HomeMy WebLinkAbout1108 Vancouver Ave - Approval Letter��� CITY o�
HURLJNOAME
t
� �n.
L
CITY OF BURLING�ME
Planning Department
City Hall - 501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CaliComia 94010-3997
Tel. (650) 558-7200
March 21, 2000
Dmitri Nadeev
550 Davis Street, Apt. #25
San Francisco CA 94111
Dear Mr. Nadeev,
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the Ciry Council, the March 13, 2000
Planning Commission approval of your design review application for a new two-story
residence became effective March 20, 2000. This application was to allow a new two-story
single-family residence at 1108 Vancouver Avenue, zoned R-1.
The March 13, 2000 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was
approved with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department date stamped February 11, 2000, sheets Al.l, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2, and
shall use traditional stucco molding around the windows;
2. that the three windows on the first floor on the West Elevation shall be joined into one
factory mulled window unit; that the two windows on the second floor above the front
entrance on the West Elevation shall be joined into one factory mulled window unit and
made one foot shorter;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the second floor, or to the first floor that
would affect the second floor, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s) or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that large scale landscaping, 15'-20' potential growth height, shall be provided in the
northeast corner of rear yard, 8'-10' tall landscaping shall be provided along the north
side, including 8' tall screen planting along north side; and that City Arborist .shall
review the landscaping plan prior to issuing a building permit to verify compliance with
this condition;
5. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's August 23, 1999 memo, and the City
Engineer's August 23, 1999 memo shall be met; and
March 21, 2000
ll08 Vancouver Avenue
page -2 -
6. that the recommendation of the Design Review Consultant's February 17, 2000, memo
be included in the construction of the new residence, using traditional stucco texture
and high quality architectural details on vents, railings, trim and stucco; and
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire
Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building
Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must
be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission
if application is made before the end of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent
jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time
is required pursuant to state or federal law.
Sincerely yours,
.�� ��
Marga�t Monroe i
City Planner �
MM: smg
c: Peter Lam, AIA
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(Lotl7, Block 37, Easton Addition RSM 2; APN: 026-183-170)
March 21, 2000
1108 Vancouver Avenue
page -2 -
6. that the recommendation of the Design Review Consultant's February 17, 2000, memo
be included in the construction of the new residence, using traditional stucco texture
and high quality architectural details on vents, railings, trim and stucco; and
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire
Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Check balance on spreadsheet before this paragraph is inserted...
Reimbursement of the unspent portion of your design review deposit
has been processed and will be mailed to you under separate cover.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building
Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must
be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission
if application is made before the end of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent
jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time
is required pursuant to state or federal law.
Sincerely yours,
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM: smg
c: Dmitri Nadeev, property owner
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(Lot17, Block 37, Easton Addition RSM 2; APN: 026-183-170)
11/15/y9 MUN 16:57 FAX 415 7775Y4'L
�vU �s' �9
�
lY LHIIt AlA I�JOOI
� . `�
� � �v�� �
�x� 6� o � g- Z - �3�' �
� l�� c�� �� � �
�� �'�' �� Gc�,[ �.
RE�E���� �
NOU 1 5 1999
CITY Of [i��;��-If�GF\ME
PLANNING DEPT.
,� wowl�t' �-r. �-e. �a GJ � � c��c..� � � �� `'�
. - � .
o� 1`� �t°�e c� s� a�. ���a�c �u c.�,� C� � � Ss� �
,� e o( � Nx✓ �' �/ j'� �—.e S'�o( �..,� .7�-e��
�
�� J3 ��rP�v - P o r,�.�e a�� �/ � �(� a�- �. c�- i t.✓-e�
�ve.�u.,�f
��c !� �
� �wi fi-�-c' �l%d��r-
�-�'d ,� rg-�/r s �7�' . � Z--�
�'.�. �� e�s c�v � C� �'�'/ �
