The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1411 Vancouver Ave - Staff ReportPa�e 5 Qurlingan�e Planning Cor�rission Minu�es �eptember 22, 1930 6. TEhJTATIVE SUBDIVISIOf! ��qP FOR 4 COfvDOMIfJIUi-1 UNITS AT 27 EL CAh1IP�lU REAL; FOR QUALITY CO�+STRUCTI0�1 'C0:'�P�1PJY CE Erbacher recorm,ended approval subject to the applicant's compliarce with the conditions of the ccndominium permit. Reference CE's memo dated September 17, 1920. C. Jacobs mcved for approval and recorr�nendation to City Council of this tentative subdivision map. Second C. P1ink; approved unanimously on voice vote. �7. TENTATIVE APdD FINAL PARCEL MAP TO COh1QINE LOT 10, BLOCK 7, BURLIPdGAME SUQDIVISION 4JITH A 10' WIDE STRIP OF LAND ADJACENT TO ITS SOUTHEASTERLY QOUfVDARY; PROPERTY AT 1411 VAPJCOUVER AVE�dUE;_ FOR �dARGARET l�l. f�!UIRHEAD At the request of the applicant's engineer, staff recommended this application be dropped from the agenda until such time as the necessary title and easement questions are resolved. Reference 9/18/£0 memo frorr� the City Enaineer. With approval of Commission, Chm. Sine announced �chis item dropped from the agenda. 8. SPECIAL PERf�1IT TO OPERATE A VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP IN THE M-1 DISTRICT AT 1745 ADRIAN ROAD, BY STEVE,G. GARDiJER OF GAnD^lEP.'S 4-��JHEEL DRIVE CP Yost revie��ed �his application to operate a vehicle repair shop in the M-? Districi. Reference staff report dated 9/18/80; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 8J25/�0; aerial photoqraph, site development layout and site dravrings; August 13, 19�0 letter from Steve G. Gardner; September 12, 19�0 memo from the Chief Building Inspector; September 4, 1980 memo from the Chief Fire Inspector; 9/8/80 . memo from the City Engineer; and July 28, 1980 letter to Steve Gardner from the 7_oning Aide, with copy of Business License Application. CP.discussed the P�1-1 District neighbor- hood, this building in particular and P1r. Gardner's plans. Staff believed this business would be an inappropriate use at its present location and recommended denial. If Commission found it a reasonable use, six conditiors �•rere recommended as listed in the siaff report. The applicant, Steve Gardner, was present. He described his repair business'which consists of component repair work, with no vehicles on the site at any time except for his personal automobile. He questioned Fire Department requirement that the � building be brought to fi-4 occupancy regulations. Discussion: clarification of the exact nature of this business; the type and present useage of the building ai 1745 Adrian Road. It was suggested there be further discussion betG,�een staff and the Fire Department regarding occupanry requirements, and it was noted the business must be approved by the Fire Department in the business license application process. Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comrneni:s and ihe hearing was closed. C. Jacobs moved for approval of this special permit with the following conditions: (1} that the permit be approved to Steve G. Gardner dba Gardner's 4-4dheel Drive, and be nontransferable; (2) that the permit be approved for vehicle component repairs only; (3) that no vehicles be brought to the site; (4) that no persons be employed on this site by Gardner's 4- Wheel Drive; (5) that the hour-s of operation be limited to tveekday evenings 6:00 - 9:00 P.ht. and weekends; (6) that all Fire and 6uilding Code requirements be satisfied; and (7) that this perr�it be subject to review and possible amendment in one year. Second C. Cistulli; approved 6-0 on roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised< �:/ l�t;,��%s:,i� AGENDA S�P 1 H �� CITY OF BURLIMGAME MEMO PLANN�NG DEPT. g/18/80 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Engineering Div. Re: Tentative and Final Parcel Map to Combine Lot 10, Block 7, Burlinghome Subdivision with a 10' Wide Strip of Land - 1411 Vancouver Ave. P. M. 80-66 At the request of the applicant's engineer, staff recommends that this application be dropped until such time as the necessary title and easement questions are resolved. .� ti�� <� Frank C. Erbacher City Engineer FCE:mg cc: Ms. Muirhead, 1411 Vancouver Ave., Burlingame Mr. Howard Hickey, 1555 Bayshore Hwy, Burlingame 0 �� . �b— ��P Howard G. Hickey � Civil Engineer 887 Waltermire St. - Belmont, Ca. 94002 September 18, 1980 �%1VIro Frank Erbacher Burlinbame City Engineer City Hall Burlingame, California 9 � Telephone (415) 593-7570 � � [l r_ � �!�� : '' I'l ` � � � , S � F�'C, `;4v`� L l" c1'rY oi4 1��i{i��2E 4010 Subject: Parcel Map for re- subdivision of 1411 Vancouver Ave. for Mrs. Margaret Muirhead. Dear Mr, Erbacher: Because we have not yet received PG & E approval for the garage encroachment within their easement, and also have not received copies from the Title Company of the law suit settlement regarding title to the 10' strip within subject Map, I hereby request that City consideration of the subject Parcel Map be postponed unti 1 those documents can be provided. I have b"een attemptinb to obtain those documents and will deliver them to your office as soon as they become available, Respect�ully submitted ; �- �� --=�--�-� %�H�o vard G. Hicl�ey, C . cc Mrse NTuirhead B�rlingame Planning Cozmnission Minutes vJ� � September 8, 1980 C. tdink moved that the Variarce be granted to Mr. Frank �olub based on the findings that the four legal requirements for a var•iance had been proven. Second C. Taylor; moti'on approved 5-0 by roll call vote, C. Harvey absent. An�eal procedures were advised. 