The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About146 Crescent Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8b Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 146 Crescent Avenue Item No. 8b Regular Action Item City of Burlingame Mitigated Negative Declaration and Design Review Address: 146 Crescent Avenue Meeting Date: August 22, 2016 Request: Application for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: James Chu, Chu Design Associates Property Owners: Raymond Wong General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-292-140 Lot Area: 6,148 SF Zoning: R-1 Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated February 16, 2016. The results of the evaluation concluded that 146 Crescent Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis by Page and Turnbull, it was determined that there would be no adverse environmental impacts, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared (see attached ND-593-P). The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the initial study, facts in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. Project Description: The subject property currently contains a one-story single family dwelling with an attached one-car garage. The subject property is located directly adjacent to Pershing Park. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing one-story single family dwelling with an attached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached one-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,289 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,298 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed house will have four bedrooms and total of two off-street parking spaces are required, one of which must be covered. The new detached garage will provide one covered parking space (10' x 20' clear interior dimensions); one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Environmental Scoping for Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)). Mitigated Negative Dedaration and Design Review 146 Crescent Avenue 146 Crescent Avenue �ot p►rea: 6,145 5F Plans date stam ed: June 29, 2016 ORIGNAL REVISED PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED 5/12/16 lans 6/29/16 lans SETBACKS ......................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................... .... . ... . .. ... ........................_..............................................._..................................................................................... Front (1st flr): 22'-�" No change 15'-0" (2nd flr): 25'-7" 20'-0„ ............................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._:......................................................................_........................................ ........................................................................................................................................................ Side (left): 4'-0" 5'-6" 4'-0" (right).�...... 10 -3 ....................No change ; 4'-0» ................................................................................ ... ....................................................�........._,,.........................................................�. ..........................._. 2nd flr : 40'-10" to balcon ; No change , .....................................................2................................................._..................... Rear (1st flr): 27°_� p�� 15'-0" � ) y o,_o„ ........................................................................................................... ..............................................__......................................_...................................................:................................................................................................................................._..............._. . __._._ ........................__...._.._..._....................................... Lot Coverage: 2,255 SF 2,262 SF 2,459 SF 36.6% 36.7% 40% .............---..._..__...._........._._............................................................. _.............._.__........._.._...__.........................................._..._.._._............................._......;.............._.........................................................-----._............_........................._�.................. . . .... FAR: 3,282 SF 3,289 SF 3,298 SF' 0.53 FAR 0.53 FAR 0.54 FAR ----......._ ............................................................_....._._..._.._..._._._.............. ...................................................................._........................................_...__.......................r...............__.........._..__......_..---...__..............................................._...._.......:............................................... _ _ ....................................................... _... _.................. # of bedrooms: 4 No change --- ............................................................... . . ................................... ........................................................................................................... _...................................;............................................................. _............................................................ _....:.. .................................................................................................................................... Off-Sireet Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (10'-0" x 20'-0") (10' x 20' No change � 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ............................................................_.... ........................................................... .................._..._..............._. .........................................................._.....................................:............._..................................................................................................................:............................... : .....................................................................................