads to the gutters and downspouts. This system is patented and is manufactured in the United States. This system allows us to remove as many tiles as we desire at any time with an unskilled laborer to detect any leak and repair immediately. The ease of long term repair and maintenance of this system made us to decide and adopt this system for all our decks. Due to the fact that the floor is floating, the manufacture requires the boundaries of the floor to be finished with a heavy metal anchor to prevent the tiles from sliding off the deck. This was done with all our decks, including the deck at issue. It is very hard to anchor/bolt this perimeter metal to the middle of the roof and penetrating the waterproofing membrane of the roof. This will create yet another potential long term structural and waterproofing problems. In order to properly install this system, we were required to anchor and bolt the perimeter metal to the rim joist around the deck. By doing so, we ended up exceeding the approved deck dimension. We were aware of the single neighbor opposing to this deck during the Planning Commission and Council hearings. We have offered numerous and very expensive concessions to our neighbor which we have reached an agreement at the eve of the Planning Commission hearing. The agreement with our neighbor has been submitted to the staff for your review. Please note that this minor adjustment is a single neighbor issue and not a community issue. Our neighbor is now satisfied with the concessions we have made. We respectfully request your support for this minor adjustment of our deck. Best Regards, Alex Mortazavi R CW DEC 2 12012 CITY OF BUR!_INGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE (the "AGREEMENT") is entered into to be effective as of December 10, 2012 by and between 2843 Adeline Drive, LLC, its predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, subsidiaries, agents, officers, directors, and individual shareholders, hereinafter referred to as "ADELIN-E, LLC") and ARTHUR J. LABRIE, JR. and KEALANI B. LABRIE (hereinafter collectively referred to as "LABRIE''). The parties are collectively referred to as "Parties." RECITALS: WHEREAS, ADELINE LLC owns the property commonly referred to as 2843 Adeline Drive in Burlingame, California (hereinafter referred to as "ADELINE PROPERTY"); . WHEREAS, ADELINE LLC is in the process of constructing a single family residence on ADELINE PROPERTY; WHEREAS, LABRIE is the owner of the property commonly referred to as 2839 Adeline Drive in Burlingame, California (hereinafter referred to as "LABRIE PROPERTY") which consists of a single family residence; WHEREAS, LABRIE has raised concerns regarding the design and construction of the single family residence on the ADELINE PROPERTY, including without limitation, location of windows, privacy screening, landscaping, fence and retaining walls; WHEREAS, LABRIE's objections over the past several years regarding the design and construction of the ADELINE PROPERTY are on file with the City of Burlingame; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the privacy screening proposed in this agreement is for the benefit of both Parties and if deemed to be inadequate may be modified by mutual agreement. WHEREAS, ADELINE LLC will be requesting the City of Burlingame to provide final approval of the construction and design amendment of ADELINE PROPERTY; 1 WHEREAS, certain improvements on LABRIE'S PROPERTY encroach upon the ADELINE PROPERTY, including without limitation, brick stair landings at the side of LABRIE' S PROPERTY, a planter box, and a portion or side of the gate inside the planter box; WHEREAS, LABRIE' S concerns regarding the design and construction of the ADELINE PROPERTY and LABRIE' S encroachment upon the ADELINE PROPERTY are referred collectively herein as "Claims"; WHEREAS, in making this Agreement, the Parties to this Agreement do not admit the sufficiency of any claims, allegations, assertions, contentions, or positions of any other party, or the sufficiency of any defenses to any such claims, allegations, assertions, contentions or positions. Further, in making this Agreement, the Parties to this Agreement agree that the covenants and releases comprising this Agreement are not intended to be admissions of liability, negligence, willful conduct, breach of contract, or fault of any kind whatsoever, by any Party; WHEREAS, the Parties desire to provide for an amicable resolution without further expense. WITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, agree as follows: In exchange for ADELINE LLC' S covenants contained herein in paragraph 2, LABRIE shall do the following: a. LABRIE and their agents shall not object or interfere, directly or indirectly, with ADELINE LLC procuring final sign -off from the City of Burlingame or any other applicable governmental agency related to the construction of the single family residence at the ADELINE PROPERTY including without limitation, the location, material and aesthetic look of any and all 2 retaining walls at the site or street level, landscaping, and fence at the ADELINE PROPERTY and the location, color, material and dimensions of any windows. This shall also prohibit LABRIE from enlisting the assistance of others within the neighborhood or elsewhere to object or raise concerns with the City of Burlingame or any other governmental agency regarding the construction of the ADELINE PROPERTY. b. Upon ADELINE LLC'S request, LABRIE shall execute all necessary documents evidencing their support in having ADELINE LLC obtain final sign -off from the City of Burlingame or any other governmental agency, within five (5) business days of ADELINE LLC'S request. c. LABRIE shall permit privacy screening which shall consist of posts and channeling selected by ADELINE LLC, vegetative screening and ten (10) giant bamboo trees placed on the planter boxes on LABRIE'S PROPERTY. LABRIE shall permit ADELINE LLC and its agents reasonable access to LABRIE'S PROPERTY for purposes of installing the privacy screening between the two properties between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. If ADELINE, LLC determines that LABRIE'S planter box needs to be raised to accommodate the bamboo trees and to retain the soil, LABRIE will authorize and accommodate ADELINE, LLC to accomplish this. d. LABRIE shall move his mail box and shall place it on the left side of LABRIE"S driveway at LABRIE'S sole discretion after the easements are executed, and in compliance with any ordinances, regulations or statutes. 2. In exchange for LABRIE'S covenants in paragraph 1, ADELINE LLC shall do the following, conditioned upon receipt of final approval from the City of Burlingame and any other applicable governmental agency and full use of the top deck at ADELINE PROPERTY; except if the City of Burlingame denies any part of the application for Design Amendment, including without 3 limitation, top deck, for other reasons unrelated to LABRIE, all other terms of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect: Ia.—ADELINE LLC shall enter into a written easement agreement with LABRIE related to LABRIE'S improvements, which are encroaching upon the ADELINE PROPERTY, as depicted on the survey attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The easements are referred in the survey as Landscape Easement and Access Easement. The easement agreement shall be recorded and shall run with the land. b. ADELINE LLC shall install privacy screening between the two properties, which posts, channeling and minimum ten (10) large bamboo trees shall be on the proposed easement section of the LABRIE PROPERTY and shall be installed in compliance with applicable building ordinances and requirements at ADELINE LLC'S sole cost. At ADELINE LLC'S discretion, ADELINE LLC may either repair or remove the temporary fence. As part of the privacy screening between the two properties, ADELINB LLC shall plant four (4) forty-eight gallon trees selected by ADELINE LLC interspersed with —ten (10) large bamboo trees on the ADELINE PROPERTY approximately five (S) feet away from the property line and in compliance with all . necessary setback requirements, and at the sole cost of ADELM LLC. In addition, a minimum of two (2) Vivex large bamboos shall be placed on the same location. Further, ADELINE LCC shall plant some of the bamboo trees in line with the planter box on LABRIE'S property to minimize the exposure to head -lights of on -coming cars on LABRIE'S PROPERTY at the sole cost of ADELINE LLC. c. ADELINE LLC shall replace the filter in LABRIE'S swimming pool. d. Top floor deck to have two panels in etched glass and a permanent 18" planter box along the full length of the rail parallel to LABRIE'S PROPERTY. a] 3. Each party hereto hereby fully, finally and forever releases the others and the others' heirs, predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, agents, executors, administrators and representatives, officers, directors, partners, attorneys, managing agents, and employees, and hereby fully and forever waives, relinquishes, releases and discharges each other from, without limitation, any and all claims, demands, controversies, causes of action, liabilities, rights, damages, costs (including attorneys' fees and court and litigation costs and expenses), and obligations, arising out of or relating to the Claims or the alleged facts and circumstances on which the Claims are based, whether at this time known or up -known whatsoever from the beginning of time to the date of this Agreement, provided that nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to release either party from their obligations under this Agreement or the Easement Agreement. 4. The Parties hereto expressly represent and warrant that they have read and understand fully the provisions of Section 1542 of the Civil Code of California, which states as follows: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of execution of the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtors. Having been apprised of the statutory language of said Section 1542, the Parties hereto, and each of them, nevertheless elect to assume all risks for claims heretofore and hereafter arising, known or unknown, or arising from the subject of this Agreement and each expressly waive and relinquish all rights and benefits which they may have, either collectively or individually, under Section 1542 of the Civil Code of California. They each fully understand that the facts upon which this Agreement is given may be found hereafter to be other than or different from the facts now believed by them to be true and each expressly accepts and assumes the risk of such possible difference in facts and each agrees that this Agreement shall remain effective notwithstanding any 5 such difference in facts. Provided that nothing herein contained shall be interpreted to release either party from their obligations hereunder. S. Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other from any and all claims, demands, suits, controversies, causes of action, liabilities, rights, damages, costs (including attorneys' fees and court and litigation costs and expenses), and obligations, arising out of or relating to the Claims or the alleged facts and circumstances on which the Claims are based; except that nothing herein shall release the parties of their respective obligations under the Agreement or Easement Agreement. 6. The Parties each expressly represent and warrant (i) that they have the sole right and exclusive authority to execute this Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and have received the consideration therefore and (ii) that the Parties understand that certain conditions, as set forth hereinabove, must be satisfied to keep this Agreement in effect, (iii) that neither has sold, assigned, transferred or conveyed, or purported to sell, assign, transfer or convey, or otherwise to have disposed of any claim, demand, right, action, debt or the like to the LABRIE PROPERTY, ADELINE PROPERTY and/or released by this Agreement, and (iv) that he or she has the exclusive authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement. 7. The Parties each covenant and agree never to commence or prosecute any action or proceeding based upon, or arising out of, any and all claims, demands, controversies, actions, (including malicious prosecution, abuse of process) causes of action, liabilities, rights, damages, costs (including attorneys' fees), obligations and losses of every kind or nature whatsoever herein released, or to permit, aid or consent to the commencement or prosecution of any such action by any person. 8. Each party hereto recognizes and acknowledges that this Agreement is a compromise of disputed claims and that neither the payments made hereunder nor any other acts, 9 promises, or representations made by any parry pursuant to this Agreement is intended to or shall be construed as an admission of liability by him or her or it or as a concession as to any other party's claims or defenses. 9. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each of them will bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected, with the Claims, the negotiation, drafting and execution of this Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith; except that, in the event any action is brought by any parry hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. The parties further agree, acknowledge and stipulate that San Mateo County Superior Court has jurisdiction over the settling parties to determine any motion brought pursuant to C.C.P. §664.6, or lawsuit for breach of contract. 10. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall take effect immediately as to all Parties in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 11 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts entered into and to be wholly performed in the State of California. 12. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto as of the date of its execution and supersedes any and all prior and/or contemporaneous agreements of the parties hereto. Each party hereto represents that he, she or it has not relied on any promise, representation, consideration or inducement made or given by or on behalf of any other party, other than those expressly set forth herein, in entering into this Agreement. 13. Each party hereto acknowledges that he, she or it have read and understand this Agreement, that he, she or it have been advised to have this Agreement reviewed by their own f counsel and its legal effect explained by such counsel and they have either done so or waived their right to do so, and that he, she or it is executing this Agreement voluntarily and with full knowledge and understanding of its terms and consequences. 14. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in separate counterparts, including facsimile, and each counterpart shall be binding against the party executing that counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective the date first mentioned hereinabove. Dated: December _LO, 2012 Dated: December 1Q, 2012 Dated: December l 0 , 2012 2843 ADE DRIVE, L By: L(� Name: ALCX M D Pi-A'LA V 1 Arthur J. Labne,1 O"j-0,' ani B. ri M910=179 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2012 Commissioner Gaul indicated that he would recuse himself from participating in the discussion regarding Agenda Item 4 (2843 Adeline Drive) as he resides within 500-feet of the property. He left the City Council Chambers. 4. 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW FOR AS - BUILT CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW, 3 '/ STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (ALEX MORTAZAVI, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated December 10, 2012, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eighteen (18) conditions were suggested for consideration. Questions of staff: Since the deck condition was imposed directly by the City Council, does the Commission have jurisdiction over a change to that condition? (Guinan — if a change to that condition is made, then the matter would be referred to the City Council as a recommendation. If the Commission does not agree to the change, then the Commission retains full approval authority.) Vice -Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Alex Mortazavi, Burlingame; represented the applicant. ■ Described the history of the project. ■ Reminded the Commission that most properties in the area are outside of the City's jurisdiction and are subject to the County of San Mateo's more relaxed standards. ■ There is only a single neighbor that has been opposed to the project and raising objections. ■ The neighbor has agreed to the changes as of late today. ■ Noted all of the upgraded, high -end materials used in the construction. ■ The reduction in the size of the deck was a point of discussion because it is over a living space. In order to prevent leakage, the deck is constructed with a patented, pre -fabricated system. If built according to the conditions, would have resulted in an area of half deck, half tar and gravel; the deck and drainage installation requires it to be installed at the edge of the building — any other installation that would have complied with the condition of approval would result in a waterproofing nightmare. ■ The neighbor is interested in privacy at the edge of the property — have worked out an agreement with the neighbors regarding additional landscaping. ■ Noted other encroachments from the neighbor's property into the development site. ■ All other changes are very minor. Commission comments: ■ Thanked the applicant for the explanation of the reasons for the changes. ■ Noted that in a meeting with the neighbor it appears that he is satisfied with the solutions. ■ Is supportive of the application. ■ Noted that he met with the applicant at the property today; the home is beautiful. ■ The design is done very tastefully. ■ Not certain the deck is a simple privacy issue; would be looking into the same area regardless of the size. There will be planter boxes placed in the area to preserve privacy. Glass is obscured to retain privacy. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2012 ■ Would have liked the changes presented to the Commission in advance of the changes being made, but feels the changes are approvable. ■ Noted that the deck is visible, but only because the landscaping has not yet matured. ■ Is a bit difficult to react to the request for the deck change, since the Commission did not impose it. ■ Feels that the deck issue must be taken on its own merit, absent a written agreement in front of the Commission. ■ Is concerned about the neighbors' objections, because the neighbor doesn't live within the City boundaries. ■ Appreciative that the applicant has worked with the neighbors. Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al 0 through Al 6 and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubjectto Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2012 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: ■ Doesn't believe that the non -Burlingame neighbor should weigh-in on the issue. n CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2012 Chair Gaul called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Gaul recused). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:48 p.m. L!j Item N4Xct Regulan PROJECT LOCATION 2843 Adeline Drive City of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Item No. A" Regular Action Address: 2843 Adeline Drive Meeting Date: December 10, 2012 Request: Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3'h story, single- family dwelling and attached garage. Applicant: Alex Mortizavi Property Owner: Denham LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-093-310 Lot Area: 22,036 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Background: On March 9, 2009, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Variance for height and Special Permit for attached garage for a new 3'/2 story single family dwelling with an attached garage on what was previously a vacant parcel at 2843 Adeline (March 9, 2009, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). This approval was appealed to the City Council on March 18, 2009. On April 20, 2009 the City Council voted to deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the project with the added condition that the "deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans". The plans that were submitted to the Building Division for a permit reflected the added condition about the deck. A building permit was issued on January 20, 2010, and the project is complete at this time. Proposed Revisions: On November 8, 2012, the Planning Division conducted a final inspection of the project and noted that there were several changes made to the project. On November 28, 2012, the applicant submitted an application for a Design Review Amendment for the following as -built changes to the project: ■ The approved landscape plan was revised due to the placement on an easement along the left side property line; ■ A window was added in the shower area of the bathroom off of bedroom #4 along the left side elevation; ■ A Frosted glass entry/gate was installed next to the garage along the left side building elevation; • The bathroom window in bedroom #5 along the left side of the house was reduced in size; ■ The garage door was upgraded from metal panel to glass panel; ■ The deck adjacent to bedroom #3 was not reduced by 50% in length and width as was conditioned by the City Council; ■ The horizontal wood siding at the rear of the house was reduced in width, ■ The horizontal wood siding was upgraded from the approved material (Hardy Plank Siding), to stained mahogany wood siding; and ■ The slanted skylight roof off the rear of the house on the main level was replaced with a flat roof. The applicant submitted a letter describing all of the changes made to the house and originally approved and as - built building elevation drawings on November 28, 2012. Other than the changes listed above, there are no changes to the design of the house. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3 Y2 story, single-family dwelling and attached garage. Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Project Description (for originally approved project): The applicant was approved to build a new, 3 Y2 story single family dwelling with an attached two -car garage on what was previously a vacant, half acre parcel at 2843 Adeline Drive. The proposed house with attached garage has a total floor area of 6,087 SF (0.28 FAR) where 8,000 SF (0.37 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 1,913 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). Because the lot slopes upward more than 25%, the Planning Division has measured the overall height of the building from 15 feet behind the front property line of the lot at the intersection of the front and side setback lines at each side of the lot (C.S. 25.28.060 c). A Variance for building was approved as part of this project because the proposed height (3'/ stories, 63'-5") exceeds the maximum allowed (2 Y2 stories, 30'). The project includes an attached two -car garage (20' x 20', clear interior measurements) which provides two covered parking spaces for the proposed five -bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The following applications were approved by the City Council on April 20, 2009: ■ Design Review for a new two and a half story, single family dwelling with an attached garage (CS 25.57.010); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a new single family dwelling (C.S. 25.61.020). ■ Special Permit for an attached garage (CS 25.28.035 a); and ■ Variance for building height (63'-5" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060 c). 2843 Adeline Drive Lot Area: 22,036 SF Plans date stamped: November 28, 2012 and December 2, 2008 PROPOSED / AS -BUILT 3 ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1st fir): 41'-6" 35'-4" (block average) (2"d fir): 40'-6" (to BR # 5 overhang) 35'-4" (block average) Side (left): 23'-6" 7'-0" (right): 12'-6" 7'-0" Rear (1st fir): 72'-6" 15'-0" (2nd fir): 72'-6" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 3,713.75 SF 8,000 SF 17% I 36% FAR: 6,087.1 SF i 8,000 SF 0.28 FAR 0.36 FAR' # of bedrooms: 5 --- Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') i 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 63'-5" z 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies CS 25.28.075 (0.32 x 6,875 SF) + 1100 SF = 8,152 SF (0.37 FAR). The maximum single-family residential house size shall be 8,000 gross square feet, excluding accessory structures (CS 25.28.070 e). 2 Variance for building height (63'-5" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060 c). -2- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Staff Comments: Staff would note that condition #2 was removed from the conditions of approval for this Design Review Amendment based on the applicants request. That condition was "that the deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans". See attached original project comments from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al through All and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; -3- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner C. Alex Mortizavi, Denham LLC, 2843 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010, applicant and property owner. -4- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Attachments:' Letter from applicant to Planning Commission, date stamped November 28, 2012 Original Application to the Planning Commission, date stamped June 30, 2008 Minutes from the April 20, 2009 City Council Appeal Meeting Minutes from the March 9, 2009, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Staff Comments (from original application) Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 30, 2012 Aerial Photo -5- November 27, 2012 Erica Strohmeier City of Burlingame Planning Department Re: 2843 Adeline Drive Dear Erica, In response to your November 15, 2012 e-mail regarding the list of items that require FYI and/or Design Review Amendment, I would like to clarify the following: 1. The approved landscape along the southeast neighbor was impossible to implement due to the fact that the sewer and storm drain easements were granted to the house at Vista Lane. Due to this easement, the planting of any tree was impossible. The approved landscape plan showed seven (7) 24-inch Umbellularia. In lieu of this we have placed four (4) 48-inch large evergreen trees and twelve (12) giant bamboo trees approximately 20 to 25 feet tall. This massive screening was done to please our neighbor, Mr. & Mrs. Art LaBrie. The landscape in front showed three (3) trees to be planted in anticipation that by building a retaining wall, all the existing very tall trees will be damaged or removed. That scenario did not happen and we were able to preserve the four (4) existing mature trees The approved landscape plan shows five (5) trees at the southwest corner. These trees are impossible to plant due to the retaining walls and limited space available for any kind of vegetation. We have planted seven (7) giant bamboo trees, approximately 20 to 25 feet tall as a replacement. In addition, we have planted fourteen (14) hedge plants for privacy from the street and screening of the house. 2. One window was added in the shower of the second floor bathroom for light and ventilation. 3. Fronted glass entry/gate was installed for privacy and security. 4. The bathroom window above the garage was reduced in size due to the location of the interior wall. S. The garage door was upgraded from metal panel to wood and glass custom door. RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2012 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 6. The deck adjacent to Bedroom #3 was not reduced by 50%. This was a subject of objection by Mr. Art LaBrie, our next door neighbor. This is a single neighbor concern and not a community issue. We have made tremendous effort to reach an agreement with him to keep our deck. In the process, we have offered him numerous concessions as follows: a. A permanent recorded easement for his driveway which is encroaching in our property b. A permanent recorded landscape easement for his encroachments on the side of our property c. Provide and pay for survey and legal fees for the above d. Plant four (4) very large trees between the two properties (on top of that, we additionally provided twelve giant bamboo trees as a privacy hedge for him) e. Repair and/or replace the fence between the two properties f. Install two (2) 48-inch trees at his property near the driveway g. Replace and pay for his pool filter 7. The horizontal wood siding at the rear of the house was upgraded to stained wood, but was reduced in area because of the symmetry of the rear elevation. 8. The small slanted skylight roof was eliminated due to structural complexity and issues. All of these minor changes to the building are not visible from the street and public. Members of the Planning Commission are welcome to contact me for a site visit and/or a tour. My cell phone number is (650) 619-4871. Regards Alex avi 2843 Adeline Drive, LLC RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2012 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. 06/30/2008 MON 15:23 FAX 415 394 8767 FDI Architecture Inc, � 001/002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696,3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: / 3 Design Review ❑ Variance ErParcel #: 02"7 O •z� - i O ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:_ ?,C2 4 "5 1`91 Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person 0" OK to send electronic copies of documents Q Name: 5- (7 4 i 1"r—, Address: #:�-7SO City/State/Zip: J. l i\aC_4!s G / q'�i t � Phone: l arm �- - -`ti? Y I Fax: � -f � � ,!-1- - e5-7-6 -q- E-mail: corr., ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person OK to send olactronic copies of documents ❑ Name: f:�& m e ,/1 %-t ac \/k_= Address: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents 0 Name: ,c, Address: 1 City/State/Zip: F5Uj-L.1 t...)61rp,'-e 1 O Phone: /(rli��7 1`371 ^ -T- 19-f Fax: E-mail: bi+Y,;t �5 (Pn��r��f�(�•(/�P_; City/State/-Lip: Fax: (� Q •JUN e.� � ?008 E-mail: �k Burlingame Business License PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FnP W,_-z_ C'., ;r' r--A-fz^ a C—� A FFADAV IT/SIG NATURE: I hereby....., nder penat of perjury at he information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. `th�_�` i f Applicant's signature: r` /J Date: I am aware of the proplplgd application and hereb authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: 3 v Date submitted: �z!>CJe * Verification that the project arcltitect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. 0 Please mark one box above with an X to Indicate the contact person for this project. S:\Handouts\PG Application 2008-B.handout West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week. Mr. Preger introduced Dr. Chindry Peavy, Chief Entomologist for the District. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW 3 Y2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE, ON PROPERTY AT 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE CDD Meeker reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on the appeal of the application for design review, hillside area construction permit, variance for height and special permit for an attached garage for a new 31/2 story single family dwelling on property at 2843 Adeline Drive, and consider public testimony and analysis contained in the staff report. Action concerning the appeal should include specific findings supporting the Council's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the City Council. Mayor Keighran opened the public hearing. The following spoke: Alex Mortazavi, applicant; Mark Bender, attorney for the appellant, 520 S. El Camino, San Mateo; Art Labrie, 2839 Adeline Drive, appellant. Mayor Keighran closed the hearing and requested comments from the public. The following citizens spoke: Cynthia Beck, 731 Birch Avenue, San Mateo (read a letter from Mrs. Labrie); Michael Gaul, 2838 Adeline Drive; Gil McCoy, 1022 Bayswater, Burlingame; David Win, 2835 Adeline Drive; Justin Jarvis, 2835 Adeline Drive. Mayor Keighran closed the public comment period. Council discussion followed. Councilman Deal made a motion to deny the appeal, and affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the project, subject to the 19 conditions in the staff report; motion seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote 4-0-1 (Baylock absent). Councilman Deal made a motion to allow the deck, shown on the project plans adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3, at dimensions that are one-half the depth and one-half the width of the design shown on the project plans approved by the Planning Commission; motion seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. Motion approved by voice vote 3-0-1-1 (Nagel dissenting; Baylock absent). _ ..... ................ _................... ....._... b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE CREATING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTIES SITUATED AT 1008-1028 CAROLAN AVENUE AND 1007-1025 ROLLINS ROAD: (i) ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE SECTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAROLAN/ROLLINS ROAD COMMERCIAL AREA AND TO ADD MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE LAND USE WITHIN THE AREA ; AND 01) INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 25 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD AN R-4 OVERLAY FOR CERTAIN C-2 ZONED PROPERTIES IN THE CAROLAN/ROLLINS ROAD COMMERCIAL AREA TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AS A CONDITIONAL USE 2 Burlingame City Council April20, 2009 Approved Minutes CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ChW4.Cauchi called fora voic&vQ1egn the motion to approve. 1111.1 assed 7-0. MPcedures were a vis item concluded a . . 3. 