HomeMy WebLinkAbout1108 Vancouver Ave - Staff Report:--
..�
ITEM #4
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
TO EXPAND AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE PROGRAM
Address: 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date: 1/9/95
Request: Special pernut amendment to increase the number of participants from 44 to 60; to
increase the azea of operation from 1368 SF (Rooms #6 and #8) to 2552 SF by expanding to the
1184 SF ldndergarten room on site; and to increase the number of vans and employee vehicles
pazked on the street for Olympian Day Camp at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (CS
25.28.030-2). T'here would be no change in the number of employees, hours, days or months
of operation.
Applicant: Len Beatie APN: 027-340-150
Property Owner: Burlingame Elementary School District
Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres more or less
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: related school uses in Roosevelt School and single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Secrion: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class
1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances.
Summary:
The applicant, Olympian Day Camp, is requesting a special permit amendment to expand its
after school day care program at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue (Roosevelt School), zonerl R-1.
The program would be expanded to the kindergarten room of the school (which has an address
of 1131 Vancouver Avenue). This 1184 SF room was most recently occupied by the Peninsula
Parent Magazine. The zoning code allows school related uses upon approval of a special p�rmit.
The original special permit for the after school program was approved in October, 1990 (see
October 2, 19901etter from City Planner to Len Beatie and September 24, 1990 P.C. minutes).
An amendment to the permit was approved effective April, 1994 to increase the number of
participants, azea of operation, hours and number of employees. At the time, Olympian was
leasing on-site parldng spaces from the school district for vehicle storage beyond its program
hours. Their application included a request for on-site parking and storage for Olympian's
vehicles. After public comment on this proposal and a school district proposal being processed
for this site at the same time, Planning Commission determined that no on-site pazking would
be allowed and that Olympian's pazking would be limited to 2-3 vans, parked on the street
during program hours only. Planning Commission did not limit parlflng to any parkiculaz street
(see April 15, 1994 letter from City Planner to Len Beatie and March 28, 1994 P.C. minutes
for Items 4 & 5).
The proposed amendments:
A. Increase the number of participants from 44 to 60.
B. Increase the area of the program from 1368 SF to 2552 SF by expanding to the 1184 SF
kindergarten room. T'he previous amendment allowed the use in Rooms 6& S at 1151
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
II3l-I151 VANCOUVER AVENUE
Vancouver. The proposed amendment would continue the use in Rooms 6& 8, and
expand the use to the landergarten room.
C. Increase the number of vans parldng on street during program hours to four vans three
days per week and three vans two days per week. The previous amendment allowed
parlang, on the street, of two vans three days per week and three vans two days per
week during program hours. In addition, to allow parlang for one employee's vehicles
parked on the street. There was no request for employee pazlang with the previous
amendment.
The number of employees (5), and the hours, days and months of operafion would remain the
same (12:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, from September through June).
Proposed Special
Permit Amendment:
N u m b e r o f
Participants:
.1
Area (S� Increase by 1184 SF
& Rooms to 2552 SF by
expanding
to ldndergarten room.
Hours, Days,
Months:
# Employees:
# Vans
& Parking:
Rooms 6 & 8 (1,368
SF) would continue
to be used.
no change
no change
4 vans 3 days/week+
3 vans 2 days/week
to be pazked on the
street during program
hours only + one
employee vehicle on
the street
Meets all other zoning code requirements.
3/94 Approved
Special Permit
Amendment:
44
Increase to 1368 SF
by expanding to
Room #6.
10/90 Original
Special Permit
Approved:
22
874 SF
Room #8 only.
Room #8 would
continue to be used.
change to
12: 30-6:00 p. m.
Monday-Friday
September-7une
3:00-6:00 p. m.
Monday-Friday
September-June
�7
2 vans 3 days/week+
3 vans 2 days/week
to be parked on the
street during program
hours only; no other
vehicles associated
with this use shall be
parked on the school
site at any time
�
�?
2 vans to pazk on
Broadway during
program hours
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT I131-I151 VANCOUVER AVENUE
Staff Comments: The City Engineer, Chief Building Inspector and Fire Marshal had no
comments on this special permit amendment. Planning staff would note that on the evening of
January 3, representatives of the school district and the applicant met with the neighbors in the
vicinity of Roosevelt School. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed expansion
of the program and parldng. The applicant will report on the meeting at the public hearing.
Study Meeting:
At the December 12, 1994 Planning Commission meeting the commission asked a number of
questions. The applicant responded with a letter (date stamped 12/29/94). The applicant notes
that the number of Olympian employees will remain at five. This is possible because Olympian
had one extra staff inember than required by the California Social Services office. The applicant
also explains how the employees arrive at the site and notes that nobody parks in the back of the
school. Ae also included a sheet delivered to neighbors on December 22. It announces a
informational meeting regarding Olympian's application.
Planning staff has included four charts from the School District's Mazch, 1994 application. The
charts list the other tenants, and show the number of students, employees, employee vehicles and
hours of operation. The peak hours for the number of students at the site would be between
9:00 a.m. and noon. It can be assumed that 9:00 and noon would also be the peak traffic hours
due to parents dropping off and picking up children. The peak hours for the number of
employee vehicles at the site would be from 12:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.
The students would be brought to the site using 3-4 vans. As with the March, 1994 special
permit amendment, the children are picked up from various schools between 12:30 p. m. and
3:00 p.m.. Pazents pick up the children between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.. Five to seven
children would be transported home in the vans.
Required �ndings for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following
conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental tQ the public
health, safety, general welfaze, or convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this fitle;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it
deems necessary to secure the purposes of this tifle and to assure operation of the use in
a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and
potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity.
Planning Commiccion Action:
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should-be taken by
resolution, and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated.
At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
3
SPECIAL PBRMIT AMENDMBNT
IZ3I-IISI VANCOUVER AVENUE
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and
date stamped November 15, 1994;
2. that the 2,552 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8 and kindergarten room) shall be used for
after school day care from 12: 30 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. , Monday through Friday throughout the
regulaz school year (September through June) with a maximum of 60 students and a maximum
of 5 employees, and no parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location;
3. that students shall be brought to the site in four vans three days per week and three vans two
days per week, and that these vans plus one employee vehicle shall be parked on the street
during program hours only (12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday) and that no vans
or other vehicles associated with this use shall be parked on the school site at any time;
4. that any change to the number of students, hours of operation, azea of building used, number
of months or time of year this program operates, the method of transporting students, number
of vans, or any change to the operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment
to this use pernut;
5. that this use permit shall be subject to review in one year (January, 1996), and thereafter upon
complaint for compliance with these conditions; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire
Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
;" `�/Lti ���� .
Sheri Saisi
Planner
cc: Olympian Day Camp c/o Len Beatie, applicant
Burlingame Elementary School District (property owner) c/o Bob Beuthel, superintendent
8
CITY OF �URLINGAME
APPLICATIOO N TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIOO N
'�a rco ��..c°' �
✓ ����n2h
Ty,ve of Avnlication: _Special Permit _Variance _Other
Project Address f/3l � iv C D u �/E2 A v'�,
Assessor's Parcel Number(s) OZ%' �J`T ���5�
APPL/CANT
Name: ��- iJ/`%%�!A l�! DA `� CA MP
Address: � O [�30X /SlS
City/State/Zip: ct,rz�ivaQm��C�c, 94�0�/
Telephone:(workl _�5�/s) 6 J',Z —6 �pio
Ihome) (Y/Sj 6 �',Z - 4l4%7
ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Telephone (daytime): _
PROPERTY OWNER ��'�e,n es�/fary
Name: �G1/1.C/�vG'�4M_F SCNDD.� D;.s�
Address: �303 Tousc%le D�r.
City/State2ip: �c�,e%�qQmc . C�r. �iyo�U
Telephone:(work) _2Sq— 38Qv
(home)
Please indicate with an asterisk /'I who the contact nerson
is for this nroiect.
�
AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE;
I hereby certify under penalty of pe�r�i that e information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowled d b ' f:
/i /� -
Ap ' ant's Signature Date
I know about the proposed application, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application.
Property Owner's Signature ate
--------------------------------------------------0 FFI C E U S E 0 N LY
Date Filed: ' ��' � Fee �2'�J ���
-----------------------------------------------------
Receipt � �
Letter(s) to applicant advising application incomp et : � -
Date application accepted as complete: �� � �
P.C. study meeting (date) �2•/2 g�_ P.C. public hearing (date) ��
P.C. Action
,sres Appeal to Council? Yes No
a�;�.r.R, Council meeting date Council Action
.. �r� ciry p .
�.BURLlNGAME `+d� 11 Y �� ��Y/����`i.t1��� - .
.. ...,�. . . ,_ , - ` �'
,�. '
�f�[��0��. f���Q�U�' �a�G�B��a�'���11� �.. . , .a:., �� r ;
��,.. _ � -
The Pianning Commission is required by law to make findings as de�ned by the City's�ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request:
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance ° with �these
questions.
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed location wi// not be detrimental o� fnf,wious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ welfare, or
� convenience.
fihe Olympian will be replacing.the Peninsula Parent Magazine as the tenant.
(Addressed as 1131 Voncouver Ave.) Thus reducing the co�nercial drop in traffic
as well as four (4) employee parking spaces on Vancouver Ave.. There will be
one additional Van added from the Olympian. The Olympian expantion into this
class room will facilitate more adequate space for an additional sixteen (16) .
children who are in need of added academic tutoring and care in order to receive
a better education. There will be no additional tr�ffic impact 2�n the area,
as the Olympian provides school pick-up and home delivery. This should provide
better safet}� and improvement to the general welfare of the area surrounding
Roosevelt SchooL
- :.�.:.
s
�.�
i
��
� ,
.. _ i .t'h;.4i'd,•,nt. , ��;'a. 4rt_t p► ,,.r'�m,.�...,':.,.;in..��.�+r?R..?;lT=-��- ., ,.,a.e..... - vry
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with tfie Bu�ngame
Genera/ P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT
i This proposal would be consistent with the zoning (R-1, low density residential)
and elementary school use as called for by the general,plans.
�
, '.i .
..'1';r �1� vi;i.;�7 �: �i ���Gv^i° _ . .., ;'-il�2-�XB 1'��Y�°N 1(i'�.^ti�::°a ,�„ �978."}if10:`, 8?� Y.� �"i3,��o+:'. '�1F El�C'i�3 iRfQ� .
- .iilnsi +:.•�':it�ii Oi6 �t1^a�PS�i2�' .. . .�..,..< .?S.{�'� �r`b�i �C�G4.n',u'+k'� �i.: �:eISJ�Ju:':$�_�rr`Jr G� 1T9�/i1lC.. — :t .8�£;�"•s�$ � .
, �Y�.���.i ��?�' sYYs P's;U -#,�. � ' f•L�iSii;Yyv�t �::-• aa�.� .ri .�z,>�=-�sv� s;��a�ss r-c• ,^rtfrs;�t��- ,�w:t��i�4ats � � .
t v �� . .: 4;r ; f �. . ;a� . . .� . '0+r.•^�= ,
3. How wi// the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character
of the existing and pofentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
Existing structures are not being affected or changed in any way.
In addition, Olytnpian will be cutting down the.traffic from a conmercially used
' building to a much lotaer density use on Vancouver Ave..
. n - _ ._ , ., . ;r_. � � ,� .e�-� -
�.�._ ...n1 f, s �H�...� y. 1!!!'sQ !,"1'`!k�s`.X� (i:i.'.t�( �t�. �.a� n•r►.nsg.�.i t«.3of��tx-cl�$�t�t'Y'� Qf}j-fFt.,y Wi'1'� � ,.
-;� ;Ws<^�r�,.. ,r;;7���u .. �� -� :�: a:u� ,_ � . . .: .
n; ,. r.. • f .�. . �, _ . , ,3 s :�J �-. ,r . :.. .�v: - -,
�92
frrn
�fITY p
* •,
) , f j(i�1t�E
�.,��.. f�
CITY OF BURLIN6AME
SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
COMP�RCIAL APPLICATIONS
1. Proposed use of site: �'�'��� Sl_°b oo li.f`t�2%nu 4ks�
i�_�._. _ n,...,.L�,� .. � _. .. _•_ __ --�. ,�.
2. D�/hours of operation:
, i -��,s_.. �
6: o0
3. Number of trucks/service vehicles (by type): / l�lcH
4. Current and Proiected maximum number of emplovees at this
location:
Existina In 2 Years In 5 Years
After A€�er After
o r���p�' ��, os �.�_ �n��
y,r��•� P-�z—�riz `�PAf� 8AM-5PM 5PM
5 �p��l�s �2�3a - �� oo f�
Weekdays `� �
fulltime �.L,3�P� 6;voPA� S�YY�.Pi �
artime
r
Weekends '
fulltime ���
artime
5. Current and Projected maximum number of rrisitors/customers
who may come to the site:
Existincr In 2 Years In 5 Years
tif /2 ; 30 �'� ��' ! 2� 3�- �€t�er
$A3�l�_iP32' M 8�r-�#r �Nf $�M �P4-
� �c:f w �
Weekda s ��:� plt'i ' �.vv f, ' �od ? _
Weekends —
6. Maximum number of employees and visitors/customers which can
be expected to be on the property at any one time: �d
7. Whe� e do will the employees park?/f/O2T� aF .jl �G �/`�
1/.4MCouvF�'�
8. Where �/will customers/visitors park?_�Qc�w ��
9. Present or most recent use of site: p�f'1IY151.L�6L pGU'Y�'L"�
-�g��Z�lit,P �
10. Listvof other tenants/firms on the �'operty:nA/2� S'Ckoo�
�ou: i.e�„ /.� _ �i�/ . i e�.�?._ •... n /�s„1i.�1 TeJ . ..� / _ _ .,. •- • - ^ — --1— -
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: � CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIRECTOR �
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM:
SUBJECT:
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR ��,(� �P��iyj
� � J�6� `�� Date of Comments
�d Yvi h2e t�t�
l�(6
J
�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION i�2`P�9�MEETING: //�. f Z
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �1�- �
ROU'I`ING FORI1�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AT
CITY ENCiINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIR$ MARS$AL
PARRB DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLANNER/ZONINa TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR S_�C.(,( �L/� P�✓1"►1
�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION A£'Y'�6AJ�MEETING: �. ��Z--
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �Y- �
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah �� �� Date oi Comments
d
�
�G� ��� � �ti�
� '
�
���� ��!�� �l�«�z/
� 2/� /�
0
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
�_ FIRE MARSHAL
PARRS DIRECTOR �
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR c� �,(Q./� ����%1Q
0
AT 1 I ''S1 ,
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION A2'�i$I� MEETING: /f�. �Z
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �V. �
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah �"' Date of Comments
� C�0,1`�,,�-
• ��(�Cj��
�� _ z� _ s,�
�� ����
����
�11`1I11Y�.�
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING
December 12, 19�4
�1P
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, ,� of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman
Galligan on Monday, December 12, 1994 at 7:3,._ •.M.
ROLL CALL
PRFSENT:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Deal,
Commissioner Ellis
STAFF PRE.SENT: City Plan;
Erbacher,
I�11`
►1 � .
The
The
Jacobs, Kelly, Key (7:34) and Mink
?eg Monroe, City Attorney; Jerry Coleman, City Engineer; Frank
Mazshall; Keith Marshall
of the November 28, 1994 meeting were approved as mailed.
of the agenda was approved.
Chairman Galli ` informed all applicants for action items that the rules of procedure for
the commissio require a minimum of 4 affirmative votes to pass a motion. If an applicant
would prefer o be heard by a full commission, they may request a continuance, Item #3,
1000 Van ver asked to set aside their decision until their action item, in anticipation of
another missioners arrival.
I�I: � u YCI
There were�io public comments.
ITEMS FOR STUDY
�C 1. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXPAND OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP AT 1131-1151
VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY
OWNER AND OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP APPLICANTI
Requests: applicant to complete application, i.e., number of employees; where do employees park; does
anyone park at the rear of the site; hours of schools now on the site and proposed; complete chart
including number of people on the entire site; enumerate peak time of day traffic movement of all tenants;
what plans have been made by the applicant to meet with the neighbors and the school district. Item set
for public hearing January 9, 1995 pending necessary responses received in a timely manner.
.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes December 12, 1994
Chairman Galligan noted that there were now 6 commissioners present and asketi again if anyone wished
a continuance? There were no such requests.
ACTION ITEMS
2. SPECIAL PERMIT T 123-125 BLOOMFIELD R AD, ZONED R-1 (JOHN STATNF.R,
PROPERTY OWNER PHII.Il' D. WILKINSO APPLICAN'1� (DENIED WITHOUT
Reference staff report, 12/12/94, ith
Planning Department comments, d
dwelling on this non-conforming 1 t
prejudice at the November 28, 1994
same remodel plans for the dwelling
resubmittal. Five conditions were su�
attachments. CP Monroe d%1
study meeting questions. A�
and for a parldng variance
'�anning Commission meeting.
�d has chosen to relocate s
�g ted for consideration.
ssed the request, reviewed criteria,
application to designate a primary
this location was denied without
�applicant has retumed with the
d edesign the carport. This is a
Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. John Steiner, homeowner, 123 25 Bloomfield, and Philip
Wilkinson, applicant were present to explain e resubmittal. There was discu 'on about the amount and
type of pavement in the front yard because th e would be a lot of cement and would be very visible
�with a carport instead of a garage. There are n cunent plans to go into the m' rtion of the house
` to do any work. They reviewed alternatives disc sed by the commission and feel cunent design is
t,he most viable and affordable. There were no o r comments and the public hearing as closed.
C. D�al noted this new design is more appropriate an the carport will appear to belong to second
umt. 'I�e then moved to approve this application, by re ution, with the conditions in the staff r port.
Motion was seconded by C. Kelly and failed on a 3-3-1 (Ce Jacobs, Key and Mink dissenting and C.
Ellis absent) roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
C. Key moved. approval of the application, by resolution, with th, conditions in the staff report and an
added condition� requiring 50 % of the front yard azea between the pro rty line and fenc�of the structure
including the area <'xn front of the dwelling at 125 be put into soft lan scaping, The conditions are as
follows: 1) that the°�project shall be built as shown on the plans submi to the Planning Department
and date stamped December 5, 1994, site plan, house and carport eleva 'ons; and other sheets date
stamped November 4, 1994 including floor plan, foundation plan, building sec 'ons and electrical; 2) that
the carport roof shall be of Class B fire rating or better in order to meet the r ' ments of the Chief
building Inspector's 11/7/94�nemo; 3) that in order to meet the requirements o e City Engineer's
memo dated December 5, 1994;;the curb cut for the driveway shall be relocated to ize and location
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building pernut; 4) that the prim unit shall be
125 Bloomfield and that any additio�ial expansion of 125 Bloomfield shall require a speci rmit from
the Planning Commission and that there �hall be no expansion of the secondary 123 Bloomfiel �structure;
5) that the project shall provide 50% softscape in the front yard between the property line and fac� of the
structures and that the softscape shall be concentrated in the area in front of the dwelling at 125
Bloomfield; and 6) that the project shall meet all tlie requirements of the Uniform building and Uniform
Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
-2-
0
�aooQ
SKI * TOURS
, R
Memo To
From:
Subject
�Q°`���Q�
�
O �� �
o b
\�q DG��
Burlingame Planning Dept.
Olympian Day Camp & Learning Center
��,y M P/q,4,
�if � j1
I'
I ' I
OAK HILL RANCH
Answer to questions of Planning Commission on 12/12/94
1. How many employees?
A. Same, no change S(five)
2. Where do they park?
Only one (1) employee brings a vehicle and parks a block
east of Vancouver on Broadway. One employee is transported
by parent all other employees (3) three drive vans which
they take to and from work with them and are used for school
pick-ups and student take home.
3. Is anyone parking in back of school?
Answer: No!
4. Hours of operation are the same
12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.
5. What are peak traffic hours?
We have no peak traffic; if there were it would be between
3:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.
� 6. A form letter from the Burlingame School District was passed out
Dec. 22nd for a meeting Jan. ��. The results of which can be
discussed at the January planning meeting.� —
7. Burlingame School District will be represented at planning meeting.
G:ODf�%"l l�Rm. l�oas��rel� 5��,
�� I SPORTS • P.O. Box 1515 • Burlingame, CA 94011-1515 •(415) 692-6400 -
0
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
REGARDING USE OF KINDERGARTEN AT ROOSEVELT
FOR OLYMPIC DAY CARE
The Burlingame School District will have an informational
meeting regarding the use of the Roosevelt Kindergarten Room
for Olympic Day Care.
Any interested party may attend.
When: January 3, 1995
Time: 6:00 p.m.
Where: Kindergarten Room at Roosevelt School
�
�
December 15, 1994
O.Olympic Day Care
Attachment 6
Larry Krusemark
True Learning Center
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
George Hart
Hart Day School
1151-B Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Lynette Muhic
Burlingame Montessori
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
Len Beatie
Olympian Day Camp
1151 Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Joanne Bailey
, Peninsula Montessori
1151-A Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Lisa Rose �i
Penins Parent, .
Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
3/16/94 List of Tenants
# of Employees
4+2 Volunteers
3
n
5
7
�- 25
� Y'el/l -SeGi /2,l �-'/ 4 7�c�r
Dlr�✓�'1pl �i_ �GiIJ C'�Z�
�S � pP��t�/ t �� ����
# Vehicles ��p��C��`J
L•'�
2
L!
3- 4 v� �.s
—o-�'�;-�
5
�'20�2�"
RQOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
180
162
V 144
a i2s
� 108
u 90
e
72
54
36
18
0
Category
� Students
CHART 3 ' '
3/ 1 6/94
R0.94.15
Students by Hour
ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
OLYMPIAN DAY TRUE LEARNING PEN. EARLY LRN. MONTESSORI HART DAY SCH. PENIN. PAR�T Totals
� ��'�
Stud.
7:30
8:00
8:30
9:00
9:30
10:00
10:30
1 1:00
1 1:30
12:00
12:30 10
1:00 13
1:30 15
2:00 20
2:30 25
3:00 44
3:30 44
4:00 44
4:30 44
5:00 30
5:30 20
6:00 0
Vans Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars
1
1
2
2
2
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
C:�
�
�
3 3 3 0 3 3 3 6 3
5 3 3 44 4 4 0 3 3 49 10 7
60 4+2 6 60 3 3 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 13 15
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
60 4+2 6 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 112 15 21
60 4+2 6 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 115 15 21
4 1 1 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 61 17 16
30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 62 16 15
25 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 62 16 15
20 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 76 18 15
15 7 5 1 1 0 3 3 59 16 12
15 3 3 0 3 3 59 11 9
15 3 3 0 3 3 59 11 9
15 2 2 45 7 8
6 1 1 26 6 7
4 1 1 4 6 7
�`
not included in totals
4 employees and 2 aides will relocate for 94/95
no students on Fridays; some transported by parents, others take bus or walk
2 employees carpooled; 2 drive vans home; 4 vans parked overnight; 1 walks to work
CHART 1
3/16/94
R0.94.12
CHART 2
ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
Employees/Cars by Hour
25.0
22.5
U 20.0
a 17.5
� 15.0
U 12.5
e
10.0
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
Category
� Employees � Cars
3/ 1 6/94
R0.94.15
8:00 A 9:00 A 10:00 11:00 12:00 I 1:00 P 2:00 P 3:00 P 4:00 PI 5:00 PI 6:00 PI
...S.�T�:. .;.�. ... . - ..
�: �/ANCQ�C�/�l� �V�. .
�
Q
/roo sE�E�t _� hoo �
u/'.1 I/eti� ir n llvc �/71/M9A/�1�
y„ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . i �—
.............{.. .........:: � M
iiiriiiiiiiii}ii iiiiiiiiiii
C� iiii�.i{iiiiiiii{ii iiiiiiiiiii ' �
. iiiTGf�:t'L;;::lii iiQ�i�r�iiiil � K�t p����ORIUI�
S+�rqe I I�Ia� I
(sRvuti d
��3i ►��couv�R;
'._ .� _.'.�.-•.
.'.�. . .'.
• �''i dF:Z ".
. aut4�i•. 3.55
d'
a7•(7 �� s.
ll � S�. F.�. 2 B�. r��
.�,
��r� C-r�o�,�.
,
� ��;, '
� �:� '
.� :�Jci?!•;�:•%'- �
� ;� ;;•
� �.� .
0 ;c ;.i�; : �
/�� �l'�•�'.
rl ... . ...� ....
(E� r�s� ��
�a �o�i-r�s
� �'g- 136gs�tota�
Stn � A9� R�rt , , av�Y;'r ;�: a;;;
�jM ANNC� UTAfC Q.�er;;.�'(i�r�
�2,rs, 9 � io)
p��� �2v�urad
aN3
Q HART DAY SCHOOL
[j] PENINSULA EARLY LEARHING CENTER
� PENINSULA PARENT, INC.
� TRUE LEARNING CENTER
J� MONTESSORI SCNOOL
2,155 SF
3,200 SF
1,100 SF
4,148 SF
2,331 Sf
�
�
�
G' FN/'
.��
October 2, 1990
�.�",E l'�LZ�� O.0 ��CZ"��'C.�c.�IxYC.P
�•�� �--_
CITY HALL-SOI PRIMROSE ROAO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 (415) 342-8625
Mr. & Mrs. Len Beatie
P. 0. Box 1515
Burlingame, CA 94011-1515
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Beatie:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
September 24, 1990 Planning Commission approval of your use permit
application became effective October 2, 1990.
