The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About814 Crossway Road - Staff Report�. �t'TY O �� 1 4 � `��c��`-�-'-�� • _� CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM April 20, 2010 Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner a�� w -� �� d �` o � � ;� � � .a� �x.��<,�,� Director's Report Meeting Date: April 26, 2010 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 814 CROSSWAY ROAD, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review was approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 2010, for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 814 Crossway Road (February 8, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on April 12, 2010, and construction is currently underway. On April 7, 2010, the applicant submitted an FYI to change the originally approved window grid pattern on windows along every elevation of the house. There are also some minor changes to window locations proposed. Because of the proposed change to the window grids, an FYI is required for Planning Commission review. There are no other changes proposed to the project. The window grid change is outlined in the attached letter from the architect. Also attached are the originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped April 7, 2010. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revision to the window grids, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner cc: Randy Grange, TRG Architects, 205 Park Road Suite #203, Burlingame, CA 94010. ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from architect, date stamped April 7, 2010 February 8, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes Originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped April 7, 2010 '•s Apri16, 2010 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: FYI - 814 Crosswav Rd. Dear Commissioner, The home at 814 Crossway Rd. was preyiously approved for a remodel and addition. We are making some modifications to the windows that require an FYI. The changes include: • Front Elevation - Changed grid patterns in windows - Changed living room picture window to two casements with grid Left Elevation - Changed grid patterns in windows � - Moved location of Bedroom 3 triple clerestory windows up by one foot. (window size remains the same) - Pair of 2' wide windows below clerestory windows on lower level Family room changed to 3' wide (locations remain the same). - Lower level Egress windows in Bedroom 4 have moved to the left 18" and axe now centered on room (window size remains the same). • Rear Elevation - Changed grid patterns in windows Right Elevation - Changed grid patterns in windows - Moved location of Master Bedroom triple clerestory windows up by one foot. (window size remains the same) - Removed First floor Pantry window. We hope you will find the proposed revision acceptable. 1, Randy Grange AIA LEED AP �. , �: ;,; ,F, r- , . , �_ _, C1TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minufes February 8, 2010 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 1b. 814 CROSSWAY ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; STEVE AND MICHELE JACKSON, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated February 8, 2010, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Randy Grange, 205 Park Road; represented the applicant Commission comments: ■ Whywas the window squared-off? Was not a suggestion of the Commission. Thought the existing window was more attractive. (Grange — more consistent with the style of the house.) ■ The angled-top windows were an attractive feature, but the change is not a deal breaker. ■ Clarified that there will still be a door at the top of the steps on the enclosed porch. ■ Noticed that the rear garage door has finro steps down. (Grange — the finro steps are not correct; the garage door is flush with the courtyard.) Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Yie moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 28, 2010, sheets A3.1 through A3.3; and date stamped January 13, 2010, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A3.4, A4.1 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 24, 2009 memo, the City Engineer's November 30, 2009 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 30, 2009 memo, the City Arborist's Ce�er�ber ?, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coord;nator's November 30, 2009 merr�c shall be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to complywith al! the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; �' � CI i Y OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minufes February 8, 2010 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc. according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi. Discussion of motion: None. will inspect and note compliance of the ) to verify that the project has been built Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 4-0-9-1(Commissioner Vistica absent, Commissioner Lindstrom recused). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:95 p.m. Commissioner Lindstrom returned to the dais. C!