HomeMy WebLinkAbout2229 Adeline Drive - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame
Design Review and Special Permif
Address: 2229 Adeline Drive
Item No. 8b
Regular Action Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2022
Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope fora two and a half
story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling.
Applicant and Designer: Form + One, Tim Raduenz
Property Owners: Cameron and Shannon Foster
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 027-161-160
Lot Area: 5,190 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that
additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot which slopes down approximatelyfourfeet befinreen
the front and rear property lines. Due to this slope, the existing house has three separate living levels, consisting
of a lower level (at the rear only), a main living (1St floor at front), and a second floor. The existing single-unit
dwelling has four bedrooms and is 2,727 SF in floor area, including a detached garage.
The applicant is proposing a rear addition to all living levels. The lowerflooraddition would include an expansion
at the rear of the house. This space is currently used as a den and would be converted to an accessory dwelling
unit (ADU). The proposed addition also includes a small expansion to the main living level at the rear onto the
existing rear deck, as well as a second story addition that would be located at the rear of the existing second
story. There is no construction or changes proposed to the existing detached garage. While the proposed
addition would add approximately 500 SF at the rear, because the lower floor would be converted to an ADU
and that square footage is not counted toward the overall FAR, the total floor area is being reduced with the
proposed addition from 2,727 SF (0.50 FAR) to 2,624 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3,160 SF (0.60 FAR) is the
maximum allowed.
With this application, the number of bedrooms would be remain at four. Two parking spaces, one of which must
be covered, are required on site. The existing detached garage has two separate garage doors fortwo covered
off-street spaces. However, because the interior dimensions measure 17'-7" wide by 22'-6" deep (18' x 18'
clear interior dimensions required for an existing finro-car garage), the existing detached garage is only counted
as a one-car garage; one uncovered parking space (9' x 18') is provided in the driveway. Per C.S.
25.48.030(L)(3)(a), no on-site parking is required forthe ADU because it is located within one-half mile walking
distance of public transit.
The existing left side of the second floor currently encroaches into the declining height envelope. Given the
downward slope on the property, the proposed second floor addition would continue this encroachment into the
declining height envelope. Therefore, the application includes a requestfora Special Permitfor Declining Height
Envelope since 169 SF of the left side of the proposed second floor addition would encroach into the declining
height envelope.
Planning staff would note that a Special Permit is not required for the deck at the rear of the house since it does
not qualify as a second story deck (deck floor is 7'-6" above grade).
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) "
This project includes building a new attached 467 SF ADU by converting a portion of the existing lower level and
by adding 174 SF at the rear of the lower floor to accommodate the new ADU. Review of the ADU application is
administrative only and is not reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff has determined that the ADU
complies with the regulations in Code Section 25.48.030 (Accessory Dwelling Units). Among those regulations
Design Review and Special Permit 2229 Adeline Drive
is an exemption from both lot coverage and FAR for ADUs that are 850 SF or less in size. Therefore, this
proposed attached ADU did not count towards the overall lot coverage or FAR for this project.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
Design Review for a two and a half story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S.
25.68.020(C)(1)(b)); and
Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (DHE) along the left side of the house (169 SF of the
proposed addition would extend beyond the DHE) (C.S. 25.10.055).
2229 Adeline Drive
�ot Ar-ea: 5,� yu 5r Plans date stam ed: Jul 26, 2022
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
Front (Lower f/r): N/A No change 15'-0"
(Main flr): 15'-0" No change 15'-0"
(Upper f/r): 35'-10" No change 20'-0"
Side (left): 4'-3" 4'-3" to addition 4'-0
(right): 10'-2" No change 4'-0
Rear (Lower flr): 48'-1" 40'-9" 15'-0"
(Main f/r): 48'-1" 31'-5" 20'-0"
(Upper f/r): 48'-1" 40'-9" 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 1,822 SF 1,948 SF 2,760 SF .
35.0% 38% 40%
FAR: 2,727 SF 2,624 SF 3,160 SF'
0.50 FAR (3,212 SF — 588 SF ADU) 0.60 FAR
0.50 FAR
# of 6edrooms: 4 No change --
Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered
(17'-7" x 22'-6" clear (9' x 18' clear interior for
interior) No change existing)
1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 18') (9' x 18')
Building Height: 28'-0" 26'-7" at addition 30'-0"
P/ate Height
8'-3" 8'-3" (matching) 9'-0"
��Sr �r�; $,�„ $��„ �matching) 8,_O.,
�2nd flr):
DH Envelope: Encroachment 2 Special Permit requested C.S. 25.10.055
for DHE encroachment on .
left side 3
� (0.32 x 5,190 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,160 SF (0.60 FAR).
