The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About211 West Ln - Staff Reporty � MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: SUBJECT: CITY PLANNER // � . � �� ... P.C. 2/23/87 Item #3 SPECIAL PERMITS FOR NON-AUTO RELATED USE AND FOR CLASSROOM USE �1T 211 WEST LANE, ZONED C-2, SUB-AREA D Richard Schiller, representing Frank Bianchi, is requesting two special permits, one for a non-auto related use in Sub-Area D and one for classes, in order to use a 1,600 SF area at 211 West Lane to teach karate. A use permit for all non-auto related uses is required in Sub-Area D(Code Sec. 25.36.035). A use permit for classroom use is required in all districts (Code Sec. 25.36.030). The applicant's specific proposal is to hold classes which average 20 students per class on weekdays and 15 to 20 students per class on Saturdays. Class hours would be Monday, Wednesday, Friday 10:30 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., Tuesday and Thursday 3:30 to 5:45 P.M, and 8:00 P.M, to 9:30 P.M., and Saturdays 11:00 A.M, to 1:00 P.M. One instructor would be present for each class session. Class size is not fixed. There are 101 students enrolled in this program. Students are encouraged to participate at least three times a week at a time of their personal convenience selected from the class schedule. The instructor is present and teaches those who arrive at the appointed hour. This building has across West Lane currently leases curbside parking enforcement item. shop. Staff Review no on-site parking. There are 20 parking spaces on the S.P. right-of-way which the building owner on a month to month basis. There are also about 12 spaces within easy walking distance. This is a code The previous use of the 1,600 SF area was a print City staff have reviewed this application. The Chief Building Inspector (January 27, 1987 memo) and the Fire Marshal (January 27, 1987 memo) had no comments. The City Engineer (January 26, 1987 memo) has no comments so long as five spaces of the 20 on the S.P. right-of- way are designated for this use and midday classes are limited to three to five persons. Planning staff would note that this business has been operating in Burlingame at another location. It relocated to this site. The relocation and need for use permit was caught in a business license review. The method of ooeration which allows participation in three classes a week but not specifically designated classes does create a problem with the enforcement of the maximum attendance at classes at certain times of the day. Effective enforcement would be dependent upon the cooperation of the instructor and his willingness to refuse participation to those who exceed the class size limit set by the Commission at any given time. n n 0 -2- Applicant's Letter In his letter of January 14, 1987 Frank Bianchi describes the length of time he has been in Burlingame and the long term nature of his students. The students' ages range from six to adult (male and female). Children's classes are on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. �dult classes are more frequent, Nlonday, Wednesday, Friday and Tuesday/ Thursday evening. Students come two to three times a week. He discusses the program's philosophy as being one of self defense, not fighting skills. He reviews his past community involvement. He notes the Commission's concern about parking and that five spaces of those on the S.P. right-of-way are assigned to his business. He notes the only class which generates any volume of parking is the 7:00 or 8:00 P.M. adult class on weeknights. Children mostly carpool. He states that there is more parking in the evening hours. He feels he has active community support for his business. Study Questions The Planning Commission studied the applicant's request for two special permits at their meeting on February 9, 1987 (Planning Commission minutes, February 9, 1987). The Commission asked a number of questions dealing with the building floor plan, parking and needs of other businesses in the area. The building floor plan taken from a packet of a previous application shows the leasable areas on California Drive and West Lane share a bathroom area at the center of the building. The bathroom area is accessed by a corridor from West Lane and by the rear doors of the shops fronting on California Drive. There is no access through the building from California Drive to West