HomeMy WebLinkAbout2508 Valdivia Way - Staff ReportIteMn No. �
Action Item
t�
^r
� � �,
b � ; ��
y :
' • ' e:
. �+' =: f . t,. .
� a � � . �� �_ .�� � �
� � : �� � l
*F � a � � p
`�' �. � �? %s� � _� � �
( +�
�`� � �� � �.� �� �: °�$k�' � .��:,.. � ~T � � -
d �R'^ `'s� �'t �...-�^^�'°—�-. . . ` � c < ��P
�k� � � . � � ._ _ � m �
1��F 4�
r.� � f
� _ _ " __""—" '__— _ _—. .. � �Ti��� �� �A� �..
� `' —� _��� _ _ . � ...
f
--`�_-um"^ �� �, .., . . � _ � .
}
. �'_��sr .. . ��¢ �
. ... � . . . ;c;tsie.
�. ��� ' . - . � .. �
PROJECT LOCATION
2508 Valdivia Way
%
�`�
�,�
City of Burlingame
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
Address: 2508 Valdivia Way
Item No.
Action Item
Meeting Date: October 22, 2012
Request: Application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a major renovation and first
floor addition to a single family dwelling with an attached garage (qualifies as substantial
construction).
Applicants and Property Owners: Peter and Joanie Schlampp
Designer: Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 025-171-020
Lot Area: 11,081 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential
zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe
constructed or converted under this exemption.
Project Description: The existing single-story house with an attached two-car garage contains 2,768 SF (0.25
FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing a major renovation and first floor
addition, which includes demolishing most of the house, but retaining the existing attached two-car garage.
Although the front setback of the existing attached garage is nonconforming (19'-4" existing front setback where
25'-0" is the minimum required for an attached garage with two, single-wide doors), a variance for front setback
and special permit for attached garage is not required since the existing attached garage will be retained. With
the proposed renovation and addition, the floor area will increase to 4,160 SF (0.38 FAR) where the zoning code
allows a maximum of 4,646 SF (0.42 FAR) on this lot. The proposed project is 486 SF below the maximum
allowed FAR (more than 10% below allowed FAR).
The proposed project is subject to design review because it qualifies as substantial construction (defined as
removal of more than 50% of the existing exterior walls) and the existing plate height is being increased from
8'-0" to 9'-0" above finished floor throughout the entire house and to 9'-10" at the garage.
With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from three (3) to six (6) (library and craft room
qualify as bedrooms). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing
attached garage (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) provides two covered spaces and one uncovered space (9'
x 20') is provided in the driveway, and therefore is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other
Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following:
■ Design Review for a major renovation and first floor addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a,
3 and 5); and
■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a major renovation and first floor addition (C.S. 25.61.020)
This space intentionally left blank.
Design Review and Hiliside Area Construction Permit 2508 Valdivia Way
2508 Valdivia Way
Lot 5ize: 11,081 5F Plans date stam ed: October 10, 2012
EXISTING PROPOSED ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS '
__ __ _ _ __ __ _ __ _
Fronf: 38'-6" (to house) 22'-1" 18'-0" (block average)
_ _ _ __ _ _....... _ _ ___..
Attached Garage: 19'-4"' 19 -4"' 35'-0" (double-wide door)
_ __ __ _...... __ _..
Side (left): 9'-2" 7'-1" 7'_0"
(right): 11'-11" 7'-8" ' 7'-0"
_ _. _ _ __
Rear: 53'-0" 53'-4" to house 15'-0"
45'-4" to deck
_ _ _ _ _. __
Lot Coverage: 2874 SF 4330 SF 4432 SF
25.9°/a 39% 40%
_ _ _ _ . _
FAR: 2768 SF 4160 SF 4646 SF Z
0.25 FAR 0.38 FAR 0.42 FAR
_ _... __ _ _..
# of bedrooms: 3 6 ---
_ _ __ __. _ _
Parking: 2 covered 2 covered 2 covered
(22'-3" x 22'-5") (22'-3" x 20'-4") (20' x 20')
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20')
_.. __ _ __ _ _ _ .. _ . .
Height: 18'-6" ' 22'-6" 30'-0"
P __.. _. ..
DH Envelo e: n/a n/a CS 25.26.075
� txisting noncontorming attached garage tront setback (19'-4" existing and proposed where 35'-0"
is the minimum required for an attached garage with a double-wide door).
2 (0.32 x 11,081 SF) + 1,100 SF = 4,646 SF (0.42 FAR)
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, City Engineer, Fire
Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
In his memo dated August 10, 2012, the Parks Supervisor notes that a protected tree removal permit will be
required to remove the existing Magnolia tree in the front yard if it qualifies as a protected size tree (more than 48
inches in circumference measured 54 inches above the ground).
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on September 24,
2012, 2012, the Commission had several questions and comments regarding this project and voted to place the
utem on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed (September 24, 2012
planning Commission Minutes).
The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans, dated October 10, 2012, to address the Planning
Commission's questions and comments. Please refer to the copy of the September 24, 2012, Planning
Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
E
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
2508 Valdivia Way
Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by
the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby
properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling
unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060).
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
October 10, 2012, sheets AO through A6„ SU1, L1.0, L2.0 and G;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or
pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first floor or garage, which would include adding or
enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 14 and August 3, 2012 memos, the Parks
Division's September 13 and August 10, 2012 memos, the Engineering Division's August 17, 2012
memo, the Fire Division's August 6, 2012 memo and the Stormwater Division's August 2, 2012 memo
shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
3
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
2508 Valdivia Way
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR
TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window
locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting
framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final
framing inspection shall be scheduled;
12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the
approved Planning and Building plans.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Peter and Joanie Schlampp, applicants and property owners
Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group, designer
Attachments:
ApplicanYs Response Letter, dated October 10, 2012
September 24, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Application to the Planning Commission
Staff Comments
Neighborhood Photographs
P!anning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 12, 2012
Aerial Photo
n
off'ce 650.33L1870 iax 650.637.9270
58� quo•ry rood san corlos co 94070
www.hylanddg.com
����i`���
RESPONSE LETTER:
JOB #: HDG1208
DATE: 10.10.12
REPLY BY: Natalie Hyland
PROJECT NAME I DESCRIPTION:
CITY•COUNTY:
REPLY ROUTING:
Commission comments:
;T 1 0 2012
BURI_INGAME
-� ��,�
Schlampp Residence
New Single Family Dwelling
2508 Valdivia Way
Burlingame - San Mateo
PLANNING DEPT+PLANNING COMMISSION
Has an issue with retaining the existing garage — require the greater setback for new garages
to de-emphasize their appearance. Try to revise the design to minimize the presence of khe
garage in some manner. (Hyland — noted that the existing garage is just over 1�-feet from the
front property line. Are attempting to minimize impacts upon the rear-yard. The garage is the
only area where there could be some cost savings. Can look at a means of softening fhe
appearance of the garage.)
HDG RESPONSE: We understand Burlingame's desire to de-emphasize Garage's
however if is very important to the family fhat this existing garage foundation
remains in iYs original location for cost, interior floor plan ar�d back yard
purposes. We respond to fhe garage comments:
1. We have softened the garage by proposing 2 garage doors + redefining
porch.
2. The "Ray Park" area should be taken into consideration. The Ray Park
architecture is not typical of the Burlingame homes in other areas. Most of
the homes in Ray Park do have a 2 car garage that is very prominent. We
believe our design fits well within Ray Parks Neighborhood.
3. Being that this is not a brand new house but rather a"substanti'al
construction" we hope it is not a code requirement but rather a design topic
that may be taken into consideration based on the design as a whole. Which
we believe blends well.
c�',�� �.�,5_.In'� „xc � F` ., -
585 qucrry road san corlos co 9407C
��ww.hylandcg.com
• Could pe�haps revise the garage to have two doors.
H�DG RESPONSE: Garage has been revised to have two doo�s.
Make the front porch a bit more prominent and a more useable featu�re.
HDG RESPONSE: Front Right Side Gable has been ia►corporated
with the Front Entry Roof to emphase in order to take focus �ff of
Garage.
Expresse�i concerns about the scale of finishing materials; could be more
substantial to be more in keeping with the "Craftsman" design. (Hyl�nd — the
band is realiy 8-inches including the cap. Some other details have been kept a
bit smaller to make it more delicate.)
H0G RESPONSE: Band has been defined to show the 8" band with
2" cap above. See Gab/e Detail sht A5
■ With respect to the Magnotia tree; the landscape plan shows it being removed —
encourages the applicant to attempt to retain the tree.
■ Disagrees with the desire to retain the Magnolia tree — in favor of removing and
replacing with something native to the area.
HDG RESPONSE: We have decided to remove the Magnolia t�r�e +
w�ll replace it with a tree per landscape plan.
