Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2760 Summit Dr - Approval LetterR E C E I V E 0 Mr. & ^Irs. Philip R. Rowland 2760 Summit Drive Burlinraine, CA 94010 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Howland: The Parcel Map for your resubdivis and westerly of Summit Drive has b office. FINAL APPROVAL of your r� four legal building sites. 1 nlh cc: 'Mr. W e Swan, P City Burlinga;n •1r. PkJ. flarr, City o Burling SAN MATEO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT County Government Center Redwood City, California 94063 h r 01 '1 f 1J CITY Of BIJKLI11taAME April 5; 1973 Resubdivis'i,dA X6E-3131 acres Hewed adjacent ecei�7+ and reviewed by this visiishereby granted, creating nne A. Parke lanner II ector for of Public Works 0MINI0N OP' T13= SKY Technical Consultants January 26, 1973 County of San Mateo Secretary of the Planning Commission County Government Center Redwood City, California 94061 Subject: Street Name, Resubdivision No. ME-3131 References: (a) Letter from County Engineer & Road Commissioner (by W. J. Mc Kidiac, file 289) dated Jan. 5, 1973, Item 11 (b) Letter from P. R. Howland of June 7, 1971 to San kateo County Planning Commission accompanying Resubdivision Application & Tentative Parcel Map) (c) Final Parcel Map, Check print of Dec. 12, 1972 and cover letter of Dec. 14, 1972 Dear Sir: Item 11 of reference (a) letter indicated that the Planning Depart— ment must approve a new street name before inclusion on a parcel map. In as much as it has been the intent of the owners to use the name "Howland Lane" as stated in the original resubdivision appli— cation of reference (b) and since no objection was subsequently raised application is hereby submitted for formal approval of the name "Howland Lane" for the private access road to the_ parcels in subject resubdivision X6E-3131. Yours very truly, 7- �� P. R. Howland 2760 Summit Drive Burlingame, California 94010 cc: County Engineer Planning Director, City of Burlingame Director of Public Works, City of Burlingame 1::)0. HO:1C 44 3Surlin9 ante, Ca,liiorllia J-4010 �� COUNT Y h (i T 71 /d r�� YU i'I LLA III I,I r.r,MM(AIIIMAN wA�LA�a In rr,.ON, GIIAIBMAII li/"�l,111\VI 1111V/llll�"YIL FRED COHEN RODERT LEVY PLANNING COMMISSION TT SDER KE ENNETH STROMROM COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER - REDWOOD CITY - CALIFORNIA, 94063 ADVISORY MEMBERS 369-1441 HENRY A. DIETZ November 24, 1971 HENRY F. EICH ROBERT L. SANS PLANNING DIRECTOR \ REINO LIUKKONEN Mr- and Mrs. Philip R. Howland j Resubdivision No. X6E-3131 2760 Summit Drive R E C FE I V E D Burlingame, California 94010 NOVZ9 1971 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howland: QIY OF 6!lRLINGAN You are herewith notified that your resubdivision application as revised on September 30, 1971, to create four legal building sites on 2.27 acres, M.O.L., located adjacent and westerly of Summit Drive, has been granted CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. The conditions placed upon this approval are as follows: I. A bond and recording -type agreement shall be filed with the County Engineer, guaranteeing the following: a) the construction of the proposed access road to plans and specifi- cations approved by the County Engineer, b) right-of-way dedication and improvements on Summit Drive, as provided for herein, c) the construction of sewer lines to the proposed lots, to plans and specifications approved by the County Engineer, d) the construction of a fire,hydrant and fire protection water main of loop design, to the satisfaction of the County Engineer and the Burlingame City Engineer; 2. Summit Drive shall be widened and improved with curb, gutter and side- walk commensurate with improvements on the adjacent northerly property, to the spacifications of the City of Burlingame; 3. The private road shall be entirely within Parcel A and a Public Access Easement shall be recorded for the entire length; 4. Drainage improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer so that each parcel can handle its own surface and downspout water without discharging onto adjacent parcels or the private road; 5. Water uses shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Burlingame City Engineer, with water meters for all lots installed on Summit Drive; 6. All utilities serving the subject property shall be placed underground from the point at which said lines enter the property; 7. The streambed on Parcels A and D shall not be diverted, modified, or built upon, and easements and/or dedications necessary to protect the streambed shall be recorded to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. 8. The private road shall be constructed in such a manner as not to in- fringe upon the creek area, with retaining walls to be used where nec- essary around the bulb; 9. Building sites shall be designed so that zoning yard variances will not be necessary; 10. A geological and soils engineering report shall be provided which shall include grading specifications, analysis of areas of instability, and recommendations for the stabilization of same; RECEIVED NOV29 1971 Mr. d Mrs. P. R. Howland II-24-71 Pg. 2 WY0� Bt1KLIN6AME II. A grading permit shall be obtained from the County if earthwork for the entire project, including preparation of building sites and road con- struction, exceeds 300 cu. yards; 12. A Parcel Map shall be filed. In addition to the above conditions, County standards require that two off-street visitor parking spaces be provided within Parcels B, C and 0. Conditions 1-II must be complied with prior to Condition 12. Subsequent to recordation of the Parcel Map, Final Approval will be granted. the Tits of 8uriinpme SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURL I NGA M E, CALIFORNIA 94010 November S, 1971 Miss Anne A. Parke San Mateo County Planning Commission County Government Center Redwood City, CA 94063 Subject: Howland Tentative Parcel Map Dear Aliss Parke.: TEL:(415) 342-8931 -i�9--/44r Ct 4i1pj Air. Howland has met with Burlingame staff to discuss subdivision and development of his property at 2760 Summit Drive. (San Mateo County Parcel 027-251-020.) All their property is in unincorporated territory but is bounded on two sides by existing city limits. It fronts on Summit Drive a public street within the City of Burlingame. We discussed the regulations, design standards and procedure to be followed to annex the Howland property to the City of Burlingame. I believe he fully understands the time required to complete all steps needed before we could legally approve his parcel reap. Consequently he has opted to seek approval by San Alateo County. Materials forwarded earlier for our review are returned with these comments. 1. Access to the property is from Summit Drive, which is a dedicated street in the City of Burlingame. 2. The property is within the Burlingame sphere of influence. 3.• Water is supplied by the City of Burlingame; wastewater is treated by the city's treatment plant; and storm water runs through Burlingame drainage channels. 4. Lot size, building type and intensity are consistent with Burlingame zoning regulations for R-1 lots of not less than 10,000 square feet. S. If this proposed subdivision is to be annexed to the City of Burlingame, Howland Lane must become a permanent easement with the city becoming part owner. The private street shall be constructed Subject: Howland TentativeParcel Map Page #2 in accordance with City of Burlingame and subject to approval by the City Engineer. We concur with County Engineer's July 23 conditions of approval k-a and 2. 6. A limitation of 15% maximum grade seems reasonable for the proposed access road. There should be a vertical curve with drainage flowing from property line to the gutter of Summit Drive. 