The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1660 Westmoor Road - Staff Report0 Item No. 8e Regular Action Items ., s �! .: ��,� � k� •�". �,�"' ,Y.; ��'I ert � �;"� _: _. � �•`��xP � , yL•y. f� '�� .i1 � t �� -.�.- � � �_� �.. ..� � �► s t3i .. +.�y�+�'.ry� �,.�, � -�._ .�_._ �►�� ,� ,,,� �� ' A s �i� rrr.....rr - -�.� � `"'� .:` '�µ� �-,:�� _A, ;.� '� � c = —� . r ' �� :�■ ,,, .��: ' � PROJECT LOCATION 1660 Westmoor Road City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1660 Westmoor Road Meeting Date: August 13, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an attached garage. Applicant and Architect: Sonia Jimenez, TOPVIEW Design Solutions Property Owner: Amauri Campos Melo General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 025-232-740 Lot Area: 5,414 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The subject property is a corner lot that has frontages on both Westmoor Road and Dufferin Avenue. For corner lots, the code defines the front of the property as the side with the shortest linear frontage (C.S. 25.08.435). For this property, the front of the lot is the frontage facing Dufferin Avenue even though the street address and front entrance of the house is on Westmoor Road. The existing one-story house with an attached garage contains 1,555 SF (0.29 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to remodel the first floor, expand the existing front covered porch, and add a new second story (1,157 SF). With the proposed project, the floor area will increase to the maximum allowed of 2,633 SF (0.49 FAR) which includes a 199 SF covered porch exemption. The number of potential bedrooms is increasing from two to four. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The remodeled attached garage provides two covered parking spaces (19'-5" wide x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) and 1 uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a)(2)). 1660 Westmoor Road Lot Area: 5,414 SF Plans date stamped: Julv 18, 2018 SETBACKS Front (1st flr): (2nd flr): Side (interiorJ: EXISTING 20'-3'/:° n/a 9'-5° 9'-4'/�' PROPOSED no change 23'-2'/z' __ 11'-4'/�" (to addition) 8'-2'/2" (to porch) Rear (1st flr): 21'-8" no change (2nd flr): n/a 24'-7" Item No. 8e Regular Action Item ALLOWED/ REQUIRED 15'-0" or block average _ 20'-0" 6'-0" 7'-6" __ _. _ 15'-0" 20'-0" Design Review SETBACKS Lot Coverage: _ _ _.. FAR: __ # of bedrooms: EXISTING 1,682 SF 31.1% 1,555 SF 0 29 FAR 2 2 covered Off-Street (19'-5" x 23'-2'/2" clear Parking: interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Building Height: DH Envelope: 18'-10" n/a '(0.32 x 5,414 SF) + 900 SF = 2,633 SF (0.49) FAR Staff Comments: None. 27'-9'/2' complies 1660 Westmoor Road ALLOWED/ REQUIRED 2,166 SF 40% __ __ 2,633 SF' 0.49 FAR 1 covered (10' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 30'-0" CS 25.26.075 Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on June 25, 2018, the Commission had several suggestions regarding this project and referred the application to a design review consultant (see attached June 25, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below were the Commission's comments and recommendations: • Windows o Overall arrangement needs to be revisited - look at the placement, size, and treatment of the windows; o Consider adding muntins or window grids to break up the size of the windows to add scale and detail; o Current proposed windows are large and apartment-like, heavy; o Double hung windows would look nice but may affect egress, maybe look at casement windows; ■ Rear elevation o No windows on the second floor, looks blank; o Break up massing on the tall gable with windows; o Consider another window in the open space where the laundry area is; ■ Right side elevation o Blank high forehead; o Add detail to the gable end such as a vent or another detail; ■ P/ate height— reduce 9 foot plate height on second floor to 8 feet; ■ Chimney— appears massive, consider separating, gas fireplaces does not need a chimney; PROPOSED 1,745 SF 32.2% _. _ ... 