■ Look at the stacked stone on the right elevation (in particular) as it I�oks very
heavy. (Hyland — provided because of the significant slope; were planning on
providing substantial plant materials in this area.)
HDG RESPONSE: Adjusted stone cap. Plans now shouv stone cap
below the window sill rather than coming off of the sill. Stone wi�l be
a soft light co/or and planting around this area is proposed.
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes September 24, 2012
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
3. 2508 VALDIVIA WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A MAJOR RENOVATION AND FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (QUALIFIES AS SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION)
(PETER AND JOANIE SCHLAMPP, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; NATALIE HYLAND,
HYLAND DESIGN GROUP, DESIGNER) (36 NOTICED) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report dated September 24, 2012, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented
the project description.
Questions of staff:
■ Clarified the setback requirement for an attached garage. (Ruben — clarified that new attached
garages with two single-doors require 25-feet; a single-wide door requires 35-feet.)
Chair Gaul opened the public comment period.
Natalie Hyland, San Carlos, and Peter and Joanie Schlampp, Burlingame; represented the applicant.
■ Purchased the home with the intent of construction on a single-story addition; after a lot of design
input, the project turned into a major renovation.
■ Have selected the "Craftsman-style" for the renovated home.
■ The lot is pretty steep; the front, right corner of the house is the most visible, so put a lot of the
design focus at that location.
■ Eventually the applicanYs mother-in-law will likely live with the family, which includes two children.
■ Have reached out to neighbors regarding the remodel and have shared the latest design plans with
the neighbors.
■ The home was the second home constructed within the subdivision; the original owner of the first
home still lives in the neighborhood and appreciates the design.
■ The neighbors at 2512 Valdivia Way have lived on their property for decades — recalled views of the
former hospital and SFO. Most of what has impacted their views in recent years has been the
growth of the Magnolia tree on the property. The neighbors didn't feel that the project would impact
their views.
■ Noted other neighbor support for the project.
Commission comments:
■ Applauded the applicant for reaching out to the neighbors.
■ Has an issue with retaining the existing garage — require the greater setback for new garages to de-
emphasize their appearance. Try to revise the design to minimize the presence of the garage in
some manner. (Hyland — noted that the existing garage is just over 19-feet from the front property
line. Are attempting to minimize impacts upon the rear-yard. The garage is the only area where
there could be some cost savings. Can look at a means of softening the appearance ofthe garage.)
■ Could perhaps revise the garage to have two doors.
■ Make the front porch a bit more prominent and a more useable feature. (Schlampp — doesn't feel a
larger porch would be more useable for the family — prefer to have the rear yard be more useable.)
■ Tough to justify keeping the garage pushed forward when the lot is so large and can accommodate
a different approach.
■ Not as opposed to retention of the garage location given that it is a common condition in the
neighborhood. Agrees with considering a different door arrangement.
F']
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes September 24, 2012
■ Expressed concerns about the scale of finishing materials; could be more substantial to be more in
keeping with the "Craftsman" design. (Hyland — the band is really 8-inches including the cap. Some
other details have been kept a bit smaller to make it more delicate.)
■ May be able to accept the retention of the garage at the location if more energy is spent to de-
emphasize the garage doors.
■ Look beyond the days when all of the activity is in the rear-yard; consider the days when the children
are grown and the front porch may become a more desirable space. (Hyland — making the porch
more prominent will cut off a lot of light to the interior. If the porch were continued to bridge the front
bedroom to the garage, the gable would be lost.)
■ With respect to the Magnolia tree; the landscape plan shows it being removed — encourages the
applicant to attempt to retain the tree.
■ Disagrees with the desire to retain the Magnolia tree — in favor of removing and replacing with
something native to the area.
■ Look at the stacked stone on the right elevation (in particular) as it looks very heavy. (Hyland —
provided because of the significant slope; were planning on providing substantial plant materials in
this area.)
Public comments:
■ None.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Cauchi made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones.
Discussion of motion:
■ Story poles haven't been discussed yet; could be beneficial in that it could alleviate any potential
delays if neighbor concerns regarding view blockage were to arise.
■ Suggested not requiring story poles, but /eave it to the applicant whether or not to erect them.
Chair Gaul called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Regular Action Calendar when plans
have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-0-0. The Planning Commission's
action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m.
