The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1561 Westmoor Road - Staff ReportItem No. Regular Acti n ' •� _ ': 5,. .=� -c � . , _ } '�,•, � � ��„ A �„ ` �� > _ � - � � ��t .. - _ � �x � . + � r � � �,.: � � . '� il I- ¢"`'^'�. `e� ' �� Y' � , �6 '- '�",y�... �T_ y� ta y'.,. r ,�-. "�.�i g„c �-�' �.. �: � � � '�.R M' �Y � T � �• QN �� •t. ,A �� _ � � . • ; � � � y .' -.�' � • ��}+' {$€,x � � �'. _ -. h '3' 3'r s,�",� ` d 7 � �J � . � �i '� s� �� s*�q v� i � '£ � " ' - 'v *<a i-.' �«� � O � _. �� ;�-�-,� ,, �� : � �� : � � � , � , n ,� . _ — �� , - �3, � , a�. _ .. _. �� :f -- -- — � � - - � - - �- � ,� �_ ri� � � —� � - �, - � �� ; i . �Y, ; ..... � �t iIG._ �... _..� �� +.-F�� . _ _ Y Y'� � , - 'i`-' .,u..+.v_.�+G.sa �.�..: � _ _ 5 _- � PROJECT LOCATION 1561 Westmoor Road City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1561 Westmoor Road Item No. Regular Acti n Meeting Date: April 11, 2011 Request: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Mark Robertson APN: 025-243-020 Property Owners: Barry Chen and Fay Du Lot Area: 5,250 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Summary: The existing single-story house with an attached garage contains 1,454 SF (0.28 FAR) of floor area and has two (2) potential bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add 247 SF at the front of the house on the first floor, and to build a new 755 SF second story. With the proposed addition, the floor area will increase to 2,313 SF (0.44 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR). The proposed project is 467 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from two (2) to four (4). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached, non-conforming, one-car garage (9'-0" x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions) will be reconfigured to accommodate a code compliant covered parking space (10' x 20' clear interior dimensions). One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition (CS 25.57.010). 1561 Wesfmoor Road Lot Area: 5,250 SF Plans Date Stam ed: March 29, 2011 ORIGINAL REVISED EXISTING 02/11/11 03/29/11 ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS ! __..._ , _.. : _ __ __ : .__.. -_ _ _ .... Front (1st f/r): ; 20'-4" 21'-4" 19'-6" (block average) 2nd f/r no change ( ): ; none 34'-1" 20'-0" _... _ . _. _ ;.._ _ :__ _ ..._.. ;.. _ . ._...._ Side (righf): 4'-6" 4'-3" (to 2"d story) 4'-0" no change (/eft): 4'-6" no change 4'-0" . _ . __ _ .... ___ _ _ Rear (1st f/r) ; 29'-6" (to awning) 40'-2" 15 -0" no change (2nd flr): none 40'-2" 20'-0" __ _..... _.... : _ _. ;... __.. .... _. _ . . ...... . _ _. Lot Coverage: 1,565.7 SF 1,637 SF 1,667 SF 2,100 SF 30% ' 31% 32% 40% _ _ ...... ___. _ ;__. _. ;__ _ ......_.. FAR: 1,453.9 SF 2,313 SF 2,780 SF no change � 0.28 FAR 0.44 FAR 0.53 FAR __ _ . _ . _ _ # of bedrooms: 2 4 no change --- Design Review 1561 Westmoor Road ORIGINAL REVISED EXISTING 02/11/11 03/29/11 ALLOWED/REQ'D Parking: ; 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (9' x 19'-6") 2 (10' x 20') (10' x 20') no change 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20'-0") (9' x 20'-0") (9' x 20') _. __ ;... __ _._.__. ;.... _ _ _........ _..._ Height: : 18'-4" 26'-1" no change 30'-0" . _ :..._ _ >. _.. . __ ___.._ __ __ DH Envelope : n�a Dormer exemption no change CS 25.28.075 I along the right side ' (0.32 x 5,250 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR) 2 Parking Variance for covered parking space length and width (9'-0" x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions, existing and proposed, where 10' x 20' is the minimum requirement) (CS 25.70.020 b), no longer required with revised proposal. Staff Comments: See attached comments from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on March 14, 2011, the Commission had several questions and comments regarding the proposed windows, the Variance request and the design of the front entry and voted to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed (March 14, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter with attachments and revised plans on March 29, 2011, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. The revised plans include reconfiguration of the existing attached garage so that a Parking Variance is no longer required. The response letter from the applicant identifies all changes made to the plans. Please refer to the copy of the March 14, 2011, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural sryle with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 29, 2011, sheets 1 through 7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which Pa Design Review 1561 Westmoor Road would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 22, 2011 and January 11, 2011 memos, the City Engineer's January 13, 2011 memo, the Parks Supervisor's January 12, 2011 memo, the Fire Marshal's January 10, 2011 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's January 11, 2011 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Mark Robertson, 918 E. Grant Place, San Mateo, CA 94402, designer. 3 Design Review Attachments: 1561 Westmoor Road ApplicanYs Response to Commission's comments and attachments, date stamped March 29, 2011 Mdnutes from the March 14, 2011, Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Variance Application (no longer required) Photographs of streetscape, date stamped January 7, 2011 Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed April 1, 2011 Aerial Photo L� MARK ROBERTSON DESIGN o 3/29/2011 ATTN: CITY OF BURLINGAME — PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT: 1� & �"D STORY A9DtTION CHEN — DU RESIDENCE 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 RE: RESPONSES TO COMMISSION COMMENTS @ March 14`h HEARING DEAR COMMISSION MEMBERS: We would like to respond to the Commissions comments and explain our revised drawings dated 3/15/2011 resubmitted for your review. Window clarification: The Exterior Finish Schedule found on Pg. # 6 has been revised removing the reference to window grids. The project does not include window grids and was correct as drawn. Color Scheme: The clients have been informed that the Blue / Turquoise accent colors on the existing house have got to go. We will stick to a traditional, earth tone color pallet for the project. Eliminate Garage Variance: We relocated the Laundry Area to the back wall of the Garage (its original location — all the plumbing is already there) and remove the existing corner of the new proposed Pantry area to provide a standard 20'X10' parking space. IYs a no-brainer, will not cost much to do, and we are happy to oblige. Change Wrought-iron Railings To Wood: 1 was trying everything I could to keep costs down, as the budget for this job is tight. I am happy to revise the plans to wood, as I feel it will look better as well ! The "golden handcuffs" (budget) often get a little tight these days ! Soften`Entry — Looks Too Abrupt: The original design was budget driven — and didn't look that bad, all things considered. However your point was well taken and we have revised the plans accordingly. We lost a month on our construction schedule with this change, and the house is sitting vacant. I was informed that we need to �I�t�n', �� ?v1AR 2 9 2011 CITY OF BURLINGAMc 918 E. GRANT PLACE, SAN MATEO, CALIF. 