2,633 SF 0.49 FAR 4 2 covered (19'-5" x 20'-0" clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 2 Design Review 1660 Westmoor Road ■ Overall Design — most compelling design is front porch or garage door (Craftsman), everything else feels ranch style; no charm to building except porch. The applicant submitted revised plans date stamped July 18, 2018 to address the Planning Commission's comments. A discussion of the analysis of the revised project and recommendation by the design review consultant is provided in the next section. Analysis and Recommendation by Design Reviewer: The design review consultant went through a few rounds of review with the project designer and homeownerto address the Planning Commission's main concerns with the project. Please refer to the attached design reviewer's analysis and recommendation, dated July 18, 2018, for a detailed review of the project. The design reviewer notes that the revisions reflect the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and that they "provide a well massed and nicely detailed structure." Based on the design review analysis of the project, the design reviewer recommends approval ofthe project as proposed. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the proposed project (featuring hip and gable roofs, proportional plate heights, stucco siding) is compatible with the variety of styles that define the character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. l�lanning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution ofthe Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 18, 2018, sheets A-0 through A-11; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 3 Design Review 1660 Westmoor Road 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff wiil inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Sonia Jimenez, TOPVIEW Design Solutions, applicant and designer Amauri Campos Melo, property owner 4 Design Review Attachments: June 25, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Design Review Analysis, dated July 18, 2018 Letter from Neighbor, received June 25, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission ApplicanYs Letter of Explanation Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 3, 2018 Area Map 1660 Westmoor Road 5 �GITY '`� ' J I � r ��iu ,�o'�` —ga City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, June 25, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers a. 1660 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. (Sonia Jimenez, TOPVIEW Design Solutions, applicant and designer; Amauri Campos Melo, property owner) (52 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1660 Westmoor Rd - Staff Reoort 1660 Westmoor Rd - Attachments 1660 Westmoor Rd - Plans - 06.25.1 S All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. > What is threshold for requiring landscape plan? (Keylon: Required for new construction projects_ Projects just involving additions are requested to at least show landscaping on the site plan. Can request it from the applicant if submittal does not provide enough information.) Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Amauri Campos Melo represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Discuss with designer whether or not to have muntins/grids in the windows? (Melo: Was divided on whether or not to have them. Likes the cleaner look a bit better,. but would not be opposed to grids if the commission fee/s it would help with neighborhood compatibility.) Would add some nice scale and detail. Could just have dividing muntins along the top portion of the windows. > Massing is handled nicely. > Any consideration to adding a detail to the front gable7 Gable vent, or siding. (Melo: Can consider it.) > Needs windows with muntins on all sides since house is on a corner. > Could have a window on the rear e/evation second story, in the bedroom. It would make the elevation look better and would make the bedroom nicer to have two windows and improve ventilation. Also another window at the open area at the top of the stairs, would add some nice light to the space. > Front porch and garage door are craftsman style, but everything else is more pedestrian. S/ider windows are huge, not correct the proportion to the craftsman elements. Should rethink the placement, size, and treatment of fhe windows. > Massing