7. The amount on grading on the individual lots is not knojm because the type of house construction and driveway location are not specified. If pole type foundations rather than concrete slabs are used for the hillside houses then less grading is required.. And the location of garages, driveways and back- arounds affect the amount of required earthmoving. A grading plan has been suggested to Mr. Howland. 8. I am most concerned with the stability of the embankment fill required to construct the private access road. Summit Drive was constructed on fill and there are longitudinal cracks in the asphaltic concrete surface. Storm water can penetrate to the subgrade and weaken the existing roadway. These cracks indicate earth movement and warrant thorough investigation. The worse possible way to construct a stable road subgrade is to dump loose soil on top of the existing embankment slope. Some loose fill has already been dumped in this manner. No additional uncompacted fill material should be placed on this steep side slope without an approved grading permit. Very truly yours, THE CITY OF BURLINGAME WAYNE M. SIVAN City Planner CC: George '`arr, City Engineer z 7 6o o a u s a n m a t e o c u n t y p I a n n i n g c o r. fi s s i o n APPLICATION FOR THE RESUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY MAXIMUM OF FOUR PARCELS This column to be Fi INSTRUCTIONS: 1) Submit one copy of the application and seven prints of map 2) Include fee of $50.00 Name of applicant: (Agent must submit written authorization) Address: Z7Go Sta tAMkT De►y4Qr Sutt^tN�At�►E . GA�I�oRtJtPt g40ta Te I ephone: 34Z.— %-1 18 Name of Property Owner: �.tL►ta tz. Eicw LA�.1 � � �LcR�aGE K.NoWt.+ut� Address: Z76,o SoMMIT D 21V� �iL 12t.It�1G.AM�� CA►..tFORM1A �14�t0 Identification of resubdivision: Lot, Block & Subdivision) CODE AVEA S4-064 (CUw3�At+E 11tl�L9 I�cGL�S Eco�o. 0 "Nip oc�sa.���iilr.TEo�SCac�Ve�iT�! \3 o 4r.6 R oeos If not located in a recorded subdivision, attach metes and bounds legal description. Existing use of property: 511.10,E �Fakt-►t t. / ��rol�Ll/JV , ��� U�Ta✓ �Es ��+.�Tr<+��. Proposed smallest parcel size:1% 000 s q 3;71, Proposed sewage disposal system: Septic tank: Yes No ✓ Sanitary District (Name): C- i�\ w-, tJGdiME N tL%.s 5A .5.T4,91 SCu>ESL Proposed water supply: Public Water District (Name): Private Water Company (Name): NbNE Private well: Yes No ✓ Name of street frontage or access. Indicate if County road, private road, common 1 easement, private drive: Cc ujM'r,1 VZc kV C�C� ►7oSG9 DaD 1 Cq'Crc.� LING • SUI-�h�T D�1� g�R NcwLAs.�il L a.t,ECFeoao �D I. AimF_� Utilities available: Gas ` 8S life E E I ectr i c i ty �JES 'P ' e I certify under penalty of perjury that all of the information supplied in this column is true and correct according to the best of my knowledge. (Si ature of Applicant) 10-70 7 copies resubdivision map attached, ap- proved as to form Er"�. r"`('; +u (- xt !G Q/ tl7,) check Application accepted, fee received cash Planning Officer Date: RFGFRRAI I S• Referred Returned Adjacent City Health Dept. ( 7 / Co. Engineer Div. of Hw s. Sphere of in f l uence: Cji Master Plan indication: Sectional District Map No. iL-) )w[• L?7+;:icwr.> Zoning D i str i ct:A�_l I ;- , ( r ,i. j. Official Plan Lines Indication: 4 Date of field check: Q-Ci Ir I( Planning Director action: Approved with conditions on Planning Commission action: Board of Supervisors action: Processing completed: (Date) Approved; Denied: Planning Director Parcel Map Filed Date File no. X6E- 3 13 1 VVFLttoGxl�''rE ��0� ��ST�c-T July 23, 1971 Planning Cor.�^nission Attention: Lee Kiernan County Engineer and Road Commissioner Yh"4- XGE-3131 - 5of;lcnd Re -Subdivision ----------------------------------------------- ------ Ede offer the following suggestions for conditions of approval: 1. That a bond and Agreement be required to guarantee: a) The construction of the proposed access road to plans and speci- fications approved by the County Engineer and the Burlingame City Engineer. bye The construction of sewer lines into the proposed lots to plans and specifications approved by the County Engineer.' —p 2. The applicant satisfy the requirements of the City of Burlingame for street improvements in Summit Drive. 