10
�
BURLI ME
�
COMMUNIN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
e of ap�lication: /► n
�Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: //�� ' �7� ���V
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: �SO�/ V�L I �l��I'
-�
O Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: P�T��" I ����/�/h!�l1�1�
Address: DS V�L�IV�K w��i
City/State/Zip: �i1/� � � M �T �
Phone: ����76��J
Fax:
E-mail: �Q�(��ii'IGi�t l • CUi'Vl
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person�
OK to send electronic copies of documents
ne
�
'✓
• .. - %' /� � � � �i
- . �� �i J ,/ i., /
Phon�
Fax:
E-mail: /��TA� �� (�i Ff� �f � l� D GOl'j!
� Burlingame Business License #: ��� /
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C// l�i"
.s. �� V.' � i..�'
AFFADAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and beli�f.
ApplicanYs signature: `�� _ `��., ! i^ Date: � 1
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby au orize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
�^mmission. ,J r\
� ' r 1�T�i��
�perty owner's signature: i ; Date:
�,1
�` Date submitted:� � 1 � �!/
ic Verification that the project adchitect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�HaN�ours�PcaPplrcatron zoo8.hondour.doc
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
This Space for CDD
Staff Use Only
�
Project Description:
�,� j,
� - � « �,)r., � �r �; � i,,�-�c,,n;.,�.
� �%✓�.S�Y�% � ��, i � r�.. � j � ; � . OI v-, �. - � ��� � � . ' �.,�,� n,� .
- �
DSR deposit/handling fee
paid by:
5��.}� .s- �pa�v�.;�-
,���` �IV�^1 1
(� I ( `1 J�,J• I (I• �/I �rLl
r,
L. �' ,�i l
r�ey:
Abbreviation
CUP
DHE
DSR
E
N
SFD
SP
Term.-
Conditional Use Permit
Declining Height Envelc
Design Review
Existing
New
Single Family Dwelling
Special Permit
� v s Project Comments 7
Date
To:
From:
September 13, 2012
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7273
0 Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
0 NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-171-
020
Staff Review:
No further comments.
Ail conditions of approval as stated on the review dated 8-3-2012 shall apply to this
project.
Reviewed
:9-14-2012
�roject Comments
Date:
To:
From
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
(� On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010
' California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California
Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in
Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00
p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the
provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in
� Ordinance 1813.
2, On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale.
�� S ecif on the lans that this ro ect will com I with the 2008 California Ener Efficienc
L} P Y P P 1 PY 9Y Y
Standards.
Go to http:!/www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2008standards! for publications and details.
,4j,� Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
L� "Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
- (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
/5)/ On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to
�/ be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further
City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project
designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically
illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business
license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all
structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame
Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed
fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined
by ;he building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the
requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California
Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and
approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown
on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval,
necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot
be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans.
11) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will
be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued
after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
12) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new
walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit
will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building
components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner
is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed.
13) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed
Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued
until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
14) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines
15�Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
�aooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that
complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the nef clear opening height
and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. Note: The area labeled
"Craft Room" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with
�#tns requirement.
1�) Jndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of
�� �Public Works.
18) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are
considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details
if your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
19) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
20) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items
1, 2, 3, 4. 5, 16, and 17 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning
Commission action.
_ i
Reviewed by: � Date: 8-3-2012
C!
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
1. Landscape P�an and Irrigation Plan look ok.
O2. New City Street tree needs to be changed to Pyrus calleryana `Red Spire"
instead of `Aristocrat'
3. Removal of existing Magnolia tree will need a permit from Parks Division if
circumference is greater than 48 in measured 54 in from ground.
- � �� r�� ���ti����
1�
�� �v
�/ �����
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 8/10/12
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 1, 2012
o( Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
❑ Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
❑ Building Division
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
❑ Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 8/17/2012
Project Comments
Date
To:
I -.7Ci :3ii1
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
❑X Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
�taff Review: August 6, 2012
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: � o� Date: C� �► Z
Project Comments
Date
To:
From
August 1, 2012
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project
proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices
(BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition).
When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater
pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size
plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached
Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at
http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_construction. php
(Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan
Sheet).
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed bv: SD `> �
Date: 8/2/2012
�x.�''d�.4.i
Y . � ��,�, » t
��4.,� ! 4
n... d"`� ,T.
C ; _�' �'�
i.'""�}.} '�;'.
Ew . � ���
t,�� , .y
�7` � dt� . �y. � <.
�' ` t i �y w, t. , .