2 Existing nonconforming Declining Height Envelope along left side.
3 Special Permit requested for Declining Height Envelope (169 SF encroachment into the DHE on left side of house).
2
Design Review and Special Permit 2229 Adeline Drive
None of the changes made to the revised plans, date stamped July 26, 2022, resulted in changes to the zoning
code compliance documented in the table above.
Staff Comments: While the new Zoning Code requires a Special Permit for upper floor plate heights exceeding 8'-
0"(C.S. 25.10.035(A)(6)), staff has made a determination that a Special Permit would not be required for second
floor additions where the plate height of the addition matches the existing plate height up to 8'-6" above second
floor. This will be incorporated into the Zoning Code with the next code update.
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: Wood clad windows with simulated true divided lites with wood trim around windows.
• Siding: Stucco.
• Roof: Terracotta barrel tiles.
• Other: Wood railing and wood decking.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 11, 2022,
the Planning Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this
item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning
Division (see attached July 11, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes).
The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans, date stamped July 26, 2022 to address the
Planning Commission's comments and suggestions. The only change to the plans includes labeling of the
existing landscaping in the rear yard, which provides screening to the neighbors. Please refer to the applicanYs
letter with a summary of the neighbor outreach in response to the public comments received at the Design
Review Study meeting.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the
City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage pattems in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures;
5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing
structure as remodeled.
Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall be
supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title
25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most specifically, the
standards established in the Design Review Criteria above, as applicable.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.
3
Design Review and Special Permit
Suggested Findings for Design Review:
2229 Adeline Drive
1. The proposed addition to an existing single-unit dwelling is consistent with the General Plan designation
of Low Density Residential and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title 25, with the
exception of the declining height envelope for which a Special Permit is being requested; the addition is
at the rear portion of the house with the mass of the addition concentrated toward the back of the lot;
that the addition is sensitive to the architectural style, mass and bulk of the existing house with multiple
levels as well as sensitive to the siting of the house on this sloped lot; and that the addition has been
designed to include elements of the existing architectural style to help integrate the addition into the
existing structure.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development as shown on the proposed plans.
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property because the project
complies with setback, lot coverage, floor area ratio and declining height envelope requirements.
For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's design review
criteria.
Required Findings for a Special Permit: Any decision to approve a Special Permit application in the R-1
zoning district pursuant to Chapter 25.78 shall be supported by written findings. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the well-defined character of the street and
neighborhood;
2. The variety of roof line, fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed new structure or
addition are consistent with the existing structure, street, and neighborhood;
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City; and
4. Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the City's reforestation requirements, and that the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is consistent with established City policies and practices.
Suggested Special Permit Findings for Declining Height Enve/ope:
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the proposed addition are
consistent with the character of the street and neighborhood which consists of one and two-story single-
unit dwellings in a variety of architectural styles and massing.
2. The variety of roof line, fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed addition are
consistent with the existing street and neighborhood in that the hip and gable roof configurations and
pitches, stucco siding, and articulation in elevations are consistent with those architectural features
found on existing structures in the neighborhood; that the lot slopes downward from the front property
line to the rear property line therefore causing the point of departure for the declining height envelope to
be below the finished floor of the house; that because the existing house placement of the existing
house it is cuRently nonconforming encroaching into the declining height envelope on the left side; and
that the architectural style that would result from a code complying project would not be compatible or
true to the massing and style of the house if the second floor were offset in order to comply with
Declining Height Envelope.
4
Design Review and Special Permit
2229 Adeline Drive
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City in that the
proposed structure is compatible with the requirements of the City's design review criteria as noted
above.
For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's Special Permit
criteria
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
July 26, 2022, sheets T1.0, A1.0 through G2.0;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or
pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall
not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all
the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in
effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
5
Design Review and Special Permit
2229 Adeline Drive
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTiON PROCESS PRIOR
TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window
locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting
framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final
framing inspection shall be scheduled;
11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
12. that priorto final inspection, Planning Division staffwill inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the
approved Planning and Building plans.
Catherine Keylon
Senior Planner
c. Tim Raduenz, Form + One„ applicant and designer
Attachments:
July 11, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes
ApplicanYs Response Letter to the Planning Commission, dated July 26, 2022
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Application
Neighbor comment letter, G. Heeran, August 1, 2022
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 29, 2022
Area Map
�
� CITY O
��;��"�
��` . ,-'�
a
4co - e°
'�roqwTep �
City of Burlingame
Meeting Minutes
Planning Commission
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Monday, July 11, 2022 7:00 PM Online
b. 2229 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for
Declining Height Envelope for a two and half story addition to an existing single-unit
dwelling. (Tim Raduenz, Form+One, applicant and designer; Cameron and Shannon
Foster, property owners) (104 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon
Attachments: 2229 Adeline Dr - Staff Report
2229 Adeline Dr - Attachments
2229 Adeline Dr - Plans
All Commissioners have visited the project site. Commissioner Lowenthal was recused from this item as
he lives within 500' from this property. Associate Planner Kolokihakaufisi provided an overview of the staff
report.