This application was to allow a day care use in room 8(874 SF) at
Roosevelt School at 1151 Vancouver Avenue. The September 24, 1990
minutes of the Planning Commission states your application was
approved with the following conditions:
1. that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be used for after
school day care from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings
shall be held in the evenings at this location;
2. that the students shall have access to the larger playground
areas during the time they are on site with the day care
program except that this use shall be limited to the 22
students who are in Room #8;
3. that the students shall be brought to the site and taken
from the site in two vans which shall be par�ced on the
Broadway frontage of the building during the program period;
4. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change
to the operation of this program at this site shall require
an amendment to this use permit;
5. that this use permit shall be subject to review for
compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every two
years thereafter or upon complaint.
/
All site improvements and construction
application to the Building Department.
one year during which time a building
extension of up to one year may be
Commission if application is made before
Sincerely
�G �
Margaret Monroe �
City Planner
MM/ds
cc: Chief Building Inspector
Park Director (when applicable)
Burlingame School District
2303 Trousdale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Assessor's Office, Redwood City
(Acreage, City of Burlingame; APN 027-340-150)
work will require separate
This approval is valid for
Permit must be issued. One
considered by the Planning
the end of the first year.
BEATIE.702
�
�'
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 8
September 24, 1990
10. SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE A CLASSROOM FOR HOMEWORK TUTORING AND ARTS
AND CRAFTS PURPOSES AT 1151 VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1
Reference staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP Monroe
reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant�s letter,
study meeting questions. Five conditions were suggested for
consideration at the public hearing. It was determined there is a
white zone on Vancouver, this is only for passenger
loading/unloading, it would be illegal to park vans there.
Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Len Beatie, Director,
Olympian Day Camp, applicant, stated his program is for children to
improve/enhance their homework; they will park their vans on the
Broadway side instead of Vancouver, there is a small white zone
there; there may be occasional pickup by parents, generally they
transport the students in their vans; the program is for special
needs students, they will not make any money on this, it is mainly
public relations for their Olympian Day Camp program; at this time
they will not go beyond the 22 children allowed in the conditions; he
stated there is a need for this program, parents pay for it, some
children are on scholarships and some get financial aid from the
county.
Marjorie Lane, 2104 Broadway was pleased that the school is being
used but not that her driveway was being used for a turnaround; this
may not apply to this program but other vans who deliver children to
the school do use her driveway. She asked that something be done,
perhaps a notice to the school or to the parents asking them not to
use her driveway. Applicant said his vehicles are all white and with
big signs on them, if she would identify her driveway he would tell
his drivers not to turn around there. There were no further audience
comments and the public hearing was closed.
With the statement this is a school which has had after school
sports, this is a worthy project, with the planning the city has done
the effect of the operations is less than when it was a school, C.
Jacobs moved for approval of the special permit by resolution with
the following conditions: (1) that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be
used for after school day care from 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday
through Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June ) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings shall be
held in the evenings at this location; (2) that the students shall
have access to the larger playground areas during the time they are
on site with the day care program except that this use shall be
limited to the 22 students who are in Room #8; (3) that the students
shall be brought to the site and taken from the site in two vans
which shall be parked on the Broadway frontage of the builcling during
the program period; (4) that any change to the number of students,
the hours of operation, the area of building used, the number of
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 9
September 24, 1990
months this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change to the
operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment to
this use permit; and (5) that this use permit shall be subject to
review for compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every
two years thereafter or upon complaint. Motion was seconded by C.
Mink and approved on a 6-0 roll call vote, C. Ellis absent. Appeal
procedures were advised.
1. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN EIGHT UN
� RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM AT 518 ALMER ROAD, ZONED R-3 /
Ref'�rence staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP /Monroe
revi �wed details of the request, staff review, applicantjsf letter,
findirigs for a negative declaration, study meeting quest' ns. Seven
conditiq�ns were suggested for consideration at the publ' hearing.
Commissio� and staff discussed provision of a 24 hour ergency power
generator �nd suggested a condition #8 addressing th' .
Chm. Graham pened the public hearing. Takuo nno, architect and
applicant, a ised they had no objection to providing a 24 hour
emergency gene�tor, they are negotiating wi two manufacturers to
provide such a nerator which will be inst ed on the ground floor;
one of staff' concerns about the arking layout had been
maneuverability, ey have revised the lans to provide two guest
parking spaces at t end of the ramp a� each of the units will have
two stalls; Mr. Kann requested condit,�ion #5 be changed to read ". .
two guest parking stal s..." ��
Responding to a question� archite�,c't advised they have found there is
a market for two master b.droom�units, buyers want more room in the
condominiums they purchase, one of the master bedrooms could be used
as a guest bedroom or a stud ��r a room for a home occupation. There
was a concern regarding the lanters and landscaped areas_on top of
the post tension slab; a��P li ant explained waterproofing measures
they would take and how .draina e would be handled. There were no
audience comments and tl� public�iearing was closed.
C. Mink found that b ed on the in3s�tial study and comments made this
evening and in the s�aff report ther is no substantial evidence that
this project will ave a significan effect on the environment and
moved for approva of the negative dec aration and condominium permit
by resolution w' h the following con 'tions: (1) that the project
shall be buil as shown on the plan submitted to the Planning
Department da stamped August 21, 1990 Sheets 0,4,6,7); August 30,
1990 (Sheet�l); September 7, 1990 (Sh ts 2,3,5); (2) that the
project sha meet Uniform Building and Fi e Codes as amended by the
City of B�rlingame; (3) that the condition of the City- Engineer's
memos of ,�.ugust 28, 1990 and September 19, 1 90, the Fire Marshal's
memo of,.:July 31, 1990 and the Director of Parks' memo of August 15,
/
(`��e f�t#g o� �uzlix��ttme
CITV HALL - SOI PRIMROSE ROAD. rc� (415)696-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 rwx (415) 342-8386
April 5, 1994
Mr. Len Beatie
Olympian Day Camp
P. O. 1515
Burlingame, CA 94011-1515
Dear Mr. Beatie:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
March 28, 1994 Planning Commission approval of your Special Permit
amendment application became effective April 4, 1994. This
application was to allow after school day program at i151 Vancouver
Avenue, zoned R1.
The March 28, 1994 minutes of the Planning Commission state your
application was approved with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February
10, 1994, Sheet 1, Parking Lot Plan;
2. that the 1, 368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8 ) shall be
used for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday throughout the regular school year
(September through June) for a maximum of 44 students and a
maximum of 5 employees, September - June, and no parent
meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location;
3. that the students shall have access to the program except that
this use shall be limited to the 44 students who are in Rooms
#6 and #8;
4. that children shall be brought to the site in 2 vans three
days a week and 3 vans two days a week, these vans shall be
parked on the street during program hours (12:30-6:00 P.M.)
and no vans or other vehicles associated with this or any
other owners sha11 be parked on the school site at any time;
..
April 5, 1994 •
1151 Vancouver Avenue
page -2-
5. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building,-the method of transporting
students or the.time of year the site is used, the number of
vans stored on the site, or any change to the operation of
this program at this site shall require an amendment to this
use permit;
6. that this use permit shall be subject to review in two and
seven months, June, 1994 and October, 1994, for compliance
with the conditions and thereafter upon compliant; and
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City
of Burlingame.
Al1 site improvements and construction work will require separate
application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for
one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One
extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning
Commission if application is made before the end of the first year.
(Erection of the signage will require separate application to the
Building Department.)
Sincerely yours,
� �'vl���
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM:smg
cc: Burlingame Elementary School District
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(2.16 AC MOL Cor Broadway & Vancouver Aves Acreage City of
Burlingame)
/;
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Graham acknowledged the concerns of the ocal residents, more thought
needs to be given to the direction the sc ol will take, she then moved to
deny the application for a Special Per 't.
Motion was seconded by C. Jacobs d failed on a 3-3-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis,
Galligan and Mink dissenting, C. K ly absent). The City Attorney informed
the Commission that in the abse e of any further motion the application
was deemed denied. Appeal pro edures were advised.
The Commission adjourned fo�a 10 minute break at 11:05 P.M. and reconvened
at 11:15 P.M.
5. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AFTER SCHOOL DAY PROGRAM AT 1151
VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
PROPERTY OWNER AND LEN BEATIE APPLICANT)
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study meeting
questions. It was pointed out that some of the testimony given regarding
the prior item would be relevant to this hearing and should be included by
reference as part of this record. Also, the parking stalls proposed in the
previous application cannot now be considered since the previous
application was denied. There was clarification in the event this Special
Permit Amendment is denied the original permit for this use would stand.
�,c��� ditions were suggested.
ii
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Mr. Beatie, owner of the Olympian Day
Camp, at Broadway and Vancouver was present to answer any questions. All
children are picked up by 2 vans from the 4 Burlingame Elementary Schools.
He has always been licensed for 44 children however there was only 1 room
available from the school at the time of his original application so he was
limited to 22. There are 38 children at this time. The second room became
available last year. Mr. Beatie acknowledged he should have come before
the Commission at that time to request this amendment.
Fred Herin, principal McKinley School, spoke in support
plan. Many children from his school participate in this
parents need choices, this is one of those choices. All
this type are full.
of this Day Care
program and the
the programs of
Harvey Bracken, 2100 Roosevelt and Robert Kane, 2112 Broadway spoke in
opposition to this request. Parking has infringed on the property owners
and gets out of control and asked that the earlier commentary this evening
relating to this issue be incorporated into the minutes pertaining to this
matter. The fact that Mr. Beatie and the school district allowed this to
take place without following procedure disturbs him. The problem has
escalated a little each year.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
-7-
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Jacobs moved to approve this application, by resolution, amending the
conditions to allow 2 vans three days a week and 3 vans two days a week to
park on the street during program hours (12:30-6:00) and no parking of vans
or employees on site at anytime. The approved conditions are: 1) that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped February 10, 1994, Sheet 1, Parking Lot Plan;
2) that the 1,368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8) shall be used for
after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Friday
throughout the regular school year (September through June) for a maximum
of 44 students and a maximum of 5 employees, September - June, and no
parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location; 3) that
the students shall have access to the program except that this use shall be
limited to the 44 students who are in Rooms #6 and #8; 4) that children
shall be brought to the site in 2 vans three days a week and 3 vans two
days a week, these vans shall be parked on the street during program hours
(12:30-6:00 P.M.) and no vans or other vehicles associated with this or any
other owners shall be parked on the school site at any time; 5) that any
change to the number of students, the hours of operation, the area of
building used, the number of months this program uses the building, the
method of transporting students or the time of year the site is used, the
number of vans stored on the site, or any change to the operation of this
program at this site shall require an amendment to. this use permit; 6)
that this use permit shall be subject to review in two and seven months,
June, 1994 and October, 1994, for compliance with the conditions and
thereafter upon compliant; and 7) that the project shall meet all the
requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by
the City of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by C. Galligan and approved on a 4-2-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis
and Mink dissenting and C. Kelly absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures
were advised.
6. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND NEGATIVE DEC���ON FOR AN EIGHTEEN (18)'UNIT
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 601 ANSEL AV , ZONED R-3 (ANSEL FLORIBUNDA
T Tl.fTmT.�T i�at�m�rr��....�.�. ��_�_____ ___
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with ttachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Plannin epartment comments, and study meeting
questions. Nine conditions were s ggested for consideration at the public
hearing. Commission asked the s ecific time work is permitted on weekends
and asked for enforcement of t code. A letter of opposition was received
from Mrs. Hagstrom and is e ered into the record.
Chm. Deal opened the pub c hearing. Jerry Yates, Habitec, San Jose was
present to answer any q stions. He felt the size should not be an issue
since their plan confor s to all the ordinances and they have been generous
about parking space, l ndscape and patio areas.
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 1994
responsible for insuring trash receptacles e emptied and trash in the
area picked up before it becomes a nuis ce; 4) that trash receptacles
shall be placed at the front door and ou ide the front door at a location
approved by the City Engineer; the b iness shall maintain and regularly
empty the trash receptacles, includ' g those on the public right-of-way at
all times and failure to.do so wo d result in review of this use permit;
5) that plans submitted to e Building Department shall meet the
conditions of the Chief Build' g Inspector's memo dated 2/14/94; 6) that
the basement area accessibl to this tenant shall not exceed 300 SF as
noted in the Fire Marshal's emo dated 2/17/94 and shall only be used for
storage in association wit this business; 7) that the project shall meet
all the requirements of he Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as
amended by the City of rlingame; and 8) that the use shall be reviewed
for conformance with t ese conditions in nine months (December, 1994) or
upon complaint therea er.
Motion was seconded�by C. Ellis and approved on a 6-0-1 (C. Kelly absent)
voice vote. Appe�,�' procedures were advised.
It was specified, for the record, that Noah's is also a deli.
4. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES AT
1131 - 11�1 VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT. PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT)
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study meeting
questions. If recommended to Council for approval, 7 conditions were
suggested. The Commission asked for clarification of to the distribution
of the parking; of the 27 spaces on site, 13 are for the district and 14
are for the tenants according to the School District proposal. The number
of parking spaces required for the new office area is based on square
footage. There was also a question pertaining to the condition of the ramp
used to access the rear parking area.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Burlingame Elementary School
Superintendent Beuthel was present to answer any questions, he clarified
there are 2 separate sources of funds, Capital funds available for
construction and General funds available for program. Often the public
combines these in their mind, however the district is not allowed to
legally intermingle these funds. Three criteria have been examined in
arriving at the decision to use Roosevelt, 1) space; 2) construction
dollars; and 3) program. This option is the most effective of these
options considered. The district has been involved in strategic planning
since 1991. The projected enrollment shows steady increase in students.
The district relies on the lease income to continue the current programs.
They would like to move the district office to Roosevelt in 1994; and to
move toward reopening Roosevelt as a district school in approximately 3
years. In Burlingame, the district office has been housed i� a public
-3-
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
school since 1913. For this reason the request to have a district office
at Roosevelt is in accordance with and remains consistent with the zoning
ordinance and general plan.
As a part of the district's presentation Lee Carney, AIA, VBN, 501 - 14th
Street, Oakland, introduced a new landscape plan that he felt would e�lain
the mitigation proposed to some of the unusual problems. If the rear
parking lot is approved the ramp would be replaced with a new a concrete
ramp.
Speakers in support of the application were; Fred Herin, current principal
at McKinley school, formerly the principal at Roosevelt school when it was
closed in 1980, Lisa Rosenthal, 2008 Easton, a tenant at Roosevelt, owner
of Peninsula Parent Magazine, and a school board member of the Burlingame
Elementary School District, Steve Warden, 736 Acacia Drive, representing
the Burlingame School District Budget Advisory Committee, a group of
parents, teachers, school employees and local citizens appointed by the
School Board to advise them on various aspects of the school budget and to
look at methods of income and other ways of controlling expenses. The
intent at the time of closure was to reopen Roosevelt when enrollment was
such that it could be reopened. Use of Roosevelt school as district
offices will not interfere with the return to a public school use. It
would be preferable for everyone if the school could be "owner occupied".
New and improved equipment would certainly be a plus for the children and
neighbors in that neighborhood; the educational purpose of the Burlingame
School District will not cause any disruption to the neighborhood. The
Peninsula Parent Magazine will be leaving in June which will free up the
space for classroom use or the business of the district. This relocation
of administrative functions is the most cost effective and reasonable
option available to the district, the Budget Advisory committee request
that the Commission approve the District's request to relocate the District
Administration Office to Roosevelt School.
The following spoke in opposition: Ron Neugauer, 1170 Vancouver,
resident/parent, James Quinn, 1116 Vancouver Avenue, Dan Ping, 1219
Vancouver, Wayne Parker, 1245 Armsby, Hillsborough, Robert Kane, 2112
Broadway, Harvey Bracken, 2100 Roosevelt, Peggy Kane, 2112 Broadway, Mark
Dollosso , 1104 Vancouver, Peter Jampowie, 2112 Roosevelt, John DeHoney,
1120 Vancouver, Kathleen Ping, Vancouver, Oscar Newelt, 1150 Vancouver,
Kathy Peto, 1160 Vancouver, Pauline Irons, 2108 Broadway,
Sue Ping, 1219 Vancouver, Art Dollosso, 2116 Roosevelt.
Points made by opponents were: will cause an unnecessary, harmful effect
on property values; the peak hour traffic between 8:30 and 9:00 is not
representative, each individual stays 3 to 4 minutes; this plan for the
district offices is the same as presented before except the portable is
removed and 4 parking spaces are added next to the fence; how will the
kindergarten room be used, is in serious need of repair; Franklin is a
better location because have separate driveway for pick up and-drop off;
'm
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 1994
access to Roosevelt is poor, narrow street frontage, dead end on Broadway
frontage, street too narrow to turn; portable at Franklin would be cheaper
than proposed renovation at Roosevelt; Franklin's site is bigger and
intensification does not affect residential property; the district offices
have been a Franklin for 14 years and have caused no problem; will need
space in Roosevelt if reopen as neighborhood school; parking proposed will
take about a third of the school yard; addition of a driveway mid-block on
Vancouver to access the district offices is unsafe; tenants want to expand
and have done so for several years; the parking lots in the school yard
will impact adjacent neighbors who will get their e�aust, noise and glare;
Vancouver gets a lot of through traffic from Hillsborough and across town,
this will add to it, want it back to neighborhood school so traffic will be
local; with out the play yard it will not be the same quality school;
concerned about need to light the parking areas for safety; some school
employees will be there as early as 6 am and others after 5, so will not be
an 8 to 5 use; in addition there will be vendors and other visitors to the
district offices during the day; the more heard the greater the impact
seems to be.
Additional comments in opposition were: the rear parking area seems to be
a open ticket for Olympian Day Care vans and buses; houses behind the
raised area at the back of the site are far enough above that they see the
tops of buses and vans parked on the site; concern vans will be aM
attractive nuisance for vandals; the school yard will be a place for kids
looking for a place to park and party; less play field area will mean more
balls in his yard; school district repaired fence between his property and
school but only after first hearing; only time can show house for sale is
mid-day, mid-summer; reviewed the history of the district's proposed uses
of site since 1988 noting that district did not ask for city permit to let
vans/buses use the tennis court; feels facility is presently being overused
to make money and would like it back to neighborhood school; opposed to
parking lot; for income from tenants they could rent office space on
Rollins Road; concern about noise and air pollution from parking area since
20' from bedroom window about 15' below window, exhaust will rise; school
yard is an echo chamber, can hear balls bounce now; no way to add a new gym
to the site if the school district comes in; the school yard is used
everyday by. children; not want an office building in the middle of a
residential neighborhood; school district proposal represent about a 20�
increase in trips to the site.
Final comments in opposition were: why relocate the district offices if
the school is to be reopened in three years; landscaping will not make
this additional use compatible with the neighborhood; the district has
guidelines for the use of schools, this allows light commercial use; find
a permanent location for school district offices in business area, it is
hard on them to move all the time; each employee does not need private
parking; private parking costs money and is not necessary;proposal does not
address how the district will reduce traffic; public school would have a
stronger sense of community and parents would work together; concern about
-5-
Burling�me Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 1994
unsafe driving and parking habits of people who now come to school to leave
off children, block street for emergency vehicles;play fields are needed
for practice during little league, will loose if offices relocated not
enough spaces.
At the end of the testimony Superintendent Beuthel spoke again. He noted
that this was a complex issue the effect of a decline in funding from the
state and a need to maximize resources and space. The objective is to
maximize the instructional program of the district. The district has
repaired fences as soon as they were made aware of problem not mentioned
until this request for offices was made; enrollment figures were discussed
and targets for opening Roosevelt; selection of Roosevelt for district
offices was the result of reviewing a wide variety of options; at this
point in time Roosevelt is the most effective, economic and efficient
option in terms of space, construction and program. If the school is
reopened as a public school the district offices would remain at the
Roosevelt site.
A second petition in opposition was submitted.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioners noted in their discussion that the school district has a real
financial need; there is an alternative of adding space at Franklin which
has a bigger site, the present uses with the district office have an impact
on the integrity of the residential neighborhood; with the district offices
here the impact would be reduced by to acceptable levels eliminating one
major morning lessee; people are more likely to drive to school today than
in 1980 so public school will have traffic impact; public school serving
local people more willing to follow a prescribed pick up/drop off routine
and avoid blocking driveways; it would cost a lot of money to reopen the
school but it would be ideal; Franklin site council may not want portable
classrooms but they are a fact of life in today's budget times, there is
room for portables at Washington school which has a smaller site.
C. Graham moved to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration to the
City Council, the motion was seconded by C. Mink and approved on a 5-1-1
(C. Jacobs dissenting and C. Kelly absent) roll call vote.
Commissioners expressed understanding of the school's need for money,
however also understands the needs of the neighborhood. It was further
stated the school district office is not the problem, have had district
offices on a school site historically and the offices do not represent that
big an incremental increase in traffic, it is the tenants that are the
major problem and burden on the neighborhood; improvements appear to have
been done as cheaply as possible, the parking off Broadway does not appear
to add to the project except for full time staff only; parking at the rear
might create a 24 hour problem not present now; parking at rear not
necessary to approve district office; play area is more important than
parking at school.
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Graham acknowledged the concerns of the local residents, more thought
needs to be given to the direction the school will take, she then moved to
deny the application for a Special Permit.
Motion was seconded by C. Jacobs and failed on a 3-3-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis,
Galligan and Mink dissenting, C. Kelly absent). The City Attorney informed
the Commission that in the absence of any further motion the application
was deemed denied. Appeal procedures were advised.
The Commission adjourned for a 10 minute break at 11:05 P.M. and reconvened
at 11:15 P.M.
5. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AFTER SCHOOL DAY PROGRAM AT 1151
VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCH00�13'ISTRICT,
PROPERTY OWNFR ANTI T.i�u RT.'TTTL� TTnrT.,,,�.....
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP N iroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comme s, and study meeting
questions. It was pointed out that some of the te imony given regarding
the prior item would be relevant to this hearing nd should be included by
reference as part of this record. Also, the par ng stalls proposed in the
previous application cannot now be consi red since the previous
application was denied. There was clarificati n in the event this Special
Permit Amendment is denied the original perm' for this use would stand.
Eight conditions were suggested.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Mr. B atie owner of the Ol
Camp, at Broadway and Vancouver was pres t to answer an �Pian Day
children are picked up by 2 vans from t 4 Burlingame Elementary Schoolsl
He has always been licensed for 44 ch' dren however there was only 1 room
available from the school at the time f his original application so he was
limited to 22. There are 38 childr at this time. The second room became
available last year. Mr. Beatie cknowledged he should have come before
the Commission at that time to r quest this amendment.
Fred Herin, principal
plan. Many children
parents need choices,
this type are full.
McKinle School, spoke in support of this Day Care
from h' school participate in this program and the
this s one of those choices. All the programs of
Harvey Bracken, 2100 osevelt and Robert Kane, 2112 Broadway spoke in
opposition to this re est. Parking has infringed on the property owners
and gets out of cont 1 and asked that the earlier commentary this evening
relating to this is e be incorporated into the minutes pertaining to this
matter. The fact at Mr. Beatie and the school district allowed this to
take place witho following procedure disturbs him. The problem has
escalated a litt e each year.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed._
-7-
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING
The CITY OF BIIRLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1995,
at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application
and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning
Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
1131-1141 VANCOUVER AVENIIE APN: 027-340-150
NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO
INCREASE THE AREA OF OPERATION FROM 1368 sf (ROOMS #6 AND
#8) TO 2552 SF BY EBPANDING TO THE 1184 SF RINDERGARTEN
ROOM ON SITE AND TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF VANS PARRED ON
STREET BY ONE FOR OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP AT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
SITE AT 1131-1141 VANCOUVER AVENIIE, ZONED R-l.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
Please note, when possible, and when multiple family or commercial
development is involved, this notice shall be posted in a public
place on the project site and on neighborinq buildinqs with
tenants. -
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
DECEMBER 20, 1994
�. �
_3
�r�
�;
;�_� -
�`��= ���;�,•� �
�I�t�E _�� t'-
.�:. - �� .
�
� T � 'I
�. __ `* `��_.
� E t: �a � *�.
�� �
� .�,� �
_ g-L'1 __ �(Y'� ��� �:... ._ °.��.
� G.
/Yn �
�1JV.��� ���j'ZB�� ��� �, � ir
�'..._.'. _. .-s., � �...
.�. ��� ��� '_ ' �...�` � J 120� � lllot �'31)�,,
_ - s'_� � � "4
a- b
� �
' I1�/ II�� ��13j� � 21a0 {� ��'" ,
� � r. " �...� -
�-•.- -_ _ r w ' `,� �::-,
� � -, .��> ��_. � �: i�4� , �.� -��
f : < , � ?' ��
� R003E�/ELT "
� �a. 216Z bQ .�c�
_ScNaoL _ -� Y �.. ` �--�'y;- <
.- .��y.
�: - _ x ; �, �,��.- .� {dj���� s �
� �: �� T (/ - �-, A � �
' � . e. ..
. . _ ? �.�„� �T`_� � - -� - -
� E..>_. � ,, _�...
�i_'�i^ : ��+':S: q
it
.
► �
yi S -_
�±- }
^Ic � 3. ;
v
-- � � �
+9'v L�
� :=� � '_'
�-;
i � y
- - i','t. f : -� -� _
�
;���
�� m�%
� :� � �S`�.Y"��2 .0 .,..R-�,�; c��, �.
�- '' fi"' �:.�`�t�Y+.�.; �Ts� •
'�� S
�
� �_ x�' ' r,`'�' £ s = _ •' �
r �
� _ --
's
� ... .��ir�J�V�OVI%►1„,� �'�"`-0
�a ts�. � Ri.� =r�,� �•: . � : � � �.