94402 U.S.A • TEL: (650) 571-1125 • FAX: (650) 57b;{3[ib�L-�-� ,$�—. additional $4500.00 off available construction funds to cover the extra months mortgage. I mention this only to explain the limited nature of our revision. I need to keep the project affordable. Attached to the back of this letter are four variations of the Entry that we considered Option A— was preferred for budget, but I didn't feel it was enough of a change. Option B— looks too "Foster Cit�' and was a budget killer. Option C— looks fine but a little too plain / stark. Option D— looks much better, but the owners don't like the window arrangement and balk at the window in the Master Closet We decided on using Option D for the Entry Porch in combination with the window treatment shown in Option C for the Master Bedroom. Quite an improvement to the original design. I'm (almost) glad we made them ;). Thank you for your kind consideration, Sincerely, �� " �' Mark Robertson. � RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2011 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PL�NNIt�dG DiV. � • nl1DW. BUiu7iNF E��1�ELOPE ----�— ---- -- — — — — - -- - - _ — � ,� � — — — — R+l SPn.rvc AaxE9TdR il`y I (fIICEDPIt SHiNC,� 91DiNG I ��i _ � - _ �C� RCCcNT'S �77P.) I � (iiiliPE.'I � ClA$5'4 (Hi� GQ4P, JNIp16�Lf, R70FIrlC _. �2 (Tr�) � �D : I �j� ._ ' 1 . -- � � i -� - -- �- - -:- -- ---- -- --- - --- --- .-_. � � c ' I I - �. . '. . _-._ � ,� _ � _ . _ ln�3JEND VEcIY1_i __} . „ 2 3 �<'v � � 'i - --i � - ---- c�z. 111T.P �1�• P ,�� - - _ - ._- � n�n R�. wp: 2r6<irT�- �' �. na> �Ni, mE, ��mEk � .I -- -- - `� _� - -- -�--� �--� ----� � . . . _.., .. _ 7 NIti7CN Ei�YP•; � � _ _ �nl C� � o � <Nl ��1 �� wn�� 5 ruFw �OFr. , ; \ , �5°/ �r000w � -_: . � o — -- � � � � � �q� � ° � -- _ (rt� �, WD. �� , � � \ n>. - - \ w `� ^ �� - __� - SHuirERS � i �. , - - _ � I , . ' / - NIRD WO WIN, _____ __� � �' _ _ \I I' _ -- ' u0X - '_ ... .... - - s i / 1_. i � — , � - �n;RD.WD.6x � - - �l . - -- - .. : - - - ---- - _ __ - - -� MFF lF — --_-- — � � _ '`=' M« 17,P `� _ _ _ _ �_ —' - - �:r - ?ARD.vID.�r6 - �M�7 FT, &UREl6 � � 15M. MET. �.• G�u�' ro MA H �C��rv.,l . �I _ �y - - 2=6' ��. F S C�VP) �_r ` _ � _:. � _ — �- c—�a-� '�, . � , ._. ' � � , : ( D 7Y P.� I � ' � o - - . � _ r 11,P. . - r ixo w x6 ` ` C�..; �� — � . — -- -- � r!1 , w `++u�1Eu5 C I N � I �NI � � � j � . 1 � '.1� 4 ��i 2-6 II ^ iI I "-O l_� Ten - :�, I� ---- � (�1WRAU61fi? --- - �..JiJ1W�.W .NiNOih BDX c�a. ` � _ ' �CEI RD. r1D. �it uP .. , � ' °a I �� -- - - — CE1 _ Fr+�� ' � . w�) o�cN. . �_- . � nnko.r� cazae�. �n)�i I F�. - , , ,.. - - _ ,v. �� „—_— --_ � _ �--- !MsruxoC-7P�--�- _ - -�0 22 5 - . -- , Y �. 5- � �' N � I , 9, �- —_ : - --- -- -- _`_-- .. _ _:� - 21 07� -GRnti C? � Ci -" ` � (n D,g• i CN��S- �-1 5, rrT �5. n n,5. , -< � Q �,�vG -r. C, r��. = i� 43� z c �" .a z� � .� � Ex�s�"fN� �� < T�.E S v� -- �'j, ��_�� <m � ��w BUiu�iNC. ENVELOPE - � ----- --- ----� �— — — — — — — — R+l sPnwc AartE�fnR � � i� I (MCEDHR SHiNG� 91D�N1'a I -f lal �cc�vrs (rrP) I � � (I�TIPE'I,CtaSS-BCni� CAMP.SMINFi.E R�X)Fl� 12 .I (Tyr�) I -� I �� ` _ .I -- 1 �-- -�r, -- _ _ - _ T' g � n �S- I — -'- r - � '.}-`' - =- 2�•3 �N � - cu�. _ - r'11. -- _ _ - - -- — .. �N1 aD, wp: 2r6Cirr. . . - , � ;, ----- --- v�,:s `.. h� 3KI 14�, C,imHt � 70 MATCH (�� . -- - _ ��_ (I'ji � �� i N) -wn�L 1F�5 �-µPN IOFT. i �ll / - - - � lN/ �J°� l-lINOOW. `c \i _.. . , ' .. = . (M RD, WD. �� i � A5. �.' . - \ � � , -- - _---.-_ � n / .. .-,. SliU1TER5 . � _ ----- �. � / - _ - as. <• ^.--- / --- � I _ _ __ rnlRD, wo. uw, .. _ - - - - _ � . _ :.- 30x -..�Y, _.,. -..r-,•. - - -� �n�RD,WD.6x < - - _ � � j- i ;�n � — — -_ -- - -- - - - ,� _ _ t -I I � I '�� ,L - - —' �- n��E , I _— — — ^ —`- ` --- � ' �Ma�.Hn.2f� -- _ ��1v� r-�. iEr, ^ �� t �SHf,MET. �� : ' = Tryr — - - ro Ma N Cr�e • ��, fi RS Lf`/P�� N' � ...j -i , -- �, � ,.� _. _ � .. c�t" ° , _ �/ 'Y6' n ' � '. Z /lil . WD, SIWIIFRS ( i P.) \ ,� i , , �o ,N I — ___—i .� � � , Z� . �� . i s 1Y , � O' CIR, ' .___ ' - - . . , ��W��, � ��' �CE1 Ro, HD, P�LL-ua , C� } 4' -� iR7r+ E�yP�PA -- -- - rJ�w�. HiNorn �X wL(r+)ToMNCN:-. � _ . . . . MR�.rtb, C�r�ElS J� FF. ,� , . � '- -' - . i _ Cn)A - _ _ _ �-- (rt� srucca CrIP�--Y _ � ao E� V � � e ,. � — - — -- �_��---- =y2j a7� E _a 2Z•. . . , n i%� cr� ��5. p O D ,.C. E1E�. = 19�(F3� r � � Z C � �? Z � c0 ,,, O g � �ye.�. � m � �� N —�nt�W. Bv�u�iNF EN�E.�.o�E — — — — - — — — — —I � — — — — (dt 54nRlC Aarr£7rbR i� �n I RTICEDPfi SN�NWTc 9tDirvG I �_ _ (F1� � FCC�f(5 �T'YP.) I I =� (flJ?YFi-I � CIASS-8 CW GOMP. SHIPJRLE ROOFING� �7i2 /� (ryr� I�/ � _'.1 . ._ . - 'Ay� • M � ` ^ •�_ —� � — _ . — ._ 5 _ � i � � _ ' r �` ----- � � T 2'-3 ��v I — L m � - � cu�, . -._. r - - ,� - _ -- � 'N V2D wG� 2 �, �r/P � . ' ,t �1 ��s>, - -- (/� 31►7 f�lEr I',un�t ' — T RTCH / '�p ( 15Hf MET. � �ti � s ctvp)— � �� cut, F�. �; Jti � � � C' ) � v � � � c, E,.ev. _ �•4 �O � Z C t.� �p Z � � �� D �'' � �m V � 0 ..,__ —�— I //'��, �—=A ��.a ��II� , '.�" ��Y�i�� . � �, � 'I , �� —..� . �..,.,�.�. -' �::ia �a �r� �t�,m - r -:y:i'i�� i��lS�INL�3 � i�^. _ ----;� -'' �,��eaas�e �w,��Mwr� ��,;�i� ... ::� _� :� - � ,-..�� '� � �� i� x�� dir Pl� _i �''� �� !'=1 �taY^,� '..�c��Mli#Y� �S ..i _._ � .. xa'�'iilt��/tlllli�■il �r1�1! �, �� _ �_ 1 ..�, �''� �z7�1qN!lB�O��M�Ir�11�/il , ■ — •--7— � r��, , '" a'� T aLjB� � -- •�• --- � M � . o /�,."� •` : ��,'` �� `°'+ ,.a..' �:'r:.. �'x' p�t.. IF!� '� i �1� • ._1--- � - — � � .�:�ii�►"w': �---,:�s �.r:�v �,.�'` _�1� � ^ �� i = III .�I�� i � .. ��1�� ,. C�� c� Ro, wn, w�-uP � � _-. 1 . ____. .__.,_ fJN—.--(ttIIN�M '�°.%��T�M R�. HD'� E-- (M STIXJGO �7'lp�'---> . ' . �; ri ��`� EtEV � 22,° 0 c n � � � l5 O � ? m O J L Qi � X � F Q OI,F '�� T ZC Z �7 Z Z �� D �m FV6, S.Y, _ = zl • 3 S' �E1T•1�5. . � AVG � D � � A r,-N-� � � � � 0 � — — — — I I _ � _ COMP, }HiPiRf,i RQyFit�in /�LLDW. BUII1�iIn1G E1�1�/ELOPE — — — —� — — ,---, ,.n ._— — �— — — — --� � � ��uDW. BUiu�ING EN�ELOi�E — — — — --- - — — — — — — — —� � — — — — • R1l SRuzK ARrtE3fbR �� II (NICEDPR SNirl6as 9lDiNG, I - 4- - (�1 AccExr �rrp) I I i2 �(ti1TYi'E�I,CU�SS'BCw. GoraP.SHINc,� R90F1NG /Tyr, i � I 5� '- 1 1� --� - N I - :, ` - _ - -- — --- — " � � r 2�'3 `N _ � - - �P � . _ _ cu�. 1�7 _ - '. _ . - H �� v�, i., y r�r. . . e- . .< (rn 51If fn�, G�mtR I " : i _ _ — _ ' — i � . . . TO MA7CH CE� MR� c�-_. � - \� � {N) � wA�t t.E]S n�PN iOFi . � = � — � � c / — _ -�.z_ . ` � � � �: . � o� �� p ......�-- - o N�oW `` . 1 � �� . � , � � -_-_.....�..�... �.. - , ,. ,� ... , _� . _ � ��. /�' ` \ f� / .. � _ --^t-�..-�_. � . i� -. . r . � , —. . - , � �, - .�-s.rz-.; -.;.T .. �.�--- — �� - - _ -�. . �, . , .�..- : . c / �.'"��' : � � . . - " � -"''" � — '_ � _ _' _.�_._.__.,.� ; . � �, ' r --1 _ - - - -- -- — —,_ �.w � � %:. .�. ` . :-. . � ..� . �� .. - � ..-,� \� i Z_ � `� 1F F - = -- � � - = `�` , 1 = ':� , _ y � - - , _ f I .i , . �-. "' � � � �TP, - - _ ._..�-"��' �'��- , , QARD.v�c.'�x6 \ cNi�1p�r�I Ef, ��y ( 5. MET 2{ ".. . �n Ma N LriP, `� S Cf1'P� -"r �.�aT s ��;��r .' , � � .. :I . . � 2� 6 .. � � , -r r I �`A ' � � .. � � i' IY _ Gt,0.. �jT,P. , - _ ��'-� ,�" • '�, `� `' ti� a . 2 > i lrA � WD. ��5 (TY P.) — _N I ty�:T' ` ?itt ; n � _ � r � �ab � � , � � .��' ��'° , z�� r.� , x„ . - o �`, �� ,� � ., �. _ . .