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW, 3 Y2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (ROBERT VAN DALE, EDI ARCHITECTURE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DENHAM LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated March 9, 2009, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Alex Mortazavi, 20 Vista Lane; represented the applicant: ■ Have self-imposed a setback of over 23-feet from the side property line due to trees along the fence line; the trees will reduce the appearance of bulk and mass of the building. ■ Noted that the trees will be California Laurel along the side of the residence; will be staggered in a manner to totally block the view of the residence at the fence line. ■ Brought a window sample for the Commission to view. ■ Submitted a manufacturer's cut -sheet for the bi-fold doors and windows. Commission comments: ■ Noted that lines of sight were drawn from several locations; was the 131.5' elevation the elevation of the patio on the adjacent property (Mortazavi — has no idea what the patio elevation is; believes it is at roughly 127' or 128'). ■ Might there be more information regarding views toward the project from the southern end of the adjacent yard on the right-hand side (Mortazavi — the right side is not affected; he owns the lot above). ■ What is the growth potential for the trees (Mortazavi — up to 20-feet tall and 25-feet wide). ■ Clarified that the thought process is to move the trees to the fence line to block the view of the house from the adjacent property; was there any thought to keeping the trees at the building itself (Mortazavi — having the tree next to the building doesn't help as much, but will be offsetting some of the trees. It is his interest to retain as much landscaping as possible; but lose the use of 4,000 square feet of property by doing so. There will be portions of the property that are visible. The eight, 24-inch trees are significant landscape features). ■ Could the residence be camouflaged more by doing more planting; is there any way to clad the elevator with wood rather than stucco (Mortazavi — the tower is further in from the property line by around 14'). ■ What is the best view from the residence (Mortazavi — one of the best views is towards Highway 92; though under County development standards, something could be built to block the view). ■ Consider eliminating or reducing the deck off of the bedroom; it is substantial in size (Mortazavi — that is the only sunny deck on the house; because of the other difficulties with the site. Will not be a heavily used area. Placing it a few feet back will not help the neighbor). The Commission tries to limit exposure of neighbors to decks overlooking a neighboring yard; due to the size of the deck, there is the potential for greater activity. There is another deck on a lower level. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 Public comments: Art and Kaelani LaBrie, 2839 Adeline Drive; Mike Ghaul, 2838 Adeline Drive; Gil McCoy, 1022 Bayswater Avenue; Steve Ehrlich, 2833 Adeline Drive; George Chrissman, 2848 Adeline Drive; Eileen Shefsky, 24 Vista Lane; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke: ■ The bedroom deck is larger than either of the two bedrooms; the elevator shaft leads directly to the deck; suggested that the owners of the home would use the deck more frequently, impacting privacy of the adjacent property to the left. ■ Is a beautiful house, but it belongs on a 5-acre lot nearer to Los Angeles; doesn't belong in the Burlingame Hills; the story poles confirmed the height of the proposed structure above the property to the left. ■ Felt that the findings for the requested height Variance cannot be made; reviewed the findings. There are other alternatives to the site and project design. ■ Will decrease the value of the property to the left by $150,000-$400,000. ■ Cited the significant difference in the size of the home versus the existing homes within the area. ■ A smaller version of the house would be a more marketable project. ■ Requested that the applicant explore other design alternatives. ■ The configuration of the property makes it difficult to develop; this is not the fault of the developer; how can the problem be best resolved. ■ The prior design was too forced on the lot; it was suggested at that time that the design follow the form of the lot. ■ Feels it is a good design. ■ The only problem in meeting the zoning requirements is the height; there is no good solution, but the current proposal is the best solution. ■ Landscape screening will minimize impacts on the neighbor. ■ There is a large old Oak tree in front of Gall's property; should be protected during construction. ■ Suggested a smaller home to be more marketable and to reduce impacts. ■ The design impacts privacy of the neighbors, even three (3) properties away from the site. ■ This is more than double the maximum height allowed. ■ Looks like a high-rise building; there is a huge potential to impact the privacy of neighbors. ■ The design is out of character with the neighborhood. ■ Shefsky's property is two (2) stories; no Variances were requested. ■ The applicant is agreeable to providing screening on the right side. ■ Also open to providing a green roof system. ■ Sooner or later, something will likely be built on the property; should the neighbors decide to appeal the Planning Commission's approval; would the City Council be bound to use the same rules applied to properties lying within the City of Burlingame? ■ The Planning Commission is sensitive to privacy issues; some of the issues raised by the neighbors are overblown. Applicant rebuttal by Alex Mortazavi: ■ Is not an office building; the Variance is caused by the method of measuring height in Burlingame; the measurement is taken from the curb line; the house follows the terrain of the lot. ■ Has owned the property for almost 10-years. ■ The solar panels on adjacent properties are irrelevant; they lie to the south of the property and will not be impacted by the new home. ■ The access to the deck from the elevator can be eliminated, if desired. ■ The style of architecture in the neighborhood is mixed. ■ The prior proposal was presented a year ago; current project is less visible. 7 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ■ Real estate agents have their own opinions regarding impacts upon property values. ■ The design of the house steps up the hill and adds to the cost of the construction due to the amount of circulation space necessary within the residence. ■ Were surprised that the neighbor encroaches upon the property with retaining walls and gates. ■ The hardship is that the lot contains one-half acre; are preserving the trees on the property; this is only a two-story building. ■ The block's average setback also creates a hardship. ■ Have minimized impacts upon the neighbors; every adjustment affects one of the neighbors; there must be a compromise; the project can't be made invisible. ■ Having a $3 million home next to a property will increase the value of the adjacent properties. ■ The Commission is aware of the efforts that have been made by the applicant. Additional Commission comments: Concerned that bedrooms 2 and 3 are problematic elements in the design; there is a certain realty that has to be accepted; the Commission is responsible for finding compromises. Has the applicant looked at shifting the mass of the bedroom to the other side of the building (Mortazavi — has looked at this alternative. Considered flipping the floor plan, but ends up impacting mature trees, particularly due to the driveway location. Would also disturb the Shefsky property even more. Can't cantilever the bedrooms; would need to expand the family room and add to the bulk of the property and impact trees. Have communicated with the neighbors and made attempts to address neighbors' interests). Regarding the screening on the south side; how tall are the trees (Mortazavi — drawn at 14-feet, but will grow to 25-feet). The tree will work better as a screen if it is taller (Mortazavi — staggering the trees will also help to screen). Continuing the mass on the south side would have a greater impact than the current design. Noted that a cool, concrete color will help to disguise the mass. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Further Commission comments: The applicant has taken the direction of the Planning Commission well; is a good design. The trees being installed on the property will provide a lot of screening. Has demonstrated that the house will be well screened from Adeline Drive. Commissioner Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: Reduce deck to 8-foot depth from the front facade. Tree protection for Oak across the street. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: ■ Concern is more with the width of the deck as it impacts the neighbor to the left, consider reducing the width rather than the depth. ■ Consider revising the motion to reduce width of deck by 50% instead of 8-foot depth reduction. ■ Clarified that the Commission never voted on the prior application. ■ The challenges created on the property are due to the topography. M CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ■ There was always an acknowledgement that there would be a Variance of some sort required for development of the property. ■ The story poles have demonstrated the potential impacts; the home is in excess of 6,000 square feet, the design is nearly acceptable, but not yet; the impacts of the bedrooms can be mitigated by placing them on the first floor. ■ Commissioner Brownrigg indicated that he couldn't support the current project as designed, without mitigating the mass more; there is no need for the deck off of the bedroom. ■ Applicant commended on the design of the building, moved in this direction at the suggestion of the Planning Commission; has addressed the concerns of the neighbors to a large degree; though there is still some impact on the LaBrie property. ■ Would like the deck off of the bedroom eliminated. ■ Hard to touch rooms to the ground with this type of design; the decks are an important element of the design and the livability of the house. ■ The screening proposed by the applicant should work to address neighbor impacts; there are actually few windows on the left wall of the residence. ■ The house is already set back quite a distance from the left property line. ■ The design in general is well worked out, has been studied by the applicant. ■ Maker of motion indicated a willingness to eliminate the deck off of the bedroom; agreed to by the second of the motion. ■ Planting plan for trees along the left side of the property should return to the Commission as an FYI. 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al through Al and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that the deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be eliminated from the design; 3. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 4. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 8. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 9. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; Q] CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 10. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 11. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 12. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 13. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 15. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 16. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 17. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 18. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 19. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Brownrigg dissenting). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:42 p.m. 4. 3 5 MARGARITA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION F R AMENDMENT TO DES SI SETBACK VARIANCE A HILLSIDE AREA CONSTR TION PERMIT FOR CH ZENTI E OUSLY APPROVED MA AND LOWER LEVEL A ITION (MIKE KERWI FF-KERWIN, APPLICANW.S AND PROPERTY OW RS; AND JOHN N ARCHIT T) PROJECT PLANNER:NLISA WHITMAN N REVI , JGES T AND AM SCALC0, Reference st report dated March 9, 20 with attachments. Commun\onditions ent Director ' eker presented the port, reviewed criteria and tall comments. Thirteen (1were suggestconsideration. Chair Cauchi note at this agenda report was t in his packet; he waeview the report and v it the site. Comm sinner Brownrigg indicate hat he would abstain since he sits on the Gr n Ribbon Task F ce with the applicant. uchi opened KeltonNHomwner 501 Waller tr( ■ posed amend ■ decided to setbacks by a . Commission corftents: None. is comments: FrankSulgit,1560 Los I Drive; Vd Pat Giorni, 1 ■ QLXstioned the credib con uction? hearing. represented the affects the downhill side f the property. iin the existing wall and fo T g on the left side of the prop ; affected inches. Drive; Brian NNrphy, 3101 Margarita Drive; f�kglaine Darling, 3100 Margarita Iboa Avenue; oke: T of the Buildink Inspections Division; what elke may be missed in the ■ Two ns are present on a property, thi is over the limit of what is all ed; is this due to the applica 's membership on a Green Ribbo Task Force (Brownrigg — the si age on the property has nothi to do with his rn bership on the een Ribbon Task Force. Terr es — feels that the Building D 'sion staff takes e ry measure to nsure that projects are built a ording to plans; appears tha he existing wall w perfectly goo use). ■ Requested tw conditions of app val that should a tightened up. Would like to ake sure that \Fe re signifi nt retaining walls tween the prop rties that should remain in plac - the existing hould be paired/replaced in xactly the sam osition. leftsideset ckVariance;took ay a significa ortion ofthe existing bedroom, easures se to what it hould be; there is ignificant diffe nce at the rear; appears to b ' 6"; as Condition 11equire a survey of a property; ne to have the true setbacks r lected rom/Terrones — el a survey should a required. Au n — if survey demonstrates that the not on the prop y line, would not b comfortable wit roposed change to Condition 3). at the wall definin the bedroom on the lower level has "c t" closer to the left property line. that Murphy (prop y owner to left) wishes to have fence i talled in the same location as 11 Project comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Driveway approach appears to extend beyond property line projection to the street. The entire driveway must stay within the property line projection to the street. Reviewed by: V V Date: 7/22/2008 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS lJelj 'DID "Nov Project Name: Project Address: The following requirements apply to the project 1 A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property comers, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the / building permit issuance.) 2 The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 re atutary sewer lateral l� is required for the project in accordance with City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMRIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions / in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14y The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 '✓ The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22y/ The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re -submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW CONINENTS.doc Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must obtain a change of address from the Engineering Department. The County records show this parcel address as 12 Vista Lane. The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 5) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non- residential buildings. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. 8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. 9) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 10) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 11) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 12) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 13) NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, and 8 must be re-submi ed before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by -� Date: a v Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 1 -61ty Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 Reviewed by: Date: 7/� �/' � 0- Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The furthest point of the structure shall not exceed 150 feet distance from approved fire apparatus access. Provide fire apparatus access 20 feet wide to the structure consistent with §503, IFC 2006. Driveway maximum slope shall not exceed 16% and the angles of approach shall not exceed 5%. Turning maximum turning radius shall comply with Central County Fire Department's standards. Engineer shall ensure at least fire hydrants can provide at least 1,500 gpm fire flow for 2 hours and a fire hydrant shall be accessible within 400 feet of the furthest point of the structure along fire apparatus access. Reviewed by: s --� Date: >,%� a Fe Date: To: From: Project Canarnents July 1, 2008 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Recycling Specialist (650) 558-727 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Include a list of BMPs and erosion and sediment control measure plan as project notes when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochures for guidance. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: -FT Date: 07/07/2008 Remember: The property owner and the contractor share ultimate responsibility for the activities that occur on a construction site. X'ou will be held responsible for any environmental damages and associated clean-up costs. cm - ..............San )•(.tko Cadyide star.tlwdter rol[Wi Prewrdbnpmsybm 0 a ..�.:.., General'Y' Construction & Site Supervision /td.ddr -.- ..4 lr.tw M ary re•b«PM.",T sam.i...al.a N•d t.n Irya'att..d0. «phw rW -d. r.-In b fwe 'k-1 rkkgkk fW.r.rrr..w a,.4wa In O..wvxar A..ie kwrrllk.ad.dwt WrMpr4a. k d,. (wlreLly+ri.t.gr , tA-,,ldb►y.datkam rrep 'rwy r rw...rl a.ar •:r.n.rr n w.w r dr Rduw ar,..r...rc,dww. y ..nd,N.t r•p+r•ybAa...wkwr.wb. ' ?n �w a.yly.e ud r.►o.ir.dra Mk. D.r bwkrr wd+k r.rry.w wbw.,b •dpb arttbdw r►e.IMtwE. w..n..bNlkr ak. wrwYrr.q.R..,.r W +.drr-f...lMklr WYrdglq Prfrdr• •Irr4rww WwwlrrJ wrr.a ra It r.rkre,.eY4.darN, ra rwrr..p.