��: r ' _� � 2It$ � �
��� ,s �' �- '.. W �` _�z-
� �7
K� �� �� -�
_ � -- „� � �,� ��
.� � ; ��. ���::�� � �i
���
; �:` .��'" z�s: a
i �� a
A ,_
_ ^��# O
� : �
a
t �
_ _ _ � {
= .� '-{ i 9�r 3 ��— 4 t'v
\T�' _ t
t . � ,\cG - /
�va4
_ �Rr
�R � " r` �
� � "°c � �.P Jr�.a_� ...
Y ,i
i t.� .
' . - . l.�jti _ �. �2`� _
. . .. . . .>=V' . . .':{_
`�� � �e��' � -�y y � �' .. . � .'�.:. - '
1�.Y � �Y �r�` �r.� . � . �`.I� c��..
� �. .. .. , , .. , _ *�uV t -
'- �'.. � J�. '. _' �� .:: . � i : -� �- '.�sS. . - - • .
�
• �
._ . _
�4
: _ ,.,__:.i.i3w .G, ..._, � �"_,-_,.y
��.�-`�.'. _
�
� ''.
�-� ,�- � �
4" . t _��: • • �
, Y�
r'�t ;F" "a_%E -. � � �
a.
,_ _ �,a�`
"- - � �; . � �.�
,.
� _ �'' ,Qas� _ , �--
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been
made for a Snecial Permit Amendment to increase the number nf nartirinantc
Olympian Dav Camp at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue zoned R-1 (CS 25 28 030-2)
(APN 027-340-150) ; property owner• Burlinaame Elementary School District.
2303 Trousdale Drive ; and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame on January 9, 1995 , at which time it reviewed and considered the
staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said
hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission
that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and
reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby
found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above
will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption
Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior
alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances and 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(b) consists of
construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial
or institutional facilities, including but not limited to: (b) Small parking
lots is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set
forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be
recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I� , Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the 9th day of Januar 1995 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, categorical exemption and special permit amendment
1131 - 1151 Vancouver Avenue
effective January 18, 1995
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Department and date stamped November 15, 1994;
2. that the 2,552 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8 and kindergarten
room) shall be used for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00
P.M., Monday through Friday throughout the regular school year
(September through June) for a maximum of 60 students and a maximum of
5 employees, and no parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at
this location; ,
f..-
3. that the stu nts shall be brought to the site in � vans three days
per week and� vans two days per week, and that these vans plus one
employe vehicle shall be parked on the street during program hours
(12:30-6:00 P.M., Monday through Friday) and that no vans or other
vehicles associated with this use shall be parked on the school site
at any time;
4. that any change to the number of students, hours of operation, area of
building used, number of months or time of year this program operates,
the method of transporting students, number of vans, or any change to
the operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment
to this use permit;
� f;
5, that this use permit shall be subject to review in one year (January,
1996), thereafter upon compliant for compliance with these conditions;�;'
and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
_ _ f
�- - -
_" � _ � % /
- LI-,
C, ����
�
a,.,, � (J
TTEM 4
CITY OF B URLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
TO EXPAND AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE PROGRAM
Address: 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue
Meeting Date: 1/9/95
Request: Special permit amendment to increase the number of participants from 44 to 60; to
increase the area of operation from 1368 SF (Rooms #6 and #8) to 2552 SF by expanding to the
1184 SF kindergarten room on site; and to increase the number of vans and employee vehicles
parked on the street for Olympian Day Camp at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (CS
25.28.030-2). There would be no change in the number of employees, hours, days or months
of operation.
Applicant: Len Beatie APN: 027-340-15o
Property Owner: Burlingame Elementary School District
Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres more or less
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: related school uses in Roosevelt School and single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class
1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances.
Summary:
The applicant, Olympian Day Camp, is requesting a special permit amendment to expand its
after school day care program at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue (Roosevelt School), zoned R-1.
The program would be expanded to the kindergarten room of the school (which has an address
of 1131 Vancouver Avenue). This 1184 SF room was most recently occupied by the Peninsula
Parent Magazine. The zoning code allows school related uses upon approval of a special permit.
The original special permit for the after school program was approved in October, 1990 (see
October 2, 19901etter from City Planner to Len Beatie and September 24, 1990 P.C. minutes).
An amendment to the permit was approved effective April, 1994 to increase the number of
participants, azea of operation, hours and number of employees. At the time, Olympian was
leasing on-site parking spaces from the school district for vehicle storage beyond its program
hours. Their application included a request for on-site parking and storage for Olympian's
vehicles. After public comment on this proposal and a school district proposal being processed
for this site at the same time, Planning Commission determined that no on-site pazking would
be allowed and that Olympian's parking would be limited to 2-3 vans, parked on the street
during program hours only. Planning Commission did not limit pazking to any particular street
(see April 15, 1994 letter from City Planner to Len Beatie and March 28, 1994 P.C. minutes
for Items 4 & 5).
The proposed amendments:
A. Increase the number of participants from 44 to 60.
B. Increase the azea of the program from 1368 SF to 2552 SF by expanding to the 1184 SF
ldndergarten room. The previous amendment allowed the use in Rooms 6& 8 at 1151
! �
SPECLAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
1131-IISI VANCOUVER AVENUE
Vancouver. The proposed amendment would continue the use in Rooms 6& 8, and
expand the use to the lflndergarten room.
C. Increase the number of vans parking on street during program hours to four vans three
days per week and three vans two days per week. The previous amendment allowed
parking, on the street, of two vans three days per week and three vans two days per
week during program hours. In addition, to allow parking for one employee's vehicles
parked on the street. There was no request for employee parking with the previous
amendment.
The number of employees (5), and the hours, days and months of operation would remain the
same (12:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, from September through June).
Proposed Special
Permit Amendment:
Number of
Participants:
.1
Area (S� Increase by 1184 SF
& Rooms to 2552 SF by
expanding
to kindergarten room.
Hours, Days,
Months:
# Employees:
# Vans
& Parking:
Rooms 6 & 8 (1,368
SF) would continue
to be used.
no change
no change
4 vans 3 days/week+
3 vans 2 days/week
to be pazked on the
street during program
hours only + one
employee vehicle on
the street
Meets all other zoning code requirements.
3/94 Approved
Special Permit
Amendment:
44
Increase to 1368 SF
by expanding to
Room #6.
10/90 Original
Special Permit
Approved:
22
874 SF
Room #�8 only.
Room #8 would
continue to be used.
change to
12:30-6:00 p.m.
Monday-Friday
September-7une
5
2 vans 3 days/week+
3 vans 2 days/week
to be parked on the
street during program
hours only; no other
vehicles associated
with this use shall be
parked on the school
site at any time
3:00-6:00 p.m.
Monday-Friday
September-7une
3
2 vans to pazk on
Broadway during
program hours
2
� r
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT ll31-1151 VANCOUVER AVENUE
Staff Comments: The City Engineer, Chief Building Inspector and Fire Marshal had no
comments on this special permit amendment. Planning staff would note that on the evening of
January 3, representatives of the school district and the applicant met with the neighbors in the
vicinity of Roosevelt School. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed expansion
of the program and parking. The applicant will report on the meeting at the public hearing.
Study Meeting:
At the December 12, 1994 Planning Commission meeting the commission asked a number of
questions. The applicant responded with a letter (date stamped 12/29/94). The applicant notes
that the number of Olympian employees will remain at five. This is possible because Olympian
had one extra staff inember than required by the California Social Services office. The applicant
also explains how the employees arrive at the site and notes that nobody parks in the back of the
school. He also included a sheet delivered to neighbors on December 22. It announces a
informational meeting regarding Olympian's application.
Planning staff has included four charts from the School District's March, 1994 application. The
charts list the other tenants, and show the number of students, employees, employee vehicles and
hours of operation. The peak hours for the number of students at the site would be between
9:00 a.m. and noon. It can be assumed that 9:00 and noon would also be the peak traffic hours
due to parents dropping off and picking up children. The peak hours for the number of
employee vehicles at the site would be from 12:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.
The students would be brought to the site using 3-4 vans. As with the March, 1994 special
permit amendment, the children are picked up from various schools between 12:30 p.m. and
3:00 p. m. . Parents pick up the children between 5:00 p. m. and 6:00 p. m. . Five to seven
children would be transported home in the vans.
Required Findings for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following
conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it
deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in
a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and
potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity.
Planning Commi.ccion Action:
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by
resolution, and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated.
At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
3
1 _ T
�
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT Il3I-ZISl VANCOUVER AVENUE
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and
date stamped November 15, 1994;
2. that the 2,552 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8 and ldndergarten room) shall be used for
after school day care from 12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday throughout the
regular school year (September through June) with a malcimum of 60 students and a m�imum
of 5 employees, and no parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location;
3. that students shall be brought to the site in four vans three days per week and three vans two
days per week, and that these vans plus one employee vehicle shall be parked on the street
during program hours only (12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday) and that no vans
or other vehicles associated with this use shall be parked on the school site at any time;
4. that any change to the number of students, hours of operation, area of building used, number
of months or time of year this program operates, the method of transporting students, number
of vans, or any change to the operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment
to this use permit;
5. that this use permit shall be subject to review in one year (January, 1996), and thereafter upon
complaint for compliance with these conditions; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire
Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
;� i
Sheri Saisi
Planner
cc: Olympian Day Camp c/o Len Beatie, applicant
Burlingame Elementary School District (property owner) c/o Bob Beuthel, superintendent
8
CITY OO F BURLINGAME
AFPLICATIOO N TO THE PLANNING COO MMISSIOO N
��RArEo � �Ea/ T
��
Type of A�plication: �pe�l� it _Variance _Other
Project Address //_� / tf� ,�v C c� c-e' a:`r 1_' .d ve_ ,
Assessor's Parcel Number(s) O27' �J4Q��5(
APPL/CANT
Name: ����- �`�/�t�!N r'v �3,�' �;' � :a '�1�
Address: �� �� t3c�Jt ;•� f'S'
City/State2ip: �!��°� =c�»�z. �rc, =� �'t;'i
Telephone:(work) ;�5'/s l � �',,'_ —� ycx�
(home) �'>is � G �,Z - dl`Y"%
ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER
Name:
Address:
City/State2ip:
Telephone (daytime): _
�-
AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE:
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowle�e and belief. �� ,'
' _ .� L c ^ ii ,/ �%
Ap 4'rcant's Signature Date
PROPERTY OWNER ���e,-,� e�fary
Name: f�L.i ,/-'�rn,%i:�.rf,ti�� S�NC'c�".' /?,s�t',
;,._;/
Address: �-__? L� _� /i�oLr s ct�i£ �E' l�i-_^ •
City/State2ip: � i.�'!'��s9� u��7��' �� . �'`�'_''�'�
r
Telephone:(work) :�_��- ; �'����
Please indicate with an asierisk f'1 who the contact nerson
is fo� this nroiect.
j e `�' �,:�
Ihome)
I know about the proposed application, and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application. ��
< <
Property Owner's Signature ate
,; ,
Date Filed• � !'-� `�
OFFICE USE ONLY
,- - �
Fee �' � � _
Receipt � ✓
Letter(s) to applicant advising application incomplet : �
Date application accepted as complete: �• -
P.C. study meeting (date) �2•/2 yy P.C. public hearing (date)
P.C. Action
�zraz Appeal to Council? Yes No
projapp.frm Council meeting date Council Action
� CITv 0
4�
BURLINGAME
It�•'= _
(.:IT`,�� ��)F E�,UFLII�iGHI�1E
��E(:IHL. F'Er�l`JIIT �PF'LIC;��i��)f .S
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ oi injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
The Olympian will be replacing the Peninsula Parent Magazine as the tenant.
(Addressed as 1131 Voncouver Ave.) Thus reducing the commercial drop in traffic
as well as four (4) emplovee parking spaces on Vancouver Ave.. There will be
one additional Van added from the Olympian. The Olympian expantion into this
class room will facilitate more adequate space for an additional sixteen (16)
children who are in need of added academic tutoring and care in order to receive
a better education. There will be no additional traffic impact bn the area,
as the Olympian provides school pick-up and home delivery. This should provide
better safety and improvement to the general welfare of the area surrounding
Roosevelt School.
2.
3
How wi// the pioposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Bui/ingame
Genera/ Plan and Zoning OrdinanceT
This proposal would be consistent with the zoning (R-1, low density residential)
and elementary school use as called for by the general plans.
How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinity7
Existing structures are not being affected or changed in any way.
In addition, Olympian will be cutting down the traffic from a commercially used
building to a much lower density use on Vancouver Ave..
t 2/92
ep.frm
I '
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injuiious to
property oi improvements in the vicinity oi to pub/ic hea/th, safety, geneia/ we/fare, oi
convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighborinp properties or structures on those
propertiesl If neighboring properties witl not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving,
landscaping sunlighdshade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare7
Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbafle), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks,
storape of chemicals, situations which encourape the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseasesl.
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection7 wll alarm systems
or sprinklers be installedl Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services
(i.e., noise, unruly qatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materials,
or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
General weJfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal conststent with the city's policy and
goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefitl
�onvenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for
this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or
handicappedl
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accoidance with the Bur/ingame Genera/
Plan and Zoning OrdinanceT
Ask the Planning Department for the general plan designation and zoninp district for the proposed project site. Also
ask for an exp�anation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated
designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit' accordingly.
3. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the
existing neighboihood and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existiny neighborhood? If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. If chanpes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing
architecture, pattern of developme�t on adjacent properties in the neighborhoodl If a use will affect the way a
neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parkinp lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area
and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change
to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other
structures in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood7 Think of character as
the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. �II there be more
traffic or less parking available resulting from this usel If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change,
state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existinq and potential uses in the peneral vicinityl Compare your
project with existinp uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state
why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
izrez
w.frm
.:�" ^
�
syrtuNcnMe
�S�
1.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
COMI�RCIAL APPLIGATIONS
� / �.
Proposed use of site: �� ��'�:' .3J �,- ,. I, r�r':",°�, � �,�,�
, _, �,, .. . T. � ..� , ,
2. Day,s/hours o-r�f operation:
�' I /. . o ,.. � . ,, Li I— i' , Pi r u �> :.. �
�� � n.-,,.' ts u� �f c
'_?�> !�� -+�v � ; Uo
� _ . ,
3. Number of trucks/service vehicles b t e ��� -�
( Y YP ) ' i' ,�cc...
4. Current and Projected maximum number of employees at this
tocation:
Existincr In 2 Years In 5 Years
After A€-�er After
td _ C Tv
$�,dal= 5,� _�EAY' A� �—:,T�� �-Pid- 8AM- 5 PM 5 PM
5 �plrn�Pes !?�3� -� ��oo f� -
Weekdays ,'
fulltime ��,'3�'�/`'I �:`L � �',a.f `'r'f/'Y�r' � : �.
artime —� `—
Weekends
fulltime � ���
artime T �
5. Current and Projected maximum number of visitors/customers
who may come to the site:
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ExistinQ In 2 Years In 5 Years
�'�� ,: ?'', 'e� A€�t�x' ( : � _% '-%� A€t�r
$���Pi2'9 � AfNiv� 8AM-�� �PM �PM �F�
1 �
`� � ' � ;,J � �
Weekda s/.��`�' t�f"I _ l � r �
Weekends ' "�""
Maximum number of employees and visitors/customers which can
be expected to be on the property at any one time: ��'
�d`o�will the employees park?/1/-r,�'�,'�-s �rf= i�t.'� ���"'
�'G}c�G'%r�
Where ��/will customers/visitors park? �L�2'c�:.: /`,_� �_ �,
Present or most recent use of site: P�if'11Y1SL(�C� p�Y�YLI
�� � Z��.� ,
List of other tenants/firms on the roperty:/��li�'t� sc��•°�
�E�i✓iNs+��%�- f�i_'l�J:t''rci:ir�,ir�� �=_,�',�v�L._'F ,c;fe' f�''�./_'rtsstts C-G�w!'tt"i'
, i - r - -- - - � .- . , , , _
� �
;
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: � CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARRS DIRECTOR •
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR ��.(,(Q� �Q�{�Yl�
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
1 � ��� �� `�" Date of Comments
�'�� C-�!� i-✓� hu'�W�
...
� J
n
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION �2�9� MEETING: //�. JZ
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �V- �
KV Urlryll\ V� � O1�1V1
0
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AT
' ('. i.. ..
CITY EN(iINEER
CiiIEF BIIILDING INBPECTOR
FIRIi MARBHAL
PAI2K8 DIRECTOR
CITY ATTOItNEY
CZTY PLANNER/ZONII�T(� TECHNICIAN
REQUEST FOR �,k?1Z�C.,(d.� �-��'l��(
,,.,�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMTSSION A2�8ATrMEETING: � f L.-
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: � V- !�'►
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah �� y� Date of Cou►ments
- ��_<��-Y,..,s:� "
(:�^'�p �.,:% �.c�y: c7 f
r
�(./�G Cv�^-� r� c�tifi
�, -
�
1 �`;��C� z �
Uv� �a�� �y �/
� � 2 �f ��
•,
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
�_ FIRE MAI2SHAL
PARRS DIRECTOR �
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR __��2Q.(�(QJ� �e-1��Y1'j
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah �J' Date of Comments
� C�4.l��i
r�_ z�_S�
N� �,�,�
���
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION �6i� MEETING: �. IZ
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �Y- �
MIlVUTFS
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING CONIlVIISSION
December 12, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
A regulaz meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman
Galligan on Monday, December 12, 1994 at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Deal, Galligan, Jacobs, Kelly, Key (7:34) and Mink
Commissioner Ellis
5TAFF PRFSENT: City Planner; Meg Monroe, City Attorney; Jerry Coleman, City Engineer; Frank
Erbacher, Fire Marshall; Keith Marshall
MIlV UTTES -
AGENDA -
The minutes of the November 28, 1994 meeting were approved as mailed.
The order of the agenda was approved.
Chaiiman Galligan informed all applicants for action items that the rules of procedure for
the commission require a muumum of 4 affirmative votes to pass a motion. If an applicant
would prefer to be heard by a full commission, they may request a continuance. Item #3,
1000 Vancoiiver asked to set aside their decision until their action item, in anticipation of
another ca�iimissioners arrival.
1�3� � M:1
There were,lio public comments.
ITEMS FOR STUDY
� 1. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXPAND OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP AT 1131-1151
VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY
OWNER AND OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP, APPLICANT)
Requests: applicant to complete application, i.e., number of employees; where do employees park; does
anyone park at the rear of the site; hours of schools now on the site and proposed; complete chart
including number of people on the entire site; enumerate peak time of day traffic movement of all tenants;
what plans have been made by the applicant to meet with the neighbors and the school district. Item set
for public hearing January 9, 1995 pending necessary responses received in a timely manner.
T
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes December 12, 1994
Chairman Galligan noted that there were now 6 commissioners present and asked again if anyone wished
a continuance? There were no such requests.
ACTION ITEMS
2. SPECIAL PERMIT �T 123-125 BLOOMFIELD ROAD, ZONED R-1 (JOHN STEINER,
PROPERTY OWNER i�ND PHILIP D. WII.KINSON, APPLICANT) (DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AT NOVEIv�BER 28. 1994 PLANrIING COMMISSION MEETING)
Reference staff report, 12/12/94, 3vith attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria,
Planning Department comments, and study meeting questions. An application to designate a primary
dwelling on this non-conforming lot and for a pazking variance at this location was denied without
prejudice at the November 28, 1994 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has returned with the
same remodel plans for the dwelling and has chosen to relocate and redesign the carport. This is a
resubmittal. Five conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chm. Galligan opened the public hearing. John Steiner, homeowner, 123=125 Bloomfield, and Philip
Wilkinson, applicant were present to explain the resubmittal. There was discus'sion about the amount and
type of pavement in the front yazd because there would be a lot of cement and �it, would be very visible
with a carport instead of a garage. There are no cunent plans to go into the main.portion of the house
to do any work. They reviewed alternatives discussed by the commission and feel th'�s cunent design is
the most viable and affordable. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Deal noted this new design is more appropriate and the carport will appear to belong to the second
unit. He then moved to approve this application, by resolution, with the conditions in the staff report.
Motion was seconded by C. Kelly and failed on a 3-3-1 (Cers. Jacobs, Key and Mink dissenting and C.
Ellis absent) roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
C. Key moved approval of the application, by resolution, with the conditions in the staff report and an
added condition requiring 50% of the front yazd azea between the property line and fence of the structure
including the area in front of the dwelling at 125 be put into soft landscaping. The conditions are as
follows: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
and date stamped December 5, 1994, site plan, house and carport elevations; and other sheets date
stamped November 4, 1994 including floor plan, foundation plan, building sections and electrical; 2) that
the carport roof shall be of Class B fire rating or better in order to meet the requirements of the Chief
building Inspector's 11/7/94 memo; 3) that in order to meet the requirements of the City Engineer's
memo dated December 5, 1994, the curb cut for the driveway shall be relocated to �.size and locafion
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit; 4) that the primary unit shall be
125 Bloomfield and that any additional expansion of 125 Bloomfield shall require a special permit from
the Planning Commission and that there shall be no expansion of the secondary 123 Bloomfield structure;
5) that the project shall provide 50% softscape in the front yard between the property line and face of the
structures and that the softscape shall be concentrated in the area in front of the dwelling at 125
Bloomfield; and 6) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform building and Uniform
Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
-2-
e
�aooQ
� SKI � TOURS
I�
� -
Memo To
From
Subject
��°¢` �\
�� O
�
O b
\�q DC�G''/
Burlingame Planning Dept.
Olympian Day Camp & Learning Center
� �y M ►I,q,�,
� j'' j�1
i�
�, �
OAK HILL R,ANCH
'- C�MMeR f OMp --
Answer to questions of Planning Commission on 12/12/94
1. How many employees?
A. Same, no change 5(five)
2. Where do they park?
Only one (1) employee brings a vehicle and parks a block
east of Vancouver on Broadway. One employee is transported
by parent all other employees (3) three drive vans which
they take to and from work with them and are used for school
pick-ups and student take home.
3. Is anyone parking in back of school?
Answer: No!
4. Hours of operation are the same: 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.
5. [�1hat are peak traffic hours?
[�Te have no peak traffic; if there were it would be between
3:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.
�
7.
A form letter from the Burlinga,"m'e School District �oas passed out
Dec. 22nd for a meeting Jan.��a. The results of which can be
discussed at the January planning meeting.j
Burlingame School District will be represented at planning meeting.
(a:`U'a�I`% /`'l�m. �l�ovs�vef� S�h,
�' I SPORTS • P.O. Box 1515 • Burlingame, CA 94011-1515 �(415) 692-6400
� �
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
REGARDING USE OF KINDERGARTEN AT ROOSEVELT
FOR OLYMPIC DAY CARE
The Burlingame School District will have an informational
meeting regarding the use of the Roosevelt Kindergarten Room
for Olympic Day Care.
Any interested party may attend.
When: January 3, 1995
Time: 6:00 p.m.
Where: Kindergarten Room at Roosevelt School
December 15, 1994
O.Olympic Day Care
� }, �
Larry Krusemark
True Learning Center
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
George Hart
Hart Day School
1151-B Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Lynette Muhic
Burlingame Montessori
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
Len Beatie
Olympian Day Camp
1151 Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Joanne Bailey
Peninsula Montessori
1 151-A Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
3/16/94 List of Tenants
# of Employees
4+2 Volunteers
3
�
5
7
Attachment 6
( YY�1ii Sz�i �Z,� �/ � �'r
Cl ��:�-�p� .�✓�. /.�"Grl� G'/�
� � pPiY'{'lil�1 � /�G�'J'1 P�'l�!'Yl�'�
# Vehicles `�����C�I�J
L
2
�
�_ ,� ���,;,: _
�-�-�a�r�-
5
�Lisa Rosenthal
Peninsula Parent, fn� �.--'` 3 _ ��"
2�-9�' Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
.�8-� � : .
GJ �� �;�-2�
ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
iE�i
162
V 144
a 126
� 108
U 90
e
72
54
36
18
0
Category
� Students
C«1:TL'i�3
y
�
3/ 1 6/94
R0.94.15
Students by Hour
CHART 1 �
ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
OLYMPIAN DAY TRUE LEARNING PEN. EARLY LRN. MONTESSORI HART DAY SCH. PENIN. PAREf�T Totals
(���
Stud. Emp. Vans Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars Stud. Emp. Cars
7:30
8:00 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 6 3
8:30 5 3 3 44 4 4 0 3 3 49 10 7
9:00 60 4+2 6 60 3 3 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 13 15
9:30 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
10:00 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
10:30 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
11:00 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
11:30 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
12:00 60 4+2 6 60 7 5 44 4 4 10 3 2 0 3 3 174 17 17
12:30 10 1 6 60 4+2 6 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 112 15 21
1:00 13 1 6 60 4+2 6 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 115 15 21
1:30 15 2 6 4 1 1 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 61 17 16
2:00 20 2 6 30 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 62 16 15
2:30 25 2 6 25 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 62 16 15
3:00 44 4 6 20 7 5 12 4 4 0 3 3 76 18 15
3:30 44 5 6 15 7 5 1 1 0 3 3 59 16 12
4:00 44 5 6 15 3 3 0 3 3 59 11 9
4:30 44 5 6 15 3 3 0 3 3 59 11 9
5:00 30 5 6 15 2 2 45 7 8
5:30 20 5 6 6 1 1 26 6 7
6:00 0 5 6 4 1 1 4 6 7
�--�--�.
not included in totals
4 employees and 2 aides will relocate for 94/95 �
no students on Fridays; some transported by parents, others take bus or walk ' —�
2 employees carpooled; 2 drive vans home; 4 vans parked overnight; 1 walks to work
3/16/94
R0.94.12
�
ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
TENANT USE STUDY
CHART 2
Employees/Cars by Hour
25.0
22.5
V 20.0
a 17.5
� 15.0
U 12.5
e
10.0
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
Category
� Employees � Cars
3/16/94
R0.94.15
8:00 A 9:00 A 10:00 11:00 12:00 I 1:00 P 2:00 P 3:00 P 4:00 PI 5:00 PI 6:00 PI
.�.'*�"" "�"e�"""�
�
�
%l3/ {�l'I��UlI'V�/�, �
.�.- � -�.: ;•
.�.