�.� , � (�iHf87U6ff�?. � .. _ MRD, NiNWM BbX �o '�� C�RD.WD�RDl1'uP (E'� f..� 6F�N�y(�(ppq r .,... . � ' .'t "�I.CN)TOMiPC .; _ . . —_ _. ; -. ,. � . : ... ., • � �� MRG.RlD', � C�ELS � � �.- �"�li� ,Y� F', _ ' -e-- (M STtK.Co C7YP�—�- v, E Ev, � � �, , . . :.. 5__ ,. _ i� . � . i . ' . �I.O%i N ' . ZZ' _ , , ,. _, :. :: , . . -- --- --- --- �_ r,eu � , � . �. _ � trT S.� - � �� ,v�. _; r-lc�. = iq•43, o� � �� °� � �� z c � �" i' z � era Z Z N �`. � % � O �., O D _. �'}°� <� 1 �Y m � CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minutes March 14, 2011 5. 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; BARRY CHEN AND FAY DU, PROPERTY OWNERSI STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated March 14, 2011, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Vice-Chair Yie opened the public comment period. Questions of staff: ■ None. Mark Robertson, 918 East Grant Place; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Requested clarification regarding window design that is to be provided. (Robertson — the windows are as drawn, and by the manufacturer identified.) ■ Will the exterior color scheme be changed? (Robertson — yes.) ■ Feels like the side elevation is somewhat abrupt, doesn't integrate into the house. Would like to see if this could be addressed. • Perhaps pull a gable toward the front entry to better integrate the design; could create an entry element due to the presence of the courtyard. ■ Was there any thought to changing the wrought-iron to wood? (Robertson — were initially planning to match the existing, but willing to consider such a change.) ■ The existing entry design is a void in the mass of the building; look at a better integration of this feature. ■ Consider reducing the variance requests. ■ There is potentially another location for the laundry room other than in the garage. ■ Identify the stair material. (Robertson — will be concrete covered with tile.) ■ Doesn't think that the wrought-iron railing compliments the design. Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Cauchi made a mofion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom. Discussion of mofion: ■ Trusts the applicant to attempt to eliminate the variances and look at design solutions suggested. 8 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes March 14, 2011 Vice-Chair Yie called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the RegularAction Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:20 p. m. Commissioner Vistica indicated that he would recuse himself from participating rn the discussion regarding Item 6(307 Channing Road) since he has a business relationship with fhe project designer. He left the City Council Chambers. 9 rg':�;�`\ �� COMMUNiTY DEVELOPNIENT DEPARTMEhiT • 501 PRirvtRose Roa� • BURLItJGA�E, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650:696.3790 • www.burlingame.org ��"��4,r� 1 Io1V �� LBj►�I�il7tlV l.do��lJ�i�l� Type of application: � Design Review � Variance ❑ Parcel #: O2 5-' ��- 3`� ZC "❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: I 5�p I WL� I I�G�� RO%� � 1`�' O Please indicate the contaci person for this project APPLiCANT project contact person OK to send electronic copies of documents Name: M�RfL t�IJCR-1�Si�I� Address: �� a�i�l�1� ��— • City/State/Zip: S(�N l��7� t C� ��flF-CG � Phone: �C�SO� �J71 ` ( (Z5 Phone: ��5> 2G1 -- 25 2 (o Fax: �C-�5U> �j)I -' ��%� Fax: C�SO� C�SZ —�1�2.5 E-mail: 1v1 l��v� M r�Jt3F..,RTSON f�? �j �'�IK11L � COM E-mail: aRCHITECT/DESfGNER project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: B�RY CNEIV �� J{ly �l,' Address: lSC ( V1�cSl1`�9C�Q(�.. �D � City/State/Zip: �tIrZUNInAl1'lE Glq • `i�-C�10 � �11 _�- � Burlingame Business License #: 2 �� S� P'RO.fECT DESCRIPTION: �I(� S,i=, IS-X 1'ZR, , 1�MILY KODM /�lii(�l ((�JI�J C�`' 1"R�N% UI— N��C /�N� N�i�l 75�. 5,,=, 2^=� Srorz.y r��,r�oN �'/ ��1 ��i��rn�.�21 �iHS W/ iff� PL�n171NC�i Qi- i3� �`IcVJ �7REC5 �/w»voR 11�NI�SC�PIN� 1��1r'�Rol'�1�'iviS. AFFADAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to th2 besi of my knowledge and belief. �ppiicant's signature: ��/�7�'��p `, uate: j �� , � i Ci7i-�'dvai� vi iilc j�ivaCSc�i a�j�iiCoilOii 8iiu ilcic.�'iy ouiiiviiZc �ilc a�OVE aNN�{CBflt i^v SGv^lli i�ilS 2'a��IC8il0�1 i0 �h2 ?�2r^!!l^y Commission. Frnperty owner's signat�are: �__�1--�_ - _ _ [3a�e: / ��/� �� ' Date submiited: �= " �`Jmrification that ihe project a�chitectlde�r has a valid Burfingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time app(ication fees are paid. ❑?I�ase mark one boz above with an X to ondicate the contact person for this project. s:'�HawoourslPcaA��;corron zooe.narrdoucdoc This Space for CD�} ata#f lJse Or�y � Project Description: 6s� �(�J�;�c� _�c�� 2�'1� �� C c�L',+t.l� n n,:;V C's��. ��'�r��a�Ee�€�r � �err� i.�.��F I�CII�ILIOliC71 UJG� I�G�IIIIL Gr� Deciinina i-ieighi Envefo�ie DSR Design Review E Existing �,I New SFD Single Family Dwelling SP Special Perrnit GIT 1.�J � ■ +;„ -- �,.e..,. U � `� "' �, CITY OF BURLINGAME '�' VARIANCE APPLICATION t=GtZ CE; �IJBSTAr�1L�Y-�RD C�t�►�CC � � i Z�ll The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. � Ex15 i IN�, G►�RAG� �F I�GUSE IS SUL��Ti�(i�r9,R,D �� rT � l�i 2 l7 CiEA2. t'ROPOS�.1] 2N, I�L.R ,�DDI 71Gh1 O� (2> PScDRQ�MS �QUi RES (I� 5ib, C�, 5t'C�L'E . IiOi�Sc 15 1a-�-�� INSL-T Ft2�l�l 51pE f%L. � SO �,(i�'.AE� GANN� �. W�D�NcD TD COD E. 'THUS W��. L'x�x�D il�l �. Stl�,S7� N�p,�21� C Iq 2A C E UA�t.I K1NC� ! �i �UR �l�i'L`/ �Jir-1�iLC C7PT1G�( b. Explain why the variance requestis necessaryfor the preservafion and enjoyment ofa substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. (E� `�Ui35T�'r(v�Kl� C,Y�a�C� IS I"PiCr�L r=o� NEi�rf�ow;flo� . oiNcrt I�OUSES F4t�V� �fyD Zj%D 510Ky �bDI710NS r'�t�PRUI,�� 7/ft�T f�� Ir��2 , vV� P.cQU�� ?Nc 519rnE A�c�lRNc:� � c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welrare or convenience. (E> CfiN�ITIOtv IS ICi ��.EMpllv� . ivC IMfAC7� ro '�✓iGiN�ry i��. NO Ci-�ArvC-�C 7o bR�UC��HY �/��RDAcH r�r=bsc,b. �. Haw will the pre�osed project be compatible !�%t.h #he aest.heti�s, ►raass, bullr and �haracter of the existing and �otential e�ses on adjoining propertie� in the general viciniiv % (�.> CG'N i�► ?IOIv' MA55 / �ULK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org ro R�� N, NO i�� cT 7o V� G� N� 7y ��PG�� . f4Nb t�AuaavC� IMt�RoL<�D L�Y ��5� i�ESi�I�( : HandoutslVariance Application.2008 a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. Do any conditions exist on the site which make other alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area? For example, is there a creek cutting through the property, an exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existing structures? How is this property different from others in the neighborhood? b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception? (i.e., having as much on-site parking or bedrooms?) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the exception? Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the property? c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocafion will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving, landscaping sunlighUshade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare? Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection? Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installed? Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal). General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit? Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped? d. How will the proposed project be compafible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and characfer of the existing and potenfial uses on adjoining properties in the general �:�:,�:ry. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it fits. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone estab!ished by size, density of development and general p2ttern of land use. W ill there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity? Compare your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. Handouts\Variance Application2008 �^x - - i= �"�� A� . � p�' f.. ;i k�i� rs + , . � i�l�''r�� I �� '.� f-aylF19 1 � ��Sl:l� � � 1in'r �` ., ��4�'_ _� � �, ��-� _ - "�P _ '_ .. ,•-t,�. .: _ —� ..- . � � � '� � �� - �"� � � —�.,,�_ �`�`*� � : -.:., b� .. �: ;� : �,� � _ �5 _ a �'° I" .� I�' � - � L: J 1 _ �-- - _ _� ��:V � `-F`="� i � ��,,,��.--� . . _. �� 3 1� � 1+ I II � � �� a �� .�- _- ... � E� � x.� k _ ��a� ` r� .. 'M�eMY.:. " I�I: �� _JI. { I !� y3 ' '�1N ,m � f�""'�� i� �,-, _.V . . , _... � 1 � 5 :� � � 5�7 � � � � �..�r � � � W `� N A ,� N o� M~�I Q � � � � o � ��z �W � �, V � � C4 [� '`' � � � � � � � � F � ~ O � � U I�-� �z', � � aa o i � � � . � .: � .� �r � f�+ --- "� � � � � _ _-, _ � �r � - w� ``' � IW� 1 p r - 3� • „s*� �_ :�, 15�! ; L �: � �� - _ -, �.;` � - ' �- . r�¢i _ . _� � 3 �t �� r �: �l ��j�i��- S��^9iAP,°. 1�` 9� K'o ^S� S�Wow . �.M i ; '` � a Q �r� � ,_ " I� � � - _� StJ B S EG`�" 1�0U SE � �y lt �. � � M � !� � �'s „ . PR41 EG"f' R�F. N4R7H , : $ ��- �� - . ;' ��. � , � _ � _ = � " � � J` ��' �- - �,-�� Cc��'�( �� ,:; », �Y�� "9R��' +C: �- _:_ . � ,�,.z - --.-..-�- - ___� - �n � � nA r F a.v��[u � _ � Project Comments Date: To: January 10, 2011 o( City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 1/13/2011 Date Revised Plans Submitted February 11, 2011 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 1-11-2011 will apply to this project. 2-22-2011 �J Date: To: From January 10, 2011 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Pianning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Codes (CBC) including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) With your re-submittal provide documentation (GreenPoints checklist, LEED checklist, or other) , as described below, which shows that this project will comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance. Note: Compliance with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance is required unless specific land use provisions for the project are approved by the Planning Commission prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. �/ ee City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated in these plans prior to performing this work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 9) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. 10)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 11)Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin, until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. �Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed ,property lines C�'On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the �property line. �4�Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table �02) 15)F�boms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. 16)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 18)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 19)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 2010 CBC §2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 5, 12, 13, 14, and 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: �'� -Date: 1-11-2011 �' � -- — I Project Comments Date: To: From January 10, 2011 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 X Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1. Landscape plan looks ok — No further comments Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 1/12/11 t._.. ....__.� ._ ,... .. , _,.-, a., . _ . ..._. ...� _.- � Project Comments Date: To: From January 10, 2011 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 x❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �/✓Z `%�il:l�"' Date: /o��f� Project Comments Date: To: From January 10, 2011 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 X NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as appropriate) for readability. For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. Reviewed by: ��C.� �1-�--�, Date: �/ �j� �/ i�j; s��. � Pi�II�i4nnP�c�mtiwPvgam ryf� T a� ,,,� �j - � .�,y y` _� �`-�_� General ''Y' � Constrnction & Site Supervision :� .� �.d:.,ti � � .� '°'. m w.��„°�� "�e �� ..m�.�,�� :e.,m ,.�.....�,�,� �i�a�m` ��.,. °�..��me mW"' � �,q • �,a��..�a.m. �. � �°w� b'°Q",`�."�°"'..e.e��c...�.,m.. �,.m �-m.v+�+.mmw�.�.*wm � me s�m.raz w+� �oe4wm ��w�3 �mae w rs mm m.m�mmaaTm�iw�N� JwWm��.�..u�.�.�.. f�m m�m m2�m eiw mcu. c.f cwvd Jv� ��v v�au4 w��LL. �v- P••w1 eeo¢ �enb � m� w..� ��wwm W.. ot Wm�w�memw..w .eamae !� vdnos se..�•a n�frd n.s m.e � ,Rr.�..,a.wb .��a m� e� m �� «°.�,�°�.a. �rr.,�, m e.�. m a..m m.:e. .u�.,,a�m '" m�.e��.:.�..,r. � �uy��W�m�� „�� "'_' ��a bN.m.m W� �m�.zh w �c.b atcm�uvluieml m m��em n �nw v�uWua�m�e YIl� mwm.�mlm /� m�(m�lvnpmm�YM 1'4vmq�v.mev�w4u �me�mAM1e�c�l�mwmad�dm w� veatbw. Nm d� va � mmV^� h e��i. p.eo.o m m �n�.ae..w. �^a� _ v�.M � m=�ori..ima�.�.,es � ...�etww�4-aectmauwn�rm. m� Mv1 tMtrM we �mm rw ee mm � � � <e�.�mbWam.o+.i...�ne �.m...� y+•�c.es mal.d.m4 +.vme•...m.a..r a��mvm kui.m4lem.:��.maw al •su�.na euwiN r..m a�. ��m� or.0 ...�o m e�u� u.m+. r•wh. r.rsY �m.u.rr:ee m.w:w.W.r. av 1...�.��.µ �.e�a „r�a.�e N��a..u'x owt, •T�� K ��od.etl cma.ev�- = OeroP��•e Ievlon m itivaaN v.ui m��.e�:� �;.,e.. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! � Runofffrom strects and otlier paved areas is a major source ofpollution in local creeks, San Francisco Bay and fl�e Pacific Ocean. I Constiuction activiries can d'uecdy affcct the health of our waters unless contrzctors and crcws plan ahead to keep dict, de6ris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following th�e guidelines will ensure your compliance witl� local stoimwater ordinance reyuiremenls. Remember, ongoing mouitoring and mainienance of installed controls is crucial tn proper implementalion. Heavy Eacth-Moving Roadwork & Paving F:esh Conciete painting & Application Landscaping, Equipment Activities & Mortar Application of Solvents & Adheaives C'rardening, Operation � -�- � -> and poo1 Mainben�nc� �� 7�',ti ��Y� ^�� ;s � >E,� � � �� , � , �_,:.�`, �. ....- �w.m��.m.�;..�m,w�w.,.rd - �� sam.'.�.,,nwmn� .,.�«,m..� ..��nm,r� _ .. l �..��ru ��..P:� m�",� �°.�� m,.e�.�� r . �.`«..��,d.,�.�.o��.- ��,.� '°°""°°`°`°"°" ��an,a.e��.�dm 'm"`,�' . . ��m ¢�� e.o.� ww�..n��awa��;e.m e�i.� ��e.�,.�.r,�.ma.,a srr�kmar..mx....m.�.a.mma saaaw.mi��r•=en�w,��is �.un.i.w§��m�.�m.,m miwer� c��v..m.m�am�vow+ota.wmm.e �M. .x...anWrc.r.sw. �w.�n•��s,�mr�mr.m,e...w� �,�wa.ro.��.m�opa��.,�.mrv�i a,eor ..... "°a mrm.�mwm.� �} ' i t�...m.m..i��m � s�.e.a=t.��.mm.-r.,•w•.n<.