Chair Gaul opened the public hearing.
Tim Raduenz, designer, represented the applicant and answered questions regarding the project.
Public Comments:
> Public comment via email from George Heeren: 1 live directly behind this proposed addition. This
gives my wife and 1 little to no privacy in our backyard. It also can make our property lose value if we
decide to sell. I am in my 80's with some health conditions. The Foster's sent a/etfer saying this will be a
small rear addition. This does not seem small as stated, 1 have looked at the blueprints. How long wi/l it
take to complete?
Chair Gaul closed the public hearing.
Commission Discussion/Direction:
> 1 like the project. I agree that the rear elevation becomes a litt/e bit more cohesive. 1 like fhe fact that
windows were added. Suggest that the applicant reach out to their neighbors at the rear. There's an
opportunity for landscape screening to fry and help with the privacy issue. In reality, the rear elevation is
already two stories with windows on the second story, so this doesn't make it any worse, it's just a little
closer. This is a good looking project.
> 1 concur with my fellow commissioner. It is really well done; it looks great and holds together nicely. 1
would also suggest revisiting the landscape, without ruining the existing, to fill in what could be lacking.
> 1 too appreciate the design that has been developed, even the little details, such as the trim detail on
the front elevation being carried over to the right elevation. I like fhe improvements to the rear elevation .
Overall, this is a nicely pulled together project. 1 also appreciate that we are refaining a nicely designed
home, generally in its original stafe, and improving upon that rather than tearing something down and
starfing from scratch.
> 1 too can support the project; it blends in very we/l. I can support fhe Specia/ Permit for declining
height envelope because part of the house already extends beyond fhe declining height envelope. I don 't
find it obtrusive or overbearing on the neighbors. I wou/d encourage the applicant to speak with the
CltyofBuNingame Page 1
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 11, 2022
neighbors behind them to see if you can add a little bit more landscaping or something that would
appease their concems.
Chair Gaul made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to place on the item on the Regular
Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following
vote:
Aye: 5- Comaroto, Gaul, Pfaff, Schmid, and Tse
Absent: 1 - Horan
Recused: 1 - Lowenthal
City of Burlingame Page 2
Page 1 of 1
Form + One
4843 Silver Springs Drive
Park City, iTT 84098
P+ 415.819.0304
E + tim�a fotmonedesign.com
TRANSMITTAL FORM
To: City of Burli.ngame (Catherine Keylon)
Subject: 2229 Adeline Commission Responses
From: Tim Radueuz
Date Sent: 07/26/2022
Number of Pa�es: l
Response to Planning Commission Comments:
1. Did yon look at design that wonld not encroach in the DHE? :
- We did, but it would cut off the existing garage and back yard because of having to move the addition
towards the left side of the property (when looking from the backyard). We also feel as though it will
help the desig� be more cohesive as the encroachment follows the same outline as the existing does, so
iYll help the rear elevation blend better and not create an overly complicated elevation.
2. How tall is the hedge at the rear? :
- The existing hedge is 8'-6". Site plan has been updated to call out hedge height. We will be protecting
the hedge to help ensure everyone's privacy.
3. Support proposal, blends in with the eaisting style; Good looking project; Rear looks more cohesive;
Appreciate the design and details :
- Thank you!
4. Addition is not making anything worse, just getting closer :
- Coirect.
5. Speak to rear neighbor at the rear- look at adding landscape screening :
- Emailed / talked to two neighbors. Our reviews seemed to have eased their concems.
.
Tim Raduenz
Form + One - Design & Planning • 4843 Silver Sprtngs Drive• Park Gty • UT • 84098 •(ais) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com
Gty of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road •(650) 558•%ZSO � F3��«�ilil�;cl€ �,t��bGrrlinr,arn�.�r�;
`wy.a'+r,
:+� ��
���uNc,narc
������
�
Type of Appiication:
Project Application - Planning Division
Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Conditional Use/Minor Use Permit
Resign Rewiew ❑ Nillside Area Construction Permit ❑ Minor Modi�cation
�Special Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Othe�
_ ___.__ _ m____ . _ � . _ �. . __.
__ _
Project Addresss � �Z � �,d �ur✓E �� • Assessor's Parcel #: �,�7� �,�1.����j zoning: /`�►" �
+ adu in exisitn basement w/
Project Desaiption: �,�� � l� F�.�a .��Z. ��3 � jloq�' addition g
ADU in existing basement + lower addition, also special permit for Declining Height Envelope
Appiicant Property Owner
Name: /!� �t�L ?�i�l �l1/� Name: �,A�l/JE�'� 1�1�'/Z— -f ..�/�AN/i/.t+/✓
Address: jl Address: ��?�2� �FL!/Y� 77jL. � �"yr`
�r,�*tf,a��:� . �4
Phone: ��
E-mail: ��
�lrtfiitect/Designe�
Name: � !/!� ��nN��Z. ��'M UIl��
Address: ,(f Q �� 7��/�i�. 7��1�✓�5
�x C��t- l�7��. y � 8
Phone:
E-mail:
�/,S= �'1�'�: l,3� �
�� �' �,�jt'lt'NFL�S�G� . �'U/r'J
Burlingame Business License #:
Appliqnt: I hereby
knowledge and beli�
Applicant's signatur
Property Owner: I
application to the Planning Division.
Property owners signature:
Authorization to Reproduce Rroject Plans: !
I hereby grant the City af Burfingame the authority to post
plans submitted with this application an the City's website
as part of the Planning approva) process and waive any
claims against the City arising out of or related to such
action.
��. (Initials of.A�et�ect/Designer)
* Architect/Oesigner must have a valid Burlingame Business License.
nformation given herein is true and corred to ihe best of my
Date: � / J �Z''
and hereby authorize the above applicant to submi# this
Date:
Daie Application Receiveal (staff onty):
DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE -"SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DHE"
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • www.burlin�ame.or�
��' City of Burlingame
BURLINGAME
`� Special Permit Application (R-1 and R-2)
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the Cit�s Ordinance (Chapter 25.78).
Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether
the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing
street and neighborhood.
The spanish style is more of a block style w/ dominant forms, which we used in the addition @ rear. Also,
neighbor to the right has a prominent balcony looking down into 2229's yard, which we trying to down
play + create more privacy for both parties. Finally the the existing lot slope has a lot to do about the
special permit for "DHE", the lot slopes toward the rear lot with a difference of about 5-6 ft. from the front
to the rear property line since the point of departure is taken by averaging the front and rear property
corners
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the
proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and
neighborhood.
We have stayed consistent w/ the (e) architecture (roof styles) and have borrowed it (design)
for the (n) addition. Also we have preserved the old clay barrel tiles for use w/ the new addition.
Street + Neighborhood: Front elevation will be preserved + retained, which the part of Adeline
has some good older homes and to that end we are keeping the look of existing which has a cool
tower entry and good back and forth of structures.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by
the City?
Its consistent w/ the design of (e) elements, its also creating more privacy for both neighbors
(side neighbor w/ balcony) .
Street + Neighborhood: Front elevation will be preserved and retained.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate.
Not applicable, we are saving the tree @ property line and all (e) landscape, which is in great
condition and well taken care of + finally very mature! Great privacy
From: Burlinaame Plannina Deot
To:
Subject: FW: 2229 Adeline Drive,zoned r-1
Date: Monday, August 1, 2022 3:03:12 PM
-----Original Message- --
From: George Heeren
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 2:16 PM
To: Burlingame Planning Dept <planningdept@burlingame.org>
Subject: 2229 Adeline Drive,zoned r-1
Sent from my iPad
Hello Rubin, I see that there is another meeting on the addition for 2229 Adeline Drive.The top floor windows in
this proposal look directly into my back yard and deck.They are ten feet closer then the existing windows that look
into our yard.We will be under the microscope. Thanks again [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW
AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn
Review and Special Permit for Declininp Heiqht Envelope for a two and a half story addition to an
existinq sinqle-unit dwellinq at 2229 Adeline Drive, Zoned R-1. Cameron D. and Shannon E. Foster Tr
propertv owner, APN: 027-161-160;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on AuQust
8. 2022, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial
evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and
categorical exemption, pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per
Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures
are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of
more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved.
2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth
in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
Chairperson
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 8th dav of Auqust, 2022 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit
2229 Adeline Drive
Effective August 19, 2022
Page 1
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped July 26, 2022, sheets T1.0, A1.0 through G2.0;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning
Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning
staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this
permit;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval
adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of
all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all
conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or
changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit
2229 Adeline Drive
Effective August 19, 2022
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at
framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans;
architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be
submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
. ����"Y ���
B
CITY OF BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � �
V:tJ
'� BURUNGAME,CA94010
" ' . PH:(650)558-7250
www.burlingame.org
Project Site: 2229 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1 '
The City of Burlingame Planning` Commission announces' the
following virtual pubiic hearing via loom on Monday, �
August 8, 2022 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting PUBLIC HEARING
online at www_zoom.us(join or by phone ' at NOTICE
(346)248-7199:
Meeting ID: 816 4833 5880 Passcode: 062429
Description: Application for Design Review and Special Permit : ,
for Dedining Height Envelope far a two and half story addition
to an existing single-unit dwelling.
Members of the public may provide;written`comments by email
to: publiccommentna hu�lingame.org.
Mailed: July 29, Z022
(Please refer to other sideJ
Citv of Burlingame - Public Hearin NoHce
If you have any questit�ns about this applicatian or would like to schedule an
appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, piease send'an email to
planninedept burlinaame.org or ca{I (650)`558-7250.
Individuals who require special assistance or a d�sabi)ity-re(ated modificatio� or
accommodafion to participate in this meeting, oc who have a disability and wish to
request;an alternative format for the agenda,'meeting notice, agenda packet or other
- writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at
plannin�deptC«�buriin�ame.org or (650) 558-7250 by �.0 am on the day of the meeting.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising on(y
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the tity at or priar #o the public hearing:
Property owners who'receive this notice are responsibte for informing their tenants
about this notice.
Kevin 6ardiner, AICP
Community Development Director ' (Pleasereferto orherside)
�
0
�
2229 Adeline Drive
300' noticing .
APN: 027-161-160
�� ,,, ,�������_ �' �"..° �. . ' �
"`�"` ' `�'.1!sa�=`} �i
__ . . • � d � _
, ,..,:. .,.
_ . , E
. ;�" E, _ _ . .. -� ..,
..,...._ , , p ; y
� �
r �.^
dl'r � � �r .,�r°� ' ='a .
��rf� � „ � � � 3� � .
r.
F 4
q'��'., �� , ��"4'.sn� � .:' ��Y��� e.w""'i� 1%isa�� e� 9�.:"3 . � �. ...
n�
< � 3 P
, �
3°.,:, '��,� s � .:?'
,�ti
�,.
�.�17
AW �
f�ldf.
, �Ifiisa€t�
.. ��.:�;lf�a
�' �'� � �4
a
� ��
- ___—p�:('�� ��
�
� `4` .a�
ti� � y
J�
-ti 1
4-.. s
�}� j . (�,.
I
��f� � `J .,
4 ��� �
t\ ; ��
•46 \ m..z�� �
V
�
�
�if� �
� ;� �� •`?.
�
� ♦
�� , � � ��'�._a.
� ;1
... : � �� . .... i
���_
N��' _
,�
����
�� ��� � ;� �� ��� � �
_ � •-F;�yF� ! n� -
',a„+ ���$1� � � . .
,;y ���
•� � M1
r.
3'.f:ryfnY
. . � � '��K ' . '�P`L
� I
d� �
`} ' " y
j. . .,- � � >..
t � �� �'� ` ���w',s ' �
�' �; �a:". - � S , r'�
� I '�.. , _ �` �r � `� � $ , �. �
�� � �' ���✓ P'
� ��' �li ���� �
4
� tJ� � ,s h y..
F �2f � � �� � € � � §
¢ � � , e
i
a . �
� s y '
r d . .. � �.. �' � —
i
� t 4h �R�d � $ �'� � �
��
� ��
G _
j�i �' � - ���'s '���
-� , � � - ....
� x�
�� � � � . t�� � �, ��� �� .R
ti " �
�1 h , lii��zt z� , � �
a, 1av„�� ,, �s�, �am, � ��.. �. _ """ ... :� � , . .� �'�:' �
�
�
e� ,:.
��, � � ��� �a�� .,
mj� � �. � ,�J II�
� .�
rg��
�'
F� �N
fY =�
�
v
9 ,'�� �. - �` � �., �
i P wE�•w� � � �
. � � t �"� � � b . .y.'` � � �^w m�'�
_ � � � `r 0.��.�` � �,� � '�� "�- � � �
�
�;, � � ;� f�`
� ..
i ��&
f���.. ���.�a b � . .4y�'��� n' �` . ���:
� s�.� ,, . � .. y� -
.� �. r� �
� �.�`_` ' � � _ h
��� 3` � Y
k �
k�' t
�' , u
�'���r � -�
�t:'...Y?h . - # �� r . EE,....
City of Burlingame
Design Review and Special Permit
Address: 2229 Adeline Drive
Item No. 9b
Design Review Study
Meeting Date: July 11, 2022
Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope for a two and a half
story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling.
Applicant and Designer: Form One, Tim Raduenz
Property Owners: Cameron and Shannon Foster
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN : 027-161-160
Lot Area: 5,190 SF
Zoning: R-1
Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot which slopes down approximately fourfeet befinreen
the front and rear property lines. Due to this slope, the existing house has three separate living levels, consisting
of a lower level (at the rear only), a main living (15t floor at front) and a second floor. The existing single-unit
dwelling has four bedrooms and is 2,727 SF in floor area, including a detached garage.
The applicant is proposing a rear addition to all living levels. The lower floor addition would include an expansion
at the rear of the house. This space is currently used as a den and would be converted to an accessory dwelling
unit (ADU). The proposed addition also includes a small expansion to the main living level at the rear onto the
existing rear deck, as well as a second story addition that would be located at the rear of the existing second
story. There is no construction or changes proposed to the existing detached garage. While the proposed
addition would add approximately 500 SF at the rear, because the lower floor would be converted to an ADU
and that square footage is not counted toward the overall FAR; the total floor area is being reduced with the
proposed addition from 2,727 SF (0.50 FAR) to 2,624 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3,160 SF (0.60 FAR) is the
maximum allowed.