3. That necessary easements or dedications be put on record to prevent Dconstruction of buildings over the drainage channel in Parcel No. 4. 4. That a geological and soils engineering report be provided to include grading specifications, areas of instability, if any exist, and make recommendations for stabilization if required. S. That a grading permit be required for the construction of the access road in the event that the approved plans indicate more than 300 cubic yards of earthwork. 6. That a Parcel Map be required. Very truly yours,' ODD G. CAIaROi"TO Special Projects Engineer OGC:SSJ:sm BOMAND RESUDDIVISION X6E-3131W///11,K13 P, r� 7D c �`1 �' -OF Da �s�+L ass �1r4'C.Mr TO 1Q� f-a16" yl�` The following are principles of subdivision design which have pertinence to this resubdivisions 1. Private roads should be kept to minimal length and should be placed in a layout only to the extent absolutely necessary to achieve access, in order to minimize construction and maintenance costs. The private road in this layout is overly long and circuitous without necessity. 2. In hillside areas, roads should not exceed grades of 15%, especially for emergency vehicles. Roads should be contoured into the hillside to the greatest degree possible and utilizing minimal dimensions. Shortness of private roads in hillside areas should be a major design goal to minimize hillside destruction and to maximize ease of access, especially for emergency vehicles. The road should be greatly shortened and the bulb reduced in size to minimum standards. In addition, the road should hug the contour more closely. 3. Streets and cul-de-sacs should not have unnecessary short -radii curves, for safety reasons. The kink in the upper reaches of the private road should be removed. 4. Natural vegetation (tree stands) and/or natural watercourses should be disturbed to the least degree possible in order to preserve existing ecological systems and in order to least disrupt hillside stability factors. The treatment of the rear property has a major destructive impact on the environment. 5. Extreme forms in lot layout are to be avoided, especially when resulting in unusable or unbuildable areas. Lot A and Lot D are of extreme design, having many irregular boundaries. 6. Lots should be designed to, provide maximum flexibility in siting of dwelling units, with maximum usable areas available; lots should be of such a configuration that a dwelling unit could reasonably be placed on the lot without benefit of zoning variances. Applies to Lots B, C and D. 7. Lot design should be adapted to logical placement of building sites, not vice versa, and preferably so that dwelling units may be built with the contours. Applies to Lots B, C and D. AAP:gh 9/2 4/71 r Al i O m I N ION OF THB SKY Technical Consultants June 17, 1971 San Mateo County Planning Commission County Government Center Redwood City, California Gentlemen: Application is hereby made to the Planning Commission of the County of San Mateo for approval of the resubdivision of real property shown on the accompanying map. It is proposed to subdivide this 2.27 acre parcel into four single family, private residential dwelling lots, each of which conforms to or exceeds the average size and frontage of residen- tial lots adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel. Three of the proposed lots would be new private residential dwelling sites and the remaining lot(lot number one) with the presently existing improvements facing on Summit Drive would continue as the single family private residential dwelling of the applicant. Access to the three newly created dwelling sites(lots two, three and four) would be by way of a proposed lane from Summit Drive. A twenty foot wide right-of-way easemrent contiguous to all four lots is proposed. The lane would additionaly serve as a fire break and