The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About145 Crescent Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Item No. �. Negative Declaration and Design Review Action Item Address: 145 Crescent Avenue Meeting Date: September 10, 2012 Request: Negative Declaration and Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form + One Property Owners: Laurence P. & Linda Dugoni/Gregory & Gina Gambrioli General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-293-030 Lot Area: 7,450 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review: Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame Citizen on September 25, 2009, it was indicated that the entire subdivision within which this property is located (Burlingame Park No. 2) may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Because the application was submitted to the Planning Division after September 25, 2009, a Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012. The results of the evaluation concluded that the property was found ineligible for National Register, California Register or Local designation through survey evaluation. This conclusion is based on the property's lack of significance under the California Register eligibility criterion. Those criterion include: Events for �ocal significance as a resource; Persons as a resource associated with the lives of persons important to local history; Architecture that "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a time and period"; and Information Potential. Therefore, the properly does not qualify as a historic resource under CEQA. Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, an Initial Study was prepared forthe project. Based on the analysis by Page and Turnbull, it was determined that there would be no adverse environmental impacts, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared (see attached ND-562-P). The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the initial study, facts in the Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house over a raised basement and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and a detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,839 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The project is 45 SF below the maximum allowed FAR) and is within 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. Three off-street parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for the proposed five-bedroom house. The project includes a detached two-car garage which provides two code-compliant covered parking spaces. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a new finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue 145 Crescent Avenue Lot Area: 7,450 SF Plans Date Stam ed: Au ust 20 and Jul 3, 2012 ; PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS _._._..........__.._....._ .............................................................................................................................................._,................__........._.................................................................................................................................................................... .................................._............._..............._._......_................._....._.....��.___ . Front (1st fIr): 25'-10" 25'-10" (block average) (2nd flr): 25'-10" 25'-10" (block average) .................................................................................................................................... ......................................................__._._..�.__._..._....�._..................................................................................._...__..—.........................__._..................._..............................._..._._._._._...........-----..._............._....._........_........ Side (left): 15'-3" (to bay window) 6'-0" (right): 6'-0" 6'-0" _ .................................................................................................._......_...........................................................................................�..............................................................................................................................................................................._...................... Rear (1st flr): 50'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 50'-6" 20'-0" ....................................._.__._.._....----........................................_...._ ...................................................._......_................_........._......._..._......................................................_.._.._..._...---..._.....;._.................................................................................................................................................................................................. Lot Coverage: 2365 SF 2980 SF 31.7% 40% ...................................................................................................................................................:.................................................................._.........................................__..�........................_........................................._............. .....� .............................._............._..........._....._......__...................................................... ............................................ . FAR: 3839 SF 3884 SF 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR ' .......................................................................................................................................... .... ............................................._...........__........�......_......................................................................................................;........._............................_.._................._..................................._.................__.._......................................_......__. # of bedrooms: 5 --- ---.._ _.�...� ............................._................................................................ . . ...................................................�_..__....__._...---._...............................................................................................;...................................................................................................................................................................................................... Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _ _..... _. _.. _.. _ ............................................................ _....................................................... .......................................................................... . .... . ................................................................................................ �...................................................................................................................................................................... _............................... Height: 30'-0" 30'-0" ...........................................................�................ _..............................................................�........................................: ...................................................._.._._.........._.._.._._.................................................................__...__......_........................... ............................................................................................................................. ........... . � DH Envelope: exemption applied 2 CS 25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 7,450 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF= 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) 2 The gable end roof exemption applies along the right side of the house (CS 25.26.075 b,1). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, City Arborist, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study meeting on July 9, 2012, the Commission had several comments and questions regarding the project and placed the item on the RegularAction Calendarwhen the plans had been revised as directed (see attached July 9, 2012 P.C. Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter dated August 13, 2012 and revised plans (sheet G1.0) date stamped August 20, 2012, to address the Commission's concerns. Please refer to the attached meeting minutes for a complete list of concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. Negative Declaration: Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on July 9, 2012. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Division staff. It has been determined that the proposed project can be covered by a Negative Declaration since the initial study did not identify any adverse impacts from the proposed construction of a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage (please referto the attached Negative Declaration No. 562-P). The Negative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review. The 20-day review period ended on August 21, 2012. There were no comments submitted during the review period. 2 Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Required Findings for a Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report and within the Negative Declaration. Action should include specific findings for accepting the environmental document (Negative Declaration) and Design Review and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 20, 2012, sheet G1.0 and date stamped July 3, 2012, sheets T1.0, GN, GP, SP, AB, Boundary and Topographic Survey, A2.0 through A4.0, L1-0 and L2-0; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 8, 2012 memo, the Engineering Division's June 14, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 5, 2012 memo, the Park Division's June 4, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 4, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 3 Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Tim Raduenz, Form + One, applicant and designer 4 Negative Declaration and Design Review Attachments: Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, dated August 13, 2012 July 9, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes from Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Photographs of Neighborhood Notice of Public Hearing — mailed August 31, 2012 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: 145 Crescent Avenue Negative Declaration and Initial Study (ND-562-P), dated August 1, 2012 Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012 5 -� _ r �� E �� .� #- ��'� .-�__ _. _ ". k'O]E�I� + Ol�TE 3841 24'h Street, #A 12098 Hwy. 42 San Francisco, Calif. 94114 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 P + a�5).819.0304 �� AUG 14 2�];2 E + tim@formonedesign.com CITY OF BURLINGo^tc CDD-PLANNING !?IV. 'I'RANS1V1gTTAL FOIZM To: Planning Department Subject: 145 Crescent Ave. Fax: From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 08-13-12 Number of Pages: Message: Hi Ruben: This is in response to the Commissions Comments of July 9, 2012. 1. After review with the Owners, we have decided to stay with the plan as is, the reasoning was that the laundry will be more central to the upstairs, and that the office/Den will work better with the family room, and also the exterior fa�ade really does not work with having a bay window that close to the exterior corner. 2. Correct the railing is in proportion, and it is lower as its not needed to be at code height. Also for the window, it was correct, but the smaller version prints may be hard to read, as I hatched it a lighter color as it's in the background, and the porch itself will be the main feature here. 3. Will do this on construction documents. 4. 5. 6. 7. Thank you, I do pride myself on doing a very period/traditional home. Yes. The mass is greatly reduced and the proportions work well, as we are not just capping it with a 4/12 pitch, to stay within the height requirements. See attached gate columns. Correct. 8. I would like to stay with the smaller windows, as these are features of older period homes you see in the area. FORM + ONE • Design & Planning • 3841 24"' SUeet, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • a�s) 819.0304 ■ tim@formonedesign.com 9. This is more of a mud room, and will be one of the more finished rooms in the house, it will be completely clad in "custom made" local cabinets from a"local" craftsman. 10. Does not work well, and sometimes less is more, the Gables on the side really are an architectural feature. 11. It really is a budget concern, and it will not be seen as the (e) home next to it is fairly close. 12. This comment will be worked into the interior drawings, once the planning package has been approved. Sincerely, Tim Raduenz — CGBP � Build It GREENM MEMBER FORM + ONE • Design & Planning • 3841 24"' Street, #A • San Francisco ■ CA • 94114 • a�s) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes July 9, 2012 5. 145 CRESCENT AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TIM RADUENZ, FORM + ONE, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; LAURENCE P. AND LINDA DUGONI/GREGORY & GINA GAMBRIOLI PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated July 9, 2012, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: None. 2 3 S 7 8 R Io U Chair Gaul opened the public comment period. Tim Raduenz, 3841 24th Street, San Francisco; represented the applicant. Commission comments: Typically don't get into the interior design, but suggested switching the laundry and the den to allow the den to have access to the front porch area. (Raduenz — would look odd to have a bump-out at this location on the side of the house; would affect the symmetry. Also trying to keep the laundry room as close to the staircase as possible. Access from the den to the family room is desirable.) Unclear about the height of the railing on the porch and the windows are missing the muntins in the laundry area. (Raduenz — the railing is lower because it is not required to be higher.) Also consider moving the spindles in the rail closer together as was typical in Craftsman design. The design fits well with the neighborhood. Tucking the second floor under the eave effectively reduces the mass. Missing an elevation on the plans that would show how the gate tucks up against the house. On the double-hung windows, was the same divided-lite detail to be provided? (Raduenz — yes.) Did the designer consider other options for the two small windows on either side of the gable? (Raduenz — could make them larger, but once the trim is in place, it may look out of place. The window actually is into a bathroom.) Concerned about the laundry room at the front; will be more visible. With respect to the attic spaces at each corner, continuing the roof line downward gives the appearance of more mass — could be reduced and provide more window area and character. Doesn't like just having a bump-out for the fire arrestor for the fire place — would like some form of a chimney to be present. (Raduenz — is a budget concern.) Could consider building a dresser or other furnishing into the attic areas that have less than five-feet of clearance. . . . . �Z • Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: f,� � C/TY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Approved Minutes July 9, 2012 Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when comp/ete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Gaul called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners Yie and Vistica). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m. 7 � 6 V RLINGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PR�nnRose Roa� • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance � Parcel #: �Z�� Z��' �j�' 4 ❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permi# ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: I� O Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: I1M ��I��y Add ress: .3�� -�f � �' " � � City/State/Zip: �`�CN � �NU�� 1� Phone: �15 � $ �� , 03�� . ��: ��'a o � 4� - �v� E-mail: I 1�� v��`Sf(y1� • �d� PR�PER� QWNE,R project contact person ❑ OK to send electr nic copies of documents�, Name: (� � �Ii�L� U6ol� 1 f> Address: !�`'l�S �� 1�� City/State/Zip: � �! �JD�D�� _�`�� Phone: � 50 . �3� - �� Fax: �' E-mai1: ��V��►"l�l�►�s) l� � Y#��•�-�( DESIGNER project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents Name: � IM ��U� 1� 7 —' � R-NL "�" d 1� � Address: �7�i � �� '�� City/State/Zip: �W �� C �� I� ��'��, Phone: �t��l �� d �" 1P ��,'�' �_.,' _ -,'_ � Fax: E-mail: �k Burlingame Business Lic PROJECT DESCRIPTION /�� . 1! �(` - AFFADAVITISIGNATl1RE: I hereby ci best of my knowledge and belie Applicant's signature: I am aware of the proposed application .� enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true nd correct to the Date: � l � r 2 y authorize the above applicant to submit this ap�lication to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature� �� N�«J��V� Date: S Date submi Sl�l ►2- �k Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license wi�l be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project Sr�HANDOUTS�PCApplication 2008.handouLdoc � ,� ,. . This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: . n- , � .. . �. , � � � ro r: wS Lr-�� ' 1�1r e �.J :.., a _R , , . Pr I� c Q-{�n� -�f � bes �� .. �e��'e� -�r o�. n� -i�o - s`� ` .�,,w,', �� dw �, I l,r� a,. � �-�a� �.�. d v�a , S � r �v 1 �. /. 5 �-a' ��- . . . Key: Abbreviation Term_ : . CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declining Hei ht EnvelopE DSR Design Review E Existing N New SFD Single Family Dwelling SP Special Permit 1 , Project Comments Date: May 31, 2012 To: � Engineering Division � Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 X Building Division � Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 � Parks Division � City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http:/Iwww.energy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 11)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 12)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 13)On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 14)Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) 15)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. Note: The area labeled "Den" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16)Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 17)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings r�ore than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 19)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 20)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 20 2113.9 Reviewed by: Date: 6-8-2012 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 [� Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 ❑ Fire Division (650) 558-7600 ❑ Building Division (650) 558-7260 O Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff ❑ Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant needs to contact City Arborist regarding the potential relocation of sidewalk area around trees in the planter strip. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/14/2012 r i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLAl�TNING REVIEW COMMENTS OJ� -twt�- �uw�i Project Name: Sr�lt.� �u.� c'ndk�*� � Project Address: C� ��'��' The followi.ng requirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey sha11 show a11 property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building pernut issuance.) ��'� �..L�Ffr,ps �, �`�,��,p Y�` f�- i�l�i��t� (,a-�o S�r3.J��yi^�l-� 2 _� T'he site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral i� is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. _ ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pu.mp sta.tions and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9, Submit a traffic impact study for the proj ect. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANIVING REVIEVJ COMNIENTS.doc e PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct fronta.ge public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project sha11 identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project sha11 comply with the City's NPDES permit requirernent to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the proj ect is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the fronta.ge curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the ta.keout service, a garbage receptacle sha11 be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: � May 31, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 ❑x Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � -- Date: ��---/1-- Project Comments Date: May 31, 2012 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650j 558-7334 From: Planning Staff 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. Replacement trees for trees removed in City planter strip shall be minimum of 15 gal chosen for the list attached. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 6t4t12 2. Irrigation plan ok. � CITY OF BURLINGAME - PARK5 DIVISION, 558-7330 eua�Trr�wn�e 850 BURLINGAME AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA 94U10-2858 OFFICIAL STREET TREE LIST - AUG 2010 , • :, ._ , TREE CIiY USA TREES TO BE USED IN PLANTING STRIPS 4' WIDE AND UNDER 6' WIDE PICTURES OF TREES CAN BE VIEWED A T www burlin,�a»z� or� UNDER THE PAR%S AND REGREATION DEPARTMENT Site Height at Min Botanical Name Common Name Locations Maturi S acin Descri tion O Acer rubrum Red Maple 1450 Capuchino 40-50' 35' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; lobed, green leaves; brilliant fall color Aesculus carnea Red Horsechestnut 2212 Adeline 40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Fast early growth; round headed; dark green leaves; lumes of crimson flowers in s rin . O Celtis ausiralis European Hackberry 1108 Cambridge 40-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; gray-green, elm-like leaves; upright; round headed form. O Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 2711 Easton 30-40' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth, glossy, dark greeu , ehn-like leaves; u ri t round form. Suse table to wool a hids O Fraxinum oxycarpa Raywood Ash 2600 Easton 40-50' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; compact, round headed; dark green leaves turn claret red in fall. O Gingko biloba Maidenhair tree 405, 409 Block Bayswater Ave, 30-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Slow �owth; fan shaped leaves turn yellow in fall; 1240 Cabrillo s readin , almost umbrella form. •� Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia `Samuel 2109 Ray Drive 30' 30' EVERGREEN: Fast growth; upright branches; dark green foliage Sommer' has a rusty bronze wloring on leaf underside. White flowers in early s rin and a ain late in summer. O Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 2705 Easton, 121 Costa Rica Ave 30-40' 40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; dark green leaves, brilliant fall color. O Platanus acerifolia London Plane 603 Plymouth 40-60' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; large, lobed, maple like leaves; sheds 'Columbia' S camore old bark; new bark smooth cream colored. O Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 2022 Ray Drive, 1422 Capuchino 40-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast gro��th; high, open branclies; large, bri t een leaves turn scarlet in cold fall. O Quercus rubra Red Oak 326 Clarendon Road, 2509 Hillside 40-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast grawth; spreading bTanches with round crown. Drive Robinia ambigua Idaho Locust 1446 Capuchino 30-40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growkh; spring clusters of bright ma enta flowers; lon leaves divided into oval leaves. Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow 2009 Devereaux Drive 35' 40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; dense, round crown; outstandin fall color O Tristania conferta Brisbane Box 860 Walnut 30-60' 45' EVERGREEN: Moderate to fast growth; reddish�brown bark; green oval leathe leaves; resembles some Eucal tus. . O Ulmus Accolade Elm 1080 Howard 60-80' S5' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; gracefixl vase shape limbs; glossy dark green foliage, yellow in fall. Subject to availability. � City recommended trees to increase the Urban Forest Canopy � � 1 i + � l 0 OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST 1 certify that ihe subject project meefis the spec�ed requirements of the Wafer Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. ��-� 5 2 Z � Sie e Date ❑ Single Family CI Multi-Famify ❑ Commercial ❑ institutional ❑ Irrigation only ❑ Industria) ❑ Other: Applicant Name (print): Contact Phone #: Project Site Address: / y� ��j' ��.c�'�� Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): ��s� Lj(� �# of Uniu: �� 1� # af Meters: �� xl`� !� �1��-�.�€�r%G`l J�aE-�� ` Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.): n�.,.,nr �T ,� hrt ��; � ��;�1 �! 1 � � _F �tl1 L_ �d=.��A}��,�4D, ltj�t d�E ��i... ' /� ! v - ��"f !� .._ 4 . :� Qf Cj_:e � C_2__ G EIC�.t�.�?t Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): � 3� �� . � Non TurF Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): ZZq (% %;2. � Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): �. Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): � Turf Non-7'urf Hydrozanes Makh Irrigation System Effiaency Irrigation System Design ii i Irrigation Trme Metering Swimming Pools / Spas Water Features Documentation Audit 'Less than 25% of the landscape area is �Yes 2y '�✓ �%p iturf ❑ No, See Water Budget All turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes All turf is planted on slopes < 25% Yes At least 80� of non-turf area is native � Yes or low water use p{ants ❑ No, See Water Budget Plants are grouped by Hydrozones Yes At least Z-inches of mulch on exposed �iYes soil surFaces 70% ETo (100% ETo for SLAsj Yes Na overspray or runoff Yes System efficiency > 70% Yes Automatic, self-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required forTier 1 controllers � Yes Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutaffs Yes No sprayheads in < 8-ft wide area Yes System only operates between 8 PM Yes and 10 AM 5eparate irrigation meter o, not required because <5,000 sq.ft. ❑ Yes Cover highly recommended ❑ Yes � � ❑ No, not required Recirculating 0 Yes less than 10% of landscape area ❑ Yes Checklist � Yes Landscape and Irrigation Design Rlan ❑ Prepared hy applicant Prepared by professional Water Budget (optional) �� O Prepared by applicant ❑ Prepared by professional Post-installation audit completed ❑ Completed by applicartt ❑ Corr�pleted by professi�ak;ma ;� �.�� MAY 3 0 2012 CITY OF BURLIf�GAME C�D�PI_ANNIi�G DI�! � , , � ��. �, . �� h � Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition). When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_construction. php (Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Follow all BMP's for Architectural Copper (see attached sheet). ��Reviewed bv: SD � Date: 6/4/2012 � :SAN� MAtE0.G0U�ITYWlAE � . � Wat�` F'��IttkiAr� ��►�� Requirements for Architectural Copper GtantY�tN�NeakhgGcmmunity. � � � _ _ � Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when fhe copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architecturai copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management PracCices (BMPs) dischar.ges to storm drains. gutter and drainpipe. must be implemented to prevent prohibited During lnstallation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street 'or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump fo the sanitary sewer. Contact your Jocal sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposaL • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervioUs coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to fhe sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobav:orq (click on "Business", then "New bevelopment", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Siorm drain inlet is blocked fo prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. y,.d f,,.. s r#4� � � ��>� � � . . ��`� � �� .�� .� �� , t..'� fi �y 1 � . . � ,� � . "�� '� �r _ S 0,+. i �.��5 � 4 , . � � . . ��X�u �.Vi. ' . . . . . ; I ��r�� v r� � �{� ¢ YS i � . �� : � t. �`` ::s+ ren� �� v � � �� { �4 :;, � � k� � fl:, s�r ' �3; �' � ,s �p _ €�, � I�t �� g { > mm �> ` � � �� _.� � 4 ��_`' _ ��. . � . �� wr r. ��s �� "� �.� _�� Yz �� ] �� 5 � �#`; }c c��: Y k � . �� . �� La'f� �P4{U'A: �tl-'a ��. ��. ++�^' � �rE �� t � � . - ` ` - „ �,�,._ d„�� o. } �� r� � ,� ' •z . F ,r � d "� �"'i'c �..+�, � � � � k.; , �� .� 4 x ,� •a �� t` .,r;,:. �� ; " Y�`� . ; .. �� . E '�` � . i i -_ ��ti m' [�- � 4 � "_ �: _ •,-y�..t` : � . . ��e S _r •.��E� 3 ,'� .. . . ,t �w�� l �,. i t �y.{ � k�, t .. e � �i y i � $ �r � � ca ' A� n,�,i i;�.�� .# �a' � ,� ., � ��' } � �•� . � ' • i. S �� ...,' y� �i ` '.� _ _ ' ��'� � � :.� �� ...� S F E � � ��* �.� � S R. y 5 .-X .t §��'�;�'.+�'i + � �: .°*�� . i, j� { � ' � ��kL� ��hy� �� xS� ��'��, x �* �� '��, - � r � � � , { k � ��. � _d� tik.�� , " l � t �� . .�S r -� . u� '�i' x. �� ¢ � .1 ' q � t �' x ' ';'a 1�� °•, t U i ��,y '� f . � , _ � �' 7,�, �� $ � R � ��, qft9 T"`T �,, �' �`� — [� � . c '� `t � 4 �'�tli � �� )� � � . � rl � �'� ��.� � � � ��'.:� s ^ � � '� ; � »�tt }Z"r� x�"'�`e h i�� 5d:5� �3 � ' ! ��.� � $ 'CTs:,....,�� "Yi kin++i1 � { .°3sr" �"R � � �} Y.,` .: � � i �' ,�� ?�.k �"''�^ ..� % a '� y �, LL� c. ,. a 3 - s � � § �'7 ��_"� ��.:. I �.. � `��.. , ` i: 't "' � , � �' � . y �' _ w'�� , � � , .F �1 � `+' �� . c , �� '� � � i ?��' r � e'- � , ti. , .S _, a � x'�� r�. + � �' �`j F' ` ,. ,. '� ��E� , �. n.' � � �f �. � �� " �� .. �;, .� ~�!. �� ry� , I � � ti� �'�t � ��x� �i . �, . � .� . � + �; �� € �-,„;., � _�. . �<'s .. _ . o� =; � ` ; ; �` � '' ' ` '` ;� r � '-.:, �� 'F , �; ;r '4 ,�.� � ".d ' �,� i f i� .�' r �.e�'C.7f . r�t ° „o `�'y �`ru`��r "� . �$ � �� `:''' ,i '.t8t ;�4 � M 4 � , �� i �� °# ` ' f ♦ ' ♦ � �', '�` w �, 7 �� i � i 4 _�_ � ��,c� � • 2 � � �� {� i�.� � � et �,, �� [j��`�(J�'`' � e � � f� •.� S �ai(t^ � - �'�/ x ,n � � � x , ... .. ��A.-. t-=� ° � �� 4 _ �.�� ,�� , � >r � t�'�" � . ,�. � � � � p.t �+�€ , " � � � � „� �� i Y �4 � " ' , ' �� ,� S ' R :f "'"" � � � � • �- , L, `� :� � � �� ',�.'... _ � ^<c'�?��„ � . .� _ _, . �- . ��> ��. � � � "�� rr„ � 3 r, �,.. y� � � e � ,�,:...h X� ;°�a'4� y � 3+ �R.. � ` `�`"'� � ��°`z�. ' 1 � # r � '� �� __� �a �� -�-''� � - � ` ,� �� .,,.�,�....,, : � ,. � : _ ; f' ��i`i� � •�� c `%�F r ;� r � � •�. �,�u��;�`�.� ;� } � �uE�-� 2 :� J � .`. ' ` 2. J � { . p iy� # aa.w. � s 71 � �` �ii- ID � �k `` � i.�°S.� t � � g, . f e�'� � � �� ` � .�i.:'. : ��; � � ��, t K�� ,,.,r�'t..:��_ <•��. .. f tsti p a _ � �� y, t; � i �' �� 9 . ., * , 7 s.� � '.`• � s �`x ` a r � ti s ;� , � �� , � �� i � � xm� Y� � � m. . .rei8 '�.�� ' � " �� . ; �.{ � `• ' ��. ��a�t . > �:' ',: � � ., =",et��` � a,�'�, �r ' �E� _�� rt � -� r` �.r�.} ,�'.. ,�- � a_.,�t�s.t-c;. �, a: o�t.:r s�. � a. r �#— s� ' t� � � ��: � � � j��.:; ° = � , J � �. � � � �� 1 � '� � � � ,, � � � . + "'' � �; . � �, , � � >� �° .�`�`?�� , � � �� r�� ' � � '`�� ' �>;F , k `� y' l�k� �.q�. `Kg �+ '� ° $ t � Y�. � : '�} a h� w :� w � � � �r . , �� ; � � � �� .9 �-� � ��'�� ;r Fr• �j=� + �s,; �` � t � t � � �� , ��:..�-� � �� • ��! � 4 �� .�:.:. r� �,,, � z �� , x �,, � '� . � � �� - � �� , �'� � � � 9 ��, }� ��;'%r A '� �.:: ,�, �� {� e'�' � �. _' ir„ aa± a . � ,. d• N . � t ' i V ..si � �'(F 'i�� 4 € � ' +►r �� . � a �� .: ,, �z ` �� A�° � . ` `, R! \ i # � r � �. . � i � �'�� , . aE , i °� _ �,.. t �'x. S ` ; .,� '� � �'r` �<: #l..,�' �� ~ �, �,,�� V - ' s . �uY.��. ;nje�P.Y3'+,•� �.4...: ,�� . r �.:,,""�� ..y�u.� _ . ^ .+i"� .- '"`°; .,�, '✓' I —r � � . . T'. �1, ` � ,.;4,,„. . �, �p, `y+ ' ��' �� r � ��' �,�' � �� .��`: `�� i � � ��:� ` � � �` ��`� � , _ _�� '' �a< � �� # . "�{:.� ' � � , i d`� a • r� s �` Z' , z �. '� t> >� � � �': � s .� � �, � �- . ` :� . � ` -� � � . : 2 �� ; .. . � '��`�,��' 4��.. . � . ' � � i � - �, � _ �� r �`� , :aw. ��+"".'.�..^�',.�" . , . . _._ ;; �� RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review for a new two-story sinqle familv dwellina and detached garaqe at 145 Crescent Avenue Zoned R-1 Laurence P. & Linda Duaoni and Greqory and Gina Gambrioli, property owners, APN: 028-293-030; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 10, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the tnitial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and negative declaration, per Negative Declaration No. ND-562 P is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th dav of September, 2012 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Effective September 20, 2012 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 20, 2012, sheet G1.0 and date stamped July 3, 2012, sheets T1.0, GN, GP, SP, AB, Boundary and Topographic Survey, A2.0 through A4.0, L1-0 and L2-0; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 8, 2012 memo, the Engineering Division's June 14, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 5, 2012 memo, the Park Division's June 4, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 4, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Effective September 20, 2012 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD __ � � � �' BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � :" _ - �� - = PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696 3790 _ _ www.burlingame.org Site: 145 CRESCENT AVENUE The (ity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Negative Declaration and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 CRESCENT AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-293-030 (/tem continued from the August 27, 2012 P/anning Commission MeetingJ Mailed: August 31, 2012 (Please refer to other side) "_=� --� � pUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlinaame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank yau. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ofher side) �, ° � � �� . � �� . x T � � � �� . . ,� � �� . �� `� � ., ��v� ,".�.n�, , i e°, �.,�.. � � �� ;� �u� �� ,��ucv� a �'r,��5., �F'"�1�ev. �� 3 S � n � , a.�� .;t `'�,�� a' `��.��a��.. �� , ',�- �i�`�,.�r`� � H�� mw� � � % �� r�.�*��T�e �'�. e �� u � � � re � � �� ., . . _ �cs �� : � � �ati'� � , ��,, ��. �c � � '� � �� ` �,� �.� �� °`� u� �n� :�m. . 0� * � .� � ,.,. , �:� ` ti,"� . � �'�h � � , * � �I �� s,e� ��`��*�� " � � > q� � ��0 - m� �� , �\`�'�� i� .. �� ?�' � �,' � ,�� ,�� ^�� '�., �ti� � y�i � � k ¢a � � � � � � �` �`. R � � ♦ ��"�� a � '�j � � �� ' ^ �� `� t y, ��9 �� - s� �� °� � �� _ � ` � ��e i��` ��3;, � � �� °.� � �� .�� n'3�sse r � � �� .'x*��s �t. � � -� , � 3v„7, at.� ., ti� �. �i � �� e� : ��°� �W��d�� .� �. k'�� • � . , , d %`.. `� *^S^wp�t�Y\� �. . f 's '. � � . .. . ♦ � } 3'.`T J . � �@.�� `: �` '� ��'" �ST ,��.�, ' �"� �� ,�`� �; � '� t5�.� ; � �' �� a�"�� "� °'� �� "� � e a� '�p��` �.ma - ��';.�' ��c�ia�� u �� , �� . ,a� t^ � . � e��° '2� � �A�.��..� �n '.�� F{' , � � ��.�"� � o . 1� ,5 �,yy��t o , ' u ` � C+�t&� � � � b`1T � � A��E � 0 �s � � �� ' �",� ��.� �.w � �,� ' J'� ' ' � a � � � �Ym� � '�. � � . > ». ' �- S � .' �"�"�` �' '�� ,��'" �a ��a� R�i��zY`�� k�n �°�a, e� ' 1 �'� �' �da�d @a9P �k�� r � `" � „� Y . . �. , a m �u � � � �a�\a� a m�� S3 � '�i � \ 3 409 � V��,' � �'@ �, � , � a � .' �, � � � s � � �� '�' \\ � � � � �� • � ' � x„ a �� ' R� � � '� v� � � �� .' " - � �: ,. . � . � . � �:� �riST �:� � a� o�. �ti ..�� a�s.a� � .��. �Pi� . . , , , a � ��. � n� �iqi �Y�� `a ' a,� �, �� ;� � �'� '�Y�. oh�� : ` r " '�. ��A`9"�' Y �e �, 8 2 `� �� s� � � �� r _ � '�'� � r�� r,�F�� m�� . a� ��: a0�3�� , ww � �a.n r� � � �:n� �`��'�` a . �': � �� r@o� � �� N� � �� 3 � �� °`�� M� �'��' ' �� . �� a�� ' �^ � � � � , � �� >i � � > � � �� e � � �� '� � � � � �� 4 � � � ` � , �., � &� r „� , - ��'�'�� . "� ' � ��u. � ° `�' a ... "� ��-' � ��,: � a,a „� " �, a � �� ,�k�� ` a a s a � � � � �� , � � � � �� iu c� : � ��' .� ��' � 4 L � � �. � . � . � � ��an.:: �u"�� ,+ 4�1 .�� . ��a `!�, �,�,e .. *� . ��0� ��at� � -�Ly � � � t � � M a�'� �� a { em e ��. �a� �,o � .. ��ti� .a�`a�� lJ� ' �� eA ' �,�`S� � k'� � � `� �Lt� �q.. �° . � �,a�� '� �9.� . �`��' � � .. ,� �' � � ie°�' . �, � ��"�,' '. �� <a �, ... . � �TM � � i � t �. � ^� .. � �v i " 2 � � a'�i�� '� , �, �,R. �`` y. �'.G �e �hd: y� � �\J P� SY �� $ `� �43' �:[ �,� � i. � �� ..:'\ .� � � �� „,��i�' � +"Aa a 6 ' �� .� �� a � +d Lt�.�`�m �:�� :: �"�-� �, +� II: p�;, � � �$�?. � � 9� ;,., �`' �g`�, "+, ' : � � � � �, q , � ,, � � �e`� � � � �, s�r� '� ;� � , .: � � � �m � > � �md'� o � �� . ,; �� v'& C.`� ' .� , . _ � �.�.� ,�� Q , �'M� f.�"� �"� ��a.:.` . .�4 3 j .,i � ^�+�a" �� ,�.��'"� �'� �, . 3."� H � o � . `� •. �� t�.. � � � � � � � ��. �� . ��-, x: � �� ; . ^��. 4 ' .;;� . `„"� ' ' d �' y�,."' r � �� p � � . z. � i. � ,�. . � .� o :.. - „ t m . „ ,_ „ . E �. . , � a a - � � �.' . .. ' .: � �� ^-w _ ' . X�° ��..�. �..� � - �, � � ,.. � ,. , . �-� _ .::« a� �� .: .. _ < _. _ � � ,. _ � � .� �.t, _ _. �., . . �. �:,�...<. City of Burlingame Negative Declaration and Design Review Address: 145 Crescent Avenue Item No. Action Item Meeting Date: August 27, 2012 Request: Negative Declaration and Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form + One Properly Owners: Laurence P. & Linda Dugoni/Gregory & Gina Gambrioli General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-293-030 Lot Area: 7,450 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review: Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame Citizen on September 25, 2009, it was indicated that the entire subdivision within which this property is located (Burlingame Park No. 2) may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Because the application was submitted to the Planning Division after September 25, 2009, a Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this proper�y by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012. The results of the evaluation concluded that the property was found ineligible for National Register, California Register or Local designation through survey evaluation. This conclusion is based on the property's lack of significance underthe California Register eligibility criterion. Those criterion include: Events for local significance as a resource; Persons as a resource associated with the lives of persons important to local history; Architecture that "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a time and period"; and Information Potential. Therefore, the property does not qualify as a historic resource under CEQA. Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. Based on the analysis by Page and Turnbull, it was determined that there would be no adverse environmental impacts, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared (see attached ND-562-P). The purpose of the present review is to hold a public hearing and evaluate that this conclusion, based on the initial study, facts in the Negative Declaration, public comments and testimony received at the hearing, and Planning Commission observation and experience, are consistent with the finding of no significant environmental impact. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house over a raised basement and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and a detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,839 SF (0.52 FARj where 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The project is 45 SF below the maximum allowed FAR) and is within 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. Three off-street parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for the proposed five-bedroom house. The project includes a detached finro-car garage which provides two code-compliant covered parking spaces. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a new finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue 145 Crescent Avenue �ot Area: �,450 5F Plans Date Stam ed: Au ust 20 and Jul 3, 2012 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1st flr): 25'-10" u ` 25'-10" (block average) (2nd flr): 25'-10" 25'-10" (block average) Side (left): 15'-3" (to bay window) 6'-0" (right): 6'-0" 6'-0" Rear (1st flr): 50'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 50'-6" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2365 SF � 2980 SF 31.7% ` 40% FAR: 3839 SF 3884 SF 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR' # of bedrooms: 5 — Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Height: 30'-0" 30'-0" DH Envelope: exemption applied 2 CS 25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 7,450 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF= 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) 2 The gable end roof exemption applies along the right side of the house (CS 25.26.075 b,1). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, City Arborist, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Environmental Scoping and Design Review Study meeting on July 9, 2012, the Commission had several comments and questions regarding the project and placed the item on the RegularAction Calendarwhen the plans had been revised as directed (see attached July 9, 2012 P.C. Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter dated August 13, 2012 and revised plans (sheet G1.0) date stamped August 20, 2012, to address the Commission's concerns. Please refer to the attached meeting minutes for a complete list of concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. Negative Declaration: Because there was a potential impact on historic resources, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission held an environmental scoping session for this project on July 9, 2012. An Initial Study was prepared by the Planning Division staff. It has been determined that the proposed project can be covered by a Negative DeClB�atioll Si�Ce the initial study did not identify any adverse impacts from the proposed construction of a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage (please referto the attached Negative Declaration No. 562-P). The Negative Declaration was circulated for 20 days for public review. The 20-day review period ended on August 21, 2012. There were no comments submitted during the review period. 2 Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Required Findings for a Negative Declaration: For CEQA requirements the Planning Commission must review and approve the Negative Declaration, finding that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing or at the public hearing that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant (negative) effect on the environment. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report and within the Negative Declaration. Action should include specific findings for accepting the environmental document (Negative Declaration) and Design Review and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 20, 2012, sheet G1.0 and date stamped July 3, 2012, sheets T1.0, GN, GP, SP, AB, Boundary and Topographic Survey, A2.0 through A4.0, L1-0 and L2-0; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 8, 2012 memo, the Engineering Division's June 14, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 5, 2012 memo, the Park Division's June 4, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 4, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 3 Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of #he existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property comers, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an archi#ectural certification t#�ai the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submifted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division stafF will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Tim Raduenz, Form + One, applicant and designer 4 Negafive Declaration and Design Review Attachments: Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, dated August 13, 2012 July 9, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes from Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Photographs of Neighborhood Notice of Public Hearing — mailed August 17, 2012 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: 145 Crescent Avenue Negative Declaration and Initial Study (ND-562-P), dated August 1, 2012 Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012 5 ��=� _ - �� _ �_ � � _ ]E'Ol�M + Ol� 3841 24th Street, #A San Francisco, Calif. 94114 P + a�s).819.0304 12098 Hwy. 42 � � � � � �T � � Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 AI.�G I � c�':: E + tim@formonedesign.com Cf?Y OF B+��LIt�!{�,�:'•'_ CQD-Pit;�d��:'+lL: _ ... '�'RANSIVII'I'TAL, ]FORNT To: Planning Department Subject: 145 Crescent Ave. From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 08-13-12 Number of Pages: Fax: lVlessage: Hi Ruben: This is in response to the Commissions Comments of July 9, 2012. 1. After review with the Owners, we have decided to stay with the plan as is, the reasoning was that the laundry will be more central to the upstairs, and that the office/Den will work better with the family room, and also the exterior fa�ade really does not work with having a bay window that close to the e�erior corner. 2. Correct the railing is in proportion, and it is lower as its not needed to be at code height. Also for the window, it was correct, but the smaller version prints may be hard to read, as I hatched it a lighter color as it's in the background, and the porch itself will be the main feature here. 3. Will do this on construction documents. 4 5 6 7 8 Thank you, 1 do pride myself on doing a very period/traditional home. Yes. The mass is greatly reduced and the proportions work well, as we are not just capping it with a 4/12 pitch, to stay within the height requirements. See attached gate columns. Correct. I would like to stay with the smaller windows, as these are features of older period homes you see in the area. FORM + ONE • Design & Planning • 3841 24"' Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • a�s) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com 9. This is more of a mud room, and will be one of the more finished rooms in the house, it will be completely clad in "custom made" local cabinets from a"local" craftsman. 10. Does not work well, and sometimes less is more, the Gables on the side really are an architectural feature. 11. It really is a budget concern, and it will not be seen as the (e) home next to it is fairly close. 12. This comment will be worked into the interior drawings, once the planning package has been approved. Sincerely, Tim Raduenz — c�BP � Build It GREEN� MEMBER FORM + ONE • Design & Planning • 3841 24�'' Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 � a�s) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes July 9, 2012 5. 145 CRESCENT AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TIM RADUENZ, FORM + ONE, APPLICANT AND DESIGfVER; LAURENCE P. AND LINDA DUGONI/GREGORY & GINA GAMBRIOLI, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated July 9, 2012, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: None. � 3 S to 7 8 � ID m Chair Gaul opened the public comment period. Tim Raduenz, 3841 24th Street, San Francisco; represented the applicant. Commission comments: Typically don't get into the interior design, but suggested switching the laundry and the den to allow the den to have access to the front porch area. (Raduenz —would look odd to have a bump-out at this location on the side of the house; would affect the symmetry. Also trying to keep the laundry room as close to the staircase as possible. Access from the den to the family room is desirable.) Unclear about the height of the railing on the porch and the windows are missing the muntins in the laundry area. (Raduenz — the railing is lower because it is not required to be higher.) Also consider moving the spindles in the rail closer together as was typical in Craftsman design. The design fits well with the neighborhood. Tucking the second floor under the eave effectively reduces the mass. Missing an elevation on the plans that would show how the gate tucks up against the house. Dn the double-hung windows, was the same divided-lite detail to be provided? (Raduenz — yes.) Did the designer consider other options for the finro small windows on either side of the gable? (Raduenz — could make them larger, but once the trim is in place, it may look out of place. The window actually is into a bathroom.) Concemed about the laundry room at the front; will be more visible. With respect to the attic spaces at each comer, continuing the roof line downward gives the appearance of more mass — could be-reduced and provide more window area and character. Doesn't like just having a bump-out for the fire arrestor for the fire place —would like some form of a chimney to be present. (Raduenz — is a budget concem.) Could consider building a dresser or other furnishing into the attic areas that have less than five-feet of clearance. . ■ . . . (2 ■ Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: None. C� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes July 9, 2012 Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Gaul called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2-0 (Commissioners Yie and Vistica). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m. 7 �� ,T. : �1�,1 `� � '`� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PR�MRose Ro� • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 - f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of app(ication: � Design Review ❑ Variance � Parcel #: �Z�� Z�-�— ��d ❑ Conditional l;se Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 Please indicaie the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: f iM f—��y Address: �� ' " � � City/State/Zip: �`Civ v1�7� � L�f � Phone: �t �J" � � �� 03�'�" � Fax: Il��G - ��"� , 7i1��i�' E-mail: I,nn�� I�V��cs��l� . t`�()� PROPEfZTI( OVI(NER project contact person ❑ OK to send electr nic copies of documents�, Name: b � �liu �6�� Address: �i`'115 7��1�'� I��.(�� City/State/Zip: �'! �JD� � C( `�� Phone: (�� • �3� - ��7� _ Fax: �' E-mail: �-t7��'�sl l� � �-l4�A�1'-bl'�'( /DESIGNER project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documenis Name: �IM ��U� t� z — ��-M � � I� � Address: �7�� 7�� - � � City/StatelZip: Phone: �� T 1 b� Fax: E-mail: �k Burlingame Business Li� PROJECT DESCRIPTION � `�� 5 ,�� 3..a y' �� 7� - r , ��2�-L-� AFFADAVlT/SIGNATURE: I hereby best of my knowledge and belie � Applicant's signature: of perjury that the information given herein is true nd correct to the �ate: � 1 � � � I am aware of the proposed application and h�reby authorize the above applicant to submit this ap Commission. Property owner's signature: �-�,.9 -�l�l��*�� Date: S 3 Date submitted: s to the Planning � � Verification that the project architecfldesigner has a valid Burlingame business license wi�l be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above wiih an X to indicate the contaci person for this project. s:�Halloours�PcaPp��cation zoos.hondo�cdoc Project Comments Date: May 31, 2012 To: � Engineering Division � Fire Division (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 X Building Division � Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 � Parks Division � City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 'f45 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to htt�://www.energy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 11)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 12)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 13)On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 14)Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) 15)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify fhe /ocation and the net c%ar opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. Note: The area labeled "Den" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16)Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 17)Provide guardrails at all landir�gs. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 19)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 20)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet t�igher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 20 2113.9 Reviewed by: =� f Date: 6-8-2012 Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 d Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 ❑ Building Division (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff ❑ Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney (650� 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review a.nd Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant needs to contact City Arborist regarding the potential relocation of sidewalk area around trees in the planter strip. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/14/2012 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REV�W CONIlVI�NTS ,�I -iw�t- S�( Project Name: �� -��( F�'t�cu*.n� - Project Address: �� = ' The following requirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed laud surveyor. The survey sha11 show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) ��w�,�{�� i.�f'� �-v � ��'i�� t � L1E >� (,�n 5�..�'y�fL-, 2 ,�. The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is i.n a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer laterall�t is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and IDevelopment Commission, 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required. for the project The sewer analysis shall identify the project's i.mpact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The tra�c study should identify the project genera.ted impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved. by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all e�sting properiy lines, easements, monuments, and new properiy and lot li.nes proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMl��NTS.doc - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest � preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land sha11 be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall subm.it a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requ.irements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 `� The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public i.mprovements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By #he preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian. traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure accepta.ble to the City. 17 The project sha11 submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engin.eer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse i.mpact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologi.c calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and e�sting improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the dxa.inage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris sha11 be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project sha11 comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PL?,NNING REVIEW COMIVLENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DE�ARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach sha11 be at least 12" above the flow lin.e of the fronta.ge curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage recepta.cle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A draim connecting the garbage azea. to the Sanitary Sewer System is required.. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEVJ COA�Ilv1ENTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � --- Date: ,S �---f .1_— Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 55&7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (S50) 558-72(}4 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, finrastory single fami(y dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. Replacement trees for trees removed in City planter strip shall be minimum of 15 gal chosen for the tist attached. 2. Irrigation plan ok. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 6/4/12 =�`,�� • CITY OF BURLINGAME - PARKS DIVISION, 558-7330 `r�-� 850 BURLINGAME AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-2858 BURLI I+lGANtE' OFFICIA,L STREET TREE LIST - AUG 2010 ,. ;�- rr�ecinusa TREES TO BE USED IN PLANTING STRIPS 4' WIDE AND UNDER 6' WIDE PICTURES OF TREES CAN BE VIEWED A T www burlingam� or� UNDER THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Site Height at Min Botanical Name Common Name Locations Maturi S acin Descri tion O Acer rubrum Red Maple 1450 Capuchino 40-50' 35' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; lobed, green leaves; brilliant fall color Aesculus carnea Red Horsechesmut 2212 Adeline 40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Fast early growth; round headed; dark green leaves; hnnes of crixnson flowers in s rin . O Ce16s australis European Hackberry 1108 Cambridge 40-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Fast growtli; gray-green, elm-like leaves; uprigltt, round headed form. O Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 2711 Easton 30-40' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth, glossy, dark greev , ehn-like leaves; u ri t round form. Sitse table to wool a hids Fraxinum oxycarpa Raywood Ash 2600 Easton 40-50' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; compact, round headed; darlc green � leaves turn claret red in fall. O Gingko biloba Maidenhair tree 405, 409 Block Bayswater Ave, 30-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Slow growth; fan shaped leaves turn yellow ni fall; 1240 Cabrillo s readin , almost umbrella form. •� Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia `Samuel 2109 Ray Drive 30' 30' EVERGREEN: Fast growth; upright branches; dark green foliage Sommer' has a rusty bronze coloring on leaf underside. White flowers ni early s rni azid a ain late in sunmier. O Pistacia chinensis Clunese Pistache 2705 Easton, 121 Costa Rica Ave 30-40' 40' DECIDUOU5: Moderate growth; dark green leaves, brilliant fa11 color. O Platanus acerifolia London Plane 603 Plymouth 40-60' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; large, lobed, maple like leaves; sheds 'Columbia' S camore old bark; new bark smooth cream colored. O Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 2022 Ray Drive, 1422 Capuchino �0-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; high, open branches; large, bri it een leaves turn scarlet in cold fall. O Quercus rubra Red Oak 326 Clarendon Road, 2509 Hillside 40-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; spreading branches with round crown. Drive Robinia ambigua Idaho Locust 1446 Capuchino 30-40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; spring clusters of bright ma enta flowers• lon leaves divided into oval leaves. Sapium sebifenun Chinese Tallow 2009 Devereaux Drive 35' 40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast gowth; dense, round crowii; outstandin fall color O Tristania conferta Brisbane Box 860 Walnut 30-60' 45' EVERGREEN: Moderate to fast growth; reddish-brown bark; green oval leathe leaves• resembles some Eucal tus. � O Ulxuus Accolade Elm 1080 Howard 60-80' S5' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; graceful vase shape limbs; glossy dark green foliage, yellow in fall. 5ubject to availability. Q City recommended trees to increase the Urban Forest Canopy �UTDOOR 1ftlATER USE EFFECtENCY CHECKLIST t certify that the subject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. �;� 5 Z 2 Sie e Date Q�Singte Family 0 Multi-Famify 0 Commercia! 0 institutiana! 0 trrigation only D Industriaf O Other. Rpptitant 3Vame (printj: Corttac# Phone #: Project 5ite Address: �!f � �� ,�� Project Area jsq.ft. or acre): ��'Jr� hl3t �# of Units: �� 1, ;�E � - ��- ' �� %ta I landscape Area (sq.ft.j: _� �. � ��5�.� K��' � aC F' � � _ K ` �4 &jf: �UI 1 IITI�L� !1 Ea {S{�.I L.}. � �o(/� • �� : `-�. � _ ` `. �` : ~ "� Non-TurF trrigated Area {sq-ft•): �q � � • � f g r �� ; _ � peciai Landscape Ar�a (SEAj (s9.ftj: -- -- g �. -aF -.. � '_ � _ - � _.....__ � Water Eeature Surface Area �sq.fi.j: � (Yon TurF Malch trrigateon System Effiaency Ir�a#ian System aesign Time # of Meters: C �� ss than 25% of the iandscaps area is �Yes Z�f, `�✓' �p rf 0 No, See Water Budget I turf areas are > 8 feet wide Yes i turF is pfanted on slopes < 25% Yes least 8d% of non turf area is native � Yes low water use plar�s ❑ No, See Water Budget �r� are grouped by Hydrozones Yes least 2-inches of mulch on expas�ct �iYes ii surFaces % Efo �i00% Efo fior StAs) Yes i overspray or runaff Yes stem effidency > 7(3% Yes �tomatic, seff-adjusting irrigatian ❑ Plo, not required forTer 1 ntroi{ers � Yes �isture sensorjrain sensor shutofFs Yes i sprayheads in <S-f�wide area. Y�s stem only operates between 8 PM Yes d 10 At�f Me#eritfig 5eparate irrigation meter o, not required berause <S,OOt3 sq.ft. O Yes Swrimming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommendeci CI Yes � � ❑ No, not required Water Features Recirculating Q Yes less.than 20%of landscape area ❑ Yes Dowrrtentatian Checklis± C�f Yes Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan ❑ Prepared by applicant Prepared 6y professionai Water Sudget (optionat) �� ❑ Prepared by applicant Q Preparea by professiona! Aedit Post-insta!lation aadit completed ❑ Completed by applicant ❑ Campleted by profess'�L� � � �;,i1�Y � `�! LL;) C!?i'vF �URLENG;�PJ�E C��-ri�.N�•.;vG �IV. ��l � � %� ` � � � �?`� Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 � Eng.ineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Starmwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition). When submitting plans for a bUilding permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_construction. php (Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Follow all BMP's for Architectural Copper (see attached sheet). ��Reviewed bv: SD �� Date: 6/4/2012 � 5hN Hh1E0 COUNTY?YfDE i�tater Pallutian P�-e�renti�n Program Glesn W�tec Healthu Cammunity. Requirements for Architecturai Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Ba_y. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited dischacges to storm drains. � During lnstallation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. Consider coating the copper materials with coating that prevents further corrosion and also maintain the desired color for a longer less maintenance. During Maintenance an impervious runoff. This wili time, requiring Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobav:orq (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Building with copperflashing, gutter and drainpipe. Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent p�ohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properiy. � ',r�}.t�.Wwwu.- +� - ..C..'.; t� „—=� �,,,��,�J�' �� , ' ,� �, �{ �` �S I �� .j � �5 �►! ��, j�� ` � i♦ � y";. ; a`'.•z� t A �� ,�X ��,� . � _ J C�- � ., • �� f , � � � '�!,;�-: �' r ,s . Rt � � p a ;, v � � Y y*' , ._� ,s �t�' • ��y {� '��:l,e �.� �,� , ;, �. � � e}�`� ��j j #' • g ;� ° t �ir'�r, 5 ) ! � � ..� m��s �rl � � �ri' d �' it rMYM-.�i �`" `i"� . � � ;��i_< .,t!`1: l i':W . F....t'��t �d� t�o31 � �5 t'# ri� �� 9iF�F,z ��• ��±'_ � i I�"``:--• � - _ 1_ _ ,� �-�� ,�. � � v„3�. +�`-vY��..y�` 4�. '��., `.+s+J.id'r,�n� .;,i � � r« r� ', '�� i�& '' ;t'�- � .; o= � � s� � -� � 1 �,� ��i �� .� ` 4 ;� � V ��{ -_ � i'�',�.'v . h: r �. " A� r '�-�`�.1 '`�Ylr � S�i. ` �� E ,. �' F� � j� � � , , ._ '�� .. t. r4 . i ;, � j ,. � - � { " � ', � y a:;� � M� , � .p"o 1 h 1 r . � � w""«s.^• y � �.:} � * � � �f n � S • �i C � , E ✓. v�� I ` � t," �.t ,.� � � � � .. j 4" ♦ :t,� "..��"'�';', �'�+� r � u-�l -. , r " 1 p ' F � � e �[(j �, t��+t:� � .. ��', 1 � .' �� i� � M�Y� f�_'M 4� F 6 � V �` �+` ; R4 ''`� . z . � � � +' }.�� `'�� ,r•' s. R �� "�,..:�1L ,''�;�.Ji'%.,. i_ � i�°�€. � �� ' � ., � � t� � TM �� j, 1 � v i 9` � •! k r. .;:i � � t� 4.'�� t4�.} �. (E .� i,r, �� -�C�'+t+ _ � :: � p � { ` . � �� : � �,6'�i'.� ^ �` . l' I � � k� � �� : �_��_ � ; i � .� p ,' s � , 1 � �v�a�` � - � $t ._ +� r �.`�, t t� ,� Si t w� � � �� ' �� ' ` � � �, d� •i �' ; i � S tl T1 # r .��i �� rr s � �. � +� � �;, s i� . 4��'�� a ,� / A I'�i` , Y �' ' e n, �r5 i � � �M1� 'ry � �, �� j,�w ,� y�.z�, ;S! �� ,,� � � �� . � �,��,; , �� + :f ;� -� e�iT r r.y A i F � O 1L �4.#• K4 h � �+i t � � �[ r �� ' „y� ^�t,� _ ��' � f • �• ` 1{.�� ' .�. ' _ �„ � F . � �e,. > � �--�, � j?' � ^ , t�` �,._ y� ;�,� it,� �1 ' ,�� A_ {� � . i _�a:� � �p,J� t � x�5is� s � �rN`�F�q �`' '� ,�. Y ��« � � � 'J ,� y+ ��_ � '�. s �� s _'� � • '� � �� `"4�Eu AY � x'�' Jt�A'Y�ta "�r � �. � �` .Y � � �. RY 3� ' � �' :: � fi. � J�e. c ,�+`�k { a ', � Fy 7; f .yw i � �� 4� k�� a � �� ` . '� y t : r � +� ,� I ' � '` °'= "t f3 S�.�I�_ .tY �Y A k'-ti �� t ,� ��sr � .� � '� �YSt � s „'� � r�� t � � Y� ��R �� #,}, �� ` � s: � ; .� S e� 3.` � � . trA �; �,r ?'��` �"'�, s� ; � a -��i-� - �� *� e ,ry i<<3� ` �� - 5 � rZ:, '� i ! �' � a }�„��}.�.a..'. � � : 4 Sa►� � „„ � 4 m ^'� �. .`� �F��A . 'i�" e..� ^ R..r:i:� . m, i q ' � �J �• a � �� .�r ,� 1 yry� rd « +'V. t �.' � 1 �� r.: i � S �� t+ :} '� � + � f�i � ; �� ;� �r , �' ri D � , E� � 1+l r �� , '� h f�� 4� � )y �3T �Ala� t'�' t � �`i� � �% ��, .��' - � ,,.. �; <�,v++.,.. w�. . . a �"��€-'�°� � ��.� �o T' � j" ��'�� •;y•� � A,.� Y� .. Yri� � ,.. � ��+�,,, � � �., i, �� 1' '� ,+�yk��? �'. ,�� ,:' . a. 'c+'r� ' ' � p� '. J ' � ?�'� ��k�.-� �� r i � ��'.... �i .,� ' � .' �C` �.��`fi� e - _ . .. .. ..�...b+i' �i£ �A�.�.^+e�rt-.�i '',r� f., �. ` , ; • _ II � � " ° i � : . � .� . r ti ;. N� � I' � , f� �� I �� / ��lf� 1 ., ,� � { �„q+ q i � n^ y� ti-k wA ":: k�t� I:� r t+7 6l`i i� i 1 I �� If. C r h- q�6� 1 N 1.: � : w � � ,J 1� ' lr, �!� 4 �� n f t �.':� ,� � . � I � s rr° ^s; � `.., �� y �� t r. +e * �y +?� ,.,� , �� ;�:� � ��. � . � r � t, _ i . �� y� � '��. I .�� . i�' k,. v� rY`` ��, �� .'s� 11�5 � � �j 5 °< j< . .� , x: 6 !Y' � •�.�. �'� Af .� �t,. � a�I ,c'�,-„T� .�, ��l��. � � � � `� a �I ,�� '°F'�i:, f �,� d �y'� a .e.? b��^-�� s � �r� v ra • .., +.. r� ��y ,�' :'� # � �� ;1 ��t4 � K �� '�{,�} a a ; '�; � '.,. � �3ffi�f( �`"e� ;F� �j .. � � � c � . } i 1 �� d ��t' xf , � .: � � ! p�� s+i �1 z i . 4 z'� ' �� ;i��) �� - 'y �� t,M�; 4 °�e. . §�� I E��y� '�iEu. . t�. ' - � .�f �� 3 1 $ ry� �'r � � , I 6 73f { I : � r �j �" . r � i � . �� .. � yyyppp�S�F� ��"!�' E�'n��;a �s �[? �� t t y �rM1 d'� � 7"r � �. �. � , i � rF Q '�f ��. CL�Y J � ��.. J� S p� �� €': � '� ` �� a '�� a .��' � ! � , ,�� Er# � .- . � �" r �� J- 1 �t, � .�e �: ' �'i � df! '. , t y�_ �A �. ..,;1 . 4... t ' � � &. � i`. �fr ..L I °1�D '� �' � � � '�� w�r ' g��'� � f � ` �'� � e, , 7'}Y w 9 t M p �4 A,, S =G: , R #. � `� � �ti id ` t � � ;:g �' ��.a g; ti� t� %� 1 j 1. VJ � 1 f � � �� <'t � : � � ,L r�rn ' `; ,, ��;' 4 s S�.'. r' A 4q:�C' I . (Y �, �J9 ._' {�' � �� - � �+� � ��; .i� �' 1 �:,.�� t9 ` � pf�. J �1 '4 �{=tiT'�� ,�. �: S ..� ��:�'t �� ::, : � � � ��,, P "V_ 1ra;._• �. �- �,. .�� 1 �'��:��,�ti V � � �:�, � ,� � , I '� �"" F: . �, ,"_ . QpI � +' � +t�� '�.i`t� . I�(¢ .��• 1 ♦�.,1 T�f�~� 7 � ~ � (r � � � %'1+ t � �� k'� � � .. ti.%i �� t\..+ \�' �'� � �ft�qc Y� �i'P � ��f ,r "� '•� ~ ��„�- t,. q �� j .� ti ��. iwSyu'1'�, ' _7 x t �. � kgJ . �0 � . iY � t� F�., r�y� - � ��zGi �' ''''�, > ,i� 4 h. :�� jr i jz .v�d�L c �w `�� j� �-I. j �a� Far '+i� .'� � ...y* � �' '�3 f � G.�.'�f� -' � � ,/ . a. ..�.�d� I ��g�s, ' ({;� � '.�L ♦ St • S4�j�' � a t'.� i , '�� .w � y # � � .+Y : � i x ;. `' ;� `�''� � �; t If } �� S � }iH �S �c Y i �q —� Y .. a«...� i��'�. � N � �"�. �Y�� r 3. j y`�7��w»o � ,x � � �, .��/� y '. f _ "v . ��. .. �,. . , �, 'S � ;� ` �.��, �e� � ,'M � � � ��fi .. �' �;.vR ifi^`—_�` � �t �' .�. q r �a S :' �.�►A... �' � � � a �� Y. j ' S�f � 1� '.,,�.r.".., ,`, t�y3 .�t.di�# j'�; �� 5 � 9 i 1�Sv ��..F7 ^ F y, �y ..... �._,.,,a ,y X t o 1 + t� ,si t ' N{'C'P # '� � y (i r i S Q ��gg 8 c i,. ( ka}��49rt��,��.� 7 � �p Cix`I:r #'.L "-�� i�', �c m f �{' t �� ' � .t� �� li�� . 4s i k � 1� s t. �� [. v��.�� € � �. F'n d .� � . ��t�`s � > � -. � ,._ f h , � S � ' I F ' �1�1 � � r , i �`� � •/■ � i '. , � x t7�; , ..� � �� °��", > . .� � � �-�` �� 4 4��a� � :., f �P � Fr '� .y �' t5� ,q• ry �; , g,� r � � ��'E� a i - '�` � ' � t i M ...1 ` � , . f. � i�i �� ■ / / a.� � � � �i �,$ � �w�t. � �s ` �! � 3f � t � �� p, e 3 ,C ��}i}1� ��'. i � �� Y 1 S k� A I`; 4y : ";YF��" •y:^�� Ssa � : i ;- �+Sa'��fg� 9 i't ti i�`�`� r�' , y � t�^ °v��`i" •r 5 r 'a�: vP. ` � H a� i� �`��' `�"! y N y,,� tg � } f . y. t .�y � Y � i D �' �= k( ��i9� : � t (1 7 � � � i�' � %�� Q , �� . �`� �tiy.'}i FJS�a4e� G .�,: � a �. � '�.g'�`��.. "� � i� �., ; �' ,r, '�"'�' '� � '��, �`,� � . .; _,�� C � � __ � � , '''.� _;T�f�,�.�.;'�'a RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and application has been made for Desican Review for a new two-story sinqle familv dwellinq and detached aaraae at 145 Crescent Avenue. Zoned R-1, Laurence P. & Linda Duqoni and Greqory and Gina Gambrioli, propertv owners, APN: 028-293-030; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on August 27, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and negative declaration, per Negative Declaration No. ND-562 P is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27�' dav of Auqust, 2012 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Effective September 6, 2012 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 20, 2012, sheet G1.0 and date stamped July 3, 2012, sheets T1.0, GN, GP, SP, AB, Boundary and Topographic Survey, A2.0 through A4.0, L1-0 and L2-0; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 8, 2012 memo, the Engineering Division's June 14, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 5, 2012 memo, the Park Division's June 4, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 4, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new consfiruction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue Effective September 6, 2012 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � '�, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 .. . _ � PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 ;.�.. : _ ;''' . i:. L,t....:.,� www.burlingame.org ; _ Site: 145 CRESCENT AVENUE f The City of Borlingame Pfanning Commission announces the following public henring on MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Negative Declaration and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and deta�hed garage at 145 CRESCENT AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 028-293-030 Mailed: August 17, 2012 (Please refer fo other side) Citv of Burlinaame .-..----�-=�'' y� �_ ''J .Y...�,� li _ _ , . ._'�; �.^ E PUBLIC HE�4RING NOTICE A copy ofi the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you rnay be limited to raising only those issues you or someone etse raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing, Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7.250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) y� „r^,:' ' � .,�a �N ',. '��": � z1Y=� ,/ a',� �` "'� �, ":-`.: . Bz r ^ �Et �J �:�. .'#�nk,� �[/ � i'" � �' .i� ' � .r �* �:. �. e.e�� '� ,...,,"-,a"Sbi. y 1 '! `� � '- _ I� \ ��• �.,. fnlr� t'� 'k'`1 r a� `*� L .r 3 S� .,,�; I . �" 9 � :� ,> , _ ,1 ; � r ,� � .. . � .. . . _, kv. ,a . � � � � �� , .` , s � . • Ls x- 2 i^ ; _ � . � ¢ ;�� /� � �'�� sr , � s � '._ �� . ` ?ia'A^2 . . , � � � �� I f *� �: . # � sF a� .: � �- ✓ ' r $ +�� '�"��`� � s. � e ' �,,�'�j � r�'�� " ,�'"� � �-,' - '� .;� .,. �;'�'� _ � N� � � (� �.� � � � � p 4 z 31 �� ' F � �l, : � Y 9 '�V � y +�� S � �� F #" � . . . ;.27'�. �y y�` �� p �' •!, g'� . . _ � - .. e � s�•: � �.� "-J'i . 4. �� Y: Y ��.. /\ .�:�" b �� , f ' ;r;�.� �t � g.. �<'t �} ey�.' . r, + # ` S �„ . ., Ks�: ..3 � >. � c.� �� ro ` 'p'.: '` . F�.�"'„ ?.'.,; �V .� �� % � �e�e , J��'� �• � �y� w �r � � � , �� ie�' '�. � Ci., i ` �� x�; � "�, y�� . R# � - .,. ��. � -y- � � � �� . �,�. . , : �. `� r _�,� ` cb � � ,� �'� ,„�?,F � � �'� � �,-, �, �. , � � °�` .i �, ;' �'Q .�" . °' � , � .�n ��' � � � `� � � � , :� Jr? �:.� - �, : . � _ , `� r� ,� � � �' � ,� { � � �� , i �'7� a ro, a ; r � �;�} �,�. r �"'- � `� �'�. . �. r � x �a s^�r�X r,. _ ,� �� .� � � � �s,� �� "�� . , r °r� w -a � � cs. , ��. : ... y. �r. - � �; � : `.� �,�,��`,,.:�' � a� . '� J �� » '� Y �� . ' �s -� t� � 4� ��J � y.� � � �� Z� ` `�� `� � � ` � �' ` �"" ��.r ` � ��' � : - , �► `� � x�' :�°� =��4''� 76, �'` "� � � !S �� '�* , � ' � k .� � "''�'�� I�� 7 ��, ��''4 ''�� $�' � ;��,>> �� `� �� " � � � � , � 'd� a`�� %' � � ��' � ` � � `� �«, � � �u�' _; �, , r�?��°?�"'r �r� �- ; ' .. r � �n �� ';� . �. : � e.� ,..wr � � r�? .3� ,� ��. a. ' ' � �� i , <r ` � `� s . _ � .,� y, � lY 1 .� , � "�4E' x:: a . , _ � .� � 4 � n � _ _ , _ , � - �. � '. � . - .e r � `� �� ,-�' � � .^ �1 � ' �:,. s�`,�'s ..� <... a� '-.- ♦ , � ,`, � ♦ ,,,p a �L' . r ��s�fi €� �� f � x ��....' � y � a �,,, � � � r ., , / , M Y . . . _ e , ' ; r .. , �,-., -' � >_ - �tl k,d : � ( `� � a' � � a 1 6 ,:f . : x�� -. � , ♦ �Vx .f� :lt� F. '' � Z� ��,i � t''. :� � : . ,i��,� �� , �� `'�' � � ��'� � � �� . , , . , .", :_� , z., : ! � � �;, � x '� �� N.-^ � � w.;:, � �, �' •,�� a ,��' �p „� �,. �`V ,� i�� ; t : y - ��` ; � ; � ' �, �� '�� , , � � �� g � _ v , ,. , . � .�, pp p ' , A '1� - �8 3 �2 1, ` . - y+ �'� � , r 3v; . , . � (''� 5(,V _ _ �Y q � � �rt#-6 � � �2 •, ) ,� . ` � � L �y �" $ � t 33�� ' +-�` . 's�'` �� r �, ��' �.�a" ��r!� �t � ��' , .�� ..;� u � ��. ,:'�.. � � i�` r r �.. i .as z�,pn '. . �� ! . � s :- r.�� k ,< s �� . . . �' f �.. � ��\ . V�� • �� +�i4is4�.� �� :' � ;k�' .. � � YU �.� +i V i`� .. �' 9 , c . . .. � .. ;�.-.rt` � 3&f. �� C�� :/;�,� � „_ t �'� � �_m . , � �g s` �� T � - ,tt� a 8� �� + -. . . \� � �%�. � � � :`i' _ '` � �s;�a . qE�'.+�� - "�=�� 1 _� � . , �i ,;,�,,`U �u' � y ' � � . . P+f t'� . Q 9 � � � .3' $.' '4f � `�' .fr' �'?1� � � �'��$�j'.� ,; : f .� "��'^> � � ^'*�t .. $i •p+L: k £ :.. p � '�� i� 8,; r. E<�r s s� a �?� �,�r �� . . �� l(`( s.`i ..� 3 �., / "id . � � ..: ' �, �� , . fy,t" y �Cn _( J'G i � �w,v,,, �� 3v , � � � 7�+ � � rv4 X � � •fi� � � � � tt" � � � �. � Y � � � � � � �;; �� 3� ��. � `'' t _. � � �� , , s � � s� � .,,.:. . it ` ,:.. LA{4 -J � x x... 3 r�i' .. � .p �„ < .: �+ � �. .�' f .�' e . ' � " �V .y t � w�'� 'a'' �'a y� �- a" �.. ;�.� .€ _ � r �� °`' �.. ,�': _ ' � . = t a � ��.M�� °�"�� "R _ � f: � .:: �t ` 4i �,w � ; � . � . . . ... � 4 �y_ ✓ � �;, �Ig, � �+:: ir�,.:�p A/� x;i � :... , . x �. , s� � � . ,. .r . � � � ' . , ' .i - - iz �� , � 1 � �` k � � th � �'s ;i� � �„ � � y � s� �� 3' d` �' �`• r � � , �, � " ` � d �a : � � � � � ; � � ` , � - _� ��g � � 'i +' � � . . }, � . � ,, � � � � ,,� - . ry �a sY� y� , „ � `, � � � � � z � ,° � , �: , �� r � s �� , � , � ," � �„� � � � .� _� '� � °�� +`�� "�,�**�" , ",y'� - m�- p �i k 'y . � �� ..-�*.v � ."x� b rE..:;� � �� ,��; .r. ��+ � ��`� . . <�a, fr� y � f„�1 � � �y. � , � a� � ', � �� .�Y 2sr.�,� . � + • .., 1' ,x{ t,�'' � �v v<� , ' �� p;,�. A9� � � �p � �� . �t � s� fr'. ., � � � � � �� a. . ^ �y; � Y [ �� .. r � � �t{�'` � � # ve � . - �� . � � ( t ' y�.s, �� .'4�� V s � . 'V�"'%"� "' .4� � . y_. �Y t`r £�,. � �i:� � � .•*�.� � � � '+�r �'� �� . � "i � �O � �:, � � � �� .� � y� �� s. �: :na ',�s�'£ ye :''r : �„ ��:.;`� �v.=- d�: � .,;a,��.�a _�,�.:d', �v`��t P�� .s ' �, .s�s - � �'6�'. 1� • - 'S,µ- . .. .. . . . � . . ..:,..m ..w.., ". _ . � � _ � � -�%-;,. . �� J.S�� ,� �.: . "�,-, �;�. City of Burlingame Environmental Scoping and Design Review Address: 145 Crescent Avenue Request: Environmental Scoping and Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form + One Property Owners: Laurence P. & Linda Dugoni/Gregory & Gina Gambrioli General Plan: Low Density Residential Item No. Design Review Study Meeting Date: July 9, 2012 APN: 028-293-030 Lot Area: 7,450 SF Zoning: R-1 Background: Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame Citizen on September 25, 2009, it was indicated that the entire subdivision within which this property is located (Burlingame Park No. 2) may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Because the application was submitted to the Planning Division after September 25, 2009, a Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012. The results of the evaluation concluded that the building contains sufficient historic integrity to be considered a contributing resource to a potential historic district, but it is not eligible for individual listing on the California Register of HistoriEal Resources under several criterions. Planning Staff will prepare an Initial Sfudy and Negative Declaration to support the findings of the Historic Resource Evaluation priorto the Planning Commission Action Hearing forthis project. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-story house over a raised basement and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and a detached finro-car garage. The proposed hou�e and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,839 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The project is 45 SF below the maximum allowed FAR) and is within 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. Three off-street parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for the proposed five-bedroom house. The project includes a detached two-car garage which provides two code-compliant covered parking spaces. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Environmental Scoping for Negative Declaration, a determinafion that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; and ■ Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). 