3. FINAL PARCEL �•1AP FOR A 9 UfdIT COf�D0��1INIUM PROJECT AT 1133 DOUGLAS AVENUE BY P�IICHAEL D. ASHLEY FOP. FAR I;ESTEP,;! CAPITAL CORPORATIO�I. ___ Reference September 3, 1980 nemo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher recommended approval of ihis map which a�ould combine two existing lots into a single parcel on condition that (1)before the Final f�1ap is recorded at least one of the existing structures be demolished, and (2)that before the Final Map is recorded the o��ner enter into an agreem�nt with the City to participate in the costs to design and construct a replacemeni water main to serve this site. Chairman Sine opened the public hearina. There were no comnents and the hearing was declared closed. C. Jacobs then�moved for approval and recommendation to the City Council of this Final Parcel 61ap �vith the two conditions of the City Engineer. Second C. Cistulli; approved 5-0 by all aye voice vote, C. Harvey absent. 4. FIPdAL SUBDIVISIOfd MAP FOR CAMINO GABLES, A 21 UNIT CONDIMINIUM PROJECT AT 735 EL CAP�IINO REAL Reference September 3, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher advised the Com- mission that the conditions of approval attached to the tentative map would be completed prior to the final -inspection and therefore recommended approval of the map. Chairman Sine opened the public hearinq; there were no comments and the hearing was closed. Motion was then made by C. Jacobs for approval and recommendation to the City Council of this ' Final Subdivision Map. Second C. Mink; approved 5-0 by all aye voice vote,C. Harvey absent. 5. TE�i1TATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO COMBIPdE LOT 10, BLOCK 7, BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION WITH A 10' 4lIDE STRIP OF LAND ADJACENT TO ITS SOLi�THEASTERLY BOUNDARY; PROPERTY AT 1411 VANCOUVER AVENUE, FOR P•1ARGARET Yl. P�IUIRHEAD. Ref2rence September 3, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher requested that this item be continued to the next regular Commission meeting to allow the applicant's surveyor time to make several minor corrections to the map. �9otion was made by C. Taylor to continue this item to the September 22, 1980 Commission meeting; second C. h1ink; approved 5-0 by all aye voice vote, C. Harvey absent.� . • APPLICATIONS FOR STUDY The following applications were set for public hearing September 22, 1980: 6_ SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 214 ROOM P10TEL WHICH ENCROACHES 59' IflTO A DESIGN GUIDELINE SETBACK; PROPERTY AT 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD BY BOB BLUNK WITH 61AX F. JAP1ES FOR DAYS INN OF AMERICA. 7. CON�P1INIUM PERP1IT FOR A 4 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 27 EL CMAINO REAL FOR QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. 8. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIOPJ MAP FOR THE ABOVE. 9. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP IN THE M-1 DISTRICT AT 1745 ADRIAN RO�iD BY STEVE G. GARDPJER FOR GARDPIER'S 4 WHEEL DRIVE. OTNER BUSINESS 10. REVIEW OF A RECENT TWO STORY ADDITION AT 109 CHANNING ROAD. Staff and Corrmission noted that present zoning regulations did not require single family A � September 3, 1980 To: PLANNING COMMISSION From: Engineering Division Reference: Tentative and Final Parcel Map To Combine Lot 10 and Easement Block 7, Burlinghome Sub Division-P.M. 80-16 � The engineering staff requests that this item be continued to the next regular Commission Meeting so that when the applicants engineer returns to the area additional information may be provided for inclusion on the map. � i��k� �'t� RANK C. ERBACHER City Engineer FCE/rlh cc- Mrs. Muirhead m Iti`�rc�l V Q�L� ,'ti�Y 1 . I:i1:7 CITY OF BURLtNGAME pLpNN�NG D€Pt• (� CITY C1.. - — �,n. BURLINGAME .� ] .�i: _I��. (�.�P i�z�� u��t��rrYr SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HAIL-50i PRIMROSE ROAO BURLINGAME� CALIFORNiA 94010 January 19, 1979 �� MICHAEL F. GALLIGAN, Galligan & Biscay 1795 South El Camino San Bruno, California ESQ. Real 94056 Subject: Mr. and Mrs. Richard Muirhead, 1411 Vancouver Avenue Dear Mike: TEL:(415) 3a2-B93i This will confirm our recent conversation regarding the ten-foot strip adjacent to the above pro�erty. As I stated, that strip does contain a water line and a sewer line serving the Muirheads and others. I agree with you that the City does not own the fee title, but sim�ly easement rights for our facilities. I checked the Assessor's �Iap and the Assessor's Roll, and it would appear that the ten-foot strip is assessed to no one. The Muirhead's property is shown as the fifty-foot lot, not including the easement strip. You asked if you mioht prepare a quitclaim deed to remove the City's interest subject to any existing easements. It is my preference that we be included in any cuiet title judgment rather than pursuing the separate quitclaim deed. Thus at the time the action is pursued I would be Dleased to stipulate that the City does not have any'interest in the �roperty but simply claims the right to maintain and replace the sewer and water facilities which are in the subject area. Yours truly, ROME F�'. COLEMAN City /Attorney JFC/k xc: Director of Public Work Planning Department Building Inspector