is right, but the windows are wrong. Diminishes the charm of the building. (Melo: Can look at it so it is more consistent with the Craftsman style.) > Double-hung windows that s/ide up and down will look good and match the craftsman style, or casement windows if needed for egress. Could still have 6-feet openings, but could have three sashes including possibly a wider middle sash. > Chimney looks massive on the front elevation with combining (wo of them. Could be scaled down if they are gas-burning fireplaces, would not need to go all the way up. > Is the RV parked on this property? What is the p/an for that part of the site? (Melo: It is planned to be City of BuAingame page 1 Printed on 7/18/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 25, 2018 a back yard. RV will go into storage, and will close the fence.) > Would help with neighborhood compatibility if the plate height on the second floor was 8 feet instead of 9. (Melo: Should not be an issue.) > Per the neighbor's lefter, can there be netting during construction? (Melo: Yes, talked to contractor. Can put netting on the fence to increase it to 9 feet to avoid debris going over fence. There is a large setback now, so it is not too close to fhe fence.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Could be wrapped up quickly with the guidance of a design review consultant. > Items to be addressed would be the fenestration/windows (size, treatment, and location), the second f/oor plate height, fireplace details, gable treatment, and landscaping shown on the plan. Commissioner Loftis made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to refer the application to a design review consultant. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7- Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse City of Budingame page y Printed on 7/18/2018 � Design Review Comments City of Burlingame Property Owner: Applicant Name: Designer: Project Address: Plantier: Date of Review: Design Guidelines: Amauri Campos Melo Sonia Jimenez Sonia Jimenez 1660 Westmoor Road `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi 18 July 2018 l. COMPATABILITY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH THAT OF THE EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. This area was a later development in Burlingame and has a few of the remaining 1940's low slung, single family homes. Many of the residences have been remodeled into two-story over the years. T'he exterior finishes are predominantly cement plaster or horizontal wood siding with wood slider, double hung or casement windows. Most of the roofs are low pitched with asphalt shingles. 2. RESPECT FOR THE PARKING AND GARAGE PATTERNS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. The houses in this area all have attached garages, as the existing and proposed garage. 3. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND CONSISTENCY AND MASS AND BULK OF STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. The massing of the house works nicely. The proposed front porch is Craftsman. The designer has incorporated "Prairie" grids for the casement windows following along the lines of the Craftsman Style. Additional windows have been added where there were previously blank spaces on the elevations. Also, a gable end treatment has been added to the second floor gable ends. 4. INTERFACE OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WITH THE STRUCTURES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. Many of the adjacent homes in the neighborhood have added a second story. The home to the South of the said property, 1654 Westmoor Road, is one of the single story residences. Between the two properties, each of their backyards is about 22'-0" deep, keeping their distance apart of about 44'-0". There will be no impact of this remodel on the neighbor's residence. 1133 Dufferin Avenue, the neighbor to the East is a two-story residence. This residence has its second floor approximately 8'-0" from the property line. However, there are only three windows at the second floor, leaving little impact from the new remodel at 1660 Westmoor which is 13'-0+ from the properly line. �. LANDSCAPING AND ITS PROPORTION TO MASS AND BULK OF THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. There are two large Maple tree on the Dufferin Avenue side of the property which will remain. The owner is proposing a new non-fruit tree at the southwest corner of the property adding some foliage adjacent near the southern neighbor. 