:•�����: :
l� l � �.� autti°x•.
f.
� 3.� 8
L: � l� (i �.1 VI Lt �
a'
Z�.n
,; �,,,�• ��� r-.�. � �B�.�� ���s.
�-
-� -, r
f /,,� ,,; /_ � ? t-,✓ :-�. �
i
:5:� ...... .. ........... I S�
,,, � .... .. .. . ....
�
'(chs K�+ �:::...: .:::: :�95�:::; .� K�t Ap i oQiuM e
iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii//ii
R� � !!!!!!!!;E';'4:: ii iiiiiiiiF � � W
� ,►� —
1/ANCC�CVFI� ,�V�.
: . irooSE�E�t�hoo j
��S'1 1/eti ir- n 13�c �Id�/N4RN1 F
� � ,,,. � �—
. .. ............... .
.............�.. ,....,,,.,, Z M
.., � ......... .. ...........
�C� ���iiiiiiiiii ii iiiiiiiiiii '
�� .
.� -r,�-��'-
� •'Jzi!'!';�} ���� I-v � � h�• �,h I�
� ...��;' ��
� I,, I � 3�Clt' a kR1a .
�� ''''�'•:��'��,: �� S ��°:a�
�Y' ,;�ir:�.::lti;• `v �
� r� 12
c��:�8- 136gs�fiota�
Sto�A9� Rrtl. :DOr}tY;'•f„�►,�:«;;:
; y q.,Nex u„�d�c q�e�;:��'�ti��k�'
�2�+s. 9 � io)
p%,� � nv��,��
���,
�.
0
Q NART DAY SCHOOL
2,155 Sf
[]] PENiNSULA EARLY LEARNING CENTER 3,200 SF
� PEHINSULA PARENT, 1NC. 1,100 SF
4,148 SF
Q TRUE LEARNING CENTER 2�331 SF
'� MONTESSORI SCHOOL
v
4Z`
�
r . � � �.,
October 2, 1990
�.�.E l�z�� .0 � ��-C�.�IYC��11'C.E
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010
Mr. & Mrs. Len Beatie
P. O. Box 1515
Burlingame, CA 94011-1515
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Beatie:
�� '� �----
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(415) 342-8625
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
September 24, 1990 Planning Commission approval of your use permit
application became effective October 2, 1990.
This application was to allow a day care use in room 8(874 SF) at
Roosevelt School at 1151 Vancouver Avenue. The September 24, 1990
minutes of the Planning Commission states your application was
approved with the following conditions:
1. that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be used for after
school day care from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings
shall be held in the evenings at this location;
2. that the students shall have access to the larger playground
areas during the time they are on site with the day care
program except that this use shall be limited to the 22
students who are in Room #8;
3. that the students shall be brought to the site and taken
from the site in two vans which shall be parked on the
Broadway frontage of the building during the program period;
4. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change
to the operation of this program at this site shall require
an amendment to this use permit;
5. that this use permit shall be subject to review for
compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every two
years thereafter or upon complaint.
i
/�
I
► �� ,
All site improvements and construction
application to the Building Department.
one year during which time a building
extension of up to one year may be
Commission if application is made before
Sincerely,
�G �
Margaret Monroe �
City Planner
MM/ds
cc: Chief Building Inspector
Park Director (when applicable)
Burlingame School District
2303 Trousdale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Assessor's Office, Redwood City
(Acreage, City of Burlingame; APN 027-340-150)
BEATiE.102
work will require separate
This approval is valid for
Permit must be issued. One
considered by the Planning
the end of the first year.
r
, �f
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 8
September 24, 1990
10. SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE A CLASSROOM FOR HOMEWORK TUTORING AND ARTS
AND CRAFTS PURPOSES AT 1151 VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1
Reference staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP Monroe
reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's letter,
study meeting questions. Five conditions were suggested for
consideration at the public hearing. It was determined there is a
white zone on Vancouver, this is only for passenger
loading/unloading, it would be illegal to park vans there.
Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Len Beatie, Director,
Olympian Day Camp, applicant, stated his program is for children to
improve/enhance their homework; they will park their vans on the
Broadway side instead of Vancouver, there is a small white zone
there; there may be occasional pickup by parents, generally they
transport the students in their vans; the program is for special
needs students, they will not make any money on this, it is mainly
public relations for their Olympian Day Camp program; at this time
they will not go beyond the 22 children allowed in the conditions; he
stated there is a need for this program, parents pay for it, some
children are on scholarships and some get financial aid from the
county.
Marjorie Lane, 2104 Broadway was pleased that the school is being
used but not that her driveway was being used for a turnaround; this
may not apply to this program but other vans who deliver children to
the school do use her driveway. She asked that something be done,
perhaps a notice to the school or to the parents asking them not to
use her driveway. Applicant said his vehicles are all white and with
big signs on them, if she would identify her driveway he would tell
his drivers not to turn around there. There were no further audience
comments and the public hearing was closed.
With the statement this is a school which has had after school
sports, this is a worthy project, with the planning the city has done
the effect of the operations is less than when it was a school, C.
Jacobs moved for approval of the special permit by resolution with
the following conditions: (1) that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be
used for after school day care from 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday
through Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings shall be
held in the evenings at this location; (2) that the students shall
have access to the larger playground areas during the time they are
on site with the day care program except that this use shall be
limited to the 22 students who are in Room #8; (3) that the students
shall be brought to the site and taken from the site in two vans
which shall be parked on the Broadway frontage of the building during
the program period; (4) that any change to the number of students,
the hours of operation, the area of building used, the number of
.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
September 24, 1990
months this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change to the
operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment to
this use permit; and (5) that this use permit shall be subject to
review for compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every
two years thereafter or upon complaint. Motion was seconded by C.
Mink and approved on a 6-0 roll call vote, C. Ellis absent. Appeal
procedures were advised.
�l. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN EIGHT UN�
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM AT 518 ALMER ROAD, ZONED R-3 �
Ref�rence staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP,!Monroe
revie.wed details of the request, staff review, applicant�� letter,
findings for a negative declaration, study meeting quest'•ns. Seven
conditi`ans were suggested for consideration at the publ' hearing.
Commissi'o� and staff discussed provision of a 24 hour ergency power
generator��nd suggested a condition #8 addressing th's.
Chm. Graham'�opened the public hearing. Takuo���nno, architect and
applicant, a�vised they had no objection to.�providing a 24 hour
emergency genei�ator, they are negotiating wi��i two manufacturers to
provide such a c��nerator which will be insta�'l.ed on the ground floor;
one of staff's`�4 concerns about the �arking layout had been
maneuverability, t�°hey have revised the lans to provide two guest
parking spaces at t�Y1.� end of the ramp a�d each of the units will have
two stalls; Mr. Kann�< requested condit,�ion #5 be changed to read ". .
two guest parking stal�s . . . " �,�;°'
Responding to a questi n;� architect advised they have found there is
a market for two master b �droom,,°units, buyers want more room in the
condominiums they purchase,`�one'`of the master bedrooms could be used
as a guest bedroom or a studt'y,�,�or a room for a home occupation. There
was a concern regarding the��'��lanters and landscaped areas on top of
the post tension slab; a�pli�ant explained waterproofing measures
they would take and how , raina�ge would be handled. There were no
audience comments and th,� public �iearing was closed.
„� �,
C. Mink found that based on the in�ial study and comments made this
evening and in the s�aff report ther� is no substantial evidence that
this project will ave a significan� effect on the environment and
moved for approva of the negative dec aration and condominium permit
by resolution w' h the following con 'tions: (1) that the project
shall be buil �as shown on the plan submitted to the Planning
Department date stamped August 21, 1990 Sheets 0,4,6,7); August 30,
1990 (Sheet ,�1); September 7, 1990 (Sh ts 2,3,5); (2) that the
project sha1�1 meet Uniform Building and Fi e Codes as amended by the
City of Bu•rlingame; (3) that the condition of the City Engineer�s
memos of August 28, 1990 and September 19, 1990, the Fire Marshal�s
memo of ;7uly 31, 1990 and the Director of Parks � memo of August 15,
T �1
�
(`�11�P (�t#� of ��trltn�ttmE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD.
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010-3997
*[� (415) 696-7250
r�x (415) 342-B386
April 5, 1994
Mr. Len Beatie
Olympian Day Camp
P. O. 1515
Burlingame, CA 94011-1515
Dear Mr. Beatie:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
March 28, 1994 Planning Commission approval of your Special Permit
amendment application became effective April 4, 1994. This
application was to allow after school day program at 1151 Vancouver
Avenue, zoned R1.
The March 28, 1994 minutes of the Planning Commission state your
application was approved with the following conditions:
l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February
10, 1994, Sheet 1, Parking Lot Plan;
2. that the 1,368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8) shall be
used for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday throughout the regular school year
(September through June) for a maximum of 44 students and a
maximum of 5 employees, September - June, and no parent
meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location;
3. that the students shall have access to the program except that
this use shall be limited to the 44 students who are in Rooms
#6 and #8;
4. that children shall be brought to the site in 2 vans three
days a week and 3 vans two days a week, these vans shall be
parked on the street during program hours (12:30-6:00 P.M.)
and no vans or other vehicles associated with this or any
other owners sha11 be parked on the school site at any time;
A
v,�ea m mcx'�+a c�:+� � i
I 1
April 5, 1994
1151 Vancouver Avenue
page -2-
�
5. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the.time of year the site is used, the number of
vans stored on the site, or any change to the operation of
this program at this site shall require an amendment to this
use permit;
6. that this use permit shall be subject to review in two and
seven months, June, 1994 and October, 1994, for compliance
with the conditions and thereafter upon compliant; and
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City
of Burlingame.
Al1 site improvements and construction work will require separate
application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for
one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One
extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning
Commission if application is made before the end of the first year.
(Erection of the signage will require separate application to the
Building Department.)
Sincerely yours,
�G�����
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM:smg
cc: Burlingame Elementary School District
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(2.16 AC MOL Cor Broadway & Vancouver Aves Acreage City of
Burlingame)
� �
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Graham acknowledged the concerns of the ocal residents, more thought
needs to be given to the direction the sc ol will take, she then moved to
deny the application for a Special Per 't.
Motion was seconded by C. Jacobs d failed on a 3-3-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis,
Galligan and Mink dissenting, C. K ly absent). The City Attorney informed
the Commission that in the abse e of any further motion the application
was deemed denied. Appeal pro edures were advised.
The Commission adjourned fo�a 10 minute break at 11:05 P.M. and reconvened
at 11:15 P.M.
5. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AFTER SCHOOL DAY PROGRAM AT 1151
VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
PROPERTY OWNER AND LEN BEATIE APPLICANTI
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study meeting
questions. It was pointed out that some of the testimony given regarding
the prior item would be relevant to this hearing and should be included by
reference as part of this record. Also, the parking stalls proposed in the
previous application cannot now be considered since the previous
application was denied. There was clarification in the event this Special
Permit Amendment is denied the original permit for this use would stand.
Ei,ght conditions were suggested.
G��7'G��
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Mr. Beatie, owner of the Olympian Day
Camp, at Broadway and Vancouver was present to answer any questions. Al1
children are picked up by 2 vans from the 4 Burlingame Elementary Schools.
He has always been licensed for 44 children however there was only 1 room
available from the school at the time of his original application so he was
limited to 22. There are 38 children at this time. The second room became
available last year. Mr. Beatie acknowledged he should have come before
the Commission at that time to request this amendment.
Fred Herin, principal McKinley School, spoke in support
plan. Many children from his school participate in this
parents need choices, this is one of those choices. Al1
this type are full.
of this Day Care
program and the
the programs of
Harvey Bracken, 2100 Roosevelt and Robert Kane, 2112 Broadway spoke in
opposition to this request. Parking has infringed on the property owners
and gets out of control and asked that the earlier commentary this evening
relating to this issue be incorporated into the minutes pertaining to this
matter. The fact that Mr. Beatie and the school district allowed this to
take place without following procedure disturbs him. The problem has
escalated a little each year.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
-7-
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Jacobs moved to approve this application, by resolution, amending the
conditions to allow 2 vans three days a week and 3 vans two days a week to
park on the street during program hours (12:30-6:00) and no parking of vans
or employees on site at anytime. The approved conditions are: 1) that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped February 10, 1994, Sheet l, Parking Lot Plan;
2) that the 1,368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8) shall be used for
after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Friday
throughout the regular school year (September through June) for a maximum
of 44 students and a maximum of 5 employees, September - June, and no
parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at this location; 3) that
the students shall have access to the program except that this use shall be
limited to the 44 students who are in Rooms #6 and #8; 4) that children
shall be brought to the site in 2 vans three days a week and 3 vans two
days a week, these vans shall be parked on the street during program hours
(12:30-6:00 P.M.) and no vans or other vehicles associated with this or any
other owners shall be parked on the school site at any time; 5) that any
change to the number of students, the hours of operation, the area of
building used, the number of months this program uses the building, the
method of transporting students or the time of year the site is used, the
number of vans stored on the site, or any change to the operation of this
program at this site shall require an amendment to this use permit; 6)
that this use permit shall be subject to review in two and seven months,
June, 1994 and October, 1994, for compliance with the conditions and
thereafter upon compliant; and 7) that the project shall meet all the
requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by
the City of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by C. Galligan and approved on a 4-2-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis
and Mink dissenting and C. Kelly absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures
were advised.
6. CONDOMINIUM_PERMIT AND NEGATIVE DEC �,"J°`' ON FOR AN EIGHTEEN (18 )' UNIT
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 601 ANSEL AV , ZONED R-3 (ANSEL FLORIBUNDA
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with ttachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Plannin epartment comments, and study meeting
questions. Nine conditions were s ggested for consideration at the public
hearing. Commission asked the s ecific time work is permitted on weekends
and asked for enforcement of t code. A letter of opposition was received
from Mrs. Hagstrom and is e ered into the record.
Chm. Deal opened the pub c hearing. Jerry Yates, Habitec, San Jose was
present to answer any q stions. He felt the size should not be an issue
since their plan confor s to all the ordinances and they have been generous
about parking space, 1 ndscape and patio areas.
�
Y � � �r
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
responsible for insuring trash receptacles e emptied and trash in the
area picked up before it becomes a nuis ce; 4) that trash receptacles
shall be placed at the front door and ou ide the front door at a location
approved by the City Engineer; the b iness shall maintain and regularly
empty the trash receptacles, includ' g those on the public right-of-way at
all times and failure to do so wo d result in review of this use permit;
5) that plans submitted to e Building Department shall meet the
conditions of the Chief Build' g Inspector's memo dated 2/14/94; 6) that
the basement area accessible to this tenant shall not exceed 300 SF as
noted in the Fire Marshal's emo dated 2/17/94 and shall only be used for
storage in association wit this business; 7) that the project shall meet
all the requirements of he Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as
amended by the City of rlingame; and 8) that the use shall be reviewed
for conformance with t ese conditions in nine months (December, 1994) or
upon complaint therea er.
Motion was seconded by C. Ellis and approved on a 6-0-1 (C. Kelly absent)
voice vote. Appe procedures were advised.
It was specified, for the record, that Noah's is also a deli.
4. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES AT
1131 - 1141 VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT,_PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANTI
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study meeting
questions. If recommended to Council for approval, 7 conditions were
suggested. The Commission asked for clarification of to the distribution
of the parking; of the 27 spaces on site, 13 are for the district and 14
are for the tenants according to the School District proposal. The number
of parking spaces required for the new office area is based on square
footage. There was also a question pertaining to the condition of the ramp
used to access the rear parking area.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Burlingame Elementary School
Superintendent Beuthel was present to answer any questions, he clarified
there are 2 separate sources of funds, Capital funds available for
construction and General funds available for program. Often the public
combines these in their mind, however the district is not allowed to
legally intermingle these funds. Three criteria have been examined in
arriving at the decision to use Roosevelt, 1) space; 2) construction
dollars; and 3) program. This option is the most effective of these
options considered. The district has been involved in strategic planning
since 1991. The projected enrollment shows steady increase in students.
The district relies on the lease income to continue the current programs.
They would like to move the district office to Roosevelt in 1994; and to
move toward reopening Roosevelt as a district school in approximately 3
years. In Burlingame, the district office has been housed in a public
-3-
t ,
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
school since 1913. For this reason the request to have a district office
at Roosevelt is in accordance with and remains consistent with the zoning
ordinance and general plan.
As a part of the district's presentation Lee Carney, AIA, VBN, 501 - 14th
Street, Oakland, introduced a new landscape plan that he felt would explain
the mitigation proposed to some of the unusual problems. If the rear
parking lot is approved the ramp would be replaced with a new a concrete
ramp.
Speakers in support of the application were; Fred Herin, current principal
at McKinley school, formerly the principal at Roosevelt school when it was
closed in 1980, Lisa Rosenthal, 2008 Easton, a tenant at Roosevelt, owner
of Peninsula Parent Magazine, and a school board member of the Burlingame
Elementary School District, Steve Warden, 736 Acacia Drive, representing
the Burlingame School District Budget Advisory Committee, a group of
parents, teachers, school employees and local citizens appointed by the
School Board to advise them on various aspects of the school budget and to
look at methods of income and other ways of controlling e�enses. The
intent at the time of closure was to reopen Roosevelt when enrollment was
such that it could be reopened. Use of Roosevelt school as district
offices will not interfere with the return to a public school use. It
would be preferable for everyone if the school could be "owner occupied".
New and improved equipment would certainly be a plus for the children and
neighbors in that neighborhood; the educational purpose of the Burlingame
School District will not cause any disruption to the neighborhood. The
Peninsula Parent Magazine will be leaving in June which will free up the
space for classroom use or the business of the district. This relocation
of administrative functions is the most cost effective and reasonable
option available to the district, the Budget Advisory committee request
that the Commission approve the District's request to relocate the District
Administration Office to Roosevelt School.
The following spoke in opposition: Ron Neugauer, 1170 Vancouver,
resident/parent, James Quinn, 1116 Vancouver Avenue, Dan Ping, 1219
Vancouver, Wayne Parker, 1245 Armsby, Hillsborough, Robert Kane, 2112
Broadway, Harvey Bracken, 2100 Roosevelt, Peggy Kane, 2112 Broadway, Mark
Dollosso , 1104 Vancouver, Peter Jampowie, 2112 Roosevelt, John DeHoney,
1120 Vancouver, Kathleen Ping, Vancouver, Oscar Newelt, 1150 Vancouver,
Kathy Peto, 1160 Vancouver, Pauline Irons, 2108 Broadway,
Sue Ping, 1219 Vancouver, Art Dollosso, 2116 Roosevelt.
Points made by opponents were: will cause an unnecessary, harmful effect
on property values; the peak hour traffic between 8:3o and 9:0o is not
representative, each individual stays 3 to 4 minutes; this plan for the
district offices is the same as presented before except the portable is
removed and 4 parking spaces are added next to the fence; how will the
kindergarten room be used, is in serious need of repair; Franklin is a
better location because have separate driveway for pick up and drop off;
�
� �1 �
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 1994
access to Roosevelt is poor, narrow street frontage, dead end on Broadway
frontage, street too narrow to turn; portable at Franklin would be cheaper
than proposed renovation at Roosevelt; Franklin's site is bigger and
intensification does not affect residential property; the district offices
have been a Franklin for 14 years and have caused no problem; will need
space in Roosevelt if reopen as neighborhood school; parking proposed will
take about a third of the school yard; addition of a driveway mid-block on
Vancouver to access the district offices is unsafe; tenants want to expand
and have done so for several years; the parking lots in the school yard
will impact adjacent neighbors who will get their exhaust, noise and glare;
Vancouver gets a lot of through traffic from Hillsborough and across town,
this will add to it, want it back to neighborhood school so traffic will be
local; with out the play yard it will not be the same quality school;
concerned about need to light the parking areas for safety; some school
employees will be there as early as 6 am and others after 5, so will not be
an 8 to 5 use; in addition there will be vendors and other visitors to the
district offices during the day; the more heard the greater the impact
seems to be.
Additional comments in opposition were: the rear parking area seems to be
a open ticket for Olympian Day Care vans and buses; houses behind the
raised area at the back of the site are far enough above that they see the
tops of buses and vans parked on the site; concern vans will be an
attractive nuisance for vandals; the school yard will be a place for kids
looking for a place to park and party; less play field area will mean more
balls in his yard; school district repaired fence between his property and
school but only after first hearing; only time can show house for sale is
mid-day, mid-summer; reviewed the history of the district's proposed uses
of site since 1988 noting that district did not ask for city permit to let
vans/buses use the tennis court; feels facility is presently being overused
to make money and would like it back to neighborhood school; opposed to
parking lot; for income from tenants they could rent office space on
Rollins Road; concern about noise and air pollution from parking area since
20' from bedroom window about 15' below window, exhaust will rise; school
yard is an echo chamber, can hear balls bounce now; no way to add a new gym
to the site if the school district comes in; the school yard is used
everyday by children; not want an office building in the middle of a
residential neighborhood; school district proposal represent about a 20%
increase in trips to the site.
Final comments in opposition were: why relocate the district offices if
the school is to be reopened in three years; landscaping will not make
this additional use compatible with the neighborhood; the district has
guidelines for the use of schools, this allows light commercial use; find
a permanent location for school district offices in business area, it is
hard on them to move all the time; each employee does not need private
parking; private parking costs money and is not necessary;proposal does not
address how the district will reduce traffic; public school would have a
stronger sense of community and parents would work together; concern about
-5-
� , , � a
Burling�me Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 1994
unsafe driving and parking habits of people who now come to school to leave
off children, block street for emergency vehicles;play fields are needed
for practice during little league, will loose if offices relocated not
enough spaces.
At the end of the testimony Superintendent Beuthel spoke again. He noted
that this was a complex issue the effect of a decline in funding from the
state and a need to maximize resources and space. The objective is to
maximize the instructional program of the district. The district has
repaired fences as soon as they were made aware of problem not mentioned
until this request for offices was made; enrollment figures were discussed
and targets for opening Roosevelt; selection of Roosevelt for district
offices was the result of reviewing a wide variety of options; at this
point in time Roosevelt is the most effective, economic and efficient
option in terms of space, construction and program. If the school is
reopened as a public school the district offices would remain at the
Roosevelt site.
A second petition in opposition was submitted.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioners noted in their discussion that the school district has a real
financial need; there is an alternative of adding space at Franklin which
has a bigger site, the present uses with the district office have an impact
on the integrity of the residential neighborhood; with the district offices
here the impact would be reduced by to acceptable levels eliminating one
major morning lessee; people are more likely to drive to school today than
in 1980 so public school will have traffic impact; public school serving
local people more willing to follow a prescribed pick up/drop off routine
and avoid blocking driveways; it would cost a lot of money to reopen the
school but it would be ideal; Franklin site council may not want portable
classrooms but they are a fact of life in today's budget times, there is
room for portables at Washington school which has a smaller site.
C. Graham moved to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration to the
City Council, the motion was seconded by C. Mink and approved on a 5-1-1
(C. Jacobs dissenting and C. Kelly absent) roll call vote.
Commissioners expressed understanding of the school's need for money,
however also understands the needs of the neighborhood. It was further
stated the school district office is not the problem, have had district
offices on a school site historically and the offices do not represent that
big an incremental increase in traffic, it is the tenants that are the
major problem and burden on the neighborhood; improvements appear to have
been done as cheaply as possible, the parking off Broadway does not appear
to add to the project except for full time staff only; parking at the rear
might create a 24 hour problem not present now; parking at rear not
necessary to approve district office; play area is more important than
parking at school.
�
, , ., -
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
March 28, 1994
C. Graham acknowledged the concerns of the local residents, more thought
needs to be given to the direction the school will take, she then moved to
deny the application for a Special Permit.
Motion was seconded by C. Jacobs and failed on a 3-3-1 (Cmsrs. Ellis,
Galligan and Mink dissenting, C. Kelly absent). The City Attorney informed
the Commission that in the absence of any further motion the application
was deemed denied. Appeal procedures were advised.
The Commission adjourned for a 10 minute break at 11:05 P.M. and reconvened
at 11:15 P.M.
5. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AFTER SCHOOL DAY PROGRAM AT 1151
VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOO�LSISTRICT,
PR(�PF.RTV (1WT7TPD �Aiil r L�1,T vL+rmTr.+ a.�.�r r..�.�....
Reference staff report, 3/28/94, with attachments. CP N�Onroe discussed the
request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comme�ts, and study meeting
questions. It was pointed out that some of the te�'£imony given regarding
the prior item would be relevant to this hearing nd should be included by
reference as part of this record. Also, the par ng stalls proposed in the
previous application cannot now be consi red since the previous
application was denied. There was clarificati n in the event this Special
Permit Amendment is denied the original perm' for this use would stand.
Eight conditions were suggested.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Mr. B atie, owner of the Olympian Day
Camp, at Broadway and Vancouver was pres t to answer any questions. Al1
children are picked up by 2 vans from t 4 Burlingame Elementary Schools.
He has always been licensed for 44 ch' dren however there was only 1 room
available from the school at the time f his original application so he was
limited to 22. There are 38 childre at this time. The second room became
available last year. Mr. Beatie cknowledged he should have come before
the Commission at that time to r quest this amendment.