With this application, the number of bedrooms would be remain at four. Two parking spaces, one of which must
be covered, are required on site. The existing detached garage has two separate garage doors fortwo covered
off-street spaces. However, because the interior dimensions measure 17-7" wide by 22'-6" deep (18' x 18' clear
interior dimensions required for an existing two-car garage), the existing detached garage is only counted as a
one-car garage; one uncovered parking space (9' x 18') is provided in the driveway.
The existing left side of the second floor currently encroaches into the declining height envelope along the left
side. Given the downward slope on the property, the proposed second floor addition would continue this
encroachment into the declining height envelope. Therefore, the application includes a request for a Special
Permit for Declining Height Envelope since 169 SF of the left side of the proposed second floor addition would
encroach into the declining height envelope.
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
This project includes building a new attached 467 SF ADU by converting a portion of the existing lower level and
by adding 174 SF at the rear of the lower floor to accommodate the new ADU. Review of the ADU application is
administrative only and is not reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff has determined that the ADU
complies with the regulations in Code Section 25.48.030 (Accessory Dwelling Units). Among those regulations
is an exemption from both lot coverage and FAR for ADUs that are 850 SF or less in size. Therefore, this
proposed attached ADU did not count towards the overall lot coverage or FAR for this project.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design Review for a two and a half story addition to an existing single-unit �iwel�i�g (C.S..
25.68.020�C)�� )�b)); and - . ., . , � . .
. ' . . . . . 4 � �.
�
Design Review and Special Permit 2229 Adeline Drive
■ Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (DHE) along the left side of the house (169 SF of the
proposed addition would extend beyond the DHE) (C.S. 25.10.055).
2229 Adeline Drive
Lot Area: 5,190 SF Plans date stamped: June 29, 2022
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
Front (Lower flr): N/A No change 15'-0"
(Main flr): 15'-0" No change 15'-0"
(Upperf/r): 35'-10"'` No change 20'-0"
Side (left): 4'-3" 4'-3" to add main / upper 4'-0
addtn & 7'-3"
(right): 10'-2" * No change 4'-0
Rear (Lower flr): 48'-1" 40'-9" 15'-0"
(Main flr): 48'-1" 31'-5" 20'-0"
(Upper flr): 48'-1" 40'-9" 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 1,822 SF 1,948 SF 2,760 SF
35.0% 38% 40%
FAR: 2,727 SF (3,212 SF — 588 SF ADU) 3,160 SF'
0.50 FAR = 2,624 SF 0.60 FAR
0.50 FAR
# of bedrooms: 4 No change ---
Otf-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered
�� �'"7�� (9' x 18' clear interior for
x 22'-6" clear interior) No change existing)
1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 18') (9' x 20')
Building Height: 28'-0" No change 30'-0"
(New height < E
@ 26'-7")
Plate Height $�_3" 8'-3" (matching) 9'-0"
(1 � flr): $���, 8'-4" (matching) 8�_�„
(2 flr):
DH Enve/ope: Encroachment Z Special Permit requested C.S. 25.10.055
for DHE encroachment on
left side 3
' (0.32 x 5,190 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,160 SF (0.60 FAR).
2., Existing nonconforming DH� along left side.
3 Special.Permit requested for Declining Height Envelope (169 SF encroachment into the DHE on leftside of
house). , , . . ,
2 -
Design Review and Special Permif 2229 Adeline Drive
Staff Comments: While the new Zoning Code requires a Special Permit for upper floor plate heights exceeding
8'-0"(C.S. 25.10.035(A)(6)), staff has made a determination that a Special Permit would not be required for second
floor additions where the plate height of the addition matches the existing plate height up to 8'-6" above second
floor. This will be incorporated into the Zoning Code with the next code update.
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: Wood clad windows with simulated true divided lites with wood trim around windows.
• Siding: Stucco.
• Roof: Terracotta barrel tiles.
• Other: Wood railing and wood decking.
Staff Comments: None.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the
City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures;
5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing
structure as remodeled.
Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall be
supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions ofTitle
25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most specifically, the
standards established in the Design Review Criteria above, as applicable.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.
Required Findings for a Special Permit: Any decision to approve a Special Permit application in the R-1
zoning district pursuant to Chapter25.78 shall be supported by written findings. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction oraddition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the well-defined character of the street and
neighborhood;
2. The variety of roof line, fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed new structure or
addition are consistent with the existing structure, street, and neighborhood;
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City; and
3
Design Review and Special Permit 2229 Adeline Drive
4. Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the City's reforestation requirements, and that the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is consistent with established City policies and practices.
