The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1373 Vancouver Ave - Staff ReportItem # Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 1373 Vancouver Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and a Special Perrnit for Height for a First and Second Story Addition Item # =� Design Review Study / Address: 1373 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date: 6/��/O1 Request: Design review and a special permit for height for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 25.28.060,a,1). Applicant and Architect: Ben Behravesh Property Owner: Nenad Vukic General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-151-040 Lot Area: 6000 SF Zoning: R-1 Summary: The existing residence is two stories with an attached garage. The residence is located on a lot sloping fi�om the west to the east across the front of the property. The west elevation of the residence is a single story, while the east elevation, at the front of the lot, is a two-story structure with a partially below-grade basement. The applicant is proposing a first floor addition to the entry of the h�use and a second story addition at the west and rear elevation of the house. The existing house totals 2211 SF (0.37 FAR). With the proposed additions, the floor area of will be 3020 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3J20 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed. This application was submitted before the deadline for the new basement regulations and therefore, the existing 827 SF garage, with walls that are more than 50% below g�-ade, is not included in the FAR calculations. There are 3 existing bedrooms and 2 new bedrooms proposed on the second story. The study on the first level currently meets the definition of a bedroom. However, the study will have one wall removed so that it does not meet the definition of a bedroom and with the proposed addition, the number of bedrooms will irncrease from 3 to 4. The existing garage provides one covered parking space and this meets the code requirements for a four- bedroom house. If two covered parking spaces are required in the future, existing floor area will have tU be eliminated or a variance will be required to accommodate a two-car garage. A special permit is required for a height of 31'-8" where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: . Design Review for a first and second story addition; and Special permit for height (31'-8" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed) PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Ist flr): 20'-4" 24'-0" 18'-0" block average (2nd flr): no change 24'-0" 20'-0" Side (left): no change 5'-6" 4'-0" (right): no change 5'-6" 4'-0" Rear (Ist flr): 31'-0" 31'-0" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 31'-0" --- 20'-0" Design Review and Special Permit 1373 Vancouver Averiue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D Lot Coverage: 2304 SF 2232 SF 2400 SF 38% 37% 40% FAR: 3020 SF 2211 SF 3020 SF 0.50 FAR 0.37 FAR 0.50 FAR Parking: no change 1 covered 1 covered (i��-6�� x 2i�-io�� io� X 20�) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 4 3 --- Height: 31'-8"* 21'-2" 30'-0" DHEnvelope: complies --- see code * Special permit required for height (31'-8" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed). Staff Comments: See attached. Erika Lewit Zoning Technician c: Ben Behravesh � _, Item #� Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 1373 Vancouver Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and a Special Permit for Height for a First and Second Story Addition Item # Consent Calendar Address: 1373 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date: 7/9//O1 Request: Design review and a special permit for height for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 25.28.060,a,1). Applicant and Architect: Ben Behravesh APN: 027-151-040 Property Owner: Nenad Vukic Lot Area: 6000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The existing residence is two stories with an attached garage. The residence is located on a lot sloping from the west to the east across the front of the property. The west elevation of the residence is a single story, while the east elevation, at the front of the lot, is a two-story structure with a partially below-grade basement. The applicant is proposing a first floor addition to the entry of the house and a second story addition at the west and rear elevation of the house. The existing house totals 2211 SF (0.37 FAR). With the proposed additions, the floor area of will be 3020 