Lane other than going through the premise of an existing business. Two of the leased areas appear to have direct access to their own bathrooms (214 California Drive and 211 West Lane). The applicant notes that his actual class attendance at any one time is difficult to determine since participation is open ended, e.g., enrollment includes any three sessions of participant's choice. Therefore, estimating parking impact is a problem. One approach would be to limit the participation at critical hours for parking (see conditions). Enforcement would be left to the instructor. A summary of parking needs for this building base3 on patrons was prepared. This data shows that this building generates (with the applicant's use included) 144 trips per day between 8:00 A.M, and 5:30 P.M. weekdays or an average of 15 trips per hour. After 5:30 P.M, on weekdays the building's uses generate 50 trips. On weekends the building generates 130 trips between 8:00 �.M, and 5:30 P.M, and 25 trips after 5:30 P.M. Businesses in the immediate area generate 331 trips between 8:00 A.M. and 5:30 P.M, and 183 trips after 5:30 P.M, weekdays or about 19 trips per hour. Together the building under consideration and the surrounding uses create demand for 34 parking spaces per hour weekdays. Weekend trip generation is substantially higher from adjacent uses because of a very popular restaurant in the area. n 0 � -3- The uses in this building compete with the adjacent uses for the 12 on-street parking spaces. Of the 20 spaces leased for this building on the S.P, right-of-way four are already designated to the Bark Stop and, if this action is approved, five would be designated for the karate school, leaving 11 for the 11 trips on average generated by the other uses in the building each hour. The four spaces designated for the Bark Stop are not now signed for their use. In addition it is difficult to know, given the size of the total enrollment and the current drop-in basis of the karate classes, whether five parking spaces will be sufficient. The bathroom requirements for the karate classes are met on the site as long as this leased area has access to the main bathrooms off the hallway. The applicant indicated that he will submit a parking availability count as requested at the public hearing. Plannincr Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated and pertinent facts from the staff report incorporated by reference. �t the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that a 1,600 SF area at 211 West Lane shall be used for self defense classes Monday, Wednesday and Friday for adults from 10:30 A.M, to 6:00 P.M, where the maximum class size shall not exceed five and Monday, Wednesday, Friday from 6:00 P.M, to 9:30 P.M. where the maximum class size shall not exceed 15 persons over 18; 2. that classes on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons from 3:30 P.M, to 5:45 P.M, shall be for children only (less than 16 years of age) and shall be limited to a maximum of 15 students, Tuesday and Thursday evening classes from 8:00 P.M, to 9:30 P.M, and Saturday classes from 11:00 A.M, to 1:00 P.M, shall be limited to a maximum of 15 students of all ages; 3. that five spaces of the 20 spaces leased by the property on the adjacent S.P, right-of-way shall be designated and signed for the exclusive use of this business; and 4. that these use permits shall be reviewed for compliance with the conditions in six months time (August, 1987) and every two years thereafter, and that this use permit shall expire if the lease to the 20 parking spaces on the S.P. right-of-way is ever terminated. �" ll,V�lC � I�� 1'�'� Margaret Monroe City Planner cc: Frank Bianchi/Richard �. Schiller David Kimmel, et al, c/o C&D MM/s Properties (property owner) � � PROJECT APPLICAI�ON 4��C'TY °� 211 WEST LANE �r CEQA ASSESSMENT BURLINGAME project address � "`' - °� project name - if an � � ) �"...o.,�,.• Y Application received ( 1 16 �37 Staff review/acceptance ( ) 1. APPLICANT Frank Bianchi 343-0540 nar�e C 0 ne , C . telephone no. 507 Polk Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 applicant's address: street, city, zip code Richard A. Schiller 771-5335 contact person, if different telephone no. 