fire access route to the canyon foliage and under- brush along the westerly boundry of the parcel. The average grade of the proposed road bed is 13.5 percent and will riot exceed 15 percent at any point. Adequate turn-arounds are pro- vided. Off street parking conforming to county standards will be provided on each lot. The name proposed is Howland Lane. The first turn -around will require some fill near the stream bed. Corregated metal pipe(42" C. M. P.) will be placed in the stream bed and covered with dirt fill. This will also alleviate severe erosion that is presently occuring along the stream bed during the wet season. All costs of the proposed access lane would be borne by the applicant. Dedication of any necessary right-of-way is understood. All of the properties adjacent to the subject 2.27 acre parcel are owned by parties other than the applicant. Very tr ly yours, ow 2760 Summit Drive Burlingame, California 94010 342-1718 P.O. Box 44-4 Burlin�a.ine, Ca lifo271lia 0 4010 SAN M'qNlNG CO COUNTY "AlQMM.S"C"" RECEIVE[) JUN21 1971 P. R. "-wland 2760 : mit Drive Burlingame, California 94010 DESCRIPTION OF THE PARCEL TO BE DIVIDED All that certain real property situated in the County of San Mateo, State of California, described as follows= BEGINNING at a point on the westerly line of Summit Drive, being also the northeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed by Panama Realty Co., a corporation, to California Ventures Incorporated, by the Deed recorded July 16, 1953 in Book 2446 of Official Records of San Mateo County at page 365(94510-K); thence from said point gf beginning, northwesterly from a tangent bearing North 18 251 251t West along the westerly line of Summit Drive on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 325 feet and a central angle of 40 101 25t1, an are distance of 23.67 feet; thence tangent to preceding curve, North 140 15, west 37.32 feet; thence tangent to preceding .course northwesterly on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 4?5 feet arid a central angle of 170 211, an arc distance of 143.84 feet; thence tangent to preceding curve, North 310 36, west, 53.36 feet; thence leaving said westerly line of Summit Drive South 670 451 west, 392.50 feet; thence South 380 301 East 177.00 Feet; thence South 550 091 19" East 160.55 feet; thence North 570 101 East 262.93 feet, returning to the point of beginning Subject to an Easement for Sanitary Sewer line over a portion of the Southwesterly 10 feet and over a portion of the South- westerly 15 feet of the herein described property, as granted in the Deed from Panama Realty Company, a corporation, to the County of San Mateo, recorded December 2, 1953 in Book 2507 of Official Records if San Mateo County at page 470(22560-L). In Deed out including the following Reservation; RESERVING THEREFRO11A an Easement for public utility purposes 5 feet in width measured at right angles from the .southeasterly, southwesterly and northwesterly boundry lines of the above described parcel. CAP` l�" TE01 COUNT` PLANN1NCi COMMISSIn" = I:CCIV'EU JUN 21 1971 3t3 � a t� RYA � � � _ \ �`\•, t q \ ,��� � /� ,•J/ / .. � .V' � • N/./_ -:� R a_3$ aka •l--'\ � ° �` '`i�P•FF'a /I'f_i � . 0 /'/: tiq �,q r'1 O�.n1M1/� n R = i S�a C� - L" 03' \ - FZ-\•^I ea ts. 2= 32S' P20POS�D 5UlWV►SAON OF 2.2-T t AIC F-- P SAN MATZO COUNTY I GAI.SFORtv1 ' Scoie kod J�hc ,,--, • ` \ ' ` ` ' ," ' ,/' 1 € PAC cE� OZ7-2 51- 02 GOpE 54- a4A. D.R. tAo%.-d NNO TLCIVkN\CAI. GONSULYAN� ' NATEt3 CLILINTV PLAN♦`IIfVG CnMN,ISSIL. .. ►RIZCEIVE0 JUN 211971 SAN MATEO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIVED JUN 21 1971 AUK(1414 ST4Agf &&V f vvL- 1J4r1OA1 CF rTJ/aA/Tr.4 A. HOWLAND RESUDDIVISION X6E-3131 .#oV.4W#T eEW.Frr,60 Bf✓ /�QP(/(AA�%i P ie R 70 CO W -OF OFN/AL IS (T,6'Ey &9CM) TO l EW14A/7W'F At , The following are principles of subdivision design which have pertinence to this resubdivision: 1. Private roads should be kept to minimal length and should be placed in a layout only to the extent absolutely necessary to achieve access, in order to minimize construction and maintenance costs. The private road in this layout is overly long and circuitous without necessity. 