� Height: 27'-10" No change 30'-0" ............................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................:.................................................................................................................... . : � ............................................................................................................................................ DH Envelope: window enclosure CS 25.26.075 exemption applied along ; No change left side of house ' (0.32 x 6,148 SF) + 1,100 SF + 231 SF = 3,298 SF (0.54 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Division. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study meeting on June 27, 2016, the Planning Commission had a few comments (see attached June 27, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes) and voted to place the project on the action calendarfollowing the environmental review process. The Commission comments from the June 27, 2016 meeting are summarized below: • Right side elevation is prominent side, look at a way to break up the massing; • Consider pulling the kitchen pop-out on the left elevation; and • Applicant should address comment received from neighbor regarding site drainage. The applicant submitted a letter and revised plans dated June 29, 2016, in the response to the Commission's questions and comments at the design review study meeting. The changes to the plans include: • Left side - kitchen wall pulled in; setback at kitchen increased to 5'-6" from 4' (minor decrease in lot coverage/FAR); • Right side — window added on first floor in living room to break up blank wall; • Landscaping — Four 24-inch Arbutus Marina trees (similar to a strawberry tree) added at rear property line for privacy; • Drainage — a licensed engineer will be retained to provide a drainage design at the time of building permit submittal. E Mitigated Negative Declaration and Design Review 146 Crescent Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration: Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on June 27, 2016. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Division staff. It has been determined that the proposed project can be covered by a Negative Declaration since the Initial Study did not identify any adverse impacts from the proposed construction of the new single family dwelling and detached garage (please refer to the attached Negative Declaration No. 593-P). The Negative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review on July 27, 2016. The 20-day review period ended on August 16, 2016; as of the printing date of this staff report (August 17, 2016), no comments have been submitted on the Negative Declaration. Required Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Suggested Findings for Mitigated Negative Declaration: A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated February 12, 2016. While the subject property was constructed in 1952 so is more than fifty years old, the results of the evaluation concluded that it is not eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. Those four criteria include Events, Persons, Architecture and Information Potential. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the environmental analysis, Historic Resource Evaluation, and comments received and addressed by this Commission there were no project-specific significant effects particular to the project or its site identified. Therefore it was determined that there would be no significant environmental effects as a result of this project. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the structure, featuring a variety of materials including wood shingles, horizontal wood siding, wood shakes, articulated first and second floor walls, and proportional plate heights is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed landscape plan incorporates plants, hedges and trees at locations so that they help to provide privacy and compatible with the existing neighborhood, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report and within the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Affirmative action on the following items should be taken separately by resolution including conditions from the staff report and/or that the commissioners may add. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration and Design Review 146 Crescent Avenue that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 29, 2016, sheets A.1 through A.6, N.1, L1.1, and site survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's May 16, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's May 19, 2016 memo, the Engineering Division's May 20, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's May 19, 2016 memo and the Stormwater Division's May 19, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of �approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window 4 Mitigated Negative Declaration and Design Review 146 Crescent Avenue locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. James Chu, Chu Design Associates, Inc., applicant and designer Raymond Wong, property owner Attachments: June 27, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes Response Letter submitted by the applicant, dated June 29, 2016 Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolutions (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 12, 2016 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (ND-593-P), dated July 27, 2016 Historical Resource Evaluation prepared by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated February 12, 2016 5 i r.'a11` I I�� '�/u?'rll ll;,nlllllli�,�tJ ..�`/ I! i � �';�li �� ' ' • - : I��.oil.ig7.. � Home Design ": Engineering June 29, 2016 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame, CA 94010 xe: 146 Crescent Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioner: Per your design review comments, we have made the following changes to the new proposed two story residence at 146 Crescent Ave., Burlingame. 