Fred Herin, principal McKinle School, spoke in support
plan. Many children from h' school participate in this
parents need choices, this s one of those choices. All
this type are full. ,
of this Day Care
program and the
the programs of
Harvey Bracken, 2100 osevelt and Robert Kane, 2112 Broadway spoke in
opposition to this re est. Parking has infringed on the property owners
and gets out of cont 1 and asked that the earlier commentary this evening
relating to this is e be incorporated into the minutes pertaining to this
matter. The fact at Mr. Beatie and the school district allowed this to
take place witho following procedure disturbs him. The problem has
escalated a litt e each year.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed.
-7-
�' � ' `s
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BIIRLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING
The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANIIARY, 1995,
at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application
and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning
Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
1131-1141 VANCOWER AVENIIE APN: 027-340-150
NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO
INCREASE THE AREA OF OPERATION FROM 1368 sf (ROOMS #6 AND
#8) TO 2552 SF BY E%PANDING TO THE 1184 SF RINDERGARTEN
ROOM ON SITE AND TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF VANS PARRED ON
STREET BY ONE FOR OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP AT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
SITE AT 1131-1141 VANCOUVER AVENIIE, ZONED R-1.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
Please note, when possible, and when multiple family or commercial
development is involved, this notice shall be posted in a public
place on the project site and on neiqhborinq buildinqs with
tenants.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
DECEMBER 20. 1994
.�
BERNqL
T
Q
3
0
a
2vio � 2oi5
�
�AN t�uv ER
,zo�
Zio4 I
1.108
2liZ
zii �
�_
A�EN�E
Il;yo I�E'D 1150 Il4o u32
��z8 ��Z4 ,�zo ���� „�Z
A��N�E
H ���s9oRoub�)
114� U3j<
✓
R003EVE�7"
S. u.,..�
21oG
21a4 �
7
211L Q
�
21 I (�
2118 J
W
Z�zz W
�
7
zi2a �
/
\Tr �
\o /
o\
Ry
\
- ,' . J
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been
made for a Special Permit Amendment to increase the number of participants
increase the number of vans and em lo ee vehicles arked on the street^for
Olvmpian Day Camp, at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (CS 25 28 030-21
(APN 027-340-150) ;_propertv owner: Burlinqame Elementary School District
2303 Trousdale Drive ; and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame on January 9, 1995 , at which time it reviewed and considered the
staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said
hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission
that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and
reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby
found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above
will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption
Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior
alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances and 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(b) consists of
construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial
or institutional facilities, including but not limited to: (b) Small parking
lots is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set
forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be
recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
C�l:iriciui:i.i
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the 9th day of Januarv, 1995 , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
�� I r
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, categorical exemption and special permit amendment
1131 - 1151 Vancouver Avenue
effective January 18, 1995
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Department and date stamped November 15, 1994;
2. that the 2,552 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8 and kindergarten
room) shall be used for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00
P.M., Monday through Friday throughout the regular school year
(September through June) for a maximum of 60 students and a maximum of
5 employees, and no parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at
this location;
3. that the students shall be brought to the site in 4 vans three days
per week and 3 vans two days per week, and that these vans plus one
employe vehicle shall be parked on the street during program hours
(12:30-6:00 P.M., Monday through Friday) and that no vans or other
vehicles associated with this use shall be parked on the school site
at any time;
4. that any chanqe to the number of students, hours of operation, area of
building used, number of months or time of year this program operates,
the method of transporting students, number of vans, or any change to
the operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment
to this use permit;
5. that this use permit shall be subject to review in one year (January,
1996), thereafter upon compliant for compliance with these conditions;
and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
�':� �, , �I::
ITEM 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
TO EXPAND AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE PROGRAM
Address: 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue
Meeting Date: 12/ 12/94
Request: Special permit amendment to increase the number of participants from 44 to 60; to
increase the area of operation from 1368 SF (Rooms #6 and #8) to 2552 SF by expanding to the
1184 SF kindergarten room on site; and to increase the number of vans pazked on street by one
for Olympian Day Camp at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (CS 25.28.030 - 2).
There would be no change in the number of employees, hours, days or months of operation.
Applicant: Len Beatie APN: 027-340-15C
Property Owner: Burlingame Elementary School District
Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres more or less
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: related school uses in Roosevelt School and single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class
1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances.
Summary:
The applicant, Olympian Day Camp, is requesting a special permit amendment to expand the
after school day care program at 1131-1151 Vancouver Avenue (Roosevelt School), zoned R-1.
The program would be expanded to the kindergarten room of the school (which has an address
of 1131 Vancouver Avenue). This 1184 SF room was most recently occupied by the Peninsula
Parent Magazine. The zoning code allows school related uses upon approval of a special permit.
The original special permit for the after school program was approved in October, 1990 (see
October 2, 19901etter from City Planner to Len Beatie and September 24, 1990 P.C. minutes).
An amendment to the permit was approved effecfive April, 1994 to increase the number of
participants, area of operation, hours, number of employees. At the time, Olympian was leasing
on-site pazking spaces from the school district for vehicle storage beyond its program hours.
Their application included a request for on-site pazldng and storage for Olympian's vehicles.
After public comment on this proposal and a school district proposal being processed for this
site at the same time, Planning Commission determined that pazking would be limited to 2-3
vans, parked on the street and during program hours only. Planning Commission did not limit
parking to any particular street (see April 15, 1994 letter from City Planner to Len Beatie and
March 28, 1994 P.C. minutes for Items 4& 5).
The proposed amendments:
A. Increase the number of participants from 44 to 60.
B. Increase the area of the program from 1368 SF to 2552 SF by expanding to the 1184 SF
kindergarten room. The previous amendment allowed the use in Rooms 6& 8 at 1151
Vancouver. The proposed amendment would continue the use in Rooms 6& 8, and
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
expand the use to the ldndergarten room.
1131-1I51 VANCOUVER AVENUE
C. Increase the number of vans parking on street during program hours by one. The
previous amendment allowed parking, on the street, of two vans three days per week and
three vans two days per week during program hours. The proposed amendment would
increase this to three vans three days per week and four vans two days per week during
program hours.
The number of employees (5), and the hours, days and months of operation would remain the
same (12:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, from September through June).
Proposed Special
Permit Amendment:
Number
Participants:
Area (S�
& Rooms
Hours, Days,
Months:
�# Employees:
# Vans
& Parking:
of
,1
Increase by 1184 SF
to 2552 SF by
expanding
to kindergarten room.
Rooms 6 & 8 (1,368
SF) would continue
to be used.
no change
no change
,.�
3 vans �'days/week+
4 vans 2 days/week
to be parked on the
street during program
hours only
Meets all other zoning code requirements.
3/94 Approved
Special Permit
Amendment:
�
Increase to 1368 SF
by expanding to
Room #6.
Room #8 would
continue to be used.
change to
12:30-6:00 p.m
Monday-Friday
September-7une
E
2 vans 3 days/week+
3 vans 2 days/week
to be parked on the
street during program
hours only
10/90 Original
Special Permit
Approved:
22
874 SF
Room #8 only.
3:00-6:00 p.m.
Monday-Friday
September-7une
K�
2 vans to park on
Broadway during
program hours
Staff Comments: The City Engineer, Chief Building Inspector and Fire Marshal had no
comments on this special permit amendment.
cc: Olympian Day Camp c/o Len Beatie, applicant
Burlingame School District, property owner
/ss
2
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
REGARDING USE OF KINDERGARTEN AT ROOSEVELT
FOR OLYMPIC DAY CARE
The Burlingame School District will have an informational
meeting regarding the use of the Roosevelt Kindergarten Room
for Olympic Day Care.
Any interested party may attend.
When: January 3, 1995
Time: 6:00 p.m.
Where: Kindergarten Room at Roosevelt School
December 15, 1994
�.
`° �� .�
D��' 1 ��' �*��
Crry - ""a'!
kls�'v�+ �RE1Yn.<
I'` .�.
O.Olympic Day Care
FROM THE DESK OF:
BOB PETERSON
BUSINESS MANAGER
BUSINESS SERVICFS
FOR YOUR INFORI�IATION
❑ PER YOUR REQUEST
BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT
2303 TROUSDALE DRIVE
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
259-3812 FAX 259-3820
_ � ��n �S�c�m����
�.
�
\ ���� � - _ no CA�'�� �s.�cS�
.
iR•�•_�..- ►�;� -� �I
r��.��:.� �a� �� � ' ,, l�, .` ♦
� � �
� �j '� ' � �, �
����u� -�.
� _ _ _ ----
���1- 5 � �C�c�.v2s-' � - — - —
_ �
'�� �-�,, ��� -- � 1, \ � -� �p�-�
�� uti� c��Ul�� � _omp� � _ �� ��L�. U�-'�'--
�►��Q- -� ln� �����__�P�-�
__
� � Cvl,��,sZ: �� c�- � � ��-�.
� �---- ��-� �� � s�,� ��
.�
1'� � --
_ -- a�`�U �-s
�� �� _� ���cs�. - � � ' ��
���
-�c�n� s�-- � � ��- ��� � _ _ -
� `,m�a�e_.. _ __
_ _
'�� - ��:� _ �5�� ��.- - 1�u�-S �-�1,�n -�- _ -----
_
��, -� .�-��� �_. .�- � ���
�' � �i`Gt � w t� � �_f� �s _ ___
,c% - k�1sUe_. G������— C�--x� �����._��--��L,(�.--- _-- ----
��;�.�,� c��-- � �I�-� - �� - �-�� --
� ���. �:�� _ _ _ --------_ _
'� �����- _ �-- � � ��L �.- --
��- � � , �s
�. �z� ��� �
,. �.
"�,
ITEM # 5
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
Special Permit Amendment for After School Day Care Program
Address: 1151 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date: 3/28/94
Request: Special Permit Amendment to increase the number of
students from 22 to 44; to increase the area used by the school
from 874 SF (Room #8) to 1,368 SF (Rooms #6 and #8); to change the
hours of operation from 3:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. to 12:30 P.M. - 6:00
P.M. Monday through Friday; and to add six off street parking
stalls for 24 hour van storage for four stalls, and two stalls for
employee van storage during program hours, for Olympian Day Camp,
at 1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S.25.28.030 - 2).
Applicant: Len Beatie APN: 027-340-150
Property owner: Burlingame Elementary School District
Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres more or less
General Plan: Low Density, Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: related school uses in Roosevelt School and
single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 -
Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations
involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances and 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(b)
consists of construction, or placement of minor structures
accessory to existing commercial or institutional facilities,
including but not limited to: (b) Small parking lots.
Previous Use: after school day care program (Room #8 - 874 SF);
parking for two vans on the street
Proposed Use: after school day care program (Rooms #6 and #8 -
1,368 SF Total); parking for 6 vans on site
Allowable Use: school related uses with a special permit
summary: The applicant, Olympian Day Camp, is requestinq a special
permit amendment for their after school day care program at 1151
Vancouver Avenue. On October 2, 1990 the Planning Commission
approved a special permit to allow a day care program at this site
(October 2, 1990 letter from M. Monroe to Len Beatie and P.C.
Minutes of September 24, 1990). Since that time the facility has
grown and the applicant is now requesting some changes to their use
permit. The following items outline the proposed changes to the
special permit.
A. Increase the capacity of the school from 22 students to 44
students.
B. Increase the size of the facility from 874 SF to 1,368 SF. The
after school day care program originally leased 874 SF located in
Room #8 at 1151 Vancouver Avenue. The current proposal expands
the facility into Room #6 and Room #8 for a total of 1,368 SF.
C. Change the hours of operation from 3:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. to
12:30 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.. The after school program now offers care
for children that leave school at 12:00 P.M. as well as 3:00 P.M..
SPECIAL PERXIT
The business will still be
September through June.
1151 Vancouver Avenae
open Monday through Friday, from
D. Provide off street parking for employees and van storage.
Olympian Day Camp is requestinq an amendment to their special
permit to allow storage of vans on site. Olympian Day Camp's
current permit allows them to park two vans on Broadway during
program hours. It does not allow more vans on the street or
storage of vans on site. The applicant now wishes to store four
vans in the parking lot located at the end of Broadway. The after
school day care program will lease six stalls from the school
district to store four vans 24 hours a day and for employee van
parking during program hours.
According to the applicant, the idea to eliminate the on street
parking of vans on Broadway came at the request of the neighbors.
At the Planning Commission January 10, 1994 meeting the School
District presented an application to remodel the Roosevelt School
auditorium/multi-purpose building into offices for the School
District staff (P.C. January 10, 1994 Minutes). At this meeting
neighbors complained about traffic and on street parking along
Broadway. The School District has since met with the neighbors and
responded by creating an off street parking lot for 14 stalls at
the end of Broadway. At the March 28, 1994 Planning Commission
meeting, the commission will again review a revised special permit
application for offices in the Roosevelt School auditorium. Part
of this application includes tenant parking for 14 stalls in a new
parking area accessed from the end of Broadway. The applicant
proposes to use six of the 14 new stalls provided ten months a
year, to store vans. Four vans will be stored 24 hours a day and
two vans will be stored during the programs hours from 12:30 P.M.
through 6:00 P.M..
Changes from March 14, 1994 Planninq Commission study meetinq to
March 28, 1994 meeting: In the application to the Planning
Commission on March 14, 1994 the applicant indicated he was leasing
six stalls to store five vans and for one employee parking space.
With this application for the March 28, 1994 meeting, the applicant
clarifies that he is still leasing six stalls. Four will be for
van storage, 24 hours a day, and two will be for vans stored on
site during program hours 12:30 P.M. through 6:00 P.M.. The vans
are used to pick up and deliver children during program hours.
PROPOSED
Use:
after school
day care
Number of
Students:
size:
44
1,368 SF
EXISTING
after school
day care
22
874 SF
2
ALLOWED/REO'D
school related
uses
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
SPECIAL PERIYIT
(continued) PROPOSED
Hours of 12:30 - 6:00 PM
Operation: Sept. to June
Parkinq: 6
on site
parking stalls
10 months per year
1I51 Vancouver Avenr�e
EXISTING ALLOWED/REO'D
3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Plan. Commission
Sept. to June review
2 Planning Commission
off site review
parking stalls
(to be used only when day care
program in session)
Meets all other zoning code requirements.
Staff Comments: The Fire Marshall, City Engineer, and Chief
Building Inspector had no comments on the proposed changes to the
special permit.
Neiqhbor's Comments: The Planning Department has received letters
from neighbors in opposition to the school district offices and
Olympian Day Camp. In their March 18, 1994 letter the neighbor
behind the Roosevelt School site in Hillsborough, lists concerns
about the parking lot at the rear of the site off Broadway. They
are concerned about lighting of the parking lots, noise, odor,
aesthetics, traffic congestion, and economic hardship with the
proposed development. They attached photos to their application
showing the view from the rear of their property to the parking
lot, and the broken fence surrounding the school site.
Study Meetinq: At the March 14, 1994 Planning Commission study
meeting the commission asked about the current number of students
permitted for the after school day care program. The applicant has
responded in his March 16, 1994 letter that they are licensed with
the California Social Services division for 44 students. The
present number of students is 39.
The commission asked about the staff number as it relates to the
increased number of students. The applicant indicates there are
five (5) staff inembers including the director. This is the number
required for the 44 permitted students. Currently they have more
employees than students as required by the California Social
Services office.
The commission asked about the method of transportation to the
site. The students are brought to the site using three vans. The
children are picked up between 12:30 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. from
various schools throughout the area. They are unloaded on site in
the fenced parking lot located off Broadway at the end of the
street. At the end of the day parents pick up children between
5:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M.. Some children are transported home by
vans. This involves between five (5) and seven (7) children.
The commission asked about the long range plans for the facility.
The director indicates that he is not planning to expand at
Roosevelt School since there is no more leasable space available at
the site.
3
SPSCIAL PSRXZT 1151 Vancouver Avenae
Rooms #8 and #6 are currently used by the Olympian Day Camp
program. Neither space is vacant. They pay rent for these areas
throughout the year even though they do not use them for 10 weeks
in the summer. The Olympian Day Camp operates from the Franklin
School site, off Trousdale Drive, during the summer months, June
through September.
The commission asked about the number of vans and where they are
stored during the program and over night. The applicant notes that
he uses a total of six (6) vans. Four vans are stored in the
locked lot at the rear of the site, when not in use. Two vans are
driven home at night by employees and are not stored on site.
The commission asked about the number of leased parking spaces and
the number of employees. Two employees drive to and from work in
the vans used to pick up children. Two other counselors are
dropped off and picked up by their parents. The fifth employee
walks to work from Bernal Avenue in Burlingame. Therefore the
director of the program indicates that he does not need any
employee parking stalls. Only four of the six parking stalls are
currently beinq used for van storage for his facility. During the
summer months when the program is held at Franklin school the vans
are used during the day and are stored at night at the counselors'
home. On their way to work the employees pick up children and
transport them to the Franklin site, so the vans are not stored at
Roosevelt School during the summer.
In his letter the applicant has indicated that he is offering to
install landscaping to screen the parking lot at the rear of the
site. He hopes this will block views of the vans from the
neighbors residences.
The applicant has submitted a memo he gives to all parents
instructing them to turn around on site, at the end of Broadway.
He directs them to pick up their children on the south side of
Broadway adjacent to the school. He hopes this will discourage
parents from using resident's driveways for maneuvering on
Broadway.
This application is being processed concurrently with the School
District application for offices at the Roosevelt School site
because the parking area proposed to be used is created as a part
of the Roosevelt School application. Without permission to create
the upper parkinq area, no vans can be stored on site. Both items
will have a public hearing at the March 28, 1994 Planning
Commission meeting.
Required Findings for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must
find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code
Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
4
SPTsCIAL PSRXIT 1151 Vancouver Avenue
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in
accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of
this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions
or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes
of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner
compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the
general vicinity.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a
public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution.
The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public
hearing the following conditions should be considered:
Conditions:
l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February
10, 1994, Sheet l, Parking Lot Plan;
2. that the 1, 368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8) shall be
used for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday throughout the regular school year
(September through June) for a maximum of 44 students and a
maximum of 5 employees, and no parent meetings shall be held
in the evenings at this location;
3. that the students shall have access to the larger playground
areas during the time they are on site with the day care
program except that this use shall be limited to the 44
students who are in Rooms #6 and #8;
4. that students shall be brought to the site by van, two of
which shall not be stored on site except during proqram hours
(12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday); four vans
shall be stored on site, up to 24 hours a day, from September
1 to June 30; during the other months no vans shall be stored
on the school site or parked in the vicinity of the school;
5. that the parking lot at the end of Broadway shall be screened
with landscaping on both the north and west sides of the
fence, adjacent to the street and neighbors rear yard;
6. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used, the number of
vans stored on the site, or any change to the operation of
this program at this site shall require an amendment to this
use permit;
7. that this use permit shall be subject to review
seven months, June, 1994 and October, 1994, for
with the conditions and thereafter upon compliant;
in two and
compliance
and
�
SPBCIAL PSRXIT 1151 Vancouver Avenue
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City
of Burlingame.
Jane Gomery
Planner
cc: Len Beatie, applicant
Bob Beuthel, superintendent, Burlingame Elementary School
District
C]
BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 14, 1994
Item set for Public Hearing March 28, 1994.
2. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AFTER SCHOOL DAY PROGRAM AT 1151
VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1, (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER AND LEN BEATIE APPLICANT)
Requests: current number of students permitted; where is program
during summer; will staff increase as student population increases;
method of transportation to site; what is long range plan for this
tenant's program at Roosevelt school; is room #8 vacant at this time;
number of vans parked onsite/offsite and timeframe duration and time of
day; how many employees are there; application shows 5 vehicles, does
this include the vans or are these for the employees, where do
employees park; would like this item tied to item #1 since parking area
is a factor;
Item set for Public Hearing March 28, 1994 pending school district
being ready and completion of needed data.
3. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR AN
EIGHTEEN (18) UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 601 ANSEL AVENUE, ZONED
R-3 (ANSEL FLORIBUNDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PROPERTY OWNER AND
HABITEC, APPLICANT).
Requests: engineering check maneuverability into/out of 5 guest
parking spaces; address all CE concerns; delineate walkway on side and
common area; number the units for identification; water heaters opening
into bedroom does not meet building code; floor to floor and floor to
ceiling dimensions; is easement signed or to be negotiated?
Item set for Public Hearing March 28, 1994.
4. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A TAKE-OUT PERMIT FOR A BAGEL BAKERY AT 1152-
1156 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1 BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL
AREA SUBAREA A, (GURDIAL S. JOHAL TR, PROPERTY OWNER AND BILL
HUGHSON, APPLICANTI.
Requests: why is permit necessary; use is like a bakery.
Item set for Public Hearing March 28, 1994.
ITEMS FOR ACTION
5. FENCE EXCEPTION FOR HEIGHT IN THE FRONT SETBACK AT 2309 RAY DRIVE,
ZONED R-1 (MATHILDE C. BROWN AND DAVID LAW, PROPERTY OWNERS AND
APPLICANTS).
Reference staff report, 3/14/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed
the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study
Page -2-
�aoo�
^I SKI � TOURS
1
�� R
��°�a ��'�
� �
O b
\�qDC'���
�'
March 15, 1994
��,Y M P/,q,�,
�j�( j�1
f
D�� ��� OAK HILL RANCH
�; SUMMER C4MP '- ..
����i��!���
1 i994
Memo To: Burlingame City Planning Commission
From: Len Beatie, Director Olympian Day Camp
Subject: Use permit for Roosevelt School
Cl�i'�% (:i: > : ; ; _ "!
C%,z`-kj•.�."x:.(,. ;r�%' ,
The following are answers to the questions posed by the City Council
on Monday, March 14th, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.:
1. How many students proposed for campus?
The California Social Services permit is for 44 students.
There are presently 39.
2. How are these students brought to the facility?
Three Vans are used as shuttles for the children between
the hours of 12:30 P.M. to 3:00 P.M.. These children are
off loaded in the fenced parking area on site at the end
of Broadway. (This is off Street.)
3. How are children dispersed after their session?
Parents pick up between 5:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M..
However, some children are taken home by vans; this
involves five (5) to seven (7) children.
4. How many staff and where do they park?
There are 5 staff inembers including the director. This
number will not increase even if we arrive at our 44
Social Services permit number allowed.
5.
0
Is Room 8 now occupied?
Yes, as is Room 6.
Do you plan to expand?
No, as there is no available spact to do so.
7. How many vehicles will be on site?
Four (4) vans will be on site 24 hours in the locked lot.
One (1) Counselor takes a van home and the Director also
takes a van home. Two Counselors are dropped and picked
up by their parents and the fourth Counselor walks to work
from B�rnal Ave. in Burlingame. Therefore, we need no
�' I SPORTS � P.O. Box 1515 • Burlingame, CA 94011-1515 •(415) 692-6400
aaooQ
,�, SKI * TOURS
.
��
-31R
�Q°¢`�\
� O
�
O b
\�q DC���
\�/
��,Y M ►Iq�,
_�,
�jF�l7
j,i
D.41 C�(P OAK HILL RANCH
' S�MMER C4MP��
employee parking and just the four (4) parking spaces,
as now being used. These four (4) spaces are needed
only from September 1 through the first two weeks of
June. These vans are assigned to Counselor drivers for
the twelve (12) weeks of summer. Each Counselor keeps
their van at their personal residence for the 12 week
period.
8. The Roosevelt School site is not used by the Olympian
Day Camp for the ten (10) weeks of the summer. However,
we still pay the lease to the school district during that
non use time.
Accompanying this memo is a copy of a directive distributed to
the parents of the Olympian Day Camp regarding child pick-up.
Note:
I know the concerns of the residents of the area regarding
the parking site in question. I have offered to plant
evergreen trees to enhance the esthetic appearance of the
fenced area. With this in mind the vans will not be in
view from the street or yard levels. One residence yard
in question bordering the west end of the school site
parking area is eight (8) inches higher than the vans
and has partial growth already.
Respectful �y,
, . ��
� -r� � --
-' (� � � ---����'�J
�' 1_ ?� C
��" �_
L�n Be 'e
Director Olympian Day Camp
'' I SPORTS • P.O. Box 1515 � Burlingame, CA 94011-1515 •(415) 692-6400
aaooQ
� SKI * TOURS
'71R
�J °¢� �Q�
�
d l� �
o b
\�� ��>�`��
AUGUST 1, 1992
MEMO T0: OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP PARENTS
��,y M ►/,q,�,
�j�%j1
D,�1 C.�MP OAK HILL RANGH
� SUNr.nEG ��CMP
FROM: LEN BEATIE, DIRECTOR OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP
SUBJECT: P.M. PARENT AND VEHICLE PICK—UPS.
IN RECEIVING OU$ USE PERMIT FOR THE ROOSEVELT SCHOOL SITE,
WE AGREED NOT TO USE BROADWAY RESIDENCE DRIVE WAYS AS A
TURN AROUND SPACE OR BLOCK DRIVEWAYS AT ANY TIME.
IN DOZNG S0, WE MUST ASK YOU TO PLEASE HELP US BY
COMPLYING WITH THIS AGREEMENT.
PLEASE USE THE TURN AROUND AREA AT THE LF�T RND OF
BROADWAY AND PARK ON THE CURB S ALONG OOSEVELT SCHOOL.
U,
JBEATIE
DIRECTOR OLY2�[PIAN DAY CAMP
_ � M�'
�
�
r, �
. � �
e
� � ��
�^�� f�,�; n�
�'b ,�'
��
�' I SPORTS • P.O. Box 1515 • Burlingame, CA 94011-1515 •(415) 692-6400
MEMO :
FROM 3:30 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. THE AREA ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
BROADWAY AT ROOSEVELT SCHOOL IS VIRTUALLY EMPTY, EXCEPT FOR
THE PICK-UP OF OLYMPIAN CHILDREN WHICH INVOLVES ONLY ABOUT
17 TO 18 VEHICLES IN A PERIOD OF AN HOUR, BECAUSE THERE ARE
SEVERAL PARENTS WITH TWO (2) CHILDREN IN OUR PROGRAM AND
THE ONES OUR COUNSELOR DROPS ON HIS WAY HOME.
