Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1104 Vancouver Ave - ApplicationCITY OF BUFiLINGAME APPLICATIOO N TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIOO N �� ��t r,✓�- M � � TyAe of Aonlication: _Special Permit _Variance _Othe Project Address � � G� !/r}�i/Cd�J�� .�'t/�,c1 v� Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 0 � '' � �� — � � � APPL/CANT Name: �� «'�%J— � Address: � � � C�'t �^�� /�-�FiS`!� City/State2ip: �� �a�N�!� �'- �/4<�GG Telephone:(work) S �5'-�� �� (homel ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER Name: _`:,f-�';�, /,' t Address: City/State/Zip: Telephone (daytime): _ PROPERTY WNE Name: r }�l �-zcs.�cc,t Address: t ° L� ��C��.�`-T� �:= City/State/Zip:� �iL . � �� � 11 ' Telephone:(work) 34��-1�G� Ihome) ._3 4��`��33/ P/ease indicate with an asterisk l"1 who the contact ver on is for this vroiect. PROJECT DESCR/PT/ON: ��'l' 6 S'� F'. ���✓� � Z t�r�C�I ✓� N 6 lJ �'�-Cc�tt ���2h'-�-lv �o7c-- �'i9--- �--��v ��i3— 6-� S 6 �' s.o� �� � �-�f� S �UJC✓7f2-ki . ` AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE: I hereby certity under penalty of pe�jury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie . — '�'�.�.�_ ( Z -1 � - r`? Applic nt' Sig ature Date I know about the proposed a pl' atio , a he eby authoriz �the above applicant to submit this application. ^ L Property Ow er' ignature D te ---OFFICE USE ONLY Date Filed: �: 3��1�F Fee �i�0 a� Receipt # ��"� �` " r � Letter�s) to applicant advising application incomplete: Date application accepted as complete: P.C. study meeting (date) P.C. public hearing (date) P.C. Action ,z�sz Appeal to Council? Yes No projapp.frm Council meeting date Council Action _. r"i �; -�� , � CITY C� 4� 6URUNGAME i �:,......,. � �,._ , CIT1' OF �UF;LII`�G�ME ��/��I�,f�10E /�PPLIL,�TIC�)f�iS The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d1. Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptiona/ or ext�aordinary circumstances oi conditions app/icab/e to your property which do not app/y to orher properties in this area. P��� ��x�s�� �J� �� ���.d C 3���'� o-r= � � � �' y-�, c,�i A��9— �v � � ��6�J . b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ property iight and what unreasonab/e property /oss o� unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/icarion. l� �K� � y2 tii 6 �n9�'L�1-G-�cJ s r zk� GS �-t � �/ � �iz�� �.f 0� � � c� a��+- C� c�.r � ��' a u r�� r� s� ��. �"� � iZon�� �'P�� uJu.v �c.rl�J �SG�'�t��v �-.� Tul�c� �/ R�1 �-� LN iCi�i�IZN�J ��'�/�"J li�%�v+C/ /"✓��L�LiL/G v'N"� 5���-z-,�t/ C� �� �� ���r�—. c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to propeity or improvements in the vicinity o� to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/faie, or convenience. � �'J � r�2 ��J L�i G?� 2- �v�� 6� /��2�/� k,r� �� G�/��u-Lk/ �k.nJCkJ 4�� �r� uJc <.v �/c2Gtl,�uv, ��Jlv [. i -, ✓ d• Ho w wi// the proposed pioject be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining propeities in the geneia/ vicinity? f f -ji(� �i1� ��C, Lo�'1� i� �t�i'i-G C�,j" � � !{it /9-% '�lt�(. �S !.(1 G!i(� /1� /� /��C�v.f-�� � �t�CG S %Z � . ��i�jJ,�7-��i PiL.� J �f'� �C�t.l<� /1v�J�' d'p3Z��. : ° }� � � i993 t 2rs2 �s�.t� a. Describe the exceptiona/ o� extraordinary circumstances or conditions applrcab/e to your property which do not app/y to other properties in this asea. Do any conditions exist on the site which make other the alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area7 For example, is there a creek cuttinp through the property, an exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existiny structuresl How is this property different from others in the neighborhoodl b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ pioperty right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the application. Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neiphborhood without the exceptionl (i.e., havinp as much on-site parkinp or bedroomsl) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the exception7 Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the propertyl c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neiphborinp properties or structures on those propertiesl If neiphboring properties will not be affected, state why. Thir�k about t�affic, noise, liphting, paving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or peneral welfarel Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharpes into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underpround storage tanks, storape of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseasesl. Pub/ic safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protectionl wll alarm systems or sprinklers be installed? Could the suucture or use within the str�cture create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly flatherings, loitering, trafficl or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materiats, or potentially dangerous activities like weldinp, woodwork, enpine �emovall. General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaninp community pood. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit7 Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sitesll Is the proposal accessible to particular sepments of the public such as the elderly or handicappedl d. How wi// the proposed projectbe compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existinp neighborhoodl If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition desipned to match existinp architecture or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhoodl If use will affect the way a neighborhood/area looks, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neighborinp structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no chanpe to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and peneral pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this usel If you don't feel the character of the nei�hborhood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the qeneral vicinityl Compare your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. �zres�...��, 0 ROUTING FORM DATE: I�'I�'"�� TO: CITY ENGINEER �_ CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARRS DIRECTOR - CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN � SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR �'�� �;� O(�,Q �L��jl� � � . AT �IQ cro SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ,- REVIEWED BY STP�.F� IN MEETING OP7 MONDAY: ��i" � `�� THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Leah �, N� �e��,�ys 2� .S�Kf�e fzY��- �%�(!'Cr �'J )�i vi cj � "l �/ 3 , En y, ��-t �y �� /z/z� � Date of Comments ��'�'^ /��`�'� 4'1 �$ o d� W a G� o� y' �''z y-e s�� �� ryG�� X S �i��vc� ✓'e��i✓� so ��• w� l C��l o�����''r �� �)� 9�`��� � � � ROUTING FORM DATE : � � � IT� l� TO: _ �� CITY ENGINEER CHZEF BIIILDING INBPECTOR FIRE M�28HAL PARRS DIRECTOR � CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR �J {� �(/�,'� f ](,�'l�� � � /. .. , J `' � AT �I � (�CI SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ,� REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: ��%,� '%.Q THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Leah � % /' �Tw'u',�."%��� _ � ���w � v/ ������ �� ��� �� . 1 �z I� Date of Comments �;,`,r, U�'�� �� ��� c�rr 1 �� �gg3 OF �ANNBN� �Fvri�,�c � ROUTING FORM DATE : � � '' �' ` / 3 TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR � FIRE MARSHAL PARRS DIRECTOR � CITY ATTORNEY , �' G � ��� c; y �L'„��� `FO .�,Q �ecJr` 99� �% .�>q:�� FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECffi1ICIAN SUBJECT: REQIIEST FOR �J� I� OCl�.'� f]GlL'�] �j11 T JI"]� /. _ . J ''' • AT �IQ SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ,� REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: ��,�j, `�.,Q THANKS, Jane/Sheri/Leah o: -�c�N� �6 �h : �� � s� � � �� 7 " % Date of Comments CJq �c s �.i � 11-h � %�,�� �F�fvr �� ��P�j � „� � T� � � � bi- �ON�--�b�t/�— �O�S�(l.c+c.i�o;-� !lr;}j /Vu C�J�F...�J'"�.LG . �c`��~�� _ _