The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2705 Adeline Drive - ApplicationJ � PROJECT APPLICAI�ON � CEQA ASSESSMENT Application received ( 1-9-87 Staff review/acceptance ( 1-16-87 �� iT� o.0 2705 Adeline Drive BURLINGpME project address ._..... ... � �+y,�'��,'`� pro�ect name - if any ) 1. APPLICANT_�Tc�hn C_arnir�c3� — P mr�l a CarnxrlV 348-6911 nar�e . telephone no. 2705 Adeline Drive, Burlingame 94010 applicant s address: street, city, zip code Pamela Cannody 348-6911 contact person, if different telephone no. 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Speci�l Perr�it O Variance* O Ccndomini�m Pernit (X) OtherMinor Nlodification *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION �or Modification to remodel an existing attic by adding two bedrooms and a bath (totalling 726 SF), which will increase e o n r o , ( 027-182-460 ) ( 5 ) ( 13 ) ( Burlinghane ) APN lot no. block no. subdivision name � (� � , R �7. ) ( 4,987 � ) zoning istrict land area, square feet John & Pamela Carmody 2705 Adeline Driv� land owner's name address �urlingame, CA 94010 Reauired Date received city zip code (yesj frroj ( 1-12-87 ) Proof of ownership . �.yes}. (no) ( ,) Owner's consent to application 5. EXISTIPIG SITE CONDITIONS �Two bedrocan, one bath home second code standard kin s ace on site. The existing garage (24'x24') is large enough to accamnodate two cars, hawever wi only an 8' wide door, it oes not meet c e requiremen s or par ing vi c es. e garage oor canno e wi e slot�e of the property. The remodellinq will not affect the existing (attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) COVerage, SetbaCkS oT 25.70.030(a height of the house Ref. code sect;on(s): ( �( � which presentlyaexceeds 4. PROPERTY IDENTIfICATION �• 30 feet. Re�uired Date received (yes) (no) ( 1_9_87 ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall;s and ' curbs; all structures and improvements; paved on-site parking; landscaping. (yes) (no) ( 1-9-8 7) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area by type of us�`on each floor plan. (yes) (no) ( 1-9-8 7) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). (yes) (no) ( ) Site cross section(s) (if relevant). (other) ( 1-12-87 ) _Letter of Explanation *Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). * 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL 726 SF remodel of existing attic area Interior alterations t0 proposed censtruction, Belov� grade ( -- SF) Second floor ( '72C SF) exiSting attiC �'ea. yross floor area First floor ( __ SF) Third floor ( __ SF) Project will not affect existing Project * coc!e Pro�ect * Code Setb3CkS, coverage or height Pr000sal Requi rem�nt Proposal Requi rement of Structure. Front setback _ 19' 15' �, Lot covera�e 30.50 40°s max. Side setback __ Ruildine height** 2g' 32' 30� max. ** �isting height of house � is Side yard 3' /5' 4' min. Lar.dscaoed area __ _ 32' . Dormers to be added Rear yard 55' 15' min. !?n�•site �kg.spaces 1 2 will be a maxurn�n of 28' high. _ _ _ � � 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) EXISTING IP! 2 YEARS after � after 8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM Full tir�e employees on site Part tir�e emoloyees on site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trin ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles IPl 5 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM *Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES Residential uses on all ad'acent lots; Sisters of Mer across the street. This use conforms to e Genera P an. Required (ry�s) ( n o ) (�e�) ( n o ) Date received ( ) Location plan of adjacent properties. ( ) Other tenants/firms on property: no. firms ( ) no. er�ployees ( ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany vehicles at this location ( ) 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $ () Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 (X ) Variance/other districts $ 75 (- ) �leoative Declaration $ 25 ( ) Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ ( TOTAL FEES $ 25. 00 RECEI PT NO 15583 Recei ved by J. Kr'anitSky I hereby certify under oenalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correc'hto the bes m.knowledge and belief. � 7 d/ C � Signature GC �''�-��_ � /l�" c.��. Date �� — Appl i Cdtlt a � STAFF USE ONLY NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. The City of Burlingame by on , 19 , completed a review of the proposed oroject and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a Conclusion: Categoricallv exempt -- Reference Code Section 15301, Existing Facilities. l �� ' � Sign t re of Processino Official Ti le Daie Signed� E7 Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te posted, the deternination shall be final. DECLARATIO'V Of POSTIPJG Date Posted: I declare under penalty of perjiary that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of the above Neoati��e Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to th� Council Chambers. Executed at 6urlingame, California on Ap�ealed: ( )Yes ( )P;o 19 JUb TH . M�TTI, CITY CLERK, CITY (`� 6URLINGAP•1E �� STAFF REVIEW 1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by: date circulated reply received City Engineer (1-9-87 ) (yes) (no) Building Irrspector ( 1-9-87 ) (yes) (no) Fire Marshal (1-g-g� ) (yes) (no) Park Department ( ) (yes) (no) City Atto mey ( ) (yes) (no) memo attached (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) 2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATIOPI MEASURES Concerns Mitigation Measures Does the applicant satisfy the Review application; make four legal requirements to findings. grant a variance? Does the proposal cc�nply with Request coim�ents fran the Fire Fire and Building Code Marshal and Chief Building requiremexlts? Inspector. 3. CEQA REQUIREP4EPlTS If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project: Is the project subject to CEQA review? No. Cateqorically exe�t. IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED: Initial Study comoleted d ( ) Study by P.C. ( ) Decision to prepare EIR ( ) Review period ends ( ) Notices of preparation mailed ( ) Public hearing by P.C. ( ) RFP to consultants ( ) Final EIR received by P.C. ( ) Contract awarded ( ) Certification by Council ( ) Admin. draft EIR received ( ) Decision on project ( ) Draft EIR accepted by staff ( ) Notice of Determination ( ) Circulation to other agencies ( ) 4. APPLICATION STATUS Date first received (1'9-87 ) Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to applicant advising info. required ( ) Yes( ) date P.C. study ( ) Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( ) Date staff report mailed to aoplicant ( ) Date Corrmission hearing ( ) Application approved ( ) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no) Date Council hearing ( ) Application approved ( ) Denied ( ) ,� , l+�)'a �� 1 �• - . .i.�� • . •. �.