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3020 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed. This application was submitted before the deadline for the new basement regulations and therefore, the existing 827 SF garage, with walls that are more than SO% below grade, is not included in the FAR calculations. There are 3 existing bedrooms and 2 new bedrooms proposed on the second story. The study on the first level currently meets the definition of a bedroom. However, the study will have one wall removed so that it does not meet the definition of a bedroom and with the proposed addition, the number of bedrooms will increase from 3 to 4. The existing garage provides one covered parking space and this meets the code requirements for a four- bedroom house. If two covered parking spaces are required in the future, existing floor area will have to be eliminated or a variance will be required to accommodate a two-car garage. A special permit is required for a height of 31'-8" where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: Design Review for a first and second story addition; and Special permit for height (31'-8" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed) PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Ist flr): 20'-4" 24'-0" 18'-0" block average (2nd flr): no change 24'-0" 20'-0" Side (left): no change 5'-6" 4'-0" (right): no change 5'-6" 4'-0" Design Review and Special Permit 1373 Yancouver Avenue PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D Rear (Istflr): 31'-0" 31'-0" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 31'-0" --- 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2304 SF 2232 SF 2400 SF 38% 37% 40% FAR: 3020 SF 2211 SF 3020 SF 0.50 FAR 0.37 FAR 0.50 FAR Parking: no change 1 covered 1 covered (i��-6�� X 21�-io��) �io� X Zo�) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') # of bedrooms: 4 3 --- Height: 31'-8"* 21'-2" 30'-0" DHEnvelope: complies --- see code * Special permit required for height (31'-8" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed). Staff Comments: See attached. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on June 25, 2001, the Commission asked the applicant to add articulation the two-story wall at the right side and to clarify whether the existing oak tree at the rear of the right elevation was accurately placed on the drawings and whether it was going to be removed with construction (6/25/O1 Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission moved to place this project on the consent calendar. The applicant has submitted plans date stamped July 2, 2001, sheets A-3 and A-4, showing the smaller window the second floor has been increased in size from 1'-8° x 2'-6" to 1'-8" x 4'-6" and a belly band has been added to articulate the right side. The oak tree at the rear right elevation is accurately shown on the plans and will remain after construction. This concern has been addressed in condition #5. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 2 Design Review and Special Permit 1373 Yancouver Avenue 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings: Based on the fact that the addition is located to the rear of the existing structure, it is found that it blends with the mass and bulk of existing structure. The style of the proposed addition is compatible with the existing Spanish colonial architectural style and the character of the neighborhood Therefore, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Findings for a Special Permit: In arder to grant a special permit for declining height envelope, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with tbe city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation far the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Special Permit Findings: Based on the fact that the dwelling is located on a lot that slopes 2'-0" from the front property line to the rear property line; that the lot also slopes 4'-0" from the left to the right side of the lot and that the proposed second floor addition is located over the portion of the dwelling, that is situated at the highest point of that slope; and that the roof pitch of the proposed addition matches that of the existing dwelling, it is found to be compatible with the special permit criteria listed above. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review and a special permit for height and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 17, 2001, sheets A-0 and A-1, and July 2, 2001, sheets A-2 and A-3, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 3 Design Review and Special Permit 1373 Vancouver Avenue 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ardinance recently approved by the City Council; 4, that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 18, 2000, memo shall be met; 5. that five existing trees on site, including the oak tree located at the rear, right side of the property, shall not be removed and the applicant shall have an arborist's report prepared which documents how each tree on the site should be protected during construction, this report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist and the contractor shall call for the Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a building permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the arborist's report; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erika Lewit Zoning Technician c: Ben Behravesh n Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2001 (N) Parking Garage Level G3�c�G4 Restriping Plan date stamped September 9, 1997, and Parking Revision pg. 1 and Parking Revisivn pg. 2"date stamped October 3�.�9�7; and that there shall be no temporarytents far any purpose installed in required parking or access-ar"eas on1this site or on the adjacent city property; 31) � the conditions of the Fire Marshal's Septembe�.8; 1997 merno, Chief Building Official's September 15, 1997 memo, Senior Building Inspector's Septerr�ber 8, 1997, Traffic Engineer's and Sen' ngineer's September 8, 1997 and October 6, 1997 memos sha11 be met; 32) that the park and fly program op rated as described in the Hyatt letter date stamped May 16; 2001, and the Thrifty Rent-A-Car letter dated ay 9, 2001, shall be allowed to operat� from this hot�l until Decer�ber 31, 2002; if at that time the applicant would like to continue to offer the park & fly program from �iis hotel, an amendment to this conditional use permit shall be required; 33) tl�at if the arrangement between� the Hyatt Hotel and Thrifty Rent-A=Car in Millbrae (location w�ere vehicles in the park and fly program-�shall be parked) expires or is revoked before December 31, 2002, the park and fly prograin at this hotel sl}�all be terminate.d; 34) that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a rate of;up to $Q:50 per hour far the first four hours, and $1.00 thereaft�r ($18.00 daily maximum), any change tg'this fee shall be reviewed-'by the city atfa public hearing; 35),�that any change to the number of parking �paces provided ar site, the�r configuration and or the operation�of the parking controls sha�l require amend�ent. fo this use permit; and 36) that before charging for on-sit�'guest parking the appli�ant shall apply far an��eive a sign permit or sign exception, if necessary, to inst�ll appropriate direc�i�°nal signage. The motion was seconded by C. Ost�rling, -' Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Dreiling absent). Appeal � 8:38 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS to Dece,�iber 2002 with conditions. The �s �v�re advised. This item concluded at 9. 1373 VANCOUVER AVENUE — ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (BEN BEHRAVESH, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; NENAD VUKIC, PROPERTY OWNER) (CONTINUED FROM THE JITNE 11, 2001 P.C. MEETING) C. Osterling noted that he lives within 500 feet of this property so will abstain from this action. He stepped down from the dias. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Ben Bahravesh, architect, represented the project noting that this site slopes away from the street which affects the height calculation; the house is more than 30 feet if measured from average top of curb but less if ineasured from adjacent existing grade, he did not want to clip the ridgeline to keep it under 30 feet; adjacent neighbor's wall is also 5 feet from property line and long and unarticulated; should note that the second floor proposed is over the existing house's first floor footprint. Planning Commissioners noted the following items should be addressed: • Long, two story wall on the right side needs articulation; and • How will proposed project affect the Oak tree at the rear of the right elevation, is it accurately placed on the drawings? Will it be removed, how will it be protected? -10- City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2001 C. Luzuriaga moved to place this item on the consent calendar with the proviso that articulation is added to the right side to soften the two story stucco wall along with addressing the Commission's other comments. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the next consent calendar provided all the information requested was submitted to staff in time. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Dreiling absent) voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m. 10. 1419 MONTERO AVENUE — ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEI� FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JD- & A SOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; STELLA HUNG, PROPERTY OWNER.) �CONTI�tUED FROM THE JUNE 11, 2001 P.C. MEETINGI. C,��Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commision asked no questions of staff. � Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Jerry Deal, designer, represen the roject noting that if this were o�i a flat lot the house would be 28 feet tall, the slope on the lot rr�a�es the di erence in the height; after last �eetmg lowered the roof pitch the most possible and still retain the Tudor le, looked at the grade of the d`veway, will need to install some retaining walls to keep fhe maximu slope to 15%, shown on plans. here were no other comments from the floor and the public comme was closed. C. Kei an noted that this was a nice design, appreci�fed the applican eleminating the height variance and moved to put this item on the consent calend�r' C. Luzuriaga s conded the motion. i` Commission comment on the motion includ � • Lowering the roof peak to feet makes this p ject fit better with the neighbor� houses and still able to do a Tu r style; and % l • Revision of roof i�proved the gambol r of lines a the the front and rear as w. ,,� f; � Chairman Vistica callecj for a voice vote on the otion to refer this item to t�ae next c nsent calendar providing a 1 the infc�rmation is submitted to s aff in time. The motion pas�ed on a-0-1 (C. Dreiling absent) voic�The Planning Commissi 's action is advisory and not appeal le. The item concluded at 8:48 p.m. ll. 1131 OXFORD ROAD — ZONED R-1 �P�'LICATION FOR DESIGN RE IEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (LEONA�D AND ANNA HEYMANN, APP CANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS: JD & ASSOCIATES. DESI.GNERI Planner Hurin briefly presented the Chairman Vistica opened the public cc with Jerry Deal, designer. Noted olde been built, meant adjusting and fixing ect descrintion. There were no auestions of staff. it. I,�onard Heymann, property owner, represented the project �and that focus was on putting the house back the way it had additions done 45 years ago. -11- Cii}� of Bzn•lingarrie Pla�2�lrrag Commrssron Unnpproved Mrntrtes Jtrne I1, 2001 C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the requested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on motion: applicant should know that this project can be pulled off of the consent calendar at the next meeting if tliere are additional comments based on the revisions and the fact that there is a fuil Commission. Actine Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3 (Cmsrs. Dreiling, Luzuriaga and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 82� p.m. 1L 1373 VANCOUVER AVENUE — ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (BEN BEHRAVESH, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT• NENAD WKIC PROPERTY OWNER) This item was continued to the June 25, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. 12. 715 CONCORD WAY — ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (STEWART ASSOCIATES APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT• KENNETH AND TINA CHURICH, PROPERTY OWNERS) CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. ActinQ Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Ken Churich, owner, was present to answer questions. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: this project is well-integrated into the neighborhood; the plans and design show excellent detail and are consistent. C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar for the June 25, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. This motion was seconded by C. Bojues. Acting Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar at the next Plaru�ing Commission meeting. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3 (Cmsrs. Dreiling, Luzuriaga and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. 13e 1419 MONTERO AVENUE — ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED UARAGE (JD & ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; STELLA HLTNG, PROPERTY OWNER) • ZT Le��it briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Keighran opened the public comment. The applicant was not present. 