The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1473 Cortez Avenue - Staff ReportItem # Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 1473 Cortez Avenue , , City of Burlingame Amendment to Design Review Address: 1473 Cortez Avenue Item No. Action Item Meeting Date: May 12, 2008 Request: Amendment to Design Review for changes to a previously approved new single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant: Tony Ward APN: 026-041-020 Property Owner: David Chan Lot Area: 6,000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. History: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission as a design review study item on January 22, 2007 and as an action item on March 26, 2007. At their March 26, 2007 review the Commission continued the item to the consent calendar after the applicant had addressed several additional items. On April 9, 2007, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review to allow for construction of a new, finro-story single family dwelling and detached garage (April 9, 2007, P.C. Minutes). A building permit was issued on July 30, 2007, and construction is nearing completion. On April 28, 2008, the Planning Commission reviewed proposed changes to the project as an FYI item. The Commission decided to place this item on a Regular Action calendar for further discussion (April 28, 2008 P.C. Minutes). Proposed Revisions: The applicant is requesting an Amendment to Design Review for changes to a previously approved new single family dwelling and detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1. The applicant is requesting approval for changes to all four building elevations (see Previously Approved and Proposed Building Elevations, sheets FYI.1 through FYI.4, date stamped April 20, 2008). The proposed changes are detailed in two letters from the applicant (dated April 20, 2008) and include: 1. Leaded Windows: Eight leaded windows were not installed throughout all four elevations. Instead, the approved leaded windows were replaced with clad windows that match what was approved throughout the rest of the house. 2. Window Headers: The approved 3x8 cedar headers over several windows were changed to 2x4 headers (per prior discussion with Planning staff). However, the headers were eliminated on many of the windows throughout the house. 3. Corbels and Rafter Tails: Enclosed eave and gutter returns were constructed where corbels and exposed rafter tails were approved. 4. Decorative Trim: The approved trim between the first and second stories on rear elevation was changed to a wooden belle trim along the rear and sides of the master bedroom overhang. 5. Planter Boxes: Planter boxes were approved on all four elevations, but the applicant is proposing to eliminate them on the right side and rear elevations. The applicant is requesting the following: ■ Amendment to Design Review for changes to a previously approved new single family dwelling and attached garage (CS 25.57.010). Amendment to Design Review 1473 Cortez Avenue Summary (includes proposed revisions): The applicant demolished an existing two-story house with attached garage and built a new two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The new house and detached garage have a total floor area of 3,416 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed floor area is 4 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The applicant applied for a permit to remove an oak tree in the center of the backyard. The tree removal application was denied by the City Arborist on November 17, 2006. The applicant has noted, and the landscape plan indicates that the tree will remain after construction and will be properly protected during construction (see condition number 16). The project includes a detached garage (427 SF, 20'-8" x 20'-8") which provides the required one covered parking space for the new four-bedroom house. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. 1473 Cortez Avenue Lot Area: 6000 SF Plans dated Janua 12, 2007, March 28, 2007, and A ril 20, 2008 APPROVED PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQ'D (April 9, 2007) (As-built) SETBACKS , , Front (1st flr): 20'-0" (no change) ' 17'-11" (block avrg.) (2nd flr): 26'-0" (no change) 20'-0" Side (left): 10'-0" (no change) 4'-0" r� ht 4'-0" (no change) 4'-0" i �g ): Rear (1st flr): 36'-0" (no change) � 15'-0" (2nd flr): 36'-0" (no change) 20'-0" ; ............................. ..... .. ................................................ .... ......................................... Lot Coverage: 2,235 SF (no change) 2,400 SF 37% 40% FAR: 3,416 SF (no change) 3,420 SF 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR' ; ........................................................................................ ............................................... _ . ..........................................._....................................................... ........ ; # of bedrooms: 4 (no change) ; --- _ ................................................. :........................................... . Parking: 2 covered 1 covered (20' x 20') (no change) (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered . � . � 9 x 20 9 x 20 .......................................................... ...................�............................... .) .......................................... _ :. ......................................� . .................................. � �� , �� - 30 -0 2 no chan e Hei ht: 9 8 _ :................................�...................... ......... ... 9.........................................:. _...................... 9 ......................................................................................................................................... .. DH Envelo e: complies no chan e CS 25.28.075 (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; -2- Amendment to Design Review 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 1473 Co►tez Avenue Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 12, 2007, sheets A.1 through A.3, A� and A.6 �^�o-, ar�d-March 28, 2007, sheets � L1.0, and April 20, 2008 (Sheets FYI.1 through FYI.4), and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo and January 3, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's November 29, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2006 memo, the City ArborisYs November 30, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2006 memo shall be met; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single -3- Amendmenf to Design Review 1473 Cortez Avenue termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water ru noff; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 15. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 16. that a certified arborisYs report showing how the oak tree in the back yard will be protected during construction, to be approved by the Parks Department, shall be prepared and implemented; 17. that the tree protection measures detailed in the certified arborist's report will be installed before a building permit is issued; 18. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; and 19. that the 24" box size replacement tree required as part of the tree removal permit issued on August 16, 2006 must be planted before final inspection. Lisa Whitman Zoning Techician c. Tony Ward 2563 26th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94116 Attachments: Letter from Tony Ward Construction, date stamped April 20, 2008 Application to the Planning Commission Approval Letter dated April 26, 2007 April 28, 2008 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (FYI) April 9, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 26, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 22, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 2, 2008 Aerial Photo -4- TONY WARD CONSTRI]CTION 1473 Cortez Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 %Ns s� �sss � — April 18, 2t108 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: FYI reaaest for 1473 Cortez Ave. Dear Planning Commissioners: Per owner's reyuest, we would like to make the following modifications to the above reference project. 1. Replace leaded glass window with simulated true divided lite clad windows to match the rest of the house. 2. Replace 3 x S cedar header trims with 2 x 4 wood trim. 3. Replace corbels with enclosed eave return at all gables, and enclosed all eave soffit (no exposed rafter tails} 4. A wooden belle trim were added at the rear & sides. Sincerely, Torry aM Con tor �,�, � , _ _ . . .W,.. ,,.. APR � k' 2008 CITY OF BU'rii.INGAME PLANNIyG DEPT. 1 , ' ✓ TONY WARD CONSTRUCTION LICENSE � 853599 2563 26TH AVE SAN FRANCISCQ CA 94116 415 5961888 Dear Planning Commission RE. FYI reasons for change 1. Leaded glass windows were replaced with simulated true divided light clad windows to allow more natural light into the bathroom areas and to be consistent with rest of house. 2. The 3X8 ceder headers with replaced with 2X4 header over a brick mould trim on the curved windows and front french door to still give the effect of a header but be more in proportion with the house. Brick mould was used on all of the windows due to the boxed in eave there was not significant room for the 2" header. 3. The corbels were replaced at the bottom of eave with an enclosed eave and gutter return to provide a cleaner finished look. 4. The wooden belle trim was continued around the rear master bedroom area over nook and kitchen to relieve stress on the stucco smooth finish and to be a continuation of the master bedroom overhang band. 5. Right elevation and rear elevation planters were removed because of inability to access planter for maintenance and watering. Master bath planter requires climbing over the 4' tub. Stair well planter access is limited and the planter is not visible except from 4' side pathway. RE��.IV�'� APR 2 �3 200$ � y pF BURLINGAME �LANNING DEPT. � ^ Ar� o�t.. "'Al�:. °�.��, COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ° BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMIIIIIISSiON Type of application: O`�� ,�vi� l� OZ� ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: «_ ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ��T�L• �Y� . O Please indicate the confact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: T ��u?'y �,-J �� - �.�% Address: .L ` �i _� 2 �, , •'— � ��1►� City/State/Zip: ��i �'�n�r-� C Z�i.� '' c Phone: �� ' ( �� Fax: E-mail ARCHITECT/DESIGNER projecf contact person e' OK to send electronic copies of doc4ments � Name Address: '`�t� I� � City/� Phon� Fax: E-mail � Burlingame Business License #: PROJEC�' DESCRIPTION: AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under � best of my knowledge and belief: -'--� Applicant's signature: ?�� I am aware of the proposed application and hereby Commission. ,-� %' Property owner's s PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ��i��J ,t /� � f /�"�� -, �- Address: �� .� � ��: �r: ��5 �.�� `L City/State/Zip: 5 ` �� l � � �� Phone: �� / ) � � '- �� a Fax: E-mail: � v of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the / r Date: �/� lv�w ; ze the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Date: �� / �` � Date submitted: * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license wi(I be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:\Handouts\PC Application 2008-B.handout ��;. �� --"-___�--�ti��•; � \�` ��-�� The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790 April 26, 2007 Jason and Denise Payne 1473 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Payne, Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the Apri19, 2007, Planning Commission approval of your application for design review became effective April 19, 2007. This application was to allow for construction of a new, two-story single family dwelling 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1. The April 9, 2007, minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 12, 2007, sheets A.1 through A.3, A.S, A.6 and L1.0, and March 28, 2007, sheets A.4 and L1.0, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this pernut; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo and January 3, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's November 29, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2006 memo, the City Arborist's November 30, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2006 memo shall be met; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building pernut has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and axchitectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; e� Register online for the City of Burlingame list serve at wwrv.burlingame.or� �� Apri126, 2007 1473 Cortez Avenue Page 2 of 3 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the fmal framing inspection shall be scheduled. 