6. IN THE CASE OF AN ADDITION, COMPATABILITY WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS REMODELED. There are very few similarities between the existing residence and the proposed two-story remodel and addition. COMMENTS: The owner and designer have worked with the recommendations of the Planning Commission. The P.C. suggested using the Craftsman Style which was reflected in the proposed Front Porch. The front door, Garage door, end gable detail and window style all reflect this recommendation. Windows have been added to blank elevations and balance the elevations well. The chimney has been reduced in size, and only supports the Living Room. The second floor plate height has been reduced to 8'-0" as requested. I believe these changes provide a well massed and nicely detailed structure. �� Cather e J.M N' meyer �� l�, z � a I � �� 1 �-t� � -�- 13 � rl � ��.,�,L� � j ,, ,. _ � _ �' C�-r� ►� � �e v ,n�,.�- ��-C�UY l� � I� e r�-►-��i � � ,.� j �,�,�. zs, .z� � � �� '. �� h l � � l-�-e c��r'� �l c�1Z c� 5 i}� ; l�(� c� 1.�1 � �'�w� �- (�Ua c� ��i�� 4 5 2018 ��' OF F3�JRLINGAME CDD-FLA�NNIN DIV g� r l c�.c,a-r�.e �� J ' � �� -�'l� p c�-' r�' �/ � 1 3 3 D��-�,,—� �V� . d � �� r "� h� s a c,�,� r�,� �//�/7� �e.- t,�`��t-� ��''�'��/�%� J I ✓ / \ � • � V� � VJ YJU � � S � �' 1/ • � � (�- G�� J � �-w� u, r �v►� tiv�- r� � �c�Y'c�- S � �- ��1 i � �°�-e !�i � � �� u.� �t.� �-C.t,� d 5 `�'".� J � � �.�� .�� t� � c� t�� ,��5+�.� �� w� � �� 1� �t,�x -h� c�� , l� �.�- c.� ;-� ti t� �� t,`Yl C�v� vv— w rt,� �� 1..� � a�'� � �,�.�+'L (ii— �� C� c.�,n S'�1"u c�_, c�..�v� � s W �l.A.. h� `,j-��c,-�c� ln�-�Iz1 ►� �p `�� . �T4..e.,-�. �� u S r�.t.l,�f �Q�c�.� u� p �� c�,,._ �� u�r ��2-,� '�h� f.t�-►rv�- n�-u�- -�e�. c�. . .� �-c,..� re� �c,e�-� �-� �%�-�/L x12 c�-fL�� h, � C'�. �u-C �"1.c.� � .e c�� v�+� 5 S v— �� h.z ��z-,—� �,,�, hti �, r � a� c�,e,i- vr�-� � u—b-�2e� �t I 33 Q �� 4 � � � �� . � � 1 1^rn-� i.� �, l ��- `� � �' Li� �� a)c 3 Z��73 S Go r�. '�-r�,� s� v ('_.-� c i � 3 Z Ce �l �'-FI5 - 2� l- 2J�-1 ,• �- � CO:�f�IUAjICATlON RL'CEIYED AFTER PREPARATION OF ST�IFF REPORT :a�: ; au��l ��`s,� a � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANtdING COMMISSION Type of application: ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: I �' �'��' '�'��C�1� j'1'��jUl� 'jt� , APPLICANT ,�-, Name: �p"n►c�- t-wi�-vt�,>,y � Address: �-f%v r�. D i;-t� Ive �f� ,�� ; f�c.� C.. �Z.1 PROPERTY OWNER Name: � M�1 t.'�'.1 ��-y� v5 I-/�c i� Address: �(�(o �;- l,C,�c St f�'l,O�,ti,^ �,,� City/State/Zip: lu pu r,; 7 p; K: ;,, , r� �{ G�0 Cit /State/Zi ' � �.�, �v - ia t�1 � c' ;,, � �� Y P � � �, , �_� C4 � �1 / P h o ne : C� �5 L -- � .3 ', - °'�- ?, '_,- i Phone: � �=� '� � � - � �l � E-mail: � ., y�w, cL � i:.� � �� ✓,�.��rir � e �'r,.( ��;E-mail: ��r✓I•a-v.� �.�,.� �s �� c� ,+�r.� � � . �-,�� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �c:��n1� ��i�,c�� v Address: �} l0 �- L71�t� w:1 �1910 �a ��. �_� City/State/Zip: _LM,Ov a� TA � �u v � �W C� �'i� � ��C' Phone: _ �S �..� - �i 3 t - �3 � �o . , E-maiL ��, �,-.��:%�-o,nU �w �� S � � �, . 'r-� Burlingame Business License #: ;3 `-�.- �. S�i a��.a�$ 1�� FFB222019 �'iY �,F EURiiNGAME ;,�, _,`:.n!n1fNr �,�� Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post pians submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. S"� (Initials of ArchitecUDesigner) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: '"��+ .,,,, �-� �� -�, � �, � i „� v p� � �; � �} �� ► r C E- � Ii7G -" � � . i W��J , �� ,�T i�C �'-.'.ilr�a��f' � 'tin�`ilJi( G_ iGIS� 1�.0 /N-.vr ln �n`.i -��i � �f' c AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I h�reby best of my knowl�dg2 and belief. ApplicanYs signature:_�' fy under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the l�PfhP I am a�,vare of th2 proposed application end�/ 1 a Commission. /'i Property owner's signature: Date: � -- j Date submitted: C?