0 ROUTING FORM DATE: September 14, 2000 TO: ✓ CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height far a first and second floor addition at 1373 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-151-040. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, September 18, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Erika/Ruben q �t •o � Date of Comments �- �-T � u r�.e L G 4-�- ) /�' �� C x.. �Gt,�,; �, a� �- f� �� 7,s,yf G l %Vi� � z• U oy�, /�, �+ . � .Gt1 v e w w� �� 6-e- �'''�� ✓ "i/. i� 416� a„R�NyAM�, CITY OF BURLINGAME �' APPLICATION TO TH� PLANNING CONIlVIISSION TyQe of Ap�lication:_Special Permit_Variance_Other�a�s� �\p��t�� Project Address: �`�_'7 '� U� f��l ��I'�R.. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): � Z, —� 5 L— O� O APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER �Name: ��}�"�� CS � Name: N �� v `�-� c. Address: c'� Address: \�j� C� c�� , City/State/Zip: � '� �� ity/State/Zip:_��LL� ��- �- �--. �40 3"J Phone (w): �pCj fl�� 1�=p� � c��: fax:�.a��-3—� - 222d- ARCffiTECT/DESIGNER Phone (w): � `�7 — �-{ 'j�4 ch>: c��5'�� .5� s9�-�'k fasc: � `1� — �-E 2c`� � Name:� nn c/s S L� C�nJtS Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. City/State/Zip: Phone (w):_ �h� �— fax: FROJECT DESCRIPTION: � R��T � na,� F-�� G,r L�N D S%]- 12� j'o � )C I �Ti ►J ��'�� Q �.`t� 2�a t 1 � � � � \T �..A til L r 'Co fZ��, t � �-t� �'r AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and cone�tQ the best �y kn�,wledge and belz�. Signature Date q/ �I/p � / I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � � �'�-- 3.�� :�� Properiy Owner's Signature Date ----------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ------------- Date Filed: °� �� i�� o g�; �345 +$�� R E C E I V E D SEP 1 1 2000 Planning Commission: Study Date: Ackion Date: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. � CITY �� CITY DF BURLINGAME BURLINGAME .... ..... ' � , SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION �,..� The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the bleitd of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of tlze new construction or addition are cojzsisteitt �vith the existing st�uctu�-e's design and witla tlze existi�ag street and neighbo�lzood. � i -� . ___ _ , � � _ --- �`� ��'�'li�� `.i �.11ll-'�l lC � o�C �.`%� :lla1�� .-�-.�`'�i C�c�l�� •,, � ,, `. . � �_:�� Se�TiOrn ��v��ilu�� i�er��9C�c%� U�Ssh�l,iT� �v�v�� 1,'`� �T T e�� c� � Y'o �Le c,� ro �� 1 vi 'e �f .�'� � S 4 � h� e,v � i C� <tC �e � ��TvuT� ��e t��et� iT��e.,'� —� et 1 0� �t� eaz � 4,� � v�. �'1 .'''; ��t ti� i� l e t oef' �—� � �t�fi��lCi Ip�1 �OrC'�� tM�'r`� P 1'f" �`! � h�Or1M c�� j`�� ,�P S('�� C`' � � C � T: �� ; � i i ,_ ,: -;T < - - 2. Explain how tlze va�iety of roof liiae, facade, exteiiorfinislz materials and elevations of tlae proposed ne�v stn�cture or addition af�e co�asiste�at ivith tlze existiitg st��c�ctut•e, street and neiglcborhood. ; ��.�� ; �_ -' � i _ , , _ � � �- - � �i` ,� , �� .'-'C -; i = � �� '� �-� ��. , � � ; ; � �� _ � �� < dh 5�� V �`1Y� --+ �. �l b,n.t e 5 ,� n T� �, � �� e �"�" � i � c� �`T � Q ��'1 ) �'��v��,'��ro�'� � We�c� �2�a��i�c, �� C� +Rl Sc5 l �1L�� wt i� '� 1� �� ST � �n �� ; i r ec `� � � �� u� e� I�=( � l� o r l�. o o�. 3. Ho►v ivill tlze proposed project be consiste�at �villz the reszdential design guidelines adopted by the ciiy (C. S. 25. 57� ? _ �� ' � � e � � LG� � I T � ��' i '� � = � c . � � �� L� 1 �? 1 rt� � � . , , '_(- ! � -! ``1 _ � - 1 �� Ule1��fJ1' �OO� r ` � ��1 -� '�vl � Y��'�� _ �� Ic_`Z,1� �° � l� F�� g t� v� � y(T �' � F S �n �� C� i ST� ��. �{?c�v� �C� h� o r ��erG� � r�m�T�e�.� � � �,'� P��cTS �T�� -Psi°irn�+�e � :��i �-�" i i.,,� 5`f"r � e'� � n iT S M a s s�+� �� , 5 �� fl c� �� c� irC � c►�' �'—�� e'��'�� I s -�_ .- � 5-�� cTf�: l n � � � � , ;- � , , - - � -- � . ' j. ' -t e 'r ,- � � 1 �, � ,�i,� _- � �,�' � `' t��l .�<'�< ��`�� -{ �s ,,, I `''� 4. Explaiiz Izo►v the removal of any trees located ►vithin the footprint of aizy new structure or culdition is necessary aitd is consisZent lvith the city's reforestatiort requirements. Wlaat mitigation is proposed for t7�e r�ernoval of any ti•ees? Explai�a ivlzy tltis mitigation is appt•opriate. � � i. � ��-. �_� �= C c ��.� r �- _ C�� L� I ��.y � �.,1� t� -� � l � �,� i-�l� U -i � i�.P (� Vl � �5 � � ✓� C' �, 1 ro Gl.�,( (p'. 