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Special Perr;it ( X) Variance* ( ) Cendorrini�m Perrit ( ) Other *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SPECIAL PERMIT to USE d l,h�� SF Slte ln Sub-Area D to hold self defense classes. There would be three classes a day Monday, Wednesday, Friday from 10:30 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Tuesdays and Thursdays there would be two classes a day, 3:30 P.M. to 5:45 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M., with one class on Saturdays from 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Both children's and adult classes are scheduled. It is anticipated that Monday-Fri ay t ere will be 15 students per class with one instructor, and five students (attach letter of explanation if additional space is neededl 111 t 2 dtUT" dy C dSS. Ref. code section(s): (25.38.031 ) ( q. PROPERTY IDEhITIFICATION - ( 029-213-030 ) ( ) (Ptn.15) APN lot no. block no. ( C-2 ) ( 11,000± ) zonino district land area, square feet David Kimmel et al, c/o C&D land owner's name Reouired Date received ��) ��l � 1�16�8% ) 5. EXISTIPJG SITE CONDITIONS c 0 (Town of Burlingame subdivision name 1680 - 14th Avenue ress an Francisco, CA � 94122 zip code Proof of o�vnershi� Owner's consent to application (see copy of lease) 11,000 SF building with but no on-site parking. for several months or Reo,uired Date received frontaqe on California Drive and West Lane The proposed studio area has been vacant onger . This space was form�rly occupied (yes) (�� Q�IISSING ) Site plan sho��ing: property lines; public sidewall;s and c�!rbs; all structures and improvements; paved on-site parking; landscaping. (yes) (fis� ( 1�] (/�i] ) Floor plans of all buildings showina: gross floor area by type of us� on each floor plan. (3 2�) (no) ( — ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). (3�€�) (no) ( — ) Site cross section( ) (if relevant). (ott,er) ( 1/16/87) letter of exp�anat�on *Land use classifications are: residential (show /i dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT PP,npqSAL NO NEW CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED Proposed censiruction, 3eloo� orade ( — SF) Second floor ( — SF) gross floor area First floor ( — SF) Third floor ( — SF) Pro.ject Code Project Code Pr000;al Requirement Proposal Requirement Front setback Lot coveraae Side setback F:uildin� height Side yard �f` Lar.dscaoed area ,.� P,ear yard �n ,ite �k�.sp��ce�� % � 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) (see aerial photo) Full tir�e employees on site Part time employees on site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trio ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles EXISTING after 8-5 5 PM 1 1 � 0 15 15 5 0 � � � � � � IM 2 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM 1 1 � 1 15 20 8 0 � � � � � 0 IPl 5 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM 1 1 � 12 0 0 � � � � � *Show calculations on reverse side or attach se�arate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES Photographer studio, dog grooming salon, retail tool company and Pasta Bravo on this site; auto dealer/service uses and other retail/ service uses on adjacent lots; this use conforms to the General Plan. Required Date received (yes) �rr�� ( BY STAFF) Location plan of adjacent properties. (yes) �;�$ ( BY STAFF� Other tenants/firms on property: no. firms ( 4 ) no. er�ployees ( 1Q ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( ±5,800 SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany vehicles at this location ( ) 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts 5100 ( X) Other application type, fee $ O Variance/R-1,4-2 districts $ 40 ( Project Assessment $ 25 (X ) Variance/other districts 5 75 (- ) Negative Declaration $ 25 (X ) Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ () TOTAL FEES $ 150.�� RECEIPT N0. 15F,E1 Received by B.WillttemOY'2 I herehy certi under oenalty or' oerjury �hat the informaticn aiven nerein is irue and corr to h �es� " ay �cnowl dge and belier. Sicnature �� Date /� � y ^ O � Aopiicant; � STF,FF USE ONLY NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. The City of Burlingame by on , 19 completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a Conclusion: Categarically exempt -- Reference Code Section 15301, Existinq Facilities �i� � ' _�,� Sign ure oi Processino Official c��., �.aJ�. �� z_ �� -�itle Daie Signed Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te oosted, the deternination shall be final. DECLAP.ATION Of POSTI^!G Dai:e Posted: I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I oosted a true copy of the above Neoati��e Declaration a2 the City Hall of said City near the doors to th� Council Chambers. �xecuted at 3urlin9ame, California on Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P!o 19 JUD Tf H A. MALFATTI, CITY CLERK, CIT`i' �� oURLINGAhiE -� STAFF REVIEW 1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by: date circulated reoly received City Engineer ( 1/22/87 ) (yes) (no) u Building Inspector ( ) (yes) (no) Fire Marshal ( �� ) (yes) (no) Park Department ( ' ) (yes) (no) City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no) memo attached (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) 2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASUP.ES Concerns Mitigation Measures Will this proposal comply with Request comments from the Fire all Fire and Building Code Marshal and Chief Building requirements? Inspector. Is there sufficient parking Request City Engineer to review to accommodate this proposal? parking and traffic impacts. 3. CEQA REQUIREM11E^!TS If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this oroject: is the project subject to CEQA review? No — categorically exempt IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED: Initial Study comoleted � Decision to prepare EIR Notices of preparation mailed RFP to consultants Contract awarded Admin. draft EIR received Draft EIR accepted by staff Circulation to other agencies Study by P.C. Review oeriod ends Public hearing by P.C. Final EIR received by P.C. Certification by Council Decision on project Notice of Determination 4. APPLICATIO�! STATUS Date first received (/��/�"7 ) Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( � ) Yes( ) date P.C. study ( a/y��) Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( ) Date staff report mailed �t aoplicant (��I �' i'} )) Date Coirenission hearing (�,Z3 .�'7) Application approved (✓) Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) no � Date Council hearing ( ) Apolication aporoved ( ) Denied ( ) ►� - �,� Z� signed date JANUARY 14, 1987 EURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA �c i� �. ►� 1 �i I� ly �JAN � 6 i987 CITY OF BURUNGAME PLANNING DEP7. Bianchi's Self-Defense Institute has operated in Burlingame, Ca. in excess of ten years. Our school has been and continues to be the oniy martial arts/self defense training school in Burlingame. Our students are orimarily Burlingame residents, many of whcm have been studying at the school in excess of five years. Our current student body inclucies approximately 20 children (ages 6 to 12); 12 children (ages 13 to 18) and 25 adults (one-third women). Included in this student population are several families (i.e. parents and their children). Our training schedule is as follows: CHILDREN'S CLaSSES - 3:30 to 5:45 p.m. Tuesdays & Thursdays 11:00 �.`�. �0 1:00 P.`-i. Saturdays aDL'LT CL�SSES - �0:30 �.'�T. �c 12:OOP.�1. '�on/Lved/Fri 3:30 P.M. to 5:OOP.M. Mon/Wed/Fri 7:00 P.M. to 9:OOP.i�I. Mor./�Ved/Fri 8:00 D.�. tc 9:30P..1. 'I'ues « Thurs Students are expected to train two to three days each week on an average and this program is adhered to. In contrast to the present popularity of "Rambo" type agressive- ness, our school has and continues to stress realistic attitudes and goals. Development and advancement in our school comes from adherence 0 BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 1�, 1987 PAGE 2 to the following creed: 1. Dedication to the art; 2. A willingness to train hard; 3. Confidence (positive attitude); 4. A willingness to help one's fellow students; 5. A sense of humility both within and outside the school; 6. Control - not showing anger or frustration; 7. Good class attendance; 8. MOST IMPORTANT - a respect for one's self and others. Our school does not merely develop one's fighting skills; rather it is a system of self-defense. Bianchi's Se1f-Defense Institute has regularly been involved in community activities. We have perfor,ned demonstrations on various occasions such as "I Love Burlingame Day;" Art In The Park; we have performed for the Burlinaame Junior Chamber of Commerce; our children's c'ass zas performed cr: the Rudy Be:�ton Show fcr �he Bur'_ingame Cable Station. Our chilcren nave �erLcr?:�ed or_ var�cus occasior_ for ma�v school activities. Biar.chi's Se1f-Derense Institute has sponsored a soccer team for the Burlinqame �YSO for the