��. ;� ��,.'"a���ti ��
�:
� �� ��
�� ��. , . .
'. �c,, i
,�
� ..
� ---- 1.-
� 4s.-
���w
2516
�
���`� `� � `j ` ��
��
� � ���� .
2512
V� I d ivi � �1l'a
v
a�
��
r�
���
2508
Subject Property
..
1 '•�y��''r� �, �'� ,� �
�^�,
_ . . . -. ,., _-,. .
2504
fi
�,
� �r'�;��� .
3�' J.,
'��i
ui rr . :" �11'. `r' � ` , I�,
����:
A�.� .��
2500
�
��C;�.��i��
JUL 31 2012
�
��,`;.
C�Ty pF gU!�LINGAME
�DD-PIANNING DIV.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION , DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
CONTRUCTION PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
Desiqn Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a maior renovation and first floor
addition to a sinqle family dwellinq with an attached qaraqe (qualifies as substantial
construction) at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1, Peter and Joanie Schlampp, property owners,
APN: 025-171-020;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
October 22, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a),
which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures
including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is
exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family
residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved.
2. Said Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit approved subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and
Hillside Area Construction Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording
of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22"d dav of October, 2012 by the
following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Hillside Area
Construction Permit.
2508 Valdivia Way
Effective November 1, 2012
Page 1
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped October 10, 2012, sheets AO through A6„ SU1, L1.0, L2.0 and G;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
by Planning staffl;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first floor or garage, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 14 and August 3, 2012
memos, the Parks Division's September 13 and August 10, 2012 memos, the
Engineering Division's August 17, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's August 6, 2012 memo
and the Stormwater Division's August 2, 2012 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Hillside Area
Construction Permit.
2508 Valdivia Way
Effective November 1, 2012
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the
approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with
approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing
inspection shall be scheduled;
12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division;
and
13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
`� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
��"w +, � . BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PH (650) 558-725� � FAX: (650) 696 3790 ;
www.burlingame.org
Site: 2508 VALDIVIA WAY
The City of Burlingame Planning Commissio OCTOBERS 22,
following public hearing on MONDAY,
2p12 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall Council Cham6ers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review and Hillside Area
Construction Permit for a major renovotion and first floor
addition to a single family dwelling with an attached
garage (qualifies as substantial construction) at 2508
Valdivia Way zoned R-l. APN Q25-171-020
Mailed: October 12, 2U12
(Please refer to other side)
City of Burlinqame
PUBLIC WEARING
NOTICE
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for inforrr�ing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
_. �
�'�
� -�.-�- _. .
y �
= w _,
� { .
s ��_
- _ �4
. �" - - . _ �.. ._. _..�_ . .>=--5���:
� F � e �.- - . � �
_ �� � �s �� �.
� � Yi t
�
��,r�� z :�. �`
�
�: � �
� F �•� � �; � ,
Yd £Zi.�`��y Y�^i,�a��t �
���t.,4 � r �� .� l��a_������}�`i�-�
4
3�'`� �,.s�'�ei P . � � �' +�'
�5��j'rF �" v"._ f 7' i 't.:
� � .. � y�� ��:
E�r�AV SX' R'�' 1t d +� J
� ..tr ' -.f� � e7• µti
�"3�-.:`�� � +N: 4.: 3�
,+��`�`�'� r� }4'`�r � � ~�` d
,.`"'. +... Ji.
� ��� r F� � � 3 `.
� � --� &��'�`5'- �°
s '` yJ °�
- �._ � �. ' `!�� � tY _�'�5 �
Q� \�4
� • -
-� _ . �
�
City of Burlingame
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
Address: 2508 Valdivia Way
Item No.
Design Review Study
Meeting Date: September 24, 2012
Request: Application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a major renovation and first
floor addition to a single family dwelling with an attached garage (qualifies as substantial
construction).
Applicants and Property Owners: Peter and Joanie Schlampp
Designer: Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 025-171-020
LotArea: 11,081 SF
Zoning: R-1
Project Description: The existing single-story house with an attached two-car garage contains 2,768 SF (0.25
FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing a major renovation and first floor
addition, which includes demolishing most of the house, but retaining the existing attached two-car garage.