1 � �'^" t�� ., � L' _ , ', _. ('� � �-, � �� E ��,� � �� -�� .._ ,_ «-�r- � �,- ;� i 7 � � -�� I � R E C E I V E D � MAY 1 7 2001 sp.frrn/11/98 CITY OF BURLIf�IGAME PLANNING �EPT. 1. Explain why the ble�zd of r�aass, scale afzd dominant structural characteristics of the. new corzstructiofa or a�Iditio�Z are consistent with the existing strcccture's design and witli the existitag street and �ieighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those propertiesl If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neigboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulkl If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain liow tlie variety of roof line, facade, exterior fi�zish �naterials and elevations of tlze proposed new structure or adtliiion are coizsistent wiih the existitzg structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal "fits" in the neighborhood. How wili the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of "character" as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will tlze proposed project be consistent witla dae reside�aiial design guidelifies a�lopted by tlae cily? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the reynoval of afay trees Zocaied within tlae foolprint of any new siructure or addition is necessary and is consis�ent with the cily's reforestation require»zents. W/icri mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why ihis mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposall If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are "protected" under city ordinance (C.S. 1 1.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. sp. frm/11 /98 �r�, ciry o� CITY OF BURLINGAME euRUN�nME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �i � �-- t BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL (650) 558-7250 i 1373 VANCOUVER AVENUE Application for design review and special permit for height for a first and second story addition at 1373 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1. (APN: 027-151-040) The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mond�y, June 11, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed June 1, 2001 (Please refer to nther side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the applicstion and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at tlle Pl�uiniil�= Department at SQ1 Primrose Road, Burlin�ame, Califc�inia. � If }'ou challen�� die subject ap��]�cltion(s) in cour2, yo❑ m�y be limited to raisin� only thu.�e issiic.s yc,u or someune else raised at lhe public hearin�, described in the notice or in �x.�ritteu coirespondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearin�r, Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for infarming their tenants about this n�tice. For additional iuformation, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Mar�aret Monroe ��-°`�- �:' ` :��F� City Planner __ Pt��LIC F�EARING NOTICE (Please refer to ot/�er ,ride) �t.�' c'T" ot CITY OFBURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD _ BURLINGAME. CA 94010 TEL:(650)558-7250 1373 VANCOWER AVENUE Application for design review and special permit for height for a first and second P U B LIC H EA RIN G story addition at 1373 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1. (APN: 027-151-040) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MondaY June 25, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed June 15, 2001 (Please refer to otlier side) CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prioi- ro the meetiug at the Plannin� Deparhnent at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. C�ilifornia. If you cl�allenge the suhject applicatioo{s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those is�ues you c�r someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in ��ritteri correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearin�. Property owne�s who recei��e this notice areresponsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank }'ou. � Mar aret Monroe � - � �� ""�`� � %`�� City Planner � �k �� "` ` PUBLIC HEARlNG NOTICE (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desien review and a special permit height for a first and second floor addition at 1373 Vancouver Avenue zoned R-1. Nenad Vukic property owner APN� 027-151-010; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on JuIX 9. 