145 Crescent Avenue Lot Area: 7.450 SF Plans Date Stamned: Ju 2012 PROPOSED SETBACKS Fronf (1st flr): (2nd flr): Side (left): (right): 25'-10" 25'-10" 15'-3" (to bay window) 6'-0" ALLOWED/REQUIRED 25'-10" (block average) 25'-10" (block average) .__. _ 6 � _ o � � ._ __..--- 6'-0" Environmental Scoping and Design Review 145 Crescent Avenue 945 Crescent Avenue �ot p►rea: �,4�� 5r Pians Date Stam ed: Jul 3, 2012 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Rear (1st flr): 50'-6" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 50'-6" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2365 SF 2980 SF 31.7% 40% FAR: 3839 SF 3884 SF 0.52 FAR ; 0.52 FAR' _ .._.�.____._.�_�---.._.._._....__._._......__...�.�.._._._......._..---.. # of bedrooms: 5 --- Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered ; 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ; (9' x 20') Height: 30'-0" 30'-0" — _.....—�__ ___....,.___._......---��__.._._....�......,...__..__._...__..._.........._...._...._.__............__......._...._..�_._....__._..._._......__......__........_........... DH Envefope: exemption applied Z CS 25.26.075 ; ' (0.32 x 7,450 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF= 3,884 SF (0.52 FAR) z The gable end roof exemption applies along the right side of the house (CS 25.26.075 b,1). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, City Arborist, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Tim Raduenz, Form + One, applicant and designer Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Photographs of Neighborhood Notice of Public Hearing — mailed June 29, 2012 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., date stamped March 28, 2012 � _� BURIJNGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAFtTMENT • 501 PRinnROSE Ro� • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org � APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of apptication: � Design Review ❑ Variance � Parcel #: �2�' Zq3" �30 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: � Please indicate the contact person for this project APPL�CA(�T project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: 1 i T� �� - Address: .J �� f " �' ` City/State/Zip: �N � �N��i�k�/'� 1`�1� Phone: �� • ��a� � Fax: Cd�� . � q'b . �i7/�' E-mail: �nn(� ��[��c��l� . �� PROPER�I( OWi�ER project confact person ❑ OK to send electr nic copies of documents�, Name: � � �.l�L� �60� � Address: /�`'1�� 1�'t (� �_ �� City/State/Zip: ,�( �'! �7��D� � C� '`n( �� Phone: �50 . �3� - �'�� Fax: �' E-mail: ��f w'l�t`��5�1�� '(�� /DESIGNER project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents Name: � IM �-�U� 1� 7 — �� Address: �7� � 7�� Cify/State/Zip: � Phone: �% �� ba� Fax: u :�.I tJ�u � L._ � i� .. • - - - �k Burlingame Business L PROJECT DESCRIPTIO �,� ; _ � ��-' .� ./Ii .��/i�I . ��..�-.��.��— - AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby ce� under enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true nd correct to the best of my knowledge and belie f Applicant's signature; Date: � % � ` � I am aware of the proposed application and h reby authorize the above applicant to submit this ap lication to the Planning Commission. F�roperty owner's signature: ��-Cl�I��-I �V� Date: S 3 / Date submitted: � � Verification that the project architeci/designer has a valid Burlingame business license wifl be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�Halloours�Pcapplicorion 2oo8.hondout.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, inclucling all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2008standardsl for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be perFormed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to perForming the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 11)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 12)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 13)On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 14)Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) 15)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. Note: The area labeled "Den" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16)Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. _ 17)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 19)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 20)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 20 --§2113.9 Reviewed by: _� 1 Date: 6-8-2012 Project Comments Date: May 31, 2012 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-723Q � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. Replacement trees for trees removed in City planter strip shall be minimum of 15 gal chosen for the list attached. 2. Irrigation plan ok. Revie�red by: B Disco Date: 6/4/12 • CITY OF BURLINGAME - PARK5 DIVISION, 558-7330 BURLiN.GPcN1E' 8SO BURLINGAME AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA 94U10-2858 OFFICIAL STREET TREE LIST - AUG 2010 „ � TREE CITY USR "` TREES TO BE U5ED IN PLANTING STRIPS 4' WIDE AND UNDER 6' WIDE PICTURES OF TREES CAN BE VIEWED AT www burlin,�am� or� UNDER THE PARKS AND REC.REATION DEPARTMENT Site Height at Min Botanical Name Common Name Locations Maturi S acin Descri tion O Acer rubrum Red Maple 1450 Capucluno 40-50' 35' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; lobed, green leaves; brilliant fall color Aesculus carnea Red Horsechestnut 2212 Adeline 40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Fast early growth; round headed; dark green leaves; lumes of crirusou flowers in s rin . O Celtis australis European Hackberry 1108 Cambridge 40-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; gray-green, elxn-like leaves; upright, rouud headedform. O Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 2711 Easton 30-40' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth, glossy, dark greeu , elin-like leaves; u ri t round form. Suse table to wool a hids O Fraxinum oxycarpa Raywood Ash 2600 Easton 40-50' 25' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; compact, round headed; darlc greeu leaves riun claret red in fall. O Gingko biloba Maidenhair tree 405, 409 Block Bayswater Ave, 30-50' 40' DECIDUOUS: Slow growth; fan shaped leaves turn yellow in fall; 1240 Cabrillo s readin , almost umbrella form. � Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia `Samuel 2109 Ray Drive 30' 30' EVERGREEN: Fast gowth; upright branches; dark green foliage Sommer' has a rusty bronze coloring on leaf underside. White flowers ni early s rni and a' late in summer. O Pistacia clunensis Chinese Pistache 2705 Easton, 121 Costa Rica Ave 30-40' 40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate growth; dazk �een leaves, brilliant fall color. O Platanus acerifolia London Plane 603 Plymouth 40-60' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; lazge, lobed, maple like leaves; sheds 'Columbia' S camore old bark; new bark smooth cream colored. O Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 2022 Ray Drive, 1422 Capuchino 40-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; high, opeii branches; large, bri it een leaves turn scarlet in cold fall. O Quercus mbra Red Oak 326 Clarendon Road, 2509 Hillside 40-70' 45' DECIDUOUS: Fast growth; spreading branches with round crown. Drive Robinia ambigua Idaho Locust 1446 Capuchino 30-40' 30' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; spring clusters of bright ma enta flowers; lon leaves divided into oval leaves. Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow 2009 Devereaux Drive 35' 40' DECIDUOUS: Moderate to fast growth; dense, round crovv�i; outstandin fall color O Tristania conferta Brisbane Box 860 Walnut 30-60' 45' EVERGREEN: Moderate to fast growth; reddish-brown bark; green oval leathe leaves; resembles some Eucal tus. . U1mus Accolade Elm lO8Q Howazd 60-80' S5' DECIDUOUS: Fest growth; graceful vase shape limbs; glossy dark � green foliage, yellow in fall. Subject to availability. 0 City recommended trees to increase the Urban Forest Canopy 4UTD04R 1i1fAiER USE EF�ICtENCY CHECKLIST t certify that the subject praject meets tf�e spec�fied requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. �r�..�/�i�-�' S Z 2 5ie v�at� Date []�Singte Famity 0 Multi-Famiiy 0 Cammercial 0 institutiona! 0 irrigation only O Industrial0 �ther. Applicant Name (print): Corrtact Phone #: Project 5ite Address: ��/� ��`��-r ��i�� Project Area jsq.ft or acrej: ��s0 h(32 �# of Units: � C 1� � :-.� . �� V" . �-''e �� Total Landscape Area (sq.ft.j: F�., -� -� , - - ,� . ->.� 2��5�,� D � Q i F �" • q�� rt�"y� L '° �° � ' : �- ° ,��? `:' E :�V`.: � Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.}: ¢j f'J� . e[ • ��e6�;¢"�,'�E3s. k�� .� -� " . _ =�•�.x�.. 3 •; � Non-TurF Irrigated Area {sq.ft.�: 2� � �,ft • � _. � .. ' ! r � f � P � 'ci' '-_ �_ �"� ' - �="' �_ - � Special LandscapeAr�a (SlAj (sq.ftj: ._.. " • _� e.F ��e ' , � Qi _ _ _.„� _.�;,�;�,�, .� Water Feature SurFace Arsa (sq.fi.j: y-. Non-Tarf Metkh Irrigation Sysiem Effiaency Irrigaiian 5ystem Qesign trrigation Trne # of Meters: C �� Lessthan 25% ofthe landscap�ar�a is �Yes Z�(, 5�p turF D No, See Water Budget AI! turf areas are > 8 feet wid� Yes A!I turF is pianted on slopes < 2596 Yes Rt least 8(]9b of non-turf area is native �Yes or low water use planis ❑ No, 5ee Water Budget Plants are grouped by Nydrozones Yes At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed �Yes soil surfaces 70% ETo (100� Efo for SL4sj Yes h{o overspray or runofF Yes Sysiem efficiency > 7Q°� Yes Automatic, self-adjusi�ng irrigation C! No, not required forTier 1 cantro ({ers � yes Moisture sensar/rain sensor shutoffs Yes No sprayh�ads in < 8-ftwide area. Yes System only operates 6etw�en 8 PfV� Yes and 10 AA4 Metering 5eparate irrigation m�ter a, not required l�ecause � 5,000 sq.ft. O Yes Swirnmirtg Paols / Spas Caver f�ighly recommended ❑ Yes � � ❑ Na, not rEguired Water Featuses Recirculating ❑ Yes Less than 1096 of landscape area ❑ Yes Doce�mentatian Checklist C� Yes t.andscape and irrigation Design Pian ❑ Prepared by app4icant Prepared by professionai Water Budget (aptional) �� CI Prepared 6y applicant ❑ Prepared by professiona{ Auciit Post-insta!#ation auditcompleted O Completed byapplicani 0 Cornpieted by profess'�ar�l� ,�;. �� 1�1A1` � � 2� ;�� GI?sr' UF E��F�LING!�ME C�D-F��,�V�lIi�G DIV. �� S �� Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � �-- Date: � /�---l1---- Project Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 r� Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 ❑ Fire Division (650) 558-7600 ❑ Building Division (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff ❑ Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant needs to contact City Arborist regarding the potential relocation of sidewalk area around trees in the planter strip. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/14/2012 . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REV�W COMl1%IENTS i�� -nv�- �"�� Project Name: Sr+�.� ��u� �'�cu� - Project Address: _ �� ' The following requirements apply to the project 1 ,,� A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land sur�eyor. The survey sha11 show all properiy lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) �.u�',�,�Ci r..Gf�� 7v � ��'I�� ' �- �,— �s� �r� s�r�.�/��y"�,Z , 2 _� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant sha11 submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requ.irements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral i� is required for the project in accordance with the Ciiy's standards. _ ) 6. The project plans sha11 show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a pazcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show a11 existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COD�IIvIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 T'he project sha11 submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 '�S The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct fronta.ge public improvements including curb, . gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project sha11, at its own cost, design and constxuct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, paxking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The proj ect shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � 'The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the di.mensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the proj ect is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COT�IMENTS.doc . � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach sha11 be at least 12" above the flow line of the fronta.ge curb in the street to preve�t overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle sha11 be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COn�IlViENTS.doc P�oject Comments Date: To: From: May 31, 2012 0 Engineering Division (650J 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 Crescent Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-293-030 Staff Review: June 4, 2012 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition). When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at http://www.flowstobay.org/bs_construction.php (Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). For assistance please coritact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Follow all BMP's for Architectural Copper (see attached sheet). ��Reviewed bv: SD � Date: 6/4/2012 . �""+`..