�xmr vA . r ti�momn�aa.maom.a •,.� �wm �'�c`Lnwe�.mm� evm^=+^^w.trm•F�o�ea.o-�lmuum �°u�..<uw.�ouw�f.mu.�m��6nmw .�naw.c.�m��o.a=.�..remN�e..�m� J�iriu�a.�1Yu� m..memm.y...._.. .al�tm re�.e�vm.�mmmw��,w�.w a.��.�em�m�.'amn..samwwu.o-. aniwow�l.m.wo¢ m�..v.�u�nie..mm. �frm.aemawmee..wa,p,ti�ro,oy.ae� ' 4 a�g nmv amt w.wm p+mlrlm .q..v4.4 W4�br+d50- M1 eelra�.me�rx.lm�r �b'^�^+`�aloumsWv.bmT�Wwm�P��n JWn6wrm+nemv.va�*M1mee�w�wvb«aum •� vNebunN..n�.mR Y�YQM1�mvue�wNlm�munrlu�� .av��+t1�a��.�abemmemm� emumx.m. mN��ma�c�Rwi�.ueMickavl ��•blw�� %yd.[['am�cbv Im�uewe:rtlaimmmp..evudmrn=(.. vmb�Ru.me...mimr.e.vmswe...n�o.e �Y m•v� �e�ea Cnw+wrvbmlmwdwoweLacwedmV�m v. �atlwlm.Wm�wum.'cmvdvrvn wbV�wlvavw�uDlNm'N•r.tln�M�em[ w�w4m �...4v.nevmm��um.ey. uem �'rmab.�s.mvmu b.:e�ee W emvavoS�.emwm. J°��ua� W.darcnW ��emFuL��Ew�whme �"^w.mmdnmt��i• av�em Ft m. "t�V�whuA�mM � Joe�tAme��cu6wtumet�vxn�a�uW�, m m�mm mvvmd�a,m.m ��.n�.aw��em.o�m�m�� mnmsm..� � r�� . . . .,�na� �awv.m�..va..�m,w.�e .>�.,em.e.�.�v.,am . .� ,.im va.m.. ��m.nm,wi..u�.arv�m ,..�.un.:�r�,��.a�mm�.w �m d��m�,..�_ww:,r� � s m� . lim...n�wa.ao u.�.�s.� � ...� �e.,,rei��m�me.m�.��a. .,.�a....�:�s�awm.e�.n�.w � wo..'o.:mm�..��we.i.we�.m„o.no�. �wAwro.,a a �� m� W�.�.n.�m.wm+�.m�i �.u�,�w emryr+.w ..:.��..mwi�.m.s.mao..�m;w�o. .w�mum�,r�.m w: w�i�� t+ema..m�a�m.�aw,.m �adw. n�+ocm.r ...aws.�m�mw,�, �.m..�m�e.,. /M:xmuWwh'�etsub. l9�bdmm..tl� � w4��6,Wtiee.4�m11vmv wnrtwiW wme��m1NW� ��Wbnhmqmaa ,dw�JWa�eEelqw.aotuo-a�k lltin�vfwve Omxalmmm ' ! p�ciena�lmihm�rm wma��a..>ts.ar.pm=. ./C+o-�denwfiomn.cwiAihiVF�a�nan�mecal wa wu w...vu m.m+....�auu (�nv.x)v�aNunttmuNr�vLmmuwv. mero�nm.tmEn4 CbmieYtWm.wvC��aJA.e.d�dmmldw 1mvWn��V9mm.P��a.uKvle: JPd�¢tivw�oV��emN�anrGamUci�nu m.mcP��mPm��lmm>�lWr1 JvwmmPn^Pilavmvl.vmmw�t m^TT�L��1�6 NpWM1m w �VWW�mflul�mn6"�'m.bcb(.LE lA�valuomrt'wuh6emEtimi�l'�Ne<mrtxv� �mmmteE.w�dMnta�dauru¢� JNmr6v.do.o��'v.n�waR�� m6uliuta.buw84Liw��mom�mm ,aluubemwe'uWnnl�md6WmA�o..�sm1- �va.�baiv � b Y ��mvmoV�� J �'�0��`�Y6amdw�vry wm�olL a�e�Gme+�m�dv.nod'm �N�r+�.ac�nommle�mWtiswi a�1��em�iW.ntiov I.em..v a�u�m.m. J�oacl.a�Rr�k�+vwm�Ya�ww'o[n� •wmew.a�onain � �. ��¢W.�metram�..ia:m..;mdvs m�.�raav�.eRx.�c'�.uepire..m�p �t��a�w�rrw.�Mmu�bu4.P leea6areaio«omcw��ooamuo6 Wakmmmaa.wuh.nc�.d:` wa wmnmer��+c�.�r�aRWe , n,<.iw .,nuw�oM.�vo��.re�i.�ww. eo.��m .m,-xeu�.aa�timm�mi..n..,.e. e.�dGur��roa..d.. . ey+ww�mr�m�mnb. tk.a.� m�ti,m wm...r'-rv+�. e ear � ' avwrup�Lklm6uvmvL w.puh m mt w� M c�[ w� mm�Y �v �r..m�m.re.� Jue�n.wsmwWeme�eeM� �� h.vww .0 �trsi �lve ottvni�un wud4 w1diN nAN.' .41.�wle�beu[.e�ciltAa r� )�u c.....pooleome. �r�rs=.:mv.tmmv mm�e�aa�mmw.:a.me..��ymmiew� :.��t�..v�a� �i �.a.meay�e.ea�f.+evmn�m�. "��°OA�••�w.so-w.�.�w�or�- lwhmu�mo..ieex�mo¢tw.urt�p.� aN...mduttx�omm.um �au.h� �i�eomw��tma.n�mo...0 �4ew«a�w�r. ^� �� w a�� '� P��r fmwl amn wmm�mt�m�ve.ww ^wWmr.�.��emm�m�nm�m..m ��N.bma.mmbKbwamo.�.u.tiwsu. ��m�`��' ��iw�n�vq��nmA�miokummea�+-��s.Jmvd � ot�mCry�2�u� . �=4+�4�m.t wmaM'e�p�eme�mon�m w�cmm.� ma � eutO�hr lNe.mbvYad'amEvrJnuv�nemx+vl. Sbrnm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,U00 per day! om(�ea .�m)wuees�c.+� dtiw�..u�..�mr �mmae.s.,ue.ae�een�m. ��uar� w.umrtr�e�eemmwm� .�dwvymmlayudu�im ombia5p NJv�m.va. ��Lnnvl��+.r�va� �um�ahcv�lLe'cv�rmmsmnv •� bWh•vnlm��m�;�ru�u.epJv�u� . ' u..uN.mux4�. wnm�Vmb.1�aRN�mv.d�wyeb5m wu.e �Y uc wo,�Lh �r. m V� Pb �+a m1 1 M+ Thm ��' �m h m.h'�me x 6�h mu � sm.eavc.mamw�ommfe.u�w�aor..w� ba��w.sam'sa.�madwm..m� �m.�r1m15a ;•' .P�ub��euvW+k alm.rdvw e.wJ:.d�.s�dne.w:w . . _a.nMw...e.�do...,,m . �vfunm.mhme..i.��u.+m�•�mm>1M aWy�emu.,.eu�mtm�enewW emunry.o ,�v �Pn.'v � DFi.mAw�[��t � me�nemautd-�t - e.Wnwm�CmvdWw.nm �t�<pm�am�o(�m�wlb�.ekwt�mmamm� W.Cuev�u�tulmrpue�llb..a��ms� b.3^wti�.r-a.e.�.wh..m�v�aea:oele'bus- �n��sifimmNbm�rwcu.a�piw- RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq with an attached qaraqe at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, Barry Chen and Fav Du, propertV owners, APN: 025-243-020: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 11, 2011, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11'h dav of April, 2011 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1561 Westmoor Road Effective April 22, 2011 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 29, 2011, sheets 1 through 7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 22, 2011 and January 11, 2011 memos, the City Engineer's January 13, 2011 memo, the Parks Supervisor's January 12, 2011 memo, the Fire Marshal's January 10, 2011 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's January 11, 2011 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1561 Westmoor Road Effective April 22, 2011 certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ��"��.� CITY OF BURLINGAME � 'J� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - _ �^��w BURLINGAME, CA 94010 - �= .: PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696=379� , � www.burlingame.org - - _ _ Site: 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD ..v The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the fallowing public hearing on MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single fnmi�y dwelling at 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD zoned R-l. APN 025-243-020 Mniled: April 1, 2011 (Please refer to other sideJ City of Burlinqame - 4 c'C.��,� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) Item No. Design Review Study � ,r_.,.-_.. `��vr �:� � � � - �`� �.i—y! � ` � �y�t � �� n *' �r,. '.�. � Y "�, �'/ . . .. ;� ` f . � ,5' E'� �� ,� FW� `�' . �� '^�' . . ��,' 41? ..- _' f �' �: + � t' 4'f -..,-.�: -: � :,;� �::� `` - ��-�- �,+r ` 'x �'� . �7-'r�. � �4�� :: K R I � 'j � t r: �,.+�+� �, �" �iCs..` ��tY � � F6'� d, .- ,s� � � i : � �'J�,j_ _ _ `a,� �'c�d+-�t -»�.�� .3 fT � _ ,�. !'-�-E � : � F- `€ � .�` _. - �^ ._ 4 � '.p � � � f d+.:; ` `� �` _�:� �..�. ;tex ��'�+.,'� 5`�{ :'f �. � � � _ Ai r�. . ��„, •s�""y�"..>.s �'y 1� : :r � �' -_ �y,a P =a t . =`".y- � " _-:. . � : aj �- 5 i��i�. � � � �' � } ,,r � k ��$�`�z� � q {. T' —` Y` r � �� R�'.. �I � I � ��,�RS� � .., � — _ � _ � � I �� " � i,�e . i ._# , � �.. I � -. . � i t _ � =�r �� - . � ___._� ' �� t � ��` - _. � -� -� ' . - � - , e � ,�,� .� �----�,r �� -_�' � _— _ �#�u�''�`` -,� �, � - .: � A� �`� .�"�= - .""�.�.`.�- �.-�;� � � _ _ .� _ �. - � �� _ :� - . � - '�� -. � . =.-.,..j�� -�,�.�,.... r�,-a�.� , i.b�n�"z, . . �'--�--�'�..� n�..,.,��.:w-.�._. � _ ...:-�:;-.::�t.. _ _ �' , - .. . ._ . . . � . .. . . .. �,, _._, . . . � -..... j . . _ t . . - " .. - - - " PROJECT LOCATION 1561 Westmoor Road City of Burlingame Design Review and Parking Variance Item No. Design Review Study Address: 1561 Westmoor Road Meeting Date: March 14, 2011 Request: Design Review and Parking Variance for substandard covered parking space length and width for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Mark Robertson Property Owners: Barry Chen and Fay Du General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 025-243-020 Lot Area: 5,250 SF Zoning: R-1 Summary: The existing single-story house with an attached garage contains 1,454 SF (0.28 FAR) of floor area and has two (2) potential bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add 217 SF at the front of the house on the first floor, and to build a new 755 SF second story. With the proposed addition, the floor area will increase to 2,313 SF (0.44 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR). The proposed project is 467 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from two (2) to four (4). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached, one-car garage is non- conforming in length and width (9'-0" x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions, existing and proposed, where 10' x 20' is the minimum requirement), and therefore a Parking Variance is required. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: • Design Review for a first and second story addition (CS 25.57.010); and ■ Parking Variance for covered parking space length and width (9'-0" x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions, existing and proposed, where 10' x 20' is the minimum requirement) (CS 25.70.020 b). 9561 Westmoor Road Lot Area: 5,250 SF Plans Date Stam ed: Februa 11, 2011 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ! ------------- -- - --- — --�--_ --------- --- -. _ _....--- - Front (1st flr): I 20'-4" 21'-4" 19'-6" (block average) (2nd flr): ; none 34'-1" ' 20'-0" — ------- _.....----- - — �---....----- -----.._.. Side (right) ; 4'-6" 4'-3" (to 2"d story) 4'-0" (left): ; 4'-6" no change 4'-0" -- ---------- ---- -------- _._..-- - ----- --- -- ----------- -- -- Rear (1st flr): ; 29'-6" (to awning) 40'-2" 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; none 40'-2" 20'-0" ---_— ---- ----- -- — — --------- ----- ----- Lot Coverage �,565.7 SF 1,637 SF 2,100 SF � 30% 31% 40% -- --- --- _ _— — -.._..--- -- ---------------------- FAR 1,453.9 SF 2,313 SF 2,780 SF 0.28 FAR 0.44 FAR 0.53 FAR' _._._...- — -�---- —._ ___ ,_ ------- -------... _ _;----._...--------------...._.._._._.. # of bedrooms: 2 4 --- -----... - ---.__....---�— --._._._._...-------� ---------------.:.----_.....---- Parkin 1 covered g: ; 1 covered (9' x 19'-6") 2 no change (10' x 20') 1 uncovered , 1 uncovered ---- -=------(9' x 20'-0")--=---------- -- ' (9' x 20') ------- - - .. _---- ---- _ __ _._. ..----- Height 18'-4" 26'-1" 30'-0 Design Review and Parking Variance 1561 Westmoor f�oad � EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED DH Envelope: � n/a i Dormer exemption along ; CS 25.28.075 the right side ' (0.32 x 5,250 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,780 SF (0.53 FAR) Z Parking Variance for covered parking space length and width (9'-0" x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions, existing and proposed, where 10' x 20' is the minimum requirement) (CS 25.70.020 b). Staff Comments: See attached comments from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Mark Robertson, 918 E. Grant Place, San Mateo, CA 94402, designer. Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Variance Application Photographs of streetscape, date stamped January 7, 2011 Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 4, 2011 Aerial Photo �a ; -_� i�='''� ; j.'� �P��«M�I i�� COMMUNiTY QEVELOP��IENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRir4�RosF ROAD • BURLWGA�E, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.725d • f: 650.E96.3790 • www.burfingame.org I ,4P�`L�CA��"i�� O TF�� PLA��i�� 0��,��10� Type of appiication: � Design Review � Variance ❑ Parcel #: O2 5��- 3` O ZO ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: J 5�j I W L' � I I� CCi I� P�O %� 1J 1�� Please indicate the contact person for this project AP P LE CANT project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents vame: MF�Rk �1��1"SC�I�I Address: �� : �Rr�Nr �'�— • �ity/State/Zip: 5(�N l��T�� C � � G. �hone: �C�50i 5�71 — ((2� =aX: ( C�So> ��! — i�J�� =-mail: rvl r�vD M t-Z0�3Cf'.,l SON� %��`�1�11{. � COM E-mail: 4RCHITECT/DESIGI�EER projectcontactperson� OK to send electronic copies of documents �ame: �ddress: �ity/State/Zip: 'none: = ax: --mail: PRQPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: 8�'�.RY �'iNEIV �r Ff�ly �U Address: 1S� ( VI�cS_� l�'ZUGfZ. �D • City/State/Zip: �UrZUNlnAl1'lE Gf� • �ili-UIO Phone: �� G) ZGI — 2`,� 2(o Fax: �.C�SJ� C�52 — ��525 � %\I � Burlingame Business License #: 2�? � c`3 �i 'ROJECT DESGRIPTtON: ��L� S,i=, l7� rL12, , I%1n11LY �GM �1iil�lilG�'1`i � rRli/V% Uf ��o��c ��v� �v�v�l 75c� 5,��, Z^=° s�o�y ��r�or� �% �21 i�c>>�ceiv�� J�> �iHs in�/ ilf� l�L�ni71NC�i G�= �3� �N�VJ �7RGC5 � M�rvo2 !1-�'1�SCh'�PINCi l��9i��hF�'i�. 4FF�DAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is tru2 and correct to the �esi of my knowledge and belief. ,� � ti�apE�cant's signature: / � �,„ �„ t�ate: % ��// �� , , diTi �a"wai c Gi il ic i G �acu a iiCaii�i � ai iu i ici cv" BUiiivi IZc iilc a�JvVc ca �IC3'lt iv SL'�m�� i�IS Z �ICBiIC� �.., `Lh@ ��2^� �� " F' P""""' i'f' Y NP PP "'y :cmmisslon. 3raper�y ovuner's signat�re: - �==� - - Qate: � (� �/� � -�' Qate s€�f�mit-�ed: � WeriricaEio� that the �roject archiieci/c�esigner has a vafid Burii�game business ficense vrill be reauired by the Fir�ance �epartrnent at the tirne application fees are paid. ]?lease mark one bax abov= with an X to indicate +he eontact person iOf ih15 pCOJ@Ct. 5:`HANDDUTS�PCApplicotion 2008.handout.doc CITY � 6i� �~� i.in� `�..e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 50'I PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org ��s €. � `, ,_ ' r �`r> CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION � ��`J��,! � � � ��1 fi=OtZ. E SUBSTA,�I�Y�fZD C�,Y-�r2(-�CC _ 1 I �Y .. _ nt.' - ._ . ,. . . The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Cornmission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumsfances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. �w5TIN6, C,r�RAC,E oF 1�[7U�E 15 SU�'�STAN��r9,fZ.D (� � rT, x!�l �� F7; C��1a2. r'��os�i� 2N� FL,�. �DDi71GiJ or (2� P�cDRC�MS �QIJiRCS ii�5ib: �-,�R�Sr'►�L'E. IfOVS� 15 LI--L ►t'VSL-T FcZD�ul SIDE f�IL. � SD �,A�'.�9E� CHNN� A� WID�I�(cD TD Co�E. TNv� w� r� �xED il�l ��1�SYr�N�►aRl� G�a�cE vA�UaNcE lS �UR �l�t"L`/ �Ji�=1�LC OPTIOI�( .. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservafion and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary hardship mighf result from the denial of the application. (�.i `�U C'�Si(�N 1�i9 R� ('a�i Rr�C�� 15 I �l°f Ch� L rOIZ NE1Gilit'�RM�OD :�NcF� I�tol,�sE.S FttqvE tf/�D 2N" soRy �bDl7iorv� Ac-t'RDuc",� ;�f�T A� �ifM�l�2 . V�P� �UE� -(Nc SF�MC (a�LG'hl�iNG� � c. Explain why the proposed use at tl�e proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in fhe vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. (E> CON i� I T ION I 5 TO �.EM p 1 fv� , I�O f M Pi�CT TO V I GI NI 1"y 1�6Z�r?�SG17 . NO CIfANG-�C 7� DRIv'CWf�'� �/��{?�UI�CI-) r�F�75c,b. d. �dQev ea�ill th.e pro�ose� preject be cQm�afib/e �it.h the ae.�fhe#ics, mass, �►�Ik ��a► character of the existing �nd potential �ses on adjoiningr propertie� in the general viciniiv % (�.> CCNDi 710N M�a��S / �uu� r0 REMr1ll�1 � IVO !I^1 Pl�C!` 7D V�CE Nliy f�PPS�� , �Ni� '�Auau11C� IMtt�U�rGD �Y �f��,D 1�ES��I� � HandoutslVariance Application2008 _��,. � J j �� ----�� - ��f � �s �,:� � ��,�,� � _`--�- _ _ __ '..�� — — � ��: �; � � ' � �' - — �� M {� � .