}wer ..I.I..ra T\.arip.NwawYMwll nny k-wrdYtm.- -Y.. M.kr ..er q.d. •Rd.e •u.4 b.lebY.r.rn. r.l.-pre.wl errf .rrbrk..11M wrta C•wer wrr.dpM.f .NI ra�.wd.. wv:Y Wlb P1rdr.krrY{w .wp.ay.wN. •Rrrp pN4YY .Ire.p..d arbor Pl.r Id ra W t"7dM.•rtPwriw•..a tl d. WLkar. I.. '- a.q.0rb.rd.r+.brrrw +.ka w«d-rlk RPrr.r d.l.. -N- •b« laa.b w.durrdwigorw.p r.dwrW 'Ckr� bk&ka arl. W wYr r•a I-NWdr w N'•y M.r e.rir..Il r trw.+..r r Inr .-tar r pwd.«b� U.. aI •k•rT.-b.i wYaurprWla Yyw wlwW.r,vJ.f ••••tk. kT au dM dw,. 'C•.w W as %TW d..p.k-C.A fl pm Iy nr Ir4 PYr-a. w.R w w... Wlb frr wpyk.hratar..+.r.N •r .. .fM awl.Ya A ptd. Itv Y ws.a W d r p.r.w. b-.1% lyda It. etr.dL. 0. b \d4 B a... •.Ike a.•.rndh Ma fhk\...rt P.rrk Irks rt• r►rbe+ b t••d w.rbq waer\y be lyd•t r..p.ry W ttr wa.. r dq.wd cp.p.. 6d WIM N.q..ry rw 6k. rw.Nrxw.r d. hw " •ine.r Yree fdMk. �.d.Ywlr w.re r\o y..:rd,,..lwbk. Mdr ary n..w.w y veal r Ik" r)N. fU..e1.4a4• -ba br.ewr"Ab,M W rNa,d ,d.w.rw4Y..d,rr.r.., r•hi r.w.art rl.waa. +..-d•w• ...II.n,P.).,,a3, W.NMe ndwwtr.}drel.h 'Nq•.mbrM arr.Wf W wqs m.M wryeka, ks4ak:whetq. W pRfiN1011Mtig(`fa1�p �Irr1 d.a-.b..rY W MrY.f.a r�r r.r,rd w�. a...a... wrr. nr.r bry w.h ..Nars.b w Irw iRs ► d-r...l w •r . er.k wr anar k.a. 'Plop.m P.dicipftlte AR.dary BelmuN, Bd.Wnq Btrlitq.me, Cobnti Ddy Gly, fial hlo Allq RxlrGly, Hdf Moon B.y, HlkDmou/I� Menb Part M7lbne, P.oilkt Porloia NRey„ Redwood City, Sm Bma, s.n Wo., San Malm, Smdk San PrNrcif o, WoodtidC County of sm mem. Pollution Prevention It's Part of the- Plan It is your responsibility to do. the job right! Runoff from streets and otherpaved areas is a•rnajor source of pollutionin local creeks, San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Construction activities can directly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Followingthese guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater ordinance requirements. Remembe , ongoing monitoring and maintenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth -Moving Equipment Operation SJr ylr,wfR.wd P^'••+•• mad. -Aw r.wre S.". NM fr.wdr m. 1- ♦0.4•••...WNdrr•.rb.+.rxd. •...k.•. ayw.«wkmm.rwdr4 wkr.Y..dyprw..a M aYa w.R rn} fw..f r «rww a,•b kdq brr W.}.j..rr pNl,t, r.Ibiy, W.rttlr �rrr.a....4p. a.kro...w••4 a.•r. rd..m. }akk W•r'Ip'r••f.dr-o dd..rrp\.yWr,lr}.wr..••ka dR npm, tw... «srr+rk hM nRWON...a / IMi.rk •I,iklrrrkrygalpurt.layrrd N.• . }rny brr+q.Y1rR ♦w.t�d.r«afa..ba4.w r.Y.w+nw.s dm dB.aa wrk Pwnr.•/•r wdr..r.w, rl•4inbr..d.Akk W' q.Ip..rw.hlnt.R.lr. try..~bd. Wrpb,--er d4 •.nr.r e,r4.� wrbr "I r Ay wr &tp P- «ar:p eS." r add bk••^+ytlh. M.rA.pw d.Ya.rw Y tq•.r srb.n,rd weP}k w\aw•« p..4k w akp.. d/hrla r1.rJw-.r. 10..wl.vdrd.ir Kdtr. wdw •q.l,.we1 « � R.gdswrf ..h4Ykwr4 Qr. p om \.� uda Aq d7ra I N.rw►w a..a •d.YP•ti••f wtn}w,.r.wa arbor wkw nr► \.w rp.Rt.d U.. s.y d.r.p ard. ••Pi (.k,mkwi r..l.lkrr Iltr,wdM..p) WY..n.r 'lam dUa Ifyw.nrlww.r,r jr.wwth r\..p dud.. +wa I swwr•rrNlraavn-- r.q.rtia.4dmf•d.ih W.rsw k«ydr.. ur rt1.Y W.r. p.rnY br+.t w•N. 16..nrp .Pnl. r Yn.rr. Na4d•1+••+rrt•dr dkped..tdmrrNrd.dl � R�wrtddddrr.pllb rM7}w,.4r yIN r.wrW+. Y.dr IerralydP Yw..rpYd by b. rr.rwl d r..Ylan..I.wr - ..r,bY, kd.w1 oR T.Igtm'IPll�.nw nBawlK, �r,c+ca: q Did YN ('». w1OfM.rfF�Nr.i.. WrNq 6r4 (AmI RTI-T170 (Ml,w.} Roadwork & Paving IUL � Dere4Pwkydr.r..fle.4dktw.,wd i+•r r« isad.4w.ralei.A tr-&%W..k rrdryw-fl.f. � O.ddlrl j-,wl h4a. W •PYk•ti7•1dP•"t pr.}dy: I Pwb.. r}rrbkarw, fq.In, W w.rkkt d.q.b• art.Wry N..,Mer...el.. dr, I w\r.bdrtrwnhv.ddl.�.ntrA+r.,m.r.b as w Nta d..Irr. • r.}ah!•dl w.In.i ..r .w.,' 6vr tbrr tiu W er.dk �% 0..rwriwl Nlr hbbu«ir. Thtil « nti i Rryd wJ d4 Mml.t w rdaban..yJwt.r w►rwrpwbla � T.d.e}asy.w kw:q d.cs kra •'••"Ir'r P,rdra D.&W C e.dk. ,/A .id prY.tW rslwd7 kwrwwb«,r nkw.:. �/ C•.r audl.tr fd rrw+d adl wk\afntdrr.w Y F..rfl\d NmklawMwil\..e 1Ym Yeva trd•a•Ww �Cs+«rl W..dt l..Ir W wrb4awhr Mwy4t I P,.p.y.r.kr.d rknd.J.warWW:n.0 A.r.db nt rd,ae. �U. ...k.a ar,dld.a «►.... w..w r.a_- _• r..w.Y. mu+d..a ,� •..p.fr/Wrn Nhw. xw4w W •di..w rwwl. I N� warm •r-W drrprd..srttr• m.- blkfhotarrwW..r,.btdp:/«.rwdnlaCr- r•fr•4.w ' d C.f.r.•adrPtr W drr...rd....f.db whk C-dP..br Pf.wk. N-+r�.,.d wk.- nw.dr.ln I Sad.k-A.W Jd tWorkMd7we.c �I:ra+rj.r awn r..«wii+rj, pi-..b.rb.a r. .. /P.rbrw.njr'T'k•••'•rVa.-1 dw 6ei.6.ha (.1-h. gr)P4mdw.as-&I..WhrwlIn- q.n•pd Ipdk.td 4domkt•bY.,.lk.df (Wilk /w%_ a.fq•rwbw.dkY.p.ip..Mw4..r. rr ��•• P}«d7t1.W n.rn rM.4 N dw wdta wrkwnW.m•.Wy\wwdrw.r.y _ n _ rd r,.k -RT.4 b•+r' Ahf- xrrmr Awn dr.+d.a Am4epardwrd law... dk.d.Nr a.ha-.rAw gdwrnwP.ru ` A-W •.w.,wliwiw 11,- brr dw--A ,I�dJ4rI.M P..ad p.w.d wr d,.f..q der _ . Aghd.Carrde S--' t/MY.s4Nr®+mt wRrb.Akt cpMltrau. �• IfRxdrrmdk4r...bwrir«trr.-..kr:. �' W ewrrMR7i.rlw Q.JIy Crw.l Mrk �Anwbrtl.. rP •f+P•••..a.,.b wnrnr.nN . Uw.J.N .dk4.t<,d�lardr,w.dw i•a.W p4m Yr du t4 �N.br.i lr.\..p.r..rla>.r.enr 1. wr.n Wh\ . r h.rd.wJ..•f•.{••r+rb • AbdwdwdY rkfr =irra arl.lr - r.W+.nb..3rw1 ♦ITra • Bwid k.rrrfr. aaar, r wk is -.•.a 1 • akq A. -I. W ,ww rr du Nar`•r - rlrrw\... brwa..r. b.kr P-ad aK U.. a.y Fresh Concrete & Mortar Application Caved Yrbw. Ih.dra � B.lk r yryra W b r.ts+4a ak1 •l••Y• ror kWh dfyW Wr •.w.4b wdw m.w,1^f.wd 11.. Dbnl W tr.afC P.rddrrrif..kh Ibuwbi � Smanipf d aa.sl dvn9 •• T•. Br.rt r Isq. WMJlwwr.rtp.+ar.wq R.r t.rrra.r,. • ,\d...rbnL.dlvlC I ww.r er.r. •a.a..y kd.ttwrar..\...w.r k yvy,�►\.. tr wvwi B Mw}b madam Para M.wrrr.s7Ela.'y')'waiw.lYi►+•!4N 6d:Ir wYr. rr.ua llerr+]aP.r rwmbelYr ne drtd, d.rr af.ka aN..K akk.a •r tvawa D..rY G.aa'r.rtr. ' ♦ D.t.d. nr rr bA r.w.. r.wr.dr. yw WRI tr k•ty. � tr.r.d qWr. rdl rhw. r rp. «\.ry par. a" rw.k ��dr.l.t.wrtraNw-grddcw.b mns.cnr.; k nr w.dh.ra w dww dr a1••wR w b. er ae.d r r«w drala � py.rwd.tyepffwadl Rmdm}W.y/pd• emNnwio. dw.u.. w..�t alww dNrn N.r.NVRy w.k w. do W >•W Irr in. ./ n.. t•7 bk. r.brwrk. raved.+.wnd.p. r r.,.r.ww1•^Ir•t.rdrw w.rlMf.n kwrM b.at«r lk.4 WM \a11rq Tp•fl•r.bw.• r Nd.r.R tb r:.. N ew+b Pr°1ii11 ./ R.rye4 M•.bd. Nt..ka.wnr tl . W nR � DI...r+drwN..w-. d.rsw lry w-wa nrt Questibns7 Call the Office of Environmental Compliance .(650) 342-3727 Painting & Application of Solvents & Adhesives RBA N..aklf rd« Py.d- i Kr to N}•Id Paw rrd.d...d -. -7 rnr ne R.M.. N.wR d r.rr +rA, .l.kpld rld.0 nrn Pb4 W m.q.Iraq tk.%wd dada IWd. re LsAw w.r. rd .w r di�....d •f..h.ad.r r mlrstim IbIM (mdrt y.,rlrat ownwrr P Wb .d- ./ ri— der bnbt u d.w P.bl errdtwr. I.I. i« w.kr-\rd rwlry P wn 4wde b nr •n.t Psrnik Rlr rd...Ji.w- r .•mra\...pk l.d d Pw.Jr:.dr. b.trrrr wd.rhr Nwr pw pdr+..W. deda iw.Lhw.d P-k, r•iw- b.k. t. M r.rw p.r At. W a6.wit, W.-r.lwr b .pr"w-W.r. YIN- W ww da..a W a hwa Dh rw xar. N•bf W..Id.a.\mraw wrta rd ra.d ./ hbl dp. W a-1 fnr...-kuraw. dry WOWNN rd .d Yrd.t .Tb m.r.pr wll..ndbplait b•lr ebb. ra iwr.d x «.r1 Cb,,W P.kl rrlPPt" rddwr Will.• W drt N.w.ra. Prr. w PN.s r.rbbt k.d .r,dk.yl R. W.ul b dy«ed of u \md•m ruck Whm.d,pbt«skrl.t 6d ,Wff Wd .WW NSA. p .r.w w ;bYirt prr.+.i.r MN Wrw rr. al. to, MR: ok k* Whk d. t.d akt.rrr.w .dry. nd w Yyr w.11- ..J \•Rdbt dvd.twrr-4 A'P .I.tb.mlwy uWe<R.npB.t xber.rngb r}drd b ufkl lke wuYw.rrttrr.rtrbdry 4 a..kktb d«46a Ay-- ol Rwyt. sww abpwr •f- wdr-i.d pd.l .. MrbY Irr.d.r WrresRsr4.fmlRry, veer T. Whf.tk.Yw b-r.\IY AM r,.yp.idr at ud brh.k.y, ant d.r dub ..r b di.},r.d xw p*w b I.-I.ry Ydfll Landscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance III IIII r it Od00 nrmt-W..4 -;.1. R.. ww d .W. by.rrkttb.-aw vela.r.r..d,drJ.- ;k � nr. rwklas• kwl.r.a W wb. ekawld. kdrn r k a d.d warrrp rbin.l l 3.)ed•I9 Ddht W m.r-41 r-4- fW dry w.br. If U. fwr.rry d.d a.r r&W.r dh. -W.wq frm atrw awkk Prrs.arnn a,d. 6W.-kh kq1-6.b..q Ak. rY ni dR dwdreyb,p'C.Nr. Na - JIhe.pP-W&.W f.Rw U"A; -Rk.rw- W rw. W r .kraw:rr a prd.n Di- dd.d wwd.n h tb wh ,/Dlvp rW...ap-kkt. rh...dwr...: i6R.nI-Wtrdr.aWT p••l•twwtwrr. Wrrkµ Cup If.- q.-1 r.r V. rt Pl.m *d w.r. I. W.-I I. rwrr.klo Wide MrNa yrdww•,•rp' Rnt, Owe dippl^p Wpn.kt awpkkq, k a,,,.wd kW «s�rken Or, rb b.lrertR bN wr•..w y.d. as Pf.U/•e.wrlNSy. M.J,ww..,e � Wrs dr\.t..M1kd.uN P,rl r.P. ww Y...wl ..rw. a..Ia ,r Fla. "Iylnt. Md - ra %, Akrl.e d.k- b, d . 7"- Tb.-ge4.ilwby dnhb, k t.ady.d.. %.d-.,.ed ws.rawl. to d.AWd w.urr.a,.m +Ma ,I N..rtrrr4 rh.dw.wrrwrs:l ' �Rwr 4nww.Bkrd lWt. DI.Pr.duwu R.•K I6kdr.aer rYbudwh.pdrda ri.y +.rdkeab4Ar\rrJr. Wrr faw.r(YPBowed kylkebnlr.warr.aelrnl.eWmeJjt .rnkt.\wr r.•,Iliry.kk.rwwapj..k.n.w).ea ' I3n..RyrYyt...raslw4.MMd.WS.n Mr. ,La ' G..OrEwlm.w.rllled: D'r:lr rteu&q rtrydkt Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! I ' moo: h:wh;h:K�: �:�F.b b:; ` ,I D..N ..r s.p,.r-bw+.k'•lao C ." dr. rhh sk4.:w w vent Jrw.d.. t. rgy..2-d pwl drri dr. C.rPr h Yrwb11. ...Nk Uk .d e..ut lrc r npk,dr rewwd hr ne ww.tr tw.ww.t •r«. WHY SHOULD WE WORRY ABOUT SOIL EROSION? Water and wind carry soil from our Bay Area land down into our streams, lakes and the Bay. This soil carries with it pollu- tants sucfn as oil and grease, chemicals, fertilizers, animal wastes and bacteria, which threaten our water quality. Such erosion also costs the home construction industry, local government, and the homeowner untold millions of dollars a year. Nature slowly wears away land, but human activities such as construction increase the rate of erosion 200, even 2, 000 times that amount. When we remove vegetation or other objects that hold soil in place, we expose it to the action of wind and water and increase its chances of eroding. The loss of soil from a construction site results in loss of topsoil, minerals and nutrients, and it causes ugly cuts and gullies in the landscape. Surface runoff and the materials it carries with it clog our culverts, flood channels and streams. Sometimes it destroys wildlife and damages recreational areas such as lakes and re- servoirs. As an example, road and home building in the Oakland hills above Lake Temescal filled the lake to such an extent that it had to be dredged in 1979 at a public cost of $750,000. NEED MORE INFORMATION? ABAG has produced a slide/tape show on soil erosion called "Money Down the Drain." It is available for showing to any interested group. Call ABAG Public Affairs at (415) 841-9730. ABAG has also published a "Manual of Standards for Sur- face Runoff Control Measures" which deals extensively with designs and practices for erosion prevention, sedi- ment control, and control of urban runoff. The manual addresses problems and_ solutions as they apply to California and the Bay Area. It can be purchased from ABAG and is available on reference at many local libraries and in city and county public works and planning depart- ments. USDA Soil Conservation Service personnel are willing to provide more information on specific erosion problems. This brochure is a cooperative project of the Association of Bay Area Governments and the East Bay Regional Park District. �s;pOF6AV AREA F3M ASSOCIATION EAST BAY REGIONAL lalBl GOVERNMENTS PARK DISTRICT � •9-t5Bt731cyfitte-Bfvd. B Oak+artd-EA-346}9 D Al- PROTBCiING YOUR PROPERTY FROM EROSION EROSION CONTROL CAN PROTECT YOUR. PROPERTY AND PREVENT FUTURE. HEADACHES Vegetation stabilized Bare Slope: Headaches t i Slope: Security and Liability f 1r) %� ("; �• soil in place • mudslide danger • minimum of loss of topsoil erosion • dogged storm • fewer winter clean- drains, flooding up problems problems =1. • protection for • expensive /r house foun- d or f dations •eroded or buried house foundations .�1��'��r� TIPS FOR THE HOMEOWNEI "Winterize" your property by mid -September. Don't wait until spring to put in landscaping. You need winter protection. Final landscaping can be done later. Inexpensive measures installed by fall will give you protection quickly that will last all during the wet season. In one afternoon you can: • Dig trenches to drain surface runoff water away from problem areas such as steep, bare slopes. • Prepare bare areas on slopes for seeding by raking the surface to loosen and roughen soil so it will hold seeds. s- Seeding of bare slopes • Hand broadcast or use a "breast seeder." A typical yard can be done in less than an hour. • Give seeds a boost with fertilizer. • Mulch if you can, with grass clippings and leaves, bark chips or straw. • Use netting to hold soil and seeds on steep.slopes. • Check with your local nursery for advice. Winter alert • Check before storms to see that drains and ditches are not clogged by leaves and rubble. Check after major storms to be sure drains are clear and vegetation is holding on slopes. Repair as necessary. Spot seed any bare areas. WHAT YOU CAN DO TO CONTROL EROSION AND PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY Soil erosion costs Bay Area homeowners millions of dol- lars a year. We lose valuable topsoil. We have to pay for damage to roads and property. And our tax money has to be spent on cleaning. out sediment from storm drains, channels, lakes and the Bay. You can protect your prop- erty and prevent future heada ches by following these guidelines: BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION • Plan construction activities during spring and summer, so that erosion control measures can be in place when the rain comes. • Examine your site carefully before building. Be aware of the slope, drainage patterns and soil types. Proper site design will help you avoid expensive stabilization work. Preserve existing vegeta- tion as much as possible. Limit grading and plant removal to the areas under current construc- tion. (Vegetation will naturally curb erosion, improve the appearance and the value of your property, and reduce the cost of landscaping later.) • Use fencing to protect plants from fill material and traffic. If you have to pave near trees, do so with permeable as- phalt or porous paving blocks. • Preserve the natural contours of the land and disturb the earth as little as possible. Limit the time in which graded areas are exposed. - • Minimize the length and steepness of slopes by benching, terracing, or constructing diversion structures. Landscape benched areas to stabilize the slope and improve its appearance. • As soon as possible after grading a site, plant vegetation on all areas that are not to be paved or Otherwise covered. • Control dust on graded areas by sprinkling with water, restricting traffic to certain routes, and paving or gravel- ing access roads and driveways. TEMPORARY MEASURES TO STABILIZE THE SOIL Grass provides the cheapest and most ef- fective short-term ero- sion control. It grows quickly and covers the ground completely. To find the best seed mix- tures and plants for your area, check with your local nursery, the U.S. Department of Ag- riculture Soil Conserva- tion Service, or the University of California Cooperative Extension. Mulches hold soil moisture and provide ground protection from rain damage. They also provide a favorable envi- ronment for starting and growing plants. Easy -to -obtain mulches are grass clippings, leaves, sawdust, bark chips and straw. Straw mulch is nearly IGO% effective when held in place by spraying with an organic glue or wood fiber (tackifiers), by punching it into the soil with a shovel or roller, or by tack- ing a netting over it. Commercial applications of wood fibers combined with various seeds and fertilizers (hydraulic mulching) are effec- tive in stabilizing sloped areas. Hydraulic mulching with a tackifier should be done in two separate appli- cations: the first composed of seed fertilizer and half the mulch, the second composed of the remaining mulch and tackifier. Commer- cial hydraulic mulch applicators —who also provide other erosion control services — are listed under "landscaping" in the phone book. Mats of excelsior, Jute netting and plastic sheets can be ef- fective temporary covers, but they must be in contact with the soil and fastened securely to work effectively. Roof drainage can be collected in barrels or storage con- tainers or routed into lawns, planter boxes and gardens. Be sure to cover stored water so you don't collect mos- quitos, too. Excessive runoff should be directed away from your house. Too much water can damage trees and make foundations unstable. STRUCTURAL RUNOFF CONTROLS Even with proper timing and planting, you may need to protect disturbed areas from rainfall until the plants have time to, establish themselves. Or you may need permanent ways to transport water across your property so that it doesn't cause erosion. To keep water from carrying soil from your site and dump- ing it into nearby lots, streets, streams and channels, you need ways to reduce its volume and speed. Some exam- ples of what you might use are: perimeter dike straw mulch • Riprap (rock lining) —to protect channel banks from erosive water flow • Sediment trap —to stop. runoff carrying sediment and trap the sediment • Storm drain otItlet protection —to reduce the speed of water flow- ing from a pipe onto open ground or into a natural channel • Diversion dike or perimeter dike —to divert excess water to places where it can be disposed of properly • Straw bale dike —to stop and detain sediment from small unprotected areas (a short-term measure) • Perimeter swale—to divert runoff from a disturbed area or to contain runoff within a disturbed area r *� • Grade stabilization structure —to carry concentrated runoff down a slope sediment trap jute netting outlet protection diversion ditch bench �/ Gmservahee RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Amendment to Desiqn Review for as -built chanqes to a previously approved new 3 '/2 storv. single-family dwellinq and attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, Alex Mortizavi, Denham LLC, property owner, APN: 027-093-310: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on December 10, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single- family residences as part of a project. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10t' day of December, 2012 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 2843 Adeline Drive Effective December 20, 2012 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, A10 through A16 and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 2843 Adeline Drive Effective December 20, 2012 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. CITY OF BURLINGAME ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ..�i1 BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA94010a"L� _ PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 66f3790r� www.burlingame.org Site: 2843 ADELINE DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new, 3-1/2 story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2843 ADELINE DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 027-093-310 Mailed: November 30, 2012 (Please refer to other side) 49!8i533_ 00.3?G Llai;Ed From 94010 US POSTAGE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) • a' �..e 4r.71t: INN - ".•^+ a � � •.max aY � �"`' s^ ✓ +., � `:e"x`� aT' F �„�` t� ��ii'°�`'� �, q a`�e - .S .a `ice"'Y 1: <s°` ti '�'r .�T ,yL'l!$ �,�•: "" ,7 $.. .. r ,`•, t,€K• i „yT'� z t ¢y" t{ .•(t 9f, �Il,. �R Y �.Y� S. �lj`�� � +e6yV ♦Tµ ����. �+ y'.,�. T � � •dam» �.. r 'w b � ,, � t �} ♦ ♦ r, v x`-- I ate' ' w • �'���� � tn. "+ �� � 'i•, f�1l�•� ,'at �q � ! � -" j .. P a.. �� . 7 `���-f��i�.i' �. , , l' � «$E�irt�`• yq.@Y+y},i•, � S� r�., , t -`�_«. `vk.: y _ f- 1� :y°-�_�,�"e� ,�•� �'C`r �'�� .max. �` �i"` x :k �. Aq' iMG�. t • �Y( '�+� � G's r 1Yi^' w V 4Y Xib^.9t:..t► ��. _ i :? lip:.... 1a�rTt �<+a wfi'� `1'i`�i:�.2� + ax ! c..' 4�' � ♦ hr� , �jA .7 kr _ � t s . a v r j CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ' Ox 'ft p BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 6- I .j www.burlingame.org 1r, Site: 2843 ADELINE DRIVE 049J82053394 $ 00.320 AWL-d From 94010 US POSTAGE The City of Burlingame City Council announces the following PUBLIC HEARING public hearing on MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 2013 at 7:00 NOTICE P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: _ Application for Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new, 3-1/2 story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2843 ADELINE DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 021-093-310 Mailed: December 28, 2012 (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW FOR AS -BUILT CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW, 3 % STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE AT 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT: WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the property owner's request for Amendment to Design review for as -built changes to a new 3'/ story single family dwelling with an attached garage; and at that time considered the analysis included in the staff report prepared for the matter, all oral and written testimony provided during the course of the public hearing, and all documents and other evidence submitted regarding the matter; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012, based upon the analysis included in the staff report, and all oral and written testimony submitted during the public hearing on the matter, the Planning Commission moved to recommend to the City Council, approval of the request on a vote of 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Gaul recused); and WHEREAS, on January 7, 2013, the City Council of the City of Burlingame conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the property owner's request for Design Review Amendment; and at that time considered the analysis included in the staff report prepared for the matter, all oral and written testimony provided during the course of the public hearing, and all documents and other evidence submitted regarding the matter. NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame as follows: 1. All of the facts recited above and in the staff report and in all of the attachments thereto, are true and correct. 2. On the basis of the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this council, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and qualifies for a Categorical Exemption, per CEQA Article 19, 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single- family residences as part of a project. 3. Said Amendment to Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Amendment to Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 1 4. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Ann Keighran, Mayor I, Mary Ellen Kearney, Clerk of the City of Burlingame, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council held on the 7t' day of January, 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mary Ellen Kearney, City Clerk 2 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval — Amendment to Design Review — 2843 Adeline Drive 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01c, A10 through A16 and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these 1 venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 2 Item NE Regular Act on :] PROJECT LOCATION 2843 Adeline Drive City of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Item No. Regular Action Address: 2843 Adeline Drive Meeting Date: December 10, 2012 Request: Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3'/ story, single- family dwelling and attached garage. Applicant: Alex Mortizavi Property Owner: Denham LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-093-310 Lot Area: 22,036 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Background: On March 9, 2009, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Variance for height and Special Permit for attached garage for a new 3'/ story single family dwelling with an attached garage on what was previously a vacant parcel at 2843 Adeline (March 9, 2009, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). This approval was appealed to the City Council on March 18, 2009. On April 20, 2009 the City Council voted to deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the project with the added condition that the "deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans". The plans that were submitted to the Building Division for a permit reflected the added condition about the deck. A building permit was issued on January 20, 2010, and the project is complete at this time. Proposed Revisions: On November 8, 2012, the Planning Division conducted a final inspection of the project and noted that there were several changes made to the project. On November 28, 2012, the applicant submitted an application for a Design Review Amendment for the following as -built changes to the project: ■ The approved landscape plan was revised due to the placement on an easement along the left side property line; ■ A window was added in the shower area of the bathroom off of bedroom #4 along the left side elevation; ■ A Frosted glass entry/gate was installed next to the garage along the left side building elevation; ■ The bathroom window in bedroom #5 along the left side of the house was reduced in size; ■ The garage door was upgraded from metal panel to glass panel; ■ The deck adjacent to bedroom #3 was not reduced by 50% in length and width as was conditioned by the City Council; ■ The horizontal wood siding at the rear of the house was reduced in width, ■ The horizontal wood siding was upgraded from the approved material (Hardy Plank Siding), to stained mahogany wood siding; and ■ The slanted skylight roof off the rear of the house on the main level was replaced with a flat roof. The applicant submitted a letter describing all of the changes made to the house and originally approved and as - built building elevation drawings on November 28, 2012. Other than the changes listed above, there are no changes to the design of the house. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3'/z story, single-family dwelling and attached garage. Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Project Description (for originally approved project): The applicant was approved to build a new, 3 Y2 story single family dwelling with an attached two -car garage on what was previously a vacant, half acre parcel at 2843 Adeline Drive. The proposed house with attached garage has a total floor area of 6,087 SF (0.28 FAR) where 8,000 SF (0.37 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 1,913 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). Because the lot slopes upward more than 25%, the Planning Division has measured the overall height of the building from 15 feet behind the front property line of the lot at the intersection of the front and side setback lines at each side of the lot (C.S. 25.28.060 c). A Variance for building was approved as part of this project because the proposed height (3'/z stories, 63'-5") exceeds the maximum allowed (2'/2 stories, 30'). The project includes an attached two -car garage (20' x 20', clear interior measurements) which provides two covered parking spaces for the proposed five -bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The following applications were approved by the City Council on April 20, 2009: ■ Design Review for a new two and a half story, single family dwelling with an attached garage (CS 25.57.010); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a new single family dwelling (C.S. 25.61.020). ■ Special Permit for an attached garage (CS 25.28.035 a); and ■ Variance for building height (63'-5" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060 c). 2843 Adeline Drive Lot Area: 22.036 SF Plans date stamped: November 28, 2012 and December 2, 2008 PROPOSED / AS -BUILT I ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS j Front (1st fir): 413-6" 364" (block average) (2"d fir): 40'-6" (to BR # 5 overhang) 364" (block average) Side (left): 23'-6" ' 7'-0" (right): 12'-6" 7'-0" Rear (1st fir): I 72'-6" 15'-0" (2nd fir): I 72'-6" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 3,713.75 SF 8,000 SF 17% 36% FAR: 6,087.1 SF 8,000 SF 0.28 FAR 0.36 FAR' # of bedrooms: 5 --- Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: ( 63'-5" 2 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies CS 25.28.075 (0.32 x 6,875 SF) + 1100 SF = 8,152 SF (0.37 FAR). The maximum single-family residential house size shall be 8,000 gross square feet, excluding accessory structures (CS 25.28.070 e). 2 Variance for building height (63'-5" proposed, where 30', is the maximum allowed) (CS 25.28.060 c). -2- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Staff Comments: Staff would note that condition #2 was removed from the conditions of approval for this Design Review Amendment based on the applicants request. That condition was "that the deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be reduced in size to one-half of the depth and one-half of the width, as shown on the approved plans". See attached original project comments from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al through Al and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; -3- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner C. Alex Mortizavi, Denham LLC, 2843 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010, applicant and property owner. -4- Design Review Amendment 2843 Adeline Drive Attachments:' Letter from applicant to Planning Commission, date stamped November 28, 2012 Original Application to the Planning Commission, date stamped June 30, 2008 Minutes from the April 20, 2009 City Council Appeal Meeting Minutes from the March 9, 2009, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Staff Comments (from original application) Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 30, 2012 Aerial Photo -5- November 27, 2012 Erica Strohmeier City of Burlingame Planning Department Re: 2843 Adeline Drive Dear Erica, In response to your November 15, 2012 e-mail regarding the list of items that require FYI and/or Design Review Amendment, I would like to clarify the following: 1. The approved landscape along the southeast neighbor was impossible to implement due to the fact that the sewer and storm drain easements were granted to the house at Vista Lane. Due to this easement, the planting of any tree was impossible. The approved landscape plan showed seven (7) 24-inch Umbellularia. In lieu of this we have placed four (4) 48-inch large evergreen trees and twelve (12) giant bamboo trees approximately 20 to 25 feet tall. This massive screening was done to please our neighbor, Mr. & Mrs. Art LaBrie. The landscape in front showed three (3) trees to be planted in anticipation that by building a retaining wall, all the existing very tall trees will be damaged or removed. That scenario did not happen and we were able to preserve the four (4) existing mature trees. The approved landscape plan shows five (5) trees at the southwest corner. These trees are impossible to plant due to the retaining walls and limited space available for any kind of vegetation. We have planted seven (7) giant bamboo trees, approximately 20 to 25 feet tall as a replacement. In addition, we have planted fourteen (14) hedge plants for privacy from the street and screening of the house. 2. One window was added in the shower of the second floor bathroom for light and ventilation. 3. Fronted glass entry/gate was installed for privacy and security. 4. The bathroom window above the garage was reduced in size due to the location of the interior wall. 5. The garage door was upgraded from metal panel to wood and glass custom door. CR LEi V FE LD NOV 2 S 2012 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV 6. The deck adjacent to Bedroom #3 was not reduced by 50%. This was a subject of objection by Mr. Art LaBrie, our next door neighbor. This is a single neighbor concern and not a community issue. We have made tremendous effort to reach an agreement with him to keep our deck. In the process, we have offered him numerous concessions as follows: a. A permanent recorded easement for his driveway which is encroaching in our property b. A permanent recorded landscape easement for his encroachments on the side of our property c. Provide and pay for survey and legal fees for the above d. Plant four (4) very large trees between the two properties (on top of that, we additionally provided twelve giant bamboo trees as a privacy hedge for him) e. Repair and/or replace the fence between the two properties f. Install two (2) 48-inch trees at his property near the driveway g. Replace and pay for his pool filter 7. The horizontal wood siding at the rear of the house was upgraded to stained wood, but was reduced in area because of the symmetry of the rear elevation. 8. The small slanted skylight roof was eliminated due to structural complexity and issues. All of these minor changes to the building are not visible from the street and public. Members of the Planning Commission are welcome to contact me for a site visit and/or a tour. My cell phone number is (650) 619-4871. Regards Alex a 2843 Adeline Drive, LLC REZEI\/ I-E-HD NOV ✓ S LU i2 CITY O7- EURUNGAME ln0pueq'9-800Z u0119311 dy 0dXslnopuulh:S •ioa(wd slgi ao; uosiad ioeiuoo aqi aleolpul o; X ue q;inn anoge xog au0 Vew aseald O -pled ale saal uolleolldde owp eql le luaw;Jedaq aoueuld sql Aq pannbai aq 111m asueoll ssauisnq awefullang pileA a seg iau6lsapj;oallyoje loafoid aql ley2 uolleol;uaA �qc �pCVZ, 4V :palllwgns oleo 0 C7 :ales :aanleu6ls s,uaunno Apadad •uo!sslwwoO 6uluueld aq; of uolleoildde slgl l!wgns of lueo!ldde anoge aql anogl�Zununlldde psddoid egl;o alenne we I :ole(l :ajnleu6ls s,lueollddy la!laq pue a6palnnou>I �tw;o lsaq agl ol;oanoo pue ani; sl u!alaq uaAi$ uogewjo;ul aq leq;raad �Idfaad;o ljapu ' S AgaJaq I :3HnIVNSIS/IIAt/0dddb 7' :NOI1dIM0SA0133romd �OOZ 11ii' - + 1 :l,ew-9 -xed >- ��. ( 0 :auoyd Q> m--r— C,,—, 1 :ssaippv y ;:�:aweN 0 sluownoop to seidoo oluamala puas of,Ao ❑ uosiod loeluoaloofoid H3NM0 ,AIH3d0IJd JWO ❑ fl �..Y asu@on ssau!sn8 awe6u!Img :clew-E) --- ----•---• -:c7 U 0l!fI— :dq/a;e;S/A;!:D :ssaippy vM :aweN ❑ sluouinoop;o soldoo olmloolo puos of HO ❑uosiediocluooloolo,d N3NJIS3QI10311H3NV C>v �- S ! CD CfP-A :I!ew-3 2 ✓� ��-.l :xed :auogd :ssajppv :aweN �p sluawnaop jo saldoo aluoiloels puss of No >0 uos�od loeiuoa;aofoid 1NVOI"IddV loa(o)d sill jol uosjad toejuoa oql almipu! aselld I�1 T--7-SS3UCIClb 10S('02Id ;!wlad leloadS ❑ ;!wjad ash leuoij!puoC) ❑ aaueuen ❑ MalA98 u6paQ :uolleoildde 3o ad NOISSIWWOO ONINNVId 3Hl 01 N0IIV3I-IddV 6jo•awe6ullanq'mmM • 06LE'969.OS9 3 • 09ZL'999'099 :d MV6 Vo -3mEw- ing . OVOU 3s08M'd -.09 • 1N3WIbWd3Q 1NMdOl3A3Q AIINnWWO3 Z00/I0Q 'OUI 0dnj30jTg3dV IQH L9LR tH 91t M EZ:91 LION 9009/H/90 - West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week. Mr. Preger introduced Dr. Chindry Peavy, Chief Entomologist for the District. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW 3 Y2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE, ON PROPERTY AT 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE CDD Meeker reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on the appeal of the application for design review, hillside area construction permit, variance for height and special permit for an attached garage for a new 31/2 story single family dwelling on property at 2843 Adeline Drive, and consider public testimony and analysis contained in the staff report. Action concerning the appeal should include specific findings supporting the Council's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the City Council. Mayor Keighran opened the public hearing. The following spoke: Alex Mortazavi, applicant; Mark Bender, attomey for the appellant, 520 S. El Camino, San Mateo; Art Labrie, 2839 Adeline Drive, appellant. Mayor Keighran closed the hearing and requested comments from the public. The following citizens spoke: Cynthia Beck, 731 Birch Avenue, San Mateo (read a letter from Mrs. Labrie); Michael Gaul, 2838 Adeline Drive; Gil McCoy, 1022 Bayswater, Burlingame; David Win, 2835 Adeline Drive; Justin Jarvis, 2835 Adeline Drive. Mayor Keighran closed the public comment period. Council discussion followed. Councilman Deal made a motion to deny the appeal, and affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the project, subject to the 19 conditions in the staff report; motion seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote 4-0-1 (Baylock absent). Councilman Deal made a motion to allow the deck, shown on the project plans adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3, at dimensions that are one-half the depth and one-half the width of the design shown on the project plans approved by the Planning Commission; motion seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. Motion approved by voice vote 3-0-1-1 (Nagel dissenting; Baylock absent). b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE CREATING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTIES SITUATED AT 1008-1028 CAROLAN AVENUE AND 1007-1025 ROLLINS ROAD: (i) ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF LAND USE SECTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A CAROLAN/ROLLINS ROAD COMMERCIAL AREA AND TO ADD MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE LAND USE WITHIN THE AREA : AND (ii) INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 25 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD AN R-4 OVERLAY FOR CERTAIN C-2 ZONED PROPERTIES IN THE CAROLAN/ROLLINS ROAD COMMERCIAL AREA TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AS A CONDITIONAL USE 2 Burlingame City Council April 20, 2009 Approved Minutes CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION - Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ChW4.Cauchi called fora voic n the motion to approve. assed 7-0. APA cedures were adv-JMPitem concluded 77741nr. 3. 2843 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE FORA NEW, 3 Y2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (ROBERT VAN DALE, EDI ARCHITECTURE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DENHAM LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated March 9, 2009, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Alex Mortazavi, 20 Vista Lane; represented the applicant: ■ Have self-imposed a setback of over 23-feet from the side property line due to trees along the fence line; the trees will reduce the appearance of bulk and mass of the building. ■ Noted that the trees will be California Laurel along the side of the residence; will be staggered in a manner to totally block the view of the residence at the fence line. ■ Brought a window sample for the Commission to view. ■ Submitted a manufacturer's cut -sheet for the bi-fold doors and windows. Commission comments: ■ Noted that lines of sight were drawn from several locations; was the 131.5' elevation the elevation of the patio on the adjacent property (Mortazavi - has no idea what the patio elevation is; believes it is at roughly 127' or 128'). ■ Might there be more information regarding views toward the project from the southern end of the adjacent yard on the right-hand side (Mortazavi - the right side is not affected; he owns the lot above). ■ What is the growth potential for the trees (Mortazavi - up to 20-feet tall and 25-feet wide). ■ Clarified that the thought process is to move the trees to the fence line to block the view of the house from the adjacent property; was there any thought to keeping the trees at the building itself (Mortazavi - having the tree next to the building doesn't help as much, but will be offsetting some of the trees. It is his interest to retain as much landscaping as possible; but lose the use of 4,000 square feet of property by doing so. There will be portions of the property that are visible. The eight, 24-inch trees are significant landscape features). ■ Could the residence be camouflaged more by doing more planting; is there any way to clad the elevator with wood rather than stucco (Mortazavi - the tower is further in from the property line by around 14'). ■ What is the best view from the residence (Mortazavi - one of the best views is towards Highway 92; though under County development standards, something could be built to block the view). ■ Consider eliminating or reducing the deck off of the bedroom; it is substantial in size (Mortazavi - that is the only sunny deck on the house; because of the other difficulties with the site. Will not be a heavily used area. Placing it a few feet back will not help the neighbor). The Commission tries to limit exposure of neighbors to decks overlooking a neighboring yard; due to the size of the deck, there is the potential for greater activity. There is another deck on a lower level. F CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 Public comments: Art and Kaelani LaBrie, 2839 Adeline Drive; Mike Ghaul, 2838 Adeline Drive; Gil McCoy, 1022 Bayswater Avenue; Steve Ehrlich, 2833 Adeline Drive; George Chrissman, 2848 Adeline Drive; Eileen Shefsky, 24 Vista Lane; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke: ■ The bedroom deck is larger than either of the two bedrooms; the elevator shaft leads directly to the deck; suggested that the owners of the home would use the deck more frequently, impacting privacy of the adjacent property to the left. ■ Is a beautiful house, but it belongs on a 5-acre lot nearer to Los Angeles; doesn't belong in the Burlingame Hills; the story poles confirmed the height of the proposed structure above the property to the left. ■ Felt that the findings for the requested height Variance cannot be made; reviewed the findings. There are other alternatives to the site and project design. ■ Will decrease the value of the property to the left by $150,000-$400,000. ■ Cited the significant difference in the size of the home versus the existing homes within the area. ■ A smaller version of the house would be a more marketable project. ■ Requested that the applicant explore other design alternatives. ■ The configuration of the property makes it difficult to develop; this is not the fault of the developer; how can the problem be best resolved. ■ The prior design was too forced on the lot; it was suggested at that time that the design follow the form of the lot. ■ Feels it is a good design. ■ The only problem in meeting the zoning requirements is the height; there is no good solution, but the current proposal is the best solution. ■ Landscape screening will minimize impacts on the neighbor. ■ There is a large old Oak tree in front of Gall's property; should be protected during construction. ■ Suggested a smaller home to be more marketable and to reduce impacts. ■ The design impacts privacy of the neighbors, even three (3) properties away from the site. ■ This is more than double the maximum height allowed. ■ Looks like a high-rise building; there is a huge potential to impact the privacy of neighbors. ■ The design is out of character with the neighborhood. ■ Shefsky's property is two (21-stories; no Variances were requested. ■ The applicant is agreeable to providing screening on the right side. ■ Also open to providing a green roof system. ■ Sooner or later, something will likely be built on the property; should the neighbors decide to appeal the Planning Commission's approval; would the City Council be bound to use the same rules applied to properties lying within the City of Burlingame? ■ The Planning Commission is sensitive to privacy issues; some of the issues raised by the neighbors are overblown. Applicant rebuttal by Alex Mortazavi: ■ Is not an office building; the Variance is caused by the method of measuring height in Burlingame; the measurement is taken from the curb line; the house follows the terrain of the lot. ■ Has owned the property for almost 10-years. ■ The solar panels on adjacent properties are irrelevant; they lie to the south of the property and will not be impacted by the new home. ■ The access to the deck from the elevator can be eliminated, if desired. ■ The style of architecture in the neighborhood is mixed. ■ The prior proposal was presented a year ago; current project is less visible. 7 . CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION —Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ■ Real estate agents have their own opinions regarding impacts upon property values. ■ The design of the house steps up the hill and adds to the cost of the construction due to the amount of circulation space necessary within the residence. ■ Were surprised that the neighbor encroaches upon the property with retaining walls and gates. ■ The hardship is that the lot contains one-half acre; are preserving the trees on the property; this is only a two-story building. ■ The block's average setback also creates a hardship. ■ Have minimized impacts upon the neighbors; every adjustment affects one of the neighbors; there must be a compromise; the project can't be made invisible. ■ Having- a $3 million home next to a property will increase the value of the adjacent properties. ■ The Commission is aware of the efforts that have been made by the applicant. Additional Commission comments: Concerned that bedrooms 2 and 3 are problematic elements in the design; there is a certain realty that has to be accepted; the Commission is responsible for finding compromises. Has the applicant looked at shifting the mass of the bedroom to the other side of the building (Mortazavi — has looked at this alternative. Considered flipping the floor plan, but ends up impacting mature trees, particularly due to the driveway location. Would also disturb the Shefsky property even more. Can't cantilever the bedrooms; would need to expand the family room and add to the bulk of the property and impact trees. Have communicated with the neighbors and made attempts to address neighbors' interests). Regarding the screening on the south side; how tall are the trees (Mortazavi —drawn at 14-feet, but will grow to 25-feet). The tree will work better as a screen if it is taller (Mortazavi — staggering the trees will also help to screen). Continuing the mass on the south side would have a greater impact than the current design. Noted that a cool, concrete color will help to disguise the mass. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Further Commission comments: The applicant has taken the direction of the Planning Commission well; is a good design. The trees being installed on the property will provide a lot of screening. Has demonstrated that the house will be well screened from Adeline Drive. Commissioner Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: Reduce deck to 8-foot depth from the front facade. Tree protection for Oak across the street. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: ■ Concern is more with the width of the deck as it impacts the neighbor to the left, consider reducing the width rather than the depth. ■ Consider revising the motion to reduce width of deck by 50% instead of 8-foot depth reduction. ■ Clarified that the Commission never voted on the prior application. ■ The challenges created on the property are due to the topography. 8 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 ■ There was always an acknowledgement that there would be a Variance of some sort required for development of the property. ■ The story poles have demonstrated the potential impacts, the home is in excess of 6,000 square feet, the design is nearly acceptable, but not yet, the impacts of the bedrooms can be mitigated by placing them on the first floor. ■ Commissioner Brownrigg indicated that he couldn't support the current project as designed, without mitigating the mass more; there is no need for the deck off of the bedroom. ■ Applicant commended on the design of the building, moved in this direction at the suggestion of the Planning Commission; has addressed the concerns of the neighbors to a large degree; though there is still some impact on the LaBrie property. ■ Would like the deck off of the bedroom eliminated. ■ Hard to touch rooms to the ground with this type of design; the decks are an important element of the design and the livability of the house. ■ The screening proposed by the applicant should work to address neighbor impacts; there are actually few windows on the left wall of the residence. ■ The house is already set back quite a distance from the left property line. ■ The design in general is well worked out, has been studied by the applicant. ■ Maker of motion indicated a willingness to eliminate the deck off of the bedroom; agreed to by the second of the motion. ■ Planting plan for trees along the left side of the property should return to the Commission as an FYI. 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 27, 2009, sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01 c, Al through Al and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that the deck lying adjacent to bedrooms 2 and 3 shall be eliminated from the design; 3. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 4. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 8. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 9. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; Li CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 10. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 11. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 12. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 13. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 15. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 16. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property _corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 17. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 18. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 19. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes March 9, 2009 Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Brownrigg dissenting). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:42 p.m. 4. 31QS MARGARITA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION F \RAMENDMENTTODES SI SETBACK VARIANCE A HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRON PERMIT FOR CH PRE OUSLY APPROVED MAI AND LOWER LEVEL ION (MIKE KERWI PENTI FF-KERWIN, APPLICA S AND PROPERTY RS; AND JOHN N N REVI , 4GES T AND AM SCALCO, Reference stXf report dated March 9, 20 with attachments. CommuriV Development Director M eker presented the port, reviewed criteria and tall comments. Thirteen (13) onditions were suggest for consideration. Chair Cauchi note at this agenda report was Net in his packet; he was not abN to review the report and v it the site. Comm sioner Brownrigg indicate hat he would abstain from vo g since he sits on the Gr n Ribbon Task FNrce with the applicant. Chair auchi opened th ublic hearing. Kelton sel, 1501 Waller treet; represented the appli nt. The roposed amend nt affects the downhill side f the property. Hom wner decided to tain the existing wall and fo ing on the left side of the prop ;affected the si setbacks by a fe inches. Commission co None. is comments: Fran Sulgit, 1560 Los Mo)tes Drive; Brian KNrphy, 3101 Margarita Drive; laine Darling, 3100 Margarita Drive; d Pat Giorni, 144 alboa Avenue; oke: ■ Q stioned the credib ' y of the Buildin Inspections Division; what e e may be missed in the con uction'? ■ Two ns are present on a property, thi is over the limit of what is all is this due to the applica 's membership on a Green Ribbo ask Force (Brownrigg —thee on the property has nothi to do with his me bership on the een Ribbon Task Force. es — feels that the Building D 'sion staff takes e ry measure to nsure that projects are ording to plans; appears tha he existing wall w perfectly goo use). ■ Requested tw conditions of app val that should a tightened up. Wouto ake sure that there are signifi nt retaining walls tweenthe prop rties that should remlac • the existing fence should be paired/replaced in xactly the sam osit.n. Ontheleftsideset ck Variance; took way a significa onion of the exidroom, easures very close to what it hould be; there is ignificant diffe nce at the reaars to b ' 6"; as art of Condition 11, equire a survey of a property; ne to have theetbacks r ected ( ' dstrom/Terrones — el a survey should a required. Au n — if survey demonstrates that the fen is not on the prop line, would not be comfortable wit roposed change to Condition 3). ■ Feel hat the wall definin the bedroom on the lower level has "cr t" closer to the left property line. Clarifie that Murphy (prop owner to left) wishes to have fence i tailed in the same location as Project comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: Y City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline. Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Driveway approach appears to extend beyond property line projection to the street. The entire driveway must stay within the property line projection to the street. Reviewed by: V V Date: 7/22/2008 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS �) '1�u .mow Project Name: SfiWY, 51m4± Project Address: The following requirements apply to the project 1 `� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property comers, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the / building permit issuance.) 2 The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 Y unitary sewer lateral M is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Pagel of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW CON SIENTSADC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions / in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14y The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 '✓ The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22y/ The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re -submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must obtain a change of address from the Engineering Department. The County records show this parcel address as 12 Vista Lane. The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 5) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non- residential buildings. Go to hftp://www.energy.Ga.gov/title24 for publications and details. 8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. 9) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 10) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 11) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 12) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 13) NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, and 8 must be re-submi ed before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by Date: f Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 RI- ity Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, .Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 0� Reviewed by: Date: 7/-, 0/0 Project Comments Date: July 1, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 v( Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The furthest point of the structure shall not exceed 150 feet distance from approved fire apparatus access. Provide fire apparatus access 20 feet wide to the structure consistent with §503, IFC 2006. Driveway maximum slope shall not exceed 16% and the angles of approach shall not exceed 5%. Turning maximum turning radius shall comply with Central County Fire Department's standards. Engineer shall ensure at least fire hydrants can provide at least 1,500 gpm fire flow for 2 hours and a fire hydrant shall be accessible within 400 feet of the furthest point of the structure along fire apparatus access. Reviewed by: �--�/ Date: %� (:5 g Date: To: From: Project Com-wnents July 1, 2008 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Recycling Specialist (650) 558-727 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Variance for height for a new two -and -half story single family dwelling with attached garage at-2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027- 093-310 Staff Review: July 7, 2008 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Include a list of BMPs and erosion and sediment control measure plan as project notes when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochures for guidance. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: ET Date: 07/07/2008 Remember: The property owner and the contractor share ultimate responsibility for the activities that occur on a construction site. X'ou will be held responsible for any environmental damages and associated clean-up costs. San Mato Countywkk Stormwater n n,r •gn.,iYr`+��:tSl/ Potlutlon PrcveMbn Yro6ram General Construction & Site Supervision 1J .r,IrdrgParwrrl d-• r■d.A d --a- wJ la . rt...M. kr dry zhw ►-1 'r.t6l T. k. x_fd-.w "-d, phi wIm a.rw --h W r I.k►gkw Rer rJ rr.M ww. i.k. r rr.ldrry K/r ,Mwl1 kww. Men dwfn■ wa wrMprrda rCn. rl .rrr.rr Remit T••• IT aY. (-la•I•t/ Jrk,a,m.wk.) ynle,►„r. rr.p. ' r-, • r..•.w JrY.r a kdr r Jiwrl wrw n w, .r.r rdaa R.d.r,rr.r.+r a.rrwd.. y erri.ek,rgbq d.d Jw.xkaaww4n ' ay nU Y_wr.Irpl.Ywr ud drmnirwdw. Mi. Ihr. kwkwrwdik r...Y.r w►. w.rb.Apir .m 0..akaIrtrw.iemk.dara.kwwIMaiw a..r.rwrraryi.wrrd •drrl+k■41a Y.d k•••d•V•R --am-al am -al rllaltW w.rW .rw ■rr.rl. ,.rke.t, rdkle nd.dbL, rd rwlke grbre.l rklrara TM Llpa./rw i.rd M wJl.nry fna wraw wamr dr.k Waw W bward r.s .-A Msb..Jrgrda Adt •K.q iwrY.r.r lk•rd.-,r..al n.rr sdawrrrr.l IM-- C-.i-.d pt..( .t w- - -rkwli Nadaalwrbtx rr4,d.WY.R.a,.ad ,�km ►la,s0 sr W rr,dlre,aerrl.•rwd alm.h.rwka". t.. 'Dr1' -r•4 ►r'J mrh.a .r dr.k r,bs "I." .�ia wdr�, Kl.rw,.r R�Nwk.saA k pri M,.d..lYo a.►Wl.r•ad .iwptr. h rCY.. q bly LIP ­1 mkr rwRY Ia.rird, r hry Maw..rr.irr ..t r,r..r,iw•b w Inver .wlew r r'w'r ra.a V. dry.Lr.p nearer wkarrr,rrlMa KY. rmlww.r,w JM •awtk w Y1rtr JM d.wn Ir— ad Irkli dYs,.kra Ck.d AM-#r Ar «'4 rks daaprr..n.a a.R w ms. wY r.r,• pkwk ard.t,sd-sd V wdd. KDJda Ndw kst.r. -kq .aAN•••■.a kwawn.ddr 1`7 ,Nvx A—wl . JrpM y MJtJ..w w14 arindk.Ma •Rkh..w,.air NY. w. rrr.Md r ,M w.Wq dx b, 0.Is1•J a.rrtr. A a%. wr.r luka rw Awa-ear AwA,'rR •rna.aa rrr+rd.ar. -..ride w.,re sw.. rw wave rdakk. Drdr r1Y ikr rwr yes d . nnYk k.J.► rVm Tetra. a r d" w W -a. Jda AmwM r Ni..p r rYd.kl. aswrY,.a, r sera•. Nrk•R wr. wwrL.l.sti M..wra drew/et rollah,�re, r.d,wl ntkMe Rdrw.e lrralab /..�a ►a•►wrp •Mwr •wnbwk. arrdJ, rd waVe,Ysy..yMywyg��ekd keWkFNheM7rwRf-1M7Q11kli101Y71aT• �1`tr41 Mkw RpY ad ewrr•a w.w{ rd.Y.ae.a.► r_'wrYY W MrY.aws,da r,wYdN.wl M Ries rn r app.,drn kn4n1 k-.ides. lnra Mawr hYY wale Mlerk► x lar vkw r ht arar weer. <.ak .e a.rr kd. Prevention Program 'Tlep.w rrtkli .hc Alan.., Belmar, Rill..,, Rrrlirtn.me, Coln-,a.ly City, rrlf hlo All-, K-laMy. HNr"-. a.,, Hilkb-nk woe Pak. mmbna, r.akk F.M. V.11". , Redwood Uly, Su s.. sm c d.., sm Mahn, smAh s.n Prm[i.rq w..&id.q c.,jy ersm M.ledb Pollution Prevention It.'s Part of the- Plan It is your responsibility to do. the job right! Runoff from streets and otlierpaved areas is a'raajor source of pollution.in local creeks, San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Construction activities can directly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other constriction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Followingthese guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater ordinance requirements. Remember, ongoing monitoring and maiutcnance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth -Moving Roadwork & Paving Fresh Concrete Painting & Application Equipment Activities & Mortar Application of Solvents & Adhesives Operation 'r - r `1 � Y 0 � /Dxelo.rAlln,dnmr..deM.dkw..mMntjdr. fr .�... rdway..i..k.rnr. bi W w.i f ,rrrwl.r N..il Dardlr C.w.n.riw Jskkk.mrr er•ia wi, �/Orrakdlrgdp.rrl rrla•b W r.lwk krea,.a•ir•r•.r �Rrsr.rdRl., wteraw wlrwkm aa.rry.rm.. � rkrst� hnrkYmn4 rPkiwd wrlk[•f•T4•• [r/' e,rlwryRr,M amrr.rr•dy V. pl.r/at.r /^a•nd"•.Hda rL.rr..wrr IS.d. Nr. rnrwr.,7wgradr Rr war mrd.lw iNkw rdi•IIq.rMkWq.l{rrrw•k[rmwrdM Mwiad.rwr.a.rpW,wrbd w.aw., /Da1t.r.sa.plwdYw•rrd.rwK Mawaao- Yryw.wwb.m.wdrk.A Ym.airdYrJ.rd. nwraa. Nr Wewda Jrdr, well r.gR.wrww wsrw d..l.lre., il..aaadYrl dl. kbk.rx.l.w q.ir.,wlw Ibrwd•e'M^•r 1'•kkr■.I.haRni.rrdra•rir Irmrq MmslT•i•r7••r.mr. wn.r,Wrwr Pft rdldeW.ldp•rr,rrlrrnaa JniowRkkryWr,luenrrYJr.i.er w.lq dR : Rwfd.d J(krrrlS.e.a.r, kaki rtir.11,.r. h.mr, ►.w, w,rrr Irk klr Alva. wk..ww►arbla ,1 M.kR.kd rdklr wd►rygalr.-L 1.1-1 A.- T•wM Rw.wJry,.kisls of U..krk dares JIkN" dh.w. WQ Wass iTrd..edr.r kskq/rr kaa.rr.r.r pram r.lbm rJxrJrww.a ra-ki•k4WMkk rd' dm W ■rdrd rm D.d.r Cw.ewd7 4a, Per[wJ.ml...Jq r.mmwhw,wwkw-ln .ylpr•rdarNr.rM1ka �C.rw rdp■aWwa.ard rilwh►•rndbPx kkrewlrf eNrr.ar,sl wilk.aelrr ra.a Iryw.wr N.id mu- _:r 1%•.YrersY.� ►1-.•dr.rL,,, ' .l CwwW,d rwYtwr•W srd.bwkw amM•a rJ rr.,k.rY.rS b, W,•t rlr ll.Y•w aiw wrdrlpamomdr r.W.. I rslrlYs..krad rkd. d.wdwWWkr.t �Ilr..k.i Yaw/Mmw wkrw waver w..n'r..d .rld&".rmnglaa, -al".11.l.aru.k e..w.4 as' sgrrreewkkaD..rd wry[kwkew.a pwrkkx Jy+w Kndi wkaJ.w veer. Ir,.r-h;..•.rr Nr...Mw4..N ✓r,w w.1. �NawrwW amrrrWllew rgmd..Cnt+•mw• WJYrr.a.rrwNwCr- ♦0..r.a:ardNrKdrrxw..yi,rrrrw bNkd,b.w•rr.lktdpf , .fdWWy J rr`k'w Igrr Irwwr.3J"Wdarmwwei.wrrb,rlrY !`r•w u,rr B-A.-r. ka rN•J•a-r•. rranAea nINJLwdpnaar nrrrwhk •�'t+'xYr..f wN•a. A.m rlrma /Rac,dwd wirYk.aalr a/SAd•N aam.V.rlW rdl.Lwai Rrdrywsis r/ Ud dryr. JwnPYrwhi Jdp p:r xr.aMl rider Ir-irw rtl...yjrwr gdnarry aw, k.Ji,tr, kka4 r.a.r)Nwdw.drrdk..b.r rlkiw IOwrgrd'riY.dkbaY,'Jrfwt.dl (widr Sip-94s k--D .da A-7 A,►rrr r.aY.r..mrabY4}.JILq W a..mwr.L iNr.rkrdmm'a ry►.rse.rxkm--W. o'Wm- rn�xwbe.rdldJ�yralwkrrsru. r.dwR srhrariw. lWikw,pp.d. U.iY dm,rt. Mb.m daq lrwtwkW..mrWYbr.W-. 1 �CAI_wdr 'kxT1•Trkr7 RM••Nemr ty}(i,arksyrrWr,r kb,WMe.p)wirwar Ram wwr. JrJaa Lr.wdx pwJ1Ya If}w...m rw.r,w)w...rtkrt..r ,Y /InY wr.Nd6Jr yw.rrY,rk.4 des m.Y.L A-U d. 1ti Jew Jwra ,r,k rrs db•1N. hAd.- .I.. aq.lry..wt wpnl �9wmrxar,IRNdrysrdJ. kdrraard,: N...rr- la.plr^..rkr.ww.r'.r..r.•• IryJrrw Ux utt1Y veer r pwkk k d•.1.wN. I IirwT r,lAa w Yd w ydbd.t •1 W,M-aY dY,sktrwrrdsd.dl � fupsa aednw. re.R. r M r,,prelnr. y1M rora.a. WIA. i.wd4a1, Yr wr•q.Yd Mr 1.. rrarwl N aanilsrl"• - KYssirarrrrbh k,J.Yrrp d Talgr.n [ q01 oI11M htewirr, gtwkc I) DIJ Nt CxiwY DYM Kew,-r-Y Da.fr IWA' Grr,(NmJ R7y-Ti1D (N kwe} Ca a Iwrr M1drs Bm► r Ymryd W 6...r.Yw.rb. dti .Ivry• ror kmh iy mJ M.rrih mdr six, pres.d Aar rkhn W w.41 h~&Y.W"'k1a A.. �Sm,r up (-.A ml- rr qw D. nnripq, nM-Nm.ammlpwJ nrq rmwpM..enn • iaw,rkhA,Ydlmarc LYd,.r mwar.iw+'wlr• 1. 4.%_% Jrni+.(wr kynry.{wJKL. rwln A.w rlwra pwd, IK Itl...rr F.rd�W dhPr Nr pAMa M•..rl'r+ibla r.ryvrwaJ,mw YllrrMk. Ird lr• wk-. r rwaw N.ry •I+p•r• rwub.l r. h..h.d,A. dr.l.a di.1.L. Ykk.,.r,nw. OMr„ 6.w.r.rw I Drl d. T wrr Mk erww. w wr.n.dw yes wM mkaiF td.Yr W T"-• wrJl wrr+w rl,. xkwvy plwia drq abdu i ATkr dear, w,ahYldra..q rddr. km 1..� w.k Rw• as./N wa r.w. M dawrwY w M. . �,k.d rd-r drJa Traver YV•t•1•wai AnwJdr"Vn.R. mwanoiw Raw rri.,,Y.r drrr�a Nw.ypgr.wsh rr. fa .,., W a►.d. kr are Nr. ►•r b.ir w.+..r.rr.anrd. d..naap. r ••I•w w,arr...r,in, wwr w sr,rl bah. k rs\. M,rw dnk I,YrrIJM r+I.,.Ir.r.IK trwadwrr ixrY M.r -. of A"W rra<Rm dv, �b+Y esk■.®IM wR.krrkk, ayrA.kavert fi n. krrldpm-If. •t.k,wrNarM •R ar r4.m -a Irrr Kdv mnakI_w.rrr.4bl r...rrkrl.. dl aaJ arras p^Pdr• .,rd.wri A. Rn%d Nr Q•kr awed Mrk r/ t.rkL tl Mwnrrrsr 'T1 r•^•-^L "A. 'A"' ­Mao �R.ryr4 k.p.Mi. Nkr.kasrnrr•WIIR . Ua•.d .t sdkY.gY.dwnbwwada iYJa.r:kia. pwarrldr.mmr kwd.Lwkk • wbWrra.r.lart..+d rr rakfd{wnrR. II'mra srY„rrw MY Mwdwk,.w.awrrt.3k.r1 �Dl.p.r Nrw■rnwm. Kn.•w dr, .rwaa Dww wd.wr kdr rr.rk . AMdaN.rY • IWIml bard• "A,. auk r r.wrwaew•r dwry dgsaM W rain f M . , is I tow-Rr dnww wr.e r rl... y r.dN A, U. drY r/ Neatrkwy wN wkr•drwwrvr,rwkL .. Questibns7 Call the Office of Environmental Compliance .(650) 342-3727 Lal dscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance • rrr rr.+.a. 01 K.► all t,.ld ►.lal,rWm .d wura -7 rwr hD.. . .nr, dk,N dx. Jnka LpwY _W_ Awn p.rd 6Wrb•rl d Llueawd dmdr�Rdl,w I..wdwa w..lv .a.r M Jlr,.r•d rr..ir.adr wr mlla[dw RanhY (mrrl Ywr I.a uawmwr M1rrkR d..wq r/ r( w rkw kink. x A-r.l.l c.dr.n I.I. drx4 �.Rw,,t.r. drwr, x •has. i rw w.rN.d Plrw Pkl wl ka.k. k are. wl psakk. Rlw. rk. rkrrrm U_'m.d n.nr.L. da.r.. Id a,-- w s u h iW.. N..w r°°,Jr d.wa • drk, I rw.R�..d,.rk, I.Id wn brrkr w e- a.r.Ira• sale W alr.wik irwa wwlwr k ,p.rpvrmrrn.. rIM W rr lira W wlrar•a DYlrr .lase 119•Y• W retla.nlwrd.nwula rrr rs.wd iNW'A"sdJ.1hewraMu ds,dry, IWI, d rM N.A.t r.YM w.,w.n w adlmce k IJ. k •. drab ebbs W i>prd d s Yak C44d,r.l drlppl.t wrJ.. W dh•.J den Rmn :rk. P!1r. x ►•1•r awrkr, kN .r Y1b.b1 R. awtkr dl.Trrd.fu kmrd•w wpta � LMm rdppk, wakwlq kdYl.p ulrrnwik rna.n wh .a W ,,,.e. rr..■: a,ixk w;k R.I wu.wrw YaYn.r.alairy 1. Dd wl Kyr m mD.a (map x r.)kNdk, da:rLtwrrw/ Jljrw.r rti rkrY acwa Ynph„ Niawbnryka rgdrd r u.Yr k. wrbn.ruer.,w[wkairyk m.kk, k awYkw R wyr/.drr• Io.ww Nrr uArr...sn..I.r. /Raryn4 xlkp.. Kra .wl.J.d pWlw• •InrMY knaw/se wrrwAea}.. ridliry, w.. q. Nhw hry.. T-.u,HY 17, raspy P.J.mnt and kr.k� reµ rd ran dmM M r dlrpsN sf w p•• Iryrk.,rly WrtL � Rrr kn..r.4Ywd pant Dl,p.,• Naau. R,aly r.Mkr ardk.,t w )wi.r wwr ♦ SwA yarkr•,aar.n JwY .YwY pid, da S.n Mrs GwbEninr.rrlxtJi D'r.W-.pAU%r M;-t w Muldsa war imrd Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per days I 'L .O..bwM,M.aNw:4 �-.b�; . ���� i` � rMxl roc)rrAr and knd.aNrn mrriJ• Dam wind W arw y rrdn■ IMm wr rrP •r,rw.d N.J. awnR. rr. pwrkYl Rmnarw r/ -Ir etwwrkJ. Y/rn w k a dd xr.np sDbrl � s,IreW,rdk, W pr,rr. pnjmY ra y rrrhr, rarpwar, dad 4m..r Nadaa r dhal rrn'.wry a.r.= d.rw pw -..- J,J. kM. whh kry b.k, b—Dhw n.0 w.na kkr parcrlw r.w,a ./ R.ama..w. Y .a .aadk.l frw .r a.J.. aalnl r. uT dr ew,d.rwp p-;6&.rw 1611- hJ � Ihr.p ps{dia W reA.w I.bd Jiwdwr, Rrr wp W ary W r anaw:.r u pr,d.0 Dl.wa NJwd wrJna. k 4,iuh f Di-w,• NrmaW rritls r h.a.dwr wawa C.11-Ines W■.dr dtpN ►rack, wrY,.d as W.nnr[a Cr► If.rm.ry, wrl.xq_ D. mrrW-fad wa.. M prlaa 4 a..nnr.Ab�M aaiad. r.rd w+n. neynllna b.r dTNpp •^•rnaln, waae hrnkMT k ypmrd Ir.p wawrkar (h, rk .. mertt is mrw.ar. y,d � a.a � 0. a.l M.w .r nha anew era rl. 1\. ,h'wl rM/r..rrwQrr eM1Jw•rw.. rr � /rr.ar arhr,a rdd.p.bd pwI ..n• w.la r..na. .Rees dr.la �,a'k.w mpryrt. p.d w anti kr iMn./1-M• kr 1. T d•ya. TM. r.aya4 arwby da kre k irNJIY •rr Iwd..pad •rw, x dal. tr I.dl.drrW w.urw ♦rem delve p1a,laad vein wY b. r *.a-" r Ik rirY .wer(r,Dewed k, k[ kr.InrwaL/Iae.nl wlA.rdYJ rmnk, •lr. r ..niry.Yt.ratnv p j`t rl..n.aJ.na .kw ' � D. nd w <,praJ.a.1 .I,a.11rs G..J J[. whh abkdn wire Jd,rrlrn.agpw-6.d P.l d.,r,4 s.4 C•ppa Y kmrfal 1. ryaark lire ad ru..l k . w.krar r.rw'.J by rr wan,. r..rr,r ►rwr. WHY SHOULD WE WORRY ABOUT SOIL EROSION? Water and wind carry soil from our Bay Area land down into our streams, lakes and the Bay. This soil carries with it pollu- tants sucfn as oil and grease, chemicals, fertilizers, animal wastes and bacteria, which threaten our water quality. Such erosion also costs the home construction industry, local government, and the homeowner untold millions of dollars a year. Nature slowly wears away land, but human activities such as construction increase the rate of erosion 200, even 2; 000 times that amount. When we remove vegetation or other objects that hold soil in place, we expose it to the action of wind and water and increase its chances of eroding. The loss of soil from a construction site results in loss of topsoil, minerals and nutrients, and it causes ugly cuts and gullies in the landscape. Surface runoff and the materials it carries with it clog our culverts, flood channels and streams. Sometimes it destroys wildlife and damages recreational areas such as lakes and re- servoirs. As an example, road and home building in the Oakland hills above fake Temescal filled the lake to such an extent that it had to be dredged in 1979 at a public cost of $750,000. NEED MORE INFORMATION? ABAG has produced a slide/tape show on soil erosion called "Money Down the Drain." It is available for showing to any interested group. Call ABAG Public Affairs at (415) 841-9730. ABAG has also published a "Manual of Standards for Sur- face Runoff Control Measures" which deals extensively with designs and practices for erosion prevention, sedi- ment control, and control of urban runoff. The manual addresses problems and_ solutions as they apply to California and the Bay Area. It can be purchased from ABAG and is available on reference at many local libraries and in city and county public works and planning depart- ments. USDA Soil Conservation Service personnel are willing to provide more information on specific erosion problems. This brochure is a cooperative project of the Association of Bay Area Governments and the East Bay Regional Park District. 0 kppC�� ISSOCIAT0 EAST BAY REGIONAL �at�HaF�7GortDAY E Ts PARK DISTRICT � 4fi�98'31�yfite 6ivd. B Oalc+and Efr 94fi49 PROTECTING YOUR PROPERTY FROM EROSION EROSION CONTROL CAN PROTECT YOUR. PROPERTY AND PREVENT FUTURE, HEADACHES Vegetation -stabilized Bare Slope: Headaches t Slope: Security and Liability r «� J(j �� • soil in place • • mudslide danger • minimum of loss of topsoil erosion • dogged storm • fewer winter clean- drains, flooding ,�••� up problems problems • protection for • expensive house foun- cleanup /y dations • eroded or r buried house !