Although the front setback of the existing attached garage is nonconforming (19'-4" existing front setback where
35'-0" is the minimum required for an attached garage with a double-wide door), a variance for front setback and
special permit for attached garage is not required since the existing attached garage will be retained. With the
proposed renovation and addition, the floor area will increase to 4,160 SF (0.38 FAR) where the zoning code
allows a maximum of 4,646 SF (0.42 FAR) on this lot. The proposed project is 486 SF below the maximum
allowed FAR (more than 10% below allowed FAR).
The proposed project is subject to design review because it qualifies as substantial construction (defined as
removal of more than 50% of the existing exterior walls) and the existing plate height is being increased from
8'-0" to 9'-0" above finished floor throughout the entire house and to 9'-10" at the garage.
With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from three (3) to six (6) (library and craft room
qualify as bedrooms). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing
attached garage (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) provides two covered spaces and one uncovered space (9'
x 20') is provided in the driveway, and therefore is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other
Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following:
■ Design Review for a major renovation and first floor addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a,
3 and 5); and
■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a major renovation and first floor addition (C.S. 25.61.020)
2508 Valdivia Way
Lot Size: 11,081 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 12, 2012
EXISTING PROPOSED : ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
_._.._._ _._ _.. .— ---_— ___._..._ ...-- _...._.. --..... _ __._..
Front: 38'-6" (to house) ; 22'-1" 18'-0" (block average)
-- — ------ ------ - ------- � ---- - - _ _._ ...----- __ _ — --. . __....
_. _._..
Atfached Garage: 19'-4" ' 19 -4" ' 35 -0" (double-wide door)
------------ ----------..__. -------....---------- ---------.........------...---._.__.__.._....._ ......................................_.._---..--_...
Side (left): 9'-2" 7'-1" 7'-0"
(righf): 11'-11 " 7'-8" 7'-0"
--------------- _ _ _____ _.._ _.___. _..._— _.. _--._._. ____--- __.._ --._.
Rear: 53'-0" 53'-4" to house 15'-0'
45'-4" to deck
' Existing nonconforming attached garage front setback (19'-4" existing and proposed where 35'-0"
is the minimum required for an attached garage with a double-wide door).
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
2508 Valdivia Way
2508 Valdivia Way
Lot Size: 11,081 SF Plans date stamped: Se tember 12, 2012
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWEDlREQUIRED
Lot Coverage: 2874 SF 4316 SF 4432 SF
25.9% 38.9% 40%
------------------._._.. _.._----.. __....__ _-------, _ __ _ __ _ _ - ..._..__............__..__._,. ____----
FAR; 2768 SF 4160 SF 4646 SF 2
0.25 FAR 0.38 FAR 0.42 FAR
-------..._....---- ------...._. --- —...._..._,_.._.- --.—._.._._....._..._._._..—�-------
# of bedrooms: 3 6 ---
Parking: 2 covered 2 covered 2 covered
(22'-3" x 22'-5") (22'-3" x 20'-4") (20' x 20')
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
�s� x 20°� (s° x 20�> (s� x 20��
_.._____._------- --.__ ._.------- -- ____;_ ----__. ___-----------.__._._ __.___.----------_ _.---.___._. __ ____..
Height: 18'-6" 22'-6" 30'-0"
_.._------...-----..._._._.._—.p _.._...----------_.—__....__._.__..___._,....._...-------......_ ................_..-----.._.._._._....._: ..._..----____-----__._.__..--_.
DH Envelo e: n/a n/a CS 25.26.075
Z (0.32 x 11,081 SF) + 1,100 SF = 4,646 SF (0.42 FAR)
�taff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, City Engineer, Fire
Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
In his memo dated August 10, 2012, the Parks Superv6sor notes that a protected tree removal permit will be
required to remove the existing Magnolia tree in the front yard if it qualifies as a protected size tree (more than 48
irches in circumference measured 54 inches above the ground).