Catherine Keylon
Senior Planner
c. Form One — Tim Raduenz, applicant and architect
Attachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Application
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed July 1, 2022
Area Map
4
Gty of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road •(650) 558-7250 • plannin�de�t@burlinpame.or�
pIMY��
� �
Qi._. '�
BURIINGAM[
�� �
Project Application - Pianning Division
Type of Applitation: Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Conditional Use/Minor Use Permit
Design Review Q Hiliside Area Construction Permit ❑ Minor Modification
�.Special Permit ❑ Variance ❑Other
Project Address: � �'Z� ��} �Ui✓� �� • Assessor's Parcel #: �,?7— f�,1— f,�Q Zoning: /�"'
,/_ + adu in exisitng basement w/
Project Description: �,v� t ��- �L� . %�'il%2 �t"�ol3/�7v� addition
ADU in existing basement + lower addition, also special permit for Declining Height Envelope
Applicant Property Owner
Name: /M ���Y` ��1 l/lV� Name: ���i�� ��/1-- "� S�i�/V/✓Li✓
Address: )� Address: ��?��� ��L//V� �jfL, � -'"'
��>� � � �
�y�a/�;
Phone: �j
E-maiL• �j
�I4+�h�tect/Designer /�
Name: � //!� �r�N��Z Zl.�/N (Jl✓�
Address: ���3 ���/`G� S�l�^/f�S
�,� Cj�7' l��g� o �
Phone:
E-mail:
�f/S` �l�/. a3� �
�I %� �' �v,�'1�/✓E4�S�6,n/ . �'vM
Burlingame Business License #:
Phone: ��� ��'l �/68
E-mail: (�AII"�/2l/Vi �'i�/2 � G�O/i1i�S�',
5,����✓�,�t� � 1��/��• �a�
Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans:
I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to
plans submitted with this application on the City's we
as part of the Planning approval process and waive �
claims against the City arising out of or related to s�
action.
�/C . (Initials of.Afel�#eet/Designer)
* Architect/besigner must have a valid Burlingame Business
Applitant: I hereby certify under penal erjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best �
knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: �'� Date: - / %� �'�""
Property Owner: I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submi
application to the Planning Division.
Property owner's signature:
Date:
my
this
Daie App/Tcatlon Received (staff only):
DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE -"SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DHE"
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • www.burlin�ame.or�
3rc�
BURLINGAME City of Burlingame
��� Special Permit Application �R-1 and R-2)
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Chapter 25.78).
Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether
the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing
street and neighborhood.
The spanish style is more of a block style w/ dominant forms, which we used in the addition @ rear. Also,
neighbor to the right has a prominent balcony looking down into 2229's yard, which we trying to down
play + create more privacy for both parties. Finally the the existing lot slope has a lot to do about the
special permit for "DHE", the lot slopes toward the rear lot with a difference of about 5-6 ft. from the front
to the rear property line since the point of departure is taken by averaging the front and rear property
corners
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the
proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and
neighborhood.
We have stayed consistent w/ the (e) architecture (roof styles) and have borrowed it (design)
for the (n) addition. Also we have preserved the old clay barrel tiles for use w/ the new addition.
Street + Neighborhood: Front elevation will be preserved + retained, which the part of Adeline
has some good older homes and to that end we are keeping the look of existing which has a cool
tower entry and good back and forth of structures.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by
the City?
Its consistent w/ the design of (e) elements, its also creating more privacy for both neighbors
(side neighbor w/ balcony)
Street + Neighborhood: Front elevation will be preserved and retained.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate.
Not applicable, we are saving the tree @ property line and all (e) landscape, which is in great
condition and well taken care of + finally very mature! Great privacy
�
CITY OF 6URLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPM€NT DEPARTMENT
sUR�INGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAO
BURLINGAME, CA94010
�'. PH:(650)558-725�
www.burlingame.org
Project Site: 2229 Adeline Drive, zoned R-1
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following virtual public hearing via Zoom on Monday,
July 11; 2022 at 7:00 P.M. Yau may access the meeting online
at www.zoom.us(join or by phone at
(346J 248-7T99,
Meeting ID: 854 9123 0621 Passcode: 625375
Description: Application for Design Review and Special Permit
far Declining Height Envelope for a two and half story rear
addition to an existing single-unif dwelling.
` Members of the public may provide written cnmments 6y email
to: pu6liccomment(p7burlingame.arg. -
Mailed: luly l, 2022
(Please refer to other side)
U LIC EARI G '
NOTlCE
Citv of Burfinparr�e - Public Hearing Natice
If you have any questions abc�ut .this applicahar� or would like to schedule an
appoir�tment ia view a h�rd co�ay c�# the �p�zlic�tian �i�d pians,'please s�nd an email to
plannin�dept(c�burlingame:org ar caf! (6S{3) 558-725(3.