1. We have moved the kitchen wall inward and provided 5'-6" setback, instead of 4'-0". 2. A new window added in living room, please see right elevation, to break up the `blank" wall. 3. We have added four (4) privacy screening trees at rear of the lot (next to gaxage), to provide more privacy between the proposed and the rear neighbor. In regards to neighbor's drainage concern, the owner will retain a license engineer to provide drainage design at the time of building permit application. Thank you for your time in reviewing the revised plan. Sincerely, %�� James Chu Chu Design 55 West 43rd Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Phone: (650)345-9286 Fax: (650)345-9287 � � CITY' � �� ,� �� o` �— 9 AP Monday, June 27, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling (James Chu, Chu Design Associates; Raymond Wong, property owner) (43 notices) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior Planner Key/on provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff.� > Requested clarification of the maximum FAR for the property,� is this an interior lot? (Keylon - referred to the staff report's calculation of the FAR. The /ot is only 6,100 square feet with a one-car garage.) > Is there anything that shou/d be discussed regarding the s/ope of the property, due to wriiten comments received? (Key/on - the grading and drainage will be reviewed by Public Works as part of the building permit process. > Generally speaking, isn't it the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that there is no drainage impact upon the neighboring property? (Meeker- correct.) Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. James Chu represented the applicant. Commission questions: > The right e/evation is the prominent side; is there some way to break up the mass more? > Has the applicant considered pulling in the kitchen pop-out on the /eft e/evation? (Chu - will review.) > How tall will the fence be a/ong the left side of the property, particularly at the rear? (Chu - may not construct a fence, but insta/l landscaping. There is a fence on the park side of the property line.) Public comments: There were no public comments. Chair Loftis c/osed the public hearing Commission discussion: > Wou/d like the architect to review the kitchen pop-out near the neighbor on the /eft. > Agrees with the comments regarding the right side wall. > Likes the wall facing the park. A motion was made by Vice Chair Gum, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to place the item on the Regular Action calendar when ready for action. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, Terrones, and Sargent City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Ciry of Budingame Page 1 Printed on 8/5/2016 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 27, 2016 Absent: 2- Bandrapalli, and Gaul City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 8/5/2018 / .e; r.,11�' I bi�':�iu lll l��r �° `'✓J ��ul111111��u ' 1 i i �'^` • • • . , , i�lla'��ZI�'��• Home Design;G�: Engineering June 29, 2016 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame, CA 94010 Re:146 Crescent Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioner: Per your design review comments, we have made the following changes to the new proposed two story residence at 146 Crescent Ave., Burlingame. 1. We have moved the kitchen wall inward and provided 5'-6" setback, instead of 4'-0". 2. A new window added in living room, please see right elevation, to break up the `blank" wall. 3. We have added four (4) privacy screening trees at rear of the lot (next to garage), to provide more privacy between the proposed and the rear neighbor. In regards to neighbor's drainage concern, the owner will retain a license engineer to provide drainage design at the time of building permit application. Thank you for your time in reviewing the revised plan. Sincerely, %�� James Chu Chu Design 55 West 43rd Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Phone: (650)345-9286 Fax: (650)345-9287 �.�.. �:�: �8JR61NGAME ,s�; . � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review � Variance ❑ Parcel #: �2$-292-140 ❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 146 CRESCENT AVE. APPLICANT Name: CHU DESIGN ASSOCIATES Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: lames@chudesign.com PROPERTY OWNER Name: RAYMOND WONG Address: SEQUOIA WCL LLC - PO BOX 16695 City/State/Zip: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94116 Phone: �415) 310-6916 E-mail: raywong5677@gmail.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: JAMES CHU Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. �City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: James@chudesign.com Burlingame Business License #: 22684 Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. �� (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW TWO-STORY RESIDENCE W/ DETACHED GARAGE AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I h b e� y unde, enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and b ief. � � Applicant's signature: Date: I am aware of the propo ed app tion nd hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. �� 1 I Property owner's signature: Date: � Date submitted: 5: �HANDOUTS�PCApplicatlon.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16w 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 55&7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, fin►o-story dwelling with a detached garage at 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028 292-140 Staff Review: May 16, 2016 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558-7330) � Landscape plan is required to meet the new `Water Conservation in Landscape RegulationsID (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final_ 3. Two additional 24' Landscape trees needed to meet requirement Reviewed by: BD Date: 5/19/16 ! certify that OUTDOOR WATER E�SE EFFICIENGY CH�C�(LiST � �[ New Construction � Fte�aabilitate�l � Other: � Sin�le Fa�mily � Multi-Fami{y �`J �ornmercial J Institt�Cianal � Irriga applicant Name {printj: Bruce A. Chan fr�r Rayrnond U�tong Praject 5ite Address: 146 Cresc�nt /�venue Project Area (sq.ft. ar acre): 64 4$ 5f # of Units: 1 ;�� ,_ � ,xr�� „�_ �� .