� �1+ � - � G_ �V� � � 4 1��1"��T ��y � � s � � � JT -�I I C+IP tC 9-�' h!. 1�� F �i � _ k! ! f� 'S�'� ' �-'o-. r t �� :i v,�ia.yef3�,� f� t" i��l �3u+d�_,� J. ,� ��,,y,� � y.. '� q iJ ry �� ...,a �.�� 4� . µ��"'�"'.'�'�AJI'� �i'�.�'&�+�'�.,�,'��1 ��'-'�=f�P 3!�"'�+..,. ''i: — � A �, y., � . � � �,, � - :- e , � �� `� �i� — _ � � _� - = t,;:, " : �+ z � � i _ � . T i t � '� ry - - f , � (— -�+ . T �' _ . '_'=- � ' s-.'"�. sc�" �I .. L. i � ; _ i' J -y�Y t ' �s; � ` �",�i"_" �"�"' .- ' �t .: 9 � fi V d � M1 ;G'��,Q �1�� . � """ � t �� ,' t...� ��3 .._i } .� � 01 '�� fi��;,� � � ,,, �. � � ...� d __ . ' f �r�t ' jitcxt� 1 I� n �. _ a.u.� � . . �F —� i _ ...`,.a $ ': -- � ."'"��."�_ � � _.._. . �..�Y...u,w °` I �5 � � u�!ila, ' �ar� �;Y� �� `�,�`� � �„ '`�u� . .; „ :5 , ., I,�ki-. — �; � ' � . r r . .,ti. � 15�7 '��' '�,,�c r� . _.,� T �,. +�,: :� � `� � S � � � N ��N o� ��N %� � Q � � �z U�' x V � � � � � W ��H ��d H Z z � � o , � � �r , � -� � W '' Z �� O'I �/ I � � _� � �' ` _ � � � � - �� _— �� ,. .� �3;. _ { - �. v,7 „ " � � � `�F�' . :, �` i l �. 6 _ - t� _ -,..� - � - -�. ----_ 15C�( SU B.1 EG`�" l�OUSE � � :�� f -�- � � [�� f; ,� � � � ti � � <� P�OS ECT R�.� N4R7F4 u::TS�"�' --.-._ � �; — ,,; �T .- � _ � . �� -a _"� _ t >'-' . _ = x- '� "*�'re_ ! a. � ' j' ; ^ ' � f � � �� a� -�` 3� ,'L.� ' _: �I. .,.� ./��- . � �- ;� . � - � ' �� J �4�� L I . f �� ; - � , � _�, � � ..� . �°� a� � � �; I ^ � � . �� =�t. jj � - � f W Yi .. 7� - ., . }}"" _ �4i�^�^_�„3�'� .. ,'.� - - - - - -- - - -�� -= _ _ � - — -- — -- ��, i �' �i . � �k � „ �, � � �ti. �� s . : _ � . 4 t � .. .� '?, ,: � ?:�^� r �" i _ c�r'1i'4J ��r , ''� � s '� M a • �, F�'^^' �! � LLL ta � _ '�i ._. 1,.a...�S1 �� .:.. ..�� r�3?5" i' �.i �� : -, ''�� • �� . m��. t� �Y �� 1+ `�'II �.�-��+ �tt.'� �Y�I IIII '� ` � � ' ,� D .t ` � � } .� ... , ;I r��_� � l.�� R- _ . �y __ . i ` ' '� � °� , � . . .� _ - -- . � � 2i�ll ��,. ��"��4' a �'. ' `'�''� ��° -��w � a�; �� ,��j�Y�'��" , a� I�;� , � ^ , r , ` �.� � � � �, �, : << �� •- �; � ,, �: � � . � r Y�r4 - ' � � �" � � ��,� v n � �:. � .i�� .�,� � �� .o >,� ,`{� t i �� n �ti., z�� °. �t� Y'� - . .. �, - " r Pr- ,� � ..,� , ��' __`,'` �'�t��;.� �°:�� 1 J' �i ��.�._� Rn � F nA ( F AVF�tv F �. �. �.��,��r —� Project Comments Date: To: January 10, 2011 d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 1 /13/2011 Date: Revised Plans Submitted February 11, 2011 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: N/A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 1-11-2011 will apply to this project. Revi �ate: 2-22-2011 Date: To: From: January 10, 2011 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Codes (CBC) including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) With your re-submittal provide documentation (GreenPoints checklist, LEED checklist, or other) , as described below, which shows that this project will comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance. Note: Compliance with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance is required unless specific land use provisions for the project are approved by the Planning Commission prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. C�Oee City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) n the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated in these plans prior to performing this work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 9) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. 10)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 11)Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin, until a Building Permit has been �ssued for the project. �how the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed �roperty lines On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the �-Rroperty line. �� 'ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 02) 15) oms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. 16)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 18)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 19)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 2010 CBC §2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 5, 12, 13, 14, and 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: Date: 1-11-2011 L�� Project Comments Date: To: From: January 10, 2011 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 i� Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 1. Landscape plan looks ok — No further comments Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 1/12/11 Project Comments Date: � From: January 10, 2011 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 0 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by �� Date: sd�_f/ Project Comments Date: To: From January 10, 2011 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 X NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second story addition and covered parking variance at 1561 Westmoor Road, zoned R-1, APN: 025-243-020 Staff Review: January 10, 2011 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3' or larger as appropriate) for readability. For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. Reviewed by: ��i/�� ll-..�, Date: � � �j� �/ iy 0/ • /. $tmmwa�u PoJuoao Fmmrion Rvg�w �` ron aa � : r� �-';�- � �,� `��..� riCIIClfll Constraction & Site Supervision �.�_ . �."m. �"°� �..�,.,e� .� �"� s°e�.P'o u a a.w.d..�`m..�'" a � �� i�w.�e� o`..�.>a�.e�Q.� , �d�� u�,�.�.� q .� >.��r.�a.m. �.m. � �m."'� e. 0 m.ns�q.4�e+med�e.��TWtlu � ��a� m mw�� aa..a .s rs.m �MN� N�16f. mJ �wtls �av'rymit 6m rt.m� amm A�b klaq m1 e�eEVm� Jc^T.v.�m�wb�36 w� J. N�� P.•.e�.mH � We.� wm�e.ummm'uhvue na..mmi: +�vdnm.se�n..�a �� v�.a�am�o. - � �....a� ..o�. m� e.i. e.� � . ..vr,��m•s4�.�,ar. �.ae�...em w�a� e a..m�..a m � �s.ar��m�e�+rm �mwm�me�eue �.mmi.... �ww��uvUsbyc�umo. • • ca.v�mm6nr� °' mv0.�lm � a.� am�m�r � P.ce d�.m. �eo imu w wv �Im mp. ��.m A�6m.lim 6 Wtl �• �•m. dm. �p . �mmmmblaP�m b6��tl 6wn mNb mvenNn � � ! mV��bY�pmmd�f�Wa6�mN w�atr'�� bYme�et¢mWYdtl.e�.rs yApv1�. mak bJev E^P�Y b wa� � a.aQmyw.m�mi�ws.e u mb�. Ve �•.cw�.ee.v vwa�e. npy� bev�+m.l.�me ruYh vt..�.a. �wex�w�.ve� � m.a.�i. .meu.mn�e.b�,.m�. �q��w.o ..w m e�wm xwe. opab. t1rY�•�b �m v�rdtrJ��rM 4dm�qtJ�vdmo�TM.w�4W�l r�¢I�� R��, �m�..�'.�°��,,.Q�.. m�m�.�.Q�..�,.�..,. Stormwater Pollutio� Prevention Program Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! Aunoff from streets and other paved azeas is a major source ofpollution in local creeks, San Francisco Bay and the Pncific Ocean. Construction activiries can direcdy affect ihe health of our waters unless conhactors and crews plan ehead to keep dirt, debris, and other consW ction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following Niese guidelines will enslu�e your compliaace with local stormwater ordinaace reqiurements. Remember, ongoing monitoring ead mainteaaace of iastalled controls is cnicial W propa implementation. Heavy Eazth-Moving Roadwork & Paving Fresh Concrete Painting &Application Landscaping, Equipment Activitiea & Mortar Application of Solvenls & Adhesives Gardening, Operation k � :F � � p�l ��ce �`"�' ,:, ,eG s� - � _ . . , .� .: �'.. . -L. '�c.. � � ,.,�.._,o ra . �—,� �o.w ��.��-.��iwd� �� r �..�w mo�ne..,.�m.�.oma �rc.,m� r,�. � �am ia.:nwe�arae..e�+.wm.w:wm� �� .uww.wwPem�.e....�.,..,,e� ' K.d.um�..��e.aW.b�. v�wn �rn.mmn.