Ruben Hurin
�enior Planner
c. Peter and Joanie Schlampp, applicants and property owners
Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group, designer
pttachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Staff Comments
Neighborhood Photographs
I��tice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 14, 2012
Aerial Photo
�a
r>�
BUftLJ ME
��
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMIV�ISSION
�e of application: /� �-1
� Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: //�� ' �7�'���/
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: /��D� V%f Ii I v�
O Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: �'����"'�Q%�l�i�s�rn�
Address: ��DS V� �IV��f ���l
city�state�ziP: Pi?'/�'Gll���111�1 � ��ir�/��
Phone: �v____�_ �
Fax:
E-mail: �� lP ��� �i / • �l�
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER projectcontactperson�
OK to send electronic copies of documents
-ne
Address:
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone: �
Fax:
E-mail:
— /V i
• � �f� �� � � �� � / � ,
Phone
Fax:
E-mail: ��TAL��1�� �t��1ll �D GD�
� Burlingame Business License #: �� /
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (// (fi''
�
, -.., �.�
AFFADAVIT151GNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
ApplicanYs signature: \` �,' � ! Date: �I I � � I I � =
I am aware of the proposec} application and hereby au orize the above applicant to submit thisl application to the Planning
Commission. r ,, (�
operty owner's signature:��, \;/ 'I �1 I � Date: 1I 1 I 1 ��
�, ; I
Date submitted: � I � � � ��/
\1 —�
�k Verification that the project atchitec�/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
O Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:`'nkNDOUTS�PCApplirotion 2008.hondout.doc
� Project Comments
Date
To:
From:
September 13, 2012
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
0 City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7273
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction !'ermit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1, APN: 025-171-
020
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated on the review dated 8-3-2012 shall apply to this
project.
Reviewed
Date:9-14-2012
�.......,
. r..�� �, _�. . .. _ _ .._ _�__..
_ Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
1) On the plans specify that this project wiil comply with the 2010 California Building Co�e, 2010
California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California
Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in
Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00
p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the
provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in
Ordinance 1813.
(� On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale.
Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency
Standards.
Go to http�/lwww enerqV ca.gov/title24/2008standards! for publications and details.
,4� Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
C� "Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Ho�idays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
--, (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
/5) /On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to
V be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further
City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project
designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically
illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business
license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all
structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame
Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed
fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined
by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the
requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California
Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and
approved by, the Buiiding Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown
on the p/ans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval,
necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot
be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans.
11) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will
be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued
after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
12) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new
walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit
will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building
components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner
is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed.
13) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed
Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued
until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
14) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines
15 Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
6) ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that
complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height
and width of all required egress windows on fhe elevafion drawinqs. Note: The area labeled
"Craft Room" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with
/ti�is requirement.
�) ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of
Public Works.
18) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are
considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details
if your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
19) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
20) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items
1, 2, 3, 4. 5, 16, and 17 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning
Commission action.
_.._._.__ ..., ,� __
__.. _._
--
Reviewed by: i-'�` � Date: 8-3-2012
V ,
C
1. Landscape Plan and Irrigation Plan look ok.
O2. New City Street tree needs to be changed to Pyrus calleryana `Red Spire"
instead of `Aristocrat'
3. Removal of existing Magnolia tree will need a permit from Parks Division if
circumference is greater than 48 in measured 54 in from ground.
r�� ��l �j� v�
Y�`�� "_.r�►'
r � /�`/�
/ l�
e
Project Comments
Date:
To:
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(65Q) 558-7260
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial constructian) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 8/10/12
Project Comments
Date:
To:
August 1, 2012
�( Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
❑ Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
❑ Building Division
(650) 558-7260
❑ Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From
❑ Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. The project shali, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 8/17/2012
Project Comments
Date
To:
From:
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly -
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: �-� � � �
� �`
Date: � � ► �
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 1, 2012
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for
a new single family dwelling (substantial construction) with an
attached garage at 2508 Valdivia Way, zoned R-1,
APN: 025-171-020
Staff Review: August 6, 2012
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project
proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices
(BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition).
When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater
pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size
plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached
Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at
http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_construction.php
(Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan
Sheet).
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed bv: SD � o
Date: 8/2/2012
c
2516
:
2512
Va I d ivi a Wa
v
_ _.__..__ �.�_�
�r � •
.
Subject Property
2504
2500
��
������ ��
.IUL 3 I 20i2
�ITY OF BU ;UNC?.Ah4E
CDG-PIAN?�ItvG DiV.
_ �����
� CITY OF BURLINGAti1E
'� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�4i, � � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ,- _
PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790
v,�ww.burlingame.org -- - - �
Site: 2508 VALDIVIA WAY - - -
The City of Burlingame Plenning Commission announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,
2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Cham6ers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review and Hiliside Areo
Construction Permit for a major renovation ond addition
to a single family dwelling with an atto�hed garage
(qualifies as su6stantial construction) at 2508 Valdivia
Way zoned R-l. APN 025-111-020
Mailed: September 14, 2012
(Please refer to other side)
- �- -
�- — _
PUBLIC WEA�ING
NOTICE
City of Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project m�y be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this �otice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please rererto other side)