�,y �," Total Landscape Area (sq.h.): Aii turf is pfanted on slopes < 259'0 Plants are grou�aed by Hydro�ones At least 4 cubic yards per 3.,0()0 sq �t to a dep#h o# 5 inches At least 3-inches of mulch on expased soil zsg5 S� Mat�rial Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.}: 490 Sf Non-Turf irrigat�d Area (sq.ft.j: 22(J5 gf lrrigated Specia! Landseape Ar�a (SLA} {sq.ft.}: N/ q Water Featurs Surface Area (sq.ft.): �V/ A the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. _,___.�- 6-16-16 Oate lnw water usirtg plants are installed for at least 75% c�f plant area 25% of tlte (andscape area is turf is no turf in parkways < iQ feet wide Hydrazenes Cc�mpost fi�ll trrigation 5yste�n y�,ly ;1 tndusirial �l Other: Contact Phone #: �50-3�46-7645 # of Meters: 1 [� Yes C7 Nn, 5ee 5�secial Landscape Area andln�' Recycied Water Area � Yes G! Na, See Water Budget Yes C] Na, if adjacent ta a parking strip � Yes C� Yes t� Yes ❑ No, See Soil Test i� Yes Use of automatic irrigatian controllers that us� evapotranspirativn or soil moisture I� Yes sensor data and utilize a rain sensoe Irrigatian contra(lers do not lose programming daYa when power source is !� Yes interrupted _ _ _ _ _ _ Irrigation system includes pressure � Y�� r�gulators Manual shut-off valves are instalfed near the (� Y�s cannectian to the water suppiy AI! sprir�kler heads installed in ihe landscape must document a distributiQn uniformity low � Yes quarter of 0,65 or higher Areas E 10 feet shall be irrigated with � Yes �u6sur�ac� irrig�tion ' l� Nn, but ihere rs nn runoff ar 5eparate irrigatian meter C7 Yes OSI R[o, not required if < 5,000 sq ft OUTOQO�t 1tUATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIS� �46 Crescent ,. Swimming Pools J Spas Cover required for new pools ar�d spas C7 Yes 1� '� �(Va, no new pool ar sga Water Features Recirculating Q Yes NI A '� ,'� ` .._ Project InfarmaEian t� Yes �I "; d� Water E#fiicient Landscape 1Norksheet 0 �; (opt'ranaf i� < 2,SQfl sq ft of lanriscape areaj '� Pr2pared by prpfessianal Soil Managerrtent Report {optionai if < 2,50� g �•" sq ft of landscape area) � Prepared by pro#essianal C3ocumentation Landscape Design Plan (optianal if < 2,500 sq �� 0 {per section 492.3) � Prepared by professional ft of landseape area) Irrigation Design Rlan {optional if < 2,SOQ sq 0 � ft of iandscape area) � Prepared by professinnal Crading [iesign Plan {optianal if < Z,5fl0 sq fi d `� � Prepar2d by prnfessinnal af landscape areaj Audit PQst-installatian acidit completed C� Completed by professit�na! �� V � �� a AUG{ItOC: � y�'F`� �� r:r• � � ��.. §� � `� � $�.� Materials Receiued and Re�iewed; C7 Regionai Water Efficient Landscape C3rdinance :�:I Project Inforrnafiion t;:,) Residenfiial Clutdoar Water Use Efficiency Cheeklist � Water EfFicient Landseape Worksheet t7 Water Efficient Landscape Workshee# 3 Residential Outdoar Water Use �fficiency Checklist �.7 Plant List =i Pcsst-Instal(ation Audit U Other. :.] L.andscape pesign Plan ' a Soil t+ttanagement ReporC � Irrigatian Design P[an � Grading Design Pian Date t�eviewed: � � � � � " ��' o ` '�.,i � �ollow up required (exptain): ��, .� � �'£ � °�' '; i� � . ..£ai�.w�k�4Y ��.h��. � .. ..::WN ,`d �', .. .. ?!�. `33. , D Drip [rrigation ' i?ate Etesubmitted: Cl Plant pal�te Daie Approved: �::1 Grading ' Dedicated Irrigation iYleier Fiequired: �J Poo! and/or spa cover Meter sizing: � pedieaied irr'r�ation meter �� (}ther: _ _ _ _ _ _ Comments: �i-'f 6-i 6 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 i� Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story dwelling with a detached garage at 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-140 Staff Review: May 16, 2016 1. Please complete, sign and return the Small Projects Checklist, which can be found at the link referenced http://flowstobay.orq/newdevelopment 2. Label all pervious and impervious surfaces and site design measures for stormwater. For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 18, or carolyn.critz veolia.com Reviewed by Carolyn Critz s l► q�� Date: � � ` � Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16, 2016 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story dwelling with a detached garage at 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-140 Staff Review: May 16, 2016 � No additional storm run-off is allowed from the post-construction project site. The site plan show the roof leaders being hard piped to a sidewalk underdrain. Please show pre-treatment and nd surface recharge of the storm runoff. 2. ' remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site (show on plans) ,(2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. 3. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire line protection are to be installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be installed by builder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval. 4. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 5. An erosion control plan will be required during the building permit stage. This plan shall include, but not limited to, delineation of area of work, show primary and secondary erosion control measures, protection of creek or storm drain inlets, perimeter controls, protections for construction access points, and sediment control measures. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 5/20/16 � . Date: To: From: Project Comments May 16, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 o Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story dwelling with a detached garage at 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-140 Staff Review: May 16, 2016 1) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at http://www.leginfo.ca.qov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb 0401- 0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. 3) Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 4) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 5) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. . f> NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2013 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 8) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 9) 18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended—Exit terminals of inechanical draft and direct- vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2013 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the property line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed or replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3") or, as an alternative, manufacturer-approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 § 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written response must include clear direction reqardinq where the reQuested information can be found on the plans. Reviewed by: � �Q�� Rick Caro III, CBO 650-558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 16, 2016 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Ptanning Staff . X Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new, two-story dwelling with a detached garage at 146 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-140 Staff Review: May 16, 2016 Comments related to the residential fire sprinkler system throughout the residence: 1. Provide a minimum 1-inch water meter. 2. Provide a backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — A schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Buildinq permit plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate fire sprinklers shall be installed under a separate deferred fire permit, approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: Christine Reed t�, , ,� � Date: 5-19-16 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FINDING THAT THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REQUEST � FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE LOCATED AT 146 CRESCENT AVENUE WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME hereby finds as follows: Section 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, per Negative Declaration ND-593-P, is hereby approved. Section 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman �, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22ND dav of August, 2016 by the following vote: Secretary RESOLUTION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE AT 146 CRESCENT AVENUE, ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE R-1 ZONE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, an application has been made for Desian Review for a new, two-story single familv dwellinp and detached qaraae at 146 Crescent Avenue. Zoned R-1, Ravmond W.M. Wonq Et AI, 146 Crescent Avenue. Burlinqame, CA, 94010, propertv owners, APN: 028-292-140; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Auqust 22, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 2. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22"d dav of Auqust, 2016, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review. 146 Crescent Avenue Effective September 1, 2016 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 29, 2016, sheets A.1 through A.6, N.1, L1.1, and site survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size garage, which would include amendment to this permit; or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's May 16, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's May 19, 2016 memo, the Engineering Division's May 20, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's May 19, 2016 memo and the Stormwater Division's May 19, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Design Review. 146 Crescent Avenue Effective September 1, 2016 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. , . .. . � 7 �� .. 7 .. �- / - , . 'r � , .� �- ' 9$3� '-' 1525 __ _ 1$�A " �� r w r � f� ` J. � • � .,... � ^ I �; e'... ' N �I � i' _ �"i � � � ��F'�/ . ; �_ ? a � , r'' � t ..� � ,• i � '� �:. � �I . � ' �, ' � 2 � . � _ ' `,� : ` ` . � w' a� ' % . !�: , ' � . �, ✓.1� � � � - � � (" � � � , `�►. . , � - �+�?� ' "�`, � �, r �;+,�'�i' � ' � - � _ r� �'�` f . � � �'� "'( - : "` % '`' ..` . � .� _. .��_ . , �� - � ..,„� �?a �; � '� f' 7 � ;;,�.- 1 �, -r .. � '� • a "� . .,,�; �' '�� '' � � a � ° ; \��: , � v�, T :;�'" s.' '� ,+ � * � . ,� ,. �, � : • � ".s C;Q � � � ��.� . .'A„��4as -'�--'__- Y � 7� � �'s'» I �„.,,. t��. � - �� __- � �� ' � ; _, . '9 _ . �y , ,� . , . l � � ��. f • �v � '� r'` �ta•:��, t. �,�' � ^' �� u .. , , . �.y� ..i, � ` � t, � � • '��` � .. 0 _,� {� N ^� �� ' 1,1 � - .e � �I ;� �' +', u: � w �. _ N�� ' � �w � X � � � ""�`,.. '' '� e" � r ` � R . j' f ,w�.s �� ;-� i a �•� � � ,�v �:, J` ` �` �! : ,-�.,�.: ,S ,� �. � . a. �� fa::' w • '� �, ,, -.. � 7� � " ' + � 6 --i � '�s �� .� :7 .. '� r . . �� '� ts�.�.�, � ; �: / � � . �, r � '. �;�;,• ' ,� Q4-: ; F % . , �e�`�y �, . . . ' \ � ' `�,�'�,I . > �' �� r �` `��.� �; ' � r ` a • � �� . " � fr ' � � ` �► y, �; ti ; "►� ♦ . �'w.. ?. � ' t"ti�.�'r �� / 1.5, �Ptvsh��i�n,,,g,,,y�� ' �v ' � . �• \ .. • _�id' . .t : �Par��.� I ' . . � � �.� H, .. � �� ^"r�,� .I�e� - r� _� � �..f '1 i � - a' i � ' .. / � �� . . 4 h V:�M. � � �I r .. . ', � .. �.:' '.. � ....�,; ` �, . � , .�h . �� , � ,•:.. ' � .. �V�.. � �i " ` � .. <_ _ . , . i.i,� �.,' � " A�� 1 -b . ' . � � •d � } �i * �� ..k � � '. �' . ; � :�:' . �� .g " ' �'~,,,� , � Y _ �v ��\\ ' p, ,� � _ � ?� � ', �.,: , ,., � � . • � ,. ; � � �t: ' � , .. yL • �,.,, � . , * „ � � . d �_ �. , � : .� � . �� . � ` . , �� ' ,r ��3 �- . r ,�iS �' . - �-e;�µ . :�,�.�w,:- . � � .;� ,.F ,-.< . _ , . , �� 1 �; . ; � ' �°� . • � A� ,�t � ' . ' M� : � / . � �',� @ 6 ` _�,�� ;� �"�`��' e9 � ' _ 6? � , �` , . � , • '_ , .�.,•. i"i'..� �� , ,�� , 'e � ` ,y • r . '. . . i �,.. , v ;. � s _ _ ` , ^ � �_p�c+�"w.'�' 4 � �„` �� "� .� . � �;, 'D ' f � t � , „ �. ',��.: `�� , i • ' � � ' � . �