� e��.m,mem.w��ww,sw " Jve[os�hemmem�m.n�¢L ��aM�P i.eea��.u�.ema.� me Nh� �P �Wu.me�'.sm�e... :ic d�..'�vi•�e.+a�ew..:Jd v..Nm4rr�x....ek�.a.s�� eaasNg�n�•v�mmrw�.em.wlm a"°�� aeev>..n�bwim�m.�.m..s�ee �u�m ¢nra��en�e.pmaml8om C��reiae.e.mdw Nnbr��EmvmvmpawominWuedame ��a�w.�h�l.�ee..Wa.mac ��,yvuruva�.mWabm�l�WaYVImeL IEwW R�am6c b��4lYmssaem..ry "m ao'mm�La��el po� }'�Ba1q(mmo�e..lmm_.�v e'm��m .u�anmeN.m1=4 '^� � � - 9��Wset�i.mm�,u�ocrose�e�a � ..�m� mama�o�vbm�a w�eA��ee.m�.,m� emvm..mp«.e•��.�4mvm Jmeu�ueelenoowAaaa¢nam.wbm�e rmbsb.n "ae` 'a"w�'m�°m"- ��me' . � xdu�•.w..,oL � imu..mm+sMav Je•�womu0..m�¢ �aammibt�mm . JN.�im�ew�etlau rx�m�n.pen�mua....moP^inalwnlwa� (e«t m�mm bin0�. �=•<Y�lvuefmLb .�pyy,2 w��mvWm�mm• aNmewee�aTl� �^�S w� nua am4 m�ea�m. e+mtl� �,.. b^Wv^ffi�w�5e ! ��e.6o-a.bElr.n�R..omdm.. J1w.��m'minuvaammeummfmmiP�u JN�Wm�eemba.ew�medw•�wm«eum em�b.m xE�.s..uN..n�R..y �"- mn6el�ve rv4�Evem...tremTae�mmmvsl�m� �es�m�.eV�hY�wlmaemm.em� wm.l«a.wr�.a,m'vpet,m..n�ue � �rrs.mw.,e v�vwee.�L�m.e.s.we.dm'm�ot.. Pm'e�w� •mmr...amwoe,..�e JmN�•��se�.atls T �.Q�e.y�mmemr.m.vuweh�avNurv+m ea•t�toa.ym.ae[m.a.m>.mMm� wbY�wemn>wuap �`�M�� v��6mml�...�..rwm�.,im�'ry. nom .IeM'�4��am.m.v „a�.�...a�.mm..a,m. J�a..e.c . a��,mm��me��,�•mf�e m...+.��em*v.a��. ^`�o.�m.e m.m �w�.� e....a �� mm�.d��,m�� mwe.mamn,..m,v�e..,e.m�. ��ams.w.< � rm.e�,� rQ �.e�.eo-ma�ae.��..m.�w- �r•wd+e.�..a�rwer.A.d�am, :e.,�.'mo�...us��V . om.a,mn �� w` �. � .w iawma� �.me e�m. �.� d. ��m,, �.a.,..em..>w�,.aR �..m.� .� �.. w rm �ymv��e.�.�e�aw��.�ec�., ..� � �mi ��rm.,mme..a��.�a. .,.u�.m.e:ac�w�� . vmmsma�wmv�m '"^°"n. � �^e��,�me.o.aa.��uF ea maww,n.u�.mmsmvw+e. �w 'm��a.�eu�mo.ae.� m i r•=>a.wm�oa.ae:..a �� .� ..rem..,wwa.�.m.m . m.aw�abma..m�,�e�m.mw�.ue �xwenm. e.�_`.sm..me,.�o-m.e..e.n,e,..a.��w„. ��m.s...e..mn.e.owe. �smm.�m..um JW��w�w�x��a�e� rveee.im �� m �cm.rs�..,�,aamn-..eap.ne � a..sesodm �v+�whbM..m: ^�r � � �`�^'•r�am..rtmeWmm �e.�.muqo.detnwc lP.e�nw.vewW?�.��m...c JOtrdNV+bmo�mwimAFCma�E�o6mtm+ml �� ' � ex m.An...�xbu J��J � JidomWvsm�anr.�.4.wowmmeiobria 1�'knn.aelv�vmwevm.mm..x�mmw.. ��m��rme�..w.maa�.maxr cd�m�.s.mwamaWvmo.m�e+�s�e= TT�'�1�muwlMr� JC�W.uryw�emtudms�s"eN'�oN(slm in.w.eo.wtw..h5m e.mnmv��.b.lmmurur� J^1��nmau.Rmw..mmo9m� �e�se,�mw�'e...�m�.a�.�°.m`�s� �Aa.iw>.am,ea�.a��m:�. �tR.um��.w*oLamewme��nm. �� ea`�..'qkdermm� ��aro�nmeoteemm...,e. �'°�� .x..w�t.�m..�vi�wbeosawm+r �s.e,ume�n "�ra..mmeen �rm,rw.audmn.e..m�mew..i oslwo�nd�=wimtiw.miem).�em..c fioma�m.b.. Jao.�ime�xy�em+vwwm�dra�.w�ormm "� . wm.�o=¢�.a.�sae:e.�m:m...;muW- mw me..m,�wae..dvvmn�+w�a paak.l(m�w��r�amN�lbmtnv .6.:.en.Maned m� bbhmim�..RL4..�veem.&n .u�raPwmieypo..ahcmO�.Ocwn JA�Eo..'�GIW�uoE]w�vwvF�fm�amwoL JPI+eeWYbalnneWxwtiov�mL� �_ o._ uv��1PhWo'mtR�hKmIiEWelml��+awim u�IedfiLWmoOabY�rub. ihnda�rn lWm�mcJ«Ialmh�hiumsekaequq�emmP� r�mewy6Qvme�vomm mhotliyL�dmilyvammhd(aWa . �mmbJc. �0�)6.11dioRd�6��de'�.pw•am��M !Wm[bM�v�le�A�htneu¢V. r�moim�vL�me J�e e.mrv�� m��yvt.� •` ��µdloG� .ds10�Mdu�6e� J�Rmenlwemb.Wa•eP��tmme- lWhshmFieLWc�loGbemabVkkqtllmqvn w.w..�acVew�( a0wurmmJ�IcdM�im. oaVPaovEJnSW NJv�m.me .�tlW woM....4b1f¢�sm6mw �'Lml.6� ��eamw•amtLwm�venJl ��"FwNw�+b. � ewm�dcyelm'v�n.vF^-Ie9�+me.mx�v mee�.�a.cW�iw.mQ+mvr�udeo.a: ;�N.n�wno�em�+.e�..r�rou. ro�Wwmelnca.qtiue[wmPa�h Jsa�.�.�memmbNMNm�evi.a.l+efSR omaemu2a•MDm.wa�u,W�drye�u. y . Ja:��A.�mm.� W mm�t�•ma=.=m. .wb�atme.�mmieoueam.nmmnw�m . bw..mwewdoa...�m�4abouotiK.QmW. wm .md»+M�Iam.d:va+�b5u J�W+.efmllomueeofeeumv�.w6 Rtrn�Ywm��n�1mY.�PrP��+.ms1 J�Ms'I��kem � �:WsdWbemypvp�e+�n�ew� •wma�emmcummiv PvmemeY.e�e�mikum�s.�ama.smw m� �h�b�exs�Mmn. �d��M1m.a.�wdbMweroa� . a.��imd�bmW�4�,sm.t .�m�^�'dmmbm�e..ame. mnm mm � vy.aemw•amavxm�v=2ao�..m �edrsm�a w.rw..nm .IIJ�1'�vwieellmGmmbinh.watlhV J p� mep� �nlmlm. ..��S�eue�iwb.N��al)u.l n Tu.iNEN.tIsM' Ne.vminAam r�w Asm�db •• .nm��aa.aleemwW4 mm.r�.m e.nm�n.dmm.v:m� :"�Q� .n� �.�...�......e,d,.,.«. ..a�n.�,..�a�,�r.F�� CR�e��arya�m..l s..kmw�� - �nm.me6. . m.uymw�am�.meNebe.tMmmeSmN.uo !� �•ee.m.wTaa.ta�.ePv�d�n�j�m1M , Gm� �lar'v�mW 6d0q.l�mnpqbartqely� xL�mm r.nce:pva tiw �b�� uol JP.+m Sboim dra.in polluters may be liable for fines ofup to $25,�00 per day! '6`� :�.m ^�"`�.;,,� ��,�.,,�;m�'.� „� �CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT eURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��'•,-'�`� = �' � ' �BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2 � � � PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696 37_90 _ www.burlingame.org - _ - - _ — _ _ — ��'� � Site: 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD �� ~ The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Cham6ers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Applicntion for Design Review and Parking Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1561 WESTMOOR ROAD zoned R-l. APN 025-243-020 Mailed: March 4, 2011 (Please refer to other side) _ i t� —� '�} — �', -._ �_. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlinqame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) -� :�;� :,; � `�`� ��_�� , �:_ :�.:J h i��f,� � ar �� . �..;= =�r :=; :�E,, � ► u� �; � �..' \ � �' _ Y.�' �� 4� /; u?i � +�' .� � M ' .r�cy . . ��:��!;� �� A� �.� � :; z. �� €��`'� - ,.: +.:: `� �{� � _ �. �-_' ��. _ � -'. � r f.� f J,� : � "`� � : — � �. } _ � 4 y, '�''�y4 I S '_ +�a Zy _ � .� � , ��' ,-- � �, � �. �,5;,. J s� •,c, s ; _ ; ,s ��` � � '� �, �-•�, ' ± ,'s' �'�`' ; .IF ' �. +r . ..e�.'�� v�t- « � e".�'�s�.'� _� � �.cL�;,,� : } r �r• � � '` � �� ..� * s � k:•- �,�'►��` R a ..'�'� ',��„-�'f 3 ; a �- � + r �t��; y`j � 4 y� ��E� �� '�"`' /,� � f �_ G� i �_ 5 � �M�� , S�, + x f: r .� a� _ ' - � -� '`` t ��/ �`� " ,�' � _ s _'% ' x = y�� t 'i� 4� ��'''t ; : . wy �.�,�ti�' 4�� ,� � �.� M .=�i�' � y `�, �''� ' ��i • i 4 % H� - �'s ?i � _ � �.��...;-): ..� �� •---,. , . �a � � �,�„� � ` '� � I� s � r �• ,k - % ,, . > �r, `` � �'' , `^ ' , � ,�.,,' .� / ,� .. ,�—�'t� �u, ' '.� . �`" � � � �` �� ,�e . ��n�� ;` � �'T..\ '�Q �`- ':-`1��+.��' ` e '�� » T,:f,,A� - < F'►' -R ` - ,'�-Y" �� r , -._ � �9_"� ` ," �;., v ; ; . - J Z. � �� g. r .4 5�� a, f' � Fl.t �� 4. ,I .. - A..'. <.# 4 �'� ,� � )•� �� '�T'= �'! � � �s �,:p.� ��'.Sc . -� /R.�' r ,[ . � _ i � iti�� [;i I .:Pi S�, � � ,Y. ' �` � - � } � '^[� 4 f F � �➢ �' � �,G. �':�l.j �� .itf {`�r-' �,i .�.:. � F _ �" � Y . 't. �t�� i �. • � ir.��" �.. f .� �+� r �t "8'f r d s� � �-, .�-�. : � - ' _ �...�'� �'� t,�. . __ I ' ' , � � ?• rt -: t4 `#�' � �� i � . y �' 6' ... ��y � .;k+.• �_? , y� _ ,. _ .� t`�� . �''� 'a { , i� ,, �'�tl �^ a ��y � "� �y��, `1'�'•_ ''.# ss ' � j�` a .�, *A�..� '� s ' � �'Sa � r� � r. = r � 4 h :. . - ,� x : .'` �� ; = --7i: � - �y;� � � ¢` � +� i, �, � ^: �,� .a;;..-� - .,J: - � f �� „4� � f�� '�.'L'6L�y _ • . , �f . . % y.5�s' -.'�`,,� i� /� � � 'i . i � � .3� - 1 ,4 � � �� _.� .� �� `�� f. y � . E• � - � �"�' l, `�*+` t �� . ' �LL' ' � ,,�., !• � �. . r. � >,� e w � }�`� — � ��. � y '' `�':� '�r� � i � : - - � '+.$ y �- a i � �,'�"� :r s�, r � � �*, .. � �" ��, — •, �.r � �y-�� .: jsa. _ � ,�' �.�� `��. "��. �:3 r a �• `: � ,� � r l�nn�,�.,,, �, ��r� j„� y� 4 � ' � ` � ' 'k�` �'� •� , � S � � ' � � ��.'"= T �y � � • • � • • �{� �1 � � �� `.� S �� -��: �''k.r ' -; 5 � �, _}�s� �� ti— w ��. �pf r--�;,`+... ��:: �''�� f�� q�- � ' ' . �