The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About260 Crescent Avenue - Approval Letter�: ; . ,� ' '".�� CITY OF BURLINGAME CORRECTED COPY May 11, 1999 Tony Brandi 904 Larch Avenue S. San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mr. Brandi, �� CITY O� BI�JRLINf3AME "E o° ��Tm wx[ 6`• Ciry Hall - 501 Primrosc Road Bw�lingarne. Califomia 9401Q3997 Td. (b6� 696-7200 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the April 26, 1999 Planning Commission approval of your setback, lot coverage and floor area ratio variance application became effective May 3, 1999. This application was to add new uncovered decking on the second floor subject to design review, to expand living area into an existing basement level, and to build a new detached garage at 260 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1. ' The Apri126, 1999 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1, that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 19, 1999 Sheets A-1 and A-2 with a 309 SF (13' x 23'-9") detached garage; , 2. that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the residential structure or accessory structure or. addition of accessory structures including decking shall require an amendment to this permit; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding, enlarging or changing the shape of a window(s), deck(s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that the City Engineer's December 30, 1998 memo and the Chief Building Official's December 22, 1998 memo shall be met; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. il � �' G"` ° �� CORRECTED COPY � � � May 11, 1999 ; I 260 Crescent Avenue � page -2- Reimbursement of the unspent portion of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to the property owner under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. _ The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, Mar a t Mo oe City Planne RH\s 260CRESC.CCA c. Jose Montes, property owner 177 Los Robles Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (SELY 59 FT 9 IN X 53 FT OF LOT 26 BLOCK 4 BURLINGAME PARK; APN: 028-286-110) � �ry �� CITY O� B4IRLJNC3AME ��•� s : ��. CITY OF BURLINGAME M:.. �. , �CT �tftl��.:"'r� Ciry Hall - 501 Primrose Road s�rt��, c��or� 9aoia3� �ret. (6so1 �-rion May 4, 1999 Tony Brandi 904 Larch Avenue S. San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mr. Brandi, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the April 26, 1999 Planning Commission approval of your setback, lot coverage and floor area ratio variance application became effective May 3, 1999.. This application was to add new uncovered decking on the second floor subject to design review, to expand living area into an existing basement level, and to build a new detached garage at 260 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1. The April 26, 1999 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 5, 1999 Sheets A-1 and A-2 with a 231 SF (11' x 21') detached garage; 2. that any changes to the footprint (including decks) or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; . . 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a window(s), deck(s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that the City Engineer's December 30, 1998 memo and the Chief Building Official's December 22, 1998 memo shall be met; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. , - May 4, 1999 260 Crescent Avenue page -2- Reimbursement of the unspent portion of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to the property owner under separate cover. All site unprovements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which tune a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, r` � Mar et onroe City Planner RH\s 260CRESC.CCA c. Jose Montes, property owner 177 Los Robles Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Inspector Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (SELY 59 FT 9 IN X 53 FT OF LOT 26 BLOCK 4 BURLINGAME PARK; APN:028-286-110) �� cirr o R � BURLJNGAME T "n� hc6��o CITY OF BURLINGAME PlaiuimB Deperdr��u Ciry Hall - 501 Prirtvose Road Burlingan�e, California 94010-3997 Tel. (650) 6967L0p Apri16, 1999 Tony Brandi 904 Larch Avenue S. San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mr. Brandi, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the March 22, 1999 Planning Commission denial, without prejudice, for your setback, lot coverage and floor area ratio variance application became effective Apri15, 1999. This application was to add new uncovered decking on the second floor subject to design review, to expand into an existing basement level, and to build a new detached garage at 260 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1. A denial without prejudice allows you to return to the Planning Commission with a revised project within a reasonable time (60 days) as determined by Planning staff. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, • �1��,��- Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s zsocxEsc.awo c. Jose Montes, property owner 177 Los Robles Drive Burlingame, CA 94010