THE BURLINGAME MONTESSORI IS OUT BY 3:30 P.M. DAILY AND
THE TRUE LEARNING CENTER IS OUT AT 1:30 P.M. AND IS CLOSED
ON FRIDAYS.
�o_
��������
TO : BUF:L I N��AME F'LANN I N�; CO�iM I 5S I OIV
Ff?OM e WAYNE AND TAM I F'ARF�:ER �'! ��� ��� 1994
1'�45 AF.'MSEsY DF; I VE
H I LLSBOROUrH , r_.AL I FO�:N I A '��O 1 U C�1Y OF BURLINGAI�hE
SUbJEi= T: F'EF:M I T AFF'L I CAT I ONS BY .
��?dN��IG DE�T.
BURL I N� Af1E ELEf1ENTARY Sr_.HOOL D I STf? I GT AND
OLYMF' I AiV DAY C:AMF�
QPINION: BOTH PERMITS SHOULD E�E DENIED BASED ON...
1. UT I L I ZAT T Oh! I5 NOT F'EF'F:ESENTAT I VE OF A
R-1 NEIrNBORH00D
�. BOTH LANDLO��D ( S�= HOOL D I ST�' I C:T ? AND
TENANT �: OLYI�F I AN DAY r_.AMP i HAVE
OF'EF;ATED I N �AD FA I TH
A�:rUMENT THE Sr_:HOOL SITE IS UNIOUE IN ITS SMALL SIZE AI�ID
A>>A I iVST : SUF,•F�OUNDED OIV ALL FOUF,� S I DES BY AIV ESTABL I SHED
F�:ES I DENT I AL A�:EA . WE AL�'EADY HAVE A TRAFF I i= AND
F•AF,'k: I NU FROL�LEM I N�= �'EAS I N�� NUMEsERS 0�" EMF�LQYEES ,
STUDENTS AND VEHIGLES WILL r:OMPOUND FFOE�LEM.
USE OF SCHOOL� FLAY����OUND AS A COMMEF.�C:I AL F'ARk; I IVu
AREA W I LL OI�LY BENEF I T F0�? F�'OF I T TEIVANT .
� TENANT ADMITTED HE I°IOVED HIS FLEET TO F.'OOSEVELT
S_r.HOQL FO�� STO��A�E TO AVOID VANDRLISM P�:OBLEMS HE
I NC:tJF,•F.'ED AT PF,� I 0�� LOCRT I OIV ... NOTH I Nt� TO DO W I TH
T�:AFFIC: SITUATION.
Sfl�ETY
LON� TERM PARk:ING OF ANY VEHIr:LES ESFECIALLY A
C:OhiMEF.'i : I AL FLEET COULD F:ESULT I N SA�'ETY
r:ONCE�NS...ATTRAr:TION FOR VANDALISM, FUEL LEAk::S,
FIF:E 0�' EXF'LOSION. IN ADDITION IT IS A VISUA�,
NOISE, AIVD ODOt?, BLI�HT TO IMMEDIATE NEI�HBORS.
C WOULD YOU WANT TO WAk:E UF' TO F I ND SEVEF:AL VRNS
PARh;ED I N YOUR E�AGk;YARD OR YOUR r,�EENRELT V I EW
TUF;NED INTO A F�R�•k;INu LOT VIEW SIMILA� TQ
RUF..L I Nr,•AME PLAZA�� )
THE SC:HOOL F'LAYGF'OUND I S AN ATT�'A��T I VE NU ISAIVC:E
AFTEFf HOU�'S FQ�' DR I Nk' I Ni� ALCpHOL ( f�..EPORTS ALREADY
� I LED W I TH Es . F' . D,?. BY ALLOW I hli� VEH I L:LES TO F'A�'F;
ON THE F'LAYi�F'OUND YOU EN�=DUF'Ai�E THE INi=:IDENTS TD
I IVi :REASE RLO1Vf W I TH D�!U>> USE AND ELEMENTS THEY
ATTRA�=:T .
LI��I—ITINv
AT TNE ��:IOf? PLANNINr SESSION MEETIN� LIGHTIN�3 WAS
DISi=USSED AS AN OF�TION. THE USE OF ANY Li�3HTINu
WOULD BE A MAJOF� V I OLAT I ON OF IVE I C�HBORS F'ERSONAL
F.' I GHTS THF'OUi�N �'�' I VAGY LOSS AIVD POSS I EtLE SLEE�'
PATTEF:N VIOLATION.
EC:C11VOh'i I C I—IAF'DSH I F'
FEOPLE ARE WILLIN�� TO FURr:HASE THEIR HOMES IN THE
AF'EA O� A S�= HOOL C�'L8L I�= O�' F'�:I VATE ?. F'EOF'L� BG�
NOT C:H005E TO HAVE THEIR HOME IN THE AREA OF A
E�AD FA I TN
SUMMARY
FHOTDB
C{]MMEF'l.: I AL EsUS I NESS ( SC:}-iOOL D I ST�: I C:T Q�'c�'Rl"O�;
THE SAME FUNr_.;IONS QF R FOR PRQFIT QFFIGE AND
WAF.�EHOUSE OF�EF•AT I �IV 7 OF,• CHOOSE A S I TE W I TH A
OF A COMMER�_ I AL FARt�� I N� FAr I L I TY .
HAS
VIEW
VIOLATIONS OF USE FE.RMIT RY OLYMPIAN. EXPANDED
THE I F; OF�EF,•AT I ON F��OM 0lVE TO TWO �:LASS�'OOhiS ,
STORArE OF r_.OMMERCIAL VEHIrLES ON SCHODLYAF:D
F•�•OF�E��TY , I NSTALLAT I QN O�' I LLEuAL F.�AMF , F�A I NT I Ni�
QF CURBS TD NO PARk'ING AND INSTRLLTNG NQ PAR1='IN�
SIUNS.
E�AD NE I r HBO��/M I SS �EF���ESENTAT I ORI OF
S I TUAT I ON ... I NSTALLAT I ON OF NEW F.'OOF OIV C:OMF�LEX
AND �EPAI�S T❑ F�:II�DE��r,•ARTEN BUILDIN� WITHOUT
F•E�•h1ITS AND ALLOWED �:ONTF;A�:TO�� TO WOF.'k: F'RIO�:' TO
REr,ULATED HOURS. ALLOWED TENANT TO IN_r.�;EASE
SF�ACE I N C�ASSF,�OOM USAvE AND LEASE S��ACE �OF.'
C:OMMERC:I AL F'AF;k' I Nr
ILLEGAL F'AF:k:IN�� STARTED IN SEF�TEMEsEF� ��3. TENANT
FILED FOR AN AMENDED FEF�MIT WHEN A NEIr,HE�OR
F.'ESEAF.'C:HED I SSUE AND F I LED ,4 �:OM�'LA I NT . I T WAS
I MPL I ED THAT TENANT SOUr,•HT �OMh1ERr_. I AL FAf?k' I N�
SF'ACE AT NE I vHL�OF'HO�D F,'EGUEST TQ ALLEV I ATE F'AF'F; i h!v
SITUATION WHEN IT WAS TO ONLY FINAN�:IRLLY BEhiEFIT
D? ST�:I i=:T THF,'�Ut;H LEASE I NL:OME RIVD P�'DV I DE A MO�;E
SEr_.U�E C:OMMERr:IAL PARk;IN�� SFOT FOt? GOMMERr_:IAL
VEH I i:LES . MF.� . E�EUTI-�EL HEA��D OU�? QF.� I u I NRL
�BJEr:TIONS AT THE PLAI�NIN� SESSION 1l1C�/94. SI1��=E
THEN HE HA5 ONLY ATTEMF�TED TO TWIST THE ISSUE TQ
�IVE THE APPEA�:ANC:E OF Ar_._r.EPTAN_r.E DN OUR PA�T AND
C�OMF�:Oh1 I SE ON H I S.
WE DHJEC:T TO THE EXPANDED USE OF THE Sr:HDOL SITE.
bOTH F'F;OF'OSALS HAVG THE VISUAL AF'F'EA�AIVC:E OF
COMME�:i=: I AL ENTE�FF? I SES AND W I LL ONLY LEAD TO
FU�'TNEF; T�:AFF I C �= ONi�EST I ON I N THE iVE I L;HBO�;HOOD .
THE PARk'IN8 OF ANY TYPE OF VEHIrLE ON THE
�'LAYUF,�OUNDS C:AUSE A D�;AST I C: REDU�:T I ON I fV THE
P�OF'EF'TY VALUE OF OUR HOMES .
PA�3E # 1: SHOWS THE I MPAC:T THAT AIVY
PAF�k: I Ni� ON Si= HOOL P��OF�EF•TY W I LL HAVE OIV ALL THE
NE I��HPOR5 ON THF,�EE S I DES DUE TO ELEVAT I ON C:HANr,•E .
ALS� AF�F�AF:EIVT I S THE I MF'A�=:T ANY L I UHT I Nu W I LL HAVE
I F ALOUD I N THE PA�F::I Nr,• LOT .
PAvE #'� : SHOWS MY SF'Ei:I F I�= F'�'OF'ERTY ... I A�1
r_.ONSIDEFED THE OUTFIELD DUF,�IN6 PASEE�ALL SEAS�N.,
THE F.:EMOVAL OF 4i> FEET AT THE EtAi= h: OF THE EsU I LD I N��
CN0�:�IALLY HOME PLATE:� WILL PUSH THE r,AME THAT MUCH
FUF.'THE�' I NTO hiY YAF:B .
PHQTOS SHOW OFEN I N� I N BOTTOM OF FENCE , E�REAk�:A��E
ON TOF' OF FEN�= E AND F'HYS I C:AL F'ATH WOF�N ON M,Y N I LL
LEAD I N� TO MY REAF: YA�:D .
������� �
`'=!� 1 b i994
.�
r�5':.
-�`
;� i-
Ci� �` k�:i�i�_:i`„=;:.1i�,:;-.
E��.+A.�1lylil�C�a C7Fs��
.. ., �- �. �.� _ �, � �y,,�� �
' v. � .i N i�"'k V,.
. � �'� '��'' t'� ti . .; y Ir;�� l , � � �. �M��„i.
i i � S� r .. �� 1V�� r i r «,:� ., . ..
^ ...., �,. .,:,�., ,,,+r , ''R
,� x; �•��)`+�J�'� I�� � 3�.a.1�l�9 �raal,aa�" i �uk �'�,1'a��^ �. �, � ,,.-
, , ,�%�ed(� �� , I.. . . ... .. . � � r '1 � � '✓uwti�u.ue�Yw. Jux �� xi�iW.a�wuiksdl7rnt.imtldu6l�'
�L � h �
I
� et ,�F� � ��� ' �'"� • a �
a�.ip,e,1 fi.� Ta 1 „� �X� 4. � r �, ,
ti'`d�,�`�1 ��r p.�iti��.r. � P. n� C,�',i�� u�i i 1 ., � i�' �
1 r Yl�ri�y r �F;!f � r��,�' . � ���i �� u,� 1��t�,l � S b �'y.
, f 1,� M � ��" � _ w�e fxaC. 4F�J,,,, e,l��y�.
`'`��� �,r ° � ✓'%4q..� � � �,: t+�+„ 'a � � +�,' "a e . . ,
4 ' .� � + ��� � � ..�� M � � s �� :e :� � r, .;
;�, i+S� � `��t k� � �' �� �. `h ' �, � — �1 "pt�� ` ° �'. "h(� . -
ti �"'1 �a f a �5i'M��t . ..�a.,,.�� .. ��� a. � '� � �• . �j�. , `,y��.�y� �":�,�L �:� 4 - � ..._ , . . � . ... . . . .
�}�^'4M J� ,r .�.:, ' ti`.:, � � +�t. i. Wa � f . . , �
� �'. .1 .
� I � �' �6P� i }... �Qt � � � y�. � ,L. .� ( i, � . . � M �. GT;P h���, -
,4W,.1'+��i1� N'� x�c• ' �.. gy���.. ; . . F���:1G+ . ei � . ��r.�'F'��� .
r � ' J M�R • . �Sre • �". . . y . . �� , If}!' 6 1 F�1�f� �
.� '���{ ' J p'' � . i \, f '',�i��� � 1f 'A � . � r\ � � - � � ' ... � '�.:�"'#'l � Y°5�.,��y �.
..1\ 5 �! � h^ '.I.11� �
��i � �{��" r ��� N��� "�. ,.,ti� . . ���. �,ry�w��. .
� . •�U� �� MJ y�. 4 4i,�' � f'�� � t+� � �.. I I � �' . M M '.,: , r 1' ,k' � � � �—��� �' � .
fly �, �
f�(q1;,�C � n'�;, N 1' IMwI � � '.. � 1 W p1„
y� 4�� �♦l j �{�, - , ♦ . .'�' tl► .� 1� .4
� �� *q��yf l.. � � ..M 1 "7 �. yeM1. ' . . . rA4N� }V
'N.� ��+ � l�?�'� j Y � 1 �1. � S. nLR�+� � ' ' 7 T�vY±
��.,1u ����. �*iysy�� '"6yJ D"��'b I�i�l'� !A�'!i. ��� d '�y.� . . �. .... �
�.��i��',�. �+. JNy,��,tl•�1,��� � ,Z���� � ,� �. . .. �1r1. . , aiS
�ti� � ' . . . �+ .. , :�,a. •+ `p , � ' .�,+''r��
� � .� � � �. �"• � r . y 4�.a� ryi - ,� T r✓�.
. '� .. i h1'i�r . � - n i', 'R' � a �r
' • r. � . t ��'�,x,,
�' ' , ' . G `� , . . r v rr � �
� v . ` � �' . .. • '� .�. ;:
� •:�. j ` L
�.:�3"; .�.• .tit . ' .� + � � `,I ./
a._ �. .. ���J+ l �� � � � �� , ,5 t � 11��. . . • ' • • #•�►
a .., .. u.E......1G'�'� � .n"' -As, �;' • �• �•i� �,t.; . . .�
��' '� ;. I � t �j
...` _ _ � . �`r, Y ryI�'+� �f� ��k iuL + 4 �!Y' M� . , � ,'T
� I 5 �tA .. �" i� ��A ,�?� � m r�� � `'s: +k
bl� L r �� �"��� �. '� �€ �ir., '�.°'.��'ti�)�:d S�� ��t'a � . . ' -:.
,'�• :.,y,.,�"' , ,a i� �.���(r/+� � •„ .iF *�i , . '�`�, .. '►'� �•, -,.:
r�� ��, r ,.
i �, r , ���" �;s� � ��',�. r� _��.�� '�'y�;.� � , �.�.: � .�('ti � . � � �
.�`..,? �yY1' �b��y��,,f�• " rr'��, .r "'f;..+:.' ,� ' • .� �
� 'J'*" � ;i'�0e'i 6 �� � � " i � � ,;;y� i� . - . ' . , -
M! :. 1 z ' r� � - .. . � , , �?"� � f .
L (�
krl ' '_��',i� J.r�," �si��"R � +�. . iy "��,�'�t��' "y��� � �1 �:'. � ' �1 r �� �` y� �rf
� � �.. y; �t �1`� �� � 1 N ♦ � .i fi� ��� SI� 4
� :F�' �f � *��t�wYJ jM31! �!� �hin�.,4y i. .: h "� + �°� "+IVy� ��' ��rE � .. , _( � s
} ! � Wli � �,r f�" . 'S '�
- ����i' �! ',,,kl, � �.i,'�i �I d� �ti..� i �4_ � � , . � "�m��..' �� t � , S �i �. � C
�1..� f ii,' S" :g � N� i�r� ° �,r
. . �... . • � �ti
' �'� * M y �j �r �M.. . ' � � . . . . � �•J� � �'� '� 1: wy .:
�c �` h � � '�.I�at� ,�. •y � +,�' � 9"�!^
,... . 4 • � ����� '�~ , - � . M .""'^� � h � t� } % �,.
.. � • �.�6, . , : � �!?r.r
�[4,�lW , . "�.. �' l,v . . � . ��.. � ;�+y�� arw'.,,. �,.
�� �• � .. . . .. . • � , �k
;:� , „.. , • � � j . . , c:
.v�* � -r .e� � �.A� ,.:�,. �At� ei• �}�y� {, � �G:,- t�,� � ,
i4 v�Y't ^ �ls.H@' � ���,���,) .;#Yt��k� �i' . �, +�"'�� 1q,�*�'��.�y�:w ^ � b 1.�wi!4���°'�'�i'Y�i
. �'��Sa.t � �.� ..�u'� w:� .11 � -��
�' � � 4 . "��L�,'���,� J�� ��� Y r
r ��+ y'S�CY,�'y��,a�^,�sP+Ti �1",S_�{h d n'� � 1 . '�
+Y 1 v R4 .�µ�,� r '� r
t � k�, � �� � r' ' � �' a � � ; �¢�� " , •
� y,�� �.� 4 �..•� .� h
Z.r. ��T.y 1!, •i ���'� I' 9
� I, °.: r ,,9 �� � !y )t 4 � , .� �� � : ... �. r
"�,,'/'��'�1�•�l�, s� '1,, *f . �f �+ �, ���� �
��'� T 't7•!`y, v'I�i .y.� .. �1 22��� ��V =�,q \ � + �
��P F�f x�Y�� ' . , � w. '.n� � .>,a�
� �. 1 F�f +y \' YY � .,t.' !t}��
�' 3' r n �' t- +� 4'. . . . , ( .
a,, . �r 'xN �!;`�� � ' iI Z • ,�: I' , ' Y ,
a +�.n . �. y• ..
��i14 ���a L�u'; � - . � , � �
'y � ,� �.
f.� �ix.�:k�"'�'� �:vw�„'� 1' o.�.. . ��. j,. .
. trMa',�^ `i - � ,. � �,GyE � ra u„ � � �,. •
• � � '� �d��♦♦� j�. 1 •1�. -� '��.s► f:� . y t
, � q �}�l . .. �� . . . i },�� .
' 't �g�f +� 't' . ' . �� , I.
%x=� 'z'�/ ti'��,. � �� �,.A ,y; ���,''' , ,
3 `��:1 t�. �' � .± "♦i V• .
�.I ( I '' 1w� ! 1 � � , . . . .
+ � rcrY .,. f � ��� � Mi ��' .� t�� i .4 ...
� �_ t � �, ' �, A��h r � " � ',� .� � �. i �^
,f ,: .tt�a�+:'".a�'��.• � � �/t , { J�,.
' �j� � `�„„'� � ♦. . `M �.7, � ly� �'. ` . n` .
f %r� � � 1�� y �� �� " :V�M�yv��Z4� � . Y'� � ; rh! Z,�, � v ! 'a � � ;��. , 1
1��. t/y�, (� R.� J V� ,���, �a ,.�.rll��� j��; ,is + tl
' ''� ����� 6t�� ( � �V: '��•� i���` « �•1�� j .j `� ��'�!�
, �'i 1��� "'1 . ,i• .�i� ���
�
. ��� , ' ' �� ;i I .' �
• .i $�:6 I� ��. '" � 1 �.
� ,'� �MY�� '���,�' �. R �` �r�Y\.
•J1
, ,R„+:�,�'' s ,;..�.,, � , y�� , r yy,+ ^. P M ,
.r � .:A :�:4 R .�v„
:� + i, e ��' t ����� �!� � }�t'
, � , �� �'� �. A,�� yR� 4
f�/�f r �•'� ` ` ;. � ; r +'' L �t +'S ' '
,�..'+''�'� � � t .� �._ 1i� �' 1. �M+ ` " ���;.3� h . i,. . y.
� �" ,M, . �, , . �r� a ����. ��� �y r
��� 1 ' . . .. �, , t � }i' • � ��1�" �
w� , ,t..'..� 5 , �.. � ; „��`� , .
Mt . .. �., "�{ ��� " �
�'• ',,+�,,��
f� +�y-: o . �,✓� ` v a` l' � "" ' .14�,y, ` a
� k� ' X`
�.� y � n r ,� '' r y!
.1' � A � � i' ,
x ,_,� ,� � :��.�� �,���;
a
.� ti 'Y d a
�' Y�.� �... I
H + . � �.
_.��� �.. �. - � ���ti
�ro. r w1>>�'.n
+�J. fi __ . ��. � l lr� 7 1 �. iy ,
. M�� �. , . � � � _ . A ,
., }, y ��:„,'�"} ',nbh,�,
�
�P .. _ f . we '.`�.. n �oP� '� . . .
! .a ; �;r , �
. ��
� � �`�i ��v�� �' � �r� � � k0� 1^I� _.`�� m
'�y��',,,ti�.� �.1e�, '��'y�'� ,� � , � .� ,r l�y�,�y �, , �,,;
N3�R.� + �`'� .dhr ,�; F , '..��'`e Rcr+�!
1, " @ �
Y t Y�� ' 1 `j Y ,'1 . ,,,Y f �! .
. � �J •:� � � �
. ♦ �fti� . � �} ' , '� f�
• ►.�f�": �'� •
�. i
. , z7Y. . 1 •��. ... .�. .
`'. � .' �r'.' ' ��� ��. }.� � � � �• � ,w��.
�' � .lil�� f '�`� s 4 7,� ,a +
^,•
_� �� �j � '��.
� � . � .:ti �7( �'�'.n ��,i
��� ; �, A � : 7, '� °:
il�:;�? ec:� •.
w►WRi1w���-. � �,� tr'�e�j� 4` � � ! � r'�t'�,��1 .
� ;..�� r F� � �
�.. �� gj �E� �,
�M�� .i • +i � � '��
�G i�� �{ ��I�n'r ��A, \ M � �l�M1
� � \ f �
•q+ My'�,�� ,r'. a L'
�
+ �i
,� �� �r� �6 :tx. ,�
r � a�t� � �, u� ; + + �
w
,ik x +. � '+ �
x��". �i Sf�4r . � �q ? fY r�,�+ 1�'t �'
�C4 , ML►*�`�^ :'• �` '�`'`' �'
.ai �s . . . .._.v-�. . � . . , �� �,."M�,. � _ .
fi ."` -
�. j � �,
' � ' � �nl�p�
¢ 7 f
�iR . 4 J ..e m�.
I�a t�.16�y.y /�f Y J�' ��ry a r'1� r;'� r.a �` �.��
"'"""".j; �, �: � P, �.� . z� +� �� • k ` , �1 .' y ° ' f;.
�;�` '.,^ h
. � �����
��,�W r
.. , . I' ' .. . H%M >
. � . . . , ` . . . , �' Y .,•:-^.�_ ,�.+. _,;. ..._ . . -.._
IIM -... ... , . . . .... � *..
* �.. �t7�rF""` . ,�y�r¢ 'C _ '
�r. M ,��,�pw;�....�—*. �rt'""r,"' _.,�; '
ax"' � "� � .k�� y��p�: it : -•�''S. � � �. �,. , i�; � �, � R"; � � � �.
� �r 1.. , � a � � w� _ :
' 1 '�''�`'�''� , utCa �.r� ^+ � � ,�y . , � � � ."+ r � � � ���,o �''"
+1.. R
. '�� u�:iR^��iA'��}' . ..t ,. ,rt' '� � �
�*','r+",.� 1,� + Ck. iiT.;. � . A �,. _•�r.;�1>.¢ � ��.
a
October 2, 1990
��P lnx�� IIC ��-C��z�.�`c�Yl'C.P
��-� �_
CITY HALL-SOI PRIMROSE ROAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010
(415) 342-8625
Mr. & Mrs. Len Beatie
P. 0. Box 1515
Burlingame, CA 94011-1515
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Beatie:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
September 24, 1990 Planning Commission approval of your use permit
application became effective October 2, 1990.
This application was to allow a day care use in room 8(874 SF) at
Roosevelt School at 1151 Vancouver Avenue. The September 24, 1990
minutes of the Planning Commission states your application was
approved with the following conditions:
1. that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be used for after
school day care from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings
shall be held in the evenings at this location;
2. that the students shall have access to the larger playground
areas during the time they are on site with the day care
program except that this use shall be limited to the 22
students who are in Room #8;
3. that the students shall be brought to the site and taken
from the site in two vans which shall be parked on the
Broadway frontage of the building during the program period;
4. that any change to the number of students, the hours of
operation, the area of building used, the number of months
this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change
to the operation of this program at this site shall require
an amendment to this use permit;
S. that this use permit shall be subject to review for
compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every two
years thereafter or upon complaint.
�
All site improvements and construction
application to the Building Department.
one year during which time a building
extension of up to one year may be
Commission if application is made before
Sincerely,
�� �._-
Margaret Monroe �
City Planner
MM/ds
cc: Chief Building Inspector
Park Director (when applicable)
Burlingame School District
2303 Trousdale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Assessor's Office, Redwood City
(Acreage, City of Burlingame; APN 027-340-150)
BEATIE.102
work will require separate
This approval is valid for
permit must be issued. One
considered by the Planning
the end of the first year.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
September 24, 1990
10. SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE A CLASSROOM FOR HOMEWORK TUTORING AND ARTS
AND CRAFTS PURPOSES AT 1151 VANCOWER AVENUE ZONED R-1
Reference staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP Monroe
reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant�s letter,
study meeting questions. Five conditions were suggested for
consideration at the public hearing. It was determined there is a
white zone on Vancouver, this is only for passenger
loading/unloading, it would be illegal to park vans there.
Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Len Beatie, Director,
Olympian Day Camp, applicant, stated his program is for children to
improve/enhance their homework; they will park their vans on the
Broadway side instead of Vancouver, there is a small white zone
there; there may be occasional pickup by parents, generally they
transport the students in their vans; the program is for special
needs students, they will not make any money on this, it is mainly
public relations for their Olympian Day Camp program; at this time
they will not go beyond the 22 children allowed in the conditions; he
stated there is a need for this program, parents pay for it, some
children are on scholarships and some get financial aid from t}ie
county.
Marjorie Lane, 2104 Broadway was pleased that the school is being
used but not that her driveway was being used for a turnaround; this
may not apply to this program but other vans who deliver children to
the school do use her driveway. She asked that something be done,
perhaps a notice to the school or to the parents asking them not to
use her driveway. Applicant said his vehicles are all white and with
big signs on them, if she would identify her driveway he would tell
his drivers not to turn around there. There were no further audience
comments and the public hearing was closed.
With the statement this is a school which has had after school
sports, this is a worthy project, with the planning the city has done
the effect of the operations is less than when it was a school, C.
Jacobs moved for approval of the special permit by resolution with
the following conditions: (1) that the 874 SF classroom (#8) shall be
used for after school day care from 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday
through Friday throughout the regular school year (September through
June) for a maximum of 22 students and no parent meetings shall be
held in the evenings at this location; (2) that the students shall
have access to the larger playground areas during the time they are
on site with the day care program except that this use shall be
limited to the 22 students who are in Room #8; (3) that the students
shall be brought to the site and taken from the site in two vans
which shall be parked on the Broadway frontage of the building during
the program period; (4) that any change to the number of students,
the hours of operation, the area of building used, the number of
a
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 9
September 24, 1990
months this program uses the building, the method of transporting
students or the time of year the site is used or any change to the
operation of this program at this site shall require an amendment to
this use permit; and (5) that this use permit shall be subject to
review for compliance with the conditions in June of 1991 and every
two years thereafter or upon complaint. Motion was seconded by C.
Mink and approved on a 6-0 roll call vote, C. Ellis absent. Appeal
procedures were advised.
11. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN EIGHT UNIT
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM AT 518 ALMER ROAD ZONED R-3
Reference staff report, 9/24/90, with attachments. CP Monroe
reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant�s letter,
findings for a negative declaration, study meeting questions. Seven
conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing.
Commission and staff discussed provision of a 24 hour emergency power
generator and suggested a condition #8 addressing this.
Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Takuo Kanno, architect and
applicant, advised they had no objection to providing a 24 hour
emergency generator, they are negotiating with two manufacturers to
provide such a generator which will be installed on the ground floor;
one of staff's concerns about the parking layout had been
maneuverability, they have revised the plans to provide two guest
parking spaces at the end of the ramp and each of the units will have
two stalls; Mr. Kanno requested condition #5 be changed to read "
two guest parking stalls . . .�� ' '
Responding to a question, architect advised they have found there is
a market for two master bedroom units, b�yers want more room in the
condominiums they purchase, one of the master bedrooms could be used
as a guest bedroom or a study or a room far a home occupation. There
was a concern regarding the planters and landscaped areas on top of
the post tension slab; applicant explained waterproofing measures
they would take and how drainage would be handled. There were no
audience comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Mink found that based on the initial study and comments made this
evening and in the staff report there is no substantial evidence that
this project will have a significant effect on the environment and
moved for approval of the negative declaration and condominium permit
by resolution with the following conditions: (1) that the project
shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department da�e stamped August 21, 1990 (Sheets 0,4,6,7); August 30,
1990 (Sheet 1); September 7, 1990 (Sheets 2,3,5); (2) that the
project shall meet Uniform Building and Fire Codes as amended by the
City of Burlingame; (3) that the conditions of the City Engineer�s
memos of August 28, 1990 and September 19, 1990, the Fire Marshal�s
memo of July 31, 1990 and the Director of Parks� memo of August 15,
{�
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
JANUARY 10, 1994
page -6-
approve the application by resolution and with the following
conditions: (1) that the addition as built shall conform to the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 8, 1993
and construction drawings date stamped December 15, 1993; (2) that the
height of the solarium shall not exceed 8'-2" as measured from the top
of concrete; (3) that, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
applicant sign the Public Works Department "Conditions of Issuance of
a Building Permit" sheet, which requires applicant to drain to the
street and to show how this drainage will be accomplished; and (4) that
the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and
Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Galligan and approved on a 6-0-1
(C. Ellis absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
11. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES AT 1131-1141
VANCOWER AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT). NEGATIVE
DECLARATION.
Reference staff report, 1/10/94, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed
the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments, and study
meeting questions. If recommended to Council for approval, 3
conditions were suggested.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Robert Beuthel, Superintendent,
Burlingame Elementary School District, 2303 Trousdale Drive,
represented the project. He noted that the district had just completed
a facilities master plan which identified considerable maintenance work
to be done to the district schools. Roosevelt school is one of the
older schools and there is considerable dry rot repair needed. They
felt that Roosevelt was a more central location for the district
offices and expanding enrollment was placing serious space demands on
the existing operating schools. He noted that this proposal did not
include a district corporation yard, once considered for the Roosevelt
site. The plans do include a modular building for storage of text
books but it would not be placed as a part of the initial construction.
They are aware of traffic issues, particularly parking. They are
providing parking on site, but want to do that without reducing
available play area for students, both tenant and if reused for a
public school in the future. The parking areas proposed would be lit
only on the nights when the board meetings were held, so the impact
would be minimal. It is not usual for the school district to be an
applicant before the city, in this case it occurs because only the
district offices will be moved; if this were reopening the school with
the office, a city use permit would not be required. The district
would like to work with the city to have a positive relationship.
In response to commissioners questions Mr. Beuthel noted that the
vehicles now stored in the upper play area may have to be relocated if
they will affect available parking required; the parking proposed
Bur
required�
conditio�
the bush
high can
were redt
; Planning Commission Minutes � JANUARY 10, 1994
� page -5-
r`
in conditions; can the poplar'tree which is required in
� to be removed be removed unde� current city ordinances; if
�too high and removed what veg�tation that will not grow as
installed; even if the columns in the 15' triangle area
e to 3' the placement of the �olumns outside of the triangle
would line u� to block sight lines for motorists.
�
Further discu sion on CEs conditions in his December 20, 1993 memo
noting that th second condition notQs tYiat both the park and public
works departmen want the tree removed and the condition three requires
the removal of e bush but does rjot preclude planting some lower
vegetation in th spot. The app;�icant would be responsible for
implementation of th of these cond�itions. It was noted that the CE's
recommendations sho ld stay as the� were proposed.
The motion to appro e was call�d to a vote with the following
conditions: (1) that t e project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Plannin Departm�nt and date stamped December 7, 1993,
Site Plan, and Wall/Fen e Elevaition; (2) that the City Engineers'
December 20, 1993 memo sh 11 ber�met; and (3) that the project shall
meet all Uniform Building a d Un�form Fire Code requirements as amended
by the City of Burlingame. Cbmmissioners voted approval 5-1-1 (C.
Jacobs dissenting, C. Ellis b,�ent). Appeal procedures were advised.
It was noted that the stop si placement and the encroachment permit
would have to be approved ]�''y the City Council before this fence
exception action was final. f
The commission adjourned f�r a 0 minute break at 9:05 P.M. and
reconvened at 9:15 P.M. ;
�
f
10. HILLSIDE AREA CON�TRIICTION ERMIT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE
AT 1540 ALTURAS D IVE, ZONED -1 (RICHARD R. COSTA, PROPERTY
Reference staff report, 1/:
the request, reviewed crit
meeting questions. If
conditions were suggeste .
Hillside Area Constructi r.
,
0/94, with atta ments. CP Monroe discussed
ria, Planning Dep rtment comments, and study
recommended to ouncil for approval, 4
There was clarifi ation on the need for a
Permit and the vari nce procedure.
Chm. Deal opened the pub ic hearing. A1 Harris, ay Area Sunrooms, 17
West 41st Street. San M eo, CA represented the pr 'ect. It was stated
that Bay Area Sunrooms(felt they will be able to eet all the City's
construction requireme�lts.
There were no other cc�mments and the public hearing w�s closed.
Commissioner Jacobs en moved that since the addition s behind the
house, narrow and 1 wer than the existing roof ridge t would not
impact existing view and if it weren't for the HACP the s�}de setback
would be a minor moc�ification because of the minimal encroachment, to
��
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes JANUARY 10, 1994
� page -7-
behind the multipurpose room will be adequate for the district offices;
they would be willing to keep the board meetings at Franklin school
where facilities are now adequate and use the kindergarten room for a
small meeting room/storage; if Roosevelt school were to reopen as a
public school it would be on a different model from existing schools,
growth projections indicate 3 to 5 years before that decision; current
leases are year to year with 30 day notice; they anticipate that if the
vans cannot be in the upper parking area they will be kept on the
street which could cause an access problem in the neighborhood; there
is no onsite parking for the present tenants.
In support: Rick Caldera, Franklin School Principal, 2385 Trousdale
Drive, asked that the community keep education as a priority; Franklin
school is already overcrowded and needs more space. Kristi Pangrazio,
President Burlingame School Board, 2710 Easton Drive, explained that
this solution is the best possible given the increase in enrollment and
the community requested reduction in class size along with needs of
special education classes and day care and the resources available.
In opposition: James Quinn, 1116 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame, CA spoke
against the project, does not want portables and lighting of parking
areas at night. He presented petitions with 98 signatures, objecting
to the proposed plans to remodel the Roosevelt School Auditorium into
school district offices. Concerns addressed the traffic problem
already present from out of area attendees at tenant schools, this
would add to them, its not safe and the use is incompatible with the R-
1 Residential Zoning. Hoped that a fair and equitable solution could
be realized without adding to the current congestion problem. kobert
Kane, 1221 Broadway, felt problem was use of facilities as private
school with everyone brought to the site by car, this would be
increased by number of district employees; questioned the Fire
Department's ability to turn in the radius available given the on
street parking on Broadway. Trash problems and weed abatement problems
noted and documented with photos. Vans parking in site without
permission. To mitigate District needs to eliminate independent
contractors use as district school and see facilities are maintained.
James Walsh, 2116 Broadway, Burlingame, CA concurred with previous
comments and questioned the lighting of the area where the vans are
parked and expressed a concern about increased vandalism in that area
that would require lights all the time.
Vic Bogan, 1201 Vancouver, acknowledge all the problems mentioned and
asked if making Broadway a one-way street with an entrance into the
school yard and a drop off point within the school grounds, hence
exiting on Vancouver, again a one-way street, would be feasible.
Harvey Bracken, 2100 Roosevelt, questioned the environmental impact of
the carbon monoxide omissions. The fire hydrant in front of the house
is usually blocked by the traffic and would be a problem if access were
needed. The ramp put in before for maintenance use is still in place.
Public notice should be at least 30 days. Pauline Irons, 2108
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes JANUARY 10, 1994
page -8-
Broadway, asked if Roosevelt School would ever be opened to its
�� original use. Enrollment numbers seem to justify its use as a public
school. If not use a public school, sell building and develop houses.
John DeHoney, 1120 Vancouver, spoke about the parking problems which
would become worse with project. Robert Lent, 2010 Broadway, asked
that the Planning Commission withdraw the current Use Permit as he felt
current use is an abuse rather than use. Austen Welt, 1150 Vancouver,
expressed concern about the traffic situation and concurred that a one-
way street could be a viable option. Wayne, Parker, 1245 Armsby Drive,
Hillsborough asked what could be done about the fencing as a privacy
issue, i.e., landscaping or some kind of site barrier. No landscaping
is drawn in the proposed plans to screen new portable or added lower
parking. He also commented about the traffic flow, new parking would
relocate baseball, parking and lighting problems.
Robert Beuthel, Burlingame School Superintendent, spoke again, advised
the Commission that it is not the intent of the School District to
create an adversarial situation and requested to continue the public
hearing in order that they might continue the request to another date
after meeting with the community. He expressed concern regarding the
lease questions and advised the Commission that the income derived from
the use of the Roosevelt site is 2.5$ of the district budget.
There were no other comments.
Commissioner Jacobs then moved to continue the public hearing to an
unspecified date.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Mink and approved on a 6-0-1 voice
vote (C. Ellis absent). The CA noted that the item would be renoticed
when it was ready for the agenda again.
12. AM ENT TO MASTER SIGN PROGRAM AN SIGN EXCEPTION AT 1160
PALOMA VENUE, ZONED C-1 (RWOK WO , PROPERTY OWNER AND MAX
Reference staff report 1/10/94, with �tachments. CP Monroe discussed
the request, reviewed cr'teria, Plan ng Department comments, and study
meeting questions. If recomm ded to Council for approval, 4
conditions were suggested. omments were made regarding code
enforcement at two of the bus' esses.
Chm. Deal opened the publi� heari The applicant was not present and
there were no comments f�6m the flo r. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Galliga 'then moved to den the
exception is a d� retionary action e
accomplish the un' orm intention of a maste
the clutter on s' e property; need better ren�
signs style wi fit with existing marquee s
application noting a sign
proposed signs do not
sign program, they add to
t� ing of how the existing
�
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes JANUARY 10, 1994
page -8-
Broadway, asked if Roosevelt School would ever be opened to its
original use. Enrollment numbers seem to justify its use as a public
school. If not use a public school, sell building and develop houses.
John DeHoney, 1120 Vancouver, spoke about the parking problems which
would become worse with project. Robert Lent, 2010 Broadway, asked
that the Planning Commission withdraw the current Use Permit as he felt
current use is an abuse rather than use. Austen Welt, 1150 Vancouver,
expressed concern about the traffic situation and concurred that a one-
way street could be a viable option. Wayne, Parker, 1245 Armsby Drive,
Hillsborough asked what could be done about the fencing as a privacy
issue, i.e., landscaping or some kind of site barrier. No landscaping
is drawn in the proposed plans to screen new portable or added lower
parking. He also commented about the traffic flow, new parking would
relocate baseball, parking and lighting problems.
Robert Beuthel, Burlingame School Superintendent, spoke again, advised
the Commission that it is not the intent of the School District to
create an adversarial situation and requested to continue the public
hearing in order that they might continue the request to another date
after meeting with the community. He expressed concern regarding the
lease questions.and advised the Commission that the income derived from
the use of the Roosevelt site is 2.5� of the district budget.
There were no other comments.
Commissioner Jacobs then moved to continue the public hearing to an
unspecified date.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Mink and approved on a 6-0-1 voice
vote (C. Ellis absent). The CA noted that the item would be renoticed
when it was ready for the agenda again.
12. AM ENT TO MASTER SIGN PROGRAM AN SIGN EXCEPTION AT 1160
PALO�VENUE, ZONED C-1 (RWOK WO , PROPERTY OWNER AND MAX
Reference staff report
the request, reviewed
meeting questions.
conditions were sug
enforcement at two of
1/10/94, with
teria, Plan�
If recomme�ide
the bus`s�fiesses.
�tachments. CP Monroe discussed
g Department comments, and study
to Council for approval, 4
ts were made regarding code
Chm. Deal opened the publi heari The applicant was not present and
there were no comments f m the flo r. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Galliga then moved to den the application noting a sign
exception is a d' cretionary action e proposed signs do not
accomplish the un' orm intention of a maste sign program, they add to
the clutter on s' e property; need better ren ing of how the existing
signs style wi fit with existing marquee sig
CITY OF BUFiLINGAME
APFLICATION TOO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
�j/ve of AQnlication: ✓" Special Permit _Variance _Other
Project Address_�Zl! �' :�`�,�', ��,-f t��z �( � u..',i:,,,� ,���=
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
APPL/CANT PROPERTY OWNER
--� ; ,
Name: i1� "/y�/�N .G�f�� (/�J�/'� ,C, � �L��Name: �'��!�°,;,?-r� .��c��� �%r�
Address: /��' v'�X /� i� Address:.� �c> j�%r«t�sd���� /,�.n,
.�
City/State2ip: �� r�r!h� �im e _�� . y� �.°/� City/State2ip: _ :{ �%�',`�ra �rn �= ;'c '%��" �L°
Telephone:(work) ; �fk� � ( r� � �� �/G'G� Telephone:(work) � S�i - 3 ��'�
(home) `� � � � � � - : ' j � 7 (home)
ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Telephone (daytime): _
Please indicate wiih an asterisk l'1 who th COnta -� narmn
is for this vroiect.
PROJECT DESCR/PT/ON: .� � � f !Fr�� r��-�- /t'�,�' �i�.ri ' � i--
�-� � � � , � �,.o � � �,
AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE:
)
I hereby certify under penalty of p�rjury,that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and .betief.
- - � f" . ---=
I know about the
application.
OFFICE USE ONLY
applicant to submit this
\ Date Filed. � `� Fee
'2 �� � � 2 J Receipt � G�GJ�
Letter(s) to applicant advising application incomplete:
Date application accepted as complete: �
P.C. study meeting (date} P.C. public hearing (date)
P.C. Action
,s�az Appeal to Council? Yes No
ao;�.f�,,, Council meeting date Council Action
/ 4� ,��. . �Lc� Ea � .� j� �C,'L�
" ���ifcant`s Signature Date�,
proposed application, and hereby authorize the above
� � �e ���
Property Owner's Signature Date
� CITY
�� OQ
eutxuNanMe
�`a..o
1.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
COMP�RCIAL APPLICATIONS
sed use of site:
/hours of operation:
�� � �
p
�<�/' S C%[ O J
�•��L'
��� tr. �'r.. pili�riii�v�-i�oirii��ni�����.i�%7«7L�%�
•- • - • .- y
2.
4. Current and Projected maximum number of employees at this
i,,,.�t;,,.,.
.ExistinQ In 2 Years In 5 Years
After After After
8.��5PNf 5�1�I 8AM-5PM 5PM 8AM-5PM 5PM
Weekdays '� j
fulltime iz'.SUt�1'� ` , �:c'P', S��cTv�� .S��Lrn � `, ;
artime ! �
Weekends _
fulltime �f�
artime --�-
5. Current and Projected maximum number of visitors/customers
who may come to the site:
ExistinQ
After
8�'1=5P-�+i a-P3d
/,Z; 3c: /�.L/ �, c-'�� ('/'1
ra �,/ N �!
In 2 Years
After
8AM-5PM I 5PM
✓ r=lrilv � SCt/7��
-�-----
6. Maximum number of employees and visitors/customers which can
be expected to be on the property at any one time: Y�
7. Where �o�will the employees park? ,�'�jc`,!?i !t �>�� S`, ;� - �;,,`
C.�i�i.� (',l ���12
8. Where ��will customers/visitors park? 1�;rc;�c%wc"-i
�
9. Present or most recent use of site:_/��c�z `',r,�;
,J
10. List of other tenants/firms on the property:_/'��t`�Le��uv�,�p CL.��c'��
f�f� �2 T /�/a +l SCf�G%D/� , � ! fl.�'1 %A//=f4 �✓1 �= ivli9�; T;- � ��„ � �
i L�=� �
In 5 Years
After
8AM-5PM I 5PM
_r_••�� � )
CIT1 �i)F EUF'! r �(�,�,f./IE
��'�. �FECIHL PEr���:�1�T =�F'LI�:HT'�•'��i�'
, ; ��
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning
C�mmission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or. injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity oi to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience. Van parking only with egress/ingress 4 times daily to
pick up school children at hours which will not interfere with traffic
in the area, i.e. between 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The vans are 1993/1994
late models, inspected and approved by the California Highway Patrol
quarterly. There will be no police or fire services required in the
ordinary operation of the vans. The social benefits results from the
education of community children.
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted Bn accordance with the Bur/ingame
Genera/P/an and Zoning OrdinanceJ Proposed use is parking of vans for
transportation of elementary school children attending private school
on site, which is consistent with the zoning and within the zoning
(R-1, low-density residential) and elementary school use as called for
by the general plans.
3. How wi// the pioposed pioject be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoinin� propeities in the genera/ vicinityT
Existing structures are not being ef ected or changed in any way.
The vans are current models, well maintained and California Highway
Patrol approved each quarter. The use of the vans will eliminate
traffic in that 88 potential parent trips will be reduced to 4 trips
daily by the vans.
� zisz
sp.frm
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ oi injurious to
property or Impiovements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighborinfl properties or structures on those
propertiesl If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving,
landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the suucture or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfarel
Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbape), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks,
storape of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseasesl.
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection7 wll alarm systems
or sprinklers be installedl Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services
(i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materials,
or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removaq.
Genera/ welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community pood. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and
goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefitl
�onvenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parkinfl for
this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderfy or
handicappedl
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Burrngame Geneia/
P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT
Ask the Planninp Department for the fleneral plan designation and zoninp district for the proposed project site. Also
ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated
designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fiY accordingly.
3. Ho w wi!/ the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and charactei of the
existing neighborhood and potential uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhoodl If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. If chanpes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing
architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhoodl If a use will affect the way a
neighbofiood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area
and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulkl If there is no change
to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other
structures in the neighborhood o� area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodt Think of character as
the image or tone established by size, density of development and ge�eral pattern of land use. wll there be more
traffic or less parking available resulting from this use7 If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change,
state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existinp and potential uses in the �eneral vicinity7 Compare you�
project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state
why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
, zrez
w.rm,
�� Employees �� Vehicles
Larry Krusemark
True Learning Center 4+ 2 Volunteers 6
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
George Hart
Hart Day School 3 2
1151-B Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Lynette Muhic
Burlingame Montessori 4 4
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
Len Beatie
Olympian Day Camp 5 5
1151 Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Joanne Bailey
Peninsula Early Learning 7 5
1151-A Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
Lisa Rosenthal
Peninsula Parent, Inc. 7 2
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
27 24
Enrollment
60
BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT
LESSEE ADDRESS LIST
1993-94
School Location Term
True Learning Center Roosevelt School 10 Month
347-4311
(Closed on Fridays)
Hours 9A.M. to 1 P.M.
10-14 Hart Day School
1151 Vancouver Ave.
Burlingame, CA 94010
348-0921
9:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
60 Burlingame Montessori
2109 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
342-4445
8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.
44 Olympian Day Camp
Rooms 6 and 8
2115 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010
692-6400
12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.
Roosevelt School 12 Month
Roosevelt School 12 Month
Roosevelt School 12 Month
60 Peninsula Early Learning Roosevelt School
1151-A Vancouver
Burlingame, CA 94010
343-8124
8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.
Peninsula Parent, Inc. Roosevelt School
P.O. Box 1280
Millbrae, CA 94030
12 Month
12 Month
Owner
Larry Krusemark
P.O. Box 1387
Redwood City, CA 94064
367-0818 (Home)
George Hart
227 Alameda
Redwood City, CA 94067
364-5284
Lynette Muhic
1129 Clovelly Lane
Burlingame, CA 94010
Len Beatie
1628 Coronado Way
Burlingame, CA 94010
692-0147 (Home)
Joanne Bailey
344-7711 (Home)
788-2500 (Business)
Lisa Rosenthal
342-9203 (Business)
WARNING NOTICE
City of Bur/ingame, 501 Primrose Road, CA. 94010
You are hereby notified that a violation of the Burlingame Municipal Code exists as
described below. Failure to comply within the time specified will result in a criminal
infraction and/or in a civil suit requiring corrective action by you.
Date: January 18. 1993
Name: Mr. & Mrs. Len Beattie
File: Code Enforcement
Address: P.O. Box 1515
Burlingame. CA 9401 1-1 5 1 5
Location of Offense: 1 151 Vancouver Avenue. Burlingame
Code Section Description of Vio/ation
Burlingame 25.52.020-Ic) Parking vans on the school site is not
Municipal allowed. See special permit conditions
Code attached.
25.20.010 Ramp built without permit.
n
J
n
u
No special permit, variance, or building permit may be issued to legalize this
violation. It must be corrected by bv
Further enforcement action will be suspended if one of the follo�Ning steps is
taken within the prescribed time limits:
'" ' By January 28, 1994, file an application for an amendment to the special
permit. Application materials enclosed. See item 'A' on reverse.
�By January 28, 1994, file an application for a building permit for ramp.
See item 'B' on reverse.
n
� Within 10 calendar days, file an application for a business license. See
� item 'C' on reverse.
� Other: Requesting an amendment to the special permit will bring the
entire special permit for review again. The alternative would be
to return to operation and parking as approved (see condition #3).
Notify me in writing by January 28, 1994 if this is what you
choose to dq.
/ssuing Officer: Sheri Saisi Tit/e: Zoning Technician
Office: Planning Department Phone: 696-7250
Method of Notice De/ivery: certified mail + return receipt #P 792 390 968
Administrative Relief Requirements
A. Variance or special permit applications must be submitted to the Planning
Department within 10 calendar days. For information about submitting an
application, contact the Planning Department, second floor, City Hall, 501
Primrose Road, ar call 696-7250.
B. Building permit �pplications must be submitted to the Building Inspector within
10 calendar da��s. For information about submitting an application, contact the
Building Department, second floor, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, or call 696-
1600.
C. Business license applications must be submitted in writing to the License Clerk
within 10 calendar days. For information about submitting an application,
contact thy License Clerk, first floor, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, or call 696-
7210.
Info�mation About Infractions and Civil Suits
An infraction is a criminal proceeding. The person charged is not entitled to a trial by
jury an is not normally entitled to have a public defender or other counsel appointed
at public expense. The maximum fine for the first offense is 5100; for the second
5200; and fcx each additional 5500. Each day of violation may constitute a separate
offense.
Civil suits n�quiring corrective action will be filed in Superior Court and will result in
an injuncticn or court order requiring compliance by you.
Note: Me;�e payment of a fine without correcting the violation does not relieve you
ofi the requirement to comply, and may result in civil action or additional
citati�ns being issued.