2. In hillside areas, roads should not exceed grades of 15%, especially for emergency vehicles. Roads should be contoured into the hillside to the greatest degree possible and utilizing minimal dimensions. Shortness of private roads in hillside areas should be a major design goal to minimize hillside destruction and to maximize ease of access, especially for emergency vehicles. The road should be greatly shortened and the bulb reduced in size to minimum standards. In addition, the road should hug the contour more closely. 3. Streets and cul-de-sacs should not have unnecessary short -radii curves, for safety reasons. The kink in the upper reaches of the private road should be removed. 4. Natural vegetation (tree stands) and/or natural watercourses should be disturbed to the least degree possible in order to preserve existing ecological systems and in order to least disrupt hillside stability factors. The treatment of the rear property has a major destructive impact on the environment. 5. Extreme forms in lot layout are to be avoided, especially when resulting in unusable or unbuildable areas. Lot A and Lot D are of extreme design, having many irregular boundaries. 6. Lots should be designed to provide maximum flexibility in siting of dwelling units, with maximum usable areas available; lots should be of such a configuration that a dwelling unit could reasonably be placed on the lot without benefit of zoning variances. Applies to Lots B, C and D. 7. Lot design should be adapted to logical placement of building sites, not vice versa, and preferably so that dwelling units may be built with the contours. Applies to Lots B, C and D. AAP:gh 9/24/71 [E CC, F-4G}/#ef�Els FtAW.4710--V Ily July 23, 1971 Planning Cormission Attention: Lee Kiernan County Engineer and Road Commissioner X6P.-3131 - Howland Re-Subdivision ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- We offer the following suggestions for conditions of approval: 1. That a bond and Agreement be required to guarantee: a) The construction of the proposed access road to plans and speci- fications approved by the County Engineer and the Burlingame City Engineer. b) The construction of sewer lines into the proposed lots to plans and specifications approved by the County Engineer.' 2. The applicant satisfy the requirements of the City of Burlingame for street improvements in Summit Drive. 3. That necessary easements or dedications be put on record to prevent construction of buildings over the drainage channel in Parcel No. 4. 4. That a geological and soils engineering report be provided to include gradin-. specifications, areas of instability, if any exist, and make recommendations for stabilization if required. 5. That a grading permit be required for the construction of the access road in the event that the.approved plans indicate more than 300 cubic yards of earthwork. 6. That a Parcel Map be required. OGC:SSJ:sm Very truly yours, ODD G. CArDMOTTO Special Projects Engineer A3iNM- 1I0111 Resu:ae of required steps to annex uninhabited territory to city Uninhabited territory is area containing less than 12 registered voters. 1. A3cp and metes and bounds description is submitted to Boundary Cozassion. Boundary Corrsssion sends statement of approval to City Clerk. 2. Petition to annex filed vrith City Clerk by at least one-fourth of property ownership. (Value of property, not number of people) 3. City Council refers to Planning Cozi-Assion for report. If subdivision of property is involved, Commission may act or. tentative map at sane time and send findings to City Council. Final man nay not be approved by Commission or Council until annexation is completed. Council adopts resolution giving notice of proposed annexation. ( if all uvrnars sign petition, hearing may be set for 28 days) 5. Resolution :oust be published tvr1ce, once a creek. Copy must be sent to school district. Notice must be mailed to property owners, except where all are signators to petition. 