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Deparhnent staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 15. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 16. that a certified arborist's report showing how the oak tree in the back yard will be protected during construction, to be approved by the Parks Department, shall be prepared and implemented; �m Register online for the City of Burlingame list serve at www.burlin�ame.or� �v Apri126, 2007 1473 Cortez Avenue Page 3 of 3 17. that the tree protection measures detailed in the certified arborist's report will be installed before a building permit is issued; 18. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; and 19. that the 24" box size replacement tree required as part of the tree removal pertnit issued on August 16, 2006 must be planted before final inspection. Reimbursement of the design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed to you under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made �etore the end of the first year. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely yours, �j%� �1�t�-- M garet Monroe City Planner c. James Chu, architect Chu Design & Engr., Inc. 55 W. 43`d Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOT 2 BLOCK 48 EASTON ADD BURLiNGAME NO 4 RSM A/45; APN: 026-041-020) File �: Register online for the City of Burlingame list serve at www.burlinaame.org �o C/TY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes Apri128, 2008 Reminded the Commission of the upcoming appeal hearing scheduled for May 5, 2008 before the City Council regarding 3066 Hillside Drive. Actions from Regular City Council meeting of April 21, 2008: None FYI: 1537 Howard Avenue — requested changes to a previously approved design review project: Accepted. FYI: 1473 Cortez Avenue — requested changes to a previously approved design review project: Pulled for discussion. ADJOURNMENT Vice-Chair Terrones adjourned the meeting at 11:44 p.m. RespectFully submitted, Stanley Vistica, Secretary 19 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Apri19, 2007 Notice for this conditional use permit should include all property owners on Adrian Road and Adrian Court, as well as all property owners within 300 feet as required by law. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Deparhnent and the appropriate environmental document has been prepared. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS COriSCrii Caleri(laP - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is reguested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Brownrigg asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 2a. 1456 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHIWA HUNG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (67 2b. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., 1NC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN C. Deal noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant at 1456 Drake and would recuse himself from voting on that item. C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar, 1456 Drake Avenue and 1473 Cortez Avenue, based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners' comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and each by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. Item 2a, 1456 Drake Avenue, passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice vote. Item 2b, 1473 Cortez Avenue, passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:38 p.m. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 3. 1605 QUESADA WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (CHARLES AND LARA CAMMARATA, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND SUZANNE DEHNE, DESIGNERI (57 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report 4/09/07, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Charles and Laura Cammarata, 1605 Quesada Way, represented the project; discussed changes made to plans based on commission comments. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2007 On one sheet of the plans note all the existing trees, unprotected size as w rotected, along all �o erty lines; For grea zre height consider Bradford Pear and Gr ' aurel in the rear; Chair Brownrigg noted that the hous a pear t esolved, think changes to it were improvements, the removal of the basement was the applica ice, moved to bring the item back on the consent calendar when the landscape plan and d' ay have be nded as recommended. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg call r a voice vote on the motion to continue this item to the conse endar after the landscape and ' ans have been amended based on the direction given and reviewed by P a ' staff. The mot' assed on a 5-0-2 (Cers Cauchi, Osterling absent). Staff noted that they would renotice is it en it was placed on the agenda again. This item concluded at 8:52 p.m. 2. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report March 26, 2007, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eighteen (18) conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if any revised plans were submitted, staff responded no. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Chu, 55 W. 43ra Ave San Mateo, architect; Jason and Denise Payne, property owners; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Ave, spoke. Issues noted: front porch area; flat areas on roof; fireplace insufficient setback; Jasmine on landscape plan; curved windows; one car garage required; tree protection; and construction site maintenance requirements. The applicant submitted a single copy of a reduced sheet of new proposed revisions at the public hearing. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: ■ May want to extend the rafters up on the roof at a pitch in order to avoid flat areas, particularly on the smallest flat area; tar and gravel is a lot of work and water can pond; ■ The proposed fireplace along the right side elevation has an insufficient setback to the property line, it needs to move at least 6" in towards the house; ■ The Jasmine vines along the left side property line need to be planted closer together and there should be more of them, in order to create a landscape barrier between the two properties; ■ The curved windows proposed on the house shall be retained during construction and shall not be replaced with rectangular windows; ■ An arborist report, prepared by a licensed arborist, shall be submitted with tree protection measures for the protected Oak tree in the rear yard, and the City Arborist shall review and approve the arborist report; the protection measures should be installed before a building permit is issued; ■ During construction, the applicant should coordinate, if possible, with the next door neighbor to share a debris box or at least avoid having two debris boxes on the street at the same time; the applicant shall abide by the new construction site maintenance requirements. C. Auran moved to approve the original plans and application, by resolution, with all conditions. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2007 CA Anderson encouraged the Commission to not approve the project with the plans submitted at the meeting because they have not yet been reviewed by staff and their content is not reflected in the staff report or record. He stated that the Commission could place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans, reviewed by staff and there is room on the agenda. C. Auran amended his motion and moved to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes noted by the Commission had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m. 3. 1136 OXFORD ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN IEW R CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ITION (S H& BENJAMIN CHEYETTE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; TIM LEY, TSH 1NTE TIONAL ARCHITECT 59 NOTICED PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA S OHMEIER Reference sta ort March 26, 2007, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presen the report, reviewed criteria and staff c ments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consi ration. Chair Brownrigg opened public hearing. Sarah Cheyette, property ow r, spoke. Issues noted: size and material of vents at front ele tion; only Scheme A will work in this rcumstance; with Scheme A front fascia should be extended sligh and to the eave as well; header rds; placement and size of bathroom widow; can window be lowered a f inches; window box mate '; and cast stone material under windows. The public hearing was closed. C. Vistica moved to approve the applicatio by resol on, with added conditions that Scheme A, date stamped March 13, 2007, be approved for the fr t el ation; that the eave over the bathroom at the front is extended proportionally to the wall to retain the sa eave projection as approved originally; the bathroom window at the front should be lowered as muc s p ible and that the vents, as reflected in Scheme A, shall be made of wood and with the conditi in the sta report: (1) that the project shall be built as sho on the plans submitt to the Planning Department date stamped March 13, 2007, Scheme A front ele tion, date stamped January 2007, left side elevation, date stamped January 11, 2006, sheets A0.10 A3.03 (excluding the proposed nt, sheet A3.01, and left side, sheet A3.03, elevations), and topo aphic survey sheet l, with simulate true divided light windows and traditional wood stucco mo throughout, and with the relocation of the irs between the garage and the house into the house and t of the required parking area; that any changes building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or r area of the building shall require an amendment to th ermit; (2) that the eave over the bathroom d front door be extended proportionally to the extension o e wall so that the eave proj ection remai the same as originally approved; that if possible, the bathroom win w at the front when relocated in th ew wall, shall be lowered as much as possible; the two vents, as shown i cheme A, shall be made of od; (3) that the variance for parking space width shall only apply to this resi ial building and shall come void if the building is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe natural disaste r for replacement; (4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Offcial's November 1, 005 memo and the Fire Marshal's, the City Engineer's, the Recycling Specialist's, and the NPDES Coordina or's 0 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes January 22, 2007 C. Au ade a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when th ��les have been installed and su a licensed surveyor and a full landsca een submitted and plan checked. This motion was sec C. Osterling. Chair Brownrigg called for a vot motion to p a ''tem on the consent calendar when the story poles have been insta surveyed by a licensed surveyor an dscape plan has been submitted and plan . he motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Com ' action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m. 7. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., 1NC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commission commented: there was an application to remove one oak tree that was denied, but another tree was removed from the rear yard; was a permit issued for that removal? Talked to owner to gain access to the rear yard and saw the location of the removed tree and the remaining oak. There were no further questions from the Commission. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. James Chu, 55 W. 43rd Avenue, San Mateo, and Jason and Denise Payne, property owners, stated: decided to keep the oak tree which was denied a removal permit on the property; agree with staff to hire a licensed arborist for a tree protection plan; obtained a tree removal permit to remove the oak in order to accommodate the construction of the detached garage. Commission commented: ■ Did a great job on the design; the right elevation looks nicer when the second floor plate comes down; the design is handsome; ■ There are a couple of flat spots on the top of the roof; should not use curb in these areas; wrap shingles to the ridge to trick the eye; ■ House has the potential to add a front porch; could extend roof element off to one side; front porch is important to extend the house to the neighborhood; ■ At the rear elevation, any thought to French doors instead of the window on the first floor? ■ Compliment profile of corbels on plans; could include an attic vent on the elevation; ■ Clarify the permits issued for the tree removal and for the tree to be retained; and ■ In front driveway side, strawberry tree should be replaced with a larger scale tree like a Bay laurel to help screen the house, and the Bay laurel shown on the plans at the front could be swapped with the strawberry tree shown. The applicant responded: French doors were not added in location of window on first floor so that there would be more useable living space inside the house in that location; and the tree in the back was approved for a tree removal permit by Steve Porter because it was a shallow based oak. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Cauchi made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the requested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Comment on motion: in favor of porch on this project, would like to see it a little larger; prepared to approve motion with understanding that porch element be added to plans; porch needs to be brought forward 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes January 22, 2007 slightly; with respect to the porch, if the front patio area gets used at all, you do not want to create a porch with a railing, generally make an entry porch to bring house forward towards the street; here want to create a patio sitting area that augments the living room; accept design as is because of the patio off of the living room at the front of the house; and the architect can take the suggestions regarding the porch under advisement. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:30 p.m. X„ COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS i were no Commissioner's Reports for review. XI. REPORTS - Revi of City Council regular meeting of January 16, 2006. CP Monr reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of January , 2006. Noting that the City Council upheld the nning Commission's action on 1557 Drake Ave and introduced the amendment to the zoning map f the ECN district. Council also held a publi earing on the tree removal at the Easton Branch Library. . Osterling noted that when they place e new utility lines in the middle of Easton Drive, it was notab that none of the major tree roots fro ither side of the street extended fully across the street. He expressed ncern about the support of the isting trees based on this root growth pattern. - FYI: 127 Loma Vista 've: Review of requ ed revision to landscape plan. Commission acknowledged t change. - FYI: Peninsula Hospital Proje Co aint Log Commission acknowledged receipt is information - FYI: Proposed Opening of P ing G ge for Peninsula Hospital Commission acknowledged thi nformation. ommission suggested that it would be helpful if the Hospital construction manager could vide the Commi 'on with a memo describing the construction activities and their timing anticipated fo ext year or so. - FYI: Peninsula Commission acknc XI. ADJO tal Replacement Project — Lo tion of Security Department ed this information. Chair Broy/nrigg adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. spectfully submitted, David Cauchi, Secretary 14 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558- 7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 November 27, 2006 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 4) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential buildings. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24 for publications and details. 5) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 6) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line. 7) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of one- hour fire-rated construction and no openings are allowed. �'8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Note: The "Den" must comply with this requirement. 9) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 10) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 11) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 12) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof surface within ten feet. 13) NOTE: Plans that specifically address item 8 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. .._.__ ..... .........., Review�--� �� ' �/ Date: �l jZ �j,� � Project Comments Date: To: December 28, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 55&7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: January 2, 2007 No further comments. Comments 1 through 12 dated 11/27/06 apply. � C� i �� Project Comments Date: November 27, 2006 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, AP N : 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 �� . ��4 ��sY' �o �-t�� s��e v� c mG �kE mak rn��Gi�YE �v� 'itr J3i1 � �'�tc� aS � _��it! �A'/L�3o/L��d-lL�E(/�c-rts.C- Fe2 yi,rE G�R-�d��Q'� BJ�- �l� -------�� a v� m�A�.—Y'2F� __=--�—_l�� .E� _ ---� Reviewed by: �� Date: ��/3 0/� C � c�ry o 'L.Il�Il �� AB(UAAA�il��ii�� ,,p�Y��&� �� A�.t�� 1�CI�A'I'��I'� �EPA�t'�'111��i�T . °Y� BURLINGAME �, � �' � � � � � � 85U Burlingame Aveuue, Budingame, California 940 ] 0-2�9� � � r � �` � Telephone (650) 558-7300 • Parks / Trees (650) 558-7330 ,; .