past three years. We are aware tnat a�rimary issue in the grantina of �.his "speciai use permit" is the question of adequate parking facilities. Please note that there are approximately 5 parking spaces specifically assigned to 211 West Lane property immediately in front of the property. This is diagonal parking parallel to the railroad tracks. Our morning adult classes typically have only two or three students; our children's classes are almost completely on a drop-off and pick-up basis; a number of the children are in carpool situations. The only really significantly attended clases are the evening adult classes beginning at 7:00 P.M. or 8:00 P.M. on week nights. BURLINGAME PLANNING CONIMISSION JANUARY 14, 1987 PAGE 3 Additional parking space is available during the evening hours since the business hours of the other commercial business ceases around 5:00 P.M. It is difficult to attempt to justify one's existence. We believe that there is a very definite value and ourpose to the program that we offer. While our student population is small, community interest has been considerably greater. We anticipate having a large group of interested Burlingame residents available and/.or present at your hearing prepared to speak to the issue of purpose and value of our contribution to the Burlingame community. G��C/v/G�r, FRANK BIANCHI BIANCHI'S SELF-DEFENSE INSTUTUTE I , C.P�1F0121JfR �(21U� ; i H o�aR �ERU�/1C►t+� 1� ' 7 � 1-(�Ok�A�'r �Ew�s, r, �. � a � Q 3 0 � �o��A D�.R�eesu� o� �YL6tobaAP�l� �L srun�o r9o`,i�VE� C q �,� 40„ Q �� r/9 ` °�e,�, �R' � rq �+O�y,�'* k�v `pR ��6 Pr, Ex�T rp � r� i� �:i.� � � NKl►.lUwy r i Se-�� ' Ro�� uP p�d0. �-E�ai4hUC,E �� '�g�eb E1•�TtKucE � � _-7—_ PE T � . �\ \ \ �.._. \� \ � ' _ - - s 0 r'ti � � `., ,, ` i.UELT L A�E � i i i , �-; - �" � � �� . �( � �� ---� - , r - . �' ; ,� _.�_ .. ��_--- __ � ,� . � ----- ---> -- �._._.. ____.,._..__ . _.,..�. ._._.... . �_ __ _ _.._ � � � Y � i �. b � • , � � . ._.. -. _ .. . } � ' _. g. � . � i - ' � . .. . .. � n . � . . . , � , .,._ .. � .__..!_ �r.--...�_.sr. _�4_.,..� .... _.•..R- .�.-."".�..,.�.�_.J._a__ a._.. �� .. _.. . :. �� RECEIVED �� ' � 1��7 GIT`! QF BURLINGAM[ �I F ^�IRJIP�G DF?T. h� �irc�% �C O �d4i I�Z'�-�p'� - 2 �9 �` �� ,�zqars , U1 �' I� o �� i: L sm �r r � � �� m I�`r Avra Pw�rs' Lusr�y S K� � .t �O� � � :, �uk��Awi TRR �1.� tswrw�.1 , ..�_ � Ti.t j� I i.�� _ T+�A�.K � �,► � �. it 1 'Y IC W ,lpi� i 6 1387 CI P�N NG DEP7ME — -- - '�( �.L t� �u� 't' (Z (F\C KS <- � : �-1 d�� / c, ' - _ > �— , _ . - � - / --/ - /� _-- -� - -- - � , , -- -- - _ _ � 1 t l.t.:' E si- � A�.: l:- ---�--- E�l7T4Ai9l.E � �----�— / . n�� . G PaPb6 D OOR SPEc ra�o� A�tEq / y < (P�-� �..�eu's DQESSI�6 � f�RE R � D o� M/',T �wonk.our� ' A r� t A i ; �! ,i � 3d'� � C�osr) �►�rA.iwu �DoR � 000c i li k f r �, (.��Ib I..�T f�OoM TENANTS �T 210-218 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Employees Area Name Full Time/Part Time Occupied #210 David Dornlas Photographer 214 Burlingame T�ol Company 216 Pasta Bravo 218 VACANT (formerly business equipment, retail> (Rear) Bark Station, 217 West Lane (PROPOSED) Bianchi's Self- Defense Inst. Totals 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 7 4 1,750 SF (±) 1,200 SF 920 SF (±) 2,600 SF 1,100 SF 1,600 SF Note: There are 20 parking spaces along the Southern Pacific right-of-way behind this building (along West Lane) which are marked as private customer parking for this building only. HW/ s 1/29/87 DATE :�l(/?-r.6`' Z Z j �� MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER \� CHIEF BUILDIN6 INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL DIRECTOR OF PARKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: �,1Z(�C'�(�.� l%Gl�/?,'/ � � �,! / � f /C.-�' u �` �/;�L� /`� � l, _ �.�� v -!�" r�� v �`�� .�r �; ,� / ^�- ^�, , ^� �/��s�',�, � �/1 �.�GS,� ,1�. h �' , �_ _ • An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will.be scheduled for ,S�f/G�� at their_ ��'�'jr,,��1� �� i`��r� meeting. We would appreciate having your corr�nents by C�+�Uq/y� �9 ��i� ,/—� �% �� . Thank you. , �L �O� � �� %1 H / 1?� %/1�,J�c,11�C /A4GY� %� �Po,�.� . � Qu ,'/�K� o, 'v ,sf� `° Helen Towber Planner s/ att. �d C O �J'J/r1 G n / � � . �,[�'.� . � � O�j� I , . ,a�dc.an �� 0 DATE : ( C//2�//'v' Z z % ��5 � MEMO 70: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSP TOR FIRE MARSHAL DIRECTOR OF PAR FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT � _ SUBJECT: l�i(�.