�— �� - � � Date: �� _ �� _. � c� the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning 5: � NANDOUTS� PC A pnCco: i or,. doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: ° J > -m � r� � ,(I. �[: � G� C,i� �v. [# i � �G � ; ii �� ' 1 1 �wC'_ �u :� :i. �_ c? S �" �JC�:'e ✓' c'�' � � I n r -� �/! � C; C� �n l tJ� i.� �, �+ �'t.i; h ('i;c� � JC.�-�t s .. �3 c ; � , : . � `f 47 �� 4 � ; r�r �"a ` 1� � c� ��ui� �t C,'i 1/ `� �� C+ SCl �, ��yi C, L� v� � UCs-vi SG�.C� • Key: Abbreviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declining Height Envelo DSR Design Review E Existin N New SFD Single Family Dwelling SP Special Permit February 23rd,2018 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Residential Design Review Application for : Residence 1660 Westmoor Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 Year built : 1942 APN : 025-232-740 Zonning : R-1 Single family home To whom it may concern: I, Sonia Jimenez (applicant) and Amauri Campos (owner) of residence at 1660 Westmoor Rd. submit a set of drawings including Sheets A-0 to A-7 for Residential Design Review. The scope of work for this project includes the following: 1. Remodel of all interior existing first floor and remove all existing roof and roof structure to be prepared for a new second floor. 2. Remove 70 SQFT portion of garage. 3. Remove existing porch and add a new 200 SQFT porch. 4. Add a new porch at the left side of the house. 5. The new second floor will enclose a new master bedroom and bathroom, a guest bathroom, two guest bedrooms and a laundry closet. This new floor will add 1,186 SQFT to the existing house and the total will be 2,660 SQFT. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, /��J ... .......... .. ... .(..pp .. ) Sonia Ji ez a licant Topview Design Solutions Burlingame Business License #32259 ....�... . . ��\I'ED ........ .... .... Amaur Campos (ow r) FEB 2 2 20i8 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLARNlNG C!`J. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a second story addition to an existinq one-story house at 1660 Westmoor Road. zoned R-1 Amauri Campos Melo and Greicy Micucci Melo, propertv owners APN: 025-232-740; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on AUqUst 13, 2018, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13�h dav of Auqust 2018 by the following vote Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1660 Westmoor Road Effective August 23, 2018 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 18, 2018, sheets A-0 through A-11; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1660 Westmoor Road Effective August 23, 2018 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. � CITY OF BURLINGAME r�,'� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � ' � — BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �'� PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1660 WESTMOOR ROAD The City o( Burlingome Planning Commission announces the following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Cham6ers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling at 1660 WESTMOOR ROAD zoned R-1. APN 0T5-232-740 Mailed: August 3, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Deve�opment Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer fo other sideJ 1660 WESTMOOR ROA� 300' noticing 025.232.740 i i`,i' . y� K.�� .m� i.. ea � t� qy736 � v \ i> p '�v^` ��f�a� , ^�� Z \ i 5 \ as� ' ``� ' . a� � ' � . �A �� w� ^ e aM � vy ro,� ..., " . I� �'' � �� j � `.ep v'o ; ' � .� G�"ic=, � n�, �'4 � �� %.. -.a � '4 °�y � C nQ Qn��l � .. . ' vr nYvf ,� ,,. �� ''F i � /,, " °,y , ''�, ., � .7J � ,�� .. ' `'"• '�ey . � ,� - �O ��y y `� '�� c> �H,y rC *, UD� Dp � ��• Q � 4� U" D ��v w'v " �4�' QC� �G� �� D D �r� o� �,�'� p 4� �`? ��a u �a�,� � p� � U� �d� G� � �O � 4 F)�j/ 'ac` c�;� c�•�" .'�; W<> pq 9�, p� 64 � Gi '1 � ac� w A� a4 �r c,� �w � `� � p�� • v' ` ,a� �� ' G�' a('+` �,n �. ' � c�� `�c.� U3� c•p G,'� �i'��` G� `'' q�j r0 � w `p �� 6 n? � `� m ;a c� e u o� c,ye' qb Ct� .. tp, �� G¢ �a G . '� 'a � . � _ .-. ;l , `� O �� '-� � . , ._ ..> n� .. 'a� �� ,. F+�` _l7 . - i � a ��E;� vE��s4f�.i £&�F39'Vp@��fip �i 9�7�� 9 7E3�3 7� t;,