�., C� ,q� _ R°eR"r`° i�ax �OJO� O�IO-%G10 � E-maii: recreaiioj��'uurliiigattie.uc� �� ---� November 17, 2006 Denise Payne 1473 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: iZEQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF OAK TREE @ 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE - BURLINGAME � I reviewed your request for the removal of one Oak tree in the back yard of the property at the above address, and have made the following determination: 1) The criteria for removal has not been met. 2) Routine tree maintenance will mitigate applicant's reason for requesting removal of the Oak tree. 3) Therefore, the application has been denied. If you wish to appeal this decision you may: 1) Submit an independent Arborist &eport supporting justifiable criteria for removal of these trees and/or any other supporting documentation you may have supporting your request for removal and, 2) Appeal this decision in writing to the Burlingame Beautification Commission, 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame. Any documentation must be received at our office hy November 29 2006 if you wish your appeal to be placed on the Beautification Commission's I�ecember 7�' agenda. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me af (650) 558-7330. Sincerely, �'---„� J f S��.,��.-r� , en Porter � City Arborist - (ISA #WC-3073) SP/gb C�: ��an � E�ika �afierkey Ro�ney & J.R. �a��att'I'�S 1477 Cortez Avenue 1469 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: i Date: // / � � b � Project Comments Date: To: From: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 Q( Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shalf clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �C�� Date: Z� ��.d� Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: November 27, 2006 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 / City Attorney Planning Staff Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 November 27, 2006 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Include appropriate stormwater BMPs as Project Notes. These BMPs include but are not limited to the following: • Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials and wastes properly to prevent contact and contamination of stormwater; • Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, wash water or sediments, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses; • Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering site and obtain all necessary permits; • Avoid cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site except in a designated area where wash water is contained and treated; • Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate; • Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather; • Limit and time application of pesticides and fertilizers to prevent polluted runoff; • Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points; • Avoid tracking dirt or other materials off-site; clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping method; • The Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees and subcontractors regarding the construction BMPs. 1 of 2 Project Comments Con't —1473 Cortez Ave.— New, 2-story house with detached garage. 2) The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging and/or storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times. The easement shall be protected from any site runoff. 3) Implement Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (if necessary): a. Install and maintain all temporary erosion and sediment controls continuously until permanent erosion control have been established; b. Address method(s) for diverting on-site runoff around exposed areas and diverting off-site runoff around the site; c. Address methods for preventing erosion and trapping sediment on-site. 4) Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: a. Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures, including inspection frequency; b. Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: �� Date: 11/27/06 2 of 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a Design Review Amendment for a new two-story single familv dwelling with detached qaraqe at 1473 Cortez Avenue zoned R-1 David Chanq, propertv owner, APN: 026-041-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Mav 12, 2008, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th dav of Mav, 2008 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 1473 Cortez Avenue Effective May 22, 2008 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 12, 2007, sheets A.1 through A.3, and A.6, March 28, 2007, sheet L1.0, and April 20, 2008 (Sheets FY1.1 through FYI.4), and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo and January 3, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's November 29, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2006 memo, the City Arborist's November 30, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2006 memo shall be met; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 15. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 16. that a certified arborist's report showing how the oak tree in the back yard will be protected during construction, to be approved by the Parks Department, shall be prepared and implemented; 17. that the tree protection measures detailed in the certified arborist's report will be installed before a building permit is issued; 18. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; and 19. that the 24" box size replacement tree required as part of the tree removal permit issued on August 16, 2006 must be planted before final inspection. . CITY OF BURLINGAME a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �, � ,-,�;, ^ �', n BURLWGAME, CA 94010 ��.��K �,� PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) � �?9a. "�" � - www.burlingame.org �� .�,�.��.,.,,.,,,�� , _ _ � �-�T��A � �� ; � Site: 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE - The City af Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, MAY 12, 2008 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Raad, Burlingame, CA: Application far Design Review Amendment for as-built changes to a new single family dwelling at 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-041-020 Mailed: May 2, 2008 (Please �efe� to other side) �ta�f-'�6�OT32� � ��.�� iu:a?i+3ti ��O(Y3 u'riJ t�✓ a s� �n��r�.^� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please �efe� to other side)