� ��G''�l�'� ; �`i' �! �� C( �f -'�%� �:- �� t S/.;iCP %d� r-. —, ` � ' /�� -� =�,- ��/ " _/ -�, �; ( � (:: �%". �'��r ;� , i /',� _ . - � � ��.5'� �2�� LT/ESi LANE� An application has been received for the above project for review by the your comnents by �r��c�/yt, �g %�i�n RECEIVED Planning Commission. The application will.be scheduled for S�7/G��- at their ��'�jri;<�� l�r% meeting. We would appreciate having Thank you. JAN 2 71987 CITY OF BURUNGAME P} � "'NIPiG C:'T Helen Towber Planner 5/ att %=�;-G �- �D-� /LiU dc�-2�-i0/�� . � - DATE: �l/7��C� Zz f �� MEMO T0: CITY EN6INEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL DIRECTOR OF PARKS FROM: PLANNIN6 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: \ .��c�� ( , r--� � , �, � '_ � ;' ,' �r ��n � , r � �, �, �� J„�, ; It��l �� l �� -1T r'� �.�G' c� /,�,�'; � �,1-- f ��. � ;;`; � ��, ; ; -/:- � .S. �'�o-SS� An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for S�/C�� .� -, n at their ��°�jrr��c�1� �� `��i � meeting. We would appreciate having " ,—� your corrments by �C(+�� Cq l�i� Thank you. Helen Towber Planner 5� dtt. / � � - � c` y i (t/� � z r� �'�'r� is ��-r <<� �i� �� ,d.� �f �° ��G—� . � - ��`�� - .�= �` �_��}, � �� l� �� 2.� ��/�'//� �' ��/ ,�� /�� '�� , /l� { . `. ` -�� ^Ci / //v7 ��/ GGJ� � �i-f� � S �� /i�''.]f'-��: � � � . ��. �f � /� � � �- -< < , /�` �7,�� C` �5,�' S�L'�`'�7� L �� /��'� Sf'G-'l�'�p ,� G' /`�/'��'G�%� � �� J� "� . �rrn��' �� !S � s''�� '�'� . ��<y��`''�' � � '�� ,�� rr�� c��'�='� ��'� � .� . _ - � . ��,�C � � � ��, ��, �/�i-�� -�� .� l�d�'�'s'l �"� ��,� � �sru. C4 a� �r�l��C�{ y�f„� C'�'1' �i�-�� j�-� . / -�"j ,� �,.�-t v /� / / � G �-� ?�� . � ;�', /�/�r�n�'� ��' � � ��'�� y�1 i .�' Page 5 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes February 9, 1987 In support of her motion C. S.Graham found this would not be a grant of special privilege, it would benefit the general public; applicants are not trying to segregate hotel versus restaurant parking, just making it somewhat more clear; there are special circumstances in that this site has two separate parking lots for the building. Motion was seconded by C. H.Graham and approved on a 6-0 roll call vote, C. Leahy absent. Appeal procedures were advised. 5. EXTENSION OF PLANNING APPROVAL FOR TWO SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A RESIDENTIAL C�RE FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY AT 1221 BAYSWATER �VENUE, ZONED R-4 Reference staff report, 2/9/87, with attachment. CP Monroe reviewed her staff inemo. C. Jacobs moved to approve a one year extension to January 6, 1988 of the Planning approvals for this project. Second C. S.Graham; motion approved unanimously on voice vote, C. Leahy absent. MINOR MODIFIC�TIONS 6. TO REMODEL AN EXISTING �TTIC BY ADDING TWO BEDROOMS AND A BATH AT 2705 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 7. TO �LLOW � THIRD BEDROOM TO BE ADDED AT GRADE AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE AT 1115 EASTMOOR ROAD, ZONED R-1 Neither of these items were called up for full review. FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the audience. ITEMS FOR STUDY 8. SIGN EXCEPTION - MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPIT�LS - 1783 EL CAMINO REAL Item set for public hearing February 23, 1987. 9. SPECI�L PERMIT - SELF DEFENSE CLASSES - 211 WEST LANE Requests: where will they park at 3:30 and 5:45 P.M.; is there access to this area from California Drive; what is the attendance at the 3:30 and 5:00 P.M, adult classes and the 3:30 and 5:45 P.M, children's classes; survey of existing parking at 3:45 and 5:45 P.M.; research parking assignments for all permits issued on this site; check building access to bathrooms. Item set for public hearing February 23, 1987. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Zoning Aide memo, 2/5/87, special permit review, 1369 North Carolan Avenue. City Manager memo re: Commissioner Attendance--Meetings Canceled Due to Lack of Quorum (1-22-87/2-3-87) Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 February 9, 1987 Letter (February 2, 1987) to Planning Commission Chairman from President of San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, re: Housing and Traffic Conference, Thursday, April 30, 1987. PL�NNER REPORT C. Garcia reviewed Council actions at its February 2, 1987 regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Charles F. Schwalm Vice Chairman TENANTS AT 210-218 CALIFORNIA DRIVE #210 � HOURS OF OPERFTION * � ii NAME M01`dDAY-FRIDAY SATURDAY I � � David Dornlas I 10:00 a.m.