The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About716 Vernon Way - Approval Letter�� CITY p � � BURLJNGAME � A < � °Nwi[o � u[ 6. The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD T'EL: (650) 558-7250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 6963790 September 24, 2004 John Stewart Stewart Associates 1351 Laurel St. San Carlos, CA 94070 Dear Mr. Stewart, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the September 13, 2004 Planning Commission approval of your application for design review, parking variance and special permits became effective September 23, 2004. This application was to allow the construction of a first and second story addition at 716 Vernon Way, zoned R-1. The September 13, 2004 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped July 20, 2004, sheets A2 and A4-A5, and date stamped September 1, 2004, sheets Al, A3, A6 and L1.0; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding �r enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans befare a Building permit is issued; 6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof September 24, 2004 716 Vernon Way Page 2 ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 7. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the parking variance for substandard covered parking space width as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 8. that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's and Fire Marshal's July 6`h memos, the Recycling Specialist's July 7`h, 2004 memo, and the City Arborist's July 21S`, 2004 memo, shall be met; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Reimbursement of the design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to the property owners under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, �dC��Y� U'�AF�_ Margaret Monroe City Planner c. Jeff and Jennifer Castello 716 Vernon Way Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOT 19 BLOCK 10 BiJRLINGABLES MAP NO 2 RSM 20/55 56; APN: 029-171-490)