��' - sau MxTec cou:uTrwroE Water Pa!lution Preventian Pragram ClranW�tac NeaUhu Community. Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges, to _the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited discharges to storm drains. During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump fo the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runnff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer .time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine: credit: Don Edwards National �Idlife Sanctuary Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program tists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2092 Building with copper flashing, gutter and drainpipe. Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. , i; � .��-�-�'�' :�'!�,^}�� . p ` ''"� . �; ��• _�� f'`� , . �; " ` f , j 'r !��C r ' �. is r ��. . k � . �,L. ,j . . �_ �, , � - � � ��a �i l fXr O; >�'� ' ` ✓ �-•� i � ` �� ` ` i � � � ��. a i1 q •� �+�G�` . . h�i i w�� r�� s . � ', r aa � +4t�ld` ' k I ' M& �r �( i�Fj �%I � ` �, �... � r S !$ -� 4 a�� . s �� p �, � y��y �/,/�� !� /V'41„�)�� " �' � -� ` � W� :�i .�� M � �� . r�i'�� iYii� .t�ix��'�3 YFYi �� I �y�ffi 4 , i ,.� ..� e ,� ,�e : - j.. � V.�."',i.� "�1''.. , ., .. I ^. `• ' � ...,•i°'�.��+atl._�... �� . � .. � �, ' { -r"yy�^.�s+�'"�y -+r�aL". t �.}k �~ � ` t �? � I I �' r -YIH�; • � �. �� , `� �- h k � e�- 4� 1� r� �. � � � ..t i� - --c—c �. ' ��rF` 1 � ,.� , r hs..-��t ��/,_. �� i'�y• 4 � §�� 1, � � �� ': � £ �*� � � r .��$� ��.� e � � wYa � °! " � a, �.r. v n � x: i :`� � , , � Mr. ��-t•' � s je � �� ls 11 .� � �r � '' ,� x� � ...k '=�,M;� � i � �` � r ' ^ ' � ,-�;.� ,�`�1 . .'� r i� t F p � �) . L 1 E ' .. ..,•r � �� i ,':1� :•�.h� �, .� R.1e- i��,,..1� `,.:�::FI� � � � . � � ;� � � � ��, �� ,� w� , M;a, %` � !` � '` 's�:e 4� � r ,� ,' `,: � 1 i � J . ��f i+; e .'�`�- e .��C�a6'�' �� .(S� � .'°sk p� ,'� t� � s '""•k. .�.�«.'+. 4Y �� . �� ;°f '�} '' � � {c,. _ ,� � \ � �:� 't� 1 �.'r r .�.� � � � x � (�T,rlt +. ',> .� fi+� ,. � r:: .z i � ' � � �' � � } � � i S � ''� 1 � . �' i i ; I._ � � �A ��p � , ��2 r,�_ h E..... r� � , . .��i4` � ..� ; �.n,#e � s z'�, ; :P �. �;� � '� a: , �`a. � tyrm� P ' �� « t t �!7.��f � ` ,a,'�g � �� T �Q�t��{r0.1 � e r 6A A � ��. :4 � , s ��. r'� � ^ �}_! �. , _��`� � � � y ( ''"�'ry .��W��t� t9;� r i i h .„ yy � '� '� �, . � ' �1�,r. , �'� �. r ��f w �} r rp�` . .. �.r,.F� � , \ . � � �� l� p �� :" �''� i�•• � v SS �A�� `+� q�=M/� �. t `�rt t .pw. r �, .� �:�� , , � '�� .._ ._ , �� ; �' j .. r. � t� � � i-. i ` '�',�� :a � tia ' � *='a � � t �," �^ �� + �$ 3 �. � � � r� � ,,,�¢,e8 p` '� � , ,, a � �� fi �w °K. �,; F�4 iF 3t� �� ; � R ilf �i ys ,' � �� , y �. }f�� t1 z�� ''+ ,�, �'1 � 3f i.if ��—� " �i ';��i,a� ��. .; . R� � :" 4 r t�.'@��* ,.'� � , ��; ' '��, � }y�,,,y.,.d�i.a = �i�`'r � w : �:,�. �,}� r i i J` ✓ y n� . R E.: _.��`.�h�.`�Ii i��i�Rl � v � �d� C�` e . �'' #_ � -• �; t� �;., � .:. �� ,� � 4 �� , r�� . �� h �� ' - �a,i�.�.a � ,„ , * �-. �}� a � � n� ��y we.�m„ ..'.�� $'�t ; x �r ..4 ' f �'y#� M h V � 4 l ` �� ' i + �' z& � �y � .` �1 } �� tf �� ♦ �a A� , ��`��.. ��..' .. �, ±ajyP/�"�y�� ,�y,'�i,.� � ,3y:� �C►T'�.�� . G f�-* � � �' i��` � �;��'''' �� ; .;, J � . , " �` �,r" �� s' �R��•�f � T �� ^ "�I f� , . � , �,' _ e - : ,' . .. ,� t: . r, .. . � �+ ,� .- � � t '� ', . , : � q�� e,.t � . y , . b. ,k x n � ` .'�, ", � ��r` " f � � , 4 �xfi�i� V`•. -�_1��4 t��::. �3. a',� � �� y 4 .� F � � � �4 4. � . �'� r � , � � �� z ��':. :< ,; y • i�' `��^ , yq � � ��•�+ i . . �, �'. R j��` , : � ?�,' \ �. � � e � ft �,�v�' �i �° �� ,y Y �� . � � , _� �, � � s. � � ti� ,. .•, � �� °, � i�a , � �i�� i ,r i �3��}� � :' : ,.�� ( �� i '` � � f `��i�S,�;r ��'/ 'f�,:%'� � '� �,f � u r ��y , ' .__•: ti�.i>��,� ;''��``K; � . �, y\ f ��'�� M; R I ��' �� ;�S ^ k��iF, ' �. � j "t � � �.� .. . . � �: , � t � � '"� . � s � b��t�, + � {�. � ' � �` 1 t+ .�;�si r� `� . ,� ; � y �; � � ,� � r$ ;,� ,�' � � � '{� � -� �r��f,�+� �"� � �� „ � "� � {� �p'}r � Y - � � g��i� Y�.... � t�l � � � $ ,:. � � � �� f� 3 � `� �� , � ( � �� '�'� �� i � �� \� �- -.�, a kL ��fk�� 1 E� �ita,, y� A � t i'@� �Ih t"S�i�i � 1 � 1{ iµ � �m q!� f � � _ � �.��R tf � t 4 ; � �1 ' J � � .y�� . . i . ��i y ��. r i�:. �� r # 7.� n�r s � �'t5 t . aJ lk � fa`= r � �_ !��W'`fir�"�s �a� � r� � i.� f! � � y}��1 } � ':� 1%d,'��1�t q .y� ��i � +y�n\�i �1 � p � �� ' t< ' ��.��,) '�` :�'\` ~ ` f M. �."T , ,, � � � _ 4 f C S 1�, � ' ��', 'k { �d�^E° . �v L ?.. d ,� � s� �, � � �� V V�� ; Y �ii_ r �:�� , y� �,�• ia � �" � �,�\.��: �. f r. I'r�� `4'•-'�" . � � r € � ; � ', `�. �� :l . . . «iw,'�� '� ''r� �y'fK �r. ..: .. . � . ' ;..YM .' ��-�. '�l z , r� c� i' �`�' � � ��+r �� „.��. 'Lii � ,��}�.;�� 6 0 � ro : §�4, � 4 ��.Y tir i �. � � �. � � , � w � ar' � ., �� Y r � .p .. +^l �. 11L 6' �, ., � ,r�' s ., .Y .� . ( . � . • � , ,•� • �. � :. Ff �; ��'� �r� '. o , l � �; y.� r �., ,�t� �. � } 4' „�`+ � � -.. <:�� .i . i . _ , � � '.$. �! ?. � � ��ai ,{x, " r i ° � � � +e�'.. � �'rt � �� . �� N 4 .;i� y.yy`.�s � . . �'� � � �� . � � 1��t�?ti 1 a'. � ;�+"il�ii �. ,�[,1� � . ��'6 4�,, .�*ti 1-t+ � Y• ri�� ''i��' i'c y� i � �� F Cu� � `�II t ��L, .� *� ��. ; � � • 7 [��!��s ,�,� 54, `� , . �. «� �`� t �:�lfr� • , i ,� „ +V't � . a y * S .'�',/� �• Y, :��'�'�f ,.a.,. y � t >:,, ��; l �rl� ��' 3YI;f � ;ry` ' �J', 1 y'�r 1F 6;�� y��, ti. � ,�y � ; � i. � s� � �y 1 �. �. z.;d � H � �., �� ,; , �vi ji+�� t _ t _ ��/� � : � { � � _ e �. r: � � 5 �: h ^ W - � �� { § E.r J y�� d 7' f .�� = ir �, . _��-'�E� :.� ::[t� . .. _ tis1' �i� ��.��\� ��, u�4Y;z �. � � ,111� 5-k�� ""Y`�-� �i�� } � �6 ��,+�P �r� t� h , 1 � � r�� sr � ' �� r�� ,,� r�� f � , �� }, s 5� a S� t �.'� r t:. �t rk:n ` t� "9 i ! �.. .� . � � ��'�� t4�5 r ��,�� x �� z�� . r_ � � h� �,i �.a r � . r i� � 'i'.. 3 iF� � d . ._� t{��(� j/i'�� 4 � �� i�j ^!fJ)�{G�'�[� J � ja} � f�?�t � F��. ?�r��" '� �....._ .. i� �3 2 4 r I E(�EI �a 3r ic e � � ��gM1 : �� i �"'a��. ■�■ J I r 4 � S 1 �i i� `i' E#�� j 4 tf � t � � j �3' .- � E �i U " i � � ,L Idi S� t i � � � � � 1_---� �� , f; � � ' f9�� t�� 's� �;� � ��'�� ,� � t , r � � t f��1�,:� _ {-i�i � A " "� , � i�� ' � n F �� `^ +lyl �� ; y� t.a,,.v�...�.�-^-� �, i . . . �" ';.1�., j t ;'.. .. , �. y p� �.SJ'S4 i`1;�� rL� ��i . ! �.. . 1{'iA : y f '{ t4: , �;n:... h �l��l �` ��i �� j{' '_ � ` r '�``�` . �'' � �` . ^6 7 3 � ; , � 4'� � - �.: � -1 i . � � "� � .:j�i'; r . �.�*,�i a�� o r. 9. ti,� . : j�°� __ , � ,� , t � � ( , ys � _ .,. . _�„�� f . _.... - ' �.� .. ° F ..'+�Q . CITY OF BURLINGAME r " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��`s�� _ , BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ��; .- PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3Z9(l� www.burlingame.org ��:' �" Site: 145 CRESCENT AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning fommission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JULY 9, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall founcil fhnmhers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Environmental Scaping and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 145 CRESCENT AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-293-030 Mailed: June 29, 2012 (Please refer fo other sideJ City of Burlin_qame �-:r� ----_��___. _ ��°" � � L.� � r 4 �� :a� _ � ` _ ;�� `,�.: _-.....: _ - „�-; �' , �� . _ .�. �S FG��T�; 3� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you chaflenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice_. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer fo other side) � .. , - -. ,w ., ,. � . .. � ��y. .. . n � �, .. } ": b. � , � � �� t � �� ' .; s > n . :r y . y�„ ,�:: � _. '4 �;�"' . � ,?. �Y � '; ,: " , a, � * X �� ". �:t �� , };, � ;�:�,-,s ,�, � �.zs , , '�`q� '�1 Aqu a ��:'. s a y � �,i� � � r �'r � ,,.,� �� `�,� �� 5 c�� f� �4' � �Y� �i . � i' ". g � i" .'% _ . e � � >y � � � e. � . ::.' _ ' � • � y �� " . �, ' 4- � � �# ' �. } '�, _ 4�t' , . a, °` � 3� �� *� � � . � � - �xk � � me -�"' , 6e � - � �F- � a r .. � 6 � '�, �C,7Y �'fii�'�d�'�� .,ea .,�� f� �� '� �.,� � � � a ;: � Y. � �� ''� .. �'"�F T� rt e � s . " . ,, l r ' � �ti �; V � � kf �� . ... "''4i', � i � ,::2 � � !�` ' 1,.', .�, F, °, H" q t � r *r �� r � � ; 'g; � � . "� .�'� �, rr'�� r - � � � ,. i �� a, *�- �s ra�,'� r "� � ' \ �v z �'-' '��;� � „�, ' � ,.. �� '5,;� �� .�,�r � .c '- �.,, �� ,� �' a � � . � � ��.. ��.� � � � t (� �� .�, � `{, �e �» � �, �;� �y^' a G hy4 . `U��' "�, . F �' `t p ': . .��.. f p �:_ � '{� �:' . � Y, t �{� �� g� � T� 0 � .� k � � ! ; � ' ��. �, , a ' "° � � ' � „x. � ,� � �b % �� ,r ; .`,' -� � "� ,,� ,. �,. .�:e , . f t � .1''y•,., j7a . �.. '`. i,& r 4 ,�, � s _. � a i4 u w . ., � �,�e- ' `1 r � ��sr�� i , W �'= �'�% � � ��P=: ,� �,.� `� ; ;`> _, . ;�� . .: .,.:, ✓.�:. , ... .:: ti� � . ., ��i , . :. .- vm -�.,, e, .• ':� . � . � .Fa, , ' �� . �� "�` � �,; � '� �;. 1 ' ' .�M, ' ' � ` - ., � .� � .� . ; s. , t �'�.. a�s, � �� y a ;�A � r f�`�. �r ' � ./ / ''>. � � yv". : . � .'r . r �'�. �` . �' � +i �`,r�`a:�, . kv'� �;'. - -,z,� 4�r ,�,V � jr"�'_ � � � � /'�� -p'�=�' � ,� ��' �.�,;�.°� � ��,� s � � ; � � �;ar, � ti' ,,� '$�r� : ;�i ,� �,�J 'i ; ` '4 'r . `P �izs � � .`s -� y + J��L � .�,�, '. �;5d'�� , _ 2` ,'+� ' �r . :� � ��;� ,� �,��, �� :, � � _�� , „ �; . ` � .e ': 6' � `� �"` � � '�'t � ��'�� r� . f Q�' �. �i� r �p� �" �Q �s �.�,`' � r` r.�'� � _ . .., e ... � � , : �., , °: �,� c1 ��:•' �� +�s� `� �c,y� a e * � �� : :.,. - , d�,'�,. � t,� � � �:. . , .'� y t �� ? •_ b, ��' r JyY", � ' .. +r ;:�, 7.Ei � � � s � 3�.P ,� � ;n , r,�"s,4. �.� �� > •`i� , ,t t . .'_,� ., '` . :' � t: ,,, y��' , �� . �� , . �° �' � `.^' .:�i ' � �- # e `�'�,•. ' � � �:, x . 5 �. � // � � � ,.__,�'� �. ' . < _. _ �. ` : �. � '�- �3 � � "1 / s 'r � � �` �� ♦ s �! �4*• �fi, , � { _�� ry ' / � } '� ,� '"° r � � � � � 4 r � � 7 _ x = �- ' ,,,..-i� } � �, a � ,� � _ _ � � u . �s ��` _ . , q� ^�r " � . ,� _T I �' ' � � ., f =�' y�: . �i ' �� `' - �� - z � �� i rts � � ¢ ;.� -'r� . � ' ,. '� `� `� €p . _ „:, �, :� . '�' rii � �� . r� � .c, , ,�a ��',,� - . °�,,�; � � - , � i = i �'" r � � � ; ,: � ' - - �"�� :: � � ; �' r-y� a�. f ., :. �k= - ;.,�.�r§��. f�. ��,. . 7v� � �� ,. � � as � '�' � Y K�� !. � k � y,��'. �� ,�, � . � `"�'.+,r dw � ��'� �� , a'. ��zT �.�?�%� ,i • •� � � � � - <�'k ;'�� - �'F �t��. � - � � � � �� . � ,� ,��`� � � �,'�'�`t' �g�.�� ,� . �° , � ' . , . . �* � . �- � ° � � • � b jr� . . � � � `��r� �`� "� � ` � � � , . , ��i�"i.�,�. ' � "r ✓ _ .��:, Y� `�� M� .,�C� � � '�,��.y a'�„�ti-... xin r"t �c `h � '^r" .w i'` �` � ! 3 . � �v� ��. �` " �� , �'� _ � �>a Ti� � � � �_ � y� � �'y� �. , {�' � 3 ` �� 4 '� 4 ^�, #+ ,x# � 3�F:�] � ,�' r* "{� n . � �� . � �T z. a �.s � . , �� ',. '�'� �'�_,�� :. �� a�� ` �i ' " t ` ` •� � ;��1�,� �' . 3 6 ''�"^,.. :: � �,� �y (� � � ye: s. �, ,: � „� • ,n � =�� _ � � " � ' � ' rz.�.�"�`._ f .. ' � g�, F'ti. . ,, �' � ° , .�` '�'' .,, , t a �� 3� �, �F: . � . ,� �, g _. _ _,� ., _ ... �., i �. - x ��r:�s y - � '�ma r � � � ., , -. �. � � . ' . ' � _ , " . .. _ , _.; >> . x - . , y n - � .� A f� � i d .y�� .. ' ^. � ...-� ; �ss�- � � , � ' � �CI� F�3� �'?�: � a',.. �a� Z �� 11, 4 7 � I 4 ° � � 6� _ �� {f �,� �� ir� �',. ° �, �t: , �-� ' .:.- 4 "'�yl #� y" � 4 � �j� i. ,. � - � � s '�� 2t� � +��.; �. Q' f i � V p� y��s� � �" � ��t� � � ,�. , . . . �w . �; . -. � ,�j !�� I _ � '1 '�� , y � y �, ,a�iy . 1 4'. �A- t. il `t 5# .F'.,. .; ✓� .. 1 j�( t �� j �� .. . � � � f ,;. . �j s k ��` �f;�,�� +��' `d� � �� _ F. �#' 1 � µ �z� ��' ° - � �� .. � �� •,, � �'�., � �� .s° . ' �` � :�� -� , y� r, � � . �� - P �' q bt. „ , > '4�'�.., s-; �� R' C.y , ,fl < �. ,jy ,. °x, ^-... Y a ��.. �` . � , ,s.,,- � A` .. � ��' t � P �� ` ��` ��' i �� ,='� P�n-,�• ��. } �5.� J,"�. � � � � , � i� �` r �-� ,, ' . � a�r+..; ~� �: .` F 4 � � ..� „Z�Z3� � �Z $Y <�, � 'k �`,�� '�� • �`� � " � �" � � .� '�-sY �` a ", - : �s;� � �` �\ ��' � ,e' � �� ys s, ' � � � � ; � � b , .. � ., .. � . . � � , 3r.. "" . * � . rt' � � '� P a'�� :: � i . .__ 5 �� :, . . a,� � � �i 'fi. � � �� i. �€,'. ~ `�. .. e�k�'.� � ��1� �=� � � ��i ' • � - � �� ; ��- �� . ri v`� _ �_y�'t . : # � s � �� , .. f �i � �� : � , "�' �" � �.�3�. '�S � '� 3 � /� � � � j$ :�T� . � �*� �;e � � ��' .._ �'�'+. �' ��' � �"� ��`€:i, '�`� .�� k��s� re , �� . �`','y . .-q , , ._ .,_. . . . . ... . .�� LL . � 3 .,. . .. .� Q __ _�.. � . �._t. — . = . » . .. . � . � . . _w�' ...... _ � .; .. ,,;h', �Y' ._;�.,�:, 4 :: . � twE.�� i-i.�. $SfiG