ROUTING FORM
DATE : � • � `� • �4
T0: V CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLAN2JER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR
�
AT I�
V
s�
StuG�'y - 3 �/� �,�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING• 3'Z�•C/�
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: 2'�`f'•�¢
THANKS,
Jane heri Leah
Date of Comments
�l m�l4n f�Q�i C��-i� �����PGI' �ret�i�xs/r.�
��lGi �� o� 3�'a�GI'w� y oh/r� -�
0�'7 / Gl��v-1 � ho�t �S 3-� . l�� f'%��si r��
��r,� '� �l�er�'J i` f �Y 5 VGr �S
� �
�- � �
/ v : /�G�,-i ;. i�L �
1
%�� �� �'�rp�rz����'�i� '
� �.
/U �. ���
� �
� C���
��
, � r
��Y�������
� L
ROUTING FORM
DATE : ��% �' • ��
TO: CITY ENGINEER
� CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
L FIRE MARSHAL
PARRB DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AT
CITY PLAPTNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQUEST FOR S,�C�--/,%/ ��rn� t a�����e!��
�
' w, �,� r`v-►� a� f2oo 1/��f � C�1DD� S/ f�_
� !� Gd��l/P,l�'
SfuGl� � 3 �/� ��
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: 3'2-�•CIT
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: L'�¢ •�¢
THANKS,
Jane heri Leah
Z `� Date of Comments
0/ vYI�I�✓� f�Gtli C��r1� a���aYPG' �l'�el�iD�Yls/y
�tv�l� �7JG o� �3�a��'w�y oh/y -�
D�'I l Gl'�v-l�r ho��S 3-h . I��-' �%��si ��
��r,�, �� �1�er� �` �, t �y 5 V��S
� �
0
�r� c�,� M �,�
������--�
VVo �n �F ;v-
�2�
�
�': I I 7� —�i �
6'����5
�r� 1 �
CiTY OF B�R!
��A!S�I�u�, !
�
BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE AT RO
a
0
a
0
�
m
. ,
�
EV T SITE
0
VANCOUVER AVENUE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 1994, at
7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans
may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
1151 VANCOUVER AVENUE APN: 027-340-150
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR THE
OLYMPIAN DAY CAMP AT 1151 VANCOUVER AVENUE, ZONED R-1
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
Please note, when possible, and when multiple family or commercial
development is involved, this notice shall be posted in a public
place on the project site and on neiqhboring buildings with
tenants.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
MARCH 18, 1994
� � .�: :��,� f�ERNq�
��` ,�� �3N� ,� ',� ., �4 ^ � ��-,
} � � 3i� ���� �:e� .... � _ _YYi..
�� � 1 �� . � ��_ .e.K e y�., i:a,s. a . r � , /
'' i
�_ � �a.•, ;
�:�,. r' ' . .
,� _ ' �- �-
� ` _<` � -_ � � � -�� - �
"'� _-�' � � 7' �, _ � + . � _ �
� Q
3 '�
�` t � � � _ ��:d �' � ` �iT4 �.A4aie
� ��.��� ; �>:.''.,�� 4 'A�_�' _..�.. t ',,.1��.
''a�j�' ��. ' �• : a
g+ �t 2oio 4 ZoiS:
2 , ,�.,�.r"�. `.._.e! . t t1+
_�' ; �
��:.
�AN CouV ER 4
�c�- �201 -'
,. R�:•
�� . �sg �� _ .
� � ��
_ � ., �- ia ' :at•.ii..-
"� .� fi�, �- � Q4
���_:
�, _ s- �� � - :
�a� �. , 2108 ,�
� : ,.`,� ;r= _ ;
�
�r �. ��
. -�F �
Iil�o u6o
I�J'
�'
t�' �'.
"a- - ,
,
A��N�E
1150 Il4o u32 �t28 Nz4 1120
A�EN�E
. . Ns�lu.�'
II�F� 113f Z{00
�-� 2104
4. 4. . .
Roo�evE�r •
z��z
��
.';
�'�
��; ; '
III(o tttZ,
��
k
� � "�� .
Q ��.�
Sc. uooL •
�� ��.-
2111� F ``, rY.
2u S J ;�
� � a
. : 2.izz W ��
_ , ��, �
_ .� -
7
.� ��112g ' O ����
O�
�' �'� � � 2�109
�. , �. - � ..
Zuz
�.-
- -.�`�:,.�,.�.
=. : . 21I (p ,,� : �� �:::
�_ `�
< �—� •..
— .�: ` � �
� ���
.�� �, � -
r��. ,
�
H���seoRouc,,�
:�
'_fi:
.1 s ��
.�?
w _.:
y..
�
�
�.:
�� �.�� .y
� ,.�, �r
c�� �+�,_
,F�-'.
��'� �;�.,.
; -
z
� : .E� �
" '�'' Sa� e� S�
Y � �'�':
�� i` _
��� F �
/ =
°' / � � _ -
�`�
_ r t �
. L /� } �.. :Y...� .
\ �� `���
��.. i � . . \OG.(�Q /
� ` \RY
�'� � �
��
�_
�:.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been
made for a Special Permit Amendment to increase the number of students from 22
to 44; to increase the area used by the school from 874 SF (Room #8) to 1 368
SF fRooms #6 and #8); to chanae the hours of operation from 3:00 P.M. - 6:00
P.M. to 12:30 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. Mondav through Friday• and to add six off street
parkina stalls for 24 hour van storage for four stalls, and two stalls for
emplovee van storaqe during program hours for Olympian Day Camp at 1151
Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (APN 027-340-1501; {property owner: Burlinaame
Elementary School District, 2303 Trousdale Drive); and
WIiEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame on March 28. 1994 , at which time it reviewed and considered the
staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said
hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission
that:
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and
reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby
found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above
will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption
Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior
alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances and 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(b) consists of
construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial
or institutional facilities, including but not limited to: (b) Small parking
lots is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set
forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be
recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the 28th day of March 1994 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, categorical exemption and special permit 1151
Vancouver Avenue
effective April 4, 1994
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department and date stamped February 10, 1994, Sheet
1, Parking Lot Plan;
2. that the 1,368 SF of classrooms (Rooms #6 and #8) shall be used
for after school day care from 12:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday throughout the regular school year (September
through June) for a maximum of 44 students and a maximum of 5
employees, and no parent meetings shall be held in the evenings at
this location;
3. that the students shall have access to the larger playground areas
during the time they are on site with the day care program except
that this use shall be limited to the 44 students who are in Rooms
#6 and #8;
4. that students shall be brought to the site by van, two of which
shall not be stored on site except during program hours (12:30
P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday); four vans shall be
stored on site, up to 24 hours a day, from September 1 to June 30;
during the other months no vans shall be stored on the school site
or parked in the vicinity of the school;
5. that the parking lot at the end of Broadway shall be screened with
landscaping on both the north and west sides of the fence,
adjacent to the street and neighbors rear yard;
6. that any change to the number of students, the hours of operation,
the area of building used, the number of months this program uses
the building, the method of transporting students or the time of
year the site is used, the number of vans stored on the site, or
any change to the operation of this program at this site shall
require an amendment to this use permit;
7. that this use permit shall be subject to review in two and seven
months, June, 1994 and October, 1994, for compliance with the
conditions and thereafter upon compliant; and
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of
Burlinqame.
,, �
J� � ITEM #�1
„
� p
CITY OF B URLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT
Special Permit for School District Offices
Address: 1131 - 1141 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date: 3/14/94
Request: Special Permit for School District Offices at 1131 - 1141
Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.030 - 2).
Applicant and Property Owner: Burlinqame Elementary School District
APN: 027 - 340 - 150 Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres
General Plan: Low Density, Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: Single Family Residences
CEQA Status: Refer to Negative Declaration 468 - P.
Also this project is Cateqorically Exempt for interior remodel
construction per CEQA Article 19, Section; 15301 - Existing
Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving
such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical
conveyances.
Previous Use: school auditorium/multipurpose room
Proposed Use: school district offices
Allowable Use: schools and related uses with a special permit
Summary: The Burlingame Elementary School District is requesting a
special permit to remodel a portion of the existing Roosevelt
School. The current auditorium/multi purpose building will be
converted into offices for eight (8) full time and four (4) part
time employees. The total area for the new district offices equals
3,670 SF.
The district offices are now located at Franklin School. The
Franklin School Site Council has requested that the district
relocate the offices to free up three more classrooms for growing
enrollment at the school. The district offices will be placed in
a currently unused portion of Roosevelt School. Other portions of
Roosevelt School are leased to various private groups including
preschools, after school care classes, and programs for learning
disabled children. The separate kindergarten classroom is leased
to Peninsula Parent, a newsmagazine (refer to attached list of
tenants - 16,657 SF total). Currently the school auditorium is not
being leased because of structural weakness caused by dry rot
damage. In the past it has been used by the City Recreation
Department for classes.
Parking will be provided on site for 27 vehicles. The proposed
district office uses require 13 parking stalls. There are two
parking areas proposed on site. One parking lot located directly
behind the new offices has thirteen (13) stalls for public and
staff use. This lot has driveway access from Vancouver Avenue.
The new 12' wide driveway goes between two existing Privet trees
that restrict the driveway width to 10' for a distance of about 4'-
0'.
1
�
0
SPSCIAL PBRXIT 1131-1141 VANCOUVER AVENDE
�
The remaining fourteen (14) parking stalls are located in a parking
lot at the rear of the site, and accessed off the end of Broadway.
These stalls will be used primarily by tenants. Although not a
part of any previous use permit, five parking stalls are currently
located in this asphalted, raised area. These stalls are used by
one of the current school tenants for van storage. The total off
street parking proposed accessible at the end of Broadway will be
14 stalls.
In addition to the 27 conforming parking stalls on the site proper,
the applicant is proposing four (4) stalls more perpendicular to
the street at the end of Broadway. Since these stalls have no back
up area on site, they do not conform to city parking code standards
and were not counted in the required parking total. However, there
have been three (3) perpendicular parking spaces partly on school,
partly on city property for many years. The district is proposing
to move the spaces completely onto their property with only the
back up on city property. The School District proposes to use
these stalls for additional tenant parking and as an area for
maneuvering when vehicles are turning around at the end of
Broadway.
Chanqes from January 10, 1994 meetinq: At the January l0, 1994
Planning Commission meeting the applicant requested a continuance
to review the project with the neighbors (P.C. January 10, 1994
Minutes). In his February 4 and 17, 1994 letters, the applicant
indicates that he met with neighboring residents on February 3,
1994. As a result of that meeting the Burlingame School District
proposes the following changes to their application.
A. Eliminate the storage portable unit (960 SF). Storage will be
incorporated into the proposed office remodel.
B. Eliminate the use of the existinq kinderqarten classroom (1,184
SF) for board/conference meetinqs. Board meetings will be held at
other school district facilities. The school district will
continue to lease the classroom space. Part of the kindergarten
structure will continue to be leased.
C. Increase the total amount of parkinq on site, from 23 to 27
stalls. In the original application the proposed uses required 18
stalls. The district office remodel portion of the project
requires 13 parking stalls. The district proposes to use a portion
of the playground for 13 parking stalls to serve the office
building uses. The parking lot located at the end of Broadway in
the upper playground area, will be striped for 14 stalls. These
stalls will be for the use of the current tenants who now park on
the street. Also at the end of Broadway four perpendicular stalls
are proposed off the street. This will allow for more tenant
parking and better maneuvering space for turning around on
Broadway.
D. No tenant parking on the street on Broadway west of Vancouver.
Tenants will now be required to park on site in the parking lot at
the end of Broadway. (Note: The district will have to apply to the
2
7
�
SPSCIAL PSRXIT 1131-1141 VANCOUVSR AVENUS
a
Traffic, Safety, and Parking Commission to change the curb markings
in this area.)
E. Eliminate qarbage collection on Broadway. The School District
has already relocated the trash collection area at the end of
Broadway. Trash storage and collection will be incorporated into
the parking lot behind the proposed offices and is temporarily
located there now.
F. Provide additional landscaping around the parking lot at the
end of Broadway. The School District proposes to install
landscaping along the fence surrounding the proposed parking lot on
the upper playground at the end of Broadway.
G. Paint the exterior of Roosevelt School in the summer of 1994.
The School District intends to paint the school during the summer
and to clean up the site.
H. Storaqe of tenant vans in the parkinq lot at the end of
Broadway. Olympian Day Care has made application to the Planning
Commission to amend their special permit to allow storage of vans
on site. (Note: Olympian Day Care's current permit allows them to
park two vans on Broadway during program hours. It does not allow
storage of vans on site.)
PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REO'D
Uses: Offices and Auditorium and * offices with
storage offices a special permit
Parking stalls: 27 5 13 for new offices
(13 for new offices and
14 for existing tenants)
Meets all other zoninq code requirements.
Staff Comments: The Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal
(February 22, 1994 memos) had no comments. The Parks Director
(November 23, 1993 memo) indicated that no protected trees are
affected by this project. The City Engineer notes (February 22,
1994 memo) that the perpendicular parking at the end of Broadway
should allow for a minimum of a three foot (3') path behind the
cars. This will require a depth of 23' from the curb at Broadway,
for the 20' stall and the 3' pathway.
3
ITEM # 2 I.f��
� ��� �' CITY OF BURLINGAME
� SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT
SpeciaZ Permit Amendment for After School Day Care Progra.m
Address: 1151 Vancouver Avenue Meeting Date:3/14/93
Request: Special Permit Amendment to increase the number of
students from 22 to 44; to increase the area used by the school
from 874 SF (Room #8) to 1,368 SF (Rooms #6 and #8); to change the
hours of operation from 3:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. to 12:30 P.M. - 6:00
P.M. Monday through Friday; and to add six off street parking
stalls for van storage and employee parking for Olympian Day Camp,
at 1151 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S.25.28.030 - 2).
Applicant: Len Beatie APN: 027-340-150
Property Owner: Burlinqame Elementary school District
Lot Dimensions and Area: 2.16 Acres more or less
General Plan: Low Density, Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1
Adjacent Development: related school uses in Roosevelt School and
single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 -
Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations
involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances and 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(b)
consists of construction, or placement of minor structures
accessory to existing commercial or institutional facilities,
including but not limited to: (b) Small parking lots.
Previous Use: after school day care program (Room #8 - 874 SF)
Proposed Use: after school day care program (Rooms #6 and #8 - 1
,368 SF Total)
Allowable Use: school related uses with a special permit
Summary: The applicant, Olympian Day Camp, is requesting a special
permit amendment for their after school day care program at 1151
Vancouver Avenue. On October 2, 1990 the Planning Commission
approved a special permit to allow a day care program at this site
(October 2, 1990 letter from M. Monroe to Len Beatie and P.C.
Minutes of September 24, 1990). Since that time the facility has
grown and the applicant is now requesting some changes to their use
permit. The following items outline the proposed changes to the
special permit.
A. Increase the capacity of the school from 22 students to 44
students.
B. Increase the size of the facility from 874 SF to 1,368 SF. The
after school day care program originally leased 874 SF located in
Room #8 at 1151 Vancouver Avenue. The current proposal expands
the facility into Room #6 and Room #8 for a total of 1,368 SF.
C. Change the hours of operation from 3:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. to
12:30 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.. The after school program now offers care
for children that leave school at 12:00 P.M. as well as 3:00 P.M..
The business will still be open Monday through Friday, from
September through June.
.� SPECIAL PERXIT
EXI3TING
D. Provide off street parking for employees and van storage.
Olympian Day Camp is requesting an amendment to their special
permit to allow storage of vans on site. olympian Day Camp's
current permit only allows them to park two vans on Broadway during
program hours. It does not allow more vans on the street or
storage of vans on site. The applicant now wishes to store five
vans in the parking lot located at the end of Broadway. The after
school day care program will lease six stalls from the school
district to store five vans and for employee parking.
According to the applicant, the idea to eliminate the on street
parking of vans on Broadway came at the request of the neighbors.
At the Planning Commission January 10, 1994 meeting the School
District presented an application to remodel the Roosevelt School
auditorium/multi-purpose building into offices for the School
District staff (P.C. January 10, 1994 Minutes). At this meeting
neighbors complained about traffic and on street parking along
Broadway. The School District has since met with the neighbors and
responded by creating an off street parking lot for 14 stalls at
the end of Broadway. At the March 14, 1994 Planning Commission
meeting, the commission will again review a revised special permit
application for offices in the Roosevelt School auditorium. Part
of this application includes tenant parking for 14 stalls in a new
parking area accessed from the end of Broadway.
PROPOSED
Use:
after school
day care
Number of
Students:
size:
44
1,368 SF
Hours of 12:30 - 6:00 PM
Operation: Sept. to June
Parking: 6
on site
parking stalls
after school
day care
22
874 SF
1151 Vancouver Avenue
ALLOWED/REO'D
school related
uses
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Plan. Commission
Sept. to June review
2 Planning Commission
off site review
parking stalls
Meets all other zoning code requirements.
Staff Comments: The Fire Marshall, City Engineer, and Chief
Building Inspector had no comments on the proposed changes to the
special permit.
2
r.�..,.,.- _.
CITY OF BIIRLINGAME
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
File No. ND - 468 P(revised per February 18, 1994 Plans),
1131 - 1141 Vancouver Avenue, Burlinqame, CA
The City of Burlingame by Margaret Monroe on March 1, 1994
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
(XX) It will not have a significant effect on the environment
(XX) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Project Description: This development consists of remodelling a
portion of the existing Roosevelt School, which is part of the
Burlingame Elementary School District. The current
auditorium/multi purpose building will be converted into offices
for eight full time and four part time employees. The total area
for the new district offices is 3, 670 SF. In the R-1 zone the
proposed office development project is a permitted use with a
special permit.
Parking will be provided on site for 27 vehicles. There are two
parking areas to city code dimensions proposed on site. One
parking lot has thirteen (13) stalls for staff and disabled
accessible use located directly behind the remodeled offices; and
the remaining fourteen (14) parking stalls are located in a lot at
the rear of the site accessed off the end of Broadway. These
stalls will be used for existing tenant parking. Four additional
stalls are provided on school property, at the end of Broadway.
These stalls back into the public right of way.
Revised February 18, 1994 Plans:
The revised plans show a reduced project area. The proposed
portable to be used for storage, will not be added to the site (960
SF). The existing kindergarten classroom will not be used for a
board/conference room (1,184 SF) and will remain as a tenant space.
The current project is to remodel the existing auditorium/multi-
purpose building for district offices (3,670 SF). The number of on
site parking stalls has been increased from 23 to 27 (13 required).
More than half of these stalls will be used for current tenant
parking.
Reasons for Conclusion: This development, as proposed, is
consistent with the intended land use and zoning for the area and
does not present any danger to human health, established
aesthetics, recreation or cultural resources.
This proposal will not create any hazardous effects on the existing
neighborhood or surrounding environment. The new use of the school
as an office will generate different traffic patterns than the
school use, but the number of vehicle trips should be about the
same. In fact there may be reduced trips based on the number of
occupants accommodated in the previous school auditorium. With the
r
new project, existing on street tenant parking will be provided on
site in two parking lots. As proposed this project will be
adequately served and will not negatively impact the existing
water, sewer or electrical facilities already in place or present
any need to alter existing public services or traffic circulation.
The proposed office use at 1131 - 1141 Vancouver Avenue will not
negatively impact the environment as proposed. Because the
property has been developed for many years, there will be no
impacts on the native plant or animal life.
The attached initial study includes reasons supporting the findings
that, based on the initial study, there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
I C� i ���
Signatu e of Processing Official Title ate Signed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the
determination shall be final.
Date posted: i'i�L� �� 7� ,��� 7�
Declaration of Postinq
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City
of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of the above Negative
Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the
Council Chambers.
'�� ;
Executed at Burlingame, California on � ���-t •`7� , 1994.
Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ) No
��� /�� ��1�
JUDIT MALFATTI CITY CLERK
�, � .
��
���C'�
'iY OF BURLINGAME
0
INITIAL STUDY SUMMARY
1131 - 1141 Vancouver Avenue
This project, as proposed, will NOT result in the following environmental impacts:
EARTH: Unstable earth conditions, displacements or compaction of soil,
destruction of unique geological features, increased water or wind erosion of
soil, changes in a beach ecosystem, exposure of people to hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, or ground failure.
• Site is flat and located in an urban setting which has been developed as
a school use for over fifty years.
2. A/R: Deterioration of ambient air quality, creation of objectionable odors, or
alteration of climate, locally or regionally.
• Site developed with school use for over 50 years.
• The new use will not affect particulate matter or deteriorate air quality
because total vehicle trips will be less than full school use would
generate.
• This is not a new use but one shifted from another location within the
air district.
3. WATER: Changes in directional course of marine or fresh waters, changes in
absorption rates, drainage patterns or rate of surface run-off or alter the course
of flood waters, alter the direction or flow or ground waters, changes in
quantities of ground waters by any means, changes in the amount and
availability of water to the public, exposure of people to water related hazard.
• Site tied into existing water distribution lines with adequate capacity in
the system.
• No new development or paving; no change to surface drainage or runoff
will occur.
4. PLANTL/FE: Changes in diversity or number of any species of plants including
endangered species, introduction of new species of plants into the area, or
reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop.
• No native plant life exists on site.
5. AN/MAL L/FE.• Changes in diversity or number of any species of animals
including endangered species, introduction of new species of animals into the
area or result in the barrier of normal migration of any species of animals or
deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat.
• No record of rare or endangered animal species for this urban site.
6. NO/SE.- Increases in existing noise or exposure of people to severe noise levels.
• Site developed as a school for over 50 years and proposed office use is
in accordance with General Plan Noise Element.
7. L/GHT & GLARE: Extreme increases in the amount of light and glare in the
environment.
• No significant increase in light and glare on site from previous school
use. All parking lot lights, if needed, will require use of shielded lighting
fixtures.
• No change to exterior of buildings.
8. LAND USE: Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of the
area.
• Proposed offices are an allowed use with a special permit in this zoning
district.
• Proposed office use of school auditorium is the same as or less intense
a development than original school use.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Any increase in rate of use of any natural resources.
• The redevelopment of this property will not result in any new or unusual
increase in the demand for natural resources.
• Development will meet all conservation requirements, by being required
to comply with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Fire Code
(UFC►.
10. R/SK OF UPSET.• Any risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances or
materials (including but not limited to, oil pesticides, chemicals or radiation ) in
the event of an accident or upset situation, possible interference in an
emergency response or evacuation plan.
• Structure will meet all UBC and UFC construction standards including
plumbing and seismic requirements.
11. POPULAT/ON.- The alteration in location, distribution, density or growth rate
of the human population.
• The existing school is underdeveloped at this site.
• The proposed office development will be fewer people (maximum of 12
employees) at the site than the previous use as an auditorium.
• The project will cause no expansion of existing structures on site.
12. HOUS/NG: Displacement of any residents or create a demand for additional
housing.
• The proposed development will not create a demand for or displace any
existing housing.
• Use is shifting from another nearby location in the City.
13. TRANSPORTAT/ON/C/RCULAT/ON.• Generation of substantial increase in
vehiculartraffic, strains on existing parking facilities or new parking, substantial
impact on existing transportation systems, alterations in present patterns of
2
e
circulation or movement of people or goods, increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians.
• All required parking for this development is provided on site in two
parking lots.
• All existing roads and highways serving this area are operating at service
level C or less and have adequate capacity for the traffic movements
required for the office use.
• The new office use will not significantly increase the number of trips to
the site, although the traffic patterns for the office employees will be
slightly different from the school use.
14. PUBL/C SERV/CES: The need for new or altered governmental services, such
as, fire protection, police protection, schools, parks or recreational facilities,
maintenance of public facilities, including roads and/or any other type of
governmental services.
• All established public services serving this area have more than adequate
capacity to accommodate the minor change in demand caused by the
shift in use from school to office.
15. ENERGY.• The use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy, substantial
increases in demand upon existing sources of energy, the need to develop new
sources of energy.
� There will be no need to develop new energy sources for this project
since the change of use will not increase the need for more energy.
16. UT/L/T/ES: The need for new systems or substantial alterations to the
following utilities (not including initial hook-ups to existing systemsl power or
natural gas, communication systems, water, sewer or septic tanks, storm
drainage, solid waste disposal.
• All existing utilities have adequate capacity for this project and no new
sources or services will be required.
17. HUMAN HEALTH: Creation of health hazards or potential health hazards or the
exposure of people to potential health hazards.
• Since this site is currently developed there are no known existing health
hazards and will be no potential health hazards created by this change
of use.
18. AESTHET/CS: The obstruction of any scenic view or vista open to the public,
or the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public.
• The existing structures will remain on site and will be improved with the
proposed construction. All construction will meet current UBC and UFC
requirements. The project is in conformance with the Zoning ordinance
3
and will therefore be compatible with the adjacent existing single family
residential uses.
• There will be no change to the exterior of the existing buildings except
for the possible requirement for disabled accessible ramps to the
structures.
19. RECREAT/ON: Any negative impact on the quantity or quality of existing
recreational opportunities.
• Underutilized portions of the playground currently used for recreation and
parking will be developed into two parking lots. This will not have a
significant impact on the existing playground use since that portion of
the school now used for education will be converted into office uses
thereby reducing the overall size of the school and demand for outdoor
facilities. A major playground area remains.
20. CULTUR.4L RESOURCES: The destruction of prehistoric or historic
archaeological sites, the destruction of any unique ethnic or cultural values or
restrict any existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
• Remodeling this site will not destroy any historic site or impact any
unique ethnic or cultural values or religious uses.
• The project will not include extensive grading or digging. Areas to be
used for parking are already paved with asphalt.
C:\WP51 \FILES\1 131 VANC.ND
revised 2-24-94