- 10:00 a.m.- Photographer i 5:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m. (closed Tuesday) � I � 214 Burlingame ' 9:00 a.m.- Tool Company 5:30 p.m. I� 216 Pasta Bravo ; 11:00 a.m.- ' 9:00 p.m.** 218 Vacant (formerly -- business equipmentj �'etail) 217 G7est Lane 211 West Lane (PROPOSED) Bark Station (dog grooming) Bianchi's Self- Defense Ins. 8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. (closed Monc�ay) Mon/Wed/Fri 10:30 a.m - 9:00 p.m. Tues/Thurs 3:30p.m.-5:45p.m. 8:OOp.m.-9:30p.m. 9:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. CUSTOMERS * V7eekdays �^Ieekends 8:00 a.m.- After 8:00 a.m- After 5:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. i 5:30 p.m. 5•.30pm I 14 -- � 15 -- 30 5 35 .� I � 8:00 a.m.- 20 5:00 p.m. , � 30 �� 25 20 11:00 a.m.-' 2p 15 15-20 -- 1:00 p.m. I Current student enrollment consists of: 32 Children (12 years old and under) 10 teenagers (ages 13-�8) 50 adults 9 individuals signed up for private lessons (consist of 2 families) Total 101 students * Information obtained via phone calls to businesses. ** At the time the Planning Commission approved a Special Permit for this use (9-13-82) the hours of operation were anticipated to be 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. AG/2-10-87 #220 222 224 241 245 261 NON AUTO RELATED USED IN THE 200 B] HOURS OF OPERATION* NAME P�ONDAY-FRIDAY SATURDAY Kustom Hi-Fi 10:00 a.m.- 10:00 a.m.- Music House 6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. (closed Mon., Thurs open till 8:00) B.B. Stern Co. I 7:30 a.m. -- Inc. �' 4:30 p.m. � Domino's Pizza 4:00 p.m.- 11:00 a.m.- (1-2 full-time 12:00 Midnight 1:00 p.m. employees, 1-3 part-time employees max.) California 11:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m.-II Bar & Grill �11:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m. '� I Christie's 6:00 a.m.- 6:30 a.m.- Restaurant 3:30 p.m. 3:30 p.m. Route 66- 11:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m.- Leons 2:00 a.m. 2:00 a.m. *Information obtained via phone calls. �OCK OF CALIFORNIA DRIVE - CUSTOMERS* Weekdays Weekends 8:00 a.m.- After 8:00 a.m.- After 5:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. 20 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 3 7 130 75 100 40 150 0 i 500 0 30 100 30 150 AG/2-10-87 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Planner Zoning Aide Reserved Parking Spaces at 211-217 �Vest Lane February 10, 1987 The Special Permit for 217 West Lane, The Bark Station (approved 6-27-83) included a condition that four of the parking spaces in the parking lot in the rear of the building be reserved for this use. No conditions have been attached to any of the other Special Permits issued for the uses at 210-218 California Drive regarding parking spaces being reserved. WR1TE IT-DON'T SAY 1T' TO FILE--211 Plest Lane INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM A. M. DATE Z� Z O 1 9 H 7 P. M. I talked to Richard Schiller regarding the Planning Commission's questions at their 2/9/87 study meeting for this self defense class application. He will get the following information by Tuesday, 2/17 at 8 AM: where students are parking now parking survey at 3:45 and 5:45 for the next week actual attendance in both adult and children's classes I talked to Pete about bathroom requirements. As long as they have access to the main bathrooms off of the hallway they are O.K. The requirements are not affected by the class size. Also, there is no access to this class area from California Drive. The front shops take up the entire frontage and eac} has a private door to the rear hallway where the bathrooms are. All students must approach this site from West Lane. � Regarding the sign, they were not aware of the sign program for the building and will remove the sign until after the public hearing for this use. REPLY ON THIS SHEET FROM Helen Williams WILMCR '$E0.VIGC LLNC - -- -- --__. _ _— . T,.N,a �� tF �E M o. Fo M i i-za ' ------ _ ,, , �$��IV�� OCT 2 � 1982 �� tANNING OEP7ME //%% � sr //. �! �� 7b� \G� , ,' /% % � /i �\ �..��/ ' � / \ _\� 3F ii�j. ' ; -'' . �' ,, ,, �� . _ _ - ---__ s ----- - -- -.,_._--___, �c �u?- t-r — _--- � C ii:'F:��L 1_.