� foundations J TIPS FOR THE HOMEOWNEI "Winterize" your property by mid -September. Don't wait until spring to put in landscaping. You need winter protection. Final landscaping can be done later. Inexpensive measures installed by fall will give you protection quickly that will last all during the wet season. In one aftemoon you can: • Dig trenches to drain surface runoff water away from problem areas such as steep, bare slopes. • Prepare bare areas on slopes for seeding by raking the surface to loosen and roughen soil so it will hold seeds. Seeding of bare slopes • Hand broadcast or use a "breast seeder." A typical yard can be done in less than an hour. • Give seeds a boost with fertilizer. • Mulch if you can, with grass clippings and leaves, bark chips or straw. • Use netting to hold soil and seeds on steep .slopes. • Check with your local nursery for advice. Winter alert • Check before storms to see that drains and ditches are not clogged by leaves and rubble. Check after major storms to be sure drains are clear and vegetation is holding on slopes. Repair as necessary. Spot seed any bare areas. WHAT YOU) • TO CONTROL EROSION ' PROTECT YOUR P. • . . SKI i�e-Ira• Soil erosion costs Bay Area homeowners millions of dol- lars a year. We Iose valuable topsoil. We have to pay for damage to roads and property. And our tax money has to be spent on cleaning. out sediment from storm drains, channels, lakes and the Bay. You can protect your prop- erty and prevent future headaches by following these guidelines: _ BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION • Plan construction activities during spring and summer, so that erosion control measures can be in place when the rain comes. • Examine your site carefully before building. Be aware of the slope, drainage patterns and soil types. Proper site design will help you avoid expensive stabilization work. Preserve existing vegeta- tion as much as possible. Limit grading and plant removal to the areas under current construc- tion. (Vegetation will naturally curb erosion, improve the appearance and the value of your property, and reduce the cost of landscaping later.) • Use fencing to protect plants from fill material and traffic. If you have to pave near trees, do so with permeable as- phalt or porous paving blocks. • Preserve the natural contours of the land and disturb the earth as little as possible. Limit the time in which graded areas are exposed. • Minimize the length and steepness of slopes by benching, terracing, or constructing diversion structures. Landscape ' benched areas to stabilize the slope and improve its appearance. • As soon as possible after grading a site, plant vegetation -on all areas that are not to be paved or otIZerwise covered. • Control dust on graded areas by sprinkling vAth water, restricting traffic to certain routes, and paving or gravel- ing access roads and driveways. TEMPORARY MEASURES- TO STABILIZE THE SOIL Grass provides the cheapest and most ef- fective short-term ero- sion control. It grows quickly and covers the ground completely. To find the best seed mix- tures and plants for your area, check with your local nursery, the U.S. Department of Ag- riculture Soil Conserva- tion Service, or the University of California Cooperative Extension. Mulches hold soil moisture and provide ground protection from rain damage. They also provide a favorable. envi- ronment for starting and growing plants. Easy -to -obtain Mulches are grass clippings, leaves, sawdust, bark chips and straw. Straw mulch is nearly 1W % effective when held in place by spraying with an organic glue or wood fiber (tackif ers), by punching it into the soil with a shovel or roller, or by tack- ing a netting over it. Commercial applications of world fibers combined with various seeds and fertilizers (hydraulic mulching) are effec- tive in stabilizing sloped areas. = �_ Hydraulic mulching with a tackifier should _ be done in two separate appli- cations: the first - composed of seed fertilizer and half the mulch, the second composed of the remaining mulch and tackifier. Commer- cial hydraulic mulch applicators —who also provide other erosion control services — are listed under "landscaping" in the phone book. Mats of excelsior, jute netting and plastic sheets can be ef- fective temporary covers, but they must be in contact with the soil and fastened securely to work effectively. Roof drainage can be collected in barrels or storage con- tainers or routed into lawns, planter boxes and gardens. Be sure to cover stored water so you don't collect mos- quitos, too. Excessive runoff should be directed away from your house. Too much water can damage trees and make foundations unstable. STRUCTURAL RUNOFF CONTROLS Even with proper timing and planting, you may need to protect disturbed areas from rainfall until the plants have time to. establish themselves. Or you may need permanent ways to transport water across your property so that it doesn't cause erosion. To keep water from carrying soil from your site and dump- ing it into nearby lots, streets, streams and channels, you need ways to reduce its volume and speed. Some exam- ples of what you might use are: plastic sheeting perimeter dike straw mulch Riprap (rock lining) —to protect channel banks from erosive water flow • 'Sediment trap —.to stop. runoff carrying sediment and trap the sediment • Storm drain outlet protection —to reduce the speed of water flow- ing from a pipe onto open ground or into a natural channel • Diversion dike or perimeter dike —to divert excess water to places where it can be disposed of properly • Straw* bale dike —to stop and detain sediment from -small unprotected areas (a short-term measure) • Perimeter Swale —to divert runoff from a disturbed area ., or to contain runoff within s a disturbed area • Grade stabilization structure —to carry concentrated runoff down a slope jute netting \hydraulic mulch landscaping 1 nrunnrnmmmn°nnuunuunuoin (llillllllllllllll �"�� mn nxunn � �111111111111 II Iltll\IIII AW Conservahee RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new 3 'h story, single-family dwelling and attached garage at 2843 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1, Alex Mortizavi, Denham LLC, property owner, APN: 027-093-310: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on December 10, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single- family residences as part of a project. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10t' day of -December, 2012 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 2843 Adeline Drive Effective December 20, 2012 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 28, 2012, building elevation drawings, date stamped January 27, 2009,_ sheets A02 through A09, and date stamped December 2, 2008, sheets A00 through A01c, Al through Al and Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan; 2. that tree protection measures shall be implemented for the Oak tree across the street from the property (near 2838 Adeline Drive) during project construction; to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; 3. that the planting plan for the trees to be located along the left side of the structure shall be presented to the Planning Commission as an FYI, prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall besubject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 6. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permit and Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 7. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Peninsula Tree Care Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department on June 30, 2008; 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 2, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's July 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 7, 2008 memo, the City Arborist's July 30, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 7, 2008 memo shall be met; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 2843 Adeline Drive Effective December 20, 2012 11. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 15. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 17. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 18. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ^F - BURLINGAME, CA 94010 I � • � .r`� x- �. PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 69&3790sr • i-3'J:: www.burlingame.org - •' Site: 2843 ADELINE DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new, 3-1/2 story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2843 ADELINE DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 027-093-310 Mailed: November 30, 2012 (Please refer to other side) r n 2d�rcrn US POSTAGE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) -�;: -, x• �[a_�c rs.s R 4 ss�,�,r[" ;sa ♦y s [•`ram-2".c�gi 4♦''-. .`•'F.. � e`� F ��+R �a�y ���.y1( �.t k y�� ..5. 'yam �"��i��V•�t,f �,�"}r-q4"r-`�„ ii"�t�•" � �Y tk r,w �5�� x �..* a � �4. t � '! p. cT�+.�•�,. �';. _. tF �., C c i ,{'�'� � � r iis. � ., ♦♦5' _-.. •,f k� � r""' `s3 •b �-Tt g - r _ i.�'♦7 � •♦ y tk ^'�- � '•t E'�i" s+r�. F w "—rT`"'''-,ys3iG,-.'T � ..s`i � ;'�,,+t�<s �''i�3 ; ..t�� � 'd;i,,, fw+- 'ii�` .r�r1„y .,,��•t �gif.�y3},�, �, � ; , x �,,, f�9��, .� .� *�a -' 'Yr -G ' ., .0 • Y f jy. Yt • t.L .,,�+�1.�_,�Y. v_' '7'+., +i'` `.1 +•..^.i�TKO ,3.-��Y' � pK'-�.�: [��� � _.�Iq a• S��j[ '".c!`SS t 3:� uy, .•r;� `"� s.. 13. � a� �', ;hT�s: `t�a ts�• '�' 3-�aa - e ♦ '-ai Siva '[:s$�"f�"+-{ -,�,, �:v ' Y` �' -`��c `'� � � 7���}jj ..� ,c t't.♦y,� a V ` j a; 1 _ � � �iSK �� - �t �, .'� L�' _ � T� rA;,w�_ i .�j _" � � �'_`'�� r_:" y Y �- `x m; --t 3"X M� +�:� e sri 7�S�rg�+� ; � �f � , �' �► s ... y y.�} ��. a 4 PS 47, �4.4 'F%.�. 1 Ate. N•� y S!y' Y t4 `4Y.[� - i� +ram'�43✓. ! ti� k `aT ~�°S ,i.,,�{\J'QT`4" .�:� ilf ��'• ZZAL • i. '� 5 Wit~ - `a' a €„�`�." _ ' � t. _.� t ye ;}.. � - � �, ;''��ti_ fir} i - y •tea �•',.. - �. 7- t ��I �i+ \ i q' _. ti _ 4 9-st�-.^y+ti.z_}�,iRaa. w ? w � �i; . � � f f�' • - _ a �'` Y,,�y`, � - � �,-Y� . ,�., t-tJ ��4,`"5 'ti a,.�'ya �d'�` ?F" ti.J "fit J1 . a� '4s . C..- . w �• �".�.. �� V� �:. � •ir:'.. YCLY� ♦fir � It �` , V�•.. � �. i= z 3 t's, �:¢ �[ ..-srzear;7 z �q.. {�-�•` y .fir• $( � � .: �� .:.r a �:aF 1,M~ �� d�:�� �r.►i/ I � crr�f �=.a'�-r`! � �,5 � .sl tr ,o:.%+'. ,� tl wit +.:�, tl�•' "r�'' ,�[+e - _ Fs{.,"`. t'1 � �Fgy y x„•,ri i- -y j�.i � S� 3'.�°Iw 22o043 Ade rive City Council Noticing 2843 Adeline Drive Meeting Date: 01.07.13 35 Notices - 027.093.310 APN OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 027093310 2843 Adeline Drive Llc 851 Burlway Rd Ste 710 Burlingame CA 94010- 027091100 Cava naro Walter J Tr 2852 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5901 027093200 Chekasina Tatiana V Tr 2874 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027091090 Chrisman George E lii 2848 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5901 027093040 De Cossio Edward F & Jennie L 2852 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5907 027093130 Dehnam Llc 20 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010-0000 027091130 Dewitt Daniel M Tr 2860 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5915 027093280 Ehrlich Steven C Tr 2833 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5969 027093150 Ehsani our Kamran 205 Park Rd Ste 207 Burlingame CA 94010- 027091080 Gaul Michael W Po Box 1617 Burlingame CA 94010-5540 027093240 Gee Calvin S Y 2860 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-0000 027093220 Gerster David A 2831 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94011--4283 027093210 Glezer Yelena Tr 2878 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027091050 Goodman Gary 2828 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5901 027093080 Ho Ivan 2835 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5969 027091040 Howley Sean J Tr 2820 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027091220 Kubiak Stanley F 6 Blackhawk Ln Burlingame CA 94010-5900 027093090 Labrie Arthur J Jr 2839 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5969 027091110 Mitchell William E Tr 2856 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027102110 Polkin horne Roy Tr 2861 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5957 027093170 Portnov Marina Tr 19 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010-0000 027093140 Schefsky Steven Tr 24 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010-5934 027370010 Sisters Of Mercy 2300 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5540 027093230 Smith Robert F Tr 2215 Hermosa Ave Hermosa Beach CA 90254--2527 027113110 Straub Theodore E 2867 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027093290 Swaminathan Sundaramoorthi 2858 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5907 027093120 Thomas Arthur J & Eileen A 16 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--5934 027102120 Tollini Jean C Tr 2851 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5957 027113080 Valentino Ray Tr 2879 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5957 027093190 Verducci Frank P Jr & M A 11 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--5934 027093250 Warren Jerry 2866 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5907 027102100 Wolfe Merle A Tr 2865 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5957 027113160 Zaragoza Ronald 2871 Hillside Drive Burlingame CA 94010--5957 027093320 Zhang Jian Guang 4568 Novato Street Union City CA 94587- 027093330 Zhang Jian Ping 14568 Novato Street Union City CA 94587- Property Notification Report Page 1 of 1 7 Sltus: 2843 Adeline Dr, Burlingame ElParcels SELECTED Owner: 2843 Adeline Drive Llc, 851 Burlway Rd Ste 710, Burlingame, CA, 94010- PROPERTY APN: 027093310 Street Labels C Lot Labels Z� 07 2p @tqC L►4Cik IT 13 a k Jp T 03 43 HILLSIDE DR00 w N O~ QT Dr 3 y 02- 01 OB O CRP HI LLSIDE Date Created: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 http://gis.co. samnateo.ca.uslgisportallapplicationslapp_PrintPropNotify.asp?APN=02709... 12/ 18/2012 1 .y CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) C. Rihm, being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States 28th day of December 2012 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 2843 ADELINE DRIVE 35- 300' radius notices SANOTICINMAFFIDAVIT.doc CITY BURLINGAME COMMUNITY NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD I" 501 r'ti=u='V BURLINGAME, CA 94010 W PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696=3790 www.burlingame.org •:�`*��- Site: 2843 ADELINE DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Amendment to Design Review for as -built changes to a previously approved new, 3-1/2 story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 2843 ADELINE DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 027-093-310 Mailed: November 30, 2012 (Please refer to other side) 0 Q ? 0 !.:a a; Fri-: —!�r" 1-, US POSTAGE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE, (Please refer to other side) Planning Commission Noticing 2843 Adeline Drive Meeting Date: 12.10.12 36 Notices - 027.093.310 APN OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 027093310 2843 Adeline Drive Llc 851 Burlway Rd Ste 710 Burlingame CA 94010- 027091100 Cava naro Walter J Tr 2852 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027093200 Chekasina Tatiana V Tr 2874 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027091090 Chrisman George E lii 2848 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5901 027093040 De Cossio Edward F & Jennie L 2852 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5907 027093130 Dehnam Llc 20 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--0000 027091130 Dewitt Daniel M Tr 2860 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5915 027093280 Ehrlich Steven C Tr 2833 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5969 027093150 Ehsanipour Kamran 205 Park Rd Ste 207 Burlingame CA 94010- 027091080 Gaul Michael W Po Box 1617 Burlingame CA 94010-5540 027093240 Gee Calvin S Y 2860 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--0000 027093220 Gerster David A 2831 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94011-4283 027093210 Glezer Yelena Tr 2878 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027091050 Goodman Gary 2828 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027093080 Ho Ivan 2835 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5969 027091040 Howley Sean J Tr 2820 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027091220 Kubiak Stanley F 6 Blackhawk Ln Burlingame CA 94010-5900 027093090 Labrie Arthur J Jr 2839 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5969 027091060 Leung Tony 2832 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5901 027091070 Lucero Fern B A Tr 1125 Grand St Redwood City CA 94061- 027093180 Mccarthy Niall P Tr 15 Vista Lane Burlingame CA 94010-4003 027093160 Menendez Eduardo Ernesto 23 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010-5934 027370020 Mercy High School Burlingame 2750 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5540 027091110 Mitchell William E Tr 2856 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5901 027102110 Polkinghorne Roy Tr 2861 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5957 027093170 Portnov Marina Tr 19 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--0000 027093140 Schefsky Steven Tr 24 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--5934 027370010 Sisters Of Mercy 2300 Adeline Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5540 027093230 Smith Robert F Tr 2215 Hermosa Ave Hermosa Beacl CA 90254--2527 027113110 Straub Theodore E 2867 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010- 027093290 Swaminathan Sundaramoorthi 2858 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5907 027093120 Thomas Arthur J & Eileen A 16 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--5934 027102120 Tollini Jean C Tr 2851 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5957 027113080 Valentino Ray Tr 2879 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010-5957 027093190 Verducci Frank P Jr & M A 11 Vista Ln Burlingame CA 94010--5934 02709 2250 Warren Jerry 2866 Hillside Dr Burlingame CA 94010--5907 CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) C. Rihm , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18-years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 30TH day of November 2012 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 2843 ADELINE DRIVE 36 - 300' radius notices SA NOTICINMAFFIDAVIT.doc