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Joe Bojues _, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the t�h day of Jul•y, 2001 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for design review and a special permit for height 1373 Vancouver Avenue effective July 17, 2001 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 17, 2001, sheets A-0 and A-1, and July 2, 2001, sheets A-2 and A-3, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 18, 2000, memo shall be met; 5. that five existing trees on site, including the oak tree located at the rear, right side of the property, shall not be removed and the applicant shall have an arborist's report prepared which documents how each tree on the site should be protected during construction, this report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist and the contractor shall call for the Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a building permit shall be issued, and that the property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the arborist's report; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the Ciry of Burlingame. clry \ �r� ot� CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD I,o I�� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 — TEIL (650) 558-7250 1373 VANCOTSVER AVENUE Application for design review and special permit for height for a first and second P U B LIC H EA RIN G story addition at 1373 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-l. (APN: 027-151-040) N OTIC E The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MondaY, July 9, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed June 29, 2001 (Ple�se refer to oihc�r srcl�l CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of thc applicatioii and plans for this pmject ma}� be reviewed prior Co the meeting at the Planluug Departmcnt at 501 Pi-i�iu-ose Road, Burlin�ame. California. If yeu challem�e the subject a�plication(s} in co�irt, youu may be limited to raisin�r onl� thu,e issues you or someoiie else raised at the public� hearin" desciibed i❑ the not�re or in written corr�spondence delivered to the eity at or- prior to the public hcarii�g. Property o��mers who receive this notice are responsibl� for informing their tenants abou[ this notice. For additionai information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thunk you. �� .�' � ��.�. e�.� � � : � Mar�aret Moi�roe �`� „�..� .� �+ %� City Planner � � �� PU�LIC h1E�4R11VG NOTICE (Ple�se reter !n otl��er .side) i�`�''f •� �� . i..� A A%" ��. �� ' � ww�� ♦}F x ` y: � S�t � `� t�� . .y � �.,4 ,S,✓ :� � �� ' yF ' � �� _ .. . ��1} �� .� . a� � .. � . � 4 � �? � �- , � r�� ?Y, � . ':y � : _ . � ':X; �; _ `!t� 1 V .� r . � . `. :� �;�. � � . � �' ti �' :� � �: �' f . �.. � ,� "� . 'T..' _ -,qX �G'Y ,. �' �� .�,�&� � _ � � �- �� .� - _ � ,. � � � ,, � :;. i�.' , �:�� _} '� ��/ \. �� '� '�, -� - <�� . : � � � � ' ` �`�" - j� � �` . . � z .� �'� ,K ',� �� ' M.: � `O<� 'P�. � � . �."' 1r _'_i y`�Z� ' � Y . � .di 'kr � � � ,� - �'3{. ,4 .` \. •�` •_�s,- ' �: a'* . > � . / t �' '.. ` _. (}, . . .. . >,._ ��•: .,�' '� n r'lJ _ys§.� .'k . �a. � . .rY, �+. . _ �lJ _ �; . � -?x,.�. - � : ' J .- •, � : - � :,�ox , l�' � s.<, t: �'.�g -, ��t '. � ` �� , ,y'� �;�. a � �: '� +,' <a`�rt,w'.. �. `� . �; ,�a`, �- �. � � 1 � � '.� � V ��. J� -� . . , � . ��'�_ � . � � ' � y� ;�4 < � ?a��, ; � ' � , � - � � - �� . :w � . .. 3 r � � X � - �, 9 �� .. •�' , .'� Y , �~ � � .�G�. ^* �S yt., �, � �� } � � � /,, �� `` a �' _ 't � �--- ' � � � �. �- . ; � . � . `� � � � ; . `..�` it ` `�� .r +i ` � .�f' � � t" / , ` .t l ,�„� _ -_� . `� - _f' �'T-;' .. �� !~ - �� '�, ,{' p �� S ,�;' •'`p° � � �', s�. ` � t .'� �O ��, ' .y ". � �t� . _ . _ � � �� ' � � '� }/ ,� � � �, � �� ; ,. '" _ � � � � �_ 1,�. 3 ��". C+-� 1 . � ; '� O � � ..� `�, . �:� � .r. �� ''� � _��. > . .. � .:�6� � . y � , `� �� l �., r _ � � � y ��,y . , ft �, �� r � ` � �. 1�' �l `�'�' S �'�� V, � �/ S1i�j,��" \ � �- ��' �� p +�: ' ` f�.i�-5�. ��':,� � � . t. �� !p� " , h � fi . +�'' �r �' �� '� , ``C• � ' .W . /�� ,� � �� I ` "� `'� - � �� ,`� �3r' k 9 �: � -� ;,y �- �, �' '� . ' • '4_,. : a�a� ! 3 :'�'� �y d.- .•� U ��C' ,. 1 , � � � .� ft.. ! �b �} , . - ,+.,y �,�,,�, . � l �� :d.. t _ .`v�� . . .�� .� �� s g`;�. . i = � 4 - � :.c' �.; ".°�,..- , ry�� . � >°1 . . � � `.��t,. �g . �(� ti 'j ;. f � . # 'r �.:c, �� q . �~ '�°' ' "g' i� `� l,� � 6 Y � �S. �'� �! �`q, 'y � - �'� ,e� � �R � �� . :r. -� � � T �� ' - /�'�. �' ,t� ' ��:+' "�.��_� . /� � � ��y_A� �� ' � � T .. `�_ � �� _ � ; A �� /�, } �1 f '� � ' � . �r �' '�k r�: � , � �- , : � ,�` �'; � � `� •.. �` r � ti�, . ;,�• � � 4�y, ., �` j � � c x, ,� �' � . � °;�� - � ^ - '� , , s' � .'} • 1. s � `7 "2{A. J "z.y�q �' _.�'-S .'� �� . ""J �: !,5 � t '`€ :^ `b3�. .r�� ' i3 � " ,ic ./ . `l .:t . � ' �•� �� .� � f��,. .22 ��'`vN � � � �'�� _ A � � -� y �_ ' _i� -•.�-i� _ . -.� ,..s .r _t . .. �, `�. . ,� � . _ � � >-�, _ . _ � � -'�... '� � � �D' `�.h - ��'�. � � �!"Y� ��g.� �� ,a. - , .ss� � T� � r,:+ ;;:. y Y � \��w .� l ��' �, , �.v ''�"'r` �`; : u. . .. , � . z ,