—� (1GCI� r r,:,-F�� ,� IR �� J l.. --- � '� / __-irr--7S" �--/� N E: �•..... 3� I �'---.__...— I�pNGICI;P RArnp ---�;/I Cor,�ipoR ;H �r,�iii �� Y3' \ . . . . ._ I. � � � �r� � , / •\ � ��''''� i `�� /l•LrJ � \ /�jG� / � 1.i--J� � � -�/' Y/Q `l % 7 /� p i . CL� 0 � � � � . /� \ / �\ �C� �� /c j., �� 0/�� ;�. ir`7 �� . ��R \\ �- � �/� � :�� R r 5 7 �� / "�� ;'`� R oc m �J �<<\ �.,.,�..._. . � �(+GFOSEp �, ; GEL1 /' / j' / : � /% � � \ // � dG� 6�� \;;�'�� - io' I �,/ �l vRca�;T .!l \ ' i � ;� o, � � / /' I` / /: zl� � �� 21, �� i� ; , ; -I-' `�-� - ��-- ,z� i __ ._i / --- - _ . - �-3•I•. —'___ �_�-,�..yi� __ _-S 4� _I ---- �—S 4—! --- - - _... -- ---, _ P L � . G f, r� � -- � �` I (:RIUP, .S(� f I. �- �/r. - I Fr.r.^� -_._..-----_.. . ... .. ��. � � `� � %� %/ �� i� � i� / _ � � — P�aPDsEo ' S�L�' - DEFEiVSE ' CLA SSESw AREA � ----_ I C.� '=•�r�r•� -, � )e-'�7 `� A,�, ;:� ' r j � • � F C'r-�i-��,,; � � � � _ �,� �: , �. -� I�' �� x�. -. ::;� : � , S�(O��GE 4 � ,' r �. �' `�` �i ��7�•��' � -. � �, . `� �� f . �� , � ,� � � '�.� ; �� . � ,� : � � � ,� ,� . , � , ,��. -� � � � �.�� . — 1 ,� s: �;� . . / J•, � � .` - � ' L'�j • � % � `�` ;.� �i.= �( ,� � r � `�` '' ` _ J� '"� � . L, :� � ` '� ��- � i�., h�! � '� � . .r , . � �� ! � � �y s r" , : ,; 'ti �.: �„ �le , '' �: :- _ `��,� ; � ,�'� , ��- �" i- !'� � � �� '� .� ,:. , � � � .� =j , � � �- . -_:� ' �� , :� � � �; ; _ J �.1. ` ' . �(�'> t E � � � , f� �r`' ' � r. � �: �'�,D , �, k �� , � . ��+ i -;�� ; �_\\ ,� `� � �.� �<; � �: ` .`� � � i}..,�� tb, � �� `-'�' ;`.�4. ` `� \ `v\ ► � ��' iC � �. � \`� � n � ' �� .. ' � �� V ' �:. , � .;_ _�. � �.� < �>� � �. � .� `� � �t .��+ �� .`� � �� '� ` 1 �,` :C �� j� � '•1.J� �.:�p ' . 4 �'1 . t � 1, �. `e C„ ,,� � . � � D';Q .. � Cj' ,',.�s ' � _ � `� ` \ ` a _i� �'r� ` h �, ,�� p �`(� ! `� \' u, �T 1' ��' ,Y� "\�� QO� 7 �� ` ;'R �� ` i �_ 1 rt ti'. � '��\��,�' , I �` �\� ` , , � , ' . 4.�� 1��, � .� � � ' p � . � �. ` � k � �, � , � � ` �, :.�`��;`� �� :� � ��' _ 3 � . �� . °°. � � , ��„c �� ; y- ;,. �� , , �'� "''�.� ,� � +- � �; '��: .�. � F_�� ; �J . r ; t: ,;�3 .. �;,,:, � : :� �. �� '� \ �� . srt� . �'j : . , `v 4. .�`r ` �' ti �'•4 � �° `' '�,N �`��' ' � s ""� �� c 1. �\ � �" �'! •1>' ♦"" , � � � ` / /'� �� . , . ., ti \\\\ � , � ' . L�t , \ 4 \. � �" , . �,� � . �r� �r: 1� . -z. '�ti'� �� ., t-- �1 � . , \ �: o �,'�' . � �`• �.�,,,, �� o `. ,� �r, � `n � s�� , �� : ; ,.. . ,� � . . �` . �' ��. �i� - . \� � �„R \T .�.,� � � n , � ' � � � �'` �� .. � ` {�l �� S ��,\ �� ` � � i; -� - � . �/.� ��; � � �1 /.��" ` .� �,` ,. � '\�� .' ��' . ' , � . . - - - -� / �� _. � i.r4. � _ ` � � ` � : , �', I% _ ;� ,. � t f :�� '�„� _ ,��'�` N V . .:� , ��:, , � � �. �', r_ � ��P ��. J;� . e- � 4 .' . . t •. � ' et• �S� � �' \ `� \ n � '\J ` ~ I' • � • _ ,�`� " �i- \ �. �( � ` ` � . �� Y . . ' �\ s (\ �' 4 . s �C� � > �U l .# . 4 � � � � aG ,�: ��.'> � �\i _ �i : : 4�:: t.? � .�.,'ta► !0 . � C�,�iP �t�2�? IIf �Lt��tTtl�c�iTTtP SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ' � BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARIN6 SPECIAL PERMIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 23rd dav of February, 1987 , at the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct - a public hearing on the application to use a 1.600 sq.ft. site at 211 West Lane to hold self defense classes. This area is zoned Sub-Area D(auto row) and non-auto related uses require a Special Permit. At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLAN�IER February 13, 1987 0 �� RESOLUT20:� .TO. � I RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PE�SITS � RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that; WHEREF�S, application has been made for a special permit i � for non-auto related use and for classroom use ' � at 211 4dest Lane (APN 029-213-030 �,� „ � and ' I i WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said application on February 23 ,19a 7 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that said special permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of � San 24ateo. � i I ! Nannette M. Giomi � Chairman I I, ROBERT J. LEAHY, Secretary of the Planning � Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that i the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular ' meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of i February ,198 %, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11/2/84 Robert J. Leahv Secretary