Individuals who 'req�aire speci�l assistance c�r a disability-refated modification or
accommodation to �a�rticipate in this me��ing, or who have a disabi[ity and wish to
request an afternative forrnat for the agerada, meeiing notice; agenda packet or other
writings that may be distributed, shoutd contact the Planning Division at
planningdept(a�burlin�ame.or� ar (65C)j 558-725Q tay 1Q am on the day of the rrt2eting.
If you challenge the subject ap}alication(s� in court, you may be timited to raising only
those issuesyou or s�meone else raised at the pubEic he�ring� described in the nofice
or in written corr�spondence delivered to the city at ar prior to the pubiic hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsib[e for informing their tenants
about this notice.
Kevin Gardiner, AICP
Community Development Director (Please refer to other sfde)-
2229 Adeline Drive
300' noticing
APN: 027-161-160
.�4 '�`�`� - � � _: �`�'
_ _ "•�`"°��` '�� �"�i, �� T � � .
� - �`� �� s" � >� �� �
�
� - �" � � � •.�' tr,� � � � � �� �' � = �
�; � � � � � .
� > � � :
� ��
__� r � � � �.s�-'. � , �;r. �'S - "�
, � � � ``
�_:: ,� , fa v ,� ., � *'a�
W___ � ; ;
- � � - � �
� - �'
� � =;,;� :: �_::,s .� ,�;� : �� � � ��� �a
�
� � � ��„� ;,�
E �'�
� �� Q � � , �� �' � � u� �� .
�
� � � r
��� �� -�- > E
t � = � �
� � ., �q, �
_� -- � � � -.�
��. �. ,
��,i �, _ � � �
-- � , � ,. �
� �_ � : g.� . ���. � � � a x ���
� �_ ��, ,-
� � ��
� � � � �,,, �' .t - �
- ��k. '�, ` �` �� * � >_; :��
�`
e
� .y� ` � a�� �
,
�
E
: m
� � �,'�' � ; r�. , � �� "u � ° ° �� > � � �
,, � ,�
�, �
� � n � ' _
; s
� � �
�_ � t
� �
� � � �� � �
� �� ' � ' �
� � „ � �
',;� �...����M � � � : � �, °� ���
«
� ��''
� � � � €* � :� _ ��`
f
, � ^ _
`
� �
_ � >. _ � _
G �
_ 4 � fl
� �
;c .
� ,;� _' � , , �: ,�� �.
� ` q.
.
, _ h
� � �>: �� �� ,. >-� �
-.. � �
'
ti�. �"�� �
' ; � � : i�'�. . �
F��ille ' �.E� r� �, k�3iE:1�� ,. a � � z. .�
� � � � �_�. � '
.� `
s,� r�yia �t � € o: ,; ; i �� �
r � - r
� ,�i I � � � '" �,'�'�'< ' � .
� � ��
� � t �� �. �' = k "
� ' ,m� . _
_ , ,�. �,; �, „
�,
>�
. _ .�
� � �:� �,
��
� � � -� .
a • � `
�-��
m r � . - , � � ,��
+� ~ . ;3�E '�'� :
�.
r F . � � �`
� z ..
� ; o -� �_ 1 , � � "�--�' ��
� � � �
� j� � ( � � - � ��`
- �� � �
, �-_ �.�
.
•., � ,
�. `'�'.f�. � � � � �
���� � '` � � .
�;E �` - ,� �,
, ,f
:
• � `' � �
�
��� � ; � � �,��
�
�, -� � • 4 � ;� � � ��: � , �
. , �� � �. �
, . : ;
F �
� ��
�f
-� , , :
�; , , � m �p
,
' : ,�J. . .,,,, �u b :. � : �, p " ' �'� ,�'^ � .��'.
I
`�,.,� � � �,.�— , E � � . � . . . ' �- � :
,
. _ _ �'
�J ,+ � � `� •
.�4 � s ,
< �'
, l ' '"�If;r. y �
�� �r
"." i � �,�a: � . " ,� ���� � "� �. "� � '�,, x` a�..f
_.� i' . "� ,.)i- � E.:E �i�� � � . � ���� - ��`� - k1,'b�' � �� - �
,
--. ! = � , � ,_ . -
;
'-a�' , � � � � .. s
��` 4 � ; . :, e. �'P .
� � � i� �+ 1- ,� � w„"�y . � � € � , _ - � �^ �o� . .
-. ,
� � F >
` .„`"
, , ,
y ♦ � ` � _
: � -.i,.� '-...
� �� � . . , _ . .
. r : ft �� r{ � .� �� .. �r.
� �
_ � , v,
��'
�'
��'. . ,� ....0 . � 4 ' T i i y .v ' ; . .� a ' . E. �a"�E
_ : .,.,.._ u : .,, f T ^+. '�_ . . � J ;�... . � .. 7� . .. , 'er ' 'a' ; �