6. Council holds protest hearing. 7. Council acts to approve or disapprove. I: PQRTa dT. S;rittern consent of annexing property owners is necessary to therea:ter tax for share oB existing bonded indebtedness of city. C. F. Secl-I' ulm GI lv* : _O-na c re: b'urlin.;amu- I'1?.7 3,, n mrat-i cm r/ "U A stutr of the acconm rZr ng c a- -- , will shcru that thero are fcrr 1 fi es i e zonil n- Y 8 �' �tiOr� as applied by tho Coal by and c.i.��cs enc�a ' n `�h those t?_::fc, would -ov-xn in tho ©,rent of a_xc pion. SCY--,-3 y C07=:*�r c'3 stricter and 3I3 SC7.e =es t�?e rev- se is t-rua. The grc '-cc-, d f orerxci is in the lab sj 2v lzr'�tc^'u� ^ s• Abvuv ,half Of the c.: w n 3zy^'a n:amo H llo is classified I'-IZ ie•�1 �'iro' lVJJ Zitu1 a T^.l Ill.,:: �1 c^..rua. of 20,000 eq. ft. The carxr rollin, silo ,urdl-� Prescnt City -laW u0al.d be 2.O,W3 S q,.Rb. so that, mayr of th3 l riffs would ba o1p-a-b! e of rccxi Mlivisior undw iLii l ng a rules. If it were a desirable condition, a lc� slati" action bf Plarmir Co=-�-ssion and Cormcil. ,could be- nocassa:7 to 1— ovid.0 a 20,000 vq.ft. 1a. i'cWtjon. Ha re; -=, it is possible th,-t tha grope -,t, cv ers mIghL fir..rl it dssira le to acreTu tha City .rc—Zu3,ation. iroil 1prd recraira ants diner by 10 font; but Haab buila vs in MI -I a:es-are Wood nore in relation to tho —land t'ran to rc3mlatican. Thera is one exca of di"= a once rUch rry> require conidorab? e Esc=sio q thaL, affects l nd pl�,nr inZ as it is iacticad bf tha Du 1- n2aY e Cox,--- ission. ,.© ro-qu re, il:'fclar. vur and r s-uY ,- ,lon ! + o, tlh=-1 jx:,b=c : --Trove—,--nts be r ado to maacu CUi Lain which ere ;� do not pco.- t ro? l c-d gG'_?w^�:.�� s�7'?�� � out in03.'�." i G CY'3. C° v_.�.�,�1...' �.� c or f-aLvy guttors and all s vireo, n vc wnts z ast be i n al l cd to Standard vr-- dths. Most of the I J I I - aroa does no: n---., this y stand—=C3 .-o have Y:ar-I a of ann ions in the area ard, in ovc yr case., the remAred i� o arr'cs have been =de. This is a T,=oblen that um be mat and the solution =ust be egvitthic bcch to the axaa to be arn�cmd and to these vho have joined tho City in recent y-=^s. City Comparisons in Z onir, Re ghat ions Present County R-1 Sin gle-Cam ily daelI I ng Permitted Uses Single-family ftollings Public parks Home occupations Accessory bui.idinZ-s Farrel ng and truck gardeninZ, Keeping of 2 cats., 2 drgs, 22 c1hi ckens, pigeon;, giCinea pj 3, st?oj:c� to certain reralz--t ions Nurseries and gl eenlaouses, buu- no salon from Tweai.ses Subject to Use Permit City of U'as Iir. a ze R-I Single -fa; i2y cbml l no Permitted Uses Sir_glo-family dwellings Public _parks and building Hoye occupl-: ons Accessory buildings Subject ,o Use Permit Churches, li.'oraries, fire stationz Churches, coxr eats, garish Golf co=ses houses Non-comiarcial clubs Iawseries and truck gTardoring but no sales from prem=es Public utility structu%•os Living rooms, MIDPLS r oorz, in acces=7 bu-ildi n2s, bu-c n--y not be rented as separate ur�it of contain Utchen, Ps ohibited. StoraJe of lime, plaster, b•,zi lding rxtuoriG?s or oth= ecr.L --ont med in or for business Hei „ I -Atat ion Height I�i ; ii bat icn 22 ►itQl"iCS, but not e_f_ceoding 351 Front, Rear and Side Yards 22 stories, but not e,,cceoding 35' (exxeptiors) on lots that slope dcsme�arc:s, 22 stories at cab level, on lots that slope ug::-ards, 22 stor ieu at setback l r u and s—a height at any post of building F`_^Onu, Rear and S"Z G.3 t! az' i Front sotbeck 251 Front setback 15 t Pear n 20, Rear n 15 r Sid: a not loss than 51 Side not loos than 51 Iut Size Liriitattioa Lot Size Lir *1;atiorz Lots and areas dosignatued on zoning map 10..000 sq. ft. as B 3 - 10.,0000 sq. ft Lots and areas d sipiated as B-4 20$000 sq. ft.